appendix empirical research concerning stress … · gender effect sig. for miss & bdi. sig....
TRANSCRIPT
Utopia Utopia Bold
Table A.1
Empirical Research Concerning Stress and PTSD
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
Adler et al.,1994
Examined theprevalence of PTSDsymptoms followingdeployment.Examined therelationship betweenrank and type oftrauma exposure andsubsequent PTSDsymptoms.
German-based U.S.Army combat unitsexposed to front linecombat. Threecategories based onexposure: 1=noexposure to dead orwounded; 2=exposed tocivilian or Iraqicasualties; and3=exposed to U.S., Iraqiand civilian casualties.
N=4199; No exposure(27%); civilian or Iraqicasualties (37%); U.S.casualties (35%) Nogender specified
No 9–10 monthspost-PGW
Exposure to deadand woundedenemies andallies; Unitrelated stressassessed byreports of stressrelated to peerand hierarchicalsupport.
Correlationalstudy examiningthe relationshipbetween rank,degree ofexposure, andPTSD symptoms.
IES; PTSDSymptomsMeasure(derived fromtheBSI/IES/DSM-III-R); ExposureMeasureassessing unit-related stress
Exposure corr. with IESscores; Those exposed toU.S. casualties hadhighest IES scores. Maineffect for rank, exposure,and current unit relatedstress for both intrusionand avoidance (IES).Higher rank associatedwith less severe PTSDsymptoms.
Baker et al.,
19921To evaluate clinicalneeds of PGW vets inan Ohio VA outreachprogram.
Personnel in 19 Reserveunits within the CentralMidwest; Branch notspecified.
N=325
No 2–5 monthspost-PGW
Questionnaireassessing war-time stressors.
Correlationalstudy examiningthe relationship ofdemographic vari-ables, childhoodexperiences, andcombat exposureto subsequentpsychologicalsequelae.
IES; BSI; MISS(cut-off=107);CopingStrategiesInventory;Childhoodvariables:childhoodtrauma.
Sig. corr. between childand combat stressors andMISS scores. Ethnicityand child stressors werecorr. w/ BSI scores,combat stress. Blackshad higher BSI, IESscores; Childhood stressassociated with higherBSI, IES, MISS. No genderdifferences. 5.9% PTSD.
74Stress
Table A.1 (continued)
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
Baker et al.,1997
Examined relationshipbetween combatexposure andsubsequent symptomsof PTSD.
N=188
50% were help-seekingand 50% were non-treatment-seekingPGW veterans on activeduty.
YesPTSD group(N=24)comparedwith groupwithoutPTSD
Unspecified,but perhapsup to 3 yearsfollowingPGW
CombatExposure Scale;self-report
Correlationalstudy andbetween-groupcomparison ofveterans with andwithout PTSD.
MISS(cut-off=116)
Degree of combatexposure was positivelyassociated with PTSDsymptom severity scores.
Brandt et al.,1997
Examined therelationship betweenphysical injury duringPGW and psychiatricsymptoms.
Service membersadmitted to ArmyMedical Center from thePGW/68% traumaticinjury; 3 categoriescreated based onpresence of psychiatricsymptoms: a) fullpsychiatric diagnosis(disorder); b) symptomsof a psychiatric disorder;c) no psychiatricdisorder or symptoms.
M=139F=22
Yes51 of 161who exper-ienced non-traumaproce-dures
During PGW Admitted toMedical Centerfor traumaticincident duringPGW. (68%traumatic injury,no definitionspecified)
Correlationalstudy examiningthe relationshipbetween physicalinjury andpsychiatricsymptoms.
Medicalrecords used toestablish chartdiagnosis andpsychiatricsymptoms.
36% had psychiatricsymptoms; 21% had Axis Idisorder; 5% adjustmentdisorder; 4% PTSD;Patients who experiencedgreater traumaticexposure were more likelyto have psychiatricsymptoms.
Em
pirical R
esearch C
on
cernin
g Stress and
PT
SD75
Utopia Utopia Bold
Table A.1 (continued)
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
Deahl et al.,1994
Examined the effectsof psychologicaldebriefing following atrauma (PGW) onsubsequent morbidity.
British soldiers servingin Army War GraveService in the PGW.
N=42 trauma subjects
YesN=20
9 monthspost-PGW
Recovering andidentifying deadbodies of alliesand enemies
Between-groupstudy comparingdebriefed andnon-debriefedsubjects onmorbidity 9months followingreturn from PGW.
IES; GHQ 50% reported debriefingas helpful. No differencebetween debriefed andnondebriefed on GHQ orIES scores; Difference in“caseness” (GHQ>5,IES>12), and change inclose relationships.Positive corr. between“caseness” andperception of life threat.
Engel et al.,1993
Examined therelationship betweenprecombatsexual/physical abuseand postcombat PTSDsymptoms.
U.S. Army's First CavalryDivision; Active duty.
M=269F=28
No 4–10 monthspost-PGW
Precombatexposure asassessed byinterview; CES
Correlationalstudy examiningrelationshipbetweenprecombat abuseand post-combatPTSD symptoms.
MISS-ODS;CES; DISInterview
M reported sig. morecombat exposure and Freported sig. moreprecombat abuse. F, butnot M, with precombatabuse reported sig.greater PTSD symptomsthan those with lessprecombat abuse. Freported sig. higherMISS-ODS scores. Sig.corr. between CES andMISS-ODS.
76Stress
Table A.1 (continued)
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
Ford et al.,
19921Compared debriefedversus nondebriefedPGW vets onpsychologicalsequelae followingPGW.
Eight Reserve units andNational Guard unitsreturning from ODS toV.A. services in Oregon.Branch not reported.
N=55No gender specified.
No 4–9 monthspost-PGW
Interviewassessing war-time stressors.Variablesincluded: familyseparation, directexposure,indirectexposure, andemotional stress.
Correlationalstudy examiningvets on post-PGWphysical andpsychologicalsymptoms.Examined changein symptoms afterdebriefing.
IES; GHQ;MaritalSatisfactionGlobal Rating
75% of entire groupreported post-PGW stressand personal and familyadjustment difficulties.Post-debriefing reportedsig. decrease in PTSDsymptoms, anxiety,depression, and socialdysfunction and a sig.increase in familyfunctioning.
Haley & Kurt,1997
Examined thepsychological andphysical symptomsreported by vetsfollowing the PGW.
Members of the 24thReserve Naval MobileConstruction Battalion.58% retired fromservice; 42% still active.
N=249
No 3 yrs/7months post-PGW
Bookletmeasuring war-time exposure
Descriptive studyexamining theprevalence ofhealth problemsin PGW vets.Factor analyzedreportedsymptoms.
Standard sur-vey measuringsymptoms, wartime exposure,andpsychologicaldistress (scalesincludedAnxiety, PTSD,somaticSymptoms,Health con-cerns).
70% reported serioushealth problemsattributed to war; sixmedical syndromessurfaced explaining 70%of variance. Traumaticstress subscale was notelevated in any group ofvets with the reportedmedical syndromes.
Em
pirical R
esearch C
on
cernin
g Stress and
PT
SD77
Utopia Utopia Bold
Table A.1 (continued)
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
Iowa PersianGulf StudyGroup, 1997
Compared deployedand nondeployed vetsself-report of symp-toms and illness 5 yrsfollowing PGW.
Stratified sample drawnfrom 4 study groups(PGW regular military,National Guard/Reserve, non-PGWregular military, andnon-PGW NationalGuard/reserve). Samplestratified for age, race,sex, rank, and branch.
N=3695M=91%White=91%Age < 25=91%
YesN=1799
5 yrs post-PGW
Military ExposureQuestionnaire;deployment asproxy
Between-groupstudy comparingdeployed versusnondeployed mili-tary personnel onpost-PGWpsychologicalsymptoms. Notdeployed to PGWas a control group.Stratified randomsample withproportionalallocations.
PCL-MIL (cut-off 50); BSI;PRIME-MD;CAGE
PGW military personnelsig. more PTSD, depres-sion, chronic fatigue,cognitive dysfunction,bronchitis, asthma, fi-bromyalgia, alcoholabuse, sex discomfortthan nondeployed PGWmilitary personnel.National Guard/reservereported more chronicfatigue and general healthproblems than regularmilitary.
McCarroll et al.,
1993a2Examined and com-pared the prevalenceof PTSD symptoms inPGW vets who han-dled human remainsversus PGW vets whodid not.
116 vets who handledremains were from Armymortuary Affairs Co.The 118 vets who didnot handle remainswere from army unitshandling logistic func-tions. No branch speci-fied.
N=234Males=84%
YesM=110 F=8
3–5 monthspost-return toU.S.
Recovering andidentifying deadallies and ene-mies.
Between groupstudy examiningand psychologicalsymptoms in PGWvets who handledremains and PGWvets who did nothandle remains.
IES; SCL-90-R Subjects who handledhuman remains reportedsig. more intrusive andavoidance symptoms.Inexperienced workersreported sig. more symp-toms than experiencedworkers. Positive corr.between number of re-mains handled and PTSDsymptoms.
78Stress
Table A.1 (continued)
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
McCarroll et al.,
1995a2Examined the rela-tionship betweenhandling human re-mains on subsequentPTSD symptoms.
55 vets who handledremains were from ArmyMortuary Affairs Co.The 56 vets who did nothandle remains werefrom army units han-dling logistic functions.No branch specified.
N=55Male=84%
YesM=52 F=4
13–15 monthspost-returnfrom PGW(follow-up)
Recovering andidentifying deadallies and ene-mies.
Between groupdesign comparingPGV who handledremains with PGVwho did not han-dle remains on thepsychologicalsymptoms post-PGW.
IES; SCL-90-R Sig. differences betweengroups on IES scores at13–15 months; Sig. de-crease in IES scores at 13–15 mo. Sig. higher IESscores for PGW vets whohandled remains. Sig.pos. corr. between ageand intrusion symptomsfor exposure group.
Perconte et al.,1993a
Examined stress levelin survivors of a mis-sile attack before andafter treatment inter-vention. Comparedstress levels with agroup of survivors whodid not receive treat-ment intervention.
PG quartermaster unithit by missile.
N=25Reserve troopsMale=84%
YesN=8
During PGW(2 monthspost-missileattack 4/91)
Missile attack (onsite; guard duty;nondeployed)
Pretest andposttest between-group designcomparing PGWvets receiving de-briefing with PGWvets not receivingdebriefing in aunit-based pro-gram.
MISS (cut-off107); BDI;SCL-90-R
On-site group sig. higherMISS and SCL-90-Rscores; F sig. higher BDI,MISS, SCL-90-R GSI atpre-Treatment than M.Sig. reduction in symp-toms post-Treatment. Nochange in symptoms fornondeployed post-Treatment.
Em
pirical R
esearch C
on
cernin
g Stress and
PT
SD79
Utopia Utopia Bold
Table A.1 (continued)
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
Perconte et al.,1993b
Examined war-relatedpsychological distressamong PGW vets fol-lowing PGW.
Community sample ofArmy, Navy, and MarineReservists. 126 activatedbut not deployed; 26deployed to Europe; 439deployed to Persian Gulfcombat theater.
N=581Male=88%White=91%
YesN=152
11 monthspost-PGW
Deployed versusnot deployed.
Between-groupdesign comparingdeployed PGWvets with nonde-ployed PGW vetson psychologicalsymptoms follow-ing trauma expo-sure. Examinedvariables of gen-der, race, andprior combat ex-posure.
MISS (cut-off107); BDI; SCL-90-R; MilitaryHistoryQuestionnaire
Sig. effect of deployment.No sig. effect of race; Sig.interaction effect of raceby deployment for MISS.Gender effect sig. forMISS & BDI. Sig. interac-tion effect for gender bydeployment. F sig. higherscores on MISS. No sig.effect of prior combat.
Sloan et al.,
1995a2Examined the effec-tiveness of theRorschach in detect-ing acute PTSD symp-toms in PGW vets.
Volunteer Marine re-servists all identified ashaving PTSD symptomsduring a general post-war debriefing. Troopsprovided security andprotected Iraqi prison-ers. No vets had priorpsychiatric history.
N=30All male
No 3–5.5 monthspost-war
No direct com-bat; Some reportseeing dead andwounded people.
Correlationalstudy examiningthe relationshipbetweenRorschach andMMPI-2 scalesmeasures of PTSD.
MMPI-2(various scales);Rorschach
Neg. corr. between PTSD(MMPI-2) & RorschachPTSD symptoms and in-dices of coping ability,personal resources, andpsych adjustment.
80Stress
Table A.1 (continued)
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
Sloan et al.,
1995b2Examined the effec-tiveness of the MISS-ODS in assessing war-related PTSD symp-toms in noncombatPGW vets.
Same as Above No 3–5.5 monthspost-war
No direct com-bat; Some reportseeing dead andwounded people.
Correlationalstudy examiningthe relationshipbetween MISS-ODS scores forPTSD and DSM-III-R criteria forPTSD.
MMPI-2(various scales);MISS-ODS(cut-off 89)
Of the 17 DSM-III-R PTSDsymptoms vets reportedan avg of 3.33 symptoms.4 PTSD pos. according toDSM. 3 of these 4 metMISS-ODS cut-off forPTSD. Pos. corr. betweenMISS-ODS and PTSDsymptoms.
Sloan et al.,
19962Examined the effec-tiveness of MMPI-2scales, and the IES indetecting PTSDsymptoms in non-combat PGW vets.
Same as Above
N=66All male
No 3–5.5 monthspost-war
No direct com-bat; Some reportseeing dead andwounded people.
Correlationalstudy examiningthe relationshipbetween MMPI-2scale elevationand elevation onIES.
MMPI-2(various scales);IES; WSI-ODS(War StressInterview-ODS)
71% experienced 1 ormore symptoms of acutePTSD for at least 1 mo.post-PGW. MMPI-2 scalescores and IES scoreswere sig. corr. with PTSDsymptoms.
Sohler et al.,
19921Interim report of on-going study examiningthe psychological se-quelae on PGW vetsfollowing the PGW.Examined variables ofgender, deployment,and pre-PGW combatexposure.
National Guard/Reserveunits in North CentralFlorida. Branch notspecified.
M=397F=110
Yes 6 monthspost-PGW
Deployed versusnondeployed;CES.
Between-groupdesign comparingPGW vets de-ployed and notdeployed on psy-chological seque-lae post-PGW.Gender, unit, andcombat exposurewere also as-sessed.
IES; Prior warexperience;SCL-90-R (GSIscores)
Deployed had higher IESscores than non-de-ployed; F higher IESscores; Sig. interactioneffect for gender by de-ployment (i.e. higher IESscores for deployed Fthan M); Experienced vetsreported sig. fewerintrusive thoughts; Freported highersymptoms. CES sig. corr.with IES.
Em
pirical R
esearch C
on
cernin
g Stress and
PT
SD81
Utopia Utopia Bold
Table A.1 (continued)
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
Southwick et
al., 19932Examined the devel-opment of traumasymptoms over timein two reserve units.
New England NationalGuards randomly se-lected from medical unitand military police unit.
M=65F=19
No TwoAssessments:Time 1=1month post-PGW;Time 2=6months post-PGW
CES Longitudinalstudy examiningsymptom severityover time in tworeserve units.Examined effectsof gender and unitstatus.
MISS (cut-off89); 17-itemPTSDSymptomsScale; DSTQ(Desert StormTrauma Quest.)
MISS=3 PTSD pos. at 1mo/4 PTSD pos. at 6 mo.;PTSD Scale criteria= 8PTSD pos. at 1 mo/7 at 6mo. Pos. corr. betweenscores on MISS, CES, &DSTQ. No unit or genderdifferences. Increase inMISS but not PTSD scalesymptoms over time.
Southwick et
al., 19952Same as Above Same as Above
M=49F=13
No 2 year follow-up (2 yr/1month post-PGW)
CES Longitudinalstudy examiningsymptom severityover time in tworeserve units.Examined genderand unit effects.Compared medi-cal and policeunits.
MISS (cut-off89); 17-itemPTSDSymptomsScale (DSM-III-R); DSTQ(Desert StormTrauma Quest.)
At 2 yrs MISS=6 PTSDpos/DSM=8 PTSD pos.Medical unit had highersymptoms. Hyperarousalhigher at all 3 time points.Increase in intrusivememories and reactivitybetween 1 mo. and 2 yrs.Decrease in irritabilitybetween 6 mo. and 2 yrs.No gender differences.CES sig. corr. with PTSDsymptoms.
82Stress
Table A.1 (continued)
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
Stretch et al.,1996(also Marloweet al., 1994)
Examined the preva-lence of PTSD symp-toms in active and re-serve deployed PGWvets and active and re-serve nondeployedPGW vets followingPGW.
Active duty and re-servists from PA andHawaii who were as-signed to Army, Navy,Air Force & Marines.Subjects were eitherdeployed (1524; active715; reserve 766) or notdeployed (2512; active1576; reserve 948) toODS.
Gender not specified.
YesN=2512
Mail survey; 2years post-PGW
Deployed versusnondeployed.Self-report ofstressors.
Between-groupdesign examiningprevalence ratesof PTSD symp-toms in activeversus reservists,and deployedversus nonde-ployed to PGW.
IES; BSI; 17-item PTSD al-gorithm de-rived from IESand BSI
Active duty=57 deployedsubjects PTSD pos. (8%)/21 of nondeployed PTSDpos. (1.3%); Reservists=70deployed PTSD pos.(9.2%)/20 nondeployedPTSD pos. (2.1%). Sig.corr. between stressorsand PTSD symptoms.
Sutker et al.,1993
Examined the rela-tionship between warstress and physicaland psychologicalsymptoms followingPGW in activated de-ployed and nonde-ployed troops.
Army National Guardand Army Reserve.Troops were distributedacross air reserve, medi-cal, and infantry supportspecialist, air ambu-lance, tactical fighters,maintenance, and quar-termaster.
N=215M=82%F=18%
YesN=60
4–10 monthspost-ODS
ODS-SES(divided groupsinto high and lowexposure).
Between-groupdesign comparingdeployed (highand low exposure)with nondeployed(no exposure) onvariables of post-ODS psychologicalsequelae.Compared PTSDpos. with PTSDneg. on personalcharacteristics.
BDI; STAI:ODS-SES; HSC;MISS (cut-off97); PCL-MIL(PTSD check-list-militaryversion)
High exposure group re-ported sig. higher MISS,PTSD Scale, BDI , anxietyand anger scores than didlow and no exposuregroups. High-exposedgroup sig. more difficul-ties sleeping, concentrat-ing, nervousness. Genderand race sig. corr. withPTSD.
Em
pirical R
esearch C
on
cernin
g Stress and
PT
SD83
Utopia Utopia Bold
Table A.1 (continued)
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
Sutker et al.,1994a
Examined the psycho-logical, physical, andpsychiatric disordersin Army reservists whoserved war-zone graveregistry duty in sup-port of ODS.
Army reservists of the35th Member ArmyReserve Quartermaster.
M=21F=3
No 8 monthspost-returnfrom PGW
ODS-SES; Open-ended assess-ment of most se-vere trauma ex-perienced atODS.
Descriptive studyexamining theprevalence of psy-chological, psy-chiatric, physicalsymptoms in armytroops who dealtwith remains 8months after re-turn from war.
Questionnaireassessing phys-ical, psycholog-ical, psychiatricvariables; BDI;SCID; PhysicalSymptomsChecklist;Anxiety-State;State-Anger(STAS). PTSDdiagnosis basedon DSM-III-R(SCID).
46% PTSD pos.; 91% ofPTSD pos. were clinicallydepressed (BDI>10), 85%of nonPTSD were notclinically depressed. AllPTSD pos. had elevatedphysical symptoms; 77%of nonPTSD had minimalconcern about physicalsymptoms.
Sutker et al.,1994b
Examined and com-pared psychologicaland physical symp-toms post-PGW inPGW vets who weredeployed to gravesregistry with PGW vetswho remained state-side.
Army Reservists as-signed to 3 quartermas-ter co. that providedsupplies and logisticsupport; 40 were de-ployed to graves registry.
N=60Female=8%Hispanic=98%
YesN=20M=95%
12 monthspost-ODS
Graves RegistryDuty Scale; de-ployed versusnondeployed.
Between-groupdesign comparingPGW vets de-ployed to gravesregistry with PGWvets remainingstateside on post-PGW psychologi-cal sequelae.
BDI; STAS;STAI; SCID;PhysicalSymptomsChecklist;Graves RegistryDuty Scale;MISS-ODS(cutoff 97).
Exposure group reportedmore current and lifetimepsychiatric disorder thannonexposure group.Exposure group greaterPTSD symptoms, higherBDI, STAS, STAI, & physi-cal symptoms checklistscores. 53% of PTSD caseshad concurrent psycho-logical disorder.
84Stress
Table A.1 (continued)
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
Sutker et al.,
1995a2Examined and com-pared the prevalenceof psychological symp-toms among militaryparticipants in war-zone exposed andstateside duty.Examined gender andethnicity between ex-posed and nonex-posed.
PG war-zone exposed(n=653) and statesideduty troops (n=259).Included Army, AirForce, Marine, NationalGuard, and reserve unitswho underwentpsychological debriefingpost-PGW.
N=912Female=13%White=63%
YesN=259M=83%F=17%
within 12months post-PGW
ODS-SES Between-groupstudy comparingwar-zone exposedand stateside dutyon psychologicalsymptoms post-PGW. Examinedgender and eth-nicity.
BDI; STAI;STAS; BSI;HSC; MISS-ODS (cut-off97)
Sig. more depression,anxiety, and somaticcomplaints for deployed;Minority sig. more symp-toms of depression; F sig.more somatic com-plaints. No main effect forgender and PTSD;Interaction effect genderby ethnicity for PTSD. 10–12% deployed PTSD pos.
Sutker et al.,
1995b2Examined and com-pared PTSD pos. andPTSD neg. subjects onthe availability of per-sonal and environ-mental resources.
Troops assigned toMarine, Air Force, Navy,Army Reserve, andNational Guard unitsdeployed to combat inPGW. Sample derivedfrom 1432 troops de-ployed as part of ODSwho underwent psycho-logical debriefing within1 year of return.
N=484M=88%F=12%
YesN=97M=87%F=13%
within 12months ofreturn fromPGW
ODS-SES Correlationalstudy examiningPTSD pos. vetswith PTSD neg.vets on personaland environ-mental resourcesavailable.
BDI; SCL-90-R;MISS-ODS(cut-off 97); SSQR;WOC
PTSD pos. vets reportedsig. less satisfaction w/social support, less familycohesion andexpressiveness, moreavoidant coping, self-blame, and wishfulthinking than PTSD neg.vets. No gender infospecified.
Em
pirical R
esearch C
on
cernin
g Stress and
PT
SD85
Utopia Utopia Bold
Table A.1 (continued)
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
Unger et al.,
19921Examined and com-pared PGW vets withNational Guard vetswho remained in U.S.on post-PGWpsychologicalsymptoms.
PGW vets followingreturn to Rhode Islandfrom deployment toPersian Gulf andNational GuardServicemen (NGS) whoremained in U.S.
N=85
YesN=51
Upon returnto RhodeIsland fromPersian Gulf;time notspecified
CES; deploymentas proxy
Between-groupdesign comparingdeployed andnondeployed re-serve personnelon post-PGW psy-chological seque-lae.
CES; SCL-90;MISS-ODS(cut-off 89).
Differences between NGSand PGW vets on CES,MISS, SCL-90-R (7 of 9scales). Of the PGW vets,50% under enemy fire sawsomeone killed; 75% feltin danger of being killed.Of PGW vets, 50%moderate-severeintrusive thoughts andavoidance and 35%nightmares.
Wolfe et al.,
19932Examined the rela-tionship between gen-der and psychologicaloutcome following ex-posure to war-zonestress.
PGW vets
N=2344Female=8%White=84%Mean age=30
No 5 days follow-ing returnfrom PGW
Survey(traditionalwartime activi-ties; nontradi-tional wartimeactivities; non-war-zone de-ployment experi-ences); Laufercombat and ODSexposure scales;self-generatedcategories.
Correlational de-sign examiningthe relationshipbetween exposure,gender, demo-graphics and sub-sequent psycho-logical symptomspost-PGW.
Ft. Devens ODSReunion Survey(exposure;psych. andphysical symp-toms); MISS(cut-off 89);BSI; Demo;DSM criteria.
F 9%, M 4% PTSD(MISS>89); F reportedhigher MISS, GSI PTSDcheck list. No gender dif-ferences for exposure.Gender, demo. (educ,marital status), Laufer ex-posure scores, ODS factorscores explain 12–17% ofvariance on (BSI, GSI,PTSD, MISS) outcomemeasures.
86Stress
Table A.1 (continued)
Wolfe et al.,
19962Examined vets re-sponse to deploymentduring ODS.
PGW vets.
Time 1:M=2136F=208Time 2:M=1687F=162
No TwoAssessments:Time 1=within 5 daysof return;Time 2=18–20 monthspost-deployment.
Same as above Longitudinalstudy examiningthe prevalence ofPTSD symptomsover time in PGWvets.
Same as above No gender differences forexposure; F. higher MISS;30% in clinical sig. rangeon BSI. Increase in reportof exposure and PTSDsymptoms from Time 1 toTime 2. Exposure, gender,avoidance, social sup-port, & family cohesionexplain 15% of variance inPTSD symptoms.
1In Rosenheck, Robert, et al., Returning Persian Gulf Troops: First Year Findings, West Haven, Connecticut: Department of Veterans Affairs, March 31, 1992.2Data presented on the same sample.
Em
pirical R
esearch C
on
cernin
g Stress and
PT
SD87
Utopia Utopia Bold
Table A.2
Empirical Research Concerning Stress and Other (Non-PTSD) Health Problems
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
Baker et al.,1
1992VA Report,Chap 7
To evaluate clinicalneeds of PGW vets inan Ohio VA outreachprogram.
Convenience sample;N=325; Reserve andGuard troops;All services:
male=74%white=87%response rate=66%
No 2–5 monthspost-PGW
Self-reportsurvey ofmilitary andPGWexperiences.
Cross-sectionalsurvey;Needsassessment.
IES;BSI;MISS
Combat-exposed troopsexperienced higherlevels of distress on BSI,MISS and intrusionsubscale of IES.
Brandt et al.,1997
To examinepsychiatric problemsof PGW surgicalpatients evacuatedfrom theater forcombat andnoncombat-relatedproblems.
N=161;All services:
male=88%white=66%
YesN=51 of 161whoexperiencednontrauma-relatedprocedures.
During andafter PGW
Admitted tomedical centerfor traumaticincident duringPGW.
Medical recordsused to establishdiagnosis.
Frequency ofAxis IPsychiatricDisorders
Trauma associatedw/greater likelihood ofAxis I disorder.
Ford et al.,1
1992VA Report,Chap 10
Evaluation ofpsychosocialdebriefing programfor PGW vets andfamilies.
N=55 help-seekers;Guard and Reservists:
male=70%age=23–55N=40 PGW vets,others deployedelsewhere.
No 4–9 monthspost-PGW
War StressInterview;Self-report.
Cross-sectionalsurvey;Self-reportbefore and afterdebriefing.
IES;GHQ;Maritalsatisfactionand familyrelations.
Symptoms appear toabate after debriefing;No differences in GHQor IES between troopsdeployed to ODS orEurope.Slightly higher IES due toreadjustment stressorsrather than ODS stress.
88Stress
Utopia Utopia Bold
Table A.2 (continued)
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
Deahl et al.,1994
Examined the effectsof psychologicaldebriefing following atrauma (PGW) onsubsequentmorbidity.
British soldiers servingArmy war grave service;N=62
Yes20 of 62
9 monthspost-PGW
Recovering andidentifying deadbodies of alliesand enemies.
Between-groupstudy comparingdebriefed andnondebriefed onmorbidity.
GHQ No difference on GHQscores between debriefedand nondebriefed;Health problems morelikely in those whoperceived a life threat.
Haley andKurt, 1997
To determinewhether symptomscan be explained dueto multiple chemicalexposures.
Convenience sample;N=249;Reserve constructionbattalion:male=100%response rate= unknown
No 11/943 years/7monthspost-PGW
Self-reportedexposure tovarious risksand self-reportedsymptoms ofcognitiveimpairment.
Self-reportedsurvey ofexposure andsymptoms;Factor-analyzedreportedsymptoms.
Self-reportedsymptoms
Combat stress not relatedto 3 syndromes;Symptoms linked toother exposures.
Iowa PersianGulf StudyGroup,1997
To compareprevalence of self-reported problems indeployed andnondeployed vets.
Stratified randomsample of 3695 active,reserve, and Guardtroops:
male=91%white=91%age <25=91%response rate=76%all from Iowa
YesN=1799M=91%F=9%
5 yearspost-PGW
Deployment;militaryexposure quest.
Epidemiologicstudy; self-reported.
Prime-MD;CAGE;BSI;PTSD-Checklist;SF-36
Deployed had higherprevalence of selectedmental and physicalhealth symptoms andsyndromes;Reservists more chronicfatigue and alcohol abusethan regular military;Most PGW exposuresrelated to medical andpsychiatric conditions.
Em
pirical R
esearch C
on
cernin
g Stress and
Oth
er (No
n-P
TSD
) Health
Pro
blem
s89
Utopia Utopia Bold
Table A.2 (continued)
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
Kizer et al.,1995
To assess nature ofsymptoms reportedby a National Guardunit that includedpersonnelw/unexplainedsymptoms.
Unit w/high rate ofunexplained symptoms;N=59;
male=90%age=23–59(mean 39)response rate=36%–78%
Yes;N=3927Some fromsame unit,others fromsimilarunits.
12/94–3/95 All served inPGW; self-report measureof variousexposures.
Comparison ofthoseexperiencingsymptomsw/vetsfrom same andother units.
Standardizedinterview andphysical exam;13 chronicsymptoms.
Target group reportedsymptoms of non-specific origin;No organic causedetected;5 of 13 symptoms weresignificantly greater intarget group: chronicdiarrhea, other GIcomplaints,concentration problems,trouble finding words,fatigue.Exposure data notpresented.
Labatte andSnow, 1992
To assesspsychological impactof exposure to intense“friendly fire”incident during PGW.
Targeted sample; N=56;Active-duty Army troopsinvolved in ground war
No 9/914 monthspost-PGW
Self-reportedcombatexposure.
Self-reportsurvey
17-itemchecklist ofsymptoms;primary focuson sleepdisturbance,alcohol use.
29% still had nightmaresand 38% reportedincreased alcohol use;Personal injury moreimportant than exposureto dead soldiers incontributing toadjustment problems.
McCarroll etal., 1993a
To see if exposure tohuman remains wasrelated to elevatedPTSD scores.
N=234males=84%
Yes(118 of 234)Deployedbut did nothandlehumanremains.
3–5 mos.post-PGW
Handledremains in GulfWar.
Comparison oftwo groups.
SCL-90-R No differences in SCL-90-R between groups.Significant differences onIES.
90Stress
Utopia Utopia Bold
Table A.2 (continued)
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
McCarroll, etal., 1995a
To see if soldiers whohandled war dead hadlater symptoms ofPTSD
N=55male=84%
YesN=56
13–15months post-PGW
Handledremains in GulfWar
Comparison oftwo groups.
SCL-90-R No differences betweengroups in SCL-90-R.Significant differences onIES.
Perconte,1993a
To evaluate treatmentof intervention forsurvivors of missileattack.
Quartermaster unit hitby missile; N=25;reserve troops:
male=84%response rate=80%
YesN=8 of 20
3/91–4/912 monthspost-missileattack
On-site duringmissile attack;War stresssurvey
Treatmentw/control groupand pre-postbetween-groupdesign.
BDI;SCL-90-R
On-site group hadgreater SCL scores pre-treatment, but notdepression.Exposure severity linkedto greater distress.
Perconte,1993b
To examine level ofpsych. distress amongPGW veterans.
Convenience sample;N=581;Army, Navy,Marine Reservists:
male=88%white=91%response rate=95%126 activated but notdeployed; 26 deployedto Europe; 429 deployedto PGW
Yes 11 monthspost-PGW
Military HistoryQuest; unitsrank ordered bywar-stressexposure
Comparison ofdeployed andnondeployedtroops.
BDI;SCL-90-R(GSI)
Distress higher amongdeployed.Among deployed, distresshigher among females;No race effects;GSI and MISS but notBDI scores increasedw/war stress rank order(units with more combatstress).
Sohler, 19921 To assess thepsychologicalsequelae of PGWservice;Examined gender,deployment, and pre-PGW exposure.
N=507;
Reserve and Guardtroops:female=21%
N=288 PGW deployedN=199 not activated
Yes 7/91–9/916 monthspost-PGW
Deployed versusnondeployed;CES
Between-groupdesigncomparingdeployed andnondeployedvets on healthand self-reportedpsych./physicalhealthsymptoms.
SCL;IES
Deployed report higherIES than not deployed;No differences on SCL-90-R.
Em
pirical R
esearch C
on
cernin
g Stress and
Oth
er (No
n-P
TSD
) Health
Pro
blem
s91
Utopia Utopia Bold
Table A.2 (continued)
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
Stretch et al.,
19952
(also Marloweet al. 1994)
Examined self-assessed physicalhealth of PGWveterans.
Active duty andreservists from PA andHI; included all services:
deployed=1524nondeployed=2512
Yes 2/93–8/93 Deployment;Self report ofstressors
Cross-sectionalsurvey;Self-report
Checklist ofphysicalsymptoms
Deployed troopsreported more physicalhealth complaints evenafter adjusting fordemographics.
Stretch et al.,
19962
(also Marloweet al. 1994)
Examined self-assessedpsychological healthof PGW veterans.
Active duty andreservists from PA andHI:
deployed=1524nondeployed=2512
Yes 2/93–8/93 Deployment;Self report ofstressors
Cross-sectionalself-admin-istered survey ofpsychologicalsymptoms
BSI;IES
Higher BSI (4%) amongdeployers;Relationship is weak withcontrol fordemographics.
Sutker et al.,1993
Examinedrelationship betweenwar stress andphysical/psych. symptomsfollowing PGW inactivated deployedand nondeployedtroops.
Convenience sample;N=215;Army NationalGuard/reserve troops
YesN=60 of 215
4–10 monthspost-PGW
ODS-SES Between-groupdesigncomparingdeployed (highand low)w/nondeployedon psych. andphysical healthmeasures.
BDI;STAI;Trait AngerScale;HSC
Deployed w/highexposure had higherdepression, anxiety, andphysical healthcomplaints thannondeployed;Deployed w/lowexposure reportsymptom levels morecomparable tonondeployed.
Sutker et al.,1994a
Examinedpsychological,physical, andpsychiatric disordersin Army Reservistswho served graveregistry duty in PGW.
N=24;Army Reservistsassigned toQuartermaster unit:
male=21female=3
No 8 mos.post-PGW
ODS-SES Descriptive studyexaminingprevalence ofself-reportedhealth problemsand diagnosedpsychiatricdisorders.
BDI;STAI;Trait AngerScale;HSC;SCID
Body handlers hadelevated physical andpsych. symptoms relativeto civilian norms;55% diagnosed w/currentAxis I disorder.
92Stress
Utopia Utopia Bold
Table A.2 (continued)
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
Sutker et al.,1994b
Examined impact ofgraves registrationduty on psych. andphysical symptoms.
N=60;Army Reservistsassigned toQuartermaster unit:
female=8%Hispanic=98%
YesN=20 of 60non-deployed
12 mos.post-PGW
Graves RegistryDuty Scale
Between-groupdesigncomparingdeployed andnondeployed.
SCID;STAI;Trait AngerScale;BDI;HSC
Deployed body handlershad higher incidence ofPTSD and somaticcomplaints.
Sutker et al.,1995a
Examined prevalenceof psychological andphysical symptoms inPGW vets;examined gender andethnicity indeployed/non-deployed.
N=912;Reserve and Guard vets;All services:
female=13%white=63%age=29 (8.4)
YesN=259non-deployed
Within 12mos.post-PGW
ODS-SES Between-groupstudy comparingwar-zoneexposed andstateside vets.
BDI;STAI;STAS;HSC
Somatic and psych.symptoms higher amongdeployed troops;Females significantlymore health complaintsthan males.
Sutker et al.,1995b
Compared PTSD pos.and PTSD neg.subjects on theavailability ofpersonal andenvironmentalresources.
National guard unitsdeployed to combat inPGW. Sample derivedfrom 1432 troops whounderwentpsychological debriefingwithin 1 year of return.
N=484M=88%F=12%
YesN=97M=87%F=13%
Within 12months ofreturn fromPGW
ODS-SES Correlationalstudy examiningPTSD-pos.subjects withPTSD-neg.subjects onpersonal andenvironmentalresourcesavailable.
BDI;SCL-90-R;MISS-ODS(cut-off 97);SSQR;WOC
PTSD-pos. subjectsreported sig. lesssatisfaction w/socialsupport, less familycohesion andexpressiveness, moreavoidant coping, self-blame, and wishfulthinking than PTSD-neg.subjects.
Unger et al.,
19921
VA Report,Chap 8
Examined physicaland psych. symptomsin deployed and non-deployed troops.
N=85;Reserve and Guard vets;No demographicsprovided.
YesN=51 of 85
Upon returnto RhodeIsland; timenot specified
CES;Deployment asproxy for stressexposure.
Between-groupdesigncomparingdeployed andnondeployedtroops.
SCL-90 Deployed troops hadsignificantly higherphysical and psych.symptoms except fordepression (somatizationnot clear).
Em
pirical R
esearch C
on
cernin
g Stress and
Oth
er (No
n-P
TSD
) Health
Pro
blem
s93
Utopia Utopia Bold
Table A.2 (continued)
Study Objectives Sample ControlTime of
AssessmentExposure
Assessment MethodologyOutcome
Assessment Relevant Findings
Wolfe et al.,1993
Examinedrelationship betweengender and healthoutcomes followingwar-zone exposure.
N=2344;Active duty Armytroops:
female=8%white=84%age=30 (9.2)all deployed
No 5 days afterreturn fromPGW.
Laufer Combatand ODSExposure Scales;Self-report.
Correlationaldesignexaminingrelationshipbetweenexposure,demographics,and symptoms.
BSI;MISS
Combat and ODS scoressign. related to BSI/GSI,MISS and PTSD; self-generated stresscategories were notrelated.
Wolfe et al.,
19962Explored patterns ofreadjustment at twotime periods post-PGW.
Time 1: N=2344Time 2: N=1853response rate=79%
Follow-up ofparticipants in Wolfe etal. (1993)
No Time 1:within 5 daysof return toU.S.Time 2: 18–20mos. afterdeployment.
Self-reportcombatexposure.
Same as above Same asabove
30% scored in clinicallysignificant range on BSIat Time 1;Significant correlationexposure and MISS;More health problems insubjects who exceededPTSD cut-off at Time 2;Combat exposure reportsincreased over time.
Wolfe et al.,
19982Examined therelationship betweenvarious exposures,including combatexposure, and bodilysymptoms.
PGW vetsN=2119
Follow-up ofparticipants in Wolfe etal. (1993)
No 18–24months post-PGW.
Laufer Combatand ODSExposure Scales;Self-report.
Multipleregressionframework (seeabove).
Healthsymptomchecklist
Combat and ODSexposure scales positivelyassociated with symptomscores in univariateanalyses. Relationshipbecomes nonsignificantafter controlling forPTSD symptom scoresand other measures.
1In Rosenheck, Robert, et al., Returning Persian Gulf Troops: First Year Findings, West Haven, Connecticut: Department of Veterans Affairs, March 31, 1992.2Data presented on the same sample.
94Stress