anthropometrics. standing working heights sitting working heights reaches gender strength...

22
Anthropometrics

Upload: gerard-blankenship

Post on 13-Dec-2015

230 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Anthropometrics

Page 2: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Anthropometrics• Standing Working

Heights• Sitting Working

Heights• Reaches• Gender Strength

Differences• Postural Strength

Differences

Page 3: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Design so the large can fit, the small can reach and the weak can lift, lower, push, pull and

carry.

Anthropometrics

Page 4: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Anthropometric MeasurementsAnthropometrics looks at the variability between people and utilizes principles of statistics to do this.

Page 5: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Percentiles • Body dimensions can be

plotted on a graph with the measurements on the horizontal x axis increasing toward the right from the zero point. The frequency of occurrences is plotted on the vertical y axis, increasing toward the top from the zero point.

Page 6: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Anthropometrics and Design • It is not customary to

design for everyone. The military has chosen to exclude 5% at the small end of the curve and 5% at the large end of the curve, thereby accommodating 90 of the measured population in the Military Standards

Page 7: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Anthropometric Measurements

Page 8: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Anthropometric Measurements

Dimension 5th 50th 95th

Male Female Male Female Male Female

Standing Vertical Grip Reach 76.8 71.1 81.9 75.8 87.0 80.5

Standing Forward Grip Reach 28.5 25.8 30.9 28.0 33.3 30.1

Height 64.6 59.8 69.1 64.0 73.6 68.1

Eye Height 62.8 55.9 67.3 60.0 71.9 64.2

Shoulder Height 52.4 48.2 56.7 52.2 61.0 56.1

Elbow Height 40.2 37.2 43.5 40.2 46.9 43.1

Sitting Vertical Grip Reach 45.5 42.1 49.4 45.7 53.4 49.2

Sitting Height 33.7 31.5 36.0 33.9 38.4 36.2

Sitting Eye Height 29.1 27.2 31.5 29.5 33.9 31.9

Sitting Elbow Height 7.7 7.3 9.7 9.3 11.6 11.2

Adapted from: Pheasant, Stephen, (1996). “Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Ergonomics and the Design of Work”, Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.

Page 9: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Anthropometrics

• 50th Percentile Male Reach = 30.9”

• 50th Percentile Female Reach = 28.0”

• 95th Percentile Male Reach = 33.3”

• 5th Percentile Female Reach = 25.8”

Page 10: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Things To Consider• Determine what body dimensions are relevant.• Determine what population group is relevant.• Use the anthropometric data as a guide and a

place to start. It does not replace employee input.• Just because something does not fall within

anthropometric guidelines does not mean it is necessarily a significant ergonomic risk.

• When designing workstations or equipment, you will never be able to accommodate everyone. Try to accommodate as much of the population as you can, given the space and cost parameters you have to work within.

Page 11: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Standing Workstation Height

NIOSH 1997 Publication, Elements of Ergonomics Programs

Page 12: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Horizontal Reach Envelopes

NIOSH 1997 Publication, Elements of Ergonomics Programs

Page 13: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Choosing Working Postures

• Standing– For heavy, bulky loads

– When frequent movement is required

– When there is no knee room under the equipment

– Where there is limited front-rear space

Page 14: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Choosing Working Postures

• Sitting – For accurate control, fine

manipulation.

– For continuous light manipulation work.

– For close visual work with prolonged attention.

– For limited headroom, low work heights.

Page 15: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Sagittal Reach Envelopes• As the arm moves though its

normal range of motion it creates an arc and creates the primary reach arc and the secondary reach arc. The primary reach arc places minimal stress on the shoulder and low back. The secondary reach envelope can place stress on the shoulder and increases stress on the low back. Reaching beyond the secondary reach arc will require forward bending and significantly increases stress on the low back.

Page 16: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Strength Variability:Females vs. Males

Body Part Percent Strength of Females vs. Males

Arms 60 %

Trunk 64%

Legs 72%

Page 17: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Male Grip Strength & AgeMale (lbs)

Percentiles 18 - 29 30 - 39 40 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69 70 - 79

5 75.2 88.0 84.4 78.3 70.5 -

25 93.7 101.2 97.7 93.7 82.5 70.1

50 110.9 112.0 108.0 102.5 90.4 80.5

75 123.5 124.6 121.3 112.4 100.3 88.4

95 144.0 144.6 134.5 132.1 113.5 100.5

Mean 110.2 113.8 109.0 102.1 90.6 76.9

Adapted from: Australian Fitness Norms, 1992, The Health Development Foundation, Adelaide, p.32.

Page 18: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Female Grip Strength & Age

Female (lbs)

Percentiles 18 - 29 30 - 39 40 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69 70 - 79

5 52.0 49.6 49.6 40.8 38.6 -

25 62.8 61.7 59.5 54.0 50.3 47.6

50 66.8 68.3 66.1 63.9 55.1 55.1

75 75.0 76.1 72.8 70.5 61.7 59.5

95 85.5 88.2 83.8 78.3 74.7 67.2

Mean 68.0 69.0 66.4 61.3 55.6 51.4

Adapted from: Australian Fitness Norms, 1992, The Health Development Foundation, Adelaide, p.32.

Page 19: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Posture Dependent Strength Variability

Page 20: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Ear-Eye-Line

• The EE line is determined by using the ear-hole and the junction of the eyelids. The EE line describes the posture of the head and serves as reference for the angle of the line of sight.

Page 21: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Line of Sight• The line of sight connects the pupil with

the visual target. Eye movement within about 15 degrees above and below the average line-of-sight angle is still comfortable.

Page 22: Anthropometrics. Standing Working Heights Sitting Working Heights Reaches Gender Strength Differences Postural Strength Differences

Practical Application of Anthropometrics

• This video clip from NASA shows how Anthropometric data was applied to the design of equipment.