arm lecture four

Upload: anon419443716

Post on 04-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    1/26

    Ethics in Business Research

    Topic FourClass Four

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    2/26

    Todays Agenda

    Review of Assignment RFP

    What is ethics?

    Stakeholders in Research

    I had taken a course

    in Ethics. I read a

    thick textbook,

    heard the class

    discussions andcame out of it

    saying I hadn't

    learned a thing I

    didn't know before

    about morals and

    what is right or

    wrong in human

    conduct.

    Carl Sandburg

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    3/26

    What is Ethics?Some years ago, sociologist Raymond Baumhart asked business people:

    What does ethics mean to you?

    Among their replies were the following:

    Ethics has to do with what my feelings tell me is right or wrong

    Ethics has to do with my religious beliefs

    Being ethical is doing what the law requires

    Ethics consists of the standards of behavior our society accepts

    I don't know what the word means

    Ethics is the study of morality's effect on conduct: the study of moral

    standards and how they affect conduct

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    4/26

    Importance of Ethics in Research

    Research depends upon the willing co-operation of the publicand business community

    Based upon confidence that research is carried out honestly,objectively and in a manner that protects participants rights toprivacy

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    5/26

    Stakeholders in Research

    Research

    Researcher

    Sponsor

    SubjectGoal of

    no harm for all

    the stakeholders

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    6/26

    Types of Ethical Violations

    Violating

    disclosure

    agreements

    Breaking

    confidentiality

    Misrepresenting

    results

    Deceiving

    participants

    Padded

    invoices

    Avoiding

    legal liability

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    7/26

    EthicsConceptual Approaches

    Ethical

    standardsEthical

    RelativismDeontology

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    8/26

    Business Research Ethics -Our Routes to Understanding

    Research Process Based

    Stakeholder Based

    Issue Based

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    9/26

    Ethical ApproachesRecap of Research Process

    Research Process

    Pre-ResearchDesigning &

    PlanningPhase

    InformationGathering

    Data

    CollectionPhase

    Analysis,Interpretationand Reporting

    Phase

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    10/26

    Ethical ApproachesResearch Designing & Planning Phase

    Sponsor nondisclosure

    Sponsors right to quality research

    Sponsors right of purpose nondisclosure

    Researchers right to absence of sponsor

    coercion

    Subject deception

    Sponsors right to quality research

    Subjects right to informed consent

    Subjects right to privacy (refusal)

    Sponsors right to quality research

    Researchers right of absence of sponsorscoercion

    Management &Research Questions

    Research Proposal

    Design Strategy

    Sampling

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    11/26

    Ethical Approaches Data Collection

    Subjects right to privacy

    Subject deception

    Sponsors right of sponsor nondisclosure

    Researchers right to safety

    Data Collection

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    12/26

    Ethical Approaches

    Data Analysis, Interpretation & Research Reporting

    Sponsors right to findings nondisclosure

    Subjects right of confidentiality

    Sponsors right to quality research

    Researchers right of absence of sponsorcoercion

    Data Analysis andReporting

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    13/26

    Ethical Issues and Stakeholders

    Sponsor

    SubjectResearcher

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    14/26

    Ethical IssuesSponsor Related Obligations

    1. Come to a consensus on the research objectives, i.e., the reason for the

    research.

    2. Set reasonable time and money budgets.

    3. Develop an understanding of the researcher and research project

    4. Give genuine consideration to the research results and be willing to use them

    to improve decision making

    5. Pay the researcher fully and on time upon successful completion, regardless of

    whether or not the results are desirable

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    15/26

    Ethical IssuesResearcher Related Obligations

    1. Develop a working knowledge of the situation. To do so, interview key decision makers

    2. Communicate exactly what the research can do.

    Project deliverables

    3. Avoid conflicts of interest.

    Sometimes say no

    4. To Decision Makers:Be knowledgeableInterpret results honestly and fullyPresent limitations of research

    5. To Participants:Avoid coercing participantsAvoid physical or psychological harmProtect PrivacyInform subjects

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    16/26

    Ethical IssuesRespondent Related Obligations

    1. Willful participation

    2. Screening questions should determine whether participants

    qualify

    3. Faithful participation

    4. Participants must follow instructions and pay attention

    5. Honest responses

    6. Privacy

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    17/26

    Ethical Treatment of Participants

    Explain study benefits

    Explain participant rights

    and protections

    Obtain informed

    consent

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    18/26

    Components of Informed Consent

    Identify researchers

    Describe survey topic

    Describe target sample

    Identify sponsor

    Describe purpose ofresearch

    Promise anonymity andconfidentiality

    Give good-faith estimateof required timecommitment

    State participation is

    voluntary State item-non response is

    acceptable

    Ask for permission

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    19/26

    Characteristics of Informed Consent

    Elements

    Competence

    Informed

    Knowledge Voluntary

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    20/26

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    21/26

    Debriefing

    Explain any deception

    Describe purpose

    Share results

    Provide follow-up

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    22/26

    Participants Confidentiality

    Minimizeinstrumentsrequiring ID

    Non-disclosure ofdata subsets

    Restrictaccess to ID

    Obtain signednondisclosure

    Reveal onlywith writtenconsent

    Participant

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    23/26

    Right to Privacy

    Right to refuse

    Prior permission to

    interview

    Limit time required

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    24/26

    Effective Codes of Ethics

    Enforceable

    Specify

    Behavior

    Regulate

    Protect

  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    25/26

    Ethical Codes of Conduct

    http://www.marketingpower.com/http://www.casro.org/http://www.mra-net.org/
  • 7/31/2019 ARM Lecture Four

    26/26

    Research Assignment on Ethics

    1. Pretests show that the average time to complete a particulartelephone interview is 20 minutes. They also show a drop in theresponse rate if respondents are told in advance about the time.Telling them it will take 15 minutes does not reduce the responserate. The researcher:

    a) Does not provide any information on the length of the interview

    b) Tells the respondent it will take only few minutes

    c) Tells the respondent it will take about 15 minutes

    2. Researcher poses as graduate student working on a thesis in orderto gain information that competitors might not otherwise give

    Instructions:

    Develop a 10-point ethical-unethical scale of each of

    the above two situations and interview 10 students