aristotelian foundations of critical thinking
DESCRIPTION
Dialectic and rhetoric have acquired negative connotations in the last several decades. This presentation suggests that a return to the Aristotelian notions of dialectic and rhetoric can recover the valid senses of those terms, and provide a standpoint from which contemporary contributions to argumentation theory and rhetoric (e.g., Perelman, Grootendorst/van Eemeren) can be viewed in a positive way. An overview of fallacies rounds out how informal logic, argumentation theory and rhetoric intersect to comprise the subject matter of modern critical thinking as a locus of interdisciplinary study.TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Aristotelian Foundations of
Critical Thinking
by William R. Minto, Ph.D.
!1
![Page 2: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Critical Thinking as a Priority for Employee Development
!2
![Page 3: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
“Critical Thinking” Appearing in More Job Postings
!3
![Page 4: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Critical Thinking as a Critical Job Skill
!4
![Page 5: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Today’s Schools Should be Teaching Critical Thinking
!5
![Page 6: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
What is Critical Thinking?
• What is the definition of “critical thinking?”"
• What is the subject matter of critical thinking?
!6
![Page 7: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Toward a Definition of Critical Thinking
• Genus: “thinking” – refers to a conscious cognitive activity, but not all thinking is critical"
• Differentia: what attributes distinguish instances of critical thinking from uncritical thinking?
!7
![Page 8: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Differentiae
• Should refer to our basic epistemic goals"
• Should exclude other valid modes of thinking, e.g., creative thinking"
• Should include both skills and dispositions
!8
![Page 9: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Critical Thinking Defined
“Critical thinking is thinking that attempts to arrive at a justified position on an issue by honestly evaluating alternative positions with respect to available evidence and arguments.”"
Based on Hatcher (2000)
!9
![Page 10: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Aspects of Critical Thinking
• Context – There is an issue on which at least two alternative positions are held !(no “cut-and-dried” solution)"
• Reality-Orientation – A justified claim must provide evidence on its behalf"
• Reason-Orientation – A justified claim must connect to the evidence by means of reasoning (rational argumentation)
!10
![Page 11: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Logic Argumentation!Theory
Rhetoric
Critical!Thinking
Dialectic Fallacies
Informal!Logic
!11
![Page 12: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Informal Logic
• A normative approach to the study of reasoning in ordinary (non-formal) language. (van Eemeren)"
• A branch of logic whose task is to develop non-formal standards, criteria, procedures for the analysis, interpretation, evaluation, criticism and construction of argumentation. (Johnson & Blair)
!12
![Page 13: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Logic Argumentation!Theory
Rhetoric
Critical!Thinking
Dialectic Fallacies
Informal!Logic
!13
![Page 14: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Argumentation Theory
• Informal logic is the philosophical core of argumentation theory"
• Different aspects of argumentation also studied in cognitive psychology, law, communications and other fields
!14
![Page 15: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Logic Argumentation!Theory
Rhetoric
Critical!Thinking
Dialectic Fallacies
Informal!Logic
!15
![Page 16: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Dialectic: A Dirty Word?
Transcendental dialectic leads to antinomies and paralogisms of reason!
EVIL
Immanuel Kant!(1724-1804)!16
![Page 17: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Dialectical Idealism
Thesis and antithesis as moments in the advance toward a dialectical synthesis.
G. W. F. Hegel!(1770-1831)!17
![Page 18: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Dialectical Materialism
G.W.F. HegelKarl Marx"(1818-1883)
!18
![Page 19: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Dialectic: Negative Connotations• Dialectic is pointless squabbling with
no path to resolution (e.g., Scholastic theological debate)"
• Dialectic rationalizes and empowers sophistry"
• Dialectic is Kantian-Hegelian-Marxist gibberish
!19
![Page 20: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Pragma-Dialectics
Frans van Eemeren &!Rob Grootendorst
!20
![Page 21: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Pragmatism and Dialectics?
!21
![Page 22: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
!22
![Page 23: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Induction and Deduction
• Induction - reasoning from particulars to universals, e.g., by example"
• Deduction - “arguments in which, certain things being laid down, something other than theses necessarily comes about through them.”"
Topics I:1,100a25-26
!23
![Page 24: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Aristotle says ...
“... we must distinguish how many species there are of dialectical arguments. There are induction and deduction.”"
Topics I:12, 105a10-11
!24
![Page 25: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Uses of Dialectic
• Intellectual training"
• Casual encounters"
• Philosophical sciences
!25
![Page 26: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Dialectics Use in Philosophy
“For the study of the philosophical sciences it is useful, because the ability to puzzle on both sides of a subject will make us detect more easily the truth and error about the several points that arise.”"
Topics I:2, 101a35-38
!26
![Page 27: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
!27
![Page 28: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The Starting Point of Dialectic
“A dialectical proposition consists in asking of something which is reputable to all men or to most men or to the wise, i.e., either to all, to most, or the most notable of these.”"
Topics I:10, 104a9-12
!28
![Page 29: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
The Starting Point of Dialectic
“...opinions that are in accordance with the arts are dialectical propositions; for people likely to assent to the views held by those who have made a study of these things, e.g., on a question of medicine they will agree with the doctor, and on a question of geometry with the geometrician; and likewise also in other cases.”"
Topics I:10, 104a33-37
!29
![Page 30: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Dialectical Deduction
“... if something has been demonstrated it cannot be otherwise – the deduction, therefore, must depend on necessities. For from truths, one can deduce without demonstrating, but from necessities one cannot deduce without demonstrating.”"
Posterior Analytics I:6,74b14-17
!30
![Page 31: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Deduction
Necessity
Truth
Demonstration
Dialectic
!31
![Page 32: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Dialectic – Summary
• Reasoning from premises constituting reputable opinion"
• Reasoning from truths, or likely truths, but not first principles of the sciences nor from necessary truths (e.g., axioms)"
• Implemented using a question-and-answer technique"
• Starts from a choice between contradictories!(“Is virtue but a habit, or no?”)"
• A technique for the discovery or provision of arguments
!32
![Page 33: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Logic Argumentation!Theory
Rhetoric
Critical!Thinking
Dialectic Fallacies
Informal!Logic
!33
![Page 34: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Rhetoric: Negative Connotations• Persuasion by any means, ethical or not"
• Persuasion by pure appeal to emotion"
• The opposite of logic"
• Verbal hot air, puffery, words without substance"
• Self-aggrandizing erudition of blowhards
!34
![Page 35: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
!35
![Page 36: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
The Rhetorical Aspect
!36
![Page 37: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
What is Rhetoric?
“Rhetoric is the counterpart of dialectic.”"
Rhetoric I:1,1354a1"
!
“Rhetoric is an offshoot (branch) of dialectic.”"
Rhetoric I;1,1356a25-30
!37
![Page 38: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Rhetorical vs. Dialectic
Rhetoric Dialectic
Example Induction
Enthymeme Deduction
!38
![Page 39: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Enthymeme: Rhetorical Deduction
“Everyone who effects persuasion through proof does in fact use either enthymemes or examples: there is no other way.”"
Rhetoric I:2,1356b5-6
!39
![Page 40: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Rhetoric in Aristotle
“Rhetoric may be defined as the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion.”"
Rhetoric I:2,1355b27-28
!40
![Page 41: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Ethos
“Of the modes of persuasion furnished by the spoken word there are three kinds. The first kind depends on the personal character of the speaker ...”"
!
Rhetoric 1:2,1356a2-3
!41
![Page 42: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
The!Rhetorical!Triangle
Ethos
!42
![Page 43: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Pathos
“... the second, on putting the audience into a certain frame of mind ...”"
!
Rhetoric 1:2,1356a3-4"
!
!43
![Page 44: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
The!Rhetorical!Triangle
EthosPathos
!44
![Page 45: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Logos
Proof through logical reasoning
!45
![Page 46: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
The!Rhetorical!Triangle
Logos
EthosPathos
!46
![Page 47: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Sophistry
“...is merely apparent in its conformity to the subject matter, so that it is deceptive and unfair. For just as unfairness in a contest is a definite type of fault, and is a kind of foul fighting, so the art of contentious reasoning is foul fighting in disputation.”!
Sophistical Refutations 11:171b20-23
!47
![Page 48: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Sophistry as a Dishonorable Profession“Those who do this in order to win the mere victory are thought to be contentious and quarrelsome persons, while those who do it to win a reputation with a view to making money are sophistical. For sophistry is a kind of art of money-making from a merely apparent wisdom.... the art of sophistry is a certain appearance of wisdom without the reality.”"
Sophistical Refutations 11,171b25-33
!48
![Page 49: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Logic Argumentation!Theory
Rhetoric
Critical!Thinking
Dialectic Fallacies
Informal!Logic
!49
![Page 50: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Aristotle’s Concept of Fallacy
“That some deductions are genuine, while others seem to be so – but are not – is evident. This happens with arguments, as also elsewhere, through a certain likeness between the genuine and the sham.”"
Sophistical Refutations 1:164b24-26
!50
![Page 51: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Contemporary Treatments of Fallacies
Well over 100 fallacies
!51
![Page 52: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
180+ Fallacies?
!52
![Page 53: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Fallacies in Aristotle
• Fallacies received extended discussion in Sophistical Refutations!
• Two divisions: "
! dependent on language"
! not dependent on language
!53
![Page 54: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Fallacies of Language
• equivocation"
• amphibole"
• composition"
• division"
• accent"
• figure of speech
!54
![Page 55: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Other Aristotelian Fallacies
TextText
Complex Question!55
![Page 56: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Other Aristotelian Fallacies
1.If it was raining, the road will be wet."
2.The road is wet."
3.Therefore, it was raining.
Affirming the Consequent!56
![Page 57: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Affirming the Consequent
Oops.!57
![Page 58: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Other Aristotelian Fallacies
False Cause!58
![Page 59: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Other Aristotelian Fallacies
False Cause!59
![Page 60: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Other Aristotelian Fallacies
Begging the Question (Circular reasoning)!60
![Page 61: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Other Aristotelian Fallacies
• accident"
• secundum quid (hasty generalization)"
• ignoratio elenchi (irrelevant conclusion)
!61
![Page 62: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Modern Additions
Ad hominem!62
![Page 63: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Modern Additions
Ad misericordiam!63
![Page 64: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Modern Additions
Ad populum!64
![Page 65: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Modern Additions
Ad baculum!65
![Page 66: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Other Modern Additions
• ad verecundiam"
• ad ignorantiam"
• ... ad nauseum
!66
![Page 67: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
!67
![Page 68: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Aristotelian Foundations of Critical • Critical Thinking as a subject matter
discipline continues to show strong Aristotelian influence"
• The importance attached to critical thinking by business and education leaders is a bright spot in the culture
!68
![Page 69: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
• Posterior Analytics — deals with
demonstration, definition, and scientific knowledge"
Topics — the method of dialectic; a handbook for
arguers"
Sophistical Refutations — logical fallacies;
relationship of logic and rhetoric
Aristotle’s Organon
!69
![Page 70: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
• The Categories — introduces Aristotle's 10-fold
classification of existents."
On Interpretation — introduces Aristotle's
theory of the proposition and the various relations
between affirmative, negative, universal, and
particular propositions. "
Prior Analytics — introduces the theory of the
syllogism, and discusses inductive inference.
Aristotle’s Organon
!70
![Page 71: Aristotelian Foundations of Critical Thinking](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052504/54c7cc054a795910358b45db/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
!71