appendix f pump test calculations

APPENDIX F

PUMP TEST CALCULATIONS

resr DATA SHEET NUS CORPORATIONPROJECTNAME. W tf.4/~ov*«_ MEASURED WELL MU tJ&tPROJE<GEOLCOISTAISTATICTIMEP

TIME

Ml

>

•

J

CTNO. /in.OS DATE: /-/fi-e<f PUMPING WELL: MlU/ICC,KilST: KAALj, 0ftfr«/r , JftfdLL } /fltG*w«. CHECKED: faX &-'V*«t/ TEST NO JTYCE FROM PUMPING WELLfft.Hr):.MjO LEVEL (fURGE START (

(t)MINSINCE

f?»**MPNStfiB>OR

STOP

fl-.0O.BS0,5-00.75"A O/.<?5"A,T0v. 75-.6P.r3.O3.r

- y.ot.SS.oi. o1<0B.o/0. 0i2.0

-.15.0'8.0a j.o^r. o2>O.O35.0VO.OV5 0

LMjJ:PUMP SETTING. FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT. OO

A<«3^ MONITORING POINT: To P OP Cft JC5RSTOP(L.J: ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL): V0 V. /O

WATER LEVELMEASUREMENTS (ft )

KCAOING

9.3V30.7r3/-183P.c?2,35. 8V335^— '- —

3*5"?3r6y3 .P3y.?&375?5! r

38. 0t.<?o

</(J 96/ *? yV3. t>LW./OVI .10Yff. o50JLCJ

• l/

53.73". 3A

s5"t it57 ie

cbmicnoN

A/A

v

'•- .

/

OTW

A/ A

. i

\

'

/

(ft.)

O-OOI.HI2.1{.483.50^25

• ——

5.35-L \&^8^7.5C * 0(> >C^ O" /

9.52.K> LLI'l'.-lSL/?.&&V.21/V 7n.~>Liq.5<e

36.9 "22. toQy.s5. aCN i . 5 Aj Q ^

PUMPINGRATE

GPM

.-

9 . oH

;~ ..

.0

7 oq

8.8Z

REMARKS

P5 •'»«* •OTllJe fvx •-;P P Tfjr r

•.

•-•' . •

S<frl •«/•• JJ>,-

.55x1 erf.?3.r,

1 ' .

•*-• •

_

S5*i </, 3Jj*c

^5«/e 3vy«t

4R.30.1I8J

PUMPING TfST DATA S H E E T ' NUS CORPORATION

(PROJECT NAME: i, J u. ±* * y »a.________________________ MEASURED WELL: /•/<> CPROJECT NO.: /1/7-Q3 ' DATE: l-g»8V PUMPING WELL:GEOLOGIST: /TAfru, l^gALJL.Qg ie»/r. rHcCrfWu* CHECKED: \f. UL- »S-f ^ TEST NO _DISTANCE FROM PUMPING WELL(ftM'):_______ PUMP SETTING.*FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT: STATIC H2OLEVELffc-M^I; a^3V" ' MONITORING POINT: TO/*TIME PURGE START OR STOP ft-i- /tW7 ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. abov* MSL):

TIME (t)MIN.SINCE-PUMP

WATER LEVELMEASUREMENTS (ft.)

KCAOIN6 COMEaiOfl OTW

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPM

REMARKS

AlAr 50.4V 8-5-730.63

4 o.o7O.O86.0 3HJO

8.571 OO.& 3'5/t/ -. .*

JZO.O33 3C,

33

V8O-O 70.61

t>770

67 rt 37.78/ soQ.Oa r 3530IS" 2V.35VO \X

. JU

AR30II22

)

^ — I

.\

. ~.,,,,,.« tt*t **m *nctt . , •, * ;;J NVS CORPORATIONPROJECT NAME: tJ W«-f>i.*c«- j£.<ftwA«-fw*«kft * MEASURED WELL: //0£.PROJE4GEOLCDISTAfSTATICTIMEP

TIME

^

••

037

r

CTNO.: fin 01 DATE: /-/g-$"i PUMPING WELL: //O CKSIST: ff f., if ALL .fOcCft-Av f« t CHECKED:»iT»i/£-.'%-S':O TEST NO- /tfCE FROM PUMPING WEOffLkf): „_ ,_.H20 LEVEL (fURGE START (

(t)MIN.SINCEPUMP

START ORSTOP

*yfS- °6f407.o8,0

to t>i2.0/f o/g.oPi 6<? r. o-3C.63^0VO. 07*5" °5"o O515". 060. O7tf.o^0. Otfl.O

LHU:,, O1 .k/ Tot»«i 7 • i3RSTOP(tJ: 7DH7

PUMP SEHING.'FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT: O.2OOMONITORING POINT: ToP o fAS/ 6ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL): IK**. ' °


«£AOINC

A2.301.75/:/./l60. 4tr .t >57. ^7.0X&.$?>&ro5/7*1JA53.VcP. ^V£.-?£V.T.l*/3.St' d • o /

^/ \ f /

v .733C). /Jfix-o37.je?6y

•

co acN

N

\

ft

>

/

OTW

/\JA

>

V/• ' ••• I

jJJiQyQr

C&ECOVER(ft.)

33%^ . 1J].g£T31 39t,303 -$$C\ / • f^ J

^i ' J C^

<3V- /fe^[.76•*0.98i*i.if/7.V175.85"/V.12.33./ .2>DU.it/6.579J tog.ov7.1

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPM

• •

• " '

"

REMARKS

P3 So* y

~ •

•

• - . ' -- ••

-*

siofpj 4/t*

* .

lit •A'R30IJ23

L ' ' ! ' i .. - • •

AR3Q||'2I»

PUMPING TEST DATA SHEET NUS CORPORATION

PROJECT NAME: _.. V.H, +/»»yt*. >________________________ MEASURED WELL:./ uJ //3 &PROJECT NO.: /J/7.02> '/ZOO-l DATE: /-/S'S*? PUMPING WELL:_ .'.**!*/ //£ OGEOLOGIST: KAftl^ Kt6lX,OO***rt.WcCf"~->- CHECKED: JfcT*-< "V jfrO TEST NO.(STANCE FROM PUMPING WELUft.Mr):__*_fi2___ PUMP SETTING. FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT:iTATIC H20 LEVELfft.MQ: .3ft. SS row MONITORING POINT:_____Tfl**JS

[TIME PURGE START OR STOP (to): ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL):

TIME

/o^-7

•

J

•

\

ti

(t)MlN.SINCE

STOP0.00 2ft .JC)

0.7$"/.o-AJ57. 50

1.1$,50P.53.03V.D^ 5^0

.07.0go/ ). o'2.;5". o/8 0p/ 635.030. o35. 0^0.0-VT.O


n*w

/JAr

'

.

,

•'

i

V/

COKREaiON

(J

-

t\

,

t1

1 . '

•1 •

-

1

i

f • .\/

OTW

AM

f

i

•. ' ; I ••

i •• •

c . ••

i -4,

REC&VERY(ft.)

0. OOOOO0 CO0 oo0,000.006 °°0.00Cx. OO0 • Cl0.000 00o oo0 000 00&.OQ0 oo0 00p.oc-0.07_0-OV0.016,10O.lbO'/i().300-3 1O.wfc

PUMPINGRATE(0)GPM

^ ,

••-

.. JM • wn j

REMARKS

P% 1 °^ &

P«/**,k*v*r ~

. -

'. • ••

• • . ' . ,

•

i j y§

PUMPING TSST DATA SHEST NUS CORPORATION _

CTNAME: UVtiVnow**. MfA5uR£DW*LL /TluJ //3&PROJgCTNO.: /f(7-03 -/Ad(?*^lCS OATE: '/-I8-91 PUMPINGWELL: /w^//6«« "GEOLOGIST: KTVn. KT3* i Tft>. Ort£ CHICKED: *3* -t •<•M" > 'TKT NO X* >^DISTASTATIITIME!

TIME

.

£e

NCEFROMPUMP1N(CHjO LEVEL (ft)(lo)>URGE START OR ST4

(OMIN.SINCE

o.e>5y. oto. o70. o9o. o<?0.0

v .c?//o.o720.0/3o 0/V0.0/j5o. o/7d. o'Bo.oHo.o^W.O"530,0o>W. O

370.0-PSf.")3a>o3/5.0

tOJ^v,

0 o0.2 C0,£OO.75AO

3WELL(ft.)<r): „ . , , , , PUMP SETTING. FESTBSLQW MONITORING ffUHT.' jfA.4: »? o- SH

apft.»: yo-fTMONITORING POINT: TdWS C»U&r * .A/A

•

.

j

CORRICTION-

A/A

1ir

|

. 1

•VN/Ar

^ X

OTW

A/A

_

.

5 "

.

.

i

*

S/

X/A-;

V/

O.SbO.loS6.-)£0.95A /VA 33A5-*A7X/.nJ.O-V-'3:3S

'.•yr< .763^13.15*Itfi3.87^ 3yf

V.68.g-75.05

5.//4". /•/.£/•/

' .//5. //

PUMPINGRATE(Q)

"» fltttf

REMARKS

pA<jf (Po-t ?*

•

, •*"••

d

V^

1 126

L

X

A


PROJECTNAME: UMi+»»*y*4. MEASURED WELL AlW H3« ,.,PROJEi•OLC•STAf

prfTATlCTIMEP

TIME

J

'

•

)

\

n'NO.: /$n.t2» ' 3QO-V.CA DATE: /-/g^fii ;r PUMPINGWELL: /nn/*ioc ..*(GIST: KTiTf) (<"S<. 3>0,5/rtJC CHEdCEO:* *- - - TEST NO fJCE FROM PUMP1NCH20 LEVEL (ftKSe):URGE START OR STC(OMIN.SINCEPUMP

START ORSTOP;.2rA TO

7"7<T2.0P 3.O3.5V. 0£ff

5.°4.07 o8.0/o.o/2 0/S.o7'8.o

. ^; o2".oO.O3svo/o.o.0

5oO55.0fcO 070.0So.o

iWELLglfftWrt-0-8M

>P(t,):

PUMP SETTING. FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT: /y*A -7.,MONITORING POINT: T"tf A*/iG«/CCC fELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. ibove MSL): "

WATERLEVELMEASUREMENTS (ft.)

READING

AS!A

i

>

(

COMREaiON

AjA

- \

• \

/

OTW

A/A-

••.••

V

'

1

/

^6".» \5.11-£T. ,-35. i i5.K5. /V5,r/^J if)

^J • / *

5,/fc5.1*7* 1 ?

5;!*" 2 i •v • t I

r.ivC.2-Ce 1-)^ lgS. 2.*5.305.305,305 8£, Vj5.2V5 '5,/y5,0-7

PUMPINGRATE(0)GPM

t

-

>

'

•

REMARKS

• i

. -

'

.,u wnoui i//

PUMPING TEST DATA SHEET

PROJECT NAME. (UM,*~ov«-PROJEGEOUDlSTASTATITIME!

TIME

CTNO.:DGIST: f<:Ttf ."5fo, S/HINCEFROMPUCH2O LEVEL (f>URGE START 1

(t)MlN.SINCEPUMP

START ORSTOP10 O/oo. 0110. 0/20.0/ Jo.omoU O.o100.0

.

i

'

MPlNGWELL{flXr):tUui: 30.9«yDRSTOPCtJ: /Otf-?

NUS CORPORATIONMEASURED WELL- /yiKJJfJA -k

DATE: /*/8'BY PUMPING WELL- m»i 1/ftC. -=*c Xf" CHECKED: kJT«t -i3-S-| TEST NO ^ >^

PUMP SETTING. FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT: A/AMONITORING POINT: Tn^OSi)Joc •>SELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. abov«MS(J:

WATER LEVEL. MEASUREMENTS (ft.)

READING

MA

'

%/

-. i_

.

*

COR«aH3N

AJ/V

X/

,

OTW

K

V

JA

/

. '

«gp.y. f3*/. 814.fe7V» 'S'L— •*//c*3. S33.0

%

PUMPINGRATE(Q)G?M

• - .

.. jw v •— . - •• ': WHO

REMARKS

P5 V»f &

* i

. x^,

• • . ' " '

.

/"^v^

• •u II 28

CORPORATION :'.; DArEUSerfr RLENa

O.tt

800 0.63

ve,

83

- *.

IIs

4"— HV*""

gggBgJlsl ggj ^

__ pIf

—»__...» .. . . • -»*—--^ _ .; v

........ . . • . . ., . •. . -, , . »... .. . . . . * . .• c - • • - • * - - - - - -

,.

PUMPING TEST DATA SHEET

PROJECT NAME:_PROJECT NO. :_/•EOLOGI$T:_J_S

LJlJf4**t«y£ft_$n.o3 /aoo luesf , ff*6. nTW . 6^f

NUS CORPORATION ,

MEASURED WELL: *v/DATE: /~/8 -f?1 PUMPINGWELL: WW |

CHECKED:*^*- •'?•'£/' TEST NO.:

/to 6 -*110 C --S~ •">

\

1 si'

1

f.

ji ^

.(STANCE FROM PUMPIN1STATIC M2o LEVEL (ft.)(io)TIME PURGE START OR ST<

TIME

01-7

>

•

•

•f-. •J

//33k

(t) MIN.SINCE

o7R00

o^<o.so0-75-/ 0

/.zr/.sol 7S«P a5^30

j.'i* •V.o

~ ' U f

s*407.ogo/O. 0

»2.e/5.6

/e o£i oar c3o.o.3ff:»'VO.C

V5-.0

3 WELL: o

IftMrt:

3P(U: /<H-7

PUMP SETTING. FEET 6ELOW MONITORING POINT: /V*MONITORING POINT: 7TU*>3(Wc6a.ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL): «"


READING

M4

.'

-

N/

CORREaiON

MA

\X

,DTW

A/A

"

\

'

X

RECOVERY(ft.)

OOOO.oo6OOO.OOO.OO

0.60

O 00O.OO

O 00

O 00

0-00

O.ooO.oc

Oo f0 Of

001.0 Oi0 01.0 0^O 03o.ov00^

o.oe'o./x./*,0.16

o.ir0.31

PUMPINGRATE(0)GPM

-

-.

./

•

• 0*1

• iREMARKS

t

^

- '

-

•

-~

t\ f • .-v .

• Ml H»i^U I t J(

PROJECTNAMS: uJrt.'«V m<»v«& MEASURED WELL: *tl/J JJ0 &a«aPROJiGEOUDISTASTATKTIME!

TIME

•

CTNO.: /II1.03 i /3iOO-3L,C> DATE: /-/S-S*! PUMPINGWELL: /WW//dC^*JOGIST: CHECKE-D: Kr«u^-ra-Sr> TEST NO JT . "il-NCE FROM PUMPINCHjO LEVEL <ft.)<*o)'URGE START OR STi

(t) MIN.SINCE

^ »- p"

v<"S". 0£a,o7o.o|o.o9o.o/oo.o//o. o/2«. o/30.0/ro.o/.&»"7o.oJ 80,0/9o.o3 >&*oaso.oiVO.O,3 70.08 .03oojo3i5:«EptO^fA

do.OKO So6 7</ <5

3WELL(ft)(r): ^ .d- PUMP SETTING. FEET BELOW MONITORING *HNT- tJ& VO T«c.

QPft-1: /OT 7MONITORING POINT: A/ i OwceAJ > :irrELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL): • -'

WATER LEVELMEASUREMENTS (ft)

READINO

NJ.A

>

• '

/y OA^NA

\^

CORRtatON

A/A

\

•

/

fc

iOA

V f

OTW

A/A

\X

AJA

^f

*&'0.380 «*fO.s-i0.67fl 83/.Of1 21l.io/.&/£i^?oyC* ' 01 v

j / Q

P. o3J2.3.53.96./4H T)>f.o5.3/

\f. 7

S. l>1_p* | ^<^ » O T^?

^.bftS.MSV)

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPM

v

.

REMARKS

Pa.'i'«* '- ' ' •••.''.

*

.

i j

'

-

i\ /

flR30l|32

!\

^

PUMPING TEST DATA SHEET \ NUS CORPORATION .}

PROJECTNAME; U> Hi^/^*v«U MEASURED WELL: /HW 110 fi •• -_«PROJE<«OLCySTAf

riTATlCTIMEP

TIME

-

J

•

\

•*~* F'

rrNO: /fn.ov /aoo*3ccs DATE.- /•/$•£$ * PUMPINGWELL: *»«J//0£ .>*fc>GIST: ICTK , tffVY CHECKED: !*S*-fc-'~--t>T TEST NO: . /* ^JCE FROM PUMPING WELL*(fft.»f ri: ^ , fe '.H20 LEVEL (fLKfo):URGE START OR STG

(t) MIN.SINCEPUMP

START ORSTOP

1.35Arci.lt5.003.<Jog.fV.oY'S.o.0-7.0^0/o.oil-Otf.o;g 0

Pl.o;r.o3o o3 .oVo.ov^. o50 05-T 0A .o7o.ogo.o

5t8.oCIPIUI:

PUMP SETTING, FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT: AM . _MONITORING POINT:. T*M«Doc.eo_ ;ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL):

WATER LEVELMEASUREMENTS (ft.) <

READING

AJA

^

'

.

/

CORREaiON

MA

\f

&TW

Al

.

-

,.v

\

^/

f

tP&J pr^^OVERX

<f<6*?f.fcV5:70,<•?()•ATI"£".7/.72.r. sJ,7y5.-7S<£,7k5.775.7vJ8 i5.8 </5.885".l/5".,ci74 014.64.07.06.1 1Ll 1L.ML.io4.01

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPM

i

•

flf

REMARKS

.....

*

'.'

,• .-

.

^Of f ITJM

PROJEPROJEGEOUDISTASTATHTiMEf

TIME

•

CTNAME: LOttJ-V-ioyaJL „, , MEASURED WELL: /»}vtf//*$N«CTNO.: 1$I7.<H ' <)0d*3LC<j[ DATE: /•/£-£? , PUMPlNGWELl: MvJl/OO Ti*MIST:- ' CHECKED: US-*-. O-'J-y.6! TESTNO.: £~ -^NCC FROM PUIHjO LEVEL (fHJRGE START <

(t) WIN.SINCEPUMP

START ORSTOP<?oo/oo.o//o o/ lo.O/ 3o. o/vo. o/5o.o/CO. 0

/7o O/PO o

—

WRING WEUi-lfU: ^

(f»X»)- a3.<? PUMP SETTING. FE8T8ELOW MONITORING POINT: ** \?ft*^ MONITORING POINT: TVljtvjii/tf/i ^

SRSTOP ): /ovl _ ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL): "« 'WATER LEVEL

MEASUREMENTS (ft.)

READING

MA,

" '

•

CORRECTION

AM-

DTW

A/A

.

J ^ Q

(ft-)

6.6?•5". 975.9o5". 82.—5".t2>—

£.ii— ~ .

5.a*b

^

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPM

~

'•

— — w-

REMARKS ^ '

.~4

• -

--'

. ' •

mi IHL ———— -

!»•

>

;

CORPORATION DATE

30.0

50

ft>0-c>

CLIENT ——— ' NO. . BvSUBJECT -

SUJL A^AU A^ia^j gftB...y

/eo.o 7.90

/IR30II35

-I

i!

_. I. . . . . . . . ... ...... I .... - . . . - , - ,* . . . . . » » .... -. .

^*" • * *

"" ' • AR30II36 „

,.,*-. ***** j/tctf NUS CORPORATION

PROJEaNAME: UN! +-.*>,#i: H* ' ^ MEASURED WELL JPROJEGEOLCDISTAJSTATICTIMEP

TIME

J0V7ill

f?$Iffl?9*>!?&XbH®\ltf\H?tr#j&'t&iMIILK'%<;*7zo

)r

CTNO.: l$»7.«5 DATE: ///B/t9 PUMPINGWELL: /Htv///0C'-«IST: KAAL / O CtfT / kfiiAa. r c * CHECKED: K" 6- - ' V:1« TEST NO 3 3 ^^CEFROMPUf:H20 LEVEL (ftURGE START C

(t)MlN.SINCE

_«UJMPS tOR«fo><a5*/4.oti.cqt.oMJ.O

izr.o;?9.«/9T.OZif.62T5.0

wr.d3of.c• RectxJt3»/.ofg.o^8. 6 .7..0

v

•-

PlNGWELLtftKr):LMtJ: 'S.Ot

72.3'r«c_

SRSTOPftftJr ^/OM7

PUMP SETTING. FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT: tj/A .MONITORING POINT: 77? P OPC^£inJC *ELEVATION OF MONITORING pOiNT (ft. above MSU: _VfJ. ftt*

WATER LEVEL *MEASUREMENTS (ft.) (

READING

H.QI*i4. 1-7 ?/ml .H II'Ri 3/•/ »3/4 ;v>v n/•y r?/*/!«?im/S 5iv (S/y 23/V 24/*/ 2V/</2t

•

CORRECTION

MC^

*-

\

J

i

/

OTW

A/ft-

N / •'-

' . i

»

RECCWEim^ M^ ^

o.o•0.110.0ST^05*0 670 010 08o n0 IIO.IV0. It6, no. 170 »8O »8o.ao

-

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPM

1 •

-

''

'•

REM'ARKS V'"

. -;aa,*:'.!*

ti4we*ti-t>M£-'-±'.r:.;.;>i-t'

i _ -a]

2.

?* ' ' ,

?^?«

•

-

f *.

. JU .. • - •

AR30.M37 n

PUMPING TEST DATA SHEET NUS CORPORATION^ PROJECT NAME: fA/H:4>**»**A. MEASUREBvVfi,^ n? A *FPROJEGEOLIOISTASTATKTIME!

TIME

id r>Mlf

hlli/&$></i;/7/.U&/<?$ifr*I3&\V\IffitSP

,

CTNO.: I$17.Q3 DATE: /-/8-81 PUMPINGWELL: '/0 C t.OGIST: K>J4w / SdAtt., oft w- , 1* * C,,.-._ CHECKED: fcT- - <**- SI TEST NO /T .?/-NCEFROMPUCH20 LEVEL (f»URGE START <

(t)MlN.SINCE

<J,0

1I.&

V6.a&/. 0

"7 -7. a90. a/O9.d171.0

ur.o/9KaZtl.a\«/4.o7* i. a

!

*

MPINGWELI«n»- , f£

tJfl.Mrl: „„. PUMP SETTING. FEET BELOW MONITORINGWIMT: A//I " ' ,'•iCi.S' MONITORING POINT: T&P O£ CAS/A/C, ' ~ >»-

Dft STOP (to): /d>«/7 ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above'MSD: VT .TJ-WATER LEVEL

MEASUREMENTS (ft.)

READING

/S.tS"/r.9xj5L r

**V 1 / ^^

• * ^ fc J

/Ibfe;?.7aJ5.->"7/J.-J2./f.fcfe/S. ->i/5.7V/5. 75

•

«*.

...

CORREaiON

.16

,

DTW

If. 7k

' • -••

RECOVERY(ft.)

o.oo.n0.10o,n0,/Z001f).\\O.IZ0,01o,o\0.0g0090,/V

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPM

•

REMARKS " '

.. lijj

faitce. %xj« t "•rf'Siot-g.- tJ-.f ' *^

A'tofe* N-1cf&5 -**4•;&.

W&c* cuexci* 3'fi ,

•:ifel

J

1 __________ SI7 ' ' .-f

\

- —— -

-• -• ——

jfi

}

1

~. |

flR30H38

PUMPING TEST DATA SHEET NUS CORPORATIONJI

A

\

PROJECTNAME: LlU.'+meYft. , MEASURED WELL: / 47 6PROJEi-t0LCJTAf

JICTIME P

TIME

/4o / OO-IUS DATE: ///«/ 61 PUMPINGWELL: //O »GIST: f T«n /yfc /UV.J K CHECKED: Kx*. f -S6* TEST NO: 4" .JCE FROM PUfH20 LEVEL (fURGE START C(t)MlN.SINCEPUMP

START ORSTOPoo0.50/.OO/.SoP.O.-.0

.

j

'

h/IPlNGWELLLMU:, 7/ '<

lft.)(f): _. ___ PUMP SETTING. FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT: w^a&1 MONITORING POINT: TOP 6t CMi«/e/

5RSTOPCU): / 0«i ,„ ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (h. above MSLl": V.V.V5"WATER LEVEL

MEASUREMENTS (ft.)

READING

//•87H&-In.%1//.8// 8<//.87

.

•

CORREaiON

-

• .

•

DTW

/ '

1

.•

,

(f)DDOrgCM&D

(ft.)

0.0'0.0Oo-o.l-01o.o

«

PUMPINGRATE(0)GPM

\

REMARKS

ffl-SCoAE„ t

• • '

• i

• • '

•

,

-

v

1 '

-

** •-

.*,„ HHUUI i jy

PUMPING TEST DATA SHEET NUS CORPORATION ^PROJECT NAME: vJ*fr«, f <-*li* MEAiURf O Wfit ,71*- L1 ]PROJCGEOLOISTASTATITIME!

TIME

1 <*09

t

'CTNO.: {*>n-o~*> DATE: /- '<- 7 PUMPINGWELL: lt*£ vJDGl$T: rC;i .< j*~Z«.~T-o CHECKED: l«icfr-fi-p<t TEST NO.: Yf" • / -'tNCE FROM PUMPING WELLlft.Xr):. . .„ ____ PUMP SETTING. FEET BELOW MONITORING5 POINT: -w lod "" )CHjO LEVEL (1'URGE START

(t) MIN.SINCEPUMP .

SJARTOR

d. 00

1.0

1.0

«..«

/d,a20.*W^.O

6/.0•

-

FLW Ir ??-|? MONITORING POINT: JftP Of c ASXXJV-. >^OR STOP (to): / Oft ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL): V^|tyr.

WATER LEVEL.MEASUREMENTS (ft.) <

READING

7_?.T91. 4l?.,6

Z1.99ll.«f

L . r«v.d<,

!«/.'?

*

CORRECTION

*./4

-•/t

-J4'-.It,• • »

-. » c.- Ifa-.It.

f

.

OTW

s a2380339093Q-La 3.31•P3.S15 H354.01

• -

JilDOOrJECOVER7"

(ft.)

Q*QQ-^)oi-0 ol.0.000-000 010. //o. a&

• •. -

.

.

•

PUMPING) RATE

(Q)GPM

-

REMARKS -v..

(JSt+t*, Oopffn. • ~ v

CO ,A,PCTI»«J OUf 4-o^ • — •«*

popp*/t SHdii .IV. — *.— .

• —# , .- .

-—•

\-'

V

X

1

••in AR30IUO

-.,.....«, NUS CORPORATION

J

w_l

\

MQjEcriUMEr:~. sry*av?* " MEASURED WELL: /«/PROJE*GEOLCDiSTAfSTATICTlMEP

TIME

)

-TWO.: '-:•, :ffn.Q2> DATE: iX/I/ftf PUMPINGWELL: /f~> //«£KStSTr JftSifcL . tf&Attj 6(l\ iJT. / cC/,« .CHECKED:1«kS*-.<S''*v''<5 TESTNO.: _THCE FROM PUMPING WELLf h KD: , ,_ . ._ . ' PUMP SETTING. FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT: -f6- t«OM20 LEVEL (*URGE START C(OMINSINCE

(TART OR

O.ftA

'O'.f

1,0

/.r.01.0

*t.or. a .6 .0«.»/*.e1 Z • C,r.eit.eZ'.o? f D

~c«. •*>5!o/6r e

tMM:. .,.,/*?.20 TdC MONITORING POINT: T«>f OP 'ASr g3R5TOPfL,»: ' /* ' ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL): V**.H


READING

/ .3t»\Gi. 3k/ 3L/*» ?<i*5 $L\°i 2>4/<; K.lt[«i 34rt-n19.34

- --

-•.-

jcj.3)<j.3i

• \ -•

•

CORRECTION

*** / /Lv * 49

• . ?

-./L-.-it*-. It,' .It,- . / 1-./fc-./t-//•t-. / (o

'•

t

- /(*- . Ib

'

OTW

/ •*tO7 .20y?.26/ *? . 7. o '/9.ZO/<j 207<MO/<f.to/ .zoH. 20/*?; z o

/f'po/ ./

RECOVERY

..6:06.00.00.00.00-000O.OcO 0aoO.o

00^?oy

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPM

•

REMARKS

Uil f ,™fc*-.,c*»

I»OP*-

popiV* S«*« ./fe *-?

1

- ' . , •«.

• ' . * ' •

'..

. • -^

, • * • '.'."-

-

: -

••• .

•

AR30II

rwn*/™<j*fi.>/ UAIA MltT - / ~ NUS CORPORATION

PROJECT NAME. UJH.-fvnay* . MEASUHEOWELL: tl\'A-PROJECT NO: />/7-d5 OATE: /-'8-9^ PUMPINGWELL: /lot *GEOLOGIST: k"4A<-. OSLltNT. KtAU.. flVC rt*-***. CHECKED: f*S»<» C*MS- S6! TECTMO- ITDISTANCE FROM PUSTATIC H20 LEVEL (iTIME PURGE START (

TIME

/C"*7, r

tin/)52>|90J01*'15P&1 /5"/a &/3//053|1lA/75-x/jp:Jjf

(t) MIN.SINCE

m}R

0-0i«/.aH<».0i3.oyf.o«?.aM/.dMf.O

l?9.o/wv.d136.0?il.d^HS.e• -7 0

Say.a

MPINGWEL!HU:

JfLXrl: ^ /*«' PUMir.. ? MOA

P SETTING. FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT: AJ/A 'IITORING POINT: ^>P t>^ CA>s»**q V J-

pftSTOPtto)- ' 7 ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (h abov* MSL>- WH.tO


READING

/6.831-7.1*2.l..f<?1 J__ QMKf V* O C?

/688/490/69//t.?o/4. 1/£.<fl/fc'jr/ / Q w

/fe»9VIn 0 0

/6.98

•

CORRECTION

-.,4

B

DTW

lt. 4

RECOVERY(ft.)

0.0(9, 13c^. Ot).050-04TO.ot007O.Ob0076^\ yj

* \r lO

O.IT0. ndP, / /O'yv0./5

PUMPINGRATE(Q)G?M

•

. .' >

'

-v

REMARKS

Pofire-l 4/afi-L-/^ se»*£ tj*c-ft./>Mf0# */y-6Ptf J*

. .. '• :

«

'.\ J

' • -

-

^ j j.\~

•*'•*

•¥

r*---

•

^r

k

PUMPING TEST DATA SHEET NUS CORPORATIONSj,j;.-« ~ • i,. i:.i-*.i.- f, • - ... ..._...,.- -. • - ~- •i*3* S&&Bfl

3IIAM£r --Kr1Clr'f->n.v*»1t MEA5ll«f D WFu Al W//<1 A "-fPiM)JECTM.r, , ,, 'il.6,3 '. ,, DATE: /-/B-0"} PUMPING WELL: W l\t t IOCS*!*GEOLOGIST: : . .ICAAL-. MtetfT. rtfa£r*--«- . K*At-C CHECKED; *. -*-<*-K«7 TEST NO.: **'JP"£&0<STAfSTATICTIMEP

TIME

/ t/7

)'/

"

/3J-

;^

4CEF«OM PUMPING WELLfftirrh n?"HiO LEVEL (ftURGE START C

(t) MIN.SINCE

STOP0.01*6_.<-»(fO

1'*IZ-O4-o*r>*+•£>^n-O^ >*^t-oSb'O

(r>t~'t>

*j2.07f.o•0

&&yi*>c+,*/-*.>.r .fiI7~>r

LMI.J:PUMP SETTING. FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT: WA ^^

n<lff f9tL MONITORING POINT: ~TXMiU.uC&Z *//jtoe T >>IRSTOPfu): tft«n ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL): A/4> - • --

WATER LEVELMEASUREMENTS (ft.) ,

READING*

W'btf\0.<c*>IO-UI

tt>>(,l\0<6t>/ o '5^/fi'5'&lO'Zl

!*'£*>/o.zr'o>?yss>'S£fo. Z 2>—

ID'Zf, .«r>I0-*t?

te-l'lIO-4C

i*.vzlyff

. * . , '

_

.1

CORREaiON

N

•

•

- ' • •

\

A

^

DTW

/VA

•-\

1

/

RECOVERY(ft)

o.oo0.01

f) .01

O -&ZO'Of

o-oS6 '&(?O'OIc-no *tft0-/o0 'II0'^^o-'30-Mo •/$-o -ye,0 •'<?Q.lZ

0-1 =5 'Z*/

• ' -

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPM

REMARKS >f*.'

A>A /-*t-v.. f*,- (*.'.'

*a*<.***<' .:• -/ >*>^f-**\w ~<,« .><

_

. • "

-

'

'

X

. - . ' ' •

. — .

PUMPING TEST DATASHEET NUS CORPORATION

PROJEPROJEGEOL<DISTASTATIiTIMEI

TIME

&$

CTNAME: tf*f »T*A *£'t> MEASURED WELL: M^-IO4 ft '•;CTNO.: ffl7-0> DATE: I~H>'B1 PUMPINGWELL: M*-/*«.£ HMIST: K«ALL/*AAL /O****** CHECKED: KTIC«,--Vi/q TE5TNO: 4 -LLNCEFROMPUMPINCH20 LEVEL (fL)doJ'URGE START OR ST

(t)MIN.SINCE

0.6

C.-LS

«.«r«.-7~

1.0

i.2ri.*«?.A7.r•3.f

: '* ~ '

4..-H

" r-0

6. -

c . - '

'1 • . .'.12.3If. 9-

'''t.C&

^1 Q

2 .30.03y ovo€>/ i.O•S& orfo4o 0

GWELL(ftHr):: I .Oi

PUMP SETTING. FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT: 6 J' iftf MONITORING POINT: TtWscWcfcfc /ToPdPfteJv'^—X

DP(u): /T?«?* ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL): V 83 .It ~ *WATER LEVEL

MEASUREMENTS (ft)

READING

MA

;

>/St.fcO

3 . 7Hi .blfl.ilm.sv/.oo^ .ogq« -a5/.t7yjt75fc.il57.1 15C| .OO.CZ

CORRECTION

tf

\

\/

DTW

/

•"'

/ - '

-•

>

-

f

(s)5p.0rRECOVERY

(ft.)

O.O

7. 7*73.17Y V3>f ii4.777.<rO-'/O

11.7 7/3 M^

/J.-J7>/t-.v^jn.i-o-'"i. S-i-Jferi-rOvi*». f?*. 5

ii k.*"«_d_l__ a BJ "V ^ ^ ^

r? a <* -»_ *•"

11.0."

1<..3f

3 .6*y^z>?y*w,a<?*S.k*«J(,.17*V>.19

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPM

-

.

.*t

REMARKS ' .-

pJrAf W»**l! 3$-—.

»»»*•

• ' - ,' — '

, .

•- ..

-i

'

-*S

USi*i*\ fi* 5c»/o«. .

• ,

'.

•

^J .•

•4 i IS

E£f>.

}'

/: L

j:

I;

A

PUMPING TEST DATA SHEET Wt/5 COKfUKAuup

PROJECT NAME:. :. UW»T>rip .>«»•••• MEASURED WELL: «vi U s /«. A '•":-%PROJEiGEOLC•STAfWIC

TtMEP

TIME

nvft

j*- ~

,

^

]|gfe

*TNO:: tfn.O* DATE: /-'fc-fl5 a PUMPINGWELL: rt~>tt±£> 5KilST: «C*Ac«- /X«At / OtLtfir _ CHECKED; K fo'- «*-«? TEST WO' -frJCE FROM PUMPING WELLffLMfl:H2O LEVEL (flURGE START ((X)MIN.SINCEIJMP

7OS60

too//6/20/ ) >fc jfcey

c.o0.3-TO.JOc.ir•/.o/•zr/ ^0a oa.raov.oC.fr4.0M)/(?.(?11. 0ib.o3LO.Oar.o30 04.0

LMc.1i /1 .64 T6CiRSTOPftfll: -/f Z%

PUMP SETTING. FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT: ^^MONITORING POINT: T P O C^lN&ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL): VgJ. 7 4


READING

b\ (.

r i tJCLrJoL . 1 13

•3.1 /63. r|3,72-6362.4,3 c,DATA

/ ,? ~ ffi if j) T *3

&$.&>{<J>\'<&>

bhot(eO,A/d

£Q ,&2.ly</' ^

5~7-%5&'*y$SSTftf5'si-^vYf'7/f5-*/-?i5"?S Y55'070?

T- 'f*}LC *o7/s-f^

COMEaiON

MA

.. , -.

' '

: -

,

•

,

DTW

A/A

..

\

•"

,

/

(ft.)

v ,y3.£"0 V5"/, fsi. IB51 . «^/,7S5"l. F ,

5/.905/.58^^-83^/ ji A A

^l O1 0 ^

l.-S0!St.t0!,"7

£J^ -O V

{fJL 4J 4.

/,55"3^5 ft37 (,0,33>SZ30.5 127.1 1SI /6*f/ , O4///. Yk8. osE . * i

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPM

REMARKS

Ps d** 3.

' . •

pj pc-C' ^««» 7o*.-,

1

1 1-1,-C

o—»

. 3

81?8

ii

. : -jr.- ; •• • :. i . . — .. . . •

- « ; : ; : : . ; - . ; • . •_ • • :

; : . (j;,j: !.; .'

. - • : • : : ; : . . .

i,..,_ ..... : . ;.. •,.; „ "•;•- ™

;"5-tf-Mw- •: : • : '»; : X*• . -. : *9 : • : : ^*

': - J> *:jMiaj" p ——

t: : . . • . r: • _

*»** <:rr -• «* •*

NUS

V

\

v

NAMir -hJ r-trAr ,.-^M. ;. „ _, MEASURED WELL- \Of, A .sPROJ CTNO. -- toftPT.S 3" ' "-••- H>i>^ "DATE: f//«/f-f ^ * PUMPINGWELL- (04* ;|GEOLO^ TA*

TIME P

TIME

fVtt

,-

;

y_-/1

GIST: *t<-LT/KAAL/tffe'r- -- CHECKED: ISK- 6" 'V r l TEST NO .: iId FROM PUMPINGH20 LEVEL (ftKSoJ-URGE START OR STO(t)M(N.SINCE

STOP

A.O

6.tf

*.€

e.lf'l.*\.*C

t.r•*..-»

;•..*•j. ••.

•••.••»'..r.>-„ .- • '- v

ir ..'

IV f

1 * . '•

1 9.6

T/.ete.o'10.0

>S".0*/o.oV<056.0S?*>&*.o

WILLCfLMr): .».•»**•

(Ph.): ipaPUMP SETTING. FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT: A/* - 1MONITORING POINT: 777? A A/5 CJcetL. .ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL): A/A -. *


READING

A/A

v

•

>

X

CORREaWN

A/A

,

f •

'

>

- - -

s

pTW

A'A

. ' •

" . • * . •

i .

• •:•

J

i

!i

i

. . ' 'ji*

is

RECOVERY(ft)

0.066.*0

e.te>0.6ft

6 .OO

d) 00

O.oL6 02.0 02,<> <?LO.'o?,0.03C.O1/0.0 (i

A 07rt.G*!•OiM_£.l*iO.ILO./CAi7o.d0.1 1O.df6. <-,770. ^

D.1I

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPM

'

//J

I3>.OH

II, \

.11. 1

/M

//. /

II. 1

REMARKS -3-

•PA^f 1 0-f 2,

«T^I •* V» s^cT . ' •

C ,.i •-. -5% »

•S—(./ i» r

«-•? . - -7« -w'«

&*| Z7i v, • •' '

5«*» i7irt

5c.i 'w 57 A...•

.

1f

;.

AR30!|l»7

rumrjrvu icji vt+ir* .»«**• . <•*«* «.w». v... ..._..

PROJECT NAME: UUrt-rfoVff'*- MIAiURED WSLL: Hi- A ^fPROJEGEOL<OISTASTATKTlMEf

TIME

-

)7Y3

flW

CTN0.1 f JI7.03 • DATE: I/I fr/*9 PUMPINGWELL:' IOC.6 H1G1ST: !<**».»./*<»*«<.> 0*'0>»'-r CHECKED: ta -C*-—**- 1 1 TESTNO.: 1 :<JNCEFROMPUMPINC:H20 LEVEL (ftXSo):>URGE START OR STC(t)MIN.SINCE

7«.«Jo. aq0 o/eo.dlld.O

LW.OJ3o..(•*• . e' 8<Lo\/C'/

0.0

O.2S

O.ff

0.75-

1.0

l.r

7.o?.rj.av..•T..-.4.0

<.0

la.o11.0

It. A_•;*i*.oJtf.o.*

iWELIfjIfLWrl: Ift.-T '1 ^K __

wxt /5aa

'PUMP SETTING, FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT: */4 ~MONITORING POINT: fAfol\ Dvctp. ' \ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL>: JA "


READING

N

V

A

-

,

t

•

<s

-

s

CORRECTION

/VA

\X

OTW

A/A

,

'

.f •

\f

^o.nd.-bLr

o.3fto.«/fld.Wlfl j| V _l

JM * *gU * T |

O.M S"

oo<ac?. dod.ooO.OO

0.00.

O.eoo.ooo.oo*.~ad.ddiJ.OO

o.oio.oi0,0:o. oio.oC.tf«p

a./*0.1*tf./

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPM

/0.7I

/6.7I

/-

REMARKS : T"

S?_i_-,« Mc; . .«.. .. • iJK

S jAt. l.'f J*t'

•

— -

PUM(. fl.- „ 2tt«>OA

———— J

^

• • ' ' ' -

^ -

b

IS

y

i*-* /x. _i * * 1

m-J-5*

L

\

<

" ^ * ^ P iilftfif £\ i"tfVj»4ftME ¥ fJ«t4if CIC - MEASURED WELL- /MuJ f ? rStiPROJECTlMO ^ dJ" / 00-3LC«i DATE: /-/f-RV PUMPINGWELL: WtA/jOfc^ig- OLOGisTr >" JCftAtt /tfftu. /Oftie^r CHECKED: wif-c v-ei TEST NO : 4_ >ii/ftTA»

TTATICTlMEP

TIME

'

',' '_-/""""

,.;

'-•

JCEFROMPUfH20 LEVEL (fiURGE START C

(t)MIN.SINCE

SYOP•O.o3t.3c>V4.oofcrao./30.0C

•

• • , > • .

. - • - •

PIPING WELLL)(fcJ:~' //•

ftt.Mrt: ._, ... PUMP SETTING. FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT: VA >-fi T<* MONITORING POINT: 7"O F Of f A: ft

)R STOP (t«): / <T Aft .. „ ,.. ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL): Vtf 7. J f • -WATER LEVEL

MEASUREMENTS (ft.)

READING

//.Y3//,yvy/.yy//.VVir.*fi

'•

-

• — • ,

CORRECTION

/J

v/.

• -

.

.

OTW

A/A

,/

•

• •

•

. . "

RECOVERY(ft.)

0 000.010 01tf.OI001

*

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPM

•'

H

t

-

• ' ., -'

aoonit* I'M • • •'•".•' . '•••**«!

REMARKS •«.?•*

! " •

'

• • • '

-w— ————f "if

PUMPING TEST DATA SHEET WUS CORPORATION

PROJEPROJEGEOUDISTASTATITIME!

TIME

>fir&

• '

CTNAME: tJM ,' 4- mov* A. MEASURED WELL: /WW-* *!CTNO.: AJ/7.03* /200-3uCNCfFROMPVMPINt?WfLL(fl.K'V PUMP SETTING. F6ST 86LOW MONITO«IN<5 PO'NT' AM\ ^CH2O LEVEL (i>URGE START*

(t)MlN.SINCE

RPORSTOP0.0J'o. oaa.o-.o.o7V. o/33.0

.

•

tMi li /3.Oft' foe MONITORING POINT: TOP o p t MI^A ^>jOR STOP (to): /-"A ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL): V 7. 82- '


READING

/3.0S/3. M/3.///3.U/3.»//j.//

«

CORRECTION

/VJA

\/

•

-

DTW

AJAx-

/

•'

(s)"o3orRECOVERY

(ft)

0.0Oo.oxo 02.O.->2-O.OL0.6 T.

'•

*

1

.

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPM

>

§

•

flR^n i t

REMARKS

/yi-i'csjc 4> ft.«*i.-j>

, ;>

*

'

, ^

LD ————————————

PROJECTNAME. /V H < f" rv> two t MEASURED WELL: US' «PROJE!GEOLCOISTAf•ATIC

^MEP

TIME

(PI*

•

>r

3NO.: //^7-6»> ••''• DATE: /*/7-ft8 PUMPINGWELL: Hi"$K5KT: -KOj, KTmf IfTlC^Sl^K CHECKED: *£»<-£- «Vfc>-» TEST NO: 'L.*CE FROM PUMPING WELLffLMr): >' /}/ fc. .HjO LEVEL (ft-Klo)URGE START OR ST

(t) MIN.SINCE

STOP

0.00.3S"O.Jfc0.7

/. 0

/ 1$/,fo2 0«?53.03 <rV-0.TO6.08.0/O.O/2 0/^ -

at t35.0"50 035.OV^ 0^ 000

.£fO60.070.0

: __ i. /9 TotDPILJ: OSIV

PUMP SETTING. FEtT BELOW MONITORING POINT: '••!«•'MONITORING POirELEVATION OF MO

WATER LEVELMEASUREMENTS (h.)

READING

Nk

^

,-

/— •

l\,H9->*~~

B^.YO</S,?0i.ziSS.13(j,l.y ^7 .r37g:se/.57f}.78f 3^ft*. (AtlJlft 07M.

CORRECTION

A/:

'

V

A

'

.

/

DTW

A/A

.-••

^

\

•

< -

(

•

/

RECOVERY(ft.)

O,O0/.*?s.173£t3°i7.OQ. •ft10.01) .°iiis.tI8.il*-•aa,—30i/3 .5/V3 Or4 753.75 .765. H-'61557as^7V. 5576.7177, 077.7878 .688060

IT: Tfc *r UCCL r/»r/^^>/r*A4h,NTTORING POINT (ft. above MSL) : W1. 1 1

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPM

/3.0*f

/ 3.0

/2.00

//.I

q 97<f. cj

<?.99

REMARKS

/oh; r»4 le.fi nw* ('

P.J/Af "JiE T »

5<fi£ 1 » 3 5^r

• • . .

5^ i ^ «..

jfe ws, rv\-ic«P«.

• 3A — — c ——

<?c,A\ cf 5l7iec

• *| Oj*c

5"c ,6 1 cf 30 jr c^

j4-|. 30,•- •

..lit

AR30I/SI

• - • • • • • • • - • • • - • - ' • • - - - • _ ' »._•* * *«*...„ -t w . •

PROJECT NAME: l*> H » + «*10Y*«. MEASURED WELL: //f *PROJECT NO.: /£ 77.03 /JOO-St-M DATE: /-/?'Q1 PUMPINGWELL: /XT* •?..GEOLOGIST: .,„,., flfr»7 , < J<> 3*6 .*«* CHICKED: *SX-fi"'*- t-«i TUT NO ^ t.BUTANCf FROM PUMPING W&u;ft.Wrl:STATIC HjO LEVEL «TIME PURGE START \

TIME

H5d(

/W«J

.* JM

(t) MIN.SINCEPUMP

START ORSTOPfio.o90o/0 o.o//O.O'i oiO.o' QO/ 5"O.o/60.0&(»#<*O.Oo.a£0.30d.75"t.oI.M/.SO;.o.TU-l,fV.d£.06-<!>g:0

/O.O/y 0/fe.Ojao30*0 •

IMiJ:PUMP SETTING. FfcET BELOW MONITORING POINT: -//d»'

-' T<X« MONITORING POINT: Td^ dC wrct CASi*4& ,QR^TOP^ 64 1\ ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft above MSL): <A?f . / -j


READING

V^.f/

90. B590.7"9/.009/.3177/.V3?«.779/.8t/)/)-/ a9/9fc*?.f/—6.47?**. t

• —0*2.1 v7 .707r.d5-7A"ilfc<?.560. 1 162. 3C57.37f 6 UVf it2 .701\ °&H.tO

•

CORRECTION

,NA

.y

OTW

fvj

• '

.

*

A

•

'•

(s)DDOrRECOVERY

(ft)

^ 7iJ?/ IbZ1.S-8*/.»/.:?ô??2, 2 V9V5&fiî tî9 tT79.5—77.VB75. iT—7105t^ 1 • *tJ •

_n Hfc • v% A

3.12.tO. 7^ • T? * ^^

5 .07V8./83C| ty3197i T.5/i y — * •*> M i

i.avi

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPMC7,99

-\

flR30

REMARKS

' ft.J 'fc-/

5<5A| «/ Oj..

;/j. *J A-xx./><2.-//ra

^

\

• - • ' V .•

IS2J2.

J

1

r»

:!

I

• - , . . . : . t— ... ..,..., .

faf • • ' = • -:- : : : > • : • • • • •: ' ' :<** : .'• ' ,':"'•'• '"• """• ""''• • ' ••"••. £* , . i . l . . .. • t ......... . . I

^ !!> c-"'; i ii ill iiH:.i.- i-

11• «r x • .-

r «;«-» i. w * • r. . - " flR30IIS3

rw<*<r.,.M «.-. —•• ..-..--- ,.wv vWArf-wrt^*,^

PROJ!PROJIGEOLlDISTASTATITIME!•_••»•»-•

TIME

O it

-

•

n£l

ICTNAME: 1-* Hi +**&y 1. MEASURED WELL: 117 $CTNO.: /Jn.OV DATE: /-f?-^ PUMPINGWELL: 1-tS & ,06HT: |<T/*. fr*K. <PO. *T* CHECKED: «<£-- »• ' *•*•* TE1TMO ^ AMCE FROM PL)CHjQ LEVEL (i>URGE^AJJT)•.•OBMBMBSB

(t)MIN.-SINCE*~-&uto?STARtOR

<o.o.rZ.o7.««/.o< a».rfo.otl.O»^.aIt.oIr.oVT.A2o.oJf.ovo.o5 .t*>*'ff*. 9

»0.d

Itfft.O

no */*:-•",_d

;

MPINGWELUftXr):ft.MiJ: 9.78

75"

DRSTOPft,): OV^

PUMP SETTING. FE€T BELOW MONITORING POINT: " J/AMONITORING POINT: fft 6(« ta»eit cAt.f^AELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL): 40. 3, "


READING

9.7fl9.?*/?.»<)f. V1. 9M.09ro.nid.iiid. ad/d.31

10.19Jfl.MIi*.«ar/tf.Y9/..--»i ^ * 3 &

§* ft _ *tf

ic-SC.IO.JT

/ •5?/d-60/"«6 n:£-•£-/»-6Z-

"

CORREatON

Nfv

,

. '

v

v

^

DTW

•isj ft

•

(S)l o)orRECOVERY

(ft)

fi.OOO.Qt

0.110,11,Q.1\0.3>](3.3(9.V5a*/ 90,550.(>o-O-t-ScO.tl0.70<X73l(3.7Vc9."76 180 •} q0.8iofc i6 Bt6.9Vo.ev

PUMPINGRATE(0)GPM

REMARKS

uett OPr<0 SAt*tc br P^WX'A)TC/IV/»t /*£

PM^lP>Oc» UifiC

^r.s-a^ - c-r».*#Ulcii ,^> tfturrr-t& PC** " Ck/^r bfpf*«*Vc**»' t.» c<" b&

v

^

fs

-/

J

r

s

•w

. *.... .,•.-.._.*-..,* _«cc< : -o- NUS CORPORATION

PROJECT NAME. ..PM^M f »T A. MEASURED WELL: IfffiPROJECTNO.: 1 J/7 0*. /2oOjl.C5i DATE: 1/1*7 /f 9 PUMPINGWELL: Mr/GEOLOGIST: K3X . *CT TPo S/K< _ CHECKED: 41*1-. 6»- 1 %•• W TKTfcio .3DISTANCE FROM PUMPING WELLffLHr): '7fiSTATlCHjOLEVgUf'TIMEPURGfSTARQ

TIME

I' T.

'

/——

•

.

/

(t)MIN.SINCEfutftiir/ "**«li!

V$TARTOR,

(1 fCc\fCO.ooo.r*\ .t>i.el.oi.rI.ow.tf.o6.5«.oW.A

11. C

if.oIt.O

J'.tf

j i". .*»

/*.*?«T.d

</C"<?

*Y ? • **

D(jJ: 9.7 'PUMP SETTING. FCET BELOW MONITORING POINT: AJ/*MONITORING POINT: T>* e r werci. C.A:I+)O>ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL):


READING

R* D/W.Crl'

Ift. to16.9*',.r rr

/O.fi'i

/d.r1C. TO

le.w'•e.tx•$T

/*>• ?//o.ivIO* '

10 *0 1

/a 'tf J•Iri -^1?-fii<?•**<? «>f.7<

CORREaiON

TA A/A

\

• - .

/

•

OTW

A/A

/

\

*

'-

/

RECOVERY(ft.)

0.BH6.8Z0.806.110.1$0.1S5.10. 10

O.(ei6.t,0o.ssO.V4,0.VOtO 3i 16.2.S"tO.ilo.nO,O£"^*os>.o "t6.0 /

.

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPM

• ,

REMARKS

• - -

-

-'

-.

^

•

MlAR30II5S

- . ' - . ' • 3 5

11'3

i!st

'Er-i i ;..v:. 1————r. . i r . . .

.. .• • 1- ;; c: r. : : ": -'h i- _.

Q «»«"•«*«d f * • i .- ,- ». -- ? S ' i . - - -

3

flft30Ii56

—

""" — 1

^

s

PROjrCTNAME.. (JHj4»*«*ftr- MEASURED WELL: H7 C •« iPROJECTNO.: rJn.O*} DATE: . /- /7-gf PUMPINGWELL: US' GGEOLOGIST: KTr^ / SfO /K*lC,Sm*C , CHECKED: t&K. «*-|-i"-fc5«i TKTNO iDISTANCE FROM PUMPING WELLffl.Mr)i».'7 tf 1'ATlCHjQ LEVEL (»

^MEPUR^fSTARTj

TIME

i

-'

J

>

^ }

Y

(t)M(N.-^SINCEJI WMPSTAR\OR\SIC»P

0.0r.tt^ ,<?(1.6

n.d?7'0<Jl<0bt.otlolol>oIZ.1 O

iYi-0

t

LMtJ: S*.ToekSTOPfUi: 0*1 ,

PUMP SETTING. FEJET BELOW MONITORING POINT: M/AMONITORING POINT: TCP «r <J£>CL CAS'ACrELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL): V 6 . SS~


READING

Ms.*,?*?. tT.J3

«.3l

«-2^•W

f-37

g-y^t

i--vvf-V7

1

CORRECTION

N/IV

\/

- • •• ,.

'•

DTW

A//V

*

N

- .

1 . .'

•

/

1

, ' ,

(»)D)DrRECOVERY

(ft.)

O.Of)OfOOH6 Of0 0^6.6 .D OkD.O6!D.IX6 /V0. /&6,1

••

PUMPINGRATE(Q)CPM

.

. . •

REMARKS

/ * 5t« t..

,

.III

•fl

rVMPINQlt*! UAIA Sflttl /VUJ> LUKfUitAIIUH

PROJECT NAME: Wf^ff /*>*«*«. MEA$U*ED WELL: I\"?APROJECT NO.: |jp * ' OATE: M*7-8$ PUMPING WELL: It J _.GEOLOGIST: I PO, KSKj.KTlC .$/«£ _ CHECKEO- R-t £..t*«-«A Tf?T*|O 30«TAN« FROM PUMPING WELUjft K')i 7 ' _ ,STATIC H2OLEVEL(iTIME PURG TAy

TIME

01 >2

l*«/2

••

(t) MIN.SINCE

,— «JMPxSTARTOR

O.o7.0q.

14. ft/;..'5. ?&S.03.0

/dy.dM-*• Hi •£r 5"<S.a—

•

FtVhft): /. fct Tbc*QBSTOPftJ: d-|l

PUMP SETTING. FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT: M/A ^5 MONITORING POINT: T«^ ar WaTLC C»2/>OC. \ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL): >T


READING

7.U7.69

1 L-7

l.-f-7.

7-7tf>T7/7-TO•?. -?0

•7. -70

•7 *?

•?.&<>

• •

CORRECTION

MA

•

\/

•

OTW

A/A

N s

'

RECOVERY(ft)

O.OO(L6001001003>0.01*1o orc o*f0.040040.0 T>0 03>

/ !

PUMPINGRATE(Q)C?M

•

'

REMARKS'

rtfl'Scooi

1

- . : . '

^

.

-.- • v^—— ±. ill

AR30I158

PROJECT NAME:._lh/fJi<f/ntfyrc. - MEASURED WELL: //£ 4 48$PROJECTNO.: fJfl.OV DATE: /'O-^g PUMPINGWELL: // O •*!GEOLOGIST: fffo. !VftK, K3X. KT^A CHECICED: fi^ V-'%-*2> TESTNO.: A v-i

, (STANCE FROM PUfUATlCHjO LEVEL (fi

VtEPURGE^A^!

L

•v

TIME

i>?/Z

i^

i~

(t)MIN.SINCEttlMP5IARTORSTOP

00£6. 0/ 20uO

"

•

/PING WELLLMU: .'

(ft.Wr)': -N-VB' PUMP SETTING. FEET BELOW MONITORING POINT: -wiSJ8 MONITORING POINT: Tc> ep tJccc c » Cf'v'

5R STOP tto*: ftQ » t . _ ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft above MSL): V^B .11


READING

3.18"!-iV•3.18

•

,.

.

CORREaiON

Nfft"\/

DTW

MA

\/

t

.

(sj DDrRECOVERY

(fl.)

cO.OOO.OtO CO

•

PUMPINGRATE(Q)/GPM

•

1

REMARKS , •'

X

•« IIIAR30MS9. '„

f(JMPltH» it±t UAtA ^fitti FHJJ \.\sKt'\jHAmjN

PROJECT NAME: frJtfi t-MoVie-ft. MEASUREDWfLL -1 ,*.PROJEGEOLIDISTASTATHTIME!

TIME

01'?

CTNO.: /W7.OV. • DATE: l/«7/»9 PUMPINGWELL: t If {J *06IST: KS'lCj. KflO.XT**; SAIJC CHECKED: - *Jt-» ** -' -Sft TE5T NO !iNCE FROM PUMPING WELUftXr):CH2O LEVEL (fL)(So):>URGE START OR ST<

(t)MIN.SINCE

'STARtOR

0.00

Q.1S

A.Sr\& *~ f i

1 • ^

MJ

i. :T?-.•»". ^--.-•:'.£•w.o•.o-.0

8.010.0

IX. O

Id. ftZd.A

?r.*3*.J>

3 .0V0.0

H .oSO.G5£ d60.07d O

4.'T<?t*'roc

5P(t.l: rt?/2

PUMP SETTING. FElET BELOW^MONMONITORING POINT: frtU-3 T

ITORING POINT: AJ/ATtA*)tb*erA. (

ELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL): - *//L ^


READING

^

\

^

,

/

CORRECTION

N

\

^

^

DTW

AJA

'

.

V,

'

y

^ •

/

RECOVERY(ft)

o. o0-000 «>t7'00

o-«>.O<?

fli-tf^

C>- CO

d?- ^e.ooc • t»-d>0o.ooG- OO

O OCt&.&0O>ooO'OiO.OI0 01O.OZ

0.03e.oiO.o«4o.oyo. os-00?0 06

PUMPINGRATE(Q)

i •

REMARKS

P<V 'lo ^/0p» 5 *4. 1108 'Slfei

. , , .

- ._

• •

•'••'• • /^

" •

J-

\

i> J II

AR30II60

j «-«««..«•»»••*« •—...-. «..»... tTvw \.unrvi\f* y\sn

^

^

' V

PROJECTNAME. k/tf ,f **7 •>•*- MEASUREDWELL "IPROJE*GEOLCPISTAIJATIC

JMEP

TIME

HSl

J

,

t -^

CTNO.: /J/7.<>2» DATE: l~/7*81 PUMPINGWELL: //£"£)GISt: KJK KfiQ.fC'T'n /*>"< CHECKED: kff\c£-i%-«e*3 TESTNO: «CE FROM PUMPING WELLfh.Kr): /_.'H20 LEVEL (ftKto):URGE START OR STC

(t) MINSINCEPUMP

STAfiJORSTOPS

&0.010.010V 0

MO 0/3iO.O'SO.oI SO -6/60.0/SecoifeAyo.oOJf.<f

0-7fAO/i$"/.JO3 opi"30U"•y.65.06. >.ro/o.c/i.O/C.oao.o

6.7?' "JVC>PIU: _^ll

PUMP SEniNG. F6ET BELOW MONITORING POINT: *//fcMONITORING POINT: 173* *UtELEVATION OF MONITORING POINT (ft. above MSL) *JA

WATER LEVEL .MEASUREMENTS (ft.) <

READING'

N/Ar

1 |__ 4fcrfW '

*

1

.*

-

1

s/

CORRECTION

A/A

\/

DTW

NA

v

1

*

S

Jtfr&VOrICpVEtr;

(ft.)

O.010-070.08o.o€6.08o.o?0.0?0.06

O.OQo.ooO.QOO-Ooo.ooO.ooO 00ooo0.00o ooO.OOo oo^ o°O.cOc> OOo ooo.oo0-00O . O o

PUMPINGRATE(Q)GPM

REMARKS

• ; • ' •

-- i

fLfffAf* -• ^52 '

••-

JM -i- 0 COO

30 o . .-b..* ««30l/6l

APPENDIX e

WETLANDS DELINEATION SURVEY

1R30//62

TRIP REPORT• .. - •

" . ' • ' • • •

PROJECT; Whitmoyer Laboratories Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study

REFERENCE - . .NUMBERt TR-88-019

DATE: . 12-13 October 1988

PURPOSE; Wetlands Survey of the Whitmoyer LaboratoriesSite and Tulpehocken Creek, Lebanon and BerksCounties, Pennsylvania

PARTICIPANT; G.p. Friday . '.

DISCUSSION;

I met with John Bentley, Scott Krall, and John Trepanowski on 12October 1988 at the NUS field trailer, which is located on theWhitmoyer Laboratories Site near Myerstown, Pennsylvania. JohnBentley gave a tour of the site, and explained that the the plantclosed last year. Discharges of arsenic from the plant siteinto the environment have continuously occurred since the 1960s.The site allegedly contains unknown numbers of buried barrelscontaining chemical wastes. On 12 October I examined the siteplus a 5 mile portion of Tulpehocken Creek from Flanagan Road tothe site. On 13 October 1988 I examined Tulpehocken Creek fromCharming Forge to Millardsvville except for areas that wereposted. The results of this field survey are attached.

INTRODUCTION

• . ' • - ' • ' ' • • " ' • ' -' -J" <~~. 'NUS Corporation, under subcontract to Ebasco Services, Inc. in:•.•! j/support of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),. is'r -conducting a Remedial Investigation at the Whitmoyer:Laboratories Site near Myerstown, Pennsylvania. One objective. .of these activities is* to survey the site and Tulpehocken Creekdownstream to Charming. Forge Lake for the presence of wetlands.Wetlands are defined by EPA (1988) as areas that are inundatedor saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency andduration sufficient to support, and that under normalcircumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typicallyadapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlandsgenerally include swamps, marshes, bogs and similar areas.On 7 October 1988 Mr. John Trepanowski of the NUS Philadelphiaoffice contacted the NUS Savannah River Center and requestedthat a wetlands survey be conducted. This report presents theresults of the wetland field survey. .

METHODS '

The Whitmoyer Laboratories site, and Tulpehocken Creek wereexamined 12-13 October 1988. The Union Canal at the WhitmoyerLaboratories site and that portion of Tulpehocken Creek fromMillardsville west to the site were traversed by foot on 12October 1988. Tulpehocken Creek from Millardsville to CharmingForge was examined 13 October 1988. The species composition of \. Jthe principal riparian plant communities, general soil and N—<xhydrological factors, and other pertinent information werequalitatively determined commensurate with EPA jurisdictionalwetland determination methodology (EPA, 1988). Photographs ofrepresentative habitats were taken with a Nikon FTN 35 mmcamera. The jurisdictional decision flow chart used to identifywetlands is given in Attachment 1; data sheets used in supportof wetlands determinations are also given in this attachment.Vegetative nomenclature follows U.S. Department of the Army(DOA) protocols (1987).

SITE DESCRIPTION

The Whitmoyer Laboratories Site is located in Lebanon County,Pennsylvania, 3/4th of a mile west of Myerstown. The site isbounded on the south by the Conrail Railroad, on the east byFairlane Avenue, on the north by Union Canal of TulpehockenCreek and on the west by Creamery Street (see Figure 1).Tulpehocken Creek flows eastwardly for approximately 15 miles toCharming Forge, a small community north of Highway 422. The !predominant soils on the site are Hagerstown silt loam and urbanlimestone materials (USDA, 1975; Figure 2). The predominantsoil type associated with Tulpehocken Creek between the site andCharming Forge is Melvin (USDA, 1967).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Wetlands, as defined by EPA (1988),'" occurred both on theWhitmoyer Laboratories Site and offsite along Tulpehocken Creek(Figures 2 and 3). Wetlands adjacent to the WhitmoyerLaboratories Site consisted of small, isolated herbaceous plantcommunities along the Union Canal and in alluvial microhabitatsin Tulpehocken Creek. Wetlands of the Union Canal (Photo 1 -see Attachment 2) were codominated by the obligate hydrophytesreed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) and rice cutgrass(Leersia orvzoides). Also present were smartweed (Polyqonumpensvlvanicuin), spotted touch-me-not (Impatiens caoensis), andsoft rush (Juncus effusus). This small wetland communityadjoined the northern retaining wall of the canal (Photo 1).Upstream from the retaining wall (Photo 2), the canal widened

. and mature trees lined the bank. Reed canary grass and -ricecutgrass also codominated the riparian herbaceous flora.Individual willow (Salix sp.), birch (Betula sp.), and blackwalnut (Juqlans niora) trees occurred on the northern bank. Thecanal narrowed approximately 75 yards from .the western siteboundary and contained stone riprap on the northern shore (Photo3). The overstory was sparse and codominated by ailanthus(Ailanthus altissima) and box elder (Acer neoundo). Saplings ofailanthus were prolific. The shrub understory was absent; theherbaceous stratum consisted of spotted touch-me-not, reed

, canary grass, and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans).Immediately upstream the vegetation along the banks of the canalwas denser (Photo 4). Here, the overstory was also dominated byailanthus and box elder. ' The understory contained blackberry(Rubus sp.) poison ivy, may apple (Podophyllum peltatum), aster(Asteraceael. and dock (Rumex so.).

Tulpehocken Creek at the Whitmoyer Laboratories Site is a smallmeandering stream which flows eastwardly . through a pasture(Photo 5) before joining the Union Canal. The western portionof the creek was lined by large box elder and the pasture wasgrazed to the creek's edge by dairy cattle. Wetlands along thisportion of Tulpehocken Creek consisted of isolated micrositeswithin the creek's banks (Photo 6, 7, & 8). These smallhabitats supported reed canary grass, smartweed, and isolatedsoft rush. The cumulative area of the wetlands along thisportion of Tulpehocken Creek is conservatively estimated tototal less than 0.1 acre. .From the site to Charming Forge, Tulpehocken Creek traversedareas of varying land use, including agricultural, forested, andurban. Much of Tulpehocken Creek was lined by an admixture ofnorthern hardwood forest types, including sycamore (Platanusoccidentalism box elder, red maple (Acer rubrum), black cherry(Prunus serotlnal. and black locust (Robinia Pseudoacacial;typically, these formed a relatively narrow buffer zone alongthe creek's banks (Photo 9); Portions of the creek reflectedman's attempt to manage the creek's flow (Photo 10).Tulpehocken Creek eventually flows through Myerstown and

f y provides recreational resources at the city park (Photo 11).

The riparian vegetation along Tulpehocken Creek from-. Charming*Forge (Photo 12) to Myerstown contained mature floodplain forest .-•••' ~" \(Photo 13) integrated with grazed pasture and residential .areas- \. J '(Photo 14); Photos 13 and 14 were taken upstream and downstream,,; x*-'respectively, from North Mill Road. This portion of Tulpehocken- :Creek was utilized as waterfowl habitat by approximately 25*'mallard ducks.The herbaceous vegeta'tion upstream from the Charming Forge'Bridge (Photo 12) was dominated by reed canary grass intermixedwith cattail (Tvoha latifolia). From Charming Forge to theWomelsdorf sewage treatment plant, Tulpehocken Creek wasbordered by a floodplain forest dominated by large, mature boxelder. This floodplain forest was characterized by a denseherbaceous stratum dominated by spotted touch-me-not, smartweed,and wood nettle (Laportea canadensis). A single wood duck drakeand hen were observed feeding in this portion of TulpehockenCreek.

Proceeding west toward Myerstown, Tulpehocken Creek flowsthrough residential properties and pasture. The largestemergent hydrophyte community observed along Tulpehocken Creekoccurred south of Stouchsburg just west of Scharff's Bridge(State Road 3063-10). This monotypic stand of cattail borderedthe southern bank of the creek and covered approximately oneacre (Photo 15).The predominant soil type associated with Tulpehocken Creekupstream (i.e., southwest) from Charming Forge is Melvin; thissoil type is classified as hydric by the USDA (1985). The areaalong Tulpehocken Creek also lies within a floodplain andtherefore meets hydrological criteria for defining wetlands.(Water lines on trees, and debris lines (twigs, bottles, etc.)were observed). Therefore, even in the absence of dominantobligate hydrophytes, much of the Tulpehocken Creek corridorfrom Charming Forge to Myerstown meets the EPA criteria forwetlands (see Figure 3).

SUMMARY

A wetlands jurisdictional determination using EPA guidelines wasconducted at the Whitmoyer Laboratories Site and alongTulpehocken Creek eastward to Charming Forge on 12-13 October1988. Wetlands on the Whitmoyer Site consisted of small,isolated herbaceous plant communities within the Union Canal andin alluvial microhabitats along Tulpehocken Creek. The largestemergent hydrophyte wetlands was observed near Scharff's Bridgejust south of Stouchsburg.Because of hydric soils and due to hydrological f actors r much ofthe Tulpehocken Creek corridor from Charming Forge to Myerstownis classified as wetlands. Based on habitat-carrying capacityand floristic diversity, the riparian floodplain forestsassocated with the Tulpehocken Creek corridor downstream from

AR30II66

site, particularly north of Highway 422, represented the0li etlands- These boitomfindo v i ^ w o o? ?2 Jde „ °°d ,anl cover f°r wildlife and serve to reduclfloodpeaks and frequency of flooding' in downstream areas

We tlands - such as these also can improve water ^ality bytemporarily or permanently retaining pollutants and alsostabilize shorelines, reducing, erosion.

REFERENCES

U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Soil ConservationService. 1975. Soil Survey of Lebanon County, Pensylvania.U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Soil ConservationService. 1967. Soil Survey of Berks County, Pennsylvania.U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Soil ConservationService. 1985. Pennsylvania Hydric Soils.U.S. Department of the Army (DOA), U.S. Army Engineer WaterwaysExperiment Station, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. AppendixC, Section 1 & 2, Corps of Engineers Wetlands DelineationManual, Technical Report ¥-87-1, Vicksburg, Mississippi.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1988. WetlandIdentification and Delineation Manual. Vol. I - Rationale,Wetland Parameters, and Overview of Jurisdictional Approach;Vol.- II - Field Methodology. Revised Interim Final Report.

AR30II68

£

crccUJIO2: CDLUKOI-J

* *]!ji- \\it Ui§ inp i "-Mil J» • MfilllHH h^llmililliliiii

1 •»-«' I

,1 Z

s

J-. «a.> i•", s

flfi30M70

/JR30U7I

ATTACHMENT 1

JURISDICTIONAL DECISION FLOW CHART AND

JURISDICTIONAL DATA SHEETS

Aft30ll72

AIII

-I tCO **°g

J M

.5

.C*

£

€>

u&

e -}e e« M k U C " • [5t_ «> €1 t. —»3Q*—-W1

V

C Me

-«- ^z fco

g«e v»

£

Six ui ' •• C ' •- !. <•

li «| «•*• O AOO *in •

M

2

*»*• - *-«

i M •v « iW I

£%>c

w —j««

»• -J >» ».w e •» u«i

«£S«"ffc£l

A III?

i«^>• ~~~" « • • • s s t

. Ir1

£2Sii^n.^

flR30IJ73

««.i- -I-» 3 ' •*• 2 «. o fc

2;**

il^--5««s

*J? «53M • •.«*«•.•M • «.«*it S-

i ii « « J

FOR SIMPLE JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION V

EPA Region: __ Field Investigatoc(s); r£'Afi'* ______ Date:Project/Site: 'jt/io te u e~ L**G$ State: A/T County; ~Applicant/Owner: ..<£#/----•-" y VeoetKlon unit f/Kane: .>iy/>y v•-•____M H _M v_____-HMM-_-_-«- -_»-.»-»->-«-_-—- -------— ••'.''.-, t-*: ^ • r ^5~

Bryophyte stratum Hon-bryophyte stratum L^ r £cc,s,*.•*.- A**************************************************************************************

Percent MidpointIndicator Area) Cover _y of coyer 2/

Species status""" tover cuss *" cuss '" Rank

2!3.4.5,6.7.8.9.

" f *«j » /u g

12.12.13.14.15.16.17.18.19..20*21.22.23.24.25.26.

Sum of Midpoints50X X Sum of Midpoints

Oo the dominant understory species Indicate that the vegetation unit supports hydrophyttcvegetation? 3/ Yes ___ Ho Inconluslve 4/" ^———«—— ™ "— • «•———•——.

V The understory Includes herbaceous species, such as all gramlnolds. forbs. ferns.fem allies. bryophytes» and herbaceous vines, as well as tree seedlings. However.bryophytes should be treated as a separate stratum for purposes of computing dominance

, (check appropriate line above).•• .••••'•2/ Cover classes (aldpolnts): T<1S (none); 1-1-51 (3.0); 2-6-ISX (10J); 3-16-25X (20.SJ"4.26-501 (38.0); 5-51-75X (63.0); 6-76-95X (85.5); 7-96-100X (98.0).V To determine the dominants, first rank the species by their midpoints. Then cumula-"~ lively sun the midpoints of the ranked species until SOS of the total for all species

midpoints 1s reached or initially exceeded. All species contributing to that cumula-tive total should be considered dominants and indicated with an asterisk above.

£/ Inconclusive should be checked when only facultative (I.e., facultative wetland.~" straight facultative, and/or facultative upland) species dominate.

9 •*R30M7S-

DATA FORM C-2: SHRU9 ANDFOR SIMPLE JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

' •EPA Region: 'J'lt-ld Investigator(t): . £& J lJ-fJ-/ _______ . .-• Pats; /$Qt/$Qs^. u&rstrtt: v/T • County; As^'-eject/Site;

tpli cant/Owner: UW£v~* v«— Ytgetatton unit I /Name:.•«»•»•»»*****#**»»••»«•»*»»»»»«»«»»•»»»»»»»»*•»****•***»**»»*»***»»*••»•»»»••••«••»«•SHRUBS*/

Percent Midpont */Indicator Areal Cover £/ of coyer "*

jecies status "" cover cuss Class ' Rank

2.3.4.5.6.7.

Sum of Midpoints50t X Sum of Midpoints

MOOOY VINES-

Percent Midpoint 2/: 'Indicator Areal Cover */ of cov«r "" - •

Species status cover cuss " cuss Rank1.

s.6.7.

.Sura of Midpoints50* X Sum of Midpoints

Oo the dominant shrub species Indicate that the vegetation unit supports hydrophyticvegetation? 3/ yes Ho __ Ineonlusive 4/Oo the dominant woody vine species indicate that tne vegetation unit supports hydro*phytle vegetation? 3/ Yes Ho Inconclusive 4/Comments: _ ____ "" ____ " . _____ ______

V A shrub 1s usually less than 6.1 meters (20 fett) tall and generally exhibits several~ erect, spreading or prostrate stems and has a bushy appearance. Percent cover of_ woody vines should be estimated Independent of strata and exclusive of seedlings.2/ Cover classes {midpoints): T<1J (none); 1*1-5* (3.0); 2-6-15X (10.5); 3-16-25X (20.5);~ 4-26-50X (38.01; 5-51-75X (63.0); 6-76-95X (85.5); 7-96-100X (93.0)..3/ To determine the dominants, first rank the shrub species by their midpoints. Then~" cumulatively sin the midpoints of the .ranked shrub species until 50X of the total

for all shrub species midpoints'is reached or Initially exceeded. Oo the same for /woody vines. All species contributing to these cumulative totals should be con-sidered dominants and marked with an asterisk above.

£/ Inconclusive should be checked when only facultative (I.e.. facultative~" straight facultative, and/or facultativeupland) species dominate.

10 flR30M76

• ... . DATA FORM C-3: SAPLING AMD TREE DATAFOR SIMPLE JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

I Region: "__ Field Investigator(s): __________________ Date:oject/Slte; ____.____ State: County;

Applicant/Owner; Vegetation UnitSAPLINGS'

Percent Midpointindicator Areal Cover */ of cover 2/

Species status " cover tuss " cuss " Rank2.3.4.5.6.7.3.

Sum of MidpointsSOS X Sum of Midpoints

REES V"" Relative

IndicatorStatus

t.5.

Total Relative Basal Area Equals 100Xto the dominant saplings indicate that fche vegetation unit supports hydrophytic vegetation?'es Mo inconluslve * vto the dominant trees indicate that the vegetation unit supports hydrophytic•egetatlont 3/ Yes ___ No ___ Inconclusive /. 4/:onnents: —— ""*

/ A tree is greater than 10 centimeters (4 Inches) diameter breast height (dbn).A sapling 1s from 1-10 centimeters (0.4-4 inches) dbh.

V Cover classes (midpoints): T<1X (none); 1-1-SX (3.0): 2-6-15X (10.5): 3-16-25* (20.5);* 4-26-50X (38.0); 5-51-75X (63.0); 6-76-95X (85.5); 7-96-100X (98.0).7 To determine the dominants, first rank the tree species by relative basal area.Then cumulatively sum the relative basal area or the ranked tree species until SOS

\ of the total relative basal area for all tree species Is reached or initially exceeded.Oo the same for saplings using the sum of midpoints. All species contributing to thesecumulative totals should be considered dominants and marked with an asterisk above.

/ Inconclusive should be checked when only facultative (i.e.. facultative wetland.straight facultative, and/or facultative upland) species dominate.

11 AR30H77

DATA FORM C-4: SOIL/ HYDROLOGY DATAFOR SIMPLE JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION ±t

-'•-• . . •

EPA Region: Field Investtgator(s): _______ . ________ -flate:Project/Site: • ; _____ State: ________ County:Applicant/Owner: ______ .Vegetation Unit I/NameSample I Within Unit (or Boundary sample****»*»»**»»*»»•*••«•**»*»*•**»**»******•******#»•-••***»»»»»»»«•»»•«»•»•»•»•*»*»•»»«»••

SOILS

Series/phase: *'V/* _ _____ p_^_ Subgroup: ____ _Is the soil on the national or state hydric soils list? res ^ 55Is tht soil a Hlstosol or Is a hlstlc eplpedon present? Yes ___ NoIs the soil: 2/ ———Mottled? Yes" Ho ___ H/A __ Matrix Color: __ ___ Mottle Color:Sleyed? Yes _Other IndicatorsDoes the sampling indicate that the vegetation unit has hydric soils?Yes Ho ___ Inconclusive j£__ __ . ./*,Rationale for decJsiqo on.hydric soils: •'*•"<• *• -'-comments:

HYDROLOGY

Is the ground surface Inundated? Yes Ho i/^ Depth of surface water: _____—Is the soil saturated?3/ Yes Ho \sDepth to free-standing~water in pit/soil probe hole: ______•• ___;___ -xList other field evidence of surface Inundation or soil saturationAre hydrology indicators present or would they be expected to be present in thevegetation unit during a significant part of the growing season? •/Yes No Inconclusive___ "Rationale for decision on hydrology:______. . '• •-____________comments: •//r~t« *€&*.&» &-*

V Mta Form C-4 can be used for soil /hydrology data within vegetation units or for~" soil/hydrology/vegetation data for boundary point determinations.v For gl eying and mottling, soils should be sampled within about 25-30 centimeters"" (10-12 inches) of the surface or immediately below the A horizon, whichever comes

first. If desired, use the back of the form to diagram or describe the soil profile.£/ This is in reference to the majority of the root zone, which for most wetland species,

particularly herbaceous plants, is generally within the upper 30 centimeters(12 inches) of soil. Also 11st the actual depth to saturation under "comments."

*/ It is not necessary to directly demonstrate that wetland hydrology is present.~" It is only necessary to show that the soil or its surface are at least periodically

saturated or Inundated, respectively/for a significant part of the growing season.Thus, it may be necessary to rely on supplemental hydrologic data (e.g.. in the /national or state hydric soils lists or county soil surveys) during the drier part iof the growing season or 1n drought years, assuming the site has not been gfljl-ft mc,hydrologically modified since the supplemental data were collected.

12 flR30M78

DATA FORM C-5: SUMMARY OF DATAFOR SIMPLE JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

Region: __ FieW Investigator(s): £ jn*/f*L/_____rS*teyProject/Site: hsfoffa* £t>C*<* State; X County;Applicant/Owner; #"xjc*w*-, Vegetation unit I/Name:

19.20.

Dominant Species Indicator Status1.2.3.4.s.6..7«8.9.10.11.12.13. ::14.:

1. Is hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes ___ No •____ Inconclusive2. Are hydric soils present? Yes ^ No • Inconclusive ______3. Are hydrology indicators present or are they expected to be present in the

vegetation unit during a significant part of the growing season ? Yes *^ NOInconclusive - ,,' '

4. Overall, is the vegetation unit wetland? Yes ^ No ___ Inconclusive _5. Rationale for overall jurfsdlcUonaVdecisions

A+/M+I S. £<&<.#K* s*<>«z&*a

6. Comments:

Note; The source of information in f's 1-3 above 1s Data Forms C-l through C-4."Cumber 4 should be checked affirmatively only if either f's 1-3 Inclusive areanswered affirmatively, or fl is answered inconclusively (because only facultativespecies dominate) but hydric soils and hydrology Indicators are present. A possibleexception to this would be for disturbed sites (See Section V of Volume II).

• • " • • ' ' 1 3 ' • . ' ' • ' '

flR30M79

FOR SIMPLE JURISDICTION!. DETERMINATION

EPA Region: __ Field Investigator (s): 4 P. fA/Crfr* _______ Date:Project /Site: j-frfo f J-A£*> State: > /? County: teApplicant/Owner: u *?**»<*/ _______ Vegetation unit I/Name; >/'./y-jBryophyte stratum Hon-bryophyte stratum

Percent MidpointIndicator Areal Cover 2/ ot cover 2/

Species S t a t u s c o v e r Class "" Class— " Rank1. 'S'fifljTi*** CAA*fi*l* . fftCW _____ 32. P/,4 /*//«, Jr:<tf£!&.*£'3.4. /••5. M6.7.8.9.

11.12.

15.16.17.18.'.9.20.21.22.23.24.25.26.

Sum of Midpoints50« X SUB of Midpoints

Oo the dominant understory species indicate that the vegetation unit supports hydrophytivegetation? 3/ Yes */* Ho Inconluslve 4/Comments: "" , ' * "T — "" _____ __

j/ The understory includes herbaceous species, such as all graminoids, forts, ferns,fern allies, bryophytes. tnd herbaceous vines, as well as tree seedlings. However,bryophytes should be treated as a separate stratun for purposes of computing dominanc

. (check appropriate line above).••2/ Cover classes (midpoints): T<1* (none); 1-1-51 (3.0); 2-6-15X (10.5); 3-16-25X (20.5" 4-26-501 (38.0); S-51-75X (63.0); 6-76-95X (85.5); 7*96-1001 (98.0).3/ To determine the dominants* first rank the species by their midpoints. Then cumula-" tlvely sun the midpoints of the ranked species until SOS of the total for all r 'M

midpoints 1s reached or initially exceeded. All species contributing to that c ,tive total should be considered dominants and Indicated with an asterisk abov

£/ Inconclusive should be checked when only facultative (I.e.. facultative~" straight facultative, and/or facultative upland) species dominate.

9 AR30II80

DATA FORM C- 5: SUMMARY OF DATAFOR SIMPLE JURISOICTIONAL DETERMINATION

EPA Region: __ Field Investigator^ ) : < / / l < 9 v __________ Date:Project/Site: yuM***?* 6 State; Vrr County; ZeApplicant/Owner: / /tVr/io* /-— Vegetation unit I/Name: P/aTb / -*«****•*•**************•**********•«***************•«•****«•««•****•****«•*•«*•***«••*

1 • • ' . ' '

Dominant Species Indicator Status1. terSt*. Qr'./?of2. /*A*/Ar«5 gyr-/^3.4.S.6..7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.t5.

8.9.20.

»«***•••*»**»*«••»«•**

1. Is hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes * No __ Inconclusive2. Are hydric soils present? Yes .*S NO • • ' Inconclusive _ __ _3. Are hydrology indicators present or are they expected to be present in the

vegetation unit during a significant part of the growing season ? Yes NoInconclusive _ __ >

4. Overall, is the vegetation unit wetland? Yes v< No ___ Inconclusive5. Rationale for overall jurisdlctfooal decision; *

6. Comments; k/&£-'-s U-f f *&r\4<£r-~ *? * tf, /

Note; The source of Information in f's 1-3 above is Data Forms C-l through C-4.Number 4 should be checked affirmatively only if either f's 1-3 inclusive areanswered affirmatively, or f1 Is answered inconclusively (because only facultativespecies dominate) but hydric soils and hydrology Indicators are present. A possibleexception to this would be for disturbed sites (See Section V of Volume II).

13

"R30//8J

DATA FORM C-l: UMOERSTORT S?£CIES DATAFOR SIMPLE JURISOICTIONAL DETERMINATION I/' • • —

EPA Region: _ Field Investigator (s): £/ //11/ ________ Date; &Project/Site: *u\?fiv.t>. :i A*,<*a State: A>/r County; ~Applicant/Owner;""-. ./ a«.*v— ___Vegetation unit f/Name: // rp >TTBryophyte stratum___ Hon-bryoohyte stratum ^ ^J^

- Percent MidpointIndicator Ireal Cover 2/ of cover 2/

Species - status cover Class" ciasi """• Rank

2.3.4..S.

• «•7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.15.16.17.

19. — —____: —— n_i n_ nr \\a.- — — — — — =^J22. ~ •23. "~ _____24. . .'• .•"25. ——— ~~H ____ ___2«- — • ZZZZ ""—

Sun of Midpoints501 X Sum of Midpoints

Oo the dominant understory species indicate that the vegetation unit supports hydrophyticvegetation? 3/ Yes / No .. •:• Inconlusive ^ : 4/Concents: ' ;" ——— " •" ""

jy The understory Includes herbaceous species, such as all gramlnolds, forbs, ferns,"" fern lilies, bryophytes, and herbaceous vines, as well as tree seedlings. However,. -

bryophytes should be treated as i separate stratjo foc. purposes-of computing dominance_ (check appropriate line.above). —•--••2/ Cover-cTTises (midpoints): T<11 (none); 1*1-51 (3.0); 2*6-151 (10.5); 3*16-251 (20.5);T 4-26-501 (38.0); 5-51-751 (63.0); 6-76-951 (85.5); 7*96-1001 (98.0).3/ To determine the dominants, first rank the species by their midpoints* Then"" tlvely sun the midpoints of the ranked species until 501 of the total for all sp<

midpoints is reached or Initially exceeded. All species contributing to that citive total should be considered dominants and Indicated with an asterisk £$$7

4/ Inconclusive should be checked when only facultative (i.e., facultative wetland.~ straight facultative, and/or facultative upland) spec/

i j/ DATA FORM C- 5: SUMMARY OF DATAFOR SIMPLE JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

EPA Region: __ Field Investieator(s):Project/Site: t s* s*4*.&~ Ls. State; r*.-. County; jf

~Applicant/Owner; ^* s£*.*>v — - _____ Vegetation Unit f/Name:

Dominant Species ' Indicator Status1.2. 73.

16.19.20.

6..7.8.9.0.11.12.13.M..15.

1. Is hydrophytic vegetation present? . Yes *^ No __ , Inconclusive2. Are hydric soils present? Yes *^ Ho Inconclusive ____3. Are hydrology .indicators present or are they expected to be present in the

vegetation unit during a significant part of the growing season 7 Yes NoInconclusive.__ ^ '

4. Overall, is the vegetation unit wetland? Yes is No ___ Inconclusive5. Rationale for overall jurjulictional decision: ______A____- • •

/6. Comments:

7. Mote: The source of information In f'-$ 1-3 above is* Data'Forms C-l'tTir"oiJgh"C-4.' "•'-'Number 4 should be checked affirmatively only if either f's 1-3 inclusive are

answered affirmatively, or fl Is answered inconclusively (because only facultative .species dominate) but hydric soils and hydrology Indicators are present. . A possible

'exception to this would be for disturbed sites (See Section V of Volume II)..

FOR SIMPLE JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION V

EPA Region: __ Field Investigator (4).: 6i'&i6'M_ ________ • DateProject/Si te : ju*g5S»*/jt> r r T State: &/+- County: /Applicant/Owner: y.-'M -.-- Vegetation unit f/Narae: ./.Bryophyte stratum __ Hon-bryophyte stratum**•***»***«•*»« *«'S»«««W»*««**««*******»«*****

Percent MidpointIndicator Area) Cover Jy of Paver 2/

Species status """ cover Class "* Class ~ ' Rank

2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.l4-15.16.17.ia.'.9.20.21.22.23.

25.26.Sun of Midpoints

SOlXuB of MidpointsDo the dominant understory species indicate that the vegetation unit supports hydrophyticvegetation? 3/ Yes m __ . No v^ Inconlusive 4/Cooaents: "" """* — "

J;/ The understory includes herbaceous species, such as all gramlnolds. forbs. ferns,fern allies, bryophytes, and herbaceous vines, as well as tree seedlings. However.bryophytes should b« treated as i separate stratus for purposes of computing dominance

. (check appropriate Hne above).••2/ Cover classes (midpoints): T<11 (none): 1*1-51 (3.0); 2*6-151 (10.5): 3*16*251 (20.5)~ 4-26-501 (38.0); 5*51-751 (63.0); 6*76-951 (85.5); 7*96-1001 (98.0).3/ To detervine the dominants, first rank the species by their midpoints. Then cumula-~ tively sun the midpoints of the ranked species until 501 of the total for all spe*

midpoints is reached or initially exceeded. All species contributing to that ctive total should be considered dominants and indicated with an asterisk above.

V Inconclusive should be checked when only facultative (i.e.. facultative wetland^~ straight facultative, and/or facultative upland) species dominate.

»' .'«H30U8«i

DATA rORM C-'2: -. SfiRuS AfO *OOCr'Y;s£ DAT;FOR SIMPLE JURISDICTION DETERMINATION

EPA Region: __Field • Investlgatbr(s): G H - rr\ .J 'su+ ^ Date: '-oJect/Slte;••». .»/5 fc~-••-.• /_ ~ State: f n d County:iplleant/Owner; u x./*- .,. _ Vegetation Unu I/Name: r,yjj.ft*******************_»»»«»«••*»««•*•»*«*•»«*****«***»•*****«»**••••••*•••«*•••«

SHRUBS _/

i . . PercentIndicator A r e a l C o v e r £/

1 Status cover Class ~"

2.3.4.S.6.7.

Sum of Midpoints501 X Sum of Midpoints

KOODY VINES

Percent Midpoint 2/'Indicator Areal Cover 2/ oFtover ~

Species status cover Class " C l a s s R a n k

1.

6.7.

Sum of Midpoints50: X Sum of Midpoints

Do the dominant shrub species indicate that the vegetation unit supports hydrophyticvegetation? V Yes___ No ,_•___. Ineonl usi ve __vDo the dominTnt woody vine species indicate/that the vegetation unit supports hydro-phytic vegetation? £/ Yes ^ Ho \s Inconclusive 47Comments.

»*****••*«**I/ A shrub is usually less than 6.1 meters (20 feet) tall and generally exhibits several

erect, spreading or prostrate stems and has a bushy appearance. Percent cover of. .woody vines should be estimated Independent of strata and exclusive of seedlings.2/ Cover classes (midpoints): T<11 (none); 1«1-5X (3.0); 2*6-151 (10.5); 3-16-251 (20.5);

4-26-501 (38.0); 5*51-751 (63.0); 6*76-951 (85.5); 7*96-1001 (98.0).3/ To determine the dominants, first rank the shrub species by their midpoints. Then

cumulatively sum the midpoints of the ranked shrub species until SOX of the totalfor all shrub species midpoints is reached or Initially exceeded. Do the sane forwoody vines. All species contributing to these cumulative totals should be con-sidered dominants and marked with an asterisk above.

£/ Inconclusive should be checked when only facultative (i.e., facultative wetland.straight facultative, and/or facultative upland) species dominate. •

10 AR30II85

DATA FORM C- 3: SAPLING AND TREE DATAFOR SIMPLE JURI SOI CTIONAL DETERMINATION

\ Region: Field Investigated s): •<?£. ' >W ^ _____ Date:oject/S1te~i • '.cbCv £.<_ t-o-fcS State: P£-' ^ County;.

Applicant/Owner: • . J vs -v Vegetation unit f/Name:SAPLINGS

_ . . . - - - . Midpointindicator Areal Cover 2/ of Cover 2/

Species . . / • Status Cover cuss"" ciass " Rank1. Jf'/M/ ficS £/Tis$//fiA utPL. ____ \5 TVJ32. flCer f\ siM. #<3Q PA C. •3. •• " .4. "~"" -s. " " ZHZ5. """"" ZHZI7. ——— _,3. ———————————"~M"——• ~'

Sum of Midpoints501 Hi Sun of Midpointst • « * > **•«««*»**««««••««-«-•«»«»»«««- •r»«. **««««*

TREES V. " •• Relative

Indicator BasalSpecies / . . ' Status Area (I) Rank

C.-»

•)>

Total Relative Basal Area Equals 1001r*«*«*******»«*»«•«****_**»*#»*_••***_*

k> the*dominant saplings Indicate that the vegetation unit supports hydrophytic vegetation?'es Ko Inconluslve 4/x> the dominant trees indicate that the vegetation unit supports hydrophytic•egetation? 3/ yes __ Ng ____ Inconclusive ___ 4/:onraents: ™"—" ——— . ——— - _______

/ A tree is greater than 10 centimeters (4 Inches) diameter breast height (dbh). />-,*A sapling is from 1-10 centimeters (0.4-4 Inches) dbh.

'/ Cover classes (midpoints): T<11 (none); 1*1-51 (3.0): 2*6-151 (10.5); 3-16-25X (20.5);* 4-26-501 (38.0); 5-51-751 (63.0); 6-76-951 (85.5); 7*96-100X (98.0).7 To determine the dominants, first rank the tree species by relative basal area.Then cumulatively SUB the relative basal area of tne ranked tree species until 501of the total relative basil area for all tree species Is reached or initially exceeded.Do the same for saplings using the sua of midpoints. All species contributing to tLcumulative totals should be considered dominants and marked with an asterisk above.

I Inconclusive should be checked when only facultative (I.e., facultative wetland,straight facultative, and/or facultative upland) species dominate.

11 AR3QII86

OATA FORM C-4: SClL/HYDnCLX*.. DATAFOR SIMPLE JURISDICTION DETERMINATION ±i

EPA Region: _ Field Investigator(s): QProject/Site: j. .-.gT". .-i>>- - -'- State:Appl leant/Owner \ ^.Vegetation Unit J name

County: — > -—

Sample I Within Unit "(or Boundary Sample («»»«••»SOILS

Series/phase: /'/rd$/j'e 5"ifr J-*&s**~ Subgroup:Is the soil on the national or state hydric soils list? res___ NOIs the soil a Kistosol or is a histic epipedon present? Yes ___ NoIs the soil: 2/ ^ ———Mottled? Yes"__ No ^ N/A __ Matrix Color: ____ Mottle Color:Gleyed? Yes ——No J^H N/AOther Indicators ______ ___ _____ ,— — , ______ ,___„__Does the sampling indicate that the vegetation unit has hydric soils?Yes No InconclusiveRationale for decision on hydric soils; ________ ____Comments:

***********HYDROLOGY

Is the ground surface inundated? Yes •No >S Depth of surface water:is the soil $aturated?3/ Yes */' Mo~ ~~"Depth to free-stand1ng""water inTpTt/soii probe hole: /' fr____• ''List other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturationAre hydrology indicators present or would they be expected to be present in tnevegetation unit during a significant part of the growing season? */Yes HO Inconclusive ~Rationale for decision on hydrology: ____•______.comments:

*•***•**•****•*•****•***•***•*•••****•««**********•**«************••*••••*•*•**•*«••**}j Data Form C-4 can be used for soil/hydrology data within vegetation units or for

soil/hydrology/vegetation data for boundary point determinations.£/ For gleying and mottling, soils should be sampled within about 25-30 centimeters

(10-12 inches) of the surface or Immediately below the A horizon, whichever comesfirst. If desired, use the back of the form to diagram or describe the soil profile.

_y This is in reference to the majority of the root zone, which for most wetland species.particularly herbaceous plants. Is generally within the upper 30 centimeters(12 inches) of soil. Also list the actual depth to saturation under •comments."

V It is not necessary to directly demonstrate that wetland hydrology Is present.It is only necessary to show that the soil or its surface are at least periodicallysaturated or Inundated, respectively, for a significant part of the growing season.Thus, It may be necessary to rely on supplemental hydrologic data (e.g.. in the

A / national or state hydric soils lists or county soil surveys) during the drier part^-^ of the growing season or in drought years, assuming the site has not been signiflc

hydrologically modified since the supplemental data were collected.

AR30II87

DATA FORM C-S: SUMMARY OF DATA .'.''•FOR SIMPLE JURISDICTION DETERMINATION

EPA Region: Field Investiaator(s): &f. r**#* ^ _____0*t*: £L2ProJect/SiteT~>y*fci t ««xL> Z a& State; ^>" f County; £.1 -Applicant/Owner; —1 4 ****-- ' Vegetation unit f/Name: jfc

Dominant Species Indicator Status1.2.3.4.s.64.7.8.9.10.u.12.13.14.15.

20.»***•••***

1. Is hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes *\_' No __^Inconclusive2. Are hydric soils present? Yes ..... No ^ Inconclusive ___3. Are hydrology Indicators present or are they expected to be present in the

vegetation unit during a significant part of the growing season ? Yes S NOInconclusive .. *"""*""

4. Overall, is the vegetation unit wetland? Yes \/ No . Inconclusive5. Rationale for overall jurisdictional decision: ____

6. Comments:

7. Mote; The source of information in f's 1-3 above Is Data Forms C*l through C-4.Number 4 should be checked affirmatively only if either f's 1-3 Inclusive areanswered affirmatively, or fl 1s answered Inconclusively (because only facultativespecies dominate) but hydric soils and hydrology Indicators are present. A possibleexception to this would be for disturbed sites (See Section V of Yolune II).

13

ATTACHMENT 2

PHOTODOCUMEKTATION

t . ,• **-

;- U

ATTACHMENT 2

PHOTODOCUMENTATION

&B30II90

AR30I192

• B30.ll 93

flR30l!95

APPENDIX H

BIOTA SURVEYS

fiR3DII96

.,APPENDIX H-l

AQUATIC BIOLOGICAL SURVEY

-«B30II97

DRAFT

. AQUATIC BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS

WHITMOYER LABORATORIES SITEJACKSON TOWNSHIP

LEBANON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

May 1989

AR30II98(

1. INTRODUCTION

The Whitmoyer Laboratories Superfund Site is located in LebanonCounty, Pennsylvania (see Figure 1). As a part of the WhitmoyerSite's Remedial Investigation/Feasibility study (RI/FS), aquaticbiological surveys vere conducted on surface vaters potentiallyimpacted by the site. These included benthic macroinvertebrate andfishery surveys of. Tulpehocken Creek (which is adjacent to thesite), as veil as a fishery survey of the nearby Lakeside Quarryand Myerstown Pond.A benthic macroinvertebrate survey was conducted on 11 and 12October, 1988 to assess the potential impacts ,from the site on themacroinvertebrate community of Tulpehocken Creek. Macroinver-tebrates are Useful in detecting environmental stresses becausesome species have limited mobility and relatively long life cycles(several months to a few years).A fishery survey of Tulpehocken Creek, Lakeside Quarry and Myers-town Pond near the Whitmoyer Laboratories Site was conducted from11 through 14 October, 1988. The main objective of the survey was .to assess the potential impacts from the site on the aforementioned

. , • • water bodies. Of special concern was bioaccumulation of arsenic, aknown site contaminant, in the resident fish. Bioaccumulation isdefined as the net accumulation of an element or chemical compoundby an organism as a result of uptake from all environmental

. , sources. Uptake can involve absorption from the surroundingV—/ aqueous solution or sediments, or ingestion.

Both juvenile and adult members of resident forage and game specieswere collected in the survey. Fish collections were analyzed forspecies composition and relative abundance at each station. Addi-tionally, fifteen fish tissue and nineteen whole body samples wereprepared using adult game and forage fishes collected in thesurvey. These samples were analyzed to determine if arsenic hadbioaccumulated in either the muscle tissue or organs of the fishes.Each sample was composited from specific portions (either filletsor whole body) of fish from a particular species that were similarin length (attempting to represent the same age class) and from thesame sampling station.

2. SAMPLING LOCATIONS

The Whitmoyer Laboratories Site RI/FS Work Plan and Field Opera- •tions Plan (FOP) established preliminary locations for benthic andfish sampling stations on Tulpehocken Creek. The preliminary lo-cations (from upstream to downstream) were Tulpehocken Creek atT-489 Bridge (Station 1 - benthos and fish); Tulpehocken Creek atRamona Road (Station 2 - benthos only); Union Canal upstream ofvault (Station 3 - fish only); Union Canal at fish pond (Station 4- fish only); Tulpehocken Creek at Fairlane Avenue Bridge (Sta-

' , '•' • -' • ' ' •' • . .' ' . * '. - ' •• . • . 'AR30I199

I I I

ul

1

vJ/

s

OCtu5aS!

AB30I200

tion 8 - benthos and fish); Tulpehocken*;Creek at Womelsdorf Bridge(Station 13 - benthos only); Tulpehocken Creek above CharmingForge Lake (Station 14 - benthos and fish); Charming Forge Lake(Station 15 -fish only); Myerstown Pond (Station 16 - fish only);and Lakeside Quarry (Station 17 - fish only). These locations arepresented in Figure 2. An*examination of actual field conditions,however, necessitated changing several locations to try to esta-blish consistency in benthic habitats (e.g. riffle areas andsubstrate particle size) between stations.

Station 1, Tulpehocken Creek at the T-489 bridge, was deleted as afish sampling station. The stream was too narrow and shallow atthis location to support fish of sufficient size for the wholebody and tissue analyses. Station 2, Tulpehocken Creek at RamonaRoad, was substituted for Station 1. ' , '

The fishery survey of the Union Canal on site did not includeStation 3, upstream from the vault. Rather, electro'fishing wasconducted from below the lock upstream to the pond at Station 4.Station 8 at the Fairlane Avenue bridge was not included in thefishery survey since electrofishing was conducted only 75 feet .away at the lock. .Station 10, Tulpehocken Creek at the College Avenue Bridge, wasestablished as a fish and benthic sampling station. This sectionof Tulpehocken Creek is located in Myerstown Park, which makes itaccessible to the general public. The risk of exposure to arsenicby eating fish would probably be greater here than at sections ofTulpehocken Creek located on private property or in wooded areas.Station 14, Tulpehocken Creek above Charming Forge Lake wasdeleted as a benthic and fish sampling station. A suitable rifflecould not be found. Station 15, Charming Forge Lake, wasredesignated as both a benthic and fish sampling station; benthicsamples were taken at the first riffle below the Charming Forgedam. ' ' • • • . . . ' . ' • • _ • ' • . '

All benthic and fish sampling stations were photo-documentedeither prior to or at the time of sample collection.

3. METHODOLOGIES

3a. Physical/Chemical MeasurementsStream flow measurements were performed at sampling stations onTulpehocken Creek on 4 through 6 October 1988, as part of theWhitmoyer Laboratories Site surface water/sediment investigation.These flow measurements are included in this report to aid in theinterpretation of results from the biological surveys. There was

flB30l20i

AR30I202

no significant precipitation in the study area from 4 through 14October 1988.A stream profile was developed at each station by measuring thewidth of the stream and water depths at selected points across thestream. Water velocity was measured at these points using; aMarsh-McBiroey Portable Water Current Meter, Model 201. Thesix-tenths of water depth method was used to estimate watervelocity at the measurement points, as recommended by EPA in "ACompendium of Field Operations Methods" (1987) for depths lessthan 2.5 feet.Dissolved oxygen, pH, water temperature and conductivity weremeasured in the field at sampling stations on Tulpehocken Creek,Myerstown Pond and Lakeside Quarry during the first week ofOctober 1988. Field measurements were taken as noted below:

o Dissolved oxygen was measured at the stations on TulpehockenCreek using a Hach Dissolved Oxygen Meter, Model N-2040. Adissolved oxygen-temperature profile was performed atMyerstown Pond and Lakeside Quarry using a YSI Model 51A. Thedissolved oxygen meters were calibrated prior to use followingthe manufacturer's instructions. The YSI stirrer was used withthe probe for the vertical profile measurements.

o The pH was measured using a Hach pH meter, Model N-2021. ThepH meter was calibrated prior to use, using standardbuffer solutions with pH values of 4.01 and 7.0 at 25° c.

o Water temperature was measured using the pH meter.

o Conductivity was measured using a Hach Conductivity Meter,Model N-1655, which was calibrated prior to use according tomanufacturer's instructions.

3b. Benthic Macroinvertebrate SamplingBenthic samples were collected at Stations 1, 2, 8, 10, 13 and 15on Tulpehocken Creek on 11 and 12 October, 1988. Semiquantitativesamples were collected using D-frame kicknets (30 cm wide x 25 cmhigh, 800 x 900 micron mesh). The sampling technique involvedplacing the kicknet perpendicular to the stream flow and thorough-ly disturbing the substrate directly upstream by kicking. Thedislodged organisms and substrate are carried into the net by thecurrent. The excessive depth of the riffles at a few stationsprevented the use of the Surber bottom sampler as the samplinggear. Therefore, for consistency, the D-frame kicknet wasselected as the most appropriate piece of equipment for the site.Upstream and downstream transects were established across theparticular riffle selected for sampling at each benthic station.The downstream transect was always sampled prior to the upstreamtransect at each station*

fiR30!203

• • . .The stream width determined the number of samples that were \ \,collected across each transect at a station. Right, center and N-^left samples were collected along the transects at Stations 13 and*15, where the stream width exceeded 30 feet. Right and leftsamples were .collected along each transect at Stations 2, 8, and10, where the stream width was 12-20 feet. Right and left sampleswere collected approximately four feet from the stream bank. AtStation 1, the only available substrata comparable to downstreamstations was below the drop from the drainage culverts, where thestream was four to six feet wide. Due to the minimal watervelocity at the sides of the stream, only two samples (A and B)were collected at Station 1. . Each sample was collected from thecenter of the stream.Each sample was obtained by compositing two subsamples, which werecollected parallel to each other, one to two feet apart, at thesample location. Each subsample was collected for a period of oneminute. The two subsamples composited to form each'sample atStation 1 were collected from downstream and upstream locations,rather than at parallel locations across the transect, as at thefive other stations.Each sample was processed in the field by placing the net contentsinto a benthos bucket, which has a U.S. Standard Uo. 30 sievebottom. Large rocks were scrubbed and sprayed to remove attacheorganisms, then discarded. The samples were then transferred tone (1) liter wide-mouth sample bottles and immediately fixed wi70% ethanol and properly labeled. Benthic samples were tran-sferred to the laboratory for processing under chain of custody.Samples collected from Station 1 Location B and the downstreamtransects at Stations 2, 8, 10, 13 and 15 were utilized forlaboratory analysis. The samples collected across the upstreamtransects and Station 1 Location A have been archived and arebeing stored pending raviev. of the data.The majority of samples were subdivided prior to sorting becauseof the large number of organisms and amount of substrata present.(Station 1 sample B was not subdivided.) The samples were subdi-vided according to procedures outlined in "Biological Field andLaboratory Methods for Measuring the Quality of Surface waters andEffluents" (EPA-670/4-73-001). The Station 10 right and leftsamples were subdivided such that 50% of the original sample wasexamined for organisms. All other samples were subdivided suchthat 25% of the original sample was examined for organisms.The portion of sample to be examined was placed in a U.S. StandardNo. 60 sieve and thoroughly washed with tap water to. remove theethanol preservative. Small amounts of sample were then placed inpetri dishes of water and examined under a dissecting microscopeat low magnification (6X). The organisms were removed from thesubstrate, identified, counted and preserved in a 70% ethanol»*

* . - '

6 . . ' • '

AB30I201*

-V/ — ORIGINALs : (RED>W solution. Identification was performed to the genus level, where

possible. The Chironomidae were identified to the family level.Community analyses on individual samples include Species Diversity(Shannon>-Weiner) Index and Percent Composition by taxa.

3c. Fishery surveys' ' ' * • - • • ' •

Fishery surveys of Tulpehocken Creek, Myerstown Pond and LakesideQuarry were conducted from 11 through 14 October, 1988. Fish were

[ . collected using six panel experimental gill nets (1/2", 1", 2",2 1/2", 3" & 3 1/2" panels), minnow traps and electrofishingequipment. Electrofishing was conducted at 110 volts A.C. @ 60cycles with a current of 1 to 1.5 amperes. Minnow traps were

• baited with sucrose, bread and cheese. The minnow traps werechecked and removed concurrently with the gill nets. Thefollowing sampling description is presented from upstream down.

: Station 2, Tulpehocken creek at Ramona Road, was surveyed for fishon the morning of 13 October 1988 using electrofishing equipment.Electrofishing Was initiated at the downstream side of the RamonaRoad bridge and continued upstream to the small waterfall at theentrance to the lock. The total length of stream electrofishedwas 400-500 feet. Total electrofishing time at station 2 was 8.6

'• ' "~ minutes. A block seine was used to prevent fish from escaping'I \ ; downstream. The waterfall served as a barrier to the upstream1 ^-^ movement of fish.I • ' - : ' • ' ' " - ' ' *

Station 4, Union Canal, was sampled for fish using a gill net andelectrofishing equipment. One gill net was set in the Union Canalpond at noon on 11 October 1988; The net was set in a triangularshape, extending from the drainage pipe to the right bank, acrossthe pool to the left batik, then back to the pipe. The gill netwas checked 30.hours later, and removed after 55 hours.Electrofishing was conducted at Station 4 during the early evening

i . of 13 October 1988. Electrofishing was initiated at a small pool•'' located directly below the floodgate in the lock and continued

upstream to the base of the drainage pipe in the pond. Totalelectrofishing time for the Union Canal was 17 minutes.

i Station 10, Tulpehocken Creek at the College Avenue Bridge, wassurveyed for fish using a gill net and electrofishing equipment.

! One gill net was set at Station 10 at midday on 11 October 1988.The gill net was anchored in the middle of the creek on the west

I side of the bridge and extended upstream on a slight angle to thenorth bank. The gill net was checked after 28 hours and removed48 hours after it was set. ^Electrofishing at Station 10 was conducted at noon on 13 October1988. Electrofishing was initiated at a pool slightly upstreamfrom the metal footbridge in Myerstown Park and continued upstream

1R30I205

to the first riffle below the College Avenue bridge. Totalelectrofishing time at Station 10 was 22.5 minutes.

The fishery survey at Charming Forge Lake (Station 15) wasconducted using gill nets, minnow traps and electrofishingequipment. Three. (3) gill-nets were set in Charming Forge Lake onthe morning.of 11 October 1933. The first net was anchored fromthe dam spillway, midway across the lake. A second gill net wastied to the free end of the first net, extended upstream andanchored midway across the lake. The third gill net was satapproximately 400 feet upstream from the dam, and extendedupstream on an angle from the right to the left side of thastream. The three gill nets were checked for fish 30 hours laterand were removed after 76 hours.

Two minnow traps were set at Station 15. A minnow trap was placedten feet downstream from the third gill net, near a dead log thatextended out into the stream. The second minnow trap was placedapproximately 50 feet upstream from the third gill net along theright bank (facing upstream).

Electrofishing was conducted at Charming Forge Lake during theafternoon of 14 October 1933 using boat-mounted electrofishingequipment. Electrofishing, which was initiated near the dam __spillway and continued upstream for 500 feet, proved unsuccessfulTherefore, electrofishing using shore-based equipment was per-formed at the first pool downstream from the extended rifflecreated by the Charming Forge Dam.Myerstown Pond (Station 16) was sampled for fish using gill nets,minnow traps and boat-mounted electrofishing equipment. A gillnet was anchored in the northwestern corner of the pond andextended to the center. A second gill net was extended from thaconcrete overflow culvert to the center of the pond. The two gillnets were checked 30 hours and 50 hours after they were set. ,The nets were checked and removed after electrofishing activities.Electrofishing was conducted at Myerstown Pond on the morning of14 October 1983 using boat-mounted equipment. Two complete lapsaround the shoreline of the pond were made during the survey.Total electrofishing time at Myerstown Pond was 37 minutes.Lakeside Quarry (Station 17) was sampled for fish using three gillnets and minnow traps. The gill nets were set in Lakeside Quarryon the morning of 11 October 1988. The nets were positionedassuming that the fish would move into shallow areas to feed.The first net was located in the southeastern corner of thequarry. A baited minnow trap was set near this net. The othertwo gill nets were anchored near the northern and southern shoresof a small, rocky island located near the center of the quarry. .<-These two neta were extended outward into the deeper sections of ithe quarry. Another baited minnow trap was placed near the V~x

848301206

northern shore of the small island. The gill nets were checkedfor fish at 30, 54 and 72 hours after initial placement.Fish collected in the field were taken to the NUS site trailer,where they were sorted by species and measured. The field fishlog identifies each specimen collected, along with its approximatelength. The fishes were wrapped in aluminum foil, stored incoolers containing.dry ice, and transferred to the laboratoryunder chain of custody for processing.

The fishes were weighed in the laboratory prior to sample prepara-tion. Scale samples were taken from each .fish selected forarsenic analysis for aging purposes (if required). The prepara-tion of composite fish samples in the laboratory was performedusing the protocols established in the Whitmoyer LaboratoriesField Operations Plan (FOP; Section 4.2.13). A one HP, stainlesssteel, commercial grade food grinder was utilized for the prepara-tion of the whole body samples for the larger fish. All process-ing equipment and work surfaces were decontaminated prior to ini-tial use and following the preparation of each sample according tothe decontamination procedures outlined in the FOP (Section 3.7).The homogenized fish samples were placed in I-CKEM 250 ml pre-cleaned glass sample bottles and properly labeled. The samplebottles were sealed in airtight plastic bags and stored in alocked freezer under chain of custody until shipment. A buildingsecurity system was activated while the samples were in custody.Fifteen fish tissue samples and nineteen whole body samples wereshipped overnight express on November 2, 1988 using standard chainof custody forms.

4. RESULTS

4a. Physical/Chemical MeasurementsThe stream flow data collected at benthic sampling stations onTulpehocken Creek on 4 through 6 October 1988 is presented inTable 1. The flow greatly increased between the upstream anddownstream sections of the study area. The lowest flow wasrecorded at the tributary (Station 1) upstream from the WhitmoyerLaboratories Site. The flow increased slightly in TulpehockenCreek between Stations 2 and 10, in the vicinity of the site. Themergers of Owl Creek and Mill Creek with Tulpehocken Creekaccounted for the large increase in flow at Stations 13 and 15.Substrates at Stations 2 and 13 were of a smaller particle sizethan at the other stations. Rubble (particle size 64-256 mm) wasless abundant in the substrate at Stations 2 and 13.Table 2 presents the chemical water quality measurements collectedin the field at sampling stations on Tulpehocken Creek, MyerstownPond and Lakeside-Quarry on 4 through 10 October 198.8. The pHmeasurements were within a range (6.31-8.31) where aquatic lifeshould not have been adversely affected. The dissolved oxygen

... ' . " . •'.. ' 9 . • , .. .

•

^

toCc 2•* tQ4. O13Hu »•**•If_j 2 M^^ « Mr

II 333o« SIss« -r iO w * U| %l |

H > MO•••*»*

Is!''•8BS

*

—Jj£

c~

I•j:

Is•H 94J4alU1Z

.

1-1 ,2U 9

. ,«M.O

-

r-oo •

0*n

•?•<*00

CS *'fl; jr.

j>fl J< 0»

"a Si!HUCQ

•*;

on o

c id id•H O U

in., .' . CM

O

a\in

o

2a i•Set

fc .ill

. IM

•»-4 9 '9 ^«S

0900

. - «C4

CMO

inCMt-t

0*

• 0

o•0

U 14e~4eao id

1*1SIS 0iH « C

eo

*f4 9 '9 **4

||

''

in.o

010

r»

»M

0V

O

o»9

tS »H 9J4 O *O

I*SQi 9 **4 9 9

O

4^ 09f><d9

to.COfM

O

V0

eon

eovoo

*«alljS-8Qr-l

III

3

^~< 9S'S

"Q. 0» M ^ .

•n

:

* .. .

B—B1_BS_i_B_^_^___-

oc•Hc3 SJ o C

SiS Si•H t 14

gJS

.V

3__i

10 AR30I208

1lie n8|o §• •—>M•4

I..W

IH

zl-t e« i00

S

V

3u «« f« p* i

Ei"r*E2yC

•V*

1 Biota

I Sampled

ri/

§M

if

"t

eIN

ino1-1

•n<0'

>4f

0

O•400 '.e

00OBiw1e

|x

Tulpehocken Cree

0 T-489 Bridge

«4

'e • -(N

ino«4

O

r»

inffft

inm-* . .

0000 :1mi0

oa

Tulpehocken Cree

0 Ramona Road

N

0

*

oo0t

*nCD

. *ft•*%

&:*v..—«BCO1mte

1

Union Canal

if

O!0

v

109

CD'

'r-

••»'•

.' Ci•

«"*J

o •0k- o .

CO00Imie

Benthos

M

Tulpehocken Cree

0 Fair lane Ave. •

\

'"."•

in

**

•H*CH

o -•

r!'

M•

in

«.-

00OB11O

Benthos

6 Fish

M .

Tttlpehoeken Cree

0 College Ave.Br

o •

; ioCOm

o•0

«o"J'«

CO•

CM

o4.4

'CO0011o•4

iM

Tttlpehoeken Cree

0 Womelsdorf Br.

94

oft ~10

p«•10

•^ s

oo' *•?

1•

-4 •

rte>o

00OO vir'e

Benthos

ft Fish

M

Tulpehocken Cree

0 Charming Forge

S

09.m

•

m• . .f***

r-*^

o•M

'CDin•4

09001• o941S

1b

Myerstown Pond

w

toce•n

8 i«J«M IN%J * f^ *1T-T^ ,«v'_.

I zm w »»144 • f^ •

S***"*

.«M^**

CDCD .1w1s

' j(u ' ,

Lakeside Quarrr

/

«4

1130/209

readings were good (6.7-13.3 mg/1); the relatively low readingCharming Forge Lake (6.7 mg/1 9 11.2° C» 60% saturation) wasunusual for slow moving bodies of water. A dissolved oxygenreading of 4.82 vg/1 § 23° C (35% saturation), was measured atStation 14 at the upper end of the lake on 19 July 1988 during thecollection of surface water samples.

i ' . ' • , . - ,

4b. Benthic Macroinvertebrates .Results of the benthic macroinvertebrate survey are listed inTable 3. Taxa and number of individuals collected in each sampleare listed. The average number of individuals per taxa for eachstation is also presented. The last page of Table 3 lists totalsfor number of taxa and number of organisms per sample. The totalnumber of taxa and average number of organisms collected for eachstation are listed in the average column.Fifty-two (52) distinct taxa were collected in this macroinverte-brate survey. The number of taxa per sample ranged 'from a low of16 (Station 10, Right) to a high of 23 (Station 15, Left). Thestation totals for number of taxa ranged from 19 (Station 1) to 32(Station 15). These stations represented the two extremes of theriffle habitats sampled. Station 1 was located on a smalltributary where the water current was slow. Station 15 wasobserved to have the fastest current, most suitable substrate andwas'well oxygenated due to spillage from the dam.

• - . . . - . : . • ' - - ' :The Trichoptera and Ephemeroptera are generally associated withgood water quality. Ephemeroptera (mayflies) were present inevery sample, except the Station 10 Right sample (Table 3). Fourgenera of mayflies representing four families were collected inthese samples. These genera included Baetis. Ephemeralla.stenonema and Tricorvthodes. Mayfly nymphs are usually found infresh water habitats where there is an abundance of oxygen.Trichoptera (caddis flies) were collected from all of the samples.Five families of Trichopterans were collected in this benthicmacroinvertebrate survey (Table 3). The caddis flies were mostnumerous in the Station 15 samples and least numerous in theStation 1 and 2 samples. The presence of the Trichoptera andEphemeroptera in waters downstream of the Whitmoyer Site is .Indicative of good water quality.The species diversity (Shannon-Weiner) index is one measure usedto compare contaminated and reference (background) areas. Theindex is used in evaluating the number of species in an area(species richness) and the distribution of abundance among species(evenness).

\

The species diversity values for individual samples are listed atthe end of Table 3. Station 1 had the highest value of 3.29.Station 15 samples were collectively the next highest in diver-sity, and were very similar (2.93, 2.92, 2.97). The lowest (1.

. - , ' • • ' - ' • ' ' • • ' • 1 2 ' . • . . ' • ,

AB30I2IO

B « : _ . - . -ti\ "• • ' • • O S3 O CO "'••00 » «0 <M• T • • in m

in5° - § S co S S S 8 o

10 <M o e

4 ° s° s a oo • j,. - „ N e „Q0 I 9+ . • "^ PI «M

mS°. o o oo . o ,0 o r,: • • • - . ' ' « n 9 4

S° « ° eo « o e o o«4 ^ IM CD

S° S S oe 2 « o o »• w

in " " ** • o 94 o *i94 • •

°Ul '° 2° § -S "" " •"• o' o o.•4 «M , ' . »4

180 » • • . « ? • «o « ooo o

° Se . .« - e« . j o j0 o o

"" ° 5« ; R « «V * oo o o

o r,e ,, » oo «, e >, ,0 0

° S* 5 S e" 5 o « o o

"-" ° **-•• '• « oo ^ e « 0 _.

° 2* g 5 «* S ° * ° S

-*«l ?• .no e ^ Oo

.8* 5 g«cf 85

, .1*

.11-e

iiir- ||| ||pbfci CM

• e•< cv f•* «

«g* gOB. 4/i- - " 2fii SftS 6Cu

13

ss

3

O hi

la 1

--

•« o

Q OH in r» tn 0*4 o o o tn ft t* *a 94 m <n \o o m&94 ftn •4f*r49if.tff+ ~iCM o ft

o<oo voco o <r o o o <0«oooo<0 a o-* o o•

00 OO O O O <0 f<4 «0 :» N W CO) CO O* O O. ft ft 94 *40«4 Ok94 - 94 :. - .

OSOVO <V\0 OO O O O OOWO«(M re OOO Oin»4 . 94ft ft

i •* O M» N CD o o 1-1 o o o o vo n i-nn o in o MO•+ \ri94 « «*r* r»

OOO W* OOO •* O O O O <» N O CD 'O OO O Or* o re .*«-l

ooo voeo oo o o o <*OO<ONOOO reo * oc a m o « 0 i - i * 0 * 4

ONO •"»•» •»« ooo \0 o o <*«•* vo o «o o oit or* • •* «»m

ovonn vo> N- •»«•> m oo ooiMr»r»*4\o o oo o o

ocoo o« \0o ooo o o •* ca <0 o •+ o oo o oOft fft ft 9494 1Of t . 9 4 ' -

«MO «M\0 O O O OOOVCONC9 O OO O O

o eo o oovo N«D o oo OOOVONON o oo ooft 94 ft <»».. . 94 «MW

O>94 94 ft

o\oo a»ft oa> o o.o OOOSNNV o oo o oO 94 ft ft

3OO OOO <*CD OOO OOO«NC9eO O OO O Ovo o n va • m ca

oaooo oo «N o o N ooooooo o oo o reO *4«-l»•« .

o o * oo oo o o *•> o o o o o o < « o o o o o

O<0"| OO «* O O O OOOOOO<0 O O O O «

O in O O O V0.4 94 o O OOOOOMO O OO O O

,& ..

t I u- AR30I2I2

090

ts i-a- n«b (B

JjI

(.i

*M ooo oo r* moo «n fn o o e o oof 1 4N ' ••*

f> v - 5 y?;' :_ o ooo v o o «oeo oo «oooo oe

"* ' • °r 2 *** r*

U o eoo O O N « O O o « o e b e o o. V ONm

. ' »4

«r ooo * «o o o woo o NOOOO oe. • • ' r« N ft 94N

Z* gv*. S

>*

Jft*4 '

o

",«

0p*

. K

Jfg

"•1e:/

5

wM

BS

-u

j

O 94 O O t* f\ ft C8 . •* wN

O OOO 10 09 N COffy 4 OO -4

• 94

o o o o o o o oe• 10 «

o v oo to o«0 OD"'• • '- ' : ";; S- ' " ••

0 O~*O OOO •

o ONO eo o e «in <•ino ooo N e o A

10. ITCD

O OOO « 10 10 1Co r» eIMN

O OOO O V CO . ' IflN \e fen 9>, • «4

o ooe i 0 c o •» ieo% CD r>N

e OB oe « » 10 oeIM . • - ' 94 9-

f4

o woo « « « oe« ' n'M '

O OOO « « CD OBN O I N

O OON CD evem • -

• . - «• ft «. &« .1. i -J * wM • to& *1 ' fi*

I'M 1 8 > g 6 6 « a

ee .0 mooon o

oo o o eoo co o

oo b Nooee oft

OO O VOOOO O

-4 o re o f>o oc 'o

oo « O N O O O et

NO o ooooe oi

oo co oeooo o

oo N oeooo o-4

.

OO . f OOOOO O

e«o * N o c N os oN

o o <r o o e o o ofV<

o re «r «oow«0 o1 94 • ft

OO O OO94OO N

— * ^ ^_ * ft b4 ft B ••H n . » i • *510 ft« & & & (Jl & «

• ! t) e « e « « « c ••DM)<M « C ••HA-^-H i 8*4 )i-4tJ»<-i'Hoebiocij3.:

(4 t* Si

0 O

o o

e o...

0 O

O 0

0 0

e o

o o

o o

0 0

o o

e o

0 O

N O

•*

''Ma: C*D b> •>«•«»•• hb to1 ) N-41 IBM

»5,,„

15

sen

1tc1

gw

„ II« . ••* «

I %i

*l?1INI

>1

tJl»4

U

a.

>1

ji4

U

B

>d

»1 fe

OS

>

*'1.

tt

M

«

u

gt<

o eo o o •* O o*0* _

o o o o ' f o oo

O OOO N O Oft ft

o <* o o to o o, - 94

• • ' • ' . . .o moo r» .0 o

o •<» o o to o o.4

O «» O O "» O O

o ooo o • o o

94 ft ft o ' co . o o

O ' to N O 0 0 O .ft

ft OOO to O O

O O O O N 0 O

o ooo o o o

0 O O O •» 0 O

re o r e r e co o o

•* o o o « o o

o . o * ^ • n» ' oo

o ooo *4 re «

gl u' Ol 9

, . 51 ^j ~ ^Wl «W5» b* i & is :( ? • * o . « a l l s

II | l '-ll if li *i 1 1 illIP; III | ] If |]|S 11go 5 |3 o

N a«n o3

CO O t»N S "Ito re* ' •' * r«N re a»o *r» re•<» q «re 9 «»

Ml *ft rei* ftre tosCO CO- CO•4 CO CO

ft ft

94 •m «494 co mN 9 •*

M •"* **

tO 9tft ft

ftft

•» «o «N O N

<O •d 1 1to ^ co»4 rt •»

2 N

9t <«N 3

2 « «re •<* N

a« re o94 \n »•* "4

co oN r««n

co re «•4 .m 94

tO • -4re re MI* .4

2 3 r. s

- M ^

3 3

d ! i1 2 °

398 8 $&i

16

and third lowest (1.51) diversity values were obtained for theStation 2 Left and Right samples, respectively. Station 2 isconsidered a control station, since it is located upstream fromthe Whitmoyer Laboratories Site and is considered unlikely to beimpacted by the site. The low values, however, are probably theresult of the physical habitat (lower flows and small particlesize of substrate). It should be noted, however, that thislocation was selected because it best represented the habitats atthe downstream stations, and there was no other area available.The lower species diversity values obtained for the Station 2, 8,10 and 13 samples should bis interpreted with some reservations.As noted in the Methodologies section, the Chironomidae wereidentified to the family taxonomic level. In these particularsamples the Chironomidae accounted for 46 to 78% of the totalnumber of organisms. A qualitative examination of the Chir-onomidae in these samples was performed using a dissecting micro-scope and the results indicated that a diverse chironomid faunawas present in the Station 2, 8 and 13 samples. Chi'ronomids fromthe Subfamilies Chironomini, Tanytarsini and Orthocladiinaeappeared to be rather evenly distributed in these samples. TheStation 10 samples .were not as diverse, and were dominated by theOrthocladiinae. Chironomidae genera noted in these particularsamples included Crleoteous. Eukieffcriella. Thienemanniella.Tvetenia. Parametriocnemus. Hi,cropseetra or Tanytarsus. Micro-tendioes and PolvoediluTn. Several other genera that could not beidentified at this magnification (50X) were also present. If theChironomidae had been quantitatively identified to genus level,the species diversity values would not have been so low for thesesamples. Similarly, if annelids had been quantified to the genuslevel, the species diversity values would not have been so low(especially for Stations 2 and 13). Therefore, it may beerroneous to make a definitive statement about the water qualityconditions at these stations based upon the species diversityvalues alone. Figure 3 presents the species diversity values ingraphic form.Percent composition by taxa is another species diversity measureused to compare contaminated and reference (background) areas.Table 4 lists the percent composition for major benthic macro-invertebrate taxa collected in the Tulpehocken Creek samples. TheOrder Diptera was the dominant taxa at Stations 2, 8, 10 and 13.Figure 3 presents the percent composition for the major taxa,averaged for each station, as calculated from the station averageslisted in Table 3.Although every attempt was made to select stations with identicalhabitats, this was not possible. The gradient over the entirestudy area ranged from the top of the watershed to several milesdownstream. This resulted in variable flow rates that in itselfcould account for a changing fauna.

AR30I2I5

I

u

i-«iif,c>-4

O

2L5u35*32£

I"L*0

&

2^r3ia**<»94

ro*)

5*»e•M

s

rein»4

r*eore-

too

o•*•

n

2

Ut—i

1usn

CO N

to ^in <-4

N

O 00

d re00 1-

01 94m •0 O

N 4 0

*•? rJ

**l O~4 94

00 IMfM «"l!2 ri- 'W €*1

as *3i i(M IM

IIAJ U

3 3V) (A

N «

M 94

0 94

eo min oto m

re into ftft

ft *M 94ft ft

ft ino o

re toin 94o re

et ,tt tto «

1 1jj U

3 3(A VI

r» to94 94

•* r»o o

ot to« -4•* to

r« I*r> r>•4

^ °•» mft 94

i

o inO O

.-.-••+ co3 3•4 N

« ai io o

1 1u u3 3IA ta

O tO Ain o ft

in .4 ftCO m M

in vo M1* <O Oin i* eo

.

94 94 tO

rt in »4v4

'

m to inn o O

re re •*

•

eo re «co ft eoOI 94 •*

« 0 UI I Ift n ft

II 1It U U31 0

M UW W W

01 to «4

to r» <»0 0 0

0 « COco m i*rt N «

*

.4 O ' »•

CO tO *4N * . N

N 00 : 94r* ft ftft ft ft

• ft ft

'

o •* o* N tOM O CO« P» tO

at u *Ji i iin in M

1 1 1u u tU li J,w w u

i i i

13 flR30I216

SPECIES DIVERSITY VALUESWHITMOYER LABORATORIES BENTHIC SURVEY

8PECIE3 DIVERSITY INDEX

STA 1 STA 2 STA 8 STA 10 STA 13 STA 15BENTHIC STATIONS ON TULPEHOCKEN CREEK

LOCATION IN STREAMi CENTER ••LEFT

PERCENT COMPOSITION - MAJOR BENTHIC TAXAWHITMOYER LABORATORIES BENTHIC SURVEYPERCENT COMPOSITION

8TA f 6TA 2 8TA 8 8TA 10 8TA 13 8TA15BENTHIC STATIONS ON TULPEHOCKEN CREEK

BENTHIC TAXACD Ephtmtroptori HH OllflpohMta •§ OthtrHID Trlehoptera GZZ2 CoUopttrt •§ Olptora

FIGORE 3

Species Diversity Values and Percent Composition byMajor Benthic Macroinvertebrate Taxa for Samples Collected

From Tulpehocken Creek on October 11 and 12, 1988Whitmoyer Laboratories Site

Substrate, another very important criteria for species coloniza-, jtion was not identical over the length of the stream. The benthib-<xfauna of a stream is found mainly in cracks and crevices, between.and under rocks and gravel, or in the boundary layer on top ofstones where the water velocity is greatly reduced. Most loticinsects move by crawling or passive displacement, and havedeveloped behavior patterns to avoid the current. Rubble domi-nated substrates tend to provide more microhabitats for coloniza-tion than substrates composed of finer particle sizes. Thisprobably accounts for Station 2 having lower diversity values.However, due to the stream gradient, the riffle selected forsampling at Station 2 was the best location available.Species diversity values can fluctuate on a seasonal basis inresponse to the varying life cycles of the aquatic insects thatinhabit a stream. The present benthic survey resulted in thecollection of many larvae and nymphs of univoltine (cna life cycleper year) aquatic insects, which developed from eggs oviposited byadults during the summer months. These larvae'and nymphs havevarying growth rates, but many grow rapidly until the water coolsdown, then overwinter as late instar stages. The emergence ofadults usually occurs in the spring or early summer. Some species -of Chironomidae and the mayfly Baetis can produce more than onegeneration per year.Without a baseline study, it is difficult to conclusively statethat the Whitmcyer Laboratories Site is having no effect on thebenthic fauna of Tulpehocken Creek. The results of the currentbenthic macroinvertebrate study suggest that the benthic fauna didnot appear to be negatively impacted, when compared to relativelyundisturbed streams. It would be very difficult to establish theWhitmoyer Laboratories Site as the causal agent of minordifferences in species composition or abundance, in view of theconfounding variables (flow, substrate, and farm runoff variancebetween stations) associated with this study. The possibleeffects of inflow from Owl Creek, Mill Creek and various pointsources on the benthic community of Tulpehocken Creek downstreamfrom Station 10 could not be completely addressed, since theselocations were not sampled.4c. Fishery surveysTable 5 lists the scientific and common names for fish speciescollected from Tulpehocken Creek, Myerstown Pond and LakesideQuarry during the survey conducted on 11 through 14 October, 1983.Twenty-three species of fish representing seven families werecollected in the survey. No special status species (Federal orState endangered, threatened or rare species) were collected inthe fishery survey. Game fish include brown trout, smallmouthbass and largemouth bass. Panfish collected include the six otherspecies of sunfish, plus yellow perch, channel catfish, and browbullhead. All other fish species collected are considerednon-game (forage) species.

20

ri •\j~«

table 5Fish Species Collected From Tulpehocken Creek, MyerstownPond and Lakeside Quarry on October 11 through 14, 1988

Whitmoyer Laboratories Site

Scientific Name Common Name

Salmonidae (Trouts)Salmo trutta Brown trout

Cyprinidae (Carps and Minnows)Campostoma anomalum Central stoneroilerCyprinus carpio Common carpNotemigonus crysoleucas Golden shinerKotropis hudsonius . Spottail shinerKotropis stramineus Sand shinerRhiniehtvs atratulus Blacknose daceSemotilus atromaeulatus Creek chub

Catostomidae ; (Suckers)Catostomus commersohi ' White suckerMoxostoma maerolepidotum Northern shorthead

redhorse

Ictaluridae (Bullhead catfishes)Ictalurus nebulosus Brown bullheadIctalurus punetatus Channel catfish

• v , ' • N •

Cyprinodontidae (Killifishes)Fundulus diaphanus Banded killifish

» • . . . • . . • • . '

Centrarchidae (Eunfishes)Ambloplites rupestris Rock bassLepomis cyanellus Green sunfishLepomis gibbosus PumpkinseedLepomis rnacrochirus BluegillMicropterus dolomieui Smallmouth bassMicropterus salmoides Largemouth bass

Tt, ;omoxis annularis • White crappie: 'omoxis nigromaeulatus Black crappie

V

Fercidae (Perches)Etheostoma olmstedi Tessellated darterPerca flavescens Yellow-perch

21

Table 6Quantitative Data for Fish Species Collected From

Tulpehocken Creek, Myerstown Pond and Lakeside Quarry Duringthe Fishery Survey Conducted on October 11 through 14, 1988

Whitmoyer Laboratories Site

STATIONSTulpehocken Creek Pond Quarry

TAXA________ 2 4 10 15 16 17

Brown trout 2 0 0 00 1Central stoneroller 0 0 3 00 0Common carp .2 10 3 10 14 2Golden shiner 3 11 2 -1 3 ' 0Spottail shiner 43 0 0 0 00Sand shiner . 0 0 13 00 0Blacknose dace 4 8 5 3 4 0 0 0Creek chub 10 0 2 0 00White sucker 129 23 99 23 6 6Northern shortheadredhorse 0 0 0 2 0 0Brown bullhead 0 0 0 0 1 1Channel catfish 0 0 0 01 0Banded kilUfish 2 0 , ( 0 0 0 0Rock bass 00 0 1 0 0Green sunfish 0 0 1 0 1 0Pumpkinseed 33 4 0 0 2 0Bluegill 2 0 0 0 12 5Stnallmouth bass 0 00 1 0 0Largemoutb bass 0 00 1 7 5White crappie 0 0 0 0 34 0Black crappie 0 00 0 1 1Tessellated darter 19 10 15 0 00Yellow perch 0 0 0 00 9

TOTAL NUMBER OFSPECIES 11 6 97 11 8

TOTAL NUMBER OFFISH 293 63 172 39 82 30

flft3QI220- - 22

The number of fish collected during the fishery survey at each"station for each species is presented in Table 6. The greatestnumber of species (11) was collected at Stations 2 and 16. Theleast number of species (6) was collected at Station 4. Theeffort expended at each station is described in Section 3c.

The fish collected.in the survey were fairly robust and displayedgood coloration. There were no signs of overt disease such asreddened areas, nodular growths, skin lesions and fungus. Thegills.of the fish were a healthy bright red and free of ectopara-sites. There were no observations in the field of fish displayingbehaviors indicative of environmental stress or ill health (e.g.,fish gulping air at the surface or erratic swimming patterns).The extent and effects of fishing pressure on the water bodiessurveyed was not' discernible from direct observation. However, afew recreational anglers were observed at Myerstown Pond andLakeside Quarry during the week the biological surveys wereconducted. Fishing rod stands were noted along the shore atCharming Forge Lake.The spillage from Charming Forge Lake is aerated as it passes overthe Charming Forge Dam. The portion of Tulpehocken Creek immed-iately upstream from the dam had a lower dissolved oxygen readingthan the other stations (Table 2). Carp and white suckers werethe dominant species collected in the first pool downstream fromthe dam (Table 6). Only one gamefich (smallmouth bass) wascollected downstream from the dam. However, this station wassampled primarily to obtain fish for the bioaccumulation study,and was not as intensely sampled for species composition.The sampling techniques used in the fishery survey have varyinglevels of efficiency, which can affect the type and size of fishcollected. Electrofishing efficiency is influenced by fishcharacteristics, habitat characteristics and operating conditions.Fish which inhabit the shoreline, such as perches, sunfishes,'carps and minnows are usually more vulnerable to electrofishingthan the benthic feeders, such as bullhead catfishes. Electro-fishing is selective towards the capture of large fish. Largefish receive a greater electroshock than smaller fish because thetotal body voltage increases with length, for a given voltage.Large fish are also easier to spot than small fish, whichincreases the probability that they will be caught by dip-netters.Several habitat characteristics can affect the efficiency ofelectrofishing. Fish metabolism increases at higher watertemperatures, which results in better perception and avoidance ofthe electrical field by the fish. Water transparency can affectthe ability of dip-netters to see the stunned fish. The water wasless transparent at Union Canal and Myerstown Pond than at thestations on Tulpehocken Creek. Mud and silt substrates, such asthose encountered at Charming Forge Lake, will reduce the current

flR30l22l

density of an electrical field more than gravel and rubble,electrofishing less efficient.Gill net sampling is affected by the size selectivity of the mesh:sizes. For a given mesh size, fish of a certain optimum size willbe held most securely. Fish larger or smaller than this optimumsize are less likely to be caught. The larger mesh panels tend tocollect more fish,,because young fish are less likely to pushthrough the mesh. For this reason, young fish are the mostabundant age group collected in experimental gill net samples, aswas observed in this fishery survey.Gill nets are selective for fish that are highly mobile. Watertemperature, turbidity, currents and water depth can affect fishmovement patterns. Spawning activity and habitat requirements cancause seasonal patterns of movement. Certain fish (e.g., bass)are better at avoiding capture in gill nets than other fish. Allof these factors play a part in determining the species composi-tion, size distribution and abundance of fish collected in afishery survey. .As with the benthic macroinvertebrate survey, habitat played acritical role in determining species composition. The fishstations were selected with the same care as the other biologicalstations; however, stream gradient, substrate and canopy (cover)

• variance also have major influences on the species distributionGiven these variables, it would be very difficult to identifywater quality as the cause of differences in community structure.Sample preparation data and laboratory results for arsenic concen-trations in the whole body and fish tissue samples are presentedin Table 7. Composite samples of game fish were not available forStations 4 and 10 due to the limited quantity and small size, ofgame fish collected at these stations.The fish samples were analyzed for arsenic by an EPA ContractLaboratory Program (CLP) laboratory under the Special AnalyticalServices (SAS) program. Arsenic was not detected in any of thefish samples analyzed at a detection limit of 2.0 mg/kg.The highest arsenic concentrations measured in surface water fromfish sample stations were from Station 10. The dissolved arsenicconcentration averaged 55.2 ug/1 As (34.1 ug/1 on 7/16/88 and 76.3ug/1 oit 10/4/88; fish samples were collected on 10/11-13/88).Using the average water concentration, the arsenic bioconcentra-tion factor (BCF) at Station 10 is less than 36.2. Since noarsenic concentrations were detected, an actual BCF can not becalculated. The BCF may actually be much lower than 36.2. In•Ambient Water Quality for Arsenic" (1984), EPA estimated themaximum BCFs for As*3, As"1"5, and organoarsenicals to be 17, 6, and9, respectively. The data from the Whitmoyer Site do not conflictwith these numbers. i )

. . •' ' ; - - ' ' '• •• ' . ' . ' ' -. - • - ' • • ' ; • ' . ' 2 4 • ' , - • ' • . .

/VR30I222

IC

§ g g S g g g g g g g g g g g g gIIa

n 6 « n 6 « *>3 •• .s. e ° s PI 3,-* '* 3 * - *5 e « « o «

b b 5 hi

OElln is!W t^-i tf] m m mm m mmm mm ft ft ft ft 94 94 m

hi hi hi b hi hi fcj • b 14 14 hi hi &4 WV O O O t J V O C C C V O O O

n n S w w « no n w M n n •> S a a a5 S 5 S S S £ 5 S 5 S £ S 5 z 8 S 5

gH L «t • <r -OB m OD «* IM • IM «r « OB o tn IM 35H •* o o * IN o ' «•« «-• oo e m «r mm m IME ft ft ft . * «r w • 10 r- r- «o oo r- e» B vow

? f f ? f I f f ? o o o o o e oi it. ' • . A AU U U U O O U U U U UU U Umm m m m m m m m mm mmm m m mft ft ft .ft ft ft ft ft .ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ftf t f t f t ' f t f t f t f t f t f t f t f t f t f t f t f t f t f t

25 M30I223

9m

ICO CD CD OD 0000 B 00 B OD B OB CO B B B B

SOD B V OD OD 00 00 B B B « 00 B B B CD BU I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ii p O O O O e o o O O O O O O O * 4 O v 4<< ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft ft!o i i i i i i i i j. i j. j. i i i i i **

9 4 . f t 9 4 9 t 9 4 9 4 f t 9 4 f t f t 9 4 f t 9 4 9 4 9 4 f t $I I t l l l l I I I I I . I I I I •s g § § g g § g s s s § s s s § sw f » 4 » 4 i M i M f n i n « < r i n i n m « e « B r > r o B

Ei Eii u* EJ "• *- "- C. K. I*. K. C ••• KU L< d fc. k ^• - - i t • •'.« * i i 7 T T • T T TS 55 S 5 5? 5 5 55 55 S 5 ^

r - C O C N O M I M r t * * 1 *

oo

; g § § i § i i § § § i § i i i § §

to tn2

i

ne * *~ «"" 9 *~ ~~ • 9' 9' r * o • « •« 4 A M j S < - 4 A j 3 r 4 * 4 j 3 t 4 » 4 J S M ' - 4 < - 4J a g n o a N o q w o q a q a qr ' S r l J r f r i S S r S S r J s S stki 3 h » 2 h i b i : * 3 a » 3 3 l h i 3 i > * « i

m m m ' * t n ' M > i n « - i c M » 4 m « 4 « n « 4 i M o

JB t» » • an

s 3 '3 «• •* •* « V*- - - - - 1 5 3U hi *

a a a T r -S «« S S i

IS 3 3 15 i 3 33 u u S 3 % A 9 3 p» » oS >4 a h» ua& • « • f y < '' 1 ' aM 9

4 b l o i r t t f ^ ' * • * » * • » » ' - i M i o i » f » r » r » r » i M i o•4 v4 *4 ^ «4 «4 v4 *4 ft ft M »4 M.

« M u » o d o e o r » v f l i o v » « n i n v n r 4 a > < n*4 *4 «4 o mm in •v.tn IM in o •» »* in r»

«o> o a c a nco a « oa eo ea> « « «o < a > 9 ao.oi i i i i i i i i i . i i i i i i ift ft ft ft ft ft ft I M I M ' I M ft ft ft ft ft ft fti t i I t i i I i i t I i i I i Io o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

1 4 I I I I I I I t I I I I I IO O O O O O O O O O O O O Q Q OSo oo o o o o oo o oo a oo o ft M IM ft m « r» co S o M

B O O f t f t f t f t f t f t f l f t f t f t f t

, If ? ? ? ? I ? ? f ? ? ? T.T Ts s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s« 01 O K C I M M •» in t o r > >o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IO o o o O o O O o o o o v O O O oin in ui 1/1 m in m m. m m m m m m-m m inI M M I M I M I M I M I M I M I M I M I M l M I M I M r M I M I Mft ft ft ft CM CM ff.CM IM (M (M CM CM CM 04 C M I M . _ .

•

26 ' flR30!22it

•§•5

51o• •ft9

3<u3

i»

APPOfOIXH-2

BIRD AMD MMtttL SURVET

\ '

AR30I225

COMMONWiAUH OF •ENN8YUMOA

___ —...... .W4470traneHiiioit.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.

J.r*1711M7f7

June 16, 1989

Mr. Terry R. RajahBiologist/Field Team LeaderNUS CorporationPark West Two, Cliff Mine RoadPittsburgh, PA 15275-1071

Dear Mr. Rajah?

In response to your request for Pennsylvania GameCommission Fish and Wildlife Database Search, we are unable toprovide a Data Search at this time. Due to computer updatingat Bloomsburg University we are experiencing technicaldeficiencies associated there. Presently we are attempting tocorrect the deficiencies.

We are sorry for any inconvenience this may causeyou. If you have any questions or require assistance pleasecontact Ms. Bullock at (717) 787-1570.any questions orcontact Ms. Bullock at (717) 787-1570.

Very truly yours,

Jacob I. SitlingerADirectorBureau of Land Management

1R30I226

APPENDIX K-3

FISH. AMPHIBIAN AND REPTILE SURVEY

flft30f227

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIAPENNSYLVANIA FISH COMMISSIONOtvWen of FtahtriM MAMfftmtat

450 Robinson UneBeflefonte. ft* IM2J-96I6

June 20, 1989

NUS CorporationTerry R.Rojahn, Biologist/Field Team Leader •Park West TwoCHff Mine RoadPittsburgh, PA 15275-1071 "Dear Mr. Rojahn:I have examined the map accompanying your recent correspondence which shows thelocation for the proposed remedial Investigation for the United StatesEnvironmental Protection Agency at the Whitmoyer Laboratories site In LebanonCounty, Pennsylvania. , .Presently, none of the fishes, amphibians, or reptiles we list as endangered orthreatened are known to occur at or 1n the Immediate vicinity of the studyarea.Enclosed 1s some Information concerning endangered and threatened species underour jurisdiction and that of the Game Commission.

Sincerely,

Clark N. Shlffer, CoordinatorHerpetology and Endangered Species

mamEnd.cc: R. Snyder

APPENDIX H-4

PLANT SURVEY

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA{J DEPT. OF RESOURCES

BUREAU OF FORESTRYP.O. BOX 1467HARRXSBURO, PA. 17120717/787-3444

. June 20, 1989

Hr. Terry R. RojahnNUS Corporation .Park Vsat TwoCliff Hin* RoadPlttaburgh, PA 15275-1071

• Rst Review of Whltaoyar Laboratories Site. • ' • • . . r • • . i -

Dear Mr. Rojahnt

Your request to review th» Vhitaoysr Laboratories citelocated in Lebanon County, Pennsylvania vaa processed using thsPennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory (PHDI). A specificsearch of the current PHDI locational data fields did not rsvsalany natural resources of special concern in the project area.

Pleaas rsasabsr that legal authority for Pennsylvania'sbiological resources resides with three administrative agencies.Ths enclosure titled, "PHDI Species List, ' outlines which spscissgroups ara Managed by thsss agencies. Although PHD Z functionssolely as an information systs* for natural resources of concern,th* Pennsylvania GaM Co««ission saintains ths Fish and WildlifeData Bass which can provide data descriptive of all saasals andbirds co»»on to Pennsylvania*

PHDI is a sits spocif ic information systt* which dsseribsssignificant natural rssources of Pennsylvania. PHDI inoludssdata dsseriptiv* of plant and anlsal sp*cles of special concern,sxssplsry natural eesaunitisa and unique geological features.Ths data syvts* is coordinated and saintainsd by ths Ospartasntof Environssntal Rssourcss with tschnlcal assistance frea thsNaturs Conservancy and tha wsatsrn Pennsylvania Conservancy.This response rsprsssnta tha sost up-to-dats auaaary of ths PHDIdata ayataa. Howsvsr, ths data is not intended to ba aconclualva compilation of tha apaelal eoneara resources at thaproject aita. On-aita biological surveys ara raeoaaandad tobat tar aaaaaaa tha natural resources of tha projact arsa.

Thank You for uaing PHDI as part of your anvlronaentalraviaw. Support for MIDI la pradoainantly dtrlvad from tha laid.Raaoures Consarvat ion Fund which raclavaa aoniaa froa tha

AR30I230

/-

APPENDIX I

BROUNDIttTER GRADIENT AND FLOW CALCUUTIONS

APPENDIX I-IGROUNDHATER FLOW CALCULATION

\ .

AR30I232

B ri Kb

04-T--rf

E*4"vpleI FT

*•. 700

r* x*tT* IODPT

T -

^ T W ( . ooo FT^ x I ooo FT x /Fr^ ' /A>

ARi30l233

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCUtATJONl V.J

CLIENT: nth V-SUBJECT: CHECKED §Y:mun 7/2* /«<»

a-OATfc

Q-

Avere. K rfST/O V

0.0255

O.OS7

TAireavjAts GAseCi OM UJATSH.

~ Z7657 = WIDTH•^ ^uJ L -

TO *

All4VA.li.llc

NUS CORPORA TIONAND SUBSIDIARY STANDARD cW

AR30I235

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULATION

FlUNO §Y: 0*7SUBJECT: CHECKED IV;

Plow fl«A/«4T* $iTe

/<

3ifr

r r 1051

»- 3538/' ' '

7/za /MDATI:

v. 7.va/ .

AR30I236••MI«u cCMmnnt*«

NUS CORPORA TIONAND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULATION

(terra

'«. l37.56-3o.iv..Oi*/

T -

"r • FTV

V TJ (

Gl - JTfcm FT*- v /7^5- Fr v

x. - . , . " • . • : ' • • • '0*1

Q x V68i PTV

?. /3 AR30I237

\NUSCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULATIONi • • ———————•———————————————————- - _______OrTCC / I•""• ^ • ""•••—~— ^—..i ^ J

FOE NO •Y:MOI 0*2

<SrCHECKED BY: DATE:

$*toa*T-o

(3 =

nut in* Mvan oitt/38o

= 584.57 - /37.3S

r i v I— r«s' O

T = <3.057 FT v 7Vf./? FT' i ——-1 /N .„

r -

a--

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES S1ANDARD CALCULA TION

£ <oe-*TH S i

__/fl ^00

"

-2.1

AR30I239

ix/

APPENDIX 1-2

6ROUNDHATER VELOCITY CALCULATIONS

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES SrANDARD CALCULATION

0.105

.?'- 31 OSI*vj 100*1

V * ^O./o

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES______ STANDARD^ CALCULATION^ ;<£ :>••'-

sJSUBJECT:

V -

•7 - 7. 23* X /O"1

FT /ye

DATf:

NUS CORPORATIONAND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULATIONS.»___;—— __________SfjfccTl

-" fASUBJECT;

& WAk/ Fi0-j \/*/6c;4,4ce5 DATE:±K* y,j/ff \ Wu-^7 -

77 •- 7. 5" /O'!f

V s 7? 7 FT/V£>

3.8 x/a'*

P.V.

TD r '"fr/.yt

NUSCORPORATIONANDSUBSIDIARieS

CUENT: BY:or/2 O;

SUBJECT:

•717

CHECKED BY

m

w

7 v A 35* x/o"5"7" - 73-5 FT

JT8- -Pr/v. v

DATE:4*

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBS/D/AR/ES____ STANDARD CALCULATIONCUENT:,-,.USepASUBJECT

V

7

FT

3. fc-./

Y ' F T

OS XXO*^ */n A c

\NUSCORPORATIONANDSUBSIDIARIES -STANDARD CALCULATION V:»'

TBY: MOI

SUBJECT:

T ?

IQHC

(3-70

3.J2X/0*5'

<2C3 N'

FT

STANDARD CALCULATIONSHEET

NUS CORPORA TIONAND SUBSIDIARIES

5,0,02.

/o

. i / - . - /ft 3

0,02.

a?6

•H«

I NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARDCALCULATIONSHEET\i ti

\U** - •' ««SUBJECT:

NUtlHAMCVISIOC*-

CHECKED BY:

3.9 .

H, 8 x

- M\A

/

C.I

DATE;&

6 "•

AR30l.2d6

NUSCORPORA TIONAND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULA TtO/V

"V -' '

j.O//

7.1 •••**• *>0.0 /

8,7

O.t

- //3y/IR30I2(*9

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULATIW

CUENTrUseP*SUBJECT:

Fill NO.: ,fin WH'frmvti — **$'»*c"lcu/?rJLf

ww/6'oy

fK

7

7 2

FT

? -- ^——- - . - . . ->

in c

pr

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULATIONSHEET

3 A

578

yv • USA 63/0//.Jy••/.sow- • • • »

- •v


CUENT:US

FIlC NO.: (*/*> BY:

SUBJECT:

NUI IHA Mvtsf a a>u

/A Fr/vd/0s&

- ;086 9^ pT/VitPr

MW-/.56 HB Frw va - 1, -,- e /3.9/ FT /

- oic 3V, Q FT/yiz.

DATE

APPENDIX 1-3

GROUNDKATER GRADIENT CALCULATIONS

flK30l2S3

NUS CORPORATION AND St/BSfD/AR/ES

A

STANDAHU CALCULATIONSHEET

Across -fk sJ4c./iA/^ Across

Xf

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULA J70/V

CUENT;._ _ _ ri*-™r>»•* • i.i.fi -~~ c: m ts MOI>

SUBJECT: . >. . , CHECKEDBY:^

. J

//./&

7 _ 52J — - '- /<50°

ao/8/.

mvsi-/ne>/5.8iv

>c. •* 0.0/37 > "AH30I255

NUS CORPORA TIONAND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCUL°

X -

Deep

>L - 0.0 /AS

NUSIIUKtVISIOett*

\NUSCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULATION^«*.••

CUENT: FOB NO.../InSUBJECT: CHECKED BY:

wtlUl

DATE:

^ 0 011S"

6

.••

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULA TIQNSHEET

= "d.

X4- ,*.'^4v c

Ack**|tkt lir-M*

NUS CORPORA TION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CLIENT_,.__.!SUBJECT:

STANDARD CALCULATIONSHEET

-To

\A^

,

.€&'***?•VS7.V,

Cley

, . ' / -

" • |

60-428

66 -

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULA^; '-

FllfiNOj73/7 MCE 2. OF

SUBJECT: CHECKED BY: DATE:fl\v4«\

(.'

VC '• *9*

* O.I OOf

10

r/3.30.0300

.0.

ay. r /a -7 -20.140 -

AR30I260

STANDARD CALCULA TIONSHEET

60 -; j

, /AVfe*

dSl.o

ur '-'J SLVe- T*X

!-, 'j- Ve> o-oo^v

fl'B'301261-

\NUSCORPORATIONANDSUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULATION

•**;»* u.SUBJECT:

<Svj fi,u

«Y$

« 0.0931

TO.

DATE:

/»<*/- ii -76 W^ei "*•> 60- Hi

,"

31 /f --88

s vy9Jo /ov 77. v -s \(89. 7J


/8.OS-

V6 •••••O

/eo

NUStUAMVUtOttlt ' A 3.0126 3

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBS,DIAR,ES STANDARD CALCULAJ,

MOB 4DATE:

3iO"7 c/t/: ' .1( Ff.-.._ Tfl.

A

3. 6

\/<r

O;

APPENDIX J

TULPEHOCKEN CREEK-UNION CANAL STREAM PROFILES

11)381-265

ufl.Y-

F«Mft ,/fgo

•MUM

\NUSCORPORATIONAND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULATION^ »l

JSUBJECT:

P/ot'k

&***i 3 2-

CHECKED BY:

'^ . I x.$ ^ •

%

0 o o3.3L 0.3 d/'«/vi- ay 0.14-5 0-3 . • . , o

o o

NUS CORPORA TION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULATION

CUENT: WIND.:ND.:/snSUBJECT: CHECKED BY: DATE:

0

/./.? /.a0,3 . /.o

. __10 .

<D

c !•£•>?.«» -,——•

* t

NMIMAMVOfOflBM

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULATION^

CUENT:

SUBJECT:ft*f-

CHECKED BY:

a8z '3X1.7

DATE: at

V

0 03 0.36 o.y .

6.303o

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

H I f mjpsftk. Stf*Arv\ ffa£i'|«*

<K>

.-««« * ' * - . . *

* J? J* 3'fLLI-STB

i BY:

0 O 0a v.-o 0.7</ /.r o.6 AV 0.1r /.//f>

NUSCORPORATIONANDSUBSIDIARieS STANDARD

SUBJECT: CHECKED BY:

u 1-7 r-4 •• •* - -5V

DATE:

o,/

•••• **•• I

uNUS CORPORA TION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULAJjjjN

'iTigffr I""}?/•• J ""MOOi BM w BH£M B£HlIECT:UJH,' Y~oy <«. CW/h-N /? ,0P«j

t tr-. = •

SUBJECT:BY:

*3 ICVICHECKED BY?

Ui'fX h6 * t't-6/ s. .4V5-X l«8c I.i7i fv.^x/,«/ c'.ef^. *.'5> |»2.= . '""

€> «>

^ 1-12-•'-.I-II.' -"""- c»t-6

f^LM C*/i?

WOE 7otDATE:6 -8

as

0,0

I. I 1.4.. 1.4 i.

•— — ••' -- — ___ 8

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULATION^

CLIENT: BY*

SUBJECT: CHECKED BY:

DepTH

00.75"

{: •i^Pi . .

DATE:

O.J/2. 0, 0. 1

I NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULA

1

\/

0 0 08.V

Q *v

_v 37

h. .

MS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULATION^

p r- MM/0 OftSUBJECT:

w H i-CHECKED BY: DA

"V

A3

a o

0."»

s/•ax •

i (-75*. .

NUS CORPORA TION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULATIO* SHEET

S f

&< j *

L r,;s-5"

< l !

"0.300.60D.70/o

l.to 1.7 1.7 1.4.

\NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULAn . .

CUENT;

CHECKED BY:(TMJA 0/27

V

0 63 0.1b 6-1 O.I<\ O.i O.Il* 0,3 O.


0.8

'•' co'*•* O.fAO tf.0

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES_________STANDARD CALCULATION!

CUENT: §vSUBJECT: CHECKED BY:

i.X ».4 o.c*

U/27OAT*

3 O.x o. I4 0."7 O./

a . 0.3 o. /• . O O


d=ri•9- o o'?: ••••../•' 0.8a /-3 o.sr/, Ayr M/z- /.ZO 0.8s-'W 0.0 O

l-"1. *:•» 4A »A


CUENT: r /? BY*

SUBJECT: CHECKED BY: BATE:

8

"V (

O c> ^3 Ao 0.1••& /.tv- 0.1T /•/ 0.3a o.t> 0.7./3?r ... _ O. O

re*

M

« .2X S-/ ^.«1 r -57

V-

IMSGOf&OmtlQWNDSUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULATION^"" ~ " ' " • • ••'••- -' •' '• ______ SHEET\

U SUBJECT:

*?.

CHECKED BY:'0/27

r V

t

AR3.0I282

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULA JKW

CUENT: I FILENO.:./3 nSUBJECT: CHECKED BY: DATE:

6-20*1

03.-4^a/?.

4*7 g I

>

'•J

0.0

6-706<trAC o.ir/.c 6J?6.vr 0.00.0

* £> cl"• V

; * *?« t x i • 6>:. .....* •!(»._ '• '•& o • 5 '* ty ': *5f _..P O'35> l|ip,f•,-»•-

•' :f5kc:> »- - * •'•

* «JPX^ O»5

IMS CORPORATIONANDSUBSIDIARIES_______ STANDARD CALCULATJOWl

CUEMT.

SUBJECT:U/Hi'4*,_(__

10

CHECKEDBY: DATE:

6 o o3 O.'if 0-Yt 0.8 0.5-

;.o dl.... . O.I

o.O

_ 'i

Ar- i — • A

" — «" - -• + • >. **^•6 • 1*3

- )

W30t2t5MM I'M* W

STANDARD CALCULATION

tePTM<,Ff>

0.0

AT CU7f /3r an/8 'i-o. 0,

1 CXO

//a. s ».s s.q 4.2.

' '-Jt 0 • £75T

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES_________STANDARD CALCULATION^

ntfNO.:rT*r**TV ft»'l&-Q*l \SUBJECT: CHECKED BY:

\\

O0.$- . 0.1O.0! 0.0j.as o./

12 '30 0.7/>r /ar o.y/a . /.a 0.7

i .

(FT) DEPTH. V/ Cfr/$«.

--1**

i •* 6:ijjj«if?i:JMTs_» ..Ska*,... *V—— i|Ji--K «*••

«^ ———

2-3 o.ao

a if

4--'-: ; .' , . - •. ....- ..... -.'.,. :".. ' - . ' -' • . .• Jt V .-.'-. .

A.€iT£ P .

NUS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES STANDARD CALCULATION , M

V"BXh.

SUBJECT: CHECKED BY: OATfc

£FT}

Oo.f

/aIS _....__..__._..0.1 ^ ..

: . O.|

. .'. 6 .r

* 2 .0>" " : . ' «• \

^

STANDARD CALCULATION

A

__ . -*fl301290•• •.»»! .».<*; M. .

\NUSCQRPQ8ATIQNANDSU8SIDIARIES • STANDARD CALCULATION

CUKNT:

SUBJECT: CKiCnEDBY:

ft . &**<> 1_

: \/6 O O

./a/ 3

nai.. . .V/& ./-IJ.i ., .f.:2f.- m3o_ __ _ - 0-67 ^-3

•l. '5f. . 0-3

OATfc

appendix f pump test calculations

Documents