armstrong or parker? a re-evaluation of jazz in the work of ralph ellison
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
I explore the relationship of jazz to Invisible Man using Ellison’s own references, definitions and attitudes to music within the text and in his essays. After discussing Ellison’s views on different generations of jazz musicians, symbolized by the contrasting figures of Louis Armstrong and Charlie Parker, I go on to develop the implications of Ellison’s decision to include Armstrong in Invisible Man. I suggest that by giving Armstrong a central role, Ellison sought to reclaim jazz as an important art form, without recourse to the damaging racial and commercial separatism of bebop.Having established the importance of Armstrong and his generation of musicians, I probe whether jazz was a formative, as well as subjective, influence on Invisible Man. I suggest that what has been called the novel’s “bebop aesthetic” has little grounding in the text and owes as much to cultural developments, such as spontaneity and Gestalt, as it does to this style of music.TRANSCRIPT
-
University of Cambridge
Faculty of English
Armstrong or Parker?
A Re-evaluation of Jazz
in the Work
of
Ralph Ellison
Robert James Carroll
Pembroke
A dissertation submitted in part-fulfilment of the regulations for the
Degree of Master of Philosophy 2005
Abstract................................................................................................................... iv
Introduction............................................................................................................. 1
I ................................................................................................................................ 4
Exit Bolden, enter Armstrong ................................................................................ 4
Louis Armstrong, Charlie Parker. ....................................................................... 4
Music is the Weapon.............................................................................................. 8
The music of invisibility................................................................................... 12
Fingering the jagged grain................................................................................ 15
II ............................................................................................................................. 20
Ellison, Improvisation and the Culture of Spontaneity ...................................... 20
Literary jazz ..................................................................................................... 23
[O]ur concept is Gestalt.................................................................................... 25
-
Rinehart Improvising in the bop apocalypse .................................................. 28
Conclusion.............................................................................................................. 31
Bibliography .......................................................................................................... 33
-
I declare that this dissertation contains ___________ words including footnotes, but
excluding bibliography.
I have written at the foot of each page the total number of words on that page,
together with a running total of words so far.
I declare that this dissertation is my own work, and that it has not previously been
submitted for any degree, either at the University of Cambridge or at any other
University. Where reference is made to the works of others the extent to which that
work has been used is indicated and duly acknowledged in the text and bibliography.
Style sheet used: MLA Handbook
Signed:
-
ivCarroll
Abstract
Jazz permeates the work of Ralph Ellison. His instinctive approach to writing
is through sound.1 This approach manifests itself in his representations of jazz in his
essays and in Invisible Man, as well as in the style and structure of the novel.
Previous approaches to this subject have stumbled over definitions of jazz.
Examining Ellisons work for a jazz aesthetic is too vague, while applying a more
specific term, such as a bebop aesthetic, ignores clear signals and references in the
text. I argue that earlier, pre-bebop performers and styles of jazz have the most
resonance in Invisible Man. For bebop musicians and their followers, swing, the
dominant form of jazz in the first half of the twentieth century, carried the stigma of
white appropriation and seemed to dilute the essential elements of jazz into
inconsequential pop music. Bebop created a racial and generational schism in the
jazz world. But I argue that Ellisons novel offers a more subtle reading of performers
such as Louis Armstrong, which could suggest more fluidity and possibility in his
music than his bebop critics permit.
I explore the relationship of jazz to Invisible Man using Ellisons own
references, definitions and attitudes to music within the text and in his essays. After
discussing Ellisons views on different generations of jazz musicians, symbolized by
the contrasting figures of Louis Armstrong and Charlie Parker, I go on to develop the
implications of Ellisons decision to include Armstrong in Invisible Man. I suggest
that by giving Armstrong a central role, Ellison sought to reclaim jazz as an important
art form, without recourse to the damaging racial and commercial separatism of
bebop.
Having established the importance of Armstrong and his generation of
musicians, I probe whether jazz was a formative, as well as subjective, influence on
Invisible Man. I suggest that what has been called the novels bebop aesthetic has
little grounding in the text and owes as much to cultural developments, such as
spontaneity and Gestalt, as it does to this style of music.
Identifying and examining specific jazz references and influences in Invisible
Man not only reveals Ellisons views on the music, it also has important implications
for Ellisons attitudes to race and identity in American society. For Ellison, jazz
demonstrates antagonistic co-operation2 in action. It shows how an individual can
maintain his or her identity, while still functioning effectively in a group. Jazz also
represents a positive example of fluid cultural appropriation, which, in Ellisons view,
is central to the successful development of a unified American society.
Paying attention to precisely which types of jazz Ellison uses in Invisible Man
illuminates both the novel and Armstrongs music.
1 Ellison, Ralph. "A Completion of Personality: A Talk with Ralph Ellison." Hersey, John. Ed. Ralph
Ellison: A Collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1974. 11. 2 Ellison, Ralph. The World and the Jug. 1964. The Collected Essays of Ralph Ellison. New York:
Modern Library, 1995. 188.
-
v Carroll
-
Introduction
[A]n ironic, down-home voice [] struck me as being as irreverent as a honky-tonk trumpet
blasting through a performance [] of Brittens War Requiem.3
I am an invisible man
4
Few writers have incorporated jazz and blues elements into their work more
successfully than Ralph Ellison. Invisible Man is often referred to as a quintessential
jazz text5 or the ultimate blues novel
6. Ellisons collections of essays, Shadow
and Act and Going to the Territory, form a rich and influential body of commentary,
which includes portraits of famous blues and jazz musicians, as well as more general
autobiographical writing about music.
Yet jazz and blues are notoriously protean art forms. They are difficult to pin
down musically7. Examining their wider significance is even more complex. As Art
Lange and Nathaniel Mackey admit in their introduction to Moment's Notice: Jazz in
Poetry and Prose:
3 Ellison, Ralph. Introduction to Invisible Man. 1982. The Collected Essays of Ralph Ellison. New
York: Modern Library, 1995. 481-482. 4 Ellison, Ralph. Invisible Man. 1952. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin, 1974. 7.
5 Porter, Horace A. Jazz Country: Ralph Ellison in America. Iowa City: Iowa University Press, 2001.
74. 6 Ellison, Mary. Extensions of the Blues. London: John Calder, 1989. 177.
7 Even theoretically equipped jazz critics tend to avoid the question, What is jazz? See Brown, Lee
B. The Theory of Jazz Music It Don't Mean a Thing... The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism.
(Spring, 1991): 115.
-
2 Carroll
Jazz is [] a music which, much more than most, is more than music. It has become a widely
deployed symbol, a signifier freighted with a panoply of meanings, attitudes, and associations
which are variously and sometimes conflictingly aesthetic, religious, racial, political,
epistemic, individual, social, philosophic, visceral, idiosyncratic, collective, utopic, dyspeptic-
-on and on. It has become, that is, iconic, its own often iconoclastic impulses
notwithstanding.8
Any attempt to examine the interaction between jazz and literature must try to
untangle this web of possible meanings.
Unsurprisingly, many critics have examined Ellisons writing and its
relationship with jazz and blues. The success of Houston Bakers chapter on blues in
Invisible Man9 partially accounts for the preponderance of jazz in my study. Many
critics have examined the presence and influence of jazz in Invisible Man. So why
give another version of what should be a tired and overworked tune? Well, for one
reason, it is difficult to discuss Invisible Man without some reference to black
vernacular forms, such as spirituals, sermons, folk tales, blues and jazz. More
importantly, critics have tended to adopt quite general approaches to jazz in Invisible
Man. Like sex, jazz is a very flexible term. Some critics have couched their studies in
the fuzzy blanket of jazz aesthetics, without convincingly defining the attributes of
this term10
. And when critics attempt to be more specific, for example by examining
Invisible Man through the cultural and aesthetic framework of bebop11
, they ignore
clear contradictory signals and references within the text.
This study will examine the relationship of jazz (and to some extent blues) to
Invisible Man using Ellisons own references, definitions and attitudes to music.
Although much has changed since 200112
, Horace Porters comment that [f]ew
critics [] have thoroughly discussed [Ellisons] essays13
still has some validity.
Porter examines the essays, Invisible Man and Juneteenth, but he fails to make
explicit connections between the jazz references in these different works. This study
will look at specific jazz influences in Invisible Man. Previous attempts to align the
novel with the bebop movement are a misreading. In fact, earlier performers and
styles of jazz have the most resonance in the novel. By using Ellisons own views to
illuminate the uses of jazz in Invisible Man, I hope to avoid becoming bogged down
in definitions, without skipping blithely over the subtleties of Ellisons approach.
In his seminal essay, Literature and Music, Steven Scher defines three ways
music can be incorporated into literature:
8 Lange, Art and Mackey, Nathaniel, eds. Moment's Notice: Jazz in Poetry and Prose. Minneapolis:
Coffee House Press, 1993. N. pag. 9 Baker, Jr., Houston A. Blues, Ideology, and Afro-American Literature: A Vernacular Theory.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984. 10
Rice, Alan J. "Finger-Snapping to Train-Dancing and Back Again: The Development of a Jazz Style
in African-American Prose." Yearbook of English Studies (1994): 105. 11
Spaulding, Timothy. Embracing Chaos in Narrative Form: The Bebop Aesthetic and Ralph Ellison's
Invisible Man." Callaloo (2004): 481-501. 12
For discussion of Ellisons attitudes to jazz in his essays see Powers, Christopher. Why Did Ralph
Ellison Dislike Bebop? SAMLA Panel, Baltimore, MD, 15-17 November, 2002. Blue Notes: Jazz
History, Fiction, and Poetics, 2002. 13
Porter. Jazz Country. 2.
-
3 Carroll
1. "Verbal music" "Any literary presentation [...] of existing or
fictitious musical compositions."
2. "Borrowing of musical strategies for literary purposes" - Applying
musical techniques, structures and devices in literature.
3. Word music - An "imitation in words of the acoustic quality of
music"14
Word music refers to a formal resemblance between music and words, which is
more applicable to poetry. Ellison uses the other two techniques extensively in
Invisible Man and I have structured my study accordingly.
Part I looks at Ellisons representations of jazz and jazz musicians. In his
essays, Ellison writes about Louis Armstrong and Charlie Parker and their contrasting
attitudes to the legacy of minstrelsy. It is easy to set up a straightforward dichotomy
between these two jazz musicians. However, Ellisons depictions of Armstrong in
Invisible Man demand a re-evaluation of the musician: they challenge the validity of
accusations about Armstrongs apparent subservience to the white establishment and
reinvigorate the relevance and vitality of his music, which bebop was beginning to
eclipse.
Part II assesses the validity of arguments that Invisible Man has stylistic and
structural affinities with jazz, in particular bebop. It places Ellison in the context of
the culture of spontaneity15
, which took cues in part from bebop, and examines
whether different styles of jazz influence the style and structure of his prose. It
considers the influential role of music in two key episodes in Invisible Man. Although
Ellison does not equate improvisation with spontaneity (as for example Jack Kerouac
does), he does utilize a combination of sound, music and principles of Gestalt
psychology to effect a radical change in the perceptions and reactions of the narrator
of Invisible Man. Finally, this study examines the role of Rinehart, who despite
superficial affinities with bebop musicians, has more in common with Louis
Armstrong, particularly in his adaptability and use of masks.
14
Scher, Steven Paul. "Literature and Music." Interrelations of Literature. Eds. Jean- Pierre Barricelli
and Joseph Gibaldi. New York: Modern Languages Association of America, 1982. 234. 15
Belgrad, Daniel. The Culture of Spontaneity: Improvisation and the Arts in Postwar America.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
-
4 Carroll
I
Exit Bolden, enter Armstrong
In June 1951, while preparing Invisible Man for publication, Ralph Ellison
changed the jazz musician featured in the novels Prologue and Epilogue from Buddy
Bolden to Louis Armstrong.16
It is a surprising and important change. By replacing
the mythic, but little-known, Bolden with Armstrong, a famous ambassador for jazz
on the world stage17
, Ellison was doing more than simply opening up the resonance of
the references beyond a small group of jazz aficionados. Armstrong was a beacon of
African American achievement, having sustained a successful career for over thirty
years. His music and his image were firmly established in the publics consciousness.
Yet Armstrong was still a controversial choice. Bebop emerged in the mid-forties. Its
two principal exponents, the saxophonist Charlie Parker and the trumpeter Dizzy
Gillespie, were critical of Armstrongs image and often explicitly defined themselves
in contrast to the older musician. As Gillespie comments in his biography: I
criticized Louis for [] his plantation image [] Handkerchief over his head,
grinning in the face of white racism [] I didnt want the white man to expect me to
allow the same things Louis Armstrong did.18
Placed in this context, Ellisons choice
of Armstrong potentially responds to contemporary criticisms of the musician. To
investigate this dialogue, I will first examine images of Armstrong, Parker and other
jazz musicians in fiction and poetry of the period. Then I will look at Ellisons essays
for reasons why he chose Armstrong. Finally, I will develop the implications of this
choice in the context of Invisible Man.
Louis Armstrong, Charlie Parker.19
Louis Armstrong is conspicuous by his absence from fictional and poetic
works in the fifties and sixties. Admittedly, part of this dearth can be explained simply
by chronology: the persistent presence of a jazz musician whose major innovations
took place in the twenties would be to some extent surprising and anachronistic. Yet
he does appear occasionally. In his 1957 short story Sonnys Blues, James Baldwin
directly exploits the gulf between Armstrong and Charlie Parker to illustrate wider
tensions beyond the jazz milieu. The story explores the relationship between two
brothers. The younger brother, Sonny, as a recovering heroin addict and aspiring jazz
musician, has much in common with Parker. His older brother, the narrator, is a war
veteran and algebra teacher, who lives within the constraints of mainstream society.
At a key point in the story, when Sonny announces his intentions to become a
16
Jackson, Lawrence. Ralph Ellison: Emergence of Genius. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 2002.
426. 17
Von Eschen, Penny. Satchmo Blows Up the World. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University
Press, 2004. 18
Gillespie, Dizzy and Fraser, Al. To Be, or Not to Bop. 1979. London: Quartet, 1982. 295. 19
Miles Davis summarizing the history of jazz.
-
5 Carroll
musician, jazz plays a central role in highlighting the discords in racial attitudes and
generational outlook: I want to play jazz, he said.
Well, the word had never before sounded as heavy, as real, as it sounded that
afternoon in Sonnys mouth. []
Are you serious?
Hell, yes, Im serious.
He looked more helpless than ever, and annoyed, and deeply hurt.
I suggested, helpfully: You mean - like Louis Armstrong?
His face closed as though Id struck him. No. Im not talking about none of that old-
time, down home crap.
Well, look, Sonny, Im sorry, dont get mad. I dont altogether get it, thats all.
Name somebody you know, a jazz musician you admire.
Bird.
Who?
Bird! Charlie Parker! Dont they teach you nothing in the goddamn Army? []
Ive been out of touch, I said. Youll have to be patient with me. Now. Whos this
Parker character?
Hes just one of the greatest jazz musicians alive, said Sonny, sullenly, his hands in
his pockets, his back to me. Maybe the greatest, he added bitterly, thats probably why you
never heard of him.20
The narrator associates jazz musicians with flimsy hedonism, what Daddy called
good-time people21
. The sudden impact and weight of the light and fizzy word,
jazz, reveals the extent of his previous lack of serious or sensuous engagement
with an important part of his heritage. As the narrator admits, he doesnt altogether
get it. When he tries to be supportive, by suggesting Armstrong as a role model, he
compounds the cultural distance between himself and his brother. The violent
physicality of Sonnys rebuff makes Armstrong, and by implication the narrator, seem
simultaneously outmoded, diluted and sterile. As Richard N Albert correctly observes,
there is a strong Uncle Tom implication22
in the phrase old-time, down home
crap. The narrator repeatedly fluffs Sonnys cues to initiate him into his (musical)
world; firstly, with an incredulous response to Bird, and then by not even
recognizing Charlie Parker by name. Words aggravate their relationship, but music
ultimately becomes a bridge between them, when the narrator hears Sonny playing in
a Greenwich Village nightclub at the end of the story. Baldwins use of Armstrong
and Parker as symbolic shorthand for old-time and progressive attitudes reinforces
the criticisms voiced by musicians of Parkers generation, but, in the story at least,
music has a unifying effect.
While bebop had a strong musical relationship with earlier styles and many of
its main innovators honed their skills in large swing bands in the thirties, Eric Lott
stresses the radical ruptures inherent in this style of music: We forget how disruptive
20
Baldwin, James. Sonnys Blues. 1957. Hot and Cool: Jazz Short Stories, ed. Marcela Breton. New
York: Plume, 1990. 109-110. 21
Baldwin. Sonnys Blues. 110. 22
Albert, Richard N. The Jazz-Blues Motif in James Baldwins Sonnys Blues. College Literature
11.2 (1984): 180.
-
6 Carroll
bebop actually was.23
Bebop quickly became a social phenomenon, with fans
mimicking the garb (beret, horn-rimmed glasses and goatee), addictions (alcohol and
heroin) and nonchalance of the bebop musicians. Some writers claimed the music as a
form of proto black nationalism. Amiri Baraka, the poet, critic and arguable founder
of the Black Aesthetic of the 1960s24
, epitomizes this attitude: When the moderns, the beboppers, showed up to restore jazz, in some sense, to its original
separateness, to drag it outside the mainstream of American culture again, most middle-class
Negroes (as most Americans) were stuck; they had passed, for the most part, completely into
the Platonic citizenship. The willfully harsh, anti-assimilationist sound of bebop fell on deaf or
horrified ears, just as it did in white America. 25
With its fast pace and challenging harmonies, bebops sonic abrasiveness was
inextricably connected to its surrounding environment. Often it was associated with
violent social action. So, for example, when Louis Armstrong visited Paris in 1948, he
needed police protection from bebop devotees and their volatile habits.26
By the
mid- to late sixties, this volatile energy infused the tone of depictions of jazz and jazz
musicians in powerful ways. Particular vitriol was directed against white boys who
were not deaf to the sound, but could never completely grasp the full range of its
implications. Barakas 1964 play Dutchman seethes with anger at this apparent
appropriation: Charlie Parker? Charlie Parker. All the hip white boys scream for Bird. And Bird saying,
Up your ass, feeble-minded ofay! Up your ass! And they sit there talking about the tortured
genius of Charlie Parker. Bird wouldve played not a note of music if he just walked up to
East Sixty-seventh street and killed the first ten white people he saw. Not a note!27
Anger and violence are not simply the inspiration for Parkers genius. They are
palpable in the characteristics and tone of the music. Bebop, Baraka suggests, is a
direct and angry reaction to racial oppression, which must be vented with notes or
bullets. In the 1974 short story Will the circle be unbroken? by Henry Dumas, the
saxophone becomes more than a surrogate weapon. The story describes three people
visiting a session for Brothers and Sisters only 28
at an underground, inner city
nightclub. They are portrayed as stereotypical white hipsters: privileged, well
educated, and with a dilettantish interest in jazz. The doorman stops them and warns
them of the dangers, but they insist on going in. On stage, a musician called Probe is
playing an afro-horn 29
, a rare and ancient instrument. At the end of the
performance, the three white characters are found slumped against the wall. They are
23
Lott, Eric. "Double V, Double Time: Bebop's Politics of Style." Callaloo. (1988): 597. 24
Harper, Phillip Brian, Nationalism and Social Division in the Black Arts Poetry of the 1960s.
Identities. Eds. Appiah, Kwame Anthony and Gates, Henry Louis, Jr. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press, 1995. 223. 25
Baraka, Amiri (Jones, LeRoi). Blues People. 1963. Edinburgh: Payback Press, 1995. 181-182. 26
Lott. "Double V 599. 27
Baraka, Amiri (Jones, LeRoi). Dutchman. 1964. The Norton Anthology of African American
Literature. New York: WW Norton & Company, 1997. 1897-1898. 28
Dumas, Henry. Will the Circle Be Unbroken? 1974. Moment's Notice: Jazz in Poetry and Prose,
ed. Art Lange and Nathaniel Mackey. Minneapolis: Coffee House Press, 1993. 179. 29
Dumas. Will the. 178.
-
7 Carroll
dead, their hearts silent in respect for truer vibrations30
. In the forties, hipsters spoke
of being slayed by a particularly fine or inventive solo. In a quasi-science fiction
transformation, Dumas takes this slang term literally and stresses the racial divide in
the music in the most fundamental way. The ending of this story echoes (with a lethal
twist) the ending of Frank OHaras 1959 poem, The Day Lady Died, Lady being
the jazz singer Billie Holiday: and I am sweating a lot by now and thinking of
leaning on the john door in the 5 SPOT
while she whispered a song along the keyboard
to Mal Waldron and everyone and I stopped breathing31
In stark contrast to Dumass separatist sentiments, OHara stresses the universality of
a musical moment. With the literal breathlessness of the final line, created by the
insertion of and I, OHara forces the reader to mimic the experience (for him and
the audience) in the Five Spot, the legendary jazz club in Greenwich Village. He gives
a glimpse of the potentially unifying impact of jazz. Of course, Holidays carefully
considered image, which encouraged audiences to thread the lyrical content of her
songs and the violent and vulnerable grain of her voice back into the biographical
details of her drug addiction and troubled relationships, was a key to her success.
Nevertheless the poems final moments briefly illustrate how Holidays voice (and
jazz music) can transcend the hardships of her life and continue to do so after her
death.
Many people approached Greenwich Village with optimism in the fifties.
Hettie Jones recalls: [G]oing to the Five Spot was not like taking the A train to
Harlem. Downtown was everyone's new place. [. . .] And all of us there black and
white were strangers at first.32
Her husband, Amiri Baraka (then LeRoi Jones),
admits that he "could see the young white boys and girls in their pronouncement of
disillusion with and 'removal' from society as being related to the black experience.
That made us colleagues of the spirit" 33
. Such communality has led critics such as
W.T. Lhamon to declare: Clearly Beats and blacks were both on the same track in
the fifties, both reaching to connect with an only apparently lost culture.34
Indeed,
Parker should have been a prime candidate for transgressing the colour line. White
hipsters claimed him as the king and founder of the bop generation35
, praising the
velocity and brilliance of his playing as well as his prodigious appetites and
addictions. But the term white Negro, which incidentally had existed for several
centuries in the West Indies to describe white men who become naturalized among
30
Dumas. Will the. 182. 31
OHara, Frank. The Day Lady Died. Lunch Poems. San Francisco: City Lights, 1964. 26. 32
Jones, Hettie. How I Became Hettie Jones. New York: Penguin, 1990. 34. 33
Baraka, Amiri. The Autobiography of LeRoi Jones/Amiri Baraka. New York: Freundlich, 1984. 157. 34
Lhamon, W.T. Jnr. Deliberate Speed: The Origins of a Cultural Style in the American 1950s.
Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1990. 70. 35
Kerouac, Jack. The Subterraneans. 1958. London: Penguin, 2001. 13.
-
8 Carroll
their servants and concubines36
, smacked of appropriation rather than integration
when Norman Mailer popularized it in his famous 1959 article37
.
In his discussion of writing about jazz in the fifties, Jon Panish sets out to
dispel the myth of racial democracy in Greenwich Village by exposing the racial
denial inherent in a color-blind society. Adopting a strategically essentialist
notion of blackness38
, Panish argues that white and black writers respond to and use
jazz in fundamentally different ways. He gives convincing close readings of
depictions of Charlie Parker by Jack Kerouac and John Clellon Holmes. These
writers, he argues, tended to fetishize the improvisational aspects of jazz at the
expense of its more communal and participatory qualities. Even in the fifties, Parker
was a polarized figure, stereotyped by Beat writers as a brilliant but pitiable victim.
Yet Panish clearly simplifies the range of responses to jazz in the fifties. He ignores
the dominant role of white jazz critics such Marshall Stearns, Nat Hentoff and Martin
Williams, who helped to consolidate a deeper and more rounded image of jazz
musicians (like Parker) as artists. Often these critics distinguished their views in direct
contrast to the Beats. He also ignores depictions of Bird in writings by Charles
Mingus or Hampton Hawes, which are problematically similar to those produced by
Kerouac and Holmes. His racial dichotomy necessarily excludes mixed-race
musicians such as Charles Mingus and ignores figures such as Bob Kaufman, the
African American poet who was the inspiration for the term beatnik39
.
Panishs most glaring omission is Ralph Ellison. He refers occasionally to
Ellisons essays, but he conveniently overlooks the depictions of jazz in Invisible
Man. Perhaps Ellisons representations of jazz would be troubling to any approach
based on a Manichean fascination with the symbolism of blackness and
whiteness40
?
Music is the Weapon
Ralph Ellison expounds a radically revisionist view of Louis Armstrong. He
not only challenges attitudes to the musicians role in race relations, but he also
revives the importance of Armstrongs musical innovations and achievements. In the
introduction to his first collection of jazz criticism, All What Jazz, Philip Larkin aligns
the saxophonist Charlie Parker with other modern practitioners in literature and the
visual arts: Parker was a modern jazz player just as Picasso was a modern painter
and Pound a modern poet.41
For the arch-traditionalist Larkin, including Parker in
36
Carmichael, A.C. Domestic Manners and Social Condition of the White, Coloured, and Negro
Population of the West Indies. London: Whittaker, Treacher and Co, 1833. I, 59. 37
Mailer, Norman. The White Negro: Superficial Reflections on the Hipster. The Portable Beat
Reader, ed. Charters, Ann. New York: Penguin, 1992. 582. 38
Panish, Jon. The Color of Jazz: Race and Representation in Postwar American Culture. Jackson:
University Press of Mississippi, 1997. xv-xvi. 39
San Francisco journalist Herb Caen coined the term beatnik to describe Kaufman. 40
Ellison, Ralph. Change the Joke and Slip the Yoke. 1958. The Collected Essays of Ralph Ellison.
New York: Modern Library, 1995. 102. 41
Larkin, Philip. All What Jazz: A Record Diary 1961-1971. 1970. London: Faber and Faber, 1985. 11.
-
9 Carroll
this alliterative trinity was the ultimate insult, an accusation of derailing natural
artistic developments with new, radical, and unnatural, forms. Despite the gloominess
of his judgements, Larkin usefully encapsulates the common perception of bebop as a
rupture as profound for jazz as Cubism was for painting and Pounds -isms were for
poetry. Yet in an essay about Charlie Parker, Ralph Ellison explicitly associates Louis
Armstrong with modernist styles and techniques: [A]t least as early as T.S. Eliots creation of a new aesthetic for poetry through the artful
juxtapositioning of earlier styles, Louis Armstrong, way down the river in New Orleans, was
working out a similar technique for jazz.42
As well as comparing the impact of these highly conscious creators of culture in
their respective art forms, Ellison claims similarities in their technique. In doing so,
he challenges the dominant version of jazz history (and the place of Armstrong and
Parker in it) and advocates a fluid approach to creative endeavours in literature and
music, which he develops in Invisible Man.
Although Ellison consistently champions and defends Armstrong, he never
devotes an essay to him. In a vast body of work that includes essays on important jazz
figures such as Duke Ellington, Charlie Parker, Jimmy Rushing and Charlie Christian,
this omission may seem strange. Arguably it is evidence of Armstrongs centrality: he
is a figure to be continually referred back to and against whom all other performers
are measured. In Change the Joke and Slip the Yoke, Ellison examines the complex
and ambiguous legacy of minstrelsy and the centrality of the mask to American (not
just African American) history. He sites Armstrong as a classic example of the
trickster: Armstrongs clownish license and intoxicating powers are almost Elizabethan; he takes
liberties with kings, queens and presidents; he emphasizes the physicality of his music with
sweat, spittle and facial contortions; he performs the magical feat of making romantic melody
issue from a throat of gravel; and some few years ago was recommending to all and sundry his
personal physic, Pluto Water, as a purging way to health, happiness and international
peace.43
With reference to clownish antics, Ellison immediately keys into and subverts one
of the principal criticisms of Armstrong, not only by subtly suggesting the freedom
his behaviour permits (license), but also by presenting a more profound
interpretation of his actions (intoxicating powers). The phrase almost Elizabethan
highlights Armstrongs immediacy and universality by harking back to a period,
imagined or otherwise, in which a broad spectrum of audience (from rabble to
royalty) witnessed a performance in a particular setting and consequently the
distinctions between High and Low culture were fewer. It also evokes the central
theme of this passage: Armstrong diverting humour. He is wise enough to play the
fool44
. His corporeal presence paradoxically permits enchanting and mystical
42
Ellison, Ralph. On Bird, Bird-Watching and Jazz. 1962. The Collected Essays of Ralph Ellison.
New York: Modern Library, 1995. 259. 43
Ellison. Change the. 106. 44
Shakespeare, William. Twelfth Night. 1601. The Riverside Shakespeare. Boston: Houghton Mifflin,
1997. 458.
-
10 Carroll
moments (magical feat). In fact, his sheer physicality is essential to the creation of
sweet and airy music (melody). Even the heavy bathos of the optimistic suggestion
of Pluto Water, a laxative Armstrong used to keep his weight down, as a path to
international peace is lifted by its prophetic reference to Armstrong as a prime
cultural export and musical ambassador in the tours sponsored by the State
Department in the sixties and seventies45
. Ellison casts the trickster as protean46
and he clearly sees Armstrongs persistent adaptability as incredibly empowering. The
musicians attitude has enabled him to flourish within existing structures, to fulfil the
expectations of Americas diverse audiences, and survive within the merciless
demands of the commercial entertainment industry; an admirable achievement in a
profession with a notoriously high casualty rate. Furthermore, Ellison claims,
Armstrongs approach is essentially American: Masking is a play upon possibility
and ours is a society in which possibilities are many. When American life is most
American it is apt to be most theatrical.47
Armstrongs persona is not simply a matter of survival. It also opens up space
for artistic expression of the highest order to develop. In a letter to Albert Murray,
Ellison elaborates on the artistically-liberating effects created by the man and mask: Ive discovered Louis singing Mack the Knife. Shakespeare invented Caliban, or changed
himself into him Who the hell dreamed up Louie? Some of the bop boys consider him
Caliban but if he is hes a mask for a lyric poet who is much greater than most now writing.48
By comparing music with literature, Ellison highlights the way jazz dissolves the
roles of composer and performer into a single contemporaneous entity.
Simultaneously, and more importantly, he re-establishes a claim for the artistic and
aesthetic distance Armstrong creates in his performances. Armstrong the virtuoso
trumpet player and Armstrong the joking and handkerchief-waving performer may
look the same, but they are not. By referring to Shakespeares ability to invent
Caliban, one of literatures most famous primitivist creations, Ellison highlights the
absurdity of any criticism that ignores the gap between the creator and his work. In
On Bird, Bird-Watching and Jazz, Ellison explicitly defends Armstrong from the
criticisms of bebop musicians on these artistic grounds: [W]hen they fastened the
epithet Uncle Tom upon Armstrongs music they confused artistic quality with
questions of personal conduct, a confusion which would ultimately reduce their own
music to the mere matter of race.49
It is easy to overstate Ellisons criticisms of Parker in this essay and cast them
as a rejection of bebop as a significant musical form. Indeed, he coldly comments on
Parkers vibratoless tone and sound of amateurish ineffectuality, as though he
could never quite make it50
. Elsewhere, he even suggests that the different physical
45
See Von Eschen. Satchmo Blows. 46
Ellison. Change the. 101. 47
Ellison. Change the. 108. 48
Ralph Ellison, letter to Albert Murray, Rome, 2 June 1957, in Trading Twelves: The Selected Letters
of Ralph Ellison and Albert Murray. Ed. Albert Murray and John F. Calhoun. New York: Modern
Library, 2000. 166. 49
Ellison. On Bird. 259. 50
Ellison. On Bird. 264.
-
11 Carroll
build51
of bebop musicians may account for the thinness of their sound compared to
the richer tone of the older (and presumably larger) men. Yet Ellison does recognize
Parker as one of the founders of postwar jazz. He praises his innovations as an
improviser and credits him with as marked an influence upon jazz as Louis
Armstrong, Coleman Hawkins or Johnny Hodges.52
Ellisons criticisms are based
largely on Parkers personal conduct, in particular his misguided attempts to cast
off the inheritance of minstrelsy: No jazzman, not even Miles Davis, struggled
harder to escape the entertainers role than Charlie Parker.53
By reacting against
Armstrongs perceived path of selling out with the surly indignation designed to
alienate his audience, Parker ironically makes his turbulent personal life an integral
part of his attraction. Self-consciously stripped of the performers mask, the make-
believe role of clown54
which afforded Armstrong such protection and freedom,
Parker exposes his raw personal chaos to the brutal gaze of a mass audience and
entertainment industry. He is like a man dismembering himself with a dull razor on a
spotlighted stage.55
Parker turns himself into a sacrificial figure conscripted to act
out a grim comedy of racial manners.56
This harsh spectacle is the play that Jon
Panish analyses when he examines representations of Parker in fiction in the fifties.
By defending Armstrong in his essays and including him in Invisible Man, Ellison
seeks to rise above mere matters of race57
.
Ellison does allude to Parkers constricted role as a white hero, supreme
hipster and the worlds greatest junky58
. Putting aside Jack Kerouacs somewhat
nave and romantic projections about Parker, it is interesting to note the differences in
Kerouacs writing about more traditional jazz figures. In a 1940 article in the Horace
Mann Record, he presciently praises Lester Young as likely to popularize the
neglected tenor sax as a solo instrument.59
When he writes about Young in Jazz of
the Beat Generation, Kerouacs comments may still be laden with characteristic
hyperbole, but he curiously echoes Ellisons image of traditional, pre-bebop jazz, as a
great, sweeping river: you can hear Lester blow and he is the greatness of America in a single Negro musician he
is just like the river, the river starts near Butte, Montana, in frozen snow caps (Three Forks)
and meanders on down across states and entire territorial areas of dun bleak land with
hawthorn crackling in the sleet, picks up rivers at Bismarck, Omaha, and St. Louis just north,
another at Kay-ro, another in Arkansas, Tennessee, comes deluging on New Orleans with
muddy news from the land and a roar of subterranean excitement that is like the entire land
sucked of its gut in mad midnight, fevered, hot, the big mudhole rank clawpole old frogular
51
Ellison, Ralph. The Golden Age, Time Past. 1959. The Collected Essays of Ralph Ellison. New
York: Modern Library, 1995. 247. 52
Ellison. On Bird. 256. 53
Ellison. On Bird. 260. 54
Ellison. On Bird. 261. 55
Ellison. On Bird. 261. 56
Ellison. On Bird. 259. 57
Ellison. On Bird. 259. 58
Ellison. On Bird. 261. 59
Gifford, Barry and Lee, Lawrence, ed. Jack's Book: An Oral Biography of Jack Kerouac. 1978.
Edinburgh: Rebel Inc, 1999. 23.
-
12 Carroll
pawed-soul titanic Mississippi from the North, full of wires, cold wood and horn Lester, so,
holding, his horn high in Doctor Pepper chickenshacks, backstreet.60
The similarity of the imagery is not coincidental. While clearly not on the same
track61
in many regards, Ellison and Kerouac recognize the potential and power of
jazz to express the variousness of the vast continent of America. Like a river, jazz can
be a paradigm of fluid inclusiveness, which maintains momentum despite individual
diversions, and whose merging makes any attempts to trace original separateness 62
as futile as trying to sluice off parts of a river according to its diverse sources. As
Ellison argues in his review of Barakas Blues People, essentialist critiques of jazz are
like attempting delicate brain surgery with a switchblade.63
Yet in his own
discussions and depictions of jazz, Ellison does not perpetuate muddy
multiculturalism. Rather he argues against rigid schematics and systems, which
smother the subtle complexities of jazz and its origins. Although Ellison was himself
accused of being an Uncle Tom for defending Armstrongs adaptability64
, he does
not advocate passive acceptance. As he points out, we wear the mask for purposes of
aggression as well as for defense.65
Ellisons views pre-empt later assertions about
the ambiguous political meanings of early minstrelsy by critics such as Dale
Cockrell66
. In Invisible Man, Ellison tests this sense of flux and investigates the extent
to which the entertainers mask can provide a positive model for enriching cultural
exchange.
The music of invisibility67
Many critics have acknowledged the important role Louis Armstrong plays in
the Prologue and Epilogue of Invisible Man, but few have commented upon the mode
of his presence. Like the Trueblood episode, which Houston Baker analyses as a
commentary on the relationship between white hegemony and black creativity as a
negotiable power of exchange, the Prologue and Epilogue explore the relationship
between black and white audiences and their expectations, in particular how to
develop black vernacular forms for popular and commercial benefit without selling
out.
60
Kerouac, Jack. "Jazz of the Beat Generation." New World Writing. 1955. In The Golden Age, Time
Past, Ellison talks similarly about the steady flow of memory, desire and defined experience summed
up by the traditional jazz beat and blues mood seemed swept like a great river from its old, deep bed.
240. 61
Lhamon. Deliberate Speed. 70. 62
Baraka. Blues People. 182. 63
Ellison, Ralph. Blues People. 1964. The Collected Essays of Ralph Ellison. New York: Modern
Library, 1995. 283. 64
Yaffe, David. Ellison Unbound. The Nation. 4 March 2002. 65
Ellison. Change the. 109. 66
Cockrell, Dale. Demons of Disorder: Early Blackface Minstrels and Their World. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1997. 67
Ellison. IM. 15.
-
13 Carroll
Living rent free in the basement of a building rented strictly to whites68
on
the border between Harlem and the rest of Manhattan, the narrator reflects upon his
experiences over the previous twenty years. With electricity siphoned from the mains
supply of Monopolated Light & Power, he illuminates his room with hundreds of
light bulbs and powers a radio-phonograph on which he plays jazz records, in
particular a song by Louis Armstrong called (What Did I Do to Be So) Black and
Blue? While the cultural context and lyrical content of this song are significant69
, the
narrator emphasizes the quality of the voice and music on this particular recording:
Id like to hear five recordings of Louis Armstrong playing and singing [] all at
the same time.70
He craves multiple renditions to bolster the sound and enable him to
feel71
the vibrations of the music with his whole body.72
In his essays Ellison
highlights the physicality (the sweat, spittle and facial contortions73
) of Armstrongs
persona, but in Invisible Man he chooses to stage Armstrongs presence via a recorded
reproduction. This decision is important. In its unification of sound (phono) and
writing (graph), a vinyl recording brings music closer to the realm of literary text.
Indeed, the narrator comments that Armstrong made poetry out of being invisible.74
Clearly, this is a pun on invisible, referring both to Armstrongs racial identity and
his literal invisibility in the medium of recorded sound. He is a voice without a
face75
.
Armstrongs protean powers, which Ellison elaborates upon in his essays, are
in evidence here in a variety of ways. The narrator admires Armstrongs ability to
work within existing structures and utilize previously rigid and aggressive tools to
create wonderful art: Louis bends that military instrument into a beam of lyrical
sound.76
Armstrongs malleable attitude echoes the haunting deathbed advice from
the narrators grandfather to overcome em with yeses77
and the words of the
veteran from the Golden Day to [p]lay the game, but dont believe in it. 78
Yet Ellison develops a complicated relationship between Armstrongs
invisibility and defiant action, not only in the destructive glut that his masked
illusion of passivity can create (similar in sentiment to let em swoller you till they
vomit or bust wide open79
), but also in the assertive freedom it brings. So, for
example, after listening to Armstrongs record, the narrator is startled by the depth of
the message and the realisation that this familiar music [] demanded action.80
68
Ellison. IM. 9. 69
I will deal with this aspect in detail later. 70
Ellison. IM. 11. 71
Ellison. IM. 10. 72
Ellison. IM. 11. 73
Ellison. Change the. 106. 74
Ellison. IM. 11. 75
Laing, David. A Voice without a Face: Popular Music and the Phonograph in the 1890s. Popular
Music (1991): 1-9. 76
Ellison. IM. 11. 77
Ellison. IM. 17 78
Ellison. IM. 127. 79
Ellison. IM. 17. 80
Ellison. IM. 15.
-
14 Carroll
More directly the narrator compares Armstrongs ability to slip into the breaks81
to
an underdog defeating a technically superior opponent in a boxing match. The
yokel steadily absorbs punches and then suddenly lands a knockout blow by
stepping inside of his opponents sense of time.82
By highlighting this aggressive
strain in the music, Ellison seeks to refute the accusations of Armstrong as an Uncle
Tom. However, Armstrongs real trick is to pretend to be a yokel. In fact, he has
utilized mass media technology to give his performances wide-ranging significance.
In Living with Music, Ellison details a significant evolution in his attitude to
recorded music. Initially he used records as a weapon83
to combat the disturbing
singing practice of his neighbour, but gradually this approach developed into an
arrangement for more harmonious living: After a while a simple twirl of the volume
control up a few decibels and down again would bring a live-and-let live reduction of
her volume.84
Repeatedly in interviews Ellison recalls the pleasure of building radios when
he was younger, depicting it as a social hobby, which bridged racial differences and
enabled him to connect with the wider community85
. In Invisible Man, the narrator
casts himself in the great American tradition of tinkers86
, able to create and utilize
new technologies through inventiveness. He has learnt to channel and control
electricity, even though it repeatedly caused him pain in the past87
. Similarly,
Armstrong gains power from his ability to harness modern technologies of audio
recording, reproduction and distribution, while maintaining his fidelity to folk and
blues roots. Jacques Attali asserts that all music, any organization of sounds is [. . .] a
tool for the creation and consolidation of a community, but he also criticizes the
mass media for the disturbing, direct access it gives institutions, such as record
companies, to the home.88
Armstrong was founder of Hot Five, the first specifically
recording group in the twenties. Like the narrator and his fight with Monopolated
Light & Power, Armstrong successfully battles against the white hegemony of
monopolizing institutions. He conducts this fight in covert and overt89
ways, but
he is always protected by his comic mask.
In his essay The Grain of the Voice90
, Roland Barthes asserts that when
listening to a recorded vocal performance, the listener instinctively uses
81
Ellison. IM. 11. 82
Ellison. IM. 11. 83
Ellison, Ralph. Living with Music. 1995. The Collected Essays of Ralph Ellison. New York:
Modern Library, 1995. 235. 84
Ellison. Living with. 235. 85
Ellison recalls how building radios helped him to make friends with a white child. See That Same
Pain, That Same Pleasure: An Interview. 1961. The Collected Essays of Ralph Ellison. New York:
Modern Library, 1995. 63-4. 86
Ellison. IM. 10. 87
For example, the narrator was forced to clamber for money on an electrified rug and he received
electric shock treatment. 88
Attali, Jacques. Noise: The Political Economy of Music. Trans. Brian Massumi. Manchester:
Manchester University Press, 1985. 6. 89
Ellison. IM. 15. 90
Barthes, Roland. The Grain of the Voice. Image-Music-Text. Trans. Stephen Heath. New York:
Hill and Wang, 1977.
-
15 Carroll
characteristics of the voice to imagine the body of the performer. Wrenched from a
performance context, with this unique rupture between sound and vision, Armstrongs
recordings (and of course many others) create a new electronic world between the
hi-fi record and the ear91
. This zone can either perpetuate racial stereotypes, as in the
case of female blues singers in the twenties, or provide space for new freedom.
Consequently, the narrator finds affinities with Armstrongs social invisibility as an
African American, but he also admires Armstrongs ability to represent and express
invisibility through sound:
Ive illuminated the blackness of my invisibility and vice versa. And so I play the invisible
music of my isolation. The last statement doesnt seem just right, does it? But it is; you hear
this music simply because music is heard and seldom seen, except by musicians. Could this
compulsion to put invisibility down in black and white be thus an urge to make music of
invisibility?92
Taken literally, the invisible music of isolation refers to the narrator listening to
Armstrongs records in his basement. The final question seems more ambiguous: the
narrators black and white could refer to jazz, with its synthesis of black and
white musical forms, or it could refer to text on the page. But the questions
ambiguities also provide some sense of resolution: like Armstrong, the narrator needs
an audience. Armstrongs skill lies in his ability to modify and commodify black folk
forms for commercial benefit without destroying their essence. Unlike bebop, whose
development during the years of the musicians recording ban in the forties arguably
led to a dominance of technique over expression and subsequent estrangement from a
mass audience, Armstrong has cultivated a form of universality, which the narrator
seeks to replicate. As Lvi-Strauss writes: [M]usic is a language with some meaning at least for the immense majority of mankind []
and since it is the only language with the contradictory attributes of being at once intelligible
and untranslatable, [] music itself [is] the supreme mystery of the science of man, a
mystery that all the various disciplines come up against and which holds the key to their
progress.93
Armstrongs invisible music provides the narrator with just such a key in his
transformation from ranter to writer94
.
Fingering the jagged grain
As well as staging Armstrongs presence via a phonograph recording in the
Prologue of Invisible Man, Ellison creates a palimpsest of jazz anecdotes, allusions
and references, which tease out the complicated origins of jazz, highlight its role in
cultural exchange and provide parallels for the narrators situation. For example, early
91
Ellison. Living with. 231. 92
Ellison. IM. 15. 93
Lvi-Strauss, Claude. Overture. The Raw and the Cooked. 1964. Trans. John and Doreen London:
Jonathon Cape, 1970. 18. 94
Ellison. Change the. 111.
-
16 Carroll
in the Prologue the narrator says, Call me Jack-the-Bear95
. This seemingly simple
statement of identity carries multifarious literary and musical connotations, which
reverberate with the narrators circumstances in different ways. With its echo of the
opening line of Melvilles Moby Dick yoked to a character from African-American
folklore96
, the phrase stakes a claim for black vernacular heritage in the grand
American literary tradition. Less obviously, in the rhyming slang of jazz argot, jack
the bear meant nowhere, which in turn meant off the scene or out of it97
. With
this unfamiliar cant, the narrator jokily and slyly embodies his state of hibernation98
in his adopted name. Jack the Bear was also an infamous exponent of stride piano, a
distinctive artform associated with Harlem99
in the twenties. Along with James P.
Johnson and Fats Waller, Jack the Bear developed this unique playing style at rent
parties and underground clubs. In The Golden Age, Time Past, Ellison refers to
such jam sessions100
as a place where the musician learns tradition, group
techniques and styles101
and must then find himself, must be reborn, must find, as
it were, his soul.102
Like a jazz musician honing his art, the narrator of Invisible Man
requires time for ideas to ferment and innovations to develop at a distance from
commercial demands. Yet significantly, the reference takes a final turn. In 1940 Duke
Ellington released a record called Jack the Bear, which united many aspects of
diverse swing styles (including the stride piano technique) and popularized them with
a wider audience. Although he does not elaborate upon this trajectory until the
Epilogue, the narrator has already mapped out his progress in his first adopted name.
Unfolding the richness of the references in this single phrase gives a glimpse into the
intricacies of cultural appropriation from folk inspiration to commercial jazz, which
mimics the process the narrator must undertaken to complete his own rebirth.
(What Did I Do to Be So) Black and Blue provides the soundtrack for the
narrators ramblings in his isolated basement. Recognizing the songs complicated
history amplifies its significance in the novel. Written by Andy Razaf and Fats Waller
for the musical Hot Chocolates in 1929, the song came from a suggestion by Dutch
Schulz, a notorious Jewish gangster who was backing the production, to write a piece
for a colored girl to sing about the problems of being colored. Although Andy
Razaf initially refused, he was persuaded by the gun-toting Schulzs ominous reply:
Youll write it [] or youll never write anything again.103
First recorded by
95
Ellison. IM. 9. 96
Jack the Bear is associated with Brer Bear from the Brer Rabbit folktales (Encyclopaedia
Britannica). 97
Leonard, Neil. The Jazzman's Verbal Usage. Black American Literature Forum. (Spring -
Summer, 1986): 152. 98
Ellison. IM. 9. 99
Early, Gerald. Three Notes Toward a Cultural Definition of The Harlem Renaissance. Callaloo.
(Winter, 1991): 138. 100
In this essay Ellison is referring specifically to Mintons Playhouse, but his comments can be
interpreted more generally. 101
Ellison. The Golden. 245. 102
Ellison. The Golden. 245. 103
Singer, Barry. Black and Blue: The Life and Lyrics of Andy Razaf. New York: Schirmer Books,
1992. 216-217.
-
17 Carroll
Armstrong in 1929104
, the song went on to become one of the first overt instances of
racial protest in American popular music.105
In its inception under violent
commercial pressures and its evolution from show tune to political statement, the
songs history conveys some of the ironies inherent in American cultural production.
More importantly, it debunks accusations of Armstrongs subservience to humiliating
racial stereotypes by casting him in a less familiar, but genuinely dissenting, role.
Clearly, the song and its performance have a range of hidden depths or lower
frequencies106
, but it takes accidental exposure to Armstrongs drug of choice107
for
the narrator to hear them. [U]nder the spell of the reefer108
which he was
deceptively given instead of a cigarette, the narrator discovers a new analytical way
of listening to music109
, peeling back the layers of the record to hear unheard sounds,
not only in time, but in space as well.110
In the depths of the record, he hears a
succession of black vernacular forms: a spiritual, a sermon and a folk tale. The
sermons subject, the Blackness of Blackness, echoes the songs lyrical content,
while the preachers use of call and response reflects an integral aspect of
Armstrongs famous style of musical phrasing. As if to emphasize the extent of the
cultural mingling inherent in the song and rise to the challenge Armstrong presents
through his creation of a new modern jazz language, the narrator pushes the
boundaries of his own descriptive vocabulary. He hears an old woman singing a
spiritual as full of Weltschmerz as flamenco111
. With these international references,
he points to Armstrongs operatic virtuosity and the driving dance intricacies of his
music, but more importantly he highlights the diverse sources of the musicians
sound.
At the heart of this underworld of sound112
is a story by the old singer of
spirituals113
, which opens up the moral and emotional ambiguities of cultural
interactions. The woman confesses to loving her master because he fathered her
sons, but hating him because he refused to fulfil his promise to free them. Eventually,
she poisons him because her sons planned to kill him. This chaotic jumbling of black
and white, love and hate, reveals the inherent confusion in tracing the delineation
between the bridges and boundaries114
of cultural dynamics and material relations.
In fact, it reveals how bridges can become boundaries and vice versa. When the
narrator emerges from this maelstrom and hears Louis Armstrong innocently asking
104
Westerberg, Hans. Boy from New Orleans: Louis "Satchmo" Armstrong - On Records, Films, Radio
and Television. Copenhagen: Jazzmedia, 1981. 37. 105
Sundquist, Eric, ed. Cultural Contexts for Ralph Ellisons Invisible Man: A Bedford
Documentary Companion. Boston: Bedford Books, 1995. 115. 106
Ellison. IM. 469. 107
Armstrong smoked marijuana almost every day. 108
Ellison. IM. 11. 109
Ellison. IM. 11. 110
Ellison. IM. 11. 111
Ellison. IM. 11. 112
Ellison. IM. 14. 113
Ellison. IM. 13. 114
Salzman, Jack et al, eds. Bridges and Boundaries: African Americans and American Jews. New
York: George Braziller, 1992.
-
18 Carroll
"What did I do / To be so black / And blue?" it seals the songs status as a coherent
public expression of a web of chaotic individual stories and stresses the intricate
threads connecting it to the many layers of vernacular expression. But when the
narrator echoes Armstrongs question at the end of the Prologue, he carefully omits
black, leaving one of the most resilient and adaptable cultural forms - the blues -
to remain. In Richard Wrights Blues, Ellison writes: The blues is an impulse to keep the painful details and episodes of a brutal experience alive in
one's aching consciousness, to finger its jagged grain, and to transcend it, not by the
consolation of philosophy but by squeezing from it a near-tragic, near-comic lyricism.115
As the narrator of Invisible Man admits in response to the old womans sad story: A
mistake was made somewhere.116
Yet, Ellison says, conflicts cannot be resolved
simply by erasure. And at the heart of the ritual of remembering are the blues, an
attitude, which can express and transcend brutal experience. Ellison makes the
explicit connection between the blues and the narrators predicament in the
penultimate paragraph of the novel with a quotation from Buddy Boldens Blues, a
New Orleans blues song. In Boldens era, the song was known as Funky Butt. As
Kenneth Warren astutely points out, Funky Butt was the name of the club in New
Orleans where Armstrong began his education in jazz improvisation. The song
becomes therefore a metonymic allusion to one of the birthplaces of jazz. 117
Thinking about the polyphonic resonances of this song, the narrator decides he must
emerge from his hibernation and confront the full range of his experience, whether it
is good or bad: [T]here's still a conflict within me: With Louis Armstrong one half of me says, "Open the
window and let the foul air out," while the other says, "It was good green corn before the
harvest." Of course Louis was kidding, he wouldn't have thrown old Bad Air out, because it
would have broken up the music and the dance, when it was the good music that came from
the bell of old Bad Air's horn that counted.118
Significantly, the narrator refers to Louis Armstrongs rendition of this song. Unlike
Black and Blue, which Armstrong recorded in many versions throughout his career,
Armstrong only recorded this song (as I Thought I Heard Buddy Bolden Say) once
with his Hot Six in 1946119
. With this near-contemporary reference, Ellison
reawakens Armstrongs social and political relevance at a time when it was being
persistently questioned and undermined. Simultaneously, he highlights the musicians
robust adaptability. Unlike Bolden, Armstrong fingered the jagged grain and
survived. And unlike the doomed characters of the previous generation, such as
Fitzgeralds Jay Gatsby or Wrights Bigger Thomas, the narrator not only survives,
but in the process of his rebirth intends to forge the uncreated conscience of his race
115
Ellison, Ralph. Richard Wrights Blues. 1945. The Collected Essays of Ralph Ellison. New York:
Modern Library, 1995. 129. 116
Ellison. IM. 13. 117
Warren, Kenneth W. "Ralph Ellison and the Problem of Cultural Authority." Boundary 2 (Summer
2003): 171. 118
Ellison. IM. 468. 119
Westerberg. Boy from. 82.
-
19 Carroll
120. Armstrong, the virtuoso jazz trumpeter and the masked trickster, proved to be the
most prescient guide.
120
Joyce, James. Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. 1916. Harmondsworth: Penguin: 1964. 275-76.
The narrator refers to this passage and its relevance to his own search for individual identity. IM 286.
-
Carroll 20
II
Ellison, Improvisation and the Culture of Spontaneity121
I would have to improvise upon my materials in the manner of a jazz musician putting a
musical theme through a wild star-burst of metamorphosis.122
When Ellison says he would have to improvise upon his materials in the
manner of a jazz musician, what does this mean in the context of Invisible Man?
Horace Porter highlights Ellisons emphasis on technical excellence: [N]either Ellisons novel nor his essays appear obviously experimental or improvisational.
Unlike writers who are relentlessly innovative, such as Jack Kerouac and William Burroughs,
Ellison attempts to achieve a jazz-inspired rendition of Jamesian virtuosity.123
However, Timothy Spaulding believes Invisible Man has clear stylistic affinities with
bebop. He describes the narrator as a literary bebop improviser who draws on the
voices and reflections of other characters, redefines and comments on their
statements, in order to emerge with his own improvisational voice by the end of the
text.124
Before examining the validity of these arguments, it is necessary to explore
different concepts of improvisation when transposed from jazz into art and literature.
The OED defines to improvise as to compose, utter, or perform verse or
music impromptu; to speak extemporaneously; hence, to do anything on the spur of
the moment. In the forties and fifties in America, the concept of improvisation was
particularly potent. Impulsive action was seen as an antidote to the stifled
homogeneity of post-war American culture. It embodied a spirit of rebellion. It
sounded a yawp over the tranquil roofs of suburbia and sought to spark an untrancing
of millions of individuals by millions of individual acts of will.125
Bebop was at the
vanguard of this "culture of spontaneity". Its informal experimentation and intense
individualism inspired a wide range of artists and writers. Obviously, the extent of
this influence is impossible to measure126
, but the ghostly clothes of jazz127
came in
many sizes and they undoubtedly helped artists and writers to fashion their own
performance aesthetic.
Jackson Pollock famously established the canvas as an arena in which to act,
which led to the creation of not a picture but an event128
. His freeform exuberance
and intuitive approach neatly situates his art as a visual analogue to bebop. Strong
biographical similarities between Pollock and Charlie Parker fuel such comparisons,
121
Belgrad. The Culture. 122
Ellison. Introduction to IM. 488-489. 123
Porter. Jazz Country. 73. 124
Spaulding. Embracing Chaos. 482. 125
McLuhan, Marshall. Quoted in Belgrad. The Culture. 4-5. 126
Robert Von Halberg suggests Artaud and Italian Futurists could have contributed to the
development of a performance aesthetic. Avant-Gardes. Cambridge History of American Literature.
Vol. 8, 1940-1995. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 83-84. 127
Ginsberg, Allen. Howl. The Portable Beat Reader, ed. Ann Charters. New York: Penguin, 1992.
67. 128
Rosenberg, Harold. "The American Action Painters." Art News (December 1952): 25.
-
Carroll 21
not only in their behaviour and addictions during their lives, but also in their deaths129
.
Pollock was a regular at jazz clubs on 52nd
street where bebop musicians performed.
According to Ellen Landau, he was inspired not just by bebops rhythm and tempo,
but its naked presentation of honest and deeply felt emotion130
. This emphasis on the
jazz musicians ability to tap raw emotion set the tone for prevailing attitudes to
bebop among other artists and writers.
Although literature lagged behind the visual arts, Jack Kerouac explicitly
aligned himself with jazz musicians in Essentials of Spontaneous Prose. In this brief
document, he repeatedly resorts to jazz as a simile for his writing technique. When
discussing imagery, he says, blowing (as per jazz musician) on subject of image;
when discussing punctuation, he recommends, the vigorous space dash separating
rhetorical breathing (as jazz musician drawing breath between outblown phrases);
and when talking about scope he says, [b]low as deep as you want131
. He stresses
the spontaneity of bebop improvisation and seeks to mimic it in prose. His emphasis
on a jazz musicians authenticity and avoidance of revision (as in first thought, best
thought132
) reveals a passionate, but limited conception of improvisation.
Ingrid Monson writes: "improvisation has often been taken as a metaphor for
freedom both musical and social."133
It is not coincidental that many of the artists and
writers who fashioned aesthetics of spontaneity were not African American.
Unhitched from its brutal origins, its evolutionary tradition and the encumbrances of
racism, jazz improvisation became synonymous with winging it134
. This whitewash
created a number of distortions. It belied the dedicated craft and honing of skill, which
is essential to successful jazz performance. As Toni Morrison explains: The point in
black art is to make it look as a jazz musician does, unthought out, unintellectual as it
were. So the work doesnt show.135
To the untrained ear, Parkers prolific originality,
spilling out seemingly-endless new musical ideas in a torrent of notes from his
saxophone, seemed the apotheosis of freedom of expression. But as musicologists
have pointed out, this attitude to extemporaneous improvisation discounts the
importance of organization to the critical aesthetic sense"136
. A bebop jam session
may have appeared chaotic, but it was governed by unwritten codes of performance.
Bebops insistence on dissonance and difficult harmonies and its foregrounding of the
129
Parker was addicted to heroin for most of his life. Pollock was addicted to alcohol. Parker died in
1955. Pollock died in 1956. 130
Quoted in O'Meally, Robert G. Ed. The Jazz Cadence of American Culture. New York: Columbia
University Press, 1998. 180. 131
Kerouac, Jack. Essentials of Spontaneous Prose. The Portable Beat Reader, ed. Ann Charters.
New York: Penguin, 1992. 57. 132
Allen Ginsberg. Quoted in Merrill, Thomas F. Allen Ginsberg. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1988.
15. 133
Monson, Ingrid. "Russell, Coltrane, and Modal Jazz." In the Course of Performance: Studies in the
World of Musical Improvisation. Ed. Bruno Nettl with Melinda Russell. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 1998. 149. 134
Murray, Albert. Improvisation and the Creative Process. The Jazz Cadence of American Culture.
Ed. OMeally, Robert. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998. 112. 135
Morrison, Toni. Interview. Quoted in Rice. Finger-Snapping. 114. 136
Chernoff, John Miller. African Rhythm and African Sensibility: Aesthetics and Social Action in
African Musical Idioms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979. 122.
-
Carroll 22
solo also ruptured the common perception of musical collectivity established by large
swing bands. Artists like Pollock and writers like Kerouac tended to magnify bebops
individualism to suit the requirements of their work, which were necessarily solo
endeavours. But as John Coltrane asserts: even when the singer says I, the audience
hears we137
. The rampant individualism, which was central to Pollocks and
Kerouacs conceptions of their jazz stimulus, eclipses important aspects of jazz
performance that continued despite the innovations of bebop.
Like Kerouac, Ralph Ellison repeatedly compares his writing to jazz music. In
Living with Music, he evokes his early development as a writer and describes how
he gave up his trumpet for the typewriter138
. In an interview, he has stated that his
instinctive approach to writing is through sound.139
But as an accomplished jazz
musician, Ellison expounded a rich and sophisticated conception of jazz
improvisation. In Living with Music, he emphasizes the group context of
improvisation and highlights the positive aspects of the struggle for identity within
jazz performance: the delicate balance struck between strong individual personality
and the group during [] early jam sessions was a marvel of social organization.140
Ellison acknowledges the pioneering role of jazz musicians, who in their own
unconscious way have set an example for any Americans, Negro or white, who would
find themselves in the arts.141
But his praise is not based on the crude conception of
spontaneity. He recognizes the constraints of extemporaneous improvisation and
highlights the freedom lying within the restrictions of [] musical tradition142
. He
admires jazz musicians for their discipline and attention to craft: the will to achieve
the most eloquent expression of idea-emotions through the technical mastery of their
instruments.143
Ellison espoused conservative attitudes to bebop in his essays and his
representations of jazz in Invisible Man focus on Louis Armstrong. If stylistic
elements of Invisible Man can be attributed to bebop, it would create a tension within
the novel between two generations of jazz musicians. However, I believe the
musically-influenced structural and stylistic elements of Invisible Man can be
explained with reference Armstrongs style of jazz and other cultural developments.
Indeed, by placing Armstrong and his music in a contemporary context, Ellison
attempts to modify prevailing views of the musicians style and reinvigorate his
relevance for a new generation of listeners.
137
John Coltrane. Quoted in Kohli, Amor "Saxophones and Smothered Rage: Bob Kaufman, Jazz and
the Quest for Redemption." Callaloo. (Winter 2002): 181. 138
Ellison. Living with. 233. 139
Ellison, Ralph. "A Completion of Personality: A Talk with Ralph Ellison." Hersey, John. Ed. Ralph
Ellison: A Collection of Critical Essays. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1974. 11. 140
Ellison. Living with. 229. 141
Ellison, Ralph. Introduction to Shadow and Act. 1964. The Collected Essays of Ralph Ellison.
New York: Modern Library, 1995. 51. 142
Ellison. Introduction to Shadow. 51. 143
Ellison. Living with. 229.
-
Carroll 23
Literary jazz144
Building on seminal work on vernacular traditions in African American
literature by Houston Baker145
and Henry Louis Gates146
, various critics have tried to
analyse the influence of jazz on prose. In Liberating Voices: Oral Tradition in African
American Literature, Gayl Jones examines how African American authors have used
their oral tradition to liberate their voices from the often tyrannic frame of another
outlook147
. She explores the influence of folklore, spirituals, blues and jazz on a wide
range of works from different genres (Poetry, Short Fiction and the Novel). Her
discussions of the influence of jazz on the style and structure of Ann Petrys Solo on
the Drums and LeRoi Joness The Screamers reveal a number of equivalents or
forms of expression which are common to jazz and prose fiction. But as Fritz Gysin
points out, the choice of equivalents is wide and the terminology, such as solos,
arrangements, antiphony, etc. is conveniently vague. Gysin suggests reducing the risk
of imprecise or flimsy associations by only applying jazz equivalents to texts with
strong thematic references to jazz.148
Indeed, Joness discussions are valid and
insightful precisely because both stories have jazz as a principal theme.
In contrast, Alan Rice149
and Anthony J. Berret150
have been tempted to argue
that prose writers, such as Toni Morrison and Ralph Ellison, employ a jazz style,
even when there is no jazz context, theme or reference. This approach creates a
tenuous basis for discussion. Nevertheless, Rice identifies three aesthetic strategies
employed by jazzy prose writers151
: antiphony, riffing, and signifying. Antiphony is
the pattern of call-and-response, which is almost ubiquitous in African American
vernacular forms - sermons, spirituals, blues and jazz. As well as not being particular
to jazz, antiphony is a very malleable term. For example, Gayl Jones suggests that the
Prologue of Invisible Man might be read as containing numerous calls to which the
episodes are various responses.152
Given the prominence of Louis Armstrong,
whose trumpet style was often described as antiphonal, and the references to various
black vernacular forms, such as spirituals and sermons, Joness observation may well
be valid. However, even with such references, attributions of antiphony specifically
from jazz (rather than sermons or blues) as a structural device for prose seem too
vague to be useful.
In his article Misreading Morrison, Mishearing Jazz: A Response to Toni
Morrison's Jazz Critics, Alan Munton takes issue with the inaccurate use of the terms
144
Berret, Anthony J. Toni Morrison's Literary Jazz. College Language Association
Journal. (March 1989): 267. 145
Baker. Blues, Ideology. 146
Gates, Henry Louis, Jr. The Signifying Monkey: A Theory of Afro-American Literary Criticism. New
York: Oxford University Press, 1988. 147
Jones, Gayl. Liberating Voices: Oral Tradition in African American Literature. Cambridge,
Massachusetts: Harvard UP, 1991. 192. 148
Gysin, Fritz. From Liberating Voices to Metathetic Ventriloquism: Boundaries in Recent
African-American Jazz Fiction. Callaloo. (Winter 2002): 274-276. 149
Rice. Finger-Snapping. 150
Berret. Toni Morrison's. 151
Rice. Finger-Snapping. 106. 152
Jones. Liberating Voices. 197.
-
Carroll 24
signifying and riffing when transposed from jazz music to prose. As he points
out, language and music do not signify in the same way153
. In fact, in the context
of jazz, signifyin(g) is redundant, since every jazz performance is a signification
upon, or a revision of, something already in existence, whether the melody or theme,
or the chord sequence.154
Signifyin(g) is an oral strategy incorporated into prose,
which can be understood without any recourse to jazz. Munton also contends that in
attempts to establish a relationship between jazz and prose, [t]he riff is foregrounded
because it is the only feature of jazz that can be compared to prose (because both may
include repetitions).155
Such an approach leads to an emphasis on rhythm at the
expense of other equally important elements of jazz, such as harmony or melody.
More seriously, in the absence of specific references to jazz within the text, the
approach becomes gratuitous. Invariably, examples cited as prose riffs simply
because they employ repetition can be explained in purely literary terms.
Alan Rices brief discussion of Invisible Man clearly reveals the problems of
examining jazzy prose 156
without jazz themes or references in the text. Although he
acknowledges them as epochal uses of the jazz aesthetic157
, he quickly skips over
the passages referring to Louis Armstrong in the novels Prologue and Epilogue.
Instead, he presses for an examination of the jazz mode158
without any signals from
the author in the text. He selects a passage from the riot scene near the end of the
novel and comments that its staccato rhythms and riffing repetitions159
mimic the
sound of bebop. Rice even refers to a specific jazz tune - Bebop recorded by Parker
in 1949 as the kind of musical performance Ellison is invoking160
. Without any
inference from the text, any correspondence between this tune and the text is arbitrary
and delusional. When discussing the interface between jazz and fiction, the presence
of jazz in some form must be a prerequisite. It need not be the dominant subject, but it
must at least be mentioned or implied through obvious or subtle references. Rices
blanket assertion that the whole text of Invisible Man is coloured by jazz
intonations161
, cheapens Ellisons uses of jazz, which are actually employed
sparingly to achieve specific effects and imbue particular meaning.
For a better example of jazzy prose, consider Ellisons description of bebop
in The Golden Age, Time Past: It was itself a texture of fragments, repetitive, nervous, not fully formed; its melodic lines
underground, secret and taunting; its riffs jeeringSalt peanuts! Salt peanuts! its timbres
flat or shrill, with a minimum of thrilling vibrato. Its rhythms were out of stride and seemingly
arbitrary, its drummers frozen-faced introverts dedicated to chaos.162
153
Munton, Alan. Misreading Morrison, Mishearing Jazz: A Response to Toni Morrison's Jazz
Critics. Journal of American Studies (1997): 250. 154
Munton. Misreading Morrison. 248. 155
Munton. Misreading Morrison. 235. 156
Rice. Finger-Snapping. 106. 157
Rice. Finger-Snapping. 112. 158
Rice. Finger-Snapping. 112. 159
Rice. Finger-Snapping. 112. 160
Rice. Finger-Snapping. 112. 161
Rice. Finger-Snapping. 113. 162
Ellison. The Golden. 240.
-
Carroll 25
The style and progress of this passage can actually be mapped onto Salt Peanuts163
,
one of the defining bebop tunes of the era. It begins with jerky bursts of commentary,
with nouns and adjectives piling up (fragments, repetitive, nervous, not fully
formed). It employs a range of punctuation and careful ellipsis, with the omission of
verbs evoking the pared-down phrasing and economy of the tunes melodic lines.
The interjection - Salt Peanuts mirrors the vociferations in the tune, as does the
pattern of the subsequent description of the piercing solos (timbres flat or shrill).
Then the prose loosens up: verbs are reintroduced (Its rhythms were ), signalling
a release into longer runs and embellishment. The final section of Salt Peanuts
consists of a drum solo and the passage appropriately ends by highlighting the
incongruity between the frenzied and apparently haphazard style of drumming and the
icy demeanour of the drummers. In this passage, the style and subject matter meld to
create what might be deemed literary jazz. Nevertheless, it would be wise to
remember Fritz Gysins plea for perspective: in most cases, writers are not attempting
to turn fiction into jazz, rather they are seeking to incorporate jazz into fiction164
. And
as Stephen Scher comments: "No matter how similar literature and music may appear
on occasion, they are only analogous, never identical."165
With these warnings in
mind, I will examine two episodes in which jazz has a stylistic or structural influence
in Invisible Man.
[O]ur concept is Gestalt166
After being injured in an explosion at the Liberty Paints factory, the narrator
of Invisible Man wakes up sitting in a white rigid chair167
. He is confused and
disoriented. He feels acute pain in his head and stomach, and he has amnesia.
Gradually he realizes the disembodied voices around him are those of doctors. He
slips in and out of consciousness. Each time he wakes up, the situation has changed,
intensifying his confusion. He hears the doctors callously discussing possible
treatments, ranging from surgery to castration. Eventually, after enduring bouts of
electric shock treatment, the narrator is told he is cured and may leave. He signs some
papers releasing the company of any responsibility for his accident and takes