arborist report - city of knox...arborist report westfield design knox city shopping centre, 425...

Tel: 03 9877 4114 ABN: 39 531 880 706

Arborist Report

for

Westfield Design

Assessment of trees at Knox City Shopping Centrealong Burwood Highway and Stud Road, Wantirna South

Prepared by

Homewood Consulting Pty Ltd150 Junction Road

Nunawading V. 3131

Prepared For

Sony Lim Regional Asset Manager-Design Concepts85 Castlereagh St

Sydney NSW 2000

Consulting Arborist

Cameron Ryder Bachelor of Horticulture (Honours)

Advanced Diploma in Horticulture (Arboriculture)

Email: [email protected]: 0400 160 889

3 April 2014

Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South

Reference: 2598

Executive SummaryHomewood Consulting Pty Ltd has been engaged to provide a report on trees located along the Burwood Highway and Stud Road frontages of the Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South.

307 trees were assessed comprising 48 different species. The most popular species were Corymbia maculata (Spotted Gum), Melaleuca styphelioides (Prickly-leaved Paperbark) and Eucalyptus sideroxylon (Red Ironbark) totalling 41, 27 and 27 specimens respectively. The trees were planted as a garden bed/informal screen and provide significant amenity to the wider landscape.

Figure 1: The trees have a significant impact on the visual amenity along Burwood Highway

The trees were individually assessed and put into 1 of 4 retention categories: 73 trees were assessed ‘Retain’70 trees were assessed ‘If possible, retain’133 trees were assessed ‘Not worth retaining’

31 trees were assessed ‘Third party ownership’

It is recommended that: 1. All trees are represented on future designs and feature surveys as well as respective

Tree Protection Zone dimensions applied to scale allowing the trees to be considered and incorporated into the proposal.

2. The design team maintains contact with the arborist to ensure that trees to be retained are provided with adequate space above and below ground.

3. Following development of a design, it is reviewed by the arborist to produce a construct impact statement detailing which trees are to be removed and/or retained as part of the proposal.

4. A tree management plan is produced following approval of the design to detail how trees to be retained will be protected during demolition and construction.


Reference: 2598

Contents1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 4

2. Key Objectives .............................................................................................................. 4

3. Methodology.................................................................................................................. 4

4. Site Map ......................................................................................................................... 5

5. Field Assessment ......................................................................................................... 6 5.1 Site Details ............................................................................................................... 6 5.2 Tree Details .............................................................................................................. 7

5.2.1 Health, Structure & ULE .................................................................................. 7 5.2.2 Landscape Contribution and Individual Significance........................................ 9 5.2.3 Retention Value ............................................................................................ 11 5.2.4 Summary ...................................................................................................... 13

6. Discussion ................................................................................................................... 14 6.1 Tree Protection Zone Specifications ....................................................................... 14

6.1.1 Tree Protection Zone Guidelines: .................................................................. 14 6.2 TPZ Map ................................................................................................................ 16 6.3 TPZ dimension Summary ....................................................................................... 17 6.4 Proposed Entry from Stud Road ............................................................................. 19 6.5 Tree Pruning and Removal .................................................................................... 23 6.6 Tree Replacement .................................................................................................. 23 6.7 Design Considerations ........................................................................................... 23

6.7.1 Encroachment ............................................................................................... 23 6.7.2 Scaffolding .................................................................................................... 24 6.7.3 Porous and Permeable Materials .................................................................. 25 6.7.4 Mulch Application .......................................................................................... 27

7. Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 28

8. Recommendation ........................................................................................................ 28

9. References .................................................................................................................. 29

Appendix 1. Data Collection Definitions .................................................................... 30

Appendix 2. TPZ Maps ................................................................................................ 34

Appendix 3. Tabular Tree Data ................................................................................... 39

Appendix 4. Photographic Tree Reports.................................................................... 53


Reference: 2598

1. IntroductionHomewood Consulting Pty Ltd has been engaged to provide a report on trees located along the Burwood Highway and Stud Road frontages of the Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South. It is understood that all or part of this area is proposed for redevelopment.

A base survey plan has been supplied identifying the areas for tree assessment. This was used to determine which trees to assess whilst out on site.

This report details the species, canopy size, Diameter at Breast Height (DBH), health, structure, Useful Life Expectancy (ULE), contribution to the landscape, retention value and recommendations for long term management of the trees.

2. Key Objectives Identify and record the dimensions of all trees within the area identified in section 4 Site

Map at the Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South. Provide an assessment of the tree specimens with regard to:

their health and structure their retention value in the landscape

Provide guidelines for tree retention in light of proposed development.

3. MethodologyAll trees were assessed on Saturday 15 and Saturday 22 March 2014.

Data collected for the trees included: Botanical Name Canopy Dimensions (HxW) Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) Health Structure Useful Life Expectancy (ULE) Landscape Contribution Individual Significance Retention Value.

For full details of the information collected see Appendix 1.

Tree heights and canopy spread are shown on the survey prepared by Madigan Surveyors, March 2014. Tree locations are as surveyed, but tree numbers in this report do not correspond with the tree numbers on the survey prepared by Madigan Surveyors March 2014.

The area contains a large number of small shrubby species including Callistemon and small Melaleuca as well as juvenile seedling eucalypts. In general these were not assessed unless they exceeded approximately 4-5m in height.

All trees were located using differentially corrected GPS using Omnistar satellite correction. In general this provides an accuracy of approximately 50cm and has been used to overlay the trees on supplied plans.

Burw

ood

Hw

y

Stud Rd

Unn

amed

Gat

eshe

ad D

r

Tyner RdMelbourne St

Jack

son

Rd

Lynn

e Av

Alderford Dr

White Rd

Pinewood Dr

Hug

hes

St

Littl

e Bu

rwoo

d H

wy

Unnam

ed

Burw

ood

Hw

y

Unnamed

4. S

ite M

ap

Ass

essm

ent o

f tre

es a

long

Bur

woo

d H

ighw

ay a

nd S

tud

Roa

d, W

antir

na S

outh

Lege

ndTr

ees

Ret

ain

Third

par

ty

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

Scop

e of

Ass

essm

ent

cada

stre

Roa

ds

²0

5010

015

020

025

m

Hom

ewoo

d C

onsu

lting

Pty

Ltd

150

Junc

tion

Roa

dN

unaw

adin

g V

IC 3

131

Ph: (

03) 9

877

4114

Base

Sho

ppin

g C

entre

Pla

n pr

ovid

ed b

y W

estfi

eld

Des

ign

Tree

s P

lotte

d by

Cam

eron

Ryd

erD

ate

Mar

ch 2

014

Proj

ectio

n: G

DA9

4 Zo

ne 5

5


Reference: 2598

5. Field Assessment

5.1 Site DetailsThe trees to be assessed were located between the existing car parks and road frontages including approximately 500m of Burwood Highway (Figure 2) and 220m of Stud Road (Figure 3). In general, both sections are heavily vegetated with a diverse mix of Australian grasses, shrubs and trees. Very few exotics exist within the area of assessment.

Figure 2: The entire frontage along Burwood Highway within the assessment area is heavily treed

Figure 3: Heavily treed section along Stud Road


Reference: 2598

5.2 Tree Details307 trees were assessed within the scope as detailed by Westfield Design comprising 48 different species. Corymbia maculata (Spotted Gum) was the most common with 41 specimens followed by Melaleuca styphelioides (Prickly-leaved Paperbark) and Eucalyptus sideroxylon (Red Ironbark) with 27 and 26 specimens respectively. The top 12 species composition is listed below in Table 1.

Table 1: Species composition

Botanical Name Common Name Status Number of IndividualsCorymbia maculata Spotted Gum Native 41Melaleuca styphelioides Prickly Paperbark Native 27Eucalyptus sideroxylon Red Ironbark Native 27Corymbia citriodora Lemon-scented Gum Native 19Eucalyptus leucoxylon Yellow Gum Native 17Casuarina cunninghamiana River She - Oak Native 17Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum Indigenous 16Eucalyptus mannifera Brittle Gum Native 12Melaleuca linariifolia Snow in Summer Native 12Eucalyptus nicholii Narrow-leaved Black Peppermint Native 11Melaleuca armillaris Giant Honey Myrtle Native 10Callistemon viminalis Weeping Bottle Brush Native 10

Others 88Total 307

The vast majority of the assessed specimens were Australian natives. 10 exotic specimens were assessed with all remaining trees being either indigenous (40 specimens) or Australian natives (257 specimens).

5.2.1 Health, Structure & ULE The health of the trees was generally good to fair with only 10% in the poor, very poor or dead categories (Figure 4). This is largely due to species composition and age. Many of the species are commonly planted urban trees in Melbourne used because either their natural growing conditions are similar to that in the region or they are a resilient, adaptable species.

Although the age of the trees varies, the maximum age of the trees within the shopping centre site is likely to be approximately 30-40 years. Within this timeframe, most eucalypts are still viable trees as they tend to be a long-lived genus in general. In contrast, the melaleucas and acacias were largely in decline and not suitable for long-term, retention.


Reference: 2598

Figure 4: Health

Approximately half of the trees assessed had fair structure (Figure 5), meaning the trees may have minor defects that are either unlikely to affect the tree’s ULE or could be pruned to remove. Of the 30% of specimens that had good structure, 80% of the trees were either Eucalyptus or Corymbia with long useful life expectancies.

Trees that have developed large defects, such as trunk decay, codominant stems, included bark or previous failures have resulted in poor tree structure. Subsequently, these trees are not considered suitable to remain in the site in light of possible future development. Many of the trees with poor structure require pruning to remain in their location or removal should be considered.

Figure 5: Structure

There is a wide spread of Useful Life Expectancies (ULE) for the trees across the site (Figure 6). This is not surprising given the variation in species and age. If all of the seedling eucalypts had been collected the 20-40 years and 40+ years categories would have been substantially higher. All trees with a ULE of less than 10 years have fair to poor structure and are a broad mix of species. Many of these have poor structure due to a lack of active management over the years.


Reference: 2598

Trees in the 10-20 years category are a mix of species in variable condition. They may be long-lived species in decline or average condition or short-lived species in good condition. Mostly they have been assigned a retention value of ‘If possible, retain’.

Trees with a ULE of greater than 20 years are almost completely from the Corymbia orEucalyptus genera and many of these have been assessed ‘Retain’.

Figure 6: ULE

5.2.2 Landscape Contribution and Individual Significance Given the variable sizes and locations of the trees, their contribution to the landscape has been corresponding variable (Figure 7). Small specimens nestled amongst a large thicket of trees were generally assigned a low to negligible contribution, whereas the large eucalypts that stood out as specimen trees were generally in the High landscape category. For example, Tree 234, Corymbia maculata (Spotted Gum) is a tall tree located near the entrance to the shopping centre on Stud Road (Figure 9). It can be seen from several vantage points and was assigned a high landscape contribution.

Figure 7: Landscape contribution

Approximately half of the trees were assigned an individual significance of low (Figure 8). This rating is about the quality of the tree specimen relative to its potential within the same


Reference: 2598

species. Given the trees were planted, few of the specimens have grown to a very large or impressive size for their respective species.

Approximately one third of the trees were in the moderate to valuable categories and subsequently almost all of these trees were assessed with a retention value of ‘Retain’. For Example, Tree 281 Eucalyptus camaldulensis (River Red Gum) is a tall indigenous species in good condition. It is suitably located with few faults or defects and was assessed as valuable (Figure 10).

Figure 8: Individual significance

Figure 9: Tree 234, Corymbia maculata, is a tall specimen near the shopping centre entrance

Figure 10: Tree 281, Eucalyptus camaldulensishas an individual significance of valuable


Reference: 2598

5.2.3 Retention Value Each tree has been provided with a retention value based on its species, condition, size, significance and landscape impact within its environment. Four retention values were considered: Retain If possible, retain Not worth retaining Third party ownership

Trees Assessed ‘Retain’

73 trees were assessed ‘Retain’ within the site. They are the most significant trees on-site and all efforts should be made to include them in final design plans. Trees assessed as ‘Retain’ are generally long-lived specimens in fair to good condition and are possible candidates for retention in a new landscape. The bulk of trees assessed in this category are from the genera Eucalyptus or Corymbia.

Tree 195, Eucalyptus mannifera (Brittle Gum) was assessed in this category (Figure 11). The tree is a mature specimen in good health with a ULE of 10-20 years. If retained in a new landscape it will provide immediate impact on its surroundings.

Trees Assessed ‘If possible, retain’70 trees have been assessed in this category.

If designing around or incorporating these trees into open space is not feasible or practical, removal and replacement would be an acceptable compromise.

The species, small size, age or landscape quality of the majority of these specimens means that replacement plants would quickly compensate the landscape and amenity value that is currently provided.

If these trees are to be retained, the proposed design will need to ensure that they have sufficient space for protection, growth and development. If this cannot be achieved, they should be removed.

Not Worth Retaining 133 trees were assessed, ‘Not worth retaining’. The assessment of ‘Not worth retaining’ indicates that these trees are either insignificant specimens or not conducive to being included in a development design. They generally will not be sustainable as a long-termfeature of any design proposal or could be very easily replaced. Trees in poor health or with significant defects in structure should not be candidates for preservation in areas where people or structures will be located (Matheny & Clark 1998).

Figure 12 is an example of one such tree. Tree 67 is a large Eucalyptus occidentalis(Swamp Yate) located on Burwood Highway. Whilst it is a large tree with a significant landscape contribution, previous major failure and subsequent decay, means that its

Figure 11: Tree 195 was assessed retain


Reference: 2598

structure is declining, is unlikely to improve and the tree should be removed. As a result the tree was assessed ‘Not worth retaining’.

Figure 12: Tree 67, Eucalyptus occidentalis was assessed ‘Not worth retaining’ due to decay and previous failure

Third Party Ownership Third party ownership infers that the trees are located off the subject site on a property owned by a third party. These trees have been assessed on the assumption that their owner requires their retention. It is neither a recommendation of good health, or suitability for retention. Discussions with the relevant parties and authorities may result in the removal of a tree assessed in this category.

31 trees were assessed as ‘Third party ownership’ primarily located on the western side of Stud Road (Figure 13)

Area of decay


Reference: 2598

Figure 13: Trees assessed ‘Third party ownership’

5.2.4 Summary 307 trees were assessed for Westfield Design along Stud Road and Burwood Highway at Knox City Shopping Centre in Wantirna South. The trees were placed into the following retention categories based on their condition, size and ULE:

73 trees were assessed ‘Retain’70 trees were assessed ‘If possible, retain’133 trees were assessed ‘Not worth retaining’31 trees were assessed ‘Third party ownership’.

Regardless of retention value, any tree that is proposed for retention will require protection throughout any demolition and construction works as well as management and inspection after construction is completed. The best way of doing this is by setting up a Tree Protection Zone around each tree and development of a tree management plan to help guide works.

N


Reference: 2598

6. Discussion

6.1 Tree Protection Zone SpecificationsDamage to trees during development can be direct and indirect.

Direct damage includes mechanical injury to the trunk, the severing of roots, or alterations to the soil environment in the immediate vicinity of tree roots (i.e. compaction or loss of organic matter).

Indirect effects of site development are usually related to soil hydrology. This includes alterations to soil moisture content, changes in the level of the water table and drainage patterns (Coder 1995).

The most common method of protecting trees during construction is by setting up a Tree Protection Zone (TPZ).

TPZs have been calculated according to Protection of Trees on Development Sites (AS 4970-2009) for all trees to be retained (excluding palms) calculating the TPZ as 12 times the trunk diameter at 1.4m above ground level (DBH).

The TPZ fence is designed to act as a physical barrier of protective fencing that is a minimum of 1.8m high. It is erected around retained specimens (at the edge of the TPZ) before site works commence. See Figure 14.

Figure 14: TPZ fencing is erected around retained trees prior to site works.

6.1.1 Tree Protection Zone Guidelines: Careful adherence to the following exclusions and inclusions will maintain the health and longevity of retained tree specimens.

Exclude the following from taking place within any TPZ (adapted from AS 4970-2009): built structures or hard landscape features (i.e. paving, retaining walls) materials storage (i.e. equipment, fuel, building waste or rubble)


Reference: 2598

soil disturbance (i.e. stripping or grade changes) excavation works including soil cultivation(specifically surface-dug trenches for

underground utilities) placement of fill lighting of fires preparation of chemicals, including preparation of cement products pedestrian or vehicular access (i.e. pathways).

Include the following procedures in setting up and maintaining any TPZ (adapted from AS 4970-2009): erect warning signs at regular intervals along the entire length of any protective TPZ

fencing (Figure 15) construct TPZ fencing to prevent pedestrian access into the protected area. mulch the TPZ area to a depth of 150mm with woodchips (if available, use woodchips

generated from on site tree clearing). irrigate TPZs periodically, as determined by the consulting arborist.

TPZ guidelines need to adhere to all stages of the design and construction process and are relevant to all on-site utilities.

Figure 15: Example of a TPZ warning sign clearly displayed on TPZ fencing

TPZs for all trees have been applied to scale in the maps in Appendix 2 and are listed in the tabular reports in Appendix 3.

The following tables provide the TPZ dimensions for those trees assessed ‘Retain’, ‘If possible, retain’ and ‘Third party ownership’.

Much of the vegetation assessed occurred in groups or clumps across the sites.

In these instances, where trees are to be retained, the TPZs should be grouped together for simplicity and to provide extra protection to the retained trees both above and below ground.

Layo

ut 3

of 3

Layo

ut 2

of 3

Layo

ut 1

of 3

Stud Rd

Burw

ood

Hw

y

Unn

amed

Melbourne St

Tyner Rd

Gateshead Dr

Whi

te R

d

Lynne Av

Alderford Dr

Hen

ry R

d

Jack

son

Rd

Hug

hes

St

Pinewood Dr

Cot

tsw

old

Pl

Littl

e B

urw

ood

Hw

y

Hob

art P

l

Salis

bury

Ct

Cap

ital C

ity B

vd

Jamieson St

Snow

den

Pl

Birc

hfie

ld C

r

Brisbane Lane

Unna

med

Burw

ood

Hw

y

Unnam

edStud Rd

Unn

amed

6.2

TPZ

Map

Ass

essm

ent o

f tre

es a

long

Bur

woo

d H

ighw

ay a

nd S

tud

Roa

d, W

antir

na S

outh

Lege

ndTr

ees

Ret

ain

Third

par

ty

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

TPZ

Ret

ain

Third

par

ty

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

layo

uts

cada

stre

Roa

ds

²0

7014

021

028

035

m

Hom

ewoo

d C

onsu

lting

Pty

Ltd

150

Junc

tion

Roa

dN

unaw

adin

g V

IC 3

131

Ph: (

03) 9

877

4114

Base

Sho

ppin

g C

entre

Pla

n pr

ovid

ed b

y W

estfi

eld

Des

ign

Tree

s P

lotte

d by

Cam

eron

Ryd

erD

ate

Mar

ch 2

014

Proj

ectio

n: G

DA9

4 Zo

ne 5

5


Reference: 2598

6.3 TPZ dimension SummaryTable 2: TPZ dimensions for tree assessed ‘Retain’

ID Botanical Name TPZ radius(m)

1 Corymbia maculata 4.22 Eucalyptus viminalis 64 Corymbia maculata 4.085 Corymbia maculata 3.126 Corymbia maculata 5.8811 Eucalyptus viminalis 3.3612 Eucalyptus viminalis 3.2413 Corymbia maculata 614 Corymbia citriodora 3.615 Corymbia citriodora 3.1216 Corymbia citriodora 3.8417 Corymbia citriodora 3.8421 Corymbia citriodora 3.623 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 7.6824 Corymbia citriodora 3

25 Corymbia citriodora 4.826 Corymbia citriodora 3.1228 Corymbia citriodora 4.6835 Eucalyptus cinerea 4.4436 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 5.439 Corymbia citriodora 4.240 Corymbia maculata 3.8441 Corymbia maculata 5.1643 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 5.2844 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 6.72

46 Casuarina cunninghamiana 5.5247 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 5.2863 Eucalyptus viminalis 7.4466 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 4.6868 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 5.5269 Eucalyptus cladocalyx 6.9686 Eucalyptus nicholii 8.1689 Corymbia maculata 4.0890 Corymbia maculata 4.5695 Corymbia maculata 6.36

104 Casuarina cunninghamiana 4.44106 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 6.48

ID Botanical Name TPZ radius(m)

113 Corymbia maculata 4.44124 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 6.6135 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 6.84138 Eucalyptus cladocalyx 7.68141 Eucalyptus scoparia 3.6142 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 6.84156 Eucalyptus nicholii 5.04162 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 4.44163 Eucalyptus viminalis 10.8165 Casuarina cunninghamiana 5.52166 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 6.24169 Corymbia maculata 3.96170 Corymbia maculata 3.72172 Corymbia maculata 4.32175 Corymbia maculata 4.2

176 Corymbia maculata 3.84181 Corymbia maculata 5.16192 Eucalyptus viminalis 6.24195 Eucalyptus mannifera 4.68197 Eucalyptus mannifera 3.24198 Corymbia maculata 5.64199 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 4.56202 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 2.88220 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 4.56221 Eucalyptus mannifera 7.08

224 Eucalyptus mannifera 2.88225 Corymbia maculata 5.76226 Corymbia maculata 7.44233 Corymbia maculata 4.56234 Corymbia maculata 6.24236 Melaleuca styphelioides 3.84237 Melaleuca styphelioides 4.68247 Corymbia maculata 7.44256 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 4.8258 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 6.48

271 Eucalyptus nicholii 5.16


Reference: 2598

Table 3: TPZ dimensions for tree assessed ‘If possible, retain’

ID Botanical Name TPZ radius (m)

3 Corymbia maculata 27 Corymbia citriodora 29 Corymbia maculata 2.2831 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 3.7237 Acacia melanoxylon 2

48 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 257 Callistemon viminalis 2.1658 Callistemon viminalis 3.1259 Callistemon viminalis 261 Corymbia maculata 2.6462 Eucalyptus occidentalis 2.0470 Eucalyptus cladocalyx 5.7672 Casuarina cunninghamiana 3.3678 Eucalyptus nicholii 3.9681 Melaleuca styphelioides 2.28

82 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 2.2885 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 2.8887 Melaleuca styphelioides 3.9692 Corymbia maculata 2.0498 Corymbia citriodora 299 Corymbia citriodora 2.88100 Corymbia citriodora 2.76101 Eucalyptus occidentalis 2.04105 Casuarina cunninghamiana 2114 Corymbia maculata 2115 Corymbia maculata 2116 Corymbia maculata 2117 Corymbia maculata 2118 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 2119 Eucalyptus occidentalis 2120 Corymbia maculata 2121 Corymbia maculata 2122 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 2123 Corymbia maculata 2127 Corymbia maculata 2134 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 2

ID Botanical Name TPZ radius (m)

136 Melaleuca styphelioides 2.76137 Eucalyptus cladocalyx 6.48139 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 2158 Eucalyptus nicholii 3.84159 Eucalyptus nicholii 5.04

161 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 2.4167 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 2.28168 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 3.48177 Eucalyptus viridis 3185 Acacia melanoxylon 2187 Allocasuarina littoralis 2188 Allocasuarina littoralis 3.6191 Allocasuarina littoralis 2.28193 Casuarina cunninghamiana 4.56209 Lagunaria patersonia 3.96

210 Lagunaria patersonia 3.96216 Lagunaria patersonia 2.76219 Corymbia maculata 2222 Melaleuca styphelioides 2.64227 Melaleuca styphelioides 2229 Corymbia maculata 2239 Robinia pseudoacacia 2240 Robinia pseudoacacia 2.28241 Robinia pseudoacacia 2.04242 Corymbia citriodora 3.24261 Eucalyptus cosmophylla 2.16263 Eucalyptus saligna 3.36264 Eucalyptus sp. 2265 Melaleuca styphelioides 3.72266 Melaleuca styphelioides 3.84267 Eucalyptus polyanthemos 4.8272 Corymbia maculata 2274 Eucalyptus polyanthemos 4.2276 Corymbia citriodora 3.96


Reference: 2598

Table 4: TPZ dimensions for tree assessed ‘Third party ownership’

ID Botanical Name TPZradius (m)

277 Populus canescens 3.6278 Eucalyptus saligna 4.32279 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 5.52280 Eucalyptus mannifera 2.64281 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 9.96282 Eucalyptus mannifera 2.04283 Melaleuca armillaris 3.6284 Eucalyptus mannifera 3.24285 Eucalyptus nicholii 2286 Eucalyptus nicholii 2.04287 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 7.68288 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 3.84289 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 5.64290 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 5.16291 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 5.04292 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 2

ID Botanical Name TPZradius (m)

293 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 8.16294 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 2295 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 2296 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 3.12297 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 5.76298 Eucalyptus nicholii 5.64299 Eucalyptus mannifera 3.24300 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 5.04301 Cupressus macrocarpa 'Aurea' 11.4302 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 2303 Melaleuca armillaris 6.24304 Eucalyptus botryoides 5.88305 Grevillea robusta 7.2306 Casuarina cunninghamiana 5.04307 Eucalyptus mannifera 2.16

6.4 Proposed Entry from Stud RoadThere is a proposal for a new entrance to the shopping centre off Stud road at the northern section of the site (Figure 16). This has the potential to impact 35 of the 307 assessed trees. They include: Trees 202-3, 206, 255-60 & 262-74 located within the subject site Trees 279-80, 282-91 & 307 located on the western side of Stud Road.

Table 5Table 6 provides a summary of the impact associated with the proposed road realignment and entrance from stud road. The impact has been individually detailed in Table 6 for each tree.

Table 5: Summary of construction impact

Impact Retain If possible, retain

Not worth retaining

Third party ownership

Total

High 4 7 10 2 23Low 0 0 1 11 12

Tree protection fencing will need to be erected behind the back of kerb for the new entrance and alignment off stud road to protect all trees to be retained. This should be completed in accordance with AS 4970-2009 and section 6.1 Tree Protection Zone Specifications.


Reference: 2598

Figure 16: Proposed new entrance from Stud Road

Existing entrance

Proposed entrance

Existing exit

Arbo

rist R

epor

t W

estfie

ld De

sign

Knox

City

Sho

pping

Cen

tre, 4

25 B

urwo

od H

ighwa

y, W

antirn

a So

uth

Refer

ence

: 259

8

Tabl

e 6:

Indi

vidu

al im

pact

ass

essm

ent

IDB

otan

ical

Nam

eD

BH

(cm

)TP

ZIm

pact

Ret

entio

n Va

lue

Com

men

t20

2E

ucal

yptu

s le

ucox

ylon

242.

88H

igh

Ret

ain

28%

incu

rsio

n in

to T

PZ, t

ree

will

requ

ire re

mov

al20

3M

elal

euca

arm

illaris

364.

32H

igh

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

Tree

ass

esse

d no

t wor

th re

tain

ing

206

Cal

liste

mon

vim

inal

is20

2.4

Low

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

Tree

ass

esse

d no

t wor

th re

tain

ing

255

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

495.

88H

igh

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

Tree

exi

sts

with

in p

ropo

sed

road

des

ign

and

will

requ

ire re

mov

al25

6E

ucal

yptu

s si

dero

xylo

n40

4.8

Hig

hR

etai

nTr

ee e

xist

s w

ithin

pro

pose

d ro

ad d

esig

n an

d w

ill re

quire

rem

oval

257

Cas

uarin

a cu

nnin

gham

iana

232.

76H

igh

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

Tree

exi

sts

with

in p

ropo

sed

road

des

ign

and

will

requ

ire re

mov

al25

8E

ucal

yptu

s si

dero

xylo

n54

6.48

Hig

hR

etai

nTr

ee e

xist

s w

ithin

pro

pose

d ro

ad d

esig

n an

d w

ill re

quire

rem

oval

259

Cas

uarin

a cu

nnin

gham

iana

202.

4H

igh

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

Tree

exi

sts

with

in p

ropo

sed

road

des

ign

and

will

requ

ire re

mov

al26

0E

ucal

yptu

s le

hman

nii

222.

64H

igh

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

Tree

exi

sts

with

in p

ropo

sed

road

des

ign

and

will

requ

ire re

mov

al26

2M

elal

euca

sty

phel

ioid

es30

3.6

Hig

hN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

gTr

ee e

xist

s w

ithin

pro

pose

d ro

ad d

esig

n an

d w

ill re

quire

rem

oval

263

Euc

alyp

tus

salig

na28

3.36

Hig

hIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

Tree

exi

sts

with

in p

ropo

sed

road

des

ign

and

will

requ

ire re

mov

al26

4E

ucal

yptu

s sp

.15

2H

igh

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

nTr

ee e

xist

s w

ithin

pro

pose

d ro

ad d

esig

n an

d w

ill re

quire

rem

oval

265

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

313.

72H

igh

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

nTr

ee e

xist

s w

ithin

pro

pose

d ro

ad d

esig

n an

d w

ill re

quire

rem

oval

266

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

323.

84H

igh

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

nTr

ee e

xist

s w

ithin

pro

pose

d ro

ad d

esig

n an

d w

ill re

quire

rem

oval

267

Euc

alyp

tus

poly

anth

emos

404.

8H

igh

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

nTr

ee e

xist

s w

ithin

pro

pose

d ro

ad d

esig

n an

d w

ill re

quire

rem

oval

268

Euc

alyp

tus

cosm

ophy

lla30

3.6

Hig

hN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

gTr

ee e

xist

s w

ithin

pro

pose

d ro

ad d

esig

n an

d w

ill re

quire

rem

oval

269

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

333.

96H

igh

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

Tree

exi

sts

with

in p

ropo

sed

road

des

ign

and

will

requ

ire re

mov

al27

0M

elal

euca

sty

phel

ioid

es22

2.64

Hig

hN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

gTr

ee e

xist

s w

ithin

pro

pose

d ro

ad d

esig

n an

d w

ill re

quire

rem

oval

271

Euc

alyp

tus

nich

olii

435.

16H

igh

Ret

ain

Tree

exi

sts

with

in p

ropo

sed

road

des

ign

and

will

requ

ire re

mov

al27

2C

orym

bia

mac

ulat

a5

2H

igh

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

nTr

ee e

xist

s w

ithin

pro

pose

d ro

ad d

esig

n an

d w

ill re

quire

rem

oval

273

Allo

casu

arin

a lit

tora

lis45

5.4

Hig

hN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

gTr

ee e

xist

s w

ithin

pro

pose

d ro

ad d

esig

n an

d w

ill re

quire

rem

oval

Arbo

rist R

epor

t W

estfie

ld De

sign

Knox

City

Sho

pping

Cen

tre, 4

25 B

urwo

od H

ighwa

y, W

antirn

a So

uth

Refer

ence

: 259

8

IDB

otan

ical

Nam

eD

BH

(cm

)TP

ZIm

pact

Ret

entio

n Va

lue

Com

men

t27

4E

ucal

yptu

s po

lyan

them

os35

4.2

Hig

hIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

29%

incu

rsio

n in

to T

PZ, t

ree

will

requ

ire re

mov

al27

9E

ucal

yptu

s si

dero

xylo

n46

5.52

Low

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

pTr

ee c

an b

e re

tain

ed, a

ppro

xim

atel

y 2%

incu

rsio

n28

0E

ucal

yptu

s m

anni

fera

222.

64Lo

wTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

No

incu

rsio

n bu

t tre

e pr

otec

tion

requ

ired

282

Euc

alyp

tus

man

nife

ra17

2.04

Low

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

pN

o in

curs

ion

but t

ree

prot

ectio

n re

quire

d28

3M

elal

euca

arm

illaris

303.

6Lo

wTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

No

incu

rsio

n bu

t tre

e pr

otec

tion

requ

ired

284

Euc

alyp

tus

man

nife

ra27

3.24

Low

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

pN

o in

curs

ion

but t

ree

prot

ectio

n re

quire

d28

5E

ucal

yptu

s ni

chol

ii13

2Lo

wTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

No

incu

rsio

n bu

t tre

e pr

otec

tion

requ

ired

286

Euc

alyp

tus

nich

olii

172.

04Lo

wTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

No

incu

rsio

n bu

t tre

e pr

otec

tion

requ

ired

287

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

647.

68H

igh

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

p20

% in

curs

ion

into

TPZ

, tre

e w

ill re

quire

rem

oval

288

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

323.

84Lo

wTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

Tree

can

be

reta

ined

, app

roxi

mat

ely

3% in

curs

ion

289

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

475.

64H

igh

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

p16

% in

curs

ion

into

TPZ

, tre

e sh

ould

be

rem

oved

as

it is

lean

ing

out i

nto

the

road

290

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

435.

16Lo

wTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

Tree

can

be

reta

ined

, app

roxi

mat

ely

5% in

curs

ion

291

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

425.

04Lo

wTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

Tree

can

be

reta

ined

, app

roxi

mat

ely

4% in

curs

ion

307

Euc

alyp

tus

man

nife

ra18

2.16

Low

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

pN

o in

curs

ion

but t

ree

prot

ectio

n re

quire

d


Reference: 2598

6.5 Tree Pruning and RemovalPruning and removal works should be carried out or be directly supervised by qualified arborists. At least one fully qualified arborist must be present on-site at all times during pruning operations. The minimum qualification should be: An Advanced Certificate of Arboriculture. A National Certificate in Horticulture (Arboriculture) AQF Level 4.

All pruning undertaken must conform to the Australian Standard Pruning of Amenity Trees (AS-4373 2007).

Where trees are to be removed on a large scale and in whole groups, it may be appropriate to use excavators or other large equipment. This kind of equipment should not be used within 35m of any trees to be retained.

6.6 Tree ReplacementAny proposed design for the site will need to ensure that sufficient space is allocated for establishment of replacement trees and plants. These can be incorporated into gardens, road reserves and public open space and will help to compensate the loss in landscape contribution from the removed trees.

The surrounding landscape has areas of indigenous vegetation. This theme should be continued when considering replacement trees, shrubs and grass species for the property.

A replacement ratio of 10: 1 should be applied to the removal of any trees. That is, for every tree that is removed, 10 plants should be replaced. Replacement plants should comprise a mixture of trees, shrubs, herbs, and grasses with a minimum of 10-15% of the replacement plants being trees. Sufficient space should be allowed in the proposed plan to cater for the trees future growth requirements.

6.7 Design Considerations

6.7.1 Encroachment In some cases, where trees are to be retained encroachment into the TPZ may be necessary. Working within the Australian Standard framework there is provision for this and it is grouped into 2 broad categories.

Minor encroachment AS 4970-2009 Encroachment of less than 10% of the TPZ and outside the SRZ is deemed to be minor encroachment according to AS 4970-2009. Detailed root investigations should not be required but must be compensated with an extension to the TPZ elsewhere. See Figure 17. Variations must be made by the project arborist considering other relevant factors including tree health, vigour, stability, species sensitivity and soil characteristics.


Reference: 2598

Figure 17: Example of TPZ encroachment and compensatory offset (image from AS 4970-2009)

Major encroachment AS 4970-2009 Encroachment of more than 10% of the TPZ or into the SRZ is deemed to be major encroachment according to AS 4970-2009. The project arborist must demonstrate that the tree(s) would remain viable. The area lost to this encroachment should be compensated for elsewhere and contiguous with the TPZ. This may require root investigation by non-destructive methods and consideration of relevant factors tree health, vigour, stability, species sensitivity and soil characteristics.

6.7.2 Scaffolding If scaffolding is required for construction, it would be possible to erect scaffolding inside the TPZ providing the following procedures were adhered to. 1. The scaffolding should be erected inside the TPZ under the direct supervision of the

consulting arborist. 2. The ground level of the construction site underneath the scaffolding should consist of the

‘raised walkway’. This will prevent compaction of the soil surface and again, all pedestrian traffic should be excluded from the ground level unless utilising the raised walkway.

3. The Tree Protection Zone will require inspection prior to the commencement of works and inspected regularly throughout the construction on site.

4. Where possible all construction works should be completed from within the building envelope.

5. The consulting arborist should oversee any activities that would require additional access into the Tree Protection Zone.

Figure 18 provides an example of scaffolding set-up


Reference: 2598

Figure 18: Scaffolding set-up (AS 4970-2009)

6.7.3 Porous and Permeable Materials Any hard surfacing within the TPZs should be minimised and/or designed to be porous. This allows for water exchange between the soil and a continuous exchange of air with the atmosphere, thereby maintaining a high soil oxygen level (Ferguson 2005).

Figure 19 provides an example of porous paving using Eco-Trihex pavers, which may be applicable for paved areas.


Reference: 2598

Figure 19: Example of Eco-Trihex paving

Where paths or pedestrian access is proposed near trees, a boardwalk may be appropriate. Creating a boardwalk underneath the canopies of trees reduces the impact on the trees as only post holes need to be dug (rather than large scale earth scraping and cutting to create a level path) minimizing soil disturbance. Soil compaction from human and vehicular traffic is also eliminated. Figure 20Error! Not a valid bookmark self-reference. provides a diagrammatic view of how a boardwalk could appear.


Reference: 2598

It is important that the boardwalk sits just above the soil level, however it need only be a few centimetres above ground level to avoid compaction of the soil.

Figure 20: A) Example boardwalk design, B) Aerial view of boardwalk design

6.7.4 Mulch Application As part of the demolition and construction, all trees to be retained should be mulched ahead of time. It is likely that mulch will be generated from on-site pruning and removal works and should be used across the site.

Mulch has many benefits to plants including: Soil moisture conservation Soil compaction reduction Grass and weed suppression Reduction in soil erosion Soil structure improvements An increase in soil fertility Moderation of soil temperature on a diurnal and seasonal basis (Harris, Clark & Matheny

1999).

The application of mulch provides a ‘blanket’ effect on the soil. It helps retain moisture in the soil, provide organic matter and is beneficial to maintaining the soil microflora. In time it helps improve soil structure and promote the existence of worms and other soil organisms, beneficial for healthy soil. In the long-term it will create a soil environment beneficial for healthy root growth. It is envisaged that the mulched areas would act as exclusion zones and reduce the potential for compaction.


Reference: 2598

7. Conclusions307 trees were assessed along the Burwood Highway and Stud Road frontages of the Knox City Shopping Centre in Wantirna South. Although there are no designs for works at this stage, it is understood that the site is of interest for future development. All trees were located using differentially corrected GPS, the trunks measured using a diameter tape and tree condition assessed.

In general the trees are in good health with fair structure. The reduced structure ratings are as a result of the lack of proactive maintenance of the trees over the years. Many trees have suffered previous failures and/or are decayed.

Following the assessments the trees were placed into 4 retention categories. 73 trees were assessed ‘Retain’These are the trees in the best condition, with the highest landscape impact and have a long ULE 70 trees were assessed ‘If possible, retain’These are trees in good condition but tend to be small and the landscape amenity can be easily compensated 133 trees were assessed ‘Not worth retaining’Juveniles or trees that are in decline or have a limited ULE. These trees should not be considered a constraint to development 31 trees were assessed ‘Third party ownership’As these trees are owned by a third party all efforts should be made to retain and protect throughout any redevelopment.

In light of a future design, tree protection measures have been supplied and dimensions accurately applied to all maps within the report. Considerations and design options to maintain the trees during development have been provided including: Tree pruning and removal Tree replacement Encroaching in TPZs Scaffolding Permeable/Low impact paving design Mulch application

If the above points are considered during the development of a design proposal, it is likely that many trees can be retained within the design.

8. RecommendationSee summary


Reference: 2598

9. ReferencesAS 4373, 2007, Australian Standard, Pruning Amenity Trees, 2nd Edition Standards Australia

AS 4970, 2009, Australian Standard, Protection of Trees on Development Sites, Standards Australia

Coder, K. D., 1995, ‘Tree quality BMPs for developing wooded areas and protecting residual trees’, in Trees and Building Sites, Proceedings of an International Workshop on Trees and Buildings, Edited by G. W. Watson and D. Neely, International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois.

Ferguson, B. K., 2005, Porous Pavements, CRC Press, Florida

Harris, R.W., Clark, J.R. & Matheny, N.P., 1999, Arboriculture; Integrated management of landscape trees, shrubs, and vines, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Matheny, N. & Clark, R. C. 1994, Evaluation of Hazard Trees in Urban Areas, 2nd edn., International Society of Arboriculture, USA.


Reference: 2598

Appendix 1. Data Collection Definitions

The information collected on each specimen was based on the assessor’s experience and opinion of each of the trees. Included are the descriptions for each of the listed categories. The following information was collected on each tree.

1.1 Botanical name: The genus, species and common name.

1.2 Canopy dimensions Height (approximate) and width (measured) of the canopy in metres.

1.3 DBHDiameter at breast height (measured at 1.3m above ground level).

1.4 Health

Table 7. Health Definition

Term Definition

Excellent The tree is demonstrating excellent or exceptional growth. The tree should exhibit a full canopy of foliage and be free of pest and disease problems.

Good The tree is demonstrating good or exceptional growth. The tree should exhibit a full canopy of foliage, and have only minor pest or diseases problems.

Fair The tree is in reasonable condition and growing well. The tree should exhibit an adequate canopy of foliage. There may be some deadwood present in the crown. Some grazing by insects or possums may be evident.

Poor The tree is not growing to its full capacity; extension growth of the laterals is minimal. The canopy may be thinning or sparse. Large amounts of deadwood may be evident throughout the crown. Significant pest and disease problems may be evident or symptoms of stress indicating tree decline.

Very Poor The tree appears to be in a state of decline. The tree is not growing to its full capacity. The canopy may be very thin and sparse. A significant volume of deadwood may be present in the canopy or pest and disease problems may be causing a severe decline in tree health.

Dead The tree is dead.


Reference: 2598

1.5 Structure

Table 8. Structure Definition

Term Definition

Good The tree has a well defined and balanced crown. Branch unions appear to be strong, with no defects evident in the trunk or the branches. Major limbs are well defined. The tree is considered a good example of the species.

Fair The tree has some minor problems in the structure of the crown. The crown may be slightly out of balance, and some branch unions may be exhibiting minor structural faults. If the tree has a single trunk, it may be on a slight lean or exhibiting minor defects.

Poor The tree may have a poorly structured crown. The crown may be unbalanced or exhibit large gaps. Major limbs may not be well defined. Branches may be rubbing or crossing over. Branch unions may be poor or faulty at the point of attachment. The tree may have suffered root damage.

Very Poor The tree has a poorly structured crown. The crown is unbalanced or exhibit large gaps with possibly large sections of deadwood. Major limbs may not be well defined. Branches may be rubbing or crossing over. Branch unions may be poor or faulty at the point of attachment. Branches may exhibit large cracks that are likely to fail in the future. The tree may have suffered major root damage.

Failed The tree has a very poorly structured crown. A section of the tree has failed or is in imminent danger of failure.

1.6 Useful Life Expectancy (ULE) Rating Useful Life Expectancy is approximately how long a tree can be retained safely and usefully in the landscape.

Table 9. ULE Definition

Term Definition

Unsafe The tree is considered dangerous in the location and has no significant amenity value.

Less than 5 years The tree, under normal circumstances and without extra stresses being imposed on it, should be safe and have value for up to five years, but will need to be replaced. During this period, normal inspections and maintenance will be required. If possible, replacement trees should be planted.

5 – 10 years The tree, under normal circumstances and without extra stresses being imposed on it, should be safe and of value for up to ten years. During this period, normal inspections and maintenance will be required.

11 – 20 years The tree, under normal circumstances and without extra stresses being imposed on it, should be safe and of value for up to twenty years. During this period, normal inspections and maintenance will be required.

20 – 40 years The tree, under normal circumstances and without extra stresses being imposed on it, should be safe and of value for up to forty years. During this period, normal inspections and maintenance will be required.

Greater than 40 years

The tree, under normal circumstances and without extra stresses being imposed on it, should be safe and of value for greater than forty years. During this period, normal inspections and maintenance will be required.


Reference: 2598

1.7 Tree Origin

Table 10. Tree Origin Definition

Term Definition

Exotic The species originates in a country other than Australia.Native The species originates within Australia.Indigenous The species originates within the local environs.

1.8 Contribution to the Landscape Rating

Table 11. Contribution to the Landscape Rating Definition

Term Definition

High The tree may be significant in the landscape, offer shade and other amenities such as screening. The tree may assist with erosion control, offer a windbreak or perform a vital function in the location (Eg: Habitat, shade, flowers or fruit).

Medium The tree may offer some screening in the landscape or serve a particular function in the location.

Low The tree offers very little in the way of screening or amenity.

1.9 Tree Significance Rating This rating system is used to rate the significance of trees in a local area. Some trees identified in local areas may be suitable for National or State registration. Trees that have State or National significance would normally be registered by The National Trust and identified as such. This system of rating and any values expressed represents the opinion of the consultant.

Trees may be considered significant in a local area if they fit into one or more of the following categories.

Exceptional size Rare Very old Unusual shape or form Aboriginal cultural value Historic value

Exceptional example of a species Economic, genetic Outstanding feature in the landscape Habitat value Erosion control


Reference: 2598

Table 12. Tree Significance Rating Definition

Term Definition

Exceptional A tree is considered exceptional because several of the preceding categories apply to the specimen. This tree is normally one that creates a profound effect on the local area and has an exceptional impact on the tree surveyor

Outstanding A tree is considered outstanding because one or several of the preceding categories apply to the specimen. This tree is normally one that attracts attention and has a noticeable impact on the area and the tree surveyor.

Valuable A tree is considered valuable because at least one of the preceding categories may be applicable or partially to the specimen. This tree is normally one that is a reasonable specimen without any particular outstanding features. It normally has a diameter at breast height over 1000mm and has good to average health and structure.

Moderate A tree is considered to have moderate value because it may be in reasonable condition but may only partially fulfil any one factor. It generally has a diameter at breast height of less than 1000mm and an average or poor health and structure.

Low value As an individual specimen, the tree is not considered significant. This may be a small specimen, with poor health or structure and be common in occurrence or possibly a weed species. This tree has no impact on the tree surveyor.

Negligible As an individual specimen, the tree is not considered significant. This may be a very small specimen with very poor health and structure and may be common in occurrence or a weed species. This tree has no impact on the tree surveyor.

1.10 Retention Value of the Tree

Table 13. Retention Value of the Tree Definition

Term Definition

Retain The tree is well suited to the site and offers amenity or screening to the site. The tree is normally in fair to good health and has fair to good structure. Its ULE should be at least the same as the design life of any new buildings. In some circumstances a tree may need to be retained for cultural/historic reasons, because it is indigenous, old, remnant or because the tree (regardless of species) may offer vital screening for surrounding properties.

If possible, retain The tree is suited to the site and, if practical, designs should be altered to accommodate the tree. This category may contain trees that are juvenile or semi-mature specimens that can potentially be replaced with standard nursery stock. It may be possible to transplant trees rated in this category.

Not worth retaining The tree is not worth retaining in the landscape. The tree may be considered a weed species, structurally unsound, dead/dying/diseased, nearing the end of its ULE or may not be suitable for the site.

Third party ownership

The tree is located outside of the subject site. It may be owned by a private entity (residential) or public body (council). For all purposes, a third party is assumed to have ownership of the tree. The tree has been assessed on the assumption that its owner requires retention of the tree. It is neither a recommendation of good health of the tree, or suitability for retention. Discussions with the relevant parties and authorities may result in the removal of a tree assessed in this category.


Reference: 2598

Appendix 2. TPZ Maps

Layo

ut 3

of 3

Layo

ut 2

of 3

Layo

ut 1

of 3

Stud Rd

Burw

ood

Hw

y

Unn

amed

Melbourne St

Tyner Rd

Gateshead Dr

Whi

te R

d

Lynne Av

Alderford Dr

Hen

ry R

d

Jack

son

Rd

Hug

hes

St

Pinewood Dr

Cot

tsw

old

Pl

Littl

e B

urw

ood

Hw

y

Hob

art P

l

Salis

bury

Ct

Cap

ital C

ity B

vd

Jamieson St

Snow

den

Pl

Birc

hfie

ld C

r

Brisbane Lane

Unna

med

Burw

ood

Hw

y

Unnam

edStud Rd

Unn

amed

TPZ

Map

Ove

rvie

w

Ass

essm

ent o

f tre

es a

long

Bur

woo

d H

ighw

ay a

nd S

tud

Roa

d, W

antir

na S

outh

Lege

ndTr

ees

Ret

ain

Third

par

ty

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

TPZ

Ret

ain

Third

par

ty

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

layo

uts

cada

stre

Roa

ds

²0

7014

021

028

035

m

Hom

ewoo

d C

onsu

lting

Pty

Ltd

150

Junc

tion

Roa

dN

unaw

adin

g V

IC 3

131

Ph: (

03) 9

877

4114

Base

Sho

ppin

g C

entre

Pla

n pr

ovid

ed b

y W

estfi

eld

Des

ign

Tree

s P

lotte

d by

Cam

eron

Ryd

erD

ate

Mar

ch 2

014

Proj

ectio

n: G

DA9

4 Zo

ne 5

5

9

8

6

5 4 32 1

7877 76

7372

7170

69 6867

6665 64

636261

60

5855 54

5250

4947

46

45 4443

41

403938

37

3635

34 33

3231

3029

28

2726

2524

23

22

212019

1817

1615

14

1211

10

7

7574

5957 56

5351

48

42

13

Burw

ood

Hw

y

Lynne Av

Melbourne St

Unn

amed

Hen

ry R

d

Littl

e Bu

rwoo

d H

wy

Hug

hes

St

Burw

ood

Hw

y

Burw

ood

Hw

y

Layo

ut 1

of 3

Ass

essm

ent o

f tre

es a

long

Bur

woo

d H

ighw

ay a

nd S

tud

Roa

d, W

antir

na S

outh

Lege

ndTr

ees

Ret

ain

Third

par

ty

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

TPZ

Ret

ain

Third

par

ty

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

cada

stre

Roa

ds

²0

2550

7510

012

.5m

Hom

ewoo

d C

onsu

lting

Pty

Ltd

150

Junc

tion

Roa

dN

unaw

adin

g V

IC 3

131

Ph: (

03) 9

877

4114

Base

Sho

ppin

g C

entre

Pla

n pr

ovid

ed b

y W

estfi

eld

Des

ign

Tree

s P

lotte

d by

Cam

eron

Ryd

erD

ate

Mar

ch 2

014

Proj

ectio

n: G

DA9

4 Zo

ne 5

5

9998

97 9695

9493 92 91

9089

88

87

8684

8281

8079

206

202

201

200

199 19

819

7

195

194

193

192 19

1 188 18

718

418

3

182

180

179

177

176

175

174 17

317

2 171

170

168

167

16616

516

416

3

162

160

159

158

157

155

15415

215

1

150

149

147

146

145 14

4

143

142 14

1 140

139

137

136

135

133

131

130 12

5 123 12

211

9

118

116

115 11

311

210

6 105 10

3

101

85

83

207 19

6

190

189

186

185 18

1

178

169

161

156

153

148

138

134

132

129

128

127

126 12

4 121

120

117 11

411

1

110

109 10

8 107

104 10

210

0

Burw

ood

Hw

y

Tyner Rd

Stud Rd

Burw

ood

Hw

y

Layo

ut 2

of 3

Ass

essm

ent o

f tre

es a

long

Bur

woo

d H

ighw

ay a

nd S

tud

Roa

d, W

antir

na S

outh

Lege

ndTr

ees

Ret

ain

Third

par

ty

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

TPZ

Ret

ain

Third

par

ty

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

cada

stre

Roa

ds

²0

2550

7510

012

.5m

Hom

ewoo

d C

onsu

lting

Pty

Ltd

150

Junc

tion

Roa

dN

unaw

adin

g V

IC 3

131

Ph: (

03) 9

877

4114

Base

Sho

ppin

g C

entre

Pla

n pr

ovid

ed b

y W

estfi

eld

Des

ign

Tree

s P

lotte

d by

Cam

eron

Ryd

erD

ate

Mar

ch 2

014

Proj

ectio

n: G

DA9

4 Zo

ne 5

5

307

306

305

304

303

302

301

300

299

298

297

296

295

294

29329

2

291

290

288

28628

4282

281

280

279

278 27

727

6

275

274

273

271

270

269

268

267

266

265 26

426

326

2

261

260

258 25

625

4

253

252

251

250

247

246

245

244 24

1 240 23

9

238

237

236

235

234 23

323

223

123

0

229

227 22

6 225

224

223

222

221

220

219

218

217

216

215

214

213

212

211

210

209

208

206

205

204

202

201

199

289

287

28528

3

272

259

257

255

249

248

243

242

228

207

203

Stud Rd

Unnam

ed

Alderford Dr

Pinewood Dr

Salis

bury

Ct

Unn

amed

Layo

ut 3

of 3

Ass

essm

ent o

f tre

es a

long

Bur

woo

d H

ighw

ay a

nd S

tud

Roa

d, W

antir

na S

outh

Lege

ndTr

ees

Ret

ain

Third

par

ty

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

TPZ

Ret

ain

Third

par

ty

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

cada

stre

Roa

ds

²0

2550

7510

012

.5m

Hom

ewoo

d C

onsu

lting

Pty

Ltd

150

Junc

tion

Roa

dN

unaw

adin

g V

IC 3

131

Ph: (

03) 9

877

4114

Base

Sho

ppin

g C

entre

Pla

n pr

ovid

ed b

y W

estfi

eld

Des

ign

Tree

s P

lotte

d by

Cam

eron

Ryd

erD

ate

Mar

ch 2

014

Proj

ectio

n: G

DA9

4 Zo

ne 5

5


Reference: 2598

Appendix 3. Tabular Tree Data

Tabu

lar R

epor

tPr

econ

stru

ctio

n As

sess

men

tKn

ox C

ity S

hopp

ing C

entre

, 425

Bur

wood

High

way,

Wan

tirna

Sout

h

IDB

otan

ical

Nam

eC

omm

on N

ame

Can

opy

Dim

ensi

ons

DB

H

(cm

)H

ealth

Stru

ctur

eU

LEC

omm

ents

Ret

entio

n Va

lue

TPZ

radi

us

(m)

1C

orym

bia

mac

ulat

aS

potte

d G

um14

m x

6m

35V

ery

Goo

dG

ood

40+

year

sR

etai

n4.

2

2E

ucal

yptu

s vi

min

alis

Man

na G

um15

m x

8m

50V

ery

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

6

3C

orym

bia

mac

ulat

aS

potte

d G

um6m

x 2

m10

Goo

dG

ood

40+

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2

4C

orym

bia

mac

ulat

aS

potte

d G

um15

m x

6m

34V

ery

Goo

dG

ood

40+

year

sTr

ee is

gro

win

g w

ith a

rest

ricte

d ro

ot v

olum

eR

etai

n4.

08

5C

orym

bia

mac

ulat

aS

potte

d G

um12

m x

5m

26G

ood

Goo

d40

+ ye

ars

Tree

is g

row

ing

with

a re

stric

ted

root

vol

ume

Ret

ain

3.12

6C

orym

bia

mac

ulat

aS

potte

d G

um15

m x

8m

49G

ood

Goo

d40

+ ye

ars

Tree

is g

row

ing

with

a re

stric

ted

root

vol

ume

Ret

ain

5.88

7C

orym

bia

citri

odor

aLe

mon

-sce

nted

Gum

7m x

5m

15G

ood

Poo

r40

+ ye

ars

Pru

ne c

odom

inan

tIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2

8C

orym

bia

citri

odor

aLe

mon

-sce

nted

Gum

11m

x 6

m30

Goo

dP

oor

5-10

yea

rsE

vide

nce

of p

revi

ous

bran

ch

failu

res

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

3.6

9C

orym

bia

mac

ulat

aS

potte

d G

um8m

x 3

m19

Goo

dG

ood

40+

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2.28

10E

ucal

yptu

s vi

min

alis

Man

na G

um16

m x

6m

35D

ead

Poo

r0

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g4.

2

11E

ucal

yptu

s vi

min

alis

Man

na G

um13

m x

4m

28D

ead

Poo

r0

year

sR

etai

n3.

36

12E

ucal

yptu

s vi

min

alis

Man

na G

um11

m x

4m

27D

ead

Poo

r0

year

sR

etai

n3.

24

13C

orym

bia

mac

ulat

aS

potte

d G

um16

m x

8m

50G

ood

Fair

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

6

14C

orym

bia

citri

odor

aLe

mon

-sce

nted

Gum

15m

x 6

m30

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

3.6

15C

orym

bia

citri

odor

aLe

mon

-sce

nted

Gum

13m

x 6

m26

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

3.12

16C

orym

bia

citri

odor

aLe

mon

-sce

nted

Gum

15m

x 7

m32

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

3.84

17C

orym

bia

citri

odor

aLe

mon

-sce

nted

Gum

13m

x 8

m32

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

3.84

18M

elal

euca

lina

riifo

liaS

now

in S

umm

er5m

x 4

m15

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

19E

ucal

yptu

s vi

min

alis

Man

na G

um11

m x

6m

28Fa

irFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Tree

is in

dec

line

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

3.36

20E

ucal

yptu

s vi

min

alis

Man

na G

um10

m x

8m

35P

oor

Poo

r0

year

sTr

ee is

in d

eclin

e, D

ecay

and

br

acke

t fun

giN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g4.

2

21C

orym

bia

citri

odor

aLe

mon

-sce

nted

Gum

10m

x 1

0m30

Goo

dFa

ir20

-40

year

sTr

ee in

con

flict

with

pow

erlin

eR

etai

n3.

6

22E

ucal

yptu

s vi

min

alis

Man

na G

um15

m x

16m

76G

ood

Poo

r10

-20

year

sTr

unk

deca

yN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g9.

12

Refer

ence

: 25

98

IDB

otan

ical

Nam

eC

omm

on N

ame

Can

opy

Dim

ensi

ons

DB

H

(cm

)H

ealth

Stru

ctur

eU

LEC

omm

ents

Ret

entio

n Va

lue

TPZ

radi

us

(m)

23E

ucal

yptu

s si

dero

xylo

nR

ed Ir

onba

rk14

m x

10m

64G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

7.68

24C

orym

bia

citri

odor

aLe

mon

-sce

nted

Gum

13m

x 6

m25

Goo

dG

ood

40+

year

sR

etai

n3

25C

orym

bia

citri

odor

aLe

mon

-sce

nted

Gum

12m

x 1

0m40

Goo

dFa

ir20

-40

year

sR

etai

n4.

8

26C

orym

bia

citri

odor

aLe

mon

-sce

nted

Gum

13m

x 5

m26

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

3.12

27C

orym

bia

citri

odor

aLe

mon

-sce

nted

Gum

13m

x 7

m30

Fair

Poo

r1-

5 ye

ars

Maj

or c

odom

inan

t inc

lusi

onN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g3.

6

28C

orym

bia

citri

odor

aLe

mon

-sce

nted

Gum

14m

x 8

m39

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

4.68

29C

orym

bia

citri

odor

aLe

mon

-sce

nted

Gum

5m x

2m

12D

ead

Poo

r0

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

30P

runu

s pe

rsic

aP

each

/Nec

tarin

e5m

x 5

m10

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

31E

ucal

yptu

s si

dero

xylo

nR

ed Ir

onba

rk8m

x 8

m31

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

3.72

32E

ucal

yptu

s si

dero

xylo

nR

ed Ir

onba

rk17

m x

12m

79G

ood

Poo

r5-

10 y

ears

Tree

is tr

ifurc

ated

with

incl

uded

ba

rk, b

eyon

d co

rrect

iona

l pru

ning

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

9.48

33E

ucal

yptu

s si

dero

xylo

nR

ed Ir

onba

rk12

m x

10m

51G

ood

Poo

r1-

5 ye

ars

Evi

denc

e of

pre

viou

s br

anch

fa

ilure

and

sub

sequ

ent

epic

orm

ic g

row

th. A

lso

conf

lictin

g po

wer

lines

.

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

6.12

34E

ucal

yptu

s m

anni

fera

Brit

tle G

um12

m x

4m

33D

ead

Poo

r0

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g3.

96

35E

ucal

yptu

s ci

nere

aM

ealy

Stri

ngyb

ark

13m

x 6

m37

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

4.44

36E

ucal

yptu

s ca

mal

dule

nsis

Riv

er R

ed G

um14

m x

12m

45G

ood

Fair

40+

year

sE

vide

nce

of p

revi

ous

bran

ch

failu

reR

etai

n5.

4

37A

caci

a m

elan

oxyl

onB

lack

woo

d6m

x 2

m16

Goo

dG

ood

10-2

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2

38M

elal

euca

lina

riifo

liaS

now

in S

umm

er6m

x 5

m21

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2.

52

39C

orym

bia

citri

odor

aLe

mon

-sce

nted

Gum

13m

x 6

m35

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

4.2

40C

orym

bia

mac

ulat

aS

potte

d G

um16

m x

7m

32G

ood

Goo

d20

-40

year

sR

etai

n3.

84

41C

orym

bia

mac

ulat

aS

potte

d G

um16

m x

9m

43G

ood

Poo

r20

-40

year

sP

rune

cod

omin

ant a

t 6m

Ret

ain

5.16

42C

orym

bia

mac

ulat

aS

potte

d G

um17

m x

9m

46P

oor

Fair

5-10

yea

rsTr

ee is

in d

eclin

eN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g5.

52

43E

ucal

yptu

s si

dero

xylo

nR

ed Ir

onba

rk13

m x

10m

44G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

5.28

44E

ucal

yptu

s si

dero

xylo

nR

ed Ir

onba

rk13

m x

14m

56G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Red

uctio

n pr

unin

g re

quire

dR

etai

n6.

72

45E

ucal

yptu

s vi

min

alis

Man

na G

um13

m x

8m

59Fa

irP

oor

1-5

year

sTr

ee is

in d

eclin

e, B

rack

et fu

ngi

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

7.08

46C

asua

rina

cunn

ingh

amia

naR

iver

She

- O

ak16

m x

8m

46G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

5.52

Refer

ence

: 25

98

IDB

otan

ical

Nam

eC

omm

on N

ame

Can

opy

Dim

ensi

ons

DB

H

(cm

)H

ealth

Stru

ctur

eU

LEC

omm

ents

Ret

entio

n Va

lue

TPZ

radi

us

(m)

47E

ucal

yptu

s le

ucox

ylon

Yel

low

Gum

10m

x 8

m44

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sR

etai

n5.

28

48E

ucal

yptu

s le

ucox

ylon

Yel

low

Gum

7m x

5m

12G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2

49E

ucal

yptu

s vi

min

alis

Man

na G

um12

m x

8m

55Fa

irFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

6.6

50E

ucal

yptu

s vi

min

alis

Man

na G

um12

m x

7m

54P

oor

Poo

r1-

5 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

6.48

51E

ucal

yptu

s le

ucox

ylon

Yel

low

Gum

6m x

6m

18G

ood

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2.

16

52A

caci

a flo

ribun

daC

atki

n W

attle

6m x

5m

12Fa

irP

oor

1-5

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

53C

allis

tem

on s

alig

nus

Will

ow B

ottle

Bru

sh5m

x 4

m9

Fair

Poo

r1-

5 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2

54C

allis

tem

on s

alig

nus

Will

ow B

ottle

Bru

sh6m

x 4

m14

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

55C

allis

tem

on s

alig

nus

Will

ow B

ottle

Bru

sh6m

x 3

m15

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

56A

caci

a sa

ligna

Wes

tern

Aus

tralia

n G

olde

n W

attle

6m x

4m

9G

ood

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

57C

allis

tem

on v

imin

alis

Wee

ping

Bot

tle B

rush

5m x

4m

18G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2.

16

58C

allis

tem

on v

imin

alis

Wee

ping

Bot

tle B

rush

5m x

5m

26G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n3.

12

59C

allis

tem

on v

imin

alis

Wee

ping

Bot

tle B

rush

5m x

3m

11G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2

60P

ittos

poru

m u

ndul

atum

Sw

eet P

ittos

poru

m5m

x 5

m16

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sE

nviro

nmen

tal w

eed

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2

61C

orym

bia

mac

ulat

aS

potte

d G

um12

m x

5m

22G

ood

Fair

20-4

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2.

64

62E

ucal

yptu

s oc

cide

ntal

isS

wam

p Y

ate

10m

x 3

m17

Goo

dG

ood

40+

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2.04

63E

ucal

yptu

s vi

min

alis

Man

na G

um14

m x

12m

62Fa

irG

ood

10-2

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

7.44

64E

ucal

yptu

s oc

cide

ntal

isS

wam

p Y

ate

14m

x 8

m46

Goo

dP

oor

5-10

yea

rsE

vide

nce

of p

revi

ous

bran

ch

failu

reN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g5.

52

65E

ucal

yptu

s oc

cide

ntal

isS

wam

p Y

ate

12m

x 8

m39

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsTr

ee is

in d

eclin

eN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g4.

68

66E

ucal

yptu

s si

dero

xylo

nR

ed Ir

onba

rk14

m x

12m

39G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

4.68

67E

ucal

yptu

s oc

cide

ntal

isS

wam

p Y

ate

16m

x 1

2m59

Goo

dP

oor

1-5

year

sTr

unk

deca

y, T

ree

is in

dec

line

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

7.08

68E

ucal

yptu

s si

dero

xylo

nR

ed Ir

onba

rk12

m x

10m

46G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

5.52

69E

ucal

yptu

s cl

adoc

alyx

Sug

ar G

um17

m x

10m

58G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

6.96

70E

ucal

yptu

s cl

adoc

alyx

Sug

ar G

um16

m x

10m

48Fa

irFa

ir10

-20

year

sE

vide

nce

of p

revi

ous

bran

ch

failu

reIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

5.76

71E

ucal

yptu

s ro

bust

aS

wam

p M

ahog

any

8m x

3m

33Fa

irP

oor

1-5

year

sE

vide

nce

of p

revi

ous

bran

ch

failu

reN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g3.

96

Refer

ence

: 25

98

IDB

otan

ical

Nam

eC

omm

on N

ame

Can

opy

Dim

ensi

ons

DB

H

(cm

)H

ealth

Stru

ctur

eU

LEC

omm

ents

Ret

entio

n Va

lue

TPZ

radi

us

(m)

72C

asua

rina

cunn

ingh

amia

naR

iver

She

- O

ak9m

x 4

m28

Fair

Goo

d20

-40

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

3.36

73M

elal

euca

sty

phel

ioid

esP

rickl

y P

aper

bark

7m x

4m

25Fa

irFa

ir10

-20

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g3

74M

elal

euca

sty

phel

ioid

esP

rickl

y P

aper

bark

5m x

2m

9Fa

irFa

ir10

-20

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

75M

elal

euca

sty

phel

ioid

esP

rickl

y P

aper

bark

6m x

3m

13Fa

irFa

ir10

-20

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

76M

elal

euca

sty

phel

ioid

esP

rickl

y P

aper

bark

6m x

3m

16Fa

irFa

ir10

-20

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

77M

elal

euca

sty

phel

ioid

esP

rickl

y P

aper

bark

7m x

3m

17Fa

irFa

ir10

-20

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2.

04

78E

ucal

yptu

s ni

chol

iiN

arro

w-le

aved

Bla

ck

Pep

perm

int

8m x

5m

33Fa

irFa

ir10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

3.96

79E

ucal

yptu

s ni

chol

iiN

arro

w-le

aved

Bla

ck

Pep

perm

int

10m

x 6

m44

Poo

rFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Tree

is in

dec

line,

rem

ove

Pitt

ospo

rum

s at

bas

e.N

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g5.

28

80M

elal

euca

sty

phel

ioid

esP

rickl

y P

aper

bark

8m x

5m

36G

ood

Poo

r5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

4.32

81M

elal

euca

sty

phel

ioid

esP

rickl

y P

aper

bark

8m x

4m

19G

ood

Goo

d10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2.28

82E

ucal

yptu

s le

ucox

ylon

Yel

low

Gum

8m x

4m

19Fa

irG

ood

10-2

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2.

28

83P

ittos

poru

m u

ndul

atum

Sw

eet P

ittos

poru

m4m

x 3

m10

Goo

dG

ood

10-2

0 ye

ars

Env

ironm

enta

l wee

dN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

84C

asua

rina

cunn

ingh

amia

naR

iver

She

- O

ak14

m x

7m

37P

oor

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Tree

is in

dec

line

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

4.44

85E

ucal

yptu

s le

ucox

ylon

Yel

low

Gum

8m x

5m

24G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2.

88

86E

ucal

yptu

s ni

chol

iiN

arro

w-le

aved

Bla

ck

Pep

perm

int

11m

x 9

m68

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sR

etai

n8.

16

87M

elal

euca

sty

phel

ioid

esP

rickl

y P

aper

bark

7m x

5m

33Fa

irFa

ir10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

3.96

88E

ucal

yptu

s sp

.G

um7m

x 2

m17

Goo

dP

oor

5-10

yea

rsE

vide

nce

of p

revi

ous

bran

ch

failu

reN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2.

04

89C

orym

bia

mac

ulat

aS

potte

d G

um15

m x

7m

34V

ery

Poo

rG

ood

40+

year

sR

etai

n4.

08

90C

orym

bia

mac

ulat

aS

potte

d G

um15

m x

7m

38V

ery

Poo

rG

ood

40+

year

sR

etai

n4.

56

91C

orym

bia

mac

ulat

aS

potte

d G

um4m

x 2

m4

Goo

dP

oor

5-10

yea

rsR

egro

wth

from

stu

mp

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2

92C

orym

bia

mac

ulat

aS

potte

d G

um9m

x 2

m17

Goo

dG

ood

40+

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2.04

93P

ittos

poru

m u

ndul

atum

Sw

eet P

ittos

poru

m3m

x 2

m7

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

94P

runu

s pe

rsic

aP

each

/Nec

tarin

e4m

x 3

m10

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

95C

orym

bia

mac

ulat

aS

potte

d G

um16

m x

12m

53G

ood

Goo

d20

-40

year

sR

etai

n6.

36

Refer

ence

: 25

98

IDB

otan

ical

Nam

eC

omm

on N

ame

Can

opy

Dim

ensi

ons

DB

H

(cm

)H

ealth

Stru

ctur

eU

LEC

omm

ents

Ret

entio

n Va

lue

TPZ

radi

us

(m)

96P

ittos

poru

m u

ndul

atum

Sw

eet P

ittos

poru

m5m

x 4

m20

Goo

dFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.4

97S

yzyg

ium

aus

trale

Bru

sh C

herry

3m x

2m

10P

oor

Poo

r1-

5 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2

98C

orym

bia

citri

odor

aLe

mon

-sce

nted

Gum

7m x

2m

10G

ood

Goo

d10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2

99C

orym

bia

citri

odor

aLe

mon

-sce

nted

Gum

10m

x 6

m24

Fair

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2.

88

100

Cor

ymbi

a ci

triod

ora

Lem

on-s

cent

ed G

um9m

x 5

m23

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2.

76

101

Euc

alyp

tus

occi

dent

alis

Sw

amp

Yat

e9m

x 4

m17

Goo

dFa

ir20

-40

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2.04

102

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

7m x

2m

11G

ood

Poo

r5-

10 y

ears

Reg

row

th fr

om s

tum

pN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

103

Euc

alyp

tus

obliq

uaM

essm

ate

Stri

ngyb

ark

10m

x 4

m17

Dea

dP

oor

0 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.04

104

Cas

uarin

a cu

nnin

gham

iana

Riv

er S

he -

Oak

14m

x 7

m37

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

4.44

105

Cas

uarin

a cu

nnin

gham

iana

Riv

er S

he -

Oak

4m x

2m

10Fa

irFa

ir10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2

106

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

13m

x 1

0m54

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sE

vide

nce

of p

revi

ous

bran

ch

failu

re, p

runi

ng re

quire

d if

tree

is

reta

ined

.

Ret

ain

6.48

107

Cal

liste

mon

vim

inal

isW

eepi

ng B

ottle

Bru

sh5m

x 3

m10

Fair

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2

108

Cal

liste

mon

vim

inal

isW

eepi

ng B

ottle

Bru

sh4m

x 3

m11

Fair

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2

109

Cal

liste

mon

vim

inal

isW

eepi

ng B

ottle

Bru

sh5m

x 4

m16

Fair

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2

110

Allo

casu

arin

a lit

tora

lisB

lack

She

-oak

5m x

4m

14Fa

irFa

ir10

-20

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

111

Cal

liste

mon

vim

inal

isW

eepi

ng B

ottle

Bru

sh5m

x 4

m20

Fair

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.4

112

Mel

aleu

ca li

narii

folia

Sno

w in

Sum

mer

8m x

6m

44P

oor

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g5.

28

113

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

14m

x 8

m37

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

4.44

114

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

5m x

2m

8G

ood

Goo

d40

+ ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2

115

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

7m x

3m

11G

ood

Goo

d40

+ ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2

116

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

8m x

3m

14G

ood

Goo

d40

+ ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2

117

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

5m x

3m

10G

ood

Goo

d40

+ ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2

118

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

6m x

2m

10G

ood

Goo

d40

+ ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2

119

Euc

alyp

tus

occi

dent

alis

Sw

amp

Yat

e6m

x 3

m15

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2

120

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

8m x

2m

10G

ood

Goo

d20

-40

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2

Refer

ence

: 25

98

IDB

otan

ical

Nam

eC

omm

on N

ame

Can

opy

Dim

ensi

ons

DB

H

(cm

)H

ealth

Stru

ctur

eU

LEC

omm

ents

Ret

entio

n Va

lue

TPZ

radi

us

(m)

121

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

7m x

2m

9G

ood

Goo

d20

-40

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2

122

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

4m x

1m

5G

ood

Goo

d20

-40

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2

123

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

4m x

1m

6G

ood

Goo

d20

-40

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2

124

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

14m

x 1

2m55

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sR

etai

n6.

6

125

Euc

alyp

tus

cosm

ophy

llaC

up G

um4m

x 3

m11

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

126

Aca

cia

salig

naW

este

rn A

ustra

lian

Gol

den

Wat

tle4m

x 2

m11

Poo

rP

oor

1-5

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

127

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

7m x

1m

7G

ood

Goo

d40

+ ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2

128

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk5m

x 3

m12

Fair

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2

129

Mel

aleu

ca li

narii

folia

Sno

w in

Sum

mer

8m x

4m

23Fa

irFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.76

130

Mel

aleu

ca li

narii

folia

Sno

w in

Sum

mer

7m x

3m

21Fa

irFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.52

131

Cal

liste

mon

vim

inal

isW

eepi

ng B

ottle

Bru

sh4m

x 3

m14

Fair

Poo

r5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2

132

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk8m

x 5

m30

Fair

Poo

r5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

3.6

133

Euc

alyp

tus

robu

sta

Sw

amp

Mah

ogan

y13

m x

12m

73Fa

irFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Tree

is in

dec

line

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

8.76

134

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

7m x

2m

14G

ood

Poo

r20

-40

year

sP

rune

cod

omin

ant

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2

135

Euc

alyp

tus

cam

aldu

lens

isR

iver

Red

Gum

14m

x 1

0m57

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

6.84

136

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk7m

x 5

m23

Fair

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2.

76

137

Euc

alyp

tus

clad

ocal

yxS

ugar

Gum

15m

x 9

m54

Fair

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Cod

omin

ant a

nd e

vide

nce

of

prev

ious

bra

nch

failu

reIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

6.48

138

Euc

alyp

tus

clad

ocal

yxS

ugar

Gum

15m

x 1

2m64

Goo

dG

ood

10-2

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

7.68

139

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

5m x

2m

13G

ood

Goo

d20

-40

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2

140

Euc

alyp

tus

leuc

oxyl

onY

ello

w G

um6m

x 7

m27

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsTr

unk

deca

yN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g3.

24

141

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

12m

x 7

m30

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

3.6

142

Euc

alyp

tus

scop

aria

Wal

lang

arra

Gum

14m

x 1

2m57

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sR

etai

n6.

84

143

Acm

ena

smith

iiLi

lly P

illy

7m x

3m

20P

oor

Poo

r1-

5 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.4

144

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk9m

x 6

m45

Goo

dFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

5.4

145

Acm

ena

smith

iiLi

lly P

illy

7m x

3m

15P

oor

Poo

r0

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

146

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk5m

x 4

m17

Fair

Poo

r5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.04

Refer

ence

: 25

98

IDB

otan

ical

Nam

eC

omm

on N

ame

Can

opy

Dim

ensi

ons

DB

H

(cm

)H

ealth

Stru

ctur

eU

LEC

omm

ents

Ret

entio

n Va

lue

TPZ

radi

us

(m)

147

Euc

alyp

tus

nich

olii

Nar

row

-leav

ed B

lack

P

eppe

rmin

t11

m x

8m

57Fa

irP

oor

5-10

yea

rsTr

unk

deca

yN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g6.

84

148

Hak

ea p

etio

laris

Sea

Urc

hin

Hak

ea9m

x 5

m18

Goo

dFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.16

149

Cal

liste

mon

sal

ignu

sW

illow

Bot

tle B

rush

9m x

3m

23Fa

irFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.76

150

Cal

liste

mon

sal

ignu

sW

illow

Bot

tle B

rush

9m x

3m

15Fa

irFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2

151

Mel

aleu

ca li

narii

folia

Sno

w in

Sum

mer

5m x

3m

44G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

5.28

152

Mel

aleu

ca li

narii

folia

Sno

w in

Sum

mer

5m x

3m

37G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

4.44

153

Mel

aleu

ca li

narii

folia

Sno

w in

Sum

mer

5m x

3m

33G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

3.96

154

Mel

aleu

ca li

narii

folia

Sno

w in

Sum

mer

6m x

3m

27Fa

irFa

ir10

-20

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g3.

24

155

Mel

aleu

ca li

narii

folia

Sno

w in

Sum

mer

7m x

4m

40Fa

irFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

4.8

156

Euc

alyp

tus

nich

olii

Nar

row

-leav

ed B

lack

P

eppe

rmin

t13

m x

10m

42G

ood

Goo

d10

-20

year

sR

etai

n5.

04

157

Cal

liste

mon

sal

ignu

sW

illow

Bot

tle B

rush

6m x

3m

13Fa

irFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2

158

Euc

alyp

tus

nich

olii

Nar

row

-leav

ed B

lack

P

eppe

rmin

t11

m x

7m

32Fa

irFa

ir10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

3.84

159

Euc

alyp

tus

nich

olii

Nar

row

-leav

ed B

lack

P

eppe

rmin

t11

m x

8m

42G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n5.

04

160

Cas

uarin

a cu

nnin

gham

iana

Riv

er S

he -

Oak

10m

x 3

m23

Poo

rFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.76

161

Euc

alyp

tus

leuc

oxyl

onY

ello

w G

um8m

x 5

m20

Goo

dG

ood

10-2

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2.

4

162

Euc

alyp

tus

cam

aldu

lens

isR

iver

Red

Gum

14m

x 8

m37

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

4.44

163

Euc

alyp

tus

vim

inal

isM

anna

Gum

16m

x 1

0m90

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sR

etai

n10

.8

164

Cas

uarin

a cu

nnin

gham

iana

Riv

er S

he -

Oak

6m x

2m

14Fa

irFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2

165

Cas

uarin

a cu

nnin

gham

iana

Riv

er S

he -

Oak

16m

x 8

m46

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

5.52

166

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

15m

x 1

0m52

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sR

etai

n6.

24

167

Euc

alyp

tus

leuc

oxyl

onY

ello

w G

um8m

x 6

m19

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2.28

168

Euc

alyp

tus

leuc

oxyl

onY

ello

w G

um7m

x 6

m29

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

3.48

169

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

15m

x 8

m33

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

3.96

170

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

15m

x 7

m31

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

3.72

Refer

ence

: 25

98

IDB

otan

ical

Nam

eC

omm

on N

ame

Can

opy

Dim

ensi

ons

DB

H

(cm

)H

ealth

Stru

ctur

eU

LEC

omm

ents

Ret

entio

n Va

lue

TPZ

radi

us

(m)

171

Euc

alyp

tus

conf

erru

min

ata

Bus

hy Y

ate

8m x

8m

18P

oor

Fair

5-10

yea

rsTr

ee is

rubb

ing

on a

djac

ent

spot

ted

gum

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.16

172

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

15m

x 9

m36

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

4.32

173

Cas

uarin

a cu

nnin

gham

iana

Riv

er S

he -

Oak

8m x

2m

18P

oor

Poo

r1-

5 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.16

174

Cas

uarin

a cu

nnin

gham

iana

Riv

er S

he -

Oak

8m x

2m

20P

oor

Poo

r1-

5 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.4

175

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

15m

x 8

m35

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

4.2

176

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

15m

x 8

m32

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

3.84

177

Euc

alyp

tus

virid

isG

reen

Mal

lee

8m x

8m

25G

ood

Goo

d10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

3

178

Mel

aleu

ca n

esop

hila

Sho

wy

Pap

erba

rk5m

x 4

m21

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2.

52

179

Euc

alyp

tus

cine

rea

Mea

ly S

tring

ybar

k10

m x

5m

27G

ood

Poo

r5-

10 y

ears

Cod

omin

ant a

nd in

clud

edN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g3.

24

180

Aca

cia

mea

rnsi

iB

lack

Wat

tle13

m x

7m

38G

ood

Poo

r5-

10 y

ears

Tree

is in

dec

line

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

4.56

181

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

15m

x 1

0m43

Fair

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

5.16

182

Allo

casu

arin

a lit

tora

lisB

lack

She

-oak

8m x

5m

22P

oor

Fair

5-10

yea

rsTr

ee is

in d

eclin

eN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2.

64

183

Allo

casu

arin

a lit

tora

lisB

lack

She

-oak

8m x

5m

25G

ood

Has

Fai

led

0 ye

ars

Act

ive

split

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

3

184

Aca

cia

mel

anox

ylon

Bla

ckw

ood

6m x

2m

8G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Sev

eral

suc

kers

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2

185

Aca

cia

mel

anox

ylon

Bla

ckw

ood

7m x

2m

15G

ood

Goo

d10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2

186

Euc

alyp

tus

botry

oide

sS

outh

ern

Mah

ogan

y13

m x

12m

53G

ood

Poo

r5-

10 y

ears

Cod

omin

ant a

nnd

incl

uded

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

6.36

187

Allo

casu

arin

a lit

tora

lisB

lack

She

-oak

6m x

4m

14Fa

irFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2

188

Allo

casu

arin

a lit

tora

lisB

lack

She

-oak

7m x

5m

30G

ood

Fair

5-10

yea

rsIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

3.6

189

Euc

alyp

tus

vim

inal

isM

anna

Gum

11m

x 7

m52

Fair

Ver

y po

or0

year

sR

emov

e as

soo

n as

pos

sibl

eN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g6.

24

190

Allo

casu

arin

a lit

tora

lisB

lack

She

-oak

6m x

4m

17Fa

irFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.04

191

Allo

casu

arin

a lit

tora

lisB

lack

She

-oak

6m x

4m

19G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2.

28

192

Euc

alyp

tus

vim

inal

isM

anna

Gum

16m

x 1

2m52

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sR

etai

n6.

24

193

Cas

uarin

a cu

nnin

gham

iana

Riv

er S

he -

Oak

14m

x 8

m38

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

4.56

194

Euc

alyp

tus

cine

rea

Mea

ly S

tring

ybar

k16

m x

10m

53P

oor

Poo

r1-

5 ye

ars

Tree

is in

dec

line

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

6.36

195

Euc

alyp

tus

man

nife

raB

rittle

Gum

16m

x 1

0m39

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sR

etai

n4.

68

Refer

ence

: 25

98

IDB

otan

ical

Nam

eC

omm

on N

ame

Can

opy

Dim

ensi

ons

DB

H

(cm

)H

ealth

Stru

ctur

eU

LEC

omm

ents

Ret

entio

n Va

lue

TPZ

radi

us

(m)

196

Euc

alyp

tus

man

nife

raB

rittle

Gum

9m x

5m

30D

ead

Poo

r0

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g3.

6

197

Euc

alyp

tus

man

nife

raB

rittle

Gum

10m

x 7

m27

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

3.24

198

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

14m

x 1

0m47

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

5.64

199

Euc

alyp

tus

leuc

oxyl

onY

ello

w G

um8m

x 8

m38

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sR

etai

n4.

56

200

Mel

aleu

ca b

ract

eata

Bla

ck T

ea-tr

ee7m

x 5

m22

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2.

64

201

Cal

liste

mon

sal

ignu

sW

illow

Bot

tle B

rush

8m x

4m

19P

oor

Poo

r1-

5 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.28

202

Euc

alyp

tus

leuc

oxyl

onY

ello

w G

um9m

x 6

m24

Goo

dG

ood

10-2

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

2.88

203

Mel

aleu

ca a

rmill

aris

Gia

nt H

oney

Myr

tle7m

x 6

m36

Goo

dFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

4.32

204

Mel

aleu

ca a

rmill

aris

Gia

nt H

oney

Myr

tle7m

x 6

m32

Goo

dFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

3.84

205

Loph

oste

mon

con

fertu

sQ

ueen

slan

d B

rush

Box

6m x

3m

13Fa

irFa

ir10

-20

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2

206

Cal

liste

mon

vim

inal

isW

eepi

ng B

ottle

Bru

sh4m

x 6

m20

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2.

4

207

Cal

liste

mon

vim

inal

isW

eepi

ng B

ottle

Bru

sh4m

x 4

m17

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2.

04

208

Euc

alyp

tus

vim

inal

isM

anna

Gum

10m

x 7

m27

Poo

rP

oor

1-5

year

sTr

unk

deca

y, T

ree

is in

dec

line

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

3.24

209

Lagu

naria

pat

erso

nia

Nor

folk

Isla

nd H

ibis

cus

10m

x 7

m33

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n3.

96

210

Lagu

naria

pat

erso

nia

Nor

folk

Isla

nd H

ibis

cus

10m

x 6

m33

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n3.

96

211

Mel

aleu

ca la

nceo

lata

Moo

nah

7m x

4m

18G

ood

Poo

r5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.16

212

Euc

alyp

tus

vim

inal

isM

anna

Gum

11m

x 5

m28

Fair

Poo

r5-

10 y

ears

Trun

k de

cay

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

3.36

213

Euc

alyp

tus

man

nife

raB

rittle

Gum

14m

x 1

1m38

Goo

dP

oor

0 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

4.56

214

Mel

aleu

ca li

narii

folia

Sno

w in

Sum

mer

8m x

8m

76Fa

irFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

9.12

215

Mel

aleu

ca li

narii

folia

Sno

w in

Sum

mer

7m x

5m

55Fa

irFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

6.6

216

Lagu

naria

pat

erso

nia

Nor

folk

Isla

nd H

ibis

cus

10m

x 5

m23

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2.

76

217

Euc

alyp

tus

leuc

oxyl

onY

ello

w G

um10

m x

6m

27G

ood

Poo

r5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

3.24

218

Aca

cia

cogn

ata

Riv

er W

attle

7m x

5m

17V

ery

Poo

rV

ery

poor

0 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.04

219

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

8m x

3m

15G

ood

Goo

d40

+ ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2

220

Euc

alyp

tus

leuc

oxyl

onY

ello

w G

um10

m x

8m

38G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

4.56

221

Euc

alyp

tus

man

nife

raB

rittle

Gum

16m

x 1

4m59

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sR

emov

e ha

ngin

g br

anch

.R

etai

n7.

08

222

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk8m

x 4

m22

Goo

dG

ood

10-2

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2.

64

Refer

ence

: 25

98

IDB

otan

ical

Nam

eC

omm

on N

ame

Can

opy

Dim

ensi

ons

DB

H

(cm

)H

ealth

Stru

ctur

eU

LEC

omm

ents

Ret

entio

n Va

lue

TPZ

radi

us

(m)

223

Euc

alyp

tus

cine

rea

Mea

ly S

tring

ybar

k9m

x 5

m27

Poo

rFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Tree

is in

dec

line

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

3.24

224

Euc

alyp

tus

man

nife

raB

rittle

Gum

9m x

5m

24G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

2.88

225

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

19m

x 8

m48

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

5.76

226

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

22m

x 9

m62

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

7.44

227

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk6m

x 2

m10

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2

228

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk5m

x 2

m10

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2

229

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

7m x

2m

12G

ood

Goo

d40

+ ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2

230

Cal

liste

mon

sal

ignu

sW

illow

Bot

tle B

rush

8m x

3m

20V

ery

Poo

rP

oor

0 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.4

231

Euc

alyp

tus

leuc

oxyl

onY

ello

w G

um9m

x 8

m24

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2.

88

232

Mel

aleu

ca a

rmill

aris

Gia

nt H

oney

Myr

tle9m

x 4

m26

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g3.

12

233

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

19m

x 8

m38

Goo

dG

ood

10-2

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

4.56

234

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

21m

x 1

1m52

Goo

dG

ood

10-2

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

6.24

235

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk7m

x 4

m24

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2.

88

236

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk9m

x 5

m32

Goo

dG

ood

10-2

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

3.84

237

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk9m

x 5

m39

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sR

etai

n4.

68

238

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk8m

x 6

m40

Goo

dP

oor

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g4.

8

239

Rob

inia

pse

udoa

caci

aB

lack

Loc

ust

4m x

4m

16Fa

irFa

ir10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2

240

Rob

inia

pse

udoa

caci

aB

lack

Loc

ust

5m x

4m

19Fa

irFa

ir10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2.28

241

Rob

inia

pse

udoa

caci

aB

lack

Loc

ust

5m x

4m

17Fa

irFa

ir10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2.04

242

Cor

ymbi

a ci

triod

ora

Lem

on-s

cent

ed G

um10

m x

5m

27G

ood

Goo

d20

-40

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

3.24

243

Mel

aleu

ca a

rmill

aris

Gia

nt H

oney

Myr

tle10

m x

6m

34Fa

irFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Evi

denc

e of

pre

viou

s br

anch

fa

ilure

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

4.08

244

Mel

aleu

ca a

rmill

aris

Gia

nt H

oney

Myr

tle8m

x 6

m23

Fair

Poo

r5-

10 y

ears

Evi

denc

e of

pre

viou

s br

anch

fa

ilure

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.76

245

Mel

aleu

ca a

rmill

aris

Gia

nt H

oney

Myr

tle8m

x 8

m39

Fair

Poo

r5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

4.68

246

Mel

aleu

ca a

rmill

aris

Gia

nt H

oney

Myr

tle4m

x 3

m22

Poo

rP

oor

1-5

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2.

64

247

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

18m

x 1

0m62

Fair

Goo

d20

-40

year

sR

etai

n7.

44

248

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk9m

x 5

m33

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g3.

96

Refer

ence

: 25

98

IDB

otan

ical

Nam

eC

omm

on N

ame

Can

opy

Dim

ensi

ons

DB

H

(cm

)H

ealth

Stru

ctur

eU

LEC

omm

ents

Ret

entio

n Va

lue

TPZ

radi

us

(m)

249

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk6m

x 3

m25

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g3

250

Mel

aleu

ca a

rmill

aris

Gia

nt H

oney

Myr

tle8m

x 1

0m50

Fair

Has

Fai

led

0 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

6

251

Euc

alyp

tus

leuc

oxyl

onY

ello

w G

um4m

x 3

m14

Goo

dFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2

252

Cas

uarin

a cu

nnin

gham

iana

Riv

er S

he -

Oak

8m x

4m

33Fa

irP

oor

5-10

yea

rsTr

ee h

as b

een

lopp

edN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g3.

96

253

Cas

uarin

a cu

nnin

gham

iana

Riv

er S

he -

Oak

8m x

4m

33G

ood

Fair

5-10

yea

rsTr

ee h

as b

een

lopp

edN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g3.

96

254

Cas

uarin

a cu

nnin

gham

iana

Riv

er S

he -

Oak

8m x

5m

30G

ood

Fair

5-10

yea

rsN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g3.

6

255

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

11m

x 8

m49

Goo

dP

oor

5-10

yea

rsTr

ee h

as b

een

lopp

ed fo

r pow

er

lines

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

5.88

256

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

12m

x 6

m40

Goo

dG

ood

10-2

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

4.8

257

Cas

uarin

a cu

nnin

gham

iana

Riv

er S

he -

Oak

8m x

3m

23Fa

irP

oor

1-5

year

sTr

ee h

as b

een

lopp

ed, r

emov

e de

ad tr

ee a

djac

ent

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.76

258

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

13m

x 9

m54

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sR

etai

n6.

48

259

Cas

uarin

a cu

nnin

gham

iana

Riv

er S

he -

Oak

8m x

4m

20Fa

irFa

ir10

-20

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2.

4

260

Euc

alyp

tus

lehm

anni

iM

alle

e8m

x 7

m22

Fair

Poo

r1-

5 ye

ars

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

2.64

261

Euc

alyp

tus

cosm

ophy

llaC

up G

um6m

x 4

m18

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2.16

262

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk8m

x 5

m30

Goo

dFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

3.6

263

Euc

alyp

tus

salig

naS

ydne

y B

lue

Gum

12m

x 4

m28

Fair

Goo

d10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

3.36

264

Euc

alyp

tus

sp.

Gum

8m x

4m

15G

ood

Goo

d10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

2

265

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk9m

x 6

m31

Fair

Goo

d10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

3.72

266

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk8m

x 4

m32

Fair

Goo

d10

-20

year

sIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

3.84

267

Euc

alyp

tus

poly

anth

emos

Red

Box

10m

x 8

m40

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sTr

ee h

as b

een

lopp

edIf

poss

ible

, ret

ain

4.8

268

Euc

alyp

tus

cosm

ophy

llaC

up G

um7m

x 5

m30

Ver

y P

oor

Poo

r0

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g3.

6

269

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk9m

x 4

m33

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g3.

96

270

Mel

aleu

ca s

typh

elio

ides

Pric

kly

Pap

erba

rk8m

x 4

m22

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g2.

64

271

Euc

alyp

tus

nich

olii

Nar

row

-leav

ed B

lack

P

eppe

rmin

t9m

x 8

m43

Goo

dG

ood

10-2

0 ye

ars

Ret

ain

5.16

272

Cor

ymbi

a m

acul

ata

Spo

tted

Gum

4m x

2m

5G

ood

Goo

d40

+ ye

ars

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n2

Refer

ence

: 25

98

IDB

otan

ical

Nam

eC

omm

on N

ame

Can

opy

Dim

ensi

ons

DB

H

(cm

)H

ealth

Stru

ctur

eU

LEC

omm

ents

Ret

entio

n Va

lue

TPZ

radi

us

(m)

273

Allo

casu

arin

a lit

tora

lisB

lack

She

-oak

8m x

6m

45Fa

irFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Tree

has

bee

n lo

pped

Not

wor

th re

tain

ing

5.4

274

Euc

alyp

tus

poly

anth

emos

Red

Box

11m

x 6

m35

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sTr

ee h

as b

een

lopp

ed b

ut

stru

ctur

e st

ill re

ason

able

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n4.

2

275

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

11m

x 7

m42

Goo

dP

oor

5-10

yea

rsTr

ee is

on

a le

an a

nd n

ot g

ood

cand

idat

e fo

r ret

entio

nN

ot w

orth

reta

inin

g5.

04

276

Cor

ymbi

a ci

triod

ora

Lem

on-s

cent

ed G

um11

m x

8m

33G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Upp

er c

anop

y ha

s fa

iled

but

stru

ctur

e st

ill fa

ir, c

ould

be

reta

ined

If po

ssib

le, r

etai

n3.

96

277

Pop

ulus

can

esce

nsG

rey

Pop

lar

14m

x 3

m30

Fair

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Larg

e th

icke

t of m

any

suck

erin

g sp

ecim

ens

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

p3.

6

278

Euc

alyp

tus

salig

naS

ydne

y B

lue

Gum

16m

x 8

m36

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

p4.

32

279

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

11m

x 9

m46

Goo

dG

ood

10-2

0 ye

ars

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

p5.

52

280

Euc

alyp

tus

man

nife

raB

rittle

Gum

9m x

4m

22G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

p2.

64

281

Euc

alyp

tus

cam

aldu

lens

isR

iver

Red

Gum

20m

x 1

6m83

Goo

dFa

ir20

-40

year

sTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

9.96

282

Euc

alyp

tus

man

nife

raB

rittle

Gum

8m x

3m

17G

ood

Fair

5-10

yea

rsR

egro

wth

from

stu

mp

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

p2.

04

283

Mel

aleu

ca a

rmill

aris

Gia

nt H

oney

Myr

tle7m

x 6

m30

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

3.6

284

Euc

alyp

tus

man

nife

raB

rittle

Gum

9m x

5m

27G

ood

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

p3.

24

285

Euc

alyp

tus

nich

olii

Nar

row

-leav

ed B

lack

P

eppe

rmin

t5m

x 4

m13

Fair

Poo

r1-

5 ye

ars

Reg

row

th fr

om s

tum

pTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

2

286

Euc

alyp

tus

nich

olii

Nar

row

-leav

ed B

lack

P

eppe

rmin

t5m

x 2

m17

Fair

Fair

1-5

year

sTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

2.04

287

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

14m

x 1

0m64

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

7.68

288

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

13m

x 8

m32

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

3.84

289

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

10m

x 1

0m47

Fair

Fair

10-2

0 ye

ars

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

p5.

64

290

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

13m

x 7

m43

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

p5.

16

291

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

10m

x 7

m42

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

5.04

292

Euc

alyp

tus

cam

aldu

lens

isR

iver

Red

Gum

1m x

1m

1G

ood

Fair

40+

year

sTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

2

293

Euc

alyp

tus

cam

aldu

lens

isR

iver

Red

Gum

19m

x 1

2m68

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

p8.

16

294

Euc

alyp

tus

cam

aldu

lens

isR

iver

Red

Gum

1m x

1m

1G

ood

Goo

d20

-40

year

sTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

2

295

Euc

alyp

tus

cam

aldu

lens

isR

iver

Red

Gum

1m x

1m

1G

ood

Goo

d20

-40

year

sTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

2

296

Euc

alyp

tus

leuc

oxyl

onY

ello

w G

um9m

x 6

m26

Fair

Fair

5-10

yea

rsTr

ee is

in d

eclin

eTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

3.12

Refer

ence

: 25

98

IDB

otan

ical

Nam

eC

omm

on N

ame

Can

opy

Dim

ensi

ons

DB

H

(cm

)H

ealth

Stru

ctur

eU

LEC

omm

ents

Ret

entio

n Va

lue

TPZ

radi

us

(m)

297

Euc

alyp

tus

leuc

oxyl

onY

ello

w G

um14

m x

10m

48G

ood

Goo

d20

-40

year

sTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

5.76

298

Euc

alyp

tus

nich

olii

Nar

row

-leav

ed B

lack

P

eppe

rmin

t12

m x

12m

47G

ood

Has

Fai

led

0 ye

ars

Not

ified

Kno

xCC

trun

k ha

s ac

tive

split

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

p5.

64

299

Euc

alyp

tus

man

nife

raB

rittle

Gum

10m

x 6

m27

Goo

dG

ood

20-4

0 ye

ars

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

p3.

24

300

Euc

alyp

tus

side

roxy

lon

Red

Iron

bark

13m

x 8

m42

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sR

educ

e no

rther

n st

emTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

5.04

301

Cup

ress

us m

acro

carp

a 'A

urea

'M

onte

rey

Cyp

ress

15m

x 1

0m95

Goo

dFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Cod

omin

ant t

runk

s w

ith in

clud

ed

bark

.Th

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

11.4

302

Euc

alyp

tus

cam

aldu

lens

isR

iver

Red

Gum

2m x

2m

1G

ood

Goo

d40

+ ye

ars

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

p2

303

Mel

aleu

ca a

rmill

aris

Gia

nt H

oney

Myr

tle7m

x 8

m52

Fair

Poo

r1-

5 ye

ars

Tree

is s

tarti

ng to

fail

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

p6.

24

304

Euc

alyp

tus

botry

oide

sS

outh

ern

Mah

ogan

y15

m x

9m

49Fa

irFa

ir5-

10 y

ears

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

p5.

88

305

Gre

ville

a ro

bust

aS

ilky

Oak

16m

x 1

2m60

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sB

roke

n br

anch

in c

anop

yTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

7.2

306

Cas

uarin

a cu

nnin

gham

iana

Riv

er S

he -

Oak

16m

x 9

m42

Goo

dFa

ir10

-20

year

sTh

ird p

arty

ow

ners

hip

5.04

307

Euc

alyp

tus

man

nife

raB

rittle

Gum

7m x

7m

18G

ood

Poo

r1-

5 ye

ars

Third

par

ty o

wne

rshi

p2.

16

Refer

ence

: 25

98


Reference: 2598

Appendix 4. Photographic Tree Reports

Preconstruction Assessment

Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna SouthWestfield Design

Health: Very GoodDBH (cm) 35

Retention Value: Retain

ULE: 40+ years

Botanical Name: Corymbia maculata

Structure: Good

Common Name: Spotted Gum

Origin: Native

Landscape Contribution: Medium

Individual Significance: Moderate

Comments:

Canopy Dimensions: 14m x 6m

Tree Number: 1

TPZ Radius (m) 4.2



ULE: 20-40 years

Botanical Name: Eucalyptus viminalis

Structure: Good

Common Name: Manna Gum

Origin: Indigenous



Comments:


Tree Number: 2

TPZ Radius (m) 6

Health: GoodDBH (cm) 10

Retention Value: If possible, retain

ULE: 40+ years


Structure: Good


Origin: Native

Landscape Contribution: Negligible

Individual Significance: Negligible

Comments:


Tree Number: 3

TPZ Radius (m) 2

Reference: 2598





ULE: 40+ years


Structure: Good


Origin: Native

Landscape Contribution: High


Comments: Tree is growing with a restricted root volume


Tree Number: 4

TPZ Radius (m) 4.08



ULE: 40+ years


Structure: Good


Origin: Native





Tree Number: 5

TPZ Radius (m) 3.12



ULE: 40+ years


Structure: Good


Origin: Native





Tree Number: 6

TPZ Radius (m) 5.88

Reference: 2598





ULE: 40+ years

Botanical Name: Corymbia citriodora

Structure: Poor

Common Name: Lemon-scented Gum

Origin: Native

Landscape Contribution: Low

Individual Significance: Low

Comments: Prune codominant


Tree Number: 7

TPZ Radius (m) 2


Retention Value: Not worth retaining

ULE: 5-10 years


Structure: Poor


Origin: Native



Comments: Evidence of previous branch failures


Tree Number: 8

TPZ Radius (m) 3.6



ULE: 40+ years


Structure: Good


Origin: Native



Comments:


Tree Number: 9

TPZ Radius (m) 2.28

Reference: 2598



Health: DeadDBH (cm) 35


ULE: 0 years


Structure: Poor


Origin: Indigenous



Comments:


Tree Number: 10

TPZ Radius (m) 4.2



ULE: 0 years


Structure: Poor


Origin: Indigenous



Comments:


Tree Number: 11

TPZ Radius (m) 3.36



ULE: 0 years


Structure: Poor


Origin: Indigenous



Comments:


Tree Number: 12

TPZ Radius (m) 3.24

Reference: 2598





ULE: 20-40 years


Structure: Fair


Origin: Native



Comments:


Tree Number: 13

TPZ Radius (m) 6



ULE: 20-40 years


Structure: Good


Origin: Native



Comments:


Tree Number: 14

TPZ Radius (m) 3.6



ULE: 20-40 years


Structure: Good


Origin: Native



Comments:


Tree Number: 15

TPZ Radius (m) 3.12

Reference: 2598





ULE: 20-40 years


Structure: Good


Origin: Native



Comments:


Tree Number: 16

TPZ Radius (m) 3.84



ULE: 20-40 years


Structure: Good


Origin: Native



Comments:


Tree Number: 17

TPZ Radius (m) 3.84



ULE: 10-20 years

Botanical Name: Melaleuca linariifolia

Structure: Fair

Common Name: Snow in Summer

Origin: Native



Comments:


Tree Number: 18

TPZ Radius (m) 2

Reference: 2598



Health: FairDBH (cm) 28


ULE: 5-10 years


Structure: Fair


Origin: Indigenous



Comments: Tree is in decline


Tree Number: 19

TPZ Radius (m) 3.36

Health: PoorDBH (cm) 35


ULE: 0 years


Structure: Poor


Origin: Indigenous

Landscape Contribution: Negligible

Individual Significance: Negligible

Comments: Tree is in decline, Decay and bracket fungi


Tree Number: 20

TPZ Radius (m) 4.2



ULE: 20-40 years


Structure: Fair


Origin: Native



Comments: Tree in conflict with powerline


Tree Number: 21

TPZ Radius (m) 3.6

Reference: 2598





ULE: 10-20 years


Structure: Poor


Origin: Indigenous



Comments: Trunk decay


Tree Number: 22

TPZ Radius (m) 9.12



ULE: 10-20 years

Botanical Name: Eucalyptus sideroxylon

Structure: Fair

Common Name: Red Ironbark

Origin: Native



Comments:


Tree Number: 23

TPZ Radius (m) 7.68



ULE: 40+ years


Structure: Good


Origin: Native



Comments:


Tree Number: 24

TPZ Radius (m) 3

Reference: 2598

arborist report - city of knox...arborist report westfield design knox city shopping centre, 425...

Documents