aquatic sediments

Upload: ahmed1581973

Post on 04-Jun-2018

229 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 Aquatic Sediments

    1/8

    Aquatic SedimentsAuthor(s): C. F. Powers, W. D. Sanville and F. S. StaySource: Journal (Water Pollution Control Federation), Vol. 48, No. 6, 1976: Literature Review(Jun., 1976), pp. 1433-1439Published by: Water Environment FederationStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25039038 .Accessed: 03/11/2013 16:59

    Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

    .JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

    .

    Water Environment Federation is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal(Water Pollution Control Federation).

    http://www.jstor.org

    This content downloaded from 196 .200.142.112 on Sun, 3 Nov 2 013 16:59:24 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=wefhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/25039038?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/stable/25039038?origin=JSTOR-pdfhttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=wef
  • 8/14/2019 Aquatic Sediments

    2/8

    Literature Review

    Sewage, Bay Park, N. Y. Jour. Research,U. S. Geol Surv., 3, 93 (1975).

    116. Ragone, S. E, and Vecchioli, J, Chemical

    Interaction during Deep Well Recharge,

    Bay Park, New York. Groundwater, 13,17

    (1975).117. Wellings, F. M, et al, Pathogenic VirusesMay Thwart Land Disposal. Water ir

    Wastes Eng., 12, 3, 70 ( 1975).118. Bader, J. S, d al, Selected References on

    Ground-Water Contamination, the United

    States of America and Puerto Rico. Listed

    in New Publications of the Geological Sur

    vey, List 799, U. S. Dept. of the Interior,

    Geological Survey (1975).119. Fields, T, Jr., and Lindsey, A. W, Landfill

    Disposal of Hazardous Wastes: A Review

    of Literature and Known Approaches.

    U. S. EPA Rept. No. SW-165 (1975).120. Ground Water Pollution from Subsurface

    Excavations : Part XL Water Well Jour.,

    22,2,37(1975).'

    121. Needle, B, and Garland, G, Dumps: A

    Potential Threat to Ground Water Sup

    plies. Water Well Jour, 22, 1 (1975).122. Behnke, J, A Summary of the Biogeochem

    istry of Nitrogen Compounds in Ground

    Water. Jour. HydroL, 27, 155 (1975).123. McNabb, J. F, and Dunlap, W. J, Subsur

    face Biological Activity in Relation toGround-Water Pollution. Groundwater,

    13,33 (1975).124. Allen, M. J, and Geldreich, E. E, Bacterio

    logical Criteria for Ground-Water Quality.

    Groundwater, 13, 45 (1975).125. Farquhar, G. J, and Rovers, F. A, Guide

    lines to Landfill Location and Managementfor Water Pollution Control. SanitaryLandfill Study, Final Report, Vol. IV,Office of Research Administration, Project

    #8083-4, Univ. of Waterloo (1975).126. Walker, W. R, and Cox, W. E, Private

    Contraints on Ground-Water Contamina

    tion. Jour. Hyd. Div., Proc. Amer. Soc.Civil Engr., 101 (HY10), 1333 (1975).

    127. H?tes, F. L, Subsurface Environment?Pri

    vate Property or Public Domain? by W.

    R. Walker and W. E. Cox (Nov. 1975).Jour. Hyd. Div., Proc. Amer. Soc. Civil

    Engr., 101 (HY10), 1365 (1975).128. Kaufman, M. I, and McKenzie, D. J, Up

    ward Migration of Deep-Well Waste In

    jection Fluids in Floridan Aquifer, SouthFlorida. Jour. Res., U. S. Geol. Surv., 3,261 (1975).

    129.Faulkner,

    G.L,

    andPascale, C. A,

    Moni

    toring Regional Effects of High PressureInjection of Industrial Waste Water in a

    Limestone Aquifer. Groundwater, 13,197 (1975).

    130. Conrad, E. T, and Hopson, N. E, Outlooksfor the Future of Deep Well Disposal.

    Water Resources Bull, 11, 370 (1975).

    131. Forrestal, L, Deep Mystery. Environ

    ment, 17,8,25 (1975).132. Cherry, J. A, et al., Contaminant Hydro

    geology, Part 1 Physical Processes. Geo

    science Canada, 2, 2, 76 (1975).133.

    Wang,M.

    S,and

    Cheng,R.

    T,A

    Studyof Convective-Dispersion Equation by

    Isoparametric Finite Elements. Jour. Hy

    drol.,24, 1/2,45 (1975).134. Schwartz, F. W, On Radioactive Waste

    Management: An Analysis of the Parameters Controlling Subsurface Contaminant

    Transfer. Jour. HydroL, 27, 1/2, 33

    (1975).135. Farquhar, G. J, and Seitz, W. J, A Map

    ping Technique for Landfill Location.Sanitary Landfill Study Final Report Vol.Ill, Office of Research Administration,

    Univ. of Waterloo, Project No. 8083-4,(1975).

    136. Bovey, R. W, et al, Occurrence of 2,4,5-Tand Picloram in Subsurface Water in theBlacklands of Texas. Jour. Environ.

    Qual., 4, 1, 103 (1975).137. LaFleur, K. S, Movement of Prometryne

    through Congaree Soil into Ground Water. Jour. Environ. Qual, 4, 1, 132

    (1975).138. Moon, K. A, Municipal Waste Disposal and

    Ground-Water Pollution. MassachusettsAudubon Society, Lincoln, Mass. (1975).

    139. Rajagopal, R, et al., Water Quality andEconomic Criteria for Rural Wastewaterand Water Supply Systems. Jour. Water

    Poll. Control Fed., 47, 1834 (1975).140. Smith, S. O, and Myott, D. H, Effect of

    Cesspool Discharge on Ground-Water

    Quality on Long Island, New York. Jour.Amer. Water Works Assn., 67, 456 (1975).

    141. Sherrill, M. G, Ground-Water Contamination in the Silurian Dolomite of Door

    County, Wisconsin. Groundwater, 13,209 (1975).

    Aquatic sediments

    C. F. Powers, W. D. Sanvtlle, and F. S.

    Stay, Corvallis Environmental Research

    Laboratory, EPA, Corvallis, Ore.

    Sediment-Water Interactions

    Exchangeof materials between sediment

    and water and the relative importance ofthe sediments as a nutrient source were

    investigated in several laboratory and fieldstudies. Bannerman et al.1 carried out

    laboratory experiments on the mobility of

    inorganic phosphorus in Lake Ontario

    -Vol. 48, No. 6, June 1976 1433

    This content downloaded from 196 .200.142.112 on Sun, 3 Nov 2 013 16:59:24 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/14/2019 Aquatic Sediments

    3/8

    Literature Review

    sediments using cores from 15 locations.

    Based on the flux range obtained, the an

    nual contribution of inorganic phosphorusfrom the sediments to the lake water was

    estimated at about 10percent

    of the ex

    ternal loading. Fillos and Swanson2 con

    ducted long-term experiments in laboratoryreactors on nutrient release rates from lake

    and river sediments. Emphasis was on

    orthophosphat?, but oxygen uptake andammonia and iron release rates were also

    measured.

    Sagher et al.3 evaluated the microbial

    availability of phosphorus from surficialsediments using algae and indigenous sedi

    ment populations as test organisms. Algalcell counts, ATP measurements, and threedifferent phosphorus extractions providedinformation on the utilization of differentsediment phosphate forms. Hydraulic

    dredging in Lake Herman, South Dakota,was monitored by Churchill et al.4 In

    creased total phosphorus was the only significant change in water quality, but thiscould not positively be attributed to dredging. Phosphorus content of return flowfrom dredged material deposited near thelake was less than that of the lake waterat the dredging site.

    Lerman and Lietzke 5used 90Sr and 137Csconcentrations in Lakes Erie and Ontarioto verify a theoretical model of the rela

    tionship between the concentration of dissolved chemical species in a lake and uptake by the sediment. They concluded

    that adsorption of the two tracers by sediment particles could be treated as a linear

    exchange reaction and that distributionof radionuclides in the sediments could bebased on a model which assumed a mean

    steady input for the years 1953-1969. Copper cycling in a shallow, soft-water eutro

    phic lake treated since the early 1960's with

    copper sulfate was investigated bySymmes.6 The results indicated that ap

    proximately96

    percentof the

    copperre

    mained in the sediments.

    Sampling and Analytical Methods

    Sasseville et al.7 described a light weight,portable, large-volume, interstitial water

    squeezer. All components in contact with

    the sample were coated to prevent metallic

    contamination; exposure to air was mini

    mal. A large-volume shallow water corer

    for quantitative sampling of benthic populations in various substrate

    typeswas de

    signed and evaluated by Thayer et al.8

    Density of organisms was greater and co

    efficient of variation less than for a van

    Veen sampler; this was attributed to the

    increased depth obtained by the corer. Astream gravel sampler developed by O'Con

    nor 9 collected less biomass than colonization cans but more than a Surber sampler.In addition, it was capable of obtainingstratified samples 60 cm into the substrate.

    In an evaluation of sedimentation traps,Kirchner10 concluded that collection of

    material on a unit- area basis was independent of trap aperture size. With the

    exception of shallow and unstratified lakes,he also found traps to be a dependable

    method for estimating sedimentation.A high-resolution, lithium-compensated

    germanium detector was used in a prototype device by Moxham et al.11 to perform

    in situ neutron activation analyses of sediments. Differences in neutron flux densitybetween saturated and dry materials were

    attributed to the water content of the sam

    ple. In a comparison of three different

    extraction procedures for mercury in sedi

    ments, Agemian et al.12 found that thesulfuric-nitric acid and hydrochloric-nitricacid methods yielded similar precision and

    results, whereas the hydrofluoric acid-aqua

    regia method was less precise and gavehigher values. A method for determination of mercury in sediments by automatedcold vapor atomic absorption was devel

    oped by Agemian and Chau.13 The systemcould be used for analysis of twenty

    samples per hour with a sensitivity of 10

    ppb Hg.McQuaker and Fung14 developed a re

    ductive pyrolysis-flame ionization tech

    niquefor the determination of total and

    organic carbon in sediments. Analysistime was less than five minutes and the use

    of a single suspension permitted direct

    comparison of total carbon, organic carbon,and carbohydrate concentrations. Recov

    ery of petroleum hydrocarbons by the

    1434 Journal WPCF

    This content downloaded from 196 .200.142.112 on Sun, 3 Nov 2 013 16:59:24 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/14/2019 Aquatic Sediments

    4/8

    Literature Review

    hexane, benzene, and chloroform extraction methods was compared on estuarinewater and sediments by Walker et al.15

    Reciprocal shaking with benzene as a solvent

    providedthe most efficient extraction.

    Chemical-Physical Characterization

    The distribution of nutrients and humicmaterials in water and sediments has been

    investigated. Hwang et al.16 determinedthe distribution of total, inorganic, and or

    ganic phosphorus in various size fractionsof lake sediments. The three forms ex

    hibited a bimodal distribution with the

    greatest concentrations in the >20/x and

  • 8/14/2019 Aquatic Sediments

    5/8

    Literature Review

    Water and sediment samples were collected from an 80 km course of the Ten

    nessee River by Perhac.28 Results sug

    gested that upstream heavy metals were

    dissolved fromcarbonates, transported

    downstream, and incorporated into the

    clayey sediments behind a dam.Steele and Wagner,29 in a survey of the

    sediments on a 130 mile section of theBuffalo River in northern Arkansas, foundthat Fe, Cu, Cr, Ni, Mn, Pb, K, and Nadecreased downstream as the drainage area

    increased in carbonate rock and decreasedin shale. Sediments downstream increasedin Mg, Ca, Zn, and Cd. The distribution

    of As, Sb, Hg, Cr., Co, Fe, Al, and C insurface sediments of Puget Sound were

    examined by Crecelius et al.30 A coppersmelter and a chlor-alkali plant were two

    major sources of As, Sb, and Hg contamination. No elevated concentrations of theother elements measured could be attributed to inputs by man. Most of the mer

    cury found in both contaminated and non

    contaminated sediments was associated

    with easily oxidizable organic matter.Walters et al.31 determined the occurrence

    of ten trace metals and minor elements insediment cores from Lake Erie. Significantenrichment for most metals was found

    within the upper 30 cm of sediment but inabout half the cores the heavy metal content decreased in the top interval. Instudies of plutonium cycling and sedimentation in Lake Michigan, Wahlgren and

    Nelson32 found that the major fraction of239Pu and 137Cs fallout inputs had been

    rapidly transported to the sediments. Theresidual fractions in the water column

    were generally homogeneously distributed

    throughout the lake in particle size fractions

  • 8/14/2019 Aquatic Sediments

    6/8

    Literature Review

    international conference on the transportof persistent chemicals in the aquatic en

    vironment, with emphasis on heavy metalsand pesticides. Topics covered includedbed sediment

    transport,sediment-water

    interchange, chemical transformations, bio

    logical uptake, and distribution of thesesubstances.

    Subjects relating to sedimentation processes in lakes received attention from a

    number of investigators. Robbins and

    Edgington42 used 210Pb and 137Cs measure

    ments to determine the rate of sedimentation in Lake Michigan. Analysis of coresfrom eight locations indicated that modernsedimentation rates differed little from av

    erage rates for the last 7,000 years. Armentano and Woodwell43 used the 210Pb

    method to determine sedimentation ratesin a Long Island marsh. Wolery and

    Walters 44 developed a model to describemodern sedimentation rates for westernLake Erie using strata containing highmercury concentrations. Two geographical areas where the most mercury would

    likely be released were identified by themodel for remedial action. Chemical

    analysis by Bortleson and Lee45 on sediment cores from Lake Monona, Wisconsin,demonstrated definite changes in chemical

    stratigraphy related to human settlementof the area. Increases in P, Fe, Mn, Al,and K were shown to have occurred in the

    uppermost sediments since the mid- to late1800's.

    Cranwell,46 in studies on six English lakesof various trophic states, examined the re

    lationship of the composition of sedimen

    tary fatty acids to environmental factors.The distribution in chain length of then-alkanoic acids was shown to indicate therelative contribution of terrestrial andautochthonous organic matter to sediment.

    Pigment analyses carried out by Gorhamand Wright47 on profundal surface sedi

    ments in Minnesota lakes demonstratedthat sedimentary organic matter was derived mainly from autochthonous mate

    rials, and that rising concentrations of fossil

    pigments clearly indicate the onset of cultural euthrophication. Banin et al.48 foundthat clay minerals were responsible for 98

    99 percent of the specific surface area ofLake Kinneret, Israel, sediments. Althoughthe carbonate fraction constituted abouthalf of the sediment by weight, it represented less than one-half of one

    percentof

    the specific surface area.

    Biological Considerations

    Kuznetsov49 noted a major parallel between soils and lake sediments in the roleof microorganisms in the mineralization of

    organic materials, although the typicalhorizons of terrestrial soils do not occur in

    aquatic sediments. He discussed differ

    ences between sediments found in eutrophic and oligotrophic lakes, the role of bacteria in the carbonate cycle, the formationof iron-manganese deposits, and the silica

    cycle. Grimes50 showed that fecal coliform concentrations increased significantlyin the immediate vicinity of a maintenance

    dredging operation in the MississippiRiver. The increase was attributed to re

    lease of sediment-bound bacteria by the

    disturbance and relocation of sediments.Biochemical reactions involved in the de

    composition of organic matter in sedimentsof a facultative oxidation pond were in

    vestigated by Brockett and Orchard.51

    Deep ponds appeared to promote biochemical activity closely associated with an

    aerobic conditions, resulting in a more

    efficient production of methane. From

    laboratory studies of biologically-inducedtransformations of

    clay-sized sediments,Wall et al.52 concluded that an environment with a high microbial population,

    carbonate substrate, and anaerobic condi

    tions was most conducive to biologicaldegradation of sediment. The vertical distribution of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)

    was determined seasonally in salt marshsediments by Christian et al.53 ATP con

    centrations were greatest in the surface

    centimeter, and microbial carbon and ni

    trogen made up a small fraction of the

    sedimentary total.

    References

    1. Bannerman, R. T, et al, Phosphorus Mobil

    ity in Lake Ontario Sediments (IFYGL).

    -Vol. 48, No. 6, June 1976 1437

    This content downloaded from 196 .200.142.112 on Sun, 3 Nov 2 013 16:59:24 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/14/2019 Aquatic Sediments

    7/8

    Literature Review

    Proc. 17th Conf. Great Lakes Res., 158

    (1974).2. Fillos, J, and Swanson, W. R, The Release

    Rate of Nutrients From River and Lake

    Sediments. Jour. Water Poll. Control

    Fed., 47, 1032 (1974).3. Sagher, A, et al, Availability of Sediment

    Phosphorus to Microorganisms. Univer

    sity of Wisconsin Water Resources Center,Technical Report W75-06090, Project No.

    OWRT-A-040-WIS (1975); NTIS PB-240822/7SL.

    4. Churchill, C. L, et al, Silt Removal from a

    Lake Bottom. USEPA Ecological Research Series Report No. EPA/660/3-74

    017, Office of Research and Development(1975).

    5. Lerman, A, and Lietzke, T. A, Uptake and

    Migration of Tracers in Lake Sediments.

    Limnol & Oceanog., 20, 497 (1975).6. Symmes, K. H, Preliminary Investigation

    Into Copper Cycling in Indian Lake, Massa

    chusetts: A Lake Treated Annually with

    Copper Sulfate. University of Massachu

    setts Water Research Center, Completion

    Report W75-11039, Project No. OWRT-A

    064-MASS (1975); NTIS PB-244 716/7SL.7. Sasseville, D. R, et al, A Large-Volume

    Interstitial Water Sediment Squeezer for

    Lake Sediments. Limnol & Oceanog.,19, 1001 (1974).

    8. Thayer, G. W, et al, A Large Corer for

    Quantitatively Sampling Benthos in Shallow

    Water. Limnol & Oceanog., 20, 474

    (1974).9. O'Connor, J. F., An Apparatus for Sampling

    Gravel Substrate in Streams. Limnol. &

    Oceanog., 19, 1007 (1974).10. Kirchner, W. B, An Evaluation of Sediment

    Trap Methodology. Limnol & Oceanog.,

    20, 657 (1975).11. Moxham, R. M, et al, In Situ Neutron Acti

    vation Analysis of Bottom Sediments ofthe Anacostia River, D. C, Geophysics,40, 151 (1975).

    12. Agemian, H, d al, A Comparison of theExtraction of Mercury from Sediments byUsing Hydrochloric-Nitric Acid, SulphuricNitric Acid and Hydrofluoric Acid-AquaRegia Mixtures. Analyst (G. B.), 100, 253

    (1975).13. Agemian, H, and Chau, A. S. Y, A Method

    for the Determination of Mercury in Sediments by the Automated Cold VaporAtomic Absorption Technique After

    Digestion. Anal Chem. Acta. (Neth.), 75,297 (1975).

    14. McQuaker, N. R, and Fung, T, Determination of Carbonaceous Material in Sedi

    ments by Reductive Pyrolysis and Spectro

    photometry. Anal. Chem., 47, 1435

    (1975).

    15. Walker, J. D, et al, Extraction of Petroleum

    Hydrocarbons from Oil-Contaminated Sedi

    ments. Bull. Environ. Contam. ToxicoL,

    13, 245 (1975).16. Hwang, C. P, et al, Phosphorus Distribu

    tion inBlackstrap Lake Sediments. Jour.Water Poll Control Fed., 47, 1081 (1975).

    17. Curtis, E. J. C, et al, Nitrification in Rivers

    in the Trent Basin. Water Res. (G. B.),

    9, 255 (1975).18. Keeney, D. R, et al, Concurrent Nitrifica

    tion-Denitrification at the Sediment-Water

    Interface as a Mechanism for NitrogenLosses from Lakes. University? of Wis

    consin Water Research Center, Technical

    Report W75-16902, Project No. OWRT-A

    057-WIS (1975); NTIS PB-244 503/9SL.19. Engler, R. M, and Patrick, W. H. Jr., Nitrate

    Removal from Floodwater OverlyingFlooded Soils and Sediments. Jour. Envi

    ron. Qual, 3, 409 (1974).20. Whelan, T, III, Methane and Carbon Diox

    ide in Coastal Marsh Sediments. Louisiana

    State University Coastal Studies Institute,Technical Report, Contract N00014-69-A

    0211-0003, Project No. NR 388-002 (1974).21. Jackson, T. A, Humic Matter in Natural

    Waters and Sediments. Soil Sei., 119, 56

    (1975).22. Kemp, A. L. W, and Wong, H. K. T,

    Molecular-Weight Distribution of HumicSubstances from Lakes Ontario and Erie

    Sediments. Chem. Geol. (Neth.), 14, 15

    (1974).23. Olson, B. H, and Cooper, R. C, In Situ

    Methylation of Mercury in Estuarine Sedi

    ments. Nature (G. B.), 252, 682 (1974).24. Batti, R, et al, Methylmercury in River

    Sediments. Chemosphere (G. B.), 1, 13

    (1975).25. Kudo, A, et al, Factors Influencing De

    sorption of Mercury from Bed Sediments.

    Can. Jour. Earth Sei., 12, 1036 (1975).26. Heiz, G. R, et al, Behavior of Mn, Fe, Cu,

    Zn, Cd, and Pb Discharged from a Waste

    water Treatment Plant into an Estuarine

    Environment. Water Res. (G. B.), 9, 631

    (1975).27. Pita, F. W, and Hyne, N. J, The Deposi

    tional Environment of Zinc, Lead and Cad

    mium in Reservoir Sediments. Water Res.

    (G. B.), 9, 701 (1975).28. Perhac, R. M, Heavy Metal Distribution in

    Bottom Sediment and Water in the Ten

    nessee River-Loudon Lake Reservoir System. University of Tennessee Water Re

    sources Research Center, Research Report

    W75-06088, Project No. OWRT-A-032

    TENN (1974).29. Steele, K. F, and Wagner, G. H, Trace

    Metal Relationships in Bottom Sediments

    of a Fresh Water Stream?The Buffalo

    1438 Journal WPCF

    This content downloaded from 196 .200.142.112 on Sun, 3 Nov 2 013 16:59:24 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
  • 8/14/2019 Aquatic Sediments

    8/8

    Literature Review

    River, Arkansas. Jour. Sed. Petrol., 45,310 (1975).

    30. Crecelius, E. A, et al, Geochemistries of

    Arsenic, Antimony, Mercury, and Related

    Elements in Sediments of Puget Sound.

    Environ. Sei. & Technol, 9, 325 (1975).31. Walters, L. J, d al, Occurrence of As, Cd,Co, Cr, Fe, Hg, Ni, Sb, and Zn in Lake

    Sediments. Proc 17th Conf. Great Lakes

    Res., 219 (1974).32. Wahlgren, M. A, and Nelson, D. M, Studies

    of Plutonium Cycling and Sedimentation

    in Lake Michigan. Proc. 17th Conf. Great

    Lakes Res., 212 (1974).33. Chester^ R, and Stoner, J. H, Trace Ele

    ments in Sediments from the Lower Severn

    Estuary and Bristol Channel. Marine

    Poll Butt. (G. B.), 6, 92 (1975).34. Alther, G. R, Geochemical Analysis of

    Stream Sediments as a Tool for Environ

    mental Monitoring: A Pigyard Case Study.Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull, 86, 174 (1975).

    35. Robbins, J. A, and Callender, E, Diagenesisof Manganese in Lake Michigan Sedi

    ments. Amer. Jour. Sei., 275, 512 (1975).

    36. Gillott, M. A, et al, The Role of Sedimentas a Modifying Factor in Pesticide-AlgaeInteractions. Environ. Entomol, 4, 621

    (1975).37. Haile, C. L, et al, Chlorinated Hydrocar

    bons in the Lake Ontario Ecosystem

    (IFYGL). University of Wisconsin, Final

    Report, USEPA Report No. EPA 660/375-022, National Environmental Research

    Center, Corvallis, Oregon (1975); NTISPB-243 364/7SL.

    38. Willis, G. H, et al, Losses of Diuron, Lin

    uron, Fenac, and Trifluralin in Surface

    Drainage Water. Jour. Environ. Qual,4, 399 (1975).

    39. Aston, S. R, and Thornton, I, The Application of Regional Geochemical Reconnais

    sance Surveys in the Assessment of WaterQuality and Estuarine Pollution. Water

    Res. (G. B.), 9, 189 (1975).40. Banat, K, d al, Experimental Mobilization

    of Metals from Aquatic Sediments byNitrilotriacetic Acid. Chem. Geol. (Neth.),14, 199 (1974).

    4L National Research Council of Canada, Pro

    ceedings of the International Conference on

    Transport of Persistent Chemicals in Aquatic

    Ecosystems. Ottawa, Canada ( 1974 ).42. Robbins, J. A, and Edgington, D. N, De

    termination of Recent Sedimentation Ratesin Lake Michigan Using Pb-210 and Cs137. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta (N.Ire.), 39, 285 (1975).

    43. Armentano, T. V, and Woodwell, G. M,Sedimentation Rates in a Long Island

    Marsh Determined by aoPb Dating. Limnol. & Oceanog., 20, 452 (1975).

    44. Wolery, T. J, and Walters, L. J, Jr., Pollutant Mercury and Sedimentation in the

    Western Basin of Lake Erie. Proc. 17th

    Conf. Great Lakes Res., 235 (1974).45. Bortleson, G. C, and Lee, G. F, Recent

    Sedimentary History of Lake Monona, Wisconsin. Water, Air and Soil Poll., 4, 89

    (1975).46. Cran well, P. A, Monocarboxylic Acids in

    Lake Sediments: Indicators, Derived fromTerrestrial and Aquatic Biota, of Paleoenvironmental Trophic Levels. Chem. Geol.

    (Neth.), 14, 1 (1974).47. Gorham, E, and Wright, H. E, Jr., The

    Geochemical and Biostratigraphic Record ofNatural and Pollutional Eutrophication ofMinnesota Lakes. University of Minnesota

    Water Resources Research Center, Report

    W75-10010, Project No. OWRT-B-081MINN (1975); NTIS-243 774/7SL.

    48. Banin, A, et al., The Specific Surface Areaof Clays in Lake Sediments?Measurement

    and Analysis of Contributors in Lake Kin

    neret, Israel. Limnol. & Oceanog., 20,278 (1975).

    49. Kuznetsov, S. I, The Role of Microorganismsin the Formation of Lake Bottom Depositsand Their Diagenesis. Soil Sei., 119, 81(1975).

    50. Grimes, D. J, Release of Sediment-Bound

    Fecal Coliformsby Dredging. Appl.

    MicrobioL, 29, 109 (1975).

    51. Brockett, O. D, and Orchard, T. A, Microbial Reactions in Facultative OxidationPonds?II. Biochemical Activity of Facul

    tative Oxidation Pond Sediment. Water

    Res. (G. B.), 9, 315 (1975).52. Wall, G. J, et al, Biological Transformation

    of Clay-Sized Sediments in SimulatedAquatic Environments. Proc. 17th Conf.Great Lakes Res., 207 (1974).

    53. Christian, R. R, et al, Distribution of Micro

    bial Adenosine Triphosphate in Salt Marsh

    Sediments at Sapelo Island, Georgia. SoilSei., 119, 89 (1975).

    Marine and estuarine pollution

    D. J. Reish, California State University,Long Beach

    T. J. Kauwling, University of Southern

    California, Los Angeles

    A. J. Mearns, Southern California CoastalWater Research Project, El Segundo

    Review articleslf 2 summarized the fateof organic compounds in the marine en

    -Vol. 48, No. 6, June 1976 1439

    This content downloaded from 196 .200.142.112 on Sun, 3 Nov 2 013 16:59:24 PM

    http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsphttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp