approaching regulation l. randall wray, levy economics institute and university of missouri—...

24
Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri—Kansas City www.levy.org ; [email protected]

Upload: sabina-carr

Post on 25-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

Approaching Regulation

L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri—

Kansas Citywww.levy.org; [email protected]

Page 2: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

Approaching Regulation

• To Reform the System We must Understand:– What is the nature of the financial system today?– What is the nature of the crisis?– What is the nature of the crisis response?– What should a financial system do?– How can we reform the system so that

• It serves a public purpose• It can be managed• It can be rescued

Page 3: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

A Minsky Moment or a Minsky Half-Century?

• Stages Approach– Commercial capitalism– Finance capitalism– Paternalistic (Managerial-Welfare State) capitalism– Money Manager capitalism (predator state,

financialization, ownership society, neoliberalism, neoconservativism, shadow banking)

• Stability bred instability• Accumulation of financial assets/liabilities• Globalization• Securitization• Self-supervision

Page 4: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

1952

119

532

1954

319

554

1957

119

582

1959

319

604

1962

119

632

1964

319

654

1967

119

682

1969

319

704

1972

119

732

1974

319

754

1977

119

782

1979

319

804

1982

119

832

1984

319

854

1987

119

882

1989

319

904

1992

119

932

1994

319

954

1997

119

982

1999

320

004

2002

120

032

2004

320

054

2007

120

082

2009

320

104

2012

120

132

-15.00%

-10.00%

-5.00%

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

Sector Financial Balances as a % of GDP, 1952q1 to 2013q3

Domestic Private Sector Balance Govt Balance Capital Account

Page 5: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

Decreasing Weight of the Banking Sector

Shares of Financial Institutions (% of Total Assets)

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.00

life insurance companies

Managed Money

Funding Corporations

Security Brokers and Dealers

Real Estate Investment Trusts

Finance Companies

Issuers of Asset-Backed Securities

Agency and GSE-backed MortgagePoolsGovernment-Sponsored Enterprises

State and Local Government RetirementFundsCredit Unions

Saving Institutions

Bank Holding Companies

Commercial BankingSource: Federal Reserve Flow of Funds Accounts

Managed Money

Commercial Banking

Page 6: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

1916

1918

1920

1922

1924

1926

1928

1930

1932

1934

1936

1938

1940

1942

1944

1946

1948

1950

1952

1954

1956

1958

1960

1962

1964

1966

1968

1970

1972

1974

1976

1978

1980

1982

1984

1986

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Households and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitHouseholds and nonprofitNoncorporate and farm Noncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farm

Noncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farmNoncorporate and farm

Nonfinancial nonfarm corporate

Nonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporate

Nonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporate

Nonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporate

Nonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporate

Nonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporate

Nonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporate

Nonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporate

Nonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporateNonfinancial nonfarm corporate

Private finance

Private finance

Private financePrivate financePrivate finance

Private financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate finance

Private financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate finance

Private finance

Private financePrivate finance

Private financePrivate finance

Private financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate finance

Private finance

Private financePrivate financePrivate finance

Private financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate finance

Private financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate finance

Private financePrivate finance

Private financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate financePrivate finance

Private financePrivate financePrivate finance

GSE

GSEGSE

GSEGSE

GSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSE

GSEGSEGSE

GSEGSE

GSEGSE

GSEGSE

GSEGSEGSEGSEGSE

GSE

GSEGSEGSEGSE

GSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSE

GSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSEGSE

GSEGSE

GSEGSEGSEGSE

GSEGSE

GSEGSEGSE

GovernmentGovernmentGovernment

GovernmentGovernment

GovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernment

GovernmentGovernmentGovernment

Government

Government

GovernmentGovernment

GovernmentGovernment

GovernmentGovernmentGovernment

GovernmentGovernment

GovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernment

GovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernment

GovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernment

GovernmentGovernment

GovernmentGovernment

GovernmentGovernmentGovernmentGovernment

GovernmentGovernmentGovernment

Total Financial Liabilities Relative to GDP

Sources: Historical Statistics of the United States: Millennium Edition (Tables Cj870-889, Ca9-19, Ce42-68, Cj787-796, Cj748-750, Cj389-397, Cj437-447, and Cj362-374), Historical Statistics of the United States: Colo-nial Times to 1970 (Series X 689-697), NIPA, Flow of Funds (from 1945).Note: The government sector excludes all financial activities of the government (retirement funds, GNMA, etc.). GSE sector includes government-sponsored enterprises and agency- and GSE-backed mortgage pools (includes, among others, GNMA and FHA pools). "Private finance" excludes the GSE sector and monetary authorities (which are both part of the financial sector in the Flow of Funds accounts). Before 1945, data for financial institutions is computed from data of the Census Bureau by taking all the liabilities (excluding equity) of commercial banks, credit unions, savings institutions, life insurance stock companies, and property and life insurance companies, and by removing private banks notes, all deposits, and life insurance reserves. From 1945, the total financial liabilities of the financial sector excludes, net interbank liabilities of commercial banks, liabilities of monetary authorities, private and public pension fund reserves, money market mutual funds shares, mutual funds shares and the items previously cited. The liabilities of monetary authorities are not included anywhere. Data for the households and noncorporate sectors is deduced from Census Bureau data about net increase in liabilities and by computing backward from the 1945 level.

Page 7: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

Bubbleonia: Boom and Bust• 1980s Thrift & Bank Crises

– Thrifts and Commercial real estate– Banks and LDC debt

• 1980s Leverage Buy-outs– Michael Milken and Junk Bonds

• 1990s New Economy and Nasdaq– “Irrational Exuberance”

• 2000s Residential Real Estate– Subprimes; foreclosures

• 2000s Commodity Markets– Quadrupled oil prices; food riots; starvation

Each crisis worse than the previous

Page 8: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

No One Saw it Coming• Two Falsehoods: Unforeseeable and Unpreventable;

Black Swans with Fat Tails• Reality: Financial Crisis Inquiry Report

– A “Man”-made crisis: Captains of Finance & Public Stewards caused it and ignored warnings

• Reality: Many economists saw it coming– Godley&Wray; Baker; Minsky (in the 1950s!)

• Reality: Everyone saw it coming– YBG-IBG: you’ll be gone, I’ll be gone– Goldman&Paulson– Betting on failure: It was Wall Street’s desired outcome

Page 9: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

Let’s name names• Widespread “failures” in regulation and

supervision– Treasury, Fed, esp NYFed (Greenspan, Geithner,

Rubin, Summers, Bernanke, Dodd, Gramm)• Dramatic failures of corporate governance and

risk management– Traders like Hank Paulson and Rubin rise to the top– Fannie’s Franklin Raines max’s CEO salary

• Excessive borrowing, risky investments, lack of transparency

• Systemic breakdown in accountability and ethics• Control Fraud

Page 10: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

Congressional Oversight Panel: All successful crisis resolutions required:

• Transparency. Swift action to ensure the integrity of bank accounting, to ascertain the value of bank assets and hence assess bank solvency

• Assertiveness. Willingness to (1) take early aggressive action to improve capital ratios of banks that can be rescued, and (2) shut down banks that are irreparably insolvent.

• Accountability. Willingness to hold management accountable by replacing – and, in cases of criminal conduct, prosecuting – failed managers.

• Clarity. Transparency in the government response with reporting of all forms of assistance being provided and clearly explained criteria for the use of public sector funds.

4 strikes and you’re out?

Page 11: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

Policy Response

• Phase 1: Credit ease• Phase 2: Let’s Make a Deal!• Phase 3: Unaccountable $29T+ loan

originations• Phase 4: Quantitative easing 1,2,3,(????) and

Confidence Fairies

Page 12: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

S elec t As s ets of the F ederal R es erve B ank ($T ) Dec 2007-Aug 2010

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

Other A s s ets

Central bank liquidity s w aps

Preferred interes ts in A IAA urora L L C and A L ICOHoldings L L CTA L F L L C

Maiden L ane III L L C

Maiden L ane II L L C

Maiden L ane L L C

Commerc ial Paper FundingFac ility L L C

Other loans

Term auc tion c redit

Repurc has e agreements :

Mortgage-bac keds ec urities

U.S . Treas ury s ec urities

Mortg ag e-bac ked s ec urities

U.S . T reas ury S ec urities

S ource: F ederal R es erve B oard of Governors

F ore ig n C entra l B a nk L iquidity S wa ps

Page 13: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

Total Institutional Participation, excluding CBLS

UBS AG (Switzerland)2.2%

RBS3.2%

Morgan Stanley11.6%

Merrill Lynch12.4%

JP Morgan Chase2.3%

Goldman Sachs5.1%

Deutsche Bank AG (Germany)3.6%

Credit Suisse (Switzerland)4%

Citigroup13.6%

BNP Paribas (France)5.1%

Bear Stearns5%

Barclays5.3%

Bank of America5.2%

AIG5.4%

All others16.1%

Almost 84% involvedjust 14 institutions!

Page 14: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

Popular Revulsion

• September NYTimes poll: Americans disapprove of the 2008 financial bailout by a 24-point margin, and believe that not enough "bankers and employees of financial institutions" were prosecuted by a staggering 70-point margin.

• Another poll asked more directly about financial regulation, and found a 50-point advantage favoring tougher regulation of financial institutions.

Page 15: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

Lessons from the Global Crisis• Discredited Notions:

– Efficient Markets, Deregulation, Self regulation, Max Shareholder Value, Great Moderation

– New Classical, Real Business Cycle, Rational Expectations, Neutral Money

– New Monetary Consensus, Inflation Targets, Taylor Rule, Quantitative Easing

– Ricardian Equivalents, Impotent Fiscal Policy, Crowding Out, Optimal Currency Area

• Crisis represents: – An institutional failure (banks mutated from utilities to casinos); – An intellectual failure (dangerous view of efficacy of mkts); – And moral failure (system built on money values)

Page 16: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

Revised View of Finance• Savings Don’t Finance Nothing

– Saving = Accounting Record of Investment• Conventional View Confuses “Paying For” with “Finance”

– The “Finance” Is Created Simultaneously with the Spending (System of Credits and Debits)

• Financialization Is Not Finance; It is Leverage or Layering– Financialized Homes, Education, Health Care, Retirement,

Death– Finance is Not a Scarce Resource– Wall St Became the Tail that Wags the Dog

Page 17: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

Reconstituting the Financial System

• Minsky Project: Reconstituting Finance to Promote Capital Development of the Economy

• Requires Proper Framework– 1. a capitalist economy is a financial system;– 2. neoclassical economics is not useful because it denies that the

financial system matters;– 3. the financial structure has become much more fragile;– 4. this fragility makes it likely that stagnation or even a deep depression

is possible;– 5.a stagnant capitalist economy will not promote capital development;– 6.however, this can be avoided by apt reform of the financial structure

in conjunction with apt use of fiscal powers of the government.

Page 18: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

What Should a Financial System Do?: Key Elements to Promote Capital Development

• 1. safe and sound payments system;

• 2. short term loans to households and firms, and, possibly, to state and local government;

• 3. safe and sound housing finance system;

• 4. a range of financial services including insurance, brokerage, and retirement savings services; and

• 5. long term funding of positions in expensive capital assets.

NB: there is no reason why these should be consolidated, nor why all should be privately supplied

Page 19: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

Minsky’s Wall St view of moneyVast majority of monetary transactions have little to do with

circulating or producing outputMany are related to financing positions in assets: M now for

more M later; issuing an IOU to get IOUs later-The M now is usually collateralized borrowing: “other people’s

money”Or: changing characteristics of income and outgo streams: r

and x swapsMany are hedges and bets on contingent outcomesNeed to redirect finance toward capital development of the

economy

Page 20: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

The Big 4: Banks or Shadow?

Page 21: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

Can we put the Genie back in the bottle? Glass Steagall

• Section 16 accorded regulated banks “all such incidental powers … necessary to carry on the business of banking” (FRB 1933, 396)undermined separation

• Liquidity creation was increasingly transferred from deposit taking by commercial banks subject to prudential regulation, to securitized structures that were exempt from reporting and regulation because they were considered capital market activities and (usually) exempt from even SEC oversight.

• Kregel: If we re-segment, commercial banks must be profitable

• Morgan Ricks: “term out” to eliminate competition from MMMF

Page 22: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

A Modest Proposal1. Banks lend directly to borrowers, and then service and hold them. There is no further public purpose served by selling loans or other assets to third parties, but there are substantial costs to government from regulation and supervision of those activities.

2. US banks cannot contract in LIBOR, an interest rate set externally with a large, subjective component and subject to manipulation. If not for indexing to LIBOR, the rates paid by US borrowers, including homeowners and businesses, would have come down as the Fed intended when it cut the fed funds rate.

3. Banks cannot have subsidiaries of any kind. No public purpose is served by allowing banks to hold assets 'off balance sheet.'

4. Banks should not be allowed to accept financial assets as collateral for loans. No public purpose is served by financial leverage.

Page 23: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

Modest Proposal con’t5. US Banks cannot lend off-shore. No national public purpose is served by allowing US banks to lend for foreign purposes.

6. Banks cannot buy (or sell) credit default insurance. The public purpose of banking as a public/private partnership is to underwrite and price risk. If a bank relies on credit default insurance it is transferring that pricing of risk to a third party, which is counter to the public purpose of banking.

7. Banks cannot engage in proprietary trading or any profit making ventures beyond basic lending. If the public sector wants to venture out of banking for some presumed public purpose it can be done through other outlets.

8. Use FDIC-approved credit models for evaluation of bank assets. Do not allow mark to market of bank assets. If there is a valid argument for marking a bank asset to market prices, that asset should not be a bank asset in the first place. The public purpose of banking is to facilitate loans based on credit analysis rather, than market valuation.

Page 24: Approaching Regulation L. Randall Wray, Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri— Kansas City ; wrayr@umkc.edu

Conclusions for Reform: Gov’t Role

• Reducing concentration plus retaining risk can reorient banks back to relationship banking

• Role for gov’t to play in re-regulating and re-supervising– There are no magic formulas (capital ratios, living wills,

skin in the game)

• Role for gov’t in direct provision of financial services– Payments system– Direct lending to serve public purpose– Guarantees for public-private partnerships