arc flash energy computation methods
DESCRIPTION
1TRANSCRIPT
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 1/39
ARC FLASH ENERGY COMPUTATION METHODS
Industrial electric power systems are typically radial connected and fed from medium voltage
systems. Transformers reduce this voltage to secondary medium voltages for operating large
motors and further distribution to low voltage motor control centers (MCC’s).
Industrial low voltage is typically 44 !. Industrial power systems have low impedance and
operate at low voltage resulting in high fault currents and arc energies.
Current standards re"uire arc flash analysis and ha#ard classification labeling throughout
industrial power systems.
$ystem voltage% fault current levels% time% and pro&imity are all factors in determining arc flash
intensities.
'elays% fuses% moldedcase (MCC) and lowvoltage power circuit brea*ers (+!,C) provide
fault protection in most industrial power systems. In radial systems% fault current magnitudes
diminish as the fault location moves further from the source.
$ystem designers achieve protection coordination by selecting devices that have timecurrentcharacteristics that intentionally introduce delay in device operation.
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 2/39
-igure shows fault current decay in a radial system as a function of distance from a source.
,roper protection coordination re"uires that the highest current levels at brea*er / have the
longest time delay (Mason% /012).
ARC HAZARD ANALYSIS USING NFPA-70E-2004
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 3/39
oth arc flash standards include algorithms for computing incident energy. The detailed
algorithms in each standard re"uire short circuit calculations and protective device settings to
determine incident energy levels. The 3-, 564 standard includes tables of common
tas*s and simple formulas to determine the ,,6 category without detailed calculations.
The first step in the 3-,564 algorithm is to determine the tas* personnel will perform.
The ne&t step is to calculate the flash protection boundary and determine if wor* on energi#ed
e"uipment falls within this distance. This standard uses the product of bolted threephase fault
current and the total clearing time to determine the flash protection boundary. If the timecurrent
product is less than 7 *cycles then the flashprotection distance is 4 feet. 6"uations / and compute the flashprotection boundary for electrical system and transformer faults respectively.
where8
9c : distance that will ;ust cause a seconddegree burn on a person (ft)%
M!bf : bolted threephase fault power (M!)%
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 4/39
M! : power rating of transformer (M!).
-or transformers with power ratings below 51 *!% multiply transformer power rating by /.1
t : total clearing time ($ec)
<nce the flash boundary is computed% one of three methods finds the necessary level of ,,6 for
wor*ers within this distance. -igure 7 shows the basic steps in these methods.
Methods / and are tabular techni"ues for finding the ha#ard ris* category (='C).
Method / uses Table /75(C)(0)(a) in the 3-, 564 to associate common wor* tas*s
with an ='C (4).
Method uses a simplified table that determines the appropriate level of ,,6. These tabular
methods can substitute for more detailed arc flash analyses but they must be applied carefully.
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 5/39
The tables only apply to listed tas*s under the specified assumptions and cannot be e&trapolated
to other situations and circumstances. These assumptions place limits on fault current and protective device operating time.
nalysis using method three is necessary when fault currents and device operating time violate
these limits.
The third method for conducting an arc flash analysis in 3-, 564 re"uires detailed
system data but gives the most precise results.
This algorithm finds the incident energy level in calories>cm. The resulting incident energy
then determines the ,,6 category from Table /.
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 6/39
The steps for detailed arc flash analysis using the 3-, 564 standard are8
/. ?se 6"uations (/) or () to determine the flashprotection boundary.
. 9etermine the minimum wor*er approach distance to electrical e"uipment for the designated
tas*. If the minimum approach is within the boundary then continue with the analysis.7. -ind the bolted threephase fault current at the wor* location. ?se ma&imum and minimum
arcsustaining current values for the remaining steps. (3-, 564 defines minimum arc
sustaining current at 4@! as 7@A of available fault current.)
4. -ind total fault clearing time for the values in step 7.
1. 9etermine if wor* will be done in open air or inside an enclosure. ?se the appropriate
formula below to compute incident energy
Bhere8 6M : incident energy in open air (calories>cm)
6M : incident energy for enclosed bo& (calories>cm)9 : distance from electrodes (inches)
t : ma&imum arc clearing time ($ec)
- : short circuit current (*% range /21 *)
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 7/39
2. If incident energy calculated from above is less than /. Cal>cm% flame retardant clothing
may not be re"uired to prevent burns although protection may be needed for other ha#ards
(raham% =odder% D ates% @).
5. 9etermine the ='C and select the proper level of ,,6 from the incident calculations.
Calculations for the 3-, 564 standard produce conservative results for incident energy
that tend to overprotect wor*ers
6"uations (7) and (4) are based on theoretical concepts and models derived from a small test
data set.
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 8/39
NFPA 70E Protection Boundaries
Flash Protection Boundary
• $erious in;ury due to arc flash burns can occur within this area unless appropriate ,,6 isused.
• nyone within this area must wear appropriate ,,6 regardless of what they are doing.
• The distance from the arc source at which the onset of a second degree burn occurs.
•
/. Cal>cmE F ./ sec. is considered a second degree burn threshold.• Medical treatment may still be re"uired if bare s*in is e&posed to this level of flash. -ull
recovery e&pected.
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 9/39
Limited Approach Boundary
• 9efines a boundary around e&posed live parts that may not be crossed by Gun"ualifiedH
persons unless accompanied by G"ualifiedH persons.
• May be closer than flash boundary.
• 9efined solely based on the nominal voltage.
Restricted Approach Boundary
• oundary near e&posed live parts that may be crossed only by G"ualifiedH persons using
appropriate shoc* prevention techni"ues and e"uipment.
• Concern is a shoc* ha#ard.
• 9efined solely based on the nominal voltage.
Prohibited Approach Boundary
shoc* protection boundary to be crossed by only G"ualifiedH persons using same protection as if direct contact with live part is planned. 9efined solely based on the nominal
voltage.
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 10/39
The theoretical ma&imum arc power in MB is half the bolted 7phase fault M!/4%/1. Thisoccurs when the arc current is 5.5A of the bolted fault current. ased on this% the flash
protection boundary is calculated as8
Arc in open air – 0.6 kV or below, 16-50 kA short circuit current
E = 5271D−
1.9593
t [ 0.0016 * Ibf 2 − 0.0076 * Ibf + 0.8938 ] (7.5)
Arc in box – 0.6 kV or below, 16-50 kA short circuit current
E = 1038.7 D−
1.4738
t [ 0.0093 * Ibf 2 − 0.3453 * Ibf + 5.9675 ] (7.@)
Arc in open air – Above 0.6 kV
E = 793 D−
2 V Ibf t (7.0)
where
6 : incident energy (cal > cm)
Ibf : bolted fault current (*)
t : arcing time (seconds)
9 : wor*ing distance from arc (inches)
Equatio! "3.7# a$ "3.8# are %art of the 2000 e$itio& a$ equatio "3.9# wa! %ro%o!e$ i the 2003 $raft.
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 11/39
3.3.2 Annex C Method (23!
Table 3.3 !"uations #or arc in box #or calculatin$ arc current, inci%ent ener$& an% #lash protection boun%ar&.
! / *! / *! ! 1 *! ! F 1 *!
Ia : 0.85 Ibf ' 0.004 Ibf 2
.0@ I bf I bf
6 :416 Ia t D
(1.6
/.@ Ia t 9.55
/2.1 Ia t 9.55
9 : (4/2 Ia t > /.).21
(/.@ Ia t > /.)/.7
(/2.1 Ia t > /.)/.7
The e"uations in Table 7.7 apply only to arc in box for short circuit currents between 0.6 kA an% 106 kA.
where
6 : incident energy (cal > cm)
I bf : bolted fault current (*)
Ia : arc current (*)
t : arcing time (seconds)
9 : wor*ing distance from arc (inches)
9 : distance of the flash protection boundary from the arcing point (inches)
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 12/39
NFPA 70E Tables
Flash Protection Boundary
Table .()()(C) of the proposed 3-, 56 J 7 '<, provides a simple method of determining flash protection boundary.
'i(ple (etho% o# %eter(inin$ #lash protection boun%ar& as per Table ))0.)*+*)* o# the propose% /A 0! – )003
rc +ocation $ystem !oltage -lash ,rotection oundary (feet)
rc in ir to / volts 4
rc in 6nclosure to / volts /
rc in 6nclosure / volts and up
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 13/39
3.".2 #a$ard%Ris& Cate'ory Classiications
Table .2()(0)() =a#ard 'is* Category Classifications/2. This table does not provide theflash protection boundary% but only prescribes the ha#ard>ris* category number. The table alsospecifies the re"uirement of !rated gloves and !rated tools. The classification of ris* categoryis based on several factors such as voltage% type of e"uipment% type of wor* to be performed%available short circuit current% circuit brea*er tripping time or fuse clearing time and the
position of the enclosure doors. The various types of wor* mentioned in the table areK operatingcircuit brea*ers or fuses% wor*ing on live parts% voltage testing% removing and installing bolted
covers% applying safety grounds% wor*ing on control circuits% etc.
n e&le of what 56 (4) Table .2()(0)() may loo* li*e is summari#ed for two
items in Table 7.48 wor*ing on live parts and voltage testing. This table is preliminary and is for
reference purposes only. 'efer to 3-,56 (4) for final application guidelines.
The e&act short circuit currents for three phase bolted faults can be calculated using commercial
software. simple appro&imation described in nne& . of proposed 3-, 56 J 7 '<,draft is using the upstream transformer data in the following e"uation. The actual short circuit
current will be less than this calculated value due to the impedance of the system upstream to
transformer .
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 14/39
)V +a!e100I,-
= (7./)
/1.732 V
where
I$C : 7phase bolted fault current
M! ase : rated M! of the upstream transformer
! : linetoline voltage at the secondary side of the transformer
AL : percentage impedance of the transformer.
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 15/39
Table 3.2 *a a4ar% isk ate$or& lassi#ication #or 7orkin$ on 8ive arts as per Table ))0.6*+*9*A
-ault
$hort Circuit Clearing .55 to .7 to / to 7@
6"uipment Type 6"uipment $ide Current (*) Time (s) .4 *! .2 *! 5. *! *!
,anel oard 4 .7 /
/ .7 /
72 ./
MCC .2 *! Class +oad $ide of 21 .7
rea*er > fuse / .7 /
us 4 .77 4
us 1 . 4
us 21 ./ 4
us 2 .77 1
us 52 . 1
us / ./ 1
us / ./ 7
us / .77 4
$witchgear .2 *! Class 71 .1 4
4 .77 4
1 . 4
21 ./ 4
1 .77 7
2 .77 1
52 . 1
/ ./ 1
<ther 6"uipment .2 *! Class 71 .1 4
4 .77 4
1 . 4
21 ./ 4
36M 6 Motor $tarters M! 11 .71 1
Metal Clad $witchgear% M! 1
<ther 6"uipment 1
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 16/39
Table 3.2 *b a4ar% isk ate$or& lassi#ication #or Volta$e Testin$ as per Table ))0.6*+*9*A
-ault
$hort Circuit Clearing .55 to .7 to / to 7@
6"uipment Type 6"uipment $ide Current (*) Time (s) .4 *! .2 *! 5. *! *!
,anel oard 4 .7 /
/ .7 /
72 ./
MCC .2 *! Class +oad $ide of 21 .7
rea*er > fuse / .7 /
us 4 .77
us 1 .
us 21 ./
us 2 .77
us 52 .
us / ./
us / ./ /
us / .77 /
$witchgear .2 *! Class 71 .1
4 .77
1 .
21 ./
1 .77 /
2 .77
52 .
/ ./
<ther 6"uipment .2 *! Class 71 .1
4 .77
1 .
21 ./
36M 6 Motor $tarters M! 11 .71
Metal Clad $witchgear% M! 1
<ther 6"uipment 1
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 17/39
ARC HAZARD ANALYSIS USING IEEE-1584-2002
The I666 /1@4 standard presents another method for detailed arc flash analysis. -igure 4
shows the steps in this algorithm with the following e&planation.
on%itions #or which the :!!! 15;2 e"uations are applicable,arameter pplicable 'ange
$ystem voltage (*!) .@ to /1 *!
-re"uencies (=#) 1 or 2 =#
olted fault current (*) .5 to /2 *
ap between electrodes (mm) /7 to /1 mm
6"uipment enclosure type <pen air% bo&% MCC% panel% switchgear% cables
rounding type ?ngrounded% grounded% high resistance grounded,hases 7 ,hase faults
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 18/39
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 19/39
)tep *+ ,stimate o Arcin' Current
-or low voltage systems (/ *!)% the arc current is given by e"uation
Ia = 10+0.662 o"Ibf # +0.0966V +0.000526 + 0.5588V *o"Ibf # ( 0.00304*o "Ibf #
Bhere
log is the log/
Ia : arcing current (*)
: J./17K open configuration
: J.05Kbo& configuration
I bf : bolted fault current for threephase faults (symmetrical 'M$) (*) ! : system voltage (*!)
: gap between conductors% (mm)
-or medium voltage systems (F/ *!)% the arc current is given by e"uation (7.).
Ia = o 0.00402 + 0.983 o"Ibf #
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 20/39
)tep 2+ ,stimate o -ormali$ed ncident ,ner'y
The normali#ed incident energy% based on . second arc duration and 2/ mm distance from the
arc% is given
E = 10 1 + 2 + 1.081 * o"Ia # + 0.0011
where
6n : incident energy normali#ed for time and distance (N >cm)
/ : .50K open configuration
: .111K bo& configuration
: K ungrounded and high resistance grounded systems
: .//7K grounded systems
: gap between conductors (mm)
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 21/39
)tep 3+ ,stimate o ncident ,ner'yThe normali#ed incident energy is used to obtain the incident energy at a normal surface at a given distance and arcing time with e"uation (7.4).
t 610
E = 4.184 -f E
D0.2
where
6 : incident energy (N > cm) <istance /actor *x #or various volta$es an% enclosure t&pes
6nclosure Type .@ to / *! F/ to /1 *!
<pen air
$witchgear /.457 .057
MCC and ,anels /.24/Cable
Cf : Calculation factor
: /. !oltage F / *!
: /.1 !oltage / *!
t : arcing time (seconds)9 : wor*ing distance from arc (mm)
& : distance e&ponent as shown in Table
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 22/39
)tep "+ Flash Protection Boundary
The flash protection boundary is the distance at which a person without personal protective e"uipment (,,6) may get a seconddegree burn that is curable.
1
t 1 6
D+ = 610 * 4.184- f E (7.1)
0.2 E+
where
9 : distance of the boundary from the arcing point (mm) Cf :calculation factor : /.K voltage F / *!
: /.1K voltage / *!
6n : incident energy normali#ed
6 : incident energy at the boundary distance (N>cm)K 6 can be set at 1.
N>cm (/. Cal>cm) for bare s*in.
t : arcing time (seconds)& : the distance e&ponent from Table 7.. I bf :
bolted fault current (*).
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 23/39
Detailed Steps
/. ather power system and electrical e"uipment data.
. 'eview system topology to determine different operating modes.
7. Calculate minimum and ma&imum fault currents and O>' ratios at wor*
locations.
4. -ind arc fault currents. This value is different from fault currents due to arc
resistance. 6"uations (1a) and (1b) compute this value for system voltages under / *!.
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 24/39
pplying specific case values of clearing time and wor*ing distance converts
this value to actual incident energy values. 9istance e&ponents for different
types of e"uipment model energy dissipation with distance The followingformula computes the actual incident energy for specific arcing time and
personnel distance.
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 25/39
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 26/39
Bhere8
9 : oundary distance from arc (mm)6 : Incident energy level at boundary (N> cm). This is usually set to the value
of 1 N> cm% which is the burn threshold energy.
0. $elect proper ,,6 category based on incident energy and flash protection
boundary.
The I666 /1@4 method is "uite comple& and re"uires e&tensive cal
culations. The standard comes with spreadsheet software for ma*ing thesecalculations.
The e"uations in I666/1@4 derive from fitting e&tensive test data
statistically to a model. The relationship of the variables produces a good fit to
the data but also results in anomalous results for certain ranges of parameters
The algorithms omit contributions from induction and synchronous motors.
They also use symmetrical fault current values that ignore 9C offsets.
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 27/39
The e&isting algorithms rely on symmetrical% threephase fault current% but most
faults start as linetoground faults and progress into a threephase fault.
$ignificant energy dissipates during the transition that is damaging to e"uipmentand dangerous to personnel.
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 28/39
Comparison on I666 and 3-, methods
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 29/39
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 30/39
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 31/39
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 32/39
ARC FLASH MITIGATION TECHNIQUES
rc flash energy depends on three *ey factors8 system voltage% fault current
magnitude and arc time. Industrial power system owners have limited control
over the first two factors% leaving only arc time as a controllable variable.
,rotective relays% fuses% +!,C% and MCC are the devices commonly used to
provide fault protection in industrial power systems. These devices all have an
inverse time relationship where higher currents cause the devices to operate
faster
properly designed protection scheme will clear system faults with minimum
interruption to electric supply. This re"uires a time delay between protective
devices that increases as the device nears the fault current source. properly
coordinated protection system has the longest time delays nearest the utility
source% which is where the highest fault currents occur. -igure shows the
relationship between fault current magnitudes and protection system time delay.
=igh fault currents produce large incident energies and re"uire the most
stringent level of arc flash ,,6.Table 4 summari#es arc flash mitigation techni"ues commonly applied in
industrial power systems. Most of these techni"ues reduce arc flash incident
energy e&posure by shortening the protection system response time to the fault
current. us differential relaying% fast bus tripping% current limiting fuses% and
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 33/39
arc flash detectors all reduce incident energy by shortening the tripping time for
a fault current. rc flash detectors respond to the high intensity light emitted
from arc flashes and give the fastest response of all these schemes. Current
limiting fuses can reduce faultclearing times to @.7 ms or less% but only within a
specified range of fault currents
<ther techni"ues in Table 4 modify wor* rules or e"uipment settings to reduce
the energy e&posure a wor*er encounters. Increasing the distance between the
wor*er and live electrical protective e"uipment reduces the incident energy asthe s"uare of the distance. G=ot stic*s%H remote control tripping% and rac*ing of
brea*ers are all methods that reduce arc flash ha#ards.
Modifying system protection settings either permanently or temporarily to
reduce operating times also reduces the arc flash energy (uff D Limmerman%
@). The use of maintenance settings on protective devices gives instantaneous ( ms) tripping of brea*ers while wor*ers are near energi#ed
electrical e"uipment. 'educing device coordination times can also reduce
incident energy but may produce small reductions relative to the cost.
+owering fault currents by using high impedance grounding can increase rather
than decrease arc energies. 'educed fault currents increase the response time of
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 34/39
inverse time protective devices. This increased time causes increased incident
energies that can lead to greater wor*er ha#ards. This techni"ue must be
accompanied by a detailed analysis of protective device coordination times.
3ew or redesigned industrial power systems can employ new e"uipment
technologies that reduce arc flash ha#ards. rc resistant switchgear redirects arc
blasts away from wor*ers. Installing main brea*ers in MCC’s adds another level
of protection and reduces faultclearing times% resulting in lower incident energy
levels (=opper D 6t#el% @). Incorporating arc flash safety into new designs
and retrofits of e&isting systems gives the best results with the least cost.
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 35/39
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 36/39
FUTURE TRENDS IN ARC FLASH ANALYSIS AND MITIGATION
The goal of arc flash analysis and mitigation is to provide wor*ers with enough
protection to prevent seconddegree burns but to avoid overprotecting wor*ers
so that they do not encounter a greater ris* of heat stress and other in;uries due
to poor visibility and limited movements. The current standards use algorithms
based on e&perimental data ac"uired from laboratory tests. These algorithms
include simplifying assumptions to ma*e the problem tractable and tend to over
estimate incident energy levels. This results in selecting higher ,,6 categories
that overprotect wor*ers. time domain representation that uses nonlinear
timevarying resistance to model arcs can give more precise estimates of arc
currents and incident energies.
Computer simulation programs such as the lternative Transients ,rogram
(T,) (Canadian>merican 6MT, ?ser roup% @) and Mat+ab with
$imulin* (Mathwor*s% 0) allow engineers to build comple& timedomain
representations of electrical networ*s. These tools also have control systems
modeling capabilities to represent protective device behaviors. It is possible tocreate a time domain models of an arc flash and system protective devices using
these tools% but fieldtesting must verify the results. Bor* should focus on the
evolution of linetoground faults into three phase faults so that fault e&posure
time can be minimi#ed.
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 37/39
Increasing the wor*ing distance is a simply way of reducing the incident energy
in an industrial electric system. $ecure wireless operation of brea*ers would
allow maintenance wor*ers to stay outside the flash protection boundary while
operating energi#ed electrical e"uipment with incident energies greater than 4
cal>cm. These devices will be part of the ne&t generation of electrical
maintenance tools.
Many of the mitigation techni"ues must have communication channels to
transfer tripping and tripbloc*ing information to other parts of the electrical
system. Innovations in secure wireless communications between protective
devices will help reduce the costs of implementing these schemes. ?sing ad hocwireless networ*ing would allow low cost e&pansion of protection schemes with
less setup time.
Continued development of digital relays can e&tend to +!,C’s and MCC’s
that have greater capabilities and more fle&ibility than today’s models.
pplication of lowcost microcontrollers to produce alternatives to time
overcurrent protection in industrial power systems will give designers morechoices in designing and retrofitting protection schemes. Implementing
impedance relays using this technology in low voltage systems can achieve high
speed tripping over @ to 0 percent of distribution feeders at low cost. =all
effect current sensors that do not saturate when sub;ected to high currents can
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 38/39
ta*e the place of current transformers with reduced cost and greater fle&ibility in
retrofitting.
Technology cannot ta*e the place of wor*er training and s*ill. 'educing the high
percentage of electrical accidents attributed to personnel errors must be a
priority. ll maintenance personnel and system operators must have continuing
training on electrical safety procedures and current industry practices regarding
loc*ing and tagging of industrial electrical e"uipment for deenergi#ed service.
Bor*er training should emphasi#e completing tas*s in the safest way% not the
easiest or fastest. Industrial maintenance supervisors and management must
ma*e electrical safety a priority. Industries should maintain electrical system
diagrams in an GasbuildH or GasoperatingH state to prevent accidents due to
undocumented system changes. These drawings should be available to wor*ers
as needed. Communication between maintenance% operations and engineering
personnel on the current state of the electrical system should promote a safe andefficient industrial operation and reduce the ris* of arc flash accidents
7/21/2019 Arc Flash Energy Computation Methods
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/arc-flash-energy-computation-methods 39/39