are science and faith in conflict? - sfu.caallen/scienceandfaith.september2013.pdf · 1 are science...
TRANSCRIPT
2
Introduction
• Richard Dawkins
[Dawkins 2006]
“Faith is the great cop-out,
the great excuse to evade
the need to think and
evaluate evidence. Faith is
belief in spite of, even
perhaps because of, the lack
of evidence.”
3
Introduction
• In the past, distinction between physical, scientific questions (about nature) and metaphysical questions (about God).
• Science (and technology) has been extremely successful.
• Now, scientism claims “. . . the methods of natural science, or the categories and things recognized in natural science, form the only proper elements in any philosophical or other inquiry.”
4
What is Science?
• Originally, any systematic study leading to
knowledge (“scientia”).
• Today, often restricted to natural science.
• But what is natural science?
� Philosophy of science
• Main approach: define scientific methods.
5
What is Science?
• Induction [Bacon 1605]Inference of general laws from the observation of many special instances.
• Falsificationism [Popper 1934]A universal proposition cannot logically be proved by any number of observations, but can be disproved by one observation.
� But scientists do in general try to defend their theories!
• Sociology of science [Kuhn 1962]Phase of refinement of current paradigm, followed by replacement of current paradigm by a new one.“. . . no standard higher than the consent of the relevant community. . .”
6
What is Science?
• Approach 2: [Hutchinson 2011]
identify necessary characteristics of science
(not sufficient): reproducibility and clarity.
• Science relies on the assumption (faith!) that
nature is governed by comprehensible laws
that lead to reproducible events.
• This assumption cannot a priori be inferred
from a scientific model, it can only be
supported a posteriori (it works!).
7
What is Science?
• Reproducibility:
Experiments or observations can be repeated
by any competent person with the same
results.
• Distinguish
experimental science:
physics, . . ., and
observational science:
astronomy, . . .
8
What is Science?
• Clarity:
The results of any scientific investigation have to be
expressed in terms that are unambiguous.
• Otherwise, cannot tell whether repeating an
experiment/observation obtains the same result.
• E.g., use numbers and units to measure the results.
• E.g., use a controlled vocabulary with well-defined
terms, such as a biological ontology, describing
biological species.
9
Limitations of Clarity
• Music can be recorded and represented as a sequence of numbers (frequencies / amplitudes of sound waves).
• This is a clear description which makes music reproducible.
• But this description does not capture the full meaning of music:
- Expert observers can appreciate the artistry of the composer and the performer.
- Music evokes emotional, subjective responses.
10
Limitations of Clarity
• Scientists describe the world at different levels: physics, chemistry, biology, . . .
• Scientists also describe the world, at the same level, from different perspectives: e.g., light as particle and wave.
• But chemistry is not just physics, and biology not just chemistry.
11
Limitations of Reproducibility
• History is the academic discipline which uses a
narrative to examine a sequence of past events and
to determine the patterns of cause and effect that
determine them.
• History is often concerned with
unique events in the past that
cannot be experimentally
repeated or observed multiple times.
• But the study of history has high standards of
scholarship and has high theoretical and practical
value.
12
Limitations of Reproducibility
• Example: History of Nazi Germany.
• How could Hitler gain so much power and commit
such terrible crimes?
• How can we avoid this to happen again?
• These are very important questions, but historians
still disagree on the answers.
• Note that German historians normally take other
approaches than other historians, because of their
personal relationship to their history.
13
Limitations of Reproducibility
• Example: Evolutionary explanation of moral
values.
• Evolution of moral values cannot be
experimentally repeated.
• Evolution of moral values has not been
observed.
• It is a subject of history, not of science.
14
Hidden Assumptions
• Ethics is the discipline of systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior.
• [Harris 2010]
“Neurobiology is allowing us to study – as a matter of scientific fact – which policies, laws and lifestyles lead to the greatest human wellbeing.”
• E.g., if the sum of general wellbeing is increased by the torture of a terrorist suspect, then torture is not even a necessary evil – it becomes a moral duty.
• Harris adopts one specific position within ethical philosophy, utilitarianism, i.e. that the greatest happiness of the greatest number should be society's goal.
• This assumption is a philosophical, non-scientific position.
15
Religion
• Religion is an organized collection of
beliefs, cultural systems, and world
views that relate humanity to the
supernatural, and to spirituality.
• From their beliefs about the cosmos
and human nature, they tend to derive
morality, ethics, religious laws or a
preferred lifestyle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion
16
Religion
• Many, but not all, religions include faith in
God.
• Faith is to act upon a worldview that is
plausible but unproven.
17
Science and Religion
• The actions of free agents are not reproducible.
• God is a free agent.
• Therefore, God cannot be the subject of scientific
investigation.
• A miracle is an event not ascribable to human power
or the laws of nature and consequently attributed to
a supernatural, especially divine, agency.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle
• Miracles are per definition not reproducible.
18
Scientific Study of Prayer
• Can healing claims be tested scientifically?And what are the results? E.g. the Great Prayer Experiment
[Benson et al., 2006]
• Limitations of the experimental study:
- Most participants were from the Unity School, which does not believe in the power of prayer.
- Prayer was distant, which is different from most real-life prayer.
19
Scientific Study of Prayer
• Which scientific methods should be used?[Gunther Brown 2012]
• Comparison of medical records before/after prayer.
• Surveys: how do patients perceive healing?
• Clinical trials: can health outcomes of prayer be measured?
• Follow-up: do healing experiences produce lasting effects?
• Cannot prove that healing is due to God’s answer to prayer.
• But can examine the results, e.g. confirm that healing happened and investigate the change of direction of the lives of healed patients.
20
Integrating Science and Christian Faith
• God has created the universe with its natural laws.
• Science is the discovery of these laws.
• God can act in unusual ways to demonstrate his
personal love.
• Humans are more than their physics, chemistry,
biology, psychology, sociology, . . .
• They are also called to know God and live in loving
relationship with him and with other humans.
21
References
Francis Bacon: “The Advancement of Learning”, Henrie Tomes, 1605.
H. Benson et al: “Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer (STEP)
in cardiac bypass patients: a multicenter randomized trial of uncertainty and
certainty of receiving intercessory prayer”, American Heart Journal, 2006.
Candy Gunther Brown: "Testing Prayer: Science and Healing“, Harvard
University Press, 2012.
Richard Dawkins: “The God Delusion”, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2006.
Sam Harris: “The Moral Landscape”, Free Press, 2010.
Ian Hutchinson: “Monopolizing Knowledge”, Fias Publishing, 2011.
Tim Keller: “The Reason for God”, Penguin Books, 2008.
Thomas Kuhn: “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”, University of Chicago
Press, 1962.
Karl Popper: “Logik der Forschung (The Logic of Scientific Discovery)”, 1934.