applicationsof arabidopsis genome
TRANSCRIPT
8/7/2019 applicationsof arabidopsis genome
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/applicationsof-arabidopsis-genome 1/10
COBIOT-839; NO. OF PAGES 10
Please cite this article in press as: Santelia D, Zeeman SC. Progress in Arabidopsis starch research and potential biotechnological applications, Curr Opin Biotechnol (2010), doi:10.1016/ j.copbio.2010.11.014
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
Progress in Arabidopsis starch research and potentialbiotechnological applicationsDiana Santelia and Samuel C Zeeman
For the past decade, Arabidopsis has been the model higher
plant of choice. Research into leaf starch metabolism has
demonstrated that Arabidopsis is a useful system in which to
make fundamental discoveries about both starch biosynthesis
and starch degradation. This review describes recent
discoveries in these fields and illustrates how such discoveries
might be applied in the green biotechnology sector to improve
and diversify our starch crops.
Address
Department of Biology, ETH Zurich, Universitaetsstr. 2, CH-8092 Zurich,
Switzerland
Corresponding author: Zeeman, Samuel C ( [email protected] )
Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2010, 22:1–10
This review comes from a themed issue onPlant biotechnology
Edited by Adi Avni and Miguel Blazquez
0958-1669/$ – see front matter
# 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
DOI 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.11.014
IntroductionStarch is the major storage carbohydrate in higher plants
and is used to sustain metabolism, growth and develop-
ment at times when photosynthesis is not active. During
the day, plants store some photo-assimilates in leaves as
starch and remobilize it at night for respiration and to
produce sucrose for export to the sink tissues [1,2]. Plantsalso accumulate starch in heterotrophic organs and use it
to fuel regrowth. Many of these starch-storing organs (e.g.
the seeds of cereal crops, the roots of cassava and the
tubers of potatoes) are staple foodstuffs in the human
diet, providing up to 80% of the daily calorific intake.
From an industrial perspective, starch represents a cheap,
renewable material, whose unique physicochemical prop-
erties are increasingly exploited in the agri-food sector
and in many manufacturing processes [3,4]. Starch is also
used as a feedstock for bio-ethanol production (e.g. corn
and cassava [5]). The use of major food crops for non-
food purposes has spurred on efforts to synthesize more
starch in plants, and to produce starches with novel
features that better fit industrial needs. A comprehensive
understanding of starch biosynthetic pathways and struc-tural properties is fundamental to these aims [6,7].
In the past decade, the wealth of genetic and genomic
resources in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana has been
used to tackle fundamental scientific questions about
starch metabolism that could not easily be addressed
using starch crops. Many genes encoding starch-related
enzymes are widely conserved in higher plants [8].
Comparison of the transitory leaf starch system with tuber
and seed endosperm systems has confirmed that the
enzymes have similar biological functions. This illustrates
the utility of the Arabidopsis genetic system. Transitory
leaf starch is synthesized and then degraded during the
course of a single diurnal cycle, allowing the roles of starch-metabolizing enzymes in both processes to be
studied. Continued use of the Arabidopsis system is likely
to grant further insights into the complex functions andinterplay between known starch biosynthetic enzymes
and facilitate the discovery of as-yet unknown enzymes
and regulatory factors. These discoveries will provide key
leads for the starch biotechnology sector.
In this review, we focus on the latest contributions of
Arabidopsis research in improving our knowledge on the
mechanisms of starch granule initiation and assembly,
and on elucidating the role of glucan transient phos-
phorylation in starch breakdown.
Industrial uses for starchStarch consists of two major components, amylopectin
(70–80%) and amylose (20–30%), both of which are
polymers of a-D-glucose units. Amylose is an essentially
linear a-1,4-linked polymer of up to several thousand
glucose residues. Amylopectin is a larger a-1,4-linked
polymer, regularly branched with a-1,6-branch points.
Short, linear adjacent chain segments within amylopectinpack efficiently into layers (crystalline lamellae) of paral-
lel double helices (Figure 1a). These crystalline lamellae
alternate with amorphous lamellae containing the branch
points. The resulting insoluble semi-crystalline matrix is
organized into higher-order structures that make up
starch granules [9]. Starches from different botanicalsources vary in size, composition, and fine structure of
amylopectin. These factors influence the physical proper-
ties and end-uses for the different natural starches
(further details about the structural variables that deter-
mine starch properties and functionality are described in
Box 1).
The most important physical changes that take place
during industrial processing of native starches are the
swelling of the granules upon heating in an excess of water and subsequent solubilization of amylose and amy-
www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2010, 22:1–10
8/7/2019 applicationsof arabidopsis genome
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/applicationsof-arabidopsis-genome 2/10
2 Plant biotechnology
COBIOT-839; NO. OF PAGES 10
Please cite this article in press as: Santelia D, Zeeman SC. Progress in Arabidopsis starch research and potential biotechnological applications, Curr Opin Biotechnol (2010), doi:10.1016/ j.copbio.2010.11.014
Figure 1
Amylose Amylopectin
ADPGlc
SSs
DBEsBEs
GBSS
Glc1P
ATP
PPiADG
ATP
AMP+ Pi
PWD
ATP
AMP+ Pi
GWD
P
P
Pi
SEX4
Pi
SEX4
(a)
pal
S
VV
S
2 µm 2 µm pal
pal
pal
epi epi
epi epi
S
S
S
S
(b) (c) (d) (e)
(g)(f)
(j)(i)(h)
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
Starch granule synthesis, structure and morphology. (a) Simplified scheme of starch synthesis (left). The filled circles in the amylose and amylopectin
models represent individual glucosyl residues. The structural relationship between amylose and amylopectin (middle). Pairs of adjacent amylopectinchains form double helices (depicted as cylinders) that pack in ordered semi-crystalline arrays. Amylose (blue) forms unordered structures within the
amorphous parts of the granule. Reversible phosphorylation of amylopectin chains (right): glucan, water dikinase (GWD) and phosphoglucan, waterdikinase (PWD) phosphorylate glucan chains (at the C6 and C3 positions, respectively), while SEX4 dephosphorylates them (see text for details).
Abbreviations: Glc1P, glucose 1-phosphate; ADG, ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase; GBSS, granule-bound starch synthase; SSs, starch synthases;
BEs, branching enzymes; SEX4, phosphoglucan phosphatase. (b– j) Starch granule morphology in Arabidopsis mutants, visualized by transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) or scanning electron microscopy (SEM). (b, c) Starch granules at the end of the day in leaf palisade cells of wild type (b) and ss4 (c). S, starch; V, vacuole. Visualized by TEM, from Roldan et al. [25]. (d–g) Starch granules and/or soluble glucans (arrowheads) accumulating at
Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2010, 22:1–10 www.sciencedirect.com
8/7/2019 applicationsof arabidopsis genome
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/applicationsof-arabidopsis-genome 3/10
lopectin (‘gelatinization’). Amylose diffuses out of the
swollen granule and, on cooling, forms a continuous gel
phase. Swollen amylopectin-enriched granules aggregate
into gel particles, generating a viscous solution. This two-phase structure, called starch paste, is desired in many
applications where processed starches are used as thick-
eners or binders. Native starches have few other uses, as
the polymers are relatively inert.
Many industrial applications require the modification of
native starches, such as oxidation, esterification, hydro-
xymethylation, dextrinization and cross-linking. These
modifications overcome the limitations of native starch
properties (e.g. stabilize the polymers against severe
heating, shear, freezing or storage; [10,11]). Such modi-
fied starches find innumerable applications in food
industries, particularly in confectionery, bakery,thickening and emulsification, and in non-food sectors
as adhesive gums, biodegradable materials, sizing agents
in textile and paper industry [3,12]. Starch phosphoryl-
ation is the only known in vivo modification of starch[13]. The presence of phosphate induces structural
changes in amylopectin, promoting the solubility of
the glucan chains [14,15]. The presence of phosphate
group also confers a very high swelling power to starch
gels [16,17].
Chemical and physical modifications of starch are costlyand frequently employ treatments with hazardous
chemicals. Thus, research has focused on ways of produ-
cing starches with enhanced properties directly in planta
[6]. Naturally occurring ‘waxy’ mutations in maize result
in starch containing amylopectin but no amylose, which
has improved paste clarity andfreeze–thaw stability after
processing compared to wild-type maize starch. The
waxy phenotype is caused by mutations affecting gran-
ule-bound starch synthase (GBSS), the enzyme respon-
siblefor amylose synthesis (Figure 1a [18]),and waxy-like
starches have also been produced in other crops [6].
Another example of the genetic improvement of starch
quality is the high-amylose starch (e.g. from maize andpotato [19]). In contrast to the waxy starches, high-amy-
lose starches have a much higher gelatinization tempera-
ture conferring a better gel texture and adhesion
capacity.
Despite the improved functionality provided by
these novel starches, they still require additional phy-
Progress in Arabidopsis starch research and potential biotechnological applications Santelia and Zeeman 3
COBIOT-839; NO. OF PAGES 10
the end of the day in leaf palisade (pal) and adjacent epidermal cell (epi) plastids of the wild type (d), isa1isa2 (e), isa1isa2isa3lda (f), isa1isa2isa3ldaamy3 (g), visualized by TEM. Bars = 2 mm, from Streb et al. [37]. (h– j) Starch granules isolated from wild type (h), sex1 (i), sex4 (j) at theend of the day, visualized by SEM. Bars = 2 mm, from Zeeman et al. [64].
Box 1 Relationship between starch structure and starch functionality
Variations in the amylose to amylopectin ratio, the amylopectin chainlength, the degree of phosphorylation and starch granule size and
shape are known to contribute to differences in the swelling behaviorof granules and the functionality of starches from different origins.
Thus, knowledge of starch structural and compositional parameters is
vital when attempting to predict and improve starch functionality.
Amylose to amylopectin ratio and amylopectin structure
The amylose/amylopectin ratio affects starch gelatinization and recrys-
tallization properties. During processing, amylopectin forms viscoussolutions that are stable in water at room temperature for days. By
contrast, amylose forms a gel that is stable in solution at temperatures
greater than 60–70 8C, but on cooling it will rapidly aggregate or
crystallize (‘retrogradation’). Thus, low-amylosestarches are desirable inprocessed foods, as they confer freeze–thaw stability [57]. A major
achievement of starch genetic improvement was accomplished by the
simultaneous antisense down-regulation of three SS in potato tubers
(GBSS, SSII and SSIII), which resulted in the production of an amylose-free, short-chain amylopectin starch with exceptional freeze–thaw
stability [58]. By contrast, high-amylose starches or starches that have alower degree of amylopectin branching are characterized by higher
gelatinization temperatures and a lower peak viscosities [16,59]. The
high gelling strength and the film-forming ability of these starches make
them useful in the production of corrugated board, paper and adhesiveproducts. Genetic engineeringof potato tubers by antisense inhibition of
both branching enzyme isoforms resulted in the production of a very
high-amylose starch in potato [19].
Degree of phosphorylation
The amount of covalently bound phosphate is positively correlated tostarch granule hydration status and negatively correlated to its
crystallinity [60]. The increased water binding-capacity of high-phosphate starches, associated with a low swelling temperature,
renders them less prone to retrogradation. High-phosphate starcheshave improved transparency, improved viscosity and freeze–thaw
stability [16]. Their charged nature also makes them particularly useful
as surface coatings in the paper-making industry [17
]. Potato tuberstarch is highly phosphorylated, as phosphorylation is integral to itsmetabolism [44]. By contrast, cereal starches are almost phosphate
free, as their degradation after seed germination proceeds via a
different enzymatic system than that in leaves of tubers. However, the
creation of highly phosphorylated cereal starches could markedlyincrease their uses.
Granule size
Starches from cereals vary considerably in size (2–35 mm). In wheat,
starch granules exhibit a bimodal size distribution, with larger lenticular
starch granules coexisting with smaller spherical granules [ 61]. Rice
has a uniform distribution of small granules ( 5 mm) whereas potatotubers have larger granules up to 100 mm in diameter. Size of starch
granule is particularly important in applications where starch is used asfiller, such as the paper-making industry [62]. While larger starch
granules confer a very high swelling power and high viscosity, small
granules are reported to have a lower gelatinization temperature and
give a smoother paste texture [61]. In some studies, differences in themolecular structure of amylopectin and amylose have been correlated
with granule size [61]. In barley, for example, small granules have a
decreased degree of amylopectin polymerization [63]. However, thereare considerable inconsistencies in the literature on this subject (see
[61] and references therein) and further investigations are required in
the future.
www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2010, 22:1–10
8/7/2019 applicationsof arabidopsis genome
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/applicationsof-arabidopsis-genome 4/10
sicochemical modifications in order to deliver optimal
functionality. In addition, crops with added-value
starches generally have a lower yield than the equiv-
alent wild-type crops producing normal starch. Thedevelopment of novel starches with further improved
functionality with no need for subsequent chemical
modifications, and the increase of starch yieldsrepresent obvious biotechnological targets.
Mechanisms of starch granule biosynthesisand the potential for crop improvementSome of the fundamental discoveries on starch biosyn-
thesis were made in crop plants and pre-date the Arabi-dopsis model system. However, the recent availability of
large mutant populations of Arabidopsis and the ease and
speed with which molecular genetic studies can be donehave greatly accelerated progress. The past few years
4 Plant biotechnology
COBIOT-839; NO. OF PAGES 10
Please cite this article in press as: Santelia D, Zeeman SC. Progress in Arabidopsis starch research and potential biotechnological applications, Curr Opin Biotechnol (2010), doi:10.1016/ j.copbio.2010.11.014
Table 1
Summary of single mutants with altered starch content and changes in starch structure due to the mutation
Mutation Locus Enzyme Starch content Phosphatecontent
Amylosecontent
Starch granulemorphology
Amylopectinchain length
distribution
Reference
ss1 At5g24300 Starchsynthase I
(SSI)
# at ED Normal Normal Smaller,elongated
## short," intermediate
[65]
ss2 At3g01180 Starch
synthase II(SSII)
Normal # " Larger, distorted "" short,# intermediate
[23]
ss3 At1g11720 Starch
synthase III
(SSIII)
" at ED in LD "" Normal Normal Minor changes [66]
ss4 At4g18240 Starch
synthase IV
(SSIV)
# at ED in LD n.d. Normal Single granule,
bigger
Minor changes [25]
be1a At3g20440 Branchingenzyme I
(BEI)
Normalb n.d.b Normalb Normalb Normalb [27,67]
be2 At5g03650 Branching
enzyme II(BEII)
Normal n.d. Normal Slightly larger Minor changes [27]
be3 At2g36390 Branching
enzyme III(BEIII)
Normal n.d. Normal Slightly larger Minor changes [27]
isa1 At2g39930 Isoamylase 1(ISA1)
##,phytoglycogen
n.d. " Smaller,irregular
" short,# intermediate
[29,30]
isa2 At1g03310 Isoamylase 2
(ISA2)
##,
phytoglycogen
n.d. Normal Smaller,
irregular
" short,
# intermediate
[29,30]
isa3 At4g09020 Isoamylase 3(ISA3)
"" Normal " Normal "" short,# intermediate
[30,36,38]
lda At5g04360 Limit dextrinase
(LDA)
Normal n.d. Normal Normal Normal [30,36,38]
sex1 At1g10760 Glucan, waterdikinase 1
(GWD1)
""" Not detected "" Larger Normal [45,64]
pwd At5g26570 Phosphoglc.,water dikinase(PWD)
" # C3, " C6 n.d. n.d. Normal [42
,47,48]
sex4 At3g52180 Starch excess
four (SEX4)
"" """ (p-oligos) """ Larger,
fewer,
rounded,thicker
Normal [51,64]
lsf1 At3g01510 Like SEXFOUR 1
(LSF1)
"" " " Normal Normal [52]
ED, end of day; EN, end of night; SD, short day; LD, long day; #, reduced; ##, greatly reduced; ###, dramatically reduced; ", increased; "", greatly
increased; """, dramatically increased; short chains, DP6–DP12; intermediate chains, DP13–DP28; long chains, DP29–DP40; n.d., not determined;
C3, glucosyl unit phosphorylated in the C3 position; C6, glucosyl unit phosphorylated in the C6 position; and p-oligos, soluble phosphorylatedglucans.a BEI is notrelated to thestandard plant A-typeor B-typeSBE families butshowsmore similarityto theglycogen-branching enzymes from fungi and
animals [27].b Unconfirmed mutant data [67].
Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2010, 22:1–10 www.sciencedirect.com
8/7/2019 applicationsof arabidopsis genome
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/applicationsof-arabidopsis-genome 5/10
have seen the study of starch synthesis in Arabidopsisenter an exciting phase, with the discovery of new protein
factors and the production of multiple mutant lines,
which shed new light on the mechanisms controlling
starch granule initiation and assembly.
ADPglucose (ADPGlc) is the substrate for starch biosyn-
thesis in higher plants. There are differences in the
biochemical pathway of ADPGlc production between
cell types and species [20]. However, the downstream
starch biosynthetic enzymes are remarkably similar in
isoform type and function [8]. Amylopectin is sufficient
to generate a semi-crystalline starch granule. Amylose is
deposited mainly as non-crystalline chains within the
granule [21]. The synthesis of amylopectin involves
the coordinated actions of at least three classes of enzyme
(Figure 1a [20,22]). Starch synthases (SSs) transfer the
glucosyl unit from ADPGlc to a growing glucan chain,
generating a new a-1,4-glycosidic bond. Branching
enzymes (BEs) introduce branch points (a-1,6-linkage)
via a glucanotransferase reaction, increasing the number
of non-reducing ends. The subsequent removal of someof these branch points by debranching enzymes (DBEs)
also facilitates the formation of a proper crystalline starch
granule. The roles of these proteins are discussed briefly
here, and in greater detail elsewhere [22].
Plants contain multiple isoforms of each class of starchbiosynthetic enzymes. In general, mutations in a particu-
lar type of SSs, BEs or DBEs alter amylopectin structure
and, in some cases, change granule morphology and the
physical properties of the starch (Table 1). Each class of
SS is thought to be responsible for synthesizing differentamylopectin chain lengths. Yet a certain level of redun-
dancy exists. The preference/competition between
different SS isoforms for the ends of linear chains will
influence the structure of the growing amylopectin mol-
ecule. Simultaneous deficiency of more than one SS
isoform results either in a starch structural phenotype
equivalent to the sum of the phenotypes of the
corresponding single mutants (e.g. SSI and III), or to a
more severe alteration (e.g. SSII and III) indicative of
synergistic actions between the enzymes (Table 2
[23,24]).
Mutation in any one of the four soluble SSs does not
prevent starch granule formation (Table 1). However,
Arabidopsis mutants defective in SSIV usually contain
just one enlarged granule per chloroplast (Figure 1b and c[25]), indicating a role for SSIV in the establishment of a
correct number of starch granules. Simultaneous loss of
SSIII and SSIV abolishes starch accumulation, despite
other SSs remaining enzymatically active [24]. Thus,
Progress in Arabidopsis starch research and potential biotechnological applications Santelia and Zeeman 5
COBIOT-839; NO. OF PAGES 10
Please cite this article in press as: Santelia D, Zeeman SC. Progress in Arabidopsis starch research and potential biotechnological applications, Curr Opin Biotechnol (2010), doi:10.1016/ j.copbio.2010.11.014
Table 2
Summary of multiple mutants with altered starch content and changes in starch structure due to the mutation
Mutation Starch content Phosphate
content
Amylose
content
Starch granule
morphology
Amylopectin chain length
distribution
Reference
ss2 / ss3 ## n.d. "" Larger, distorted """ short, ## intermediate [23] ss1 / ss4 ## n.d. n.d. Single granule,
bigger
## short, " intermediate [24]
ss2 / ss4 ## n.d. n.d. Single granule,bigger
"" short, # intermediate [24]
ss3 / ss4 Not detected – – – – [24]
ss1 / ss2 / ss3 ## n.d. "" Smaller """ short,# intermediate,# long
[24]
ss1 / ss2 / ss4 ## n.d. "" Single granule,
bigger
# short, " intermediate [24]
be1 / be2 Normal n.d. Normal n.d. Minor changes [27]
be1 / be3 Normal n.d. normal n.d. Minor changes [27]
be2 / be3 Not detected – – – – [27] isa1 / isa2 ##, phytoglycogen n.d. n.d. Smaller, irregular " short, # intermediate [29,37] isa2 / lda ##, phytoglycogen n.d. n.d. Smaller, irregular " short, # intermediate [30,37]
isa3 / lda """, limit dextrins n.d. Normal Bigger, rounded "" short, # intermediate [36,37,38]
isa1 / isa3 ##, phytoglycogen n.d. " Smaller, irregular "" short, # intermediate [37,38] isa1 / isa3 / lda Little or none
detected,
phytoglycogen
n.d. "" n.d. """ short, ## intermediate [37,38]
isa1 / isa2 / lda ##, phytoglycogen n.d. n.d. Smaller, irregular "" short, ## int ermediat e [37] isa1 / isa2 / isa3 ###, phytoglycogen n.d. n.d. Smaller, cracked,
fissured
"" short, ## int ermediat e [37]
isa1 / isa2 / isa3 / lda Not detected,
phytoglycogen,
limit dextrins
n.d. n.d. Tiny spherical
particles (up to
100 nm diameter)
""" short, ## intermediate [37]
ED, end of day; EN, end of night; SD, short day; LD, long day; #, reduced; ##, greatly reduced; ###, dramatically reduced; ", increased;"", greatlyincreased; """, dramatically increased; short chains, DP6–DP12; intermediate chains, DP13–DP28; long chains, DP29–DP40; and n.d., not
determined.
www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2010, 22:1–10
8/7/2019 applicationsof arabidopsis genome
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/applicationsof-arabidopsis-genome 6/10
the presence of either SSIII or SSIV appears to beessential for granule initiation. Further investigations will
be necessary to explain their mode of action.
There are two classes of BEs (BEI and BEII). Class I
preferentially transfers longer chains than class II [26].Reducing both isoforms simultaneously using an anti-
sense approach in potato leads to highly abnormal starch
granules, with longer chains and less branched amylopec-
tin [19]. In Arabidopsis, the situation is unusual because
there are two members of class II, but no enzyme that
shows similarity to class I [27]. No significant structural
changes are detected in the single mutants (Table 1),
whereas plants lacking both BEII isoforms are unable to
make starch (Table 2 [27]).
The role of DBEs in starch biosynthesis is more com-
plicated. Mutations that reduce or eliminate isoamylase
(ISA) activity of the ISA1 class in Chlamydomonas [28],
Arabidopsis (Figure 1e [29,30]) and cereal endosperms
[31,32] result in the replacement of some or all of the
starch with phytoglycogen, a soluble glycogen-like poly-mer. In Arabidopsis and potato, ISA1 forms a hetero-
multimeric complex with ISA2, in which ISA1 represents
the catalytic subunit and ISA2 the non-catalytic subunit
[33]. Mutation of either gene (Table 1), or both simul-
taneously (Table 2), leads to a comparable phytoglyco-
gen-accumulating phenotype [29,30]. In the unicellular
alga Chlamydomonas, substitution of starch with phyto-
glycogen upon loss of ISA activity is essentially complete
[28]. Thus, a mandatory role for DBEs in starch granule
crystallization was initially proposed [34,35]. Overlap-
ping functions between DBE isoforms in amylopectinsynthesis was suggested as an explanation for the milder
phenotype of Arabidopsis and cereal mutants, where the
substitution of starch with phytoglycogen was only par-
tial (Figure 1d and e). Loss of the remaining DBEs in
Arabidopsis (ISA3 and LDA) does not lead to phytogly-
cogen production (Table 1) and these isoforms are
thought to be mainly involved in starch degradation[36]. However, Arabidopsis mutants lacking all DBE
isoforms are devoid of starch (Figure 1f [37,38]). While
this result supported a mandatory role for DBEs in
granule biosynthesis, Streb et al. (2008) demonstrated
that mutating AMY3, which encodes the chloroplastica-
amylase, in addition to all four DBE genes, partiallyrestores starch synthesis (Figure 1g). Thus, the defect
in starch granule biosynthesis in the absence of DBEs is
nota consequence of the loss of DBE activity per se . Streb
et al. (2008) proposed that the change in glucan structure
resulting from the loss of DBEs enables other enzymes
(e.g. AMY3) not normally involved in amylopectin bio-
synthesis to act on the aberrant glucans to influence their
final structure [37]. While this shows that DBEs are not
essential for starch granule formation, their role in facil-
itating the process is nevertheless strongly supported bythese Arabidopsis studies.
DBEs have also been implicated in the control of thecorrect number of starch granules because Arabidopsis
and other plant species lacking DBEs have numerous
smaller granules in their plastids [39,40]. This effect
could be indirect, since the accumulation of small, soluble
glucans observed in these mutants might ectopicallyprime granules.
The goal of studies on the starch biosynthetic enzymes in
Arabidopsis is to unravel the complex genetic and bio-
chemical interactions between them and to develop struc-
tural models that can explain both the molecular
organization of amylopectin and the insoluble nature of
starch. Unfortunately,with the small amounts of starch that
can be extracted from Arabidopsis, it is difficult to assess the
relationship between the novel starch structures obtained
and their resultant physicochemical properties. Neverthe-
less, translational research to apply the knowledge gained
in Arabidopsis into agriculturally relevant plants may result
in the development of novel starches with useful function-
alities. By controlling the combinations and relative activi-
tiesof the endogenousstarch biosynthetic enzymes,a range
of starches with differences in composition, polymer struc-
ture, granule size and solubility should be possible. Intro-
duction of genes from other systems could further diversify
polymer structure and potentially introduce secondary
modifications to the glucan.
Factors controlling the amount of starch-bound phosphateMost native starches contain phosphate groups mono-
esterified to the glucose residues. The extent of phos-
phorylation varies from a relatively high level in potatotuber starch (0.5% of glucosyl units) to almost undetect-
able amounts in the cereal starches [13]. Phosphate esters
are exclusively found on amylopectin, mostly at the C-6
and, to a lesser extent, the C-3 positions of the glucosyl
units [41,42]. Within the structure of amylopectin, the
phosphates are predominantly located on longer-than-
average chains in the amorphous regions [13]. The pre-sence of phosphate significantly influences the molecular
structure, crystallinity, functional properties and potential
uses of starch (see Box 1 and references therein). The
presence of phosphate, particularly on the C3 position,
alters the geometry of the adjacent glucosidic linkages
[43
], and is likely to disrupt the formation and packing of glucan double helices [14].
Glucan phosphorylation is essential for the normal metab-
olism of leaf starch [44,45]. Glucan, water dikinase (SEX1/
GWD) phosphorylates the C6 position of glucosyl residues
[46], while phosphoglucan, water dikinase (PWD) phos-
phorylates the C3 position of pre-phosphorylated glucan
chains [42,47,48]. Starch phosphorylation is believed to
increase the hydration status of the granule–stroma inter-
face, facilitating the action of the glucan-hydrolyzingenzymes, such as exoamylases (b-amylases) and DBEs.
6 Plant biotechnology
COBIOT-839; NO. OF PAGES 10
Please cite this article in press as: Santelia D, Zeeman SC. Progress in Arabidopsis starch research and potential biotechnological applications, Curr Opin Biotechnol (2010), doi:10.1016/ j.copbio.2010.11.014
Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2010, 22:1–10 www.sciencedirect.com
8/7/2019 applicationsof arabidopsis genome
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/applicationsof-arabidopsis-genome 7/10
These enzymes exhibit relatively little activity on native,non-phosphorylated starch granules [49]. Removal of the
phosphate groups, at both the C3 and C6 positions, by
phosphoglucan phosphatase (SEX4, for S tarch EX cess 4)is
also required for proper starch metabolism. This suggests
an interdependencebetweenreversible starch phosphoryl-ation and glucan hydrolysis [50,51].
Arabidopsis mutants lacking either of the glucan, water
dikinases or SEX4 accumulate starch to high levels. The
starch itself is altered in the amount or location of the
glucan-bound phosphate, in amylose content, and in
granule size (Table 1, Figure 1h– j). In sex4 mutants, most
of the glucan-bound phosphate is present as soluble
phospho-oligosaccharides, presumed intermediates of
starch breakdown, which are below the limit of detection
in wild-type plants [51]. Phospho-oligosaccharides are
released from starch granule surface by AMY3 and the
DBE isoamylase 3 (ISA3; [51]). Mutation of these two
enzymes in addition to SEX4 abolishes the accumulation
of phospho-oligosaccharides and leads to highly elevated
levels of starch, which is increased in phosphate com-pared to the wild type (D. Santelia and S.C. Zeeman,
unpublished data). Furthermore, Arabidopsis contains
two glucan phosphatase homologues, LSF1 and LSF2
(for Like S ex F our), both of which are implicated in starch
metabolism ([52]; D. Santelia and S.C. Zeeman, unpub-
lished data) but whose precise functions remain to be
elucidated.
Interestingly, manipulation of enzymes directly involved
in the synthesis of amylopectin, such as SSIII [23], BEI
and BEII [19], also results in increased starch phosphatecontent. This effect is correlated with an overall increase
of the average amylopectin chains length in these
mutants [41].
GWD is currently a target of the starch biotechnology
industry. Decreasing its activity can increase starch con-
tents and prevent unwanted starch degradation in storedpotato tubers, while increasing its activity can elevate
granule-bound phosphate content [22]. However, the
impact of manipulating PWD and SEX4 in starch crops
has yet to be determined. Starch phosphorylation occurs
during both starch synthesis and degradation, although at
different rates [53]. Given the antagonistic activities of glucan, water dikinases and phosphoglucan phosphatases,
the level of phosphate on starch may be controlled by
both processes rather than by phosphorylation alone.
Hence, the coordinated modulation of GWD, PWD
and SEX4 in tissues such as cereal endosperm may further
increase the amount of starch-bound phosphate and alter
the ratio at the C3 and C6 positions.
ConclusionsThe improvement in our understanding of starch biosyn-thesis resulting from basic research in Arabidopsis creates
new options for the rational design of novel starches.However, testing their suitability for downstream appli-
cations is not trivial, since large amounts of starch are
needed. Improvements in our ability to predict starch
functionality from structural data or to evaluate starch
properties on a small scale will enhance the transfer of thisbasic knowledge to crop plants.
Strategies for controlling starch yield will be more com-
plicated. Enhanced starch yields have been obtained by
increasing ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase activity (the
regulated step in the starch biosynthetic pathway; [54]),
increasing ATP supply to the plastid [55], and decreasing
plastidial adenylate kinase activity [56]. However, opti-
mizing assimilate partitioning between new plant bio-
mass and useful storage compounds such as starch will
require systems-level understanding of plant growth.
Knowledge of the factors controlling photosynthetic
capacity and resource allocation within the plant, and
of the metabolic networks in both source and sink tissues,
will be crucial. It remains a major challenge to interpret
the large molecular profiling datasets from transcriptomic,
proteomic and metabolomic experiments in such a way as
to rationally engineer plant metabolism. Arabidopsis is
the best higher-plant system to pioneer such systems
biology methods, but it remains to be seen how good a
model it will be for the control of resource allocation in
distantly related plant species, where distinct regulatory
mechanisms may have evolved.
References and recommended readingPapers of particular interest, published within the period of review,have been highlighted as:
of special interest of outstanding interest
1. Smith AM, Zeeman SC, Smith SM: Starch degradation. Annual Review of Plant Biology 2005, 56:73-98.
2. Zeeman SC, Smith SM, Smith AM: The diurnal metabolism ofleaf starch. Biochemical Journal 2007, 401:13-28.
3. Delcour JA, Bruneel C, Derde LJ, Gomand SV, Pareyt B,Putseys JA, Wilderjans E, Lamberts L: Fate of starch in foodprocessing: from raw materials to final food products. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology 2010, 1:87-111.
4. Blennow A, Nielsen TH, Baunsgaard L, Mikkelsen R, Engelsen SB:Starch phosphorylation: a new front line in starch research .
Trends in Plant Science 2002, 7:445-450.5.
Smith AM: Prospects for increasing starch and sucrose yieldsfor bioethanol production. Plant Journal 2008, 54:546-558.
This review surveys strategies for the manipulation of starch metabolismto increase yield in plants that could be used for biofuel production.
6. Jobling S: Improving starch for food and industrialapplications. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2004, 7:210-218.
7. Morell MK, Myers AM: Towards the rational design ofcereal starches. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2005,8:204-210.
8.
Deschamps P, Colleoni C, Nakamura Y, Suzuki E, Putaux JL,Buleon A, Haebel S, Ritte G, Steup M, Falcon LI et al.: Metabolicsymbiosisand thebirthof theplant kingdom. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2008, 25:536-548.
Progress in Arabidopsis starch research and potential biotechnological applications Santelia and Zeeman 7
COBIOT-839; NO. OF PAGES 10
Please cite this article in press as: Santelia D, Zeeman SC. Progress in Arabidopsis starch research and potential biotechnological applications, Curr Opin Biotechnol (2010), doi:10.1016/ j.copbio.2010.11.014
www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2010, 22:1–10
8/7/2019 applicationsof arabidopsis genome
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/applicationsof-arabidopsis-genome 8/10
This work demonstrates the existence of starch-like polymers in acyanobacterium. Phylogenetic analyses of storage polysaccharide meta-bolism genes across species enable the authors to define a likely minimalset of enzymes present in the ancestor of all plants, among them starchsynthases, branching and debranching enzymes.
9. Buleon A, Colonna P, Planchot V, Ball S: Starch granules:structure and biosynthesis. International Journal of Biological
Macromolecules 1998, 23:85-112.10. BeMiller JN: Starch modification: challenges and prospects.
Starch-Sta rke 1997, 49:127-131.
11. Tharanathan RN: Starch-value addition by modification. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2005, 45:371-384.
12. Ramesh HP, Tharanathan RN: Carbohydrates—the renewableraw materials of high biotechnologicalvalue. Critical Reviews inBiotechnology 2003, 23:149-173.
13. Blennow A, Bay-Smidt AM, Olsen CE, Moller BL: The distributionof covalentlyboundphosphate in thestarchgranule in relationto starch crystallinity . International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2000, 27:211-218.
14.
Hejazi M, Fettke J, Haebel S, Edner C, Paris O, Frohberg C,Steup M, Ritte G: Glucan, water dikinase phosphorylatescrystalline maltodextrins and thereby initiates solubilization.Plant Journal 2008, 55:323-334.
Using artificial crystallized maltodextrins as a model for the starchgranule, the authors carried out in vitro studies to characterize the initialreactions of starch degradation. Phosphorylation of crystallized malto-dextrins by glucan, water dikinase results in the solubilization of bothphosphorylated and non-phosphorylated glucan chains.
15. Blennow A, Engelsen SB: Helix-breaking news: fightingcrystalline starch energy deposits in the cell. Trends in Plant Science 2010, 15:236-240.
16. Blennow A, Bay-Smidt AM, Bauer R: Amylopectin aggregationas a function of starch phosphate content studied by sizeexclusion chromatography and on-line refractive index andlight scattering. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2001, 28:409-420.
17.
Blennow A, Bay-Smidt AM, Leonhardt P, Bandsholm O,Madsen MH: Starch paste stickiness is a relevantnative starchselection criterion for wet-end paper manufacturing. Starch-Sta rke 2003, 55:381-389.
This paper correlates starch-bound phosphate with starch paste sticki-ness—an important parameter for wet-end paper manufacturing. Thesuitability for paper manufacture of various potato starches with largevariation in natural phosphate levels was assessed. Those with elevatedphosphate contents had a more efficient granule burst and performedbest.
18. Shure M, Wessler S, Fedoroff N: Molecular identification andisolation of the waxy locus in maize. Cell 1983, 35:225-233.
19. Schwall GP, Safford R, Westcott RJ, Jeffcoat R, Tayal A, Shi YC,Gidley MJ, Jobling SA: Production of very-high-amylose potatostarch by inhibition of SBE A and B. Nature Biotechnology 2000,18:551-554.
20. Ball SG, Morell MK: From bacterial glycogen to starch:understanding the biogenesis of the plant starch granule. Annual Review of Plant Biology 2003, 54:207-233.
21. Denyer K, Johnson P, Zeeman S, Smith AM: The control of
amylose synthesis. Journal of Plant Physiology 2001,158:479-487.
22.
Zeeman SC, Kossmann J, Smith AM: Starch: its metabolism,evolution, and biotechnological modification in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 2010, 61:209-234.
A comprehensive review focusing on the mechanisms of starch granulesynthesis and degradation, the evolution of starch biosynthesis, and thebiotechnological modification of starch in plants.
23.
Zhang XL, Szydlowski N, Delvalle D, D’Hulst C, James MG,Myers AM: Overlapping functions of the starch synthases SSIIand SSIII in amylopectin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. BMCPlant Biology 2008, 8:96.
Starch synthases SSII and SSIII are both involved in the elongation of theamylopectin chains and have partially redundant functions. The starchphenotypeof the Arabidopsis ss2ss3 doublemutant is quite differentthan
that of either of the single mutants, suggesting synergy between theactivities of these two isoforms.
24.
Szydlowski N, Ragel P, Raynaud S, Lucas MM, Roldan I,Montero M, Munoz FJ, Ovecka M, Bahaji A, Planchot V et al.:Starch granule initiation in Arabidopsis requires the presenceof either class IV or class III starch synthases. Plant Cell 2009,21:2443-2457.
This paper shows that Arabidopsis plants lacking the two related starchsynthase isoforms SSIII and SSIV do not accumulate starch, despitehaving 60% of the wild-type level of starch synthase activity (accountedfor by SSI and SSII). The authors suggest that the SSIII and SSIV arerequired for granule initiation.
25.
Roldan I, Wattebled F, Mercedes Lucas M, Delvalle D, Planchot V,Jimenez S,PerezR, Ball S, D’Hulst C, MeridaA: Thephenotype ofsoluble starch synthase IV defective mutants of Arabidopsisthaliana suggests a novel function of elongation enzymes inthe control of starch granule formation. Plant Journal 2007,49:492-504.
Arabidopsis mutants defective in starch synthase 4 (SS4) have almostnormal levels of starch, but they accumulate only one large granule perplastid. The authors propose a role for SS4 in the control of the correctstarch granules number.
26. Guan HP, Preiss J: Differentiation of properties of maizebranching isozymes. Plant Physiology 1993, 102:52-152.
27. Dumez S, Wattebled F, Dauvillee D, Delvalle D, Planchot V,Ball SG, D’Hulst C: Mutants of Arabidopsis lacking starchbranching enzyme II substitute plastidial starch synthesis by cytoplasmic maltose accumulation. Plant Cell 2006,18:2694-2709.
This paper describes Arabidopsis mutants lacking specific isoforms of starch branching enzymes, showing that simultaneous loss of BE2 andBE3 abolishes starch granule biosynthesis. Instead the be2be3 doublemutant accumulates maltose and maltooligosaccharides, presumablyderived from the amylolysis of linear glucans made by starch synthases.
28. Mouille G, MaddeleinML, Libessart N, TalagaP, Decq A, DelrueB,Ball S: Preamylopectin processing: a mandatory step forstarch biosynthesis in plants. Plant Cell 1996, 8:1353-1366.
29. Delatte T, Trevisan M, Parker ML, Zeeman SC: Arabidopsismutants Atisa1 and Atisa2 have identical phenotypes and lack the same multimeric isoamylase, which influences the branchpointdistribution of amylopectin duringstarch synthesis. Plant Journal 2005, 41:815-830.
30. Wattebled F, Dong Y, Dumez S,Delvalle D, Planchot V,Berbezy P,Vyas D, Colonna P, Chatterjee M, Ball S et al.: Mutants of Arabidopsis lacking a chloroplastic isoamylase accumulatephytoglycogen and an abnormal form of amylopectin. Plant Physiology 2005, 138:184-195.
31. James MG, Robertson DS, Myers AM: Characterization of themaize gene sugary1, a determinant of starch composition inkernels. Plant Cell 1995, 7:417-429.
32. Nakamura Y, Kubo A, Shimamune T, Matsuda T, Harada K,Satoh H: Correlation between activities of starch debranchingenzyme and alpha-polyglucan structure in endosperms ofsugary-1 mutants of rice. Plant Journal 1997, 12:143-153.
33. Hussain H, Mant A, Seale R, Zeeman S, Hinchliffe E, Edwards A,HyltonC, BornemannS, SmithAM, MartinC etal.: Three isoformsof isoamylase contribute different catalytic properties for thedebranching of potato glucans. Plant Cell 2003, 15:133-149.
34. Ball S, Guan HP, James M, Myers A, Keeling P, Mouille G,Buleon A, Colonna P, Preiss J: From glycogen to amylopectin: amodel for the biogenesisof theplant starch granule. Cell 1996,86:349-352.
35. Myers AM, Morell MK, James MG, Ball SG: Recent progresstoward understanding biosynthesis of the amylopectincrystal. Plant Physiology 2000, 122:989-997.
36. Delatte T, Umhang M, Trevisan M, Eicke S, Thorneycroft D,Smith SM, Zeeman SC: Evidence for distinct mechanisms ofstarch granule breakdown in plants. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2006, 281:12050-12059.
37.
Streb S, Delatte T, Umhang M, Eicke S, Schorderet M,Reinhardt D, Zeeman SC: Starch granule biosynthesis in Arabidopsis is abolished by removal of all debranching
8 Plant biotechnology
COBIOT-839; NO. OF PAGES 10
Please cite this article in press as: Santelia D, Zeeman SC. Progress in Arabidopsis starch research and potential biotechnological applications, Curr Opin Biotechnol (2010), doi:10.1016/ j.copbio.2010.11.014
Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2010, 22:1–10 www.sciencedirect.com
8/7/2019 applicationsof arabidopsis genome
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/applicationsof-arabidopsis-genome 9/10
enzymes but restored by the subsequent removal of anendoamylase. Plant Cell 2008, 20:3448-3466.
This paper shows that quadruple mutants of Arabidopsis lacking all deb-ranching enzymes (DBEs) are devoid of starch and accumulate highamounts of soluble,highly branchedglucans. Additional lossof a-amylase3 (AMY3) partiallyrestores thecapacityto makestarch, demonstrating thatDBEs function to facilitate amylopectin biosynthesis, but are not essential.
38. Wattebled F, Planchot V, Dong Y, Szydlowski N, Pontoire B,Devin A, Ball S, D’Hulst C: Further evidence for the mandatory nature of polysaccharide debranching for the aggregation ofsemicrystalline starch and for overlapping functions ofdebranching enzymes in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiology 2008, 148:1309-1323.
39. Burton RA, Jenner H, Carrangis L, Fahy B, Fincher GB, Hylton C,Laurie DA, Parker M, Waite D, Van Wegen S et al.: Starch granuleinitiation and growth are altered in barley mutants that lack isoamylase activity . Plant Journal 2002, 31:97-112.
40. Bustos R, Fahy B, Hylton CM, Seale R, Nebane NM, Edwards A,Martin C, Smith AM: Starch granule initiation is controlled by aheteromultimeric isoamylase in potato tubers. In Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2004, 101:2215-2220.
41. Blennow A, Bay-Smidt AM, Olsen CE, Moller BL: Analysis ofstarch-bound glucose 3-phosphate and glucose 6-phosphate
using controlled acid treatment combined with high-performance anion-exchange chromatography . Journal of Chromatography A 1998, 829:385-391.
42.
Ritte G, Heydenreich M, Mahlow S, Haebel S, Kotting O, Steup M:Phosphorylation of C6- and C3-positions of glucosyl residuesin starch is catalysed by distinct dikinases. FEBS Letters 2006,580:4872-4876.
The authors establisheda robust method, using 31P NMR, to evaluate thespecific activity of glucan, water dikinase (GWD) and phosphoglucan,water dikinase (PWD). They show that C6-phosphorylation and C3-phosphorylation is catalyzed by GWD and PWD, respectively.
43.
Hansen PI, Spraul M, Dvortsak P, Larsen FH, Blennow A,Motawia MS, Engelsen SB: Starch phosphorylation-maltosidicrestrains upon 30- and 60 -phosphorylation investigated by chemical synthesis, molecular dynamics and NMRspectroscopy . Biopolymers 2009, 91:179-193.
Two forms of maltose, phosphorylated at either the C3 or C6 positions,were synthesized and subjected to combined molecular dynamics and
NMR studies to evaluate the effect of phosphate position on the glucanstructure. The authors provide evidence for a major influence of the C3-bound phosphate on the glucosidic bond orientation in starch.
44. Lorberth R, Ritte G, Willmitzer L, Kossmann J: Inhibition of astarch-granule-bound protein leads to modified starch andrepression of cold sweetening. Nature Biotechnology 1998,16:473-477.
45. Yu TS, Kofler H, Hausler RE, Hille D, Flugge UI, Zeeman SC,Smith AM, Kossmann J, Lloyd J, Ritte G et al.: The Arabidopsissex1 mutant is defective in the R1 protein, a general regulatorof starch degradation in plants, and not in the chloroplasthexose transporter. Plant Cell 2001, 13:1907-1918.
46. Ritte G, Lloyd JR, Eckermann N, Rottmann A, Kossmann J,Steup M: The starch-related R1 protein is an alpha-glucan,water dikinase. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2002, 99:7166-7171.
47. Baunsgaard L, Lutken H, Mikkelsen R, Glaring MA, Pham TT,Blennow A: A novel isoform of glucan, water dikinasephosphorylates pre-phosphorylated alpha-glucans and isinvolved in starch degradation in Arabidopsis. Plant Journal 2005, 41:595-605.
48. Ko ¨ tting O, Pusch K, Tiessen A, Geigenberger P, Steup M, Ritte G:Identification of a novel enzyme required for starchmetabolism in Arabidopsis leaves. The phosphoglucan, waterdikinase. Plant Physiology 2005, 137:242-252.
49.
Edner C,Li J, Albrecht T, MahlowS, HejaziM, Hussain H,Kaplan F,Guy C, Smith SM, Steup M et al.: Glucan, water dikinase activity stimulates breakdown of starch granules by plastidial beta-amylases. Plant Physiology 2007, 145:17-28.
This paper describes in vitro experiments demonstrating that the activityof starch-hydrolyzing enzymes on isolated, phosphate-free starch gran-
ules is significantly enhanced when accompanied by glucan, waterdikinase-mediated starch phosphorylation. This effect is mutualistic,since b-amylases activity also stimulated starch phosphorylation.
50.
Hejazi M, Fettke J, Kotting O, Zeeman SC, Steup M: The laforin-like dual-specificity phosphatase SEX4 from Arabidopsishydrolyzes both C6-and C3-phosphate esters introduced by starch-related dikinases and thereby affects phase transition
of alpha-glucans. Plant Physiology 2010, 152:711-722.This paper shows that the phosphoglucan phosphatase SEX4 can hydro-lyze the phosphate esters from both the C6 positions and C3 positions of phosphorylated starch granules or maltodextrins. Dephosphorylation iscomplete when acting on soluble maltodextrins, but incomplete whenacting on insoluble crystalline maltodextrins.
51.
Ko ¨ tting O, Santelia D, Edner C, Eicke S, Marthaler T, Gentry MS,Comparot-Moss S, Chen J, Smith AM, Steup M et al.: STARCH-EXCESS4 is a laforin-like phosphoglucan phosphataserequired for starch degradation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 2009, 21:334-346.
This paper shows that the phosphoglucan phosphatase SEX4 is crucialfor starch degradation. Arabidopsis sex4 mutants accumulate high levelsof soluble phosphorylated glucans (phospho-oligosaccharides). Thesederive from phosphorylated starch and are released during starch degra-dation at night. The sex4 mutant is impaired in starch degradation.
52.
Comparot-Moss S, Kotting O, Stettler M, Edner C, Graf A,Weise SE, Streb S, Lue WL, MacLean D, Mahlow S et al.: A
putative phosphatase. LSF1, is required for normal starchturnover in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiology 2010,152:685-697.
LSF1 ( Like Sex F our 1) is a close homolog of Arabidopsis phosphoglucanphosphatase SEX4. This paper shows that LSF1 is located in the chlor-oplast, on the surface of starch granules and is required for starchdegradation. lsf1 mutants accumulate more starch than wild-type plantsand contain slightly elevated amounts of starch-bound phosphate. How-ever, unlike sex4, lsf1 does not contain phospho-oligosaccharides.
53. Ritte G, Scharf A, Eckermann N, Haebel S, Steup M:Phosphorylation of transitory starch is increased duringdegradation. Plant Physiology 2004, 135:2068-2077.
54. Stark DM, Timmerman KP, Barry GF, Preiss J, Kishore GM:Regulation of the amount of starch in plant tissues by ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase. Science 1992, 258:287-292.
55. Geigenberger P, Stamme C, Tjaden J, Schulz A, Quick PW,Betsche T, Kersting HJ, Neuhaus HE: Tuber physiology andproperties of starch from tubers of transgenic potato plantswith altered plastidic adenylate transporter activity . Plant Physiology 2001, 125:1667-1678.
56. Regierer B, Fernie AR, Springer F, Perez-Melis A, Leisse A,Koehl K, Willmitzer L, Geigenberger P, Kossmann J: Starchcontent and yield increase as a result of altering adenylatepools in transgenic plants. Nature Biotechnology 2002,20:1256-1260.
57. Hermansson AM, Svegmark K: Developments in theunderstanding of starch functionality . Trends in Food Science and Technology 1996, 7:345-353.
58. Jobling SA, Westcott RJ, Tayal A, Jeffcoat R, Schwall GP:Production of a freeze–thaw-stable potatostarch by antisenseinhibitionof three starch synthase genes. Nature Biotechnology 2002, 20:295-299.
59. Hofvander P, Andersson M, Larsson CT, Larsson H: Fieldperformance and starch characteristics of high-amylosepotatoes obtained by antisense gene targeting of twobranching enzymes. Plant Biotechnology Journal 2004,2:311-320.
60. Muhrbeck P, Eliasson AC: Influence of the naturally-occurringphosphate-esters on the crystallinity of potato starch. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1991, 55:13-18.
61. Lindeboom N, Chang PR, Tyler RT: Analytical, biochemical andphysicochemical aspects of starch granule size, withemphasis on small granule starches: a review. Starch-Sta rke2004, 56:89-99.
62. Wang YJ, Liu WJ, Sun ZH: Effects of granule size and shape onmorphology andtensile properties of LDPE andstarchblends. Journal of Materials Science Letters 2003, 22:57-59.
Progress in Arabidopsis starch research and potential biotechnological applications Santelia and Zeeman 9
COBIOT-839; NO. OF PAGES 10
Please cite this article in press as: Santelia D, Zeeman SC. Progress in Arabidopsis starch research and potential biotechnological applications, Curr Opin Biotechnol (2010), doi:10.1016/ j.copbio.2010.11.014
www.sciencedirect.com Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2010, 22:1–10
8/7/2019 applicationsof arabidopsis genome
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/applicationsof-arabidopsis-genome 10/10
63. Tang HJ, Ando H, Watanabe K, Takeda Y, Mitsunaga T:Physicochemical properties and structure of large, mediumand small granule starches in fractions of normal barley endosperm. Carbohydrate Research 2001, 330:241-248.
64. Zeeman SC, Tiessen A, Pilling E, Kato KL, Donald AM, Smith AM:Starch synthesis in Arabidopsis. Granule synthesis,composition, and structure. Plant Physiology 2002,
129:516-529.65. Delvalle D, Dumez S, Wattebled F, Roldan I, Planchot V,
Berbezy P, Colonna P, Vyas D, Chatterjee M, Ball S et al.: Solublestarch synthase I: a major determinant for the synthesis of
amylopectin in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. Plant Journal 2005,43:398-412.
66. Zhang XL, Myers AM, James MG: Mutations affecting starchsynthase III in Arabidopsis alter leaf starch structure andincrease the rate of starch synthesis. Plant Physiology 2005,138:663-674.
67. Wang XC, Xue L, Sun JQ, Zuo JR: The Arabidopsis BE1 gene,
encoding a putative glycoside hydrolase localized in plastids,plays crucial roles during embryogenesis and carbohydratemetabolism. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 2010,52:273-288.
10 Plant biotechnology
COBIOT-839; NO. OF PAGES 10
Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2010, 22:1–10 www.sciencedirect.com