article_wjpps_1386003302.pdf

Upload: enko-satrovic

Post on 08-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • www.wjpps.com

    4698

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION ON BLISTER PACKING MACHINE

    Ramasubramaniyan.P*, Palanichamy.S, Srinag.T,Sharanya.N ,Lakshmi.M, Solairaj.P

    Department of Pharmaceutics, Sankaralingam Bhuvaneswari College of Pharmacy, Sivakasi,

    Tamil Nadu, India.

    ABSTRACT

    This article discusses about the equipment qualification on blister

    packing machine which covers different types of qualification like

    design, installation, operational and performance qualification and re-

    qualification. It also includes the process involved in the blister

    packing machine and detail description of equipment parts like

    unwinding station, forming station, sealing station, heating station,

    cooling station, feeder, lidding material and labeling through

    packaging. It also covers the details of packaging importance and its

    types.

    Keywords: Equipment, Qualification, Blister Packing Machine,

    Packaging.

    INTRODUCTION

    Equipment

    The collective analytical measurement instruments, in conjunction with firmware, assembled

    to perform a mechanical process. In a computerized system, the equipment is controlled by

    the computer system. The computer collects measurement data from the equipment. A device

    or collection of components that perform a process to produce the result. ([1])

    Qualification

    1. Action of proving that any premises, systems and items of equipment work correctly and

    actually lead to the expected results. The meaning of the word validation is sometimes

    WWOORRLLDD JJOOUURRNNAALL OOFF PPHHAARRMMAACCYY AANNDD PPHHAARRMMAACCEEUUTTIICCAALL SSCCIIEENNCCEESS

    VVoolluummee 22,, IIssssuuee 66,, 44669988--44771188.. RReevviieeww AArrttiiccllee IISSSSNN 2278 4357

    Article Received on 16 August 2013, Revised on 15 Sept 2013, Accepted on 12 November 2013

    *Correspondence for

    Author:

    * Dr. P. Ramasubramaniyan,

    Professor, Department of

    Pharmaceutics, Sankaralingam

    Bhuvaneswari College of

    Pharmacy, Sivakasi, Tamil

    Nadu, INDIA.

    [email protected]

  • www.wjpps.com

    4699

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    extended to incorporate the concept of qualification.

    2. The action of providing that any equipment or process works correctly & consistently

    and produces the expected results. Qualification is part of, but not limited to, a validation

    process.

    Types of Qualification

    1. Design Qualification (D.Q)

    2. Installation Qualification (I.Q)

    3. Operational Qualification (O.Q)

    4. Performance Qualification (P.Q)

    5. Re-Qualification. ([2])

    History of Validation

    The concept of validation was first proposed by two Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

    officials, Ted Byers and Bud Loftus, in the mid 1970s in order to improve the quality of

    pharmaceuticals. ([3]) It was proposed in direct response to several problems in the sterility of

    large volume parenteral market. The first validation activities were focused on the processes

    involved in making these products, but quickly spread to associated processes including

    environmental control, media fill, equipment sanitization and purified water production. The

    concept of validation was first developed for equipment and processes and derived from the

    engineering practices used in delivery of large pieces of equipment that would be

    manufactured, tested, delivered and accepted according to a contract. ([4] The use of validation

    spread to other areas of industry after several large-scale problems highlighted the potential

    risks in the design of products. ([5])

    Reason for Validation

    Validation is "Establishing documented evidence that provides a high degree of assurance

    that a specific process will consistently produce a product meeting its pre-determined

    specifications and quality attributes. A properly designed system will provide a high degree

    of assurance that every step, process, and change has been properly evaluated before its

    implementation. Testing a sample of a final product is not considered sufficient evidence that

    every product within a batch meets the required specification FDA (1987). ([6])

    Design Qualification (DQ)

    It is the documented verification that the proposed design of the facilities, systems and

    equipment is suitable for the intended purpose.

  • www.wjpps.com

    4700

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    Installation Qualification (IQ)

    It is the documented verification that the equipment or systems, as installed or modified,

    comply with the approved design, the manufacturers recommendations and/or user

    requirements.

    Operational Qualification (OQ)

    It is the documented verification that the equipment or systems, as installed or modified,

    perform as intended throughout the anticipated operating ranges.

    Performance Qualification (PQ)

    It is the documented verification that the equipment and ancillary systems, as connected

    together, can perform effectively and reproducibly based on the approved process method

    and specifications.

    User Requirements Specification

    The User Requirements Specification should be treated as a contractual document avoiding

    conflicts with other technical specification documents. The URS should not be considered a

    mere part of the validation documentation but rather the main and possibly only specification

    document for the equipment.

    The URS should as a minimum, cover all mandatory parts including those necessary to

    guarantee the final product quality and achieve compliance with the rules.

    Ideally, the requirements should be independent from the suppliers product and express the

    customer needs without addressing specific design solutions. ([7])

    URS Scope

    User Requirement Specifications (URS) Scope includes but is not limited to;

    Level-1, full details of end user operability.

    Level-2, full details of functionality.

    Level-3, software functionality interface.

    A full description of the required system performance.

    Performance criteria, critical parameters and operating range.

    Cleaning and maintenance requirements.

    Appropriate regulatory requirements.

    Documentation requirements.

  • www.wjpps.com

    4701

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    Training requirements.

    All none industry standard testing that may be required. ([8])

    Design Qualification (DQ)

    Design qualification is the documentation of the planning phase, including the decision

    making for the equipment. Design qualification takes place before the equipment is

    constructed. With the design qualification, the conformity of the equipment or facility

    planning with certain requirements is reviewed. To this end, the requirements laid out in the

    user requirements are compared with the specifications compiled by the supplier (technical

    specifications) and confirmed in writing. ([9])

    Installation Qualification (IQ)

    The (IQ) execution; verifies that the equipment, and its ancillary systems or sub-systems have

    been installed in accordance with installation drawings and or specifications. It further details

    a list of all the GMP requirements that are applicable to this particular installation

    qualification.

    These requirements must all be satisfied before the IQ can be completed and the qualification process is allowed to progress to the execution of the Operational Qualification. Installation Qualification Scope (IQ)

    The scope of the IQ testing/inspections will cover the under listed subjects, but is not

    restricted to them alone.

    Verify all components parts.

    Verify installation is as specified.

    Insert a brief description of the validated product process.

    Insert a brief description of the operational function.

    Verify supplied voltages.

    Verify whether the electrical installation qualification (IQ) complies.

    Verify all alarms and visual displays.

    Confirm the issue level of software.

    Identify and verify the serial & model numbers.

    Review all calibration certificates.

    Verify signal continuity.

    Verify the ambient conditions.

    Verify the documentation provided for the maintenance of the system. ([10])

  • www.wjpps.com

    4702

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    Before installation

    Obtain manufacturer's recommendations for installation site requirements.

    Check the site for the fulfillment of the manufacturer's recommendations (utilities such as

    electricity, water and gases plus environmental conditions such as humidity, temperature,

    vibration level and dust). Allow sufficient shelf space for the equipment itself, related

    SOP's, operating manuals, logbooks and software. ([11])

    The most important aspects to consider during IQ

    Provide as-built documentation.

    Check training reports.

    Check that documentation is complete.

    Check calibration reports.

    Identify piping and instrumentation. ([12])

    Operational Qualification (OQ)

    Operational qualification is defined as Documented verification that the system or sub-

    system performs as intended throughout all anticipated operating ranges. ([13])

    OQ demonstrates that an instrument will function according to its operational specification in

    the selected environment.

    Operational Qualification (OQ) is the process of demonstrating that a instrument will

    function according to its operational specification in the selected environment. Before OQ

    testing is done, one should always consider what the instrument will be used for. Testing may

    be quite extensive if the instrument is to be used for all types of applications and where some

    of these place great demands on the performance of the system. ([14])

    OQ should include, but not be limited to the following

    (a) Tests that have been developed from knowledge of processes, systems and equipment;

    (b) Tests to include a condition or a set of conditions encompassing upper and lower

    operating limits, sometimes referred to as worst case conditions.

    The completion of a successful Operational qualification should allow the finalization of

    calibration, operating and cleaning procedures, operator training and preventative

  • www.wjpps.com

    4703

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    maintenance requirements. It should permit a formal "release" of the facilities, systems and

    equipment. ([15])

    Typical tests in the OQ include the following:

    Alarm tests

    Behavior of the system after energy breakdown

    Accuracy of filling lines

    Transportation speed in a sterilization tunnel

    Temperature distribution in an autoclave

    Performance of a washing machine, accuracy of a weighing system([16])

    Performance Qualification

    PQ demonstrates that a balance or instrument consistently performs according to a

    specification appropriate to its routine use.

    Performance Qualification (PQ) is the process of demonstrating that an instrument

    consistently performs according to a specification appropriate to its routine use. The test

    frequency is much higher than for OQ. Another difference is that PQ should always be

    performed under conditions that are similar to routine sample analysis PQ should be

    performed on a daily (or at least a weekly) basis, or whenever the instrument is used.

    The test frequency depends not only on the stability of the equipment but also on everything

    in the system that may contribute to the analysis results.

    1. Define the performance criteria and test procedures.

    2. Select critical parameters.

    3. Define the test intervals

    PQ should include, but not be limited to the following:

    (a) Tests, using production materials, qualified substitutes or simulated product, that have

    been developed from knowledge of the process and the facilities, systems or equipment;

    (b) Tests to include a condition or set of conditions encompassing upper and lower operating

    limits. ([17])

    The following technical systems need to be performance-tested and qualified:

    High purity water systems (monitoring of the quality parameters: pH, Total Organic

    Carbon, conductivity, Central processor unit, temperature)

    Heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems (temperature, pressure, humidity)

  • www.wjpps.com

    4704

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    Complex connected systems (e.g., filling line, BPI production line; performance

    parameters) ([18])

    Requalification Requalification is the repetition of the qualification effort or a selected portion of it. ([19])

    Packing

    Packaging is defined as the collection of different components which surround the

    pharmaceutical product from the time of production until its use.

    Background Two basic types of pharmaceutical blister packages exist. In one variety the cavity is

    constructed of clear, thermoformed plastic, and the lid is formed of clear plastic or a

    combination of plastic, paper, and/or foil. The other type of package contains foil as an

    essential component of both webs and its cavity is created by cold stretching. ([20])

    Types of Packaging

    1. Thermoforming

    2. Cold forming

    Importance of Packaging

    Protects against all adverse external influences that can alter the properties of the

    product.

    Protects against biological contamination.

    Protects against physical damage.

    Carries the correct information and identification of the product.

    Tamper evident / Child resistance/ Anti counterfeiting.

    Functions of Packaging

    1. Containment

    -Not to leak, nor allow diffusion and permeation

    -Strong enough to hold the contents during handling

    2. Protection

    -Light

    -Moisture

    -Oxygen

    -Biological contamination

  • www.wjpps.com

    4705

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    -Mechanical damage

    -Counterfeiting

    General properties of blister packaging material:

    - Tensile strength

    - Tear strength

    - Impact resistance

    - Stiffness

    - Temperature resistance

    - Moisture resistance

    Factors Affecting Blister Thickness

    A. Material: The nature of material e.g. softening temperature, hardening time, elasticity etc.

    B. Process: Pressure and plug system usually produce forming produces thicker top section

    while in vacuum forming, it is thicker near the base and thinner at the top.

    C. Essential machine operation:

    1. Heating and thermoforming.

    2. Cold forming.

    3. Feeding and filling.

    4. Heat sealing of the bidding material.

    5. Punching out or guillotining the tray from the web.

    6. Printing of the lidding web.

    7. Batch marking.

    Advantages of Blister Packaging

    1. Blisters are very inexpensive to produce.

    2. Can be used for promoting products.

    3. Protects and holds the product securely.

    4. Many sizes available, from small unit-dose.

    5. Allows products to be seen, but not touched.

    6. Product is very visible.

    Disadvantages of Blister Packaging

    1. Blisters require some type of a card to seal the blister.

    2. Requires heat sealing the blister to the card.

  • www.wjpps.com

    4706

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    Blister Packaging Components

    The four basic components of pharmaceutical blister packages are the forming film, the

    lidding material, the heat-seal coating, and the printing ink. Forming films account for

    approximately 8085% of the blister package, and lidding materials make up 1520% of the

    total weight of the package. Since the forming film and the lidding material form an

    integrated package, they must match precisely.

    Forming film

    The forming film is the packaging component that receives the product in deep drawn

    pockets. One key to package success is selecting the right plastic film for the blisters in terms

    of its property type, grade, and thickness. Consideration must be given to the height and

    weight of the product, sharp or pointed edges of the final package, and the impact resistance,

    aging, migration, and cost of the film. The plastic also must be compatible with the product.

    Factors influencing package production and speed of assembly must be taken into account,

    including heat sealing properties and the ease of cutting and trimming formed blisters.

    Lidding materials

    The lidding material provides the base or main structural component upon which the final

    blister package is built. It must be selected according to the size, shape, and weight of the

    product as well as the style of the package to be produced. Lidding materials range in caliper

    or thickness from 0.36 to 0.76 mm, but 0.460.61 mm is the most popular range. The surface

    of the lidding material must be compatible with heat-seal coating process. Clay coatings are

    added to the lidding material to enhance printing. Heat-sealing and printability are both

    important considerations in blister packaging, and the lidding material must offer the best

    workable compromise.

    Printing inks

    Printing inks provide graphics and aesthetic appeal. They can be applied to the lidding

    material by letterpress, gravure, offset, flexographic, or silk-screen printing processes.

    Printing inks must resist heat sealing temperatures as high as 300 C without showing any

    discoloration or tackiness (blocking). In addition, they must sufficiently resist abrasion,

    bending, and fading and must be safe for use with the intended product. Printing inks should

    not contain excessive amounts of hydrocarbon lubricants, greases, oils, or release agents.

  • www.wjpps.com

    4707

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    Qualification tests should always precede production runs. Finally, printing inks must comply

    with FDA recommendations.

    Cold-formed foil/foil

    Best known to Americans is the blister package made of a foil, film, paper, or multimaterial

    backing that is adhered to a sheet of thermoformed plastic blisters. However, a less common

    type of blister is the foil/foil lamination used for products that are particularly susceptible to

    moisture and/or light. Unlike all-plastic blisters, these are not thermoformed but instead are

    cold-pressed into shape. Products that require the highest degree of protection are packed in

    an all-foil package. Cold-formable foil is finding favor because it is the only material that

    provides a 100% barrier to moisture, oxygen, and light.

    Machinery and assembly

    Blister packaging machinery

    Modern thermoformfillseal machines can operate at speeds

  • www.wjpps.com

    4708

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    The heating station

    The heating station raises the temperature of the plastic forming films to a level suitable for

    deep drawing. Forming films containing the polyvinyl chloride (PVC) support material are

    heated to 120140C. Polypropylene (PP) forming films are heated to 140150C. Forming

    films containing aluminum are not heated before the forming process.

    The forming station

    The forming station forms the plastic blister cavities via compressed air or die plates. Films

    containing aluminum are formed with mechanical forming tools only.

    The cooling station

    The cooling station cools PP films after the forming process. Laminates containing PVC or

    aluminum do not need to be cooled.

    The feeding machine

    The loading area fills the blister cavities with product. The feeding machine can be linked, or

    the product to be packaged can simply be swept into the blisters.

    The sealing station

    The sealing station heat seals the lidding material to the forming film that contains the

    product. All heat-sealing methods mate the blister and lid under constant pressure for a

    specified time, during which heat is supplied. The mating surfaces fuse and bond, setting

    almost instantaneously when heat input stops. Depending on the type of machine, the sealing

    temperature typically ranges between 140 and 340C.

    The cooling station

    The cooling station is necessary with all forming films. PP forming films must be cooled

    longer than other types of film.

    Labeling through packaging

    Packages are labeled, notched, and then marked with a batch number at the coding station.

    The perforating device makes a cross-shaped perforation along the sealing seams. At the

    punching station, the packages are then separated into sheets that typically contain from 10 to

    20 individual blisters. The vision system checks the filled packages for defects. Finally, a

    multipacking machine packs the individual packages into bigger cartons. ([21])

  • www.wjpps.com

    4709

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    METHODOLOGY

    The execution of equipment qualifications involved the following:

    Development of IQ, OQ and PQ protocols.

    Approval of IQ, OQ and PQ protocols.

    Executing the IQ, OQ and PQ.

    Workout of IQ, OQ and PQ report.

    Approval of IQ, OQ and PQ report.

    Design Qualification (DQ)

    The Blister packing machine was to be checked whether the user requirements are fulfilled.

    Installation Qualification (IQ)

    Instrument specifications during installation:

    Table No. 1: Equipment details

    1 Equipment to be installed as per drawing(s)/ manufacturers

    recommendation.

    2. Equipment identification nameplate is to be visible.

    3. Major components are to be securely assembled.

    4. Any physical damage is to be checked.

    5.

    Required electric connections are to be tight and grounded. Earthing

    connection is to be done properly.

    6. Sufficient space is to be provided around the equipment/ system for

    servicing.

    7. All moving parts are to be covered with suitable guard.

    8. All utilities related to equipment are to be connected.

    9. Parts are to be accessible for easy cleaning.

    While installing the machine, the following parameters were observed and confirmed

    Identification of Execution Team members.

    Purchase order verification.

  • www.wjpps.com

    4710

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    Verification of Manual, Drawing and Related documents.

    Installation Verification.

    Verification of Material of construction.

    Verification of Utilities.

    Major component verification.

    Operational Qualification

    The machine was run as per the operating instructions for 30minutes with empty load and

    observed the operation and recorded.

    While machine was in operation, switch off the mains power supply.

    After few minutes, the machine was restarted and the operation performance was

    observed and the result was recorded.

    During the operation of equipment, the temperature was controlled or adjusted to 1100 c

    to 1600c to form the blister cavities and then adjusted to 1400 c to 3400 c for sealing the

    lidding material. Then the operation was observed. The result of operational qualification

    was noted.

    While operating the machine, the following tests are to be carried out:

    Safety features;

    Alarm tests;

    Behavior of the system after energy breakdown;

    Accuracy of filling lines;

    Continuity of Operation;

    Power Failure Recovery Study;

    Functionality of Push buttons/switches provided on Electrical /Control panel;

    Temperature Controller performance verification;

    Operational Performance of ACG Pampac Blister Packing Machine and

    Performance Verification of ACG Inspection system

    Performance Qualification

    During PQ, the temperature was adjusted from 1100C to 1600C for optimal forming

    temperature study and finally the temperature was fixed.

  • www.wjpps.com

    4711

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    Later the temperature was adjusted to 1800C - 2400C to study the optimal sealing

    temperature study and finally the temperature was fixed.

    During performance of the machine, the following parameters were observed:

    Defective tablets;

    Missed tablets;

    Black spots;

    Machine speed;

    Optimal forming temperature;

    Optimal sealing temperature.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    The equipment qualification of Blister packing machine was conducted by four types

    namely, Design qualification, Installation qualification, Operation qualification and

    Performance qualification.

    Design Qualification

    For qualifying the Blister packing machine, the vendor manufactured and supplied the

    machine as per the requirements of the user. The design qualification was satisfied.

    Installation Qualification

    i. Instrument specifications: 1. Equipment was installed as per drawing(s)/ manufacturers recommendation.

    2. Equipment identification nameplate was visible.

    3. Major components are securely assembled.

    4. There was no physical damage.

    5. Required electric connections and earthing connections are tightly grounded and done

    properly.

    6. Sufficient space was provided around the equipment/ system for servicing.

    7. All moving parts were covered with suitable guard.

    8. All utilities related to equipment are connected.

    9. Parts were accessible for easy cleaning.

  • www.wjpps.com

    4712

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    The following parameters are within the limits and it was observed that the installation of

    the equipment was in proper manner.

    Identified the Execution Team members.

    Verified the Purchase order.

    Verified the Manual, Drawing and Related documents.

    Installation was verified.

    Material of construction was verified.

    Utilities were verified.

    Verified the Lubricants.

    Procedures were identified.

    Installation checks specific to equipment were identified and carried out as per individual

    test procedures.

    Verified the Major component.

    The details of each component were recorded and the supplied component was checked

    and installed as per the User Requirement Specification / Manufacturers

    recommendations. All are found correct. (Table No. 10).

    Table No. 2: Basic Unit

    Description Specified Supplied

    Make ACG Pampac ACG Pampac Model B45 R B45 R Sr. No. BR631401666-10 BR631401666-10

    Inspection System Shall be provided Provided

    Temperature control and Indication

    Shall be provided on MMI provided on MMI

    Servo drivers

    Shall be provided for various access operations of Pulling & perforation stations with other

    provided for various access operations of Pulling & perforation stations with other

    Machine Dimension 4400(L) x 2170(W) x 2350 (H) mm.

    4400(L) x 2170(W) x 2350 (H) mm.

    Forming Area Maximum 240 mm (Width) x 210mm (Advance)

    Maximum 240 mm (Width) x 210 mm (Advance)

    Forming Depth Upto 12mm Up to 12mm

  • www.wjpps.com

    4713

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    Forming cycles

    Upto 45 cycles per minute for PVC Upto 35 cycles per minute For ALUMINIUM

    Up to 45 cycles per minute for PVC Up to 35 cycles per minute For ALUMINIUM

    Forming Speed Upto 9.5 meters per minute Up to 9.5 meters per minute

    Operational Qualification

    Operational qualification was carried out by the vendor under the supervision of machine

    operator, validation person and the engineering person. The following parameters are

    within the limits:

    Alarm tests were good.

    System after energy breakdown works properly.

    Accuracy of filling lines was good.

    Continuity of Operation was good.

    Power Failure Recovery Study was good.

    Functionality of Push buttons/switches provided on Electrical /Control panel works

    properly.

    Temperature Controller performance verification was within the limit.

    The safety feature testing was carried out by operating the equipment. The exercise

    was repeated for 2 more times. All the safety features were tested and found in

    compliance with the URS.

    Table No. 3: Safety Features

    Sr. No.

    Description of safety features

    Method of Testing Acceptance Criteria

    1. Base Foil end sensor

    Foil Consumed / take out the base foil manually during machine is in operation

    Machine Stops at Zero Position

    2. Lidding Foil end

    Lidding Foil Consumed / take out the Lidding foil manually during machine is in operation

    Machine Stops at Zero Position

    3. Sensor for base foil Low level

    If the foil roll level reaches low

    Buzzer will made ON to indicate the operator after completion of set time machine will stop

    4. Loop sensor Manually Operate the sensor Base foil unwinding

  • www.wjpps.com

    4714

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    for base foil unwinding

    motor shall be ON

    5. Sensor for Base foil Joint When sensor detects the joint in the base foil

    The joint blister will get rejected at 450

    6. Sensor for Lidding foil Joint

    When sensor detects the joint in the Lidding foil

    The joint blister will get rejected at 450

    Critical Parameters

    Some important critical parameters such as Continuity of Operation, Power Failure

    Recovery Study, Functionality of Push buttons/switches provided on Electrical/Control

    panel, Temperature Controller performance verification, Operational Performance of ACG

    Pampac Blister Packing Machine Model: B45 R and Performance Verification of ACG

    Inspection System were performed and the results are presented.

    Continuity of Operation

    Machine ran for 30 minutes and found no abnormal noise or vibrations. Motor ran

    continuously without tripping, motor/machine parts were not excessively heated up.

    Hence continuity of operation with empty load for 30 minutes was found within the limits.

    Power Failure Recovery Study

    Power failure alarm was in good condition.

    When power supply was stopped, machine also got stopped at zero position.

    When power resumes, machine started with the existing set parameters.

    Performance Qualification

    The following parameters are within the limits

    Machine speed was verified.

    Optimal forming temperature was good.

    Optimal sealing temperature was good.

    Black spots were identified and rejected.

    Missed tablets were identified and rejected.

    Defective tablets were identified and rejected.

    Machine Speed Verification:

    The machine speed was maintained at three different ranges such as minimum (10 cycles /

    min), optimum (25 cycles / min) and maximum (43 cycles / min) in order to evaluate the

  • www.wjpps.com

    4715

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    forming and sealing of the blister as specified in protocols. The forming and sealing of the

    blister was found satisfactory.

    Optimal Forming Temperature Study

    This study was carried out using the dummy product with PVC as forming foil at different

    machine speeds (10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 43 cycles / min) under various temperatures

    such as 110C, 120C, 130C and 140C. The parameters like pocket shape, deformations,

    pin holes, cracks and dents were evaluated at top and bottom of the heating plate. The

    results showed that all the parameters were found within the limits.

    Optimal Sealing Temperature

    This study was carried out using the dummy product foiled with PVC as forming foil and

    aluminium as lidding foil at different machine speeds (10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 43 cycles

    / min) under various temperatures such as 180C, 195C, 220C, 235C and 250C. The

    parameters like knurling quality, pin holes, cracks, dents and leak test were evaluated. The

    results proved that all the parameters were found within the limits.

    Performance of ACG inspection system

    This study was performed at 10, 20 and 30 cycles / min to evaluate or identify the defects

    such as missed tablets, black spots and defective tablets. From the results it was found that

    the evaluated parameters were within the limits.

    After completion of performance qualification we observed that the obtained results were

    within the limits and found satisfactory.

    SUMMARY

    The design, installation, operational and performance qualification of ACG-PAMPAC

    BLISTER PACKING MACHINE, Model: B45 R was performed as per the approved

    qualification protocol.

    During installation qualification, the material of construction of all product contact parts

    were verified and certified as SS316L and its equivalent and the non contact parts were

    certified for SS304 and its equivalent.

    All the utilities are connected and found to be adequate. All the major components i.e.

    Basic Unit, Base foil unwinding station, Heating station, Forming station, Linear indexing

    station, Feeding station, Lidding foil unwinding station, Sealing station, Cooling station,

  • www.wjpps.com

    4716

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    Punching & Perforation station, Rotary pickup station, Web support assembly, Electrical

    controls and other were identified, installed, checked and mounted properly during

    installation qualification.

    During operation qualification, all the accessories provided to the equipments were

    calibrated and the results were found satisfactory.

    Control panel components and function of each key/component of the panel against its

    specified function was checked as per the operational instructions and the results were

    found satisfactory.

    Safety feature testing has been tested as per the procedure mentioned in the protocol and

    all the results are within the limits.

    The critical operating parameters such as

    Verification of continuity of operation,

    Power failure recovery study,

    Verification temperature controllers,

    Operation performance of Blister packing machine and

    Verification of security, Recipe management functionalities were verified and found

    correct.

    All the observations during operational qualification were found satisfactory and were

    within the limits.

    As part of performance qualification, the machine was run with dummy tablets at 10

    cycles/min, 20 cycles / min and 30 cycles / min and the quality of blisters were found

    satisfactory.

    CONCLUSION

    All the results observed for individual qualification steps are found within the limits as per

    the proposed protocols and the equipment was successfully qualified in compliance with

    the URS, cGMP and FDA requirements.

    The installation, operational and performance qualification of ACG-PAMPAC BLISTER

    PACKING MACHINE, Model: B45 R was performed as per the approved protocol

    No.GITPRIOP307 and GITPRPQP307 respectively. Hence the ACG-PAMPAC BLISTER

    PACKING MACHINE, Model: B45 R can be released for routine use.

  • www.wjpps.com

    4717

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    REFERENCE

    1. P.A. Cloud, Validating a Laboratory Incubator, BioPharm 1997, 10(11), 3042.

    2. P. Bedson, The Development and Application of Guidance on Equipment

    Qualification of Analytical Instruments, Accred. Qual. Assur. 1996, 1(6), 265

    274.

    3. Agalloco,J."Validation: an unconventional review and reinvention". Validation: an

    unconventional review and reinvention, 1995, 49 (4), pp. 175179.

    4. Hoffmann, A., Kahny-Simonius, J., Plattner, M., Schmidli-Vckovski, V., &

    Kronseder, C. 'Computer system validation: An overview of official requirements and

    standards'. Pharmaceutica Acta Helvetiae, 1998, vol. 72 (6), pp. 317325.

    5. Leveson, N. G. & Turner, C. S. 'An investigation of the Therac-25 accidents',

    Computer, 1993, 26 (7), pp. 1841.

    6. FDA, Guidelines on General Principles of Process Validation, 1987.

    7. Sandro De Caris, Marco Bellentani, Beny Fricano, Carlo Bestetti, Marco Silvestri and

    Barbara Testoni. Risk-Based Equipment Qualification: A User/Supplier Cooperative

    Approach, the official magazine of ISPE, 2007, 27 (3).

    8. http://www.validation-online.net/user-requirements-specification.html

    9. Maas & Peither AG GMP Publishing LOGFILE No. 8, 2011, pp. 1.

    10. http://www.validationonline.net/installation-qualification.html.

    11. Satyabrata Jena, K.Sravya, Arjun Goje, D. Narendra Prasad and Syed Sameer.

    Equipment Qualification For RMG, FBD, Blender & Compression Machines- An

    Overview, International Journal of Novel Drug Delivery Technology; 2011, 1 (3), pp.

    191.

    12. Robert A. Nash, Alfred H. Wachter., Pharmaceutical Process Validation. 3rd Ed.,

    2003, volume 129, Marcel Dekker, Inc, pp. 493.

    13. Robert A. Nash, Alfred H. Wachter., Pharmaceutical Process Validation. 3rd Ed.,

    2003, volume 129, Marcel Dekker, Inc, pp. 457.

    14. Satyabrata Jena, K.Sravya, Arjun Goje, D. Narendra Prasad and Syed

    Sameer.Equipment Qualification for RMG, FBD, Blender & Compression Machines-

    An Overview, International Journal of Novel Drug Delivery Technology; 2011, 1 (3),

    pp. 192.

    15. PDA, Validation of Computer-Related Systems, Technical Report No. 18, PDA J. Sci.

    Technol. 1995, 49 (1), pp. S1S17.

    16. Robert A. Nash, Alfred H. Wachter., Pharmaceutical Process Validation. 3rd Ed.,

  • www.wjpps.com

    4718

    P.Ramasubramaniyan et al. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

    2003, volume 129, Marcel Dekker, Inc, pp. 459.

    17. http://www.validation-online.net/process-qualification.html

    18. Robert A. Nash, Alfred H. Wachter., Pharmaceutical Process Validation. 3rd Ed.,

    2003, volume 129, Marcel Dekker, Inc, pp. 460.

    19. J.Agalloco, Master Planning of Validation, PDA Training and Research Institute,

    1998, pp. 104.

    20. R. Pilchik, Pharmaceutical Blister Packaging, Part I: Rationale and Materials,

    Pharm. Technol. 2000, 24 (11), pp. 6878.

    21. R. Pilchik, Pharmaceutical Blister Packaging, Part I: Rationale and Materials,

    Pharm. Technol. 2000, 24 (11), pp. 58.