antimicrobials and the evolution of eusociality and t… · hypothesis: antimicrobials increase in...

32
1 ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY Andrew Beattie Christine Turnbull Department of Biological Sciences Macquarie University Sydney, Australia [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 03-Oct-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

1

ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY

Andrew BeattieChristine Turnbull

Department of Biological SciencesMacquarie University

Sydney, Australia

[email protected]

Page 2: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

2

The major social insects

Ants (© Ron Oldfield)

Social wasps©Micropolitan.org

Social bees©2008 Peter O

www.aussiebee.com.au

Termiteswww.evergreenpest.com.au

Page 3: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

3

Criteria for Eusociality

1. Cooperative brood care

2. Reproductive division of labour; castes

3. Overlap between at least two

generations; offspring assist parents

4. Is there another one?

Page 4: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

4

THIS TALK

• Bull ants

• Bees

• Wasps

• Thrips

• (Bioprospecting)

Page 5: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

5

Page 6: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

6

Bull Ants have two defences against antimicrobial attack

1. EXTERNAL

• Paired metapleural glands

• Strong antiseptic

Page 7: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

7

Extracting antimicrobial metapleural secretions

Page 8: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

8

Metapleural secretion activity against microorganisms

Yeasts (fungi):strong

Gram + bacteria:mixed

Gram –ve: strong

Page 9: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

9

Bull Ant Antimicrobial defences: 2 – Internal • Reverse-phase HPLC

• A: control haemolymph

• B; challenge haemolymph

• F1, F2 inducible O-glycosylated proline-rich antibacterial peptides

• ‘Formaecins’

• Non-glycosylated synthetic isoform had very reduced activity

• J. Biol. Chem. 273:6139-6143 (1998)

• Jim Mackintosh

F1,F2 active

against inoculum

Page 10: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

10

Summary: Bull Ant Antimicrobials:: external and internal

• Two-tier antimicrobial defence system:

1. External antiseptics from metapleural gland

2. Internal immune system with inducible peptides

• But all ant species highly eusocial – what about species at earlier stages of sociality?

Page 11: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

11

Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation

• EXPERIMENT:

• To compare social insects that are solitary, semi-social and eusocial

• Australian bees: Amegilla, Exoneura, Exoneurella, Trigona

• Hypothesis

Page 12: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

12

Within-colony density

social

Within-colony genetic diversity

solitary

Disease Threat

Semi-social

Page 13: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

13

Sampling E. robusta–mountain ash forests

Page 14: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

14

Sampling E. nigrescens-fire induced

heathland

Page 15: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

15

E. nigrescens

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1.80

2.40

3.21

4.27

5.70

7.60

10.13

13.51

18.01

24.01

32.01

42.69

Surface area (mm2)

Per

cen

t G

row

th

E. nigrescens

Antimicrobial ActivityNew Bioassay:

Opposing gradients of antimicrobial strength and microbial inoculum

Growth of golden

staph completelyinhibited

Page 16: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

16

Antimicrobial Strength: Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations

Status Species MIC (50) MIC(100)

Solitary A.cingulata 201 362

Solitary A. bombif. 220 280

Semi- E. robusta 29 38

Semi- E. nigresc. 15 17

Social Ex. Trident. 50 68

Social T. carbon. 0.7 2.2

Page 17: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

17

ANTIMICROBIAL STRENGTH IN BEES

• density

• genetic

• diversity

• solitary semi-social eusocial

POINT OF NO

RETURN?

Page 18: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

18

• Conclusions:

• Group size and within-colony relatedness inceases with increasing sociality.

• (Fungal loads were greatest in solitary species)

• Antimicrobials strong in social bees, weakest in solitaries

• Major increase in antimicrobial strength with first signs of sociality

Page 19: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

19

Antimicrobial Activity of Wasps species.

Page 20: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

20

Wasp Summary:

• Social species showed significantly higher (18x) antimicrobial activity than solitary species

• The most important variable leading to increased antimicrobial strength was increase in group size and social complexity.

Page 21: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

21

Antimicrobials in Thrips:solitary and social

Page 22: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

22

LB Control

Staph Control

Social Thrips

Wasp extract effective at 1/32nd of a wasp

equivalentSocial thrip extract effective at 50 thrip

equivalents

Social Wasps

Solitary thrip extract no effect at 180 thrip

equivalents

Lb + extract

solitary

Page 23: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

23

Concentration–growth response curves showing activity of extracts from eight thrips species against S. aureus.

Turnbull C et al. Biol. Lett. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0719

©2010 by The Royal Society

Soceusoc

Semi-soc

Page 24: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

24

Next phase the only known eusocial beetle:Astroplatypus incompertus

Page 25: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

25

Antimicrobial traits and the evolution of sociality/eusociality (i)

Social evolution means increasing group size and colony complexity; manifestly increasing the need for antimicrobial defences.

Thus, the traits that enabled nascent colonies to combat microbial pathogens have been fundamental to social evolution in thrips and should be included with the other essentials.

Page 26: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

26

Antimicrobial traits and the evolution of sociality (ii)Was there a role for microbial pathogens in social evolution?

1) The first response appears to have been an increase inthe strength of antimicrobial compounds.

2) Limits to this response, e.g. resource limitation or self-antibiosis might require an increase the number of individuals producing antimicrobials. This scenarioembeds a role for microbial pathogens in the social evolution of thrips.

What about all the other social insect groups?

Page 27: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

27

Bioprospecting using ecological and evolutionary hypotheses

• Already big-time (NIH) (www.fic.nih.gov/programs)

• Evolutionary and Ecological Applications

• J. Biological Engineering

• J. Biomimicry

• Hypothesis-Driven Bioprospecting

Page 28: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

28

For pharmaceuticals in general (Henkel et al. 1999,Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38:643)

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

molluscs (442)

insects/worms (244)

rare actinomycetes (1.915)

algae (1.276)

marine macroorganisms (2.959)

fungi (8.161)

plants (7.323)

bacteria (10.417)

BNPD total (29.432)

sugars

macrocycles

quinones

peptides

N-heterocycles

O-heterocycles

alicycles

arenes

aliphatics

others

Page 29: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

29

Sources of Drugs 1981-2002 (from Newman et al. 2003. Journal of Natural Products)

All NEW COMPOUNDS

• 28% from natural product or derivative

• 24% based on natural product or

mimic 52%

ALL ANTICANCER DRUGS

• 40% from natural product or derivative

• 21% based on natural product or

mimic 61%

Page 30: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

30

Page 31: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

31

THANKS TO

• ADAM STOW

• CHRISTINE TURNBULL

• DAVID BRISCOE

• MICHAEL GILLINGS

• JIM MACINTOSH

• SHANNON SMITH

• HELEN DOCHERTY

• RUTH BURTON

• DUNCAN VEAL

• PAUL DUCKETT

• KEIRA BEATTIE

• DOUG BEATTIE

• SAM HUSSEY

• SIOBHAN DENNISION

• PETER WILSON

• DAVID NIPPERESS

• MICHAEL SCHWARTZ

• STEPHEN HOGGARD

• CHRIS PALMER

• TOM CHAPMAN

• HOLLY CARAVAN

Page 32: ANTIMICROBIALS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EUSOCIALITY AND T… · Hypothesis: Antimicrobials increase in strength with group size and level of social organisation • EXPERIMENT: • To

�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������