8/9/2019 Argument and Issue Structure

1/2

Agreement

 The author in this issue talks about…

At the very outset, I’d like to state that I’m in complete

agreement with what the author says. There are multiple

reasons for my agreement with the issue topic. I’ll try and

elaborate my views in the ensuing paragraph.

Primarily !rst of all, I see no discard with what the author

suggests. "e says### And I in totality stand by it. $oreover,

there are various other reasons which prompt my approval. In

the light of the topic, it is %uite imperative. &urthermore, itasserts###"ence, there seems to be no loop hole in it. In

addition to this, ### 

'ventuallythereafter, some aspect which may elude once

perspective is### At the same time, it becomes

obligatory to take a stand. (evertheless, ### roughen

things can be smoothenironed out. "owever, it’s easier said

than done. The wearer knows where the show pinches. )o, wehave to put ourselves e*actly in the circumstances before

delivering the +udgment then alone with the ob+ectives to be

achieved.

&inally, a few more e*planations will +ustify my stand. It is

immensely essential that we ### 

 Though, some criticism is bound to be inevitable, yet one

can’t shun over the responsibilities.

 To wrap up my discussion over this issue, I’d once again

e*emplify as I have done in the preceding paragraph. After all,

life has many options we take up and shun some.

8/9/2019 Argument and Issue Structure

2/2

-isagreement The author in this agreement conveys his views on### I

distinctly and vehemently disapprove the opinion e*pressed. To

unwind my argument, I’d like to start by suggesting that the

author through this argument has depicted lack of research,

database and statistics. (ot only is that but there are also some

gaping ows inherent in the topic. I’ll earnestly try to elucidate

my stand of view on the argument.

&irst of all primarily, the author has made a statement

without giving any background. The reader doesn’t know where

it is coming from. &urthermore, there aren’t facts to backup the

conclusion. At the same time, the author doesn’t seem to care

to give relative details with which one could compare these

deductions. "owever, convincing the topic, it has to have

conviction, clarity and purpose which seem to be missing intotality. The author is probably blissfully ignorant of it.

 Thereafter eventually, he has### but $ay we as a

reader, pose a very relevant %uestion. /ne can’t but wonder at

the lack of pragmatism in the argument. The argument sounds

nothing but the vein, shallow and inconsistent.

&inally, the place, the popular and the ethos, all are so

relevant in deciding such factors but the intrinsic aws of thetopic have no concern for these details.

 To sum up my discussion on the argument, I’d like to

mention that had the author instead of this observation, it’d

have been much more relevant, convincing and aw proof. It

wouldn’t have been vulnerable to such bitter criticism.