ON THE APPLCATION OF BLUE ZONE RIGHTS ON CANNABIS ISSUES

First, we need to point out that authority simply does not want us to know about what they call ancient obscure laws that they would rather not have on the books, andagain the best way to talk about these rights is by showing examples; [like] The Grand father clause is an old common law blue zone law /concept thatauthority would not like you to know of because it creates exceptions to new rules.

In Vancouver there are now over 60 dispensaries that opened who are trying to get grandfather rights before they rule in the Federal and SCC precedent setting cases before them now. - What's at stake is that the Federal Courts are trying to reverse marijuana rights won in BCSC by declaring that when/if we get charged in any marijuana activity means we must now defend these charges in Federal Court under the rule of law like other NATO countries in these Admiralty courts, AND in this waywe're being robbed of benefiting from our favourable BCSC rulings

AND frankly the only defence that any 'ordinary resident' has to bar the AG/police from taking your rights away is to be prove to them that you are a 'private individual' therefor cannot be deprived of any right that we won in BCSC. In law, any recognized Party could declare that by joining their party, you become a private individual, AND if this party actually had a policy that they will defend that these BCSC marijuana grandfathered rights cannot be taken away would result in a case where, when/if you were busted for breaking a Federal rule, wouldresult where we can demand that these charges be heard in BCSC instead of Federal Court, and theJudge would be forced to send you to BCSC where the charges would be dropped if they conflict with any favourable case law precedent that we enjoy under our rule of law [not NATO's rule of law] and frankly if you're found guilty in BCSC means you were breaking both Federal and Provincial law.

IN PRACTICE, The only 'recognized party' that will defend this right to not have ourmembers or agents deprived of our BCSC rule of law is the Marijuana Party. IN LAW, that means if you are just an 'ordinary resident' at the time of being arrested, means you have no such right to refuse to be governed under NATO /Federal Court, when it's a Federal warrant that's being served. IN LAW what the Harpster is doing is taking away the Sovereign rights of ordinary residents by insisting that you must now be governed under these NATO courts. AND with our political affiliation, they have no right to take away our rule of law.

The only practical choices left are to: get your party to change their policy [or] join our party

EVER SINCE The Magna Carta was introduced, we're governed under habeus corpus IN OTHER WORDS: Maritime laws have historically always tried to take away ourcommon law rights, especially when the King approved of such supremist /elitist tactics There is nothing new under the sun [Eccl 8] - Sec 8(2) CC declares that English case law will uphold that when Kings abandon their trust that the common law courts must respond to protect private individuals the right to be ruled under our case law.

The Courts are duty bound to NOT repeat what Hitler did to his undesirables in 1935 AND no king can ever implement Admiralty rule on its people without having lost a war. GUILTY AS CHARGED: Constitutionally [under blue law] it's called TREACHERY: Collusion with the treasury to subvert the rule of law of any Commonwealth body

BASIC ISSUE What rule of law is Supreme in Canada? The HARPSTER has declared that all our common law marijuana case law rights that we won in any Provincial Supreme Court are no longer applicable, and frankly there's no way around it - either you protect your grandfather clause rights by registering with our party [or] you lose a right to object to this change of jurisdiction. Our defence is bulletproof, but regrettably we are not.

HOW DOES THIS SPECIFICALLY APPLY TO VANCOUVER AND BC? Under the City's plan 80% of the dispensaries will be shutdown, and there are no provisions being offered to protect the suppliers of these dispensaries that remain. If left to Federal Courts, there might be no growers to supply the remaining dispensaries. In Vancouver there are 6 Electoral Districts, and 38 in the province, and we all can open at least one EDA HEADquarters in each district, and protect our BCSC won rights in our premises. Every one of our EDAs can protect growers who supply its members under BC case law precedents.

This means that each HEADquarters can offer reasonable access to medical cannabis to 185,000 [or so] residents in that community, and under Freedom of Contract, the EDA can protect its growers, who could be anywhere in the province, as long as our growers comply with common sense fire and safety concerns [as under the MMAR - not MMPR rules] AND AGAIN we must emphasize that we can thank the HARPSTER for enabling us to lawfully take back our rights under the Elections Act, and under a necessity defence [Sec 8(3) CC] which lists every common law [blue zone] right known to man.

BOTTOM LINE: it all comes down to politics, and consent of the governed.We live in the most criminally organized civilization in the history of mankind Left to their demise, it can only go from bad to worse, because the very foundation of their police state is based on this twisted blue zone right of 'by the people for the economy' under Admiralty rule [colour of office] This might be the truth BUT it will never set them Free from serving evil.

BY DEFINITION: we are not the lawless ones, by insisting that NATO rulecannot take over our inalienable rights to be governed under our case law.They keep proving that their rule simply does not work in Mexico or SouthAmerica and frankly they really don't care about human rights, when theyinsist that medical rights to cannabis leads to harmaceutical drug addition.This criminal cartel simply has no right to call us enemy combatants [like they subject Americans to].

Blame it on the Magna Carta: Since then, 'consent of the governed' cannot exist without voluntary compliance of especially Authority to obey its citizens' common law rights as Supreme. Things are so bad here that a General Amnesty for past trespasses [like S. Africa did] is one of the only effective ways to find real remedy thru Peaceful means History has proven that '1-issue parties' [like ours] that spring up to protect a basic common law right usually wins [like: emancipation]

IN POLITICS: timing is very important. We actually have earned the respect to say that we only seek a Peaceful solution to a mess where criminals insist on dividing society in order to conquer all.