“translating concrete capability requirements into ... · nato unclassified 1 col george j....

1 NATO UNCLASSIFIED

COL George J. Beldecos, Hellenic Air Force

ACT IRM NSIP Branch

“Translating Concrete Capability Requirements into Capability Packages”

Supreme Allied Commander Transformation

NATO UNCLASSIFIED

2 NATO UNCLASSIFIED

ACT/IRM/NSIP Branch

Participate actively in the transformational effort

by delivering a wide range of capabilities,

through the development of Capability Packages,

in an approach commensurate

(in time, cost, and effectiveness)

with the concrete capability requirements

of a changing security environment,

in accordance with NATO’s Level of Ambition

and mission requirements.

3 NATO UNCLASSIFIED

Agenda

• Main CPs currently under development

• Air Basing, Maritime and POL CPs

• CPs to be derived from the NDPP process.

4 NATO UNCLASSIFIED

ACT/NSIP

Main CPs under development

Number/Title Part I (Requirements

Definition)

Part II (Consolidated

Resource

Proposal)

Estimated

Submission

Remarks

CP 0A1303 Rev1

Ballistic Missile Defence

Jul. 2012 Under devt Dec 2012

CP 9A0130

Satellite Communications

Transmission Services

Mar. 2007

Mar. 2011

Under devt Nov 2012 CP on hold (2007-11)

until SATCOM

Strategy approval by

MC.

CP 0A0149 R01

NATO Deployable C2

Assets

Under devt Feb. 2013

CP 9C0102

Service Management and

Control

Mar. 2012 Under devt TBD Awaiting for NATO

SMC Policy

5 NATO UNCLASSIFIED

CP 0A1303 Rev1

Ballistic Missile Defence

• Rev1 for BMD will expand the scope of NATO’s current Active Layered Theatre Ballistic Missile

Defence programme’s C3 capabilities beyond the protection of NATO deployed forces to also

protect NATO European populations, territory and forces, as decided by the Heads of State and

Government during the Lisbon Summit.

• The revised CP will provide the Battle Management C3I (BMC3I) capability. Only this part of the

programme is eligible for NATO common funding.

• The MCR for BMD were produced by ACT in 2011. The NATO Staff Requirements (NSR) are

expected to be approved by the CNAD in Nov 2012.

• Estimated date of submission: Dec 2012

• Estimated date of approval: Apr 2013

• Estimated NSIP Budget: 400 MEUR

6 NATO UNCLASSIFIED

CP 9A0130

SATCOM Services

• Estimated date of submission: Nov 2012

• Estimated date of approval: Apr 2013

• Estimated NSIP Budget: 1,000+ MEUR

(spread yearly up to 2034)

• CP 9A0130 will provide satellite communications services in support of NATO’s permanent missions and operations, as defined in the LoA, and according to the guidelines set forth in the Strategy for the provision of SATCOM (MC-576), approved in June 2011.

• The CP will provide space capacity in a mix of survivable, protected and assured wide band - narrow-band, and commercial services; static and deployable ground assets; management and control services; and life-cycle facilities.

• SATCOM is an enabling capability for some of the Lisbon Critical Capabilities

(AMN, JISR, AGS, ACCS, Bi-SC AIS, ALTBMD)

7 NATO UNCLASSIFIED

CP 0A0149 R01

NATO Deployable C2 Assets

• RO1 of the CP will provide comprehensive Deployable Communications and

Information System (DCIS) capability in order to satisfy the requirements to deploy and

sustain forces for NATO-led operations.

• The capability implementation must

be flexible and modular in order to

tailor the DCIS support to specific

mission needs.

• DCIS resources will need to be

available at the appropriate

readiness states and survivable and

able to operate in adverse electronic,

climatic, geographic, land or sea-

based operational environments.

• Estimated date of submission: Apr. 2013

• Estimated date of approval: Jul. 2014

• Estimated NSIP Budget: 168+ MEUR

8 NATO UNCLASSIFIED

CP 9C0102

Service Management and Control

• IAW the NATO LoA, there is a need to be capable of managing CIS service delivery

and support for multiple simultaneous missions, conducted at locations separated by

distances extending from NATO territory to strategic distances and beyond.

SMC Implementation

SMC Integration and Architecture

Process and Change Management

Support

Enterprise-Wide SMC Tool

Implementation

Domain-Specific SMC Tool

Implementation

Network Service Management

InfoSec Service Management

IS Infrastructure Management

System/Service-Specific SMC Tool

Implementation

Router

Management

IDS Management

Storage Management

Virtualisation Management

• This CP provides the capability to

deliver and sustain all required NATO

CIS services and rapidly restore

critical services in the event of failure

or disruption.

• Estimated date of Submission: TBD

(pending NATO SMC Policy, currently under development by NHQC3S)

9 NATO UNCLASSIFIED

IMSM-0248-2011, 25 May 2011

Request to resubmit AIR BASING CPs after CRR12

9A1301 “Air to Air Refueling Assets”

9A1304 “Multipurpose Air Assets in SACEUR’s AOR”

9A1385 “Defensive and Offensive Air Assets in SACEUR’ AOR”

9A0951 “Air Transport Assets in SACEUR’s AOR”

A0951A01 “Air Transport Assets in SACEUR’s AOR-Tactical”

Request to resubmit POL CPs after CRR12

9A0980 “Bulk Fuel Assets in the Northern Area of NATO”

9A0990 “Bulk Fuel Assets in the Southern Area of NATO”

Air Basing and POL CPs

10 NATO UNCLASSIFIED

Air Basing CPs


NDPP step 2: MCR


Air Basing Selection is harmonised with NDPP.

Airbases required to meet MCR will be selected

by the SCs in a resource efficient manner and

presented to the MC for endorsement.

Offers

Requirements

Methodology Selected

Airbases

Output

MCR

Quantitative

Selection

Methodology

Comparison

CPs

Air Basing Selection

Qualitative

Data


Air Basing selection

phases


Maritime Requirements


“Logistic Support and Resupply Facilities for

Multinational Maritime Forces in the Southern Region”

• Piers

• Ammunition and fuel facilities

• Battle Damage Repair (BDR)

• NATO Naval Forces Sensor and Weapons

Accuracy Check Sites (FORACS)

CP 3A0013


MCM-0066-2010 on CP 3A0013

• Defer enhancements to the maritime

infrastructure.

• Defer all maritime POL-related projects.

• Over and above maritime infrastructure

requirements to be freshly assessed in the

NDPP and CRR 2012.


MCR Maritime Capabilities

• Quantitative requirements generally

unchanged from DRR07 (some exceptions).

• MCR did not produce requirements for

ashore logistics support to maritime forces.

• Further work needed to identify maritime

bases.


POL Requirements


Existing POL CPs

Very Old (but still extant) Submitted, but stalled

since 2007 CP 2A0013 ‘Provide and Maintain Dedicated / Secure Bulk

Fuel Supply - Central Region (Less BALTAP) approved 12

Jan 1996

CP 2A0013 Add 1 approved 10 Dec 1997

CP 2A0013 Add 2 approved 29 Oct 1999

CP 9A0980 “Bulk Fuel Assets in the

Northern Area of NATO”

(submitted Sep 2007)

CP 2A0014 ‘Provide Dedicated / Secure Military Bulk Fuel

Supply to BALTAP Area of Northern Region’ approved 11

Feb 2000

CP 3A0023 ‘Restore NATO Pipeline Systems in the

Southern Region’ approved 7 Apr 1997

CP 9A0990 “Bulk Fuel Assets in the

Southern Area of NATO”

(submitted 6 Feb 2007)

CP 3A0023 Add 1 approved 1 Apr 2002


MCR POL Capabilities

• Further work required to support the re-validation of the

requirement currently being met by the bulk fuel CPs.

• Once the airbases and maritime bases have been

selected, the quantities of POL can then be identified

using the scenario analysis information.

• This will enable POL storage and transport

requirements to be determined.


• Type of Fuel

F-34: Aviation Fuel - NATO ‘Single’ Fuel

F-44: Maritime Aviation Fuel

F-76: Naval Fuel for ships

• Quantity of Fuel

Daily rate of Consumption

Storage required (according to logistic policy)

• Readiness of Fuel

Related to the NTM of the Assets requiring it

POL Requirements


NATO Bulk

Fuel Strategy

Military Logistic Resources

The Military Capability

Requirement :

How much fuel to be

stored and where

How much to be delivered

to:

Airbase locations

Maritime locations

Land locations

at what rate

Proposes the most

effective technical method

of meeting the Military

Requirement:

Adds to this additional

infrastructure for:

Alternate connections

and elements for

redundancy

System elements for

political Energy

Security

The most effective way

of paying for the system

proposed by Military and

Logistic pillars. Options

include:

NSIP, but with

greater efficiency

Host Nation

ownership with

NATO usage costs

Commercial

ownership and

operation


NATO Defence Planning Process

(NDPP) Establish

Political

Guidance

Determine

Requirements

Apportion

Requirements

Set Targets

Facilitate

Implementation

Review

Results Improving

Alliance

Capabilities

STEP 1

Establish

Political

Guidance

STEP 2

Determine

Capability

Requirements

STEP 4

Facilitate

Implementation

STEP 5

Review

Results

STEP 3

Apportion

Requirements/ Set Targets


NDPP Step 3

Apportion Requirements /

Set Targets

Distribute MCR throughout

Distribute MCR throughout

Alliance

Nations (individual &

multinational targets)

NATO – Collective capability

targets

Fair burden sharing

Emphasis on priority shortfalls

Nations review & discuss

Target packages revised to

account for reasonable

challenge

Approved in multilateral forum

via consensus “minus one”

Establish

Political

Guidance

Determine

Requirements

Apportion

Requirements

Set Targets

Facilitate

Implementation

Review

Results Improving

Alliance

Capabilities


NDPP Step 3


CONCLUSION

Success in the complex endeavour

to deliver the required concrete capabilities

through the development of new Capability Packages,

may only be achieved

with the full involvement of Nations

in a collaborative, traceable and transparent manner.


NCS – related CPs

• CP 2A0180-REV1 “NATO Command Facilities for JF HQ Brunsum”

• CP 5A0148 “NATO Command Facilities for JF HQ Naples”

• CP 5A0149 “NATO Command Facilities for LANDCOM Izmir”

• CP 9C0101 “Relocation of NCIS from Latina (ITA) to Oeiras (PRT)”

Backed by a Political Decision

and the willingness of all Nations to support them,

they were approved in less than a year from their initiation.


Questions

“translating concrete capability requirements into ... · nato unclassified 1 col george j....

Documents