architecture graduate portfolio

42
AMANDA KRACZKOWSKY ARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO 2012

Upload: mandy-kraczkowsky

Post on 10-Mar-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

This portfolio was submitted to Northeastern University and The Savannah College of Art and Design for admission to each school's respective M. Arch program.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

AMANDA KRACZKOWSKY ARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO 2012

Page 2: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

vivacious 1. full of spirit and animation; lively or vital2. having or displaying tenacity of life

(adj)

In order to engage the senses of the user, architecture must be vivacious. The animated spirit of the form and the composition of the structure must be visually captivating for those who immerse themselves within the space. The transitions throughout a building should be a harmonious marriage of functionality and stimulating spatial progression.

Vivaciousness also refers to the ability of a being to endure and survive within an environment. The greatest architectural works exude an understanding of their surroundings and are adaptive to the changing needs of their users. To ensure future growth and sustainability, we now must address not only the needs of people but also the demands of nature. We must find a way to create an endurable structure within our natural environment while still main-taining a practical application of spatial integrity and program.

In the past few years I have come to understand duality of archi-tecture both in its artistic expression and its functional foundations. A building should not only speak to its users in structure and shape but it should speak of its vernacular. I have come to appreciate the natural environment not only as a source of inspiration for a building but as a driver for the entirety of the design. The vivacity which nature exudes in its rejuvenation, growth and development must be the driving force behind creating lasting, captivating and sustainable architecture.

projectsarchitectural studios & relevant work

studio IV: park. shop. live. create. an artist’s community, parking, retail and residential structure in Austin, Texas

studio III: oasis urbaine (urban oasis) a multi-modal transportation hub in the Rive Gauche district of Paris, France

studio II: bywater community center a community center to fight blight in the Bywater district of New Orleans

studio I: greenovation an improved and futuristic look at student housing in Savannah, Georgia

fundamentals III: residence and spa at 215 w. broughton st. a three-story residential townhouse above a retail space in Savannah, Georgia

fundamentals II: factor’s walk climbing gym a rock climbing center promoting fitness in downtown Savannah, Georgia

fundamentals I: le sommet ski resort an exploration of the structure and tectonics of the built form

construction technology ii. AAA architecture construction documents

additonal paintings and artistic explorations

sta

tem

en

t o

f in

ten

t

co

nte

nts

Page 3: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

IV: p

ark

. sh

op

. liv

e. c

rea

te.

studio iv project location: Austin, Texas program: multipurpose, parking, retail, residential

park. shop. live. create. was inspired by the local culture of the artistic community in Austin, Texas. the vibrant citygoers of live music capitol of the world, home to the austin city limits concert and austin art festival, fueled the playful, colorful design of this multifunctional building. amentities of the structural program include 750 parking spaces, 11 individual street level retail spaces, 35 residential apartments and 22 leasable artist gallery studios.

stu

dio

IV: p

ark

. sh

op

. liv

e. c

rea

te.

park. shop. live. create.creating an artist’s mecca in Austin, TX

Mandy KraczkowskyArchitecture Design Studio IV

Professor Amy WynneFall Quarter 2011

Page 4: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

IV: p

ark

. sh

op

. liv

e. c

rea

te.

stu

dio

IV: p

ark

. sh

op

. liv

e. c

rea

te.

the beginning developmental concept by which this studio was orchestrated began with the under-standing of systematic parking decks. through exploration of circulation and by understanding ve-hicular and pedestrian movement, the structures became foundations for explorative interventions.

the importance of parking

parking garage studiessingle-threaded helix circulation model

intervention 1

single-threadedtwo-way traffi c system

original model intervention

parking garage studiesdouble-threaded helix circulation modelintervention 1

double-helixone-way traffi c system

intervention original model

parking garage studiessplit-level circuation model

intervention 1

split-leveltwo-way traffi c system

original model intervention

parking garage studiesmulti-bay circulation modelintervention 1

multi-baymulti-way traffi c system

intervention original model

parking garage studiessingle-threaded helix circulation model

intervention 1

single-threadedtwo-way traffi c system

original model intervention

parking garage studiesmulti-bay circulation modelintervention 1

multi-baymulti-way traffi c system

intervention original model

parking garage studiessplit-level circuation model

intervention 1

split-leveltwo-way traffi c system

original model intervention

parking garage studiesdouble-threaded helix circulation modelintervention 1

double-helixone-way traffi c system

intervention original model

Page 5: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

IV: p

ark

. sh

op

. liv

e. c

rea

te.

stu

dio

IV: p

ark

. sh

op

. liv

e. c

rea

te.

the congress street district of austin boasts a variety of locally owned and operated retail and perfor-mance venues. this local atmosphere inspired by the “keep austin weird” movement, an emphatic approach toward showcasing local artisans and musicians within the city and to ensure a flourishing independent business sector. other notable landmarks in this district on the north side of the colo-rado river include new high-rise residential landmarks and a hike & bike trail which utilizes the natural shape of the river to provide an outdoor park within an urban environment.

site analysis

site analysisproject location

site analysisproject location

site analysisaustin city grid

Page 6: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

experiential perspectives

view from a distance

approaching car entry

entering garage leaving garage

stu

dio

IV: p

ark

. sh

op

. liv

e. c

rea

te.

stu

dio

IV: p

ark

. sh

op

. liv

e. c

rea

te.

application of programmassing model study 1 &2

application of programmidterm massing model @ 1/128”

application of programmidterm massing model @ 1/128”

experiential perspectives

driving through garage level parking and leaving car

appraching circulation tower circulation tower gallery

experiential perspectives

walking to housing component & south gallery walking to retail component (north side)

entry park for hike & bike trail & circulation paths above returning to circulation tower (northeast corner)

experiential perspectives

walking to housing component & south gallery walking to retail component (north side)

entry park for hike & bike trail & circulation paths above returning to circulation tower (northeast corner)

experiential perspectives

view from a distance

approaching car entry

entering garage leaving garage

experiential perspectives

view from a distance

approaching car entry

entering garage leaving garage

design development

Page 7: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

IV: p

ark

. sh

op

. liv

e. c

rea

te.

stu

dio

IV: p

ark

. sh

op

. liv

e. c

rea

te.

fi nal designtypical fl oor plannorth gallery

circulation tower

walkway

south gallery

residences

two-waycirculation ramp

skyways fromgarage togalleries andapartments

pedestrian pathway

solar photovoltaic skin circulation plan

Page 8: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

IV: p

ark

. sh

op

. liv

e. c

rea

te.

stu

dio

IV: p

ark

. sh

op

. liv

e. c

rea

te.

Page 9: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

IV: p

ark

. sh

op

. liv

e. c

rea

te.

stu

dio

IV: p

ark

. sh

op

. liv

e. c

rea

te.

24” x 24” square precast concrete columns

16rb32 rectangular concrete columns

8’-0” x 20” double-tee beams

safety guard rails

w 30 x 99 columns anchored to concrete slab (skin frame)

photovoltaic solar panels anchored to w 30 x 99columns with spacing for ventilation

curtain wall panelspolycarbonate plastic sun shadingretail signage

approach arrive connect

enter circulate park

enter explore shop

Page 10: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

IV: p

ark

. sh

op

. liv

e. c

rea

te.

stu

dio

IV: p

ark

. sh

op

. liv

e. c

rea

te.

Page 11: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

III:

oa

sis u

rba

ine

(u

rba

n o

asis

)

studio iii project location: Rive Gauche, Paris, Franceprogram: multipurpose, tram/bus station & market

oasis urbaine (urban oasis) utilized a prime location at the end of the Avenue du France in Paris’s up-and-coming Rive Gauche district to provide a multi-modal train, tram and bus station for the young neighborhood. inspired by the idea of movement and the post modern green buildings set to be constructed in the area by 2020, oasis urbaine included a naturally growing skin for sustainability as well as an outdoor open-air market for users to openly interact with their community members.

collaborative studio project: architectural studio iii, fundamentals iii, interior design studio iv

studio iii (amanda kraczkowsky): main revit model & structural grid, all photoshop work and board composition, renderings, sections, elevations, skin design

fundamentals iii (matthew spinner): structural detailing, assisting skin composition, process book work

interior design studio iv (michelle kuvinka): kiosk design and functional detailing

stu

dio

III:

oa

sis u

rba

ine

(u

rba

n o

asis

)

Page 12: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

III:

oa

sis u

rba

ine

(u

rba

n o

asis

)

stu

dio

III:

oa

sis u

rba

ine

(u

rba

n o

asis

)

the Rive Gauche district of Paris, France is located in the southeast corner of the city, balancing the equally modern district of La Defense in the northwest corner. the highly developed and popular sector of La Defense boasts what the Rive Gauche sector currently lacks; a connection to the hu-man scale regardless of the monumentality of the structures. the Rive Gauche is an impressive ex-ample of juxtaposition between the classic historic sector of Paris and a modern atmosphere, yet a connection to the human scale and natural environment would prove crucial in the design.

site analysis

CirculationGreater Paris AnalysisSite Analysis

1.

60

Circulation Rive Gauche AnalysisSite Analysis

1.

1.

1.

1.

60

60

CirculationOn-Site AnalysisSite Analysis

1.

1.

1.

1.

60

greater paris

13th arrondissement (district)

site location, roadways, railways

Natural EnvironmentOn-Site AnalysisSite Analysis

61

vegetation private green space public green space

the rive gauche contains an adequate amount of vegetation, yet does not provide any true in-teractive green space or usable parks for visitors and residents to utilize. the area also lacks a major staple of french life, the outdoor air market or ‘marche.’ in order to maximize the func-tionality of the twin sites, the larger trapezoidal site became home to a multi-modal train de-pot with a connecting bridge to the open air marche and park located on the smaller site.

Page 13: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

III:

oa

sis u

rba

ine

(u

rba

n o

asis

)

stu

dio

III:

oa

sis u

rba

ine

(u

rba

n o

asis

)

Man-M

ade FeaturesO

-Site FeaturesSite A

nalysis

Prevalent O -Site Features

Train Tracks- Secondary tracks below

site do not interact with

site, will be concealed by the addition of the deck

- Primary Train track and Tram

way run longitudi

nally through site on ground plane, direct impact

Scale- H

eights of surrounding buildings adhere to 37 m

eter rule, may not exceed heigh restrictions

- Four additional superstructures to the northeast of the site exceed heigh restrictions at 180 m

and 120-150 m , respectively

Roof Form

s- Roof form

s are at to adhere to modern buildings

Fenestration Pa erns/O

penings/Sun Penetration- H

eight juxtaposition of buildings allow for

maxim

um sunlight to reach center courts of plots

- Changing of heights results in dicussions am

ong developers of the site

Setbacks- Properties are classi ed as a �“build to�” instead of m

ade to follow m

andated setbacks- Sidew

alks mandated at 15 m

with vegetation of

sorts, overall width m

ay be shorter and resized to 10 m

but without vegetation

Non-intersecting train tracks below

to-be-built deckRespective heights and openings of surround buildings

Pedestrian and bicycle friendly walkw

ay, 15 m w

idth C

hange in building heights/openings for sun penetration

Construction Zone Documentation

Steel reinforcing cables ascending for aid in construction majorconcrete columns below deck

Formwork in place to pour concrete/contain construciton area

Barriers keep from unneccesary falls/intrusion(From top down) Deck, Car parking garage,

Train passageway at lowest level/ground plane

Finished deck surface aboveBeginning completion of surface with asphaltSurface may be bridge of future building plot

Man-Made Features O -Site FeaturesSite Analysis

Deck Construction Over Railway

Section model of proposed Metro shows layers of circulation. Circulation must work successfully below and above site.

Layering/Circulation- Multiple layering of circulation allows for all dif-

ferent types of tra c to ow e ciently.

Column Supports- Large columns, approximately two meters in di-ameter, support the dead and live loads of current

and potential future superstructures.

Metro Rail- The bo om layer consists of railways for the Metro

lines that carry passengers in and out of Paris.

Metro Station- Second layer is the main Metro station were Met-

ro rails can be contained as well.

Existing Railways- Third layer, already present, contains the vast bed

of multi-functional rail lines that support Paris.

Proposed Tram-way/Vehicular/Pedestrian Tra c- The top layer, fully visable is a collage of pedestri-an, vehicular, and the proposed Tram-way that will cirle around the entire perimeter of inner-city Paris.

Roadway below site shows complex layering and structure. Columns support loads from deck and proposed structures.

Man-Made Features O -Site FeaturesSite Analysis

1. 1.

Deck Construction Over Railway

Section model of proposed Metro shows layers of circulation. Circulation must work successfully below and above site.

Layering/Circulation- Multiple layering of circulation allows for all dif-

ferent types of tra c to ow e ciently.

Column Supports- Large columns, approximately two meters in di-ameter, support the dead and live loads of current

and potential future superstructures.

Metro Rail- The bo om layer consists of railways for the Metro

lines that carry passengers in and out of Paris.

Metro Station- Second layer is the main Metro station were Met-

ro rails can be contained as well.

Existing Railways- Third layer, already present, contains the vast bed

of multi-functional rail lines that support Paris.

Proposed Tram-way/Vehicular/Pedestrian Tra c- The top layer, fully visable is a collage of pedestri-an, vehicular, and the proposed Tram-way that will cirle around the entire perimeter of inner-city Paris.

Roadway below site shows complex layering and structure. Columns support loads from deck and proposed structures.

Man-Made Features O -Site FeaturesSite Analysis

1. 1.

deck constructionthe site is located on a manufactured deck above existing rail lines. the deck incorporates new rail lines as well as a road-way system. during the time of site analysis, the upper deck was still under construction, therefore the majority of site anal-ysis information stemmed from urban planning scale models designed by SEMAPA, the leading organization in charge of the massive development.

Page 14: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

III:

oa

sis u

rba

ine

(u

rba

n o

asis

)

stu

dio

III:

oa

sis u

rba

ine

(u

rba

n o

asis

)

Inspiration Images

Oasis, A pleasant or peaceful area or period in the midst of a di cult, troubled, or hectic place or situation. Creating an Oasis amongst hectic urban life will provide a place people are drawn to.

Tent Structure, Provides shade for people waiting or passing by. The user is a racted to these forms and ones similar due to its safe and homey nature. People will gather in places with this structure because they feel protected.

Marche, Serves as a traditional Market place where a variety of goods can be sold. The trainstation needs this in uence due to the lack of grocery stores in the area. A Farmers Market of fruits, vegetables, and plants will a ract locals and travelers alike.

67

66 68

69 71

70

design development

Page 15: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

III:

oa

sis u

rba

ine

(u

rba

n o

asis

)

stu

dio

III:

oa

sis u

rba

ine

(u

rba

n o

asis

)

Page 16: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

III:

oa

sis u

rba

ine

(u

rba

n o

asis

)

stu

dio

III:

oa

sis u

rba

ine

(u

rba

n o

asis

)

Page 17: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

III:

oa

sis u

rba

ine

(u

rba

n o

asis

)

stu

dio

III:

oa

sis u

rba

ine

(u

rba

n o

asis

)

Proposed BuildingStructural Perspective

Structural Skeletal System

Skin Design Skin DetailsDesign Progression

Planter System with Irrigation System.

Page 18: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

II: b

ywa

ter c

om

mu

nity

ce

nte

r

studio ii project location: Bywater, New Orleans, Louisiana program: community center

the bywater community center was heavily influenced by the surrounding geographic context of new orleans, the vibrant music and festival culture and the tumultuous conditions still impacting the community from Hurricane Katrina. music and the flow of the Mississippi River, the backbone upon which New Orleans was established, became the main driving force for creating a fluent circulation path throughout the building. the community center utilized an existing horse stable structure and included a program with a cafe, day care center, meeting hall and outdoor amphitheater.

collaborative studio project: architectural studio ii, graduate interior design studio ii

studio ii (amanda kraczkowsky): revit model, final board, final model, process book, design develop-ment and changes, hand rendering perspectives and sections

grad interior design studio ii (rand gharaibeh): revit model, process book & graphics, design devel-opment and changes, 3dmax renderings, interior rcp’s & furniture layouts

Bywater Community Center Promoting Community Spirit in New Orleans, Louisiana

The ClientThe Bywater Neighborhood Association is in need of a place to hold community activities and local events.

Design TheoryThe design is based on the Japanese principle ‘shakkei’, defined as borrowed scenery or landscape. The original agricultural land division of New Orleans plantations is known as the Arpent System.

Design ConceptThe musical keywords used to influence the design are octave, rhythm, and dynamic. Their relationship to water and its fluid qualities are the basis for the overall design.

Design IntentThe intention is to create a highly dynamic, functional program. A modern building intervention, representative of the fluidity of water and the sound of music, will provide a connection within the two separate halves of the Bywater community.

C o n c e p t

S i t e A n a l y s i s

O c t a v e R h y t h m D y n a m i c I n t e g r a t i o n G r o w t h F l o w C o n s t a n t Va r i a b l e s I n t e r a c t i n g F l u c t u a t i o n

D e s i g n

Mandy Kraczkowsky & Rand GharaibehARCH 302 & INDS 714 Winter 2011

Professors Montgomery & Whitney

G. Intersection of North Rampart St & Poland Avenue

H. Community Room

I. Day care CenterC. North Cafe Entrance from Poland Avenue, Accessible Parking, Outdoor Amphitheater

New Orleans, LouisianaLocated at the mouth of the Mississippi River and on the Gulf of Mexico, New Orleans, Louisiana has a rich history of trade, shipping, music and culture. Sedimentary silt shapes the landscape of the city and creates differences in topography of 40 feet above and 15 feet below sea level.

BywaterBywater is located in the Upper Ninth ward of the city grid. Bywater sits three feet above sea level and is bordered by the Industrial Canal to the East and the Mississippi River to the South.

Site1000 Poland Avenue consists of a narrow stable building and an adjacent green space. The location is on the corner of Poland Avenue and North Rampart Street.

Scope of ProjectThe design will include the renovation of the existing stables building and adding new space through a secondary structure and a redesign of the outdoor area.

Mississippi RiverArpent System

Land Division Purity, Harmony, Reflectivity

DynamicGrowth

Interacting

Fluctuation Rhythm

Interacting FlowConstant

Fluctuation

Live Jazz Night Clubs The Mississippi River Mirliton Festival Southside Bywater Jazz Musicians Mardi Gras

Street Section: North to South

0 Elevation Line

1.5’

3’

4.5’

6’

A. West Facade from North Rampart St. and Rear Entry

B. Poland Avenue, Accessible Parking and Entryway

C. Lobby & Existing Building Renovation

D. Main Entry and Lobby

E. Cafe and Secondary Entry

F. Main Entrance: Poland Avenue

A l t e r n a t i v e Fu r n i t u r e P l a n s B a s e d o n S p a t i a l U s a g e

Cafe

Women’s Rest room

Men’s Rest room

Janitor ClosetShower

Rentable OfficeMeeting Office

Liaison OfficeMain Lobby

Coat Closet Rest room

Classroom

Nap Room

Mechanical Room

Storage

Library

Community Room

Day Care & Play Space

Interior Courtyard

Cafe Counter

E a s t E l e v a t i o n S o u t h E l e v a t i o n We s t E l e v a t i o n N o r t h E l e v a t i o n

A

S i t e P l a n : 1 0 0 0 Po l a n d A v e n u e

Accessible Parking

Cafe Entry

Main Entry

Rear Entry

Outdoor Amphitheater

Pola

nd A

venu

e

North Rampart Street

Water Collection Cisterns

Readapted Use ofExisting StructureNew Building Addition

Outdoor Urban Garden

Interior Courtyard

Fire Station

Neighborhood Residences

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

stu

dio

II: b

ywa

ter c

om

mu

nity

ce

nte

r

Page 19: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

SCHEMATIC DESIGN

C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R

S c h e m a t i c D e s i g n

SITE ORGANIZATION

Existing East Elevation; Facing Poland Avenue

stu

dio

II: b

ywa

ter c

om

mu

nity

ce

nte

r

stu

dio

II: b

ywa

ter c

om

mu

nity

ce

nte

r

the bywater community, located south of the infamously flooded lower 9th ward, received moder-ate damage from recent Hurricane Katrina. its proximity to the Mississippi River and its placement on slightly higher ground saved the area from receiving the same catastrophic damage as its neighbor-ing districts. however, due to blight caused by the displacement of new orleans citizens, the area’s community spirit has not be revived back to its original status. through the construction of a com-munity center at bywater, it was the hope of our studio to reestablish this ward’s vivaciousness.

site analysis

SITE ORGANIZATION

Existing South Elevation; Facing North Rampart Street

new orleans parish

bywater district & industrial canal

new orleans

bywater

mississippi river

existing historical horse stable (on site)

Page 20: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

II: b

ywa

ter c

om

mu

nity

ce

nte

r

stu

dio

II: b

ywa

ter c

om

mu

nity

ce

nte

r

the design theory of ‘shakkei’, meaning ‘borrowed landscape’ in Japanese became a primary driv-er for utilizing the new orleans landscape within the design. drawing also from the city’s rich musi-cal history, the three key musical terms octave, rhythm and dynamic were used as concept drivers. based on the landmasses formed by the mississippi river’s water flow and this musical terminology, the goal became to create a modern intervention on an existing historic structure by linking the cul-tural history of the bywater neighborhood with its promising future.

C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R

CONCEPTUAL AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN

C o n c e p t u a l A p p r o a c h

Wrapping

Octave

Fluctuating

Depth

Dynamic

Integration

Rhythm

Growth

Flowing

Layering

Concept models re ect the integrated relation of the feelings inspired from site, music, and water.

Integration

Rhythm

Growth

Flowing

Layering

Concept models re ect the integrated relation of the feelings inspired from site, music, and water.

C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R

CONCEPTUAL AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN

C o n c e p t u a l A p p r o a c h

Wrapping

Octave

Fluctuating

Depth

Dynamic

Integration

Rhythm

Growth

Flowing

Layering

Concept models re ect the integrated relation of the feelings inspired from site, music, and water.

Figure-Ground Rhythm Flow Integration

Variables Interacting Dynamic Wavy

Concept diagrams re ect the integrated relation of the feelings inspired from site, music, and water.

Figure-Ground Rhythm Flow Integration

Variables Interacting Dynamic Wavy

Concept diagrams re ect the integrated relation of the feelings inspired from site, music, and water.

Figure-Ground Rhythm Flow Integration

Variables Interacting Dynamic Wavy

Concept diagrams re ect the integrated relation of the feelings inspired from site, music, and water.

Page 21: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

II: b

ywa

ter c

om

mu

nity

ce

nte

r

stu

dio

II: b

ywa

ter c

om

mu

nity

ce

nte

r

Original Conceptual Schematic Plans

SCHEMATIC ORIGINS

The original concept sketches include a sweeping curve which intersects the existing building and expands into thegreen space.

The schematic connection between the old and new was intended to reach out into the neighbhorhood as an invitation to all community members to utilize the building.

SCHEMATIC DESIGN

C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R

S c h e m a t i c D e s i g n

CONCEPTUAL & SCHEMATIC SYNTHESIS

Amphitheater shapeResponding to Mississippi River

Stepping design for clerestoryResponding to Mississippi River

Amphitheater responding to building elevation Curvature mimicing Mississippi River& Shakkai System

Original Conceptual Schematic Plans

SCHEMATIC ORIGINS

The original concept sketches include a sweeping curve which intersects the existing building and expands into thegreen space.

The schematic connection between the old and new was intended to reach out into the neighbhorhood as an invitation to all community members to utilize the building.

ORIGINAL CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN

SCHEMATIC DESIGN

C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R

S c h e m a t i c D e s i g n

SECOND SCHEMATIC FLOOR PLAN

SCHEMATIC DESIGN

C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R

S c h e m a t i c D e s i g n

THIRD SCHEMATIC FLOOR PLAN

schematic design development

Page 22: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

II: b

ywa

ter c

om

mu

nity

ce

nte

r

stu

dio

II: b

ywa

ter c

om

mu

nity

ce

nte

r

mechanical room

storage

library

interiorcourtyard

communityroom

cafe

women’srestroomshowe r

janitor closetmen’s

restroom

rentable officemeeting office

liaison office

main lobby

coat closet

restroom (for classroom)

classroom (flex space)

nap room & childcare area

daycare

outdoor amphitheater

water collection cisterns

new building addition

rear entry &outdoor urban garden

accessibleparking

cafe entry

readapted use of historic

structure

main entrance

Page 23: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

II: b

ywa

ter c

om

mu

nity

ce

nte

r

stu

dio

II: b

ywa

ter c

om

mu

nity

ce

nte

r

FINAL DESIGN

C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R

E a s t E l e v a t i o n

We s t E l e v a t i o n

FINAL DESIGN

C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R

E a s t E l e v a t i o n

We s t E l e v a t i o n

We s t t o E a s t S e c t i o n N e w B u i l d i n g

E a s t t o We s t S e c t i o n N e w B u i l d i n g

FINAL DESIGN

C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R

We s t t o E a s t S e c t i o n E x i s t i n g B u i l d i n g

E a s t t o We s t S e c t i o n E x i s t i n g B u i l d i n g

Page 24: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

II: b

ywa

ter c

om

mu

nity

ce

nte

r

stu

dio

II: b

ywa

ter c

om

mu

nity

ce

nte

r

FINAL DESIGN

C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R

Po l a n d A v e n u e a n d E n t r y w a y I n t e r s e c t i o n o f N o r t h R a m p a r t S t . & Po l a n d A v e n u e

We s t Fa c a d e a n d R e a r E n t r y

FINAL DESIGN

C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R

Po l a n d A v e n u e a n d E n t r y w a y I n t e r s e c t i o n o f N o r t h R a m p a r t S t . & Po l a n d A v e n u e

We s t Fa c a d e a n d R e a r E n t r y

FINAL DESIGN

C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R

Po l a n d A v e n u e a n d E n t r y w a y I n t e r s e c t i o n o f N o r t h R a m p a r t S t . & Po l a n d A v e n u e

We s t Fa c a d e a n d R e a r E n t r y N o r t h C a f e E n t r a n c e f r o m Po l a n d A v e n u e , A c c e s s i b l e Pa r k i n g , O u t d o o r A m p h i t h e a t e r

M a i n E n t r a n c e : Po l a n d A v e n u e

N o r t h C a f e E n t r a n c e f r o m Po l a n d A v e n u e , A c c e s s i b l e Pa r k i n g , O u t d o o r A m p h i t h e a t e r

M a i n E n t r a n c e : Po l a n d A v e n u e

FINAL DESIGN

C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R

M a i n E n t r y a n d L o b b y C o m m u n i t y R o o m

Page 25: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

II: b

ywa

ter c

om

mu

nity

ce

nte

r

FINAL DESIGN

C O M M U N I T Y C E N T E R a t B Y W A T E R

stu

dio

II: b

ywa

ter c

om

mu

nity

ce

nte

r

Page 26: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

II: b

ywa

ter c

om

mu

nity

ce

nte

rst

ud

io II

: byw

ate

r co

mm

un

ity c

en

ter

stu

dio

I: g

ree

no

vatio

n

studio i project location: downtown Savannah, Georgia program: student housing renovation

following the concept of human proportioning and accessibility, the renovation of SCAD’s Ogletho-rpe House dormitory became a relavent concept to explore when designing student housing in rela-tion to comfort and needs of the student population. the existing structure, a 1960’s motel adorned with wrought iron and art deco detailing, provided the bones beneath a total exterior transforma-tion and built addition. the new design included flexible suite-style student rooms as well as more traditional double rooms, a new lobby and adjacent green space and a green skin composed of ventilated louver systems for natural ventilation.

stu

dio

I: g

ree

no

vatio

n

Page 27: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

I: g

ree

no

vatio

n

stu

dio

I: g

ree

no

vatio

n

beginning the first official studio course with a site located in our school’s city provided a well-grounded knowledge of the existing cultural context of Savannah. the analysis of the site included the student’s perspective on housing, which became crucial consideration in a practical design. the input of student clients in conjunction with our own knowledge of existing dormitory conditions in savannah became the driving force in addressing the necessary programmatic components for a dormitory renovation.

site analysis

!"#$%&!'($)&!*+$)

+,-,..,&)/!##$"$)!0),'%)1)2$+3".)

456)7)!"#$%&!'($),-$)

+,-,..,&)",)86956)

)

+3%$)($'3:$%$';)

!"#$%&!'($),-$<)=)85>?)

@,'.,'2)+%<)=)464<A?))

oglethorpe house

J.O.’s cafe

club SCAD

parking

stu

dio

I: g

ree

no

vatio

n

) ) ) )

)

)

!"#$%&!'($)&!*+$) ) )

B!?C)/,0$%$'3,)

/#*@)+/,2)

(,'D3.")

+3%$)"$!:$%'E)

&3$','/&E)

Page 28: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

I: g

ree

no

vatio

n

stu

dio

I: g

ree

no

vatio

n

stu

dio

I: g

ree

no

vatio

n

transition from urban bustle to private green spaceskin louvers allows natural ventilation and reflect sunlight

transition from urban to natural environment within structure

Page 29: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

I: g

ree

no

vatio

n

stu

dio

I: g

ree

no

vatio

n

Page 30: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

stu

dio

I: g

ree

no

vatio

n

stu

dio

I: g

ree

no

vatio

n

Page 31: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

fun

da

me

nta

ls III

: 215

w b

rou

gh

ton

st

fund. iii project location: downtown Savannah, Georgia program: residence & 1st floor retail

utilizing the existing historical context of Savannah’s downtown commercial center, the residence at 215 w. broughton with leasable retail space introduced specific interaction with a client and explored problem solving in order to meet their specific needs. spatial configuration of rooms and openings was based on the desires of the client and overall exterior design remained dependent on matching the surrounding downtown facade syles and materiality. proposed structure

215 w. broughton st

215 w. broughton st

fun

da

me

nta

ls III

: 215

w b

rou

gh

ton

st

Page 32: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

fun

da

me

nta

ls III

: 215

w b

rou

gh

ton

st

load bearing masonry wall

structural floor plan

fun

da

me

nta

ls III

: 215

w b

rou

gh

ton

st

Page 33: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

fun

da

me

nta

ls II:

fac

tor’

s w

alk

gym

fund. ii project location: downtown Savannah, Georgia program: rock climbing gym

the climbing gym on factor’s walk and its accompanying programmatic requirements became the first exploration into the systematic skill of managing spaces and their adjacent connections. func-tional square footages and the first inclusion of a real-life site made this the first practically applied project I had explored. programmatic elements included a three-story rock climbing wall, party and meeting rooms, locker and restroom areas and specific mechanical/storage needs.

fun

da

me

nta

ls II:

fac

tor’

s w

alk

gym

Page 34: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

fun

da

me

nta

ls II:

fac

tor’

s w

alk

gym

fun

da

me

nta

ls II:

fac

tor’

s w

alk

gym

Page 35: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

fun

da

me

nta

ls I:

le s

om

me

t sk

i re

sort

fund. i project location and program theoretical

this course introduced the first practical application of tectonics and structural integrity within the field of architecture. through the exploration of various spatial configurations, solid and voided el-ements and a concrete repeatable floor plan, an overall structure and conceivable building was formed. steps to complete this project included the study of primary, secondary and tertiary spaces, application of entryways and circulation, application of a tower to achieve monumentality and the construction of a base to ensure a secure connection within a theoretical site.

fun

da

me

nta

ls I:

le s

om

me

t sk

i re

sort

studies of primary, secondary and tertiarty spatial conditions led to structural grid development and entryway studies

Page 36: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

fun

da

me

nta

ls I:

le s

om

me

t sk

i re

sort

fun

da

me

nta

ls I:

le s

om

me

t sk

i re

sortfinal model

Page 37: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

co

nst

ruc

tion

te

ch

no

log

y II:

AA

A A

rch

itec

ture

c.t. ii project location: downtown Savannah, Georgia program: 1st floor retail, 2nd & 3rd floor office space

in order to fully understand the concept of structural assembly and the stringency of building codes, in groups of three we planned for a commercial building on broughton street. design developments included site location and accompanying elevations, universal accessibility requirements for spac-ing, structural sections and layout and subsequent structural detailing.

collaborative project: three students all enrolled in architectural studio ii & construction technology ii

amanda kraczkowsky: primary coding and zoning, elevation design, main steel structural system design, accompanying door jamb detailing

anna gosselin: coding and zoning, elevations, main universal accessibility design, site cast concrete system, accompanying mullion connection detail

arielle villardo: coding and zoning, elevation design, main site location analysis, precast concrete system, accompanying door head connection detail

co

nst

ruc

tion

te

ch

no

log

y II:

AA

A A

rch

itec

ture

SHEET INDEXA- 101 COVER SHEETA- 102 FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONSA- 103 EGRESS AND ACCESSIBILITY DETAILSA- 104 WALL SECTIONSA- 105 WALL DETAILSS- 101 SITECAST CONCRETE STRUCTURAL DETAILSS- 102 STEEL ASSEMBLY STRUCTURAL DETAILSS- 103 PRECAST CONCRETE STRUCTURAL DETAILS

Build

ing

De

sign

230

We

st B

rou

gh

ton

Str

ee

tSa

van

na

h, G

A 3

1401

Project Partners:

Anna GosselinMandy Kraczkowsky

Arielle Vilardo

ARCHITECTURE

SCADConstruction

Tech II

Site, Roof Plan, andDrawing Index

A-101

Re

visio

ns

01. 1

3.11

Des ig

nSu

bmiss

ion

02. 0

2.11

Init ia

lRev

ision

AG02

. 26.

11Co

n tex

tIn p

utAV

Page 38: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

co

nst

ruc

tion

te

ch

no

log

y II:

AA

A A

rch

itec

ture

UP

UP

UP

UP UP

UPELEV.

6' - 0" 3' - 0"

EXIS

TIN

G B

UIL

DIN

G

EXIS

TIN

G B

UIL

DIN

G

STAIR #2

STAIR #1

RESTROOM

MERCANTILEOPEN FLOOR PLAN

90' -

0"

6' -

10"

7' -

7"4'

- 4"

6' -

0"

3' -

0"3'

- 0"

9' -

4"

3' - 8" 3' - 0" 5' - 9" 3' - 4" 3' - 0" 4' - 0" 3' - 0" 9' - 7" 8' - 5" 3' - 0" 4' - 1"

60' - 0"

23' - 0"

8' - 9"

18' - 8 3/4" 16' - 3 1/4" 6' - 0" 17' - 1 1/2"

----A 104-1

----A 104-2

----A 104-3

A 105-3

A 105-1

A 105-2

ELEVATOR

STAIR # 2

STAIR #1

RESTROOM

OFFICE SPACE/ BUSINESS AREAOPEN FLOOR PLAN

EXIS

TIN

G B

UIL

DIN

G

EXIS

TIN

G B

UIL

DIN

G

UP

90' -

0"

19' -

9"

7' -

7"8'

- 4"

4' -

4"6'

- 8"

3' -

0"

70' -

0"

9' -

4"

3' -

0"

23' - 0"

12' - 4 1/2"

3' - 0" 5' - 1" 3' - 0" 7' - 0" 3' - 0" 4' - 0" 3' - 0" 13' - 0" 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" 4' - 1"

60' - 0"

4' - 6" 3' - 0" 5' - 0 3/4" 3' - 0" 7' - 0" 3' - 0" 4' - 0" 3' - 0" 4' - 0" 3' - 0" 5' - 11 1/4" 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" 4' - 2"

3' -

0"

ELEVATOR

OFFICE SPACE/ BUSINESS AREAOPEN FLOOR PLAN

STAIR # 1

RESTROOM

STAIR # 2

EXIS

TIN

G B

UIL

DIN

G

EXIS

TIN

G B

UIL

DIN

G

8' -

4"4'

- 4"

6' -

8"

3' - 0" 5' - 1" 3' - 0" 7' - 0" 3' - 0" 4' - 0" 3' - 0" 13' - 3" 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" 3' - 10"

9' -

4"

3' -

0"

23' - 0"

8' - 9"

3' -

0"

3' -

0"

3' - 0" 5' - 0 3/4" 3' - 0" 7' - 0" 3' - 0" 4' - 0" 3' - 0" 4' - 0" 3' - 0" 6' - 3 1/4" 3' - 0" 5' - 0" 3' - 0" 3' - 10"

FIRST FLOOR0' - 0"

SECOND FLOOR13' - 0"

THIRD FLOOR24' - 0"

ROOF35' - 0"Brick Facing

Terra Cotta Tiles

Double Pane Glass

FIRST FLOOR0' - 0"

SECOND FLOOR13' - 0"

THIRD FLOOR24' - 0"

ROOF35' - 0"

CommercialStorefront Glass

Steel Framming

Low E Glass

Terra Cotta Tile

Build

ing

De

sign

230

We

st B

rou

gh

ton

Str

ee

tSa

van

na

h, G

A 3

1401

SCADConstruction

Tech II

Project Partners:

Anna GosselinMandy Kraczkowsky

Arielle Villardo

ARCH 341 - Winter 2011Professor Alexis D. Gregory

ARCHITECTURE

Re

vis io

ns

1/8" = 1'-0"A104-1FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"A102-2SECOND FLOOR PLAN

1/8" = 1'-0"A102-3THIRD FLOOR PLAN

NORTH NORTH

NORTH

Floor Plans andElevations

A-102

01.1

3.11

De

sign

Su

bm

issio

n02

.26.

11La

you

t R

evi

sion

- A

V03

.09.

11R

evi

sion

- A

V

1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"2 SOUTH ELEVATION

co

nst

ruc

tion

te

ch

no

log

y II:

AA

A A

rch

itec

ture

UP

UP

UP

UP UP

UPELEV.

A-102E101-4

A-102E101-5

62' - 8 1/2"

Maxim

um Travel Distance

6' - 0" 3' - 0"

EXIS

TIN

G B

UIL

DIN

G

EXIS

TIN

G B

UIL

DIN

G

STAIR

STAIR

RESTROOM

MERCANTILEOPEN FLOOR PLAN

A-102E101-6

2' - 6"

4' -

0"

16' - 9"

20' -

2 1

/4"

0' -

2 1/

2"

ELEVATOR

55' -

2 1/4"

Maxim

umTra

vel D

istanc

e

STAIR

STAIR

RESTROOM

OFFICE SPACE/ BUSINESS AREAOPEN FLOOR PLAN

EXIS

TIN

G B

UIL

DIN

G

EXIS

TIN

G B

UIL

DIN

G

ELEVATOR

54' -

111/4

"

Maxim

umTra

vel D

istanc

e

OFFICE SPACE/ BUSINESS AREAOPEN FLOOR PLAN

STAIR

RESTROOM

STAIR

EXIS

TIN

G B

UIL

DIN

G

EXIS

TIN

G B

UIL

DIN

G

0' -

6"

RESTROOM

2' - 4"TOILET IS 2'-4" oc FOR CLEAR SPACING

3' - 11"

INDICATES 5' TURNING RADIUS

3' -

0"

3' CLEARANCE IN DOOR SPACING

6' -

9"

10' - 4"

3' -

6"

3' - 0"36" OF WHEEL CHAIR RAIL BEHIND TOILET

7' - 0"

7' -

5"

MORE THAN 42" OF CLEARANCE

0' -

5"

4" OF WALL BEYOND DOOR SWING

42" OF WHEEL CHIAR RAIL

4' -

6"

8' -

8"

4' -

3 3/

4"4'

- 4

1/4"

3' - 0"

3' -

0"

2' - 6"

4' -

0" UP

AREA OF REFUGE: MIN. OF 30" X 40" SPACE OUTSIDE OF THE 48" OF LANDING SPACE

5' - 2 1/2"

3' - 10 1/4"

0' - 11"

STAIR TREAD IS 11"

1' - 0"

HANDRAILS EXTEND 12INCHES BEYOND STAIR

STAIR IS GREATER THAN 44" WIDE

5' - 1 1/4"

0' - 6"CLEARANCE OFGREATER THAN 60 "

R 3' - 8 15/32"

STAIR

ELEVATOR

6' -

0"

UP

1' -

0"

HANDRAIL MUST EXTEND12" BEYOND END OF STAIR

STAIR IS GREATER THAN 44" WIDE

4' - 0"2' -

6"

AREA OF REFUGE: MIN OF 30" X 48"

3' - 0"

EXIT DOOR IS 6' WIDTH ANDOPENS TO A 16' X 19' SPACE

INDICATES 5' TURNING RADIUS

5' -

0"

R 4' - 7 7/8"

3' - 10 1/2"

HANDRAILS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE AMINIMUM RADIUS OF 1 1/4" TO A DIAMETER OF 2"

Build

ing

De

sign

230

We

st B

rou

gh

ton

Str

ee

tSa

van

na

h, G

A 3

1401

SCADConstruction

Tech II

Project Partners:

Anna GosselinMandy Kraczkowsky

Arielle Villardo

ARCH 341 - Winter 2011Professor Alexis D. Gregory

ARCHITECTURE

Re

vis io

ns

1/8" = 1'-0"E101-1FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"E101-2SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"E101-3THIRD FLOOR PLAN

NORTH

NORTHNORTH

EgressFloor Plans

A-103 1/4" = 1'-0"E101-4TYPICAL RESTROOM ENLARGED PLAN

1/4" = 1'-0"E101-5TYPICAL STAIR #2 ENLARGEDFLOORPLAN

1/4" = 1'-0"E101-6TYPICAL STAIR #1 ENLARGEDFLOORPLAN

02.2

7.11

2nd

Eg

ress

Su

bm

issio

n -

AG

01.2

7.11

Egre

ss S

ub

miss

ion

03.0

9.11

3rd

Eg

ress

Su

bm

issio

n A

G

Page 39: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

co

nst

ruc

tion

te

ch

no

log

y II:

AA

A A

rch

itec

ture

co

nst

ruc

tion

te

ch

no

log

y II:

AA

A A

rch

itec

ture

4’ x 4’ x 24" CONCRETECOLUMN FOOTING

W8 8"X8" COLUMNPLACED 30’ X 30’ O.C.

12" x 18" CONCRETEFOUNDATION FOOTING

12" x 18" CONCRETEFOUNDATION FOOTING

1.5 " DEEP CONTROL JOINTSSPACED 10’ ON SLAB

EXI

STI

NG

BU

ILD

ING

EXI

STI

NG

BU

ILD

INGS 102-4

S-102

6" CONCRETE SLAB CONTAININGWELDED WIRE FABRIC OVERVAPOR RETARDANT BARRIER ONGRAVEL DRAINAGE

W8 8"X8" COLUMNPLACED 30’ X 30’ O.C.

4’ x 4’ x 24" CONCRETECOLUMN FOOTING

W8 8"X8" COLUMNPLACED 30’ X 30’ O.C.

12K1 JOISTS AT 4’ O.C.

12K1 JOISTS AT 4’ O.C.

10K1 STEEL JOISTS AT 2’ O.C. IN STAIRWAY

10K1 STEEL JOISTS AT 2’O.C. IN STAIRWAY

12K1 JOISTS AT 4’ O.C.

EXI

STI

NG

BU

ILD

ING

EXI

STI

NG

BU

ILD

ING

W8 8"X8" COLUMNPLACED 30’ X 30’ O.C.2

4K4

OP

EN

WE

B S

TEE

L J

OIS

T

EXI

STI

NG

BU

ILD

ING

EXI

STI

NG

BU

ILD

ING

W8 8"X8" COLUMNPLACED 30’ X 30’ O.C.

12K1 JOISTS AT 4’ O.C.

12K1 JOISTS AT 4’ O.C.

10K1 STEEL JOISTSAT 2’ O.C. IN STAIRWAY

12K1 JOISTS AT 4’ O.C.

10K1 STEEL JOISTS AT 2’ O.C. IN STAIRWAY

24

K4 O

PE

N W

EB

STE

EL

JO

IST

W8 8"X8" COLUMNPLACED 30’ X 30’ O.C.

24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST

FIRST FLOOR0' - 0"

SECOND FLOOR13' - 0"

THIRD FLOOR24' - 0"

ROOF35' - 0"

STAIRWELL TO ROOF

W8 8"X8" COLUMNPLACED 30’ X 30’ O.C.

W8 8"X8" COLUMNPLACED 30’ X 30’ O.C.

W8 8"X8" COLUMNPLACED 30’ X 30’ O.C..

24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST

6" CONCRETE SLAB W/ WELDED WIREFABRIC OVER MOISTURE BARRIER ONCRUSHED GRAVEL DRAINAGE

8" REINFORCED CMU MASONRY WALL

12" X 18" CONCRETEFOOTING

24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST

24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST

4’ x 4’ x 24" COLUMN FOOTINGWITH STEEL CABLEREINFORCING

W8 8"X8" COLUMN PLACED 30’ X30’ O.C.

ANCHOR BOLT

LEVELING GROUT

4’ x 4’ x 24" COLUMN FOOTINGWITH STEEL CABLE EINFORCING

6" CONCRETE SLABCONTAINING WELDED WIRE FABRIC

VAPOR RETARDANT BARRIERGRAVEL DRAINAGE

W8 8"X8"COLUMN PLACED30’ X 30’ O.C.

W16X36 STEEL BEAM

24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING

CONCRETE FILL

WELDED STEELANGLE CONNECTION

REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL

BOND BEAM WITHREINFORCED STEEL BRACING

ANCHOR BOLT WITHSTEEL BEARING PLATE

24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST

1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING

CONCRETE FILL

Build

ing

De

sign

230

We

st B

rou

gh

ton

Str

ee

tSa

van

na

h, G

A 3

1401

SCADConstruction

Tech II

Project Partners:

Anna GosselinMandy Kraczkowsky

Arielle Villardo

ARCH 341 - Winter 2011Professor Alexis D. Gregory

ARCHITECTURE

Re

visio

ns

Ori g

ina

lSu

bm

is sio

n:2

/24/

2011

Re

v isio

n1 :

2/29

/201

1R

ev i

sion

2 :3/

9/20

11Fi

na

lRe

visio

n:3

/10/

2011

1/8" = 1'-0"S 102-1FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"S 102-2SECOND FLOOR PLAN

1/8" = 1'-0"S 102-3THIRD FLOOR PLANNORTH

NORTH NORTH

SteelAssembly

S-102 1/8" = 1'-0"S 102-4EAST/WEST SECTION 3/4" = 1'-0"S 102-5COLUMN TO FOOTING DETAIL 3/4" = 1'-0"S 102-6COLUMN TO FLOOR DETAIL

SCALE SCALE SCALE

SCALESCALE SCALE SCALE

S 102−7

S 102−6

S 102−5

3/4" = 1'-0"S 102-7WALL TO FLOOR CONNECTION

METAL COPING

ANCHOR PLATE WITHCOMPRESSION BARS

CONTINUOUS CLEAT

FORMED METAL COPING

REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL

GROUT

STEEL BEARING PLATE

ANCHOR BOLT

MORTAR JOINT

STEEL REINFORCING

CANT STRIP

ROOF MEMBRANE

MOISTURE BARRIER

INSULATION

1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING

OPEN WEB 24K4 STEEL JOISTS

ROOF CONNECTION

FOUNDATION FOOTING

DRAINAGE MAT

EARTH

PROTECTION BOARD

CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB WITH STEELWELDED WIRE REINFORCING

EXPANSION JOINT

MEMBRANE

PROTECTION BOARD

CRUSHED STONE DRAINAGE

MEMBRANE

STEEL REINFORCING CABLES

FIRST FLOOR 0’−0"

THIRD FLOOR 24’ − 0"

ROOF 35’ − 0"

SECOND FLOOR 13− 0"

REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL

BOND BEAM WITHREINFORCED STEEL BRACING

ANCHOR BOLT WITHSTEEL BEARING PLATE

24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST

1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING

CONCRETE FILL

REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL

BOND BEAM WITHREINFORCED STEEL BRACING

ANCHOR BOLT WITHSTEEL BEARING PLATE

24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST

1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING

CONCRETE FILL

RIGID INSULATION

RIGID INSULATION

RIGID INSULATION

GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL

GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL

GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL

CONCRETE SIDEWALK

WEATHERSTRIPPING

HEAD JAMB

GLASS AND ALUMINUM FRAMED DOOR

VAPOR RETARDER

THRESHOLD

THRESHOLD SEALANT

WEATHERSTRIPPING

VAPOR RETARDER

BACKER RODS AND SEALANT

FLASHINGWOOD FRAMED WINDOW

ADDITIONAL SILL OR SUBSILLFOR EXTERIOR DRIP

FLASHING

STOOL

FLASHINGWOOD FRAMED WINDOW

ADDITIONAL SILL OR SUBSILLFOR EXTERIOR DRIP

FLASHING

STOOL

METAL COPING

ANCHOR PLATE WITHCOMPRESSION BARS

CONTINUOUS CLEAT

FORMED METAL COPING

REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL

GROUT

STEEL BEARING PLATE

ANCHOR BOLT

MORTAR JOINT

STEEL REINFORCING

CANT STRIP

ROOF MEMBRANE

MOISTURE BARRIER

INSULATION

1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING

OPEN WEB 24K4 STEEL JOISTS

ROOF CONNECTION

FOUNDATION FOOTING

DRAINAGE MAT

EARTH

PROTECTION BOARD

CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB WITH STEELWELDED WIRE REINFORCING

EXPANSION JOINT

MEMBRANEPROTECTION BOARD

CRUSHED STONE DRAINAGEMEMBRANE

STEEL REINFORCING CABLES

FIRST FLOOR 0’−0"

THIRD FLOOR 24’ − 0"

ROOF 35’ − 0"

SECOND FLOOR 13− 0"

SEE DOOR JAMB PLAN DETAIL

REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL

BOND BEAM WITHREINFORCED STEEL BRACING

ANCHOR BOLT WITHSTEEL BEARING PLATE

24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST

1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING

CONCRETE FILL

REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL

BOND BEAM WITHREINFORCED STEEL BRACING

ANCHOR BOLT WITHSTEEL BEARING PLATE

24K4 OPEN WEB STEEL JOIST

1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING

CONCRETE FILL

RIGID INSULATION

RIGID INSULATION

RIGID INSULATION

RIGID INSULATION

GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL

GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL

GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL

GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL

METAL COPING

ANCHOR PLATE WITHCOMPRESSION BARS

CONTINUOUS CLEAT

FORMED METAL COPING

REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL

GROUT

SHELF ANGLE

MORTAR JOINT

STEEL REINFORCING

CANT STRIP

ROOF MEMBRANE

MOISTURE BARRIER

INSULATION

1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING

ROOF CONNECTION

FOUNDATION FOOTING

DRAINAGE MAT

EARTH

PROTECTION BOARD

CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB WITH STEELWELDED WIRE REINFORCING

EXPANSION JOINT

MEMBRANEPROTECTION BOARD

CRUSHED STONE DRAINAGEMEMBRANE

STEEL REINFORCING CABLES

FIRST FLOOR 0’−0"

THIRD FLOOR 24’ − 0"

ROOF 35’ − 0"

SECOND FLOOR 13− 0"

REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL

1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING

CONCRETE FILL

RIGID INSULATION

RIGID INSULATION

RIGID INSULATION

GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL

GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL

GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL

REINFORCED 8" X 8" X 16"CMU LOAD BEARING WALL

1.5" CORRUGATED METAL DECKING

CONCRETE FILL

RIGID INSULATION

GYPSUM PLASTER INTERIOR WALL

STEEL 12K1 JOIST

SHELF ANGLE

STEEL 12K1 JOIST

SHELF ANGLE

STEEL 12K1 JOIST

Build

ing

De

sign

230

We

st B

rou

gh

ton

Str

ee

tSa

van

na

h, G

A 3

1401

SCADConstruction

Tech II

Project Partners:

Anna GosselinMandy Kraczkowsky

Arielle Villardo

ARCH 341 - Winter 2011Professor Alexis D. Gregory

ARCHITECTURE

Re

visio

ns

Ori g

ina

lSu

bm

is sio

n:2

/24/

2011

Re

v isio

n1 :

2/29

/201

1R

ev i

sion

2 :3/

9/20

11

Fin

alR

evi

sion

:3/1

0/20

11

Wall Sections

A 104

A 104-1

A 104-2

A 104-3REAR WALL SECTION

FRONT WALL SECTION

SIDE WALL SECTION3/4" = 1'-0" SCALE

3/4" = 1'-0" SCALE

3/4" = 1'-0" SCALE

Page 40: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

ad

diti

on

al p

ain

ting

s &

art

istic

exp

lora

tion

s

additional paintings & artistic explorations

recreation of claude daubigny’s “the barges”18” x 24” acrylic on canvas final project, art history II (ARTH 110) spring 2009

ad

diti

on

al p

ain

ting

s &

art

istic

exp

lora

tion

s

Page 41: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

en

viro

nm

en

tal c

on

tro

l 1: m

iam

i re

side

nc

e

ad

diti

on

al p

ain

ting

s &

art

istic

exp

lora

tion

s

ad

diti

on

al p

ain

ting

s &

art

istic

exp

lora

tion

s

“a walk in the garden”16” x 20” acrylic on canvas (commissioned work) summer 2011

reinterpretation of claude monet’s “water lillies”24” x 36” oil on canvas (commissioned work) summer 2011

Page 42: Architecture Graduate Portfolio

en

viro

nm

en

tal c

on

tro

l 1: l

igh

ting

stu

die

s

AR

CH

ITEC

TUR

E PO

RTF

OLI

O 2

012

AMANDA KRACZKOWSKY49 OLD MUSKET DRIVE

NEWINGTON, CONNECTICUT 06111(860) 202 - 8388 [email protected]