AD-A096 892 ARMY MISSILE COMMAND REDSTONE ARSENAL AL PLANS ANAL--ETC F/G I6/4I MISSILE MATERIEL READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.(U)I OCT 80 .J A BAGGETT, R S DOTSON

UNCLD ASI FIEDD S4I/ 5 ' L

EE1 EE4hEI]

Technical Report D-81-1

c~O MISSILE MATERIEL READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

! [DT1C",ECTE

OCTOBER 1980

:1 adtc~rie4 A~raee a, AIbsarva 38eo

Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited

* Plans, Analysis, and Evaluation DirectorateUS Army Missile CommandRedstone Arsenal, AL 35898

pDlfte : -' ": bt

ions w:. . .: nd. and

" -, whito

- FOF I1. JUL 71 PKEOUSEU ISO6LEi 3 2 6 0 1 l.... .. . ... ,* - ,... .. . , .L . .. .. - _.T - - _ _. --

DISPOSITION INSTRUCTIONS

Destroy this report when it is no longer needed. Do not returnit to the originator.

I

DISCLAIMR

The findings in this report are not to be construed as an officialDepartment of the Army position unless so designated by otherauthorized documents.

TRADE NAMES

Use of trade names or manufacturers in this report does not constitutean official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercialhardware or software.

UNCLASSIFIE~DSECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE ("a fle. ERnw..d)

PAGE READ ZNSTRUCTIONSREPORT DOCUMENTATION PAEBEFORE COMPLETING FORMIREPORT NUMB3ER 1

2.GOVT ACCESSION No. 3. RECIPIENT'$ CATALOG NUMBER

4. TITLE (wnd Su~bitle) 5" TYPE OF REPORT I PERIOD COVERCO

Miccilu Materiel Readiness ReportDl, Fia i epOt ejExecutive Summary, 6. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER

7. AU THOR(a) B. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER(.)

johnRay A./BaggettRyon S./DotsL

9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. PROGRAM ELEMENT. PROJECT, TASKUC Amy Ms~il ComandAREA & WORK UNIT NUMBERS

Plans, Analysis & Evaluation Dir , .Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898

I I. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATECornmianderUS Army Missile Command, ATTN: DRS!4I-1LL1 //jk,*8Redstone Arsenal, Al, 3)89,9 13. NUMBER OF PAGES

14. MONITORING AGENCY NAME & ADDRIESSIl differentI from Contr~olling Ollie.) IS. SECURITY CLASS. (of this repot)ICommanderUS3 Army iiissile Command Ucasfe

RedsoneArsealAL 3898IS.. OECLASSIFICATION/DOWNGRADING

ATTN: DRSMI- L.3 SHDL

IC. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (o1 this Report)

Approved for pubic release; distribution unlimited.

17, GISTRI9UTION STATEMENT (of th. abstract entered In~ Block 20, it differentI froat Report)

If. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

19 KEVYWORDS (Coninue. onl ,.e,.e side If nacaaawy and identify by block nun ber)

,iu iC S Availabilitypvrat i ris anid ,upport Readiness'Upiy Operational Readiness

i~rjv iionr. ng Systems Analysis'1Ttf'ar~ceLogistics Analysis

- 2, Aft" ACT M(Ci m ,- 1es ad necowsvmIad 1~11Ylf by block -- inbee)

!,I. ve ",ur.-try deor i bec- 'he appl ication of Ali 75Q10i. Missi le ReadiressI~~~i 'r r.. ', r t, pr flc r 7b es reoupKeisi b i Ii it is an id pr o euJ r e s fo ,r e va ,lc, i i

'1 .~ r 'K- 1, 1"ik' r:- rtinsse )f' missile equipment . I'quipment, to be* , .-~ .1 /~'Th 1 : 11. is0uce for tao i cat purrn,,o, tralin ing equip-

., i.i ul eR0. :'!,a -quipmer:1 , andl seleoto other miis-i le eqiiitoenI.... .4:;* I urp:Find per 10.1 .ttime. Thie report ing syst er.

DD) FIJo" 103 EcWnow OF I NOV6GS IS ODSOLETE _________________

Aft_____________ _TNCLASS __[_F1_EDIt

UNCLASSIFIEDSECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAIE(WRhs Date Bled)

(Block 20, cont')

".aDA Form 3266 - Missile Equipment Status Report, used for each reportablefailure (Figure 1).

DA Form 3266-1 - Missile Materiel Readiness Report, used for monthly

consolidation of DA Form 3266 (Figure 2).

The DA Form 3266-1 serves as the basis for equipment status ratinks reported

for missile systems designated as pacing items in AR 220-1, Unit Status Reportine

ii UN C LASSTF I nI

SECURITY CLASSIFtCATION OF THIS PAGE"u on D.C. EWn-od)

r4

FOREWORD

The Materiel Readiness Reporting System Executive Summary was developed

by the US Army Missile Command under the general technical cognizance of

Mr. B. J. Risse', Acting Director, Plans, Analysis, and Evaluation Directorate,

US Army Missile Command, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898. AR 750-40, Missile

Materiel Readiness Report is the basic document for this Executive Summary.

rii

CONTENTS

Section Page

ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

1. INTRODUCTION ....... ................ 1

2. OBJECTIVES ........ ................. 1

3. FOLLOW-ON OBJECTIVES ...... ............ 6

4. DEVELOPMENT OF EVALUATION PROGRAMS .. ..... 6

5. ANALYSIS CF MISSILE READINESS ... ....... 8

6. PRESENT OBJECTIVES .... ............ 15

7. PERFORMANCE FEEDBACK PROGRAM . ....... . 15

8. CONCLUSIONS ...... ................ 15

9. DISTRIBUTION ..... ............... 16

IV

ILLUSTRATIONS

Figure Page

1. DA Form 3626, Missile Equipment Status Report ...... 2

2. DA Form 3266-1, Missile Materiel Readiness Report 3

3. Readiness Rating Criteria ...... ............ 5

4. 3-Step Readiness/Log Analysis Process ... ....... 7

5. CONUS/World Wide Missile X Status Graph ... ...... 9

6. Theater Missile X Status Graph ..... .......... 10

7. USAREUR (45th AADCOM) Missile X Status . ...... ..11

8. EUSA/FORSCOM Missile X Status .... .......... .12

9. Worldwide Missile X Compound Status ........... .. 13

10. Theater Missile X Component Status ............. 14

v1

MISSILE MATERIEL READINESS REPORTING SYSTEM

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ABSTRACT

AR 750-40 Missile Materiel Readiness Report prescribes responsibilitiesand procedures for evaluating and reporting the materiel readiness of missileequipment. Equipment to be reported includes TOE/MTOE systems used fortactical purposes, training equipment, operational readiness float equipment,and selected other missile equipment as directed for a specified purpose andperiod of time. The reporting system comprises two forms:

DA Form 3266 - Missile Equipment Status Report, used for each reportablefailure (Figure 1).

DA Form 3266-1 - Missile Materiel Readiness Report, used for monthlyconsolidation of DA Form 3266 (Figure 2).

The DA Form 3266-1 serves as the basis for equipment status ratings reportedfor missile systems designated as pac'ng items in AR 220-1, Unit StatusReporting.

1. Introduction

The Missile Materiel Readiness Report was developed and introduced in-January 1980 to replace the Materiel Readiness Report DA Form 2406. It wasimportant to change from DA Form 2406 because it was a quarterly report andgave no indication as to what specific action was needed to correct degradedreadiness conditions in specific units, missile systems, or theaters. Asimple system was developed consisting of failure reports (DA Form 3266) whichare rolled up into monthly reports (DA Form 3266-I). These reports are keypunched as received and form MICOM's readiness evaluation data base.

2. Objectives

The schedule of objectives for the AR 7S0-40 reporting system were asfollows:

a. Convert readiness rating criteria from red/amber/green to ge no go,design forms, write, staff, and publish AR 750-40 (Aug 78 - Dec 79) (Figure 3).

b. Establish mechanized AR 750-40 reporting system (Aug 79 - Sep 80).

c. Initiate AR 750-40 reporting system from field (Big 4 Systems), Jan 80.

MISSILE EGUIPMENT STATUS REPORT REQUIREMENT CONTROL SYMBOLFo' um o tis I-Io'l, R AMo.Ao. . '.p P, .s'l WiihC I OSOG CSGLD-1463

To fl AUTODIN USE ONLY 2. REPORT NO 3 ORG OOOAAC If0 15 comm,,n

DIc *A- .4 ~~F-7T57 m Dtt IA) 4. DS/GS OAAC fig 21 como.)

AN' tv'j 01"105 lo 0vouSt IF3_FRMS TYPE Of REPORT B JUIuAN 7. WEAPON 6SYSTEM STATUS (Z9j

f2 ATE SYSTEMC. m ow bell f) 23 26 CODE *D 5MSION CAPABLE

Sllzy L. , 9 N, 57 a, At 4 * le-RiGINAL 1,18 6 ') ;?tOT MISSION

)V. .. _1 5" 'C4ANGE ILIA Dj CAPABLE

9 EITESTAU 30)1- 0. LA.l/IME ITEM 'YON -OPERATIONALMISO CAAL ,GNOT MISSION CAPABLE OATE C (31 34) TIME (3 38,~

I END ITEM PCCN CODE 12 ENO ITEM SERIAL NO. 13 OATIEfTIUE OPERATIONAL (51) a[?EIT b0ATA

394,'55,DATE 1 2(. 52 52) TIME f 56 591

14IE MSIN 6) RTACTICAL b [D TRAINING c, 0 FLOAT d. (D TEST

15 ARE PARTS NEEDED TO REPAIR END ITEM AVAILABLE IN COMMAND) (61 63)

__ ft O PARTS REQUIRED a 5 ON 14AND IN OS ASL B o AVAILABLE THROUGHI CONTROLLED

b r7 PARTS UNDETERMINED a. 5 AVAILABLE AT GS IDXISBTIUIN

ON HAND IN PLL I 5 AVAILABLE THROUGH h. CPAPTS NOT AVAILABLE INCOMAMAND CROSS LEVEL COMMAND

'B ACTIONS IN. PROGRESS OR COMPLETED 164 661 C DENO ITEM JOB OROERED 17. NMCM b NMCS

a _ REPAIR COMPLETED Tif L7 TO OIS SPT ORG I PT_ A

- ARS EDES CANED12 ::]TOGS 167 691 (70 7~2) 1173 75, I 176 78,IP. "~nl r d REQU S~ HANGE 13, FLOAT EXCHANGE I-

!b CHANGE UBR dN PART VLUMBER *.NOUN/MOMENCI.ATURE ICODE DOCUMENT 'UBE f 8 56, (57 761 a, 67 OT1

( 29, JI3{

0)

04.T _ _ _i

VA-CUNCTIo'. REMARKLS

11c CLT kkE W-j.- ft & RZEvLE-

20 TYPED OR PRINTED NAME. GRADE AND BRANCH OF AUTHIENTIC^T %GOFFEICER is, APUR

L ~ E t.- &C IICLLJ c~r "k I)ADA I~~O 266 E,<ION OF I FEB 7SISOBSOArE

Os 3Fwu e ILWIT FILE 4

2 OTHER 5

, - V ..,,, - ...

.... .... .... .... .... .... ..... ... .I

' - - 1

C,; i

o , . . .. . . . . . . . .-

.- .-

F4;r -

- - .o

(no4C4 Fe. c tl~u ran~ 1iT -eSJS

NO.1C I OA CU01 7 ACOWI OA OO I C 217 - CT

- - - 0068-7002 1.30-00-626-8312

ICC10OG- ,-, 3 2',,y Y Circuit Card

MSI.L0iL e Ni/A alti Slp-rt ti JIM4f

TPAR failure (Electron Tub e (S. e 7-),was the direct cause ci all svst m

(cJ.- th Ceurt Per f .. . it 10u~187 for t"e s-o part

Ickter 1SSON 1'D10-00-626-i3l?'( u se -1,en haupee 73 oe r ~ a ,.E to. Te

u. a lbi1l t, f -c-tcl -are 1505 I 1- OC. _ 06-265) t o Ill-w feldino

Figure 2

-Conltmuied

IlAnNNEss RATINC. (CRITERIA FORlI 4PROVFl) RANK BATTERY )SOVIARFj

- ------ -- - . - - - - tis font WrON ISSILZ SYTEM ~ HR.qume-] To lHe On-liand a'.nd

0A For. LIKES OD DC "A",eratotutlP1h- I's IS T

~ oroe C ~qladar 1 CF A I 1l0%~l LIIC .rItOs:

laIproved Pulse Ac0 Radar Lf FfTA I I lt the .n . , iU-(PAR) - ___ 4-- - 4 ocris - Pc-,5, all !lr;s sloo.

to IroomvdHIiih Poner ILL if I Tat Oy t s tk-, cOn-Radar (Il-FR BA Idird 11-5-n Ci;'.sle

lItproved Rstiie Oni, Radar II stt,'rr, to in r n-e hIROPQIR I'_t),'r irs -cs or .rie

Improved Battery Control I~e rite] 1.ot noip

x Central (to0 include fu' L[FI)IA I i-c (NW)..L o ~ ~ ~ . . I te 1 .- -

A. Tactical Cunt rolConsole (ICC) I -. ti t.tt

S. Cht Tgt Dect ConoeCtlO________ I erational!rO

C. Fire Control Console ;; .. I-C.-. (FCC, FL 11iC -,o~taI aD. Intercoa Cooed fnit fo!l, prraTinal

(ICU) IIterrneator Sat

I (I CC)(to inriude fully ap LIFELA Asari ni,i

__ __ ultcows as listed): I-TA. Ikut o"tic Data 1AR C. io3ta raW-: Set -ill

Processor Icnin a . n1-1a

(Interropator Set AfTx-46[V) I F FOO(

x Data Coatrte CoorIn_____ AN/CSA-77 (NCRE)___

&aproved Platoon Ce Post pl~.adI'.s

x CIPCP)lto include full, 01p LFFrPA IAI t'"A nd11*-I I~~e Onerati-ll over

su hcttpen s as listed) Oi of the fren-encA. Target Dlisplay and Saoil

l-npatewent Control A

C I oe (TOFC) 1. All launchers msE

B. Aito-tic Dlata Processor, heira eal atlote(ADlP) )l t- U T

x I lPro,,el IIAN La-acher (Lch-t IFC

x N dlauncher ,et I o LFFFPA____ Controli Box (ILSCR)________ 4

x Iaproved HIAWK k1,ssile LFFFKri 711

x Generator I,0(11, 4110 liz 6i

x T.7:;.!r!5z (La~r T-anspl tIFCable IsyStFec NW

x ANICSA-l3O (tO-I) consisTptj rSlof the followinp____

A. -------hnsj

N taCable, 17'

AI TI alIn :~ ia I-- - -- - -~~l It -- i~

d. Provide visibility as to Missile Materiel Readiness, Jun 80.

3. Follow-On Objectives

Follow-on objectives were established in July 1980 as follows:

a. Assess status of AR 750-40 mechanizations, Jul 80.

b. Develop a set of ADP programs to fully meet mechanization objectives,

Jul-Sep 80.

c. Develop a set of ADP programs to analyze AR 750-40 mechanized output,

Aug-Oct 80.

From analysis of the above objectives, a simple three step process has

evolved to evaluate readiness. See Figure 4. This process is to:

a. Manually analyze DA Form 3266-1 to determine system components causingmost missile system down time.

b. From this list of heavy hitters, determine national stock numbers

failing most within end items and causing most down time. ARTIS Terminal

access to the DA Form 3266 end item failure reports is used for this step.

c. Prepare multifaceted investigation of specific NSN's to determinerecommendations for NICP, NMP, Procurement, Quality Assurance, or designengineering action.

4. Development of Evaluation Programs

In order to facilitate the above evaluation, a number of data evaluation

programs have been developed. These programs permit detailed analysis of

compiled DA Form 3266. These programs identify the problem by organization,

end item, and national stock number of spare parts. In addition, the indi-

vidual DA Form 3266 data can be displayed in order to check any data entry.

The programs shown below can be called up for any time period (i.e., last 30

days, 90 days, or 6 months to one year) if trend analysis is desired.

a. Failures Selected by Organization

b. Failures Selected by Weapon System

c. Failures Selected by End Item

d. Failures Selected by Mission Identification

e. Occurrences of NSN by Organization

6

AI I i

IME

ITI

IP I

IZ -/0

II IC-

IoLi [I~~i'

41

~ K -

Ic

- ~ j

f. Occurrences of NSN by Weapon System

g. Occurrences of NSN by End Item

h. Non-Mission Capable Supply/Non-Mission Capable Maintenance (NMCS/N?%14)or by organization

i. N CS/NMCM by Weapon System

j. NM4CS/NMCM by Serial Number

k. Parts Not Available in Command

1. Individual DA Form 3266

m. Any National Stock Number

5. Analysis of Missile Readiness

a. Figures 5 through 8 are examples of the materiel readiness of MissileSystem X for a typical month. From this analysis, overall trends in readinessperformance of the missile system worldwide down to theater, command, andbattalion level can be identified. Notational data is used to preclude classi-fication of this paper.

b. Figures 9 and 10 show the components causing Missile System X's downtimeboth worldwide and by theater. Since Radar Y is consistently causing most of thesystem downtime, an analysis of all failure reports submitted on this radar iscalled up on the ARTIS Terminal and printed out. The analysis of the printoutshows that the Liquid Cooler (NSN 1430-00-066-5696, .VMDF price $16,064.00 each)is the heavy hitter item most often reflected in the failure reports. The demandhistory for this stock number is then called up on the ARTIS Terminal and printedout. The demand history analysis shows that 182 Liquid Coolers have been issuedin the past 24 months to support Radar Y's total density of 80 each. This meansthat on the average the Liquid Cooler is being replaced once a year or slightlymore often. Further inquiry reveals the 2 Bn sample data collection mean timebetween failure rate is one Cooler failure every 3.5 months, most of which arerepaired with piece parts at the DS level. Ultimately, two needed fixes areidentified. One involves rerouting a wiring harness to prevent it from rubbingagainst the vibrating pump and wearing through the wiring insulation causing anelectrical short and possible fire. The other involves a better oil coolantpressure leak test at the contractor's cooler rebuild shop to stop field rejec-tions of rebuilt coolers for leaking coolant seals, hoses, etc.

c. Follow-up procedures are needed to insure that the specified correctiveactions are in fact accomplished. Currently, a review of "old business" andstatus of these actions is accomplished before the start of the monthly MICOMreadiness review for the DCG Readiness, Project Managers, and Directors. Theobjective is to get well on the problem-causing repair parts, thus improvingthe readiness of the heavy hitter compoinent end item and thereby improve thetotal missile system materiel readiness performance.

CD

W I uXwm~w

~U)

jw _j .-z-I z

U,

CaM

cn C r- c Inc" c

Lin~A1,

U) P. in q0 U)c( u

CI

coo;

I n Vin

cuffff~ _________

WIn

x Lu u

. InLL > -40

I m

fr-r

~ (5)1D

cu CU

II

Ir i i _ _ __ _ _ _ _ I

IMgo to ~ U __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _

to in1UU _______________

l4 b r4

.4

SI I

LdILI-xwLI

(n EL:j '"U 0>- 0 4 CD O

fr- 1"4 \1 EU_j Lu

rr w ws _ __ _ _ __ _ _

1En

van"

Lii

IZ\

X4 atE~zIU) I z

Ii z .CwCLi j

mII - N Is0 W M n"E m a

U,.0

to) a) OD r- w In I c

EnELJ'

~Lin

tol

LIn w N wi w m tv

6. Present Objectives

The current objectives are to refine our readiness and logistical analysisprocedures and establish realistic readiness yardsticks for future systems.This will be done by threat analysis, development of missile system hardwarematrices, and assignment of rating criteria in coordination with the fieldmissile community, Project Manager personnel, TRADOC schools, and DA staff.The immediate objectives are to:

a. Compile historical records - Lessons Learned.

b. Analyze data records for remedial actions needed.

c. Use data analysis to effect timely feedback to user.

d. Maintain coordination between MICOM support elements and fieldcommanders.

7. Performance Feedback Program

In conjunction with actions as outlined in Para 6 above, a user feedbackprogram is being implemented in three phases. In Phase 1, as a product of ourrepair parts expediting effort, we began in January 1980 to provide daily feed-back to field requisitioners on status of requisitions for repair parts reportedas required on the DA Form 3266 failure reports. In Phase 2, beginning in Mayof this year, a program of data feedback to the field commanders was initiated.This program consists of providing detailed analysis of weapon system and missileunit materiel readiness performance in color transparency form on a monthly basis.Starting at MACOa level, we now plan to go down to division level by December.Field response to this program has been rapid and very positive.

In Phase 3, between now and February 1981, we expect to have established amail order catalog of selected computer printouts. These printouts will showthe failure history of a unit, a missile system, and end items to include repairparts for each failure. These reports will be made available to commanders downto battalion level on a request basis.

S. Conclusion

The objective of the Missile Materiel Readiness Reporting System wasoriginally to provide the Commander, MICOM, with visibility as to specificcauses for degraded missile materiel readiness in the most timely manner feasible.In addition, continuing efforts have been implemented which provide the capa-bility to analyze the field reports and initiate timely remedial action. Thefield commander can now be apprised of the status of his missile readiness incomparison with his contemporaries and of positive action being taken by supportagencies to improve his readiness posture as well as an indication of thoseactions he can take locally to help himself.

DISTRIBUTION

No. of Copies

Commander IUS Army Materiel Development

and Readiness CommandAPTN: DRCPA-SA5001 Eisenhower Ave.Alexandria, VA 22333

DirectorUS Army Materiel Systems

Analysis ActivityATIN: DRXSY-DL/DRXSY-CAberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005

'ommander

US Army, Harry Diamond LaboratoriesA--il: DELHD - Sys AnalWashington, DC 20438

C DrmanderUS Army Troop Support and AviationMateriel Readiness Command

AWTN: DRSTS-G4300 Goodfellow BoulevardSt. Louis, MO 63166

-ommanderUS Army Communications and Electronics

Materiel Readiness Command

AI.fN: DRSEL-SAFort Monmouth, NJ 07703

-omander'S Arm'y Tank Automotive R&D CommandA"TN: DRDTA-RPLWarren, MI L8090

CommanderUS Army Tank Automotive R&D Command

A-r N: DRDTA-VWarren, MI 48090

-ommander

US Army Armament Readiness CommandAIN: DRSAR-SARock Island, IL 61201

16

No. of Copies

CommanderUS Army Armament R&D CommandATTN: DRDAR-SEAPicat inny Arser.alDover, NJ 07801

CommanderUS Army Depot Support CommandATTN: DRSTS-MCLetterkenny Army DepotChambersburg, PA 17201

CommanderUS Army Mobility Equipment CommandATTN: DRDME-0Fort Beivoir, VA 22060

Commander7iatick Research & Development CommandATTN : DRXM-0Natick, MA 01760

Commander:-S Army Test and Evaiuation CommandA.N: DRSTE-SY

Aberdeen, MD 21005

Commander':S Army International Logistics CommandATIN : DRSIL-WSAlexarnd-ia, VA 22333

DirectorW17COM Operations Research GroupP-igewood Arsena., MI IIuiO

DEC Inventory Research fficeCCo ¢.,, UC Custom. 030,

Second and Chestnt Str..

": Army TH %kDC 's -,-. :rC ,: : "

Ah'' ','A "M s~'''h ,-'v

fn . 4.

No. of Copies

CommanderUS Army Logistics Management CenterA'ITPN: DRXCMC-DFt. Lee, VA 23801

Defense Documentation CenterCameron StationAlexandria, VA 22314

CommanderUS Army Research OfficeP.O. Box 12211Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

CommanderDARCOM Automated Logistics Management

Systems Activity210 N. 12th BlvdP.O. Box 1578St. Louis, MO 63188

CommanderUS Army Aviation R&D CommandATTN: DRDAV-DP.O. Box 209St. Louis, MO 63166

CommanderUS Army Communicaticis RV&D CommandATN: DRDCO-SArt. Monmouth, NJ 07703

CommanderDARCOM Materiel Readiness Support ActivityA'ITN: DRXMD-EIBluegrass Army Depuc.Lexington, KY 40511

CommanderUS Army Electronics R&D cmmand

i: • DRDEL-SAAdelphi, MD 20783

CommanderLogistics Management CenterA-N: DR)24C - Log Anal"t. Lee, VA 23801

mrander' Army Tank Automotive ', trie1Foadiness Command

-N : DRSTA

T: upjo

Cmmander

Ft .Huac hu a, A.,' 8,)-61<

0Army Logistics- Evaluat ion AgencyAI1T 1T1: PALO-LEAUie- Cumber land Arnmy ,e potLNew ubeanPA t7 0 7

ninma nderUSArmy Forces Command

AI7N: AFLO-RE (COL Pertain)McPherson, G:A C30O

::eadquartersDeo-artn'znt of the Arry

~ :DAM4-OUR ,nI-CThe Pentagon'kathingtori, DC 203iC

HeadquartersLeoartme nt of the Army

_iQ: DALO-PLR (Mr. Klynhe Pentagon

W-.Shington, DC ctlO1

Ma,tr Gerneral Charles w. Mearscrnmanding General

-'d Army Air D.efense 'cimasai,uNew fork F-9175

CommandantVSAry Aijr DLefense0"

7t. Bliss, TX 7?9:

-""5 Artil'eryBrcdFp"Y

mmnas"ae:SchC

,nunander7t Sur

W. I-C(r.W~,

No. of Copies

Commander I

US At-my Materiel Development

and Readiness CommandA'TN: DRCRE-FS (Mr. Driscol)3001 Eisenhower Ave.

Alexandria, VA 22333

CommandantUS Army Field Artillery School

GM Section

ATTN: ATSF-WD-GM (LTC Hallaque)

CommanderUS Army Research and Stdrd Group (Europe)Edison House

223 Old Mary LeboneDondon IWI, 5th UKBox 65 FPO, NY 09510

DRSMI-FR, Mr. Strickland 1-LP, Mr. Voig 1-C 1

DRSMI-X 1-RPR 2-RPP (Record Set) 2

(Reference Copy) 1

-DS 5

20