application of the 2010 mcdonald mri criteria · 1 “mri in ms: the radiologist perspective”...

5
1 MRI in MS: the radiologist perspective MRI in MS: the radiologist perspectiveUnidad de Resonancia Magnética Servicio de Radiología Hospital Vall d’Hebron Barcelona alex.rovira@idicat.org Àlex Rovira Scans Scans must must be be technically technically adequate adequate The The simplification simplification and and less less restrictive restrictive McDonald McDonald criteria criteria may may ultimately ultimately compromise compromise diagnostic diagnostic specificity specificity (overdiagnosis) (overdiagnosis) Interpretation Interpretation must must be be done done by by experts experts: with with knowledge knowledge of of relevant relevant clinical clinical and and laboratory laboratory information information Application of the 2010 McDonald MRI criteria Application of the 2010 McDonald MRI criteria with with enough enough skills skills to to recognize recognize the the full full range range of of brain brain and and spinal spinal cord cord MS MS imaging imaging abnormalities abnormalities familiar familiar with with atypical atypical features features that that should should raise raise the the diagnosis diagnosis of of other other diseases diseases (“red (“red flags”) flags”) Misdiagnosis of MS Common Common (academic academic institutions institutions) Mainly Mainly due due to to improper improper interpretation interpretation of of MRI MRI findings findings d Solomon et al. Neurology 2012 >25 25% under under treatment treatment Increase Increase specificity specificity of MRI of MRI findings findings is is still still required required Situations in which misdiagnosis may occur Situation Preclinical Preclinical diagnosis diagnosis Pitfalls Incidental MRI Incidental MRI findings findings suggest suggest MS MS normal population aged 18 normal population aged 1850 (5 50 (510%) 10%) migraine (x4) migraine (x4) Modified from Rudick and Miller. Neurology 2013 Diagnosis at Diagnosis at first first symptom symptom MS MS mimics mimics Difficult Difficult when when clinical clinical presentation presentation is is atypical atypical e.g e.g. Vasculitis, . Vasculitis, lymphoma lymphoma, hipoxic hipoxicischemic ischemic vasculopathies vasculopathies, sarcoidosis sarcoidosis, Lyme Lyme disease disease… Misdiagnosis Misdiagnosis has has significant significant consequences consequences: Patient Patient care care Health Health care care system system cost cost (overtreatment overtreatment)

Upload: others

Post on 15-Feb-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Application of the 2010 McDonald MRI criteria · 1 “MRI in MS: the radiologist perspective” Unidad de Resonancia Magnética Servicio de Radiología Hospital Vall d’Hebron Barcelona

1

““MRI in MS: the radiologist perspectiveMRI in MS: the radiologist perspective””

Unidad de Resonancia MagnéticaServicio de RadiologíaHospital Vall d’Hebron

Barcelonaalex.rovira@idi‐cat.org

Àlex Rovira

••ScansScans mustmust bebe technicallytechnically adequateadequate••TheThe simplificationsimplification andand lessless restrictiverestrictive McDonaldMcDonald criteriacriteria maymay ultimatelyultimatelycompromisecompromise diagnosticdiagnostic specificityspecificity (overdiagnosis)(overdiagnosis)••InterpretationInterpretation mustmust bebe donedone byby expertsexperts::

••withwith knowledgeknowledge ofof relevantrelevant clinicalclinical andand laboratorylaboratory informationinformation

Application of the 2010 McDonald MRI criteriaApplication of the 2010 McDonald MRI criteria

gg yy••withwith enoughenough skillsskills toto recognizerecognize thethe fullfull rangerange ofof brainbrain andand spinalspinal cordcord MSMS imagingimagingabnormalitiesabnormalities••familiarfamiliar withwith atypicalatypical featuresfeatures thatthat shouldshould raiseraise thethe diagnosisdiagnosis ofof otherother diseasesdiseases (“red(“redflags”)flags”)

Misdiagnosis  of MS

••CommonCommon ((academicacademic institutionsinstitutions))••MainlyMainly duedue toto improperimproper interpretationinterpretation ofof MRIMRI findingsfindings

dd

Solomon et al. Neurology 2012

••>>2525%% underunder treatmenttreatment

IncreaseIncrease specificityspecificity of MRI of MRI findingsfindings isis stillstill requiredrequired

Situations in which misdiagnosis may occur

Situation

••PreclinicalPreclinical diagnosisdiagnosis

Pitfalls

••Incidental MRI Incidental MRI findingsfindings suggestsuggest MSMS

normal population aged 18normal population aged 18‐‐50 (550 (5‐‐10%)10%)migraine (x4)migraine (x4)

Modified from Rudick and Miller. Neurology 2013

••Diagnosis at Diagnosis at firstfirst symptomsymptom

••MS MS mimicsmimics

••DifficultDifficult whenwhen clinicalclinical presentationpresentation isis atypicalatypical

••e.ge.g. Vasculitis, . Vasculitis, lymphomalymphoma, , hipoxichipoxic‐‐ischemicischemicvasculopathiesvasculopathies, , sarcoidosissarcoidosis, , LymeLyme diseasedisease……

MisdiagnosisMisdiagnosis has has significantsignificant consequencesconsequences::•• PatientPatient carecare•• HealthHealth carecare systemsystem costcost ((overtreatmentovertreatment))

Page 2: Application of the 2010 McDonald MRI criteria · 1 “MRI in MS: the radiologist perspective” Unidad de Resonancia Magnética Servicio de Radiología Hospital Vall d’Hebron Barcelona

2

Diagnostic strategy in patients with multifocal brain T2 Diagnostic strategy in patients with multifocal brain T2 lesions of unknown originlesions of unknown origin

DemographicDemographic datadataFamilyFamily historyhistoryVascular Vascular riskrisk factor factor profileprofileClinicalClinical informationinformation / CSF / CSF analysisanalysisFullFull rangerange ofof imagingimaging abnormalitiesabnormalities

–– Distribution and shape of lesionsDistribution and shape of lesions–– Involvement:Involvement:

callososeptalcallososeptal interfaceinterfaceUU‐‐fibersfibersbrainstem brainstem spinal cordspinal cord

Full Full rangerange of of imagingimaging abnormalitiesabnormalities

Perivenular  topography of MS plaques“Dawson‘s fingers“

venule plaque

Dawson J. Trans Roy Soc Edinb 1916Horowitz et al. AJNR 1989

HR MR venography (SWI)

venule p q

FLAIR* sequence (3T)Central vein visibility 

SWIFLAIR FLAIR*

Diagnostic value of SWI

Hipointensity signals within MS lesions

FLAIR T1 gad SWI

Intralesional susceptibility signal (ISS) 48% of non48% of non‐‐enhancingenhancing MS MS lesionslesions58% of 58% of enhancingenhancing MS MS lesionslesions

Page 3: Application of the 2010 McDonald MRI criteria · 1 “MRI in MS: the radiologist perspective” Unidad de Resonancia Magnética Servicio de Radiología Hospital Vall d’Hebron Barcelona

3

Susceptibility‐weighted imaging

ITSS within lesions

FLAIR

MSMigraine

SWI

MRI features in MSCorpus callosum lesions

MS

Vascular lesions

MS

CADASIL(40%)

SUSAC(100%)

Small‐vessel disease(diabetes)

NMO

Juxtacortical lesionsMRI features in MS

Courtesy of Dr. García‐Merino

T1 GadPDFlairT2

Page 4: Application of the 2010 McDonald MRI criteria · 1 “MRI in MS: the radiologist perspective” Unidad de Resonancia Magnética Servicio de Radiología Hospital Vall d’Hebron Barcelona

4

Cortical / juxtacortical lesionsDouble‐inversion recovery sequences (3.0T)

DIRFLAIRPDT2

Juxtacortical lesions

MS

Double Inversion Recovery sequences

Vascular

Brainstem/cerebellar lesionsMRI features in MS

MRI at 9.4 TCourtesy of T. Naidich LPM in CIS

Spinal cord Sd. ON Brainstem Sd.

Subclinical lesions in 27‐53% of patients with CIS

Spinal cord lesions 83% of patients with early relapsing MS

Prevalence of spinal cord lesions in MS

Spinal cord lesions in 74‐92% of patients with MS

McDonald 2010 criteria fulfill in 29.8% (brain only) and in 34.7%(brain and spinal cord) in CIS (NNS=7)

Sombekke et al. Neurology 2013; O`Riordan et al. JNNP 1998; Dalton et al. JNNP 2003 Lycklama à Nijeholt GJ et al. Brain 1998; Bot et al. Neurology 2004

Page 5: Application of the 2010 McDonald MRI criteria · 1 “MRI in MS: the radiologist perspective” Unidad de Resonancia Magnética Servicio de Radiología Hospital Vall d’Hebron Barcelona

5

Brain MRI with equivocal findings

Bot et al. Radiology 2002Abnormal spinal cord MRI in 74‐92% of patients with MS

MS or incidental findings in a young subject?

FLAIR

Ovoid lesions

Juxtacortical lesions

Juxtacortical lesion

SWI

Subclinical spinal cord lesions

Corpus callosum lesion

Iron within lesions on SWI

MultipleMultiple sclerosissclerosis

Frontal subcortical lesions

No juxtacortical, corpus callosum 

FLAIR

MS or incidental findings in a young subject?

No subclinical spinal cord lesions

plesions

No iron content on SWI

SWI

Incidental Incidental findingfinding

ConclusionsConclusions

ConventionalConventional MRIMRI techniquestechniques,, whichwhich areare highlyhighly sensitivesensitive forfordetectingdetecting CNSCNS demyelinatingdemyelinating plaques,plaques, areare recognizedrecognized asas thethemostmost importantimportant paraclinicalparaclinical tooltool forfor diagnosingdiagnosing MSMS

IncidentalIncidental findingsfindings andand vascularvascular lesionslesions maymay mimickmimick MSMSIncidentalIncidental findingsfindings andand vascularvascular lesionslesions maymay mimickmimick MSMS

MRIMRI patternpattern inin MSMS isis usuallyusually relativelyrelatively specificspecific whenwhen thethe fullfullrangerange ofof signalsignal abnormalitiesabnormalities areare takentaken intointo considerationconsideration

NonNon‐‐conventionalconventional techniquestechniques maymay improveimprove thethe specificityspecificity ofofMRIMRI