applicability

99
In the process of power generation technology selection, the decision- maker is evaluating systems that will enable utilities to meet stringent environmental requirements while providing competitive electricity prices. The technologies must produce significantly lower emissions of acid rain gases, greenhouse gases, and air toxics species than the present generation of coal-fueled power plants. Additionally, the project must be environmentally sound such that a permit can be obtained before the project is considered for financing. The financial community looks at the satisfaction of regulatory and permit issues as a pre- requisite to any commitment. The permit must exist or be obtainable before the financial community will commit funds. Specifically, the financial community will not accept any permitting or environmental risk. This means that the need to develop and obtain the environmental permits is the responsibility of the ultimate owner or the developer. In addition, from the lender’s perspective, there is no “extra credit” given for developing a design that goes beyond the environmental and regulatory requirements. At a time when the utility business is becoming more deregulated, the technology required to produce electric power has to satisfy more environmental regulatory requirements. New or modified facilities must be developed to comply with a full range of environmental regulations. The significant regulations and environmental issues include: o National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) o Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA) o New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) o National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) o Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) o Greenhouse Gases Reduction o Emissions Allowances and Trading o Hazardous Air Pollutants o Water Discharge o Solid Waste Disposal o Externalities The CAAA requirements are the most extensive, and the technology needed to address these requirements offers an opportunity for CCTs to achieve a competitive advantage. The advantage to an existing generator is that the emission reductions required of existing plants would be achieved by repowering with a CCT rather than installing additional emission controls to the source. This assumption is realistic in that the CCT will meet the most stringent emission limitation expected. A review of both existing environmental regulations and potential future environmental concerns, which may or may not impact the selection of technology, is valuable to the decision-making process. The following highlights some of the key issues.

Upload: kevin-j-mills

Post on 16-Apr-2017

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Applicability

In the process of power generation technology selection, the decision-maker is evaluating systems that will enable utilities to meet stringent environmental requirements while providing competitive electricity prices. The technologies must produce significantly lower emissions of acid rain gases, greenhouse gases, and air toxics species than the present generation of coal-fueled power plants. Additionally, the project must be environmentally sound such that a permit can be obtained before the project is considered for financing. The financial community looks at the satisfaction of regulatory and permit issues as a pre-requisite to any commitment. The permit must exist or be obtainable before the financial community will commit funds. Specifically, the financial community will not accept any permitting or environmental risk. This means that the need to develop and obtain the environmental permits is the responsibility of the ultimate owner or the developer. In addition, from the lender’s perspective, there is no “extra credit” given for developing a design that goes beyond the environmental and regulatory requirements.

At a time when the utility business is becoming more deregulated, the technology required to produce electric power has to satisfy more environmental regulatory requirements. New or modified facilities must be developed to comply with a full range of environmental regulations. The significant regulations and environmental issues include:

o National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)o Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA)o New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)o National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)o Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)o Greenhouse Gases Reductiono Emissions Allowances and Tradingo Hazardous Air Pollutantso Water Dischargeo Solid Waste Disposalo Externalities

The CAAA requirements are the most extensive, and the technology needed to address these requirements offers an opportunity for CCTs to achieve a competitive advantage. The advantage to an existing generator is that the emission reductions required of existing plants would be achieved by repowering with a CCT rather than installing additional emission controls to the source. This assumption is realistic in that the CCT will meet the most stringent emission limitation expected.

A review of both existing environmental regulations and potential future environmental concerns, which may or may not impact the selection of technology, is valuable to the decision-making process. The following highlights some of the key issues.

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) - NEPA of 1969 was approved into law on January 1, 1970. This Act established a national policy to promote efforts that will prevent or eliminate damage to the environment. The law required, as a part of a proposal for activities that could have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment, the submission of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The EIS identifies environmental impacts that can result from a project and then provides an approach and alternatives that may be used to mitigate the impacts. The specific requirements for the EIS have evolved and will continue to evolve. However, for CCT projects, the most significant requirements include emission streams, effluent streams, and waste streams associated with air, water, and solid waste. The

Page 2: Applicability

EIS will identify the quantity, composition, and frequency of discharges. The evaluation of discharges is essential to ensure the project meets discharge limitations.

Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA) - CAAA was signed into law in November of 1990 with a goal to reduce pollution from gaseous emissions by 56 billion pounds a year. The control of pollutants that can contribute to acid rain is subject to Title IV of the CAAA. These regulations include a two-phase, market-based approach to reduce SO2 emissions from power plants and provides for the requirement to have an allowance trading system. Reductions of oxides of nitrogen will also be achieved, but through performance standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Title III of the CAAA identifies a “major polluter” as a source that will emit more than 10 tons per year of any one of 189 listed hazardous pollutants or more than 25 tons per year of any combination of hazardous air pollutants. Other requirements of the CAAA cover non-attainment areas, permitting, motor vehicles, and stratospheric ozone depletion.

The Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct) - EPAct was signed into law in October of 1992. Under Title XVI, Global Climate Change is addressed. Among the provisions, Title XVI calls for DOE to establish a voluntary reporting system for participants to submit information on their greenhouse gas emissions. On October 19, 1993, the Climate Change Action Plan, which described the actions that would be taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, was released by the President and Vice President. The Plan describes nearly 50 new and expanded initiatives that would reduce emissions. Included in those initiatives were the use of CCTs.

New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) - The EPA has issued a series of standards that address a number of basic industrial categories. NSPS reflect the maximum degree of emission control that can be achieved by an industry through direct emission control, operation, and other available methods. NSPS are available for the various fuel sources and are used as a part of the permitting process. NSPS are applicable to the following combustion sources:

o Fossil fuel fired steam generatorso Electricity utility steam generating unitso Industrial - commercial - institutional steam generating unitso Incineratorso Municipal waste combustorso Sewage treatment plantso Gas turbines

National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) - The Clean Air Act directs EPA to identify and set national ambient air quality standards for pollutants that cause adverse effects to public health and the environment. EPA has set national air quality standards for six common air pollutants: particulate matter (measured as PM10 and PM2.5), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), ground-level ozone (O3) [smog], and lead (Pb). For each of these pollutants, EPA has set health-based or “primary” standards to protect public health, and welfare-based or “secondary” standards to protect the environment (crops, vegetation, wildlife, buildings and national monuments, visibility, etc.). Additional requirements will be placed on facilities based on whether the facility will be located in an area that is meeting the ambient air quality standards. If the NAAQS are being met in an area of a proposed facility, the facility will be subject to the requirements of the attainment area (i.e., prevention of significant deterioration of air quality). If requirements are

Page 3: Applicability

not being met, non-attainment area requirements will be applicable. In non-attainment areas, the control equipment should be designed to achieve the lowest achievable emission rate (LAER), which is the most stringent of either any State’s Implementation Plan emission rate or any demonstrated technology but in no case less stringent than NSPS. The non-attainment area requirements also specify that the emissions from the new source be more than offset by a reduction in emissions from existing sources in the area.

Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) - The PSD requirements are applicable to major modifications or new major stationary sources being located in areas that are meeting NAAQS. The PSD requirements are developed around the concept of installing the best available control technology (BACT). By definition, the CCTs should qualify as BACT, which is the maximum degree for emission reduction determined on a case-by-case basis for new sources in clean air areas with cost, energy, and technical feasibility taken into account, but in no case is BACT less stringent than NSPS. The PSD requirements also include air quality dispersion modeling to estimate compliance with PSD increments and NAAQS. Preconstruction monitoring (both ambient air pollutants and meteorology) may be required for comparing existing ambient air quality to NAAQS and for dispersion modeling. An analysis of impairment to visibility, soils, and vegetation that would occur as a result of the source, and the air quality impacts of projected general commercial, residential, industrial, and other growth associated with the source is also required.

Environmental Externalities - The costs to society because of increased health care, depleted resources, and a general reduction in quality of life are environmental externalities. However, the consideration of environmental externalities has not yet been a major influence in the selection of technology for electrical power generation. The categories of environmental externalities range from measured impacts on crops, fish, recreational opportunities, and visual aesthetics. The trend away from reflecting environmental costs in utility decisions is occurring due to the ratepayer and competitive pressure to reduce the cost of power.

Environmental ConcernsAt the present time, the uncertainties of future pollution control plans discussed below cause concerns that will have to be addressed if they become an EPA standard. In fact, the more stringent standards will likely affect existing sources as well as future sources. The future sources will have to use the emission offsets from the existing sources against new sources. There has not been any indication of the direction that EPA is heading, and it is not possible to anticipate what the future requirements may be, or the effect. Nevertheless, the future emissions from a new or repowered plant with a CCT will be less than the emissions from the existing plant. Table 8-1 provides a brief implementation schedule for some of the CAAA Titles.

Ozone Non-Attainment - Title I of the CAAA addresses the issue of non-attainment, that is, those areas that are not meeting ambient air quality standards. The area of concern in this regard is the ozone non-attainment area. Within ozone non-attainment areas, the concern is that NOx emissions are being considered as precursors to ozone generation, and further control of NOx emissions may be forthcoming. In the Northeast Ozone Transport Region, a potential future requirement limiting NOx emission rates to 0.2 lb/MMBtu, or lower, may be imposed in order to meet ozone standards in the region.

Ozone NAAQS - EPA is phasing out and replacing the previous 1-hour primary ozone standard with a new 8-hour standard to protect against longer exposure periods. EPA is setting the standard at 0.08 parts per million (ppm). EPA will designate areas as

Page 4: Applicability

non-attainment for ozone by the year 2000 (using the most recently available three years of air quality data at that time). Areas will have up to three years (or until 2003) to develop and submit state implementation plans (SIPs) to provide for attainment of the new standard. The new standards will not require local emission controls until 2004, with no compliance determinations until 2007. The Clean Air Act allows up to 10 years from the date of designation for areas to attain the revised standards with the possibility of two one-year extensions.

Ozone Transport Assessment Group (OTAG) - Because ozone is a pollutant that travels great distances, it is increasingly clear that it must be addressed as a regional problem. For the past two years the EPA has been working with the 37 most eastern states through the OTAG in the belief that reducing interstate pollution will help all areas in the OTAG region attain the NAAQS. A regional approach can reduce compliance costs and allow many areas to avoid most traditional non-attainment planning requirements. The OTAG completed its work in June 1997 and forwarded recommendations to the EPA. Based on these recommendations, the EPA will propose a rule requiring states in the OTAG region that are significantly contributing to non-attainment or interfering with maintenance of attainment in downwind states to submit SIPs to reduce their interstate pollution. The EPA plans to issue the final rule by September 1998.

PM2.5 NAAQS - EPA is making more stringent the current particulate standard from PM10 down to PM2.5 and smaller. EPA revised the PM standards by adding a new annual PM2.5 standard set at 15 micrograms per cubic meter (g/m3) and a new 24-hour PM2.5 standard set at 65 g/m3. The EPA will make designation determinations (i.e., attainment, non-attainment, or unclassifiable) within two to three years of revising a standard. A comprehensive monitoring network will be required to determine ambient PM2.5 particle concentrations across the country. Monitoring data will be available from the earliest monitors by the spring of 2001, and three years of data will be available from all monitors in 2004. EPA will make the first determinations about which areas should be designated non-attainment status by 2002. States will have three years from the date of being designated non-attainment (or until between 2005 and 2008) to develop pollution control plans and submit them to EPA showing how they will meet the new standards. Areas will then have up to 10 years from their designation as non-attainment to attain the PM2.5 standards, with the possibility of two one-year extensions.

SO2 NAAQS - In January 1997, EPA proposed a new program to address the potential health risks posed to asthmatics by short-term peak levels of sulfur dioxide in localized situations. If implemented, this standard could affect sources with a potential to produce high concentrations of short-term bursts of SO2 emissions.

Haze - The EPA proposed regional haze regulations to address visibility impairment. The proposed regulations will protect specific areas of concern, known as “Class I” areas. The Clean Air Act defines mandatory Class I Federal areas as certain national parks (over 6,000 acres), wilderness areas (over 5,000 acres), national memorial parks (over 5,000 acres), and international parks. There are 156 of these areas protected under the existing visibility protection program. The proposed regional haze regulations apply to all states, including those states that do not have any Class I areas. State and local air quality agencies will implement the proposed regional haze program through revisions to their SIPs. The states will make decisions about specific emission management strategies.

Hazardous Air Pollutants - Title III of the CAAA covers the emissions of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) from stationary sources. This has the potential of requiring

Page 5: Applicability

power plants to control emissions of HAPs and to perform risk assessments of the most exposed individual if required by EPA. There is a study by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) that indicates the emissions of HAPs from power plants are quite small -- in fact, just over half the values previously estimated by EPA. The EPA is required under the CAAA to perform two studies on power plant HAP emissions; one regarding the emissions of mercury from power plants, and the other on all other HAP emissions from utility sources. The interim report on HAPs, including mercury, was sent to Congress in October 1996; the final report was issued in early 1998. The final report recommended further study on HAPs.

Acid Deposition - Title IV relates to acid deposition. Phase I SO2 emission requirements are being met primarily by fuel switching and/or blending, with some utilities opting for flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems to take advantage of bonus allowances for early compliance with the Phase II requirements. The indications are that Phase II requirements for the utilities will be a test of the use of the allowance system. Utilities are expected to be purchasing excess allowances during Phase I and saving them for use in Phase II. Many utilities will be able to postpone making a decision on the method to be used to comply with the allowance program, whether it is the further use of fuel switching, or the installation of FGD scrubbers (which are also being demonstrated in the CCT program), or repowering existing sources with a CCT system with its inherently low SO2 emission rate. The benefits of CCT are seen in the emission projections that are lower than emission rates projected by competitive technologies. Phase II NOx emission regulations are established for the various boiler types with the emission limits based on combustion controls, coal or natural gas reburning, or selective catalytic reduction.

NOx NSPS - The EPA proposed revisions to the Standards of Performance for Nitrogen Oxide emissions from new fossil-fuel fired steam generating units. The proposed emission limit is that after July 9, 1997 no affected unit shall be constructed, modified, or reconstructed such that the discharge of any gases contain nitrogen oxides in excess of 170 nanograms per joule (1.35 pounds per megawatt-hour) net energy output. < Definitions: Net output means the net useful work performed by the steam generated, taking into account the energy requirements for auxiliaries and emission controls. For units generating only electricity, the net useful work performed is the net electrical output (i.e., net busbar power leaving the plant) from the turbine generator set. >

Greenhouse Gases - International agreements have targeted CO2 for reduction to pre-1990 levels. The overall effect of these international agreements is that the use of fossil fuels must be made more efficient than the existing operations. The U.S. policy on climate change calls for signing a legally binding treaty to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. A Senate resolution (S.Res. 98) states that the Senate will not approve a treaty that does not set identical emissions levels and compliance timetables for all parties. The resolution endorses the scientific consensus on climate change, and, while it throws a spotlight on the issue of developing countries, it still allows the United States negotiating flexibility.

Water - Water-related requirements such as water usage may be a significant issue that impacts the environmental permitting. For example, the concept of zero discharge may impact the handling of the process water. The trend in this country and North America in general is toward the reduction of water usage.

Waste - A final area of concern relates to the requirements to reduce the quantity of the waste that is being discharged. The trend is toward developing a process that is capable of zero discharge. New projects need to look at the beneficial uses of the

Page 6: Applicability

solid waste, such as concrete production road construction or use of sulfur as the feed stock for process plant operation. The challenge will be to encourage use of byproducts in these markets and to develop additional markets.

Page 7: Applicability

40 CFR

§  60.1  Applicability.

(a) Except as provided in subparts B and C, the provisions of this part apply to the owner or operator of any stationary source which contains an affected facility, the construction or modification of which is commenced after the date of publication in this part of any standard (or, if earlier, the date of publication of any proposed standard) applicable to that facility.

(b) Any new or revised standard of performance promulgated pursuant to section 111(b) of the Act shall apply to the owner or operator of any stationary source which contains an affected facility, the construction or modification of which is commenced after the date of publication in this part of such new or revised standard (or, if earlier, the date of publication of any proposed standard) applicable to that facility.

(c) In addition to complying with the provisions of this part, the owner or operator of an affected facility may be required to obtain an operating permit issued to stationary sources by an authorized State air pollution control agency or by the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) pursuant to Title V of the Clean Air Act (Act) as amended November 15, 1990 (42 U.S.C. 7661). For more information about obtaining an operating permit see part 70 of this chapter.

(d) Site-specific standard for Merck & Co., Inc.'s Stonewall Plant in Elkton, Virginia. (1) This paragraph applies only to the pharmaceutical manufacturing facility, commonly referred to as the Stonewall Plant, located at Route 340 South, in Elkton, Virginia ("site").

(2) Except for compliance with 40 CFR 60.49b(u), the site shall have the option of either complying directly with the requirements of this part, or reducing the site-wide emissions caps in accordance with the procedures set forth in a permit issued pursuant to 40 CFR 52.2454. If the site chooses the option of reducing the site-wide emissions caps in accordance with the procedures set forth in such permit, the requirements of such permit shall apply in lieu of the otherwise applicable requirements of this part.

(3) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (d)(2) of this section, for any provisions of this part except for Subpart Kb, the owner/operator of the site shall comply with the applicable provisions of this part if the Administrator determines that compliance with the provisions of this part is necessary for achieving the objectives of the regulation and the Administrator notifies the site in accordance with the provisions of the permit issued pursuant to 40 CFR 52.2454.

§  60.111  Definitions.

As used in this subpart, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in the Act and in subpart A of this part.

(a) Storage vessel means any tank, reservoir, or container used for the storage of petroleum liquids, but does not include:

(1) Pressure vessels which are designed to operate in excess of 15 pounds per square inch gauge without emissions to the atmosphere except under emergency conditions,

Page 8: Applicability

(2) Subsurface caverns or porous rock reservoirs, or

(3) Underground tanks if the total volume of petroleum liquids added to and taken from a tank annually does not exceed twice the volume of the tank.

(b) Petroleum liquids means petroleum, condensate, and any finished or intermediate products manufactured in a petroleum refinery but does not mean Nos. 2 through 6 fuel oils as specified in ASTM D396-78, 89, 90, 92, 96, or 98, gas turbine fuel oils Nos. 2-GT through 4-GT as specified in ASTM D2880-78 or 96, or diesel fuel oils Nos. 2-D and 4-D as specified in ASTM D975-78, 96, or 98a. (These three methods are incorporated by reference -- see §60.17.)

(c) Petroleum refinery means each facility engaged in producing gasoline, kerosene, distillate fuel oils, residual fuel oils, lubricants, or other products through distillation of petroleum or through redistillation, cracking, extracting, or reforming of unfinished petroleum derivatives.

(d) Petroleum means the crude oil removed from the earth and the oils derived from tar sands, shale, and coal.

(e) Hydrocarbon means any organic compound consisting predominantly of carbon and hydrogen.

(f) Condensate means hydrocarbon liquid separated from natural gas which condenses due to changes in the temperature and/or pressure and remains liquid at standard conditions.

(g) Custody transfer means the transfer of produced petroleum and/or condensate, after processing and/or treating in the producing operations, from storage tanks or automatic transfer facilities to pipelines or any other forms of transportation.

(h) Drilling and production facility means all drilling and servicing equipment, wells, flow lines, separators, equipment, gathering lines, and auxiliary nontransportation-related equipment used in the production of petroleum but does not include natural gasoline plants.

(i) True vapor pressure means the equilibrium partial pressure exerted by a petroleum liquid as determined in accordance with methods described in American Petroleum Institute Bulletin 2517, Evaporation Loss from External Floating-Roof Tanks, Second Edition, February 1980 (incorporated by reference -- see §60.17).

(j) Floating roof means a storage vessel cover consisting of a double deck, pontoon single deck, internal floating cover or covered floating roof, which rests upon and is supported by the petroleum liquid being contained, and is equipped with a closure seal or seals to close the space between the roof edge and tank wall.

(k) Vapor recovery system means a vapor gathering system capable of collecting all hydrocarbon vapors and gases discharged from the storage vessel and a vapor disposal system capable of processing such hydrocarbon vapors and gases so as to prevent their emission to the atmosphere.

(l) Reid vapor pressure is the absolute vapor pressure of volatile crude oil and volatile nonviscous petroleum liquids, except liquified petroleum gases, as determined by ASTM D323-82 or 94 (incorporated by reference -- see §  60.17).

Page 9: Applicability

§  60.40b  Applicability and delegation of authority.

(a) The affected facility to which this subpart applies is each steam generating unit that commences construction, modification, or reconstruction after June 19, 1984, and that has a heat input capacity from fuels combusted in the steam generating unit of greater than 29 MW (100 million Btu/hour).

(b) Any affected facility meeting the applicability requirements under paragraph (a) of this section and commencing construction, modification, or reconstruction after June 19, 1984, but on or before June 19, 1986, is subject to the following standards:

(1) Coal-fired affected facilities having a heat input capacity between 29 and 73 MW (100 and 250 million Btu/hour), inclusive, are subject to the particulate matter and nitrogen oxides standards under this subpart.

(2) Coal-fired affected facilities having a heat input capacity greater than 73 MW (250 million Btu/hour) and meeting the applicability requirements under subpart D (Standards of performance for fossil-fuel-fired steam generators; §  60.40) are subject to the particulate matter and nitrogen oxides standards under this subpart and to the sulfur dioxide standards under subpart D (§  60.43).

(3) Oil-fired affected facilities having a heat input capacity between 29 and 73 MW (100 and 250 million Btu/hour), inclusive, are subject to the nitrogen oxides standards under this subpart.

(4) Oil-fired affected facilities having a heat input capacity greater than 73 MW (250 million Btu/hour) and meeting the applicability requirements under subpart D (Standards of performance for fossil-fuel-fired steam generators; §  60.40) are also subject to the nitrogen oxides standards under this subpart and the particulate matter and sulfur dioxide standards under subpart D (§  60.42 and §  60.43).

(c) Affected facilities which also meet the applicability requirements under subpart J (Standards of performance for petroleum refineries; §  60.104) are subject to the particulate matter and nitrogen oxides standards under this subpart and the sulfur dioxide standards under subpart J (§  60.104).

(d) Affected facilities which also meet the applicability requirements under subpart E (Standards of performance for incinerators; §  60.50) are subject to the nitrogen oxides and particulate matter standards under this subpart.

(e) Steam generating units meeting the applicability requirements under subpart Da (Standards of performance for electric utility steam generating units; §  60.40a) are not subject to this subpart.

(f) Any change to an existing steam generating unit for the sole purpose of combusting gases containing TRS as defined under §  60.281 is not considered a modification under §  60.14 and the steam generating unit is not subject to this subpart.

(g) In delegating implementation and enforcement authority to a State under section 111(c) of the Act, the following authorities shall be retained by the Administrator and not transferred to a State.

(1) Section 60.44b(f).

Page 10: Applicability

(2) Section 60.44b(g).

(3) Section 60.49b(a)(4).

(h) Affected facilities which meet the applicability requirements under subpart Eb (Standards of performance for municipal waste combustors; §  60.50b) are not subject to this subpart.

(i) Unless and until subpart GG of this part is revised to extend the applicability of subpart GG of this part to steam generator units subject to this subpart, this subpart will continue to apply to combined cycle gas turbines that are capable of combusting more than 29 MW (100 million Btu/hour) heat input of fossil fuel in the steam generator. Only emissions resulting from combustion of fuels in the steam generating unit are subject to this subpart. (The gas turbine emissions are subject to subpart GG of this part.)

(j) Any affected facility meeting the applicability requirements under paragraph (a) of this section and commencing construction, modification, or reconstruction after June 19, 1986 is not subject to Subpart D (Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators, §  60.40)

§  60.41b  Definitions.

As used in this subpart, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in the Act and in subpart A of this part.

Annual capacity factor means the ratio between the actual heat input to a steam generating unit from the fuels listed in §  60.42b(a), §  60.43b(a), or §  60.44b(a), as applicable, during a calendar year and the potential heat input to the steam generating unit had it been operated for 8,760 hours during a calendar year at the maximum steady state design heat input capacity. In the case of steam generating units that are rented or leased, the actual heat input shall be determined based on the combined heat input from all operations of the affected facility in a calendar year.

Byproduct/waste means any liquid or gaseous substance produced at chemical manufacturing plants, petroleum refineries, or pulp and paper mills (except natural gas, distillate oil, or residual oil) and combusted in a steam generating unit for heat recovery or for disposal. Gaseous substances with carbon dioxide levels greater than 50 percent or carbon monoxide levels greater than 10 percent are not byproduct/waste for the purpose of this subpart.

Chemical manufacturing plants means industrial plants which are classified by the Department of Commerce under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code 28.

Coal means all solid fuels classified as anthracite, bituminous, subbituminous, or lignite by the American Society of Testing and Materials in ASTM D388-77, 90, 91, 95, or 98a, Standard Specification for Classification of Coals by Rank (IBR -- see §  60.17), coal refuse, and petroleum coke. Coal-derived synthetic fuels, including but not limited to solvent refined coal, gasified coal, coal-oil mixtures, and coal-water mixtures, are also included in this definition for the purposes of this subpart.

Coal refuse means any byproduct of coal mining or coal cleaning operations with an ash content greater than 50 percent, by weight, and a heating value less than 13,900 kJ/kg (6,000 Btu/lb) on a dry basis.

Page 11: Applicability

Combined cycle system means a system in which a separate source, such as a gas turbine, internal combustion engine, kiln, etc., provides exhaust gas to a heat recovery steam generating unit.

Conventional technology means wet flue gas desulfurization (FGD) technology, dry FGD technology, atmospheric fluidized bed combustion technology, and oil hydrodesulfurization technology.

Distillate oil means fuel oils that contain 0.05 weight percent nitrogen or less and comply with the specifications for fuel oil numbers 1 and 2, as defined by the American Society of Testing and Materials in ASTM D396-78, 89, 90, 92, 96, or 98, Standard Specifications for Fuel Oils (incorporated by reference -- see §  60.17).

Dry flue gas desulfurization technology means a sulfur dioxide control system that is located downstream of the steam generating unit and removes sulfur oxides from the combustion gases of the steam generating unit by contacting the combustion gases with an alkaline slurry or solution and forming a dry powder material. This definition includes devices where the dry powder material is subsequently converted to another form. Alkaline slurries or solutions used in dry flue gas desulfurization technology include but are not limited to lime and sodium.

Duct burner means a device that combusts fuel and that is placed in the exhaust duct from another source, such as a stationary gas turbine, internal combustion engine, kiln, etc., to allow the firing of additional fuel to heat the exhaust gases before the exhaust gases enter a heat recovery steam generating unit.

Emerging technology means any sulfur dioxide control system that is not defined as a conventional technology under this section, and for which the owner or operator of the facility has applied to the Administrator and received approval to operate as an emerging technology under §  60.49b(a)(4).

Federally enforceable means all limitations and conditions that are enforceable by the Administrator, including the requirements of 40 CFR parts 60 and 61, requirements within any applicable State Implementation Plan, and any permit requirements established under 40 CFR 52.21 or under 40 CFR 51.18 and 40 CFR 51.24.

Fluidized bed combustion technology means combustion of fuel in a bed or series of beds (including but not limited to bubbling bed units and circulating bed units) of limestone aggregate (or other sorbent materials) in which these materials are forced upward by the flow of combustion air and the gaseous products of combustion.

Fuel pretreatment means a process that removes a portion of the sulfur in a fuel before combustion of the fuel in a steam generating unit.

Full capacity means operation of the steam generating unit at 90 percent or more of the maximum steady-state design heat input capacity.

Heat input means heat derived from combustion of fuel in a steam generating unit and does not include the heat input from preheated combustion air, recirculated flue gases, or exhaust gases from other sources, such as gas turbines, internal combustion engines, kilns, etc.

Page 12: Applicability

Heat release rate means the steam generating unit design heat input capacity (in MW or Btu/hour) divided by the furnace volume (in cubic meters or cubic feet); the furnace volume is that volume bounded by the front furnace wall where the burner is located, the furnace side waterwall, and extending to the level just below or in front of the first row of convection pass tubes.

Heat transfer medium means any material that is used to transfer heat from one point to another point.

High heat release rate means a heat release rate greater than 730,000 J/sec-m 3 (70,000 Btu/hour-ft 3).

Lignite means a type of coal classified as lignite A or lignite B by the American Society of Testing and Materials in ASTM D388-77, 90, 91, 95, or 98a, Standard Specification for Classification of Coals by Rank (IBR -- see §  60.17).

Low heat release rate means a heat release rate of 730,000 J/sec-m 3 (70,000 Btu/hour-ft 3) or less.

Mass-feed stoker steam generating unit means a steam generating unit where solid fuel is introduced directly into a retort or is fed directly onto a grate where it is combusted.

Maximum heat input capacity means the ability of a steam generating unit to combust a stated maximum amount of fuel on a steady state basis, as determined by the physical design and characteristics of the steam generating unit.

Municipal-type solid waste means refuse, more than 50 percent of which is waste consisting of a mixture of paper, wood, yard wastes, food wastes, plastics, leather, rubber, and other combustible materials, and noncombustible materials such as glass and rock.

Natural gas means (1) a naturally occurring mixture of hydrocarbon and nonhydrocarbon gases found in geologic formations beneath the earth's surface, of which the principal constituent is methane; or (2) liquid petroleum gas, as defined by the American Society for Testing and Materials in ASTM D1835-82, 86, 87, 91, or 97, "Standard Specification for Liquid Petroleum Gases" (IBR -- see §  60.17).

Noncontinental area means the State of Hawaii, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the Northern Mariana Islands.

Oil means crude oil or petroleum or a liquid fuel derived from crude oil or petroleum, including distillate and residual oil.

Petroleum refinery means industrial plants as classified by the Department of Commerce under Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code 29.

Potential sulfur dioxide emission rate means the theoretical sulfur dioxide emissions (ng/J, lb/million Btu heat input) that would result from combusting fuel in an uncleaned state and without using emission control systems.

Page 13: Applicability

Process heater means a device that is primarily used to heat a material to initiate or promote a chemical reaction in which the material participates as a reactant or catalyst.

Pulp and paper mills means industrial plants which are classified by the Department of Commerce under North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code 322 or Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code 26.

Pulverized coal-fired steam generating unit means a steam generating unit in which pulverized coal is introduced into an air stream that carries the coal to the combustion chamber of the steam generating unit where it is fired in suspension. This includes both conventional pulverized coal-fired and micropulverized coal-fired steam generating units.

Residual oil means crude oil, fuel oil numbers 1 and 2 that have a nitrogen content greater than 0.05 weight percent, and all fuel oil numbers 4, 5 and 6, as defined by the American Society of Testing and Materials in ASTM D396-78, Standard Specifications for Fuel Oils (IBR -- see §  60.17).

Spreader stoker steam generating unit means a steam generating unit in which solid fuel is introduced to the combustion zone by a mechanism that throws the fuel onto a grate from above. Combustion takes place both in suspension and on the grate.

Steam generating unit means a device that combusts any fuel or byproduct/waste to produce steam or to heat water or any other heat transfer medium. This term includes any municipal-type solid waste incinerator with a heat recovery steam generating unit or any steam generating unit that combusts fuel and is part of a cogeneration system or a combined cycle system. This term does not include process heaters as they are defined in this subpart.

Steam generating unit operating day means a 24-hour period between 12:00 midnight and the following midnight during which any fuel is combusted at any time in the steam generating unit. It is not necessary for fuel to be combusted continuously for the entire 24-hour period.

Very low sulfur oil means an oil that contains no more than 0.5 weight percent sulfur or that, when combusted without sulfur dioxide emission control, has a sulfur dioxide emission rate equal to or less than 215 ng/J (0.5 lb/million Btu) heat input.

Wet flue gas desulfurization technology means a sulfur dioxide control system that is located downstream of the steam generating unit and removes sulfur oxides from the combustion gases of the steam generating unit by contacting the combustion gas with an alkaline slurry or solution and forming a liquid material. This definition applies to devices where the aqueous liquid material product of this contact is subsequently converted to other forms. Alkaline reagents used in wet flue gas desulfurization technology include, but are not limited to, lime, limestone, and sodium.

Wet scrubber system means any emission control device that mixes an aqueous stream or slurry with the exhaust gases from a steam generating unit to control emissions of particulate matter or sulfur dioxide.

Wood means wood, wood residue, bark, or any derivative fuel or residue thereof, in any form, including, but not limited to, sawdust, sanderdust, wood chips, scraps, slabs, millings, shavings, and processed pellets made from wood or other forest residues.

Page 14: Applicability

§  60.42b  Standard for sulfur dioxide.

(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), (d), or (j) of this section, on and after the date on which the performance test is completed or required to be completed under §  60.8 of this part, whichever date comes first, no owner or operator of an affected facility that combusts coal or oil shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere any gases that contain sulfur dioxide in excess of 10 percent (0.10) of the potential sulfur dioxide emission rate (90 percent reduction) and that contain sulfur dioxide in excess of the emission limit determined according to the following formula:

Es=(Ka Ha+Kb Hb)/(Ha+Hb) where:

Es is the sulfur dioxide emission limit, in ng/J or lb/million Btu heat input,

Ka is 520 ng/J (or 1.2 lb/million Btu),

Kb is 340 ng/J (or 0.80 lb/million Btu),

Ha is the heat input from the combustion of coal, in J (million Btu),

Hb is the heat input from the combustion of oil, in J (million Btu). Only the heat input supplied to the affected facility from the combustion of coal and oil is counted under this section. No credit is provided for the heat input to the affected facility from the combustion of natural gas, wood, municipal-type solid waste, or other fuels or heat input to the affected facility from exhaust gases from another source, such as gas turbines, internal combustion engines, kilns, etc.

(b) On and after the date on which the performance test is completed or required to be completed under §  60.8 of this part, whichever comes first, no owner or operator of an affected facility that combusts coal refuse alone in a fluidized bed combustion steam generating unit shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere any gases that contain sulfur dioxide in excess of 20 percent of the potential sulfur dioxide emission rate (80 percent reduction) and that contain sulfur dioxide in excess of 520 ng/J (1.2 lb/million Btu) heat input. If coal or oil is fired with coal refuse, the affected facility is subject to paragraph (a) or (d) of this section, as applicable.

(c) On and after the date on which the performance test is completed or is required to be completed under §  60.8 of this part, whichever comes first, no owner or operator of an affected facility that combusts coal or oil, either alone or in combination with any other fuel, and that uses an emerging technology for the control of sulfur dioxide emissions, shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere any gases that contain sulfur dioxide in excess of 50 percent of the potential sulfur dioxide emission rate (50 percent reduction) and that contain sulfur dioxide in excess of the emission limit determined according to the following formula:

Es=(Kc Hc+Kd Hd)/Hc+Hd) where:

Es is the sulfur dioxide emission limit, expressed in ng/J (lb/million Btu) heat input,

Kc is 260 ng/J (0.60 lb/million Btu),

Kd is 170 ng/J (0.40 lb/million Btu),

Page 15: Applicability

Hc is the heat input from the combustion of coal, J (million Btu),

Hd is the heat input from the combustion of oil, J (million Btu). Only the heat input supplied to the affected facility from the combustion of coal and oil is counted under this section. No credit is provided for the heat input to the affected facility from the combustion of natural gas, wood, municipal-type solid waste, or other fuels, or from the heat input to the affected facility from exhaust gases from another source, such as gas turbines, internal combustion engines, kilns, etc.

(d) On and after the date on which the performance test is completed or required to be completed under §  60.8 of this part, whichever comes first, no owner or operator of an affected facility listed in paragraphs (d) (1), (2), or (3) of this section shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere any gases that contain sulfur dioxide in excess of 520 ng/J (1.2 lb/million Btu) heat input if the affected facility combusts coal, or 215 ng/J (0.5 lb/million Btu) heat input if the affected facility combusts oil other than very low sulfur oil. Percent reduction requirements are not applicable to affected facilities under paragraphs (d)(1), (2), or (3).

(1) Affected facilities that have an annual capacity factor for coal and oil of 30 percent (0.30) or less and are subject to a Federally enforceable permit limiting the operation of the affected facility to an annual capacity factor for coal and oil of 30 percent (0.30) or less;

(2) Affected facilities located in a noncontinental area; or

(3) Affected facilities combusting coal or oil, alone or in combination with any other fuel, in a duct burner as part of a combined cycle system where 30 percent (0.30) or less of the heat input to the steam generating unit is from combustion of coal and oil in the duct burner and 70 percent (0.70) or more of the heat input to the steam generating unit is from the exhaust gases entering the duct burner.

(e) Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this section, compliance with the emission limits, fuel oil sulfur limits, and/or percent reduction requirements under this section are determined on a 30-day rolling average basis.

(f) Except as provided in paragraph (j)(2) of this section, compliance with the emission limits or fuel oil sulfur limits under this section is determined on a 24-hour average basis for affected facilities that (1) have a Federally enforceable permit limiting the annual capacity factor for oil to 10 percent or less, (2) combust only very low sulfur oil, and (3) do not combust any other fuel.

(g) Except as provided in paragraph (i) of this section, the sulfur dioxide emission limits and percent reduction requirements under this section apply at all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction.

(h) Reductions in the potential sulfur dioxide emission rate through fuel pretreatment are not credited toward the percent reduction requirement under paragraph (c) of this section unless:

(1) Fuel pretreatment results in a 50 percent or greater reduction in potential sulfur dioxide emissions and

(2) Emissions from the pretreated fuel (without combustion or post combustion sulfur dioxide control) are equal to or less than the emission limits specified in paragraph (c) of this section.

Page 16: Applicability

(i) An affected facility subject to paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of this section may combust very low sulfur oil or natural gas when the sulfur dioxide control system is not being operated because of malfunction or maintenance of the sulfur dioxide control system.

(j) Percent reduction requirements are not applicable to affected facilities combusting only very low sulfur oil. The owner or operator of an affected facility combusting very low sulfur oil shall demonstrate that the oil meets the definition of very low sulfur oil by: (1) Following the performance testing procedures as described in §  60.45b(c) or §  60.45b(d), and following the monitoring procedures as described in §  60.47b(a) or §  60.47b(b) to determine sulfur dioxide emission rate or fuel oil sulfur content; or (2) maintaining fuel receipts as described in §  60.49b(r).

§  60.43b  Standard for particulate matter.

(a) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is completed or is required to be completed under §  60.8 of this part, whichever comes first, no owner or operator of an affected facility which combusts coal or combusts mixtures of coal with other fuels, shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from that affected facility any gases that contain particulate matter in excess of the following emission limits:

(1) 22 ng/J (0.051 lb/million Btu) heat input,

(i) If the affected facility combusts only coal, or

(ii) If the affected facility combusts coal and other fuels and has an annual capacity factor for the other fuels of 10 percent (0.10) or less.

(2) 43 ng/J (0.10 lb/million Btu) heat input if the affected facility combusts coal and other fuels and has an annual capacity factor for the other fuels greater than 10 percent (0.10) and is subject to a federally enforceable requirement limiting operation of the affected facility to an annual capacity factor greater than 10 percent (0.10) for fuels other than coal.

(3) 86 ng/J (0.20 lb/million Btu) heat input if the affected facility combusts coal or coal and other fuels and

(i) Has an annual capacity factor for coal or coal and other fuels of 30 percent (0.30) or less,

(ii) Has a maximum heat input capacity of 73 MW (250 million Btu/hour) or less,

(iii) Has a federally enforceable requirement limiting operation of the affected facility to an annual capacity factor of 30 percent (0.30) or less for coal or coal and other solid fuels, and

(iv) Construction of the affected facility commenced after June 19, 1984, and before November 25, 1986.

(b) On and after the date on which the performance test is completed or required to be completed under 60.8 of this part, whichever date comes first, no owner or operator of an affected facility that combusts oil (or mixtures of oil with other fuels) and uses a conventional or emerging technology to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere

Page 17: Applicability

from that affected facility any gases that contain particulate matter in excess of 43 ng/J (0.10 lb/million Btu) heat input.

(c) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is completed or is required to be completed under §  60.8 of this part, whichever date comes first, no owner or operator of an affected facility that combusts wood, or wood with other fuels, except coal, shall cause to be discharged from that affected facility any gases that contain particulate matter in excess of the following emission limits:

(1) 43 ng/J (0.10 lb/million Btu) heat input if the affected facility has an annual capacity factor greater than 30 percent (0.30) for wood.

(2) 86 ng/J (0.20 lb/million Btu) heat input if

(i) The affected facility has an annual capacity factor of 30 percent (0.30) or less for wood,

(ii) Is subject to a federally enforceable requirement limiting operation of the affected facility to an annual capacity factor of 30 percent (0.30) or less for wood, and

(iii) Has a maximum heat input capacity of 73 MW (250 million Btu/hour) or less.

(d) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is completed or is required to be completed under §  60.8 of this part, whichever date comes first, no owner or operator of an affected facility that combusts municipal-type solid waste or mixtures of municipal-type solid waste with other fuels, shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from that affected facility any gases that contain particulate matter in excess of the following emission limits:

(1) 43 ng/J (0.10 lb/million Btu) heat input,

(i) If the affected facility combusts only municipal-type solid waste, or

(ii) If the affected facility combusts municipal-type solid waste and other fuels and has an annual capacity factor for the other fuels of 10 percent (0.10) or less.

(2) 86 ng/J (0.20 lb/million Btu) heat input if the affected facility combusts municipal-type solid waste or municipal-type solid waste and other fuels; and

(i) Has an annual capacity factor for municipal-type solid waste and other fuels of 30 percent (0.30) or less,

(ii) Has a maximum heat input capacity of 73 MW (250 million Btu/hour) or less,

(iii) Has a federally enforceable requirement limiting operation of the affected facility to an annual capacity factor of 30 percent (0.30) for municipal-type solid waste, or municipal-type solid waste and other fuels, and

(iv) Construction of the affected facility commenced after June 19, 1984, but before November 25, 1986.

Page 18: Applicability

(e) For the purposes of this section, the annual capacity factor is determined by dividing the actual heat input to the steam generating unit during the calendar year from the combustion of coal, wood, or municipal-type solid waste, and other fuels, as applicable, by the potential heat input to the steam generating unit if the steam generating unit had been operated for 8,760 hours at the maximum design heat input capacity.

(f) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is completed or is required to be completed under 60.8 of this part, whichever date comes first, no owner or operator of an affected facility that combusts coal, oil, wood, or mixtures of these fuels with any other fuels shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere any gases that exhibit greater than 20 percent opacity (6-minute average), except for one 6-minute period per hour of not more than 27 percent opacity.

(g) The particulate matter and opacity standards apply at all times, except during periods of startup, shutdown or malfunction

§  60.44b  Standard for nitrogen oxides.

(a) Except as provided under paragraphs (k) and (l) of this section, on and after the date on which the initial performance test is completed or is required to be completed under §  60.8 of this part, whichever date comes first, no owner or operator of an affected facility that is subject to the provisions of this section and that combusts only coal, oil, or natural gas shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from that affected facility any gases that contain nitrogen oxides (expressed as NO2) in excess of the following emission limits:

------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nitrogen oxide emission limits ng/J (lb/million Fuel/Steam generating unit type Btu) (expressed as NO[INF]2[/ INF]) heat input------------------------------------------------------------------------(1) Natural gas and distillate oil, except (4): (i) Low heat release rate............................. 43 (0.10) (ii) High heat release rate........................... 86 (0.20)(2) Residual oil: (i) Low heat release rate............................. 130 (0.30) (ii) High heat release rate........................... 170 (0.40)(3) Coal: (i) Mass-feed stoker.................................. 210 (0.50) (ii) Spreader stoker and fluidized bed combustion..... 260 (0.60) (iii) Pulverized coal................................. 300 (0.70) (iv) Lignite, except (v).............................. 260 (0.60) (v) Lignite mined in North Dakota, South Dakota, or 340 (0.80) Montana and combusted in a slag tap furnace.......... (vi) Coal-derived synthetic fuels..................... 210 (0.50)(4) Duct burner used in a combined cycle system: (i) Natural gas and distillate oil.................... 86 (0.20) (ii) Residual oil..................................... 170 (0.40)------------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 19: Applicability

(b) Except as provided under paragraphs (k) and (l) of this section, on and after the date on which the initial performance test is completed or is required to be completed under §  60.8 of this part, whichever date comes first, no owner or operator of an affected facility that simultaneously combusts mixtures of coal, oil, or natural gas shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from that affected facility any gases that contain nitrogen oxides in excess of a limit determined by the use of the following formula:

En=[(ELgo Hgo)+(ELro Hro)+(ELc Hc)]/(Hgo+Hro+Hc) where:

En is the nitrogen oxides emission limit (expressed as NO2), ng/J (lb/million Btu)

ELgo is the appropriate emission limit from paragraph (a)(1) for combustion of natural gas or distillate oil, ng/J (lb/million Btu)

Hgo is the heat input from combustion of natural gas or distillate oil,

ELro is the appropriate emission limit from paragraph (a)(2) for combustion of residual oil,

Hro is the heat input from combustion of residual oil,

ELc is the appropriate emission limit from paragraph (a)(3) for combustion of coal, and

Hc is the heat input from combustion of coal.

(c) Except as provided under paragraph (l) of this section, on and after the date on which the initial performance test is completed or is required to be completed under §  60.8 of this part, whichever date comes first, no owner or operator of an affected facility that simultaneously combusts coal or oil, or a mixture of these fuels with natural gas, and wood, municipal-type solid waste, or any other fuel shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere any gases that contain nitrogen oxides in excess of the emission limit for the coal or oil, or mixtures of these fuels with natural gas combusted in the affected facility, as determined pursuant to paragraph (a) or (b) of this section, unless the affected facility has an annual capacity factor for coal or oil, or mixture of these fuels with natural gas of 10 percent (0.10) or less and is subject to a federally enforceable requirement that limits operation of the affected facility to an annual capacity factor of 10 percent (0.10) or less for coal, oil, or a mixture of these fuels with natural gas.

(d) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is completed or is required to be completed under §  60.8 of this part, whichever date comes first, no owner or operator of an affected facility that simultaneously combusts natural gas with wood, municipal-type solid waste, or other solid fuel, except coal, shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from that affected facility any gases that contain nitrogen oxides in excess of 130 ng/J (0.30 lb/million Btu) heat input unless the affected facility has an annual capacity factor for natural gas of 10 percent (0.10) or less and is subject to a federally enforceable requirement that limits operation of the affected facility to an annual capacity factor of 10 percent (0.10) or less for natural gas.

(e) Except as provided under paragraph (l) of this section, on and after the date on which the initial performance test is completed or is required to be completed under §  60.8 of this part, whichever date comes first, no owner or operator of an affected facility that simultaneously combusts coal, oil, or natural gas with byproduct/waste shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere any gases that contain nitrogen oxides in excess of the emission limit determined by

Page 20: Applicability

the following formula unless the affected facility has an annual capacity factor for coal, oil, and natural gas of 10 percent (0.10) or less and is subject to a federally enforceable requirement that limits operation of the affected facility to an annual capacity factor of 10 percent (0.10) or less:

En=[(ELgo Hgo)+(ELro Hro)+ (ELc Hc)]/(Hgo+Hro+Hc) where:

En is the nitrogen oxides emission limit (expressed as NO2), ng/J (lb/million Btu)

ELgo is the appropriate emission limit from paragraph (a)(1) for combustion of natural gas or distillate oil, ng/J (lb/million Btu).

Hgo is the heat input from combustion of natural gas, distillate oil and gaseous byproduct/waste, ng/J (lb/million Btu).

ELro is the appropriate emission limit from paragraph (a)(2) for combustion of residual oil, ng/J (lb/million Btu)

Hro is the heat input from combustion of residual oil and/or liquid byproduct/waste.

ELc is the appropriate emission limit from paragraph (a)(3) for combustion of coal, and

Hc is the heat input from combustion of coal.

(f) Any owner or operator of an affected facility that combusts byproduct/waste with either natural gas or oil may petition the Administrator within 180 days of the initial startup of the affected facility to establish a nitrogen oxides emission limit which shall apply specifically to that affected facility when the byproduct/waste is combusted. The petition shall include sufficient and appropriate data, as determined by the Administrator, such as nitrogen oxides emissions from the affected facility, waste composition (including nitrogen content), and combustion conditions to allow the Administrator to confirm that the affected facility is unable to comply with the emission limits in paragraph (e) of this section and to determine the appropriate emission limit for the affected facility.

(1) Any owner or operator of an affected facility petitioning for a facility-specific nitrogen oxides emission limit under this section shall:

(i) Demonstrate compliance with the emission limits for natural gas and distillate oil in paragraph (a)(1) of this section or for residual oil in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, as appropriate, by conducting a 30-day performance test as provided in §  60.46b(e). During the performance test only natural gas, distillate oil, or residual oil shall be combusted in the affected facility; and

(ii) Demonstrate that the affected facility is unable to comply with the emission limits for natural gas and distillate oil in paragraph (a)(1) of this section or for residual oil in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, as appropriate, when gaseous or liquid byproduct/waste is combusted in the affected facility under the same conditions and using the same technological system of emission reduction applied when demonstrating compliance under paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this section.

(2) The nitrogen oxides emission limits for natural gas or distillate oil in paragraph (a)(1) of this section or for residual oil in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, as appropriate, shall be applicable to

Page 21: Applicability

the affected facility until and unless the petition is approved by the Administrator. If the petition is approved by the Administrator, a facility-specific nitrogen oxides emission limit will be established at the nitrogen oxides emission level achievable when the affected facility is combusting oil or natural gas and byproduct/waste in a manner that the Administrator determines to be consistent with minimizing nitrogen oxides emissions.

(g) Any owner or operator of an affected facility that combusts hazardous waste (as defined by 40 CFR part 261 or 40 CFR part 761) with natural gas or oil may petition the Administrator within 180 days of the initial startup of the affected facility for a waiver from compliance with the nitrogen oxides emission limit which applies specifically to that affected facility. The petition must include sufficient and appropriate data, as determined by the Administrator, on nitrogen oxides emissions from the affected facility, waste destruction efficiencies, waste composition (including nitrogen content), the quantity of specific wastes to be combusted and combustion conditions to allow the Administrator to determine if the affected facility is able to comply with the nitrogen oxides emission limits required by this section. The owner or operator of the affected facility shall demonstrate that when hazardous waste is combusted in the affected facility, thermal destruction efficiency requirements for hazardous waste specified in an applicable federally enforceable requirement preclude compliance with the nitrogen oxides emission limits of this section. The nitrogen oxides emission limits for natural gas or distillate oil in paragraph (a)(1) of this section or for residual oil in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, as appropriate, are applicable to the affected facility until and unless the petition is approved by the Administrator. (See 40 CFR 761.70 for regulations applicable to the incineration of materials containing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's).)

(h) For purposes of paragraph (i) of this section, the nitrogen oxide standards under this section apply at all times including periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction.

(i) Except as provided under paragraph (j) of this section, compliance with the emission limits under this section is determined on a 30-day rolling average basis.

(j) Compliance with the emission limits under this section is determined on a 24-hour average basis for the initial performance test and on a 3-hour average basis for subsequent performance tests for any affected facilities that:

(1) Combust, alone or in combination, only natural gas, distillate oil, or residual oil with a nitrogen content of 0.30 weight percent or less;

(2) Have a combined annual capacity factor of 10 percent or less for natural gas, distillate oil, and residual oil with a nitrogen content of 0.30 weight percent or less; and

(3) Are subject to a Federally enforceable requirement limiting operation of the affected facility to the firing of natural gas, distillate oil, and/or residual oil with a nitrogen content of 0.30 weight percent or less and limiting operation of the affected facility to a combined annual capacity factor of 10 percent or less for natural gas, distillate oil, and residual oil and a nitrogen content of 0.30 weight percent or less.

(k) Affected facilities that meet the criteria described in paragraphs (j) (1), (2), and (3) of this section, and that have a heat input capacity of 73 MW (250 million Btu/hour) or less, are not subject to the nitrogen oxides emission limits under this section.

Page 22: Applicability

(l) On and after the date on which the initial performance test is completed or is required to be completed under §  60.8, whichever date comes first, no owner or operator of an affected facility which commenced construction or reconstruction after July 9, 1997 shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from that affected facility any gases that contain nitrogen oxides (expressed as NO2) in excess of the following limits:

(1) If the affected facility combusts coal, oil, or natural gas, or a mixture of these fuels, or with any other fuels: A limit of 86 ng/JI (0.20 lb/million Btu) heat input unless the affected facility has an annual capacity factor for coal, oil, and natural gas of 10 percent (0.10) or less and is subject to a federally enforceable requirement that limits operation of the facility to an annual capacity factor of 10 percent (0.10) or less for coal, oil, and natural gas; or

(2) If the affected facility has a low heat release rate and combusts natural gas or distillate oil in excess of 30 percent of the heat input from the combustion of all fuels, a limit determined by use of the following formula:

En = [(0.10 * Hgo) + (0.20 * Hr)]/(Hgo + Hr) Where:

En is the NOX emission limit, (lb/million Btu),

Hgo is the heat input from combustion of natural gas or distillate oil, and

Hr is the heat input from combustion of any other fuel.

§  60.45b  Compliance and performance test methods and procedures for sulfur dioxide.

(a) The sulfur dioxide emission standards under §  60.42b apply at all times.

(b) In conducting the performance tests required under §  60.8, the owner or operator shall use the methods and procedures in appendix A of this part or the methods and procedures as specified in this section, except as provided in §  60.8(b). Section 60.8(f) does not apply to this section. The 30-day notice required in §  60.8(d) applies only to the initial performance test unless otherwise specified by the Administrator.

(c) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall conduct performance tests to determine compliance with the percent of potential sulfur dioxide emission rate (% Ps) and the sulfur dioxide emission rate (Es) pursuant to §  60.42b following the procedures listed below, except as provided under paragraph (d) of this section.

(1) The initial performance test shall be conducted over the first 30 consecutive operating days of the steam generating unit. Compliance with the sulfur dioxide standards shall be determined using a 30-day average. The first operating day included in the initial performance test shall be scheduled within 30 days after achieving the maximum production rate at which the affected facility will be operated, but not later than 180 days after initial startup of the facility.

(2) If only coal or only oil is combusted, the following procedures are used:

(i) The procedures in Method 19 are used to determine the hourly sulfur dioxide emission rate (Eho) and the 30-day average emission rate (Eao). The hourly averages used to compute the 30-

Page 23: Applicability

day averages are obtained from the continuous emission monitoring system of §  60.47b (a) or (b).

(ii) The percent of potential sulfur dioxide emission rate (% Ps) emitted to the atmosphere is computed using the following formula:

% Ps=100 (1−% Rg/100)(1−% Rf/100) where:

% Rg is the sulfur dioxide removal efficiency of the control device as determined by Method 19, in percent.

% Rf is the sulfur dioxide removal efficiency of fuel pretreatment as determined by Method 19, in percent.

(3) If coal or oil is combusted with other fuels, the same procedures required in paragraph (c)(2) of this section are used, except as provided in the following:

(i) An adjusted hourly sulfur dioxide emission rate (Ehoo) is used in Equation 19-19 of Method 19 to compute an adjusted 30-day average emission rate (Eaoo). The Eho is computed using the following formula:

Ehoo=[Eho−Ew(1−Xk)]/Xk where:

Ehoo is the adjusted hourly sulfur dioxide emission rate, ng/J (lb/million Btu).

Eho is the hourly sulfur dioxide emission rate, ng/J (lb/million Btu).

Ew is the sulfur dioxide concentration in fuels other than coal and oil combusted in the affected facility, as determined by the fuel sampling and analysis procedures in Method 19, ng/J (lb/million Btu). The value Ew for each fuel lot is used for each hourly average during the time that the lot is being combusted.

Xk is the fraction of total heat input from fuel combustion derived from coal, oil, or coal and oil, as determined by applicable procedures in Method 19.

(ii) To compute the percent of potential sulfur dioxide emission rate (% Ps), an adjusted % Rg (% Rgo) is computed from the adjusted Eaoo from paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section and an adjusted average sulfur dioxide inlet rate (Eaio) using the following formula:

% Rgo=100 (1.0−Eaoo/Eaio) To compute Eaio, an adjusted hourly sulfur dioxide inlet rate (Ehio) is used. The Ehio is computed using the following formula:

Ehio=[Ehi−Ew(1−Xk)]/Xk where:

Ehio is the adjusted hourly sulfur dioxide inlet rate, ng/J (lb/million Btu).

Ehi is the hourly sulfur dioxide inlet rate, ng/J (lb/million Btu).

Page 24: Applicability

(4) The owner or operator of an affected facility subject to paragraph (b)(3) of this section does not have to measure parameters Ew or Xk if the owner or operator elects to assume that Xk=1.0. Owners or operators of affected facilities who assume Xk=1.0 shall

(i) Determine % Ps following the procedures in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, and

(ii) Sulfur dioxide emissions (Es) are considered to be in compliance with sulfur dioxide emission limits under §  60.42b.

(5) The owner or operator of an affected facility that qualifies under the provisions of §  60.42b(d) does not have to measure parameters Ew or Xk under paragraph (b)(3) of this section if the owner or operator of the affected facility elects to measure sulfur dioxide emission rates of the coal or oil following the fuel sampling and analysis procedures under Method 19.

(d) Except as provided in paragraph (j), the owner or operator of an affected facility that combusts only very low sulfur oil, has an annual capacity factor for oil of 10 percent (0.10) or less, and is subject to a Federally enforceable requirement limiting operation of the affected facility to an annual capacity factor for oil of 10 percent (0.10) or less shall:

(1) Conduct the initial performance test over 24 consecutive steam generating unit operating hours at full load;

(2) Determine compliance with the standards after the initial performance test based on the arithmetic average of the hourly emissions data during each steam generating unit operating day if a continuous emission measurement system (CEMS) is used, or based on a daily average if Method 6B or fuel sampling and analysis procedures under Method 19 are used.

(e) The owner or operator of an affected facility subject to §  60.42b(d)(1) shall demonstrate the maximum design capacity of the steam generating unit by operating the facility at maximum capacity for 24 hours. This demonstration will be made during the initial performance test and a subsequent demonstration may be requested at any other time. If the 24-hour average firing rate for the affected facility is less than the maximum design capacity provided by the manufacturer of the affected facility, the 24-hour average firing rate shall be used to determine the capacity utilization rate for the affected facility, otherwise the maximum design capacity provided by the manufacturer is used.

(f) For the initial performance test required under §  60.8, compliance with the sulfur dioxide emission limits and percent reduction requirements under §  60.42b is based on the average emission rates and the average percent reduction for sulfur dioxide for the first 30 consecutive steam generating unit operating days, except as provided under paragraph (d) of this section. The initial performance test is the only test for which at least 30 days prior notice is required unless otherwise specified by the Administrator. The initial performance test is to be scheduled so that the first steam generating unit operating day of the 30 successive steam generating unit operating days is completed within 30 days after achieving the maximum production rate at which the affected facility will be operated, but not later than 180 days after initial startup of the facility. The boiler load during the 30-day period does not have to be the maximum design load, but must be representative of future operating conditions and include at least one 24-hour period at full load.

Page 25: Applicability

(g) After the initial performance test required under §  60.8, compliance with the sulfur dioxide emission limits and percent reduction requirements under §  60.42b is based on the average emission rates and the average percent reduction for sulfur dioxide for 30 successive steam generating unit operating days, except as provided under paragraph (d). A separate performance test is completed at the end of each steam generating unit operating day after the initial performance test, and a new 30-day average emission rate and percent reduction for sulfur dioxide are calculated to show compliance with the standard.

(h) Except as provided under paragraph (i) of this section, the owner or operator of an affected facility shall use all valid sulfur dioxide emissions data in calculating % Ps and Eho under paragraph (c), of this section whether or not the minimum emissions data requirements under §  60.46b are achieved. All valid emissions data, including valid sulfur dioxides emission data collected during periods of startup, shutdown and malfunction, shall be used in calculating % Ps and Eho pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section.

(i) During periods of malfunction or maintenance of the sulfur dioxide control systems when oil is combusted as provided under §  60.42b(i), emission data are not used to calculate % Ps or Es under §  60.42b (a), (b) or (c), however, the emissions data are used to determine compliance with the emission limit under §  60.42b(i).

(j) The owner or operator of an affected facility that combusts very low sulfur oil is not subject to the compliance and performance testing requirements of this section if the owner or operator obtains fuel receipts as described in §  60.49b(r).

§  60.46b  Compliance and performance test methods and procedures for particulate matter and nitrogen oxides.

(a) The particulate matter emission standards and opacity limits under §  60.43b apply at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction. The nitrogen oxides emission standards under §  60.44b apply at all times.

(b) Compliance with the particulate matter emission standards under §  60.43b shall be determined through performance testing as described in paragraph (d) of this section.

(c) Compliance with the nitrogen oxides emission standards under §  60.44b shall be determined through performance testing under paragraph (e) or (f), or under paragraphs (g) and (h) of this section, as applicable.

(d) To determine compliance with the particulate matter emission limits and opacity limits under §  60.43b, the owner or operator of an affected facility shall conduct an initial performance test as required under §  60.8 using the following procedures and reference methods:

(1) Method 3B is used for gas analysis when applying Method 5 or Method 17.

(2) Method 5, Method 5B, or Method 17 shall be used to measure the concentration of particulate matter as follows:

(i) Method 5 shall be used at affected facilities without wet flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems; and

Page 26: Applicability

(ii) Method 17 may be used at facilities with or without wet scrubber systems provided the stack gas temperature does not exceed a temperature of 160 °C (320 °F). The procedures of sections 2.1 and 2.3 of Method 5B may be used in Method 17 only if it is used after a wet FGD system. Do not use Method 17 after wet FGD systems if the effluent is saturated or laden with water droplets.

(iii) Method 5B is to be used only after wet FGD systems.

(3) Method 1 is used to select the sampling site and the number of traverse sampling points. The sampling time for each run is at least 120 minutes and the minimum sampling volume is 1.7 dscm (60 dscf) except that smaller sampling times or volumes may be approved by the Administrator when necessitated by process variables or other factors.

(4) For Method 5, the temperature of the sample gas in the probe and filter holder is monitored and is maintained at 160±14 °C (320±25 °F).

(5) For determination of particulate matter emissions, the oxygen or carbon dioxide sample is obtained simultaneously with each run of Method 5, Method 5B or Method 17 by traversing the duct at the same sampling location.

(6) For each run using Method 5, Method 5B or Method 17, the emission rate expressed in nanograms per joule heat input is determined using:

(i) The oxygen or carbon dioxide measurements and particulate matter measurements obtained under this section,

(ii) The dry basis F factor, and

(iii) The dry basis emission rate calculation procedure contained in Method 19.

(7) Method 9 is used for determining the opacity of stack emissions.

(e) To determine compliance with the emission limits for nitrogen oxides required under §  60.44b, the owner or operator of an affected facility shall conduct the performance test as required under §  60.8 using the continuous system for monitoring nitrogen oxides under §  60.48(b).

(1) For the initial compliance test, nitrogen oxides from the steam generating unit are monitored for 30 successive steam generating unit operating days and the 30-day average emission rate is used to determine compliance with the nitrogen oxides emission standards under §  60.44b. The 30-day average emission rate is calculated as the average of all hourly emissions data recorded by the monitoring system during the 30-day test period.

(2) Following the date on which the initial performance test is completed or is required to be completed under §  60.8 of this part, whichever date comes first, the owner or operator of an affected facility which combusts coal or which combusts residual oil having a nitrogen content greater than 0.30 weight percent shall determine compliance with the nitrogen oxides emission standards under §  60.44b on a continuous basis through the use of a 30-day rolling average emission rate. A new 30-day rolling average emission rate is calculated each steam generating

Page 27: Applicability

unit operating day as the average of all of the hourly nitrogen oxides emission data for the preceding 30 steam generating unit operating days.

(3) Following the date on which the initial performance test is completed or is required to be completed under §  60.8 of this part, whichever date comes first, the owner or operator of an affected facility which has a heat input capacity greater than 73 MW (250 million Btu/hour) and which combusts natural gas, distillate oil, or residual oil having a nitrogen content of 0.30 weight percent or less shall determine compliance with the nitrogen oxides standards under §  60.44b on a continuous basis through the use of a 30-day rolling average emission rate. A new 30-day rolling average emission rate is calculated each steam generating unit operating day as the average of all of the hourly nitrogen oxides emission data for the preceding 30 steam generating unit operating days.

(4) Following the date on which the initial performance test is completed or required to be completed under §  60.8 of this part, whichever date comes first, the owner or operator of an affected facility which has a heat input capacity of 73 MW (250 million Btu/hour) or less and which combusts natural gas, distillate oil, or residual oil having a nitrogen content of 0.30 weight percent or less shall upon request determine compliance with the nitrogen oxides standards under §  60.44b through the use of a 30-day performance test. During periods when performance tests are not requested, nitrogen oxides emissions data collected pursuant to §  60.48b(g)(1) or §  60.48b(g)(2) are used to calculate a 30-day rolling average emission rate on a daily basis and used to prepare excess emission reports, but will not be used to determine compliance with the nitrogen oxides emission standards. A new 30-day rolling average emission rate is calculated each steam generating unit operating day as the average of all of the hourly nitrogen oxides emission data for the preceding 30 steam generating unit operating days.

(5) If the owner or operator of an affected facility which combusts residual oil does not sample and analyze the residual oil for nitrogen content, as specified in §  60.49b(e), the requirements of paragraph (iii) of this section apply and the provisions of paragraph (iv) of this section are inapplicable.

(f) To determine compliance with the emissions limits for NOX required by §  60.44b(a)(4) or §  60.44b(l) for duct burners used in combined cycle systems, either of the procedures described in paragraph (f)(1) or (2) of this section may be used:

(1) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall conduct the performance test required under §  60.8 as follows:

(i) The emissions rate (E) of NOX shall be computed using Equation of 1 this section:

E = Esg + (Hg /Hb)(Esg − Eg) (Eq. 1) Where:

E = emissions rate of NOX from the duct burner, ng/J (lb/million Btu) heat input

Esg = combined effluent emissions rate, in ng/J (lb/million Btu) heat input using appropriate F-Factor as described in Method 19

Hg = heat input rate to the combustion turbine, in Joules/hour (million Btu/hour)

Hb = heat input rate to the duct burner, in Joules/hour (million Btu/hour)

Page 28: Applicability

Eg = emissions rate from the combustion turbine, in ng/J (lb/million Btu) heat input calculated using appropriate F-Factor as described in Method 19

(ii) Method 7E of appendix A of this part shall be used to determine the NOX concentrations. Method 3A or 3B of appendix A of this part shall be used to determine oxygen concentration.

(iii) The owner or operator shall identify and demonstrate to the Administrator's satisfaction suitable methods to determine the average hourly heat input rate to the combustion turbine and the average hourly heat input rate to the affected duct burner.

(iv) Compliance with the emissions limits under §  60.44b (a)(4) or §  60.44b(l) is determined by the three-run average (nominal 1-hour runs) for the initial and subsequent performance tests; or

(2) The owner or operator of an affected facility may elect to determine compliance on a 30-day rolling average basis by using the continuous emission monitoring system specified under §  60.48b for measuring NOX and oxygen and meet the requirements of §  60.48b. The sampling site shall be located at the outlet from the steam generating unit. The NOX emissions rate at the outlet from the steam generating unit shall constitute the NOX emissions rate from the duct burner of the combined cycle system.

(g) The owner or operator of an affected facility described in §  60.44b(j) or §  60.44b(k) shall demonstrate the maximum heat input capacity of the steam generating unit by operating the facility at maximum capacity for 24 hours. The owner or operator of an affected facility shall determine the maximum heat input capacity using the heat loss method described in sections 5 and 7.3 of the ASME Power Test Codes 4.1 (see IBR §  60.17(h)). This demonstration of maximum heat input capacity shall be made during the initial performance test for affected facilities that meet the criteria of §  60.44b(j). It shall be made within 60 days after achieving the maximum production rate at which the affected facility will be operated, but not later than 180 days after initial start-up of each facility, for affected facilities meeting the criteria of §  60.44b(k). Subsequent demonstrations may be required by the Administrator at any other time. If this demonstration indicates that the maximum heat input capacity of the affected facility is less than that stated by the manufacturer of the affected facility, the maximum heat input capacity determined during this demonstration shall be used to determine the capacity utilization rate for the affected facility. Otherwise, the maximum heat input capacity provided by the manufacturer is used.

(h) The owner or operator of an affected facility described in §  60.44b(j) that has a heat input capacity greater than 73 MW (250 million Btu/hour) shall:

(1) Conduct an initial performance test as required under §  60.8 over a minimum of 24 consecutive steam generating unit operating hours at maximum heat input capacity to demonstrate compliance with the nitrogen oxides emission standards under §  60.44b using Method 7, 7A, 7E, or other approved reference methods; and

(2) Conduct subsequent performance tests once per calendar year or every 400 hours of operation (whichever comes first) to demonstrate compliance with the nitrogen oxides emission standards under §  60.44b over a minimum of 3 consecutive steam generating unit operating hours at maximum heat input capacity using Method 7, 7A, 7E, or other approved reference methods.

§  60.47b  Emission monitoring for sulfur dioxide.

Page 29: Applicability

(a) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (f) of this section, the owner or operator of an affected facility subject to the sulfur dioxide standards under §  60.42b shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS) for measuring sulfur dioxide concentrations and either oxygen (O2) or carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations and shall record the output of the systems. The sulfur dioxide and either oxygen or carbon dioxide concentrations shall both be monitored at the inlet and outlet of the sulfur dioxide control device.

(b) As an alternative to operating CEMS as required under paragraph (a) of this section, an owner or operator may elect to determine the average sulfur dioxide emissions and percent reduction by:

(1) Collecting coal or oil samples in an as-fired condition at the inlet to the steam generating unit and analyzing them for sulfur and heat content according to Method 19. Method 19 provides procedures for converting these measurements into the format to be used in calculating the average sulfur dioxide input rate, or

(2) Measuring sulfur dioxide according to Method 6B at the inlet or outlet to the sulfur dioxide control system. An initial stratification test is required to verify the adequacy of the Method 6B sampling location. The stratification test shall consist of three paired runs of a suitable sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide measurement train operated at the candidate location and a second similar train operated according to the procedures in section 3.2 and the applicable procedures in section 7 of Performance Specification 2. Method 6B, Method 6A, or a combination of Methods 6 and 3 or 3B or Methods 6C and 3A are suitable measurement techniques. If Method 6B is used for the second train, sampling time and timer operation may be adjusted for the stratification test as long as an adequate sample volume is collected; however, both sampling trains are to be operated similarly. For the location to be adequate for Method 6B 24-hour tests, the mean of the absolute difference between the three paired runs must be less than 10 percent.

(3) A daily sulfur dioxide emission rate, ED, shall be determined using the procedure described in Method 6A, section 7.6.2 (Equation 6A-8) and stated in ng/J (lb/million Btu) heat input.

(4) The mean 30-day emission rate is calculated using the daily measured values in ng/J (lb/million Btu) for 30 successive steam generating unit operating days using equation 19-20 of Method 19.

(c) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall obtain emission data for at least 75 percent of the operating hours in at least 22 out of 30 successive boiler operating days. If this minimum data requirement is not met with a single monitoring system, the owner or operator of the affected facility shall supplement the emission data with data collected with other monitoring systems as approved by the Administrator or the reference methods and procedures as described in paragraph (b) of this section.

(d) The 1-hour average sulfur dioxide emission rates measured by the CEMS required by paragraph (a) of this section and required under §  60.13(h) is expressed in ng/J or lb/million Btu heat input and is used to calculate the average emission rates under §  60.42b. Each 1-hour average sulfur dioxide emission rate must be based on more than 30 minutes of steam generating unit operation and include at least 2 data points with each representing a 15-minute period. Hourly sulfur dioxide emission rates are not calculated if the affected facility is operated less than 30 minutes in a 1-hour period and are not counted toward determination of a steam generating unit operating day.

Page 30: Applicability

(e) The procedures under §  60.13 shall be followed for installation, evaluation, and operation of the CEMS.

(1) All CEMS shall be operated in accordance with the applicable procedures under Performance Specifications 1, 2, and 3 (appendix B).

(2) Quarterly accuracy determinations and daily calibration drift tests shall be performed in accordance with Procedure 1 (appendix F).

(3) For affected facilities combusting coal or oil, alone or in combination with other fuels, the span value of the sulfur dioxide CEMS at the inlet to the sulfur dioxide control device is 125 percent of the maximum estimated hourly potential sulfur dioxide emissions of the fuel combusted, and the span value of the CEMS at the outlet to the sulfur dioxide control device is 50 percent of the maximum estimated hourly potential sulfur dioxide emissions of the fuel combusted.

(f) The owner or operator of an affected facility that combusts very low sulfur oil is not subject to the emission monitoring requirements of this section if the owner or operator obtains fuel receipts as described in §  60.49b(r).

§  60.48b  Emission monitoring for particulate matter and nitrogen oxides.

(a) The owner or operator of an affected facility subject to the opacity standard under §  60.43b shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous monitoring system for measuring the opacity of emissions discharged to the atmosphere and record the output of the system.

(b) Except as provided under paragraphs (g), (h), and (i) of this section, the owner or operator of an affected facility shall comply with either paragraphs (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this section.

(1) Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous monitoring system, and record the output of the system, for measuring nitrogen oxides emissions discharged to the atmosphere; or

(2) If the owner or operator has installed a nitrogen oxides emission rate continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) to meet the requirements of part 75 of this chapter and is continuing to meet the ongoing requirements of part 75 of this chapter, that CEMS may be used to meet the requirements of this section, except that the owner or operator shall also meet the requirements of §  60.49b. Data reported to meet the requirements of §  60.49b shall not include data substituted using the missing data procedures in subpart D of part 75 of this chapter, nor shall the data have been bias adjusted according to the procedures of part 75 of this chapter.

(c) The continuous monitoring systems required under paragraph (b) of this section shall be operated and data recorded during all periods of operation of the affected facility except for continuous monitoring system breakdowns and repairs. Data is recorded during calibration checks, and zero and span adjustments.

(d) The 1-hour average nitrogen oxides emission rates measured by the continuous nitrogen oxides monitor required by paragraph (b) of this section and required under §  60.13(h) shall be expressed in ng/J or lb/million Btu heat input and shall be used to calculate the average emission rates under §  60.44b. The 1-hour averages shall be calculated using the data points required under §  60.13(b). At least 2 data points must be used to calculate each 1-hour average.

Page 31: Applicability

(e) The procedures under §  60.13 shall be followed for installation, evaluation, and operation of the continuous monitoring systems.

(1) For affected facilities combusting coal, wood or municipal-type solid waste, the span value for a continuous monitoring system for measuring opacity shall be between 60 and 80 percent.

(2) For affected facilities combusting coal, oil, or natural gas, the span value for nitrogen oxides is determined as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------ Span values for Fuel nitrogen oxides (PPM)------------------------------------------------------------------------Natural gas.......................................... 500Oil.................................................. 500Coal................................................. 1,000Mixtures............................................. 500(x+y)+1,000z------------------------------------------------------------------------

where:

x is the fraction of total heat input derived from natural gas,

y is the fraction of total heat input derived from oil, and

z is the fraction of total heat input derived from coal.

(3) All span values computed under paragraph (e)(2) of this section for combusting mixtures of regulated fuels are rounded to the nearest 500 ppm.

(f) When nitrogen oxides emission data are not obtained because of continuous monitoring system breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks and zero and span adjustments, emission data will be obtained by using standby monitoring systems, Method 7, Method 7A, or other approved reference methods to provide emission data for a minimum of 75 percent of the operating hours in each steam generating unit operating day, in at least 22 out of 30 successive steam generating unit operating days.

(g) The owner or operator of an affected facility that has a heat input capacity of 73 MW (250 million Btu/hour) or less, and which has an annual capacity factor for residual oil having a nitrogen content of 0.30 weight percent or less, natural gas, distillate oil, or any mixture of these fuels, greater than 10 percent (0.10) shall:

(1) Comply with the provisions of paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (e)(2), (e)(3), and (f) of this section, or

(2) Monitor steam generating unit operating conditions and predict nitrogen oxides emission rates as specified in a plan submitted pursuant to §  60.49b(c).

(h) The owner or operator of a duct burner, as described in §  60.41b, which is subject to the NOX standards of §  60.44b(a)(4) or §  60.44b(l) is not required to install or operate a continuous emissions monitoring system to measure NOX emissions.

Page 32: Applicability

(i) The owner or operator of an affected facility described in §  60.44b(j) or §  60.44b(k) is not required to install or operate a continuous monitoring system for measuring nitrogen oxides emissions.

§  60.49b  Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

(a) The owner or operator of each affected facility shall submit notification of the date of initial startup, as provided by §  60.7. This notification shall include:

(1) The design heat input capacity of the affected facility and identification of the fuels to be combusted in the affected facility,

(2) If applicable, a copy of any Federally enforceable requirement that limits the annual capacity factor for any fuel or mixture of fuels under §§  60.42b(d)(1), 60.43b(a)(2), (a)(3)(iii), (c)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), 60.44b(c), (d), (e), (i), (j), (k), 60.45b(d), (g), 60.46b(h), or 60.48b(i),

(3) The annual capacity factor at which the owner or operator anticipates operating the facility based on all fuels fired and based on each individual fuel fired, and,

(4) Notification that an emerging technology will be used for controlling emissions of sulfur dioxide. The Administrator will examine the description of the emerging technology and will determine whether the technology qualifies as an emerging technology. In making this determination, the Administrator may require the owner or operator of the affected facility to submit additional information concerning the control device. The affected facility is subject to the provisions of §  60.42b(a) unless and until this determination is made by the Administrator.

(b) The owner or operator of each affected facility subject to the sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, and/or nitrogen oxides emission limits under §§  60.42b, 60.43b, and 60.44b shall submit to the Administrator the performance test data from the initial performance test and the performance evaluation of the CEMS using the applicable performance specifications in appendix B. The owner or operator of each affected facility described in §  60.44b(j) or §  60.44b(k) shall submit to the Administrator the maximum heat input capacity data from the demonstration of the maximum heat input capacity of the affected facility.

(c) The owner or operator of each affected facility subject to the nitrogen oxides standard of §  60.44b who seeks to demonstrate compliance with those standards through the monitoring of steam generating unit operating conditions under the provisions of §  60.48b(g)(2) shall submit to the Administrator for approval a plan that identifies the operating conditions to be monitored under §  60.48b(g)(2) and the records to be maintained under §  60.49b(j). This plan shall be submitted to the Administrator for approval within 360 days of the initial startup of the affected facility. The plan shall:

(1) Identify the specific operating conditions to be monitored and the relationship between these operating conditions and nitrogen oxides emission rates (i.e., ng/J or lbs/million Btu heat input). Steam generating unit operating conditions include, but are not limited to, the degree of staged combustion (i.e., the ratio of primary air to secondary and/or tertiary air) and the level of excess air (i.e., flue gas oxygen level);

(2) Include the data and information that the owner or operator used to identify the relationship between nitrogen oxides emission rates and these operating conditions;

Page 33: Applicability

(3) Identify how these operating conditions, including steam generating unit load, will be monitored under §  60.48b(g) on an hourly basis by the owner or operator during the period of operation of the affected facility; the quality assurance procedures or practices that will be employed to ensure that the data generated by monitoring these operating conditions will be representative and accurate; and the type and format of the records of these operating conditions, including steam generating unit load, that will be maintained by the owner or operator under §  60.49b(j). If the plan is approved, the owner or operator shall maintain records of predicted nitrogen oxide emission rates and the monitored operating conditions, including steam generating unit load, identified in the plan.

(d) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall record and maintain records of the amounts of each fuel combusted during each day and calculate the annual capacity factor individually for coal, distillate oil, residual oil, natural gas, wood, and municipal-type solid waste for the reporting period. The annual capacity factor is determined on a 12-month rolling average basis with a new annual capacity factor calculated at the end of each calendar month.

(e) For an affected facility that combusts residual oil and meets the criteria under §§  60.46b(e)(4), 60.44b (j), or (k), the owner or operator shall maintain records of the nitrogen content of the residual oil combusted in the affected facility and calculate the average fuel nitrogen content for the reporting period. The nitrogen content shall be determined using ASTM Method D3431-80, Test Method for Trace Nitrogen in Liquid Petroleum Hydrocarbons (IBR-see §  60.17), or fuel suppliers. If residual oil blends are being combusted, fuel nitrogen specifications may be prorated based on the ratio of residual oils of different nitrogen content in the fuel blend.

(f) For facilities subject to the opacity standard under §  60.43b, the owner or operator shall maintain records of opacity.

(g) Except as provided under paragraph (p) of this section, the owner or operator of an affected facility subject to the nitrogen oxides standards under §  60.44b shall maintain records of the following information for each steam generating unit operating day:

(1) Calendar date.

(2) The average hourly nitrogen oxides emission rates (expressed as NO2) (ng/J or lb/million Btu heat input) measured or predicted.

(3) The 30-day average nitrogen oxides emission rates (ng/J or lb/million Btu heat input) calculated at the end of each steam generating unit operating day from the measured or predicted hourly nitrogen oxide emission rates for the preceding 30 steam generating unit operating days.

(4) Identification of the steam generating unit operating days when the calculated 30-day average nitrogen oxides emission rates are in excess of the nitrogen oxides emissions standards under §  60.44b, with the reasons for such excess emissions as well as a description of corrective actions taken.

(5) Identification of the steam generating unit operating days for which pollutant data have not been obtained, including reasons for not obtaining sufficient data and a description of corrective actions taken.

Page 34: Applicability

(6) Identification of the times when emission data have been excluded from the calculation of average emission rates and the reasons for excluding data.

(7) Identification of "F" factor used for calculations, method of determination, and type of fuel combusted.

(8) Identification of the times when the pollutant concentration exceeded full span of the continuous monitoring system.

(9) Description of any modifications to the continuous monitoring system that could affect the ability of the continuous monitoring system to comply with Performance Specification 2 or 3.

(10) Results of daily CEMS drift tests and quarterly accuracy assessments as required under appendix F, Procedure 1.

(h) The owner or operator of any affected facility in any category listed in paragraphs (h) (1) or (2) of this section is required to submit excess emission reports for any excess emissions which occurred during the reporting period.

(1) Any affected facility subject to the opacity standards under §  60.43b(e) or to the operating parameter monitoring requirements under §  60.13(i)(1).

(2) Any affected facility that is subject to the nitrogen oxides standard of §  60.44b, and that

(i) Combusts natural gas, distillate oil, or residual oil with a nitrogen content of 0.3 weight percent or less, or

(ii) Has a heat input capacity of 73 MW (250 million Btu/hour) or less and is required to monitor nitrogen oxides emissions on a continuous basis under §  60.48b(g)(1) or steam generating unit operating conditions under §  60.48b(g)(2).

(3) For the purpose of §  60.43b, excess emissions are defined as all 6-minute periods during which the average opacity exceeds the opacity standards under §  60.43b(f).

(4) For purposes of §  60.48b(g)(1), excess emissions are defined as any calculated 30-day rolling average nitrogen oxides emission rate, as determined under §  60.46b(e), which exceeds the applicable emission limits in §  60.44b.

(i) The owner or operator of any affected facility subject to the continuous monitoring requirements for nitrogen oxides under §  60.48(b) shall submit reports containing the information recorded under paragraph (g) of this section.

(j) The owner or operator of any affected facility subject to the sulfur dioxide standards under §  60.42b shall submit reports.

(k) For each affected facility subject to the compliance and performance testing requirements of §  60.45b and the reporting requirement in paragraph (j) of this section, the following information shall be reported to the Administrator:

Page 35: Applicability

(1) Calendar dates covered in the reporting period.

(2) Each 30-day average sulfur dioxide emission rate (ng/J or 1b/million Btu heat input) measured during the reporting period, ending with the last 30-day period; reasons for noncompliance with the emission standards; and a description of corrective actions taken.

(3) Each 30-day average percent reduction in sulfur dioxide emissions calculated during the reporting period, ending with the last 30-day period; reasons for noncompliance with the emission standards; and a description of corrective actions taken.

(4) Identification of the steam generating unit operating days that coal or oil was combusted and for which sulfur dioxide or diluent (oxygen or carbon dioxide) data have not been obtained by an approved method for at least 75 percent of the operating hours in the steam generating unit operating day; justification for not obtaining sufficient data; and description of corrective action taken.

(5) Identification of the times when emissions data have been excluded from the calculation of average emission rates; justification for excluding data; and description of corrective action taken if data have been excluded for periods other than those during which coal or oil were not combusted in the steam generating unit.

(6) Identification of "F" factor used for calculations, method of determination, and type of fuel combusted.

(7) Identification of times when hourly averages have been obtained based on manual sampling methods.

(8) Identification of the times when the pollutant concentration exceeded full span of the CEMS.

(9) Description of any modifications to the CEMS that could affect the ability of the CEMS to comply with Performance Specification 2 or 3.

(10) Results of daily CEMS drift tests and quarterly accuracy assessments as required under appendix F, Procedure 1.

(11) The annual capacity factor of each fired as provided under paragraph (d) of this section.

(l) For each affected facility subject to the compliance and performance testing requirements of §  60.45b(d) and the reporting requirements of paragraph (j) of this section, the following information shall be reported to the Administrator:

(1) Calendar dates when the facility was in operation during the reporting period;

(2) The 24-hour average sulfur dioxide emission rate measured for each steam generating unit operating day during the reporting period that coal or oil was combusted, ending in the last 24-hour period in the quarter; reasons for noncompliance with the emission standards; and a description of corrective actions taken;

Page 36: Applicability

(3) Identification of the steam generating unit operating days that coal or oil was combusted for which sulfur dioxide or diluent (oxygen or carbon dioxide) data have not been obtained by an approved method for at least 75 percent of the operating hours; justification for not obtaining sufficient data; and description of corrective action taken.

(4) Identification of the times when emissions data have been excluded from the calculation of average emission rates; justification for excluding data; and description of corrective action taken if data have been excluded for periods other than those during which coal or oil were not combusted in the steam generating unit.

(5) Identification of "F" factor used for calculations, method of determination, and type of fuel combusted.

(6) Identification of times when hourly averages have been obtained based on manual sampling methods.

(7) Identification of the times when the pollutant concentration exceeded full span of the CEMS.

(8) Description of any modifications to the CEMS which could affect the ability of the CEMS to comply with Performance Specification 2 or 3.

(9) Results of daily CEMS drift tests and quarterly accuracy assessments as required under appendix F, Procedure 1.

(m) For each affected facility subject to the sulfur dioxide standards under §  60.42(b) for which the minimum amount of data required under §  60.47b(f) were not obtained during the reporting period, the following information is reported to the Administrator in addition to that required under paragraph (k) of this section:

(1) The number of hourly averages available for outlet emission rates and inlet emission rates.

(2) The standard deviation of hourly averages for outlet emission rates and inlet emission rates, as determined in Method 19, section 7.

(3) The lower confidence limit for the mean outlet emission rate and the upper confidence limit for the mean inlet emission rate, as calculated in Method 19, section 7.

(4) The ratio of the lower confidence limit for the mean outlet emission rate and the allowable emission rate, as determined in Method 19, section 7.

(n) If a percent removal efficiency by fuel pretreatment (i.e., % Rf) is used to determine the overall percent reduction (i.e., % Ro) under §  60.45b, the owner or operator of the affected facility shall submit a signed statement with the report.

(1) Indicating what removal efficiency by fuel pretreatment (i.e., % Rf) was credited during the reporting period;

Page 37: Applicability

(2) Listing the quantity, heat content, and date each pre-treated fuel shipment was received during the reporting period, the name and location of the fuel pretreatment facility; and the total quantity and total heat content of all fuels received at the affected facility during the reporting period.

(3) Documenting the transport of the fuel from the fuel pretreatment facility to the steam generating unit.

(4) Including a signed statement from the owner or operator of the fuel pretreatment facility certifying that the percent removal efficiency achieved by fuel pretreatment was determined in accordance with the provisions of Method 19 (appendix A) and listing the heat content and sulfur content of each fuel before and after fuel pretreatment.

(o) All records required under this section shall be maintained by the owner or operator of the affected facility for a period of 2 years following the date of such record.

(p) The owner or operator of an affected facility described in §  60.44b(j) or (k) shall maintain records of the following information for each steam generating unit operating day:

(1) Calendar date,

(2) The number of hours of operation, and

(3) A record of the hourly steam load.

(q) The owner or operator of an affected facility described in §  60.44b(j) or §  60.44b(k) shall submit to the Administrator a report containing:

(1) The annual capacity factor over the previous 12 months;

(2) The average fuel nitrogen content during the reporting period, if residual oil was fired; and

(3) If the affected facility meets the criteria described in §  60.44b(j), the results of any nitrogen oxides emission tests required during the reporting period, the hours of operation during the reporting period, and the hours of operation since the last nitrogen oxides emission test.

(r) The owner or operator of an affected facility who elects to demonstrate that the affected facility combusts only very low sulfur oil under §  60.42b(j)(2) shall obtain and maintain at the affected facility fuel receipts from the fuel supplier which certify that the oil meets the definition of distillate oil as defined in §  60.41b. For the purposes of this section, the oil need not meet the fuel nitrogen content specification in the definition of distillate oil. Reports shall be submitted to the Administrator certifying that only very low sulfur oil meeting this definition was combusted in the affected facility during the reporting period.

(s) Facility specific nitrogen oxides standard for Cytec Industries Fortier Plant's C.AOG incinerator located in Westwego, Louisiana:

(1) Definitions.

Page 38: Applicability

Oxidation zone is defined as the portion of the C.AOG incinerator that extends from the inlet of the oxidizing zone combustion air to the outlet gas stack.

Reducing zone is defined as the portion of the C.AOG incinerator that extends from the burner section to the inlet of the oxidizing zone combustion air.

Total inlet air is defined as the total amount of air introduced into the C.AOG incinerator for combustion of natural gas and chemical by-product waste and is equal to the sum of the air flow into the reducing zone and the air flow into the oxidation zone.

(2) Standard for nitrogen oxides. (i) When fossil fuel alone is combusted, the nitrogen oxides emission limit for fossil fuel in §  60.44b(a) applies.

(ii) When natural gas and chemical by-product waste are simultaneously combusted, the nitrogen oxides emission limit is 289 ng/J (0.67 lb/million Btu) and a maximum of 81 percent of the total inlet air provided for combustion shall be provided to the reducing zone of the C.AOG incinerator.

(3) Emission monitoring. (i) The percent of total inlet air provided to the reducing zone shall be determined at least every 15 minutes by measuring the air flow of all the air entering the reducing zone and the air flow of all the air entering the oxidation zone, and compliance with the percentage of total inlet air that is provided to the reducing zone shall be determined on a 3-hour average basis.

(ii) The nitrogen oxides emission limit shall be determined by the compliance and performance test methods and procedures for nitrogen oxides in §  60.46b(i).

(iii) The monitoring of the nitrogen oxides emission limit shall be performed in accordance with §  60.48b.

(4) Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. (i) The owner or operator of the C.AOG incinerator shall submit a report on any excursions from the limits required by paragraph (a)(2) of this section to the Administrator with the quarterly report required by paragraph (i) of this section.

(ii) The owner or operator of the C.AOG incinerator shall keep records of the monitoring required by paragraph (a)(3) of this section for a period of 2 years following the date of such record.

(iii) The owner of operator of the C.AOG incinerator shall perform all the applicable reporting and recordkeeping requirements of this section.

(t) Facility-specific nitrogen oxides standard for Rohm and Haas Kentucky Incorporated's Boiler No. 100 located in Louisville, Kentucky:

(1) Definitions.

Air ratio control damper is defined as the part of the low nitrogen oxides burner that is adjusted to control the split of total combustion air delivered to the reducing and oxidation portions of the combustion flame.

Page 39: Applicability

Flue gas recirculation line is defined as the part of Boiler No. 100 that recirculates a portion of the boiler flue gas back into the combustion air.

(2) Standard for nitrogen oxides. (i) When fossil fuel alone is combusted, the nitrogen oxides emission limit for fossil fuel in §  60.44b(a) applies.

(ii) When fossil fuel and chemical by-product waste are simultaneously combusted, the nitrogen oxides emission limit is 473 ng/J (1.1 lb/million Btu), and the air ratio control damper tee handle shall be at a minimum of 5 inches (12.7 centimeters) out of the boiler, and the flue gas recirculation line shall be operated at a minimum of 10 percent open as indicated by its valve opening position indicator.

(3) Emission monitoring for nitrogen oxides. (i) The air ratio control damper tee handle setting and the flue gas recirculation line valve opening position indicator setting shall be recorded during each 8-hour operating shift.

(ii) The nitrogen oxides emission limit shall be determined by the compliance and performance test methods and procedures for nitrogen oxides in §  60.46b.

(iii) The monitoring of the nitrogen oxides emission limit shall be performed in accordance with §  60.48b.

(4) Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. (i) The owner or operator of Boiler No. 100 shall submit a report on any excursions from the limits required by paragraph (b)(2) of this section to the Administrator with the quarterly report required by §  60.49b(i).

(ii) The owner or operator of Boiler No. 100 shall keep records of the monitoring required by paragraph (b)(3) of this section for a period of 2 years following the date of such record.

(iii) The owner of operator of Boiler No. 100 shall perform all the applicable reporting and recordkeeping requirements of §  60.49b.

(u) Site-specific standard for Merck & Co., Inc.'s Stonewall Plant in Elkton, Virginia. (1) This paragraph applies only to the pharmaceutical manufacturing facility, commonly referred to as the Stonewall Plant, located at Route 340 South, in Elkton, Virginia ("site") and only to the natural gas-fired boilers installed as part of the powerhouse conversion required pursuant to 40 CFR 52.2454(g). The requirements of this paragraph shall apply, and the requirements of §§  60.40b through 60.49b(t) shall not apply, to the natural gas-fired boilers installed pursuant to 40 CFR 52.2454(g).

(i) The site shall equip the natural gas-fired boilers with low nitrogen oxide (NOX) technology.

(ii) The site shall install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous monitoring and recording system for measuring NOX emissions discharged to the atmosphere and opacity using a continuous emissions monitoring system or a predictive emissions monitoring system.

(iii) Within 180 days of the completion of the powerhouse conversion, as required by 40 CFR 52.2454, the site shall perform a stack test to quantify criteria pollutant emissions.

Page 40: Applicability

(2) [Reserved]

(v) The owner or operator of an affected facility may submit electronic quarterly reports for SO2 and/or NOX and/or opacity in lieu of submitting the written reports required under paragraphs (h), (i), (j), (k) or (l) of this section. The format of each quarterly electronic report shall be coordinated with the permitting authority. The electronic report(s) shall be submitted no later than 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter and shall be accompanied by a certification statement from the owner or operator, indicating whether compliance with the applicable emission standards and minimum data requirements of this subpart was achieved during the reporting period. Before submitting reports in the electronic format, the owner or operator shall coordinate with the permitting authority to obtain their agreement to submit reports in this alternative format.

(w) The reporting period for the reports required under this subpart is each 6 month period. All reports shall be submitted to the Administrator and shall be postmarked by the 30th day following the end of the reporting period.

§  60.330  Applicability and designation of affected facility.

(a) The provisions of this subpart are applicable to the following affected facilities: All stationary gas turbines with a heat input at peak load equal to or greater than 10.7 gigajoules (10 million Btu) per hour, based on the lower heating value of the fuel fired.

(b) Any facility under paragraph (a) of this section which commences construction, modification, or reconstruction after October 3, 1977, is subject to the requirements of this part except as provided in paragraphs (e) and (j) of §  60.332.

§  60.331  Definitions.

As used in this subpart, all terms not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in the Act and in subpart A of this part.

(a) Stationary gas turbine means any simple cycle gas turbine, regenerative cycle gas turbine or any gas turbine portion of a combined cycle steam/electric generating system that is not self propelled. It may, however, be mounted on a vehicle for portability.

(b) Simple cycle gas turbine means any stationary gas turbine which does not recover heat from the gas turbine exhaust gases to preheat the inlet combustion air to the gas turbine, or which does not recover heat from the gas turbine exhaust gases to heat water or generate steam.

(c) Regenerative cycle gas turbine means any stationary gas turbine which recovers heat from the gas turbine exhaust gases to preheat the inlet combustion air to the gas turbine.

(d) Combined cycle gas turbine means any stationary gas turbine which recovers heat from the gas turbine exhaust gases to heat water or generate steam.

(e) Emergency gas turbine means any stationary gas turbine which operates as a mechanical or electrical power source only when the primary power source for a facility has been rendered inoperable by an emergency situation.

Page 41: Applicability

(f) Ice fog means an atmospheric suspension of highly reflective ice crystals.

(g) ISO standard day conditions means 288 degrees Kelvin, 60 percent relative humidity and 101.3 kilopascals pressure.

(h) Efficiency means the gas turbine manufacturer's rated heat rate at peak load in terms of heat input per unit of power output based on the lower heating value of the fuel.

(i) Peak load means 100 percent of the manufacturer's design capacity of the gas turbine at ISO standard day conditions.

(j) Base load means the load level at which a gas turbine is normally operated.

(k) Fire-fighting turbine means any stationary gas turbine that is used solely to pump water for extinguishing fires.

(l) Turbines employed in oil/gas production or oil/gas transportation means any stationary gas turbine used to provide power to extract crude oil/natural gas from the earth or to move crude oil/natural gas, or products refined from these substances through pipelines.

(m) A Metropolitan Statistical Area or MSA as defined by the Department of Commerce.

(n) Offshore platform gas turbines means any stationary gas turbine located on a platform in an ocean.

(o) Garrison facility means any permanent military installation.

(p) Gas turbine model means a group of gas turbines having the same nominal air flow, combuster inlet pressure, combuster inlet temperature, firing temperature, turbine inlet temperature and turbine inlet pressure.

(q) Electric utility stationary gas turbine means any stationary gas turbine constructed for the purpose of supplying more than one-third of its potential electric output capacity to any utility power distribution system for sale.

(r) Emergency fuel is a fuel fired by a gas turbine only during circumstances, such as natural gas supply curtailment or breakdown of delivery system, that make it impossible to fire natural gas in the gas turbine.

§  60.332  Standard for nitrogen oxides.

(a) On and after the date on which the performance test required by §  60.8 is completed, every owner or operator subject to the provisions of this subpart as specified in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section shall comply with one of the following, except as provided in paragraphs (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k), and (l) of this section.

(1) No owner or operator subject to the provisions of this subpart shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any stationary gas turbine, any gases which contain nitrogen oxides in excess of:

Page 42: Applicability

where:

STD=allowable NOx emissions (percent by volume at 15 percent oxygen and on a dry basis).

Y=manufacturer's rated heat rate at manufacturer's rated load (kilojoules per watt hour) or, actual measured heat rate based on lower heating value of fuel as measured at actual peak load for the facility. The value of Y shall not exceed 14.4 kilojoules per watt hour.

F=NOx emission allowance for fuel-bound nitrogen as defined in paragraph (a)(3) of this section.

(2) No owner or operator subject to the provisions of this subpart shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any stationary gas turbine, any gases which contain nitrogen oxides in excess of:

where:

STD=allowable NOx emissions (percent by volume at 15 percent oxygen and on a dry basis).

Y=manufacturer's rated heat rate at manufacturer's rated peak load (kilojoules per watt hour), or actual measured heat rate based on lower heating value of fuel as measured at actual peak load for the facility. The value of Y shall not exceed 14.4 kilojoules per watt hour.

F=NOx emission allowance for fuel-bound nitrogen as defined in paragraph (a)(3) of this section.

(3) F shall be defined according to the nitrogen content of the fuel as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------ F (NO[INF]x[/INF] Fuel-bound nitrogen (percent by weight) percent by volume)------------------------------------------------------------------------N[le]0.015........................................ 00.015<N[le]0.1................................. 0.04(N)0.1<N[le]0.25.................................. 0.004+0.0067(N-0.1)N>0.25......................................... 0.005------------------------------------------------------------------------

where:

N=the nitrogen content of the fuel (percent by weight). or: Manufacturers may develop custom fuel-bound nitrogen allowances for each gas turbine model they manufacture. These fuel-bound nitrogen allowances shall be substantiated with data and must be approved for use by the Administrator before the initial performance test required by §  60.8. Notices of approval of custom fuel-bound nitrogen allowances will be published in the Federal Register.

Page 43: Applicability

(b) Electric utility stationary gas turbines with a heat input at peak load greater than 107.2 gigajoules per hour (100 million Btu/hour) based on the lower heating value of the fuel fired shall comply with the provisions of paragraph (a)(1) of this section.

(c) Stationary gas turbines with a heat input at peak load equal to or greater than 10.7 gigajoules per hour (10 million Btu/hour) but less than or equal to 107.2 gigajoules per hour (100 million Btu/hour) based on the lower heating value of the fuel fired, shall comply with the provisions of paragraph (a)(2) of this section.

(d) Stationary gas turbines with a manufacturer's rated base load at ISO conditions of 30 megawatts or less except as provided in §  60.332(b) shall comply with paragraph (a)(2) of this section.

(e) Stationary gas turbines with a heat input at peak load equal to or greater than 10.7 gigajoules per hour (10 million Btu/hour) but less than or equal to 107.2 gigajoules per hour (100 million Btu/hour) based on the lower heating value of the fuel fired and that have commenced construction prior to October 3, 1982 are exempt from paragraph (a) of this section.

(f) Stationary gas turbines using water or steam injection for control of NOx emissions are exempt from paragraph (a) when ice fog is deemed a traffic hazard by the owner or operator of the gas turbine.

(g) Emergency gas turbines, military gas turbines for use in other than a garrison facility, military gas turbines installed for use as military training facilities, and fire fighting gas turbines are exempt from paragraph (a) of this section.

(h) Stationary gas turbines engaged by manufacturers in research and development of equipment for both gas turbine emission control techniques and gas turbine efficiency improvements are exempt from paragraph (a) on a case-by-case basis as determined by the Administrator.

(i) Exemptions from the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section will be granted on a case-by-case basis as determined by the Administrator in specific geographical areas where mandatory water restrictions are required by governmental agencies because of drought conditions. These exemptions will be allowed only while the mandatory water restrictions are in effect.

(j) Stationary gas turbines with a heat input at peak load greater than 107.2 gigajoules per hour that commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction between the dates of October 3, 1977, and January 27, 1982, and were required in the September 10, 1979, Federal Register (44 FR 52792) to comply with paragraph (a)(1) of this section, except electric utility stationary gas turbines, are exempt from paragraph (a) of this section.

(k) Stationary gas turbines with a heat input greater than or equal to 10.7 gigajoules per hour (10 million Btu/hour) when fired with natural gas are exempt from paragraph (a)(2) of this section when being fired with an emergency fuel.

(l) Regenerative cycle gas turbines with a heat input less than or equal to 107.2 gigajoules per hour (100 million Btu/hour) are exempt from paragraph (a) of this section.

§  60.333  Standard for sulfur dioxide.

Page 44: Applicability

On and after the date on which the performance test required to be conducted by §  60.8 is completed, every owner or operator subject to the provision of this subpart shall comply with one or the other of the following conditions:

(a) No owner or operator subject to the provisions of this subpart shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any stationary gas turbine any gases which contain sulfur dioxide in excess of 0.015 percent by volume at 15 percent oxygen and on a dry basis.

(b) No owner or operator subject to the provisions of this subpart shall burn in any stationary gas turbine any fuel which contains sulfur in excess of 0.8 percent by weight.

§  60.334  Monitoring of operations.

(a) The owner or operator of any stationary gas turbine subject to the provisions of this subpart and using water injection to control NOx emissions shall install and operate a continuous monitoring system to monitor and record the fuel consumption and the ratio of water to fuel being fired in the turbine. This system shall be accurate to within ±5.0 percent and shall be approved by the Administrator.

(b) The owner or operator of any stationary gas turbine subject to the provisions of this subpart shall monitor sulfur content and nitrogen content of the fuel being fired in the turbine. The frequency of determination of these values shall be as follows:

(1) If the turbine is supplied its fuel from a bulk storage tank, the values shall be determined on each occasion that fuel is transferred to the storage tank from any other source.

(2) If the turbine is supplied its fuel without intermediate bulk storage the values shall be determined and recorded daily. Owners, operators or fuel vendors may develop custom schedules for determination of the values based on the design and operation of the affected facility and the characteristics of the fuel supply. These custom schedules shall be substantiated with data and must be approved by the Administrator before they can be used to comply with paragraph (b) of this section.

(c) For the purpose of reports required under §  60.7(c), periods of excess emissions that shall be reported are defined as follows:

(1) Nitrogen oxides. Any one-hour period during which the average water-to-fuel ratio, as measured by the continuous monitoring system, falls below the water-to-fuel ratio determined to demonstrate compliance with §  60.332 by the performance test required in §  60.8 or any period during which the fuel-bound nitrogen of the fuel is greater than the maximum nitrogen content allowed by the fuel-bound nitrogen allowance used during the performance test required in §  60.8. Each report shall include the average water-to-fuel ratio, average fuel consumption, ambient conditions, gas turbine load, and nitrogen content of the fuel during the period of excess emissions, and the graphs or figures developed under §  60.335(a).

(2) Sulfur dioxide. Any daily period during which the sulfur content of the fuel being fired in the gas turbine exceeds 0.8 percent.

(3) Ice fog. Each period during which an exemption provided in §  60.332(f) is in effect shall be reported in writing to the Administrator quarterly. For each period the ambient conditions

Page 45: Applicability

existing during the period, the date and time the air pollution control system was deactivated, and the date and time the air pollution control system was reactivated shall be reported. All quarterly reports shall be postmarked by the 30th day following the end of each calendar quarter.

(4) Emergency fuel. Each period during which an exemption provided in §  60.332(k) is in effect shall be included in the report required in §  60.7(c). For each period, the type, reasons, and duration of the firing of the emergency fuel shall be reported.

§  60.335  Test methods and procedures.

(a) To compute the nitrogen oxides emissions, the owner or operator shall use analytical methods and procedures that are accurate to within 5 percent and are approved by the Administrator to determine the nitrogen content of the fuel being fired.

(b) In conducting the performance tests required in §  60.8, the owner or operator shall use as reference methods and procedures the test methods in appendix A of this part or other methods and procedures as specified in this section, except as provided for in §  60.8(b). Acceptable alternative methods and procedures are given in paragraph (f) of this section.

(c) The owner or operator shall determine compliance with the nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide standards in §§  60.332 and 60.333(a) as follows:

(1) The nitrogen oxides emission rate (NOx) shall be computed for each run using the following equation:

NOx=(NOxo) (Pr/Po)  0.5 e19(Ho -- 0.00633) (288°K/Ta)  1.53 where:

NOX = emission rate of NOX at 15 percent O2 and ISO standard ambient conditions, ppm by volume.

NOX = observed NOX concentration, ppm by volume at 15 percent O2.

Pr=reference combustor inlet absolute pressure at 101.3 kilopascals ambient pressure, mm Hg.

Po=observed combustor inlet absolute pressure at test, mm Hg.

Ho=observed humidity of ambient air, g    H2O/g air.

e=transcendental constant, 2.718.

Ta=ambient temperature, °K.

(2) The monitoring device of §  60.334(a) shall be used to determine the fuel consumption and the water-to-fuel ratio necessary to comply with §  60.332 at 30, 50, 75, and 100 percent of peak load or at four points in the normal operating range of the gas turbine, including the minimum point in the range and peak load. All loads shall be corrected to ISO conditions using the appropriate equations supplied by the manufacturer.

Page 46: Applicability

(3) Method 20 shall be used to determine the nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, and oxygen concentrations. The span values shall be 300 ppm of nitrogen oxide and 21 percent oxygen. The NOx emissions shall be determined at each of the load conditions specified in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.

(d) The owner or operator shall determine compliance with the sulfur content standard in §  60.333(b) as follows: ASTM D 2880-71, 78, or 96 shall be used to determine the sulfur content of liquid fuels and ASTM D 1072-80 or 90 (Reapproved 1994), D 3031-81, D 4084-82 or 94, or D 3246-81, 92, or 96 shall be used for the sulfur content of gaseous fuels (incorporated by reference-see §  60.17). The applicable ranges of some ASTM methods mentioned above are not adequate to measure the levels of sulfur in some fuel gases. Dilution of samples before analysis (with verification of the dilution ratio) may be used, subject to the approval of the Administrator.

(e) To meet the requirements of §  60.334(b), the owner or operator shall use the methods specified in paragraphs (a) and (d) of this section to determine the nitrogen and sulfur contents of the fuel being burned. The analysis may be performed by the owner or operator, a service contractor retained by the owner or operator, the fuel vendor, or any other qualified agency.

(f) The owner or operator may use the following as alternatives to the reference methods and procedures specified in this section:

(1) Instead of using the equation in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, manufacturers may develop ambient condition correction factors to adjust the nitrogen oxides emission level measured by the performance test as provided in §  60.8 to ISO standard day conditions. These factors are developed for each gas turbine model they manufacture in terms of combustion inlet pressure, ambient air pressure, ambient air humidity, and ambient air temperature. They shall be substantiated with data and must be approved for use by the Administrator before the initial performance test required by §  60.8. Notices of approval of custom ambient condition correction factors will be published in the Federal Register.

Page 47: Applicability

§  52.01  Definitions.

All terms used in this part but not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in the Clean Air Act and in parts 51 and 60 of this chapter.

(a) The term stationary source means any building, structure, facility, or installation which emits or may emit an air pollutant for which a national standard is in effect.

(b) The term commenced means that an owner or operator has undertaken a continuous program of construction or modification.

(c) The term construction means fabrication, erection, or installation.

(d) The phrases modification or modified source mean any physical change in, or change in the method of operation of, a stationary source which increases the emission rate of any pollutant for which a national standard has been promulgated under part 50 of this chapter or which results in the emission of any such pollutant not previously emitted, except that:

(1) Routine maintenance, repair, and replacement shall not be considered a physical change, and

(2) The following shall not be considered a change in the method of operation:

(i) An increase in the production rate, if such increase does not exceed the operating design capacity of the source;

(ii) An increase in the hours of operation;

(iii) Use of an alternative fuel or raw material, if prior to the effective date of a paragraph in this part which imposes conditions on or limits modifications, the source is designed to accommodate such alternative use.

(e) The term startup means the setting in operation of a source for any purpose.

(f) [Reserved]

(g) The term heat input means the total gross calorific value (where gross calorific value is measured by ASTM Method D2015-66, D240-64, or D1826-64) of all fuels burned.

(h) The term total rated capacity means the sum of the rated capacities of all fuel-burning equipment connected to a common stack. The rated capacity shall be the maximum guaranteed by the equipment manufacturer or the maximum normally achieved during use, whichever is greater.

§  52.02  Introduction.

(a) This part sets forth the Administrator's approval and disapproval of State plans and the Administrator's promulgation of such plans or portions thereof. Approval of a plan or any portion thereof is based upon a determination by the Administrator that such plan or portion meets the requirements of section 110 of the Act and the provisions of part 51 of this chapter.

Page 48: Applicability

(b) Any plan or portion thereof promulgated by the Administrator substitutes for a State plan or portion thereof disapproved by the Administrator or not submitted by a State, or supplements a State plan or portion thereof. The promulgated provisions, together with any portions of a State plan approved by the Administrator, constitute the applicable plan for purposes of the Act.

(c) Where nonregulatory provisions of a plan are disapproved, the disapproval is noted in this part and a detailed evaluation is provided to the State, but no substitute provisions are promulgated by the Administrator.

(d) All approved plans and plan revisions listed in subparts B through DDD of this part and on file at the Office of the Federal Register are approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Notice of amendments to the plans will be published in the Federal Register. The plans and plan revisions are available for inspection at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, N.W., suite 700, Washington, D.C. In addition the plans and plan revisions are available at the following locations:

(1) Office of Air and Radiation, Docket and Information Center (Air Docket), EPA, 401 M St., SW., Room M1500, Washington, DC 20460.

(2) The appropriate EPA Regional Office as listed below:

(i) Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, John F. Kennedy Federal Building, One Congress Street, Boston, MA 02203.

(ii) New York, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2, 290 Broadway, New York, NY 10007-1866.

(iii) Delaware, District of Columbia, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 3, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, PA 19107.

(iv) Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 345 Courtland Street, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30365.

(v) Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604-3507.

(vi) Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Fountain Place, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas TX 75202-2733.

(vii) Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7, 726 Minnesota Avenue, Kansas City, KS 66101.

(viii) Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, 999 18th Street, Suite 500, Denver, CO 80202-2466.

Page 49: Applicability

(ix) Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, American Samoa, and Guam. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.

(x) Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, 1200 6th Avenue Seattle, WA 98101.

(e) Each State's plan is dealt with in a separate subpart, which includes an introductory section identifying the plan by name and the date of its submittal, a section classifying regions, and a section setting forth dates for attainment of the national standards. Additional sections are included as necessary to specifically identify disapproved provisions, to set forth reasons for disapproval, and to set forth provisions of the plan promulgated by the Administrator. Except as otherwise specified, all supplemental information submitted to the Administrator with respect to any plan has been submitted by the Governor of the State.

(f) Revisions to applicable plans will be included in this part when approved or promulgated by the Administrator.

§  52.07  Control strategies.

(a) Each subpart specifies in what respects the control strategies are approved or disapproved. Where emission limitations with a future effective date are employed to carry out a control strategy, approval of the control strategy and the implementing regulations does not supersede the requirements of subpart N of this chapter relating to compliance schedules for individual sources or categories of sources. Compliance schedules for individual sources or categories of sources must require such sources to comply with applicable requirements of the plan as expeditiously as practicable, where the requirement is part of a control strategy designed to attain a primary standard, or within a reasonable time, where the requirement is part of a control strategy designed to attain a secondary standard. All sources must be required to comply with applicable requirements of the plan no later than the date specified in this part for attainment of the national standard which the requirement is intended to implement.

(b) A control strategy may be disapproved as inadequate because it is not sufficiently comprehensive, although all regulations provided to carry out the strategy may themselves be approved. In this case, regulations for carrying out necessary additional measures are promulgated in the subpart.

(c) Where a control strategy is adequate to attain and maintain a national standard but one or more of the regulations to carry it out is not adopted or not enforceable by the State, the control strategy is approved and the necessary regulations are promulgated by the Administrator.

(d) Where a control strategy is adequate to attain and maintain air quality better than that provided for by a national standard but one or more of the regulations to carry it out is not adopted or not enforceable by the State, the control strategy is approved and substitute regulations necessary to attain and maintain the national standard are promulgated.

Page 50: Applicability

Florida Statutes

62-296.570 Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) - Requirements for Major VOC- and NOx-EmittingFacilities.(1) Applicability.(a) The requirements of this rule shall apply to those major VOC- and NOx-emitting facilities specified in Rule 62-296.500(1)(b), F.A.C.; specifically, to those VOC emissions units within such facilities which are not regulated for VOC underRules 62-296.501 through 62-296.516, F.A.C., and those VOC and NOx emissions units which have not been exempted pursuant toRule 62-296.500(1)(b), F.A.C., or by a specific provision of Rules 62-296.500 through 62-296.516, F.A.C.(b) The requirements of this rule shall not apply to emissions units that would otherwise be exempt from the air permitting requirements of the Department pursuant to Rule 62-210.300(3), F.A.C., or that would otherwise be considered insignificant pursuant to Rule 62-213.300(2)(a)1., F.A.C., or Rule 62-213.430(6)(b), F.A.C.(2) Compliance Requirements. Emissions units subject to the requirements of this rule shall comply with the operation permit requirements of Rule 62-296.570(3), F.A.C., and the RACT emission limiting standards of Rule 62-296.570(4), F.A.C. If, pursuant to an air operation or construction permit, the owner or operator of a emissions unit subject to the requirements of this rule assumes (or has assumed) a more stringent NOx or VOC emissions limit than the RACT emissions limit established in Rule 62-296.570(4),F.A.C., for the applicable emissions unit category, compliance with the emissions unit's NOx or VOC emissions limit in its air operation or construction permit shall be considered compliance with RACT for purposes of this rule.(3) Operation Permit Requirements.(a) The owner or operator of any emissions unit subject to the requirements of this rule shall apply for a new or revised permit to operate in accordance with the provisions of this rule by March 1, 1993, unless a later filing date is specified by the Department in writing.(b) If the existing operation permit for any emissions unit subject to the requirements of this rule would expire between the effective date of this rule and March 1, 1993, or any later filing date specified by the Department, the expiration date of such permit is hereby extended until March 1, 1993, or such later date. This provision shall not apply in the case of a revocation or suspension of such permit pursuant to Chapter 62-4, F.A.C.(4) RACT Emission Limiting Standards.(a) Compliance Dates and Monitoring.1. Each applicant for a new or revised operation permit for an emissions unit subject to the requirements of this rule shall propose a schedule for implementing the RACT emission limiting standards as expeditiously as practicable but no later than May 31, 1995. The emissions unit shall demonstrate compliance with the RACT emission limiting standards in accordance with a schedule specified in the emissions unit's air operation permit issued pursuant to Rule 62-296.570(3), F.A.C.2. Fuel-specific NOx and VOC emission limits established under this rule shall be incorporated into the new or revised operation permit for each emissions unit and become effective in accordance with the terms of the permit.3. For units that are not equipped with a continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) for NOx or VOCs, compliance with the emission limits established in this rule shall be demonstrated by annual emission testing in accordance with applicable EPA Reference Methods from Rule 62-297.401, F.A.C., or other methods approved by the Department in accordance with the requirements of Rule 62-297.620, F.A.C., except as otherwise provided in Rule 62-296.570(4)(b), F.A.C. If required, such annual emission testing shall be conducted during each federal fiscal year (October 1 – September 30). Annual compliance testing while firing oil is unnecessary for units operating on oil for less than 400 hours in the current federal fiscal year.4. For units that are equipped with a CEMs, compliance shall be demonstrated based on a 30-day rolling average. The CEMs must meet the performance specifications contained in 40 Code of Federal Regulations

Page 51: Applicability

Part 60, Appendix B, or 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 75, hereby adopted and incorporated by reference.(b) Emission Limiting Standards.1. Emissions of NOx from any rear wall fired, forced circulation, 16-burner, compact furnace shall not exceed 0.20 lb/million BTU while firing natural gas and 0.36 lb/million BTU while firing oil.2. Emissions of NOx from any front wall fired, natural circulation, 18-burner, compact furnace shall not exceed 0.40 lb/million BTU while firing natural gas and 0.53 lb/million BTU of NOx while firing oil.3. Emissions of NOx from any front wall fired, natural circulation, 24-burner, compact furnace shall not exceed 0.50 lb/million BTU while firing natural gas and 0.62 lb/million BTU of NOx while firing oil.4. Emissions of NOx from any tangentially fired, low heat release, large furnace shall not exceed 0.20 lb/million BTU while firing natural gas.5. Emissions of NOx from any gas turbine shall not exceed 0.50 lb/million BTU while firing natural gas and 0.90 lb/million BTU while firing oil. Unless compliance is demonstrated using a CEMs, compliance shall be demonstrated by a stack test on one representative turbine unit within a facility if the turbines are substantially similar.6. Emissions of VOC and NOx from carbonaceous fuel burning facilities, other than waste-to-energy facilities, shall not exceed 5.0 lbs/million BTU and 0.9 lb/million BTU, respectively.7. Emissions of NOx from any oil-fired diesel generator shall not exceed 4.75 lb/million BTU.8. Emissions of NOx from any cement plant shall not exceed 2.0 lb/million BTU.9. Emissions of NOx from any other external combustion emissions unit subject to the requirements of this rule, and not covered in Rule 62-296.570(4)(b)1. through 8., F.A.C., shall not exceed 0.50 lb/million BTU. Compliance shall be demonstrated annually in accordance with the applicable EPA Method from Rule 62-297.401, F.A.C., or other method approved by the Department in accordance with the requirements of Rule 62-297.620, F.A.C.10. Emissions of VOC from resin coating operations shall be limited by the use of low-VOC resin or thermal oxidation of emissions from the purge cycle.11. Emissions of VOC from any emissions unit subject to this rule but specifically exempted from any of the control technology requirements of Rules 62-296.501, through 62-296.516, F.A.C., shall not exceed the applicable exemption criteria.(c) Exception for Startup, Shutdown, or Malfunction. The emission limits in this rule shall apply at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction as provided by Rule 62-210.700, F.A.C.

Specific Authority 403.061 FS. Law Implemented 403.031, 403.061, 403.087 FS. History–New 2-2-93, Amended 4-17-94, Formerly 17-296.570, Amended 11-23-94, 1-1-96, 3-2-99.

62-213.300 Title V Air General Permits.(1) Applicability. The following facilities are eligible to operate under the terms of a Title V air general permit issued pursuant to the procedures and conditions of this rule.(2) General Procedures.(a) Eligibility Determination. The responsible official of the facility shall determine its eligibility for a Title V air general permit pursuant to the applicability criteria of subsection 62-213.300(1), F.A.C.1. No facility which contains an emissions unit, other than a unit described in a Title V air general permit under this rule or a unit considered insignificant pursuant to this paragraph, shall be eligible to use any air general permit in this rule. No facility iseligible to use more than one air general permit under this rule. For purposes of this rule, an emissions unit or activity shall be considered insignificant if all of the following criteria are met:a. The emissions unit or activity would be subject to no unit-specific applicable requirement.b. The emissions unit or activity would neither emit nor have the potential to emit:(i) 500 pounds per year or more of lead and lead compounds expressed as lead;(ii) 1,000 pounds per year or more of any hazardous air pollutant;(iii) 2,500 pounds per year or more of total hazardous air pollutants; or(iv) 5.0 tons per year or more of any other regulated pollutant.c. The emissions unit or activity, in combination with other units and activities at the facility, would not cause the facility to emit or have the potential to emit:(i) 100 tons per year or more of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, or volatile organic compounds;

Page 52: Applicability

(ii) 5 tons per year or more of lead and lead compounds expressed as lead;(iii) 10 tons per year or more of any hazardous air pollutant;(iv) 25 tons per year or more of total hazardous air pollutants; or(v) 100 tons per year or more of any other regulated pollutant.2. Any facility that would use a Title V air general permit under this rule must surrender all existing air permits authorizing the operation of the facility.3. If a facility permitted by this rule at any time becomes ineligible for the use of the Title V air general permit and is subject to the source-specific Title V air operation permit requirements of Chapter 62-213, F.A.C., it shall be subject to enforcement action for operating without an air operation permit.4. Notwithstanding the shield provisions of Rule 62-213.460, F.A.C., any facility utilizing a Title V air general permit will be subject to enforcement action for operation without a permit under Chapter 62-213, F.A.C., if it is determined to be initially ineligible for the air general permit which is being utilized by the facility.(b) Notification. For each facility intending to operate under the provisions of a Title V air general permit, the responsible official must submit the correct notification form for the specific general permit to be utilized, as set forth in Rule 62-213.900, F.A.C., to give notice to the Department of intent to use one of the air general permits listed in this rule.(c) Administrative Corrections. Within 30 days of any changes requiring corrections to information contained in the notification form, the responsible official shall notify the Department in writing. Such changes shall include:1. Any change in name of the responsible official or facility address or phone number;2. A change in facility status requiring more frequent monitoring or reporting by the responsible official from that noted on the most recent notification form; and3. Any other similar minor administrative change at the facility.(d) Violation of Permit. The Title V air general permit is valid only for the specific activity indicated. Any deviation from the specified activity and the conditions for undertaking that activity is a violation of the permit. The responsible official is placed on notice that violation of the permit constitutes grounds for revocation and suspension pursuant to Rule 62-4.100 and subsection 62-4.530(4), F.A.C., and initiation of enforcement action pursuant to Sections 403.141 through 403.161, F.S. No revocation shall become effective except after notice is served by personal service, certified mail, or newspaper notice pursuant to Section 120.60(5), F.S., upon the person or persons named therein and a hearing held, if requested within the time specified in the notice. The notice shall specify the provision of the law or rule alleged to be violated, or the permit condition or Department order alleged to be violated, and the facts alleged to constitute a violation thereof.

62-212.400 Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD).The provisions of this rule generally apply to the construction or modification of air pollutant emitting facilities in those parts of thestate in which the state ambient air quality standards are being met.The provisions of this rule also establish various requirements for existing emissions units and facilities in such areas, includingspecific construction/operation permit requirements.(1) General Prohibitions.(a) Except as provided in Rule 62-212.500, F.A.C., the Department shall not permit the construction or modification of anyemissions unit or facility that would cause or contribute to a violation of any ambient air quality standard.(b) Except as provided in Rule 62-212.400(3)(f) and (g), F.A.C., the Department shall not permit the construction ormodification of any emissions unit or facility that would cause or contribute to an ambient concentration at any point within abaseline area that exceeds either the appropriate baseline concentration for the point plus the appropriate maximum allowableincrease or the appropriate ambient air quality standard, whichever is less.(c) The Department shall include conditions in each permit issued to insure that the provisions of this rule are not violated.

Page 53: Applicability

(2) Applicability. This subsection establishes the criteria for determining whether or not a proposed new facility ormodification to a facility is subject to the preconstruction review requirements of this rule, either in whole or in part. Thepreconstruction review requirements of this rule include the applicable provisions of: Rules 62-212.400(4), F.A.C., GeneralProvisions; 62-212.400(5), F.A.C., Preconstruction Review Requirements; 62-212.400(6), F.A.C., Best Available ControlTechnology (BACT); and 62-212.400(7), F.A.C., Construction/Operation Permit Requirements; all as modified by the applicableprovisions of Rule 62-212.400(3), F.A.C., Exemptions and Exclusions. A proposed new facility or modification that is not subjectto the preconstruction review requirements of this rule, either in whole or in part, may be subject to review requirements underother rules of this chapter.(a) Facility and Project Exemptions.1. Nonprofit Health and Educational Facilities Exemption. A proposed new facility or modification shall not be subject to thepreconstruction review requirements of this rule if the new or modified facility would be a nonprofit health or nonprofit educationalinstitution.2. Pollution Control Project Exemptions.a. A pollution control project that is being added, replaced, or used at an existing electric utility steam generating unit and thatmeets the requirements of 40 CFR 52.21(b)(2)(iii)(h), adopted and incorporated by reference at Rule 62-204.800, F.A.C., shall notbe subject to the preconstruction review requirements of this rule.b. A significant net increase in the actual emissions of a collateral pollutant that would occur solely as a result of a projectundertaken for the purpose of complying with the hazardous air pollutant emission reduction requirements of 40 CFR Part 63,Subpart S, adopted and incorporated by reference at Rule 62-204.800, F.A.C., shall not be subject to the preconstruction reviewrequirements of this rule, provided the owner or operator demonstrates to the Department that such increase would not cause orcontribute to a violation of any ambient air quality standard, maximum allowable increase, or visibility limitation.c. A significant net increase in the actual emissions of a collateral pollutant that would occur solely as a result of a projectundertaken for the purpose of complying with the non-methane organic compound emission reduction requirements of 40 CFR Part60, Subpart Cc or WWW, adopted and incorporated by reference at Rule 62-204.800, F.A.C., shall not be subject to thepreconstruction review requirements of this rule, provided the owner or operator demonstrates to the Department that such increasewould not cause or contribute to a violation of any ambient air quality standard, maximum allowable increase, or visibilitylimitation.3. Temporary Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Project Exemption. The installation, operation, cessation, or removal ofa temporary clean coal technology demonstration project that meets the requirements of 40 CFR 52.21(b)(2)(iii)(i), adopted andincorporated by reference at Rule 62-204.800, F.A.C., shall not be subject to the preconstruction review requirements of this rule. Atemporary clean coal technology demonstration project shall have the meaning provided in 40 CFR 52.21(b)(36), adopted and

Page 54: Applicability

incorporated by reference at Rule 62-204.800, F.A.C.4. Permanent Clean Coal Technology Demonstration Project Exemption. The installation or operation of a permanent cleancoal technology demonstration project that constitutes repowering shall not be subject to the preconstruction review requirementsof this rule, provided that the project does not result in an increase in the potential to emit of any regulated pollutant emitted by theunit. This exemption shall apply on a pollutant-by-pollutant basis. A clean coal technology demonstration project shall have themeaning provided in 40 CFR 52.21(b)(35), adopted and incorporated by reference at Rule 62-204.800, F.A.C.5. Very Clean-Coal Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Unit Exemption. The reactivation of a very clean-coal firedelectric utility steam generating unit, as defined under 40 CFR 52.21(b)(38), adopted and incorporated by reference at Rule62-204.800, F.A.C., shall not be subject to the preconstruction review requirements of this rule.(b) Fugitive Emissions Exemption. A proposed new facility or modification shall not be subject to the preconstruction reviewrequirements of this rule if:1. The affected facility would not belong to any of the facility categories listed in Table 212.400-1, Major Facility Categories,or any other facility category which, as of August 7, 1980, is being regulated under 40 CFR 60 or 40 CFR 61; and2. The facility or modification would be subject to the preconstruction review requirements of this rule only if fugitiveemissions, to the extent quantifiable, are considered in determining whether the affected facility would be subject topreconstruction review requirements pursuant to Rule 62-212.400(2)(d)2., F.A.C., if it is or were itself a proposed new facility.(c) Alternative Fuel or Raw Material Exemption.A modification that is to occur for any of the following reasons shall not be subject to the preconstruction review requirements ofthis rule:1. Use of an alternative fuel or raw material by reason of any order under Sections 2(a) and (b) of the Energy Supply andEnvironmental Coordination Act of 1974 or the Power Plant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, or by reason of a natural gascurtailment plan pursuant to the Federal Power Act;2. Use of an alternative fuel by reason of an order or rule under Section 125 of the Act;3. Use of an alternative fuel at a steam generating unit to the extent that the fuel is generated from municipal solid waste;4. Use of an alternative fuel or raw material which the facility was capable of accommodating before January 6, 1975, unlesssuch change would be prohibited under any federally enforceable permit condition which was established after January 6, 1975; or5. Use of an alternative fuel or raw material which the facility is approved to use under any permit issued under 40 CFR 52.21or Rule 17-2.500 (transferred) or 62-212.400, F.A.C.(d) New and Modified Facilities.1. New Minor Facilities.A proposed new minor facility shall not be subject to the preconstruction review requirements of this rule.2. New Major Facilities.Unless exempted under Rule 62-212.400(2)(a) or (b), F.A.C., a proposed new major facility shall be subject to the preconstructionreview requirements of this rule if:

Page 55: Applicability

a. For any pollutant regulated under the Act, except for lead, the sum of the quantifiable fugitive emissions and the potentialemissions of all emissions units at the facility which have the same "Major Group" Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code(as described in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1972, as amended by the 1977 Supplement; U.S. GovernmentPrinting Office, stock numbers 4101-006 and 003-005-00176-01, respectively) would be equal to or greater than 250 tons per year;orb. For any pollutant regulated under the Act, except for lead, the sum of the quantifiable fugitive emissions and the potentialemissions of all emissions units at the facility which have the same "Major Group" Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codewould be equal to or greater than 100 tons per year; and the facility would belong to any of the facility categories listed in Table212.400-1, Major Facility Categories; orc. For lead or lead compounds, measured as elemental lead, the sum of the quantifiable fugitive emissions and the potentialemissions of all emissions units at the facility which have the same "Major Group" Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codewould be equal to or greater than 5 tons per year.3. Modifications to Minor Facilities.Unless exempted under Rule 62-212.400(2)(a), (b) or (c), F.A.C., a proposed modification to a minor facility shall be subject to thepreconstruction review requirements of this rule only if the modification would be a physical change which, in and of itself, wouldconstitute a new major facility subject to preconstruction review requirements pursuant to Rule 62-212.400(2)(d)2., F.A.C.4. Modifications to Major Facilities.a. Unless exempted under Rule 62-212.400(2)(a), (b) or (c), F.A.C., a proposed modification to a major facility shall be subjectto the preconstruction review requirements of this rule if:(i) The facility to be modified would be subject to preconstruction review requirements pursuant to Rule 62-212.400(2)(d)2.,F.A.C., if it were itself a proposed new facility; and(ii) The modification would result in a significant net emissions increase (as set forth in Rule 62-212.400(2)(e)2., F.A.C.) ofany pollutant regulated under the Act; or the facility to be modified is located within 10 kilometers of a Class I area and themodification would result in a net emissions increase (as set forth in Rule 62-212.400(2)(e)1., F.A.C.) of any pollutant regulatedunder the Act, which increase would have an impact on any Class I area equal to or greater than 1.0 microgram per cubic meter(24-hour average).b. A proposed modification to a major facility shall be subject to the provisions of Rule 62-212.400(2)(d)3., F.A.C.,Modifications to Minor Facilities, if the facility to be modified would not be subject to preconstruction review requirementspursuant to Rule 62-212.400(2)(d)2., F.A.C., if it were itself a proposed new facility.(e) Emissions Increases.1. Net Emissions Increase.A modification to a facility results in a net emissions increase when, for a pollutant regulated under the Act, the sum of all of thecontemporaneous creditable increases and decreases in the actual emissions of the facility, including the increase in emissions of

Page 56: Applicability

the modification itself and any increases and decreases in quantifiable fugitive emissions, is greater than zero.2. Significant Net Emissions Increase.A significant net emissions increase of a pollutant regulated under the Act is a net emissions increase equal to or greater than theapplicable significant emission rate listed in Table 212.400-2, Regulated Air Pollutants – Significant Emission Rates.3. Contemporaneous Emissions Changes.An increase or decrease in the actual emissions or in the quantifiable fugitive emissions of a facility is contemporaneous with aparticular modification if it occurs within the period beginning five years prior to the date on which the owner or operator of thefacility submits a complete application for a permit to modify the facility and ending on the date on which the owner or operator ofthe modified facility projects the new or modified emissions unit(s) to begin operation. The date on which any increase in the actualemissions or in the quantifiable fugitive emissions of the facility occurs is the date on which the owner or operator of the facilitybegins, or projects to begin, operation of the emissions unit(s) resulting in the increase. The date on which any decrease in theactual emissions or in the quantifiable fugitive emissions of the facility occurs is the date on which the owner or operator of thefacility completes, or is committed to complete through a federally enforceable permit condition, a physical change in or change inthe method of operation of the facility resulting in the decrease.4. Creditable Emissions Changes.a. An increase or decrease in the actual emissions or in the quantifiable fugitive emissions of a facility is creditable if:(i) The Department has not relied on it in issuing a permit under the provisions of Rule 17-2.500 (transferred), or 62-212.400,FAC, or EPA has not relied on it in issuing a permit under the provisions of 40 CFR 52.21, which permit is in effect when theincrease in emissions of the modification occurs; and(ii) The Department has not relied on it in demonstrating attainment, defining reasonable further progress, or issuing a permitunder the provisions of Rule 17-2.17 (repealed), 17-2.510 (transferred), 17-2.650 (transferred), 62-212.500, or 62-296.500 through62-296.516, FAC, which permit is in effect when the increase in emissions of the modification occurs.b. An increase or decrease in the actual emissions or in the quantifiable fugitive emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide,or particulate matter which occurs before the applicable minor source baseline date is creditable only to the extent that it must beconsidered in calculating the amount of any maximum allowable increase in ambient concentration remaining available. Withrespect to particulate matter, only PM10 emissions shall be used to evaluate the net emissions increase of PM10.c. A decrease in the actual emissions or in the quantifiable fugitive emissions of a facility is creditable only if:(i) The old level of actual emissions, the old level of federally enforceable allowable emissions, or the old level of allowableemissions under Rule 62-296.500 through 62-296.516, 62-296.570, 62-296.600 through 605, or 62-296.700 through 62-296.712,F.A.C., whichever is lowest, exceeds the new level of actual emissions;(ii) It is federally enforceable on and after the date that the owner or operator obtains from the Department a permit to constructthe new or modified facility; and

Page 57: Applicability

(iii) It has approximately the same qualitative significance for public health and welfare as that attributed to the increase in theemissions of the modification.(f) Pollutants Subject to PSD Preconstruction Review.1. Except as provided under Rule 62-212.400(2)(f)3., F.A.C., below, for a proposed new facility or modification subject to thepreconstruction review requirements of this rule pursuant to Rule 62-212.400(2)(d)2. or 3., F.A.C., the preconstruction reviewrequirements of this rule shall apply to all pollutants regulated under the Act for which the sum of the potential emissions and thequantifiable fugitive emissions of the facility or modification would be equal to or greater than the significant emission rates listedin Table 212.400-2, Regulated Air Pollutants – Significant Emission Rates; or for which the sum of the potential emissions and thequantifiable fugitive emissions of the facility or modification would be greater than zero when the facility is located within 10kilometers of a Class I area and the potential and quantifiable fugitive emissions would have an impact on the Class I area equal toor greater than 1.0 microgram per cubic meter (24-hour average).2. Except as provided under Rule 62-212.400(2)(f)3., F.A.C., below, for a proposed modification subject to the preconstructionreview requirements of this rule pursuant to Rule 62-212.400(2)(d)4., F.A.C., the preconstruction review requirements of this ruleshall apply to all pollutants regulated under the Act for which the modification would result in: a significant net emissions increase(as set forth in Rule 62-212.400(2)(e)2., F.A.C.); or a net emissions increase (as set forth in Rule 62-212.400(2)(e)1., F.A.C.) whenthe facility to be modified is located within 10 kilometers of a Class I area and the net emissions increase would have an impact onthe Class I area equal to or greater than 1.0 microgram per cubic meter (24-hour average).3. For a proposed new facility or modification subject to the preconstruction review requirements of this rule which wouldconstruct in an area designated as nonattainment for any pollutant other than ozone under Rule 62-204.340, F.A.C., thepreconstruction review requirements of this rule shall not apply to emissions of the affected pollutant. For a proposed new facilityor modification subject to the preconstruction review requirements of this rule which would construct in an ozone nonattainmentarea, the preconstruction review requirements of this rule shall not apply to emissions of volatile organic compounds; however, insuch case the preconstruction review requirements of this rule shall apply to emissions of nitrogen oxides, even if the proposed newfacility or modification would also be subject to the preconstruction review requirements of Rule 62-212.500, F.A.C., for nitrogenoxides.(g) Relaxations of Restrictions on Pollutant Emitting Capacity.If a previously permitted facility or modification becomes a facility or modification which would be subject to the preconstructionreview requirements of this rule if it were a proposed new facility or modification solely by virtue of a relaxation in any federallyenforceable limitation on the capacity of the facility or modification to emit a pollutant (such as a restriction on hours of operation),which limitation was established after August 7, 1980, then at the time of such relaxation the preconstruction review requirementsof this rule shall apply to the facility or modification as though construction had not yet commenced on it.(3) Limited Exemptions and Special Provisions.

Page 58: Applicability

The provisions of this subsection establish exemptions and exclusions from certain of the General Provisions of Rule62-212.400(4), F.A.C., and PSD Review Requirements of Rule 62-212.400(5), F.A.C.(a) Relocatable Facilities.A relocatable facility which has a valid Department operation permit and which has previously been reviewed and issued aconstruction permit pursuant to 40 CFR 52.21 or to the preconstruction review requirements of this rule shall obtain permission torelocate and operate such facility at a new location through an amendment to the facility's operation permit, provided the followingconditions are met:1. The duration of emissions of the facility at the new location would not exceed two years;2. The federally enforceable allowable emissions would not be increased at the new location and the emissions of the facilitywould not have a significant impact on any Class I area or area where an applicable maximum allowable increase is known to beviolated;3. The owner or operator has provided the Department with reasonable assurance that the emissions of the facility at the newlocation would not cause or contribute to a violation of ambient air quality standards; and4. The owner or operator of the facility would obtain an amendment to the operating permit prior to beginning operation at thenew location identifying the new location and the duration of operation.(b) Voluntary Fuel Conversions (Reserved).(c) Temporary Emissions.A proposed facility or modification subject to the preconstruction review requirements of this rule shall be exempt from therequirements of Rules 62-212.400(5)(d), (e), (f), and (g), F.A.C., for a particular pollutant, provided:1. The duration of emissions of the facility or net emissions increase of the modification would not exceed two years;2. The owner or operator of the facility or modification has provided the Department with reasonable assurance that theemissions of the facility or net emissions increase of the modification would not cause or contribute to a violation of any ambientair quality standard or have a significant impact on any Class I area or area where an applicable maximum allowable increase isknown to be violated.(d) Modifications Under Fifty Tons Per Year.If a proposed modification subject to the preconstruction review requirements of this rule would be made to a facility that was inexistence on March 1, 1978, and would result in a net emissions increase of each pollutant listed in Table 212.400-2, Regulated AirPollutants – Significant Emission Rates, of less than 50 tons per year after the application of BACT, such modification shall beexempt from the requirements of Rule 62-212.400(5)(d), (e), (f), and (g), F.A.C., as they relate to any maximum allowable increasefor a Class II area.(e) General Ambient Monitoring Exemption.A proposed facility or modification subject to the preconstruction review requirements of this rule shall be exempt from themonitoring requirements of Rule 62-212.400(5)(f) and (g), F.A.C., with respect to a specific pollutant if:1. The emissions of the pollutant from the new facility or the net emissions increase of the pollutant from the modificationwould not have an impact on any area equal to or greater than that listed in Table 212.400-3, De Minimis Ambient Impacts; or

Page 59: Applicability

2. The ambient concentration of the pollutant in the area that the proposed facility or modification would affect is less than theappropriate de minimis concentration listed in Table 212.400-3; or3. The pollutant is not listed in Table 212.400-3.(f) Temporary Exclusions From Increment Consumption.1. Construction Related Emissions.Concentrations of particulate matter attributable to the increase in emissions from construction or other temporary emission-relatedactivities of new or modified facilities shall be excluded in determining compliance with any maximum allowable increase.2. Mandatory Fuel Conversions.By an Order issued by the Secretary, the following ambient concentrations shall be excluded in determining compliance with anymaximum allowable increase, provided the addition of such concentrations shall not cause or contribute to a violation of anyambient air quality standard. No exclusion of such concentrations shall apply more than five years after the effective date of thelatest applicable plan or order as set forth in Rule 62-212.400(3)(f)2.a. or b., F.A.C., below.a. Concentrations attributable to the increase in emissions from facilities which have converted from the use of petroleumproducts, natural gas, or both by reason of an order in effect under Sections 2(a) and (b) of the Energy Supply and EnvironmentalCoordination Act of 1974 or the Power Plant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978 over the emissions from such facilities before theeffective date of such an order.b. Concentrations attributable to the increase in emissions from facilities which have converted from using natural gas byreason of a natural gas curtailment plan in effect pursuant to the Federal Power Act over the emissions from such facilities beforethe effective date of such plan.3. SIP Revision Related Temporary Emissions.By an Order issued by the Secretary, concentrations attributable to the temporary increase in emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogendioxide, or particulate matter from facilities which are affected by SIP revisions approved by the Administrator shall be excluded indetermining compliance with any maximum allowable increase, provided such Order shall:a. Specify the time period over which the temporary emissions increase of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, or particulatematter would occur (such time is not to exceed two years in duration unless a longer time is approved by the Administrator);b. Specify that the time period for excluding certain concentrations in accordance with Rule 62-212.400(3)(f)3.a., F.A.C.,above, is not renewable;c. Allow no emissions increase from a facility which would:(i) Have a significant impact on a Class I area or area where an applicable maximum allowable increase is known to beviolated; or(ii) Cause or contribute to a violation of any ambient air quality standard.d. Require limitations to be in effect by the end of the time period specified in accordance with Rule 62-212.400(3)(f)3.a.,F.A.C., above, which would ensure that the emissions levels from facilities affected by the SIP revision would not exceed thoselevels occurring from such facilities before the SIP revision was approved.4. Innovative Control Technology.By an Order issued by the Secretary, concentrations attributable to any federally enforceable interim allowable emissions resulting

Page 60: Applicability

from the use of innovative control technology that are in excess of the final allowable emissions based on the application of BACT,shall be excluded in determining compliance with any maximum allowable increase, provided such Order shall:a. Specify the time period over which the interim allowable emissions would occur (such time period shall not exceed fouryears, however such Order may be renewed for a period not to exceed an additional three years if the innovative control technologyfails and the additional time period is needed to apply BACT through a demonstrated system of control).b. Allow no emissions that would:(i) Have a significant impact on any Class I area or area where an applicable maximum allowable increase is known to beviolated; or(ii) Cause or contribute to a violation of any ambient air quality standard.c. Require limitations to be in effect by the end of the time period specified in Rule 62-212.400(3)(f)4.a., F.A.C., above, whichwould ensure that the emission levels from the emissions units using the innovative control technology would not exceed those thatare equivalent to the application of BACT.(g) Permanent Exclusions From Increment Consumption.The increase in ambient concentrations attributable to new emissions units outside the United States over the concentrationsattributable to emissions units which are included in the baseline emissions shall be excluded in determining compliance with anymaximum allowable increase.(4) General Provisions.(a) Facilities or Modifications Affecting Class I Areas.1. Additional Notification Requirements.a. The Department shall comply with the additional notification requirements of Rule 62-210.350(2)(h), FAC, for a proposednew facility or modification that would be located within 100 kilometers of, or whose emissions may affect, any Federal Class Iarea.2. Federal Land Manager Participation.a. The Federal Land Manager of any lands contained in a Class I area which may be affected by emissions from a proposedfacility or modification may demonstrate to the Department that the emissions from the proposed facility or modification wouldhave an adverse impact on the air quality-related values (including visibility) of the Federal Class I area, notwithstanding that thechange in air quality resulting from emissions from such facility or modification would not cause or contribute to concentrationswhich would exceed any maximum allowable increase for a Class I area.b. If this demonstration is received by the Department within thirty (30) days after the Department has mailed or transmitted tothe Federal Land Manager a complete application pursuant to Rule 62-210.350(2)(b), FAC, it shall be considered in theDepartment's preliminary determination and proposed agency action on the permit application. If this demonstration is receivedwithin the public comment period on the Department's proposed agency action, it shall be considered in the Department's finaldetermination and final agency action on the permit application.c. If the Department finds that the Federal Land Manager's analysis does not demonstrate to the Department's satisfaction thatan adverse impact on the air quality related values (including visibility) of a Class I area would occur, a written explanation of the

Page 61: Applicability

reasons for such finding shall be included in the Department's preliminary or final determination as provided in Rule62-212.400(4)(a)2.b., FAC. If the Department is satisfied that the Federal Land Manager has demonstrated an adverse impact onthe air quality related values (including visibility) of a Class I area, the Department shall not issue the permit.3. Variances from Class I Increments.The owner or operator of the proposed facility or modification may demonstrate to the Federal Land Manager that the emissionsfrom such facility or modification would have no adverse impact on the air quality related values of such lands (includingvisibility), notwithstanding that the change in air quality resulting from emissions from such facility or modification would cause orcontribute to concentrations which would exceed a maximum allowable increase for a Class I area. If the Federal Land Managerconcurs with such demonstration and so certifies to the Department, the Department may (provided that all applicable requirementsare otherwise met) issue the permit with such emission limitations as may be necessary to assure that emissions of sulfur dioxide,nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter would not exceed the following maximum allowable increases, pursuant to 40 CFR51.166(p)(4), over baseline concentration for such pollutants:MaximumAllowableIncreasePollutant and (micrograms perPeriod of Exposure cubic meter)Particulate matter (PM10):Annual arithmetic mean 17.024-hr maximum 30.0Sulfur dioxide:Annual arithmetic mean 20.024-hr maximum 91.03-hr maximum 325.0Nitrogen dioxide:Annual arithmetic mean 25.04. Sulfur Dioxide Variance by Governor with Federal Land Manager's Concurrence.a. The owner or operator of a proposed facility or modification which cannot be approved under Rule 62-212.400(4)(a)3.,F.A.C., above, may demonstrate to the Governor that the emissions unit or modification cannot be constructed by reason of anymaximum allowable increase for sulfur dioxide for periods of twenty-four hours or less applicable to any Class I area and, in thecase of Federal mandatory Class I areas, that a variance under this clause would not adversely affect the air quality related values ofthe area (including visibility);b. The Governor, after consideration of the Federal Land Manager's recommendation (if any) and subject to his concurrence,may grant, after notice and an opportunity for a public hearing, a variance from such maximum allowable increase; andc. If such a variance is granted, the Department may issue a permit in accordance with the provision of Rule62-212.400(4)(a)6., F.A.C., below, provided that all applicable requirements are otherwise met.5. Sulfur Dioxide Variance by Governor with President's Concurrence.a. The recommendations of the Governor and the Federal Land Manager shall be transferred to the President in any case where

Page 62: Applicability

the Governor recommends a variance pursuant to Rule 62-212.400(4)(a)4., F.A.C., above, in which the Federal Land Manager doesnot concur;b. The President may approve the Governor's recommendation if he finds that such variance is in the national interest; andc. If such a variance is approved, the Department may issue a permit in accordance with provisions of Rule 62-212.400(4)(a)6.,F.A.C., below, provided that all applicable requirements are otherwise met.6. Emission Limitations for Gubernatorial Variances.In the case of a permit issued under the procedures of Rule 62-212.400(4)(a)4. or 5., F.A.C., the facility or modification shallcomply with emission limitations as may be necessary to assure that emissions of sulfur dioxide from the emissions unit ormodification would not (during any day on which the otherwise applicable maximum allowable increases are exceeded) cause orcontribute to concentrations which would exceed the following maximum allowable increases over the baseline concentrations andto assure that such emissions would not cause or contribute to concentrations which exceed the otherwise applicable maximumallowable increases for periods of exposure of 24 hours or less for more than 18 days, not necessarily consecutive, during anyannual period:MaximumAllowableIncrease(micrograms perPeriod of Exposure cubic meter)24-hr maximum 36.03-hr maximum 130.0(b) Baseline Related Provisions.1. General.The establishment of a minor source baseline date for a pollutant establishes the baseline area for that pollutant based on thedesignations of individual prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) areas under Rule 62-204.360, F.A.C. The boundary of thebaseline area may be changed only by redesignating the boundaries of the affected PSD areas in accordance with the redesignationprovisions of Rule 62-204.320, F.A.C. The minor source baseline date for an area may be disestablished or changed as the result ofsuch redesignation of PSD areas.The establishment of a baseline area requires the determination of the baseline emissions that affect the baseline area. The baselineemissions are determined for each pollutant for which maximum allowable increases are established under Rule 62-204.260,F.A.C., and are used to compute the baseline concentration levels for each point within the baseline area. The baselineconcentration is the ambient concentration value to which the applicable maximum allowable increase is added to determine themaximum allowable ambient concentration for each point within the area.2. Baseline Dates.Within one year of the establishment of a minor source baseline date for a PSD area designated under Rule 62-204.360, FAC, theDepartment shall publish such date in the Florida Administrative Weekly.3. Determination of Baseline Emissions.a. Except as provided under Rules 62-212.400(4)(b)3.b. through d., F.A.C., the baseline emissions shall be the actual emissions

Page 63: Applicability

representative of all facilities in existence on the applicable minor source baseline date which are located within the baseline area orhave a significant impact on the baseline area.(i) On an annual basis, the actual emissions representative of a facility shall be the sum of the actual emissions of eachemissions unit within the facility.(ii) On a short-term basis, the actual emissions representative of a facility shall be the sum of the normal maximum emissionsof each emissions unit within the facility, where normal maximum emissions are the emissions that would occur for each applicableaveraging time if an emissions unit were operated at the lesser of its maximum or federally enforceable permitted capacity, usingthe normal types and amounts of fuels or materials processed, and operated for the lesser of the normal or federally enforceablepermitted number of hours per day.b. The baseline emissions of a facility on which construction commenced on or before the major source baseline date but whichwas not in operation by the applicable minor source baseline date, shall be the federally enforceable allowable emissions of thefacility, provided such facility would be subject to the preconstruction review requirements of this rule if it were a proposed newfacility.c. The following emissions shall not be included in the baseline emissions but shall be considered in calculating the amount ofany maximum allowable increase remaining available:(i) The actual emissions representative of a facility on which construction commenced after the major source baseline date,provided such facility would be subject to the preconstruction review requirements of this rule if it were a proposed new facility;(ii) Any increase in the actual emissions representative of a facility resulting from a physical change in or change in the methodof operation of the facility which occurred after the major source baseline date, but prior to the applicable minor source baselinedate, provided such facility would be subject to the preconstruction review requirements of this rule if it were a proposed newfacility and such increase would not qualify for an exemption from the preconstruction review requirements of this rule pursuant toRule 62-212.400(2)(c), F.A.C.;(iii) Any decrease in the actual emissions representative of a facility resulting from a physical change in or change in themethod of operation of the facility (including demolition or any otherwise permanent reduction in the productive capacity or thefacility) which occurred after the major source baseline date, but prior to the applicable minor source baseline date, provided suchfacility would be subject to the preconstruction review requirements of this rule if it were a proposed new facility; and(iv) Any increase or decrease in the actual emissions representative of all facilities occurring after the applicable minor sourcebaseline date.d. Notwithstanding the provisions of Rules 62-212.400(4)(b)3.a. through c., F.A.C., any decrease in the actual emissionsrepresentative of a facility on which the Department has relied in demonstrating attainment, defining reasonable further progress, orissuing a permit under the provisions of Rule 17-2.17 (repealed), 17-2.510 (transferred), 17-2.650 (transferred), 62-212.500,

Page 64: Applicability

62-296.500 through 62-296.516, or 62-296.700 through 62-296.712, F.A.C., shall be included in the baseline emissions and shallnot be considered in calculating the amount of any maximum allowable increase remaining available.e. For purposes of Rules 62-212.400(4)(b)3.c.(ii) and (iii), F.A.C., a physical change in or change in the method of operation ofa facility shall not include:(i) Routine maintenance, repair, or replacement of component parts of an emissions unit;(ii) An increase in the hours of operation or in the production rate, unless such change would be prohibited under any federallyenforceable permit condition which was established after the major source baseline date, pursuant to 40 CFR 52.21, or this section,or under regulations approved pursuant to 40 CFR 51.18; or(iii) A change in ownership of an emissions unit or facility.f. The date on which any increase in the actual emissions representative of a facility occurs is the date on which the owner oroperator of the facility begins, or projects to begin, operation of the emissions unit(s) resulting in the increase.g. The date on which any decrease in the actual emissions representative of a facility occurs is the date on which the owner oroperator of the facility completes, or commits to complete through a federally enforceable permit condition, the physical change orchange in the method of operation of the facility resulting in the decrease.(c) Ambient Monitoring Quality Assurance Requirements.The owner or operator of the proposed facility or modification shall meet the requirements of 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix B, duringthe operation of ambient air quality monitoring stations required pursuant to the provisions of Rule 62-212.400(5)(f) or (g), F.A.C.A copy of the above referenced document is available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office,Washington, D.C., and may be inspected at the Department's Tallahassee office.(5) Preconstruction Review Requirements.(a) General.1. A proposed facility or modification subject to the preconstruction review requirements of this subsection shall be reviewedand permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rules 62-212.400(5)(b) through (h), F.A.C., below, unless specificallyexempted from one or more of those requirements pursuant to Rule 62-212.400(3), F.A.C., Exemptions and Exclusions.2. No owner or operator of a facility or modification subject to the preconstruction review requirements of this subsection shallbegin construction prior to obtaining a permit to construct in accordance with all applicable provisions of this rule and Rule62-210.300, F.A.C.3. Within 60 days after receipt of a complete application for a permit to construct, as required in Rule 62-212.400(5)(a)2.,F.A.C., above, the Department shall make a preliminary determination as to whether the application should be approved or denied.(b) Technology Review.The proposed facility or modification shall comply with all applicable emission limitations contained in Part VI of this chapter and40 CFR Parts 60 and 61.(c) Best Available Control Technology.The proposed facility or modification shall apply Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for each pollutant subject topreconstruction review requirements as set forth in Rule 62-212.400(2)(f), F.A.C.(d) Ambient Impact Analysis.

Page 65: Applicability

The owner or operator of the proposed facility or modification shall demonstrate to the Department that the increase in federallyenforceable allowable emissions from the proposed facility or modification, together with all other applicable increases anddecreases in emissions resulting from the construction or modification (including secondary emissions), will not cause or contributeto a violation of any ambient air quality standard or maximum allowable increase.(e) Additional Impact Analyses.1. The owner or operator of the proposed facility or modification shall provide the Department with analyses of:a. The impairment to visibility and soils, and to vegetation having a significant commercial or recreational value, that wouldoccur as a result of the facility or modification and associated commercial, residential, industrial and other growth;b. The air quality impact projected for the area as a result of general commercial, residential, industrial and other growthassociated with the facility or modification; andc. The impairment to visibility, if any, which would occur in any Federal Class I area within 100 kilometers of the facility ormodification, with the exception of the Bradwell Bay National Wilderness Area, as a result of emissions from the facility ormodification. (Federal Class I areas are designated in Rule 62-204.360(3)(b), F.A.C.)2. The analyses required under Rule 62-212.400(5)(e)1., FAC, shall be carried out using EPA-approved methods, if available.3. The Department may require the owner or operator of a proposed facility or modification subject to the provisions of Rule62-212.400(5)(e)1.c., FAC, to include as part of the required analysis such visibility monitoring data as are available from Federalor State visibility monitoring programs in the affected Class I area. If such data are not available or are demonstrated to beinadequate for a visibility analysis, the Department may require the applicant to collect up to one year of preconstruction visibilitymonitoring data and such postconstruction visibility monitoring data as are necessary to analyze the effect that emissions from thefacility or modification may have, or are having, on visibility in the affected Class I area.(f) Preconstruction Air Quality Monitoring and Analysis.The owner or operator of the proposed facility or modification shall provide the Department with an analysis of ambient air qualityin the area that the facility or modification would affect for each pollutant subject to NSR requirements as set forth in Rule62-212.400(2)(f), F.A.C.1. The analysis shall include:a. For any pollutant for which no national or state ambient air quality standards have been established, such air qualitymonitoring data as the Department determines are necessary to assess ambient air quality for that pollutant in any area that theemissions of the pollutant would affect; andb. For any pollutant (other than nonmethane hydrocarbons) for which national or state ambient air quality standards have beenestablished, continuous air quality monitoring data sufficient to determine whether emissions of that pollutant would cause orcontribute to a violation of any ambient air quality standard or any applicable maximum allowable increase.2. The continuous air quality monitoring data required under Rule 62-212.400(5)(f)1., F.A.C., shall have been gathered overthe twelve month period immediately preceding the filing of the application for a permit under this rule unless the Department

Page 66: Applicability

determines that monitoring data gathered over a period shorter than twelve months, but in no case shorter than four months, areacceptable for purposes of Rule 62-212.400(5)(f)1., F.A.C.3. Any air quality monitoring data required under Rule 62-212.400(5)(f)1., F.A.C., shall be gathered in general accordancewith the applicable procedures specified in the Ambient Monitoring Guidelines for Prevention of Significant Deterioration (EPA450/4-87-007, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, N.C.27711, May 1987). A copy of the above referenced document is available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., and may be inspected at the Department's Tallahassee office.(g) Postconstruction Monitoring.The Department may require the owner or operator of the facility or modification to conduct postconstruction air qualitymonitoring and provide the data to the Department if the Department finds that such monitoring is necessary to determine the effectthat emissions from the facility or modification may have, or are having, on air quality in any area.(h) Permit Application Information Required.At a minimum, the owner or operator of the facility or modification shall provide the following information to the Department:1. A description of the nature, location, design capacity and typical operating schedule of the facility or modification, includingspecifications and drawings showing its design and plant layout;2. A detailed schedule for construction of the facility or modification;3. A detailed description of the system of continuous emissions reduction proposed by the facility or modification as BACT,emissions estimates and any other information as necessary to determine that BACT would be applied to the facility ormodification;4. Information relating to the air quality impact of the facility or modification, including meteorological and topographical datanecessary to estimate such impact; and5. Information relating to the air quality impacts of, and the nature and extent of, all general commercial, residential, industrialand other growth which has occurred since August 7, 1977, in the area the facility or modification would affect.6. A good-engineering-practice stack height, or other dispersion techniques, analysis to demonstrate compliance with Rule62-210.550, FAC.(6) Best Available Control Technology (BACT).(a) BACT Determination. Following receipt of a complete application for a permit to construct an emissions unit or facilitywhich requires a determination of Best Available Control Technology (BACT), the Department shall make a determination of BestAvailable Control Technology during the permitting process. In making the BACT determination, the Department shall giveconsideration to:1. Any Environmental Protection Agency determination of Best Available Control Technology pursuant to Section 169 of theClean Air Act, and any emission limitation contained in 40 CFR Part 60 (Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources) or40 CFR Part 61 (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants).2. All scientific, engineering, and technical material and other information available to the Department.3. The emission limiting standards or BACT determinations of any other state.

Page 67: Applicability

4. The social and economic impact of the application of such technology.(b) Phased Construction Projects – For phased construction projects, the determination of BACT shall be reviewed andmodified in accordance with 40 CFR 51.166(j)(4), adopted and incorporated by reference in Rule 62-204.800, F.A.C.(c) Use of Innovative Control Technology. With the consent of the Governor(s) of other affected state(s), the Department shallapprove, through the permitting process, the use of a system of innovative control technology if the proposed system would complywith the requirements of 40 CFR 51.166(s)(2)(i) through (v).1. The permit shall provide that the system of innovative control technology be discontinued under the conditions set forth in40 CFR 51.166(s)(3)(i) through (iii).2. If a system of innovative control technology must be discontinued, the facility's permit shall be amended to require theapplication of BACT through the use of a demonstrated system of control as expeditiously as practicable but no later than threeyears after amendment of the permit.(d) Test Methods and Procedures. All emissions tests performed pursuant to the requirements of this rule shall comply with thefollowing requirements.1. Pollutants for Which a Standard has Been Established Pursuant to 40 CFR Part 60, 40 CFR Part 61, or 40 CFR Part 63. Thetest methods shall be as specified in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix A, 40 CFR Part 61, Appendix B, or 40 CFR Part 63, Appendix B,adopted and incorporated by reference in Rule 62-204.800(7), (8), (9), F.A.C.2. Pollutants for Which No Standard has Been Established Pursuant to 40 CFR 60, 40 CFR 61, or 40 CFR 63. The test methodsshall be as specified in the BACT determination.(7) Construction/Operation Permit Requirements.(a) Construction Permits.Any construction permit issued pursuant to this rule shall contain all of the conditions and provisions necessary to insure that theconstruction and operation of the facility or modification shall be in accordance with the requirements of this rule.(b) Operation Permits.Any operation permit issued for a facility or modification shall include all operating conditions and provisions required under Rule62-212.400(7)(a), F.A.C., above, and set forth in the original or amended construction permit.(8) Future Statutory and Regulatory Changes.Within 60 days following any substantive changes in the PSD provisions of the Clean Air Act (including Title I, Part C) or EPAregulations contained in 40 CFR 51.24, the Department shall publish a notice in the Florida Administrative Weekly identifying thechanges and any new substantive differences created thereby in the state regulations. At the next regularly scheduled meeting of theEnvironmental Regulation Commission, not sooner than 14 days after the notice required above, the Department shall notify theCommission of the changes.(9) Effective Date.The provisions of Rule 62-212.400, F.A.C., shall become effective on November 1, 1981.TABLE 212.400-1MAJOR FACILITY CATEGORIES(LIST OF 28)Fossil fuel fired steam electric plants of more than 250 million Btu/hr heat inputCoal cleaning plants (with thermal dryers)

Page 68: Applicability

Kraft pulp millsPortland cement plantsPrimary zinc smeltersIron and steel mill plantsPrimary aluminum ore reduction plantsPrimary copper smeltersMunicipal incinerators capable of charging more than 250 tons of refuse per dayHydrofluoric acid plantsSulfuric acid plantsNitric acid plantsPetroleum refineriesLime plantsPhosphate rock processing plantsCoke oven batteriesSulfur recovery plantsCarbon black plants (furnace process)Primary lead smeltersFuel conversion plantsSintering plantsSecondary metal production plantsChemical process plantsFossil fuel boilers (or combinations thereof) totaling more than 250 million Btu/hr heat inputPetroleum storage and transfer units with total storage capacity exceeding 300,000 barrelsTaconite ore processing plantsGlass fiber processing plantsCharcoal production plantsTABLE 212.400-2REGULATED AIR POLLUTANTS – SIGNIFICANT EMISSION RATESSignificantEmission RatePollutant (Tons Per Year)Carbon monoxide 100Nitrogen oxides 40Sulfur dioxide 40Ozone 40 VOCParticulate matter 25PM10 15Total reduced sulfur (including H2S) 10Reduced sulfur compounds(including H2S) 10Sulfuric acid mist 7Fluorides 3(Pounds Per Year)Lead 1200Mercury 200Municipal waste combustor organics(measured as total tetra- throughocta-chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxinsand dibenzofurans) (Megagrams per Year)3.2 x 10-6(Tons per Year)3.5 x 10-6Municipal waste combustor metals(measured as particulate matter) (Megagrams per Year)14(Tons per Year)

Page 69: Applicability

15Municipal waste combustor acid gases(measured as sulfur dioxide andhydrogen chloride) (Megagrams per Year)36(Tons per Year)40Municipal solid waste landfill emissions(measured as nonmethane organiccompounds) (Megagrams per Year)45(Tons per Year)50TABLE 212.400-3DE MINIMIS AMBIENT IMPACTSConcentration(Micrograms PerPollutant Cubic Meter) Averaging PeriodNitrogen dioxide 14 AnnualLead 0.1 QuarterlySulfur dioxide 13 24-hourPM10 10 24-hourFluorides 0.25 24-hourMercury 0.25 24-hourCarbon monoxide 575 8-hourHydrogen sulfide 0.2 1-hourOzone No de minimis airquality level is providedfor ozone. However, anynet increase of 100 tonsper year or more ofvolatile organic compoundssubject to preconstructionreview would be requiredto perform an ambientimpact analysis, includingthe gathering of ambientair quality data.

Specific Authority 403.061 FS. Law Implemented 403.031, 403.061, 403.087 FS. History–Formerly 17-2.500, Amended 2-2-93, Formerly 17-212.400, Amended 11-23-94, 1-1-96, 3-13-96, 2-5-98, 8-15-99.