art. 1474 - price
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/4/2019 Art. 1474 - PRICE
1/4
5. When There Is Sale Even When No Price Has Been Agreed Upon
Art. 1474 provides: Where the price cannot be determined in accordance with thepreceding articles, or in any other manner, the contract is INEFFICACIOUS. However, if
the thing or any part thereof has been delivered to and appropriated by the buyer, he must
pay a reasonable price therefore. What is reasonable price is a question of fact dependenton the circumstances of each particular case.
Art. 1474 presents the ONLY EXCEPTION when there would still be a valid saleeven when there has been no meeting of the minds as to the price or any other
consideration.
Covers all sale contract situations where there has been at least a meeting of
the minds or an agreement to buy and sell the subject matter.
A remedy clause in favor of the seller who has delivered the subject matter in
accordance with an agreement with the buyer who has received and
appropriated it.
Note: If price is merely an estimate Court may fix the reasonable price.
a. What does article 1474 Mean by Preceding Articles?
Should be construed to refer to all articles preceding, namely Articles 1469 to
1473.
b. What does Article 1474 Mean by Inefficacious?
The inability to produce the effect wanted; inability to get things done. Does not exclude void sale contracts when the price is neither certain or
ascertainable.
It includes valid conditional contracts of sale (which have become
inefficacious) in the same group as void contacts, form the focal point ofprice.
c. Concept of Appropriation; Summation
To set apart for some special purpose; to take for oneself; take possession of:
use as ones own.
Covers the situation of acceptance by the buyer as the counterpart ofdelivery on the part of the seller, and having treated thereafter the subject
matter as his own.
Concept of appropriation is not applicable to real estate and that the rights of
the parties to a purported sale would be under the principles applicable to
builders in good faith.
Appropriation under article 1474, even when applied only to movables, wouldnecessarily entail transformation of the subject matter of sale such that it
can no longer be returned to its original state, as to warrant the fixing of
reasonable price to prevent unjust enrichment.
-
8/4/2019 Art. 1474 - PRICE
2/4
Case-Law Basis: Robles v. Lizarraga Hermanos
Established the appropriation doctrine under Article 1474 founded on the
principles of unjust enrichment and estoppel.
The doctrine is based on the principle of unjust enrichment directed against the
buyer who is not allowed to retain the subject matter of the sale without being liable to
pay the price even when no such agreement on the price was previously made.
The doctrine applies even when there is a no contract situation because of no
meeting of the minds as to the price, although there was a meeting of the minds as to thesubject matter, and may apply to void sale contract situation where the defect is as to the
price.
There is a valid contract of sale in spite of the lack of an agreement as to price or defect
in the agreement upon which an action for specific performance would prosper for therecovery of the price when the following elements are present:
1. There was a meeting of the minds of the parties of sale and purchase as to the
subject matter;
2. There was an agreement that price would be paid which fails to meet the criteriaof being certain or ascertainable: and
3. There was delivery by the buyer, of the subject matter of the sale.
RULINGS ON RECEIPTS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS EMBODYING PRICE
El Oro Engravers v. Court of Appeals
Sales Invoices are not evidences of payment since they are only evidence of the
receipt of the goods; and that the best evidence to prove payment of the price is theofficial receipt issued by the seller.
Leabres v. Court of Appeals
Where the buyer sought to enforce his purchase of a parcel of land based
primarily on a receipt signed by the seller acknowledging the sum of P1000,00.
There was merely an acknowledgement of the sum of One Thousand Pesos. Therewas no agreement as to the total price of the land nor to the monthly installment to be
paid by the buyer. Requisites of a valid contract of sale are lacking in the said receipt and
therefore the sale is not valid nor enforceable.
The requisites of a valid Contract of Sale namely:
1. Consent or meeting of the minds of the parties;
2. Determinate subject matter;
3. Price certain in money or its equivalent
-
8/4/2019 Art. 1474 - PRICE
3/4
Toyota Shaw, Inc. v. Court of Appeals
The court held that there was never any perfected contract between the partiesunder the agreement that only provided for a downpayment of P100,000.00, but did not
indicate the total purchase price nor the manner by which the balance shall be paid.
Limson v. Court of Appeals
When there is nothing in the receipt to indicate that the P20,000.00 earnestprice was part of the purchase price, the only conclusion that could be made was that
there was no sale.
Coronel v. Court of Appeals
The Court held that there was a perfected contract of sale, there being no
reservation of any title until full payment of the purchase price.
Cheng v. Genato
The Court ruled that there was neither a valid nor enforceable sale since the
requisites of a valid contract of sale are lacking in the receipt.
Xentrex Automotive, Inc. v. Court of Appeals
The Court held that a contract of sale is perfected at the moment there is a
meeting of the minds upon the thing which is the object of the contract and upon theprice,
David v. Tiongson
The Court clarified that the sale of real property on installments even when the
receipt or memorandum evidencing the same does not provide for the stated installments,when there has already been partial payment, the Statute of Frauds is not applicable
because it only applies to executory and not to completed, executed, or partially executed
contracts.
Tigno v. Aquino
The Court held that in itself, the absence of receipts or any proof of consideration,would not be conclusive of the inexistence of a sale since consideration is always
presumed.
INADEQUACY OF PRICE
Lesion or inadequacy of cause shall not invalidate a contract, unless there has
been fraud, mistake, or undue influence.
-
8/4/2019 Art. 1474 - PRICE
4/4
1. Distinguished from Simulated Price
When the parties to an alleged contract do not really intend to be bound by it,
the contract is simulated and void. A simulated or fictitious contract has no
legal effect whatsoever because there is no real agreement between the parties.
Gross inadequacy of price by itself will not result in a void contract of sale,unless it signifies a defect in the consent or that the parties actually intended a
donation or some other contract.
2. Rescissible Contracts of Sale
a. Those entered into by guardians whenever the ward whom they represent suffer
lesion by more than one-fourth of the value of the object of sale; andb. Those agreed upon in representation of absentees, if the latter should suffer lesion
by more than one-fourth of the value of the object of sale.
3. Judicial Sale
Gross inadequacy of price may avoid judicial sale of real property. However, for ajudicial sale to be set aside on the ground of inadequacy of price, the inadequacy must be
such as to be shocking to the conscience of man.
4. Sales with Right to Repurchase
In a conventional sale with a right to repurchase feature, the gross inadequacy of
price raises a presumption of equitable mortgage.
WHEN MOTIVE NULLIFIES SALE
When the primary motive is illegal, such as when the sale was executed over a
parcel of land to illegally frustrate a persons right to inheritance and to avoid payment ofestate tax, the sale is void because illegal motive predetermined the purpose of the
contract.
Motive particular reason of a contracting party which does not affect the other party.