apresentacao aes eletropaulo_4_q12_eng
TRANSCRIPT
4Q12 Results
February, 2013
2012 Highlights
Investments of R$ 831 million in 2012, a 12% increase in comparison with 2011
D f 19% i SAIDI d 15% i SAIFIOperationalOperational
Decrease of 19% in SAIDI and 15% in SAIFI
1.0% increase in energy consumption
Gross revenues totaled R$ 15,314 million, a 0.5% increaseFinancialFinancial $ , ,
Ebitda of R$ 656 million in 2012, a reduction of 77%
Net income of R$ 108 million, a 93% decrease
FinancialFinancial
O J 24th 2013 it li d th i d f th t di t iff i b d th E C t On January 24th, 2013, it was applied the index of the extraordinary tariff review based on the Energy CostsReduction Program, regulated through the Provisional Measure 579, converted into Law No. 12,783 in January14th, 2013. The average tariff reduction is estimated in 20%, effective from January 24th, 2013
RegulatoryRegulatory
.DividendsDividends The Management proposes proceeds distribution in the amount of R$ 55 million, representing 25% of 2012
distributable income plus interest on equity, composed of R$ 0.31 per common share and R$ 0.34 per preferredshare
th t
2
Eletrobrás CaseEletrobrás Case In February 21th, 2013, State Court published decision in favor of AES Eletropaulo, revoking the decision of 1st
instance of December 12, 2012
2012 Highlights
Safety: 19% drop in accidents with employees and contractors, being recorded one fatality with contractors and
19% decrease in fatal accidents with the population
I ti d E ll f C t S ti f ti t ti f ti i d h d 80 6% i th
SocialSocial
Innovation and Excellence for Customer Satisfaction: customer satisfaction index reached 80.6% in the
Abradee research, the highest since the survey was started
Development and Enhancement of Communities: investment of R$ 122 million in social projects, energy
efficiency and legal access to electric power, benefiting about 1.7 million peopleefficiency and legal access to electric power, benefiting about 1.7 million people
Efficient Use of Energy Resources: R$ 44 million invested in 520 units - such as hospitals, schools and public
buildings, generating efficiency and having their electricity consumption reduced by 38,846 MW
EnvironmentEnvironment
.
National Quality Award - PNQ 2012, of Fundação Nacional da Qualidade – FNQ
ISE- Corporate Sustainability Index of BM&FBovespa - 2012/2013 - portfolio for the 8th consecutive year
Brazil's most admired company, for the fourth consecutive year, in the category "Electricity Supply" award
AwardsAwards
sponsored by the magazine Carta Capital
Child Award, Fundação Abrinq/ Save the Children, for attending to children up to 6 years in the Centro deEducação Infantil Luz e Lápis
Guia Exame de Sustentabilidade: AES Brasil group was recognized by Exame magazine as one out of
3
Guia Exame de Sustentabilidade: AES Brasil group was recognized, by Exame magazine, as one out oftwenty model companies in sustainability
.
Growth in consumption due to better performance at residential and commercial
Consumption evolution (GWh)¹
16,408 11,614 36,817 45,10117,029 11,815 37,570 45,557
+3.8% -3.2% +1.7% +4.4% +2.0% -3.6% +1.0%
5,996
8,284
5,803
7,987
2,799 2,922
Residential Industrial Commercial Public Sector and Others
Captive Market Free Clientes Total Market
41 – Own consumption not considered
2011 2012
SAIDI below regulatory limits and in its lowest level since 2006
SAIDI¹ (last 12 months) SAIDI1 (LTM)
its lowest level since 2006
-17%10.09 9.32 8.68 8.67 8.49
11.86 10.60 10.368.35 8.23
9.87 8.23
2009 2010 2011 2012 jan/13 jan/12 jan/13
► ANEEL Reference for 2012 SAIDI: 8.49 hours
SAIDI (hours)SAIDI (hours)SAIDI Aneel Reference
5
► ANEEL Reference for 2012 SAIDI: 8.49 hours
1 - System Average Interruption Duration IndexSource: ANEEL and AES Eletropaulo
SAIFI remains below regulatory limits
SAIFI¹ (last 12 months) SAIFI1 (LTM)
7 87
-15%
7.87 7.39 6.93 6.87 6.64
6.17 5.46 5.45 4.65 4.55 5.37 4.55
2009 2010 2011 2012 jan/13 jan/12 jan/13
► ANEEL Reference for 2012 SAIDI: 6.64 times
SAIFI (times)SAIFI Aneel Reference SAIFI (times)
6
► ANEEL Reference for 2012 SAIDI: 6.64 times
1 - System Average Interruption Duration IndexSource: ANEEL and AES Eletropaulo
Losses level below the regulatory reference for the 3rd Cycle of Tariff Reset
Losses (last 12 months) Regulatory Reference² - Total Losses (last 12 months)
11 8 10.6 10.3 9.8 9.4
5.3 4.4 4.0 4.1
11.8 10.9 10.5 10.2
6.5 6.5 6.5 6.1
2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014 2014/20152009 2010 2011 2012
Technical Losses ¹ Non Technical Losses
71 – In January 2012, the Company improved the assessment of the technical losses. As a consequence of this improvement, technical losses calculated are in a level of 6.1%. 2 – Values estimated by the Company to make them comparable with the reference for non-technical losses determined by the Aneel
Investments focused on system expansion, maintenance and quality of client services
4Q12 2012
R$ 831 millionR$ 252 million
Investments (R$ million) Investments (R$ million)
831
59
63
711
R$ 831 millionR$ 252 million
216
2836600
700
800 22
35
26
739831
647
72
9
32+21%
213
196 35
108
200
300
400
500
717796
621
69209
252
Maintenance
72
1
213
0
100
200
2011 2012 2013(e) 4Q11 4Q12
203 244
Client Service
System Expansion
Losses Recovery
Own Resources Paid by the clients
IT
Paid by the Clients
Others 81 – Maintenance capex is the investment s made for the grid modernizationand improvement in quality of service
Gross revenues reflects expansion in residential and commercial and new tariff
Gross Revenues (R$ million)
+0.5%
5.405 5.354
15.240 15.314
1 3 3 1 308
3.838 3.885+1.2%
9.813 9.887
23 72
2.453 2.556
23 721.373 1.308
2011 2012 4T11 4T12Net revenue ex‐construction revenue
9
Construction revenues
Deduction to Gross Revenue
Higher average cost of energy purchaseddue to energy from auctions, exchange variation
Operating Costs and Expenses ¹ (R$ million) and adjustment of bilateral contract
+21%
1 2511,531
6,9408,390
+27%
5,689 6,858
1,469 1,923
1,251
358 3981,827 2,321
2011 2012 4Q11 4Q12
Energy Supply and Transmission Charges PMS² and Other Expenses
101 - Depreciation and other operating income and expenses are not included 2 - Personnel, Material and Services
Manageable PMSO items below the inflation
PMS and other expenses (R$ million)
4 9%+4.9%
3828 54 30 49 (25)
106 38
1,251 1,251 1,357 1,357 1,423 1,423 1,423 1,507 1,555 1,531 1,531
2011 Non recurring 2011¹
2011: ex non recurring
Collective bargaining
Others² 2012: ex non recorring
FCESP ADA Costs of reorganization
and restructuring
Non recurring 2012³
2012reported
111 - Non Recurring 2011: Reversal of tax and labor contingencies and changes in accounting criteria of ADA2 - Other: Expenses of Action Plan 2011-2012, fleet maintenance, call center, offset by lower advertising expenses and consulting, among others.3 - Non Recurring 2012: Reversal of civil and labor provisions in 2Q12 and IT expenses
Ebitda reduction reflects tariff review, higher costs with parcel A and extraordinary gains (AES Atimus SP in
Ebitda (R$ million)
p y g (2011)
(782)
(707)
(263)2,848
2,066
1 358
(263)(232)
(159) (49)
2011 Parcel A Non recurring Market review PMSO¹ Others Costs with 2012
1,358 1,126 967
656
121 – PMSO variation, excluding costs with reorganization and restructuring and non-recurring costs related to the 3Q11 and 3Q12
2011 Parcel A Non recurring 2011 and 2012
Market, review and adjustment
in Parcel B
PMSO¹ Others revenues and
expenses
Costs with reorganization
and restructuring
2012
Lower interest and fair value of assets related to concession impacted the financial resultsp
Financial Result (R$ million)
(2)2011 2012 4Q11 4Q12
(2)(21)
(52)
- 93%
143%
(22)(2)
(21)
(52)
(22)(2)
13
Net income variation reflects tariff review, Parcel A and sale of AES Atimus SP in 2011
354
1.572
Net Income (R$ million)
1 207
11354
172108
687- 93%
Net income - December 31, 2012 107.9
Realization of equity valuation adjustments 89 9
Dividends 2012 (R$ milhões)
1.207
647
(121) (132)137
( )
- 111%699
18
Realization of equity valuation adjustments 89.9
Ajustment for dividend and Interest on equity prescribed 5.1
Legal Reserve (5%) (9.9)
Distribution basis 193.1
Dividends distributed - (121)
(470)
(132) (228)
(73)
Interest on equity distributed - 12/31/2012 54.3
Proposed complementary dividends 0.5
Estatutory reserve 138.2
2011 2012 4Q11 4Q12
Net Income ‐ AdjustedRegulatory assets and liabilities variation
Expected date: Ex-dividends: 04/05/13; payment: until the end of 2013
14
Regulatory assets and liabilities variationTariff review postponement effect
Lower cash generation due to tariff review and higher expenses with Parcel A
Operational Cash Generation (R$ million) Final Cash Balance (R$ million)
higher expenses with Parcel A
- 48% - 41%
Operational Cash Generation (R$ million) Final Cash Balance (R$ million)
- 48% - 41%
1,390
814
2,4161,218
2011 20122011 2012
15
Net debt impacted by lower cash balance
Avarage Cost
6.2x
Net Debt (R$ billion)
6.6 6.9
1.4x
0.9x
4.9x
110 2% 118.0%2.3 3.1 110.2%
2011 2012
2011 2012
12.1% 11.3%Effective rateGross Debt/Ebitda Adjusted with Fcesp
Net Debt (R$ billion)
Average Time - years
161 –Adjusted EBITDA with the expenses related CESP Foundation and regulatory assets and liabilities.
Net Debt/Ebitda Adjusted with FcespAverage Time years
% of CDI
Focus on efficiency
Main initiatives
Change of corporate headquarters OperationalOperational
g
Optimization of operational bases
Stores review by increasing of outsourcing
Organizational restructuring
30% growth in the productivity of operations teams of the regional north (being implemented for
other regional)
Increase in the number of clients served by automatic channels
f
Sale of real estate with an estimated value of $ 239 million, of which R$ 160 million was alreadyFi i lFi i l
Renegotiation of supplies contracts
sold
Covenants renegotiation and lengthening debt profile
Reducing manageable costs estimated at R$ 100 million from 2013
FinancialFinancial
17
The statements contained in this document with regard to theb i t j t d ti d fi i l lt
4Q12 Results
business prospects, projected operating and financial results,and growth potential are merely forecasts based on theexpectations of the Company’s Management in relation to itsfuture performance.Such estimates are highly dependent on market behavior andSuch estimates are highly dependent on market behavior andon the conditions affecting Brazil’s macroeconomicperformance as well as the electric sector and internationalmarket, and they are therefore subject to changes.