“environmental friendly techniques in textile sector” conference/day … · parameters...
TRANSCRIPT
Page 1
Implemented byImplemented by
“Environmental Friendly Techniques in Textile
Sector”March 20th, 2016
Page 2
Implemented by
3/31/2016
GIZ - General Facts & Figures
Established: Since January 1st, 2011 GIZ encompasses the
competences and experiences of DED, GTZ and InWEnt.
The former GTZ was established in 1975.
Type of Firm: Company owned by the German Federal Govt.
Main client: German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and
Development (BMZ)
Other clients: Other German federal ministries, partner-country,
governments and international clients such as the ADB,
EC, UN, World Bank as well as private enterprises
GIZ supports the German Government in achieving its objectives in the
field of international cooperation for sustainable development.
Page 3
Implemented by
3/31/2016
GIZ World Wide
GIZ operates in 130 countries
Head offices in Eschborn und Bonn
GIZ employs some 17,000 staff worldwide, of whom more
than 60% are national personnel.
Additionally there are
- 1,300 development aid workers
- 750 integrated and 324 returning experts (CIM)
- 700 national staff of partner organisations
- 850 weltwärts volunteers 31.03.2016
Page 4
Implemented by
GTZ Head Office, Eschborn
GTZ Berlin, Germany
GTZ Bonn, Germany
GTZ local presence
Offices for German development
cooperation
GTZ Brussels, Belgium
GIZ Offices
31.03.2016 Seite 5
Implemented by
Positioning of IGEP
GIZ – India
Sustainable Economic
Development Energy
Environmental Policy, Conservation & Sustainable Use of Natural
Resources
Urban and Industrial Environmental Policy and
Management
Natural Resources Management
Indo-German Environment Partnership
Sanitation
Environment, Economy &
Socio-Economic Development
31.03.2016 Seite 6
Implemented by
Municipal Solid Waste Management
Slum-free Cities
Waste Water Management
Environmentally Friendly Techniques
Urban-industrial Climate Change incl. Disaster Risk
Management
Planning of New Industrial Parks & Investment Zones
Natural Resources Accounting in
Selected Sectors
Environmental Fiscal Reform in the Area of Waste & Waste Water
Resource Efficiency & Sustainable
Consumption
Sustainable Urban Habitat
Sustainable Industrial Development
Policy for Environment and Climate
Core Topics
Page 7
Implemented by
31.03.2016
“Environment Friendly
Techniques in Textile Sector”
Page 8
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Objective
Use of environment-friendly technologies and techniques is
promoted in selected industry sectors, particularly from Small
and Medium Enterprises (SMEs).
Page 9
Implemented by
31.03.2016
To the identified problems of concern, potential solutions
were identified based on:
BREF (best available techniques reference) documents;
Cleaner Production measures implemented in industries;
Solutions available in the market; International Case
Examples & National / Local Case Examples
Identified 18 potential measures as “suggestive
measures”.
Identified 15 potential measures/ techniques that could be
tested in pilots having best practice and policy dimensions
by GIZ.
Page 10
Implemented by
31.03.2016
“Pilot Measures in Textile Sector”
Page 11
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Pilot 1: Replacement of alkaline scouring with bio-
scouring enzyme for enzymetic scouring.
Problem:
Scouring produces strongly alkaline effluents (around pH 12.5)
with high organic loads,
High concentrations of Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), oil and
grease in wastewater
Needs caustic boil & chlorine in process
Pilot measure:
Bio-scouring enzyme for enzymatic scouring
Page 12
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Page 13
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Parameters Conventional Process Bio-Scouring Process Difference
Total turns 33 20 - 13 turn
Batch time 18 Hrs 10 Hrs - 8 Hrs
No. of drains 13 8 - 5 Drains
Water
consumption
3900 lit / batch 2400 lit/ batch - 1500 lit/
batch
Chemical cost 5.88 4.98 - 0.9 Rs./kg
Labor cost 1.05 0.58 - 0.47 Rs./kg
Electricity 0.72 0.36 - 0.36 kW/kg
Steam 1000 500 - 500
kg/batch
Page 14
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Cost Benefit Analysis:
The processing cost of fabric reduced to Rs. 3.91 per kg of
fabric from Rs. 5.15 per kg of fabric.
There is no capital cost only replacement of chemical (although
10 % additional cost compared to existing chemicals in some
cases)
Total savings Rs. 50,22,000 per annum.
When & Where Implemented:
M/s Mangal Textile, Ahmedabad & M/s Komal Texfeb, Ahmedabad
replaced the alkaline scouring with bio scouring in 2013.
Page 15
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.2016
Pilot 2: Caustic Soda Recovery System.
Problem:
In mercerization process, fabric is washed with water to remove
un-reacted caustic soda (98 to 99 % of unreacted caustic)
Wash water contains substantial amount of caustic soda which
is resource loss
Generates pollution in the wastewater (higher COD, TDS, TSS,
alkalinity etc).
Pilot measure:
Caustic Soda Recovery System
Page 16
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Page 17
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.2016
Cost Benefit Analysis:
Capital cost was Rs. 92,40,000
Operating costs of Rs. 48,21,000 per annum
Total savings of Rs. 1,42,00,000
Payback period of 12 months.
When & Where Implemented:
M/s Shyam Corporation, Ahmedabad installed the caustic recovery
plant in 2013.
Page 18
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.201631.03.2016
Pilot 3: Recycle/reuse of cooling water and condensate
water as boiler feed water.
Problem:
Jet dyeing machines equipped with common heat exchangers
used for both heating and cooling
Cooling & Condensate water is drained with other effluent
Increasing fresh water consumption as well as effluent quantity
& load at ETP.
Pilot measure:
Cooling water from jet dyeing machines is reused as process hot
wash water on soft flow dyeing machines, RFD (Ready For
Dyeing) machines, etc.
Page 19
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Cost Benefit Analysis:
Capital cost was Rs. 11,00,000
Operating cost (10 HP pump operation)
to Rs. 1,96,000 per annum
Resulted in saving of Rs. 12,12,000 (Rs.
5,94,750 fuel cost + Rs. 6,17,760 fresh
water pumping cost) per annum
Payback period of 13 months
When & Where Implemented:
M/s Komal Texfab, Ahmedabad installed the
recovery system plant in 2013.
Page 20
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Problem:
Problems associated with manual methods of preparing
solutions are following:
Errors in manually calculating amount of dyestuff, auxiliary and
water.
Manually weighing of precise amount of required dye takes time
and skill, risk of mistakes in a busy production environment is
high.
Manually dispensing auxiliaries and water accurately is very
time consuming.
Variations in water temperature can affect the stability and
accuracy of solutions for certain dyestuffs.
Pilot 4: Auto Colour Dispensing through
Spectrophotometer & Chemical Dispensing System.
Page 21
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.2016
Pilot measure:
An infrared exhaust laboratory-dyeing machine with a fully
automated dosing system.
Page 22
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Cost Benefit Analysis:
Capital cost was Rs. 2,00,00,000,
Minimum operating and maintenance cost
Total savings is Rs. 62,64,000 per annum
Simple payback of 3.5 years.
When & Where Implemented:
M/s Komal Texfab, Ahmedabad Auto Dispensing System (Aral,
Israel), Spectrophotometer (gretagmacbeth) and IR dyer
(Copower) were installed by industry in year 2011.
Page 23
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.201631.03.2016
Pilot 5: Low Liquor Ratio Jet Dyeing Machines.
Problem:
Current Jet dyeing machines operate at a liquor ratio of 10:1
Resulting in excess water consumption and excess waste water
generation
Pilot measure:
Machines of newer designs operate at a liquor ratio of 7:1
These machines usually incorporate low-friction Teflon internal
coatings and advanced spray systems to speed rinsing.
Page 24
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Page 25
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.2016
Cost Benefit Analysis:
Capital cost of 900 kg/hr machine was Rs. 1.25 crore,
Reduced operating cost than conventional jet dyeing machines
Total savings was Rs. 18,90,000 per annum
Payback period of 80 months (Excluding cost of chemicals
saving & waste water treatment & disposal cost).
When & Where Implemented:
M/s Komal Texfab, Ahmedabad installed low liquor ratio machines
in 2009.
Page 26
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.201631.03.2016
Pilot 6: Reuse of Treated Water for Washing at Printing
Machines.
Problem:
Screen are washed on every change of pattern & colour.
Frames also need washing on change overs.
Printing machine requires 1500 lit/hr for continuous cleaning of
the blanket and screens
Wash water generated is treated in ETP.
Pilot measure:
ETP plant treated water is recycled for its use in cleaning
process of screen & frames
Page 27
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Page 28
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.2016
Cost Benefit Analysis:
Capital cost was Rs. 3,00,000,
Operating cost (7.5 HP pump running) of Rs 86,000 per annum
Total savings of Rs 2,58,000
Payback period of 21 months
When & Where Implemented:
M/s Komal Texfab, Ahmedabad started reusing ETP treated water
for washing in 2013.
Page 29
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.201631.03.2016
Pilot 7 (A): Recycle/reuse of cooling water and
condensate water as boiler feed water.
Problem:
Jet dyeing machines equipped with common heat exchangers
used for both heating and cooling
Cooling & Condensate water is drained with other effluent
Increasing fresh water consumption as well as effluent quantity
& load at ETP.
Pilot measure:
Cooling water and the condensate is recovered completely from
jet dyeing machines and reused as boiler feed water
Page 30
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Page 31
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.2016
Cost Benefit Analysis:
Capital costs was Rs. 3,00,000
Operating cost (10 HP pump operation) to Rs. 3,13,000 per
annum
Resulted in saving of Rs. 33,00,000 per annum
Payback period of 3 months
When & Where Implemented:
M/s Rinkoo Processors, Ahmedabad installed the recovery system
plant in 2010.
Page 32
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.201631.03.2016
Pilot 7 (B): Reuse of Treated Water for Washing at
Printing Machines.
Problem:
Screen are washed on every change of pattern & colour.
Frames also need washing on change overs.
Printing machine requires 1500 lit/hr for continuous cleaning of
the blanket and screens
Wash water generated is treated in ETP.
Pilot measure:
ETP plant treated water is recycled for its use in cleaning
process of screen & frames
Page 33
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Page 34
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.2016
Cost Benefit Analysis:
Capital cost was Rs. 1,00,000,
Operating cost (6 HP pump running) of Rs 1,69,000 per annum
Total savings of Rs 3,46,500
Payback period of 10 months
When & Where Implemented:
M/s Rinkoo Processors, Ahmedabad started reusing ETP treated
water for washing in 2010.
Page 35
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.201631.03.2016
Pilot 8: Batch Washing in Place of Continuous Washing
in Jet Dyeing Machine.
Problem:
In Jet Dyeing Machine continuous washing is carried out with
fresh water to remove the unexhausted dyes and chemicals
5000 litre / batch of water is consumed without any real
requirement and as a normal practice.
Pilot measure:
Batch / Intermittent washing is applied with fresh water intake of
three cycles in batch manner instead of continuous flow of water
Page 36
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Page 37
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.2016
Cost Benefit Analysis:
The reduction in water consumption was approx. 39600 KL per
annum on 11 nos. machine
Without any capital cost or operating costs
Saving of Rs. 3,05,000 per annum (pumping cost only)
Immediate Payback.
When & Where Implemented:
M/s Rinkoo Processors, Ahmedabad started the batch washing in
2010.
Page 38
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.201631.03.2016
Pilot 9: Reuse of Alkaline Stream from Mercerising.
Problem:
In mercerising process, fabric is treated with caustic soda
(NaOH) solution
The alternate to recover caustic is caustic recovery plant
Requires high capital investment and running cost in form of
steam and manpower
Pilot measure:
Alkaline stream is collected in underground tanks
50O caustic stream is reused for next batch
20O caustic stream is pumped to overhead tank and is supplied
to individual jigger machines for use in dyeing (alkaline stream
is used for boiling and bleaching of fabrics)
Page 39
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Page 40
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.2016
Cost Benefit Analysis:
Capital cost was Rs. 5,00,000
Negligible operating cost
Total savings of Rs. 5,40,000 per annum
Payback period of 12 months.
When & Where Implemented:
M/s Rinkoo Processors, Ahmedabad started reusing alkaline
stream for dyeing in 2010.
Page 41
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.201631.03.2016
Pilot 11: Installation of Variable Frequency Drive in Jet
Dyeing Machine.
Problem:
In Jet Dyeing higher pressure of 3.5 kg/cm2 is required to
ensure uniform dyeing
Lower pressure of 1.5 kg/cm2 is required for creating movement
of the fabric
Pump is made to operate on much more than the required
pressure or is throttled to get the required pressure
Electricity is wasted
Pilot measure:
Retro fitment of a VFD armed with PLC based control gear to
the Jet Dyeing Machine
Page 42
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Page 43
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.2016
Cost Benefit Analysis:
Capital cost of one 12.5 HP VFD is Rs. 30,000,
Operating costs is negligible
Total savings of Rs. 55,000 per annum
Payback period of 7 months.
When & Where Implemented:
M/s Rinkoo Processors, Ahmedabad installed VFDs on 11 nos. of
Jet Dyeing machines in 2010.
Page 44
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.201631.03.2016
Pilot 12: Water Consumption Optimisation at Jigger
Machines.
Problem:
In overflow rinsing, clean water is drained through an overflow
weir usually set near a normal running level.
Overflow rinsing is inefficient in terms of water use
3 times (1200 litre/batch) higher flow rate of overflow water
required.
Pilot measure:
Installed two separate water lines for jigger machines
For water filling (1.5 inch) with auto timer based controller to fill
required quantity of water
For overflow (0.5 inch) line with auto timer controller which
allows only 400 litre per 20 minutes and stops the water flow
after one turn.
Page 45
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Page 46
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.2016
Cost Benefit Analysis:
Capital cost was Rs. 2,00,000 per jigger
Water saving of 360 KL/yr.
Although the fresh water cost is not significant, the payback in
this case is not fast considering the fresh water cost only.
When & Where Implemented:
M/s Mukesh Industries, Ahmedabad started the Jigger water
optimisation in 2010.
Page 47
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.201631.03.2016
Pilot 13: Optimisation of Heat Energy in Jigger Machines.
Problem:
High heat quantity is required to raise the water temperature in
Jigger
Steam pressure (3 kg/cm2) leads to higher velocity through the
water bath, which escapes to atmosphere without delivering the
heat and increase the steam consumption
Average specific steam consumption at jigger machine is 1.5 to
2 kg of steam per kg of fabric.
Page 48
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Pilot measure:
Water supplied to the jigger is from condenser cooling water
(soft water) of caustic recovery plant at 50 0C
Water is preheated and will need steam only to raise
temperature from 50 0C to average 85 0C.
Hot water is further heated in closed tank with direct steam
injection at 1 kg/cm2g pressure only to utilise the full heat
content of the steam
Page 49
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.2016
Cost Benefit Analysis:
Capital cost of various modifications was Rs. 13,50,000
Total savings of Rs. 8,70,000,
Negligible operating cost
Payback period of 18 months
When & Where Implemented:
M/s Mukesh Industries, Ahmedabad done the modification in 2011.
Page 50
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.201631.03.2016
Pilot 14: Flash Steam Recovery of Drying Range to
Preheat Boiler Feed Water.
Problem:
A typical 16 cylinder dryer requires 110 kg steam input per hour
for 2400 m/hr fabric running rate
Steam after condensation comes out of the dryer cylinder at
approx. 2 kg/cm2g pressure collected in an open tank, flash
steam generates due to sudden change in pressure.
Flash steam goes into atmosphere as waste.
The industry is having 4 nos. of drying ranges with average 45
KL/day condensate generation from each range.
Pilot measure:
Industry designed a simple system to recover this flash steam
and raise the temperature of boiler feed water
Page 51
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Page 52
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.2016
Cost Benefit Analysis:
Capital cost for modification was Rs. 1,00,000
Savings due to reduction in fuel consumption of Rs. 35,67,000
per annum
Negligible operating cost
Payback period of 10 days.
When & Where Implemented:
M/s Mukesh Industries, Ahmedabad installed the system for heat
content utilisation from flash steam in 2012
Page 53
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.201631.03.2016
Pilot 15: Heat losses optimisation at cylinder drying
range.
Problem:
A typical 16 cylinder dryer requires 110 kg steam input per hour
for 2400 m/hr fabric running rate
The side plates of cylinders, are not insulated and losses heat to
the surrounding area.
Major challenges for insulating the side plates of a cylinder dryer
are :
Cylinder dryers rotates at 50-60 rpm
Normally industries insulate with glass/mineral wool
Water resistance of mineral wool is very low and thus gaining
moisture by insulation makes it conductive to heat loss
Normally insulation peel off within 2-3 month of installation
Due to low moisture resistance and holding of moisture within
insulation promotes corrosion
Page 54
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Pilot measure:
Side plates of drying range are insulated with more durable (life
& properties) mineral/rock wool, which can result in reduction of
steam consumption.
Page 55
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.2016
Cost Benefit Analysis:
Capital costs of the insulation Rs. 35,000 for 12 m2 surface area
No operating costs involved
Total saving is Rs. 1,16,000
Payback period of 4 months.
When & Where Implemented:
M/s Mukesh Industries, Ahmedabad insulated the side plates in
2014
Page 56
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.201631.03.2016
Pilot 16: Optimisation of exhausts by controlling the
exhaust humidity with automation
Problem:
In Cotton Printing, Stenter is used before printing but after pre-
treatment.
In case of Polyester or PC Dyeing, stenter is used twice
Only 5.4% of heat given to stenter is utilized in heating the fabric
in case of Heat Setting.
Heat gained by fabric in any typical stenter operation is 4.6%
only.
It is further evident that approx. 95% stenters is used for the
purpose of moisture evaporation, released to atmosphere or
wasted.
Page 57
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Pilot measure:
Installing the Stenter exhaust moisture controlling system
(retrofit)
Page 58
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.2016
Cost Benefit Analysis:
Capital costs of the insulation is Rs. 1,65,000,
No operating costs involved,
Estimated saving is Rs. 1,85,000 (@ 5 % savings)
Payback period in 11 months..
When & Where Implemented:
M/s Mukesh Industries, Ahmedabad is installing the device in 2014
Page 59
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.201631.03.2016
Pilot 17: Efficient Boiler Operation.
Problem:
Highest efficiencies been secured with coal are in the range of
50-82%
Combustion efficiency of the boiler was found to be only 80 %
while of efficient boilers is more than 90 %.
The reasons for low combustion efficiency are:
The heat transfer is poor due to low heat transfer area and short
contact time between flue gas and the water.
The fuel charging door remains more or less open during the
entire operation due to various reasons, mostly human errors
There is no control over fuel firing in combustion chamber
Page 60
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Pilot measure:
Replaces the existing non-efficient boiler with the efficient 6
TPH capacity boiler with ESP system to take care the air
emissions as well.
Page 61
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.2016
Cost Benefit Analysis:
The capital cost of the boiler is Rs. 85,00,000 (excluding ESP)
Operating cost remains the same while it will reduce due to
consideration of latest technologies and control of the boiler
system,
Total savings of Rs. 50,00,000
Payback period of 21 months
When & Where Implemented:
M/s V R Polyfab, Ahmedabad commissioned the new boiler in
2014
Page 62
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Pilot Measures Implemented in Ahmedabad
Pilot Benefits Status
Process Development:
Bio- Scouring in place
of Alkaline Scouring
Water consumption reduction:
45.45%
Chemical consumption reduction:
8.65%
Electrical power consumption
reduction: 37.04%
Fuel (coal) consumption reduction:
24.55%
Reduction in boiler emissions
Reduction in waste water
generation (quality & quantity)
Implemented:
Mangal Textile,
Ahmedabad
Komal Texfeb,
Ahmedabad
Trials (Positive
Results)
Vinod Textile,
Ahmedabad
Shyam Textile,
Ahmedabad
Aakash Fashion,
Ahmedabad
Chemical Recovery &
Reuse – Caustic
Chemical (Caustic) consumption
reduction: 93%
Reduction in waste water
generation (quality & quantity)
Implemented:
Shyam Textile,
Ahmedabad
Page 63
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.2016
Pilot Benefits Status
Recycle/reuse of
cooling water and
condensate water as
boiler feed water
The total boiler feed water is being
now catered by recovered
condensate & cooling water
amounting to 50 KL per day.
Boiler feed water consumption
reduction: 100%
Recovery of energy in form of heat
from hot water: 15%
Reduction in boiler emissions
Reduction in waste water generation
(quality & quantity)
Implemented:
Rinkoo
Processors,
Ahmedabad
Komal Texfab,
Ahmedabad
Automated Chemical
Dosing Systems
Reduction in chemical usage: 10%
Reduction of rework by 3 %
Reduction in water consumption
Reduction in energy consumption
Reduction in waste water generation
(quality & quantity)
Pilot:
Komal Texfab,
Ahmedabad
Pilot Measures Implemented in Ahmedabad
Page 64
Implemented by
31.03.201631.03.2016
Pilot Benefits Status
Batch Washing in
Place of Continuous
Washing in Jet Dyeing
Machine
Economic savings with reduced
fresh water consumption by 360 KL
per year
Reduction in effluent generation
due to reuse of cooling water.
Reduces the load on ETP and
reduction of CETP charges in
future for the volume of waste
water reduced
Pilot:
Rinkoo
Processors,
Ahmedabad
Water Consumption
Optimisation at Jigger
Machines
Economic savings with reduced
fresh water consumption by 360 KL
per year
Reduction in effluent generation
due to reuse of cooling water.
Reduces the load on ETP and
reduction of CETP charges in
future for the volume of waste
water reduced
Pilot:
Mukesh Industry,
Ahmedabad
Pilot Measures Implemented in Ahmedabad
Page 65
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Pilot Benefits Status
Low-Liquor-Ratio
Jet Dyeing
Machines
Reduced water consumption: 30%
Reduced electrical power consumption:
20%
Reduced fuel (coal) consumption: 30%
Reduced consumption of chemicals &
auxiliaries.
Reduction in waste water generation
(quality & quantity)
Pilot:
Komal Texfab,
Ahmedabad
Reuse of Treated
Water for Washing
at Printing Machines
Reduced fresh water consumption by 150
KL per day
Reduction of CETP charges in future for
the volume of waste water reduced
Pilot:
Rinkoo
Processors,
Ahmedabad
Komal Texfab,
Ahmedabad
Reuse of Alkaline
Stream from
Mercerising
Reduction of caustic consumption by
15000 kg per year.
Reduction of CETP charges in future for
the volume of waste water reduced
Pilot:
Rinkoo
Processors,
Ahmedabad
Pilot Measures Implemented in Ahmedabad
Page 66
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Pilot Benefits Status
Installation of
Variable Frequency
Drive in Jet Dyeing
Machine
Reduction in electricity consumption
Better process control
Pilot:
Rinkoo
Processors,
Ahmedabad
Optimisation of
Heat Energy in
Jigger Machines
Reduction in coal consumption by 102 tons
per year.
Reduction in fresh water consumption of
30000 KL per year
Reduction of CETP charges in future for the
volume of waste water reduced
Reduced emissions from boiler
Pilot:
Mukesh
Industry,
Ahmedabad
Flash Steam
Recovery of Drying
Range to Preheat
Boiler Feed Water
Reduction in coal consumption by 510 tons
per year.
Reduction in fresh water consumption of
3375 KL per year due to recovery of flash
steam
Reduced emissions from boiler
Pilot:
Mukesh
Industry,
Ahmedabad
Pilot Measures Implemented in Ahmedabad
Page 67
Implemented by
31.03.2016
Pilot Benefits Status
Boiler Efficiency
Optimisation
Reduction in coal consumption:
10-30%
Reduction in boiler emissions.
Pilot:
V R Polyfab,
Ahmedabad
Dryer Heat Loss
Reduction
Reduction in steam consumption:
5-10%
Reduction in boiler emissions.
Production area working
conditions will improve
Safety for workers will improve
Pilot:
Mukesh Industry,
Ahmedabad
Installation of Exhaust
Humidity Control
System in Stenters
Reduction in consumption of
electrical power: 5-10%
Reduction in consumption of fuel
(coal): 20%
Reduction in thermic fluid heater
emissions.
Reduction in process time.
Pilot:
Mukesh Industry,
Ahmedabad
(Under Implementation)
Pilot Measures Implemented in Ahmedabad
Page 68
Implemented by
31/03/2016
Implemented by
Thank You
As a federal enterprise, GIZ supports the German Government in
achieving its objectives in the field of international cooperation for
sustainable development.
Published by
Deutsche Gesellschaft für
Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
Registered offices, Bonn and Eschborn, Germany
Sustainable and Environment-friendly Industrial Production
1st Floor, B 5 / 1, Safdarjung Enclave
New Delhi 110029
T +91 11 49 49 53 53
F +49 11 49 49 53 51
I www.giz.de, www.igep.in
Responsible
Mr. N. Raghu Babu
Author(s)
Mr. Nitesh Patel
In Cooperation with