approaches to queries for cohort identification

40
11/6/17 1 Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification Paul Harris, PhD Professor, Biomedical Informatics Patients Community Faculty/Staff

Upload: others

Post on 27-Feb-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

1

ApproachestoQueriesforCohortIdentification

PaulHarris,PhDProfessor,BiomedicalInformatics

Patients

CommunityFaculty/Staff

Page 2: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

2

Faculty/Staff

Page 3: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

3

OR…

Page 4: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

4

291Publications

Page 5: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

5

Step 1: Potential volunteers (or their parents/caretakers) self-register to indicate a willingness to be contacted for research studies.

Page 6: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

6

Potential volunteers (or their parents/caretakers) self-register to indicate a willingness to be contacted for research studies.

Poweredby

Potential volunteers (or their parents/caretakers) self-register to indicate a willingness to be contacted for research studies.

Poweredby

Page 7: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

7

Registered researchers search database for individuals based on study inclusion criteria and geographical location (Only De-Id Information)

Researchers send IRB approved recruitment message to ‘matched’ volunteers.

Volunteers make final choice to share identifiable information for direct contact.

Page 8: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

8

Researchers contact interested volunteers and follow normal study consent procedures.

152Publications

Page 9: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

9

Page 10: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

10

?

It’sEarly… NoFormalEvaluationYetforEnrollment,ButPeopleareClicking

Page 11: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

11

InterestedinAdopting/[email protected]

Page 12: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

12

20

• AnInformaticsplatformdesignedtocontinuouslyengagepatientsandofferopportunitiestoparticipateinresearch

• Acohortof~20,000Vanderbiltpatientsthathaveoptedintobecontacted directly bye-mailtoparticipateinresearchortoprovideinputonresearchideas

• Aconvenientandefficientpanelofpatientrepresentativesforwhichwehavemedicalrecorddata

• Uses:survey,clinical,interventionalresearchandstakeholderengagementtoguideresearchefforts

Page 13: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

13

MRAVCohortAuthenticated(MHAV)individualscanusethislinktoprovideinformationabouthowtheywishtobecontactedforrecruitment(e.g.e-mail,phone,onlybymydoctor,etc)

0100020003000400050006000

18-29

30-39

40-49

50-59

60-69

70-79

80-89

90-99

MRAVCohortAgeDistribution

MRAVCohortTop5 Conditions

HypertensionNOS

BenignHypertension

DiabetesUncomplTypeII

HyperlipidemiaNEC/NOS

AllergicRhinitisNOS

Page 14: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

14

• ObtainIRBapprovalforuseofMRAVrecruitmenttoolandemailcontactlanguage

• SubmitaMyResearchAccessRequest

• Reviewedforparticipantburdenandavailabilityofprogrammers

• Self-ServiceIdentificationthroughRDDiscoverInterface

• - or- submitaResearchDerivativeRequesttoidentifyeligiblepatientsbasedonstudycriteria,ifapplicable(IDASCore,$120perprogramminghour)

• Onceapproved,DataCoordinatingCenterCoreprogrammerssendemailnotificationstoparticipantsincludingapprovedlanguage($82perprogramminghour)

HowtoRecruitPatientsFromTheMRAVCohort

ExpressionofInterest/Pre-ScreeningSurvey

ExpressionofInterest/Pre-ScreeningSurvey

Page 15: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

15

• Enablesmoreefficientscreeningandrecruitingofpatientsversustraditionalmethodsofmanuallyreviewingupcomingappointmentlistsandcross-referencingEMR

• Basedonalistofupcomingappointmentsinapredeterminedsetofclinics,SubjectLocatorsearchespatient’sEMRviatheresearchdatawarehouseforcommonlyused,discreteinclusion/exclusioncriteriatosignificantlynarrowdownthenumberofpatientsthatrequirescreening

– CriteriaincludesIC9/10andCPTcodes,demographics,vitals,keywords,medications

Snapshot–PilotStudies

Nephrology• Examined: 2598• Candidates: 96

(reduction- 96%)CleftPalate• Examined: 2490• Candidates: 27

(reduction- 99%)

Cardiology(2studies)(reduction- 95%)

StartingHereàFilteringCriteria

ReviewList

ClinicsofInterest

StudyWorkQueue(DailyReview)

Page 16: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

16

Page 17: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

17

BioVUØ LinksDNAextractedfromdiscardedblood

samplestode-identifiedEMRØ ~177kDNAsamples,over20k pediatricØ 74 BioVUprojectsapprovedtodate

SyntheticDerivativeØ Researchtooltoenablestudieswith

de-identifiedclinicaldataØ Contains2.5millionrecords;highlydetailed

longitudinalclinicaldatafor~1million

ResearchDerivativeØ IdentifiedclinicaldatawarehouseØ Tools(e.g.SubjectLocator)Ø Services(FeeforService)Ø NewREDCap extractiontoolkit

Page 18: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

18

Page 19: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

19

•Recommendations for clinical data representation to support phenotyping• 1. Structure clinical data into queryable forms.• 2. Recommend use of a common data model, but also support customization for

the variability and availability of EHR data among sites.

•Recommendations for phenotype representation models• 3. Support both human-readable and computable representations.• 4. Implement set operations and relational algebra.• 5. Represent phenotype criteria with structured rules.• 6. Support defining temporal relations between events.• 7. Use standardized terminologies, ontologies, and facilitate reuse of value sets.• 8. Define representations for text searching and natural language processing.• 9. Provide interfaces for external software algorithms.• 10. Maintain backward compatibility.

Page 20: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

20

PARTNERS

Visionandpurpose

Ourgoalistopositivelyimpacthumanhealthbyimprovingparticipantenrollmentandretentioninmulti-centerclinicaltrials.

Achievingthisgoalwillrequiresophisticatedinformatics-basedrecruitmenttools andnovelengagementapproachestoacceleraterecruitmentandretention.

Participant Trial

Page 21: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

21

KeyPrinciples• RespectingCTSAautonomyanddiversity• Afocusonminorityandunderservedpopulations• Makingthemostofelectronichealthrecords• Preservingadiseaseneutralapproach• Focusoncostefficiency• Respectingandreturningvaluetoparticipants• Buildonbestpractice(avoidreinventingthewheel)• Evidencebased….Whatworks?(testbed)• Finiteresources– scalability/tools• Homeforrecruitmentexperts(across+beyondCTSA)

EHR-Based Site Feasibility

Page 22: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

22

EHR-Based Feasibility

Page 23: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

23

EHR-Based Feasibility

Page 24: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

24

Same,butDifferent

EHR-Based Feasibility

EHR-Based Feasibility

Page 25: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

25

Page 26: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

26

Page 27: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

27

Page 28: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

28

Page 29: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

29

Page 30: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

30

Non-Fed Fed

EHR-Based Feasibility: Federated

Page 31: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

31

RelatedResultsFederated Non-Federated

Counts TriNetXCountsDifferencebetweencounts

TriNetX(CTSASites)

Differencebetweencounts

Count1 237,770 172,500

Count2 233,310 2.28% 168,710 2.19%

Count3 214,630 8.00% 157,650 6.56%

Count4 181,630 15.0% 129,660 17.75%

Vanderbilt Differencebetweencounts RIC Differencebetween

counts

9,731 39,571

9,505 2.32% 38,319 3.16%

9,106 4.20% 37,132 3.10

7,302 19.81% 7,302 16.76%

ThechangeinthecountsisvirtuallythesamebetweenFederatedandNon-Federated

+NeedFederatedtodosophisticatedsensitivityanalysisofinclusion/exclusionrules

Page 32: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

32

We’reworkingonjoining…

We’reworkingonleveraging…

Page 33: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

33

We’reworkingonjoining…

We’reworkingonleveraging…

Page 34: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

34

Page 35: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

35

Page 36: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

36

Page 37: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

37

Page 38: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

38

THREE Immediate Opportunities To Collaborate

Sharematerials,tools,bestpractices,… www.trialinnovationnetwork.orgàà Toolkit

1

Page 39: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

39

Recentofferings(videoavailable)

ShowcaseYourWork--- www.trialinnovationnetwork.orgGiveaWebinar(logistics,setup,archivalsupportedbyRIC)

2

InterestedinAdopting/[email protected]

3Collaborate–TrialsToday- Local

Page 40: Approaches to Queries for Cohort Identification

11/6/17

40