application of the 2010 mcdonald mri criteria · 1 “mri in ms: the radiologist perspective”...
TRANSCRIPT
1
““MRI in MS: the radiologist perspectiveMRI in MS: the radiologist perspective””
Unidad de Resonancia MagnéticaServicio de RadiologíaHospital Vall d’Hebron
Barcelonaalex.rovira@idi‐cat.org
Àlex Rovira
••ScansScans mustmust bebe technicallytechnically adequateadequate••TheThe simplificationsimplification andand lessless restrictiverestrictive McDonaldMcDonald criteriacriteria maymay ultimatelyultimatelycompromisecompromise diagnosticdiagnostic specificityspecificity (overdiagnosis)(overdiagnosis)••InterpretationInterpretation mustmust bebe donedone byby expertsexperts::
••withwith knowledgeknowledge ofof relevantrelevant clinicalclinical andand laboratorylaboratory informationinformation
Application of the 2010 McDonald MRI criteriaApplication of the 2010 McDonald MRI criteria
gg yy••withwith enoughenough skillsskills toto recognizerecognize thethe fullfull rangerange ofof brainbrain andand spinalspinal cordcord MSMS imagingimagingabnormalitiesabnormalities••familiarfamiliar withwith atypicalatypical featuresfeatures thatthat shouldshould raiseraise thethe diagnosisdiagnosis ofof otherother diseasesdiseases (“red(“redflags”)flags”)
Misdiagnosis of MS
••CommonCommon ((academicacademic institutionsinstitutions))••MainlyMainly duedue toto improperimproper interpretationinterpretation ofof MRIMRI findingsfindings
dd
Solomon et al. Neurology 2012
••>>2525%% underunder treatmenttreatment
IncreaseIncrease specificityspecificity of MRI of MRI findingsfindings isis stillstill requiredrequired
Situations in which misdiagnosis may occur
Situation
••PreclinicalPreclinical diagnosisdiagnosis
Pitfalls
••Incidental MRI Incidental MRI findingsfindings suggestsuggest MSMS
normal population aged 18normal population aged 18‐‐50 (550 (5‐‐10%)10%)migraine (x4)migraine (x4)
Modified from Rudick and Miller. Neurology 2013
••Diagnosis at Diagnosis at firstfirst symptomsymptom
••MS MS mimicsmimics
••DifficultDifficult whenwhen clinicalclinical presentationpresentation isis atypicalatypical
••e.ge.g. Vasculitis, . Vasculitis, lymphomalymphoma, , hipoxichipoxic‐‐ischemicischemicvasculopathiesvasculopathies, , sarcoidosissarcoidosis, , LymeLyme diseasedisease……
MisdiagnosisMisdiagnosis has has significantsignificant consequencesconsequences::•• PatientPatient carecare•• HealthHealth carecare systemsystem costcost ((overtreatmentovertreatment))
2
Diagnostic strategy in patients with multifocal brain T2 Diagnostic strategy in patients with multifocal brain T2 lesions of unknown originlesions of unknown origin
DemographicDemographic datadataFamilyFamily historyhistoryVascular Vascular riskrisk factor factor profileprofileClinicalClinical informationinformation / CSF / CSF analysisanalysisFullFull rangerange ofof imagingimaging abnormalitiesabnormalities
–– Distribution and shape of lesionsDistribution and shape of lesions–– Involvement:Involvement:
callososeptalcallososeptal interfaceinterfaceUU‐‐fibersfibersbrainstem brainstem spinal cordspinal cord
Full Full rangerange of of imagingimaging abnormalitiesabnormalities
Perivenular topography of MS plaques“Dawson‘s fingers“
venule plaque
Dawson J. Trans Roy Soc Edinb 1916Horowitz et al. AJNR 1989
HR MR venography (SWI)
venule p q
FLAIR* sequence (3T)Central vein visibility
SWIFLAIR FLAIR*
Diagnostic value of SWI
Hipointensity signals within MS lesions
FLAIR T1 gad SWI
Intralesional susceptibility signal (ISS) 48% of non48% of non‐‐enhancingenhancing MS MS lesionslesions58% of 58% of enhancingenhancing MS MS lesionslesions
3
Susceptibility‐weighted imaging
ITSS within lesions
FLAIR
MSMigraine
SWI
MRI features in MSCorpus callosum lesions
MS
Vascular lesions
MS
CADASIL(40%)
SUSAC(100%)
Small‐vessel disease(diabetes)
NMO
Juxtacortical lesionsMRI features in MS
Courtesy of Dr. García‐Merino
T1 GadPDFlairT2
4
Cortical / juxtacortical lesionsDouble‐inversion recovery sequences (3.0T)
DIRFLAIRPDT2
Juxtacortical lesions
MS
Double Inversion Recovery sequences
Vascular
Brainstem/cerebellar lesionsMRI features in MS
MRI at 9.4 TCourtesy of T. Naidich LPM in CIS
Spinal cord Sd. ON Brainstem Sd.
Subclinical lesions in 27‐53% of patients with CIS
Spinal cord lesions 83% of patients with early relapsing MS
Prevalence of spinal cord lesions in MS
Spinal cord lesions in 74‐92% of patients with MS
McDonald 2010 criteria fulfill in 29.8% (brain only) and in 34.7%(brain and spinal cord) in CIS (NNS=7)
Sombekke et al. Neurology 2013; O`Riordan et al. JNNP 1998; Dalton et al. JNNP 2003 Lycklama à Nijeholt GJ et al. Brain 1998; Bot et al. Neurology 2004
5
Brain MRI with equivocal findings
Bot et al. Radiology 2002Abnormal spinal cord MRI in 74‐92% of patients with MS
MS or incidental findings in a young subject?
FLAIR
Ovoid lesions
Juxtacortical lesions
Juxtacortical lesion
SWI
Subclinical spinal cord lesions
Corpus callosum lesion
Iron within lesions on SWI
MultipleMultiple sclerosissclerosis
Frontal subcortical lesions
No juxtacortical, corpus callosum
FLAIR
MS or incidental findings in a young subject?
No subclinical spinal cord lesions
plesions
No iron content on SWI
SWI
Incidental Incidental findingfinding
ConclusionsConclusions
ConventionalConventional MRIMRI techniquestechniques,, whichwhich areare highlyhighly sensitivesensitive forfordetectingdetecting CNSCNS demyelinatingdemyelinating plaques,plaques, areare recognizedrecognized asas thethemostmost importantimportant paraclinicalparaclinical tooltool forfor diagnosingdiagnosing MSMS
IncidentalIncidental findingsfindings andand vascularvascular lesionslesions maymay mimickmimick MSMSIncidentalIncidental findingsfindings andand vascularvascular lesionslesions maymay mimickmimick MSMS
MRIMRI patternpattern inin MSMS isis usuallyusually relativelyrelatively specificspecific whenwhen thethe fullfullrangerange ofof signalsignal abnormalitiesabnormalities areare takentaken intointo considerationconsideration
NonNon‐‐conventionalconventional techniquestechniques maymay improveimprove thethe specificityspecificity ofofMRIMRI