aquatic ecosystem restoration in massachusetts

46
Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts Tim Purinton, Director, Mass Division of Ecological Restoration

Upload: buzzards-bay-coalition

Post on 07-May-2015

403 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

A presentation about aquatic ecosystem restoration in Massachusetts. Presented by Tim Purinton, director of the Massachusetts Division of Ecological Restoration, during the Buzzards Bay Coalition's 2012 Decision Makers Workshop series. Learn more at www.savebuzzardsbay.org/DecisionMakers

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Tim Purinton, Director, Mass Division of Ecological Restoration

Page 2: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Department of Fish and Game

Mary Griffin, Commissioner

Page 3: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

• Physical Restoration – Freshwater and Salt Water

• Flow Restoration – RIFLS, Dam Management, Comprehensive Water

Planning

• Technical Assistance (Riverways Program) – Adopt-A-Stream, Wild & Scenic Rivers, Water

Quality, etc.

The mission of the Division of Ecological Restoration is to restore and protect the Commonwealth’s rivers, wetlands and watersheds for the benefit of people and the environment.

Division of Ecological Restoration (DER)

Page 4: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Aquatic Habitat Restoration

…activities that assist in the recovery of the natural processes of a aquatic ecosystem that have been

• degraded, • altered or • destroyed.

Such activities will:

• restore natural processes, • remove ecosystem stressors, • increase resilience of the ecosystem, & • create no lasting harm.

“Ecological restoration is an intentional activity that initiates or

accelerates the recovery of an ecosystem with respect to its health, integrity and sustainability.”

Page 5: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

• One-third of wetlands lost to filling and alteration

• Thousands of acres of coastal marshes are impacted by road and rail crossings that block flow of ocean tides or impede fish and wildlife passage

• A growing number of rivers and streams are impacted by low flow (and surcharge)

• Urban sprawl and development pose a continued and growing threat to river and wetland health

• Over 3,000 dams fragment and degrade our rivers and an estimated 30,000 culverts exist in the Commonwealth

• Climate change

Problems

Page 6: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Restoration Solutions

• Replacing culverts to restore full tidal passage and natural hydrology

• Fill removal and stream daylighting

• Removal of dams, dikes, and other barriers

• Reduce and remove stormwater pollutants

• Water conservation measures (including reducing irrigation and creating riparian buffers)

• Invasive species control

Page 7: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Barriers and Fragmentation

• 43 are flood control dams

• 44 licensed hydropower dams

• 164 water supply dams (not all in use)

Page 8: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Dam Removal

Page 9: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Culvert Replacement

Page 10: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Tidal Exchange

Page 11: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Habitat Complexity

Page 12: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Floodplain Restoration

Page 13: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Flow Restoration

Page 14: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Massachusetts Restoration Examples

• North Hoosic River – Clarksburg (dam removal in a cold water stream in Western Mass) Partners: MassDER, Trout Unlimited, Town of Clarksburg, NRCS, USFWS, American Rivers, Sweet

Water Trust, Hoosic River Watershed Association, Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture, Cascade School Supplies

• Bronson Brook – Worthington (culvert modification and replacement, woody debris installation) Partners: Town of Worthington, DFW, NRCS, USFWS, American Rivers, NOAA, Westfield Wild and

Scenic Committee, The Nature Conservancy, Connecticut River Watershed Association

• Eel River - Plymouth (removal of series of water control structures, a dam, stream naturalization and Atlantic white

cedar swamp) Partners: MassDER, Town of Plymouth, USFWS, NRCS, American Rivers, TNC, MassDEP, CWRP-

Horsley Witten Group

Page 15: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Briggsville Dam Removal- Clarksburg

Page 16: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts
Page 17: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

North Hoosic River

Page 18: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

16’

tall

Page 19: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts
Page 20: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts
Page 21: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts
Page 22: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts
Page 23: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts
Page 24: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Briggsville Dam Removal Funding

• Design: $171,000

• Implementation: $385,000

• Oversight & monitoring: $52,000

• Partner in-kind ~ $5,000

• Total: $613,000

www.entmoney.com

Page 25: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InrkO32gCVI

Page 26: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Bronson Brook -Worthington

Page 27: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Bronson Brook -Worthington

Page 28: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Bronson Brook -Worthington

Page 29: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Eel River Headwaters Restoration - Plymouth

Page 30: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Eel River

Page 31: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Eel River

• Wetland acres restored: 40 acres – seven bog cells • Culvert replacements: 2 road crossings • Barriers removed: 6 including the Sawmill Dam • Miles of stream restored: 2 miles (from headwaters spring to Sawmill Dam) • Total project area, bogs and dam inclusive: Approximately 60 acres • Number of Atlantic white cedar trees planted: 17,000 • Number of other trees, shrubs, and herbs planted: 7,000 • Scale of earthwork: Approximately 30,000 cubic yards • Pieces of large wood used to construct in-stream habitat: Approximately 1000 • Construction Cost: $ 1.9 million • Funders: Multiple: Local, State, Federal and Private • Years to Design, Permit, Fundraise and Complete: 4 • Job Creation/ Maintenance: 2-4 Engineers, Consultants, and Surveyors (part-time), 5-8 Construction Contractors (part-time)

Page 32: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Eel River

Page 33: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Eel River

Page 34: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts
Page 35: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts
Page 36: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts
Page 37: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts
Page 38: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Eel River Headwater Restoration

Before After

Page 39: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Climate Change

Confronting climate change in the U.S. Northeast • Massachusetts,

Union of Concerned Scientists

Changes in average summer heat index, a measure of how hot it actually feels, given temperature and humidity

Page 40: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Aquatic Ecosystem Impacts &

Vulnerabilities • Changes in water depths, flow dynamics

• Alteration of banks and floodplains

• Increase water temp – change in wetland & animal species

• Drying of peat soils resulting in release of stored carbon

• Proliferation of invasives

Page 41: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Climate Change Adaptation

• Restoration is a core, no-regrets strategy to assist with adaptation

• Restoration builds resiliency

• Healthy wetlands sequester carbon

• Barrier removal creates access to refugia, reduces water temperatures

Page 42: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Key Elements of Holistic Restoration

• Focus on ecological processes • Movement of water, sediment, organic matter,

nutrients/chemicals, light/heat, and biota

• Not ‘form’ or single/target species focus

• Work on the appropriate scale • Watershed focus

• Consider regional controls, and reach-level processes, conditions, and stressors

• Temporal considerations

• Coordination and synergy • Focus existing efforts

• Coordination, not just co-location

Page 43: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

“Mother Nature & Father Time” (Bill Mitsch)

• Establish basic conditions for recovery

• Resist over engineering and excessive manipulation

• Communicate that restoration is a trajectory rather than instantaneous success

• Monitor, evaluate and mange adaptively

Page 44: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Economic Argument • Restoration leverages funding and attracts millions of competitive

federal dollars annually into the Massachusetts economy.

• Implementation projects produce an average employment demand of 12.5 jobs and $1,750,000 in total economic output from each $1 million spent, contributing to a growing “restoration economy” in Massachusetts.

• Ecological restoration projects help support a number of economic sectors, including design & engineering, construction, wholesale construction materials, nursery products, & non‐profit science.

• Because of this diversity of contributing sectors and the non‐export nature of the projects, the “ripple effects” from a dollar spent on ecological restoration travel widely through the Massachusetts economy.

• Restoration projects generate total economic outputs equal to or greater than other types of capital projects such as road and bridge construction and repair, replacement of water infrastructure, etc.

Page 45: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

Regulation Reform

Non-Ecological Restoration Projects

Ecological Restoration Projects

Page 46: Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration in Massachusetts

End

[email protected] (617) 626-1542

Photo Credit: Doug Kerr