anthropogenic activities and its impact along the coastal...
TRANSCRIPT
Dayananda Sagar College of EngineeringDepartment of Civil Engineering
“Anthropogenic Activities and its
Impact along the Coastal Region
of Mangaluru, India”
Presented by
Dr. H.K. Ramaraju (PI)
Professor and Head, Dept of Civil Engineering
Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering
Shavige Malleshwara Hills, K S Layout,
Bangalore-560 078
1
CONTENTS
Introduction
Materials and Methodology
Results and Discussions
Conclusions
References
2
INTRODUCTION
Coastal environment is persistently stressed from anthropogenic
activities and other developmental activities
Due to the rapid industrialization, water and soil gets polluted
and causing a huge impacts on the environment. Most of the
wastewater discharged into the surrounding water bodies or
land disturbs the ecological balance and deteriorates the water
quality and soil properties
Coastal anthropogenic activities such as disposal of untreated or
partially treated sewage and industrial effluents and their
possible impacts hinder the coastal environment are discussed
by considering physicochemical characteristics.
Huge amount of pollution load from the major industries located
nearby are discharging into the sea directly or through the west
flowing rivers of the area, Gurupura and Nethravathi. Due to
this Soil properties were also affected.
The present study focused on the deviation of the values of the
different physicochemical parameters of water and soil in the
coastal area of Mangaluru.
3
MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY
Study Area-Mangaluru
Mangaluru coast is a belt of about 22 Kms with Arabian Sea in
the West and the Western Ghats in the East
Mangalore city is situated in the southern part of India on the
coastal side of Karnataka. The study area for the present study
consists of Baikampady Industrial area where majority of
industries were located, areas nearby coastal belt and
Netravathi-Gurupur river mouth.
The cluster area is surrounded on the West by Arabian Sea,
East by Kunjathbail, South by Mangalore city and North by
Surathkal.
The major rivers Gurupura is located adjacent to the boundary
of Baikampady Industrial cluster & Nethravathi is located at a
distance of 20 km from the Baikampady Industrial cluster
towards South.
4
Baikampady Industrial cluster is located at 8 km away on
Northern side of Mangalore city.
The Baikampady Industrial Cluster is declared as critically
polluted area with a CEPI score of 73.68
The Baikampady Industrial cluster consists of a major
Refinery, storage of crude and finished petroleum products,
LPG storage & bottling,
Fertilizer plant,
Pharmaceutical industry,
Brewery,
Edible oil processing units,
Sea food processing units,
Lead refining unit,
Cashew processing units,
Paint & Dispersion unit,
Iron ore pelletization plant and
Pig Iron plant etc
5
Figure 1 Map showing the Boundary of Mangaluru Taluk 6
7
Glimpse of Study Area :
Fig 2 Aerial View of Waste water stream near
Chitrapura8
9
Figure 5 Death of fishes at
Nethravathi-Gurupura Estuary
Figure 4 Stream Near Thokur Bridge
flowing towards Gurupura River
Figure 3 Aerial View of Waste water stream near Panambur Beach
10
Figure 6 Aerial View of Nethravathi Gurupura Estuary
11
METHODOLOGY
14 Surface Water samples and four soil samples were collected from
randomly selected locations of the study area (SW1 to SW14 and S1 to
S4) respectively, during the month of January 2019
The sampling was done during the morning hours and samples were
protected from direct sunlight during transportation. The water
samples and soil samples from the sampling locations were collected in
well cleaned polythene bottles and polypropylene covers respectively.
Physicochemical analysis of the collected water samples was done by
adopting standard methods (APHA 1995).
12
Fig 7 Map Showing the Surface water sampling
Locations and soil Sampling Locations in the study area 13
14
Figure 8 Surface water sampling near HPCL Figure 9 Surface water sampling at Thokur
Bridge
Figure 10 Sea water sampling at Nethravathi-
Gurupura Estuary
Figure 11 Surface water sampling near
Chitrapura
15
Figure 12 Surface water sampling near Panambur
BeachFigure 13 Surface Water Sampling in Thokur Lake near MRPL
Figure 14 Surface water Sampling near Adani Wilmar Ltd. Figure 15 Backside of MRPL
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
The physicochemical characteristics of water samples
pH:
It is a measure of hydrogen ion concentration in water. Its valuedetermines whether water is acidic or alkaline. In the present studypH ranges between 6.62 to 8.2. pH range of 7 to 8 has beenconsidered good for fish culture (Jhingran, 1997).
Fig 16 Mean values of pH in study site
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Sample Code
pH
16
Turbidity:
Turbidity of samples depends on the quantity of solid matters
present in the suspension state. Turbidity in water samples
ranges from 0.7 NTU to 17.3 NTU. Clay, silt, organic matter,
plankton and other microscopic organisms cause turbidity in
water recognized as a valuable limiting factor in the biological
productivity of water bodies (Kishore et al., 2005). In the
present study high turbidity value of 17.3 NTU recorded in the
surface water SW/9 collected near BPCL.
Fig 17 Mean values of Turbidity in study site
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
N T
U
Sample Code
Turbidity
17
Electrical Conductivity:
Electrical conductivity is a measure of capacity of a substance or
solution to conduct electric current. It mainly depends on the
amount of dissolved solids in water. Its values range between
1000 µs/cm to 44500 µs/cm. High values of E.C. is found in the
sample SW/14 of Chitrapura. Usually the large variation in E.C.
is mainly attributed to geochemical process like ion exchange,
reverse exchange, evaporation silicate weathering, rock water
interaction, sulfate reduction and oxidation processes (Ramesh
K, 2008)
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
µs/c
m
Sample Code
Conductivity
Fig 18 Mean values of Electrical Conductivity in study site
18
Total Dissolved Solids:
The various kinds of minerals present in the water denote the
amount of dissolved solids. The total dissolved solid varied from
650 mg/l to 28925 mg/l. High values of TDS is recorded in
SW/14 of chitrapura sea. It has been reported that TDS might
reduce the hydraulic conductivity of irrigated area and that
growing concerns are met as total dissolved solids content in
water surpasses 480 mg/l (C Zidi et al, 2017).
Fig 19 Mean values of Total dissolved Solids in study site
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
mg
/l
Sample Code
Total Dissolved Solids
19
Total alkalinity:
Alkalinity in natural water is due to free hydroxyl ions and
hydrolysis of salts formed by weak acids and strong bases.
Higher alkalinity favours the growth of phytoplankton (Francis
Andrade et al., 2011). In the present study the total alkalinity
recorded ranged from 100.53 mg/l to 252 mg/l and high value is
observed in the sample SW/11 of N-G Estuary.
Fig 20 Mean values of Total Alkalinity in study site
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
mg
/l
Sample Code
Total Alkalinity
20
Total hardness:
It is a measure of variable complex mixtures of anions andcations Calcium and magnesium play an important role inantagonizing the toxic effects of various ions and neutralizingthe excess acid produced (Das & Srivastava, 2003). The totalhardness in the study varies between 45.6 mg/l to 7400 mg/l.High values of total hardness was observed in the sampleSW/14 of Chitrapura. The high levels of hardness increasestoxicity of zinc to fish (Lloyd, 1960)
Fig 21 Mean values of Total Hardness in study site
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
mg
/l
Sample Code
Total Hardness
21
Chlorides:
Chlorides are mineral salts and, so are not affected by biological
action of sewage. It naturally occurs in all types of water. The
chloride content in the water sample varied from 200 mg/l to 14463
mg/l. Highest chloride content is recorded in the sample SW/14 of
Chitrapura.
Fig 22 Mean values of Chlorides in study site
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
mg
/l
Sample Code
Chlorides
22
Sulphates:
It is a naturally occurring anion in all kinds of natural waters.
Higher concentration of sulfate indicates the pollution by
industrial and domestic waste and also by the biological
oxidation of sulphur to sulphate. The sulphate content in the
surface water samples varied from 15.36 mg/l to 999.60mg/l
Fig 23 Mean values of Sulphates in study site
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
mg
/l
Sample Code
Sulphates
23
Dissolved Oxygen:
It is the amount of oxygen dissolved in water. In the present
study DO values ranged from 1.21 mg/l to 5.4 mg/l. SW/9 of
surface water near BPCL and SW/12 of N-G Estuary point were
recorded lowest DO value. DO is very important and in some
instances even limiting factor for maintaining aquatic life
(Francis Andrade 2011). The minimum value observed was may
be due to the discharge of untreated sewage that causes
Eutrophication and other harm effects.
Fig 24 Mean values of Dissolved Oxygen in study site
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
mg
/l
Sample Code
D O
24
Biochemical Oxygen Demand:
Biochemical oxygen demand gives the content of microorganisms
and its organic matter load present in the sample. In the present
study BOD ranges from 9 mg/l to 45 mg/l and high value of BOD
is observed in the sample SW/10 of Gurupura river.
Fig 25 Mean values of Total Hardness in study site
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
SW/1 SW/2 SW/3 SW/4 SW/5 SW/6 SW/7 SW/8 SW/9 SW/10 SW/11 SW/12 SW/13 SW/14
mg
/l
Sample Code
B O D
25
Chemical Oxygen Demand:
COD is a measure of oxygen equivalent of the organic matter
content of water that is susceptible to oxidation by a strong
chemical oxidant. Thus, COD is a reliable parameter for judging
the extent of pollution in water (Amirkolaie, 2008). In the
present study COD values ranged from 72 mg/l to 1032 mg/l.
High value of COD is recorded in the sample SW/14 near
chitrapura.
Fig 26 Mean values of Chemical Oxygen Demand in study site
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
mg
/l
Sample Code
C O D
26
The physicochemical characteristics of soil samples
0
2
4
6
8
S7 S8 S9 S10
sample code
Figure 27 pH of the soil samples
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
S7 S8 S9 S10
%
dS
/m
sample code
O C in %
E C in ds/m
Figure 28 Electrical Conductivity at 25°C and organic carbon of the soil samples
27
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1 2 3 4
mg
/kg
sample code
Available S
Available Zn
Available Fe
Available Cu
Figure 29 Available S, Available Zn, Available Fe, Available Cu of soil samples
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
S7 S8 S9 S10
kg
/acre
sample code
Available P2O5
Available K2O
Figure 30 Available P2O5 and Available K2O of the soil samples
28
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
S7 S8 S9 S10
mg
/kg
sample code
Available Ca
Available Mg
Figure 31 Available Ca and Available Mg of soil samples
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
S7 S8 S9 S10
mg
/kg
sample code
Available Mn
Available B
Figure 32 Available Mn and Available B of the soil samples
29
CONCLUSIONS
The present study was carried out with a view to identify
anthropogenic activities and their impacts along the coastal
region of Mangaluru, and the conclusions of the same are as
follows.
The study reveals that Electrical conductivity, Total Dissolved
Solids and Chlorides concentration of the samples SW/1 (bridge
near Thokur), SW/2 (Panambur), SW/3 (Near TOIL), SW/5 (Near
AWM), SW/7 (Chitrapura) were met above the standard limits as
per IS: 2296-1982 Standard: Inland Surface Water Class – E.
Electrical conductivity, Chlorides, Sulphates and TDS
concentration in Gurupura river ( SW/10 and SW/11) exceeds
limits as per IS: 2296-1982 Standard: Inland Surface Water
Class – E. Low values of DO were found in almost all the
samples, this is may be because of excessive algae and
phytoplankton growth driven by high levels of phosphorus and
nitrogen.30
DO level in the Nethravathi-Gurupura Estuary point was foundlower than prescribed standards i.e. 4 mg/l as per the Environment(Protection) Rules, 1986: Class SW-Ⅰ. Fishes were found dead andfloating on the water at Nethravathi-Gurupura Estuary point (DO2.3 mg/l).
BOD concentration in Gurupura river (SW/10 and SW/11) exceedsthe limit of 3 mg/l as per IS: 2296-1982 Standard: Inland SurfaceWater Class – E. BOD concentration in the Panambur sea water wasfound higher than prescribed standards i.e. 3 mg/l as per theEnvironment (Protection) Rules, 1986: Class SW-ⅠⅠ.
High COD values were also found in almost all the collected surfacewater samples.
And with respect to soil samples, values of pH, organic carbon,available magnesium, available sulphur, available manganese,available Boron were met below the Normal range. Decrease in thesoil pH is may be due to the release of organic acids by thedecomposition of organic substances
It is evident from study that anthropogenic activities near the coastalregion have resulted in the deviation in the values of physicochemicalcharacteristics of the samples. Thus there is an urgent need to arrestthe spread of pollution of water and soil near the coastal area. 31
Dakshina Kannada district is drained by Netravathi, Gurupur,
Mulki, Kumaradhara, Payasvini and and Shambhavi rivers
which originate in the Western Ghats and flow westwards to
join the Arabian Sea
The average rainfall of Dakshina Kannada district is 3882 mm
and is received mainly during the southwest monsoon season
extending from June to September. About 85% of the annual
rainfall occurs during the monsoon months. Post - monsoon
season yields about 8% and the balance of annual rainfall from
December to March. (CGWB)
Average rainfall of neighboring districts like Udupi,
Chikkamagalur, Hassan, Kodagu are 4041mm, 1882mm,
967mm and 2639 mm respectively. (CGWB)
The Quantity of waste water generation from the major
industries of Mangalore was nearly 15 MLD, this waste water
will reach the neighboring Gurupura river and finally reaches
the Arabian Sea.
32
The average groundwater development in Dakshina Kannada
district is nearly 60%. Inspite of copious rainfall, during summer
season many parts of the district face acute scarcity of water due
to highly undulating nature of the terrain and unfavourable sub-
surface conditions.
The annual runoff in the Nethravathi river basin ranged from
13.6 to 41.2% of annual rainfall with a mean of 29%. The mean
annual runoff varied spatially from 774 to 1527 mm in different
sub-basins. The mean annual runoff was higher in urban land
(2040 mm), followed by orchard (1511 mm), forest (987 mm)
etc.(Geethu Krishnan et al.,2017)
However, there is scope for arresting the sub-surface flow at
suitable locations through the construction of sub-surface dams.
The surface runoff can also be arrested by constructing check
dams, vented dams etc throughout the district at appropriate
places. This can assure availability of water during peak
requirement period. Such measures are necessary in areas of
Bantwal and Mangalore taluks which are categorised as critical33
REFERENCES
Alumaa, P.U., Kirso, V., Petersell And E Steinnes 2002. Sorption of Toxic Heavy Metals To Soils. Int. J.
Hyg. Envir. Hlth., 204: 375-376
APHA (1995). Standard Methods For The Examination Of Water And Wastewater. American Public
Health Association, New York.
Das AK And Srivastava NP (2003) Ecology Of Sarani Reservoir (MP) In The Context Of Fisheries.
Pollut. Res. 22, 533-539.
Geethhu krishnan et al., (2017), Estimation of Runoff Potential using SWAT for Nethravathi River
Basin, Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 8(4):970-973
Francis Andrade (2011), Studies on Mangalore coastal water pollution and its sources Indian Journal
of Science and Technology, Vol.4 No. 5, ISSN; 0974- 6846
IS: 2296-1982 Tolerance Limit For Inland Surface Waters Subject To Pollution
Jackson M L. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall Of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Usa, 1958
Jhingran AG (1997) Optical Appearance And Interpretation Of Annceli On Scales Of Gadeesia Chapra
(Ham). J. Inland Fish Soc. Ind. 91, 138-153.
Kishore K, Joshi BD And Deepali K (2005) Physicochemical Characteristics Of Pond Water At Kanpur
Village In Bareilly District (UP). Him. J. Environ. Zool. 19, 89-92
Lloyd, R. 1960. The Toxicity Of Zinc Sulfate To Rainbow Trout. Ann. Appl. Biol., 48: 84-94.
Samanta, S., Mitra, K., Chandra, K., Saha, S., Bandopadhya And Ghosh, A. 2005. Heavy Metals In
Water Of The Rivers Hoogly And Haldi At Haldia And Their Impact On Fish. J. Environ. Biol., 26: 517-
523
C. Zidi et al., (2017), Assessment of Groundwater Quality in Al-Buraimi, Sultanate of Oman, JMES,
Volume 8, Issue 4, Page 1266-1276
34
35