application of pk/pd in new anti- infective drug development

15
Application of PK/PD in New Anti- Infective Drug Development: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives Seong Jang, Ph.D. Reviewer, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, OTS/CDER/FDA

Upload: others

Post on 07-Apr-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Application of PK/PD in New Anti-Infective Drug Development:

Current Challenges and Future Perspectives

Seong Jang, Ph.D. Reviewer, Office of Clinical Pharmacology,

OTS/CDER/FDA

Disclaimer

The views presented here do not necessarily reflect those of the US Food and Drug Administration.

2

Outline

• Summarize PK/PD principles for anti-infective drugs: Current application

• Describe potential application of PK/PD in new anti-infective drug development

• Discuss current challenges and future perspectives

3

Why is PK/PD information important?

4

HOST

DRUG

BUG

Drug class/MOA PK characteristics PD behavior Dose and regimen

Immunocompetence Comorbidities Previous treatment Colonization

Susceptibility Resistance mechanisms MIC

FID~ U.S. Food and Drug Administration Protecting and Promoting Public Health

www.fda.gov

5

MIC T>MIC

Cmax/MIC

AUC/MIC Ratio

Time

Dru

g C

on

cen

trat

ion

Aminoglycosides Daptomycin Metronidazole Quinolones

Aminoglycosides Clindamycin Daptomycin Vancomycin Macrolides Metronidazole Linezolid Quinolones Tetracyclines

Β-Lactams Oritavancin

Cmax

Tmax

AUC

PK/PD index: Determinant of drug response

Identifying the PK/PD index that best correlates with efficacy

6

•  In vitro hollow-fiber system •  Animal model of infection

11 10 R2 = 93% R2- 81%

11 R2 ,. 47.5%

10 9 10

.c .r=. O> 9 C>

8 :.E :.E t: 8 t: :::> => 7 u. 7 LL 0 {) 6 0 6 0 .... ,,.. g> 0) 5 ,

5 0 ..J ...J

0

.c

.!2> 9

.c t: 8 ::::, LL 7 (.) 0 6 T"""

O> 0 6 ..J 0

4 A 8 4 1

B 0013 4

C 0 0

3 3 I 10 100 1000 10000 0.1 10 100 1000 '10000

3 0 20 40 80 100

24-Hour AUC/MIC Peak LeveJ/MIC Time Above MIC(%)

Determination of PK/PD Target PK/PD target: The magnitude of PK/PD index required

for desired efficacy in animal models of infection

7

PK/PD target determined from animal models is used as the target for humans.

~ 4 100 CXDO L 0 I

R 2 =76% - ,q-2 08 0 of- 80 N 0 C 0 CC) 0 a, L

~ a., ' 0°8 a,

60 ~ 0 0.. ......, ..c -a 0 .2l > 40 R2=82%

..c .f ,t: - 2 ~ ::,.

V) 20 cLO IL

\...)

s: -4 0 0

0 0 0 0 8' -l,

I I I 1111111 -<l - 6 1 10 100 1000 1 10 100 1000

AUC 24 /.MIC (F1r e.e. Drug) AUC 24 /MI C (Free Drug)

Current Utility of PK/PD target Dose selection for clinical studies:

8

Time

200 mg • AUC24 = 15 μg·hr/mL

Target AUC24/MIC Ratio = 30

500 mg • AUC24 = 40 μg·hr/mL

100 mg • AUC24 = 8 μg·hr/mL

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n

0 24 0 24 0 24

MIC = 0.5 μg/mL

Current Utility of PK/PD target: Probability of Target Attainment (PTA)

9

PK/PD target & Human (Patients) PK

AUC (n=1000)   AUC/MIC (n=1000)  MIC=1   MIC=2   MIC=4   MIC=8  

10 (P1)….   10   5   2.5   1.25  

20 (P10)….   20   10   5   2.5  

30 (P25)….   30   15   7.5   3.75  

40 (P40)….   40   20   10   5  

…..   …..   ……   …….   …….  200 (P100)   200   100   50   25  

% PTA  

Target AUC24/MIC Ratio = 5 Dose: 100 mg QD

~100% 99% 90% 60%

-CJ -C J -lJ

Probability of Target Attainment

10

MIC (mg/L) 0.03 0.06 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32

% P

roba

bilit

y of

Tar

get A

ttain

men

t

0

20

40

60

80

100

MIC (mg/L) 0.03 0.06 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32

% P

roba

bilit

y of

Tar

get A

ttain

men

t

0

20

40

60

80

100

Perc

ent a

t MIC

0

10

20

30

40

•  To determine susceptibility criteria •  To evaluate the clinical dose proposed

Potential Application of PTA as an Evidence of Drug Efficacy When a clinical efficacy trial is not feasible or is limited for infections or pathogens of low occurrence,

11 Quality of data for PK/PD target and human PK simulation are critical.

MIC (mg/L) 0.03 0.06 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32

% P

roba

bilit

y of

Tar

get A

ttain

men

t

0

20

40

60

80

100

Perc

ent a

t MIC

0

10

20

30

40

too rare to evaluate clinical efficacy

PTA as an Evidence of Drug Efficacy: Limitations and Challenges PK/PD target determined in animal model

12

•  PD endpoints vs. Clinical Response: stasis, 1-log kill, 2-log kill, or survival in animals •  Role of immune system: Immunocompromised animals •  Concentrations in infection sites Animals ≤ Human

Q

8 0 ' -

8 Q

1 10 100 1000 AUC 24 /MIC (Free Drug)

PTA as an Evidence of Drug Efficacy: Limitations and Challenges

Human PK simulations

13

•  Monte Carlo Simulation: Observed PK variability

•  Different variability b/w healthy subjects vs. patients with infection

35±8.5 (HS) vs. 33±23 (Pts)

•  Covariates of Pop. PK: Comorbidities, Infection itself, and etc

0 0

PTA as an Evidence of Drug Efficacy: Future Perspective

14

•  Intensive animal studies with better animal models •  PK/PD target using clinical exposure-response data •  PK, MIC, and clinical outcomes from Phase 2 dose-ranging studies •  PK, MIC, and clinical outcomes from Phase 3 studies:

To apply to other infection sites

AUC/MIC0 10 20 30 40

Clin

ical

Res

pons

e

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Acknowledgement Kimberly Bergman, Pharm.D. Ryan Owen, Ph.D. Kellie S. Reynolds, Pharm.D. John A. Lazor, Pharm.D.

15