april 2010 urban agriculture uamagazine · cover this issue will look at options for closing the...

56
www.ruaf.org UA 23 April 2010 The Role of Urban Agriculture in Sustainable Urban Nutrient Management URBAN AGRICULTURE MAGAZiNE Analysing the Nexus of Sanitation and Agriculture Nutrient Cycles in Three African Cities Food Security and Productive Sanitation

Upload: others

Post on 19-Jun-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

ww

w.r

uaf

.org

UA23

April 2010

The Role of Urban Agriculture in

Sustainable Urban Nutrient Management

URBAN AGRICULTUREMAGAZiNE

Analysing the Nexus of Sanitation and Agriculture

Nutrient Cycles in Three African Cities

Food Security and Productive Sanitation

Page 2: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

23

www.ruaf.org

In this issue

Urban Agriculturemagazine Editorial 03

ClosingtheRural-UrbanFoodandNutrientLoopsinWestAfrica:arealitycheck 08

AnalysingtheNexusofSanitationandAgricultureatMunicipalScale 11

ClosingthePhosphorusLoopinHanoi,Vietnam 13

AssessingPatternsofNitrogenManagementinPeriurbanAgricultureofHanoi,Vietnam 15

NutrientCyclesinThreeAfricanCities 17

DecentralisedCompostingofMarketWasteandUseinConakry,Guinea 20

TheProductiveGarden:AnexperienceinthecityofBeloHorizonte,Brazil 22

ImprovingFoodSecuritythroughEnvironmentalManagementinIbadan 25

MunicipalSolidWasteManagementasanIncentiveforCityFarminginPune,India 27

CommercialSubstratesforUrbanAgricultureinBogotá 29

UsingParticipatoryUrbanDesignto“ClosetheNutrientLoop”inthePhilippines 31

UsingUrbanOrganicWasteasaSourceofNutrients,theneedofawarenessraising 34

NoPlaceLikeHome:GenderandCapacityDevelopmentinMasterCompostingProgrammes 35

ProducingOrganicFertiliserfromUrine-DivertingDryToiletsinDongsheng,China 39

TheRoleofUrbanAgricultureinWasteManagementinMexicoCity 40

EnergyBalanceinaSuburbanChinampaAgroecosysteminMexicoCity 42

FoodSecurityandProductiveSanitation:Practicalguidelineontheuseofurineincropproduction 43

TheEmergingMarketofTreatedHumanExcretainOuagadougou 45

IntroducingUrineasanAlternativeFertiliserSource:CasestudiesfromNigeriaandGhana 49

CoverThis issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can play an important role in creating sustainable urban nutrient management. It is produced in collaboration with WASTE. This issue of the UA Magazine is partly made possible by subsidy from the EU.

photo: Waste Recycling in Gaza, Palestine. by: A. Adam-Bradford

11

20

Analysing the Nexus of Sanitation and Agriculture

Decentralised Composting and Use of Market Waste

The Emerging Market of Treated Human Excreta

45

Page 3: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

3

www.ruaf.org

Thelargestsourceistheresiduesfromthefoodflowsenteringthecity,comprisingorganichouseholdandmarketwastebutalsohumanandanimalexcreta.Mostofthese resources endup in landfills or pollute theurbanandperiurbanenvironment(urbannutrientsink).

This issue looks at options for closing thenutrient loopthroughsafe recyclingofurbanwastes,andargues thaturbanagriculturecanplayanimportantroleincreatingsustainableurbannutrientmanagement.

Rapidurbanisation inmany cities is associatedwith anincrease in urban poverty, growing food insecurity andmalnutrition. The recent food and economic crisis hasmade city andnational governments realise thaturban food securityisamajorissuethatrequirespolicyinterven-tion.Alongwithmoreefficientwateruse inagriculture,theproductivesafeuseofrecycledurbanwastewater,rain-waterandorganicwasteshasbeenidentifiedasasustain-ablewaytoproducefoodforthegrowingcities(SUSANA,2009,seepage41).Managementofurbanwastesisahigh-costconcernformanycities.Insteadofflushingwasteoutofthecityorbringingthewastetoheapsinlandfills,illegaldumpsortransferstations,thereisgrowingunderstand-ingthatcompostingandlocalreuseisanenvironmentallyattractivewaytomanagepartsoftheseotherwisewastedresources, especially in low- and middle-income coun-tries.

Additionalargumentsareprovidedbytherapidincreasein fertiliserpricesand thedwindlingphosphatemarket,makingtheneedforalternativesourcesoffertilisersmoreandmoreimportant.Phosphorusshortagewillbeoneofthemostpressingproblemsofthecomingyears.According

Waste Management for Nutrient Recovery: Options and challenges for urban agriculture Urban agriculture is a response to the increase in demand for food and the market proximity in cit-ies. This way of producing food is highly dependent on available space, nutrients and water. While access to space and water largely depends on local conditions, farmers commonly use different organ-ic and inorganic nutrient sources.

Olufunke CofieRené van Veenhuizen

Verele de Vreede Stan Maessen

Editorial

Peak phosphorus and the need for recycling

Phosphorusshortagewillbeoneofthemostpressingproblemsofthecomingyears.Theimminentshortageisacrucialproblemfortheworld’sfoodsupplies.Phosphorusisanessentialnutrientforallplantsandanimals.Itisalsooneofthethreekeycompo-nents(togetherwithnitrogenandpotassium)offertilisers,andthereforecrucialfortheworld’sfoodsupplysystem.The demand for phosphate is increasing, while global fossilreservesarefinite.ThereservesintheUShavebeendecreasingrapidlysince2006anditispredictedthateconomicreserveswillbedepletedwithin25years.Accordingtoexperts,globalreserveswillbeusedwithinapproximately100years.Theglobalsupplyofrecoverablephosphorusislimitedandconcentratedinjustafewcountries.The bulk of fossil phosphorus is found in just five countries:Morocco/WesternSahara,China,theUS,SouthAfricaandJordan.Phosphatepricesaresetessentiallybythecurrentthreeproduc-ingcountries,theUS,ChinaandMorocco.Theproblemisevenmoreserious,asphosphateisakeycomponentoffertilisersandthere are no alternatives. Other known sources of phosphaterockareeconomicallynotviabletomine.Theneedforalternativesourcesofphosphateisbecomingmoreandmorepressing.Therearefewsolutionstotheproblemotherthanimprovingtheefficiencyofnutrientmanagementinagri-culture,andrecoveryofnutrientsfromwaste(water)ormanure/human excretions. Recycling of phosphates from human andanimal manure contributes to closing the phosphate cycle.Atpresent,approximately11.4milliontonsofphosphateislostyearlyduetoerosionandprecipitation.Thephosphorusshortagewillundoubtedlycreatenewdevelopmentsandopportunitiesintechnologyinnovationandsustainablebusinessdevelopment.The Nutrient Flow Task Group (NFTG) is a Dutch initiative facili-tated by the Development Policy Review Network (DPRN) that strives to accelerate the search for solutions for phosphorus deple-tion and its global impact. http://phosphorus.global-connections.nl.

toexperts,globalreserveswillbeusedupwithinthefore-seeablefuture(Brown,2003).

Manyauthoritiesseektoaddresstheseissuesinthedevelop-ment of more resilient cities. Urban agriculture provides

Page 4: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

4

linkagestoboththesupplyof(wastes)andthedemand(foodandincome)fornutrientsinandaroundsettlements,whilecontributingtolocaleconomicdevelopment,povertyallevi-ationandsocialinclusionoftheurbanpoor–andwomeninparticular–aswellastoreducedvulnerabilityofcitiesandtheir inhabitants. Nutrient loops can be closed, especiallythroughsafe recycling,and theenvironmentalbenefitsofurbanagriculturecanbeenhanced.

Nutrients Agricultureisakeysectorforunderstandingthecyclingofmacronutrients like phosphorus, carbon, nitrogen andsulphur(seethearticleonpage8).Therearesixteenessen-

tialnutrientsrequiredforcropproduc-tion, which are usually divided intomacronutrients and micronutrients.Carbon (C), hydrogen (H) and oxygen(O) are macronutrients, abundantlyavailable in the air. Macronutrientsavailable in the soil and usuallyrequiredinlargeamountsforproduc-tion (taken up by the roots in ionicform)are:nitrogen(N),phosphorus(P),potassium(K),sulphur(S),calcium(Ca)andmagnesium(Mg).Throughoutthisissue attention is paid to the mainthreeN,P,andK,ofwhichcropsneedthelargestamounts.Nitrogenismostimportantforplantgrowth,andoftenthe first limiting nutrient. The mainnaturalsourcesofplant-availableNinthe soil are degraded organicmatterand N from the air that is fixed bymicroorganisms.The supply of plant-

availablePcomesfromsolublephosphatesinthesoilandfrommineralisedorganicmatter.MostarticlesinthisissueconcentrateonNandP.

Although micronutrients (including copper, iron, manga-nese,molybdenum,boron,chlorideandzinc)arerequiredinsmalleramountsthanthemacronutrients,theyareasessen-tialforplantgrowthasmacronutrientsandforabalanceddiet.TheIAASTD(report2009,www.agassessment.org)iden-tifiedthelackofmicronutrient-richfoodsasamajorprob-lem in many developing countries and suggested that amore nutritious diet (including vegetables) containingmicronutrientsisneeded.Inmanycountriesmicronutrientsarenormallyavailableinsufficientquantitiesinthesoilandthrough the mineralisation of organic matter. In highlyweatheredsoils,suchasthoseinthetropicsorindryareas,theavailabilityofmicronutrientscanhowevervary.

Under certain conditions,micronutrients can also occur inexcessofplantneedsandbecometoxictoplants.Thisconcernsothertraceelementstoo,suchaslead,cadmium(bothheavymetals),orchromium,noneofwhicharenutrients.Thehealtheffectsandtheheavymetal thresholdconcentrationunderwhich it ispossible topractisesafeurbanagriculturehavebeenthesubjectofmuchdiscussion(Puschenreiteret al.1999,Barkeret al.,2007)andthelattervariesstronglybetweenthe

Editorial

www.ruaf.org

variouselements.Keepingsafedistancefrommainsourcesofcontamination(traffic,industrialsmokeandwastewater)andappropriatecropchoicecanreducerisktohealthofconsum-ers(DeZeeuwandLock2001,Simmonset al.,2010).

Integrated nutrient management Referencesonurbannutrientmanagementoftenrefertothepreventionofover-enrichmentoffragileenvironments(suchasurbangreenareas)withphosphateandnitrogen.Also,theGlobalPartnershiponNutrientManagement(UNEP:www.gpa.unep.org) sees raising awareness on the causes andharmfulimpactsofthisover-enrichmentasamajorpartofnutrientmanagement,whilerecentlydiscussionshavebeeninitiated to include attention to improved sanitation and(decentralised)productivereuse–includingurbanagricul-ture–aspossiblesolutions.Andindeed,manyarticlesinthisissueregardproductiveuseofnutrients(inwastes,wastewa-terandsanitation)asaninterestingoptioninpropernutri-entmanagement(recyclingandclosingtheloop).

Thearticleonpage8looksatrural-urbannutrientflowsandoptions for recyclingnutrients,whichnormally endup indrainsorinlandfills,pollutingtheurbanenvironment(citiesasnutrientsinks).Theauthorssupport the idea that foodproduction,especiallyinandaroundcitiescanbeenhancedifthenutrientsandorganicresiduesfromurbanconsump-tionarerecycledbackintoagriculture.Buttheyalsowarnthatthisisnotsoeasyinthefaceofsignificantlogisticalandfinancialchallenges.Thearticlesonpage8,11,and13,lookatnutrientcyclesanddiscussmethodstoanalysethese.

Nutrientsareneededinsmall-scaleagriculturalproductionactivitiesforhouseholdconsumptionandincomegenerat-ingpurposes aswell as inparks andgardens.Oneof themajorconstraintstoagriculturalproductivityinandaroundcitiesisthatfarmerscannotchoosetheirsitesbuthavetousethosethatnotbeingusedorunsuitableforconstructionpurposes.Thesesitesareoftenonslopes,ofpoorfertilityortoowettosupportbuildings.Asfarmlandincitiesislimited,farmers cannot let the sites lie fallow to regenerate. Incontrast, urban production patterns are commonly veryoutputintensive,withmultipleharvestsperyear.Thesesoilsneedapermanentnutrientsupplyandtobemanagedforincreasednutrientretentioncapacity, improvedsoilstruc-tureandwater-holdingcapacity.

Chemicalfertilisersareoftennotavailabletooraccessibleforurbanproducers,butfertiliserusealonewouldnotbeenoughto restore soil fertility.Building theorganicmatterbase isimportant for improvingpoor soils, andorganicmaterialscomefrommanure,cropresiduesandcompost.Theseholdplantnutrientsinmorecomplexforms,whicharereleasedforplantuseaftertheorganicmaterialdecomposes.

Againstthebackgroundofsoaringworldchemicalfertiliserprices,thereisaneedforagriculturalauthoritiestosupportorganicnutrientresourcesandtoseekalternativesolutions,suchasmixturesoforganicand inorganic fertiliserasanefficientalternativetousingeitheroneofthemseparately.AnexampleofsuchamixtureisComlizer(seeBox).

Urine application tested on tomatoesPhoto: CREPA

Page 5: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

5

www.ruaf.org

ComlizerComlizer is a product derived from mixing composted municipal waste (organic waste, faecal sludge) and ammo-nium sulphate fertiliser. Developed in Ghana, it has been tested on maize and compared with split application of NPK (15-15-15) and ammonium sulphate, as usually practised by farmers. Maize yield from plots that received Comlizer at the rate of 91 kg N ha-1 compared well with yield from plots that received NPK (15-15-15) and ammonium sulphate at the rate of 150 kg N ha-1. Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake in maize plants grown with Comlizer was 11 per cent higher than with NPK (15-15-15) + ammonium sulphate. Moreover, the organic matter content of soil treated with Comlizer was 22 percent and 64 percent higher than with fertiliser and on the soil alone. Crop water use efficiency was 12 per cent higher in Comlizer-treated crops than those treated with chemical fertiliser. There was no threat from heavy metals and patho-gens. Compared to mineral fertiliser, Comlizer improved crop yield, nutrient uptake, soil organic matter content and crop water use efficiency. Moreover, Comlizer is relatively cheaper: it was found to cost about half the amount of ammonium sulphate fertiliser (Source: Adamtey et al.). Similar experiences are described in this issue on pages 37 and 47 where human faeces are mixed with compost, result-ing in increased plant growth.

IntegratedSoilFertilityManagementcombinestheuseofbothorganicandinorganicnutrientsourcestoincreasecropyield,rebuilddepletedsoilsandprotectthenaturalresourcebase.Itseekstoadaptlocalsoilfertilitymanagementpracticestoopti-misetheeffectivenessoforganicandinorganicinputsincropproduction.Butnutrientmanagementalonecannotassurethe desired productivity in urban agricultural productionsystems.Ithastobecoupledwithappropriatemanagementofwaterandotheragronomicpractices.Andorganicandinor-ganicnutrientmanagementneedtobeintegratedinurbanagriculturalsystems.

Challenges of scaling up organic waste manage-mentMostofthecontributionstothisissuedescribeexperienceswiththeuseoforganicsolidwasteforcompostproductionand its reuse (articlesonpages20-34).And indeed, inmost

cities sustainable management of solidwastehasbecomeaseriousproblem.Thewastestreamisnotahomogenousmass.The organic waste fraction remains thelargest proportion to be recovered, andcomposting offers a possibility to reducethe total waste volume by half. This canhave significant consequences for thetransportofwaste(thelargestcostfactorofurbanwastemanagement),whichcouldbeanincentiveformunicipalauthoritiestoconsiderresourcerecoverymoreseriously,giventheirinsufficientfinancial,technical

and institutional capacities to collect, transport and safelytreatanddisposeofmunicipalwastes(seethearticlesonpage8and20).Therequiredapproacheshavetobedecentralised,whichwouldallowtheuseoforganicwastewithoutsignifi-canttransportcosts;henceprioritygiventobackyardcompost-ing(household)followedbycommunityapproaches.

AnevaluationofcompostingprojectsinWestAfricapointedoutthat,apartfrombeingnotfinanciallyviable,acommonproblemleadingtoprojectfailurewaslackofmarketanaly-sisandpoor institutional integration (Cofie,BradfordandDrechsel,2006).Soundplanningisrequiredandshouldbebasedonabusinessmodelaimingatcostrecoverythatissufficienttomakethesystemsustainablewhileconsideringinstitutional linkages, sources ofwaste supply and soundquantificationofcompostdemand.

Inmost cases, thesupplyoforganicmaterial is fargreaterthancanberealisticallyabsorbedinurbanagriculture.Thiscan limit the up-scaling potential. A demand assessmentshouldlookatallpotentialclientsandtheirwillingnessandabilitytopay.Itisexpectedthatamajordemandforcompostinrapidlyexpandingcitieswillcomefromlandscapedesign-ers(horticulturists,parksandgardens)andrealestatedevel-opers(seethearticleonPune,Indiaonpage27).Aswehaveseen,mosturbanfarmersarewillingtousecompostalthoughnotallhavethenecessaryexperience.Properadviceisrequirediffarmersaretoseetheadvantagesofcompostandnotloseinterest,forexampleifthereleaseofnutrientsisnotasfastastheyexpectedfrommineralfertiliserormanure.

Variousstakeholderinstitutionscouldplaytheroleofregu-lator,manager, supporter of initiatives or beneficiary.Thearticlesonpage31onparticipatorydesign,andpage34onmaster composter programmes, describe approaches inwhich all stakeholders participate in a thorough capacitybuildingandplanningprocess.Thearticleonpage17arguesthatlinkagesbetweensectorssuchaswastemanagement,butalsobetweencropandlivestock,needtobeenhanced.

Health implications are a major constraint to recyclingorganicwasteinurbanagriculture.Duetothecloseconnec-tionoforganicwasterecyclingwiththefoodchain,theissueofhealthiscrucial,not justforfarmersengagedinurbanagriculture,butalsoforconsumersoftheproductsthatarederivedfromrecycledorganicwaste(seethearticleonpage37andthebox).Simplehealthandsafetyprotectionmeasurescan be taken to mitigate many of these health hazards.Several articles show the added value ofwaste reuse. Forinstance,thenutrientvalueoftheuncollectedsolidwasteinKumasiwouldbesufficienttopaytheservicecostsofsolidwaste management for the whole city (US$180,000 permonth).Moreover,about80percentofthisamountisspenton waste collection and transportation to disposal sites,whichcouldbedrasticallyreducedthroughcompostingfortheadditionalbenefitofthefarmingcommunity.Thechal-lengeforthemunicipalityistousethesavedmoneytosubsi-disecompoststations.Thisisnoteasy,asotherbudgetgapssuch as hospital supply and teacher salaries have a highpriorityinmunicipalities.Photo: CREPA

Page 6: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

6

www.ruaf.org

Editorial

Alternativefinancemechanismsshouldbesought,suchascarboncredits(CleanDevelopmentMechanism).Divertingsolidorganicwastefromlandfillsbycompostingisalsooneof the simplestways to prevent emissions ofmethane (agreenhousegas)andtoreducegroundwaterpollutiondueto leachates from the landfill. Recovering methane fromlandfills is still a technical challenge due to high lossesthroughleakage.

Nutrient recovery from on-site sanitation systemsWerner (2004)argues that,atpresent, farmersworldwideusearound150milliontonsofsyntheticallyproducednutri-entsannually,whileatthesametimeconventionalsanita-tionsystemsdumpmorethan50milliontonsoffertiliserequivalentswithamarketvalueofaround$15billionintowaterbodies.Theauthorcallsforaparadigmshiftinsanita-tion towards a recycling-oriented closed loop approach.Ecological sanitation is such a shift, aiming to close localmaterialflow-cycles.Itisbasedonanoverallviewthatmate-rialflowsarepartofanecologicalsystemthatcanbetailoredtotheneedsoftheusesandlocalconditionsofsanitationandagriculture.However,alsohere,thereareanumberofchallenges,whicharerelatedtoawarenessandknowledge,regulation,theneedfordataontheexistinggapbetween

actualandpotentialreuse,andon organisational and infra-structural issues (seearticleonpage41).

Excreta are a rich source oforganic matter and essentialinorganic plant nutrients suchas nitrogen, phosphorus andpotassium. Each day, humansexcrete in the order of 30 g ofcarbon,10-12gofnitrogen,2gofphosphorus and 3 g of potas-sium.Mostoftheorganicmatter

iscontainedinthefaeces,whilemostofthenitrogen(70-80%)andpotassiumarecontainedinurine.Thedistributionofphosphorusbetweenurineandfaecesvariesbetween30-70and 20-80 percent. The organic matter and nutrientscontainedinexcretacanberecycledandreusedasfertiliser-cum-soilconditioner,tofertilisecropsandfishponds.

The fertilising equivalent of excreta is, in theory at least,nearlysufficientforapersontogrowhisownfood(seepage41). Although this model ignores losses in the system, itmeansthatexcretafromonepersonoverthecourseofayearcontain enough nutrients to grow about 250 kg of grain.However,thevalueofnutrientsthatcanberecoveredduringrecyclingwouldbelessthanthevaluecontainedintherawexcreta.Thetypeofstorage/collectionandtreatmentdeter-mineshowmuchoftheseresourcescanberecoveredandharnessed,andatthesametimehowsafethefinalproductisfortheenduser.Somemodestlow-costtreatmentoptionsforexcretaincludeconstructedwetlands,dryingbeds,andstabilisationponds.Decomposedexcretaimprovesoilstruc-ture, increase water-holding capacity, reduce pests and

diseasesandneutralisesoiltoxins.However,farmersoftenpreferanimalmanuresbecauseoflackofknowledge,nega-tiveperception(ofstakeholders)andthepossiblehealthriskassociatedwithhumanexcretause.

Human urine isalsoawell-balanced(NPK)sourceofnutri-entsandcontainseasilyaccessibleplantnutrients.Theexactnutrientcontentdependsonaperson’sfoodconsumption.The urine collected would then be further processed andusedasalocalfertiliserinagriculturalproduction,thusclos-ingthenutrientcycle.Urineisrichinplantnutrientsrequiredforhealthier cropgrowthandhigh crop yield (Esreyet al.,1998).Completeurinediversionhasthepotentialtorecoverthemajorityofthenutrientsfromthewastewaterstream,80%ofthenitrogen(N),55%ofthephosphorus(P),60%ofthepotassium(K)aswellasasubstantialfractionofsulphurandmagnesium.Thisistheequivalentofapproximately11gN,1gP,2.5gKperpersonperday,dependingonaperson’sdiet.

Hugeamountsofurineandotherorganicwastesaregener-ateddailyinurbancentres.Theurinecanbecollectedinordi-nary jerrycans,but for largervolumes tanksarerequired.Storingurineforatleastamonthcansignificantlyreducepossiblepathogenicorganismsandmake itanevensaferfertiliser. Urine generally poses amuch lower health riskthanfaecalmaterialoranypollutedwatersource.However,whilefarmershavegenerallyacceptedtheuseofmanure,thediscussionofurineusage continues, even though theelementswefindinurinehavealreadypassedthroughthehumanbodyandmightneveragainpassthroughtheplantbarrier and return to the humanbody through ingestion(seealsoarticlesonpages37,41and43).

ISSUE Integrated Support for Sustainable Urban Environment (2007 – 2010)The aim of ISSUE-2 is to scale up sanitation and solid waste infrastructure and activities, in order to effectively contrib-ute to realising the MDGs (Millennium Development Goals). Fifteen districts (in 13 countries) are involved in the programme. Each district has set its own clear targets for these improvements and expansion. Overall this will bene-fit 75,000 households. The main beneficiaries will be the users of the systems and the entrepreneurs who provide the required services.

The ISSUE-2 programme includes the following innovative features:• Genuinely decentralised management, done by a

programme board at programme level, with district level field management.

• Using sanitation and solid waste management as the springboard to supporting sustainable livelihoods.

• A substantive focus on the sustainable modernisation of management of the urban environment: one that is based on a mix of approaches, rather than a single large technical system.

• A focus on the economic and environmental potentials to be derived from better understanding and managing

Urine application in OuagadougouPhoto: CREPA

Page 7: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

7

www.ruaf.org

From research to useAconsiderablequantityofurbanwasteisbiodegradableandhence of interest for recycling into a useful resource forurbanagricultureandotheruses.However,despitealltheknownandconvincingbenefitsofreuse-orientedsustain-ablesanitationsystems,anumberofchallengesandprob-lemsstillneedtobeovercome.Akeychallengeisthatlocallyappropriate solutionsneed tobesupportedby standards,which can also be implemented.Where for example onlypartialornowastewatertreatmentispossible,healthrisksofproductivereuseofwastewatercanbereducedthroughcomplementaryhealthriskreductionmeasuresasexplainedinthenewWHOguidelinesforsafeuseofexcretaandwaste-water(WHO2006,Drechselet al.2010).

Butinmostpartsoftheworld,thenewclosedloopsanita-tionparadigmhasnotyetreachedthelegislation,andwasteand wastewater use are not clearly incorporated intonationalor localpolicy inmostcountries. In fact, inmanycountries,thelawissilentonthereuseofhumanwaste,orisnotencouraging.Thefearofhealthimpacts,culturalbarriersandthelargerfocusonthesupplyofwaterthanitsreturnflow,mightexplain the lackofclearpolicies insupportofsafereuseoptions.

Reversingcurrenttrendsandpatternsrequirestheadoptionofholistic and integrated approaches. Inmany cases of urbanplanning, urban water and urban sanitation are managedseparately,andcertainlynotinconjunctionwithurbanfarm-ing.Multi-stakeholderconsultation, jointplanningand jointdecision-makingwillbeneededtoadaptexistingpoliciesordevelopnewones.Inviewofareuse-orientedwastemanage-ment,akeystakeholderwillbesmallandmicro-enterprises,asthesectorlacksbusinessmodels.Moreappliedresearchisalsoneededtoassessrisksandriskmanagementoptionsinsupportofthelocalpolicydialogue.

Manyurbanandperiurbanareasarevastnutrientsinks,asthe

recyclable nutrient potential from organic waste is seldomexploited and thus lost. Urban agriculture can significantlyimprovewastemanagementthroughtheproductive(andsafe)reuseofurbanorganicwastes(e.g.soilimprovement,recyclingofnutrientsoranimalfeed)andurbanwastewater(irrigationwaterandrecyclingofnutrients).Asthearticlesinthisissueshow,theinterestsofurbanwasterecyclinganduseofsanita-tionproductsgowellwiththepromotionofurbanagriculture,since urban and periurban farmers are in need of organicmatter as a soil conditioner,while cities and townswish toconservedisposalspaceandreducethecostsoflandfillsaswellasmunicipalsolidwastemanagement.Inaddition,thiscreatesother opportunities such as involvement of informalwastecollectorsandtheprivatesector.

Olufunke Cofie,IWMI-Ghana,RUAFEmail:[email protected]é van Veenhuizen,ETC-UA,RUAFVerele de Vreede, WASTEEmail:[email protected] Maessen, WASTE-ISSUE

References - Adamtey, N., Cofie, O., Forster, D., 2009. An economic analysis of

co-compost- fertiliser mixture (comlizer) use on maize production in the Accra plain of Ghana. research progress report. Submitted to iWMi and Eawag/Sandec, p. 10.

- Barker, C., G. prain, M. Warnaars, X. Warnaars, l. Wing, F. Wolf. 2007. impacts of urban agriculture: Highlights of Urban Harvest research and development, 2003-2006 peru: international potato Center. 62pp.

- Brown, A. D. (2003) Feed or Feedback: Agriculture, population Dynamics and the State of the planet, international Books, Utrecht.

- Cofie, O. A Adam-Bradford and p. Drechsel, 2006. recycling of Urban Organic Waste for Urban Agriculture. in: van Veenhuizen, r. Cities Farming for the Future, urban agriculture for green and productive cities. rUAF-iirr-iDrC.

- Drechsel, p., C.A. Scott, l. raschid-Sally, M. redwood and A. Bahri (eds.) 2010. Wastewater irrigation and health: Assessing and mitigation risks in low-income countries. Earthscan-iDrC-iWMi, UK, 404 pp. www.idrc.ca/openebooks/475-8/

- Henao and Baanante, 2006 - iAASTD: report 2009, www.agassessment.org- lock, K, and H. de Zeeuw. 2001. Mitigating the health risks associated

with urban and peri-urban agriculture, Urban Agriculture Magazine 1 (3): 6-8.

- puschenreiter Markus, Hartl Simmons, r. M. Qadir, p. Drechsel (2010) Farm-based measures for reducing human and environmental health risks from chemical constituents in wastewater. in: Drechsel, p., C.A. Scott, l. raschid-Sally, M. redwood and A. Bahri (eds.) Wastewater irrigation and health: Assessing and mitigation risks in low-income countries. Earthscan-iDrC-iWMi, UK, p. 209-238

- WASTE. 2006. End of the pipe, report, which can be downloaded from www.waste.nl

- Werner, C. 2004. Ecosan – principles, urban applications & challenges. presentation on the UN Commission on Sustainable Development, 12th session – New York, 14-30 April 2004

- WHO 2006, Guidelines can be downloaded from www.who.int/water_sa-nitation_health.

- Wilfried & Horak Othmar. 1999. Urban agriculture on heavy metal contaminated soils in Eastern Europe. Vienna: ludwig Boltzmann institute for Organic Agriculture and Applied Ecology.

resource and nutrient cycles within, and between, districts.• A commitment to exploring the synergies derived from

integrating the management of solid waste and excreta waste streams.

The programme is nearing its end and several districts have conducted research on the material cycle and possi-bilities of reuse human excreta in agriculture. Costa Rica has done a study on the effects of reusing urine in the production of corn. The results can be found in a bio-assay that will be published soon. In 2009 similar research was done with sugar cane as the crop. India also has done research on reuse of urine, focusing on application with mineral fertiliser in different ratios. The aim of the research was to study the yield as well as the positive effects on the

soil and plants. The study was carried out by the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University in 2008 – 2009. More infor-mation: www.waste.nl

The urine circuitPhoto: CREPA

Page 8: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010 www.ruaf.org

8

Closing the Rural-Urban Food and Nutrient Loops in West Africa: A reality check Pay Drechsel,

Olufunke Cofie and George Danso

Inthisstudy,weaimedatgainingabetterunder-standingoftherural-urbannutrientflows,optionsforrecy-clingandtheroleofurbanagriculturecomparedtoperiur-banandruralfarming.Four cities (Accra, Kumasi and Tamale in Ghana, andOuagadougouinBurkinaFaso)wereselectedalongaSouth-Northgradientacrossavarietyofagro-ecologicalzones.

In each city,we analysed, qualitatively and quantitatively,foodflowsrelatedtoallkeymarketsaswellastheconsump-tion and fate of the related waste. This involved market,household and street food surveys over different seasons

Rapid urbanisation in developing countries inten-sifies the challenges of making sufficient food available for the increasing urban population, and managing the related waste flow. Unlike in rural communities, there is usually little or no return of food biomass and related nutrients into the food production process. Most waste ends up on land-fills or pollutes the urban environment. This is transforming cities into vast nutrient sinks, while the rural production areas are becoming increasingly nutrient deficient (Drechsel and Kunze, 2001).

withinterviewsofmorethan1700traders,4835householdsand922streetfoodconsumers(Drechselet al.,2007).Twenty-two food items including fruits, vegetables and livestockproductswereconsidered.Presentingfoodflowsingeneralcouldbebasedonvariouscriteria,likethenumberofeachfooditem,thediversityoffooditems,ortheircalorieorvita-mincontent.Aswewereinterestedinthenutrientcyclewelookedatmassmovementsandnutrientcontent.InamoredetailedstudyinKumasi,allorganicnon-fooditems,suchastimberandfodder,werealsoconsideredtoassesstheoverallpotential fororganicwastecomposting (Belevi,2002).Thepresentstudywasaccompaniedbyademandandwilling-ness-to-payanalysisforwasteproductsinvariousfarmingsystems,andanumberofcost-benefitanalysisscenariosfordifferent demand-supply options, compost station sizes,transport capacities etc., using the financial software ofGTZ-GFA(1999)forcompostproduction.

In- and outflowsBasedontheirweight,therelativelyheavystaplecropslikeyam,cassavaandplantainformthemajorcomponentofallfoodflowsmovinginandoutofthecities,especiallyintheWestAfricanforestzone,whichisAfrica’stuberbelt.Thisisreflectedinabout600,000tonnesofyam,cassavaandplan-tainenteringKumasieveryyear,whichisnearlytwothirdsofitstotalfoodinflow.Thevolumeoftheflowrequiresthatastandard7t-transporterentersthecityeverythreeminutes

Location of the cities under study

Analysing the feasibility and viability of compost productionOrganic waste materials can be recycled into carefully processed high-grade compost for agricultural use. Long-term success of commercial production, however, depends on a number of prerequisites. One key factor is economic viabil-ity. Before establishing a composting business, it is necessary to make sure that compost production and marketing will be an economically attractive and self-financing activity. In 1999, a GTZ project on municipal waste composting compiled a useful set of materials to assist planners and decision-makers in making feasibility assessments. The information package included a computer-based tool called the “Decision-makers’ guide to compost production”. The software offers users a quick and easy method to determine, right from the outset of the planning process, the costs that will have to be covered and gives a break-down of those costs (see book section).

Page 9: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

9

www.ruaf.org

duringdaytime,asignificantlogisticalchallengeinviewofcommontrafficjams.Furthertothenorth,traditionalcere-alsarean importantpartof thediet. Rice inparticular isbecoming increasingly fashionable as an urban fast foodcomponent, both in the north and in Accra to the south.About30-50percentofthefoodenteringthecitiesleavesthemagainfromwholesalemarkets.

Food sourcesInthefourcities,foodflowsoriginatingfromruralareasarethemostimportantoverallfoodsources.Dependingonthecity,ruralfarmingcontributesbetween64and88percentofthetotalinflowtotheurbanarea,withpercentagesagainlargelydeterminedbytheweightoftubercrops.Especiallyinterestingisthedifferentiationbetweencommod-itiesandseasons,whichshowsthenicheandcontributionofurbanandperiurbanfarmingintermsoffreshleafyvegeta-bles,likespringonionandlettuce.Urbanfarmingprovidesupto90percentofthecities’consumption.Also,mostfreshmilkfound inKumasi isproduced in theurbanareaat the localuniversity. In the periurban areas of Kumasi, large poultryfarmsproduce80percentoftheeggsconsumedinthecity,whilethesefarmssufferincreasinglyfromcheappoultrymeatimports,especiallyfromBrazil.Thesituationissimilarintheotherthreecities,whereurbanand periurban farming supplies only certain commodities,and thusdoesnot contribute significantly to overall urbanfoodsecuritybuttoadiversifiedfoodsupply.Inparticular,foodrich in Vitamin A, such as carrots, local spinach, tomatoes,lettuce,beans,eggsandmilkderivepredominantlyfromurbanandperiurbanfarms.Allthesedatarefertomarket-orientedproduction. They do not include backyard farming, whichcontributestosubsistencesupply.Inthecitiesstudied,back-yardfarminginvolvesnotsomuchvegetablesbutstaples(seeUA-Magazine22,p.6),andallowsthehouseholdstosavemoneyotherwisespentonfood.Intermsofthefoodamount,however,urbanagricultureonlycontributesaround5percenttotheoverallurbanconsumptioninthecities,whileperiurbanareas(40kmradius)cancontributebetween10and36percent.

The urban nutrient sink Withthefood,largeamountsofnutrientsflowintothecities.Some food-borne nutrients find their way back into cropproduction, e.g. throughorganicwaste recycling inurbanbackyards.Buttheoverallpictureshowssignificantnutrientlosses(depletion)inruralareasandhugenutrientaccumu-lationandlossinurbanareas.Asthebulkofthewasteendsinstreets,drainsorlandfills,urbancentresareindeednutri-ent‘sinks’(seefigure).Thishassignificantimplicationsforenvironmentalpollution.

Closing the nutrient loop – not so easy!Toclosethenutrientcycleitisnecessarytobringthenutri-entsbackintofoodproduction.Thismightbeeasyinruralareaswhereconsumptionandproductionare“neighbours”,butalongtherural-urbancorridorthisbecomesasignificantlogisticalandfinancialchallenge.Nevertheless, it is impor-tanttonotethefateoffoodandnutrientsinthecity“organ-ism”:Alargeshareofthefoodbroughtintothecitiesleavesthecityagainthroughtrade.ThedatafromKumasi,Ghana,

showthatoutoftheconsumedfoodanditswasteproductsbeforeandafterconsumptioninhouseholds,about•15percentofthenitrogenistransferredtotheatmospherefromthehouseholds

•20percentofthenitrogenandphosphorusarecollectedwith waste and then landfilled or processed in faecalsludgetreatmentplants

•65-80percentof thenitrogenandphosphorus, respec-tively,arelostfromseptictanks,viawastewateroruncol-lectedsolidwastetotheenvironment.

Currently,about18percentofthegeneratedsolidwasteand66 per cent of the faecal sludge remain uncollected inKumasi’sstreets,pitsandseptictanks.Thenutrientvalueofthenon-collectedsolidandliquidwaste(sludge)wouldintheorybesufficient topaytheservicecostsofsolidwastemanagementforthewholecity(USD180,000permonth).Fromatechnicalperspective,partofthisenvironmentalloadcouldbereducedviawastecompostingorco-compostingofsolidwastewithfaecalsludge.InKumasi,230,000–250,000tonnesof organicwasteand inAccra 255,000 to 366,000tonnesoforganicwasteareeffectivelyavailableannuallyforcomposting, meaning that these amounts are alreadycollectedandhavenoothercurrentuse.ThenutrientcontentofthiswasteinAccraaloneisestimatedat3,500to5,300tonnesperyearofnitrogen,1,700to2,600tonnesperyearofphosphorusand760–1,100tonnesperyearofpotassium.Theseamountscouldeasilycovertheentirenutrientdemand

Balance of imported and exported nutrients per capita in the rural-urban continuum, based on the four cities studied

Valuable resources not recoveredPhoto: Pay Drechsel

Page 10: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

10

www.ruaf.org

Closing the rural-Urban Food and Nutrient loops in West Africa: A reality check

of urban farming. In a scenariowhich only considers theamount of waste already collected and transported to alandfill,about60percentoftheproducedcompostcouldbeusedtoreplenishallurbanfarmsoilsinKumasi.Ifallwastewerecollected,30percentofthecompostwouldbesuffi-cient,whiletherestcouldbesoldoutsidethecity.However,ifthecompostissoldatapricewhichcoversitsproductioncosts,onlyasmall fractionofabout 1000 tonnesperyearwouldbebought,whilemore than100,000tonneswould

remain in the warehouses.Andevenifsubsidised,trans-port costs would limitcompost sale to a narrowradius around its distribu-tionpoints.These economic constraintsfavour community-basedprojects, with low produc-tioncostsduetooftencheaplabour. However, theamountsproducedandsolddonotneedorallowecono-

mies of scale, and thus cannot contribute significantly tooverallurbanwastemanagement.Theselimitationsclearlyshowthattheideaof“closingtherural-urbannutrientloop”isspatiallyconstrainedandnotgenerallyrealistic.Whileitisfeasibletotransporthigh-value(food) products over long distances and through variousmiddlemenintothecity,itishardlyfeasibletotransportawasteproductthesamewayback,unlesstherearefavour-ablemarketconditions,suchasapotentbuyer,addedvalue,nocompetitionorstrongsubsidies:• Awin-winsituationcouldforexamplebeaprivate-publicpartnership linking public compost stations and realestatedevelopersinterestedinlargeamountsofcompostforgardening,asobservedinAccra.

• InKumasi,amixoffertiliserandcomposthasbeentestedthatincreasesthevalueofthewasteproduct.Thiscouldcreatenewdemand.

• However,inthesamecity,andmanyothers,compostsalessufferwhen cheap poultrymanure is available. Poultrymanurehasahighnitrogencontent,whichiseasilyavail-able,whilecompostisoftenpoorinnitrogenanddecom-poses slowly. Despite its positive impact on soil watercontentetc.,itisnotattractiveforexoticvegetables,likelettuce,whichhaveagrowingperiodofonly5-6weeks.Thusmarket analysis shouldnot only look at a specificproductbutalsoatcompetingproducts.

• Many city authorities have stressed that composting ismostwelcomeasameans to reducewastevolume (i.e.transportcosts).Thuscompostproduction-evenwithoutanymarket-savesmoney,whichcouldbeusedtofinancethe composting itself.Compost saleswere consideredasecondaryissueorbonus.Thisfavourableviewofcompost-ingstemsfromtheincreasingproblemsfacedbyauthori-tiesinfindingcommunity-supportedlandfillsitesinthevicinity of the cities, while local communities are lessreluctanttoacceptacompoststation.Fromthispointofview, compost stations should be planned as close aspossibletothepointsofwastegeneration;andfromthe

salesperspective, asdecentralisedaspossible. Knowingthedailyproductionoforganicwaste,transportcostsandstation costs, it is possible to determine the optimalnumber of decentralised compost stations that wouldminimise costs. In the caseofAccra, thesewould rangefrom6(tocoverthemostoptimisticagriculturalandnon-agriculturalcompostdemand)to33stations(toreduceasmuchwastevolumeaspossible).

• Arguments in support of subsidies could build on thereductionofenvironmentalpollutioninthecity(upto20percentinKumasi),butwouldofcoursebemorepersua-sivewith improved collection capacity.This concerns inparticular improved excreta management from septictanks,sincethemostsignificantnitrogenandphosphorusfluxestosoil,surfacewatersandgroundwateroccurviafaecesandurine.

ConclusionsWhileitiseasytodemandclosedloopconcepts,thenumberofsuccessstoriesusuallydecreaseswithincreasingscalefromhousehold to community to city-wide initiatives. To lookbehindthecommongoalsofclosedloopconcepts,thisstudyputmuchemphasisonactualcompostdemandandeconomicfeasibility.Theanalysisshowedthatclosingtherural-urbanloopispossibleformanufacturedhigh-valuefoodproducts,whichwillreturntotheirruralroots,butonlyunderparticularconditions for low-value waste products, like compost.Therefore,anyinitiativeaimingatnutrientrecoveryshouldcarefullyanalyselocaldemandandmarkets.

Pay DrechselInternationalWaterManagementInstitute,Colombo,SriLanka.Email:[email protected] Cofie and George DansoInternationalWaterManagementInstitute,Accra,[email protected]

References - Danso, G., p. Drechsel and O. Cofie. 2008. large-scale urban waste

composting for urban and peri-urban agriculture in West Africa: An integrated approach to provide decision support to municipal authorities, in: parrot l. et al. (eds). Agricultures et développement urbain en Afrique subsaharienne : environnement et enjeux sanitaires. paris: l’Harmattan (Ethique économique) p.51-62

- Danso, G., p. Drechsel, S. Fialor and M. Giordano. 2006. Estimating the demand for municipal waste compost via farmers’ willingness- to-pay in Ghana. Waste Management 26 (2006) 1400–1409- Drechsel, p. and D. Kunze (Eds.) 2001. Waste Composting for Urban

and peri-urban Agriculture - Closing the rural-urban nutrient cycle in Sub-Saharan Africa. iWMi/FAO/CABi: Wallingford, 229 pages.- Drechsel, p.; S. Graefe, S.; and M. Fink, 2007. rural-urban food,

nutrient and virtual water flows in selected West African cities. Colombo, Sri lanka: international Water Management institute. 35p (iWMi research report 115) http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/publications/iWMi_research_reports/pDF/pub115/rr115.pdf

- GTZ-GFA. 1999. Utilization of organic waste in peri-urban centers. The decision makers’ guide to compost production (with financial

analysis tool); Software Tool - Economic Model, Version 0.9 E, GFA, Germany

- leitzinger, Ch. (2000). ist eine Co-Kompostierung aus stofflicher Sicht in Kumasi/Ghana sinnvoll? MSc Thesis. ETH, Zurich,

Switzerland.

Leafy vegetables like nitrogenPhoto: Pay Drechsel

Page 11: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

11

www.ruaf.orgUrban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

Analysing the Nexus of Sanitation and Agriculture at Municipal Scale Pay Drechsel

Marco Erni

To better understand the linkage between sanita-tion and agriculture at municipal scale, a study was carried out that addressed the following research questions:- How does a larger investment in flush toilets affect

water quality and urban farmers?- How much of the nutrient demand of urban farm-

ers could be covered through waste composting?

Modellingisrequiredtoanswerthesequestionsatmunici-pal scale. A common approach is to quantify water andnutrientflows,forexample,viamaterialflowanalysis(MFA)(seebox). MFAhasbeenusedextensively toquantify theflowsoffoodandothermaterialspassingthroughcities,therelatedconsumptionandamountsofwastegenerated,aswellasthefateofthatwaste.Oncethepathwaysandquan-titiesareknown,thesameflowscanbebrokendownintostreams of nutrients, biomass, energy, etc. This analysisallowsresearcherstoidentifypointsinthesystematwhichinterventions to reduce the environmental burden orincreaseresourceefficiencywouldbemostappropriate.Theanalysis becomes decision support when scenarios arecalculatedtoseehowtheflowswillbeaffectedbypopula-tion growth or certain investments in infrastructure ortransportcapacity.

The InternationalWaterManagement Institute (IWMI) andSANDEC/EAWAGappliedMFA twice in Kumasi, Ghana, firstwithemphasisonsolidwasteandoptionsforco-compostingforurbanagriculture,latertounderstandnutrientflowsinthehouseholdwastewatersystems,focusingparticularlyonurbanandperiurbanfarmersexposedtohighlypollutedwater.Severalscenariosweremodelledto• quantifytheamountsofnutrientswhichcouldberecov-eredfromthesystembeforetheyarelostonlandfillsortheenvironment,

• quantify future urban water needs and wastewatergenerationand

• identify the impactof changingsanitationpracticesonwaterpollutionandnutrientavailabilityforfarming.

Thescenariosconsideredvarioustypesofinvestmentsthatare planned in Kumasi as part of efforts to achieve theMillennium Development Goals (MDGs). The modellingshowedinterestingresults(Leitzinger,2000;Erni,2007;Ernietal.,2010),someaspectsofwhicharehighlightedhereto

illustratetheapplicationpotentialofMFA:• The planned investments in urban water supply wouldlargely be outpaced by population growth in the sameperiod resulting in amuch smaller improvement in percapitasupplythanofficiallyaimedat.Italsoshowedthatiftheexpansionworkwasdelayed (asoftenhappens),percapitawateravailabilityinKumasiwouldactuallydecrease.Inallscenarios,theamountofwaterpercapitawouldnotsurpasstheminimumforconventionalseweroperation.

• Evenifthecitydoesnotaimatsewerageandoptsformoreflushingtoiletsconnectedtoseptictanks,asiscommonnow, more toilets in certain better-off districts wouldstronglycompetewithotherhouseholdwaterneedsanddrasticallyaffectwatersupplytotheaveragehouseholdinKumasi.

• Fromthenutrientperspective,thetoiletswoulddecreasetheamountofnutrientsdirectlyenteringsurfacewaterviagutters,buttoamuchlargerextentincreasethenutri-entsenteringgroundwaterfromtheseptictanks,whicharehardlyeveremptied.Thiswouldresultinanetincreaseofnutrientsreleasedtotheenvironment.

TheMFAshowedthatduetothecontinuingscarcityofdrink-ingwater,Kumasi,likemanyotherAfricancities,canachievethesanitationMDGbetter through investments inwater-saving toilet systems. A higher fraction of dry sanitationsystemswould not only have a positive impact onwaterdemand but also reduce the nutrients released into thewater cycle (as has also been shown byMontangero andBelevi(2007)forVietnam).

Whathappenstothenutrientsreleasedtotheenvironment?Themajorityfindtheirwayintothestreamspassingthroughthecity.ComparedtothenutrientlevelsupstreamofKumasi,the nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations down-streamof the cityareapproximately 14and6 timeshigher,respectively. In absolute figures, the amounts correspondapproximatelytohalfoftheannuallygeneratedhumanexcretainKumasi,and indeed the largestNandP input intowaterbodiesderivesfromdomesticsources,i.e.failingsanitation.

Thisnutrientloadmovesdownstreampassinghundredsoffarmerswhousethewatertoirrigatetheirvegetables.Morethan50percentofthefarmersinurbanandperiurbanKumasiareawarethattheirirrigationwatercontainsnutrients,butonlyasmallpercentageshowedahighlevelofawarenessandindicatedthat theyregularlyconsiderthiswhilemanagingcropnutrientneeds.Thereasonsforthisaretwo-fold:a)Farmersusethewaterfirstofalltoirrigatehighlyperish-

Page 12: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

12

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010 www.ruaf.org

ReferencesErni, M. (2007). Modelling urban water flows: An insight into current and future water availability and pollution of a fast growing city. Case Study of Kumasi, Ghana. MSc thesis. Swiss Federal institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland. (http://e-collection.ethbib.ethz.ch/ecol-pool/dipl/dipl_307.pdf; accessed on 23. July 2009)

Erni, M., p. Drechsel, H-p. Bader, r. Scheidegger, C. Zurbruegg and r. Kipfer (2010). Bad for the environment, good for the farmer? Urban sanitation and nutrient flows. irrigation and Drainage Systems. Special issue on Wastewater reuse (in press)

leitzinger, Ch. (2000). ist eine Co-Kompostierung aus stofflicher Sicht in Kumasi/Ghana sinnvoll? MSc Thesis. ETH, Zurich, Switzerland.

Montangero, A. and H. Belevi. (2007). Assessing nutrient flows in septic tanks by eliciting expert judgment: A promising method in the context of developing countries. Water research 41, 1052-1064.

able crops; thus irrigation frequency depends on cropwaterneedsandnotnutrientneeds.

b)Withoutoptionsforwater,soilorcropanalysis,farmers’nutrientmanagementdependsonobservationsthattheymakeofthecropsandtheirowngeneralexperience.Aswaternutrientloadsalsovary,farmersprefertostayonthesafesideandapplye.g.poultrymanureorchemicalfertiliseraccordingtotheirownexperience.

Farmers do not tend to reduce theirmanure applicationratesover time.Thisresultseasily inover-fertilisationandnutrientimbalances,whichwasverifiedinthiscaseusingtheNUTMONmodel (seebox).This situation can stronglyaffectcropgrowth.Fortunately,incontrasttomostcereals,leafyvegetablesloveexcessnitrogen.

TheMFAisonlyoneofseveralmethodsneededtoanswerquestions like thoseposed above. Looking only at alreadycollected and transported solid waste and excreta, theKumasiMFAshowedthattheamountofNandPthatcouldberecycled throughco-compostingwouldbesufficient tocoverthedemandofallurbanfarmersandevensomefarm-ers inKumasi’speriurbanfringe(see thepreviousarticle).However,evenifallnutrientswereavailableatoneormorecompost stations, adetailedanalysiswouldbeneeded todeterminehowmanyfarmersareactuallyinterestedintheproduct (or already have a cheaper fertiliser, like poultrymanure),howmanyofthosewhoareinterestedwouldbewillingtopayfortheproductatapricethatcoversthecostofoperatingthecompoststation,andhowmuchtheyarewillingtopayinadditionforthetransporttoreachtheprod-uct. InthecaseofKumasi,theanswerstothesequestionsshowedthatthefinaltargetgroupwouldbesosmallthatcomposting only the urban market waste would alreadycovertheirdemand.Thisagainwasanimportantmessageasitmeansthattoreachthetargetgroup,thereisnoneedto introducewastesorting(organic– inorganic)athouse-holdleveltohaveenoughorganicwasteforcomposting.Toreachalargergroupofusers,theaboveconstraintswillhavetoberemoved.

Analysing nutrient flows and balances There are various ways to analyse nutrient flows and balances in urban or rural systems, on farms or for whole cities, these are two examples.

NUTMON is an integrated model which allows farmers and researchers to jointly analyse nutrient flows and balances at the farm or plot level to improve soil fertility manage-ment. NUTMON software is easy to use and a free global public good. It can be used to analyse nutrient balances at village, regional, national, and supra-national levels and to better understand the effects of current and alternative land use options on productivity, farm finances and sustain-ability. NUTMON looks primarily at in- and outflows, rather than internal processes, to determine whether there will be a nutrient deficiency or a surplus. In addition to major nutrient inflows and outflows (erosion, leaching, harvest, fertilisation, atmospheric deposition, etc.), the NUTMON Toolbox considers interactions with livestock and human activities such as household waste recycling. It can also link the nutrient flows with financial assessments. More information: http://www.nutmon.orgExamples of the use of NUTMON in periurban vegetable farming: www.vegsys.nl

Material flow analysis or flux analysis (MFA) goes beyond NUTMON and allows researchers to capture all flows in and out of the black box as well as between different compo-nents or transfer points in the box. It describes the fluxes of resources used and transformed as they flow through a city or region, using a defined space and time frame. In indus-trialised countries, MFA proved to be a suitable instrument for early recognition of environmental problems and devel-opment of solutions to these problems. The scientific basis is more complex than that of NUTMON and based on the law of conservation of matter and energy. One commonly used MFA programme is SIMBOX, which was developed at the Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (EAWAG), Zürich, Switzerland. Licenses for its use can be obtained from EAWAGMore information and application examples: www.eawag.chwww.eawag.ch/organisation/abteilungen/sandec/publika-tionen/publications_sesp/downloads_sesp/MFA_lecture_notes_05.pdfwww.eawag.ch/organisation/abteilungen/sandec/schwer-punkte/sesp/mfa/index_EN.

Analysing the Nexus of Sanitation and Agriculture at Municipal Scale

Pay Drechsel International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.e-mail:[email protected] Erni Eawag,SwissFederalInstituteofAquaticScienceandTechnology.

Page 13: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

13

www.ruaf.org

Phosphate rock - the main source of phosphorus used in ferti-lisers - is a finite resource, and global production of high-qual-ity phosphate rock is estimated to peak by 2033 (Cordell et al., 2009), after which demand for fertilisers will exceed supply (also see the box in the editorial).

Material flow analysis EAWAG/SANDECanditspartnersinVietnamhavedevelopedatooltoestimateandvisualisewaterandnutrientflowsina region. The tool links urban organic waste/wastewatermanagementandurbanagriculture.Concretely,itconsistsof a computermodelmade up of a series of Excel-based

Closing the Phosphorus Loop in Hanoi, VietnamIn Hanoi, Vietnam, water bodies are polluted by high levels of nutrients, which are discharged in wastewater. At the same time, farmers in and around the city use artificial fertilisers. A nutrient accounting tool indicates where to set priorities to enhance nutrient recovery, and in this way reduce water pollution and the mining of limited phos-phorus reserves. The analysis in this article focuses on phosphorus.

Agnès Montangero

nutrientaccountingsheets.Theuserentersvariousparam-eters,suchasthenumberofinhabitants,typeofsanitationsystem,areaundercultivationandlivestockpopulation.Themodel subsequently estimates, for instance, phosphorusinputsintosurfacewatersandphosphorusrecoveryforagri-culturaluse.Themodelisdesignedtosupportlocalactorsinanalysingtheimpactofdifferentmeasuresonfertiliserneedandnutrientdischargeintheenvironment.

Thetoolisbasedonmaterialflowanalysis(MFA).Thismethodstudiesthefluxesofresourcesusedandtransformedastheyflowinaspecifiedregion. In industrialisedcountries,MFAprovedtobeasuitableinstrumentfortheearlyrecognition

Wastewater irrigation in periurban HanoiPhoto: Montangero

Simplified representation of the environmental sanitation and urban agriculture system of Hanoi Province

Page 14: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010 www.ruaf.org

14

of environmental problems and development of counter-measures(BacciniandBrunner,1991).Itcanalsobeappliedin rapidly developing cities in the South to evaluate theimpactofchangesinconsumptionpatterns,solidwasteandwastewater treatment infrastructure, periurban agricul-turalproduction,andwasteandwastewaterreusepracticesonresourceconsumptionandenvironmentalpollution.

Phosphorus supply and demand in HanoiInHanoi, likeinmanyothercitiesindevelopingcountries,high population growth, industrialisation and economicdevelopmenthave led to increasedresourceconsumptionandenvironmentaldegradation.Periurbanagricultureisofkeyimportanceinthesupplyoffoodandprovisionofincome,especiallytothepoorestsectionofthepopulation.However,rapidurbanisationalsocreatespressureontheland.Farmerstendtousemorefertilisersinanattempttoenhanceyieldandmaximise benefit from their decreasing land area. Abetter balance between nutrient supply in urban wasteproductsandnutrientdemandinperiurbanfoodproduc-tioncouldbethekeytoreducingresourceconsumptionandenvironmentalpollution(Montangeroet al.,2007).

The MFA tool was applied to demonstrate the effects ofselectedextremescenariosonphosphorusinputsintotheriverandonphosphorus recovery foragriculturaluse. Forthispurpose,theeffectsofvariousparameters,suchasthetypeofsanitationsystem,areaundercultivationandlive-stockpopulationweresimulated.

The impact of urine diversion toiletsToillustratethemodel,thisarticlelooksattheimpactthatthetypeofsanitationsystemhasonphosphorusrecovery(moreinformationanddifferentscenarioscanbefoundinMontangeroet al.,2007andMontangeroandBelevi,2008).

InHanoi,mostbuildingsareconnectedtoseptictanks,whichcollect wastewater from toilets. Most of the phosphoruscontainedintoiletwastewaterleavestheseptictankinthepre-treatedeffluent(septictanksdonotretainphosphorusefficiently).Effluentfromseptictanksandgreywater(laun-dry,kitchenandbathwastewater)reachsurfacewatersviaroadsidedrainage channels.Together, theyaccount for94percentofthetotalphosphorusloadinHanoi’swaterbodies.Onlyasmallproportionofthisphosphorusloadisrecoveredforuseinfoodproduction.

Urinediversiontoiletsoffercrucialadvantagesoverseptictankswithregardtophosphorusrecovery,sincethesetoiletshavetwocompartments,keepingurineandfaecesseparate.Urine leaves the toilet through a pipe / tube. Faeces arestoreddirectlybeneaththetoilet.Afterdefecation,drysoil,ashorsawdustisspreadoverthefaeces,controllingodourandabsorbingmoisture.Therearegenerallytwochambersforfaecesusedalternatively.Whenoneofthechambersisfull,theotherisusedandthefaeces/ashmixtureisstoredinthefirstcompartmentforaboutayear.Duringthisperiod,pathogenicmicroorganismsdieoff,substantiallyreducingthehealthrisksassociatedwithreuseof themixtureasafertiliser in agriculture. The urine, meanwhile, possibly

References- Baccini p, Brunner pH, 1991. Metabolism of the Anthroposphere.

Springer, New York.- Cordell D, Schmid-Neset T, White S, Drangert JO, 2009. preferred

future phosphorus scenarios: A framework for meeting long-term phosphorus needs for global food demand. in: International Conference on Nutrient Recovery from Wastewater Streams. Edited By K. Ashley, D. Mavinic, F. Koch. iWA publishing, london, UK.

- Esrey S, Gough J, rapaport D, Sawyer r, Simpson-Hébert M, Vargas J, Winblad U (ed), 1998. Ecological Sanitation. Swedish international Development Cooperation Agency, Stockholm, 1998.

- Montangero A, Belevi H, 2008. An approach to optimise nutrient management in environmental sanitation systems despite limited data. Journal of Environmental Management 88:1538–1551.

- Montangero A, Cau lN, Viet Anh N, Tuan VD, Nga pT, Belevi H, 2007. Optimising water and phosphorus management in the environmental sanitation system of Hanoi, Vietnam. Science of the Total Environment 384:55–66.

diluted, can be used for irrigation. This system makes itpossible to retain all the nutrients contained in humanexcreta–apartfromasmallamountofnitrogenvolatilisingduringurine storage.These nutrients could subsequentlytaketheplaceofsomeoftheartificialfertilisersusedinagri-culture.ItisinterestingtonotethatthiskindofsystemwasformerlywidespreadinNorthVietnam.

Theextenttowhichphosphorusrecoverycouldpotentiallybeincreasedwasquantified.Assuming,forexample,thatallseptictanks in Hanoi were replaced by urine diversion toilets, theamount of artificial phosphorus fertiliser required could bereduced from 2800 to 1200 tonnes per year – a 57 per centdecrease!Thisisonesteptowardsclosingthephosphorusloop.

Need for an integrated planning approachTo further develop scenarios such as that involving urinediversion for Hanoi (or other cities), more information isneededonusers’perceptionsofnewsanitaryfacilities,thecostsandwhethertheseareacceptabletousers,longertermmarketanalysis,etc.MFAcouldbeusedasatoolinintegratedplanningthatinvolvesallstakeholders.

Agnès Montangero Eawag/SandecandSkat–SwissResourceCentreandConsultanciesforDevelopmentEmail:[email protected]

Relative contributions of various sources to the total phosphorus load in Hanoi’s surface waters

Closing the phosphorus loop in Hanoi, Vietnam

Page 15: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

15

www.ruaf.org

Assessing Patterns of Nitrogen Management in Periurban Agriculture of Hanoi, Vietnam

Dionys Forster, Harald Menzi, Roland Schertenleib, Bernd Lennartz

Urbanfooddemandwillstronglyincreaseinthecomingdecades,especiallyinAfricaandAsia.Citiesconsti-tuteasortof“nutrientsink”(Belevi,2000;Drechseletal.onpage8ofthisissue),sincesomecomponentsoftheimportedagriculturalproductsendupinwaterwaysoronlandfills.Betteruseoforganicresiduesinurbanandperiurbanagri-culture couldhelpovercome thewasteproblemand savelimitedresourceswhilecontributingtosustainedfoodsecu-rity(DrechselandKunze,2001;Schertenleibet al.,2004).

Knowledgeofexistingandpotentialpatterns incropandnutrientmanagement,isapre-requisiteforanywastereusescenario.Therefore,thenutrientuseinurbanandperiurbanagriculturalsystemsneedstobeanalysed,inordertoavoidsurplusapplicationoffertiliser.Thisarticlehighlightsexpe-riences froma study undertaken inHanoi and publishedearlieras”Exploringspatiallyexplicitcroprotationmodelsforperiurbanagriculturalproductionsystems”(Forsteret al.,2009a)and”Linkingnutrientflowstospatiallyexplicitcroprotations”(Forsteret al.,2009b).

To identify the potential for organic waste reuse for agricultural production in and around a city, in so-called “spatially explicit scenarios of re-use”, it is necessary to analyse existing patterns of nutrient management. These management patterns are mainly influenced by the type of crops cultivated, the distance between the field and the farmer’s homestead and the perceived soil fertility.

Bac Hong, HanoiThe commune Bac Hong, in north Hanoi, was selectedbecause of its diverse periurban production system. Thecommunecovers7.2km2offlatland,ofwhich5.1km2isallo-catedtomixedfarming,includingcropandlivestockproduc-tion.Staplecropssuchaspaddyrice(Oryza s.L.),sweetpotato(Ipomoea batatasL)andcashcropslikemaize(Zea maizeL.)arethemaincropsforthewarmandhumidtropicalfirstandsecondseasons(mid-Februarytomid-Juneandmid-Junetomid-October), while maize and other cash crops such asvegetablesaregrownonareducedareaoflandduringthecoolerthirdseason(OctobertoFebruary).

The studyThirty-four farmers were selected from all parts of thecommune.The selected farms had 5 to 7 fields each thatrangedfromsmall(79m2)tolarge(862m2).Semi-structuredinterviewsandadifferentialGPSsystemwereusedfordatacollection. Similar toNUTMON (seepage 11), the crop, soilconditions (e.g. farmer’s perceived soil fertility) and themanagement practice of each field was discussed andrecordedonafarmmapduringfieldvisitsintwoconsecu-tiveyears(2005/2006).Threedifferentyearlycroprotationswere evaluated: 1) staple crop based,with two staple cropseasons and one fallow season; 2) cash crop accentuated,withtwostaplecropandonecashcropseason;and3)cash crop based,withthreecashcropseasons.

Factorsthatpossiblyinfluencedthechoiceofcroprotationswere:distance from thehomestead to the field, field size,perceived soil fertility, water availability, topography andlivestock.Theimportanceofthesefactorswasanalysedtoexplainwhyaspecificrotationwasused.Sincetheenviron-mentand landusestrongly influence thecombinationofcrops inrotation,ratherfixedpatterns inrequirementsofproductionsourcescouldbeexpected.Thus,inasecondstep,nutrientflowsassociatedwithcroprotationswereanalysed.Organic,inorganicandtotal(inorganic+organic)nitrogenfertiliserinputswereusedasindicatorsfornutrientflows.The nutrient inputs were farmyard manure, compost orinorganicsourcessuchaschemicalfertilisers.

Crop allocation Thedistancefromthehomesteadtothefieldprovedtobeanimportant influencing factor. Farmers whose fields werelocatedfartherfromtheirhomesteadsweremorelikelytochoosecroprotationsbasedonstaplefoodcrops,whilethecloserthefieldwastothehomestead,themorelikelyacroprotationwithcashcropssuchasvegetableswouldbeused.Interviewing farmers on their farming system

Photo: D. Forster

Page 16: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

16

www.ruaf.orgUrban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

Inadditiontodistance,perceivedsoilfertilityplayedarole:thelikelihoodoffindingcashcropsinrotationwashigheronplots with perceived high soil fertility. With increasingdistanceanddecreasingperceivedsoilfertility,thenumberof cash crops in rotation decreasedwhile the number ofstaplecropsincreased.

Nutrient managementTotal, inorganic andorganicnitrogen fertiliser inputs (260,210,50kgha-1, respectively)weresignificantly lowerfor thestaplecropbasedrotation.Furthermore,meantotalnitrogenfertiliserinputwasfoundtobesignificantlyhigherforcashcropbasedrotation(540kgha-1)thanforthecashcropaccen-tuatedrotation(480kgha-1).Inaddition,variationoforganicfertiliserinputswasconsiderablyhighamongallrotations.Ingeneral, theaveragenitrogen inputcontributedbyorganic

fertiliserwasfarhigherforthecashcropaccentuated (110 kg ha-1) and cash cropbased(120kgha-1)rotationsthanforthestaplecropbased(50kgha-1)rotation.Thelatter can be partially explained by thefactthatthecashcropsusuallyrespondwell to the application of organicmanures. Longer distance and limitedavailability of organic manures furtherpronouncedthepattern.Asafirstprior-ity, farmers applied manure on closefields with a high proportion of cash

crops.Only ifmanurewas leftover itwas thenappliedonmoredistantfieldsdominatedbystaplecropbasedrotations.Likewise,whenfarmerswereasked toallocateorganicandinorganicfertiliserondifferentfieldsofanexemplaryfarm,themajorityoforganicfertiliserwasappliedonfieldsclosetothehomestead.Farmersarguedthatorganicfertilisershouldbeusedonallfields,butinpractice,theyoftenwouldtrytoeconomisefertilisermanagement.Thoughfarmersknewthatcropsbenefitfromorganicmatterapplication,theyprimarilyappliedthebulkymanureoncashcrops,closetotheirhome-steads.Conversely, inorganicfertilisercouldeasilybetrans-portedbybicycletostaplecroprotationsonremotefields.

ReferencesBelevi, H., 2000. Material flow analysis: a planning tool for organic waste management in Kumasi, Ghana. 03.04.14 2003 http://www.gtz.de/ecosan/download/belevi.pdf

Drechsel, p. and Kunze, D. (Editors), 2001. Waste Composting for Urban and peri-urban Agriculture: Closing the rural-Urban Nutrient Cycle in sub-Sahara Africa. CABi, iWMi, FAO, Wallingford, Colombo, rome, 229 pp.

Forster, D., Amini, M., Menzi, H. and lennartz, B., 2009a. Exploring spatially explicit crop rotation models for peri-urban agricultural production systems. sumitted to Agricultural Systems.

Forster, D., Amini, M., Menzi, H. and lennartz, B., 2009b. linking nutrient flows to spatially explicit crop rotations. sumitted to Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment.

Schertenleib, r., Forster, D. and Belevi, H., 2004. An integrated approach to environmental sanitation and urban agriculture. Acta Hort. (iSHS). 643, 223-226.

ConclusionCroprotationscanbespatiallyexplicit:thecroprotationmaychangedependingonwherethefieldislocatedandhowsoilfertilityisperceived.Asdifferentcropshavedifferentnutri-entrequirements,fertiliserinputislikelytochangeaswell,dependingonthecroprotation.However,croprotationsaretemporalandallowthesummingupofnutrientinputsoverthe entire rotation (e.g. spanning one year).Variations innutrientsupply,whichareoftendifficulttoexplainatlargerscales,canthusbeconsolidatedandpresentedinonefigure.Forinstance,whendifferentcropsweregroupedintorota-tions,thecoefficientofvariationoftotalnitrogeninputwasalmost10percentlessthanforsinglecrops.Therefore,ifthecommuneorvillageareacanbemappedaccordingtocroprotations,itispossibletoestimatenitrogeninputsfortheclassifiedarea.Inaddition,theareawithhighorloworganicfertiliserusecanbeidentified.Besidesnitrogeninputs,dataoncropoutputscouldalsobeassessedandusedfornutrientbalanceestimates. Furthermore, insteadofonlyassessingnitrogen,phosphorousorpotassiumcouldalsobeincludedtoprovideamorecomprehensivepictureofnutrientflowsfortherespectivecommuneorvillage.

Dionys Forster ResearchInstituteofOrganicAgriculture(FiBL),Switzerland.Email:[email protected] Menzi Swiss College of Agriculture (SHL), Berne University of AppliedSciences,Switzerland.Email:[email protected] Schertenleib Eawag:SwissFederal InstituteofAquaticScienceandTechnology,Switzerland.Email:[email protected] Lennartz InstituteforLandUse,RostockUniversity,Germany.Email:[email protected]

Assessing patterns of Nitrogen Management in periurban Agriculture of Hanoi, Vietnam

In the periurban commune of Bac Hong, Hanoi, organic manure is still highly appreciated by farmers. In general, total nitrogen fertiliser supplies are sufficient to meet the crops’ nutrient requirement. Since organic fertilisers cover only a small fraction of the crops’ total nitrogen requirement (20 – 30 per cent), reuse of organic waste still has an impor-tant development potential. Surplus application of organic fertilisers has not been observed; however, surplus applica-tion of inorganic fertilisers may, in some cases, give cause for concern. Additional organic waste reuse in the commune could contribute to reducing application of mineral fertilis-ers. Possible obstacles include costs associated with transport of the waste, its quality (e.g. pathogens, heavy metals, etc.), and the lack of incentive among farmers to use the rather bulky organic waste instead of easily manageable mineral fertilisers.

Data collection in Bac HongPhoto: D. Forster

Cash crops are cultivated closer to the homesteadsPhoto: D. Forster

Page 17: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

17

www.ruaf.org

Nutrient Cycles in Three African Cities Diana Lee-Smith

Nancy KaranjaMary Njenga

Thomas DongmoGordon Prain

Urban Harvest developed its programme andsupported researchasdescribed in the forthcomingbookUrban Harvest: Agriculture in the Cities of East and Central Africa.Thethreecitiesfeaturedinthisarticleallwantedtostudy nutrient cycles in urban agriculture as one of thetopicsoftheCGIARresearch.Asco-authorsofthesestudies,wesummariseanddiscussthefindingshere.

Nairobi, KenyaSeventypercentoftheKenyancapital’ssolidwasteisbiode-gradableandcouldpotentiallybeusedforlivestockfeedorcompostmaking. Every yearnutrientsworth aboutUSD 2millioncouldbegeneratedfromthecity’sestimated635,000tonnes of waste. However, our preliminary mapping oforganic waste flows in 2003-2004 found that they aremanagedbyafewlargeandsmall-scaleactorsinanuncoor-dinated way, mostly outside the market. Since on-farmmeasurementswerenot taken,wemappedbut couldnotmodelNairobi’stotalnutrientinflowandoutflow.

Wefoundthatthematerialsandmarketflowsofcompostandmanureareentirelydisconnectedfromeachother.Both,however,arecharacterisedbylackofmarketinformationandad hoc arrangements between producers and consumers.Thisappliedtobothlargecommercialfarmsandlandscapers,and small farmers needing items like livestock fodder ortryingtogetridof livestockwastes.At thefinalworkshop,wheretheresearchresultswerediscussed,farmersidentifiedtheirlackofsecurityandsafetyininformalsettlementsasthemainconstrainttonutrientcycling.

Atthetimeofthestudy,only0.6percentofthecity’stotalannual organic waste (2500 t) was being processed ascompost by community-based organisations (CBOs).However,theseorganisationsarenotthemainactorsinvolvedinmanagingNairobi’snutrientflows;theyareout-numberedbyurbanhouseholdsengagedinmixedcrop-livestockfarm-ing.Thesefarmersrecyclenutrientseitherontheirownfarms

orthroughnon-marketexchanges.Basedondatafroma1985samplesurveyinNairobi,weestimatedthat54,500house-holdsin2003(35percentofallNairobifarmers)usedcompost.Mostofthesehouseholds(91percent)producethecompostthemselves.Twenty-ninepercentofallNairobifarmers(esti-matedat37,700householdsin2003)usedlivestockmanuretofertilisetheircrops,44percentproducingitontheirownmixedfarms.Only3.6percentofthosewhousedcompostpurchaseditandonly2percentpurchasedmanure.Schoolsand institutions engaged in farming, such as prisons andorphanages, alsoproduce compost,but theamountshavenotbeenmeasured.Thus,althoughtheamountmarketedisverylimited,itisclearthatthescaleoftheseactivitiesismuchlargerthanthatundertakenbyCBOs.

In the case ofmanure, ruralMaasai herders are linked tourbanandruralcropproductionenterprisesviaanorganisedmarketinNairobi.But,duetolackofinformation,manureproducedbylivestockkeeperswithinthecityisdisconnectedfromthismarketandismostlydumpedorburned.

WefoundthatNairobi’surbanandperiurbancompostswereoflowerqualitythancattlemanureandwaybelowoptimumlevels,especiallyforNandP(whichareimportantforKenyansoils); and the compost samples also had a low C:N ratiomainly due to the farmers’ lack of knowledge.To improvetheirproduct,andthemanagementoftheirassociations,thefarmersneedcapacitybuilding.Theabsenceofanenablinglegal frameworkwasalso found to limitqualityaswellasdemandforcompost:thegroupsdidnotoperateinformally-recognised spaces and farmers were reluctant to fertiliselandthatdidnotbelongtothem.

Further,withover60percentofNairobi’spopulationlivingininformalsettlements,whichcoveronlyabout5percentofthetotallandarea,wastesproducedtherehavelittlechanceofbeingrecycledthroughlocalcrop-livestockfarms,whichmostlybelongtobetter-offpeoplewithbackyards.However,whilenotmuchofthecity’swasteisprocessedbyCBOsinthese conditions and even less is well utilised, compost-

Day-old chicks delivery to a poultry enterprise in YaoundePhoto: Urban Harvest

When Urban Harvest began its sub-Saharan pro-gramme in 2002, scientists in the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) knew that crop-livestock interactions intensify with human population densities(1). However, little was known about the nature of these interactions at the higher densities in and around cities, such as Nairobi where the popula-tion density was on average almost ten times high-er than in the rural areas at that time.

A pig farmer and his wife in YaoundePhoto: Urban Harvest

Page 18: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

18

www.ruaf.org

Nutrient Cycles in Three African Cities

making does contribute toneighbourhood cleanlinesswhere local authorityservicesarelacking.

A task force to develop anurban agriculture policy inKenyawas formed in 2007,led by the Ministry ofAgriculture’s ProvincialAgriculture Board and theKenyaAgriculturalResearch

Institute(KARI). Thegroupbegandraftingapolicyinearly2009andthankstostakeholderengagementnutrientrecy-clingisexpectedtobecomepartofthepolicy.Publicaware-nesscampaigns,mediaarticlesandofficialstatementscouldfollow,promotingcompostproductionasastrategyforclean-ingupthecity,whichwouldimprovethedemandforcompostanditsbusinesspotential.Anurbanagriculturepolicyalsoneeds tobe localised throughurbanby-lawsforenhancedregulation and control, as is alreadyunderway inNakuru.SomeoftheconsiderationsforlegalisingurbanagricultureandorganicwastemanagementhavealsobeenincorporatedinadraftLandBillforKenya.

Nakuru, KenyaFollowingtheNairobistudy,UrbanHarvestwantedtogetamorein-depthpictureofsourcesandtypesoforganicwastegeneratedandusedbyurbanfarmers.AccordingtoFoeken(2006),Kenya’sfourthlargesttown,Nakuru,hasbothlarge-and small-scale farming within its boundaries, togethersupplying22percentofthefoodintakeoffarminghouse-holds,and8percentofthetown’soverallfoodneeds.Thirty-fivepercentofNakuru’spopulationengagedinurbanfarm-ingin1998,27percentofallhouseholdsgrowingcropsand20percentkeepinglivestock.TheseareverysimilartofiguresfromastudyofsixKenyan townsconductedbyLee-Smithandothersinthe1980s.

Common crops in Nakuru are maize, kale (sukuma wiki),beans,onions,spinach,tomatoesandpotatoes,whilechicken,cattle,goats,ducksandsheeparecommonlivestock.Foeken(2006)foundthat thepoorwereproportionally lessrepre-sented among urban farmers than the better-off Nakururesidents,mostly due to land access. Our 2005 study alsoconfirmedthatlivestockkeepersweremorelikelythancropgrowerstobefarmingforincomepurposes.Thesedatacanbefoundintheforthcomingbook.

Farmerspurchased70percentoffooditemstheyconsumed,butmorethan50percentofkaleandspinachconsumedwassourcedfromtheirownfarms,showinghowurbanagricul-tureactsasasourceoffoodaswellasameanstosaveincome.Mostcattlekeepersweremixedfarmersandkeptarangeoflivestock,similartowhatisobservedinotherurbancentresintheregion.

Farmersinourstudyrecyclednearlyalltheirdomesticorganicwaste,mostlyaslivestockfodder,whichbenefitsthetownintermsofwastemanagementandefficientfoodproduction.

Weprojectedthatabout283,000tofwetmanureisproducedannually in the livestockandmixed farmsofNakuru, justover half of it not being re-used in farming, resulting indumpingandenvironmentalcontamination.Withanaver-ageof20tofwetmanureproducedbyanurbanfarmerinNakuru,thoselivinginamiddle-incomeareawithbackyardmixedfarmsachievedaveryhighre-userateof88percent,mostly applied to their own crops, while those in a low-incomeareawithahigherpopulationdensityandlessspaceonlyachieved17percentre-use.Mostoftherecycledmanure(61percent)wasuseddirectlyonthesameurbanfarms,while6percentwenttoruralfarmsandtherestwassoldorusedelsewhereintown.Womentendedtobemoreinvolvedthanmeninmanagingthenutrientcyclingofdomesticorganicwaste such as livestock fodder. Some intensive vegetableproducersinthelow-incomeareasweremakinggooduseofthismanureonunder-utilisedplotsandthepracticecouldbeexpandedwithmunicipalsupport.

Theurbanfarmingsystemwouldworkbetteriflower-incomelivestockfarmerswereencouragedtofarmmoreefficientlyusinglandsetasideforthepurpose.Alternatively,orinaddi-tion, collection and re-use of livestock wastes from low-incomefarmsinhigh-densityareaswouldincreaseboththeefficiencyoffoodproductionandwastemanagement.Thiscouldbedonethroughorganisedcollectionanddistributionpoints and guidance to crop farmers through extensionservices. Thedumpedmanurecouldalsobeco-compostedwithhouseholdandmarketorganicwasteandpackagedasabio-fertiliser.

Currently,thesefindingsarebeingtakenupbytheMunicipalCouncil of Nakuru (MCN) through its Department ofEnvironment.Theyhavealreadyinfluencedongoingeffortstodevelopurbanagriculturebye-laws,followingresolutionsofaworkshopforNakurucouncillorsinMay2005.

Yaoundé, CameroonAbouthalfofCameroon’spopulationlivesinurbanareas.Thepopulationofthecapital,Yaoundé,isestimatedtobeincreas-ingatabout10percentperannumandisexpectedtoreach4millionby2020.UnemploymentinYaoundéisabout25percent and many households feed themselves and providesomeincomethroughurbanagriculture.Weconductedtwostudies in Yaoundé, one on those selling traditional leafyvegetables, mostly produced by women from about 32,000households,andanotheronintegratedcropandlivestockproductiononsmallmixedfarms. Both are importanturban farming systems inYaoundé.

In 2003 we collectedprimary data from 150chickenandpigproducers,75ineachcategory,basedon a stratified randomsampletakenalongsevenmajor axes crossing

Poorly managed nutrient cycling in NairobiPhoto: Urban Harvest

A pig farmer in YaoundePhoto: Urban Harvest

Page 19: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

19

www.ruaf.org

Note1) starting at 150-160/km2 and becoming optimal with respect to

recycling efficiency around 375/km2 (Staal, 2002)

Referencesprain, G., N. Karanja and D. lee-Smith (Eds). Urban Harvest: agriculture in the cities of East and Central Africa, Springer, New York, 2010

Foeken, D. “To subsidise my income”; urban farming in an East-African Town, Brill, leiden, Boston, 2006

lee-Smith, D., M. Manundu, D. lamba and p.K. Gathuru, Urban food production and the cooking fuel situation in urban Kenya, Nairobi, Mazingira institute, 1987

Njenga, M. and N. Karanja, “Community-Based Compost production for UA in Nairobi” in van Veenhuizen, r, Cities Farming for the Future: UA for Green and Productive Cities, rUAF/iirr/iDrC, Ottawa, 2006

Staal, S 2002, ‘livestock and environment in peri-urban ruminant systems’, presentation at the LEAD/ILRI Seminar, international livestock research institute, Nairobi, May 2002.

Yaoundé, in anattempt toassessthepoten-tialofthisvibrantsub-sector ofCameroon’sagri-culture. Wefound that rear-ing small live-

stock in city backyards contributes to urban dwellers’incomes,healthandnutrition,aswellasbeinganintegralpartoftheirculture(animalsaregivenasgiftsorusedforreligiouspurposes).

Following cultural norms, more women were said to beinvolvedinkeepingchickens(65percent)andmoremeninkeepingpigs(76percent).Householdskeptlivestockmainlyasasourceofrevenue,andbothtypesofenterprisegeneratedagoodincome.Manysoldanimalstogenerateliquidity(55percent)anda significantproportionofall sales (30per cent)were specifically used to pay children’s school fees. A highproportionofsalesweresaidtoresultfromdemandduringfestivals such as Christmas and Aid-el-Kebir (77 per cent).Manurewasacrucialpartoftheurbanfarmingsystemfortheproductionofgardencrops.Somefarmersusedmanurealone,whilesomeappliedamixtureofmanureandfertiliser.

PoultryproductioninurbanandperiurbanYaoundérepre-sents70percentofthetotalfortheCentralProvince,about0.91millionbirds,mostlybroilers(710,000)andsomelayers(200,000).AtthetimeofthisstudyCameroonhadaboutonemillionpigswith approximately 50,000 located in theurban andperiurbanarea.Bycombiningthefiguresfromoursurveysoflivestockfarmersandvegetablegrowerswithofficialstatis-ticswewereabletocalculatethetotalvolumesofmanureproducedandutilised.Yaoundéproducesover 20,000 t ofthisorganicfertiliserperannum,ofwhichabout69percentisutilisedinfarmingandtherest,about6,350t,isdiscarded.Ourstudyalsoshowedthatthisproductionsystemsupportsamarket for itself outside the city, notably in a provincialurbancapital,Bamenda,wheretheproductfetchesahigherprice.Tenpercentofthecapitalcity’smanureproductionissoldthisway,althoughofficialagriculturalplanningisnotawareofthisfact!

We found that 10 – 20,000 persons, including producers,retailers, processors, animal input and feed traders, areemployedintheurbanlivestockindustry.Becausepigsandchickensbothgrowrapidly,theyprovideahighlevelofproteinandaquickreturnoninvestment.Urbanlivestockproduc-tionsupplementsthedietoflow-incomehouseholdswithanimportantlocalsourceofproteinandminerals.Thewastedmanurecorrespondstoadischargeof400tofnitrogen,229tofphosphorousand114tofpotassiumaswaste,whichalsoconstitutes serious environmental pollution. Although pigand poultry production near residential areas in townscreatesproblemsrelatedtosmell,noiseandpollution,includ-ingcontaminationofthewatertablebynitrates,theseneedtobeweighedagainsttheirbenefitsanddealtwiththrough

improved planning and management. Proper support isrequiredforthisvibrantsectorofagriculture.

ConclusionTogether, these studies indicatethe scale of nutrient productionand itsuneven recycling throughfarminginAfricancities.Theyalsosuggestsomeofthemainparam-eters for improving theefficiencyofsuchrecycling. Theroleplayedby small urban mixed crop-live-stock farms is clearly important,while the potential for exportingnutrientstoruralfarmsandevenother cities is demonstrated inbothYaoundéandNakuru.

However,lowerincomefarmersareatadisadvantagebecausetheylackthesameaccesstoback-yard land for mixed farming, especially when they arecrammed into extremely dense informal settlements in aplace like Nairobi. The better livelihoods, improvedwastemanagementandfoodproductionthatcouldpotentiallybegained by supporting these low-income farmers throughstrategic means is clearly enormous. Some solutions areemerginginNakuru,basedonthepracticesoffarmersthem-selves and as agricultural extension and city authoritiesstarttotakeaninterestinmanagingandregulatingurbanfarming.

Diana Lee-SmithMazingiraInstitute,[email protected] KaranjaCIP,Nairobi:[email protected]@cgiar.orgThomas DongmoIRAD,Yaoundé[email protected] PrainCIP,[email protected]

Waste co-composting with manure in Kahawa Soweto in NairobiPhoto: Urban Harvest

Dairy farmer in Kahawa Soweto in NairobiPhoto: Urban Harvest

Page 20: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

20

www.ruaf.org

Decentralised Composting of Market Waste and Use in Urban Agriculture; Conakry, Guinea

Composting is a promising approach to solvingtheseproblems.Theportionofbiodegradableorganicwasteishigherinlow-incomecountries(sometimesupto90percentofthetotalwastestream).Organicwastesandresiduesare usually locally available, unlike the importedmineralfertilisers,whichmanypeoplecannotaffordtobuy.Inaddi-tiontoimprovedsoilsandyields,compostproductionandapplicationmay have indirect benefits, such as increasedfood security and incomegeneration, reduced landfills oforganicwasteandtherelatedpreventionofpollution.

Due to the lower macro-nutrient content of compostcomparedtothatofmineralfertiliser,itisachallengingtasktomarketthisproductandalsotoconvincepotentialusersof the additional positive effects of compost, such as itssupportofsoilfunctionsandthepreventionofsoilerosion.One common approach is to blend compost with othermaterials,likenitrogen-richchickenmanure.

Technologies for the aerobic treatment of organic wasterange fromopenwindrow composting to closed systems.Thecomplexityandscaleofthesesystemsvaryconsiderably.Theeasiestwaytocompostorganicwasteistomakestaticpiles,whilemoreeffortisrequiredforbin/barrelcompost-ing or open windrow composting, in which the waste ismechanically rotated to improve aeration. Systems withforced aeration or enclosed systems are even morecomplex.

SeveraleffortstopromotecompostingtechnologiesinAfricahavebeenunsuccessful fordifferent reasons (LinznerandWassermann, 2006). Composting projects in the pastdecadesfocussedonlarge-scalecompostingplants,butthemajorityofthesecompostingplantsfailedowingtowastecharacteristics (like impurities, hazardous substances ormaterialpropertiesthathinderedthedegradationprocess),

It is estimated that two out of three people will live in urban centres in West Africa within the next 20 years. According to UNOWA (2007) more than nine-ty per cent of the urban population lives under sub-standard conditions. An important issue is the management of urban solid organic waste. Currently, these wastes contribute to urban pollu-tion, while large amounts of nutrients are lost.

Roland Linzner

seasonalvariations(problemofcontinuoussupplyofinputmaterial), lackof technicaleducationand training, lackof(funds for) maintenance, variations in water and powersupplyandthestatusofwastemanagementinpoliticsandadministration(Dulac,2001).Amajorproblemforlarge-scalecompostingplantsisthefundingofconstructioncostsandinvestmentcostsformachineryandequipment.Large-scalefacilities have a higher turnover of organic waste, whichrequiresacontinuoussupplyof inputmaterials.Seasonalvariationsandfeasibilityoftransporthavetobeconsideredin this context. Furthermore, it is necessary to have anadequatecompostdemandinordertogeneratesufficientrevenues.

Since the 1990s new approaches have been introducedthroughsmall-scalecompostingprojectsinitiatedbyNGOsorneighbourhoodcommunities.Decentralisedcompostinginvolvessmallgroupsofpeopleandrelativelylowcosts.Localgovernmentsorotherinstitutionscansupportsuchaproj-ectbyeducatingthepublic,providinglandforthefacility(littlespaceisrequired),assistingwithstart-upcosts,trans-portinganddisposingofrejectstolocallandfills,andusingthe final compost inpublicparksor in collaborationwithMinistries of Agriculture. These small-scale operationsdependmainlyonhumanlabour(e.g.pre-sortingprocesses,turnoverandirrigationofthewindrows).Thestart-upcostsforthesefacilitiesinvolvelowcapitalinputas(almost)nomachineryisused.Therunningcostsarealsolow,becausehuman labour is comparably cheap in low-income coun-tries.

Manual turnover in a compost station in Conakry Photo: Roland Linzner

Page 21: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

21

www.ruaf.org

Duetohighfuelpricesinlow-incomecountries,itisimpor-tanttominimisetransportcosts.Thelocationofthecompost-ingfacilityshouldthereforepreferablybeclosetoboththepointoforiginoftheinputmaterialandtheplaceofcompostapplication.

Both for larger scale andmore decentralised composting,proper assessment of input supply, compost quality andexisting andpotentialmarkets for compost is required.Aproper market assessment provides information on thepotentialcompostusersandtheexistingfieldsofapplica-tion, e.g. city farmers (urban agriculture), application inparks, horticulture, silviculture etc. and on the estimatedvalueoftheproductfortheuser(willingnesstopay,abilitytopay,priceofcompetingproducts).Acomprehensiveguidefor themarketing of compost in low andmiddle-incomecountries is freely available on the internet (Rouse et al.,2008). Transport and seasonal variations affect both thequantity and the composition of the input material.Collectionschemesforcertainwastetypesmayalreadyexist.Thepurityoftheinputmaterialhasamajorinfluenceonthequalityoftheproducedcompost:sourceseparatedorganicmaterialimprovesthequalityofthecompost.

Conakry, GuineaA researchproject“Recirculationof localorganicwaste inurbanandruralagriculture-theimpactonsoilfunctionsinGuinea” (West Africa) was carried out at the Institute ofWaste Management and the Service National des Sols(Guinea), and was funded by the Austrian Academy ofSciences (more informationavailableat:http://www.wau.boku.ac.at/abf.html:Linzneretal.,2007).Thestudyfocussedonasmall-scalefacilityintheperiurbanareaofConakryandincludedacostanalysisandfieldtrials.

Thefacilityhasamainrottingareaofapproximately80m2

witharoofandaconcreteslabinclined5percent.Marketwaste serves as the input material; the bulk of which iselephantgrassasoilpalmstemsarenotsuitableduetotheirfibrousnesses.About40membersofawomen’scooperativehavebeentrainedtooperatethecompostingfacility.Theyareatthesametimeusersoftheproducedcompostbecausethey carry out periurban agriculture activities at thecomposting site. The cooperative is associated with theMinistryofAgricultureandusesfieldsthatareownedbytheMinistry.Thelandforthecompostingstationwasprovidedby the Ministry at no cost. In the first year of operationapproximately4tofcompostwereproduced,eventhoughthe facility did not operate in the rainy season (June toSeptember).

The economic viability of composting is crucial for thesustainability of such a project. The overall expenses forconstruction and operation (material and labour) of thesmall-scale (decentralised) plant in Conakry for one yearamountedtoapprox.5,700EUR(fortheproductionof4tofcompost). Construction costs accounted for about 70 percent of this amount. This illustrates the impossibility ofcovering start-up costs (construction costs) by means ofrevenues (compost selling),andconfirmspreviousexperi-

ences regarding the difficulty of establishing economicviability(DrechselandKunze,2001).Thereisthusaneedtoreduce the costs to aminimum, e.g. throughCommunityBasedCompostingSchemesinwhichland,inputmaterial,collectionand labourcanbeobtainedfreeoratmarginalcost.Withrespecttolocation,itisimportanttodeterminewhetherthefacilityshouldbeclosetotheinputmaterialsorclosetotheendusersofcompost(ifalocationclosetobothisnotpossible).

Basedontherecordskept,asmallcostanalysiswascarriedout.TheAustrianFundingOrganisationfundedallcostsatthebeginning(constructionandrunningcosts).Thereforethecompostpricewascalculatedbasedontheideaofcover-ing the running costs of the compost station (1,660 EUR)withanannualoutputof4tofcompost.Theproductioncostof1tofcompostisapproximately415EURand1kgofcompostshould thereforebesold forat least0.41EURon the localmarket. Unfortunately it is difficult to charge this price,because of the availability of cheap competing products,suchascowdung(0.05EUR/kg)orchickenmanure(0.075to0.1EUR/kg).Bycontrastimportedmineralfertiliserissoldatacostofapproximately0.5to0.6EUR/kg,whichisencour-aging for composting.Adetailedcompilationof the costs(currencyconversionratesfromtheyears2005and2006)isprovidedintheprojectreport(Linzneretal.,2007).

Theprojectwasalsoconfrontedwithcostissuesthatwerenotanticipatedinadvance,e.g.municipalchargesandthecostsofhiringtruckdriversformarketwaste.Thecostsforbulkymaterial,mixedmarketwasteandtransportaccountedfor390EURfortheoutputof4tofcompost.

Theresultsofthefieldtrialsshowedthatcompostapplica-tioninConakryincreasedthemaizegrainyieldinthefirstyearbyapprox.400kg/ha.Thissurplusyieldcontributedtothefoodsecurityoftheinvolvedfemalefarmers.Aconsider-ableamountofmoneycouldbesavedbecausetheydidnothave to purchase asmuch food. Furthermore, selling theharvestgeneratedanincomeofapprox.200EURperhectareandpervegetationperiodthatcouldsubsequentlybeusedto meet other basic needs, e.g. schooling for children. Incomparison: themonthlywageof anon-skilledworker inGuinearangesfrom12.5to25EUR,withwagesofscientificpersonnelrangingfromapprox.50to75EUR.Itwasreportedthatincomeandwagesinurbanagricultureareoftenhigherthanthoseofmid-levelcivilservants. InthelastfewyearssalariesinGuineahavestayedmoreorlessthesamewhilethepricesofrice(thestaplefood)andfuelhaveincreasedsteadily. Living conditions have therefore worsened. Thismeansthatcompostapplicationinurbanagriculturecouldgenerateanincomethatisindispensableforsurvival.

Roland LinznerInstitute of Waste Management, BOKU-University of NaturalResourcesandAppliedLifeSciences,Vienna,AustriaEmail:[email protected]

For references see page 24

Page 22: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

22

www.ruaf.org

TheprocessstartedinJanuary2008,withaware-ness-raisingandorganisationandtrainingofthegardeners.The garden’s development over a nine-month periodwascontinuouslymonitored,withaspecificfocusonproduction,food and nutrition, socio-economic factors and gender.Currently, seven households are farming at the Jardim Produtivo.

Recycling organic materialsAtthestartoftheproject,eachparticipatingfamilyreceivedabucketwiththecapacitytohold5kgofhouseholdwaste(includingleftoverpreparedfoods,peelsandinediblepartsoffruitsandvegetables).Eachhouseholdconsistsoftwoorthreemembers.Throughouttheprojectperiod,fiveofthesefamilieswereabletocollectabucketfulofhouseholdwasteeveryeighttotendays.IntheperiodMarch25toSeptember25, the total organic household waste collected for thecommunitygardenwas84buckets,or420kg.Theorganicmaterialwasusedforthecollectiveproductionofcompost,whichwasdistributedtoallmembersoftheJardim(whichissharedbysevenhouseholds).

The Productive Garden: An experience in the city of Belo Horizonte, BrazilAs part of the RUAF’s Cities Farming for the Future programme (1), a project called the Jardim Produtivo (Productive Garden) was initiated to transform a vacant plot(2) of 3,500 m2 into a multifunctional urban space.

Bruno Martins Dala Paula Ivana Cristina Lovo

José Divino Lopes Filho

Inaddition,thegardenersobtainedorganicmaterialthroughanumberofotherchannels.Aninterestingpartnershipwasformedbetweenthefarmersandtwosmallpoultryproduc-tionenterprises, located in the surroundingarea. Poultrymanure (3) is the primary source of nitrogenused in themanufacturing of compost. On average, the two partnerenterprisesproduce400kgofchickenlittereverytwoweeks.Thegardenersalsousedpruningmaterialfromparksandgardens, like residual cutgrass.This is veryuseful for theproductionofcompostandforprotectingthesoilandplant-ingbeds,sinceitcontrolsthewasteofwaterandprotectscropsplanteddirectlyinthebeds.Threetruckloadsofthistypeoforganicwasteweredeliveredtotheproductionareaduringtheprojectperiod(theexactamountwasnotquanti-fied).ItwasprovidedbytheParksandGardensofficeofthemunicipalityonlyonrequest(it isnotroutinelyprovided).CattleandhorsemanurewasdonatedbyruralfarmersorcollectedfromroaminganimalsneartheJardim.Leavesofplantsgrowinginandaroundthegardenwerealsocollected.Inaddition to theabove, thehouseholdspurchasedcattlemanurefromlocalsuppliers(bagof50x80cmofdrycattlemanureissoldforR$5.00=USD2.8).Theestimateddemandforthecattlemanureforthecurrentproductionlevelsinthegardenis12m3/year,orapproximatelysixtonnes.

Itwas not possible to obtainmore information from theauthoritiesonthecostsoflittercollectionandmaintenanceofpublicareas,plazasandgardenscomparableinsizetotheJardim Produtivo.Thisinformationwouldbeneededtoesti-mate the savings that could be gained with this type of

Using urban waste as mulch, Photo: Ivana C. Lovo

Page 23: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

23

www.ruaf.org

organic garden through reduced expenditure onmainte-nanceofpublicareasanddisposalofthementionedvolumeoforganicwastes.

Inorganic materialInadditionto therecyclingoforganicmaterialandnutri-ents,over2,700PETbottleswerecollectedandusedinthegarden to create two irrigation circles and 20 horseshoe-shapedandrectangularplantingbeds,coveringanareaofapproximately 980 m2. The gardeners and neighbouringresidentsseparatedandcollectedthesebottles.Burlapsacks(40x80 cm) were also used together with Tetrapac milkcontainers to build a shed to store the tools used in thegarden.Theburlapsackswereusedtoincreasetheadher-enceofthecementmasstotheironstructuresofthewallsoftheshedandthemilkcontainerswereusedtowaterproofitsroof.Thesematerialswerealsocollectedbythebenefi-ciaryfamilies themselvesanddonatedby localmerchantsandneighbours.

The table summarises the recycledmaterialsusedduringthemonitoringperiod.

Water recyclingIn2009,togetherwiththeSWITCHProjectinBeloHorizonte,twocisterns(ASAmodel(4))wereinstalledtocapturerainwa-ter.Thecisternshaveacapacityof18leachandaresetuptocatchwateronthegroundsofthechurchpropertylocatednexttotheproductionarea(Seephoto).Withthecisternsandanappropriateirrigationsysteminplaceitwillbepossi-bletosupply80percentofthewaterneededforthegardens,therebyreducingmonthlyexpenditures(theaveragecostofwaterduring the sevenmonthsofmonitoringwasR$566(USD321)/month).

Improved nutritionNutritionindicatorswerecollectedbeforetheimplementa-tion of the Jardim Produtivo (in April 2008) and after 5months(inSeptember2008),usingafoodfrequencysurveyanda24-hourfoodlog.Theresultsshowedanincreaseintheaverage number of vegetable portions(5) consumed (0.5portions/dayvs.1.8portions/day,respectively).Thefrequencyof consumption of each type of vegetable also increasedbetween April and September. Initially participantsconsumedlettuceanaverageof2timesperweekandthisincreased to 5 times per week. Tomato consumptionincreasedfromapproximately3timesperweekto7timesperweek.Consumptionofotherleafyvegetables(cabbage,almeirãoandacelga)alsorosefrom4to6timesperweek.Itappearedthattheavailabilityofvegetables,andtheassur-anceofsafeproduction–freeofcontaminationfromagro-toxinsandchemicalfertilisers–andthestronginvolvementoflocalconsumersinallthestagesofproduction,favouredthisincreaseinconsumption.

Table

Recycled material Use

PETbottles/containers

2,789units Containmentofplantingbeds

Householdwaste 420kg(monitoredfrom25Marchto29Sept.2008)

Composting

Pruningmaterialfromgardensandparks

Volumewasnotmeasured

Compostingandprotectionofsoilandplantletsinthebeds

Poultrymanure 400kgevery2weeks

Composting

Cattleandhorsemanure

Volumewasnotmeasured

Preparationofnaturalfertilisersanddefenses

Plantleaves Volumewasnotmeasured

Preparationofnaturalfertilisersanddefenses

Burlapsacks(usedtotransportpota-toes)

25sacksmeasuring40x80cm

Constructionoftoolshed(toenhanceadherenceofcementtowalls)

Tetrapaccontainers 60long-lifemilkcontainers

Constructionoftoolshed(towater-prooftheroof)

Preparation of biofertiliser Photo: Marcos Jota

The area in Belo Horizonte, before the work startedPhoto: Marcos Jota

and after: the Productive GardenPhoto: Ivana C. Lovo

Page 24: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

24

www.ruaf.org

Integration and upscaling Thelocalgovernmentplayedanimportantrolebymakingresourcesavailablefreeofcharge,suchascutgrassandwater,andbycontributingtotheconstructionofthegarden.

Acommunitygardenlike theJardimcanbeanimportantfactor in municipal solid waste management, allowingdecentralisedcollectionandrecycling,eliminatingcostsandreducingtransport.Decentralisedrecyclingandcompostingintegrated with food production thus reduces wastemanagement costs, protects the environmental andpromoteshealthandabetterqualityoflife.However,thereisstillalongwaytogoinscalinguptheseexperiencesandincorporating such productive areas in municipal solidwastemanagement systems. To increase the scale to theterritorialandenvironmentalmanagementofBeloHorizonteas a whole, regional policies and regulations need to bealtered.Thisrequirestheinvolvementandcommitmentofotheractors.

Aproductivegardencanbeaspacethatintegratescitizensand nature. It further promotes the health of the localcommunitythroughtheuseofmedicinalplants;maintainstraditionalecologicalknowledgepasseddownfromgenera-tion to generation; creates opportunities for recreationactivities; and (re)affirms the cultural identity of ruralemigrants living in cities. Urban agriculture furthermoretransformsvacantlots–consideredtobefocalpointsforthepropagationofdiseasevectors–intoproductivegreenareas,increasing their visual impact on the urban landscape. Itimproves thepermeabilityof the soil, thus increasing thecity’s capacity to recharge the water table and reducingflooding. It also strengthens social relationships betweenneighboursandcommunities.

Bruno Martins Dala Paula UniversidadeFederaldeMinasGerais-UFMGIvana Cristina Lovo UniversidadeFederaldeSantaCatarina-UFSCEmail:[email protected]é Divino Lopes Filho NutritionProgramoftheSchoolofNursing,UFMG

Notes1) For more information on CCF in BH see: http://www.ipes.org/

index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=101&itemid=1122) Term used by the Urban planning Office for unused urban areas

and for which no plans exist. 3) “Chama de galinha”, or chicken litter, a mixture of sawdust and

chicken manure.4) ASA is a Social Training and Mobilisation programme to Familiarise

with a Semi-Arid Climate, under which one million rural cisterns have been installed.

5) The concept of portion is that provided by the Ministry of Health of Brazil (2005). A portion of vegetables is the quantity capable of providing 15 calories, and a portion of fruit is that which provides 70 calories.

ReferencesBrazilian Ministry of Health. Secretariat of Health Care. General Coor-dinator of Food and Nutrition policy. Food guide for the Brazilian population: promoting healthy eating. 236pp. Brasília: Ministry of Health, 2005.

Jota, M. l. C. implantação de Hortas Comunitária e Formação de Multiplicadores(as) em Agricultura Urbana com enfoque de Gênero. Apostila para oficinas formativas – A Matéria Orgânica. Ministry of Social Development and Combating Hunger: prefecture of lagoa Santa and Jota Consultants. 2008. 9p.

WHO - World Health Organization. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Food Nutr Bull 25:292-302p; 2004.

The productive Garden: An experience in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Compost managementPhoto: Marcos Jota

References page 20 - 21Dulac N. (2001): The organic waste flow in integrated sustainable waste management. Tools for decision-makers – experiences from the Urban Waste Expertise programme (1995-2001). A. Scheinberg. Nieuwehaven, WASTE.

Drechsel p. and Kunze D. (2001): Waste composting for urban and peri-urban agriculture: closing the rural-urban nutrient cycle in Sub-Saharan Africa. CABi publishing, iSBN 0 85 199 548 9.

linzner r. and Wassermann G. (2006): Factors constraining and promoting the implementation of small-scale composting in West African Countries. OrBiT 2006: Biological Waste Management. From local to Global; proceedings of the international Conference / Eckhard Kraft (ed.). Weimar: Verlag OrBiT e.V.; iSBN 3-935974-09-4. Weimar, 2006.

linzner r., Binner E., Mentler A., Smidt E., Salhofer S.p. and Soumah M. (2007): lpCC-Guinée: recirculation of local Organic Waste in Urban and rural Agriculture - the impact on Soil Functions in Guinea / West Africa. Final report on behalf of the Commission for Development Studies at the Austrian Academy of Sciences: link: http://www.kef-online.at/images/stories/downloads/projektberichte/p139_Endbericht_Guinea.pdf (last access: 07.09.2009).

rouse J., rothenberger S. and Zurbrügg C. (2008): Marketing Compost - A Guide for Compost producers in low and Middle-income Countries. Swiss Federal institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (EAWAG) - Department of Water and Sanitation in Developing Countries (SANDEC), iSBN 978-3-906484-46-4, Dübendorf, 2008.

UNOWA (2007): Urbanisation and insecurity in West Africa population Movements - Mega Cities and regional Stability. United Nations Office for West Africa (UNOWA) issue papers, October 2007.

Page 25: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

25

www.ruaf.org

The Sustainable Ibadan Project (SIP) was estab-lishedin1994(togetherwith11similarprojectsacross theworld)byUNCHS(HABITAT)aspartoftheSustainableCitiesProgramme. Participants at a City Consultative Forum in1995concludedthatwastemanagementandconversiontoorganicfertiliserweretopprioritiesforIbadanandjointlyidentifiedaerobiccompostingtechnologyusingwindrowsas a viablemethod to collect and recyclewaste, generateincome,andusecompostforurbanagriculture.

Oneofthepioneercommunity-basedprojectsisthe“AyeyeWaste Sorting Centre”. In collaboration with Urban BasicServices(sponsoredbyUNICEF),theauthorstrainedcommu-nitymembersinwasteassessmentandsourceseparationofbiodegradableandnon-biodegradablewastes.Theprojecthasbeenable togenerate economic returnsandemploy-mentforthelocalcommunity(SridharandAdeoye,2003).

Ayeye communityAyeye is a densely populated, low-income communitylocatedinthecoreareaofthecity,withapopulationof13,720locatedinthecoreareaofIbadancity.Itoccupiesanareaof14.13ha,with42compoundsand460houses(asobservedin2009).Thepopulationperhousingunitisestimatedtobeabout30.Womenandchildrenregularlysellandloadgoodsalongroadsinthearea.TheAyeyecommunityhasverylowaccesstosanitationandotherbasicservices.Thepercapitagenerationrateofsolidwastesisabout0.43kgperday,60to80percentofwhichisorganicinnature.

Themany open drains in the neighbourhood pollute theGegestream.Atthestartoftheprojectin1994,therewasnowastedisposalfacilityandpeoplelitteredeverywhere,espe-

Improving Food Security through Environmental Management in Ibadan: The case of the Ayeye community Solid waste disposal is a nagging problem faced by various communities in Ibadan in southwest Nigeria and other state capitals. Ibadan, the capital of Oyo State, is the most densely populated city in the state with over three million inhabitants. It is said that in Ibadan every street is a market. Many backyards are used for growing local vegetables and medicinal herbs.

Bolanle Wahab, M. K. C. Sridhar and A. A. Ayorinde

ciallyalongtheGegestream.Atthattime,thecommunityhadonlyonetoilet.In2002,theAyeyeCommunitybuilttwo“PayandUse”toilets,whichinitiallywereemptiedintothenearbydrainsandthenintothestream.In2009however,theSustainableIbadanProjectestablishedasysteminwhichthepitsareemptiedbyso-called“faecalwastecontractors”.ThecommunitychargesfiveNaira(0.25Eurocents)toeachuserofthetoilet.Thishasimprovedthephysicalconditionofthearea.

Concept and methodologyTheinitiativewassetuptodeveloppracticablesolutionstothesolidwasteproblemsbyconvertingwastestofertiliser.By improvingenvironmentalhealthandemploymentandgeneratingincomeaswellasfoodsecurity,italsoaimedtobenefit thecommunity (particularlywomenandchildren,whoarethemostinvolvedinwastecollectionanddisposalandthusthemostvulnerabletoitshazards).Improvingsani-tationandtrainingcommunitymembersonfoodsecurity,healthcareandwastemanagementissueswerealsopartoftheproject.

Thecommunitymemberscollectedsolidwastesfromtheirhomes,andfoodwastefromtheAyeye-Agbenifoodmarket.Household wastes were sorted into major components(plastics,metalandglass)andthentransferredtoasortingcentre(whereseparatecubicleswereprovidedforthesegre-gatedwaste)atalocationdesignatedbythecommunity.

The community provides compost also to other local government areas. Photo: Photo: M.K.C. Sridhar

Page 26: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010 www.ruaf.org

Biodegradablewasteswereconvertedintoorganicfertiliser.UNDPandUNICEFprovidedmajorfunding,while theOyoStateGovernmentandotherstakeholders (likeuniversity)provided other support through materials and humanresources.A5-tperdaycapacityplantwascommissionedinNovember2002.Itwastoproduce45-50bagsof50kgorganicfertiliserperdaytobesoldtofarmerswithinandoutsidethecommunity.

Theprojectwasexecutedinthreephases(in2001-2002),aquickappraisalsurvey;construction,mobilisationandtrain-ing;andcommunityparticipationinthecompostingprocess,andfieldtrialsofcompostutilisationonidentifiedfarms.Attheendtheprojectwashandedovertothecommunity.

Results and lessons Detailsofthewastegeneratedinthecommunity(in2002)aregivenintable1.Thetotalcompostablewastegeneratedpercapita/daywas0.16kg.Othermajorcomponentsincludeplastics(highandlowdensityfilm),metal,andasharisingfromthecookingactivities.

Table 1. Wastes generated in Ayeye community (kg) (Totalpopulation:13,720,or30perhousingunit).

Theprojecthasbeensustainedsince2002.Itisrequiredthatthewastecollectionisefficient,electricitysupplyisregular,productionissteady,andbuyersarereadilyavailable.Intheprojectperiod, thesupplyofelectricity to thecompostingplantwasnotregular,whichaffectedproductioncapacity.Otherconstraintsidentifiedwerelackoflandareaforexpan-sion,andlackofanorganisedmarketingframework.

Atleastfourpeopleworkedregularlyatthesortingcentreproducing about 10 bags of fertiliser perweek (each bagweighing 50 kg). In addition, they also producedGrade Acompostbyfortifyingitwithadditionalnitrogen(3.0to3.5percent)andphosphate(1.8to2.0percent),whichwasingreaterdemandbyfarmerswhogrewmaizeandothercropsrequiringhighN.

Maizeandothervegetablecropswerealsogrownondemon-stration plots. The finished compost and the compostamendedwithadditionalNandPproducedyieldscompa-rabletowhenchemicalfertiliserswereused(seetable2).Thefarmersappreciatedthebenefitsoforganicfertiliserappli-cation,astheysawincreasedyields,asecondcropwithnoadditional inputs and its usefulness in controlling soilerosionanddegradation(Adeoyeet al.2008).Farmersandhorticulturistsareeagertohavethecompostproducedinlargerquantitiestosatisfytheirneeds.

Table 2. Effect of organic fertiliser produced by Ayeye community on maize yield and comparison with the effect of chemical fertiliser

Thecommunityprojectprovidescomposttohorticulturistsand Oyo State Farmers Association, whose members arespread across 33 Local Government Areas (LGAs). But themembersarecontinuallylookingformarketswheretheycansell theircompostandtheirfarmproduce.Thecompostisalsosoldtootherurbanandperiurbanfarmers:chairmenofthe11LGAsinIbadanbuyanddistributethecomposttotheirfarmers.Ayeyerepresentsoneofthetraditionalcorecommu-nitiesinIbadan.Theother11LGAshaveexpressedinterestinreplicating the project in their communities. This projectalsoservesasamodelinNigeriaandsevenofthesesmalltomediumlevelcompostingplantshavebeenestablishedindifferentpartsofthecountry.

Bolanle Wahab,DepartmentofUrbanandRegionalPlanning,M. K. C. Sridhar DivisionofEnvironmentalHealthSciences,FacultyofPublicHealth,UniversityofIbadan,IbadanA. A. Ayorinde ProjectManager,SustainableIbadanProject,OyoStateMinistryofEnvironmentandWaterResources,Ibadan,NigeriaCorresponding Author: M. K. C. Sridhar: Email: [email protected]

referencesSridhar, M. K. C. and G.O. Adeoye, 2003. Organo-mineral fertilizers from urban wastes: Developments in Nigeria, The Nigerian Field, 68: 91-111.

Adeoye, G. O., O. O. AdeOluwa, M. Oyekunle, M. K. C. Sridhar, E. A. Makinde and A.A. Olowoake, 2008. Comparative evaluation of Organo-mineral Fertilizer (OMF) and Mineral Fertilizer (NpK) on yield and quality of Maize (Zea mays (l) Moench), Nigerian Journal of Soil Science, Vol. 18, pp. 132-137.

Per week per house

Per week in 460 houses

Per day in 460 houses

Per capita per day

Compostable waste

21.55 9913 1416.14 0.103

Animal waste 11.385 5237.1 784.16 0.057

Recyclables 15.15 6982.0 997.43 0.073

Total 48,085 22,132 3198 0.233

Fertiliser treatment Plant height,cm

Grain yield,t/ha

Number of seeds per cob

No fertiliser, n=12 177.97 2.02 197

NPK fertiliser (15:15:15);n=10

237.67 5.40 463

Organo-mineral fertiliser, 1.5 t/ha, n=14

212.5 6.06 435

Organo-mineral fertiliser, 3 t/ha, n=12

238.93 6.52 546

Using compost on maize produced yields comparable to when fertilisers were usedPhoto: M.K.C. Sridhar

26

Page 27: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

27

www.ruaf.org

Pune,situatedinWesternMaharashtra,India,isarapidlygrowingcityofabout5millioninhabitants(Kraas&Kroll 2008).The city produces around900-1100 tonnes ofsolidwaste per day, all ofwhich enters the Corporation’spremises. Organic waste amounts to 630 tonnes, corre-spondingto65percentofthesolidwasteproduced.Itisesti-matedthatthelargestpartoftotalsolidwaste(40percent)is derived from private households, while the rest comesfromhotelsandrestaurants,shopsandmarkets (seeKroll2007).Privateseparationandprocessingcouldthuscontrib-uteconsiderablytorelievingthecentraliseddisposalinfra-structure.

WastemanagementdidnotreachthemunicipalagendaofIndian citiesuntil the secondhalfof the20th century.ThemanagementsystemsinPunetodayarebasedontheideaofon-siteseparation.Wastepickersormunicipallitterservicescollectthewasteatthehouseholdsoratcentralcollectionpoints. Some recyclable materials are extracted and theremainingwasteistransportedtoalandfillsiteoutsidethecity,where,however,onlyasmallpartofthebiodegradablematteriscompostedproperly(Kroll2007).

Municipal waste regulations Intheearly1980sseveralsmallcivilmovementsbeganrais-ingawarenessabouttherisingamountofwasteinthecity.Their ecological concerns occasioned the promotion oforganicwasterecyclingathouseholdlevel.Adoptionofthepracticeprogressedslowly,partlyduetothenegativeconno-tationsofdealingwithwasteswithintheIndianmiddleclasshouseholds (Behmanesh 2009). A changewas inducedbytheintroductionoftheMunicipalSolidWastes(ManagementandHandling)Rules2000(MSW2000).Theyincludedlocalamendments in Pune that made the disposal of organicwasteonresidentialpremisesmandatoryforhousingsoci-etiesbuiltafter2002(Kroll2007).Theinhabitantsofthose

Municipal Solid Waste Manage-ment as an Incentive for City Farming in Pune, IndiaThe disposal of waste presents an increasing chal-lenge to the administrative bodies of megacities. The Municipal Corporation of the Indian city Pune has introduced source separation systems and on-site organic waste composting. The citizens con-cerned are looking for practical ways to treat their organic wastes and they have found city farming to be a viable solution.

Sohal Behmanesh

societies now seek acceptable solutions for decomposingtheirorganicwaste.

Organic waste recycling and city farmingThePuneMunicipalCorporation(PMC)collaborateswiththenon-governmental organisation “Wealth-from-organic-waste”,whichemergedfromanearlyecologicalcivilmove-mentandpromotesaviableorganicwasterecyclingtech-nique.Theorganisation’smembershavebeenadvertisingnatural bio-catalysts, or “biosanitisers”, developed by theBhawalkar Ecological Research Institute (BERI) for manyyears. City residents,mostly housewives, aremotivated touseorganicwasteandthebiosanitiserstocultivateorganicfruits and vegetables on their rooftops and terraces. Thecomponentsaresimplyaddedtothecultivationbeds.Thepracticeisviableforcitiesbecauseofthemicro-scalefarm-ing techniques involved, low cost, and lack of unpleasantsmellsduringthedecompositionoforganicwastes.

The new regulatory framework provided an improvedcontextinwhichtopromotethispractice.CitizensinPunehavestartedtoimplementcityfarmingatdifferentscales:fromherbalkitchengardenstocultivatedterracesofmorethan100m2.Localwardofficersnowcooperatewithbuildersandinhabitantsinprovidinginfrastructureforthecompostsitesonthesocieties’courtyardsandindisseminatingknow-howontheuseofcompostincityfarming,anorphanagerecyclesitsdiaperwasteandusesterracegardenstoeducatechildrenaboutnature;prisonersrecycletheprison’skitchenwaste and grow fruits and vegetables; organic waste is

Cultivation in plastic bags with soil and organic wastePhotos: Sohal Behmanesh

Page 28: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010 www.ruaf.org

ReferencesBehmanesh, Sohal (2009): Urban Agriculture in pune/india. Transition processes in the context of an emerging megacity. Diploma Thesis, University of Cologne; in cooperation with Bharati Vidyapeeth institute of Environment Education and research (BViEEr) of pune.

Doshi, r.T., Doshi, S. & Shah, Vandana (2003): City Farming - the Natural Alternative, Experiences in india. in: Urban Agriculture Magazine (August), 18-19.

Kraas, Frauke & Kroll, Mareike (2008): Steuerungsprobleme aufstei-gender Megastädte- Zur reorganisation der Abfallwirtschaft von pune/indien. in: Geographische rundschau 60 (11), 56-61.

Kroll, Mareike (2007): Nachhaltige Steuerung aufsteigender Megastädte? Abfallwirtschaft in pune, indien. Diploma thesis, University of Cologne.

Yasmeen, Gisèle (2001): Urban Agriculture in india: A Survey of Expertise, Capacities and recent Experience. City Feeding people report 32.

For more information: institute of Natural Organic Agriculture (n.a.): www.inoraindia.com

Bhawalkar Ecological research institute (BEri) (n.a.): Biosanitizer Brief. www.wastetohealth.com

Municipal Solid Waste Management as an incentive for City Farming in pune, india

compostedinamaternityhospital;anddisabledarmyveter-ansplantmedicinalplantsintheirresidence.

Efficientdisposalofgarbageseemstobethemostsignifi-cantmotivationforusers.Theaccess tohealthyandfreshfoodandtheecologicalbenefitsseemtobeoflesserimpor-tance.But,thepotentialforcreatingclosednutritioncycleswithin the city and reducing its ecological footprint byproducingfreshorganicproductsonsiteisunderestimated.Lackofawarenessispartlytoblame,butalsothefactthatprojectsinvolvemainlymiddleclassinhabitantsofhousingsocieties.

Anothercityfarmingproject,initiatedbythePMCwiththeinternational NGO International Institute for EnergyConservation(IIEC)envisagestheinvolvementoflocalenvi-ronmentalNGOsandproductsuppliersforabroadimple-mentationofrooftopgardensonprivate,publicandcommer-cialbuildings.

Bottlenecks and potentialsPune’s municipality has a good basic understanding ofdifferentkindsofcityfarming.TheMSW2000amendmentsprovidedanimportantincentivefortheemergenceofcityfarming using composted organic household wastes.However,thepotentialforpovertyalleviationandchancesforbroadercollaborationinimplementingwaste-recyclingtechniqueshavebeenneglected.Lower-incomehouseholdsandorganicwasterecyclingarenotconsidered incurrentcity farmingprojectproposalsof theGardenDepartment.Thelackofinterestinaddressingsocialmattersmaystemfrom the Department’s limitedmandate. The disposal ofwastesfallsunderthemandateoftheHealthDepartment,whichhasnovisionregardingdevelopinganeco-city.

SomeattemptshavebeenmadetoimplementcityfarmingoninformalholdingsinPune,however,theinsecurityoflandholdingsandthedenselybuiltinfrastructureinslums,wherelightandspacearelimitingfactorsforcultivation,areimpor-tantobstacles.AprojectinitiatedbyalocalNGO,inwhichslum dwellers produced and sold manure from organicwaste, ended due to a forced eviction from the area(Behmanesh2009).

Sofar,noefforthasbeenmadetobringtogetherdifferentstakeholders,suchasthemunicipality,NGOs,buildingsoci-eties,sluminhabitantsandurbanfarmers.TheHealthandGarden departments of the municipality have also not

exchanged information regarding their city farmingproj-ects. Important synergy effects could be achieved if thedifferentdepartmentsofthemunicipalityintegratedtheirexistingcityfarmingapproaches.Awarenessraisingaboutthepotentialofasustainablevalorisationoforganicwastesinslumcommunitieswithinsufficientmunicipalinfrastruc-turalfacilitiesisneeded.IfthevisionoftransformingPuneinto a pilot city of“green roofs” in India (see Behmanesh2009)progresses,thefirststepofbringingtogetherenviron-mentalandconstructionstakeholderscouldbeexpandedtoincludeasocialcomponent.ThePMC,asarepresentativeofallofPune’sinhabitants,shouldthenfacilitateamoreinclu-siveandholisticapproachtocityfarming.

The future ThePuneMunicipalCorporationisslowlyadoptingtheideaoforganicwasterecyclingandcityfarmingandsupportingits promotion. One important incentive for urbanites toapplythesepracticesathouseholdlevelwasprovidedbytheMSW 2000 rule amendments. If implementation can beexpanded(tootherhousesandslums),themetropoliswillbenefit from this closing of nutrient loops, but also fromaugmentedurbanbiodiversity,decreasedwaterrun-offaswellasanimprovedmicroclimate.Allotmentgardeningandeco-housing projects using rooftops as garden areas arestarting to emerge. An information exchange on innova-tionsofwaste-recyclingtechniquestogetherwiththesenewinitiativescouldbenefitall typesofcity farmingactivitiesandbroadentheeffectsofadecentraliseddisposaloforganicwastes.

Sohal Behmanesh CenterforDevelopmentResearch,Bonn,GermanyEmail:[email protected]

28

Rooftop garden in PunePhoto: Sohal Behmanesh

RoTrees on thin layers of soil in a backyardPhoto: Sohal Behmanesh

Page 29: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

29

www.ruaf.org

Urban agriculture is increasingly common inBogotá,thecapitalofColombia.Especiallyduetorural-to-urbanmigration, the percentage of Colombians living incities rose from40percent in 1951 to75percent in2005(DANE,2009).Thepovertyrateinmanyofthecountry’scitiesisincreasingandagrowingproportionofurbanresidentsencounterdifficultiesinsecuringaccesstofood.Inaddition,thereisanincreaseindemandfororganicallyproducedfoodandmanyinhabitantsarepreparedtopaymoreforthequal-ityandsafetythattheseproductsoffer.Urbanfarmersarewellpositionedtotakeadvantageofthislucrativemarket.

There are an estimated 4000 agricultural producers inBogotá.Intheperiurbanareastherearemorethan300hect-ares ofhighlyproductive vegetablegardensboth inopenfieldsandingreenhouses.Inthecityitself,though,mostlycontainers are used in open or closed spaces (backyards).These containers need substrate capable of maintainingcontinuous harvests, especially if they are used for theproductionofvegetables.

PeatisoneofthemostfrequentlyusedsubstratesinBogotá,particularlyforgrowingtomatoesandothervegetables.Itisanaturalproduct,containing80percentorganicmatterthathasmanypositivequalitiesincludinggoodwaterretention.It is free of pathogens and thus need not be disinfected.However,peatisimportedfromCanadaandisveryexpensive(approximatelyUSD2/kg).Itismoreaffordableforcommer-cialproducerswhohaveextensiveareasofproduction(10-30ha)thanforsmallproducerswhocultivateonlysmallareas(0.5-2ha).Smallproducersaremore interested incheaper,localsubstratesofhighqualitysuchas lime,compost,rawhusk,scum(residueofburntcharcoal),burnthusk,charcoal-sand,solidhumus,sawdustandurbanwastecompost.

Dueto thehighpriceofavailablesubstrates,mainlypeat,thereisaneedforcheaper,locallyproduced,substrates(ofthesamehighquality).Inaddition,recyclingoflocallyavail-ablematerialreducespollutionandthecostof(urban)wastemanagement.Forinstance,inwarmerregionswheresugarproductiondominates(CachazaandVinaza), thecontami-nationofriversandsoilshasbeendiminishedbyalmost60

Commercial Substrates for Urban Agriculture in BogotáThere is a need for low-cost, locally produced sub-strates for urban agricultural production in Bogotá, Colombia. The Colombian Agricultural Research Corporation (CORPOICA) coordinates participatory research on substrate mixtures using a wide vari-ety of low-cost organic materials.

Blanca ArceAndrés Peña

percent throughthecompostingof industrialwaste.Thiswasteisutilisedassubstrateinvegetableproduction.AndinCajicaCity,under theorganicwaste recyclingprogrammeinitiatedin2008,organicwastefromall11,000households(50,000 citizens) is collected and converted into organicfertiliser for agricultural use. Local high school studentsteach households how to make the compost at home.MaterialsareprovidedbyCajicaCity,andthecollectedwastecompostisusedfororganicfertiliserandanimalfeed.

Astudywasundertaken in2009 toevaluate these locallyavailablesubstrates,usingmixturesfromawidevarietyoflow-costorganicmaterialsthatcouldbeusedinurbanagri-culture.

The projectTheurbanagricultureprojectCORPOICAworkedwiththreeschools and households in three municipalities of theDepartment of CundinamarcaWest Savannah of Bogotá:Funza,FacatativaandElRosal.Thisinvolved60teachers,90students (from elementary school to high school) and 21households.Theprojectaimedatstrengtheningtechnologi-calinnovationandskills,byinvolvingresearchers,teachers,students and households in participatory planning andresearch(Photo1).

Theprojectinvolvedthefollowingsteps.• Workinggroupswereorganizedcomprisingofresearch-ers,teachers,studentsandfarmers.

• A programme of technical-pedagogical training (withtheoryandpractice)wascreated,basedonagro-ecologicalguidelinesandgoodagriculturalpractices.

• Urbanandperiurbanhorticulturalspacesweredesignedinaparticipatoryway(separatelyforeachgroupinitsown

Fresh vegetables produced on substratePhoto: Blanca Arce, Urban Agriculture Project-Corpoica, Colombia

Page 30: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010 www.ruaf.org

30

environment)and inaccordancewith local,educationalandsocio-economicconditions.

• Vegetables were identified and agricultural techniqueswerediscussed,adjustedandvalidated.

• Participantsmonitoredthetechnologicalinnovations.• Didactic support material for technology transferencewascreated,andurbanagriculturewas included in thecurriculumoftheelementaryandthehighschool.

• OutreachactivitieswereundertakenintencitiesaroundBogotá,todisseminatetheresultsachieved.

Sixlocallyavailablesubstrateswereevaluated(inPVCgutter-ing):treatedsoil(lime,compost,rawhusk),scum(residueofburntcharcoal),burnthusk,charcoal(togetherwithsandataratioof2:1),andsolidhumus(mixtureofsoil,solidhumusandrawhuskataratioof2:1:1).ThesystemofPVCguttersisidealforusewithcropsthathavealonggrowingcycle,astheyprovideagoodaccommodationfortheroots,arelowcostandsavewaterandelectricity.

Theprojectlookedattheperformanceoflettuceplantsindifferentcontainers.Similartestsweredoneintheresearchcentre,inthreeurbanschoolgardensandinsixurbanhomekitchen gardens.The substratesmadeup of two ormorematerialsmixed togetherdemonstratedbetterpropertiesthanthosethatonlycontainedoneelement.Differenttech-niqueswerealsoapplied:rainwaterharvesting,theuseofvarioussubstratesincludingsolidandliquid(onlywaterandwithnutrient solutions). It is important tohave the rightsubstrate mixture, and specific mixtures are needed fordifferentvegetables.Thenutrientsolutionswerecomposedof minor andmajor elements (chloride, sodium, sulphur,magnesium,calcium,potassium,iron,copper,bromine,zinc).These nutrient solutions when used in substrates arespecially formulated to nurture the development of theplants,whichhavedifferentneedsdependingontheirstageofgrowth.Theyareeasytoobtainandhandleandtheyarecheaperthanimportedalternatives.

Main results Through this project vegetable production in vessels andcontainers and in conventional organic gardens hasimproved in Bogotá. Various systems of production havebeendevelopedandrecommendedforgrowingurbancropsin containers. For both containers and organic gardens, atrainingmodulehasalsobeendeveloped.Themodule forconventionalorganicgardensemphasisestheefficientuseofnaturalresources(soil,water)andenvironmentalconser-vation(Photo2).Themoduleforvesselsorcontainersincludesavarietyofdifferentmaterials,suchasPVCguttering,prefab-ricatedroofmaterial,fibrecementboards,blackplasticbags,recycled soft drink bottles, wood; and in different set up:pyramidal, stepped and netted structures (see GonzálezRojas,2007:UAMno19).

Thesubstratesofrawhuskandburnthuskweretheleastefficientbecauseof their lowmoisture retentioncapacityandthedifficultyofachievinghomogeneoushumidity.Ricehuskisasub-productofthemillingindustry,whichisnotavailablelocally,sothemaincostistransport.

Themixturesusing solidhumus (combinedwith soil andrawhusk)andcompost(combinedwithlimeandrawhusk)hadbetter characteristics in termsofgermination rateoflettuce;moistureretentioncapacity;infiltrationanddrain-age; contamination; colour of the crop; environmentalconservation;costandavailabilityatlocallevel;andquality.With thesemixtures, the urban farmers obtained lettucewithagreaternumberofleavesandahigherfreshweight,thusleadingtobetterearnings.Theothertypesofsubstrateproducedlettucewithnutritionaldeficienciesandthusledto lower quality and output. For more information seeTibaitatá-Corpoicaresearchcenter(2009).

The production of lettuce using thesemixtures achievedresultssimilartothoseobtainedwiththeuseofcommercialsubstrate.Thedisadvantageof thelatter is that it ismoreexpensiveandcomesinlarger(25kg)bags.Theseneedtobestored,whichisnotgoodforthequalityofthesubstrate.Amixtureofcompostwithlocalproductsseemstobeagoodalternativeintermsofprice,performanceandaccessibility(itiseasytoproduceorbuyinshopsinthecity).

FutureTeachers, students and households are replicating andadapting their vegetable production systems in built-upareas, including thedesignof theirurbangarden schoolsandhouseholdproductiveunits.Byusingdifferentcontain-ers,theycantakebetteradvantageofthescarceamountofspaceavailable,andplantawidervarietyofspeciesfortheirownconsumptionandforsale.Inthiswaytheyhavebeenable to improve their family’s diet, diversify their foodpatterns, and generate complementary income.Recommendations are being developed on the use ofsubstrates containing compost and local sub-products. Agrowinguseofcompostwillreducetheamountofwasteinthecity.Theresultsareencouraging,butmoreresearch isneededonissuesliketransport,typeofcontainersandvege-tablevarieties.

Blanca Arce, Andrés Peña ColombianAgriculturalResearchCorporation(CORPOICA),Bogotá,ColombiaEmail:[email protected]

Commercial Substrates for Urban Agriculture in Bogotá

Substrates were tested in different technologies at the Tibaitatá research centrePhoto: Blanca Arce, Urban Agriculture Project-Corpoica, Colombia

References on page 52

Page 31: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

31

www.ruaf.orgUrban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

Theallotmentgardenconceptwasintroducedin2003 by the PeriUrban Vegetable Project (“PUVeP”) inCagayan de Oro City in the Southern Philippines (seeUA-Magazineno. 18andno. 20).Thanks to the supportofcommunitygroups,XavierUniversityandlocalgovernment,todaytherearetenallotmentgardensinoperationforthebenefit of the urban poor. As PUVeP has also introducedcompostingandvermicomposting,thegardeningcommu-nitiesare thusfamiliarwith thebenefitsofusingorganicwasteasfertiliserforfoodproduction(PUVeP,2008).

Reuse of organic wastePlanningforthereuseoforganicwasterequiresexamina-tionofthesolidwastestreaminthefollowingstages:segre-gation(insomesystems);collection;transportation;process-ing; and disposal or reuse. Each of these steps has to beviewed in relation to the different sources of the waste.Organicsolidwasteisgeneratedroughlyintwoways:itiseitherinbulkandsegregated(suchaswastefromwholesaleproducemarkets)ordispersedandunsegregated(suchaswastegeneratedbyhouseholdsandsmall-scalecommercialoperations).Thesecategories requiredifferentapproachesincollectionandprocessing.

Under the conventional approach inmost cities,unsegre-gated solidwaste is collectedand transported toa singlecentralised location. An alternative is a decentralisedapproachinwhicheachdistrict takesresponsibilityfor itsownsolidwastemanagement,fromcollectiontoprocessingandreuse.ThisisessentiallytheprinciplebehindnationallegislationthathasbeenintroducedinthePhilippines,theEcologicalSolidWasteManagementAct (RA9003)and, inCagayandeOroCity,asupportingmunicipalordinance(No.

Using Participatory Urban Design to “Close the Nutrient Loop”: A Case study from the PhilippinesA shift towards resilient cities will require more than rethinking the built form; it will require the redesign of systems to facilitate more sustainable urban living practices. “Closing the nutrient loop” is an important principle in sustainable urban design, but challenging to implement. Engaging the com-munity in the design of such systems is therefore critical to their successful implementation.

Jeannette M.E. Tramhel

8975-2003).This legislationrequiressegregation, recyclingand composting, and represents a shift away from theconventional practice of operating a single centraliseddumpsite towards a decentralised approach with severalsmaller sites, referred to as Materials Recovery Facilities(MRFs).Effectiveimplementationofthislegislationrequiresthatsolidwastebesegregatedatitssourceandthatseveralpracticalissuesbeaddressed.

Participatory urban design A participatory process was undertaken to explore theseissues with selected communities in Cagayan de Oro(Barangays Lapasan, Kauswagan and Macasandig). Thesethree“barangays”(districts)werealreadyfamiliarwithallot-mentgardensandhadexpressedinterestintheproject.Theprocesshadthesupportoftheircouncilsandthecityadmin-istration.

Participatory urban design is based on the principle that“theenvironmentworksbetterifthepeopleaffectedbyitschangesareactively involved in its creationandmanage-mentinsteadofbeingtreatedaspassiveconsumers”(Sanoff,

Vegetable landing area at Agora MarketPhoto: Jeanette Tramhel

Page 32: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010 www.ruaf.org

32

2000).Moreover,urbandesignisinherentlyanasset-basedapproach,giventhatthedesignerisgenerallyencouraged“tobeginwithwhatisalreadythere.”Therefore,theapproachknownasAsset BasedCommunityDevelopment (“ABCD”)was explored for its suitability as a participatory urbandesigntool.Itwasincorporatedintothetraditional“designcharrette”,whichwasrestructuredasa two-stageprocessthatbeganwithcommunityconsultationsineachbarangay,followedbya trainingcourse fora coregroupof selectedparticipants.

1)CommunityconsultationsParticipantswereencouragedtosharetheir“successstories”–thesecouldbeanyaccomplishments,largeorsmall,initi-atedbymembersofthecommunity,eithertogetherorindi-vidually, related to organic wastemanagement or urbanagriculture and the community assets (i.e. skills, people,physicalresources)thathadbeeninvolvedtoachievethem.These accomplishments (or“assets”) were indicated on abasemap.Majorsourcesoforganicwastewere identifiedwithbluedotsandexistingorpotentialsitesforurbanagri-culturewereshownbygreendots.Theexerciseencourageda shift in mindset among participants towards viewingorganic“waste”asacommunity“asset”.Participantsweretheninvitedtodevelopavisionstatementfortheintegra-tionoforganicsolidwastemanagementwithurbanagricul-tureintheircommunity.

Inasecondconsultation,participantswereaskedtoconsiderandpostanypossibleprojectsfortheintegrationoforganicsolidwastemanagementandurbanagriculturethatwouldhelp the community move towards its vision statement.Thegroupprioritisedandselectedoneideaasthebasisforapilotproject.

2)TrainingofCommunityEcoAidsThepurposeofthetrainingcoursewastwo-fold;itservedsimultaneouslyasadesignstudioandasacapacity-buildingexercisetofostercommunity-basedenvironmentalleader-ship.Ineachbarangay,outofthosewhohadparticipatedintheconsultations,7-8personswereselectedwhowereinter-estedinthetopicandhadalreadydemonstratedleadershippotential.

Duringthe5-daycourse,traineesdevelopedasiteplanforthepilotproject that theirowncommunitieshadchosen.Thisrequiredthattraineesbeprovidedwithabasicunder-standing of the principles behind waste segregation, theadvantages of “closing the nutrient loop,” the basics ofcomposting and its use in agriculture, and the socio-economicdimensionsofwastemanagement.Asessiononcity planning andurban design explained planning tools

suchaslandusezoning,aswellastheprinciplesof“design-ingwithnature” (McHarg, 1967)andcreating“continuousproductive urban landscapes” (Viljoen, 2005). Anothersession considered how the commercial sector could beengaged.These lecturesweresupplementedwith“hands-on”exercisesandfieldtrips.Allof theinformationgainedwasusedinthedevelopmentofthepilotprojects.

At theendof theweek, finalpresentationsweremade tobarangay officials and other invited guests. Each teampresenteditsproposedpilotprojecttoitsrespectivebaran-gaycouncil.Follow-upconsultationswerethenheldinthebarangaystoprovideanopportunityforthecommunitytoofferfeedbackandsupportforprojectimplementation. Inthemonths thathave followed,CommunityEcoAids inallthree barangays have started implementing elements oftheirprojectproposals.

Design proposal for Barangay LapasanTheprimarysourceofbulkorganicsolidwasteinLapasanistheAgoramarketandvegetable landingarea (seephoto).Accordingtomunicipaldata,itgeneratesonaverageabout16m3(or9t)oforganicsolidwasteperday.Bycomparison,theunsegregatedsolidwastethatisgeneratedby320house-holdsinthepilotareawouldamounttoonlyabout0.5tperday.1Theamountofcompostthatcanbeproducedfromthisvolumevariesgreatly,dependingonthequalityoftheinputmaterialandtheprocessingmethodunderlocalconditions.UsingIndonesianwindrowsorboxcomposting,3toforganicsolid waste generates about 750 kg of compost (Eawag/Sandec:2006,34);conversionratesof25-27percentforthesemethods seem to be the norm in most Asian countries(WasteConcern:2007).2

Basedonprecedentstudiesofsimilarfacilities,itwasesti-matedthattoprocess1-3toforganicwasteperday,about1,000m2wouldberequired.3AfacilityofthatsizeinLapasancouldprocessaboutonethirdoftheorganicwastefromthemarketandlandingareaandalloftheorganicwastefromabout650-2000households(orsomeothercombinationofthetwosources).Basedona25percentconversionrate,suchafacilityprocessing1-3torganicwasteperdaycouldproduce250-750kgofcompostperday(90-270tperyear).

Asset mapping in MacasandigPhoto: Jeanette Tramhel

“After five years, Barangay Macasandig will be one of the cleanest and greenest barangays in the city with healthy people, who are orderly, peaceful, self-reliant and self-suffi-cient in vegetable production and root crops as a result of composting and recycling of organic waste.”

Vision Statement, July 10, 2008

Using participatory Urban Design to “Close the Nutrient loop”: A Case study from the philippines

Page 33: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

www.ruaf.orgUrban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

Asimilarcalculationcanbemadetodeterminethelandareathatwouldberequiredto“absorb”thisamountofcompost.Itisestimatedthat,underlocalconditions,oneha(i.e.10,000m2) can absorb about 12 t of compost per year (Holmer:2009).4Given that theaverageallotmentgarden isabout3,000m2,onesuchgardencanabsorbabout4tofcompostperyear.Putinanotherway:onehacanabsorbtheorganicsolidwastegeneratedbyabout85households,andoneallot-ment garden (of 3,000 m2) can absorb that of about 30households.

The site thatwas considered for thisdesignproposal is apieceofvacantlandthatcomprisesabout15,000m2intotal.Itsadvantagesincludeitsproximitytothemarketandland-ingarea,toamillthatcansupplysawdustandtopotentialendusers (producersenroute tomarket). Italsoabutsanexistingallotmentgardenandisservicedbygoodroadswithtworeasonablepointsofaccess.

Thesiteplan thatwasdeveloped for Lapasan includesanMRF (5,000m2)with facilities to process compost, to sortrecyclablesandresiduals,andanadjacentallotmentgarden(5,000 m2). As the site is intended to eventually processsolidorganicwastefromtheAgoramarketandlandingareaaswellasthatfromhouseholds,theEcoAidshadtoconsidersuitablemethods of collection and transport for the twosources.Theirplanproposesthatthewastefromthemarketbecollectedbycityvehiclesalongthemajorroadsindicatedinred;andthatbarangaytruckscollectthehouseholdwastealongthesmallerroadsindicatedinpurpleandbytricyclesalongtheroutesindicatedinyellow(seemap).

Theunderlyingprincipleforthisurbandesignconceptwasenvironmental sustainability. But social and economicsustainabilitywerealsoconsidered;theplanintegratestheexisting functions performed by tricycle drivers in wastecollection,takesintoaccountthesalesofexcesscomposttooffsetsomeoftheoperationalcosts,andpromotesmutualsupport between the MRF and adjacent gardens. As theproposalandsiteplanweredevelopedaspartofacapacity-

building exercise, it is hoped that the“EcoAids” return totheir community with skills and enthusiasm for projectimplementation.Ultimately,“closingthenutrientloop”willrequireaseriousteameffortandsupportfromtheentirecommunity.

Jeannette M.E. TramhelPlan:NetLimitedEmail:[email protected]

The author wishes to acknowledge the support of an ECOPOLIS Graduate Research and Design Award from the International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada.

Notes1) This has been calculated as follows: 320 x 5 persons per household x

0.6 kg/SW per person x 50% organic matter. 2) More efficient methods will improve conversion rates; if more of the

nutrient content in the organic matter is retained, the result is better-quality compost. Not only does shredding the material hasten the process, it also improves conversion; in experiments conducted at the periUrban Vegetable project at Xavier University College of Agriculture, conversion rates of 67 per cent have been achieved (Holmer: 2009).

3) Box composting requires 800 m2; indonesian windrows requires 1000 m2 (Eawag/Sandec: 2006, 50). This is consistent with information from other studies and operations in other barangay.

4) This has been calculated by pUVep as follows: A general recommen-dation is 2 to 4 t of compost per ha for each cropping, depending on the status of the organic matter in the soil: if the level is low, 4 t are recommended, but if satisfactory, then 2 t are adequate. As the duration of a cropping is on average 3 months, it is reasonable to expect 4 croppings per year. With an average application of 3 t per ha per cropping, 12 t of compost would be required per year per ha. This also varies with the type of crop.

5) Suggested size for an allotment garden is a minimum of 3,000-3,500 m2, to enable a 300 m2 plot per family (pUVep Garden Handbook: 2008).

Sharing success stories in MacasandigPhotos: Jeanette Tramhel

Design concept for the site plan in LapasanPhoto: Jeanette Tramhel

33

Using participatory Urban Design to “Close the Nutrient loop”: A Case study from the philippines

Page 34: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

34

www.ruaf.org

Theuseofliquidandsolidurbanwasteforanimaland crop production in the city is a centuries-old practice.Throughouttheworld,urbanfarmerssupplynutrientstotheircropsbyapplyingorganicmatterand/orchemicalfertilisers.InYaoundé,Cameroon,63percentofurbanandperiurbanfarm-ers purchase recycled livestockwastes and 75 per cent userecoveredandrecycledfreshanddecomposedkitchenwaste(Parrotet al.,2009).InDakar,Senegal,98percentofurbanandperiurbanfarmersuseorganicmatter,eitherfromlivestock(35percent),plantandsoil-basedcompost(46percent)orcitywastes(19percent)(Ba,2007).InAntananarivo,Madagascar,100percentuse livestockmanure:88percentusemanurefromtheanimalsontheirownfarms,and12percentbuyit.Mostoftheseurbanfarmersalsousechemicalfertilisers.

Buttheuseofliquidandsolidurbanwasterequiresmedia-tiontoconnectitintheeyesofthepublictotheproductionofhealthyfood.

UrbanwastewasusedforperiurbanagricultureinParistwocenturies ago, but has disappeared because of healthconcerns.Inthe19thcentury,marketgardenersinParisdeliv-eredtheirvegetablestothecentralmarkets,andduringthenightcollectedhouseholdrefusefromthestreetsasreturnfreight.Thiswasallinagreementwiththeadministrationofthecity.However,asEuropeancitiesdeveloped,theseprac-tices became increasingly unpopular. The “Great Stink ofLondon”in1858andthefearofcholeraledtopoliciesthatsetinmotiontheconstructionofseweragesystemsasanorderlyway to removewasteandwastewater from thebigcities.SewersystemsbecameobligatoryinParisin1852,butledtopollutionoftheriverSeine(Barles,2005;Mandinaud,2005).A solution was seen in market gardening using sewage.Although the restrictions were very rigorous (no contactbetweenthewaterandconsumedpartsofthecrop,limita-tiontovegetablesthatarecookedbeforeconsumption),anoriginal urban market gardening zone was created onaround 2,000 ha.This system functioned for a long timewithoutanysanitationproblems,butaftertheFirstWorldWar chemical industries increasingly used the seweragesystem,andpollutionbecameamajorconcern.Stillitwasattheendofthe20thcentury,thattheauthoritiesprohibitednotonlymarketgardeningbutalsoother formsofurbanwaste recycling. Numerous certification processes do not

allow the use of sludge in cropproduction, so it is replaced withchemical fertilisers. This processhas had a strong psychologicalimpact,andstillmanypolicymakers

Using Urban Organic Waste as a Source of Nutrients, the need of awareness raising

prefertobuildwasteincineratorsratherthanallowtherecy-clingofurbanorganicwastes.

As inmanyother cities indeveloping countries, inHanoi,Vietnam, urbanwaste recycling iswidespread but slowlydeclining.Of theurban farmers, 56per centbuymanure,mainlyfrompoultry,butalsofrompigsandlivestock.Theyalsobuycompostfromthelocalwastetreatmentcompany(Mai Thi Phuong Anh, 2004). The VAC system (Vuo`n AoChuoˆng,orliterally:garden-pond-breeding),integratespigbreedingwithaquaculture,inanefforttoclosethenutrientcycle.However,theexportofproductsforhumanconsump-tionnecessarilyleadstoaneedforadditionalinputs.RecentresearchonurbanandperiurbanmarketgardeninginHanoihasshownthatthemajorityofaddednutrientsaresuppliedbychemicalfertilisers,althoughsomeorganicwasteisused.OnethirdofthenitrogenusedinurbanagricultureinHanoiisfromorganicmatter,whichisappliedmainlyintheformofpigorpoultrymanurefromthefarmer’sownanimalsoraneighbouringfarm(ToThiThuHa,2008).

Althougha closed cycle that includesallurbanwastesandurbanagriculturedoesnotexist,itwouldbeawasteofthisvaluableresourceifthecurrentsystemofrecycling,whichhasproven to be reliable in many situations, disappearedcompletely.Increasingurbanisationislikelytodeterioratethecity/agriculturerelationship.However,despitetherapiddevel-opmentofeconomicactivitiesinHanoi,agricultureisstillanimportantpartofthecityanditmustbeintegratedinurbanprojects.Awarenessraisingandsupportivepoliciesareneces-sarytomakeoptimaluseofavailablenutrientsinthecity.

Hubert de Bon, CIRAD,URHortSys,Montpellier,FranceEmail:[email protected]é Fleury, ENSP,Versailles,FranceEmail:[email protected] Thi Thu Ha, FAVRI,GiaLam,Hanoi,VietnamEmail:[email protected]

Hubert de Bon André FleuryTo Thi Thu Ha

Photo: H. de Bon

References on page 38Photo: H. de Bon

Page 35: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

35

www.ruaf.org

No Place Like Home: Capacity development in master composting programmesDomestic waste in developing countries contains a great deal of organic material – ranging from 60 to 90 per cent (Lacoste and Chalmin, 2007). Some of this waste is routinely fed to animals, or decomposes in heaps in landfills, illegal dumps or transfer stations. There is widespread agreement that composting is a less expensive and more environmentally attractive way to manage this waste, especially in low- and middle-income countries.

Yetexperiencewithcompostingisquitedisappoint-ing,particularlyindevelopingcountries.Large-scalecompost-ingprojectsfallapartwhenitturnsoutthatthevalueofcompostdoesnotcoverthecostsofseparatecollectionandcompostingatalargescale.ExperienceindevelopedcountriessuggeststhatcompostingisabletocompeteonlywhenthepriceofcontrolleddisposalinalandfillorincineratorrisesaboveaboutUSD40(WASTE,2009).Theresultisthatmuchorganicwastegoestodumpsitesorisdischargedtolandorwater.

Homeandcommunitycomposting–wherethecompostisused by the household, institution or community thatproducesit–presentsanelegantwayoutofthisdilemma,becausethereisaclosedloopandnoexternalmarketsareneeded.Traininghouseholdstoseparatewasteandcompostthemselveshasformedthebasisforanumberofsuccessfulinitiatives in North America and Europe, specifically inBelgiumandtheUK(LöfflerandVanacker,2006).Upuntilnow,however,thishomecompostinghasremainedmostlya“rich country” approach, and has not really entered thediscussionofmodernisingthesolidwasteinfrastructureindevelopingcountries.

Solid waste management as a social systemSolidwastemanagementisaso-calledsystem of provision.Itsharescertaincharacteristicswithotherurbaninfrastruc-turesystemsinenvironmentalmanagement,suchasenergy,waterandtransportationsystems.Localauthoritiesortheprivatesectorareproviders,removingsolidwastegeneratedbyhouseholdandbusinessusers(clients),andtransportingittodisposalortreatmentsites.

Wheretherearenoproviders,suchasinslumsorperiurbanornewlysettledareas,householdsandbusinesseshavetolive with their wastes or create their own managementsystems.Self-provisioningdescribesagroupofapproachesforhouseholdstoprovidetheirownenvironmentalservices.Household-basedprovisioningiswhatmosthouseholdsdobeforetheareainwhichtheyliveisurbanisedormodernised,but many of these traditional approaches have negative environmental externalities. In modern self-provisioning,environmental benefits are central: households choose toimplementtheirownsysteminordertoprotecttheenviron-ment. In the European Union, in countries like theNetherlands, Sweden, Germany and Denmark, self-provi-sioningisgaininginpopularityasacomplementtoformalprovisioningsystems(vanVlietet al.,2005).

Homecompostingputstheprovideranduserinthesameunit: thehousehold,or in somecases thebusiness.Homecomposting eliminatesmany of the costs formechanicalcollection, processing and transportation. Households areresponsible for treating and recycling their own organicwaste (Practical Action, 2007). Sustainability in homecomposting requires organised collective support andcapacitystrengtheningsystems:suchasthroughthemaster composter approach(Sherman,2005).

Anne Scheinberg Yuan Zheng

Photo: WASTE

Photo: WASTE

Page 36: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

36

www.ruaf.org

No place like Home: Gender and Capacity Development in Master Composting programmes

Master composter programmesThemastercomposterapproach isonewayoforganisinghome compostingwith a built-inmarketing and supportsystem for thehouseholds involved,whicharebothusersandproviders.ThesesystemshavebeenadoptedinBelgiumonalargescale(LöfflerandVanacker,2006).

In master composter programmes, the work of wastemanagementisaprocessofcapacitybuilding(Scheinberg,2007).Mastercompostersgothroughatraining,afterwhichtheyarepreparedtoteachhouseholdshowtomanagetheirown organicmaterials. As it is a capacity-based improve-mentapproach,thelargestpartoftheinvestmentgoestotraining.Thecostsofphysical infrastructureare less thanUSD 100perhousehold for a system that canmanageasmuchas 75 per cent of domesticwaste inmost low- andmiddle-incomecountries`(1).

Amastercomposterprogrammeisdesignedtosetinmotiona“virtualcycle”ofpractical,self-helpsolidwasteactivities,intheframeworkofmodernisedself-provisioning.Thetypeofapproachisrelatedtothe“eachonereachone”neighbour-to-neighbour initiatives, but it also has characteristics of“pyramid”salesschemes,suchasusedbyAvonforhouseholdproductsinNorthAmerica.Theobjectiveoftheprogrammeis to set up permanent relationships between speciallytrainedindividualsinthecommunity,the“mastercompos-ters”,andafixednumberof theirneighbours,friendsandrelatives,the“compostinghouseholds”.Themastercompos-tersarenotrequiredtopayfortheirtraining,buttheyareexpected to sign an agreement or contract that commitsthemtoparticipateforaperiodoftime.Thiscontractalsoentitlesthemtostatus,furthertrainingandotherbenefits(Longman,2000).

Once they have completed their three-day training, themastercompostersformagroupandcontinuetocooperatewitheachotherinlearninghowtocomposttheirownmate-rialsathome,somethingthatisabsolutelyessentialiftheyare to be able to help others. Each master composterprogressesthroughanumberofstages,eventuallybecom-ingthe“compostexpert”for15-25householdsintheirimme-diateneighbourhood.

Intropicalclimatesthere could be asmany as fourcompostingcyclesof three monthseach per year,while in temper-ateclimatesthisisoften limited totwo, becausecompostpiles arenot very active atambienttempera-turesinwinter.Stages in the

role of master composterStage 1. Make a commitment to being a master composter1. Agree to participate for a minimum of 2-3 years, to really get the programme going.2. Attend the training and apply the lessons to building your own home composting system.

Stage 2. Extend the reach and communicate the importance of home composting3. Tell others about the programme, especially potential households, the press and media, school and religious groups and government officials. 4. Recruit and subscribe 15-25 households per cycle.5. Conduct a three-day training which includes choosing and building compost bins on day 2, and agreeing on day 3 which families will start the process by taking the bins home and filling them.6. Where possible, collect or save organic waste divided into ‘green’ (nitrogen-rich) and ‘brown’ (carbon-rich) materials so that one of the composters can be charged with the collected compostables on day 3.

Stage 3. Build capacities for composting at household level7. Design and conduct training sessions for each of these households, which results in the selection of a household-spe-cific home composting “package” including a (standard or modified) bin, regular visits, support in using or “marketing” finished compost.8. As each household joins, be prepared to spend one to two hours per household, giving an orientation, identifying the main person in charge of the compost, siting the composting bin, where relevant choosing the type of bin, modifying the existing bin, etc.9. Visit the household as requested by the household members.10. Support the household in using the compost at their own

house or at another location, such as a separate garden or farming area, or the houses of relatives.

Stage 4. Organise collective solutions for issues households cannot solve themselves11. Support the household in safe management/marketing of excess compost.

12. Organise removal of partially or completely finished compost if the household cannot use it or market it them-selves.

13. Organise as needed the purchase of supplies, materials and tools for groups of households.

14. Facilitate lab testing, agronomic advice, specialised trou-ble-shooting, etc.

15. Be alert to problems, trends or situations that need atten-tion; write down your observations, and communicate these to the programme coordinators on a regular basis.

Photo: WASTE

Page 37: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

37

Stage 5. Monitor effectiveness and contribute to continued programmatic development16. Supply each household with self-monitoring forms and

teach them how to use them.17. Visit each household on a regular “route” about once a month to collect the self-monitoring forms and check how things are going.

18. Participate in a quarterly needs analysis and fine-tuning exercise, to develop new programme components such as a “compost bank” or “trouble-shooting tools”.

19. Report on each cycle and begin a new cycle at least once, and preferably twice, per year.

20. Cooperate with municipal or NGO programme coordinators and support overall research, monitoring and evaluation.

Master composter as a development interven-tionAs part of its project portfolio,WASTE, Advisers onUrbanEnvironment and Development (www.waste.nl), adaptedand implemented themaster composter approach (as a“bestpractice” inhomecomposting) in three countries.AWASTE-supportedmaster composter initiativewas imple-mentedinaBulgarianvillagestartingin2007;andmonitor-ingshowsmodestresultsintermsofwasteseparation,butalsocitizeninvolvementandawarenessofthewasteissue.Anothermastercomposterinitiativealsobeganin2007inHambantotaandKalmunai,respectivelySinhalaandTamil-speaking regions of Sri Lanka. The approach was furtherintroducedinCentralAmericain2010:inSanJosé,CostaRica,andinagroupofeightperiurbancommunitiesparticipat-inginWASTE’sISSUE2programmeinManagua,Nicaragua.

Topoli, Varna County, BulgariaImplementation of the master composter approach inBulgariabegan in 2007, towards the closeof a three-yearMATRA project funded by the Dutch Ministry of ForeignAffairs to offer alternative approaches to environmentalservices in villages.Abouthalf thepopulation inBulgarialivesinvillages,eachconsistingof200to1,000households(Scheinberg,2007).

TheMATRAprojectworkedwithself-provisioninginwastemanagement through on-site composting of householdorganicwaste, sometimes in combinationwithurineandanimal manures. The goal forWASTE’s Bulgarian mastercomposterprogrammewasexperimentationandtestingofanalternativemodelforwastemanagement.Thestrategywas to carry out a small-scale experiment in the largestvillageintheMATRAproject,Topoli,toinvestigatewhetherthisapproachwouldhavepotentialaspartofavillageself-provisioningstrategyinBulgaria.

The programme startedwith 15 households. Participationincreasedintheinitialmonthstoabout40householdsinthatvillage,butfailed tocontinueexpandingbeyondthisnumber.

Hambantota, Southern Province, and Kalmunai, Eastern Province, Sri LankaIncontrast,thegoalfortheSriLankaprogrammewasmorepracticalasitfocusedonimprovingtheexistingsystem.Theplanwastoworkwithlocalorganisationstoimprovesolidwaste management through self-provisioning for 10,000tsunami-affectedhouseholdsintwodistricts:7,000house-holdsinHambantotaintheSouthernProvinceand3,000inAmparaDistrict.Homecompostingbinshadbeendistrib-utedwidely during thepost-tsunamiperiod, butwithoutanytrainingorsupport.Themastercomposterprogrammewas designed to test whether organised support couldimprovetheperformanceandsatisfactionrate.

The project provided basic training to the first group ofmaster composters in two communities. The two groupsweremade up of representatives ofmeso-level organisa-tions,institutions,orotherentitiesineachlocationand10to20membersofindividualhouseholds.Theaimwasforeachmastercompostertorecruit15-25householdstoparticipateincompostingwithinthefirstyear,and60-100householdsbytheendofthesecondyear.Thetrainingcouldthuspoten-tiallysetinmotionhomecompostingbyasmanyas2,000householdsineachlocationwithintwoyears.InHambantota,theprojectreachedseveralhundredhouseholdswithinthefirst several years. It was less popular in Ampara District(Scheinberg,2007),apparentlydueinparttotheexpecta-tionscreated:Hambantotahouseholdswantedtoimprovetheirownsituations,whilethoseinAmparaDistrictcametothetrainingwiththeexpectationthattheywouldbeabletoearn income from selling compost. About a third of themostlymaleparticipantsinAmparaleftindisappointmentafterthefirstday.

Maria Aguilar, San José, Costa RicaTheCostaRican trainingbrought togethermanyenviron-mental educators and community activists, and a smallnumberofpersonsinvolvedinraisingwormsforvermicom-posting.The trainingwas intendedmostly for knowledgedissemination, since itwas not connected to any specificcommunity.Thechoiceofcompostingbinsfocusedonthosewhichweresimpletobuildandeasytotransport.Thegroup

www.ruaf.orgUrban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

Page 38: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

38

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010 www.ruaf.org

Notes1) Organic waste makes up between 65 and 80 per cent of domestic

waste in all but the US and Australian cities profiled in the 2010 UN-Habitat Third Global report, Solid Waste Management in the World’s Cities.

ReferencesBench, M.l., Woodard, r., Harder, M.K. & Stantzos, S. (2004). “Waste minimisation: Home digestion trials of biodegradable waste.” resources, Conservation and recycling 45(1): 84-94.Boekelheide, D. and A. Gill (no date). The MCplANT Master Composter Volunteer program in Charlotte, North Carolina: “Stop preaching to The Choir, Turn the Choir into Missionaries”lacoste, E. and p. Chalmin (2007). From Waste to resource, 2006 World Waste Survey. Economica, paris.löffler, E. and l. Vanacker, (2006). interview with luc Vanacker, public Waste Agency of Flanders, and Myriam de Munter, Flemish Organisation for promoting Composting and Compost Use (VlACO). retrieved 29 May 2008, from http://www.governanceinternational.org/english/interview22.htmllongman, W. (2000). Master Composter/recycler Training Manual WSU Cooperative Extension, Clark County, USA.practical Action (Anonymous) (2007). Home Composting Bins, practical Action, The Schumacher Centre for Technology & DevelopmentSherman, r. (2005). “Backyard Composting Developments.” Biocycle 46(1): 45.Vliet, B. van, H. Chappells and E. Shove (2005). infrastructures of Consumption. Earthscan publications limited, london.Scheinberg, A. (2007). Master Composting programmes: Experiences in Bulgaria and Sri lanka, paper given at the 2007 iSWA conference, WASTE, the NetherlandsScheinberg, A., D. C. Wilson and l. rodic (principal authors and editors) (in press), “Solid Waste Management in the World’s Cities.” UN-Habitat’s Third Global report on Water and Sanitation in the World’s Cities. Earthscan, UK.WASTE (2009) Training materials for master composter course, internal publication.

References- Ba A. 2007. les fonctions reconnues à l’agriculture intra et

périurbaine (AipU) dans le contexte dakarois ; caractérisation, analyse et diagnostic de durabilité de cette agriculture en vue de son intégration dans le projet périurbain de Dakar (Sénégal). Thèse de doctorat “Sciences Agronomiques et de l’Environnement”, institut des Sciences et industries du Vivant et de l’Environnement (Agroparis-Tech) et Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar, 245 pp + annexes.

- Barles S. 2005. Experts contre experts: les champs d’épandage de la ville de paris dans les années 1870 par | |Histoire urbaine n° 14 2005/3 Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.

- Mai Thi phuong Anh, Ali M., Hoang lan Anh, To Thi Thu Ha (2004) Urban and peri-urban agriculture in Hanoi: opportunities and constraints for safe and sustainable food production. AVrDC- The world vegetable center / CirAD, Technical bulletin N°32, Shanhua, Taiwan.

- Mandinaud V. 2005. la pollution des sols des champs d’épandage d’eaux usées, contrainte et/ou ressource pour le développement

durable en plaine de Bessancourt-Herblay-pierrelaye. Développe-ment durable et territoires [En ligne], Dossier 4: la ville et l’enjeu du Développement Durable, mis en ligne le 17 novembre 2005,

- N’dienor M. 2006. Fertilité et gestion de la fertilisation dans les systèmes maraîchers périurbains des pays en développement : intérêts et limites de la valorisation agricole des déchets urbains dans ces systèmes, cas de l’agglomération d’Antananarivo (Madagascar). Doctorat Agronomie Chimie du sol, iNApG et Université d’Antananarivo, 167 pp + annexes

- parrot l., Sotamenou J., Kamgnia Dia B. 2009. Municipal solid waste management in Africa: Strategies and livelihoods in Yaoundé, Cameroon. Waste Management. vol.29:n°2: p. 986-995

- To Thi Thu Ha. 2008. Durabilité de l’agriculture péri-urbaine de Hanoi: le cas de la production des légumes. Thèse de doctorat “Sciences Agronomiques, institut des Sciences et industries du Vivant et de l’Environnement (AgroparisTech) et Hanoi University of Agriculture (HUA), 162 pp.

wasmadeupof30percentmenand70percentwomen.Themenweremoreactiveinbuildingthebins,andthewomenfocused on learning how to manage the compost anddisseminateinformationabouttheresults.

Managua, NicaraguaThetrainingwasgiventoparticipantsfromthehostcommu-nity and seven other nearby communities. It focused ondirect improvement of neighbourhoods and the environ-ment.Bytheseconddaymostofthe25womenandgirlsand10menandboyshadalreadydecidedwhomtheyweregoingtorecruitnext.Participantsfromonecommunitychangedthestructureofthewholetrainingbydemandingtobeableto collect materials and actually started the compostingprocessonday3.Thisaddedagreatdealtothetraining,asitprovidedanopportunityfortheparticipantstounderstandpracticaldifferencesbetweengreenandbrownmaterials,andtoseehowmuchwatertoaddwhen.

ConclusionMaster composter programmes appear to be a route tosustainableself-provisioningthroughthewindowofcapac-ity development. Their success depends onmany factors,includingthetargetgroup’slevelofagriculturalexperienceandknowledge.

Whilethethree-daytrainingcreatesenthusiasmandenergy,anddevelopscapacity,reinforcementandencouragement,aswellaspositivefeedbackforgoodresults,arealsoneededto actualise the potential of the “each one reach one”approach.

Anne Scheinberg, WASTE, Advisers on Urban Environment andDevelopment,theNetherlandswithcontributionsfromYuan Zheng,WageningenUniversityandResearchCentre,TheNetherlandsEmail:[email protected]

references page 38

No place like Home: Gender and Capacity Development in Master Composting programmes

Page 39: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

39

www.ruaf.org

Theprojectaimedtoclosethenutrientloop,reduceenvironmentalpollution,providelocalfarmerswithorganicfertiliserandimprovethesoilquality.ItwaspartofahousingprojectcarriedoutbythelocalDongshenggovernmentincollaboration with Stockholm Environment Institute. Thefirstphaseof implementation,which included832house-holds, or about 3000 inhabitants,was used to train localworkerstorunthecompostingplantbythemselves.

Urine-diverting dry toilets were installed and the faecescollectedinbasementbins.Theseweretransferredperiodi-callytoanonsitecompostingfacilitybuiltforthisproject.Thecompostingwascarriedoutusingabatchtechniqueinabuildingwithsixindividual,6m3compartments,eachwithforced air supplied through small openings in the floorbeneath the mass and supplemental floor heating.Temperature,moistureandpHwerecontrolled,sooptimalconditionswere achieved, thus ensuring sanitisation andcomposting. The temperature wasmonitored twice dailyand the moisture was controlled daily using a standardcompaction method. Effective microorganisms includinglacticacidbacteria,purplesulphurbacteriaandyeastwereinoculatedatthestartinordertooptimiseandreducethecompostcycleto35days.Tosanitisethecompost,thenaturalheat of the composting process itself was used. WHOGuidelinesstipulatethat1-2daysat65°Cundercontrolledconditionsissufficienttokillallpathogens.Therefore, themain task was to reach this needed high temperature.Sawdustwasaddedasanadditionalcarbonsourceinordertohelpfuelthecompostingprocess.Althoughthetempera-tureonlyreachedaround61°C,thiswassufficientforelimi-nationofE.coli (whichwasusedasan indicator)duringatypical35-daycompostcycle.

Thehouseholdsaddedsawdustasacarrieranddesiccant,priortothecompostingstepinordertoregulatemoisturelevelsandreduceodour.Theresultwasa,moreorless,pure

Producing Organic Fertiliser from Urine-Diverting Dry Toilets in Dongsheng, ChinaAlthough batch composting of manure is very com-mon throughout China at both large and small scales, there is little experience with composting of human waste in urban centres. This project, the first on thermal composting of human faeces under indoor controlled conditions, took place in a high-density urban setting in Dongsheng, Erdos Municipality in Inner Mongolia, China.

Jan MertensArno Rosemarin

faeces compost, which determines the fertiliser value. Incomparison to animalmanure,which contains urine, thenitrogenlevelsforthefaeces-onlycompostwerelower(2.43per cent of dry mass), but the content of stable organiccarbon was high (organicmatter was 49 per cent of drymass). Thus the faeces-only compost is a good source oforganic carbon to act as a soil conditioner forwater andnutrientretention.This isofparticular importance in thispartofChinawheresoilsarecarbondeficient.Theincreasedhumuscontentenhancessoilfertilitybyincreasingorganiccarbonandbetterwaterretention.Large-scaleagriculturetrials,usingthecompostandurinefromthehouseholdsonpotatoandmaizecrops,showedgoodresults.

Theworkshowedthatcompostingofhumanfaecescanbecarriedoutinanurbansettingandthecompostalongwithurineprovidesacompetitivealternativetochemicalfertiliser.

Jan Mertens, Arno RosemarinStockholmEnvironmentInstituteEmail:[email protected]

Composting of human faeces in an urban settingPhoto: Jan Mertens

Content of the finished compost

Moisture 32

Percentage of dry mass

Organicmatter 49

pHValue 7.3

Total nitrogen 2.4

AvailableN 0.8

AvailableP 0.2

AvailableK 0.2

Page 40: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

40

www.ruaf.org

MexicoCityhasanaveragealtitudeof2,200metres,amild climatewith temperatures from 18ºC to 24ºC andannual rainfall that ranges from 700 to 1,400 mm. TheMexico CityMetropolitan Zone (MCMZ) covers an area of7,860 km2. This area includes the Federal District and 54municipalities, which together have a population of 22million(INEGI,1990).

Thearea’sprincipalproductionsystemscanbecategorisedasurban(familygardensandbackyardmilkandporkmeatproduction), suburban (vegetables, flowers, backyard andkitchen gardens, greenhouses and dairy production), andperiurban(onterraces-nopalproduction,kitchengardens,corn, silvopasture, milk and dairy production, bees andsheep;andinthevalleys-livestocksystems,withextensivegreenhouses,amaranthandtuna-pricklypearproduction).

The Role of Urban Agriculture in Waste Management in Mexico CityAgriculture in what is now Mexico City can be traced back to the great city of Tenochtitlán, one of the most important urban centres in Mesoamerica (Palerm, 1990). New forms of agriculture have recently emerged in and around Mexico City, which, like those in prehispanic times, can be categorised as urban ecosystems because the majority of the inputs are obtained from the bioregion.

H. Losada, J Rivera, J. Vieyra J. Cortés

Theinputsforthesedifferenturbanproductionsystemsareeitherhouseholdwastesorby-productsfromthecity.

Organic wasteIn general, low levels of external inputs are used. Solidorganicwasteisanimportantsourceoffoodforanimalsandcomesfrommarkets,restaurantsorhomes.Theamountofsolidorganicwasteobtainedfromlocalmarketsandfromthecity’smetropolitanfoodsupplydepot(CEDA)isconsider-able.Occupying300ha,theCEDAreceives60percentofthenationalharvestanddistributesfruitandvegetablestothemarketsinandoutsideMexicoCity.Losadaet al.(1996)esti-matedthedailyorganicwasteproduction(in1996)tobe725tonnes.At least90 tonnesof thiswastewasused to feedapproximately2,500dairycowsinthevicinity(eastofthecity),whichproducedabout37,500litresofmilkperday.Thetomatowastewas especially used to feed (about 50,000)pigs, while other waste was used to feed chickens andrabbits.

Organicsolidwastefromthefoodprocessingindustry(torti-llafactories,nixtamalcornprocessing,mills,bakeries,cookie/cracker factories and others) is used in stables as a foodsourcewithahighstarchconcentration,aswellasforback-yardlivestock(fortheproductionofmilkandmeat)andpigfarming.The latter two systemsalso receiveorganic solidwasteproductsfromhomes.Grassfromthesidewalksandtrafficislands,constitutesasecondarysourceoffodderforthedairystablesinurbanspaces.

Inthesuburbanandperiurbanzones,freshordrydairycattlemanureservesasanexcellentinputforagriculturalactivi-ties.Itisagoodsourceoforganicmaterial,macronutrients(N,P,K)andwater,anditprotectscropsagainstlowtempera-tures.Thelattertwobenefitsareofparticularimportanceinnopal cultivation on terraces. In the suburbanChinampasystemandintheperiurbanvalleys,excretaindriedform(20per centwater) is used as compost (Chinampa) or addeddirectlytothecrops(corn).UnpublisheddatafromLosadaetal.(2000)showthattheamountsofexcretausedareequiva-lentto730tonnesper/ha/yearintheChinampazone,540tonnes/ha/per year in thenopal zone and 50 tonnes/ha/year in the tuna (prickly pear) zone. Plant residues fromnopalproduction(14tonnes/ha/year)serveasanimportantinputintheterracedareaduringthepruningseason(March,AprilandMay).Inallcasesthewasteisobtainedforfree;onlytransportneedstobepaidfor.

Nopal is an important production systemPhoto: H. Losada

Page 41: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

41

www.ruaf.org

Mass and energy flows Other external inputsneed tobe considered in the city’ senergy balance (see also the next article). In the moreadvanceddairy systems these includeexternally acquiredpregnant cows,medicines, semen (for artificial insemina-tion), high-protein foodstuffs,mineral salts, vitamins andother supplements. Inmorecommercialagriculture theseareseeds, inorganic fertilisers,herbicidesand insecticides,andmaterialforthegreenhouses.

Labourinputisgenerallymoreintenseintheproductionofvegetables, legumes, flowers and nopal (both in theChinampa and terrace systems; Canabal andTorres, 1992)thaninthelivestocksystems(withsomeexceptions,suchasinstables).Waterandenergyuse,however,ishigherinlive-stocksystems.Thehigheruseofgasolineandtransportforagricultural products results from transporting manurefromthestablestothefieldandtheharvestedproductstothemarket.

Thewasteconsumedbytheanimalsinurbandairyfarmsispredominantly local and the waste excreta coming fromstablesandpigfarmsformsanimportantinputforagricul-tureinthesuburbanandperiurbanzones.Energybalancesintheseurbansystemsarenotoptimal.Researchonnopalproduction (Losadaet al. 1996)showsdifferentdegreesofefficiencyinthecaptureofenergyaswellasintheuseofmacronutrients.

Incontrasttoconventionalproductionsystemsthatarehighlydependent on non-renewable sources and fossil fuels, theenergyandmacronutrientflowsintheseurbanandperiurbansystemsdependoninputsofbiologicalorigin,whichconstitutea renewable resource. These systems also have a positivemediumtolongtermpositiveeffectonsoilformation.

Urban agricultureNewurbanproductionsystemsinMexicoCity,suchastheChinampasystem(whichisconsideredmorediverse-seethenextarticle-)andthe terraced(nopalvegetable)andtuna(Teotihuacan)productionsystemsarewelladapted to theurbanenvironment.Theymakeoptimaluseoflocalinputs,uselocalwastesasasourceofnutrientsandareinterlinked.Like any production system, these systems need propermanagement (especially in the dairy systems the odourproducedandthepresenceoffliesneedtobecontrolled),buttheyposerelativelylittledangertotheurbanenvironment.

H. Losada, J Rivera, J. Vieyra and J. CortésDepartment of Reproductive Biology, Metropolitan AutonomousUniversity-Iztapalapa,MexicoD.F.Email:[email protected]

Low levels of external inputs are usedPhoto: H. Losada

ReferencesFenn, M E., 1996. De la limitación del nitrógeno al exceso: saturación de nitrógeno en bosques de NorteAmérica. 11th international Symposium and 111th National Meeting on Sustainable Agriculture.

National institute of Geographical and Computerized Statistics (iNEGi), 1990. General population and Housing Census. losada, H., D. Grande, J. Vieyra, l. Arias, r. pealing, J. rangel and A. Fierro, 1996. A sub-urban agro-ecosystem of nopal-vegetable production based on the intensive use of dairy cattle manure in the southeast hills of Mexico City. livestock research for rural development. 8(4):66-70.

palerm, A. 1990. prehispanic Mexico. Essays on evolution and ecology. National Council for the Arts and Culture. Mexico.

Page 42: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

42

www.ruaf.org

Agricultural energetics involves the analysis ofenergy flows fromall inputs andoutputs of a crop or ananimalproductionsystem,mostoftenemphasisingtheeffi-ciency of interlinked production subsystems. Usually aninput-outputratioiscalculatedasanindicatoroftheproduc-tionefficiencyofagivenproduct.Itcanalsobeusedasanindicatorofsustainability(Senanayake,1991):thelowertheenergyratio,themoreexpensivethesystem.Theanalysisofanyproductionsystemdependsontheboundaryadopted.Energeticevaluationsareimportantbecausetheyhighlightthedepletionofnon-renewablesourcesofenergyandtheincreasingeffectthishasonprices.

Four Chinampa subsystems and three dairy subsystemswereanalysed.Dataon inputsandoutputswas collectedthrough interviewswith theowners.Theenergyvaluesofthedifferentinputsandoutputsofbothsub-systemsweredeterminedusingstandardenergeticvalues (Mega Joulesperkg)fromdifferentliteraturesources,orwereestimatedusingvegetablesofsimilarchemicalcomposition.Thestudylookedattheenergyrequiredfortheproductionofchemicalfertilisers, improvedseeds(ahighpercentageofseedsarelocallyproduced),andfeedforanimals.Manurewasconsid-eredtobeaninputtotheChinampaplotsandanoutputforthedairyunits.Maizeislocallyproduced,henceonlyitsener-geticvaluewasconsideredandnottheenergyinvestedinitsproduction.

Amongthosestudied,themostefficientproductionsystemturnedouttobeadairyunitownedbyRobertoPeña(RPinthetable),whiletheChinampaplotswerelessefficient.Themostimportantfactoraffectingtheefficiencywastheuseofexternal inputs,whichincreasedtheenergyconsumption.As manure is exchanged between the two sub-systems,modifications in the energy balance accordingly showed

Energy Balance in a Suburban Chinampa Agroecosystem in the Southeast of Mexico CityThe Chinampa agroecosystem is a very diverse sub-urban production system (Jiménez et al., 1990, Losada et al. 1998) in Mexico City. Soriano (1999) described the whole Chinampa system as com-posed of five interlinked subsystems (Chinampa plots, dairy cattle units, backyard production, home gardens and greenhouses). A summary on an eval-uation of energy flows and energetic efficiency of the Chinampa system is presented here.

Ramón Soriano-Robles Ladislao Arias

Leidy Rivera

betterenergyratiosfortheChinampas.

Vegetable production in the Chinampas is a low-energysystem.Theuseoflocalseedsandorganicfertilisersaccountsforimportantsavingsofenergybecausetheseinputsdonotrequireextraenergytobeproduced.Chinampaproductionunitsthatusedtheirownmaterials(internalinputs)weremoreefficient,hence,thesustainabilityofChinampaagri-culturedependsonthesystemitself, i.e.ontheuseoftheunits’ownwastesorrecyclablematerials.

The use of industrial by-products in milk productionimproves the efficiency of the dairy systems. Consideringmanureasanoutputratherthanasawastegivesanotherdimensiontotheefficiencyofsuchsub-systems.Theuseofindustrial by-products (wheat bran, milled maize, maizedough,oats straw) isdesirable inenergy terms, since thisusesenergysourcesthatwouldotherwisebewasted.

Ramón Soriano-Robles, Ladislao Arias and Leidy RiveraDepartmentofBiologyoftheReproduction.MetropolitanAutonomousUniversity.CampusIztapalapa.México,D.F.E-mail:[email protected]

ReferencesJiménez-Osornio, J., T. rojas, S. Del Amo and A. Gómez-pompa. 1990. past, present and future of the chinampas. Maya sustainability. University of California riverside. USA.

losada, H., H. Martínez, J. Vieyra, r. pealing, r. Zavala and J. Cortés. 1998. Urban agriculture in the metropolitan zone of Mexico City: changes over time in urban, suburban and periurban areas. Environment and Urbanization. 10(2):37-54.

Senanayake, r. 1991. Sustainable agriculture: Definitions and parameters for measurement. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 1(4):7-28

Soriano, r. 1999. The Chinampa system as a model of sustainable agriculture. phD. Thesis. Wye College, University of london.

Modified energy ratio in the seven production units studied.

Chinampa plots Dairy units

Prod. unit FR SF MF H AN AS RP

E. Ratio (I/O)MJ input/MJ product

122.48 26.06 3.9 31.9 0.54 1.011 0.19

Energy ratio modified

32.14 8.5 1.5 8.6 4.78 6.01 1.75

Page 43: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

43

www.ruaf.org

Theguidelinewasacollaborativeeffortofseveralinternational organisations and institutions active in thefield of sustainable sanitation and agriculture under theaegisoftheSustainableSanitationAlliance(SuSanA)work-inggrouponFoodSecurityandProductiveSanitationledbytheStockholmEnvironmentInstitute(SEI).Theguidelineisdirectedtowardsthedonorcommunityanddecisionmakers,extension workers and other professionals active in theareasofagriculture,waterandsanitation,planningandtheenvironment.Themaintargetgroup,however,isprofession-alsintheagriculturalsector.

Theuseofurineasafertilisercanhelpmitigatepovertyandmalnutrition, and improve the tradebalance of countriesimportingchemicalfertilisers.Foodsecuritycanbeincreasedwith a fertiliser that is available free for all, regardless oflogistic and economical resources. Safe handling of urineincluding treatment and sanitisation before use is a keycomponentofsustainablesanitationaswellassustainablecropproduction.

Consumed plant nutrients leave the human body withexcreta, andonce thebody is fullygrown there is amassbalancebetweenconsumptionandexcretion.Thishasthreeimportantimplications:•Theamountofexcretedplantnutrientscanbecalculatedfrom the food intake, forwhichdata is better andmoreeasilyavailablethanforexcreta.•Ifallexcretaandbiowaste,aswellasanimalmanureandcrop residues, is recycled, then the fertility of the arablelandcanbemaintained.•Irrespectiveof theamountsand concentrationsofplantnutrientsintheexcreta,oneimportantfertilisingrecom-

Food Security and Productive Sanitation: Practical guideline on the use of urine in crop productionThe upcoming publication titled Practical guide-line on the use of urine in crop production gives practical guidance on the use of urine in crop pro-duction as a vital component of sustainable crop production and sanitation systems. It also includes guidance on how to initiate activities that will facilitate the introduction of new fertilisers to the agricultural community.

Anna RichertRobert GenschHåkan Jönsson

Linus DagerskogThor-Axel Stenström

Moussa Bonzi

mendationisthustostrivetodistributetheexcretafertilis-ersonanareaequaltothatusedforproducingthefood.

Sourceseparationandsafehandlingofnutrientsfromthetoiletsystemsisonewaytofacilitatetherecirculationanduseofexcretaincropproduction.Urinecontainsmostofthemacronutrientsaswellassmallerfractionsofthemicronu-trients excreted by human beings. Nitrogen, phosphorus,potassium and sulphur as well as micronutrients are allfound in urine in plant available forms. Urine is a wellbalanced nitrogen-rich fertiliser which can replace andnormallygivethesameyieldsaschemicalfertiliserincropproduction (see the other articles in this issue for exam-ples).

Theurinefromonepersonduringoneyearissufficienttofertilise300-400m2ofcroptoalevelofabout50-100kgN/ha.Urineshouldbehandledinclosedtanksandcontainersandshouldbespreaddirectlyontothesoil,notontheplant,inNdosesequivalenttowhatisrecommendedforureaandammoniumfertilisers.Atasmallscale,plasticwateringcansare suitable for spreading the urine,while at larger scale,spreadersforanimalslurryaresuitable.Aircontactshouldbeminimisedinordertoavoidammonialosses;andtheurineshouldbeincorporatedintothesoilasquicklyaspossible.

The ecostation in sector 19Photo: Linus Dagerskog, CREPA

Page 44: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

44

www.ruaf.org

Theeconomicvalueoftheurinecanbecalculatedbycompar-ingittothepriceofmineralfertiliseronthelocalmarketorbycalculatingthevalueoftheincreasedyieldofthefertilisedcrop.CalculationsinBurkinaFasoshowthattheannualamountofplantnutrientsintheexcretafromonefamilyisroughlyequaltothequantityinone50kgbagofureaandone50kgbagofNPK(seethenextarticle).Thevalueofthisperpersonisapprox-imatelyUSD10,whilethevalueoftheincreasedyieldofmaizeisapproximatelyUSD50perperson.Thevalueofa20ljerrycanofurinewasestimatedtobeUSD0.25.

Healthrisksassociatedwiththeuseofhumanurineinplantproductionaregenerallylow.Sourceseparationofurineisastrong barrier against pathogen transmission sincemostpathogensareexcretedwithfaecalmatter.Theamountoffaecalcross-contaminationisdirectlyrelatedtothehealthriskinthesystemforurineuseincropproduction.Collectionsystemsforurineshouldbedesignedtominimisetheriskoffaecalcross-contamination.Groups thatarepotentiallyatriskarecollectionpersonnelandfieldworkers,households,local communities and product consumers. The possiblehealth risks of other contaminating substances excretedwithhumanurine (heavymetals,hormonesandpharma-ceuticals) are far smaller than those associatedwith thecommonsanitationsystem;andtheriskofnegativeeffectsonthequantityandqualityofthecropsisnegligible.

TheWHO guidelines for safe use of wastewater, excreta and greywater(2006)promoteaflexiblemulti-barrierapproachformanaging the health risks associatedwith the use ofexcretainagriculture.Thisconceptiscomprisedofaseriesofmeasures/barriersfrom‘toilettotable’.Eachofthebarri-ershasapotentialtoreducehealthrisksassociatedwiththeexcretause.WHOrecommendsthatseveralofthesebarriersbeput inplaceasneeded to reduce thehealth risk toanacceptableminimum.

Barriersincludeforexamplestorage,croprestrictions,with-holdingperiodsandreducedcontact,correcthandlingandcookingofthefoodcrop.ThePractical guideline on the use of urine in crop productiongivesexamplesofhowurinecanbehandledsafelytominimisetheriskofpathogentransmis-sion,asoutlinedintheWHOguidelinesforsafeuseofexcretaincropproduction.

Institutionalaspectsareincreasinglyimportantasproduc-tivesanitationsystemsbecomemainstream.Achallengeistointegratetheuseofexcretainexistingregulatoryframe-works.Initially,thefollowingactivitiesaresuggestedwhen

productivesanitationsystemsareimplemented:•Identifystakeholdersandclarifydriversandrestrictionsforeachoneinrelationtotheimplementationofurineuseincropproduction.•Includeandtargetthefarmersintheinitialplanning.•Organiseanarenaforfeed-backandinteractionbetweenstakeholders,•Organiselocalcommunitiessothatthereisastructureforimplementationandastructureformonitoring.

Knowledgeontheuseofurineasafertiliserisbestgainedand disseminated through local demonstration experi-ments involvingorganisations thatworkwith small-scalefarmers and local communities as well as local researchorganisations.Thenewfertilisersshouldbeintroducedwiththesamemethodologythatisusedwhenintroducinganynewfertiliserintheagriculturalcommunity.

To implement a productive sanitation system in a localcontext,itisoftennecessarytotranslateoradapttheinfor-mationgiveninthePractical guideline on the use of urine in crop production totherespectivelocalsiteconditions.Thelast chapter of the book gives recommendations on howlocalguidelinescanbedevelopedandreasonablystructuredanditsummarisesthemostimportantfactorsthatdirectlyorindirectlyinfluencethefarmingactivitiesrelatedtotheurineuse.Thisinformationiscomplementedbyexamplesofexisting local guidelines from Burkina Faso and thePhilippines.

The Practical guideline on use of urine in crop productionispublished in 2010 and available from the EcoSanRes andSuSanAwebpageswww.ecosanres.org,www.susana.org

Anna RichertHåkan JönssonThor-Axel StenströmStockholmEnvironmentInstitute,[email protected](correspondingauthor)Robert GenschXavierUniversity,PhilippinesLinus DagerskogMoussa BonziCREPAHQ,BurkinaFaso

ReferencesWHO guidelines for the safe use of wastewater, excreta and greywater. 2006. Volume 4: Excreta and greywater use in agriculture. WHO, Geneva. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/wastewater/gsuweg4/en/index.html

Ouedraogo Ablassé at the ecostation in sector 27 with some solid and liquid fertilizer by the storage chambers for dried faecesPhoto: Linus Dagerskog, CREPA

Barrier concept for safe use of urine as a fertiliser

Food Security and productive Sanitation

Page 45: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

45

www.ruaf.org

The technical, social and institutional problemsaround an excreta-recycling system at scale may seemdaunting,especiallyforrapidlygrowingcitiesinthedevel-opingworld.Bracken(2008)describesthemassiveamountofnutrientsbroughtintocitieswiththefood(alsoseethearticleonpage8).Inasustainablesocietythesenutrientsarerecycledbacktoproductiveland.Todaytheyoftenaccumu-late in deep-pit latrines and septic tankswith the risk ofleaching to groundwater together with pathogens. Noexplicitprice canbe calculated forwastingnutrientsandspreading pathogens through poor excretamanagement,butthisapproachdoeshavedireeffectsintermsofsoilfertil-ityloss,increaseddiseaseburdenandeutrophication.Intheabsenceofpoliticalpressure,themarketcouldbeanimpor-tant driving force for the recycling of human excreta.Especially within the context of unpredictable chemicalfertiliserprices,exemplifiedbythepricehikein2008,treatedhuman excreta can provide a reliable nutrient source foragricultureinandaroundcities.

Urbanhouseholdswantatoiletthatiscomfortableandreli-able,buttheyhaveingeneralnointerestinusingtheexcretaasafertiliser.Thisiswhyacollectionserviceisneeded,provid-ing the link between households and the urban farmers.Suchanintegratedecologicalsanitation(Ecosan)systemhasbeen set up in four sectors of the city of Ouagadougou,throughtheprojectECOSAN_UE.

The Emerging Market of Treated Human Excreta in OuagadougouSince March 2009, there has been a “human fertil-iser” market in Ouagadougou, the capital of Burkina Faso. Human urine and dried faeces are collected and taken to eco-stations, where they are sold to farmers after adequate storage. In this way they increase sanitation coverage, create jobs in the private sector and provide urban farmers with complete and efficient indigenous fertilisers.

Linus DagerskogChiaca Coulibaly

Ida Ouandaogo

TheEuropeanUnionfinancedtheECOSAN_UEproject,whichoperatedfrom2006-2009andwasimplementedbyCREPA(Regional Center for low costWater and Sanitation), GTZ(GermanTechnicalCooperation)andONEA(NationalWaterandSanitationAuthority).TheprojectisactiveinfouroutofOuagadougou’s thirty urban sectors, where many urbanagricultureactivitiestakeplace.

Three main components of the eco-sanitation chain inOuagadougouwillbediscussedhere,startingattheend:theuseoftreatedhumanexcreta.Itwillthenlookatthecollec-tion and treatment,andlastlyattheproductionofhumanfertilisers.

Figure: The urine circuit in Ouagadougou.

UseEvenbeforeconstructionofthetoiletsbeganin2006,effortswerebeingmadetosensitiseurbanfarmerswithrespecttothevalueofurineasafertiliser.Thiswasnecessarybecauseiftherewasnointerestintheendproduct,thewholechainwouldsurelyfail.Thepromotionwasbasedonparticipativeexperimentationusingurineas a fertiliser in eachof thefoursectors.Theurinehadbeencollectedwithmobileurinalsduring a film festival. In a first wave, 70 urban farmersappliedurineandcomparedittoureaontestplotswithNPKasbasefertiliser(seeBonzi,2008,forresults).Yieldsoftheplots using NPK and urinewere higher. Urinewas dosedbased on its nitrogen content,whichwas around 5 g/l inOuagadougou.

Sincethen,600urbanfarmershavebeentrainedontheuseofurineasafast-actingnitrogenfertiliser,andtoacertainextentalsoontheuseofsanitiseddryfaecesasbasefertil-iser.Thetrainingisbasedonpracticalknowledgeconcerningsoilpreparation,applicationperiod,applicationmethodandTransport of urine to the fields, Storage of urine and Urine

application in OuagadougouPhoto-: Linus Dagerskog, CREPA

Page 46: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

46

www.ruaf.org

dosefordifferentplants,andalsoonsafetymeasuresfortheplants,farmersandconsumers.

InMarch2009anevaluationworkshopwasheldwithurbanfarmers from the four sectors todecideon the transitionfrom“free”humanfertiliserstoafertilisermarket.ThepriceofliquidandsolidfertiliserswasbasedontheNPKcontentcomparedtothecostofanequivalentamountofnutrientsas chemical fertiliser. Based on earlier calculations byDagerskog (2007), the work of Jönsson et al. (2004), andconsiderationsthathumanfertiliserscontainorganicmate-rialandtraceelementsbutalsodemandmoreworkbothintransportandapplicationcomparedtochemicalfertilisers,areasonablepricewassetatUSD0.20perjerrycanofhygie-nisedurineandUSD0.10perkgofhygienisedfaeces(soldin25and50kgbags).

TheinterestinbuyingEcosanfertiliserdependslargelyonthe price of the chemical fertilisers, but there are alsoconvincedadopterslikeMr.DeraMouni(seeBox).

Collection and treatment Ineachsectoracollectionsystemmanagedbyalocalasso-ciationwassetup.Theassociationcollectsandtransportsurine and dried faeces from households to eco-stations,whereitisstoredforfurthersanitation.Theurineiscollectedin yellow containers, and stored in tanks for sanitisation.Afterstorageitistappedintogreenjerrycans,withthelabel“Liquid Fertiliser”. The sanitised faeces are put in bagslabelled “Solid Fertiliser”. The associations managing thecollection and treatment would ideally cover their own

running costs by selling the fertilisers to farmers, as thetheoreticalcost/benefitanalysisshows(seeBox).

Thus, theoretically theassociations involved in collection/treatmentcouldcovertheiroperatingcosts,butthisrequiresthatthefollowingoperatingcriteriabefulfilled.Intheactualsituation,afterayearoffunctioning,noneofthesecriteriawerecompletelyfulfilledasofyet.

1.Excreta volume:At least theaboveestimatedamountofurineandfaecesperhouseholdhas toenter thesystem.However,ittakestimebeforethefaecesfromdoublevaulttoiletscanenterthesystem,simplybecausethefirstvaultisemptiedafteroneyear,attheearliest.Also,inpractice,lessurinefromthehouseholdsentersthesystemthanwaspredicted.Notallthehouseholdswithtoiletsactuallyusethem–sometoiletshavebeenbuiltonnewlots,whicharenot yet inhabited; other households stopped using thetoiletsinangeroverthecollectionfee. Inaddition,whenurinating,manypeoplefinditmoreconvenienttousethetraditionalshowerthanthetoilet.2.Fee:Thehouseholdshavetopaythecollectionfee.However,about50percentofthehouseholdsdonotpaythefee.

3.Scale:Thecollectionsystemhastooperateatfullcapacity.However,itdidnotdosoinallsectorsofthecity.4.Storage:Therehastobesufficientstoragecapacityattheeco-stationstohandlethevolumegeneratedperhouse-holdinthesystem.Thepresentstoragecapacitywouldnotbeenoughforthe“estimatedvolumes”ofurineattheeco-stations.Basedontheestimatedproductionofurineand

Dera Mouni, urban farmer for the past 25 years In the beginning I was a bit sceptical, but after the training first at CREPA and then here in our own fields I was convinced. The liquid fertiliser gives very good yields.For the last crop cycle I bought the liquid fertiliser for my cabbage, but this cycle I will grow peppers as well. Peppers respond very well to liquid fertiliser. It is true that I have to invest some more when using the liquid fertiliser. For one plot of 40 m2, I usually apply manure and then 2 kg of urea. The urea costs me around USD 1. With the urine I use around 10 jerry cans, which costs me USD 2 and is also heavier to apply. In return I have fewer problems with insect attacks, and the yields have been great. What I harvest from one plot I can usually sell for USD 50. Of the 16 farmers who participated in the fertiliser tests on this site I am the only one as far as I know who now buys the liquid fertilisers. Many farmers don’t see tomorrow. In order to get them to buy liquid fertiliser, the cost has to come down a little bit more. Once they have gotten used to it, the price can be increased again! I think this system has a future, because the chemical fertilisers kill the soil in the long term, and we know that. The liquid fertiliser is new for us. Regarding the solid fertiliser (sanitised faeces) it will be easy to sell. The treated faeces looks like the manure we are used to.

Cost/benefitThe income depends on the amount of urine and faeces that enters the system and is then sold to farmers. The following calculation was based on the estimation that 40 per cent of the urine and 75 per cent of the faeces produced by a house-hold actually enters the system.The cost for transport and treatment is about USD 2.30/house-hold/month. A benefit could be obtained of USD 2/household/month from selling the excreta and USD 0.3/household/month from a household collection fee (the fee is USD 0.6/household/month, but the cost for collecting it is USD 0.3/household/month). The costs referred to are only operating costs for the collection and treatment. They do not include investment and depreciation costs for equipment, especially urine storage tanks. These costs need external funding.

The Emerging Market of Treated Human Excreta in Ouagadougou

Double vault toilet with adobe brick superstructure (~340 $)Photo: Linus Dagerskog, CREPA

Page 47: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

47

www.ruaf.org

faeces,theeco-stationsmustbeabletostore200lofurine(45daysstorage+somebuffervolume)and40kgoffaeces(threemonthsextrastorageonsite+somebuffervolume)perhousehold.Thiscouldbecomeamajorobstacleinthefuture,asitisnotclearyetwhowilltakeonthecostforincreasedstoragevolumes.Thelocalcostofahigh-qualitystoragetankof1m3isaroundUSD300,correspondingtoUSD60perhousehold.

5.Reuse demand:Theremustbeademandforalltheexcretaenteringthesystem.Butsofar,thedemandforurinehasnotbeenveryhigh.Somefarmershaveboughtlargequan-tities,but theurbanfarmers’willingness topayhasnotbeenuptoexpectations,partlybecauseofthetransport-ing cost from the eco-stations to the farm-site (aroundUSD0.05/jerrycan).

ProductionIn Ouagadougou only 19 per cent of the population hasaccess to improved sanitation, like connection to sewers,septic tanks or improved pit latrines. The common pit-latrinesinOuagadougouhaveseveralproblems.Inadditionto the risks of groundwater pollution andnutrient losses

A Yellow Revolution in Aguié, Niger

Linus Dagerskog (CREPA), Laurent Stravato (IFAD) and Elisabeth Kvarnström (SEI)

Human urine is collected and used as a liquid fertiliser by more than 700 households in the Aguié province in southern Niger. The “yellow revolution” was triggered in 2009 through partici-pative tests in eight villages, demonstrating the effects of using urine as a fertiliser on cereals and vegetables.

PPILDA (1) is a USD 17.6 million rural development project in Aguié supported by IFAD (2). One of the main activities is identifying and supporting local innovations in farming communities, often via farmer field schools. In 2007, PPILDA constructed wells around several villages to enable vegetable farming during the dry season. Organic fertilisers were used, but not enough was available to cover the needs, while the chemical fertilisers avail-able in Aguié, mainly urea and NPK 15:15:15, are costly and of poor quality. Looking for alternatives, PPILDA contacted CREPA(3) to see how productive sanitation could improve local nutrient management. It was estimated that the annual quantity of plant nutrients in human urine and faeces produced by an aver-age family in Aguié (9 persons) is roughly equivalent to one bag of urea (50kg) and one bag of NPK (50kg). Two such bags cost around USD 80 on the local market, which is more than most families can afford. It is also known that urine contains the majority of the nutrients leaving the human body, while rarely containing pathogens.

On this basis IFAD granted a pilot project for CREPA, PPILDA and SEI (4) to test the use of urine as a fertiliser and develop sensitisa-tion tools, low-cost appropriate technologies and strategic

documents in order to facilitate an upscaling of productive sani-tation. The Aguié project promotes productive sanitation via participative agriculture experimentation, sensitisation to the dangers and resources in urine and faeces and the promotion of low-cost reuse-oriented urinals and latrines, adapted to the cultural context. For fertiliser collection, the “no-cost” Eco-lilly urinal (5), a 25-litre plastic jerry can and a funnel, is promoted together with low-cost versions of urine-diverting dehydration and composting toilets (which are subsidised with USD 45). The central message is that proper use of these urinals and latrines helps eliminate the dangers and capture the resources in urine and faeces. Thanks to good yields and good-looking vegetables, the demand has been high for urinals and toilets that make the collection of the “new fertiliser” possible.

In the future it is probable that this kind of close collaboration between sanitation and agriculture professionals will increase, since maintaining or increasing yields will demand the optimal use of all available nutrient sources. And the demand for fertilis-ers could in turn be the motor for sanitation in periurban and rural areas.

The Aguié project results and tools are available on www.ecosanres.org/aguie.

Notes1) Projet de Promotion des Initiatives Locales pour le Développement à

Aguié2) International Fund for Agriculture Development3) Centre Régional de l’Eau Potable et de l’Assainissement à faible coût 4) Stockholm Environment Institute5) In Aguié this urinal costs USD 2-3. While urine collection is easy, the

storage of large volumes is a challenge. Enriching composts and incorporating urine in the field during the dry season can be alternatives to storage.

frominfiltration, therearealsoflies,odours, risk of collapse anddifficul-tiesinemptyingthepits.ThereisnotyetasystemforsludgetreatmentinOuagadougou, which means thesludge is informallydumped inandaroundthecity.Toprovideanalternative,theprojectpromoted the Urine Diverting DryToilet(UDDT).Whenurineandfaecesarekeptseparate,therearegenerallyfewerproblemswithodoursandflies,the treatment is relatively easy andnutrient losses are prevented. Thetoiletsarebuiltoffgroundtoprotectthe groundwater and enhance thedehydration of the faecalmatter. A range ofmodelswithsingleordoublevaultsindifferentmaterialswasavailableforthehouseholdstochoosefrom.Inthecourseoftheproj-ectseverallessonswerelearnedandadaptationsmade.

Single vault integrated into the house (variable cost)Photo: Linus Dagerskog, CREPA

Page 48: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

48

www.ruaf.org

ReferencesBonzi, Moussa, 2008, “Experiences and opportunities for human excreta fertilisers in improving small scale agriculture”, presentation during side event of the World Water Week, Stockholm, Sweden, www.ecosanres.org/pdf_files/www2008/Dr_Bonzi_14.pdf

Bracken, patrick; panesar, Arne, 2008, ”Ecosan in poor urban areas, sustaining sanitation and food security”, irC conference: Sanitation for the urban poor: partnerships and Governance”, 19-21 Nov, 2008, Delft, the Netherlands http://www.irc.nl/redir/content/download/ 140068/433182/file/GTZ-bracken-panesar-irC-final-version%2028.doc

Dagerskog, linus, 2007, “ECOSAN et la valeur des fertilisants humains - le cas du Burkina Faso”, iTN conference paper, Ouaga-dougou, Burkina Faso, 26-28 Nov 2007

Jönsson, Håkan et al. 2004, “Guidelines on the use of Urine and Faeces in Crop production”, EcoSanres publication series, report 2004-2, http://www.ecosanres.org/pdf_files/ESr_publications_2004/ESr2web.pdf

Sawadogo, Sawadogo Hamadé, 2008, “Approche GirE et expansion de l’agriculture urbaine à Ouagadougou”, Master’s Thesis, 2iE, Ouagadougou

WSp, 2009, “Study for financial and economic Analysis of Ecological Sanitation in Sub Saharan Africa”, www.wsp.org/UserFiles/file/Ecosan_report.pdf

DiscussionTheprojecthas succeeded in raisingawarenessonurbanexcreta and nutrientmanagement inOuagadougou, andONEAisplanningtocontinuethetoiletconstructionsinthefourpilotsectors.Ifthecollectionsystemcontinuestogrow,itwillbenecessarytoknowhowmuchexcretaurbanfarm-erspotentiallycanuse.Sawadogo(2008)thereforemadeaninventoryofurbanfarmingwithinOuagadougoucitylimitsandfoundintotal201hectares,93percentofwhichisdedi-cated to vegetable farmingand 7 percent tohorticulture.However,healso found thatmore than75percentof theurbanfarmersdonothaverightstothelandtheyfarm.TheseurbanfarmerswouldonlyhaveuseforasmallpartofalltheexcretaproducedinOuagadougou(lessthan5percent).Therest would need to be transported to agricultural landoutsidethecity.

Thismeansthat,iftheauthoritiesdecidetoadoptECOSANon a large scale, agricultural production using sanitisedexcretaneedstobemadeapriorityinandaroundthecitytoavoidhightransportationcosts.InthecaseofOuagadougou,the scarcity ofwater during the dry periodwill limit theexpansion of urban vegetable farming in the city.Watersavingtechnologies,suchasdripirrigation,andthepoten-tial of greywater recycling can be explored. It is, however,clearthatalargepartneedstobeappliedinrain-fedcerealproduction.

Arelatedproblemis thestorageof largevolumesofurineuntilthetimeofapplicationintherainyperiod.AlltogetherthepopulationofOuagadougougeneratesaround525,000m3ofurineperyear,amountingto1.2lofurineperpersonperday!Simplemethodsofreducingthevolumeofurinewith-outlosingnitrogenwouldbeofgreatvalue.Thealternativetostoragecouldbetoapplytheurinetothelandduringthedryperiod,oruseitasanitrogensourceforcomposting.

Asitstandsnow,externalfundingisnecessarytosupportpartoftheoperatingcostsoftheassociations.From2010,themunicipalitywill takeover thecoordinationandfinancialsupport of the system. Insteadofpaying theassociationsdirectly,thesubsidymightbemoreefficientiftargetedtotheendof thechain, linking it toeach jerrycanorbagoffertilisersoldandappliedinfarming.Theincentivetosellthefertiliserswouldthenbecomeevengreater,andtheasso-ciationswouldbestimulatedtoimprovetheirmarketing.It

willalsobeimportanttohaveamunicipalstrategyforwhattodowhendemanddoesnotmeetsupply,andhowtousetheexcretaelsewhere.

Thenew Ecosan system inOuagadougou is by nomeansideal,butithastakensomeinnovativestepsinurbannutri-entmanagement.Theexperiencesshowthattheoperatingcostsofcollectionandtreatmentcanalmostberecoveredbythesaleoftreatedexcreta,ifthedistancestobecoveredarerelativelyshort.Publicfundingisneededforinvestmentsinandcontrolofthesystem,andtoacertainextentforrunningcosts,atleastintheshortterm.Itisalwaysdifficulttomobi-lisescarcepublicfunds,butifthegaininhealthandenviron-mental protection could be evaluated in addition to thementionedagriculturalbenefits,itwouldprobablyprovetobeaneconomicallysoundpublicinvestment.

Linus DagerskogLinusDagerskog,StockholmEnvironmentalInstitute(SEI).E-mail:[email protected] Coulibaly and Ida OuandaogoCREPA,BurkinaFaso.

The Emerging Market of Treated Human Excreta in Ouagadougou

A woman from Saja Manja applying the liquid fertilizerPhoto’s: Linus Dagerskog, CREPA

The EcoSan circuit painted on the entry door to the ecostationPhoto: Linus Dagerskog, CREPA

Page 49: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

49

www.ruaf.org

Althoughthereisasyetnorecordofurinecollec-tionforcommercialagriculturaluseinGhanaandNigeria,on-stationexperimentsinsomeuniversitiesshowpromis-ing results. Factors such as transport logistics, financialfeasibilityand to investigate the farmers’ and consumers’perceptions about using urine for vegetable productioninfluencetheadoptionofurineasafertiliserinagriculture.

InIbadan,Nigeria,RUAFpartnersimplementedaprojectonurineuseamongagroupofyoungurbanvegetablefarmers.Likewise through the EU-funded SWITCH programme, asimilardemonstrationandresearchstudywasimplementedinAccra,Ghana.Inbothcases,theobjectivewastointroduceurineusetourbanvegetableproducersthroughparticipa-tory action research, training and demonstration, and toinvestigatethefarmers’perceptionsaboutandthefeasibil-ityofusingurineintheirfarmlocations.

IbadanWithapopulationofabout2.5millionpeople,IbadanisoneofthelargestcitiesinNigeria.About200farmersareactiveinthetargeturbanandperi-urbansiteinIbadan,producingmostlyvegetables, suchasgreenamaranths (Amaranthuscaudatus), jute melo (Corchorus olitorus) and sometimesflutedpumpkin(Telfaria).

ThisstudywascarriedoutatthevegetableproductionsiteinthearmybarracksofIbadanNorthWestLocalGovernmentArea,Mokola.Temperaturesatthissiterangefrom210Cto310Candaverage,bimodal,annualrainfallis1,280mm.

Individualinterviewswerecarriedoutwith161peopleinthecommunity(60farmersand101marketers),whowereaskedabouttheirperceptiononurineuseforcropproduction.Theparticipantswere shownplantingdemonstrations involv-ingtheproductionofgreenamaranthsusingfertilisertreat-

Introducing Urine as an Alternative Fertiliser Source for Urban Agriculture: Case studies from Nigeria and GhanaIf human urine is properly collected and used for agriculture, it contributes to improved environ-mental sanitation in cities and reduces the costs of crop production. The innovation lies in the integra-tion of agriculture, environment and sanitation sectors.

mentsattherateof100kgN/ha.Thevarioustreatmentsandtheresultsaregiveninthefigure).Therequiredamountoffertiliserwasbasedonnitrogencompositionofthefertil-isermaterials.

Urine was collected in plastic containers from the malehosteloftheUniversityofIbadan,whichisaboutthreekilo-metres from the farm location. The collected urine wasstoredairtightforamonthbeforebeingused(moreinfor-mation:AdeOluwaetal.,2009).

Mostrespondentswerenotawareofthepossibilityofusingurineasafertiliser,andmanyofthemperceivedurineuseasagoodagricultural innovation,20percentof thefarmersand 26 per cent of consumers cited cultural norms as aconstrainttourineuse.Another26percentofthefarmersand 38 per cent of the consumers had specific religiousobjections to urine usage. Nevertheless,many respondedthattheywoulduseurineforvegetableproductionifitgivesabetteryieldthanotherformsoffertiliser,andmostconsum-erswouldbuyvegetablecropsgrownwithurineifitdidnotposeanyhealththreat.

Using urine rather than conventional mineral fertiliserssignificantly increases the yield ofAmaranthus caudatus,(oneofthemostcommonvegetablesinNigeria)andcouldtherebyalsoincreasefarmers’income.Microbialanalysisofharvestedvegetablesdidnotshowanysignificantdifferenceinmicrobialcontaminationbetweenthedifferentlytreatedproduce.

Effects of fertiliser treatments on fresh weight yield of green amaranths at 4 weeks after planting at Mokola, Ibadan. (source: Adeoluwa 2010)

Olufunke CofieAdeoluwa Olugbenga

Philip Amoah

Page 50: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010 www.ruaf.org

50

AccraAccra,likeIbadan,isexperiencingrapidpopulationgrowthand agriculture is becoming a clear feature in the urbanfringes. It isoneof tendemonstrationcitiesundertheEUfunded Project “Sustainable Urban Water ManagementImprovesTomorrow’sCity’sHealth (SWITCH)”, one compo-nentofwhichisdevelopingoptionstoeffectimprovementsin agricultural production and other livelihood activitiesusing freshwater, storm and wastewater (see also UA-Magazineno.20orwww.switchurbanwater.eu).

It is estimated that up to 90 per cent of fresh vegetableconsumption in Accra comes from intensive productionwithin and around the city. To maintain soil fertility thefarmersoftenusepoultrymanureandchemicalfertilisers.Thehighcostofthesefertilisersisbecomingaconstrainttofarmingactivities in thecity.Hencealternative sourcesofnutrientsarewelcomeandcouldenhanceproductivity.

Meanwhile,95percentof thecity’spopulaceuseson-sitesanitation facilities (public toilet, bucket latrines, septictanks)asthemainmeansofsanitation,makingtheseplacespotentialsourcesofnutrientsandorganicmatterproduc-tionforurbanagricultureinAccra.Manypublicurinalsarelocatedwithinsomeofthemostdenselypopulatedresiden-tialareasandpublicplaces,andarenotsubject topropercollectionandmanagement.Consequentlyurinefromtheurinalsisdischargeddirectlyintothedrainsflowingintothelagoon,resultinginpollution.Astudycarriedout(Cofieetal.,2007) on 14 urinals located within the Central BusinessDistrictrevealedthat7.3m3ofurineisgeneratedperday.Thisisapproximately2,200m3ofurineperyear.Intermsofnitro-gencontentthisvolumerepresents6.6tonnesofplantavail-ablenitrogen.AspartoftheSWITCHprojectIWMIcollabo-rates with Safisana, a private entrepreneur, to introduceurineasafertilisertofarmers.Theentrepreneurmanagesthe transportofurinefromtheurinals to thefarm,whileIWMIconductsthenecessaryresearchinvestigation.

LikeinIbadanfieldtrialsweresetupatDzorwuluvegetableproductionsiteinAccratodeterminetheeffectofurineandotherfertilisersontheyieldofcabbage.Inaddition,trainingand sensitisation was undertaken with urban farmers,extension staff of the Ministry of Food and Agriculture(MoFA),Ghana,andotherkeystakeholders,aboutthepossi-blebenefitsandrisksofusinghumanurineasanalternativesourceoffertilisation.Aspartofthisprogramme,aseminar

wasorganisedfortheextensionstaffoftheMinistryofFoodandAgriculture(MoFA)atLainAccra,followedbyameetingwithabout42farmersfromDzorwulu,PlantPoolandRidge,inAccra.Twopresentationsweremadeforthefarmersandextensionstaff.Toencourageabetterunderstandingoftheissues discussed, coloured photographs (showing farmersfromotherpartsoftheworld,cropsfertilisedwithurineandwithouturine,cropstreatedwithurineandotherformsoffertiliser,etc.)wereshowntothefarmers.Onbothoccasionsquestionandanswersessionsfollowedthepresentations.

The field trials at Dzorwulu area showed similar results(Adamteyet al,forthcoming)asinIbadan.Thefarmersandtheextension staff of the Ministry of Food and Agricultureexpresseddifferentconcernsontheuseofurineincropproduc-tion.Amongtheissuesraisedbyfarmerswere:howurinecanbesuppliedonaregularbasis,howtogetstoragefacilitiesforthevolumeofurinetobesupplied,themodeandratesofappli-cationforvariouscropsandfordifferentsoiltypes(especiallysandysoil),theeffectofurineonsoilcharacteristics,e.g.soilsalinity.Theextensionstaffontheotherhandwereconcernedabout thepossibility of collectingurine, how to reduce thepotentialriskassociatedwithurinebeforeuse,guidelinesontheuseofurine,willingnessoffarmerstouseurineasanalter-nativesourceoffertiliser,thehygienicqualityofcropsproducedwithurineandconsumers’readinesstoacceptandconsumesuchproducts. Inspiteof thenumerousconcerns raisedbybothfarmersandtheextensionstaffoftheMinistryofFoodandAgriculture,theideaofusingurineincropproductionwashighlywelcomed.Participantsfrombothgroupsexpressedaninterestinseeinghowurineisusedanditseffectoncrops.

Olufunke Cofie, Adeoluwa Olugbenga and Philip AmoahInternationalWaterManagementInstitute,Accra,GhanaEmail:[email protected]

ReferencesAdeOluwa, O.O., G.O. Adeoye and S.A. Yusuff, 2009. Effects of organic nitrogen fortifiers on some growth parameters of green amaranths (Amaranthus caudatus l.). renewable Agriculture and Food Systems: 24(4); 245–250.

Cofie, O. O. and Drechsel, p. (2007) ‘Water for food in the cities: The growing paradigm of irrigated (peri)-urban agriculture and its struggle in sub-Saharan Africa’, African Water Journal, vol 1, no 2, pp23–32

Adeoluwa, O. 2010. UNlOCKiNG THE WEAlTH iN HUMAN UriNE AS SAFE FErTiliZErS FOr FArMiNG iN iBADAN CiTY. project Technical report submitted to iWMi. 50p

introducing Urine as an Alternative Fertiliser Source for Urban Agriculture: Case studies from Nigeria and Ghana

Testing of urine application and co-composting products in AccraPhoto’s: René van Veenhuizen

Urine storage tanks at the testing site in AccraPhoto: René van Veenhuizen

Page 51: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

515151

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010 www.ruaf.org

Booksfurther readings

51African Urban Harvest Agriculture in the Cities of Cameroon, Kenya, and Uganda Prain, Gordon, Nancy Karanja and Diana Lee-Smith, EditorsA co-publication with the International Development Research Centre and the International Potato Center through Urban Harvest. Forthcoming: Available August 2010, ISBN 978-1-4419-6249-2Cropcultivationandlivestock-raisinghavelonghistoriesinurbanAfrica,asinotherareasoftheworld,butbroadaware-ness among researchers and policy makers of either thehistory or the contemporary facts of life inAfricanurbandevelopmentismuchmorerecent.BasedonevidencefromstudiesconductedinEasternandCentralAfrica, thisbookdraws out implications for practice, policy, and furtherresearch throughout the developing world. Featuringresearchundertaken in several cities inCameroon, Kenya,andUganda, the authors present an in-depth analysis ofurban agriculture, livelihoods andmarkets; urban ecosys-temhealth;andthekindsofpolicyandinstitutionalchangerelatedtourbanagriculturethathavebeenachievedinthethree countries through the partnership platforms andstakeholderdialogueestablishedintheparticipatingcities(seearticleinthisissueonpage17).

Wastewater Irrigation and Health: Assessing and mitigating risk in low-income countriesDrechsel, P.,Scott, C.A., Raschid-Sally, L., Redwood, M., Bahri, A. (editors) (2009) Earthscan www.earthscan.co.uk; Freedowloadat:www.idrc.ca/en/ev-149129-201-1-DO_TOPIC.htmlThis book approaches the problem of non-functioningwastewater treatment systems resulting in risk to publichealthbecauseofpoorqualitywaterbeingusedforirriga-tion,fromapracticalandrealisticperspective.Itaddressestheissueofhealthriskassessmentandreductioninadevel-oping country setting, establishinga connectionbetweenagricultureandsanitation.It“representsthebest,moderninnovativethinkingonthetopicandsymbolisesanimpor-tantturningpointinthehistoryofwastewaterreuseinirri-gationasamajorcontributortowaterandnutrientconser-vation, public health andwelfare.” (Professor Hillel Shuval, Hadassah Academic College and Hebrew University, Jerusalem).

Practical guideline on the use of urine in crop production: the Sustainable Sanitation Alliance (SuSanA) working group on Food Security and Productive SanitationStockholm Environment Institute (SEI). Forthcoming 2010Thisguidelineisdirectedtowardsthedonorcommunityanddecisionmakers, extensionworkersandotherprofessionalsactiveintheareasofagriculture,waterandsanitation,plan-ningandtheenvironment,especiallyprofessionalsintheagri-

culturalsector.Itgivespracticalguidanceontheuseofurineincrop production as a vital component of sustainable cropproduction and sanitation systems. It covers key aspects ofhowtouseurineasafertiliserinproductivesanitationsystemsandalsoincludesguidanceonhowtoinitiateactivitiesthatwillfacilitatetheintroductionofnewfertiliserstotheagricul-turalcommunity(seearticleinthisissueonpage41).

Decentralised Composting for Cities of Low- and Middle- Income Countries: A users’ manualRothenberger, S, Zurbrugg, C., Enayetullah, I. and Sinha, A.H.M.M. (2006)Thisbookisaboutconvertingorganicwasteintoaresource.ItisbasedonWasteConcern’sexperienceinimplementingseveral decentralised composting projects in Dhaka andreplicatingtheminBangladeshandotherAsiancities.Thismanualprovidesstep-by-stepguidelinesonhowtoinitiateadecentralisedcompostingprojectinadevelopingcountry.Theseincludeidentifyingstakeholderinterestsandprepar-ing a business plan; developing a collection system; thedesign, construction, operation and maintenance of acompostingfacility;andtheactualmarketingofthecompost.http://www.eawag.ch/organisation/abteilungen/sandec/publikationen/publications_swm/downloads_swm/decomp_Handbook_loRes.pdf

Greywater use in the Middle East, Technical, Social, Economic and Policy Issues. Edited by Stephen McIlwaine and Mark Redwood. Practical Action Publishing. 2010. 208 pages. Paperback. ISBN 978 1 85339 698 4InwaterscarceareasoftheMiddleEast,greywater(whichishouseholdwastewaterexcludingtoiletwaste)iscommonlyusedbypoorcommunitiestoirrigatehomegardens,supple-mentingwateravailabilityinthehouseholdandimprovingfoodsecurity.ThisbookdrawstogethermaterialpresentedataconferenceinJordanin2007,andexaminesthetechnicalapproaches to treating and using greywater for irrigation,includingitsassociatedriskstohealthandtheenvironment.

Disposable Cities: Garbage, governance and sustain-able development in urban Africa Myers, G.A. , Ashgate Publishing Limited, Hampshire, UK (2005) Basedonin-depthfieldworkinthreecities,DaresSalaam,ZanzibarandLusaka,thisbookprovidesacriticalanalysisofthe United Nations Sustainable Cities Program in Africa(SCP).Italsoputsforwardahistoricallygroundedcritiqueofneoliberalism, good governance and sustainable develop-mentdiscourses.http://www.amazon.com/Disposable-Cities-Sustainable-Development-Re-Materialising/dp/0754643743

Page 52: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

52

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010 www.ruaf.org

Booksfurther readings

Integrated Nutrient Management, Soil Fertility, and Sustainable Agriculture: Current issues and future challengesGruhn, P., Goletti, F. and Yudelman, M., International Food Policy Research Institute, Food, Agriculture, and the Environment Discussion Paper 32 (2000)The authors call for an Integrated Nutrient Managementapproach to themanagementofplantnutrients formain-tainingandenhancingsoilthatusesbothnaturalandman-madesourcesofplantnutrients.Thekeycomponentsofthisapproacharedescribed;therolesandresponsibilitiesofvari-ousactors,includingfarmersandinstitutions,aredelineated;and recommendations for improving the management ofplantnutrientsandsoilfertilityarepresented.http://agecon-search.umn.edu/bitstream/16236/1/dp000032.pdf

Composting – Decentralized composting in low-income countries: A case study from the Republic of Guinea / West Africa (2008)DVD: Austria, 40 minutes, Languages: German, English and FrenchBasedontheproject“LPCC-Guinée:Recirculationoflocalorganicwasteinurbanandruralagriculture- the impact on soil functions in Guinea /WestAfrica”, an educational filmwasproducedby theInstituteofWasteManagement.Thisactivitywas

fundedbytheCommissionforDevelopmentStudiesattheAustrianAcademyofSciences.Thefilmintendstoprovideinformationontheimportanceoforganicwastemanage-mentandperiurbanagricultureespeciallyinurbanagglom-erations of low-income countries. The biodegradationprocessisexplainedandwhatfactorsofinfluencehavetobeconsideredindaytodaycompostingactivities.Thetargetgroupsforthisfilmarestate/municipalofficials,students,researchers,publicutilitycompanies,peoplecarry-ing out composting and farmers in urban and periurbanagriculture.http://www.wau.boku.ac.at/12714.html?&L=1

Utilization of organic waste in (peri-) urban centres. The decision makers’ guide to compost production GTZ-GFA. 1999. (includes financial analysis tool); Software Tool - Economic Model, Version 0.9 E, GFA, Germany Beforeestablishingacompostingbusiness,itisnecessarytomakesurethatcompostproductionandmarketingwillbean economically attractive and self-financing activity. In1999,aGTZprojectonmunicipalwastecompostingcompileda useful set ofmaterials to assist planners and decision-makersinmakingfeasibilityassessments.Theinformationpackageincludedacomputer-basedtoolcalledthe“Decision-makers’guidetocompostproduction”.Thesoftwareoffersusersaquickandeasymethodtodetermine,rightfromtheoutsetoftheplanningprocess,thecoststhatwillhavetobecoveredandgivesabreak-downofthosecosts.Thebookand

software,originallyavailablefreeofcharge,areout-ofprint.ThelastavailablecopiesofthesourcebookandsoftwarecanbeorderedfromGFIUmwelt.h t tp : / /www.g fa -g roup.de/pub l i ca t ions/home_beitrag_868146.html

Rural-Urban Food, Nutrient and Virtual Water Flows in Selected West African CitiesDrechsel, P., Graefe, S. and Fink, M., IWMI Research Report 115, International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka, (2007) This study quantifies rural-urban food flows inGhanaandBurkinaFasoandanalysesthedepen-dencyoffourcities–Accra,Kumasi,TamaleandOuagadougou–onfoodsuppliedfromrural,peri-urbanandurbanareasaswellasfromimports.Furthermore, the report discusses the role ofurbanandperiurbanagricultureandoptionstoreducetheenvironmentalburdenbyclosingtherural-urbanwaterandnutrientscycles.http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/Publications/IWMI_Research_Reports/PDF/PUB115/RR115.pdf

Phosphorus Recovery from Human UrineGethke, K., Herbst, H., Montag, D., Bruszies, D. and Pinnekamp, J. in Water Practice & Technology 1:4 (2006) AttheInstituteofEnvironmentalEngineering(ISA)ofRWTHAachenUniversity,severalresearchanddevelopmentprojectsconcerningphosphaterecoveryhavebeencarriedout.Inthecontextoftheseprojectsthedecompositionprocessesduringthestorageofhumanurinewereobservedandaprocesstorecoverphosphorusfromurinewastested.Apreconditionforthisprocessistheuseofno-mix-toiletsseparatingurineandfaeces.Thesetoiletshavebeenintegratedinsomenewsettle-mentsinGermanyprovidedwithecologicalsanitarysystems.Therecoveryprocessisbasedonstruvitecrystallisation.http://themas.stowa.nl/Uploads/nieuwe%20sanitatie/Informatie/Bibliotheek/Overig/Gethke%20et%20al.%20(2006)%20-%20Phosphorus%20recovery%20from%20human%20urine.pdf

Note1) Exchange rate: 1 USD = 1800 pesos colombianos

References- González rojas, C. p. 2007. Technologies for the production of

Edible plants in Bogotá, Colombia. in: UA-Magazine no. 19: Stimulating innovation in Urban Agriculture

- National Administrative Department of Statistics (DANE) 2009 http://www.dane.gov.co/daneweb_V09/- Tibaitatá-Corpoica research Center. 2009. Technical report of

Urban Agriculture, Bogotá

references from page 30

Page 53: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

535353

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010 www.ruaf.org

Weblinks

53www.waste.nl WASTE works towards sustainable improvement of theurbanpoor’slivingconditionsandtheurbanenvironmentingeneral. Their programmes and projects have a focus onbottom-updevelopmentinrelationtorecycling,solidwastemanagement,ecologicalsanitationandknowledgesharing.WASTE,locatedintheNetherlands,teamsupwithorganisa-tionsinAfrica,Asia,LatinAmericaandEasternEuropethatshareitsgoalsandapproaches.

www.sandec.ch SandecistheDepartmentofWaterandSanitationinDevelopingCountriesattheSwissFederalInstituteofAquaticScienceandTechnology (Eawag). Its mandate is to assist in developingappropriate and sustainablewater and sanitation conceptsandtechnologiesadaptedtothedifferentphysicalandsocio-economicconditionsprevailingindevelopingcountries.

www.skat.ch SkatisanindependentSwissresourcecentreandconsultancycompanyworkinginthefieldsofdevelopmentandhumanitar-ianaid.Since1978,Skathasprovidedtechnicalexpertiseandmanagementsupport,aswellastrainingandresearchfacili-ties.Skat’sareasofexpertiseare:watersupplyandsanitation,buildingandsettlements,mobilityandtransport,governance,economicdevelopmentandenvironmentalmanagement.

www.fibl.org TheResearchInstituteofOrganicAgriculture(FiBL)isoneoftheworld’sleadingorganicresearchinstitutes.Interdisciplinaryresearchteamsandcollaborationamongresearch,extensionandeducationarethestrengthsofFiBLtoensurerapidknowledgetransfertobeneficiaries.FiBLresearchprojectscanbefoundindifferentpartsoftheworldbeitinEurope,SouthAmerica,AfricaorAsia.

www.wau.boku.ac.at/abf.html “The Institute ofWasteManagement at the University ofNaturalResourcesandAppliedLifeSciences,Vienna(BOKU)evaluates waste management objectives of political andlegal relevance with regard to their short- and long-termecological and economic impact. Technologies for soundtreatment and disposal ofwaste are developed, based onnatural processes. The goal is to develop adapted wastemanagement measures, that include technological (e.g.decentralisedcomposting),organisational(e.g.documenta-tionsystemforhazardouswastes)andeducationalmeasures(e.g.curriculumdevelopment,trainingcourses).

http://phosphorus.global-connections.nlTheNutrientFlowTaskGroup (NFTG) isaDutch initiative

facilitated by the Development Policy Review Network(DPRN)thatstrivestoacceleratethesearchforsolutionsforphosphorusdepletionanditsglobalimpact.TheNFTGisabroadnetworkofpublicparties(theMinistriesofAgricultureandSpatialPlanning,WaterAuthoritydeDommel),NGOs(WASTE, ETC-RUAF, ICCO), the private sector (Grontmij,Thermphos, SNB, GMB-Watertechnology, Royal Haskoning,Tebodin,Orgaworld3R-Agrocarbon),knowledgeinstitutions(PlantResearchInternational,Alterra,WageningenUniversity,Unesco-IHE)andnetworkorganisations(NetherlandsWaterPartnership,Aqua forAll).Contactperson:GerPannekoek,Email:[email protected];http://www.phosphaterecovery.com/

www.reseaucrepa.org Setupin1988asaregionalproject,CREPA(RegionalCentreforlowcostWaterSupplyandSanitation)isnowanintergov-ernmentalinstitutionwith17membercountries,allfranco-phoneexceptGuineaBissau.Thirteennationalrepresenta-tionsarecoordinatedbytheheadquartersinOuagadougou,BurkinaFaso.Research,training,demonstrationprojectsandcommunicationarefocusedonlow-costappropriatetech-nologies, community participation, alternative financialmechanismsandtheroleofthelocalauthorities.EcoSanisone of CREPA’s core programmes together with BasicCommunityServices,IntegratedWasteWaterManagementandHCES/SludgeManagement.

http://phosphorusfutures.net/ ThemainobjectiveoftheGPRIistofacilitatequalityinterdis-ciplinaryresearchonglobalphosphorussecurityforfuturefoodsecurity.Inadditiontoresearch,theGPRIalsofacilitatesnetworking,dialogueandawarenessraisingamongstake-holdersandthecommunityonglobalphosphorusscarcityandpossiblesolutions.

www.ecosanres.org/ Ecosanres-Closingthelooponsanitation.Keyresourcesonthiswebsiteare:factsheetsonsustainablesanitationissuesand publications, including “Toilets That Make Compost”,“Pathways for Sustainable Sanitation” and “EcologicalSanitation:RevisedandEnlargedEdition”.

www.susana.org/index.php/lang-en/working-groups/wg05 Workinggroup5ofthe“SustainableSanitationAlliance”aimstoraiseawarenessaboutthereuse-orientedsustainablesani-tationapproachanditsprospectivecontributiontoglobalfoodsecurityandtopromotethisapproachonalargescale.Factsheetavailable at: http://www.susana.org/images/documents/05-working-groups/wg05/en-wg5-factsheet-2008-05-28.pdf

Page 54: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

54

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010 www.ruaf.org

Events

Mini Seminar on Phosphorous Shortage (at the European Parliament in Brussels, Belgium), and International Workshop of the Global Phosphorous Research Initiative [Linkoping, Sweden]25-26 FebruaryBotheventshavebeenheldalready,butinformationontheresultsandforthcomingactivitiescanbeobtainedat:-http://phosphorus.global-connections.nl (on the Brussels event)-http://phosphorusfutures.net/ (on the international workshop).

World Urban Forum 5: The Right to the City - Bridging the Urban Divide[Rio de Janeiro, Brazil]22–26 March 2010Inthespaceofafewshortyears,theWorldUrbanForumhasturnedintotheworld’spremierconferenceoncities.AmongtheconceptsthatdrovethediscussionsinRioincludedwerereducing inequality and poverty, participatory democracy,sustainable urban development, equal access to shelter,health,water,sanitationandtheright to the inclusive city.RUAForganizedaspecialevent(seewww.ruaf.org).More information: http://www.unhabitat.org/categories.asp?catid=584

Multiple Geographies of Urban Agriculture in the Global North: Integrating Perspectives from Planning and Design, Ecology, Public Health, and Political Economy[Washington DC, USA]14–18 April 2010Urbanagriculture(UA)isundergoingarenaissanceinNorthAmericancities;communitiesandindividualshavelaunchedinnumerableinitiativestofarmandgardeninemptylots,atschools,inbackyards,andonroofsandstoops.Thegoalofthisconferencewastobringcriticalhumangeographyintoconversationwithplanninganddesign,publichealth,andecological and environmental sciences to both “ground”theoryinon-the-groundUAexperiencesandprovidecriticalinsightsintothehistoriesandassumptionsinformingtheseinitiatives.Moreinformation:http://www.aag.org/

Land Management Strategies for Improving Urban-Rural Inter-Relationships[Hannover, Germany]09-11 May 2010 GLL Hannover (the agency for Geoinformation, LandDevelopmentandRealEstate)supportedbyGTZisorganis-ing an International Land Management Symposium inHannover.TheConferencewilldealwithbestpracticeandregionalsolutionsinurban-ruralinter-relationships.Topics

include: themanagement of peri-urban areas,migration,and the development of sound integrated developmentapproaches.Moreinformationwith:[email protected]@gtz.de

1st World Congress on Cities and Adaptation to Climate Change[Bonn, Germany]28–30 May 2010ResilientCities2010isthefirsteditionofanannualglobalforum for exchange, learning, networking, debating andpolicy making on approaches and solutions for climatechange adaptation and resilience-building in cities andmunicipalities. The latest scientific findings, effectiveapproachesandstate-of-the-artprogrammeswillfeedthediscussionsand set thedirection for futureplanningandinvestment.Theeventwillbringaboutpolicypropositionsandimpulsesforinnovation.RUAFandFAOcollaboratedintheorganizationofaspecialevent.Moreinformation:http://www.iclei.org/index.php?id=10242

NAREA Workshop on Economics of Local Food Markets[Atlantic City, USA]15–16 June 2010The2010WorkshopontheEconomicsofLocalFoodMarketswill immediately follow the annual meeting of theNortheastern Agricultural and Resource EconomicsAssociation(NAREA).Thegoaloftheworkshopistohighlightcurrentresearchandbringtogetherresearchers,extensioneducators,privatesectorparticipants,andpolicymakerstoexchange ideas and develop a common set of priorityresearchandeducationneedsforlocalfoodsystems.Moreinformation:http://www.narea.org/2010/

World Cities Summit 2010[Singapore]28–30 June 2010World Cities Summit brings together practitioners andpolicymakerswithleadingexpertsintheirfieldtoidentifyinnovativesolutionstothemostpressingchallengesfacingcities today.The inaugural summit in June 2008 broughttogether 800 senior delegates including leaders, mayors,policy makers and the civil society. The emphasis of thesecond summit is on the twobroad themes: Liveable and Sustainable Cities for the Future and Building Sustainable and Eco-friendly Cities.http://www.worldcities.com.sg/

Page 55: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

555555

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010 www.ruaf.org

Events

55Innovation and Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Food[Montpellier, France]28 June – 1 July 2010This event will include various workshops, including“Agriculture,NatureandCities:enhancing innovationsforsustainable development”. The symposium will combinedifferent types of sessions with key note lectures, roundtables,andparallelthematicorregionalworkshopstoreflectuponfuturechoices,toidentifynewconcreteproposalsforresearchagendasandforpoliticalaction,andtodiscusshowinnovationssystemscanbetterachievesustainability.Moreinformation::www.isda2010.net

Linking Health, Equity and Sustainability in Schools[Geneva, Switzerland]10–11 July 2010ThismeetingisorganizedbytheSwissNetworkofHealthPromotingSchools(SNGS),theSchoolsforHealthinEuropeNetwork(SHEnetwork)andtheInternationalSchoolHealthNetwork (ISHN) in collaboration with the foundations ofglobal and environmental education (SBE and SUB). Theinternationalsymposiumisopentoallwhoareinterestedinquestionsofhealthandsustainabledevelopmentinschool,inparticularyoungpeopleandotherstakeholders,research-ers,NGOsandgovernmentofficials.Thesymposiumwillbeprecededandfollowedupbyon-linediscussionsandwebi-narsaswellasacoordinatedsetofpresentationsinthelargeinternational IUHPE conference being held immediatelyafterward.Moreinformation:http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=19431182

Local Food Systems in Old Industrial Regions: Challenges and Opportunities[Toledo, Ohio, USA]3–7 August 2010Theconferenceaimstobringtogetherbothacademicsandpractitioners to share their knowledge, experience, andexpertisewithregardtodevelopingandmaintaininglocalfood systems in old industrial regions. The conference issponsoredby the InternationalGeographicalUnionbut isopen for participation from individuals in a variety ofacademicdisciplines(including,butnotlimitedto,geogra-phy, planning, public policy, public health, environmentalscience,horticulture,womenandgenderstudies,sociology,anthropology,andeconomics).Moreinformation:http://uac.utoledo.edu/igu_commission/ToledoMC2010-Home.htm

Growing Power’s National-International Urban & Small Farm Conference[Milwaukee, USA]8–9 September 2010HostedbyGrowingPower,thisinternationalconferencewillteach the participants how to plan, develop and expandsmall farms inurbanand rural areas. Learnhowyou cangrowfoodyear-round,nomatterwhattheclimate,andhowyoucanbuildmarketsforsmallfarms.Seehowyoucanplaya part in creating a new food system that fosters betterhealthandmoreclosely-knitcommunities.More information:www.growingpowerfarmconference.orgorwww.growingpower.org/conference

9th Canadian Urban Forest Conference (CUFC9) “Water, Trees and Communities”[Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada]5-8 October 2010The conference, organised by theTown ofTruro andTreeCanada,willbringhundredsofarborists,foresters,cityplan-ners,environmentalistsandengineers together todiscussandshareknowledgerelatedtothethemeof“Water,Treesand Communities”. Trees are increasingly recognised asplayinganimportantrolein“greeninfrastructure”byregu-latingthehydrologiccycleandprotectingmunicipaldrink-ingwatersupplies.Moreinformation:www.cufc9.ca

Managing the Urban Rural Interface [Copenhagen, Denmark]19–22 October 2010 TheconferenceisthefinaleventofthePLURELproject(Peri-urbanLandUseRelationships–Strategiesandsustainabilityassessment tools for urban-rural linkages) funded by theEuropean Commission’s sixth Framework Programme forresearch(ECFP6036921).Theconferenceaimstopresentthestatusofscientificapproachestoassesstheperiurbanland-userelationshipsandassociatedeffectsonsustainability,tosettheagendaforfutureresearchinthefield,andtoenhanceinternationalresearchcooperation.Theeventtargetsabroadspectrumofparticipants,recognis-ing themultidisciplinarity of research in urban and rurallinkages.This includes, but is not limited to, those in thefieldsoflanduse,urbanandruraldevelopment,planning,architecture,geography,economicsandsocialandenviron-mentalsciences.Contributionsmayaddressmethodologi-cal, theoretical issues, applications or dissemination, andparticipatoryaspects.Moreinformation:http://www.plurel.net/Default.aspx?id=87

Page 56: April 2010 URBAN AGRICULTURE UAMAGAZiNE · Cover This issue will look at options for closing the loop through safe recycling of urban wastes, and argues that urban agriculture can

Urban Agriculture magazine • number 23 • April 2010

Urban Agriculturemagazine

23The Role of Urban Agriculture in Sustainable Urban Nutrient ManagementISSN 1571-6244No. 23, April 2010

UA Magazine is published two times a year by the Network of Resource Centres on Urban Agriculture and Food Security (RUAF), under the Cities Farming for the Future Programme, which is financed by DGIS, the Netherlands, and IDRC, Canada.

UA Magazine is translated into French, Spanish, Portuguese, Chinese, and Arabic, and distributed in separate editions through the RUAF regional net-works, and is also available on www.ruaf.org.

The RUAF Partners are: IWMI-Ghana, International Water Management Institute, Accra, Ghana, English-speaking West AfricaEmail: [email protected]; Website: http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/africa/West/projects/RUAFII-CFF.htm MDPESA: Municipal Development Partnership, Harare, Zimbabwe, Eastern and Southern AfricaEmail: [email protected]; Website: http://www.mdpafrica.org.zw/ua_cffp.html IWMI-India, International Water Management Institute, Hyderabad, India, South and South East AsiaEmail: [email protected]; Website: http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/southasia/ruaf/about.html IPES, Promoción del Desarrollo Sostenible, Lima PeruLatin America and UA Magazine in Spanish and PortugueseEmail: [email protected]; Website: www.ipes.org/au IAGU, Institut Africain de Gestion Urbaine, Dakar, Senegal, French- speaking West Africa and UA Magazine in French, Email: [email protected]; Magazine in French: http://www.iagu.org/RUAF/index.html AUB-ESDU; American University of Beirut North Africa and Middle East and UA Magazine in Arabic Email: [email protected] / [email protected] Website: www.urbanagriculture-mena.org IGSNRR, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resource Research of the Chinese Academy of Sciences; China and UA Magazine in Chinese Email: [email protected]; Website: www.cnruaf.com.cn ETC-Urban Agriculture, Leusden, The NetherlandsCoordination and Support and Magazine in English Email: [email protected]; Website: www.ruaf.org

Editors, No. 23This issue was compiled by René van Veenhuizen (Responsible Editor), together with Olufunke Cofie of IWMI-Ghana Office, and Verele de Vreede of WASTE

Web Editing, Events, and Books Femke Hoekstra and René van VeenhuizenAdministration Ellen RadstakeLanguage Editor Catharina de Kat-Reynen Design, Layout and Printing Koninklijke BDUSubscriptions The editor: [email protected]

Address Urban Agriculture MagazineP.O. Box 64, 3830 AB Leusden,The NetherlandsVisitors’ address: Kastanjelaan 5, Leusden.Tel: +31.33.4326000, Fax: +31.33.4940791 e-mail: [email protected], website: www.ruaf.org

We would like to receive your contributions or suggestions for the next issue of the UA Magazine

RUAF CELEBRATES 10 YEARS OF PROMOTING URBAN AGRICULTURE WORLD WIDE NO. 25: rUAF 10 Years; promoting Urban Agriculture (DECEMBEr 2010)

Please send us your contribution before: 1 SEPTEMBER 2010

Tenyearsago,ETCFoundation initiatedaprogrammenamed: “Resource Centre on Urban Agriculture andForestry” (RUAF). The RUAF project developed into aninternational network of 1 global and 7 regional Resource Centres on Urban Agriculture and Food Security, which in 2004 obtained independent legalstatusastheRUAF Foundation.In addition to ongoing networking, documentation,awarenessraising,andpolicylobbying,theRUAFpart-ners, with the start of the “Cities Farming for the Future” programme in 2005, focused on capacitydevelopmentandsupporttomulti-stakeholderpolicydevelopmentandactionplanning inurbanagricul-turein20cities,involvinglocalauthorities,NGO’sandurbanproducerorganisationsin17countries.

Andsince2009inthe“From Seed to Table programme”thishasbeenbroadenedwithstrengtheningurbanproducersorganisationsandenhancinglocalcapacityinthedevelopmentof“FromSeed toTable”projectswithurbanproducergroups (participatorymarketanalysistoidentifyconsumerdemand,groupbusinessplanning,urbanproducerfieldschools,processing/packagingunits,directmarketing toconsumers interested inecologicalproducts).Thiswork has had important effects on local institutional capacities and enhanced politicalawarenessandimportantpolicychangeatcityandnationallevel.Internationalrecognitionofthepotentialandimpactsofurbanagricultureforurbanfoodsecu-rityandnutrition,povertyalleviation,recyclingofurbanwastes,adaptationtoclimatechangehasgrownsubstantiallyinthisdecade.

Anoverviewofmain RUAF publicationstodatecanbefoundat theRUAFwebsite (www.ruaf.org) includinganumberofleadingpublicationslike“GrowingCities,GrowingFood”(DSE,2000),“CitiesFarmingfor theFuture” (IIRR,2006),“WomenFeedingCities” (PracticalAction, 2008),“Cities, Poverty andFood”(PracticalAction,2010)and24thematicissuesoftheUrbanAgricultureMagazine(6languages,7000subscribers).

RUAFwillorganiseanumberofactivitiesin2010,tocelebratethis anniversary, including a special issue of the Urban Agriculture Magazine.

NO. 25: RUAF 10 Years; Promoting Urban Agriculture (NOVEMBER 2010)We would welcome your contributions in the form of photos and short stories that show the development ofurbanagricultureinthepast10yearsinacertaincityorcountryanditsimpacts,orthatanalysetheroleurbanagri-culturecanplayinansweringmajorchallengesinthenear

future(e.g.urbanfoodsecurity,climatechange,productivereuseofwastewaterandnutrients,etcetera).