aranca views - shale gas - the next cradle of energy?

s

Shale Gas - the Next Cradle of Energy?

October 16, 2014

© Aranca 2014. All rights reserved. | [email protected] | www.aranca.com

Aranca is an ISO 27001:2013 certified company P a g e | 1

By Karan Sampat, Analyst – Investment Research

While crude prices continued to scale new highs during the latter part of last decade, a silent revolution fomenting in the energy space

went unnoticed. When crude prices hit their all-time high of more than US$147 per barrel in July 2008, the need to find an alternative

source of energy gained importance, with the US spearheading efforts in what was termed a new technology – “hydraulic fracturing” or

“fracking”. The technology allowed extraction of gas trapped beneath the shale layer to tap into the vast pool of unexplored source of

energy, which is estimated to run into billions of barrels of oil equivalent. As of 2013, technically recoverable shale gas resources

accounts for nearly one third of the total gas resources of the world. The revolution would not only help reduce US’ dependence on

fossil fuels and provide a much cleaner source of energy (thereby lowering emissions) but also would lead to energy security and lower

reliance on oil from the Middle East. Currently, the US is expected to be energy self-sufficient by 2030, according to the Energy

Information Administration (EIA). Others seem to be following suit – Europe has intensified exploration efforts and so has China in

search for shale gas.

Nonetheless, the key is continued improvement in the efficiency in producing shale oil & gas. In recent weeks, prices of crude oil have

hit the lowest level since June 2012. As of today, Brent and WTI crude are trading at $80.69 and $82.91 a barrel, respectively. This

sharp decline in prices of crude oil has been primarily ascribed to the International Energy Agency (IEA)’s reduction in the demand

forecast for oil to 700,000 barrels a day from 900,000 barrels a day. Furthermore, the decrease in oil imports from the US due to a rise

in shale volumes coupled with Saudi Arabia’s decision to sell oil at lower prices rather than cutting down production is adding to the

downside. The EIA estimates just 4% of shale oil production would become economically unviable if oil prices touch $80 a barrel.

According to certain estimates, at the lowest level, oil would need to breach below $50–55 a barrel for a majority of the shale oil

produced to operate at sub-optimal profit margins.

Top 10 countries with technically recoverable shale resources

Rank Country Shale oil (billion barrels)

1 Russia 75

2 US 58

3 China 32

4 Argentina 27

5 Libya 26

6 Australia 18

7 Venezuela 13

8 Mexico 13

9 Pakistan 9

10 Canada 9

World Total 345

Rank Country Shale gas (trillion cubic feet - tcf)

1 China 1,115

2 Argentina 802

3 Algeria 707

4 US 665

5 Canada 573

6 Mexico 545

7 Australia 437

8 South Africa 390

9 Russia 285

10 Brazil 245

World Total 7,299

Source: EIA June 10, 2013

Technically recoverable shale resources vs total resources

Source: EIA, http://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas/

10%

90%

3,357 bn bl Shale oil

Conventional oil

32%

68%

22,881 tcf Shale gas

Conventional gas

s


October 16, 2014



US Shale Gas: Energy Self Sufficiency in 15 Years!

Shale gas to play a significant role in meeting US energy demand

The US has witnessed the most successful shale gas developments to date. The International Energy Agency (IEA) reported the US is

forecast to surpass Russia and Saudi Arabia as the world’s leading oil producer by 2015 due to the shale gas boom. Natural gas

accounts for approximately 30% of US energy consumption. The contribution of shale gas to US domestic gas production increased

from a meager 2% in 2000 to 23% by 2010. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects shale gas to account for 48% of total

US gas supply by 2030.

Due to its high British thermal unit (BTU) content and the well-developed storage and transfer infrastructure, natural gas is widely used

in the country’s industrial, commercial, and residential sectors. The US unconventional energy boom has reversed the decline of

domestic production and suppressed gas prices. Thus, shale gas is likely to play a substantial role in meeting US energy demands.

Contribution of shale gas to domestic gas production

Source: Annual Energy Outlook 2014 Early Release

US likely to be net exporter of LNG by 2016

The US is speculated to be the net exporter of natural gas by the end of 2016. Due to the shale revolution, production of gas is

expected to far exceed the expected consumption. This is evident from a drastic fall in the import of natural gas in the US and also,

conditional approval by Department of Energy (DOE) in past one year, to build six LNG export facilities further strengthens the claim.

The excess gas is likely to be exported largely to Asia, where the prices of natural gas are the most attractive.

Forecasted production and consumption of natural gas in US (quadrillion Btu)


Economic impact of shale gas

The US was expected to have imported 10 billion cubic feet of natural gas, if not shale gas, per day by now. However, the country could

potentially export 10 billion cubic feet of gas per day by 2020 instead. Shale gas can have a multiplier effect on the US economy far

beyond just the supply chain from exploration sites to exports. According to data from the EIA, the US currently produces 14% more of

its own energy than in 2005. Natural gas production is projected to increase 3% per year until 2020 vis-à-vis 2011, whereas

consumption is estimated to increase by just 1% annually over the same period. Moreover, petroleum contributed $13.82 billion to US

exports in July, according to data released by the US Department of Commerce on September 4, 2014. This represents a $1.72 billion

increase over July 2013. This helped reduce the overall US trade deficit to $40.5 billion in July, from $40.8 billion in June. In addition to

98%

2%

2000

77%

23%

2010

58%

42%

2020

52%

48%

2030

Total gasproduction

Shale gas

51%

49%

2011

55%

45%

2020

57%

43%

2030

57%

43%

2040 Production

Consumption

s


October 16, 2014



oil & gas export and reducing the trade deficit, shale gas has the potential to revive the transportation, petrochemical, power generation,

and manufacturing sectors as well as increase disposable income per household by reducing electricity bills. By enhancing the global

supply of natural gas, the US can establish much-required energy security for itself as well as its trade partners. The price of natural

gas rose from $2.42 million btu (mmbtu) in 2000 to $12.69 mmbtu in June 2008. In most recent years, natural gas prices stabilized

around $4.00 mmbtu, largely due to the advent of shale gas developments. The EIA reports natural gas prices would remain below $5

mmbtu until 2023. The manufacturing sector in the US could recover, supported by such sustainable lower energy costs compared with

those incurred by its global peers..

Consumption of various energy sources in the US (quadrillion Btu)


Effect of shale gas on sectors

Looking at the energy demand pattern, oil is the primary source of fuel in the transportation sector, whereas natural gas is mainly used

in the residential, commercial, industrial and power generation sectors. However, low gas prices and high oil price may encourage more

future investments based on natural gas in this sector.

Transportation sector: Low gas prices and high oil prices may result in substitution of oil with natural gas in this sector. Natural gas

can be used in two ways in the transportation sector: 1) Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) and 2) Liquefied natural gas (LNG). The major

advantage of LNG over CNG is that it can hold three times more fuel than the latter and thereby cover more mileage. A key drawback

of LNG’s commercial viability is that it requires a low temperature tank, which needs high cost and is difficult to downsize. Therefore,

LNG will take more time to be extensively commercialized. Currently, CNG is mainly used in public transportation such as buses and

carrier services, which have short and medium range operation. The future of LNG in transportation will depend upon how fast auto

manufacturers are able to introduce vehicles that run on LNG. Pricing and fuel efficiency of such vehicles would be the keys to success

of LNG in the transportation sector. Thus, natural gas has the potential to transform the transportation sector.

Petrochemical sector: Naphtha and ethane are the two most widely used feedstocks in the US chemical industry. Naphtha is derived

from oil and ethane from natural gas liquids (NGL). Energy prices in the US have decreased due to the shale gas revolution, thereby

significantly reducing the US petrochemical industry’s raw material costs. PwC, in its report dated 2012, reported that by 2025, shale

gas could enable US manufacturers to reduce their raw material and energy costs by $11.6 billion annually. Ethane, the raw material for

producing ethylene, is separated from the NGL contained in shale gas. Ethane prices have fallen by more than 50% in five years. This

has led to increased new investments toward ethane-based plants. According to a study by Booz & Co., NGLs from conventional gas

would constitute 60% of US ethylene feedstock source by 2015, followed by NGLs from shale gas at 28% and the remaining 12%

would include naphtha and heavier feedstock. The abundant supply of NGL due to the shale gas revolution decreased the price of

ethane, thereby making it cheaper to produce ethylene. The cost involved in setting up a naphtha based plant (355 killiotonnes per

Natural gas

Oil

Coal

Others

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

s


October 16, 2014



annum - ktpa) and a gas based plant (500 ktpa) can be approximately $715 million and $718 million respectively. Assuming the

abundance in supply of natural gas continues, US chemical companies would benefit from the low cost of ethylene production. PwC

reported the US chemicals industry invested $15 billion in ethylene production, increasing capacity by 33%. However, this might pose a

threat to naphtha crackers. Although ethane crackers have benefitted from the low price of natural gas in the US, naphtha crackers

would have to focus on developing high-value products to survive the competition.

Power generation sector: The EIA estimates the average power plant capital and operating costs based on natural gas to be at

$1,157/kW vis-à-vis $3,640/kW for coal-based plants in 2012. Lower capital and operating costs, coupled with lower natural gas prices,

would drive more power plant operators toward natural gas and increase its share in the power generation fuel mix. Cheaper gas would

reduce the cost of producing electricity and overall electricity prices. Lower electricity prices would imply more annual household

income. In the near term, power generation companies could switch from other fuels to natural gas by varying the capacity factors of

different generating units to take advantage of the cheaper fuel.

US to be energy self-sufficient by 2030

As reported by the EIA in its Annual Energy Outlook 2014 Early Release, crude oil production is forecast to increase 5.9% each year

from 2011 until 2020 and natural gas by 3% during the same period. Energy consumption is projected to remain flat at 100.73

quadrillion Btu in 2020 vis-à-vis 97.11 quadrillion Btu in 2011. Thus, the US is estimated to become energy self-sufficient by 2030 owing

to increased production of oil and gas and slowing domestic demand. The IEA forecasts the US to overtake Saudi Arabia to become

the world’s top oil producer over the next two decades due to increasing shale oil and gas output.

Current and expected investments in shale gas transport infrastructure from 2011 through 2035

Shale play would require investments of about $56 billion ($2.6 billion/year) over the next 22 years.

Natural gas infrastructure

New gas transmission capability – Approximately 43 Bcfd

New gas transmission mainline – 850 miles/year

New laterals to/from power plants, processing facilities, and storage fields – 800 miles/year

New gas gathering lines – almost 14,000 miles/year

New gas processing capability – Approximately 35 Bcfd

New working gas storage capacity – Approximately 37 Bcf/year

Pipeline and gathering compression – More than 580,000 horsepower/year

Natural Gas Liquid (NGL) infrastructure

NGL transmission capacity – 3.6 mmbpd

New NGL transmission line – 700 miles/year

Pumping requirement for pipeline – 30,000 horsepower/year

NGL fractionation capacity – Approximately 151 MBOE/d to be added each year

NGL export capacity – 64 MBOE/d to be added each year

Source: http://www.ingaa.org/File.aspx?id=21498

http://www.ingaa.org/File.aspx?id=21498

s


October 16, 2014



Canada: It’s time to look beyond North America

All eggs hatched in the same basket

Canada is the world’s third largest producer of natural gas. Western Canada is blessed with vast unconventional gas reserves. The

country currently exports 50% of the natural gas it produces to North America. However, demand for Canadian natural gas has

decreased in the US, as the country is all set to be self-sufficient in natural gas due to shale gas developments. Canada does not have

export terminals that can transport LNG beyond North America. It also lacks processing facilities to liquefy and ship LNG beyond North

America.

Going forward, will it be Europe or Asia?

Canada will have to turn to Europe, or Japan, China and other developing Asian countries to sell the excess natural gas it produces.

The Asian energy market is significantly closer to the west coast of Canada than the European markets; thus, producers could examine

market opportunities in Asia and particularly those in South East Asia. With just eight sailing days to Japan and 11 sailing days to

China, the west coast ports of Kitimat and Prince Rupert are closer to these markets than any other North American port.

Proposed projects

Northern Gateway, Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) and Keystone XL are the proposed pipeline projects that would help Canadian

energy producers to access new markets.

Enbridge’s Northern Gateway project (capacity of 193 thousand barrels per day) and Kinder Morgan’s TMX project (capacity of 890

thousand barrels per day) will help reach the growing energy markets of Asia.

TransCanada’s Keystone XL would provide access to the refining capacity on the US Gulf Coast.

s


October 16, 2014



Europe – Uncertainty prevails over shale gas exploration

Europe to benefit from US Shale gas revolution

Russia is the largest exporter of oil and gas to the EU. Gazprom, Russia’s state-owned company, transports gas to Europe via Ukraine.

The frequent tensions between Russia and Ukraine have often impacted gas supplies to Europe. The US shale gas revolution could

prove to be a boon for Europe if US companies decide to produce adequate quantity to be supplied to Europe, thereby reducing their

dependence on Russia. It brings the opportunity to diversify energy supply. A decrease in the prices of natural gas due to higher supply

could also help the recession hit Europe limit costs.

Current scenario of shale gas in Europe

Although sizeable quantity of shale gas has been reported in Europe, none of the Western European countries currently feature in the

top 10 technically recoverable shale oil and gas resources. Large-scale shale gas production remains a big question due to the wide

range of environmental, regulatory and economic obstacles. Significant regulatory risks persist due to lack of regulatory framework.

Also, the EU member countries are unable to reach a consensus of opinion. France and Bulgaria have legally prohibited shale gas

production, while public discussion on shale gas is going on in Germany and the Netherlands. EU members also differ on the potential

environmental risks of the fracking activity. On the economic front, shale gas deposits in Europe are located much deeper than that in

the US and would require higher gas prices to be exploited in a commercial attractive way. Moreover, European companies lack the

technical know-how on fracking techniques and skilled resources.

Unconventional producers of gas to compete with conventional producers

Countries like Russia, Algeria, and Norway are the major suppliers of conventional gas to Europe. These countries can set the marginal

gas price at any time if desired for geopolitical or economic reasons. Therefore, any shale gas developments have to compete with the

abundant conventional supply of gas in this region.

Help in achieving carbon emissions target

Europe has the toughest carbon emissions target in the world. It aims to cut gas emissions by 40% by 2030 compared with the 1990

level. Shale gas offers a cheap and carbon friendly way to meet energy needs and might prove to be vital in achieving carbon emission

targets. Thus, improving energy efficiency and promoting low-carbon technologies will be just as important as before, especially for the

EU, given its more limited known reserves of unconventional oil and gas.

s


October 16, 2014



China has potential, currently prefers playing the waiting game

Coal expected to dominate; natural gas consumption projected to increase threefold by 2025

Coal forms the major source of energy consumption in China and is expected to dominate for the considerable future. Demand for

natural gas is expected to increase approximately 2.7 times from 3.768 tcf in 2010 to 10.27 tcf in 2025, as reported by EIA.

China energy consumption (quadrillion Btu)


Issues that need to be mitigated to produce shale gas

China has the largest (1,115 tcf) technically recoverable shale gas reserves in the world. It also has a regulatory framework that

supports the development of shale gas technology. The key issues it might face for exploration of shale gas are shortage of water,

depth of gas deposits, and lack of infrastructure to process and transport natural gas from the exploration site. China needs to develop

strategic partnership with foreign companies to adopt the skills and technologies needed to develop and explore gas reserves.

Use of natural gas needs to be encouraged

Being a manufacturing economy, China is plagued with environmental issues, particularly air pollution. Use of natural gas in

manufacturing can help the country mitigate this problem. Greater adoption of natural gas in manufacturing could lead to less

dependence on coal and increase shale gas development activity in China. Commencement of shale gas development in China could

significantly reduce shale gas prices. The cost of drilling is believed to be high in China when compared to the US due to location-

specific conditions. State-owned oil and gas company Sinopec stated that the cost of drilling one shale gas well, including the cost for

drilling, fracturing and procurement of services from technical service companies, is currently around $14.7 million vis-à-vis $6.7 million

on average in the US.

Russia-China Natural Gas Deal

China recently made a 30-year deal with Russia at a price range of $10.50–11 per mmbtu to buy 3.8 million cubic feet per day of

natural gas from 2018 via a pipeline from Eastern Serbia. This deal could possibly set a benchmark price for further natural gas deals

for Asian peers. The key inference from this deal is that the cost of regasification, liquefaction, and transport to Asia can be

approximated at $7 per mmbtu (assuming the LNG cost in the US is $4 per mmbtu). Another possible inference is that China would

only explore shale developments in sizable quantities at a cost less than $11 per mmbtu. (assuming the LNG cost in the US is stable at

$4 per mmbtu for next few years)

NG Liquids

Coal

Others

0

50

100

150

200

250

s


October 16, 2014



Impact on GCC

Need to realign the core market from US to Asia

The shale gas revolution has had limited impact on GCC so far, as the US is yet to reduce oil imports in significant quantities from the

region. GCC countries are major oil producing economies. Currently, the US is one of the major importers of crude oil from GCC. This

trend is about to change due to the shale gas revolution. With the global energy demand for oil expected to increase, GCC countries

would need to realign their core market to Asia from US. This could represent both an opportunity as well as threat to GCC countries.

World energy consumption by fuel type, 1990–2040 (quadrillion Btu)

Source: International Energy Outlook 2013, EIA

Qatar needs to find an alternative to oil price indexed contracts

Qatar leads among GCC countries in terms of producing huge quantities of natural gas. Qatar is the world’s largest exporter of LNG

and enjoys long-term gas contracts linked to the price of oil. Asia accounts for almost half of Qatar’s LNG export. Due to emergence of

natural gas supplies from North America and the option of indexing the contract price of natural gas to Henry Hub Natural Gas Spot

Price (which is less volatile than crude oil price), Qatar’s Asian partners are likely to ink deals with the US. Also, countries are not willing

to pen down long-term gas contracts due to the prevailing uncertainty in future gas prices; this could impact Qatar’s profitability.

Favorable raw material conditions in Qatar

Qatar expects demand from Asia to increase fast enough to more than compensate for the reduction in demand from the US. The

country can increase export volumes to Asia, mainly China and Japan, where demand for LNG is expected to increase considerably

enough to absorb the excess LNG supplies from shale gas developments. The recent shale gas developments provide Qatar with new

opportunities. In the foreseeable future, Qatar would still have favorable raw material conditions. The country can benefit from it by

altering end markets around shale gas induced market changes.

GCC countries with current account surplus need to venture in US shale play

Another option for GCC companies would be to participate in the US shale boom by venturing in companies engaged in the exploration

and production of shale developments. Increasing advancement in the fracking methodology in the US, which will lower the cost of

exploration, coupled with compressed natural gas prices, are bound to impact the profit margins of GCC countries.

0

50

100

150

200

250

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

2027

2028

2029

2030

2031

2032

2033

2034

2035

2036

2037

2038

2039

2040

Liquids Coal Natural gas Renewables Nuclear

Projections History 2010

s


October 16, 2014



Critical factors to shale gas production

Cost of producing natural gas: The cost of producing natural gas varies from site to site and country to country. Ken Medlock, Senior

Director of Rice University’s Baker Institute Center reported that in the US, some wells have a profitable cost of $2.65 per thousand

cubic feet (tcf), whereas others cost $8.1 per tcf. The median cost is $4.85 per tcf. It is difficult to translate shale development costs in

the US to those in other areas globally. For example, Medlock revealed a 10,500 vertical foot well with a 4,000 foot lateral in the

Haynesville Shale costs about $8 million; however, the same well in Poland would cost $14–16 million. This is due to the higher costs

associated with importing equipment, fracking crews, and deeper shale reserves vis-à-vis the US, among others. The most important

observation here is that the median cost price of $4.85 per tcf is less than the $11 per mmbtu benchmark set by the Russia-China deal.

Market price: The prevailing market price of natural gas will be the key to determine the viability of producing the discovered natural

gas.

Recovery of investment: Shale gas production must be sufficient enough to recover the investment in time. Logistics should be

efficient enough to facilitate distribution to end markets.

Infrastructure: Exploration and production sites must be adequately serviced by roads and pipelines to process and transport natural

gas.

Regulatory framework: Regulatory support in the form of transparency in allocation of permits and licenses, stable regulatory regime,

subsidies for exploration and production would aid the private companies engaged in shale gas production.

Environmental concerns: Fracking is a water-intensive process and might pose risks in areas where availability of water is a problem.

Waste water, which is kept in storage ponds, could overflow during heavy rains. Fracking may also contaminate groundwater and lead

to air quality degradation.

Spills and blow outs: Spills and blow outs could cause severe health and environment hazards if the gas gets mixed with ground

water and contaminates it or might spread into the surrounding soil. If gas gets mixed with groundwater, it may lead to tremors or

explosion due to pressure build up by gastification.

s


October 16, 2014


Aranca is an ISO 27001:2013 certified company

P a g e | 10

ARANCA DISCLAIMER

This report is published by Aranca, Inc. Aranca is a customized research and analytics services provider to global clients.

The information contained in this document is confidential and is solely for use of those persons to whom it is addressed and may not

be reproduced, further distributed to any other person or published, in whole or in part, for any purpose.

This document is based on data sources that are publicly available and are thought to be reliable. Aranca may not have verified all of

this information with third parties. Neither Aranca nor its advisors, directors or employees can guarantee the accuracy, reasonableness

or completeness of the information received from any sources consulted for this publication, and neither Aranca nor its advisors,

directors or employees accepts any liability whatsoever (in negligence or otherwise) for any loss howsoever arising from any use of this

document or its contents or otherwise arising in connection with this document.

Further, this document is not an offer to buy or sell any security, commodity or currency. This document does not provide individually

tailored investment advice. It has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who

receive it. The appropriateness of a particular investment or currency will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and

objectives. The investments referred to in this document may not be suitable for all investors. This document is not to be relied upon

and should not be used in substitution for the exercise of independent judgment.

This document may contain certain statements, estimates, and projections with respect to the anticipated future performance of

securities, commodities or currencies suggested. Such statements, estimates, and projections are based on information that we

consider reliable and may reflect various assumptions made concerning anticipated economic developments, which have not been

independently verified and may or may not prove correct. No representation or warranty is made as to the accuracy of such statements,

estimates, and projections or as to its fitness for the purpose intended and it should not be relied upon as such. Opinions expressed are

our current opinions as of the date appearing on this material only and may change without notice.

© 2014, Aranca. All rights reserved.

aranca views - shale gas - the next cradle of energy?

Business