arX

iv0

801

2268

v4 [

hep-

th]

29

May

200

8FIANTD14-08

Mixed-Symmetry Massless Fields in Minkowskispace Unfolded

ED Skvortsov1

IETamm Department of Theoretical Physics PNLebedev Physical InstituteLeninsky prospect 53 119991 Moscow Russia

Abstract

The unfolded formulation for arbitrary massless mixed-symmetry bosonicand fermionic fields in Minkowski space is constructed The unfolded form isproved to be uniquely determined by the requirement that all gauge symme-tries are manifest The unfolded equations have the form of a covariant con-stancy condition The gauge fields and gauge parameters are differential formswith values in certain irreducible Lorentz tensors The unfolded equations forbosons determine completely those for fermions The proposed unfolded for-mulation also contains dual formulations for massless mixed-symmetry fields

1skvortsovlpiru

Contents

1 Summary of Results 3

2 Mixed-Symmetry Fields in Minkowski Space 6

3 Unfolding Dynamics and σminus Cohomology 1331 General Features 1432 Interpretation of Unfolded Systems Describing free Fields 1933 Examples of Unfolding 23

4 Unfolding Mixed-Symmetry Fields 3341 Simplest Mixed-Symmetry Fields 3342 General Mixed-Symmetry Fields 3743 Physical Degrees of Freedom Counting 4244 Solving the Generalized Jacobi Identities 4345 Dynamical Content via σminus Cohomology 45

5 Conclusions 50

Introduction

In four dimensional Minkowski space spin degrees of freedom are known to be clas-sified by non-negative integers or half-integers However in dimensions higher thanfour spin degrees of freedom are described by a set of (half)integers according to theweights of the Wignerrsquos little group The simplest and the most developed are thecases of totally symmetric [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11] and totally antisymmetricfields [12 13 14] All other types are referred to collectively as mixed-symmetryMixed-symmetry fields naturally arise in field theories in higher-dimensions for in-stance in (super)string theory [15]

The simplest mixed-symmetry fields were originally considered in [16] and [17]The most general type of mixed-symmetry fields was studied in [18 19 20 21]though the rigorous proof of the fact that the proposed in [20] fieldsgauge symme-tries content and equations describe massless particles properly was given in [22 23]In terms of BRST approach mixed-symmetry fields characterized by at most twonon-zero weights were studied in [24 25 26 27] An elegant approach to the de-scription of mixed-symmetry fields was proposed in [28 29 30] on the basis of thesimplest mixed-symmetry fields

In this paper massless mixed-symmetry fields are reformulated within the un-folded approach [31 32 33] because it is the unfolded approach that underlies thefull nonlinear theory of interacting massless fields with arbitrary totally symmetricspins [7] being the only approach succeeded in constructing the full theory thoughexhaustive results concerned with cubic vertices of higher-spin fields were obtainedwithin the light-cone approach in [34 35 36] Therefore to unfold an arbitrary

1

spin viz mixed-symmetry fields in the Minkowski space is considered as the firststep towards the full nonlinear theory of arbitrary spin fields

The main statement of the paper is that a free massless field with spin degrees offreedom characterized by an arbitrary bosonic or fermionic unitary irreducible repre-sentation of the Wignerrsquos little algebra can be uniquely described within the unfoldedapproach in which all gauge symmetries are manifest The unfolded system has theform of a covariant constancy equation The gauge fields and gauge parameters aredifferential forms on the Minkowski space with values in certain irreducible repre-sentations of the Lorentz algebra ie irreducible tensors or spin-tensors The fullunfolded system is described in terms of a single nilpotent operator σminus whose coho-mology groups correspond to independent differential gauge parameters dynamicalfields gauge-invariant equations and Bianchi identities

Another advantage of the unfolded approach is in that the equations for bosonsand fermions have literally the same form the only difference being in change oftensor representations in which the fields takes values by the corresponding spin-tensors The form and the order of dynamical equations second for bosons andfirst for fermions turns out to be encoded in σminus cohomology In fact the unfoldedsystem is constructed for the bosonic case and then proved to have the sameform for fermions The similarity between bosons and fermions within the unfoldedapproach can have deep applications in theories with supersymmetries

Despite the deep relations of the unfolded approach to the nonlinear theory ofhigher-spin fields unfolding by itself provides a very powerfull method for analysisof dynamical systems For instance once some linear dynamical system is unfoldedit is given a direct interpretation in terms of Lie algebrasmodules and all gaugesymmetries become manifest

The paper is organized as follows the main result ie the unfolded form ofequations describing a massless field with the spin that corresponds to an arbitraryirreducible representation of the Wignerrsquos little algebra is stated in Section 1 All thenecessary information about mixed-symmetry fields in the Minkowski space-time iscollected in Section 2 The basic facts concerning the unfolded approach viz thevery definition the relation to Lie algebrasmodules to the Chevalley-Eilenbergcohomology are recalled in Section 3 illustrated on the examples of a scalar fieldspin-one field and totally symmetric spin-s and spin-(s+ 1

2) fields in Section 33 The

proof of the general statement of Section 1 is in Section 4 The physical degrees offreedom are analyzed in Section 43 The discussion of the results and conclusionsare in Section 5 Multi-index notation and basic facts on Young diagrams andirreducible representations are collected in Appendices

Conventions

As the most general type of irreducible representations of orthogonal algebras vizthe Wignerrsquos little algebra the Lorentz algebra is considered the essential use ismade of Young diagramsrsquo language A certain Young diagram is denoted by Ywith subscripts or directly enumerating the lengths of the rows as Ys1 s2 or

2

when rows of equal lengths are combined to blocks as Y(s1 p1) (s2 p2) pibeing the number of rows of length si Loosely speaking we do not make any differ-ence between irreducible finite-dimensional representations of orthogonal algebrasYoung diagrams2 and the corresponding irreducible (spin)-tensors3 eg rank-twosymmetric traceless tensor-valued field φab ie φab = φba and ηabφ

ab = 0 can beequivalently denoted either as φ or φY with Y = Y2 equiv Y(2 1) The scalarrepresentation Y0 is denoted by bull Unless otherwise stated all Young diagramsare of orthogonal algebras viz so(dminus 1 1) or so(dminus 2) For more detail on Youngdiagrams see in Appendix B Greek indices micro ν=0(d-1) are the world indicesof the Minkowski space-time Md d equiv dxmicro part

partxmicro is the exterior differential on MdThe degree of differentials forms on Md is indicated by the bold subscript eg adegree-q differential form ω onMd with values in so(dminus1 1)-irrep characterized bythe Young diagram Y is denoted as ωY

q (loosely speaking Y-valued degree-q formωYq ) The wedge symbol and is systematically omitted Lowercase Latin letters ab=0(d-1) are vector indices of so(dminus 1 1) fiber indices of the sections of tensor

bundles over the Minkowski space-time Greek indices α β γ = 12[d2] are fiber

spinor indices of so(d minus 1 1) The multi-index condensed notation is used in thepaper the (anti)-symmetrization is denoted by placing the corresponding indices in(square) round brackets for details on the multi-index notation see Appendix A

1 Summary of Results

The main statement of the paper is that given a unitary irreducible bosonic(fermionic)representation of the massless Wignerrsquos little algebra so(dminus2) which is characterizedby Young diagram Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) (Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) 1

2)

there exists a uniquely determined unfolded system that describes a massless spin-Y field with all gauge symmetries being manifest The system has the form of acovariant constancy equation

Dωp = 0 ωp isin Wp

δωp = Dξpminus1 ξpminus1 isin Wpminus1

δξpminus1 = Dξpminus2 ξpminus2 isin Wpminus2

δξ1 = Dξ0 ξ0 isin W0 (11)

2In addition to the Young symmetry conditions extra restrictions (with the aid of invarianttensors Levi-Civita for sl(d) metric and Levi-Civita for so(d)) have to be imposed on the tensors tomake them irreducible In what follows it is important that irreducible so(d)-tensors are tracelessNo special consideration is given to (anti)-self dual fields see Appendix B

3In the case of fermionic representations of orthogonal algebras ie spin-tensors the tensorpart of a spin-tensor (all but one spinor indices can be converted pairwise to tensor indices bymeans of Γ-matrices hence we consider spin-tensors with one spinor index only) is characterizedby Young diagram which is labeled by the subscript 1

2 eg an irreducible rank-two symmetrictensor-spinor ψαab satisfies Γα

aβψβab = 0 and belongs toY2 1

2

The connection with the standard

Gelfan-Zeitlin labels is obvious Additional conditions viz Majorana Weyl and Majorana-Weylare irrelevant to the problems concerned

3

where W =oplusinfin

q=0Wq is certain graded space D is a nilpotent operator of degree

(+1) D Wq rarr Wq+1 and D2 = 0 Gauge fields take values in Wp where

p =sumi=N

i=1 pi is the height of Young diagram Y the first level gauge parameters inWpminus1 the second level gauge parameters in Wpminus2 and so on The gauge invarianceis manifest by virtue of D2 = 0 The reducibility of gauge transformations is similarto those of totally anti-symmetric fields

SpaceWp which contains the gauge fields of the unfolded system is a graded by

nonnegative integer g = 0 1 set of differential formsWp = ωY0q0 ωY1

q1 ω

Ygqg

q0 = p Diagrams Yg that characterize so(d minus 1 1)-irreducible representations inwhich the fields and gauge parameters take values are uniquely determined by theinitial diagram Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN)( 1

2) of so(dminus 2)

The dynamical field is incorporated in a p-form ωY0p isin Wg=0

p that takes valuesin the irreducible representation(irrep) of the Lorentz algebra so(d minus 1 1) that ischaracterized by Young diagram Y0 of the form

sN minus 1pN

s2 minus 1p2

s1 minus 1

p1

(12)

ie it is obtained by cutting off the first column of Y All other gauge fields inthe system are auxiliary and can be expressed in terms of derivatives of ωY0

p It is

convenient to enumerate the Lorentz-irreps in which gauge fields ωYgqg take values by

a pair n k of integers Roughly speaking the first integer is related to the numberof the block of Y n = N 0 the second one is related to the relative length ofthe n-th and (n+ 1)-th blocks The so(dminus 1 1)-irreps Yg=0Yg=(sNminus1) are givenby Ynk with n = N k = 0(sN minus 1) of the form

k

sN minus 1pN

s2 minus 1p2

s1 minus 1

p1

(13)

The diagrams Yg with g = sN (sNminus1 minus 1) are given by Ynk with n = N minus 1

4

k = 0(sNminus1 minus sN minus 1) of the form

sNminus1

sN minus 1pN

k

s2 minus 1p2

s1 minus 1

p1

(14)

and analogously for the rest of Yg with g lt s1 The diagrams Yg with g = s1 s1 +1 are given by Ynk with n = 0 k = 0 1 of the form

sN minus 1

sN minus 1pN

s2minuss3minus1

s2 minus 1p2

s1minuss2minus1

s1 minus 1

p1

k + 1

(15)

Gauge fields ωYgqg for g sim n = N k are (p1 + + pN)-forms gauge fields ω

Ygqg for

g sim n = Nminus1 k are (p1+ +pNminus1)-forms gauge fields ωYgqg for g sim n = 0 k

are zero-forms Hence form degree function qg is completely defined The grade g isequal to the element number (starting from zero) in the set of pairs n k orderedby k in increasing order and then by n in decreasing order

Space Wpminus1 which contains the first level gauge parameters of the system is aset of forms with values in the same so(dminus 1 1)-irreps as gauge fields but the form

degree is less by one ie Wpminus1 = ξY0q0minus1 ξ

Y1q1minus1 ξ

Yg

qgminus1 The sector Wgpminus1 for

g ge s1 is trivial du to qg = 0 Analogously spaces Wq for q lt p minus 1 and q gt pcan be defined To sum up the element of space Wpplusmni at grade g sim n k is adegree-(qg plusmn i) form with values in Yg equiv Ynk irrep of the Lorentz algebra

The Minkowski background space is described in terms of vielbein(tetrad) hamicrodxmicro

and Lorentz spin-connection abmicro dxmicro which determines Lorentz-covariant derivative

DL = d+When reduced to Wg

q the full system has the form

DLωYg

qg= σminus

(

ωYg+1qg+1

)

ωYg

qgisin Wg

p ωYg+1qg+1

isin Wg+1p

δωYg

qg= DLξ

Yg

qgminus1 + σminus

(

ξYg+1

qg+1minus1

)

ξYg

qgminus1 isin Wgpminus1 ξ

Yg+1

qg+1minus1 isin Wg+1pminus1

δξYg

qgminus1 = (16)

where operator D is a sum D = DL minus σminus of Lorentz-covariant derivative DL andcertain nilpotent operator σminus

andq otimesYg+1 rarrandq+∆g+1otimesYg ∆g = qg minus qg+1 ge 0

5

(σminus)2 = 0 built of background vielbein hamicrodx

micro which is unambiguously fixed bythe symmetry of Yg and Yg+1 σminus contracts (∆g + 1) vielbeins ha with the tensorrepresenting Yg+1 to obtain the tensor with the symmetry of Yg appropriate Youngsymmetrizers are implied

Since σminus affects tensor indices only it is correctly defined on spin-tensors too anddoes not violate the Γ-tracelessness condition The unfolded equations for fermionshave the same form as for bosons the irreducible tensors are to be replaced withcorresponding spin-tensors

The case of the last block of the length one ie single column is not specialbut requires some comments Since (sN minus 1) = 0 it is not possible to add a cellto the bottom-left of the N -th block of Y0 therefore Yn=Nk=0 equiv Y0 is theonly diagram with n = N and diagram Yn=Nminus1k=0 equiv Yg=1 has the symmetry ofY(s1 minus 1 p1) (sNminus1 minus 1 pNminus1) (1 pN + 1)

Subspace Wnkq with definite n forms an irreducible module of iso(d minus 1 1)

whereas the subspace with definite both n and k forms a finite-dimensional irre-ducible module of so(d minus 1 1) ie an irreducible Lorentz tensor characterized byYg as was stated above The intervals of constancy of qg correspond to gnk withdefinite n ie the set of forms on which a certain irreducible iso(dminus 1 1)-moduleis realized all have the same degree

Let us also note that Wkgep are infinite-dimensional whereas Wkltp are finite-dimensional The higher degree spaces Wkgep correspond to the equations of motion(Wk=p+1) and Bianchi identities (Wkgtp+1) which manifest the gauge symmetriesMost of the equations express higher grade g gt 0 fields via the derivatives of phys-ical field ωY0

q0and only certain elements of Wg=2

k=p+1 impose on ωY0q0

second orderdynamical equations The significance of the fields with g gt 0 is to make all gaugesymmetries be manifest

2 Mixed-Symmetry Fields in Minkowski Space

The types of the Minkowski space particles being by definition in one-to-one corre-spondence with unitary irreducible representations(uirrep) of the Poincare algebraiso(dminus 1 1) in the case of four space-time dimensions were classified by Wigner in[37]

Leaving out the details of the Wignerrsquos construction for recent reviews and forgeneralization to an arbitrary space-time dimension d see [38] important is thatgiven m2 gt 0 and a uirrep Y of the Wignerrsquos little algebra being so(d minus 1) form2 gt 0 and so(d minus 2) for m2 = 0 there exists a standard procedure to constructa uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) which is called a massive(massless) particle of spin-YSo-called continuous or infinite spin particles [37] [39] are not considered in thispaper Therefore physical degrees of freedom for massive and massless particles areclassified by irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) and so(dminus 2) respectively

More elaborated are the two cases of totally-symmetric spin-s particles Y =Ys equiv Y(s 1) [40 1 10] viz scalar vector graviton and of totally anti-symmetric spin-p particles Y = Y(1 p) [12 13 14] The others are referred to col-

6

lectively as mixed-symmetry the simplest one beingY = Y2 1 equiv Y(2 1) (1 1)Yet different problem is to realize a uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) on the solutions of a

wave equation for a field φYM(x) which takes values in a certain representation YM

of the Lorentz algebra so(dminus1 1) ie φYM(x) is a Lorentz tensor or a set of tensors

As field theories free particles can be described in either non-gauge or gauge wayin the former case a uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) is realized on the solutions of the waveequation directly whereas for the latter case a uirrep of iso(dminus1 1) is realized on thequotient of the solutions by certain specific solutions called pure gauge The waveequation (+m2)φYM

(x) = 0 which fixes the quadratic Casimir m2 of iso(dminus1 1)is generally supplemented with a set of algebraicdifferential constraints to singleout an irreducible in the sense of the little algebra component Field φYM

(x) takesvalues in a certain finite-dimensional representation of so(d minus 1 1) which is notirreducible in most cases nevertheless it can be made irreducible when dealing withfree equations of motion only Yet more different problem is to realize an irrep ofiso(d minus 1 1) on the solutions of the variational problem for some action in mostcases the procedure requires a set of auxiliary fields which carry no physical degreesof freedom

The choice of so(dminus 1 1)-representation YM (even if irreducible) in which fieldφYM

(x) takes values is not unique eg a free massless spin-one particle can bedescribed either by a gauge potential Amicro(x) subjected to

Amicro minus partmicropartνAν = 0 δAmicro = partmicroξ (21)

or by a field strength Fmicroν subjected to

partmicroFmicroν = 0 part[microFλρ] = 0 (22)

In the case of a massless spin-two particle (Y = so(dminus2)) in addition to the con-ventional description in terms of the metric gmicroν

Rmicroν minus1

2gmicroνR = 0 (23)

the Weyl tensor Cmicroνλρ known to have the symmetry of 4 can describe a freespin-two in a non gauge way

part[microCmicromicro]νν = 0 partλCmicroλνν = 0 (24)

Another example is a 4d massless scalar particle which can be described eitherby a scalar field φ(x) subjected to φ = 0 or more exotically by an antisymmetricgauge field ωmicroν (so-called notoph [41]) subjected to

ωmicroν minus partmicropartρωρν + partνpart

ρωρmicro = 0 δωmicroν = partmicroξν minus partνξmicro (25)

This equation describes a massless particle with spin- so(dminus2) equiv Y1 1so(dminus2) which

for d = 4 by virtue of the so(d minus 2) Levi-Civita tensor εij is equivalent to a scalar

4In antisymmetric basis Cmicroνλρ satisfies Cmicroνλρ = minusCνmicroλρ Cmicroνλρ = minusCmicroνρλ and C[microνλ]ρ = 0

7

Y1 1so(dminus2) sim Y0 0

so(dminus2) On the other hand a scalar particle can be describedby a rank-d antisymmetric field ωmicro1microd

satisfying ωmicro1microd= 0 where the use of

so(d minus 1 1)-duality is made of ωmicro1microd= εmicro1microd

φ These two types of duality arereferred to as trivial

The general statement is that free particles can be described by an infinite num-ber of ways called dual descriptions [42 43 44 45 46] but dual theories exhibitcertain difficulties while introducing interactions [47 48 49 50] eg despite the factthat free massless spin-one and spin-two particles can be described by the Maxwellfield strength and by the Weyl tensor respectively introducing interactions requiresthe corresponding gauge potentials Amicro and gmicroν to be brought in

There exists a distinguished choice of so(dminus1 1)-irrep YM in which field φYM(x)

takes values that can be referred to as fundamental or minimal For the minimaldescription of a spin-Y particle the spin degrees of freedom and the so(dminus1 1)-irrepYM are characterized by the same Young diagram ie YM = Y eg a spin-oneparticle by Amicro a spin-two by gmicroν All other descriptions are referred to as dual Itis the minimal descriptions that will be discussed further by this reason the termspin-Y particle can be substituted for more accepted spin-Y field

A massive totally symmetric spin-s field can be described [51] by a totally sym-metric tensor field φ(micro1micros) subjected to

(+m2)φmicro1micros= 0

partνφνmicro2micros= 0

φννmicro3micros

= 0

(26)

where the last equation (tracelessness condition) makes the tensor irreducible in theso(d minus 1 1) sense the first one puts the system on-mass-shell and the second oneprojects out the components orthogonal to the momentum restricting φmicro1micros

tocontain only a spin-s irrep of so(dminus 1)

Analogously a massive totally anti-symmetric spin-p field ie Y = Y(1 p)can be described by a totally anti-symmetric tensor field ω[micro1microp] subjected to

(+m2)ωmicro1microp= 0

partνωνmicro2microp= 0

(27)

where the tracelessness condition becomes trivial for anti-symmetric tensorsThese two results are easily generalized to an arbitrary spin-Ys1 snmassive

field which can be minimally described by a symmetric in each group of indicestensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) subjected to

(+m2)φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0

partmicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n]

φmicro1(s1)(microk(sk)microk)microi(siminus1)micron(sn) = 0 k isin [1 nminus 1] k lt i

ηmicroimicrojφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i j isin [1 n]

(28)

where the last two conditions are just the Young symmetry and the tracelessnessconditions which make the field carry an irrep-Ys1 sn of so(dminus 1 1) and can

8

be thought of as the part of the definition of field φYM(x) The first equation puts

the system on-mass-shell the second one projects out all so(dminus1)-irreps which thetensor φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)microp(sp) decomposes into except for the one with the symmetry ofYs1 sn so(dminus 1)-diagram

Let D (m2Ys1 sn) be an iso(d minus 1 1) module extracted by (28) beingirreducible for m2 6= 0 or for Y0 (scalar field) Since minimally described masslessfields are gauge theories a uirrep H (0Ys1 sn) of iso(d minus 1 1) correspondingto a massless spin-Ys1 sn field should be defined as appropriate quotient bythe pure gauge solutions of the form

0 minusrarr gauge solutions minusrarr all solutions minusrarr H (0Ys1 sn) minusrarr 0 (29)

where the sequence is non-split as there is no so(dminus 1 1)-covariant way to extractso(d minus 2)-irrep Ys1 sn from the Lorentz tensor with the same symmetry ofYs1 sn by virtue of a single so(dminus 1 1)-vector the momentum pmicro sim partmicro

A massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described as the quotient of(26) with m2 = 0 by pure gauge solutions of the form δφmicro1micros

= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) where

ξmicro1microsminus1 is a totally symmetric gauge parameter subjected to the equations of thesame form (26) ie on-mass-shell tracelessness and transversality thus belongingto D (0Ysminus 1) The definition of H (0Ys) is given by

0 minusrarr D (0Y(sminus 1 1)) minusrarr D (0Y(s 1)) minusrarr H (0Y(s 1)) minusrarr 0 (210)

There is a bit difference for a totally anti-symmetric spin-p massless field Puregauge solutions are defined analogously as δωmicro1microp

= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] where ξ[micro1micropminus1] is

a rank-(pminus1) antisymmetric gauge parameter subjected to the equation of the sameform (27) and thus belonging to D (0Y(1 pminus 1)) In contrast to a totally sym-metric spin-smassless field the gauge transformations are reducible in the sense thatδωmicro1microp

equiv 0 provided that one transforms gauge parameter δξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1]

with a second level rank-(p minus 2) antisymmetric gauge parameter ξ[micro1micropminus2] and soon Some components (parallel to the momentum) of the first level gauge parameterξmicro1micropminus1 do not contribute to the gauge law for ωmicro1microp

these are represented by thesecond level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 modulo those components of ξmicro1micropminus2 thatdo not contribute to ξmicro1micropminus1 and so on till δξmicro = partmicroξ Gauge parameters ξmicro1micropminus1ξmicro1micropminusk

k isin [1 p] and ξ are referred to as the first level the k-th level and thedeepest level of reducibility respectively The corresponding iso(d minus 1 1)-uirrep isgiven by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0Y(0 0)) minusrarr D (0Y(1 1)) minusrarr

minusrarr D (0Y(1 p)) minusrarr H (0Y(1 p)) minusrarr 0 (211)

For example Maxwell gauge potential Amicro possesses gauge parameters of the firstlevel only as p = 1 in this case

Though a considerable success in describing on-mass-shell massless fields wasachieved for instance within the light-cone approach [52] there are many reasons tohave an off-shell gauge symmetry ie to construct equations that are invariant with

9

respect to gauge transformations with gauge parameters not subjected to ξ = 0To make the symmetry off-shell generally requires to relax the irreducibility of theso(dminus 1 1)-representation in which field φY(x) takes values

For instance a massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described[53] by atraceless rank-s symmetric field φmicro1micros

with an off-shell gauge symmetry

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

(d+2sminus4)η(micro1micro2part

νpartρφνρmicro3micros) = 0 φννmicro3micros

= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1

= 0 partνξνmicro2microsminus1) = 0 (212)

where in order for φmicro1microsto be traceless the gauge parameter has to be not only

traceless but transverse also this still being true for general mixed-symmetry fieldsApparently to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters the trace-lessness constraint for field φmicro1micros

has to be relaxed The same spin-s massless fieldcan be described[1] by field φmicro1micros

subjected to5

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

2part(micro1partmicro2φ

ννmicro3micros) = 0 φνρ

νρmicro5micros= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1

ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1= 0

(213)

where in order to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters a trace-lessness is relaxed to a double-tracelessness ie field φmicro1micros

takes values in thedirect sum of two so(d minus 1 1)-irreps being symmetric traceless tensors of ranks sand (s minus 2) The general statement is that for equations of motion to have an off-shell gauge symmetry the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep in which field φY(x) takes values has tobe reducible with additional direct summands representing certain nonzero tracesThese additional fields are called auxiliary and carry no physical degrees of freedomImposing certain gauge equations (28) can be restored

A massless totally antisymmetric spin-p field can be described by an antisym-metric rank-p tensor field ω[micro1microp] subjected to

ωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1part

νωνmicro2microp] = 0 δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] (214)

where the symmetry at the all levels of reducibility is manifest and off-shell ieδξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1] for the second level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 not subjectedto any differential constraints and analogously for the gauge symmetries at deeperlevels

Much similar to totally anti-symmetric fields mixed-symmetry massless fieldspossess reducible gauge transformations ie for a field φ with equations of motioninvariant under gauge transformations δξ1φ =

sum

i1partξi11 there exist the second level

gauge transformations δξ2ξi11 =

sum

i2partξi22 such that δξ2φ equiv 0 there exist the third

level gauge transformations δξ3ξi22 =

sum

i3partξi33 such that δξ3ξ1 equiv 0 and so on The

difference from totally anti-symmetric fields is in that there are generally more thanone gauge parameters at each level of reducibility (enumerated by index ik at thek-th level)

5Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [1] have the form Gmicro1microsminus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 where Gmicro1microsis equal to (213) the two forms being equiva-

lent

10

For instance the simplest mixed-symmetry massless field has the spin- andcan be minimally described[16 17] by a field φ[micromicro]ν which is anti-symmetric in thefirst two indices and satisfies Young symmetry condition6 φ[micromicroν] = 0 The equationsof motion

φmicromicroλ + 2part[micropartλφmicro]λν minus partνpart

λφmicromicroλ minus 2partνpart[microφλ

micro]λ = 0 (215)

are invariant underδφmicromicroν = part[microξ

Smicro]ν + part[microξ

Amicro]ν minus partνξ

Amicromicro (216)

with symmetric and anti-symmetric gauge parameters ξS(microν) and ξA[microν] Let us stress

that to maintain an off-shell gauge symmetry field φ[micromicro]ν has to take values in a

reducible so(d minus 1 1) representation oplus so does symmetric gauge parameterξS(micromicro) oplus bull which is in accordance with φ ν

microν 6= 0 and ξSνν 6= 0 Analogously tototally anti-symmetric fields there exist second level gauge transformations with avector parameter ξmicro

δφmicromicroν = 0

δξAmicroν = 23(partmicroξν minus partνξmicro)

δξSmicroν = partmicroξν + partνξmicro

(217)

In this case H

(

0)

is given by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

oplusD (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0 (218)

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) field the depthof reducibility of gauge transformations is equal to p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi where p is the height

of the first column of the Young diagram and at the r-th level of reducibility gaugeparameters have the symmetry of

sN minus 1

pNkN

s2 minus 1

p2k2

s1 minus 1

p1

k1

i=Nsum

i=1

ki =

i=Nsum

i=1

pi minus r (219)

This pattern of reducibility of gauge transformations will be of great importancewhile constructing the unfolded formulation in Section 4 As is easily seen at the

6In more detail the field φmicroνλ satisfies φmicroνλ = minusφνmicroλ φmicroνλ+φνλmicro+φλmicroν = 0 Equivalentlya symmetric basis can be used ie φSmicroνλ = φSνmicroλ φ

Smicroνλ + φSνλmicro + φSλmicroν = 0 The two bases are

related by φS(microν)λ = 1radic3(φAmicroλν + φAνλmicro) φ

A[microν]λ = 1radic

3(φSmicroλν minus φ

Sνλmicro)

11

first level of reducibility the gauge parameters are various tensors whose LorentzYoung diagrams are obtained by cutting off one cell from the original so(d minus 2)-diagram in all possible ways ie the number of gauge parameters at the first levelis equal to the number of blocks N eg two for spin- There is only one gaugeparameter at the deepest level of reducibility whose Young diagram is obtained bycutting off the first column from Y eg for spin-

This pattern corresponds of course to on-shell equations ie the gauge param-eters taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of Young symmetry (219) are subjectedto (28)-like equations To obtain an off-shell gauge symmetry the field content hasto be extended to take values in certain reducible so(d minus 1 1)-representations ad-ditional components turn out can be identified with certain traces of a single fieldwith the symmetry of Y as an sl(d)-tensor In general gauge parameters are alsoreducible tensors with the symmetry of (219) In the case of a spin- massless fieldthe trace φ ν

microν in the sector of fields and the trace ξSνν in the sector of gauge param-eters are the additional components In the general case of a spin-Y = Ys1 snmassless field field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) should satisfy [20]

ηmicroimicroiηmicroimicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n] (220)

which is a generalization of the Fronsdalrsquos double-trace condition (213) As it will beshown this condition naturally arises in the unfolded approach Note that double-tracelessness is imposed on each group of symmetric indices and it is not requiredfor cross-traces to vanish

Let a generalized Weyl tensor for a minimally described spin-Y massless field bea gauge-invariant combination of the least order in derivatives of field φY(x) that isallowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell On the other hand it is the generalized Weyltensor that the minimal non-gauge description of a massless spin-Y field is basedon For a spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN)so(dminus2) massless field the generalizedWeyl tensor has the symmetry of Y(s1 p1 + 1) (s2 p2) (sN pN)so(dminus11) and isof the s1-th order in derivatives In the case of spin-one (Y = so(dminus2)) Maxwell field

strength Fmicroν with the symmetry of can be also called a generalized Weyl tensorFermionic mixed-symmetry fields share most features of bosonic ones viz the

reducibility of gauge transformations the enlargement of the field content for theequations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge invariance The difference is thatthe equations for fermions have the first order in derivatives and the irreducibility ofspin-tensors is achieved by the Γ-tracelessness condition7 instead of the tracelessnessone

For example a massless totally symmetric spin-(s + 12) field can be described

7Γmicro are the Clifford algebra generators and satisfy ΓmicroΓν + ΓνΓmicro = 2ηmicroν part equiv Γmicropartmicro Γ-trace isa contraction of a spinor index and one tensor index with Γmicro eg Γνφ

microν equiv Γαν βφ

βmicroν

12

off-shell[54] by a totally symmetric spin-tensor field φα(micro1micros) subjected to8

partφmicro1microsminus spart(micro1

Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros)

ΓνΓρΓλφνρλmicro4micros= 0 Γνξνmicro2microsminus1 = 0

(221)

where in order to get an off-shell gauge invariance the irreducibility of φα(micro1micros) hasto be relaxed to the triple Γ-tracelessness

A massless totally anti-symmetric spin-Y(1 p) 12field can be described off-shell

by a totally anti-symmetric spin-tensor field ωα[micro1microp] subjected to

partωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1Γ

νωνmicro2microp] = 0

δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp]

(222)

Similar to the bosonic case (222) possesses reducible gauge transformations Thedifference is that one can impose the triple Γ-tracelessness on ωα[micro1microp] but thisrestricts the first level gauge parameter to be Γ-traceless Γνξνmicro2micropminus1 = 0 andhence the second order gauge parameter has to be on-mass-shell ie partξmicro1micropminus2 = 0Therefore for equations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge symmetry of allorders no Γ-trace conditions have to be imposed on fieldgauge parameters

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) 12field the

pattern of gauge symmetries is given by the spin-tensors with the tensor part de-scribed by (219) the definition of the Weyl tensor remains unchanged also

The descriptions based on tensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) which is analogous tothe metric gmicroν are referred to as metric-like At least in writing equiv partmicropartνη

microν theexplicit use of metric ηmicroν is made of which complicates the issue of introducinginteractions with gravitation

Let us note that in principle one can verify the gauge invariance of the fieldequations for massless mixed-symmetry fields despite the fact that the very form ofgauge transformation is cumbersome due to Young symmetrizers The advantageof the unfolded approach is in that gauge invariance at all levels of reducibility ismanifest

3 Unfolding Dynamics and σminus Cohomology

In this section we first recall the definition of unfolding and the relation of the sim-plest unfolded systems to Lie algebrasmodules and Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomologywith coefficients Second peculiar properties of unfolded systems that describe freefields and specifically the so-called σminus cohomology concept are recalled Third thevery procedure of constructing the unfolded form is illustrated on the examples ofmassless spin-zero spin-one arbitrary totally symmetric spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2)

fields the relation with the general statement of Section 1 is pointed out in each ofthe examples

8Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [54] have the form Gmicro1microsminus s

2Γ(micro1ΓνGνmicro2micros) minus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 Gmicro1micros= partφmicro1micros

minus spart(micro1Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0 which is equivalent to

(222)

13

31 General Features

Some dynamical system is said to be unfolded [31 32 33] if it has the form

dWA = FA(W ) (31)

whereWA is a set9 of differential forms of degree-qA on some d-dimensional manifoldMd d - exterior differential on Md and FA(W ) is an arbitrary degree-(qA + 1)function of WA assumed to be expandable in terms of exterior (wedge) productsonly10

FA(W ) =infinsum

n=1

sum

qB1++qBn=qA+1

fAB1Bn

W B1 and andW Bn (32)

where fAB1Bn

are constant coefficients satisfying fAB1BiBj Bn

= (minus)qBiqBj fA

B1BjBiBn

Moreover FA(W ) must satisfy the integrability condition (called generalized Jacobiidentity) obtained by applying d to (31)

F B δFA

δW Bequiv 0 (33)

Any solution of (33) defines a free differential algebra (FDA) [55 56 57 58] If Ja-cobi identities (33) are satisfied irrespective ofMd dimension11 the free differentialalgebra is referred to as universal [10 59] It is the universal algebras only that willbe considered further

Equations (31) are invariant under gauge transformations

δWAqA

= dǫAqAminus1 + ǫBqBminus1

δFA

δW B for qA gt 0 (34)

δWA0 = ǫB

prime

0

δFA

δW Bprime

1

Bprime qBprime = 1 for qA = 0 (35)

where ǫAqAminus1 is a degree-(qA minus 1) form taking values in the same space as WAqA

Inits turn δWA

qA= 0 can be treated as unfolded-like system for ǫAqAminus1 ie dǫ

AqAminus1 =

minusǫBqBminus1δFA

δWB there emerge second level gauge transformations

δǫAqAminus1 = dξAqAminus2 minus ξBqBminus2

δFA

δW B (36)

provided that FA(W ) is linear in matter fields and analogously for the gauge trans-formations at deeper levels Therefore the reducibility of gauge transformations ismanifest in the unfolded approach For a degree-qA gauge field WA

qAthere exist qA

levels of gauge transformations

9In this section indices A B C are of arbitrary nature In the cases of practical significance AB C vary over certain irreps of the Lorentz algebra

10The wedge symbol and will be systematically omitted further11As the forms with the rank greater than d are identically zero there exist certain identities

eg Wn andWn equiv 0 for n+m gt d which make the operator δδWA to be ill-behaved

14

The use of the exterior algebra respects diffeomorphisms which is very appropri-ate for introducing interactions with the gravitation The whole information aboutthe dynamics turns out to be contained in FA(W ) and one can even extend anunfolded system to other manifolds[59] simply by changing the exterior differentialthe new unfolded system has literally the same form

Note that introducing enough auxiliary fields it is possible to reformulate anydynamical system in the unfolded form although it may be difficult to unfold someparticular system or to find all unfolded forms

Collected below are some important cases of unfolded systems which have adirect bearing on Lie algebras [55 59]

Lie algebrasFlat connections Let ΩI equiv ΩImicrodx

micro be a subsector of degree-oneforms The only self-closed unfolded equations are of the form

dΩI = minusf IJKΩ

JΩK (37)

Generalized Jacobi identity (33) implies the Jacobi identity f IJKf

JLMΩKΩLΩM equiv

0 for some Lie algebra g with structure constants f IJK Therefore the closed

subsector of one-forms is in one-to-one correspondence with Lie algebras and(37) is the flatness condition for a connection ΩI of g This provides acoordinate-independent framework for describing background geometry Inthe cases of interest g is iso(d minus 1 1) so(d minus 1 2) so(d 1) and sp(2n) [59]Background geometry connection ΩI is assumed to be of order zero whereasall matter fields including dynamical gravitation are of the first order Allequations are assumed to be of the first order in matter fields and hencedescribe free fields only

In this paper g = iso(dminus 1 1) and ΩI = ab ha where ab equiv abmicro dxmicro

is a Lorentz spin-connection and ha equiv hamicrodxmicro is a background vielbein which

defines a non-holonomic basis of a tangent space at each point of the manifoldFlatness equation (37) for iso(dminus 1 1)-connection ΩI reads

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb = 0(38)

The first is the zero torsion equation that expresses the Lorentz spin-connectionvia the first derivative of hamicro The second can be recognized as the zero curva-ture equation For example in Cartesian coordinates the explicit solution isab

micro = 0 and hamicro = δamicro

The advantage of description of background geometry as the flatness conditionfor a connection of the space-time symmetry algebra is in that this way iscoordinate-independent In what follows we assume ab ha to satisfy (38)which is enough if there is no need for the explicit form of the solution in someparticular coordinate system For instance in (anti)-de Sitter space (38) ismodified by the terms proportional to the cosmological constant λ2

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb + λ2hahb = 0(39)

15

and admits no simple solutions with hamicro = δamicro ab = 0 Nevertheless without

giving the explicit solution to imply that ab ha satisfy (39) is sufficient forgeneral analysis eg for constructing Lagrangians [60]

Contractible FDA The simplest equations linear in matter fields of the form

dWAq = fA

BWBq+1 (310)

can be reduced by linear transformations to either

dWAq = WA

q+1 dWAq+1 = 0 (311)

ordWA

q = 0 (312)

where the second equation of (311) is the consequence of Jacobi identities(33) for the first one In the first case by virtue of gauge transformations(34) δWA

q = dξAqminus1 + χAq δW

Bq+1 = dχA

q the field WAq can be gauged away In

both cases by virtue of the Poincarersquos Lemma these equations are dynamicallyempty and correspond to the co-called contractible FDAs [55]

g-modulesCovariant constancy equations Let WAq be a closed subsector of

q-forms of matter gauge fields Linear in matter fields equations may involvethe background g-connection ΩI which is of zeroth order Such equationsreferred to as linearized over g background (described by any solution ΩI of(37)) have the form

dWAq = minusΩIfI

ABW

Bq (313)

Jacobi identity (33) where (37) is also taken into account

ΩJΩK(minusf I

JKfIAB + fJ

ACfK

CB

)W B

q = 0 (314)

implies fIAB to realize a representation of g Therefore the closed subsector

of forms of definite degree is in one-to-one correspondence with g-moduleswhereas

DΩWAq equiv dWA

q + ΩIfIABW

Bq = 0 (315)

is a covariant constancy equation and (DΩ)2 = 0 since the connection is

flat (37) In the cases of interest A runs over certain finite-dimensionalso(d minus 1 1)-irreps ie g-modules decompose with respect to its subalgebraso(dminus 1 1) sub g into a direct sum of certain irreducible tensors This is whywe single out the Lorentz-covariant derivative DL from the whole g-covariantderivative DΩ the remaining part acts vertically (algebraically) In the caseof ΩI being an iso(d minus 1 1) flat connection the Lorentz covariant derivativeDL = d+ satisfy DL

2 = 0 as the exterior differential d does

DLTab = dT ab +a

cTcb +b

cTac + (316)

In Cartesian coordinates DL equiv d and we do not make any distinction betweend and DL whereas in (anti)-de Sitter (DL)

2 6= 0 and the difference between d

16

and DL has to be taken into account Also zero torsion equation (381) canbe rewritten as DLh

a = 0 The remaining part of ΩI which acts algebraicallyand mixes different so(dminus 1 1)-modules into g-modules is associated with thegenerators of translations with gauge field ha

Gluing g-modulesChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology LetWpWq andWr takevalues in g-modules R1 R2 and R3 the representations are realized by oper-ators T1 T2 and T3 respectively Still linear in matter fields but nonlinear inbackground connection ΩI equations are of the form

DΩWp equiv dWp + T1(Ω)Wp = f12(Ω Ω)Wq

DΩWq equiv dWq + T2(Ω)Wq = f23(Ω Ω)Wr

DΩWr equiv

(317)

where the terms forming g-covariant derivative are isolated on the lhs Thetwo g-modules R1 R2 appear to be glued together by the term f12(Ω Ω) isinHom(Λpminusq+1(g) otimes R2R1) Jacobi identity (33) implies f12(Ω Ω) to be aChevalley-Eilenberg cocycle with coefficients in Rlowast

2 otimesR1 where Rlowast2 is a mod-

ule contragradient to R2 and f12(Ω Ω)f23(Ω Ω) = 0 Coboundaries canbe proved to be dynamically empty and can be removed by a field redefini-tion Consequently f12(Ω Ω) should be a nontrivial representative of theChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology group with coefficients in Rlowast

2otimesR1 It followsalso that nothing but zero forms can be joined to zero forms ie the onlypossible linearized unfolded equations on forms of zero degree are (315) withq = 0

For any dynamical system linearized over certain g-background (described byany solution ΩI of (37)) equations of motion (315) along with gauge transforma-tions of all orders of reducibility acquire a very simple form

δξ1 = DΩξ0

δξpminus1 = DΩξpminus2

δWp = DΩξpminus1

DΩWp = 0

(318)

where Wp takes values in certain g-module R DΩ is the associated g-covariantderivative and ξpminusk k isin [1 p] are the gauge parameters of k-th order of reducibilitytaking values in the same g-module R and being forms of degree (p minus k) Thegauge invariance at each order of reducibility and of equations of motion is dueto (DΩ)

2 = 0 In some sense the gauge fields Wp and the gauge parameters ξpminusk

seem to play the same role at the linearized level This uniformity is of essentialimportance when analyzing unfolded systems

In the presence of gluing terms eg when only two modules say R1 and R2 areglued by nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycle fpr(Ω Ω) full chain of equations

17

and gauge transformations (318) is modified to12

δξ11 = DΩξ10

δξ1pminusr = DΩξ1pminusrminus1

δξ1pminusr+1 = DΩξ1pminusr + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

20 δξ21 = DΩξ

20

(319)

δξ1pminus1 = DΩξ1pminus2 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus2 δξ2rminus1 = DΩξ

2rminus2

δW 1p = DΩξpminus1 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus1 δW 2

r = DΩξ2rminus1

DΩW1p = fpr(Ω Ω)W

2r DΩW

2r = 0

where W 1p ξ

1pminusk and W 2

r ξ2rminusm take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively

Important is that the gauge fieldsparameters taking values in R2 contribute to therhs of the equationsgauge transformations for the gauge fieldsparameters takingvalues in R1 but for forms of degree greater than (p minus r) The above two systemsare nothing but the specializations of (31) (34) (36)

Also let us note that there is no strong reason to make any distinction betweenthe terms linear in the background g-connection ΩI which correspond to g-modulesand the terms of higher order in ΩI which correspond to Chevalley-Eilenberg co-cycles Both terms can be combined into a single object the generalized covariant-derivative D = d+T (Ω)+f(Ω Ω) equiv DΩ+f(Ω Ω) with the property D2 = 0Moreover by means of D (319) and (318) can be rewritten in a similar mannerConsequently at the linearized level the most general unfolded equations and gaugetransformations have the form

δξ1 = Dξ0

δξpminus1 = Dξpminus2

δWp = Dξpminus1

DWp = 0

(320)

where D is built of d background connection ΩI and satisfies D2 = 0 The gaugefieldsparameters take values in certain spacesWq viz Wp isin Wp ξpminus1 isin Wpminus1ξ0 isin W0 The elements of Wq are differential forms with values in certain g-modules It is also convenient to define higher degree spaces Wqgtp the equationsRp+1 = DWp = 0 take values in Wp+1 Rp+2 = DRp+1 belongs to Wp+2 andby virtue of D2 = 0 satisfies Rp+2 equiv 0 and so on Therefore there exist certainidentities which belong to Wp+2 for the equations which belong to Wp+1 andthere exist certain identities which belong to Wp+3 for the identities in Wp+2 andso on At the field theoretical level these identities correspond to Bianchi identitiesfor the first level gauge transformations higher identities correspond to the Bianchiidentities for the deeper levels of gauge transformations

12The sign factor (minus)pminusr+1 before fpr(Ω Ω) is ignored and is thought of as the part of thedefinition of fpr(Ω Ω)

18

A remark should be made that the forms belonging to Wq may have differentdegrees if there are Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles present As a result spaces Wq

may contain different number of elements For instance (319) can be reduced to(320) if one defines

Wq =

W 1q q lt pminus r

W 1q W

2qminusp+r q ge (pminus r)

(321)

where W 1q and W 2

qminusp+r take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively In termsof (319) the elements of Wq for q lt (pminus r) were referred to as ξ1q the elements ofWq for q = (pminus r)(pminus 1) to as ξ1q ξ

2qminusp+r the elements ofWq for q = p to as W 1

pW 2

r the elements of Wq for q gt p to as R1q R

2qminusp+r (the equations of motion and

Bianchi identities)

32 Interpretation of Unfolded Systems Describing free Fields

When describing free fields unfolded formulations will be referred to as frame-like [61 60] though the very term frame-like has a more broad definition Thesesystems consist of equations (37) describing background geometry of a finite chainof (317)-like equations describing the gauge fields of the model and of (317)-likeequations with q = 0 glued to gauge forms ie it requires a Lie algebra g (commonlyiso(dminus1 1) so(dminus1 2) or so(d 1)) a set of g-modules R0RN and an appropriateset of nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles f01fNminus1N The physical degreesof freedom are contained in the forms of zero degree and the module RN in whichzero degree forms take values is infinite-dimensional

Since frame-like unfolded systems contain inevitably infinitely many fields mostof them being either auxiliary or Stueckelberg13 there arises a problem of reconstruc-tion a metric-like formulation by a given unfolded formulation or of extracting thedynamical content for a given unfolded system

The questions to be answered are what are the dynamical fields what arethe differential gauge parameters and what are the gauge invariant equations ofmotion These answers are not universal and depend on the chosen scheme ofinterpretation Different interpretations correspond to dual descriptions of the samedynamical system

Frame-like unfolded systems are endowed at the linearized level with additionalstructures providing a natural way for interpretation Indices AB vary overcertain finite dimensional Lorentz irreps ie each of Rn n = 0 N decomposes asRn =

sum

k Pnk where Pnk are certain so(d minus 1 1)-modules characterized by Ynk

Young diagrams of Section 1We say that some frame-like unfolded system is given an interpretation if [62]

1 On the whole space W =oplusinfin

q=0Wq where the matter gauge fields gauge pa-rameters equations of motion and Bianchi identities take values there exists

13A field is called Stueckelberg if it can be gauged away by pure algebraic symmetry

19

a bounded from below grading g = 0 1 ie Wq =oplusinfin

g=0Wgq The ho-

mogeneous element of Wgq is a certain differential form with values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep and is denoted as W gq In simplest cases the grade is just the

rank of the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep the element of Wgq takes values in

2 The closed subsector of one-forms ΩI describes a background geometry vizMinkowski or (anti)-de Sitter The generalized covariant derivative D is to bedivided into three parts the last one not being necessary nontrivial

D = DL minus σminus + σ+ (322)

where DL is a background Lorentz-covariant derivative and has a zero gradeσminus is an operator of grade (minus1) and σ+ contains positive grade operatorsThe only differential part is in DL whereas σplusmn acts vertically and is built ofthe background vielbein ha If two modules are glued the gluing element issupposed to be of grade (minus1) and also denoted as σminus

The equations then have the form

DLWn +

gminusnsum

i=1

σ+(W n+i

)= σminus

(W n+1

) g = 0 1 (323)

and analogously for the gauge transformations In the flat space all operators ofpositive grade appear to be trivial for the massless case As it does not affect theanalysis let us consider a simplified version with σ+ = 0 Then D2 = DL

2+σminusDL+DLσminus + (σminus)

2 = 0 is equivalent to DL2 = 0 (σminus)

2 = 0 and σminusDL +DLσminus = 0 Thefirst is a part of the flatness condition (38) for the iso(d minus 1 1)-connection Thesecond is the nilpotancy condition for σminus The third is satisfied provided that σminus istwisted by the factor (minus)∆g where (∆g + 1) is a degree of σminus which is equal to thenumber of the vielbeins ha that σminus is built of Indeed the vielbeins ha anticommutewith DL and hence the action of σminus is to be twisted by the factor (minus)∆g in orderσminusDL +DLσminus = 0 holds true Without further mention the pure sign factor (minus)∆g

will be though of as a part of the definition of σminusIt is useful to illustrate the action of σminus when for example unfolded equations

on fields with values in two modules R1 and R2 are glued as in (319)

R1︷ ︸︸ ︷

R2︷ ︸︸ ︷ g

q

t t t t

t t t

W 1p

ξ1pminus1

ξ10

W 2r

ξ2rminus1

ξ20

(324)

20

where short arrows stand for the action of σminus within each module and long arrowsfor the action of σminus between two modules (gluing terms) and dots stand for gaugefieldsparameters at different grades bold dots represent the elements of Wp =W 1

pW2r

All information about the dynamics turns out to be concealed in cohomologygroups of σminus [62] H(σminus) =

Ker(σminus)Im(σminus)

Let us analyze unfolded system (320) whichat grade g has the form

δξg1 = DLξg0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 )

δW gp = DLξ

gpminus1 + σminus(ξ

g+1pminus1)

0 = DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p )

(325)

Beginning from the deepest level of gauge transformations and from the lowestgrade it is obvious that those ξg+1

0 that are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueck-elberg(algebraic) gauge parameters for those ξg1 that belong to the image of σminusTherefore those ξg1 that are σminus-exact can be gauged away The leftover gauge sym-metry satisfies δξg1 = DLξ

g0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 ) = 0 so that those ξg+1

0 that belong to thecoimage of σminus are expressed via derivative of ξn0 Having sieved W0 and W1 inthis way only those ξg0 are still independent that are σminus-closed and hence belong toH

0(σminus) since only forms of zero-degree are elements of W0 Then those ξg+11 that

are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueckelberg gauge parameters for those ξg2 thatbelong to the image of σminus Therefore only those ξg1 are still independent that areσminus-closed but not σminus-exact and hence belong to H

1(σminus) Having sievedW0Wpminus1

one after another it turns out that independent differential gauge parameters at thek-th level are given by H

pminusk(σminus) Analogously those fields W gp that are σminus-exact

can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gauge parameters at Wpminus1 Thosefields W g+1

p that are not σminus-closed can be expressed via derivatives of fields at lowergrade by virtue of the equations Rg

p+1 equiv DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p ) = 0 these fields are

called auxiliary Therefore the dynamical fields ie those that are neither aux-iliary nor Stueckelberg are given by H

p(σminus) The nilpotency of D2 equiv 0 impliescertain relations of the form DLR

gp+1 + σminus(R

g+1p+1) = 0 between Rg

p+1 Therefore

auxiliary fields are expressed by virtue of σminus-exact Rgp+1 and σminus-non-closed Rg+1

p+1

are themselves expressed via derivatives of Rgp+1 Consequently the independent

equations on dynamical fields are given by Hp+1(σminus) From the cohomological point

of view higher degree forms correspond to certain nontrivial relations between equa-tions called Bianchi identities and manifest gauge nature of equations As there aregenerally more than one levels of gauge transformations one can expect the highercohomological group to be nontrivial

To sum up

21

cohomology group interpretation

Hpminusk k = 1p differential gauge parameters at the k-th level of re-

ducibilityH

p dynamical fieldsH

p+1 independent gauge invariant equations on dynamicalfields

Hp+k+1 k = 1p Bianchi identities for the k-th order gauge symmetryH

p+k k gt p supposed to be trivial in a regular case

To distinguish fields in cohomological sense the following convention is introduced[63]

Stueckelberg fields(gauge parameters) are those that can be eliminated bypure algebraic symmetry ie these fields are σminus-exact (are those that canbe used to gauge away certain fields ie these parameters are not σminus-closed)

Auxiliary fields are those that can be expressed via derivatives of some otherfields ie these fields are σminus-nonclosed Let us note that this definition isgenerally ambiguous eg in system

partA = B

partB = A(326)

which field is auxiliary is a matter of choice This ambiguity is removed byvirtue of grade[62 63]

Dynamical fields are those that are neither auxiliary nor Stueckelberg ie thesefields are representatives of σminus-cohomology classes

Note that if certain dynamical field given by Hp belongs to the grade-gf subspace

Wgfp and the corresponding equations given by H

p+1 belong to the grade-ge subspaceWge

p+1 the order of equations is equal to ge minus gf + 1If the unfolded system is supposed to admit a lagrangian formulation there has

to be a one-to-one correspondence between the number of dynamical fields and thatof equations k-th level gauge symmetries and k-th level Bianchi identities ie in acertain sense there should be a duality H

pminusk sim Hp+1+k k isin [0 p] This takes place

for all unfolded systems exemplified in this paperSince the operators involved ie DL and σminus are of grade 0 and minus1 only the

fields with the grade greater than g0 for any g0 ge 0 form a quotient module thusdescribing the same system on its own - dual formulations This picture partlybreaks in (A)dSd because of appearance of grade +1 nilpotent operator σ+

D = DL + σminus + λ2σ+ (327)

The specific character of frame-like unfolded systems which will be crucial forus is that by virtue of the inverse background vielbein hmicroa all form indices of any

gauge fieldparameter Wa1(s1)ap(sm)q can be converted to the fiber ones

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (328)

22

The resulting tensor W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is not irreducible and can be decomposedinto so(dminus 1 1)-irreps according to the so(dminus 1 1)-tensor product rule

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] =rArr Ys1 smotimes

so(dminus11)

Y(1 q) =oplus

α

Yα (329)

where one-column Young diagramY(1 q) of height-q represents the anti-symmetricindices d1 dq and Yα are the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the tensor product decomposesinto Having converted all fields (parameters equations) of a given unfolded systemto the fiber tensors one can make the identification of the fields in the unfolded ap-proach and those of the metric-like approach though the general covariance gaugeinvariance and other advantages of the unfolded formalism will be not manifestWhile constructing the unfolded formulations of a known metric-like systems or in-terpreting a given unfolded system in terms of metric-like fields this technique willbe widely used Moreover the calculation of σminus cohomology groups is largely basedon the explicit evaluation of (329)-like expressions Once an unfolded form is knownno use of this technique is needed either to generalize it to other backgrounds or tointroduce interactions

Field W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is traceless in a1 am and d1 dq separatelyHowever the cross traces need not vanish and hence some of Yα represent tracesTo distinguish between the traces of different orders let us introduce the followingthe Y-valued degree-q form WY

q is said to be a trace of the r-th order iff it has theform

WYq = hh

︸︷︷︸

r

hh︸︷︷︸

qminusr

CYprime

0 (330)

for some Yprime-valued degree-0 form CYprime

0 where (q minus r) indices of the backgroundvielbeins ha are contracted with the tensor representing Yprime and r indices are freefor the whole expression to take values in Y the appropriate Young symmetrizeris implied When the indices of WY

q are converted to the fiber ones the expression

takes the form ηη︸ ︷︷ ︸

r

CYprime ie CYprime

represents a trace of the r-th order

Different aspects of unfolding are illustrated on the examples of a massless scalarfield a massless spin-one field and a massless spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2) fields

33 Examples of Unfolding

Example 331 Unfolding a scalar field [31 62] First it should be noted thatit is easy of course to convert the Klein-Gordon equation C = 0 to a system offirst order equations

partmicroC = Cmicro

partmicroCmicro = 0(331)

but when writing the second equation the explicit form of the metric is to be usedhence these equations are not of unfolded form (31)

23

Described in terms of a scalar field C(x) the theory is brought into a non gaugeform therefore zero-forms only are allowed or else there would be some gaugesymmetry according to (34) The most general rhs of dC = has the form

dC = haCa (332)

for some vector-valued zero-form Ca This equation just parameterizes the firstderivative of C(x) and is similar to the first of (331) There are three terms allowedon the rhs of dCa =

dCa = hbCab + hbC

ab + haC prime (333)

with Cab Cab and C prime taking values in antisymmetric symmetric and scalar so(dminus1 1)-irreps ie bull The first term is forbidden by Bianchi identity hadC

a equiv 0To analyze the remaining terms let us decompose dCa into so(dminus 1 1)-irreps

partmicroCahmicrob = otimes = oplus oplus bull (334)

where = part[aCb] = part(aCa) minus 1dηaapartbC

b bull = partaCa = C

The component represents Bianchi identity in the first order reformulation ofthe Klein-Gordon equation Indeed expressing Ca as partaC implies part[aCb] equiv 0 bullrepresents the desired Klein-Gordon equation whereas is the only component al-lowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell Therefore to impose the Klein-Gordon equationthe term haC prime has to be omitted

dCa = hbCab (335)

The only possible rhs for dCaa = compatible with Jacobi identity hbdCab equiv 0

is of the form dCaa = hbCaab for Caaa taking values in a rank-three symmetric

so(d minus 1 1)-irrep ie The process of unfolding continues unambiguously inthis way and results in the full system

dCa(k) = hbCa(k)b equiv F a(k)(C) k = 0 1 (336)

where Ca(k) is rank-k totally symmetric traceless field ie taking values in k

so(dminus 1 1)-irrepTo make a connection with the general statement of Section 1 for Y = Y(0 0)

the general scheme results in

Yg bull

n k 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 0 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore spaces Wq and operator σminus which enters D = DL minus σminus should be definedas

Wq = WqWaq W

aaq (337)

24

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbWa(gminus1)bq g gt 0

(338)

Consequently W is a space of various differential forms with values in totally sym-metric traceless so(d minus 1 1)-tensors graded by the form degree and by the rankof so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Space Wq forms an irreducible iso(d minus 1 1)-module System(336) reads

Dω0 = 0 ω0 isin W0 (339)

The cohomology groups of σminus are easy to find

H0(σminus) = C(x) as the lowest grade field is automatically closed σminus(C) = 0 and it

cannot be exact as a form of zero degree Contrariwise zero-forms with gradegreater than zero are not closed σminus(C

k+1) = hbCa(k)b = 0lArrrArr Ck+1 = 0

H1(σminus) = haB(x)0 for some B(x)0 isin W

00 One-form Ba

1 = haB(x)0 is closedσminus(B

a1) = haB

a1 = hah

aB(x)0 equiv 0 and it cannot be represented as σminus(C2) =

hbCab as far as Cab is traceless The cohomology groups at higher grade are

trivial since σminus(haBa(k)(x)0) 6= 0 for k gt 0

Hqgt1(σminus) = empty as one can make sure

The interpretation in terms of Section 32 is as follows as is expected the dynamicalfield given by H

0 is C(x) The equations are given by the projection of dCa = hbCab

to H1 ie C = 0 The fields with k gt 0 are auxiliary being expressed via

derivatives of C(x) Ca(k) = partapartaC(x) Inasmuch as there is no gauge symmetryin the system the higher cohomology groups are trivial

An infinitely many dual formulations of a massless scalar field are also includedIndeed the fields with k ge k0 gt 0 form a quotient module Rk0 ie one canconsistently write

dCk = σminus(Ck+1) k ge k0 (340)

The first equationdCa(k0) = hbC

a(k0)b (341)

imposes on the dynamical field Ca(k0)

partbCba(k0minus1) = 0

part[bCc]a(k0minus1) = 0(342)

which imply at least locally Ca(k0) =

k0︷ ︸︸ ︷

partaparta C and C = 0 for some fieldC(x) All fields at higher grade are auxiliary This statement is confirmed bythe cohomology analysis H

0(Rk0 σminus) = Ck0 ie scalar is described in termsof a traceless rank-k0 symmetric tensor field subjected to the equations given byH

1(Rk0 σminus) = haBa(k0minus1)0 minus k0(k0minus1)

2(d+2k0minus4)ηaahcB

a(k0minus2)c0 +hcB

a(k0)c0 for B

a(k0minus1)0 B

a(k0)c0

taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps characterized by diagrams k0 minus 1 k0

These two elements represents just the components ofWk0

1 sim k0 otimes with the

25

symmetry of k0 minus 1 (trace) andk0

the third component with the symmetryof k0 + 1 is exact

The above results can be easily extended to (A)dSd background and to a massivescalar field [62]

DLCk = σminus(C

k+1) + σ+(Ckminus1) = 0 (343)

where there appears a nontrivial positive grade operator

σ+(Ckminus1) = (m2 minus λ2k(k + dminus 1))

(

haCa(kminus1) minus(sminus 1)

d+ 2k minus 4ηaahbC

a(kminus1)b

)

(344)

and DL is a Lorentz-covariant derivative in (A)dSd In the (A)dSd case the situationis more interesting due to the appearance of σ+ operator and the possibility of theaccidental degeneracy of σ+ when m2 = λ2kprime(kprime + dminus 1) for some kprime [62]

Example 332 Unfolding Maxwell equations [64 65] An example of masslessspin-one field is more interesting as a gauge system The main object is a one-formAmicro From gauge transformation law

δA1 = dξ0 (345)

it follows that there should not be other forms of rank greater than zero If this werethe case the gauge parameters of these new forms would be involved by virtue of(34) making the gauge law for A1 inappropriate Indeed there are two possibilitiesto introduce higher degree forms on the rhs of dA = (i) dA1 = R2 fora scalar valued degree-two form R2 which possesses its own gauge parameter χ1δR2 = dχ1 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law for A1 is modifiedto δA1 = dξ0 + χ1 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gaugeparameter χ1 This case corresponds to contractible free differential algebras (310)(ii) dA1 = hbω

b1 for a vector valued degree-one form ωa

1 which possesses its owngauge parameter ǫa0 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law forA1 is modified to δA1 = dξ0 + hbǫ

b0 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of

Stueckelberg gauge parameter ǫa0 Consequently in both cases A1 can be made non-dynamical which is not what was expected Therefore the only possibility is tointroduce a zero-form C

[ab]0 anti-symmetric in a b parameterizing by virtue of

dA1 = hahbC[ab]0 (346)

the Maxwell field strength Bianchi identity hahbdC[ab]0 equiv 0 tolerates two terms on

the rhs of dC[ab]0 =

dC[ab]0 = hcC

[ab]c0 + h[aC

b]0 (347)

with C[ab]c0 and Ca

0 taking values in and so(dminus 1 1)-irreps the former taken inantisymmetric basis In order to determine which of the terms should be omittedif any the decomposition of the first derivative of the Maxwell field strength intoLorentz irreps has to be analyzed

C [ab]|c equiv partmicroC[ab]hmicroc = otimes = oplus oplus (348)

26

where = part[aCbc] = partbCab and = partcC [ab] minus part[cCab] + 2

dminus1ηc[apartdC

b]d part[aCbc]

is identically zero provided that C [ab] is expressed via the first derivative of Amicroor represents the second pair of Maxwell equations in terms of field strength C [ab]In both cases this component should be zero and moreover this can not be keptnonzero as there is no hcC

[abc]-like term allowed on the rhs of (347) The secondpartbC

ab is the desired Maxwell equations in terms of Amicro or the first pair of Maxwellequations in terms of the field strength Consequently to impose Maxwell equationsterm h[aCb] has to be omitted whereas the third is the only component allowed tobe nonzero on-mass-shell

Again unfolding continues unambiguously and requires an infinite set of fields

C[ab]c(k)0 taking values14 in

kto be introduced

dC [ab]c(k) = hdC[ab]c(k)d k = 0 1 (349)

The full system has the form

dA1 = hahbCab0 equiv F (AC) δA1 = dξ0

dC[ab]c(k)0 = hdC

[ab]c(k)d0 equiv F [ab]c(k)(C) k = 0 1

(350)

and represents two modules being glued together by the term on the rhs of thefirst equation

For Y = Y(1 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 resultsin

Yg bull

n k 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 1 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore

Wq =

W0 q = 0

WqW[ab]qminus1W

[ab]cqminus1 q gt 0

(351)

let us point out the shortening of W0 The action of σminus on Wq isin Wq is defined as

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hahbW[ab]qminus1 g = 1

hdW[ab]c(gminus2)dqminus1 g gt 1

(352)

With D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (350) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (353)

14The fields C [ab]c(k) are taken in antisymmetric basis ie they are antisymmetric in a bsymmetric in c(k) and C [abd]c(kminus1)equiv0

27

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 0 form a finite-dimensional iso(dminus1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g gt0 form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

Again the cohomology groups are easy to find gauge parameters are given byH

0(σminus) = ξ0 dynamical fields by H1(σminus) = A1 Maxwell equations by H

2(σminus) =

h[aBb]0 and the Bianchi identities for the first order gauge transformations by

H3(σminus) = hahbB0 the rest of groups are empty H

kgt3(σminus) = empty Important is thedirect correspondence between the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2

the gauge parameters in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3There are infinitely many of non-gauge dual formulations based on C [ab]c(k0) eg

for k0 = 0 one recovers the Maxwell equations in terms of the field strength

part[aCbc] = 0

partbCab = 0

(354)

Let us note that the ambiguity at the first step of unfolding (the terms haC prime andh[aCb] in the above two examples) expresses the possibility of introducing a massterm

Example 333 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-s field [31 6466] We start from the metric-like description of a massless spin-s field in termsof a double-traceless symmetric rank-s field φmicro1micros

satisfying (213) the secondorder equations are invariant with respect to the first order gauge transformationwith traceless rank-(s minus 1) gauge parameter ξmicro1microsminus1 Inasmuch as the Young di-agram s of so(d minus 2) is of the height one there are gauge transforma-tions of the first level only Therefore the dynamical field in the unfolded ap-proach has to be a one-form There is only one way to identify φmicro1micros

and ξmicro1microsminus1

with certain ωY01 and ξY0

0 taking values in the same so(d minus 1 1)-irrep Y0 namely

Y0 = sminus 1 ie ωa(sminus1)1 and ξ

a(sminus1)0 takes values in a rank-(s minus 1) symmet-

ric traceless tensors Field φmicro1microsis identified with a totally symmetric part of

ωa(sminus1)1 ie φmicro1micros

= hb1(micro1hbsminus1

microsminus1ωa1asminus1

micros)ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 the double-tracelessness

condition is the consequence of the tracelessness of ωa(sminus1)1 in a1asminus1 ξmicro1microsminus1

is identified with ξa(sminus1)0 directly ξmicro1microsminus1 = hb1micro1

hbsminus1microsminus1

ξa1asminus1ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 andone can make sure that the Fronsdalrsquos gauge transformation law is recovered fromδω

a(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 Field ω

a(sminus1)1 has a redundant component with the symmetry

ofsminus 1

which can be made Stueckelberg by virtue of gauge parameter ξa(sminus1)b

with the same symmetry type ie

δωa(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)c0 (355)

It automatically follows that there is a degree-one gauge field ωa(sminus1)b1 coupled with

ωa(sminus1)1 as

dωa(sminus1)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)c1 (356)

28

The only solution to Bianchi identity hcdωa(sminus1)c1 equiv 0 is15

dωa(sminus1)b1 = hcω

a(sminus1)bc1 (357)

where a new field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

is introduced and so on

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1 (358)

until the field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

for which the Bianchi identity solvesas

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 (359)

where field Ca(s)b(s)0 represents a generalized Weyl tensor and has the symmetry of

s The solution of Bianchi identity hchddC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 equiv 0 has the form

dCa(s)b(s)0 = hc

(

Ca(s)cb(s)0 +

s

2C

a(s)bb(sminus1)c0

)

(360)

where Ca(s+1)b(s)0 has the symmetry of s

s+ 1 The second term on the rhs

of (360) supplements the first one to have a proper Young symmetry Further

unfolding requires a set of degree-zero forms Ca(s+i)b(s)0 taking values in so(dminus1 1)-

irreps characterized by Young diagrams ss+ i

The full system has theform

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1

δωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(k)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)b(k)c0 k isin [0 sminus 2]

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 δω

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0

dCa(s+i)b(s) = hc

(

Ca(s+i)cb(s) +s

i+ 2Ca(s+i)bb(sminus1)c

)

i isin [0infin)

(361)

By the construction the system incorporates Fronsdalrsquos field φmicro1microswith the correct

gauge law but there is still to be proved that the Fronsdalrsquos equations are reallyimposed and that there are no other dynamical fields in the system Let us recon-struct Fronsdalrsquos equations (213) whereas the second statement will be proved asa part of a more general theorem The first two equations of (361) read

partmicroωa(sminus1)ν minus partνω

a(sminus1)micro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)cν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)cmicro (362)

partmicroωa(sminus1)bν minus partνω

a(sminus1)bmicro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)bcν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)bcmicro (363)

It is convenient to convert all world indices to the fiber ones

partcωa(sminus1)|d minus partdωa(sminus1)|c = ωa(sminus1)c|d minus ωa(sminus1)d|c (364)

partcωa(sminus1)b|d minus partdωa(sminus1)b|c = ωa(sminus1)bc|d minus ωa(sminus1)bd|c (365)

15The proof is not given as more general statement about the solutions of such equations isproved in the next Section

29

where ωa(sminus1)|b equiv ωa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro ωa(sminus1)bb|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bbmicro hcmicro

Contracting (365) with ηbd and then symmetrizing c with a1asminus1 results in

partcωa(sminus1)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus1)c|c= 0 (366)

By symmetrizing in (364) a1asminus1 with d

ωa(sminus1)c|a = partcωa(sminus1)|a minus partaωa(sminus1)|c (367)

and then by contracting (364) with ηdasminus1

ωa(sminus1)c|

c= (sminus 1)

(

partcωa(sminus2)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus2)c|c

)

(368)

all the terms of (366) can be expressed via ωa(sminus1)|b Plugging these to (366) gives

ωa(sminus1)|a minus partapartc((sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c

)+ (sminus 1)partapartaω

a(sminus2)c|c= 0 (369)

where ωa(sminus1)|a is to be identified with Fronsdalrsquos field φa(s) as ωa(sminus1)|a = 1sφa(s)

then ωa(sminus2)c|

c= 1

2φa(sminus2)c

c (sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c = φa(sminus1)c and the equation

acquires the Fronsdalrsquos form (213)

φa(s) minus spartapartcφa(sminus1)c + s(sminus1)

2partapartaφ

a(sminus2)cc= 0 (370)

For Y = Y(s 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 results in

Yg sminus 1 sminus 1 s

ss+ 1

n k 1 0 1 sminus 1 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = sminus 1 g = s g = s+ 1

qg q0 = 1 qsminus1 = 1 qs = 0 qs+1 = 0

therefore

Wq =

Wa(sminus1)0 W

a(sminus1)b0 W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0 q = 0

Wa(sminus1)q W

a(sminus1)bq W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)q W

a(s)b(s)qminus1 W

a(s+1)b(s)qminus1 q gt 0

(371)and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hcWa(sminus1)b(gminus1)cq g isin [1 sminus 1]

hchdWa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)dqminus1 g = s

hc

(

Wa(gminussminus1)cb(s)qminus1 + s

gminuss+1W

a(gminussminus1)bb(sminus1)cqminus1

)

g gt s

(372)

With D = DL minus σminus full system (361) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (373)

30

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sminus 1 sim g isin [0 sminus 1]form a finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k =0 1 sim g ge s form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

The representatives of cohomology classes can be chosen as H0 = ξ

a(sminus1)0 H1 =

hbφa(sminus1)b H2 = hbhcG

a(sminus1)c minus hahcGa(sminus2)bc + γηaahahcG

a(sminus4)bcnn+ (βηabhahc +

αηaahbhc)Ga(sminus3)cn

n16 H

3 = hbhahcχa(sminus2)c H

kgt3 = empty where φa(s) and Ga(s) are

double-traceless tensor fields and ξa(sminus1) and χa(sminus1) are traceless H01 are nontrivialat the lowest grade whereas H

23 are nontrivial at grade-one therefore the orderof equations that are imposed on the dynamical field is equal to two It turns outthat there is no need in the explicit form for α β and γ it is sufficient to find outthe Young symmetry of representatives only The uniqueness of Fronsdalrsquos theoryat the level of action was demonstrated in [67] and at the level of equations in[6 53] Consequently there is no need for equations (370) to be found explicitly -those of Fronsdal are the only possible Again there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2 the gauge parameters

in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3 The system contains an infinitely many ofdual formulations those that have field W

a(sminus1)b(k0)1 at the lowest grade are gauge

dual descriptions whereas those that have field Ca(s+k0)b(s) at the lowest grade arenon-gauge Dual description based on field W

a(sminus1)b(1)1 was elaborated in [68]

Example 334 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field[69

70 31] Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field results in literally

the same unfolded system (361 373) but with fields taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that are irreducible spin-tensors with the same tensor part as in the bosoniccase Note that operator σminus is not modified but the σminus cohomology groups areslightly changed such that the equations become of the first order

The Dirac equation Unfolded system (336) or equivalently (339) describesa massless spin-1

2field provided that Ck take values in s 1

2so(dminus1 1)-irreps

ie Ck equiv Cαa(k) and Γαb βC

βba(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equation of (336)

partmicroCα = hmicroaC

αa (374)

with hbmicroΓβb α

gives the Dirac equation

Γαa βpart

aCβ = 0 (375)

the rest of equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives of dynamicalfield Cα

The Rarita-Schwinger equation Unfolded system (350) or equivalently(353) describes a massless spin-3

2field provided that irreducible tensors in (351)

are replaced by the corresponding irreducible tensor-spinors ie A1 equiv Aαmicro C

k equiv

Cα[ab]c(k) and Γαb βC

β[ab]c(k) = 0 Γαd βC

β[ab]dc(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equa-tion of (350)

1

2(partmicroA

αν minus partνA

αmicro) = hmicroahνbC

α[ab] (376)

16α = minus (s(d+sminus5)minusd+6)(sminus2)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6) β = (sminus2)

(d+sminus4) γ = (d+sminus6)(sminus2)(sminus3)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6)

31

with Γ-matrices and converting world indices micro ν to the fiber ones according toAαa equiv Aα

microhamicro gives the Rarita-Schwinger equation

Γαb βpart

bAβa minus partaΓαb βA

βb = 0 δAαa = partaξα (377)

The rest of unfolded equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives ofdynamical field Aα

microThe Fang-Fronsdal equation for a spin-(s + 1

2) massless field Unfolded

system (361) or equivalently (373) describes a massless spin-(s + 12) field pro-

vided that irreducible tensors in (371) are replaced by the corresponding irreducibletensor-spinors With all world indices converted to the fiber ones the first equationof (361) has the form

Gαa(sminus1)|[cd] equiv partcωβa(sminus1)|d minus partdωβa(sminus1)|c = ωβa(sminus1)c|d minus ωβa(sminus1)d|c (378)

where ωαa(sminus1)|b equiv ωαa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωαa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

αa(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro

Analogously to the bosonic case nonsymmetric component of ωβa(sminus1)|d canbe gauged away algebraically Hence the Fronsdalrsquos field φαa(s) is identified asωαa(sminus1)|a = 1

sφαa(s) Then Γα

b βφβa(s) = Γα

b βωβa(sminus1)|b Γα

b βΓβc γφ

γa(sminus2)bc = ηbcωαa(sminus2)b|c

and the Fronsdalrsquos triple Γ-traceless constraint is a consequence of irreducibility ofωαa(sminus1)|b in α a1asminus1 and the lack of any conditions with respect to a1asminus1 andb Since the Fronsdalrsquos field contains three irreducible components with the sym-metry of s 1

2 s-1 1

2and s-2 1

2 the equations of motion has to be

nontrivial in these three sectors too The projector on the dynamical equations issimply Γα

b βGβa(sminus1)b|a and gives

Γαb βpart

bφβa(s) minus spartaΓαb βφ

βa(sminus1)b = 0 (379)

which is in accordance with (222) But we would like to note that there aretwo components with the symmetry of s-1 1

2 namely ηbcG

αa(sminus2)b|ac and

Γαb βΓ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] The correct projector on this component of the equations isgiven by the combination

2(sminus 1)ηbcGαa(sminus2)b|ac minus γαb βγ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] (380)

which is identically zero when Gαa(sminus1)|[bc] is expressed via ωβa(sminus1)c|d by virtue of(378) Therefore it is (380) that does not express certain part of ωβa(sminus1)c|d interms of first derivatives of the dynamical field φαa(s) and thus this is a dynamicalequation Obviously (380) is a representative of σminus cohomology group H

2g=0 In

terms of φαa(s) the representative has the form

Γαb βpart

bΓβc γφ

γa(sminus1)c minus partcφαa(sminus1)c +

(sminus 1)

2partaφ

αa(sminus2)cc= 0 (381)

which is equal to the Γ-trace of (379) The gauge transformations has the form

δφαa(s) = partaξαa(sminus1) (382)

32

where Γαb βξ

βa(sminus2)b = 0Consequently unfolded equations for totally symmetric bosonic fields are proved

to completely determine the unfolded equations for totally symmetric fermionicfields Though σminus is not modified in the fermionic case σminus cohomology groupsare changed since the fermionic dynamical equations are of the first order

4 Unfolding Mixed-Symmetry Fields

First in Section 41 an example of the simplest massless mixed-symmetry field ofspin- is investigated in detail and leading arguments are given for a spin- fieldSecond the general statement on arbitrary mixed-symmetry fields is proved whereastechnical details are collected in Sections 44 and 45 The analysis of the numberof physical degrees of freedom is carried out in Section 43

41 Simplest Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Example 411 Spin- field In the metric-like approach a spin- field is mini-mally described[16 17] by the subjected to (215) field φ[micromicro]ν that takes values in a

reducible so(dminus 1 1)-representation oplus the latter component is identified withthe trace φ ν

microν The gauge transformations (216) has two levels of reducibility with

two gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξA[microν] taking values in oplus bull so(dminus 1 1)-irreps at the

first level and one parameter ξmicro taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irrep at the secondlevel (217)

First the metric-like field φ[micromicro]ν has to be incorporated into certain differentialform eYq which is called a physical vielbein the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y and the degreeq to be defined below To make the symmetries both of the first and of the secondlevel of reducibility manifest the degree of the physical vielbein has to be two atleast

Moreover were the physical vielbein taken to be a degree-one form not all of thegauge symmetries even at the first level would be manifest Indeed there are twopossibilities for physical vielbein eY1 to contain a component with the symmetry of

Namely Y = and Y = since otimes = oplus oplus and otimes = oplus oplus

The associated differential gauge parameter is ξ0 in the first case and ξ0 in thesecond case Inasmuch as the gauge parameters are the forms of degree-zero onlyone of the required two parameters is present in each of the cases

The degree of the physical vielbein has to be not greater than two if the com-ponent associated with the metric-like field φmicromicroν is required not to be a certaintrace part The reason why a dynamical field should not be a certain trace part isexplained in the next Section

Therefore the physical vielbein has to be of degree-two and has to take valuesin so(dminus 1 1)-irrep that belongs to the vector representation ie e2 equiv ea2 equiv eamicroν

The associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξa1 equiv ξamicro contains in its Lorentz decomposition

otimes = oplus oplusbull both anti-symmetric ξAmicroν = ξa[microhbν]ηab and symmetric ξSmicroν = ξa(microh

bν)ηab

33

gauge parameters the latter enters along with the trace ξamicrohmicroa There exists a second

level gauge parameter χa0 which is directly identified with ξmicro as ξmicro = hbmicroχ

aηabThere are no redundant components in the gauge parameter However physicalvielbein e2 contains one redundant component in its decomposition into Lorentz

irreps otimes = oplus oplus The first and the second components are to be associatedwith a traceful φmicromicroν whereas the third one totally anti-symmetric component e[a|bc]

of ea|bc = eamicroνhbmicrohcν is a redundant one and has to be made non-dynamical In order

to do so algebraic gauge parameter ξ[abc]0 with the symmetry of is introduced It

is obvious from pure algebraic gauge law

δea2 = hbhcξ[abc]0 (41)

that the redundant component can be fixed to zero and ea2 can be directly identifiedwith φmicromicroν as e

amicromicro = φmicromicroνh

aν From gauge transformation laws δea2 = dξa1 δξa1 = dχa

0

ie δeamicroν = 12

(partmicroξ

aν minus partνξ

amicro

) δξamicro = partmicroχ

a required gauge transformations (216)(217) for metric-like field φmicromicroν and for the first order gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξ

A[microν]

are easily recoveredSince in the unfolded approach each gauge parameter possesses its own gauge

field and vice-verse associated with ξ[abc]0 gauge field ω

[abc]1 enters as

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 (42)

which determines the first equation Applying d to this equation results in Bianchiidentity hbhcdω

[abc]1 equiv 0 which has a unique solution of the form

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 (43)

with C[abc][df ]0 having the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensor of a spin-

field ie it is anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and C[abcd]f0 equiv 0 To clarify the form of

the solution let C[abc]|[df ]0 be a degree-zero form anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and with

no definite symmetry between these two groups of indices The Bianchi identityimplies hbhchdhfC

[abc]|[df ]0 equiv 0 which is equivalent to C

a[bc|df ]0 equiv 0 since vielbeins

ha anticommute Therefore the solution is parameterized by those components of

C[abc]|[df ]0 sim otimes that has the symmetry of Young diagrams with no more than

three rows since the requirement for total anti-symmetrization of any four indicesto give zero is the characteristic property of Young diagrams with at most three

rows otimes ni is the only component of zero trace order17 with three rows andthere are no components with the number of rows less than three Alternatively one

17Although there are trace components with the number of rows less than four eg theirtensor product by the metric ηab contains components with the symmetry of the sl(d)-Young

diagrams with more than three rows Nontrivial trace with the symmetry of corresponds tothe mass-like term Hence traceful tensors either do not satisfy the Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms

34

could search for the solution in the sector of degree-one forms as dω[abc]1 = hdC

[abc]|d1

with some C[abc]|d1 but Bianchi identity hbhchdC

[abc]|d1 equiv 0 implies that the only

component of C[abc]|d1 sim otimes that is allowed must have less than three rows which

is impossible since [abc] makes Young diagrams of otimes consist of three rows atleast18 Thus one has to search for the solution among the forms of less degree

Further unfolding requires a set of fields C [abc][df ]g(k) with the symmetry ofk

to be introduced and the full system has the form

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 δea2 = dξa1 + hbhcξ

[abc]0 δξa1 = dχa

0

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 δω

[abc]1 = dξ

[abc]0

dC[abc][df ]g(k)0 = hvC

[abc][df ]g(k)v0 (44)

Consequently the unfolded system incorporates field φmicromicroν with all required differ-ential gauge parameters at all levels of reducibility the redundant component of the

physical vielbein does not contribute to the dynamics ω[abc]1 sim otimes = oplus oplus

the first component is a field strength for the redundant field once the field hasbeen gauged away the associated field strength is zero and ω

[abc]ρ = hamicrohbνhcλT[microνλ]ρ

for some T[microνλ]ρ T[microνλρ] equiv 0 which incorporates both and (as the trace) Torecover equations (215) in terms of metric-like fields it is convenient to convert allfiber indices to the world ones in the first two equations

part[microeaνλ] = hb[microhcνω

abcλ] (45)

part[microωabcν] = hd[microhfν]C

abcdf (46)

to substitute Tmicroνλρ and to contract two indices in the second equation

part[microφνλ]ρ = Tmicroνλρ (47)

partρTmicroνρλ minus partλTρ

microνρ = 0 (48)

Plugging (47) in (48) gives equation (215)For Y = Y(2 1) (1 1) ie N = 2 and p = 2 the general scheme of Section

1 results in

Yg

n k 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 1 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

18Again the trace component enters the tensor product as η otimes and has the number of rowsnot less than three

35

therefore

Wq =

W a0 q = 0

W a1 W

[abc]0 q = 1

W aq W

[abc]qminus1 W

[abc][df ]qminus2 W

[abc][df ]gqminus2 q gt 1

(49)

and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbhcW[abc]qminus1 g = 1

hbhcW[aaa][bc]qminus2 g = 2

hdW[aaa][bb]c(gminus3)dqminus2 g gt 2

(410)

with D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (44) can be rewritten as

Dω2 = 0 δω2 = Dξ1 δξ1 = Dξ0 (411)

where ω2 isin W2 ξ1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 2 k = 0 sim g = 0and n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 1 form two finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-moduleswhereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g ge 2 form an infinite-dimensionaliso(dminus 1 1)-module

Example 412 Spin- field (briefly) In the case of a massless spin- fieldthere are two gauge parameters at the first level of reducibility which have the sym-metry19 of and one gauge parameter at the second level with the symmetryof First for Y = Y(3 1) (2 1) the proposed scheme results in

Yg

n k 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3 g = 4

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 2 q2 = 1 q3 = 0 q4 = 0

therefore the physical vielbein has to be a two-form taking values in ie e2 equiv

eaab2 Associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξaab1 has components otimes = oplus oplus the first two having the symmetry of the required gauge parameters with the thirdone being redundant The last three components in the decomposition of the physical

vielbein otimes = oplus oplus oplus are also redundant By virtue of Stueckelberg

symmetry with parameter ξ1 these three components can be gauged away inasmuch

as otimes = oplus oplus The redundant component of the first level gauge

parameter ξ1 also can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg symmetry with

level-two gauge parameter ξ0 Consequently at least the fact that the unfoldedsystem incorporates the metric-like field all the required gauge parameters andredundant components do not contribute to the dynamics is proved

19To simplify the example no consideration is given to the trace components of the fields

36

42 General Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Given a massless field of spin Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) described by a metric-like field φY(x) taking values in the irrep of the Lorentz algebra so(d minus 1 1) withthe same symmetry type(minimal formulation) there exists a unique unfolded systemwith the physical vielbein at the lowest grade and all symmetries being manifest thatreproduces the original metric-like system The system has the form (11)

Sketch of the proof

1 The lowest grade field (physical vielbein) eY0q0

turns out to be completely de-termined by the requirement for it to contain the metric-like field and for itsgauge parameters ξY0

q0minusk k gt 0 to contain all the necessary gauge parametersat all levels of reducibility (219)

2 eY0q0

and its gauge parameters appear to contain redundant components thathave to be made non-dynamical The only way to achieve this is to introduceStueckelberg symmetry δeY0

q0= σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus1) δξ

Y0q0minus1 = σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus2) with certain

ξY1q1minusk k gt 0 which turns out to be unambiguously defined by this requirement

3 ξY1q1minus1 has associated gauge field ωY1

q1and gauge transformations δωY0

q0=

σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) completely determines the first equation deY0

q0= σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) whichimplies Jacobi identity σ1

minus(dωY1q1

) equiv 0 The general solution is proved in Sec-tion 44 to have the form dωY1

q1= σ2

minus(ωY2q2

) with certain ωY2q2

The secondequation implies the second Jacobi identity σ2

minus(dωY2q2

) equiv 0 and so on

4 Once the total unfolded system is defined the proof of the facts that (i)the correct dynamical equations are imposed (ii) there are no other dynamicalfields or other differential gauge symmetries in the system is obtained throughthe calculations of σminus cohomology groups Ignoring the trace pattern of fieldsie for traceful tensors the proof of (ii) can be simplified and is done in thissection Even stronger statement that there exists a duality H

p+1+k sim Hpminusk is

proved in Section 45

First as it is clear from the examples above the metric-like field φYM(x) has

to be incorporated into a differential form eY0q of degree-q taking values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep Y0 (for this reason eY0q is called physical vielbein) Having converted

all world indices to fiber ones in accordance with (329) so(dminus 1 1)-tensor productY0 otimes Y(1 q) of Y0 with one column diagram of the height q must contain thecomponent with the symmetry of YM In the case of the minimal formulationYM = Y where Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) characterizes the spin

It is useful to introduce a notion of the quotient of two Young diagrams let thequotient of two Young diagrams Y1Y2 be a direct sum of those diagrams whoseso(dminus 1 1)-tensor product by Y2 contains Y1 For the first sight given q ge 0 anyelement Q of YMY(1 q) might be chosen as Y0 If q is greater than the heightof YM the component with the symmetry YM in the tensor product QotimesY(1 q)has to be certain trace inevitably

37

Although there is no apparent problems in considering unfolded systems withdynamical field hidden in certain trace component of the physical vielbein egMaxwell gauge potential Amicro might be identified with the trace eamicroνh

microa of two-form

eamicroν However this exotic incorporating of the physical field does not take place inthe already known systems Moreover it can be proved that such exotic systemsdo not exist if irreducible Nevertheless they might be a part of some reduciblesystem which describes more than one field Therefore we require the degree q ofthe physical vielbein to be not greater than the height of YM

Inasmuch as (i) the equations imposed on φY(x) possess reducible gauge trans-formations with the number of levels equal to the height p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi of Y (ii) for

a degree-q gauge field of an unfolded system there exist q levels of gauge transfor-mations the degree q of physical vielbein eY0

q must be equal to pThe quotient YY(1 p) contains only one element (provided φY(x) is for-

bidden to be a trace component) it is the diagram (12) with the symmetry ofY0 = Y(s1 minus 1 p1) (sN minus 1 pN) ie it is equal to Y without the first col-umn Therefore physical vielbein eY0

p is completely defined So does gauge param-

eters ξY0pminusk at the k-th level of reducibility k isin [1 p] The requirement for tensor

product Y0 otimes Y(1 pminus k) to contain all gauge parameters ξik given by (219)at the k-th level of reducibility is also satisfied Consequently the whole patternof fieldsgauge parameters of the metric-like formulation is reproduced Note thatY0 equiv Y0 and q0 = p in the terms of Section 1

Let us note that if one writes down the physical vielbein explicitly as ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

where si are the lengths of the rows ofY and converts the form indices to the tangentones by virtue of inverse background vielbein hmicroa

ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|[d1dp] = ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

hmicro1d1 hmicropdp (412)

dynamical field φY(x) should be identified with ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|a1ap which hasthe symmetry of Y with some traces included Consequently the generalizedLabastidarsquos double-tracelessness condition (220) [20] is obvious inasmuch as thecontraction of two metric tensor ηaiaiηaiai with the i-th group of indices vanishes

Generally in addition to φY(x) decompositionY0otimesY(1 p) of physical vielbeineY0p into Lorentz irreps contains redundant components which must not contributeto the physical degrees of freedom So does Y0 otimesY(1 pminus k) ie in addition toξik it contains a lot of components that can not be made genuine differential gaugeparameters There are only two possible ways to get rid of redundant fields in theunfolded formalism

A redundant components could be directly fixed to zero by algebraic (Stueckel-berg) symmetry

B redundant components might be auxiliary fields for other fields (at lower grade)and so on The process stops since the grade is assumed to be bounded frombelow

We require dynamical fields incorporated in the physical vielbein to be at the lowestgrade Actually (B) takes place for dual gauge descriptions but not for the minimal

38

Therefore the only possibility to make redundant components to be non-dynamicalis to introduce a Stueckelberg symmetry with certain parameters ξY1

q1minusk

δeY0p = dξY0

pminus1 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) (413)

δξY0pminus1 = dξY0

pminus2 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus2) (414)

(415)

where σ1minus is a certain operator built of background vielbein ha that contracts a

number of indices of Y1 with hahc to obtain Y0 Diagram20 Y1 and form degreeq1 can be easily found since Y1 otimes Y1 q1 minus i i gt 0 must contain all redundantcomponents of eY0

p and ξY0pminusk

In the unfolded formalism each gauge field possesses its own gauge parameter andvice-versa Therefore there is a gauge field ωY1

q1 which contributes to the equations

for eY0p as

deY0p = σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) (416)

The first equation determines the first Jacobi identity of the form σ1minus(dω

Y1q1

) equiv 0which can be solved as

dωY1q1

= σ2minus(ω

Y2q2

) (417)

for certain gauge field ωY2q2

and operator σ2minus that satisfies σ1

minusσ2minus equiv 0 The general

solution of Jacobi identities is given in Section 44 From now on let the super-scripts of σminus be omitted The second equation determines the second Jacobi identityσminus(dω

Y2q2

) equiv 0 which can be also solved and so on Consequently the knowledgeof the lowest grade gauge field eY0

p and of the Stueckelberg symmetries required toget rid of redundant components determines the first equation which by virtue ofJacobi identities determines the second and so on The total unfolded system hasthe structure

dωYg

qg= σminus

(

ωYg+1qg+1

)

g = 0 1

δωYg

qg= dξYg

qg+ σminus

(

ξYg+1

qg+1minus1

)

δξYgqg

=

(418)

where σminus is certain algebraic operator built of background vielbein ha and (σminus)2 = 0

The only facts remain to be proved are that there are no other dynamical fieldsand that the proper correspondence (duality) between the cohomology groups holdstrue To this end it is sufficient to analyze only the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps content ofH

qg ie only the symmetry type and the multiplicity of irreducible Lorentz tensors

that by virtue of (330) are the representatives of Hqg

It is proved in the next Section that there is a duality Hpminuskg=0 sim H

p+k+1g=1 between

the σminus cohomology groups which reveals the one-to-one correspondence betweenthe gauge dynamical fields and equations of motion the level-k gauge symmetries

20The specific character of Minkowski massless fields is in that all Stueckelberg parameters canbe incorporated into a single Y1-valued form this not being the case for (anti)-de Sitter masslessfields

39

and the level-k Bianchi identities The representatives of cohomology groups in thesector of fields and gauge symmetries directly correspond to those of metric-likeapproach and there is no other nontrivial cohomology in these sectors

Though the trace pattern of fieldsgauge parameters is also important and thecalculation of σminus cohomology groups provides a comprehensive answer to this ques-tion the very procedure being a bit technical Ignoring the trace pattern of thefields it can be easily proved that the required metric-like field is incorporated inphysical vielbein eY0

q0 all the redundant components of the physical vielbein can be

gauged away by a pure algebraic symmetry and the same holds for differential gaugeparameters ξY0

q0minusk at all levels of reducibility ie the required pattern of gauge pa-rameters is recovered whereas all the redundant components are either Stueckelbergor auxiliary This is the necessary condition only and the traces has to be takeninto account Also it is still to be proved that the correct equations of motionsare imposed Provided that there are no trace conditions on the fields the sys-tem is referred to as off-shell[65] An off-shell system may contain only constraintsthat express auxiliary fields via the derivatives of the dynamical field imposing norestrictions on the latter

The off-shell system Technically ignoring the traces is equivalent to thereplacement of all so(dminus1 1)-irreps by the sl(d)-irreps that are characterized by thesame Young diagrams ie instead of taking so(dminus1 1)-tensor products one needs toapply the sl(d)-tensor productrsquos rules which are much simpler The decompositionof the physical vielbein eY0

q0into sl(d)-irreps is given by diagrams Yαi of the form

αN+1

sN minus 1

pNαN

s2 minus 1

p2α2

s1 minus 1

p1

α1

(419)

where α1+ +αN+1 = q0 = p The decomposition of Stueckelberg gauge parameterξY1q1minus1 for eY0

q0has the components of the same form but with αN+1 ge 1 because

Y1 (13) has already the form of Y0 with one cell in the bottom-left Thereforeall components of eY0

q0except for those with αN+1 = 0 are of Stueckelberg type but

there is only one component of eY0q0

with αN+1 = 0 namely it has αi = pi i isin [1 N ]and hence has the symmetry of Y The decomposition of level-k differential gaugeparameter ξY0

q0minusk has the form (419) with α1 + + αN+1 = p minus k and again all

the components of ξY0q0minusk with αN+1 ge 1 can be gauged away by pure algebraic

symmetry with ξY1q1minuskminus1 Consequently there is a complete matching between (219)

40

and those in ξY0

q0minusk that are not pure gauge themselves It can be easily proved alsothat if ignoring the traces there are no other dynamical fieldsdifferential gaugeparameters at higher grade Consequently

Lemma H(σminus) with respect to sl(d) are given by

Hk(σminus)sl(d) =

Yαi g = 0 α1 + + αN = k αN+1 = 0 k le p

empty k gt p(420)

The triviality of the higher k gt p cohomology groups for sl(d) which shouldcontain equations of motion and Bianchi identities is expected since the system isoff-shell For the equations to have the second order in derivatives the only nontrivialcohomology group H

p+1 must be at the grade-one ie Hp+1g=1 6= empty As is seen from

the examples above the equations correspond to those representatives of Hp+1g=1 that

are certain traces Indeed the total rank |WYgqg | which is equal to the sum qg + |Yg|

of degree qg and rank of Yg is preserved by σminus Therefore |WYgqg | = |W

Y0q0| + g

and |RY1q1+1| = |ω

Y0q0| + 2 = |Y|+ 2 where eY0

q0isin Wg=0

p and RY1q1+1 isin W

g=1p+1 contain

metric-like field φYM(x) and the equations on φY(x) respectively Consequently

the representative of Hp+1g=1 that corresponds to the equations on the traceless part

of φY(x) has to be identified with certain trace of the first order and so on for thetraces of φY(x)

The calculation of σminus cohomology groups carried out in Section 45 implies

1 The only nontrivial cohomology groups are Hpminuskg=0 and H

p+k+1g=1 k = 1 p

Therefore the dynamical fields and independent gauge parameters belong tothe zero grade Wg=0

q subspaces the equations are of the second order and theBianchi identities for the k-th level gauge symmetries are of the (k + 2)-thorder

2 Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 ie there is a one-to-one correspondence between the

elements of Hpminuskg=0 that are traces of the r-th order and the elements of Hp+k+1

g=1

that are traces of the (r + k + 1)-th order Roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1

Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on Therefore there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the dynamical fields and the equations of motion the level-k gaugesymmetries and the k-th Bianchi identities

3 The so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that correspond to the elements of Hpminusk(σminus) and arethe traces of the zeroth order are given by the so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagramsthat have the form (419) with αN+1 = 0 and α1 + + αN = p minus k whichexactly reproduce the required pattern (219) Note that certain higher ordertraces are also the elements of cohomology groups These fields represent thersquoauxiliaryrsquo fields of the metric-like formulation which had to be introduced tomake the gauge symmetry off-shell To prove the theorem it is not necessary toknow the concrete trace pattern the duality between the cohomology groupsis sufficient The details of the trace pattern are in Section 45

41

In the fermionic case the traces are substituted for Γ-traces Important isthat acting on tensor indices only σminus does not break down the irreducibility ofspin-tensors The duality has the form H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 or simply H

pminuskg=0 sim

Hp+k+1g=0 which means that equations are of the first order and the duality between

fieldsequations gauge symmetriesBianchi identities takes place which completesthe proof

Note that Yg=s1 equiv Yn=0k=0 has the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensorfor a spin-Y massless field

sNpN

s2p2

s1

p1 + 1

(421)

Analogously to the examples of Section 33 massless mixed-symmetry fields can bedescribed by the same unfolded system (16) that is restricted to Wg

q with g ge g0ie the system contains infinitely many dual formulations As the generalized Weyltensor and its descendants are non-gauge fields the dual descriptions with g0 ge s1are non-gauge and the dual descriptions with 0 lt g0 lt s1 are gauge

43 Physical Degrees of Freedom Counting

Notwithstanding the simplicity of the unfolded form and the uniqueness of unfoldingthere still might be a question of whether the unfolded equations do describe thecorrect number of physical degrees of freedom

It is well-known that for systems with the first class constraints only with mass-less fields belonging to this class the counting of degrees of freedom is that one firstlevel gauge parameter kills two degrees of freedom one second level gauge parame-ters kills three degrees of freedom and so on For example a spin-two massless fieldpossesses d(dminus3)

2degrees of freedom which is just d(d+1)

2minus 2d d(d+1)

2and d being the

number of components of φmicroν and ξmicroThe complete information concerning the rsquonumberrsquo of fieldsgauge parameters

ie the multiplicity and the symmetry of corresponding tensors is contained inH

kg=0(σminus) for k = 0p Not only can a number of physical degrees of freedom be

calculated but the whole exact sequence that defines an iso(d minus 1 1) irrep can bederived The elements of this sequence are certain so(dminus 1) tensors that define anso(dminus 2) tensor as a quotient of so(d minus 1) tensors eg (218) The decompositionof so(dminus 1 1)-fields into irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) can be done with the aid ofpartmicro or after Fourier transform with the aid of momentum pmicro

For example for a spin-two field the cohomology groups that correspond to thedynamical fieldsdifferential gauge parameters and its decomposition into so(dminus 1)irreps have the form

42

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus bull sim φmicroν φ

νν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2bull

Quick sort of Young diagrams in 0 minusrarr 2H0 minusrarr H1 minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 gives the

correct exact sequence 0 minusrarr minusrarr minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 which defines a masslessspin-two irrep H (0 )

For the simplest mixed-symmetry field the hook- there are two levels of gaugetransformation hence relevant cohomology groups are H

0 H1 and H2

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus oplus bull sim ξAmicroν oplus ξ

Smicroν ξ

Sνν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2 oplus 2bull

H2 oplus sim φmicroνλ φ

νmicroν 6= 0 oplus oplus oplus 2 oplus bull

Again quick sort of diagrams in 0 minusrarr 3H0 minusrarr 2H1 minusrarr H2 minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0

gives exact sequence (218)Consequently the problem of calculation the number of physical degrees of free-

dom to be precise of deriving the exact sequence is effectively reduced to the simplecombinatoric problem of (i) decomposition so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagram representa-tives of H(σminus) to so(dminus 1)-diagrams (ii) cancellation of like terms in sequence

0 minusrarr (p+ 1)H0 minusrarr pH1 minusrarr minusrarr 2Hpminus1 minusrarr Hp minusrarr H (0Y) minusrarr 0 (422)

Skipping combinatoric technicalities we state that in the general case of a spin-Ymassless mixed-symmetry field (422) reduces to the correct exact sequence thatdefines a uirrep H (0Y) of iso(dminus 1 1)

44 Solving the Generalized Jacobi Identities

Unfolding some dynamical system there arises a problem of solving Jacobi identities(33) that have schematically a form hhdω1

q equiv 0 where a number of backgroundvielbeins ha is contracted with the fiber indices of ω1

q The Jacobi identity restrictsdω1

q to have a certain specific form dω1q = hhω2

r where the so(dminus1 1)-irrep inwhich ω2

r takes values the degree r and the projector built of hh are completelydetermined The solutions are given by21

Lemma A Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values inY = Y(s p) (k 1)

so(dminus 1 1)-irrep The general solution of

hcdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq = 0 (423)

21As was pointed out in Section 33 nonzero traces either violate Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms and therefore are ignored

43

has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq k lt s

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1 k = s q ge p + 1

0 k = s q lt p+ 1

(424)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 take values inY(s p) (k + 1 1)

and Y(s+ 1 p+ 1) so(dminus 1 1)-irreps respectively22

Proof The parametrization of dωq by a degree-(q + 1) form taking values in the

same so(dminus 1 1)-irrep dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = R

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q+1 obviously fails to satisfy

(423) Inasmuch as (423) contains a vielbein the solution has to contain a number

of vielbeins too The most general parametrization of dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q with only

one vielbein included has the form dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = hdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)|dq for some

q-form taking values in a tensor product of Y by a vector representation ie thereis no definite symmetry between index d and the rest of the indices

hchdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)c|dq = 0larrrarr ωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)[c|d]

q = 0 (425)

Only those irreps in Yotimes are allowed that have c and d symmetric ie correspondto Y(s p) (k + 1 1) for k lt s This is not possible in the case k = s ie Y =Y(s p+ 1) and the only possibility to have c and d symmetric is to add the whole

column toY which requires dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q to be represented as dω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hchcωa1(sminus1)cap(sminus1)cap+1(sminus1)cqminuspminus1 and therefore q must be large enough Roughly

speaking the proof is based on the fact that the anti-symmetrization of two indicesat the same row of a Young diagram is identically zero the anti-symmetrizationbeing due to contraction with vielbeins

Note that choosing nonmaximal solutions of Jacobi identities results in loweringthe gauge symmetry so that not all redundant components are excluded

Unfolding totally-symmetric massless higher-spin fields the possible rhs termsin dω

a(sminus1)b(t)1 = are restricted by Jacobi identities and an essential use is made

of

Corollary The solution of Jacobi identity

hcdωa(sminus1)b(tminus1)c1 equiv 0 (426)

is of the form

dωa(sminus1)b(t)1 =

hcωa(sminus1)b(t)c1 t lt sminus 1

hchdCa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 t = sminus 1

(427)

22The symmetric basis is used being more convenient in this case as the contracted with vielbeinstensors are already irreducible

44

The following statement is a generalization of the Lemma-A to the case where(s p) (k 1) is a rsquosubdiagramrsquo of a larger Young diagram Y that has a numberof rows precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) Appropriate Young symmetrizershave to be included as the mere contraction of a number of vielbeins breaks theirreducibility of the tensor For instance hcω

a(s1)b(s2minus1)c is already irreducible withthe symmetry of Ys1 s2 minus 1 but this is not the case for hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) which hasto be added one term hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) + 1s1minuss2+1

hcωa(s1)bb(s2minus1)c to get the symmetry

of Ys1 minus 1 s2

Lemma B Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values in Y =

Y( (s p) (k 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irrep where the dots stands for the blocks inY precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) The general solution of

Π[hcdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq

]= 0 (428)

where Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p)(k minus 1 1) has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

Π[

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq

]

k lt s

Π[

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1

]

k = s q ge p+ 1

0 k = s q lt p + 1

(429)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 takes values in

Y (s p) (k + 1 1) and Y (s+ 1 p+ 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irreps respec-tively and Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p) (k 1)

Proof The proof is similar to that of Lemma-A with the only comment that thesymmetrizers do not affect the argumentation that anti-symmetrization of two in-dices in the same row is identically zero

45 Dynamical Content via σminus Cohomology

Before discussing the calculation of σminus cohomology let us first recall necessary factsconcerning the evaluation of so(d minus 1 1)-tensor products Let P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) be anumber of integer partitions k1 + + kN = m of m where ki is constrained byki le ǫi and different rearrangements of ki satisfying the constraints are regarded asdistinct partitions The generating function for the partition P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) is

sum

m

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m)tm =

i=Nprod

i=1

(1minus tǫi+1)

1minus t(430)

These integer partitions gives the multiplicities of irreps in so(dminus 1 1)-tensor prod-ucts (Clebsh-Gordon coefficients) we are interested in [71]

45

The so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary irrep Ylowast = Y(si pi) by aone-column diagram of the height qlowast can be explicitly calculated as

sNpN

s2

p2

s1

p1

otimes

q =sum

αjβi

Nαjβi

αN+1

βN

αN

ǫNpN sN

β2

α2

ǫ2p2 s2

β1

α1

ǫ1p1 s1

(431)

where αi βi αi + βi le pi i isin [1 N ] αN+1 ge 0 and there exist ρ ge 0 such that

qlowast =i=Nsum

i=1

(αi + βi) + αN+1 + 2ρ (432)

The multiplicity Nαjβi of Ylowastαj βi

is given by integer partition

Nαjβi = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ǫi = pi minus αi minus βi (433)

and the total trace order r is

r =i=Nsum

i=1

βi + ρ (434)

Roughly speaking to obtain an element of the tensor product one should first cutoff from bottom-right of the i-th block a column of height βiminusγi pi ge βiminusγi ge 0 (totake different traces) and second add an arbitrary number αi+γi pi ge αi+γi ge 0 ofcells to each block provided the γi cells annihilate ie they are added to the placesfrom which γi cells were removed at the first stage Multiplicity may be differentfrom one due to different rearrangements of γi ie when multiplied by the rest ofq-column different traces can give rise to the same diagram The number of suchrearrangements is given by P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ρ =

sumi=N

i=1 γi For instance sl(n)-tensor

product otimes is given simply by

otimessl(n) = oplus oplus oplus (435)

46

The so(d)-tensor product can be represented as a sum of the form

otimesso(n) = otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

otimessl(n)

oplus

otimessl(n)

︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

oplus

otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

2nd order

=

oplus oplus oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

oplus

oplus 2 oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

︸︷︷︸

2ndorder

(436)

where the sum is over trace order and the boxes that are connected by the arc areto be contracted and then the sl(n)-product rules are to be applied to the rest ofthe diagrams

Evaluating the so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary spinor-irrep Ylowast =Y(si pi) 1

2by a one-column diagram of the height qlowast one can contract any number

of Γ matrices with the indices of the column and then multiply therefore the tensorproduct rule for spin-tensors can be reduced to bosonic rule (431) as

Y(si pi) 12otimesso(n) Y(1 q) =

qsum

k=0

(Y(si pi) otimesso(n) Y(1 q minus k)

)

12

(437)

for example

12otimesso(n) = 1

2oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order Γ-traces

oplus

12oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order Γ-traces

oplus

oplus

2 12

︸︷︷︸

2nd order Γ-traces

oplus

bull 12

︸︷︷︸

3d order Γ-traces

(438)

The multiplicity N12

αjβiof Ylowast

αj βi12

is given by

N12

αjβi=

i=ρsum

i=0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus i) (439)

Let us now analyze the origin of σminus cohomology Its action σminus Wgq rarr W

gminus1q+1

preserves g+ q and hence the whole complex C(W σminus) is a direct sum of complexesC(qprime σminus) where q

prime refers to the end element Wg=0qprime of the complex

C(qprime σminus) 0 minusrarr minusrarr Wg=1qprimeminus1 minusrarrW

g=0qprime minusrarr 0 (440)

47

Moreover σminus preserves the total rank (the form degree + rank of the so(d minus 1 1)-

irrep in which the field takes values) LetWa(s1)a(sm)q be an element ofWg

qprime When

all form indices of Wa(s1)a(sm)q are converted to the fiber ones according to (329)

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (441)

the action of σminus is just an anti-symmetrization of all d1 dq with those indices aithat are extra as compared to Ygminus1 plus some terms to restore the correct Youngsymmetry of Ygminus1 Let the decomposition ofW a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] into so(dminus1 1)-irreps be of the form

Ya1(s1) am(sm)otimes

Y(1 q) =oplus

r=0

oplus

ir

N rirYr

ir (442)

where the summation is over the trace order r and then over ir which enumeratesall so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that enters in the tensor product as the traces of the r-thorder N r

irbeing the multiplicity of Yr

ir The multiplicity of the zeroth order traces

is always equal to one N0i0= 1 In fact the diagrams Y 0

i0can be directly obtained

by the sl(n)-tensor product ruleThe very anti-symmetrization is insensitive to whether a certain component en-

ters as a trace or not When decomposed into so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the elements ofWg

qprime and Wgminus1qprime+1 have a number of components of the same symmetry type The

action of σminus is just a linear transformation that either sends the whole so(dminus 1 1)-irrep to zero23 or sends it to the components of Wgminus1

qprime+1 of the same symmetry typeImportant is that σminus does not act between different so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Thereforecomplex C(qprime σminus) is a direct sum of complexes parameterized by so(dminus 1 1)-irrepsYprime that are given by various tensor products

Ynk

otimes

Y(1 q) (443)

provided that the field WYnkq is an element of Wgprimeminusi

qprime+i for certain i When reducedto such a complex

C(Yprime qprime σminus) 0rarr rarr Vg rarr Vgminus1 rarr rarr 0 (444)

the action of σminus is a linear transformation between the spaces Vg rarr Vgminus1 dimen-

sions of which are equal to the multiplicity of Yprime in the decomposition of WYgqg and

WYgminus1qg+1 The action of σminus is maximally non-degenerate compatible with nilpotency

Therefore to find cohomology groups the dimension of each linear space in everycomplex has to be calculated

Let us note that only the types and multiplicities of so(dminus1 1)-irreps are foundbelow ie no attention is paid to the description of how the corresponding tensorsare contained in the fields WY

qprime This is sufficient for our purposes though it isobvious (412) how the metric-like field φYM

is incorporated in an element ofWg=0p

23provided that the appropriate basis on the space of so(dminus1 1)-irreps with the same symmetrytype is chosen

48

The calculation of σminus cohomology is divided into three cases that cover the wholevariety of so(dminus 1 1)-irreps that can result from the tensor products (443)

In the Lemmas below it is assumed that complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is parameterizedby so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Yprime = Ylowast

αj βiof the form (431) with Ylowast = Ynk q

lowast = q such

that WYnkq isin C(qprime σminus) and ρ is defined according to (432)

In the first case Yprime is an element of Y0 otimesY(1 q)

Lemma 1 The σminus cohomology groups Hqg=0 and H

qg=1 are nontrivial and are given

by

Hqg =

Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βiMαj βi

αN+1 = 0sumi=N

i=0 αi = qq isin [0 p] g = 0

H2pminusqminus1 q isin [p+ 1 2p+ 1] g = 1

empty q gt 2p+ 1 any g

(445)where Mαj βi is the multiplicity of the irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

defined below

Proof From the very form of Yn=N0 equiv Yg=0 equiv Y(si minus 1 pi) it follows that theso(dminus1 1)-irreps that the element ofWg=0

q sim Y0otimesY(1 q) decomposes into may

be contained in Wg=1qminus1 only ie Wg=0

q and Wg=kqminusk contain no so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of

the same symmetry type for k gt 1 Therefore the length of complex C(Yprime q σminus)where Yprime isin Y0otimesY(1 q) is equal to one ie C(Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

q σminus) 0 minusrarrV1 minusrarr V0 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions of V0 and V1 are given by the multiplicitiesof the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

in Wg=1qminus1 and Wg=0

q respectively

dim(V1) =

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus 1) ρ ge 1

0 ρ = 0αN+1 = 0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) αN+1 gt 0

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) (446)

If αN+1 gt 0 the dimensions of V0 and V1 are equal and each irreducible componentof Wg=0

q with αN+1 gt 0 can be gauge away by virtue of the corresponding element

of Wg=1qminus1 thus being exact H

kgt2p+1 = empty inasmuch as ρ le p and the componentsof the forms with rank greater than (2p + 1) must have αN+1 gt 0 thus beingexact If αN+1 = 0 the dimensions are different dim(V1) lt dim(V0) for q le pdim(V1) = dim(V0) for q = p + 1 and dim(V1) gt dim(V0) for q gt p Thereforethe number of those Ysi piαj βi

isin Wg=0q q le p that are not exact is equal to

Mαj βi = |dim(V1) minus dim(V0)| the same is the number of those Ysi piαj βiisin

Wg=1qminus1 q gt p+ 1 that are not exact The obvious property of integer partitions

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ǫ1 + + ǫN minusm) (447)

results in the important duality in the cohomology groups Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 or

roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on

49

The second case is the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) where Yprime is an element of the tensor

product Ynk otimesY(1 q) for certain q ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmaxn minus 1

Lemma 2 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainqprime ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmax

n minus 1 the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The complex has the length two ie 0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr 0 wherethe dimensions are given by dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫN 1|ρ+ 1)dim(V2) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ+ 1) Simple calculations with generating functions resultsin dim(V0) lt dim(V1) dim(V2) lt dim(V1) and dim(V0) minus dim(V1) + dim(V2) = 0and consequently the sequence is exact

Analogously

Lemma 3 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainq ge 0 with k = 0 and n lt N the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The speciality of such Yprime is that the complex has the length three ie0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr V3 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions are given by

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 ǫn + 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V2) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 1) ρ ge ǫn + 1

0 otherwise

dim(V3) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn minus 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 2) ρ ge ǫn + 2

0 otherwise

Again simple calculations with generating functions results in appropriate inequali-ties and dim(V0)minusdim(V1)+dim(V2)minusdim(V3) = 0 and consequently the sequenceis exact

The above three cases covers the whole variety of the so(d minus 1 1)-tensors thatcan result from the tensor products YnkotimesY(1 q) for any n k and q The caseswith sN = 1 and Y = Y0 are special but the calculation of cohomology groupsleads to the same result

In the fermionic case the computations are similar due to the multiplicity givenby (439) The difference is that all nontrivial cohomology is concentrated in gradezero Indeed taking into account (446) where P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) is to be replaced by(439) it follows that dim(V0) ge dim(V1) for all q and H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 where r

is referred to the Γ-trace order or roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 andso on

5 Conclusions

The unfolded system constructed in the paper has a simple form of a covariantconstancy equation and describes arbitrary mixed-symmetry bosonic and fermionic

50

massless fields in d-dimensional Minkowski space The gauge fieldsparameters aredifferential forms with values in certain finite-dimensional irreducible representationsof the Lorentz algebra that are uniquely determined by the generalized spin

The key moment is that all gauge symmetries are manifest within the unfoldedformulation which is of most importance in controlling the number of physicaldegrees of freedom when trying to introduce interactions Unfolded systems areformulated in terms of differential forms which is a natural way to respect diffeo-morphisms and hence to describe systems that include gravity

Though the necessary conditions for the system to have a lagrangian descriptionare satisfied ie the fields are in one-to-one correspondence with the equations andthe k-th level gauge symmetries are in one-to-one correspondence with the k-thBianchi identities the very lagrangian remains to be constructed

Another interesting moment is that the unfolded equations for bosons are thesame as for fermions namely the operators involved ie exterior differential dand σminus remains unmodified when tensors are replaced with spin-tensors Thoughthis nice property partly breaks down in (anti)-de Sitter space within the unfoldedapproach bosons and fermions have much in common the fact being very useful forsupersymmetric theories

The proposed unfolded system includes all non-gauge dual descriptions whichare based on the generalized Weyl tensor and its descendants but not all of gaugedual descriptions It would be interesting to construct an unfolded system thatcontains all dual formulations

The interactions of the totally symmetric massless higher-spin fields are knownto require a nonzero cosmological constant ie are formulated in (anti)-de Sitterspace [2] Mixed-symmetry fields exhibit some interesting features in the presence ofcosmological constant For example not all of the Minkowski gauge symmetries canbe deformed to (anti)-de Sitter [72] As a result massless mixed-symmetry fields havemore degrees of freedom in (anti)-de Sitter compared to its Minkowski counterparts[73] and in the Minkowski limit a massless mixed-symmetry field splits in a certaincollection of massless fields generally Contrariwise a single mixed-symmetry fieldcan not be smoothly deformed to (anti)-de Sitter Another interesting effect is theexistence of the so-called partially-massless fields [74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 8283 84] the fields that have a number of degrees of freedom intermediate betweenthat of massless and massive and split in a set of massless fields in the Minkowskilimit Therefore the extension of the proposed approach to (anti)-de Sitter spaceseems to be non-trivial but nevertheless worth being investigated

In a series of papers [85 61 86 60] it was suggested so-called frame-like approachto the general mixed-symmetry fields in (anti)-de Sitter To generalize the proposedin the present paper unfolded system to (anti)-de Sitter case and to compare to thatof [60] is the next step to perform

We consider the proposed unfolded system as the first stage in constructing thefull interacting theory of mixed-symmetry fields

51

Acknowledgements

The author appreciates sincerely MA Vasiliev for reading the manuscript and mak-ing many detailed and valuable suggestions and illuminating comments the verywork was initiated as the result of discussions with MA Vasiliev The author isalso grateful to RR Metsaev and KB Alkalaev for useful discussions and to OVShaynkman for discussion of the fermionic case The work was supported in partby grants RFBR No 05-02-17654 LSS No 440120062 and INTAS No 05-7928by the Landau Scholarship and by the Scholarship of Dynasty foundation

Appendix A Multi-index convention

The multi-index notations is used a group of indices in which certain tensor issymmetric or is to be symmetrized is denoted either by one letter with the numberof indices indicated in round brackets or by placing a group of indices in roundbrackets eg

T a(s) equiv T a1a2as T a1aiaj as = T a1ajaias (A1)

V aT a(s) equiv V (a1T a2as+1) equiv1

s+ 1(V a1T a2a3as+1 + V a2T a1a3as+1 + + V as+1T a1a2as)

(A2)

V (bT a(s)) equiv V (bT a1as) equiv1

s + 1

(V bT a1a2as + V a1T ba2a3as + + V asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A3)Analogously the group of indices in which certain tensor is anti-symmetric or is tobe anti-symmetrized is denoted by placing indices in square brackets eg

T a[s] equiv T a1a2as T a1aiai+1as = minusT a1ai+1aias (A4)

V [bT a[s]] equiv V [bT a1as] equiv1

s+ 1

(V bT a1a2as minus V a1T ba2a3as + + (minus)sV asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A5)The operators of (anti)-symmetrization are weighted to be projectors (the factor 1

s+1

above)

Appendix B Young diagrams

Comprehensive information on Young diagrams can be found for example in thetextbook [71]

Definition B1 Given an integer partition ie a nonincreasing sequence si i isin[1 n] si ge si+1 of positive integers (or nonnegative when it is convenient to workwith a sequence of a fixed length) associated Young diagram Ys1 s2 sn is agraphical representation consisting of n left-justified rows made of boxes with the

52

i-th row containing si boxes

s10s11

s1s2s3s4

s5s6s7

s8s9

Finite-dimensional irreducible representation(irrep) of sl(d) ie various irre-ducible sl(d)-tensors are in one-to-one correspondence with Young diagrams of theform Ys1 s2 s[ d

2] The associated irreducible tensors

T

s1︷︸︸︷aa

s2︷︸︸︷

bb (B1)

or in condensed notation T a(s1)b(s2) have at most [d2] groups of indices being sym-

metric in each group separately and satisfy the condition that the symmetrizationof any group of indices with one index of any of the subsequent groups is identicallyzero ie

T a(s1)(b(sk)b)c(sjminus1) equiv 0 k lt j (B2)

If s[ d2] 6= 0 and d is even the (anti)-selfduality condition has to be imposed for

appropriate signature (anti)-selfduality is conventionally denoted by the sign factors+(minus) before s[ d

2] In this paper we do not consider (anti)-self dual representations

A scalar representation Y0 0 0 is denoted by bull a vector irrep Y1 0 0by rank-two symmetric tensor irrep by rank-two antisymmetric tensor irrep

by and so onFinite-dimensional irreducible representations of so(d) are of the two types ten-

sor and spin-tensor and are also characterized by Young diagrams which in thecase of spin-tensor irreps refer to the symmetry of the tensor part Young diagramsthat correspond to spin-tensor irreps are labeled by 1

2-subscript Spinor indices

α β γ = 12[d2] are placed first and are separated from tensor indices by rdquordquo For

example a spinor ψα irrep is denoted by bull 12 a vector-spinor irrep Aαaby 1

2and

so on To make tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry conditionthe tracelessness condition with respect to each pair of indices is to be imposed

ηccTa(s1)cb(siminus1)cd(sjminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n j = 1n (B3)

To make spin-tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry condition Γ-tracelessness condition with respect to each tensor index and a spinor index is to beimposed

Γαc βT

βa(s1)cb(siminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n (B4)

where Γαc β satisfy Γα

a βΓβb γ

+ Γαb βΓ

βaγ = 2ηab Additional conditions on spinors viz

Majorana Weyl and Majorana-Weyl are irrelevant to the problems concerned Also

53

in both cases it is required for the sum of the heights of the first two columns ofYoung diagrams to be not greater than d Note that the Γ-tracelessness conditionis stronger than the tracelessness one and applying the Γ-tracelessness twice to twosymmetric indices gives the tracelessness

0 = 2ΓαaβΓ

βb γT γ(ab) = ηabT

αab (B5)

To handle with arbitrary large Young diagrams the so-called block representationis used ie the rows of equal lengths are combined to blocks

Y(s1 p1) (sn pn) equiv Y

p1︷ ︸︸ ︷s1 s1

p2︷ ︸︸ ︷s2 s2

pn︷ ︸︸ ︷sn sn (B6)

References

[1] C Fronsdal ldquoMassless fields with integer spinrdquo Phys Rev D18 (1978) 3624

[2] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoCubic interaction in extended theories ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Nucl Phys B291 (1987) 141

[3] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoOn the gravitational interaction ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Phys Lett B189 (1987) 89ndash95

[4] M A Vasiliev ldquoConsistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in(3+1)-dimensionsrdquo Phys Lett B243 (1990) 378ndash382

[5] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoOn the geometry of higher-spin gauge fieldsrdquoClass Quant Grav 20 (2003) S473ndashS486 hep-th0212185

[6] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoFree geometric equations for higher spinsrdquoPhys Lett B543 (2002) 303ndash310 hep-th0207002

[7] M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear equations for symmetric massless higher spin fieldsin (a)ds(d)rdquo Phys Lett B567 (2003) 139ndash151 hep-th0304049

[8] X Bekaert I L Buchbinder A Pashnev and M Tsulaia ldquoOn higher spintheory Strings brst dimensional reductionsrdquo Class Quant Grav 21 (2004)S1457ndash1464 hep-th0312252

[9] D Sorokin ldquoIntroduction to the classical theory of higher spinsrdquo AIP ConfProc 767 (2005) 172ndash202 hep-th0405069

[10] X Bekaert S Cnockaert C Iazeolla and M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear higherspin theories in various dimensionsrdquo hep-th0503128

[11] A Sagnotti E Sezgin and P Sundell ldquoOn higher spins with a strong sp(2r)conditionrdquo hep-th0501156

[12] P K Townsend ldquoCovariant quantization of antisymmetric tensor gaugefieldsrdquo Phys Lett B88 (1979) 97

54

spin viz mixed-symmetry fields in the Minkowski space is considered as the firststep towards the full nonlinear theory of arbitrary spin fields

The main statement of the paper is that a free massless field with spin degrees offreedom characterized by an arbitrary bosonic or fermionic unitary irreducible repre-sentation of the Wignerrsquos little algebra can be uniquely described within the unfoldedapproach in which all gauge symmetries are manifest The unfolded system has theform of a covariant constancy equation The gauge fields and gauge parameters aredifferential forms on the Minkowski space with values in certain irreducible repre-sentations of the Lorentz algebra ie irreducible tensors or spin-tensors The fullunfolded system is described in terms of a single nilpotent operator σminus whose coho-mology groups correspond to independent differential gauge parameters dynamicalfields gauge-invariant equations and Bianchi identities

Another advantage of the unfolded approach is in that the equations for bosonsand fermions have literally the same form the only difference being in change oftensor representations in which the fields takes values by the corresponding spin-tensors The form and the order of dynamical equations second for bosons andfirst for fermions turns out to be encoded in σminus cohomology In fact the unfoldedsystem is constructed for the bosonic case and then proved to have the sameform for fermions The similarity between bosons and fermions within the unfoldedapproach can have deep applications in theories with supersymmetries

Despite the deep relations of the unfolded approach to the nonlinear theory ofhigher-spin fields unfolding by itself provides a very powerfull method for analysisof dynamical systems For instance once some linear dynamical system is unfoldedit is given a direct interpretation in terms of Lie algebrasmodules and all gaugesymmetries become manifest

The paper is organized as follows the main result ie the unfolded form ofequations describing a massless field with the spin that corresponds to an arbitraryirreducible representation of the Wignerrsquos little algebra is stated in Section 1 All thenecessary information about mixed-symmetry fields in the Minkowski space-time iscollected in Section 2 The basic facts concerning the unfolded approach viz thevery definition the relation to Lie algebrasmodules to the Chevalley-Eilenbergcohomology are recalled in Section 3 illustrated on the examples of a scalar fieldspin-one field and totally symmetric spin-s and spin-(s+ 1

2) fields in Section 33 The

proof of the general statement of Section 1 is in Section 4 The physical degrees offreedom are analyzed in Section 43 The discussion of the results and conclusionsare in Section 5 Multi-index notation and basic facts on Young diagrams andirreducible representations are collected in Appendices

Conventions

As the most general type of irreducible representations of orthogonal algebras vizthe Wignerrsquos little algebra the Lorentz algebra is considered the essential use ismade of Young diagramsrsquo language A certain Young diagram is denoted by Ywith subscripts or directly enumerating the lengths of the rows as Ys1 s2 or

2

when rows of equal lengths are combined to blocks as Y(s1 p1) (s2 p2) pibeing the number of rows of length si Loosely speaking we do not make any differ-ence between irreducible finite-dimensional representations of orthogonal algebrasYoung diagrams2 and the corresponding irreducible (spin)-tensors3 eg rank-twosymmetric traceless tensor-valued field φab ie φab = φba and ηabφ

ab = 0 can beequivalently denoted either as φ or φY with Y = Y2 equiv Y(2 1) The scalarrepresentation Y0 is denoted by bull Unless otherwise stated all Young diagramsare of orthogonal algebras viz so(dminus 1 1) or so(dminus 2) For more detail on Youngdiagrams see in Appendix B Greek indices micro ν=0(d-1) are the world indicesof the Minkowski space-time Md d equiv dxmicro part

partxmicro is the exterior differential on MdThe degree of differentials forms on Md is indicated by the bold subscript eg adegree-q differential form ω onMd with values in so(dminus1 1)-irrep characterized bythe Young diagram Y is denoted as ωY

q (loosely speaking Y-valued degree-q formωYq ) The wedge symbol and is systematically omitted Lowercase Latin letters ab=0(d-1) are vector indices of so(dminus 1 1) fiber indices of the sections of tensor

bundles over the Minkowski space-time Greek indices α β γ = 12[d2] are fiber

spinor indices of so(d minus 1 1) The multi-index condensed notation is used in thepaper the (anti)-symmetrization is denoted by placing the corresponding indices in(square) round brackets for details on the multi-index notation see Appendix A

1 Summary of Results

The main statement of the paper is that given a unitary irreducible bosonic(fermionic)representation of the massless Wignerrsquos little algebra so(dminus2) which is characterizedby Young diagram Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) (Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) 1

2)

there exists a uniquely determined unfolded system that describes a massless spin-Y field with all gauge symmetries being manifest The system has the form of acovariant constancy equation

Dωp = 0 ωp isin Wp

δωp = Dξpminus1 ξpminus1 isin Wpminus1

δξpminus1 = Dξpminus2 ξpminus2 isin Wpminus2

δξ1 = Dξ0 ξ0 isin W0 (11)

2In addition to the Young symmetry conditions extra restrictions (with the aid of invarianttensors Levi-Civita for sl(d) metric and Levi-Civita for so(d)) have to be imposed on the tensors tomake them irreducible In what follows it is important that irreducible so(d)-tensors are tracelessNo special consideration is given to (anti)-self dual fields see Appendix B

3In the case of fermionic representations of orthogonal algebras ie spin-tensors the tensorpart of a spin-tensor (all but one spinor indices can be converted pairwise to tensor indices bymeans of Γ-matrices hence we consider spin-tensors with one spinor index only) is characterizedby Young diagram which is labeled by the subscript 1

2 eg an irreducible rank-two symmetrictensor-spinor ψαab satisfies Γα

aβψβab = 0 and belongs toY2 1

2

The connection with the standard

Gelfan-Zeitlin labels is obvious Additional conditions viz Majorana Weyl and Majorana-Weylare irrelevant to the problems concerned

3

where W =oplusinfin

q=0Wq is certain graded space D is a nilpotent operator of degree

(+1) D Wq rarr Wq+1 and D2 = 0 Gauge fields take values in Wp where

p =sumi=N

i=1 pi is the height of Young diagram Y the first level gauge parameters inWpminus1 the second level gauge parameters in Wpminus2 and so on The gauge invarianceis manifest by virtue of D2 = 0 The reducibility of gauge transformations is similarto those of totally anti-symmetric fields

SpaceWp which contains the gauge fields of the unfolded system is a graded by

nonnegative integer g = 0 1 set of differential formsWp = ωY0q0 ωY1

q1 ω

Ygqg

q0 = p Diagrams Yg that characterize so(d minus 1 1)-irreducible representations inwhich the fields and gauge parameters take values are uniquely determined by theinitial diagram Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN)( 1

2) of so(dminus 2)

The dynamical field is incorporated in a p-form ωY0p isin Wg=0

p that takes valuesin the irreducible representation(irrep) of the Lorentz algebra so(d minus 1 1) that ischaracterized by Young diagram Y0 of the form

sN minus 1pN

s2 minus 1p2

s1 minus 1

p1

(12)

ie it is obtained by cutting off the first column of Y All other gauge fields inthe system are auxiliary and can be expressed in terms of derivatives of ωY0

p It is

convenient to enumerate the Lorentz-irreps in which gauge fields ωYgqg take values by

a pair n k of integers Roughly speaking the first integer is related to the numberof the block of Y n = N 0 the second one is related to the relative length ofthe n-th and (n+ 1)-th blocks The so(dminus 1 1)-irreps Yg=0Yg=(sNminus1) are givenby Ynk with n = N k = 0(sN minus 1) of the form

k

sN minus 1pN

s2 minus 1p2

s1 minus 1

p1

(13)

The diagrams Yg with g = sN (sNminus1 minus 1) are given by Ynk with n = N minus 1

4

k = 0(sNminus1 minus sN minus 1) of the form

sNminus1

sN minus 1pN

k

s2 minus 1p2

s1 minus 1

p1

(14)

and analogously for the rest of Yg with g lt s1 The diagrams Yg with g = s1 s1 +1 are given by Ynk with n = 0 k = 0 1 of the form

sN minus 1

sN minus 1pN

s2minuss3minus1

s2 minus 1p2

s1minuss2minus1

s1 minus 1

p1

k + 1

(15)

Gauge fields ωYgqg for g sim n = N k are (p1 + + pN)-forms gauge fields ω

Ygqg for

g sim n = Nminus1 k are (p1+ +pNminus1)-forms gauge fields ωYgqg for g sim n = 0 k

are zero-forms Hence form degree function qg is completely defined The grade g isequal to the element number (starting from zero) in the set of pairs n k orderedby k in increasing order and then by n in decreasing order

Space Wpminus1 which contains the first level gauge parameters of the system is aset of forms with values in the same so(dminus 1 1)-irreps as gauge fields but the form

degree is less by one ie Wpminus1 = ξY0q0minus1 ξ

Y1q1minus1 ξ

Yg

qgminus1 The sector Wgpminus1 for

g ge s1 is trivial du to qg = 0 Analogously spaces Wq for q lt p minus 1 and q gt pcan be defined To sum up the element of space Wpplusmni at grade g sim n k is adegree-(qg plusmn i) form with values in Yg equiv Ynk irrep of the Lorentz algebra

The Minkowski background space is described in terms of vielbein(tetrad) hamicrodxmicro

and Lorentz spin-connection abmicro dxmicro which determines Lorentz-covariant derivative

DL = d+When reduced to Wg

q the full system has the form

DLωYg

qg= σminus

(

ωYg+1qg+1

)

ωYg

qgisin Wg

p ωYg+1qg+1

isin Wg+1p

δωYg

qg= DLξ

Yg

qgminus1 + σminus

(

ξYg+1

qg+1minus1

)

ξYg

qgminus1 isin Wgpminus1 ξ

Yg+1

qg+1minus1 isin Wg+1pminus1

δξYg

qgminus1 = (16)

where operator D is a sum D = DL minus σminus of Lorentz-covariant derivative DL andcertain nilpotent operator σminus

andq otimesYg+1 rarrandq+∆g+1otimesYg ∆g = qg minus qg+1 ge 0

5

(σminus)2 = 0 built of background vielbein hamicrodx

micro which is unambiguously fixed bythe symmetry of Yg and Yg+1 σminus contracts (∆g + 1) vielbeins ha with the tensorrepresenting Yg+1 to obtain the tensor with the symmetry of Yg appropriate Youngsymmetrizers are implied

Since σminus affects tensor indices only it is correctly defined on spin-tensors too anddoes not violate the Γ-tracelessness condition The unfolded equations for fermionshave the same form as for bosons the irreducible tensors are to be replaced withcorresponding spin-tensors

The case of the last block of the length one ie single column is not specialbut requires some comments Since (sN minus 1) = 0 it is not possible to add a cellto the bottom-left of the N -th block of Y0 therefore Yn=Nk=0 equiv Y0 is theonly diagram with n = N and diagram Yn=Nminus1k=0 equiv Yg=1 has the symmetry ofY(s1 minus 1 p1) (sNminus1 minus 1 pNminus1) (1 pN + 1)

Subspace Wnkq with definite n forms an irreducible module of iso(d minus 1 1)

whereas the subspace with definite both n and k forms a finite-dimensional irre-ducible module of so(d minus 1 1) ie an irreducible Lorentz tensor characterized byYg as was stated above The intervals of constancy of qg correspond to gnk withdefinite n ie the set of forms on which a certain irreducible iso(dminus 1 1)-moduleis realized all have the same degree

Let us also note that Wkgep are infinite-dimensional whereas Wkltp are finite-dimensional The higher degree spaces Wkgep correspond to the equations of motion(Wk=p+1) and Bianchi identities (Wkgtp+1) which manifest the gauge symmetriesMost of the equations express higher grade g gt 0 fields via the derivatives of phys-ical field ωY0

q0and only certain elements of Wg=2

k=p+1 impose on ωY0q0

second orderdynamical equations The significance of the fields with g gt 0 is to make all gaugesymmetries be manifest

2 Mixed-Symmetry Fields in Minkowski Space

The types of the Minkowski space particles being by definition in one-to-one corre-spondence with unitary irreducible representations(uirrep) of the Poincare algebraiso(dminus 1 1) in the case of four space-time dimensions were classified by Wigner in[37]

Leaving out the details of the Wignerrsquos construction for recent reviews and forgeneralization to an arbitrary space-time dimension d see [38] important is thatgiven m2 gt 0 and a uirrep Y of the Wignerrsquos little algebra being so(d minus 1) form2 gt 0 and so(d minus 2) for m2 = 0 there exists a standard procedure to constructa uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) which is called a massive(massless) particle of spin-YSo-called continuous or infinite spin particles [37] [39] are not considered in thispaper Therefore physical degrees of freedom for massive and massless particles areclassified by irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) and so(dminus 2) respectively

More elaborated are the two cases of totally-symmetric spin-s particles Y =Ys equiv Y(s 1) [40 1 10] viz scalar vector graviton and of totally anti-symmetric spin-p particles Y = Y(1 p) [12 13 14] The others are referred to col-

6

lectively as mixed-symmetry the simplest one beingY = Y2 1 equiv Y(2 1) (1 1)Yet different problem is to realize a uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) on the solutions of a

wave equation for a field φYM(x) which takes values in a certain representation YM

of the Lorentz algebra so(dminus1 1) ie φYM(x) is a Lorentz tensor or a set of tensors

As field theories free particles can be described in either non-gauge or gauge wayin the former case a uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) is realized on the solutions of the waveequation directly whereas for the latter case a uirrep of iso(dminus1 1) is realized on thequotient of the solutions by certain specific solutions called pure gauge The waveequation (+m2)φYM

(x) = 0 which fixes the quadratic Casimir m2 of iso(dminus1 1)is generally supplemented with a set of algebraicdifferential constraints to singleout an irreducible in the sense of the little algebra component Field φYM

(x) takesvalues in a certain finite-dimensional representation of so(d minus 1 1) which is notirreducible in most cases nevertheless it can be made irreducible when dealing withfree equations of motion only Yet more different problem is to realize an irrep ofiso(d minus 1 1) on the solutions of the variational problem for some action in mostcases the procedure requires a set of auxiliary fields which carry no physical degreesof freedom

The choice of so(dminus 1 1)-representation YM (even if irreducible) in which fieldφYM

(x) takes values is not unique eg a free massless spin-one particle can bedescribed either by a gauge potential Amicro(x) subjected to

Amicro minus partmicropartνAν = 0 δAmicro = partmicroξ (21)

or by a field strength Fmicroν subjected to

partmicroFmicroν = 0 part[microFλρ] = 0 (22)

In the case of a massless spin-two particle (Y = so(dminus2)) in addition to the con-ventional description in terms of the metric gmicroν

Rmicroν minus1

2gmicroνR = 0 (23)

the Weyl tensor Cmicroνλρ known to have the symmetry of 4 can describe a freespin-two in a non gauge way

part[microCmicromicro]νν = 0 partλCmicroλνν = 0 (24)

Another example is a 4d massless scalar particle which can be described eitherby a scalar field φ(x) subjected to φ = 0 or more exotically by an antisymmetricgauge field ωmicroν (so-called notoph [41]) subjected to

ωmicroν minus partmicropartρωρν + partνpart

ρωρmicro = 0 δωmicroν = partmicroξν minus partνξmicro (25)

This equation describes a massless particle with spin- so(dminus2) equiv Y1 1so(dminus2) which

for d = 4 by virtue of the so(d minus 2) Levi-Civita tensor εij is equivalent to a scalar

4In antisymmetric basis Cmicroνλρ satisfies Cmicroνλρ = minusCνmicroλρ Cmicroνλρ = minusCmicroνρλ and C[microνλ]ρ = 0

7

Y1 1so(dminus2) sim Y0 0

so(dminus2) On the other hand a scalar particle can be describedby a rank-d antisymmetric field ωmicro1microd

satisfying ωmicro1microd= 0 where the use of

so(d minus 1 1)-duality is made of ωmicro1microd= εmicro1microd

φ These two types of duality arereferred to as trivial

The general statement is that free particles can be described by an infinite num-ber of ways called dual descriptions [42 43 44 45 46] but dual theories exhibitcertain difficulties while introducing interactions [47 48 49 50] eg despite the factthat free massless spin-one and spin-two particles can be described by the Maxwellfield strength and by the Weyl tensor respectively introducing interactions requiresthe corresponding gauge potentials Amicro and gmicroν to be brought in

There exists a distinguished choice of so(dminus1 1)-irrep YM in which field φYM(x)

takes values that can be referred to as fundamental or minimal For the minimaldescription of a spin-Y particle the spin degrees of freedom and the so(dminus1 1)-irrepYM are characterized by the same Young diagram ie YM = Y eg a spin-oneparticle by Amicro a spin-two by gmicroν All other descriptions are referred to as dual Itis the minimal descriptions that will be discussed further by this reason the termspin-Y particle can be substituted for more accepted spin-Y field

A massive totally symmetric spin-s field can be described [51] by a totally sym-metric tensor field φ(micro1micros) subjected to

(+m2)φmicro1micros= 0

partνφνmicro2micros= 0

φννmicro3micros

= 0

(26)

where the last equation (tracelessness condition) makes the tensor irreducible in theso(d minus 1 1) sense the first one puts the system on-mass-shell and the second oneprojects out the components orthogonal to the momentum restricting φmicro1micros

tocontain only a spin-s irrep of so(dminus 1)

Analogously a massive totally anti-symmetric spin-p field ie Y = Y(1 p)can be described by a totally anti-symmetric tensor field ω[micro1microp] subjected to

(+m2)ωmicro1microp= 0

partνωνmicro2microp= 0

(27)

where the tracelessness condition becomes trivial for anti-symmetric tensorsThese two results are easily generalized to an arbitrary spin-Ys1 snmassive

field which can be minimally described by a symmetric in each group of indicestensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) subjected to

(+m2)φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0

partmicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n]

φmicro1(s1)(microk(sk)microk)microi(siminus1)micron(sn) = 0 k isin [1 nminus 1] k lt i

ηmicroimicrojφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i j isin [1 n]

(28)

where the last two conditions are just the Young symmetry and the tracelessnessconditions which make the field carry an irrep-Ys1 sn of so(dminus 1 1) and can

8

be thought of as the part of the definition of field φYM(x) The first equation puts

the system on-mass-shell the second one projects out all so(dminus1)-irreps which thetensor φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)microp(sp) decomposes into except for the one with the symmetry ofYs1 sn so(dminus 1)-diagram

Let D (m2Ys1 sn) be an iso(d minus 1 1) module extracted by (28) beingirreducible for m2 6= 0 or for Y0 (scalar field) Since minimally described masslessfields are gauge theories a uirrep H (0Ys1 sn) of iso(d minus 1 1) correspondingto a massless spin-Ys1 sn field should be defined as appropriate quotient bythe pure gauge solutions of the form

0 minusrarr gauge solutions minusrarr all solutions minusrarr H (0Ys1 sn) minusrarr 0 (29)

where the sequence is non-split as there is no so(dminus 1 1)-covariant way to extractso(d minus 2)-irrep Ys1 sn from the Lorentz tensor with the same symmetry ofYs1 sn by virtue of a single so(dminus 1 1)-vector the momentum pmicro sim partmicro

A massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described as the quotient of(26) with m2 = 0 by pure gauge solutions of the form δφmicro1micros

= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) where

ξmicro1microsminus1 is a totally symmetric gauge parameter subjected to the equations of thesame form (26) ie on-mass-shell tracelessness and transversality thus belongingto D (0Ysminus 1) The definition of H (0Ys) is given by

0 minusrarr D (0Y(sminus 1 1)) minusrarr D (0Y(s 1)) minusrarr H (0Y(s 1)) minusrarr 0 (210)

There is a bit difference for a totally anti-symmetric spin-p massless field Puregauge solutions are defined analogously as δωmicro1microp

= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] where ξ[micro1micropminus1] is

a rank-(pminus1) antisymmetric gauge parameter subjected to the equation of the sameform (27) and thus belonging to D (0Y(1 pminus 1)) In contrast to a totally sym-metric spin-smassless field the gauge transformations are reducible in the sense thatδωmicro1microp

equiv 0 provided that one transforms gauge parameter δξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1]

with a second level rank-(p minus 2) antisymmetric gauge parameter ξ[micro1micropminus2] and soon Some components (parallel to the momentum) of the first level gauge parameterξmicro1micropminus1 do not contribute to the gauge law for ωmicro1microp

these are represented by thesecond level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 modulo those components of ξmicro1micropminus2 thatdo not contribute to ξmicro1micropminus1 and so on till δξmicro = partmicroξ Gauge parameters ξmicro1micropminus1ξmicro1micropminusk

k isin [1 p] and ξ are referred to as the first level the k-th level and thedeepest level of reducibility respectively The corresponding iso(d minus 1 1)-uirrep isgiven by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0Y(0 0)) minusrarr D (0Y(1 1)) minusrarr

minusrarr D (0Y(1 p)) minusrarr H (0Y(1 p)) minusrarr 0 (211)

For example Maxwell gauge potential Amicro possesses gauge parameters of the firstlevel only as p = 1 in this case

Though a considerable success in describing on-mass-shell massless fields wasachieved for instance within the light-cone approach [52] there are many reasons tohave an off-shell gauge symmetry ie to construct equations that are invariant with

9

respect to gauge transformations with gauge parameters not subjected to ξ = 0To make the symmetry off-shell generally requires to relax the irreducibility of theso(dminus 1 1)-representation in which field φY(x) takes values

For instance a massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described[53] by atraceless rank-s symmetric field φmicro1micros

with an off-shell gauge symmetry

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

(d+2sminus4)η(micro1micro2part

νpartρφνρmicro3micros) = 0 φννmicro3micros

= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1

= 0 partνξνmicro2microsminus1) = 0 (212)

where in order for φmicro1microsto be traceless the gauge parameter has to be not only

traceless but transverse also this still being true for general mixed-symmetry fieldsApparently to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters the trace-lessness constraint for field φmicro1micros

has to be relaxed The same spin-s massless fieldcan be described[1] by field φmicro1micros

subjected to5

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

2part(micro1partmicro2φ

ννmicro3micros) = 0 φνρ

νρmicro5micros= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1

ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1= 0

(213)

where in order to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters a trace-lessness is relaxed to a double-tracelessness ie field φmicro1micros

takes values in thedirect sum of two so(d minus 1 1)-irreps being symmetric traceless tensors of ranks sand (s minus 2) The general statement is that for equations of motion to have an off-shell gauge symmetry the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep in which field φY(x) takes values has tobe reducible with additional direct summands representing certain nonzero tracesThese additional fields are called auxiliary and carry no physical degrees of freedomImposing certain gauge equations (28) can be restored

A massless totally antisymmetric spin-p field can be described by an antisym-metric rank-p tensor field ω[micro1microp] subjected to

ωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1part

νωνmicro2microp] = 0 δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] (214)

where the symmetry at the all levels of reducibility is manifest and off-shell ieδξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1] for the second level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 not subjectedto any differential constraints and analogously for the gauge symmetries at deeperlevels

Much similar to totally anti-symmetric fields mixed-symmetry massless fieldspossess reducible gauge transformations ie for a field φ with equations of motioninvariant under gauge transformations δξ1φ =

sum

i1partξi11 there exist the second level

gauge transformations δξ2ξi11 =

sum

i2partξi22 such that δξ2φ equiv 0 there exist the third

level gauge transformations δξ3ξi22 =

sum

i3partξi33 such that δξ3ξ1 equiv 0 and so on The

difference from totally anti-symmetric fields is in that there are generally more thanone gauge parameters at each level of reducibility (enumerated by index ik at thek-th level)

5Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [1] have the form Gmicro1microsminus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 where Gmicro1microsis equal to (213) the two forms being equiva-

lent

10

For instance the simplest mixed-symmetry massless field has the spin- andcan be minimally described[16 17] by a field φ[micromicro]ν which is anti-symmetric in thefirst two indices and satisfies Young symmetry condition6 φ[micromicroν] = 0 The equationsof motion

φmicromicroλ + 2part[micropartλφmicro]λν minus partνpart

λφmicromicroλ minus 2partνpart[microφλ

micro]λ = 0 (215)

are invariant underδφmicromicroν = part[microξ

Smicro]ν + part[microξ

Amicro]ν minus partνξ

Amicromicro (216)

with symmetric and anti-symmetric gauge parameters ξS(microν) and ξA[microν] Let us stress

that to maintain an off-shell gauge symmetry field φ[micromicro]ν has to take values in a

reducible so(d minus 1 1) representation oplus so does symmetric gauge parameterξS(micromicro) oplus bull which is in accordance with φ ν

microν 6= 0 and ξSνν 6= 0 Analogously tototally anti-symmetric fields there exist second level gauge transformations with avector parameter ξmicro

δφmicromicroν = 0

δξAmicroν = 23(partmicroξν minus partνξmicro)

δξSmicroν = partmicroξν + partνξmicro

(217)

In this case H

(

0)

is given by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

oplusD (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0 (218)

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) field the depthof reducibility of gauge transformations is equal to p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi where p is the height

of the first column of the Young diagram and at the r-th level of reducibility gaugeparameters have the symmetry of

sN minus 1

pNkN

s2 minus 1

p2k2

s1 minus 1

p1

k1

i=Nsum

i=1

ki =

i=Nsum

i=1

pi minus r (219)

This pattern of reducibility of gauge transformations will be of great importancewhile constructing the unfolded formulation in Section 4 As is easily seen at the

6In more detail the field φmicroνλ satisfies φmicroνλ = minusφνmicroλ φmicroνλ+φνλmicro+φλmicroν = 0 Equivalentlya symmetric basis can be used ie φSmicroνλ = φSνmicroλ φ

Smicroνλ + φSνλmicro + φSλmicroν = 0 The two bases are

related by φS(microν)λ = 1radic3(φAmicroλν + φAνλmicro) φ

A[microν]λ = 1radic

3(φSmicroλν minus φ

Sνλmicro)

11

first level of reducibility the gauge parameters are various tensors whose LorentzYoung diagrams are obtained by cutting off one cell from the original so(d minus 2)-diagram in all possible ways ie the number of gauge parameters at the first levelis equal to the number of blocks N eg two for spin- There is only one gaugeparameter at the deepest level of reducibility whose Young diagram is obtained bycutting off the first column from Y eg for spin-

This pattern corresponds of course to on-shell equations ie the gauge param-eters taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of Young symmetry (219) are subjectedto (28)-like equations To obtain an off-shell gauge symmetry the field content hasto be extended to take values in certain reducible so(d minus 1 1)-representations ad-ditional components turn out can be identified with certain traces of a single fieldwith the symmetry of Y as an sl(d)-tensor In general gauge parameters are alsoreducible tensors with the symmetry of (219) In the case of a spin- massless fieldthe trace φ ν

microν in the sector of fields and the trace ξSνν in the sector of gauge param-eters are the additional components In the general case of a spin-Y = Ys1 snmassless field field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) should satisfy [20]

ηmicroimicroiηmicroimicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n] (220)

which is a generalization of the Fronsdalrsquos double-trace condition (213) As it will beshown this condition naturally arises in the unfolded approach Note that double-tracelessness is imposed on each group of symmetric indices and it is not requiredfor cross-traces to vanish

Let a generalized Weyl tensor for a minimally described spin-Y massless field bea gauge-invariant combination of the least order in derivatives of field φY(x) that isallowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell On the other hand it is the generalized Weyltensor that the minimal non-gauge description of a massless spin-Y field is basedon For a spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN)so(dminus2) massless field the generalizedWeyl tensor has the symmetry of Y(s1 p1 + 1) (s2 p2) (sN pN)so(dminus11) and isof the s1-th order in derivatives In the case of spin-one (Y = so(dminus2)) Maxwell field

strength Fmicroν with the symmetry of can be also called a generalized Weyl tensorFermionic mixed-symmetry fields share most features of bosonic ones viz the

reducibility of gauge transformations the enlargement of the field content for theequations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge invariance The difference is thatthe equations for fermions have the first order in derivatives and the irreducibility ofspin-tensors is achieved by the Γ-tracelessness condition7 instead of the tracelessnessone

For example a massless totally symmetric spin-(s + 12) field can be described

7Γmicro are the Clifford algebra generators and satisfy ΓmicroΓν + ΓνΓmicro = 2ηmicroν part equiv Γmicropartmicro Γ-trace isa contraction of a spinor index and one tensor index with Γmicro eg Γνφ

microν equiv Γαν βφ

βmicroν

12

off-shell[54] by a totally symmetric spin-tensor field φα(micro1micros) subjected to8

partφmicro1microsminus spart(micro1

Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros)

ΓνΓρΓλφνρλmicro4micros= 0 Γνξνmicro2microsminus1 = 0

(221)

where in order to get an off-shell gauge invariance the irreducibility of φα(micro1micros) hasto be relaxed to the triple Γ-tracelessness

A massless totally anti-symmetric spin-Y(1 p) 12field can be described off-shell

by a totally anti-symmetric spin-tensor field ωα[micro1microp] subjected to

partωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1Γ

νωνmicro2microp] = 0

δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp]

(222)

Similar to the bosonic case (222) possesses reducible gauge transformations Thedifference is that one can impose the triple Γ-tracelessness on ωα[micro1microp] but thisrestricts the first level gauge parameter to be Γ-traceless Γνξνmicro2micropminus1 = 0 andhence the second order gauge parameter has to be on-mass-shell ie partξmicro1micropminus2 = 0Therefore for equations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge symmetry of allorders no Γ-trace conditions have to be imposed on fieldgauge parameters

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) 12field the

pattern of gauge symmetries is given by the spin-tensors with the tensor part de-scribed by (219) the definition of the Weyl tensor remains unchanged also

The descriptions based on tensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) which is analogous tothe metric gmicroν are referred to as metric-like At least in writing equiv partmicropartνη

microν theexplicit use of metric ηmicroν is made of which complicates the issue of introducinginteractions with gravitation

Let us note that in principle one can verify the gauge invariance of the fieldequations for massless mixed-symmetry fields despite the fact that the very form ofgauge transformation is cumbersome due to Young symmetrizers The advantageof the unfolded approach is in that gauge invariance at all levels of reducibility ismanifest

3 Unfolding Dynamics and σminus Cohomology

In this section we first recall the definition of unfolding and the relation of the sim-plest unfolded systems to Lie algebrasmodules and Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomologywith coefficients Second peculiar properties of unfolded systems that describe freefields and specifically the so-called σminus cohomology concept are recalled Third thevery procedure of constructing the unfolded form is illustrated on the examples ofmassless spin-zero spin-one arbitrary totally symmetric spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2)

fields the relation with the general statement of Section 1 is pointed out in each ofthe examples

8Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [54] have the form Gmicro1microsminus s

2Γ(micro1ΓνGνmicro2micros) minus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 Gmicro1micros= partφmicro1micros

minus spart(micro1Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0 which is equivalent to

(222)

13

31 General Features

Some dynamical system is said to be unfolded [31 32 33] if it has the form

dWA = FA(W ) (31)

whereWA is a set9 of differential forms of degree-qA on some d-dimensional manifoldMd d - exterior differential on Md and FA(W ) is an arbitrary degree-(qA + 1)function of WA assumed to be expandable in terms of exterior (wedge) productsonly10

FA(W ) =infinsum

n=1

sum

qB1++qBn=qA+1

fAB1Bn

W B1 and andW Bn (32)

where fAB1Bn

are constant coefficients satisfying fAB1BiBj Bn

= (minus)qBiqBj fA

B1BjBiBn

Moreover FA(W ) must satisfy the integrability condition (called generalized Jacobiidentity) obtained by applying d to (31)

F B δFA

δW Bequiv 0 (33)

Any solution of (33) defines a free differential algebra (FDA) [55 56 57 58] If Ja-cobi identities (33) are satisfied irrespective ofMd dimension11 the free differentialalgebra is referred to as universal [10 59] It is the universal algebras only that willbe considered further

Equations (31) are invariant under gauge transformations

δWAqA

= dǫAqAminus1 + ǫBqBminus1

δFA

δW B for qA gt 0 (34)

δWA0 = ǫB

prime

0

δFA

δW Bprime

1

Bprime qBprime = 1 for qA = 0 (35)

where ǫAqAminus1 is a degree-(qA minus 1) form taking values in the same space as WAqA

Inits turn δWA

qA= 0 can be treated as unfolded-like system for ǫAqAminus1 ie dǫ

AqAminus1 =

minusǫBqBminus1δFA

δWB there emerge second level gauge transformations

δǫAqAminus1 = dξAqAminus2 minus ξBqBminus2

δFA

δW B (36)

provided that FA(W ) is linear in matter fields and analogously for the gauge trans-formations at deeper levels Therefore the reducibility of gauge transformations ismanifest in the unfolded approach For a degree-qA gauge field WA

qAthere exist qA

levels of gauge transformations

9In this section indices A B C are of arbitrary nature In the cases of practical significance AB C vary over certain irreps of the Lorentz algebra

10The wedge symbol and will be systematically omitted further11As the forms with the rank greater than d are identically zero there exist certain identities

eg Wn andWn equiv 0 for n+m gt d which make the operator δδWA to be ill-behaved

14

The use of the exterior algebra respects diffeomorphisms which is very appropri-ate for introducing interactions with the gravitation The whole information aboutthe dynamics turns out to be contained in FA(W ) and one can even extend anunfolded system to other manifolds[59] simply by changing the exterior differentialthe new unfolded system has literally the same form

Note that introducing enough auxiliary fields it is possible to reformulate anydynamical system in the unfolded form although it may be difficult to unfold someparticular system or to find all unfolded forms

Collected below are some important cases of unfolded systems which have adirect bearing on Lie algebras [55 59]

Lie algebrasFlat connections Let ΩI equiv ΩImicrodx

micro be a subsector of degree-oneforms The only self-closed unfolded equations are of the form

dΩI = minusf IJKΩ

JΩK (37)

Generalized Jacobi identity (33) implies the Jacobi identity f IJKf

JLMΩKΩLΩM equiv

0 for some Lie algebra g with structure constants f IJK Therefore the closed

subsector of one-forms is in one-to-one correspondence with Lie algebras and(37) is the flatness condition for a connection ΩI of g This provides acoordinate-independent framework for describing background geometry Inthe cases of interest g is iso(d minus 1 1) so(d minus 1 2) so(d 1) and sp(2n) [59]Background geometry connection ΩI is assumed to be of order zero whereasall matter fields including dynamical gravitation are of the first order Allequations are assumed to be of the first order in matter fields and hencedescribe free fields only

In this paper g = iso(dminus 1 1) and ΩI = ab ha where ab equiv abmicro dxmicro

is a Lorentz spin-connection and ha equiv hamicrodxmicro is a background vielbein which

defines a non-holonomic basis of a tangent space at each point of the manifoldFlatness equation (37) for iso(dminus 1 1)-connection ΩI reads

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb = 0(38)

The first is the zero torsion equation that expresses the Lorentz spin-connectionvia the first derivative of hamicro The second can be recognized as the zero curva-ture equation For example in Cartesian coordinates the explicit solution isab

micro = 0 and hamicro = δamicro

The advantage of description of background geometry as the flatness conditionfor a connection of the space-time symmetry algebra is in that this way iscoordinate-independent In what follows we assume ab ha to satisfy (38)which is enough if there is no need for the explicit form of the solution in someparticular coordinate system For instance in (anti)-de Sitter space (38) ismodified by the terms proportional to the cosmological constant λ2

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb + λ2hahb = 0(39)

15

and admits no simple solutions with hamicro = δamicro ab = 0 Nevertheless without

giving the explicit solution to imply that ab ha satisfy (39) is sufficient forgeneral analysis eg for constructing Lagrangians [60]

Contractible FDA The simplest equations linear in matter fields of the form

dWAq = fA

BWBq+1 (310)

can be reduced by linear transformations to either

dWAq = WA

q+1 dWAq+1 = 0 (311)

ordWA

q = 0 (312)

where the second equation of (311) is the consequence of Jacobi identities(33) for the first one In the first case by virtue of gauge transformations(34) δWA

q = dξAqminus1 + χAq δW

Bq+1 = dχA

q the field WAq can be gauged away In

both cases by virtue of the Poincarersquos Lemma these equations are dynamicallyempty and correspond to the co-called contractible FDAs [55]

g-modulesCovariant constancy equations Let WAq be a closed subsector of

q-forms of matter gauge fields Linear in matter fields equations may involvethe background g-connection ΩI which is of zeroth order Such equationsreferred to as linearized over g background (described by any solution ΩI of(37)) have the form

dWAq = minusΩIfI

ABW

Bq (313)

Jacobi identity (33) where (37) is also taken into account

ΩJΩK(minusf I

JKfIAB + fJ

ACfK

CB

)W B

q = 0 (314)

implies fIAB to realize a representation of g Therefore the closed subsector

of forms of definite degree is in one-to-one correspondence with g-moduleswhereas

DΩWAq equiv dWA

q + ΩIfIABW

Bq = 0 (315)

is a covariant constancy equation and (DΩ)2 = 0 since the connection is

flat (37) In the cases of interest A runs over certain finite-dimensionalso(d minus 1 1)-irreps ie g-modules decompose with respect to its subalgebraso(dminus 1 1) sub g into a direct sum of certain irreducible tensors This is whywe single out the Lorentz-covariant derivative DL from the whole g-covariantderivative DΩ the remaining part acts vertically (algebraically) In the caseof ΩI being an iso(d minus 1 1) flat connection the Lorentz covariant derivativeDL = d+ satisfy DL

2 = 0 as the exterior differential d does

DLTab = dT ab +a

cTcb +b

cTac + (316)

In Cartesian coordinates DL equiv d and we do not make any distinction betweend and DL whereas in (anti)-de Sitter (DL)

2 6= 0 and the difference between d

16

and DL has to be taken into account Also zero torsion equation (381) canbe rewritten as DLh

a = 0 The remaining part of ΩI which acts algebraicallyand mixes different so(dminus 1 1)-modules into g-modules is associated with thegenerators of translations with gauge field ha

Gluing g-modulesChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology LetWpWq andWr takevalues in g-modules R1 R2 and R3 the representations are realized by oper-ators T1 T2 and T3 respectively Still linear in matter fields but nonlinear inbackground connection ΩI equations are of the form

DΩWp equiv dWp + T1(Ω)Wp = f12(Ω Ω)Wq

DΩWq equiv dWq + T2(Ω)Wq = f23(Ω Ω)Wr

DΩWr equiv

(317)

where the terms forming g-covariant derivative are isolated on the lhs Thetwo g-modules R1 R2 appear to be glued together by the term f12(Ω Ω) isinHom(Λpminusq+1(g) otimes R2R1) Jacobi identity (33) implies f12(Ω Ω) to be aChevalley-Eilenberg cocycle with coefficients in Rlowast

2 otimesR1 where Rlowast2 is a mod-

ule contragradient to R2 and f12(Ω Ω)f23(Ω Ω) = 0 Coboundaries canbe proved to be dynamically empty and can be removed by a field redefini-tion Consequently f12(Ω Ω) should be a nontrivial representative of theChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology group with coefficients in Rlowast

2otimesR1 It followsalso that nothing but zero forms can be joined to zero forms ie the onlypossible linearized unfolded equations on forms of zero degree are (315) withq = 0

For any dynamical system linearized over certain g-background (described byany solution ΩI of (37)) equations of motion (315) along with gauge transforma-tions of all orders of reducibility acquire a very simple form

δξ1 = DΩξ0

δξpminus1 = DΩξpminus2

δWp = DΩξpminus1

DΩWp = 0

(318)

where Wp takes values in certain g-module R DΩ is the associated g-covariantderivative and ξpminusk k isin [1 p] are the gauge parameters of k-th order of reducibilitytaking values in the same g-module R and being forms of degree (p minus k) Thegauge invariance at each order of reducibility and of equations of motion is dueto (DΩ)

2 = 0 In some sense the gauge fields Wp and the gauge parameters ξpminusk

seem to play the same role at the linearized level This uniformity is of essentialimportance when analyzing unfolded systems

In the presence of gluing terms eg when only two modules say R1 and R2 areglued by nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycle fpr(Ω Ω) full chain of equations

17

and gauge transformations (318) is modified to12

δξ11 = DΩξ10

δξ1pminusr = DΩξ1pminusrminus1

δξ1pminusr+1 = DΩξ1pminusr + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

20 δξ21 = DΩξ

20

(319)

δξ1pminus1 = DΩξ1pminus2 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus2 δξ2rminus1 = DΩξ

2rminus2

δW 1p = DΩξpminus1 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus1 δW 2

r = DΩξ2rminus1

DΩW1p = fpr(Ω Ω)W

2r DΩW

2r = 0

where W 1p ξ

1pminusk and W 2

r ξ2rminusm take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively

Important is that the gauge fieldsparameters taking values in R2 contribute to therhs of the equationsgauge transformations for the gauge fieldsparameters takingvalues in R1 but for forms of degree greater than (p minus r) The above two systemsare nothing but the specializations of (31) (34) (36)

Also let us note that there is no strong reason to make any distinction betweenthe terms linear in the background g-connection ΩI which correspond to g-modulesand the terms of higher order in ΩI which correspond to Chevalley-Eilenberg co-cycles Both terms can be combined into a single object the generalized covariant-derivative D = d+T (Ω)+f(Ω Ω) equiv DΩ+f(Ω Ω) with the property D2 = 0Moreover by means of D (319) and (318) can be rewritten in a similar mannerConsequently at the linearized level the most general unfolded equations and gaugetransformations have the form

δξ1 = Dξ0

δξpminus1 = Dξpminus2

δWp = Dξpminus1

DWp = 0

(320)

where D is built of d background connection ΩI and satisfies D2 = 0 The gaugefieldsparameters take values in certain spacesWq viz Wp isin Wp ξpminus1 isin Wpminus1ξ0 isin W0 The elements of Wq are differential forms with values in certain g-modules It is also convenient to define higher degree spaces Wqgtp the equationsRp+1 = DWp = 0 take values in Wp+1 Rp+2 = DRp+1 belongs to Wp+2 andby virtue of D2 = 0 satisfies Rp+2 equiv 0 and so on Therefore there exist certainidentities which belong to Wp+2 for the equations which belong to Wp+1 andthere exist certain identities which belong to Wp+3 for the identities in Wp+2 andso on At the field theoretical level these identities correspond to Bianchi identitiesfor the first level gauge transformations higher identities correspond to the Bianchiidentities for the deeper levels of gauge transformations

12The sign factor (minus)pminusr+1 before fpr(Ω Ω) is ignored and is thought of as the part of thedefinition of fpr(Ω Ω)

18

A remark should be made that the forms belonging to Wq may have differentdegrees if there are Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles present As a result spaces Wq

may contain different number of elements For instance (319) can be reduced to(320) if one defines

Wq =

W 1q q lt pminus r

W 1q W

2qminusp+r q ge (pminus r)

(321)

where W 1q and W 2

qminusp+r take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively In termsof (319) the elements of Wq for q lt (pminus r) were referred to as ξ1q the elements ofWq for q = (pminus r)(pminus 1) to as ξ1q ξ

2qminusp+r the elements ofWq for q = p to as W 1

pW 2

r the elements of Wq for q gt p to as R1q R

2qminusp+r (the equations of motion and

Bianchi identities)

32 Interpretation of Unfolded Systems Describing free Fields

When describing free fields unfolded formulations will be referred to as frame-like [61 60] though the very term frame-like has a more broad definition Thesesystems consist of equations (37) describing background geometry of a finite chainof (317)-like equations describing the gauge fields of the model and of (317)-likeequations with q = 0 glued to gauge forms ie it requires a Lie algebra g (commonlyiso(dminus1 1) so(dminus1 2) or so(d 1)) a set of g-modules R0RN and an appropriateset of nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles f01fNminus1N The physical degreesof freedom are contained in the forms of zero degree and the module RN in whichzero degree forms take values is infinite-dimensional

Since frame-like unfolded systems contain inevitably infinitely many fields mostof them being either auxiliary or Stueckelberg13 there arises a problem of reconstruc-tion a metric-like formulation by a given unfolded formulation or of extracting thedynamical content for a given unfolded system

The questions to be answered are what are the dynamical fields what arethe differential gauge parameters and what are the gauge invariant equations ofmotion These answers are not universal and depend on the chosen scheme ofinterpretation Different interpretations correspond to dual descriptions of the samedynamical system

Frame-like unfolded systems are endowed at the linearized level with additionalstructures providing a natural way for interpretation Indices AB vary overcertain finite dimensional Lorentz irreps ie each of Rn n = 0 N decomposes asRn =

sum

k Pnk where Pnk are certain so(d minus 1 1)-modules characterized by Ynk

Young diagrams of Section 1We say that some frame-like unfolded system is given an interpretation if [62]

1 On the whole space W =oplusinfin

q=0Wq where the matter gauge fields gauge pa-rameters equations of motion and Bianchi identities take values there exists

13A field is called Stueckelberg if it can be gauged away by pure algebraic symmetry

19

a bounded from below grading g = 0 1 ie Wq =oplusinfin

g=0Wgq The ho-

mogeneous element of Wgq is a certain differential form with values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep and is denoted as W gq In simplest cases the grade is just the

rank of the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep the element of Wgq takes values in

2 The closed subsector of one-forms ΩI describes a background geometry vizMinkowski or (anti)-de Sitter The generalized covariant derivative D is to bedivided into three parts the last one not being necessary nontrivial

D = DL minus σminus + σ+ (322)

where DL is a background Lorentz-covariant derivative and has a zero gradeσminus is an operator of grade (minus1) and σ+ contains positive grade operatorsThe only differential part is in DL whereas σplusmn acts vertically and is built ofthe background vielbein ha If two modules are glued the gluing element issupposed to be of grade (minus1) and also denoted as σminus

The equations then have the form

DLWn +

gminusnsum

i=1

σ+(W n+i

)= σminus

(W n+1

) g = 0 1 (323)

and analogously for the gauge transformations In the flat space all operators ofpositive grade appear to be trivial for the massless case As it does not affect theanalysis let us consider a simplified version with σ+ = 0 Then D2 = DL

2+σminusDL+DLσminus + (σminus)

2 = 0 is equivalent to DL2 = 0 (σminus)

2 = 0 and σminusDL +DLσminus = 0 Thefirst is a part of the flatness condition (38) for the iso(d minus 1 1)-connection Thesecond is the nilpotancy condition for σminus The third is satisfied provided that σminus istwisted by the factor (minus)∆g where (∆g + 1) is a degree of σminus which is equal to thenumber of the vielbeins ha that σminus is built of Indeed the vielbeins ha anticommutewith DL and hence the action of σminus is to be twisted by the factor (minus)∆g in orderσminusDL +DLσminus = 0 holds true Without further mention the pure sign factor (minus)∆g

will be though of as a part of the definition of σminusIt is useful to illustrate the action of σminus when for example unfolded equations

on fields with values in two modules R1 and R2 are glued as in (319)

R1︷ ︸︸ ︷

R2︷ ︸︸ ︷ g

q

t t t t

t t t

W 1p

ξ1pminus1

ξ10

W 2r

ξ2rminus1

ξ20

(324)

20

where short arrows stand for the action of σminus within each module and long arrowsfor the action of σminus between two modules (gluing terms) and dots stand for gaugefieldsparameters at different grades bold dots represent the elements of Wp =W 1

pW2r

All information about the dynamics turns out to be concealed in cohomologygroups of σminus [62] H(σminus) =

Ker(σminus)Im(σminus)

Let us analyze unfolded system (320) whichat grade g has the form

δξg1 = DLξg0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 )

δW gp = DLξ

gpminus1 + σminus(ξ

g+1pminus1)

0 = DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p )

(325)

Beginning from the deepest level of gauge transformations and from the lowestgrade it is obvious that those ξg+1

0 that are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueck-elberg(algebraic) gauge parameters for those ξg1 that belong to the image of σminusTherefore those ξg1 that are σminus-exact can be gauged away The leftover gauge sym-metry satisfies δξg1 = DLξ

g0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 ) = 0 so that those ξg+1

0 that belong to thecoimage of σminus are expressed via derivative of ξn0 Having sieved W0 and W1 inthis way only those ξg0 are still independent that are σminus-closed and hence belong toH

0(σminus) since only forms of zero-degree are elements of W0 Then those ξg+11 that

are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueckelberg gauge parameters for those ξg2 thatbelong to the image of σminus Therefore only those ξg1 are still independent that areσminus-closed but not σminus-exact and hence belong to H

1(σminus) Having sievedW0Wpminus1

one after another it turns out that independent differential gauge parameters at thek-th level are given by H

pminusk(σminus) Analogously those fields W gp that are σminus-exact

can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gauge parameters at Wpminus1 Thosefields W g+1

p that are not σminus-closed can be expressed via derivatives of fields at lowergrade by virtue of the equations Rg

p+1 equiv DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p ) = 0 these fields are

called auxiliary Therefore the dynamical fields ie those that are neither aux-iliary nor Stueckelberg are given by H

p(σminus) The nilpotency of D2 equiv 0 impliescertain relations of the form DLR

gp+1 + σminus(R

g+1p+1) = 0 between Rg

p+1 Therefore

auxiliary fields are expressed by virtue of σminus-exact Rgp+1 and σminus-non-closed Rg+1

p+1

are themselves expressed via derivatives of Rgp+1 Consequently the independent

equations on dynamical fields are given by Hp+1(σminus) From the cohomological point

of view higher degree forms correspond to certain nontrivial relations between equa-tions called Bianchi identities and manifest gauge nature of equations As there aregenerally more than one levels of gauge transformations one can expect the highercohomological group to be nontrivial

To sum up

21

cohomology group interpretation

Hpminusk k = 1p differential gauge parameters at the k-th level of re-

ducibilityH

p dynamical fieldsH

p+1 independent gauge invariant equations on dynamicalfields

Hp+k+1 k = 1p Bianchi identities for the k-th order gauge symmetryH

p+k k gt p supposed to be trivial in a regular case

To distinguish fields in cohomological sense the following convention is introduced[63]

Stueckelberg fields(gauge parameters) are those that can be eliminated bypure algebraic symmetry ie these fields are σminus-exact (are those that canbe used to gauge away certain fields ie these parameters are not σminus-closed)

Auxiliary fields are those that can be expressed via derivatives of some otherfields ie these fields are σminus-nonclosed Let us note that this definition isgenerally ambiguous eg in system

partA = B

partB = A(326)

which field is auxiliary is a matter of choice This ambiguity is removed byvirtue of grade[62 63]

Dynamical fields are those that are neither auxiliary nor Stueckelberg ie thesefields are representatives of σminus-cohomology classes

Note that if certain dynamical field given by Hp belongs to the grade-gf subspace

Wgfp and the corresponding equations given by H

p+1 belong to the grade-ge subspaceWge

p+1 the order of equations is equal to ge minus gf + 1If the unfolded system is supposed to admit a lagrangian formulation there has

to be a one-to-one correspondence between the number of dynamical fields and thatof equations k-th level gauge symmetries and k-th level Bianchi identities ie in acertain sense there should be a duality H

pminusk sim Hp+1+k k isin [0 p] This takes place

for all unfolded systems exemplified in this paperSince the operators involved ie DL and σminus are of grade 0 and minus1 only the

fields with the grade greater than g0 for any g0 ge 0 form a quotient module thusdescribing the same system on its own - dual formulations This picture partlybreaks in (A)dSd because of appearance of grade +1 nilpotent operator σ+

D = DL + σminus + λ2σ+ (327)

The specific character of frame-like unfolded systems which will be crucial forus is that by virtue of the inverse background vielbein hmicroa all form indices of any

gauge fieldparameter Wa1(s1)ap(sm)q can be converted to the fiber ones

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (328)

22

The resulting tensor W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is not irreducible and can be decomposedinto so(dminus 1 1)-irreps according to the so(dminus 1 1)-tensor product rule

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] =rArr Ys1 smotimes

so(dminus11)

Y(1 q) =oplus

α

Yα (329)

where one-column Young diagramY(1 q) of height-q represents the anti-symmetricindices d1 dq and Yα are the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the tensor product decomposesinto Having converted all fields (parameters equations) of a given unfolded systemto the fiber tensors one can make the identification of the fields in the unfolded ap-proach and those of the metric-like approach though the general covariance gaugeinvariance and other advantages of the unfolded formalism will be not manifestWhile constructing the unfolded formulations of a known metric-like systems or in-terpreting a given unfolded system in terms of metric-like fields this technique willbe widely used Moreover the calculation of σminus cohomology groups is largely basedon the explicit evaluation of (329)-like expressions Once an unfolded form is knownno use of this technique is needed either to generalize it to other backgrounds or tointroduce interactions

Field W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is traceless in a1 am and d1 dq separatelyHowever the cross traces need not vanish and hence some of Yα represent tracesTo distinguish between the traces of different orders let us introduce the followingthe Y-valued degree-q form WY

q is said to be a trace of the r-th order iff it has theform

WYq = hh

︸︷︷︸

r

hh︸︷︷︸

qminusr

CYprime

0 (330)

for some Yprime-valued degree-0 form CYprime

0 where (q minus r) indices of the backgroundvielbeins ha are contracted with the tensor representing Yprime and r indices are freefor the whole expression to take values in Y the appropriate Young symmetrizeris implied When the indices of WY

q are converted to the fiber ones the expression

takes the form ηη︸ ︷︷ ︸

r

CYprime ie CYprime

represents a trace of the r-th order

Different aspects of unfolding are illustrated on the examples of a massless scalarfield a massless spin-one field and a massless spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2) fields

33 Examples of Unfolding

Example 331 Unfolding a scalar field [31 62] First it should be noted thatit is easy of course to convert the Klein-Gordon equation C = 0 to a system offirst order equations

partmicroC = Cmicro

partmicroCmicro = 0(331)

but when writing the second equation the explicit form of the metric is to be usedhence these equations are not of unfolded form (31)

23

Described in terms of a scalar field C(x) the theory is brought into a non gaugeform therefore zero-forms only are allowed or else there would be some gaugesymmetry according to (34) The most general rhs of dC = has the form

dC = haCa (332)

for some vector-valued zero-form Ca This equation just parameterizes the firstderivative of C(x) and is similar to the first of (331) There are three terms allowedon the rhs of dCa =

dCa = hbCab + hbC

ab + haC prime (333)

with Cab Cab and C prime taking values in antisymmetric symmetric and scalar so(dminus1 1)-irreps ie bull The first term is forbidden by Bianchi identity hadC

a equiv 0To analyze the remaining terms let us decompose dCa into so(dminus 1 1)-irreps

partmicroCahmicrob = otimes = oplus oplus bull (334)

where = part[aCb] = part(aCa) minus 1dηaapartbC

b bull = partaCa = C

The component represents Bianchi identity in the first order reformulation ofthe Klein-Gordon equation Indeed expressing Ca as partaC implies part[aCb] equiv 0 bullrepresents the desired Klein-Gordon equation whereas is the only component al-lowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell Therefore to impose the Klein-Gordon equationthe term haC prime has to be omitted

dCa = hbCab (335)

The only possible rhs for dCaa = compatible with Jacobi identity hbdCab equiv 0

is of the form dCaa = hbCaab for Caaa taking values in a rank-three symmetric

so(d minus 1 1)-irrep ie The process of unfolding continues unambiguously inthis way and results in the full system

dCa(k) = hbCa(k)b equiv F a(k)(C) k = 0 1 (336)

where Ca(k) is rank-k totally symmetric traceless field ie taking values in k

so(dminus 1 1)-irrepTo make a connection with the general statement of Section 1 for Y = Y(0 0)

the general scheme results in

Yg bull

n k 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 0 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore spaces Wq and operator σminus which enters D = DL minus σminus should be definedas

Wq = WqWaq W

aaq (337)

24

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbWa(gminus1)bq g gt 0

(338)

Consequently W is a space of various differential forms with values in totally sym-metric traceless so(d minus 1 1)-tensors graded by the form degree and by the rankof so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Space Wq forms an irreducible iso(d minus 1 1)-module System(336) reads

Dω0 = 0 ω0 isin W0 (339)

The cohomology groups of σminus are easy to find

H0(σminus) = C(x) as the lowest grade field is automatically closed σminus(C) = 0 and it

cannot be exact as a form of zero degree Contrariwise zero-forms with gradegreater than zero are not closed σminus(C

k+1) = hbCa(k)b = 0lArrrArr Ck+1 = 0

H1(σminus) = haB(x)0 for some B(x)0 isin W

00 One-form Ba

1 = haB(x)0 is closedσminus(B

a1) = haB

a1 = hah

aB(x)0 equiv 0 and it cannot be represented as σminus(C2) =

hbCab as far as Cab is traceless The cohomology groups at higher grade are

trivial since σminus(haBa(k)(x)0) 6= 0 for k gt 0

Hqgt1(σminus) = empty as one can make sure

The interpretation in terms of Section 32 is as follows as is expected the dynamicalfield given by H

0 is C(x) The equations are given by the projection of dCa = hbCab

to H1 ie C = 0 The fields with k gt 0 are auxiliary being expressed via

derivatives of C(x) Ca(k) = partapartaC(x) Inasmuch as there is no gauge symmetryin the system the higher cohomology groups are trivial

An infinitely many dual formulations of a massless scalar field are also includedIndeed the fields with k ge k0 gt 0 form a quotient module Rk0 ie one canconsistently write

dCk = σminus(Ck+1) k ge k0 (340)

The first equationdCa(k0) = hbC

a(k0)b (341)

imposes on the dynamical field Ca(k0)

partbCba(k0minus1) = 0

part[bCc]a(k0minus1) = 0(342)

which imply at least locally Ca(k0) =

k0︷ ︸︸ ︷

partaparta C and C = 0 for some fieldC(x) All fields at higher grade are auxiliary This statement is confirmed bythe cohomology analysis H

0(Rk0 σminus) = Ck0 ie scalar is described in termsof a traceless rank-k0 symmetric tensor field subjected to the equations given byH

1(Rk0 σminus) = haBa(k0minus1)0 minus k0(k0minus1)

2(d+2k0minus4)ηaahcB

a(k0minus2)c0 +hcB

a(k0)c0 for B

a(k0minus1)0 B

a(k0)c0

taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps characterized by diagrams k0 minus 1 k0

These two elements represents just the components ofWk0

1 sim k0 otimes with the

25

symmetry of k0 minus 1 (trace) andk0

the third component with the symmetryof k0 + 1 is exact

The above results can be easily extended to (A)dSd background and to a massivescalar field [62]

DLCk = σminus(C

k+1) + σ+(Ckminus1) = 0 (343)

where there appears a nontrivial positive grade operator

σ+(Ckminus1) = (m2 minus λ2k(k + dminus 1))

(

haCa(kminus1) minus(sminus 1)

d+ 2k minus 4ηaahbC

a(kminus1)b

)

(344)

and DL is a Lorentz-covariant derivative in (A)dSd In the (A)dSd case the situationis more interesting due to the appearance of σ+ operator and the possibility of theaccidental degeneracy of σ+ when m2 = λ2kprime(kprime + dminus 1) for some kprime [62]

Example 332 Unfolding Maxwell equations [64 65] An example of masslessspin-one field is more interesting as a gauge system The main object is a one-formAmicro From gauge transformation law

δA1 = dξ0 (345)

it follows that there should not be other forms of rank greater than zero If this werethe case the gauge parameters of these new forms would be involved by virtue of(34) making the gauge law for A1 inappropriate Indeed there are two possibilitiesto introduce higher degree forms on the rhs of dA = (i) dA1 = R2 fora scalar valued degree-two form R2 which possesses its own gauge parameter χ1δR2 = dχ1 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law for A1 is modifiedto δA1 = dξ0 + χ1 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gaugeparameter χ1 This case corresponds to contractible free differential algebras (310)(ii) dA1 = hbω

b1 for a vector valued degree-one form ωa

1 which possesses its owngauge parameter ǫa0 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law forA1 is modified to δA1 = dξ0 + hbǫ

b0 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of

Stueckelberg gauge parameter ǫa0 Consequently in both cases A1 can be made non-dynamical which is not what was expected Therefore the only possibility is tointroduce a zero-form C

[ab]0 anti-symmetric in a b parameterizing by virtue of

dA1 = hahbC[ab]0 (346)

the Maxwell field strength Bianchi identity hahbdC[ab]0 equiv 0 tolerates two terms on

the rhs of dC[ab]0 =

dC[ab]0 = hcC

[ab]c0 + h[aC

b]0 (347)

with C[ab]c0 and Ca

0 taking values in and so(dminus 1 1)-irreps the former taken inantisymmetric basis In order to determine which of the terms should be omittedif any the decomposition of the first derivative of the Maxwell field strength intoLorentz irreps has to be analyzed

C [ab]|c equiv partmicroC[ab]hmicroc = otimes = oplus oplus (348)

26

where = part[aCbc] = partbCab and = partcC [ab] minus part[cCab] + 2

dminus1ηc[apartdC

b]d part[aCbc]

is identically zero provided that C [ab] is expressed via the first derivative of Amicroor represents the second pair of Maxwell equations in terms of field strength C [ab]In both cases this component should be zero and moreover this can not be keptnonzero as there is no hcC

[abc]-like term allowed on the rhs of (347) The secondpartbC

ab is the desired Maxwell equations in terms of Amicro or the first pair of Maxwellequations in terms of the field strength Consequently to impose Maxwell equationsterm h[aCb] has to be omitted whereas the third is the only component allowed tobe nonzero on-mass-shell

Again unfolding continues unambiguously and requires an infinite set of fields

C[ab]c(k)0 taking values14 in

kto be introduced

dC [ab]c(k) = hdC[ab]c(k)d k = 0 1 (349)

The full system has the form

dA1 = hahbCab0 equiv F (AC) δA1 = dξ0

dC[ab]c(k)0 = hdC

[ab]c(k)d0 equiv F [ab]c(k)(C) k = 0 1

(350)

and represents two modules being glued together by the term on the rhs of thefirst equation

For Y = Y(1 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 resultsin

Yg bull

n k 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 1 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore

Wq =

W0 q = 0

WqW[ab]qminus1W

[ab]cqminus1 q gt 0

(351)

let us point out the shortening of W0 The action of σminus on Wq isin Wq is defined as

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hahbW[ab]qminus1 g = 1

hdW[ab]c(gminus2)dqminus1 g gt 1

(352)

With D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (350) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (353)

14The fields C [ab]c(k) are taken in antisymmetric basis ie they are antisymmetric in a bsymmetric in c(k) and C [abd]c(kminus1)equiv0

27

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 0 form a finite-dimensional iso(dminus1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g gt0 form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

Again the cohomology groups are easy to find gauge parameters are given byH

0(σminus) = ξ0 dynamical fields by H1(σminus) = A1 Maxwell equations by H

2(σminus) =

h[aBb]0 and the Bianchi identities for the first order gauge transformations by

H3(σminus) = hahbB0 the rest of groups are empty H

kgt3(σminus) = empty Important is thedirect correspondence between the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2

the gauge parameters in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3There are infinitely many of non-gauge dual formulations based on C [ab]c(k0) eg

for k0 = 0 one recovers the Maxwell equations in terms of the field strength

part[aCbc] = 0

partbCab = 0

(354)

Let us note that the ambiguity at the first step of unfolding (the terms haC prime andh[aCb] in the above two examples) expresses the possibility of introducing a massterm

Example 333 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-s field [31 6466] We start from the metric-like description of a massless spin-s field in termsof a double-traceless symmetric rank-s field φmicro1micros

satisfying (213) the secondorder equations are invariant with respect to the first order gauge transformationwith traceless rank-(s minus 1) gauge parameter ξmicro1microsminus1 Inasmuch as the Young di-agram s of so(d minus 2) is of the height one there are gauge transforma-tions of the first level only Therefore the dynamical field in the unfolded ap-proach has to be a one-form There is only one way to identify φmicro1micros

and ξmicro1microsminus1

with certain ωY01 and ξY0

0 taking values in the same so(d minus 1 1)-irrep Y0 namely

Y0 = sminus 1 ie ωa(sminus1)1 and ξ

a(sminus1)0 takes values in a rank-(s minus 1) symmet-

ric traceless tensors Field φmicro1microsis identified with a totally symmetric part of

ωa(sminus1)1 ie φmicro1micros

= hb1(micro1hbsminus1

microsminus1ωa1asminus1

micros)ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 the double-tracelessness

condition is the consequence of the tracelessness of ωa(sminus1)1 in a1asminus1 ξmicro1microsminus1

is identified with ξa(sminus1)0 directly ξmicro1microsminus1 = hb1micro1

hbsminus1microsminus1

ξa1asminus1ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 andone can make sure that the Fronsdalrsquos gauge transformation law is recovered fromδω

a(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 Field ω

a(sminus1)1 has a redundant component with the symmetry

ofsminus 1

which can be made Stueckelberg by virtue of gauge parameter ξa(sminus1)b

with the same symmetry type ie

δωa(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)c0 (355)

It automatically follows that there is a degree-one gauge field ωa(sminus1)b1 coupled with

ωa(sminus1)1 as

dωa(sminus1)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)c1 (356)

28

The only solution to Bianchi identity hcdωa(sminus1)c1 equiv 0 is15

dωa(sminus1)b1 = hcω

a(sminus1)bc1 (357)

where a new field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

is introduced and so on

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1 (358)

until the field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

for which the Bianchi identity solvesas

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 (359)

where field Ca(s)b(s)0 represents a generalized Weyl tensor and has the symmetry of

s The solution of Bianchi identity hchddC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 equiv 0 has the form

dCa(s)b(s)0 = hc

(

Ca(s)cb(s)0 +

s

2C

a(s)bb(sminus1)c0

)

(360)

where Ca(s+1)b(s)0 has the symmetry of s

s+ 1 The second term on the rhs

of (360) supplements the first one to have a proper Young symmetry Further

unfolding requires a set of degree-zero forms Ca(s+i)b(s)0 taking values in so(dminus1 1)-

irreps characterized by Young diagrams ss+ i

The full system has theform

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1

δωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(k)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)b(k)c0 k isin [0 sminus 2]

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 δω

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0

dCa(s+i)b(s) = hc

(

Ca(s+i)cb(s) +s

i+ 2Ca(s+i)bb(sminus1)c

)

i isin [0infin)

(361)

By the construction the system incorporates Fronsdalrsquos field φmicro1microswith the correct

gauge law but there is still to be proved that the Fronsdalrsquos equations are reallyimposed and that there are no other dynamical fields in the system Let us recon-struct Fronsdalrsquos equations (213) whereas the second statement will be proved asa part of a more general theorem The first two equations of (361) read

partmicroωa(sminus1)ν minus partνω

a(sminus1)micro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)cν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)cmicro (362)

partmicroωa(sminus1)bν minus partνω

a(sminus1)bmicro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)bcν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)bcmicro (363)

It is convenient to convert all world indices to the fiber ones

partcωa(sminus1)|d minus partdωa(sminus1)|c = ωa(sminus1)c|d minus ωa(sminus1)d|c (364)

partcωa(sminus1)b|d minus partdωa(sminus1)b|c = ωa(sminus1)bc|d minus ωa(sminus1)bd|c (365)

15The proof is not given as more general statement about the solutions of such equations isproved in the next Section

29

where ωa(sminus1)|b equiv ωa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro ωa(sminus1)bb|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bbmicro hcmicro

Contracting (365) with ηbd and then symmetrizing c with a1asminus1 results in

partcωa(sminus1)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus1)c|c= 0 (366)

By symmetrizing in (364) a1asminus1 with d

ωa(sminus1)c|a = partcωa(sminus1)|a minus partaωa(sminus1)|c (367)

and then by contracting (364) with ηdasminus1

ωa(sminus1)c|

c= (sminus 1)

(

partcωa(sminus2)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus2)c|c

)

(368)

all the terms of (366) can be expressed via ωa(sminus1)|b Plugging these to (366) gives

ωa(sminus1)|a minus partapartc((sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c

)+ (sminus 1)partapartaω

a(sminus2)c|c= 0 (369)

where ωa(sminus1)|a is to be identified with Fronsdalrsquos field φa(s) as ωa(sminus1)|a = 1sφa(s)

then ωa(sminus2)c|

c= 1

2φa(sminus2)c

c (sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c = φa(sminus1)c and the equation

acquires the Fronsdalrsquos form (213)

φa(s) minus spartapartcφa(sminus1)c + s(sminus1)

2partapartaφ

a(sminus2)cc= 0 (370)

For Y = Y(s 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 results in

Yg sminus 1 sminus 1 s

ss+ 1

n k 1 0 1 sminus 1 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = sminus 1 g = s g = s+ 1

qg q0 = 1 qsminus1 = 1 qs = 0 qs+1 = 0

therefore

Wq =

Wa(sminus1)0 W

a(sminus1)b0 W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0 q = 0

Wa(sminus1)q W

a(sminus1)bq W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)q W

a(s)b(s)qminus1 W

a(s+1)b(s)qminus1 q gt 0

(371)and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hcWa(sminus1)b(gminus1)cq g isin [1 sminus 1]

hchdWa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)dqminus1 g = s

hc

(

Wa(gminussminus1)cb(s)qminus1 + s

gminuss+1W

a(gminussminus1)bb(sminus1)cqminus1

)

g gt s

(372)

With D = DL minus σminus full system (361) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (373)

30

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sminus 1 sim g isin [0 sminus 1]form a finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k =0 1 sim g ge s form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

The representatives of cohomology classes can be chosen as H0 = ξ

a(sminus1)0 H1 =

hbφa(sminus1)b H2 = hbhcG

a(sminus1)c minus hahcGa(sminus2)bc + γηaahahcG

a(sminus4)bcnn+ (βηabhahc +

αηaahbhc)Ga(sminus3)cn

n16 H

3 = hbhahcχa(sminus2)c H

kgt3 = empty where φa(s) and Ga(s) are

double-traceless tensor fields and ξa(sminus1) and χa(sminus1) are traceless H01 are nontrivialat the lowest grade whereas H

23 are nontrivial at grade-one therefore the orderof equations that are imposed on the dynamical field is equal to two It turns outthat there is no need in the explicit form for α β and γ it is sufficient to find outthe Young symmetry of representatives only The uniqueness of Fronsdalrsquos theoryat the level of action was demonstrated in [67] and at the level of equations in[6 53] Consequently there is no need for equations (370) to be found explicitly -those of Fronsdal are the only possible Again there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2 the gauge parameters

in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3 The system contains an infinitely many ofdual formulations those that have field W

a(sminus1)b(k0)1 at the lowest grade are gauge

dual descriptions whereas those that have field Ca(s+k0)b(s) at the lowest grade arenon-gauge Dual description based on field W

a(sminus1)b(1)1 was elaborated in [68]

Example 334 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field[69

70 31] Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field results in literally

the same unfolded system (361 373) but with fields taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that are irreducible spin-tensors with the same tensor part as in the bosoniccase Note that operator σminus is not modified but the σminus cohomology groups areslightly changed such that the equations become of the first order

The Dirac equation Unfolded system (336) or equivalently (339) describesa massless spin-1

2field provided that Ck take values in s 1

2so(dminus1 1)-irreps

ie Ck equiv Cαa(k) and Γαb βC

βba(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equation of (336)

partmicroCα = hmicroaC

αa (374)

with hbmicroΓβb α

gives the Dirac equation

Γαa βpart

aCβ = 0 (375)

the rest of equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives of dynamicalfield Cα

The Rarita-Schwinger equation Unfolded system (350) or equivalently(353) describes a massless spin-3

2field provided that irreducible tensors in (351)

are replaced by the corresponding irreducible tensor-spinors ie A1 equiv Aαmicro C

k equiv

Cα[ab]c(k) and Γαb βC

β[ab]c(k) = 0 Γαd βC

β[ab]dc(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equa-tion of (350)

1

2(partmicroA

αν minus partνA

αmicro) = hmicroahνbC

α[ab] (376)

16α = minus (s(d+sminus5)minusd+6)(sminus2)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6) β = (sminus2)

(d+sminus4) γ = (d+sminus6)(sminus2)(sminus3)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6)

31

with Γ-matrices and converting world indices micro ν to the fiber ones according toAαa equiv Aα

microhamicro gives the Rarita-Schwinger equation

Γαb βpart

bAβa minus partaΓαb βA

βb = 0 δAαa = partaξα (377)

The rest of unfolded equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives ofdynamical field Aα

microThe Fang-Fronsdal equation for a spin-(s + 1

2) massless field Unfolded

system (361) or equivalently (373) describes a massless spin-(s + 12) field pro-

vided that irreducible tensors in (371) are replaced by the corresponding irreducibletensor-spinors With all world indices converted to the fiber ones the first equationof (361) has the form

Gαa(sminus1)|[cd] equiv partcωβa(sminus1)|d minus partdωβa(sminus1)|c = ωβa(sminus1)c|d minus ωβa(sminus1)d|c (378)

where ωαa(sminus1)|b equiv ωαa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωαa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

αa(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro

Analogously to the bosonic case nonsymmetric component of ωβa(sminus1)|d canbe gauged away algebraically Hence the Fronsdalrsquos field φαa(s) is identified asωαa(sminus1)|a = 1

sφαa(s) Then Γα

b βφβa(s) = Γα

b βωβa(sminus1)|b Γα

b βΓβc γφ

γa(sminus2)bc = ηbcωαa(sminus2)b|c

and the Fronsdalrsquos triple Γ-traceless constraint is a consequence of irreducibility ofωαa(sminus1)|b in α a1asminus1 and the lack of any conditions with respect to a1asminus1 andb Since the Fronsdalrsquos field contains three irreducible components with the sym-metry of s 1

2 s-1 1

2and s-2 1

2 the equations of motion has to be

nontrivial in these three sectors too The projector on the dynamical equations issimply Γα

b βGβa(sminus1)b|a and gives

Γαb βpart

bφβa(s) minus spartaΓαb βφ

βa(sminus1)b = 0 (379)

which is in accordance with (222) But we would like to note that there aretwo components with the symmetry of s-1 1

2 namely ηbcG

αa(sminus2)b|ac and

Γαb βΓ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] The correct projector on this component of the equations isgiven by the combination

2(sminus 1)ηbcGαa(sminus2)b|ac minus γαb βγ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] (380)

which is identically zero when Gαa(sminus1)|[bc] is expressed via ωβa(sminus1)c|d by virtue of(378) Therefore it is (380) that does not express certain part of ωβa(sminus1)c|d interms of first derivatives of the dynamical field φαa(s) and thus this is a dynamicalequation Obviously (380) is a representative of σminus cohomology group H

2g=0 In

terms of φαa(s) the representative has the form

Γαb βpart

bΓβc γφ

γa(sminus1)c minus partcφαa(sminus1)c +

(sminus 1)

2partaφ

αa(sminus2)cc= 0 (381)

which is equal to the Γ-trace of (379) The gauge transformations has the form

δφαa(s) = partaξαa(sminus1) (382)

32

where Γαb βξ

βa(sminus2)b = 0Consequently unfolded equations for totally symmetric bosonic fields are proved

to completely determine the unfolded equations for totally symmetric fermionicfields Though σminus is not modified in the fermionic case σminus cohomology groupsare changed since the fermionic dynamical equations are of the first order

4 Unfolding Mixed-Symmetry Fields

First in Section 41 an example of the simplest massless mixed-symmetry field ofspin- is investigated in detail and leading arguments are given for a spin- fieldSecond the general statement on arbitrary mixed-symmetry fields is proved whereastechnical details are collected in Sections 44 and 45 The analysis of the numberof physical degrees of freedom is carried out in Section 43

41 Simplest Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Example 411 Spin- field In the metric-like approach a spin- field is mini-mally described[16 17] by the subjected to (215) field φ[micromicro]ν that takes values in a

reducible so(dminus 1 1)-representation oplus the latter component is identified withthe trace φ ν

microν The gauge transformations (216) has two levels of reducibility with

two gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξA[microν] taking values in oplus bull so(dminus 1 1)-irreps at the

first level and one parameter ξmicro taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irrep at the secondlevel (217)

First the metric-like field φ[micromicro]ν has to be incorporated into certain differentialform eYq which is called a physical vielbein the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y and the degreeq to be defined below To make the symmetries both of the first and of the secondlevel of reducibility manifest the degree of the physical vielbein has to be two atleast

Moreover were the physical vielbein taken to be a degree-one form not all of thegauge symmetries even at the first level would be manifest Indeed there are twopossibilities for physical vielbein eY1 to contain a component with the symmetry of

Namely Y = and Y = since otimes = oplus oplus and otimes = oplus oplus

The associated differential gauge parameter is ξ0 in the first case and ξ0 in thesecond case Inasmuch as the gauge parameters are the forms of degree-zero onlyone of the required two parameters is present in each of the cases

The degree of the physical vielbein has to be not greater than two if the com-ponent associated with the metric-like field φmicromicroν is required not to be a certaintrace part The reason why a dynamical field should not be a certain trace part isexplained in the next Section

Therefore the physical vielbein has to be of degree-two and has to take valuesin so(dminus 1 1)-irrep that belongs to the vector representation ie e2 equiv ea2 equiv eamicroν

The associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξa1 equiv ξamicro contains in its Lorentz decomposition

otimes = oplus oplusbull both anti-symmetric ξAmicroν = ξa[microhbν]ηab and symmetric ξSmicroν = ξa(microh

bν)ηab

33

gauge parameters the latter enters along with the trace ξamicrohmicroa There exists a second

level gauge parameter χa0 which is directly identified with ξmicro as ξmicro = hbmicroχ

aηabThere are no redundant components in the gauge parameter However physicalvielbein e2 contains one redundant component in its decomposition into Lorentz

irreps otimes = oplus oplus The first and the second components are to be associatedwith a traceful φmicromicroν whereas the third one totally anti-symmetric component e[a|bc]

of ea|bc = eamicroνhbmicrohcν is a redundant one and has to be made non-dynamical In order

to do so algebraic gauge parameter ξ[abc]0 with the symmetry of is introduced It

is obvious from pure algebraic gauge law

δea2 = hbhcξ[abc]0 (41)

that the redundant component can be fixed to zero and ea2 can be directly identifiedwith φmicromicroν as e

amicromicro = φmicromicroνh

aν From gauge transformation laws δea2 = dξa1 δξa1 = dχa

0

ie δeamicroν = 12

(partmicroξ

aν minus partνξ

amicro

) δξamicro = partmicroχ

a required gauge transformations (216)(217) for metric-like field φmicromicroν and for the first order gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξ

A[microν]

are easily recoveredSince in the unfolded approach each gauge parameter possesses its own gauge

field and vice-verse associated with ξ[abc]0 gauge field ω

[abc]1 enters as

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 (42)

which determines the first equation Applying d to this equation results in Bianchiidentity hbhcdω

[abc]1 equiv 0 which has a unique solution of the form

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 (43)

with C[abc][df ]0 having the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensor of a spin-

field ie it is anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and C[abcd]f0 equiv 0 To clarify the form of

the solution let C[abc]|[df ]0 be a degree-zero form anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and with

no definite symmetry between these two groups of indices The Bianchi identityimplies hbhchdhfC

[abc]|[df ]0 equiv 0 which is equivalent to C

a[bc|df ]0 equiv 0 since vielbeins

ha anticommute Therefore the solution is parameterized by those components of

C[abc]|[df ]0 sim otimes that has the symmetry of Young diagrams with no more than

three rows since the requirement for total anti-symmetrization of any four indicesto give zero is the characteristic property of Young diagrams with at most three

rows otimes ni is the only component of zero trace order17 with three rows andthere are no components with the number of rows less than three Alternatively one

17Although there are trace components with the number of rows less than four eg theirtensor product by the metric ηab contains components with the symmetry of the sl(d)-Young

diagrams with more than three rows Nontrivial trace with the symmetry of corresponds tothe mass-like term Hence traceful tensors either do not satisfy the Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms

34

could search for the solution in the sector of degree-one forms as dω[abc]1 = hdC

[abc]|d1

with some C[abc]|d1 but Bianchi identity hbhchdC

[abc]|d1 equiv 0 implies that the only

component of C[abc]|d1 sim otimes that is allowed must have less than three rows which

is impossible since [abc] makes Young diagrams of otimes consist of three rows atleast18 Thus one has to search for the solution among the forms of less degree

Further unfolding requires a set of fields C [abc][df ]g(k) with the symmetry ofk

to be introduced and the full system has the form

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 δea2 = dξa1 + hbhcξ

[abc]0 δξa1 = dχa

0

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 δω

[abc]1 = dξ

[abc]0

dC[abc][df ]g(k)0 = hvC

[abc][df ]g(k)v0 (44)

Consequently the unfolded system incorporates field φmicromicroν with all required differ-ential gauge parameters at all levels of reducibility the redundant component of the

physical vielbein does not contribute to the dynamics ω[abc]1 sim otimes = oplus oplus

the first component is a field strength for the redundant field once the field hasbeen gauged away the associated field strength is zero and ω

[abc]ρ = hamicrohbνhcλT[microνλ]ρ

for some T[microνλ]ρ T[microνλρ] equiv 0 which incorporates both and (as the trace) Torecover equations (215) in terms of metric-like fields it is convenient to convert allfiber indices to the world ones in the first two equations

part[microeaνλ] = hb[microhcνω

abcλ] (45)

part[microωabcν] = hd[microhfν]C

abcdf (46)

to substitute Tmicroνλρ and to contract two indices in the second equation

part[microφνλ]ρ = Tmicroνλρ (47)

partρTmicroνρλ minus partλTρ

microνρ = 0 (48)

Plugging (47) in (48) gives equation (215)For Y = Y(2 1) (1 1) ie N = 2 and p = 2 the general scheme of Section

1 results in

Yg

n k 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 1 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

18Again the trace component enters the tensor product as η otimes and has the number of rowsnot less than three

35

therefore

Wq =

W a0 q = 0

W a1 W

[abc]0 q = 1

W aq W

[abc]qminus1 W

[abc][df ]qminus2 W

[abc][df ]gqminus2 q gt 1

(49)

and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbhcW[abc]qminus1 g = 1

hbhcW[aaa][bc]qminus2 g = 2

hdW[aaa][bb]c(gminus3)dqminus2 g gt 2

(410)

with D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (44) can be rewritten as

Dω2 = 0 δω2 = Dξ1 δξ1 = Dξ0 (411)

where ω2 isin W2 ξ1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 2 k = 0 sim g = 0and n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 1 form two finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-moduleswhereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g ge 2 form an infinite-dimensionaliso(dminus 1 1)-module

Example 412 Spin- field (briefly) In the case of a massless spin- fieldthere are two gauge parameters at the first level of reducibility which have the sym-metry19 of and one gauge parameter at the second level with the symmetryof First for Y = Y(3 1) (2 1) the proposed scheme results in

Yg

n k 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3 g = 4

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 2 q2 = 1 q3 = 0 q4 = 0

therefore the physical vielbein has to be a two-form taking values in ie e2 equiv

eaab2 Associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξaab1 has components otimes = oplus oplus the first two having the symmetry of the required gauge parameters with the thirdone being redundant The last three components in the decomposition of the physical

vielbein otimes = oplus oplus oplus are also redundant By virtue of Stueckelberg

symmetry with parameter ξ1 these three components can be gauged away inasmuch

as otimes = oplus oplus The redundant component of the first level gauge

parameter ξ1 also can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg symmetry with

level-two gauge parameter ξ0 Consequently at least the fact that the unfoldedsystem incorporates the metric-like field all the required gauge parameters andredundant components do not contribute to the dynamics is proved

19To simplify the example no consideration is given to the trace components of the fields

36

42 General Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Given a massless field of spin Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) described by a metric-like field φY(x) taking values in the irrep of the Lorentz algebra so(d minus 1 1) withthe same symmetry type(minimal formulation) there exists a unique unfolded systemwith the physical vielbein at the lowest grade and all symmetries being manifest thatreproduces the original metric-like system The system has the form (11)

Sketch of the proof

1 The lowest grade field (physical vielbein) eY0q0

turns out to be completely de-termined by the requirement for it to contain the metric-like field and for itsgauge parameters ξY0

q0minusk k gt 0 to contain all the necessary gauge parametersat all levels of reducibility (219)

2 eY0q0

and its gauge parameters appear to contain redundant components thathave to be made non-dynamical The only way to achieve this is to introduceStueckelberg symmetry δeY0

q0= σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus1) δξ

Y0q0minus1 = σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus2) with certain

ξY1q1minusk k gt 0 which turns out to be unambiguously defined by this requirement

3 ξY1q1minus1 has associated gauge field ωY1

q1and gauge transformations δωY0

q0=

σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) completely determines the first equation deY0

q0= σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) whichimplies Jacobi identity σ1

minus(dωY1q1

) equiv 0 The general solution is proved in Sec-tion 44 to have the form dωY1

q1= σ2

minus(ωY2q2

) with certain ωY2q2

The secondequation implies the second Jacobi identity σ2

minus(dωY2q2

) equiv 0 and so on

4 Once the total unfolded system is defined the proof of the facts that (i)the correct dynamical equations are imposed (ii) there are no other dynamicalfields or other differential gauge symmetries in the system is obtained throughthe calculations of σminus cohomology groups Ignoring the trace pattern of fieldsie for traceful tensors the proof of (ii) can be simplified and is done in thissection Even stronger statement that there exists a duality H

p+1+k sim Hpminusk is

proved in Section 45

First as it is clear from the examples above the metric-like field φYM(x) has

to be incorporated into a differential form eY0q of degree-q taking values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep Y0 (for this reason eY0q is called physical vielbein) Having converted

all world indices to fiber ones in accordance with (329) so(dminus 1 1)-tensor productY0 otimes Y(1 q) of Y0 with one column diagram of the height q must contain thecomponent with the symmetry of YM In the case of the minimal formulationYM = Y where Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) characterizes the spin

It is useful to introduce a notion of the quotient of two Young diagrams let thequotient of two Young diagrams Y1Y2 be a direct sum of those diagrams whoseso(dminus 1 1)-tensor product by Y2 contains Y1 For the first sight given q ge 0 anyelement Q of YMY(1 q) might be chosen as Y0 If q is greater than the heightof YM the component with the symmetry YM in the tensor product QotimesY(1 q)has to be certain trace inevitably

37

Although there is no apparent problems in considering unfolded systems withdynamical field hidden in certain trace component of the physical vielbein egMaxwell gauge potential Amicro might be identified with the trace eamicroνh

microa of two-form

eamicroν However this exotic incorporating of the physical field does not take place inthe already known systems Moreover it can be proved that such exotic systemsdo not exist if irreducible Nevertheless they might be a part of some reduciblesystem which describes more than one field Therefore we require the degree q ofthe physical vielbein to be not greater than the height of YM

Inasmuch as (i) the equations imposed on φY(x) possess reducible gauge trans-formations with the number of levels equal to the height p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi of Y (ii) for

a degree-q gauge field of an unfolded system there exist q levels of gauge transfor-mations the degree q of physical vielbein eY0

q must be equal to pThe quotient YY(1 p) contains only one element (provided φY(x) is for-

bidden to be a trace component) it is the diagram (12) with the symmetry ofY0 = Y(s1 minus 1 p1) (sN minus 1 pN) ie it is equal to Y without the first col-umn Therefore physical vielbein eY0

p is completely defined So does gauge param-

eters ξY0pminusk at the k-th level of reducibility k isin [1 p] The requirement for tensor

product Y0 otimes Y(1 pminus k) to contain all gauge parameters ξik given by (219)at the k-th level of reducibility is also satisfied Consequently the whole patternof fieldsgauge parameters of the metric-like formulation is reproduced Note thatY0 equiv Y0 and q0 = p in the terms of Section 1

Let us note that if one writes down the physical vielbein explicitly as ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

where si are the lengths of the rows ofY and converts the form indices to the tangentones by virtue of inverse background vielbein hmicroa

ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|[d1dp] = ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

hmicro1d1 hmicropdp (412)

dynamical field φY(x) should be identified with ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|a1ap which hasthe symmetry of Y with some traces included Consequently the generalizedLabastidarsquos double-tracelessness condition (220) [20] is obvious inasmuch as thecontraction of two metric tensor ηaiaiηaiai with the i-th group of indices vanishes

Generally in addition to φY(x) decompositionY0otimesY(1 p) of physical vielbeineY0p into Lorentz irreps contains redundant components which must not contributeto the physical degrees of freedom So does Y0 otimesY(1 pminus k) ie in addition toξik it contains a lot of components that can not be made genuine differential gaugeparameters There are only two possible ways to get rid of redundant fields in theunfolded formalism

A redundant components could be directly fixed to zero by algebraic (Stueckel-berg) symmetry

B redundant components might be auxiliary fields for other fields (at lower grade)and so on The process stops since the grade is assumed to be bounded frombelow

We require dynamical fields incorporated in the physical vielbein to be at the lowestgrade Actually (B) takes place for dual gauge descriptions but not for the minimal

38

Therefore the only possibility to make redundant components to be non-dynamicalis to introduce a Stueckelberg symmetry with certain parameters ξY1

q1minusk

δeY0p = dξY0

pminus1 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) (413)

δξY0pminus1 = dξY0

pminus2 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus2) (414)

(415)

where σ1minus is a certain operator built of background vielbein ha that contracts a

number of indices of Y1 with hahc to obtain Y0 Diagram20 Y1 and form degreeq1 can be easily found since Y1 otimes Y1 q1 minus i i gt 0 must contain all redundantcomponents of eY0

p and ξY0pminusk

In the unfolded formalism each gauge field possesses its own gauge parameter andvice-versa Therefore there is a gauge field ωY1

q1 which contributes to the equations

for eY0p as

deY0p = σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) (416)

The first equation determines the first Jacobi identity of the form σ1minus(dω

Y1q1

) equiv 0which can be solved as

dωY1q1

= σ2minus(ω

Y2q2

) (417)

for certain gauge field ωY2q2

and operator σ2minus that satisfies σ1

minusσ2minus equiv 0 The general

solution of Jacobi identities is given in Section 44 From now on let the super-scripts of σminus be omitted The second equation determines the second Jacobi identityσminus(dω

Y2q2

) equiv 0 which can be also solved and so on Consequently the knowledgeof the lowest grade gauge field eY0

p and of the Stueckelberg symmetries required toget rid of redundant components determines the first equation which by virtue ofJacobi identities determines the second and so on The total unfolded system hasthe structure

dωYg

qg= σminus

(

ωYg+1qg+1

)

g = 0 1

δωYg

qg= dξYg

qg+ σminus

(

ξYg+1

qg+1minus1

)

δξYgqg

=

(418)

where σminus is certain algebraic operator built of background vielbein ha and (σminus)2 = 0

The only facts remain to be proved are that there are no other dynamical fieldsand that the proper correspondence (duality) between the cohomology groups holdstrue To this end it is sufficient to analyze only the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps content ofH

qg ie only the symmetry type and the multiplicity of irreducible Lorentz tensors

that by virtue of (330) are the representatives of Hqg

It is proved in the next Section that there is a duality Hpminuskg=0 sim H

p+k+1g=1 between

the σminus cohomology groups which reveals the one-to-one correspondence betweenthe gauge dynamical fields and equations of motion the level-k gauge symmetries

20The specific character of Minkowski massless fields is in that all Stueckelberg parameters canbe incorporated into a single Y1-valued form this not being the case for (anti)-de Sitter masslessfields

39

and the level-k Bianchi identities The representatives of cohomology groups in thesector of fields and gauge symmetries directly correspond to those of metric-likeapproach and there is no other nontrivial cohomology in these sectors

Though the trace pattern of fieldsgauge parameters is also important and thecalculation of σminus cohomology groups provides a comprehensive answer to this ques-tion the very procedure being a bit technical Ignoring the trace pattern of thefields it can be easily proved that the required metric-like field is incorporated inphysical vielbein eY0

q0 all the redundant components of the physical vielbein can be

gauged away by a pure algebraic symmetry and the same holds for differential gaugeparameters ξY0

q0minusk at all levels of reducibility ie the required pattern of gauge pa-rameters is recovered whereas all the redundant components are either Stueckelbergor auxiliary This is the necessary condition only and the traces has to be takeninto account Also it is still to be proved that the correct equations of motionsare imposed Provided that there are no trace conditions on the fields the sys-tem is referred to as off-shell[65] An off-shell system may contain only constraintsthat express auxiliary fields via the derivatives of the dynamical field imposing norestrictions on the latter

The off-shell system Technically ignoring the traces is equivalent to thereplacement of all so(dminus1 1)-irreps by the sl(d)-irreps that are characterized by thesame Young diagrams ie instead of taking so(dminus1 1)-tensor products one needs toapply the sl(d)-tensor productrsquos rules which are much simpler The decompositionof the physical vielbein eY0

q0into sl(d)-irreps is given by diagrams Yαi of the form

αN+1

sN minus 1

pNαN

s2 minus 1

p2α2

s1 minus 1

p1

α1

(419)

where α1+ +αN+1 = q0 = p The decomposition of Stueckelberg gauge parameterξY1q1minus1 for eY0

q0has the components of the same form but with αN+1 ge 1 because

Y1 (13) has already the form of Y0 with one cell in the bottom-left Thereforeall components of eY0

q0except for those with αN+1 = 0 are of Stueckelberg type but

there is only one component of eY0q0

with αN+1 = 0 namely it has αi = pi i isin [1 N ]and hence has the symmetry of Y The decomposition of level-k differential gaugeparameter ξY0

q0minusk has the form (419) with α1 + + αN+1 = p minus k and again all

the components of ξY0q0minusk with αN+1 ge 1 can be gauged away by pure algebraic

symmetry with ξY1q1minuskminus1 Consequently there is a complete matching between (219)

40

and those in ξY0

q0minusk that are not pure gauge themselves It can be easily proved alsothat if ignoring the traces there are no other dynamical fieldsdifferential gaugeparameters at higher grade Consequently

Lemma H(σminus) with respect to sl(d) are given by

Hk(σminus)sl(d) =

Yαi g = 0 α1 + + αN = k αN+1 = 0 k le p

empty k gt p(420)

The triviality of the higher k gt p cohomology groups for sl(d) which shouldcontain equations of motion and Bianchi identities is expected since the system isoff-shell For the equations to have the second order in derivatives the only nontrivialcohomology group H

p+1 must be at the grade-one ie Hp+1g=1 6= empty As is seen from

the examples above the equations correspond to those representatives of Hp+1g=1 that

are certain traces Indeed the total rank |WYgqg | which is equal to the sum qg + |Yg|

of degree qg and rank of Yg is preserved by σminus Therefore |WYgqg | = |W

Y0q0| + g

and |RY1q1+1| = |ω

Y0q0| + 2 = |Y|+ 2 where eY0

q0isin Wg=0

p and RY1q1+1 isin W

g=1p+1 contain

metric-like field φYM(x) and the equations on φY(x) respectively Consequently

the representative of Hp+1g=1 that corresponds to the equations on the traceless part

of φY(x) has to be identified with certain trace of the first order and so on for thetraces of φY(x)

The calculation of σminus cohomology groups carried out in Section 45 implies

1 The only nontrivial cohomology groups are Hpminuskg=0 and H

p+k+1g=1 k = 1 p

Therefore the dynamical fields and independent gauge parameters belong tothe zero grade Wg=0

q subspaces the equations are of the second order and theBianchi identities for the k-th level gauge symmetries are of the (k + 2)-thorder

2 Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 ie there is a one-to-one correspondence between the

elements of Hpminuskg=0 that are traces of the r-th order and the elements of Hp+k+1

g=1

that are traces of the (r + k + 1)-th order Roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1

Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on Therefore there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the dynamical fields and the equations of motion the level-k gaugesymmetries and the k-th Bianchi identities

3 The so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that correspond to the elements of Hpminusk(σminus) and arethe traces of the zeroth order are given by the so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagramsthat have the form (419) with αN+1 = 0 and α1 + + αN = p minus k whichexactly reproduce the required pattern (219) Note that certain higher ordertraces are also the elements of cohomology groups These fields represent thersquoauxiliaryrsquo fields of the metric-like formulation which had to be introduced tomake the gauge symmetry off-shell To prove the theorem it is not necessary toknow the concrete trace pattern the duality between the cohomology groupsis sufficient The details of the trace pattern are in Section 45

41

In the fermionic case the traces are substituted for Γ-traces Important isthat acting on tensor indices only σminus does not break down the irreducibility ofspin-tensors The duality has the form H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 or simply H

pminuskg=0 sim

Hp+k+1g=0 which means that equations are of the first order and the duality between

fieldsequations gauge symmetriesBianchi identities takes place which completesthe proof

Note that Yg=s1 equiv Yn=0k=0 has the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensorfor a spin-Y massless field

sNpN

s2p2

s1

p1 + 1

(421)

Analogously to the examples of Section 33 massless mixed-symmetry fields can bedescribed by the same unfolded system (16) that is restricted to Wg

q with g ge g0ie the system contains infinitely many dual formulations As the generalized Weyltensor and its descendants are non-gauge fields the dual descriptions with g0 ge s1are non-gauge and the dual descriptions with 0 lt g0 lt s1 are gauge

43 Physical Degrees of Freedom Counting

Notwithstanding the simplicity of the unfolded form and the uniqueness of unfoldingthere still might be a question of whether the unfolded equations do describe thecorrect number of physical degrees of freedom

It is well-known that for systems with the first class constraints only with mass-less fields belonging to this class the counting of degrees of freedom is that one firstlevel gauge parameter kills two degrees of freedom one second level gauge parame-ters kills three degrees of freedom and so on For example a spin-two massless fieldpossesses d(dminus3)

2degrees of freedom which is just d(d+1)

2minus 2d d(d+1)

2and d being the

number of components of φmicroν and ξmicroThe complete information concerning the rsquonumberrsquo of fieldsgauge parameters

ie the multiplicity and the symmetry of corresponding tensors is contained inH

kg=0(σminus) for k = 0p Not only can a number of physical degrees of freedom be

calculated but the whole exact sequence that defines an iso(d minus 1 1) irrep can bederived The elements of this sequence are certain so(dminus 1) tensors that define anso(dminus 2) tensor as a quotient of so(d minus 1) tensors eg (218) The decompositionof so(dminus 1 1)-fields into irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) can be done with the aid ofpartmicro or after Fourier transform with the aid of momentum pmicro

For example for a spin-two field the cohomology groups that correspond to thedynamical fieldsdifferential gauge parameters and its decomposition into so(dminus 1)irreps have the form

42

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus bull sim φmicroν φ

νν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2bull

Quick sort of Young diagrams in 0 minusrarr 2H0 minusrarr H1 minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 gives the

correct exact sequence 0 minusrarr minusrarr minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 which defines a masslessspin-two irrep H (0 )

For the simplest mixed-symmetry field the hook- there are two levels of gaugetransformation hence relevant cohomology groups are H

0 H1 and H2

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus oplus bull sim ξAmicroν oplus ξ

Smicroν ξ

Sνν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2 oplus 2bull

H2 oplus sim φmicroνλ φ

νmicroν 6= 0 oplus oplus oplus 2 oplus bull

Again quick sort of diagrams in 0 minusrarr 3H0 minusrarr 2H1 minusrarr H2 minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0

gives exact sequence (218)Consequently the problem of calculation the number of physical degrees of free-

dom to be precise of deriving the exact sequence is effectively reduced to the simplecombinatoric problem of (i) decomposition so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagram representa-tives of H(σminus) to so(dminus 1)-diagrams (ii) cancellation of like terms in sequence

0 minusrarr (p+ 1)H0 minusrarr pH1 minusrarr minusrarr 2Hpminus1 minusrarr Hp minusrarr H (0Y) minusrarr 0 (422)

Skipping combinatoric technicalities we state that in the general case of a spin-Ymassless mixed-symmetry field (422) reduces to the correct exact sequence thatdefines a uirrep H (0Y) of iso(dminus 1 1)

44 Solving the Generalized Jacobi Identities

Unfolding some dynamical system there arises a problem of solving Jacobi identities(33) that have schematically a form hhdω1

q equiv 0 where a number of backgroundvielbeins ha is contracted with the fiber indices of ω1

q The Jacobi identity restrictsdω1

q to have a certain specific form dω1q = hhω2

r where the so(dminus1 1)-irrep inwhich ω2

r takes values the degree r and the projector built of hh are completelydetermined The solutions are given by21

Lemma A Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values inY = Y(s p) (k 1)

so(dminus 1 1)-irrep The general solution of

hcdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq = 0 (423)

21As was pointed out in Section 33 nonzero traces either violate Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms and therefore are ignored

43

has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq k lt s

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1 k = s q ge p + 1

0 k = s q lt p+ 1

(424)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 take values inY(s p) (k + 1 1)

and Y(s+ 1 p+ 1) so(dminus 1 1)-irreps respectively22

Proof The parametrization of dωq by a degree-(q + 1) form taking values in the

same so(dminus 1 1)-irrep dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = R

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q+1 obviously fails to satisfy

(423) Inasmuch as (423) contains a vielbein the solution has to contain a number

of vielbeins too The most general parametrization of dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q with only

one vielbein included has the form dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = hdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)|dq for some

q-form taking values in a tensor product of Y by a vector representation ie thereis no definite symmetry between index d and the rest of the indices

hchdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)c|dq = 0larrrarr ωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)[c|d]

q = 0 (425)

Only those irreps in Yotimes are allowed that have c and d symmetric ie correspondto Y(s p) (k + 1 1) for k lt s This is not possible in the case k = s ie Y =Y(s p+ 1) and the only possibility to have c and d symmetric is to add the whole

column toY which requires dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q to be represented as dω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hchcωa1(sminus1)cap(sminus1)cap+1(sminus1)cqminuspminus1 and therefore q must be large enough Roughly

speaking the proof is based on the fact that the anti-symmetrization of two indicesat the same row of a Young diagram is identically zero the anti-symmetrizationbeing due to contraction with vielbeins

Note that choosing nonmaximal solutions of Jacobi identities results in loweringthe gauge symmetry so that not all redundant components are excluded

Unfolding totally-symmetric massless higher-spin fields the possible rhs termsin dω

a(sminus1)b(t)1 = are restricted by Jacobi identities and an essential use is made

of

Corollary The solution of Jacobi identity

hcdωa(sminus1)b(tminus1)c1 equiv 0 (426)

is of the form

dωa(sminus1)b(t)1 =

hcωa(sminus1)b(t)c1 t lt sminus 1

hchdCa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 t = sminus 1

(427)

22The symmetric basis is used being more convenient in this case as the contracted with vielbeinstensors are already irreducible

44

The following statement is a generalization of the Lemma-A to the case where(s p) (k 1) is a rsquosubdiagramrsquo of a larger Young diagram Y that has a numberof rows precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) Appropriate Young symmetrizershave to be included as the mere contraction of a number of vielbeins breaks theirreducibility of the tensor For instance hcω

a(s1)b(s2minus1)c is already irreducible withthe symmetry of Ys1 s2 minus 1 but this is not the case for hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) which hasto be added one term hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) + 1s1minuss2+1

hcωa(s1)bb(s2minus1)c to get the symmetry

of Ys1 minus 1 s2

Lemma B Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values in Y =

Y( (s p) (k 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irrep where the dots stands for the blocks inY precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) The general solution of

Π[hcdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq

]= 0 (428)

where Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p)(k minus 1 1) has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

Π[

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq

]

k lt s

Π[

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1

]

k = s q ge p+ 1

0 k = s q lt p + 1

(429)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 takes values in

Y (s p) (k + 1 1) and Y (s+ 1 p+ 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irreps respec-tively and Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p) (k 1)

Proof The proof is similar to that of Lemma-A with the only comment that thesymmetrizers do not affect the argumentation that anti-symmetrization of two in-dices in the same row is identically zero

45 Dynamical Content via σminus Cohomology

Before discussing the calculation of σminus cohomology let us first recall necessary factsconcerning the evaluation of so(d minus 1 1)-tensor products Let P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) be anumber of integer partitions k1 + + kN = m of m where ki is constrained byki le ǫi and different rearrangements of ki satisfying the constraints are regarded asdistinct partitions The generating function for the partition P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) is

sum

m

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m)tm =

i=Nprod

i=1

(1minus tǫi+1)

1minus t(430)

These integer partitions gives the multiplicities of irreps in so(dminus 1 1)-tensor prod-ucts (Clebsh-Gordon coefficients) we are interested in [71]

45

The so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary irrep Ylowast = Y(si pi) by aone-column diagram of the height qlowast can be explicitly calculated as

sNpN

s2

p2

s1

p1

otimes

q =sum

αjβi

Nαjβi

αN+1

βN

αN

ǫNpN sN

β2

α2

ǫ2p2 s2

β1

α1

ǫ1p1 s1

(431)

where αi βi αi + βi le pi i isin [1 N ] αN+1 ge 0 and there exist ρ ge 0 such that

qlowast =i=Nsum

i=1

(αi + βi) + αN+1 + 2ρ (432)

The multiplicity Nαjβi of Ylowastαj βi

is given by integer partition

Nαjβi = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ǫi = pi minus αi minus βi (433)

and the total trace order r is

r =i=Nsum

i=1

βi + ρ (434)

Roughly speaking to obtain an element of the tensor product one should first cutoff from bottom-right of the i-th block a column of height βiminusγi pi ge βiminusγi ge 0 (totake different traces) and second add an arbitrary number αi+γi pi ge αi+γi ge 0 ofcells to each block provided the γi cells annihilate ie they are added to the placesfrom which γi cells were removed at the first stage Multiplicity may be differentfrom one due to different rearrangements of γi ie when multiplied by the rest ofq-column different traces can give rise to the same diagram The number of suchrearrangements is given by P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ρ =

sumi=N

i=1 γi For instance sl(n)-tensor

product otimes is given simply by

otimessl(n) = oplus oplus oplus (435)

46

The so(d)-tensor product can be represented as a sum of the form

otimesso(n) = otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

otimessl(n)

oplus

otimessl(n)

︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

oplus

otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

2nd order

=

oplus oplus oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

oplus

oplus 2 oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

︸︷︷︸

2ndorder

(436)

where the sum is over trace order and the boxes that are connected by the arc areto be contracted and then the sl(n)-product rules are to be applied to the rest ofthe diagrams

Evaluating the so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary spinor-irrep Ylowast =Y(si pi) 1

2by a one-column diagram of the height qlowast one can contract any number

of Γ matrices with the indices of the column and then multiply therefore the tensorproduct rule for spin-tensors can be reduced to bosonic rule (431) as

Y(si pi) 12otimesso(n) Y(1 q) =

qsum

k=0

(Y(si pi) otimesso(n) Y(1 q minus k)

)

12

(437)

for example

12otimesso(n) = 1

2oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order Γ-traces

oplus

12oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order Γ-traces

oplus

oplus

2 12

︸︷︷︸

2nd order Γ-traces

oplus

bull 12

︸︷︷︸

3d order Γ-traces

(438)

The multiplicity N12

αjβiof Ylowast

αj βi12

is given by

N12

αjβi=

i=ρsum

i=0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus i) (439)

Let us now analyze the origin of σminus cohomology Its action σminus Wgq rarr W

gminus1q+1

preserves g+ q and hence the whole complex C(W σminus) is a direct sum of complexesC(qprime σminus) where q

prime refers to the end element Wg=0qprime of the complex

C(qprime σminus) 0 minusrarr minusrarr Wg=1qprimeminus1 minusrarrW

g=0qprime minusrarr 0 (440)

47

Moreover σminus preserves the total rank (the form degree + rank of the so(d minus 1 1)-

irrep in which the field takes values) LetWa(s1)a(sm)q be an element ofWg

qprime When

all form indices of Wa(s1)a(sm)q are converted to the fiber ones according to (329)

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (441)

the action of σminus is just an anti-symmetrization of all d1 dq with those indices aithat are extra as compared to Ygminus1 plus some terms to restore the correct Youngsymmetry of Ygminus1 Let the decomposition ofW a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] into so(dminus1 1)-irreps be of the form

Ya1(s1) am(sm)otimes

Y(1 q) =oplus

r=0

oplus

ir

N rirYr

ir (442)

where the summation is over the trace order r and then over ir which enumeratesall so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that enters in the tensor product as the traces of the r-thorder N r

irbeing the multiplicity of Yr

ir The multiplicity of the zeroth order traces

is always equal to one N0i0= 1 In fact the diagrams Y 0

i0can be directly obtained

by the sl(n)-tensor product ruleThe very anti-symmetrization is insensitive to whether a certain component en-

ters as a trace or not When decomposed into so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the elements ofWg

qprime and Wgminus1qprime+1 have a number of components of the same symmetry type The

action of σminus is just a linear transformation that either sends the whole so(dminus 1 1)-irrep to zero23 or sends it to the components of Wgminus1

qprime+1 of the same symmetry typeImportant is that σminus does not act between different so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Thereforecomplex C(qprime σminus) is a direct sum of complexes parameterized by so(dminus 1 1)-irrepsYprime that are given by various tensor products

Ynk

otimes

Y(1 q) (443)

provided that the field WYnkq is an element of Wgprimeminusi

qprime+i for certain i When reducedto such a complex

C(Yprime qprime σminus) 0rarr rarr Vg rarr Vgminus1 rarr rarr 0 (444)

the action of σminus is a linear transformation between the spaces Vg rarr Vgminus1 dimen-

sions of which are equal to the multiplicity of Yprime in the decomposition of WYgqg and

WYgminus1qg+1 The action of σminus is maximally non-degenerate compatible with nilpotency

Therefore to find cohomology groups the dimension of each linear space in everycomplex has to be calculated

Let us note that only the types and multiplicities of so(dminus1 1)-irreps are foundbelow ie no attention is paid to the description of how the corresponding tensorsare contained in the fields WY

qprime This is sufficient for our purposes though it isobvious (412) how the metric-like field φYM

is incorporated in an element ofWg=0p

23provided that the appropriate basis on the space of so(dminus1 1)-irreps with the same symmetrytype is chosen

48

The calculation of σminus cohomology is divided into three cases that cover the wholevariety of so(dminus 1 1)-irreps that can result from the tensor products (443)

In the Lemmas below it is assumed that complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is parameterizedby so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Yprime = Ylowast

αj βiof the form (431) with Ylowast = Ynk q

lowast = q such

that WYnkq isin C(qprime σminus) and ρ is defined according to (432)

In the first case Yprime is an element of Y0 otimesY(1 q)

Lemma 1 The σminus cohomology groups Hqg=0 and H

qg=1 are nontrivial and are given

by

Hqg =

Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βiMαj βi

αN+1 = 0sumi=N

i=0 αi = qq isin [0 p] g = 0

H2pminusqminus1 q isin [p+ 1 2p+ 1] g = 1

empty q gt 2p+ 1 any g

(445)where Mαj βi is the multiplicity of the irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

defined below

Proof From the very form of Yn=N0 equiv Yg=0 equiv Y(si minus 1 pi) it follows that theso(dminus1 1)-irreps that the element ofWg=0

q sim Y0otimesY(1 q) decomposes into may

be contained in Wg=1qminus1 only ie Wg=0

q and Wg=kqminusk contain no so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of

the same symmetry type for k gt 1 Therefore the length of complex C(Yprime q σminus)where Yprime isin Y0otimesY(1 q) is equal to one ie C(Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

q σminus) 0 minusrarrV1 minusrarr V0 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions of V0 and V1 are given by the multiplicitiesof the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

in Wg=1qminus1 and Wg=0

q respectively

dim(V1) =

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus 1) ρ ge 1

0 ρ = 0αN+1 = 0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) αN+1 gt 0

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) (446)

If αN+1 gt 0 the dimensions of V0 and V1 are equal and each irreducible componentof Wg=0

q with αN+1 gt 0 can be gauge away by virtue of the corresponding element

of Wg=1qminus1 thus being exact H

kgt2p+1 = empty inasmuch as ρ le p and the componentsof the forms with rank greater than (2p + 1) must have αN+1 gt 0 thus beingexact If αN+1 = 0 the dimensions are different dim(V1) lt dim(V0) for q le pdim(V1) = dim(V0) for q = p + 1 and dim(V1) gt dim(V0) for q gt p Thereforethe number of those Ysi piαj βi

isin Wg=0q q le p that are not exact is equal to

Mαj βi = |dim(V1) minus dim(V0)| the same is the number of those Ysi piαj βiisin

Wg=1qminus1 q gt p+ 1 that are not exact The obvious property of integer partitions

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ǫ1 + + ǫN minusm) (447)

results in the important duality in the cohomology groups Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 or

roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on

49

The second case is the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) where Yprime is an element of the tensor

product Ynk otimesY(1 q) for certain q ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmaxn minus 1

Lemma 2 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainqprime ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmax

n minus 1 the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The complex has the length two ie 0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr 0 wherethe dimensions are given by dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫN 1|ρ+ 1)dim(V2) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ+ 1) Simple calculations with generating functions resultsin dim(V0) lt dim(V1) dim(V2) lt dim(V1) and dim(V0) minus dim(V1) + dim(V2) = 0and consequently the sequence is exact

Analogously

Lemma 3 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainq ge 0 with k = 0 and n lt N the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The speciality of such Yprime is that the complex has the length three ie0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr V3 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions are given by

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 ǫn + 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V2) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 1) ρ ge ǫn + 1

0 otherwise

dim(V3) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn minus 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 2) ρ ge ǫn + 2

0 otherwise

Again simple calculations with generating functions results in appropriate inequali-ties and dim(V0)minusdim(V1)+dim(V2)minusdim(V3) = 0 and consequently the sequenceis exact

The above three cases covers the whole variety of the so(d minus 1 1)-tensors thatcan result from the tensor products YnkotimesY(1 q) for any n k and q The caseswith sN = 1 and Y = Y0 are special but the calculation of cohomology groupsleads to the same result

In the fermionic case the computations are similar due to the multiplicity givenby (439) The difference is that all nontrivial cohomology is concentrated in gradezero Indeed taking into account (446) where P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) is to be replaced by(439) it follows that dim(V0) ge dim(V1) for all q and H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 where r

is referred to the Γ-trace order or roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 andso on

5 Conclusions

The unfolded system constructed in the paper has a simple form of a covariantconstancy equation and describes arbitrary mixed-symmetry bosonic and fermionic

50

massless fields in d-dimensional Minkowski space The gauge fieldsparameters aredifferential forms with values in certain finite-dimensional irreducible representationsof the Lorentz algebra that are uniquely determined by the generalized spin

The key moment is that all gauge symmetries are manifest within the unfoldedformulation which is of most importance in controlling the number of physicaldegrees of freedom when trying to introduce interactions Unfolded systems areformulated in terms of differential forms which is a natural way to respect diffeo-morphisms and hence to describe systems that include gravity

Though the necessary conditions for the system to have a lagrangian descriptionare satisfied ie the fields are in one-to-one correspondence with the equations andthe k-th level gauge symmetries are in one-to-one correspondence with the k-thBianchi identities the very lagrangian remains to be constructed

Another interesting moment is that the unfolded equations for bosons are thesame as for fermions namely the operators involved ie exterior differential dand σminus remains unmodified when tensors are replaced with spin-tensors Thoughthis nice property partly breaks down in (anti)-de Sitter space within the unfoldedapproach bosons and fermions have much in common the fact being very useful forsupersymmetric theories

The proposed unfolded system includes all non-gauge dual descriptions whichare based on the generalized Weyl tensor and its descendants but not all of gaugedual descriptions It would be interesting to construct an unfolded system thatcontains all dual formulations

The interactions of the totally symmetric massless higher-spin fields are knownto require a nonzero cosmological constant ie are formulated in (anti)-de Sitterspace [2] Mixed-symmetry fields exhibit some interesting features in the presence ofcosmological constant For example not all of the Minkowski gauge symmetries canbe deformed to (anti)-de Sitter [72] As a result massless mixed-symmetry fields havemore degrees of freedom in (anti)-de Sitter compared to its Minkowski counterparts[73] and in the Minkowski limit a massless mixed-symmetry field splits in a certaincollection of massless fields generally Contrariwise a single mixed-symmetry fieldcan not be smoothly deformed to (anti)-de Sitter Another interesting effect is theexistence of the so-called partially-massless fields [74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 8283 84] the fields that have a number of degrees of freedom intermediate betweenthat of massless and massive and split in a set of massless fields in the Minkowskilimit Therefore the extension of the proposed approach to (anti)-de Sitter spaceseems to be non-trivial but nevertheless worth being investigated

In a series of papers [85 61 86 60] it was suggested so-called frame-like approachto the general mixed-symmetry fields in (anti)-de Sitter To generalize the proposedin the present paper unfolded system to (anti)-de Sitter case and to compare to thatof [60] is the next step to perform

We consider the proposed unfolded system as the first stage in constructing thefull interacting theory of mixed-symmetry fields

51

Acknowledgements

The author appreciates sincerely MA Vasiliev for reading the manuscript and mak-ing many detailed and valuable suggestions and illuminating comments the verywork was initiated as the result of discussions with MA Vasiliev The author isalso grateful to RR Metsaev and KB Alkalaev for useful discussions and to OVShaynkman for discussion of the fermionic case The work was supported in partby grants RFBR No 05-02-17654 LSS No 440120062 and INTAS No 05-7928by the Landau Scholarship and by the Scholarship of Dynasty foundation

Appendix A Multi-index convention

The multi-index notations is used a group of indices in which certain tensor issymmetric or is to be symmetrized is denoted either by one letter with the numberof indices indicated in round brackets or by placing a group of indices in roundbrackets eg

T a(s) equiv T a1a2as T a1aiaj as = T a1ajaias (A1)

V aT a(s) equiv V (a1T a2as+1) equiv1

s+ 1(V a1T a2a3as+1 + V a2T a1a3as+1 + + V as+1T a1a2as)

(A2)

V (bT a(s)) equiv V (bT a1as) equiv1

s + 1

(V bT a1a2as + V a1T ba2a3as + + V asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A3)Analogously the group of indices in which certain tensor is anti-symmetric or is tobe anti-symmetrized is denoted by placing indices in square brackets eg

T a[s] equiv T a1a2as T a1aiai+1as = minusT a1ai+1aias (A4)

V [bT a[s]] equiv V [bT a1as] equiv1

s+ 1

(V bT a1a2as minus V a1T ba2a3as + + (minus)sV asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A5)The operators of (anti)-symmetrization are weighted to be projectors (the factor 1

s+1

above)

Appendix B Young diagrams

Comprehensive information on Young diagrams can be found for example in thetextbook [71]

Definition B1 Given an integer partition ie a nonincreasing sequence si i isin[1 n] si ge si+1 of positive integers (or nonnegative when it is convenient to workwith a sequence of a fixed length) associated Young diagram Ys1 s2 sn is agraphical representation consisting of n left-justified rows made of boxes with the

52

i-th row containing si boxes

s10s11

s1s2s3s4

s5s6s7

s8s9

Finite-dimensional irreducible representation(irrep) of sl(d) ie various irre-ducible sl(d)-tensors are in one-to-one correspondence with Young diagrams of theform Ys1 s2 s[ d

2] The associated irreducible tensors

T

s1︷︸︸︷aa

s2︷︸︸︷

bb (B1)

or in condensed notation T a(s1)b(s2) have at most [d2] groups of indices being sym-

metric in each group separately and satisfy the condition that the symmetrizationof any group of indices with one index of any of the subsequent groups is identicallyzero ie

T a(s1)(b(sk)b)c(sjminus1) equiv 0 k lt j (B2)

If s[ d2] 6= 0 and d is even the (anti)-selfduality condition has to be imposed for

appropriate signature (anti)-selfduality is conventionally denoted by the sign factors+(minus) before s[ d

2] In this paper we do not consider (anti)-self dual representations

A scalar representation Y0 0 0 is denoted by bull a vector irrep Y1 0 0by rank-two symmetric tensor irrep by rank-two antisymmetric tensor irrep

by and so onFinite-dimensional irreducible representations of so(d) are of the two types ten-

sor and spin-tensor and are also characterized by Young diagrams which in thecase of spin-tensor irreps refer to the symmetry of the tensor part Young diagramsthat correspond to spin-tensor irreps are labeled by 1

2-subscript Spinor indices

α β γ = 12[d2] are placed first and are separated from tensor indices by rdquordquo For

example a spinor ψα irrep is denoted by bull 12 a vector-spinor irrep Aαaby 1

2and

so on To make tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry conditionthe tracelessness condition with respect to each pair of indices is to be imposed

ηccTa(s1)cb(siminus1)cd(sjminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n j = 1n (B3)

To make spin-tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry condition Γ-tracelessness condition with respect to each tensor index and a spinor index is to beimposed

Γαc βT

βa(s1)cb(siminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n (B4)

where Γαc β satisfy Γα

a βΓβb γ

+ Γαb βΓ

βaγ = 2ηab Additional conditions on spinors viz

Majorana Weyl and Majorana-Weyl are irrelevant to the problems concerned Also

53

in both cases it is required for the sum of the heights of the first two columns ofYoung diagrams to be not greater than d Note that the Γ-tracelessness conditionis stronger than the tracelessness one and applying the Γ-tracelessness twice to twosymmetric indices gives the tracelessness

0 = 2ΓαaβΓ

βb γT γ(ab) = ηabT

αab (B5)

To handle with arbitrary large Young diagrams the so-called block representationis used ie the rows of equal lengths are combined to blocks

Y(s1 p1) (sn pn) equiv Y

p1︷ ︸︸ ︷s1 s1

p2︷ ︸︸ ︷s2 s2

pn︷ ︸︸ ︷sn sn (B6)

References

[1] C Fronsdal ldquoMassless fields with integer spinrdquo Phys Rev D18 (1978) 3624

[2] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoCubic interaction in extended theories ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Nucl Phys B291 (1987) 141

[3] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoOn the gravitational interaction ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Phys Lett B189 (1987) 89ndash95

[4] M A Vasiliev ldquoConsistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in(3+1)-dimensionsrdquo Phys Lett B243 (1990) 378ndash382

[5] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoOn the geometry of higher-spin gauge fieldsrdquoClass Quant Grav 20 (2003) S473ndashS486 hep-th0212185

[6] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoFree geometric equations for higher spinsrdquoPhys Lett B543 (2002) 303ndash310 hep-th0207002

[7] M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear equations for symmetric massless higher spin fieldsin (a)ds(d)rdquo Phys Lett B567 (2003) 139ndash151 hep-th0304049

[8] X Bekaert I L Buchbinder A Pashnev and M Tsulaia ldquoOn higher spintheory Strings brst dimensional reductionsrdquo Class Quant Grav 21 (2004)S1457ndash1464 hep-th0312252

[9] D Sorokin ldquoIntroduction to the classical theory of higher spinsrdquo AIP ConfProc 767 (2005) 172ndash202 hep-th0405069

[10] X Bekaert S Cnockaert C Iazeolla and M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear higherspin theories in various dimensionsrdquo hep-th0503128

[11] A Sagnotti E Sezgin and P Sundell ldquoOn higher spins with a strong sp(2r)conditionrdquo hep-th0501156

[12] P K Townsend ldquoCovariant quantization of antisymmetric tensor gaugefieldsrdquo Phys Lett B88 (1979) 97

54

when rows of equal lengths are combined to blocks as Y(s1 p1) (s2 p2) pibeing the number of rows of length si Loosely speaking we do not make any differ-ence between irreducible finite-dimensional representations of orthogonal algebrasYoung diagrams2 and the corresponding irreducible (spin)-tensors3 eg rank-twosymmetric traceless tensor-valued field φab ie φab = φba and ηabφ

ab = 0 can beequivalently denoted either as φ or φY with Y = Y2 equiv Y(2 1) The scalarrepresentation Y0 is denoted by bull Unless otherwise stated all Young diagramsare of orthogonal algebras viz so(dminus 1 1) or so(dminus 2) For more detail on Youngdiagrams see in Appendix B Greek indices micro ν=0(d-1) are the world indicesof the Minkowski space-time Md d equiv dxmicro part

partxmicro is the exterior differential on MdThe degree of differentials forms on Md is indicated by the bold subscript eg adegree-q differential form ω onMd with values in so(dminus1 1)-irrep characterized bythe Young diagram Y is denoted as ωY

q (loosely speaking Y-valued degree-q formωYq ) The wedge symbol and is systematically omitted Lowercase Latin letters ab=0(d-1) are vector indices of so(dminus 1 1) fiber indices of the sections of tensor

bundles over the Minkowski space-time Greek indices α β γ = 12[d2] are fiber

spinor indices of so(d minus 1 1) The multi-index condensed notation is used in thepaper the (anti)-symmetrization is denoted by placing the corresponding indices in(square) round brackets for details on the multi-index notation see Appendix A

1 Summary of Results

The main statement of the paper is that given a unitary irreducible bosonic(fermionic)representation of the massless Wignerrsquos little algebra so(dminus2) which is characterizedby Young diagram Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) (Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) 1

2)

there exists a uniquely determined unfolded system that describes a massless spin-Y field with all gauge symmetries being manifest The system has the form of acovariant constancy equation

Dωp = 0 ωp isin Wp

δωp = Dξpminus1 ξpminus1 isin Wpminus1

δξpminus1 = Dξpminus2 ξpminus2 isin Wpminus2

δξ1 = Dξ0 ξ0 isin W0 (11)

2In addition to the Young symmetry conditions extra restrictions (with the aid of invarianttensors Levi-Civita for sl(d) metric and Levi-Civita for so(d)) have to be imposed on the tensors tomake them irreducible In what follows it is important that irreducible so(d)-tensors are tracelessNo special consideration is given to (anti)-self dual fields see Appendix B

3In the case of fermionic representations of orthogonal algebras ie spin-tensors the tensorpart of a spin-tensor (all but one spinor indices can be converted pairwise to tensor indices bymeans of Γ-matrices hence we consider spin-tensors with one spinor index only) is characterizedby Young diagram which is labeled by the subscript 1

2 eg an irreducible rank-two symmetrictensor-spinor ψαab satisfies Γα

aβψβab = 0 and belongs toY2 1

2

The connection with the standard

Gelfan-Zeitlin labels is obvious Additional conditions viz Majorana Weyl and Majorana-Weylare irrelevant to the problems concerned

3

where W =oplusinfin

q=0Wq is certain graded space D is a nilpotent operator of degree

(+1) D Wq rarr Wq+1 and D2 = 0 Gauge fields take values in Wp where

p =sumi=N

i=1 pi is the height of Young diagram Y the first level gauge parameters inWpminus1 the second level gauge parameters in Wpminus2 and so on The gauge invarianceis manifest by virtue of D2 = 0 The reducibility of gauge transformations is similarto those of totally anti-symmetric fields

SpaceWp which contains the gauge fields of the unfolded system is a graded by

nonnegative integer g = 0 1 set of differential formsWp = ωY0q0 ωY1

q1 ω

Ygqg

q0 = p Diagrams Yg that characterize so(d minus 1 1)-irreducible representations inwhich the fields and gauge parameters take values are uniquely determined by theinitial diagram Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN)( 1

2) of so(dminus 2)

The dynamical field is incorporated in a p-form ωY0p isin Wg=0

p that takes valuesin the irreducible representation(irrep) of the Lorentz algebra so(d minus 1 1) that ischaracterized by Young diagram Y0 of the form

sN minus 1pN

s2 minus 1p2

s1 minus 1

p1

(12)

ie it is obtained by cutting off the first column of Y All other gauge fields inthe system are auxiliary and can be expressed in terms of derivatives of ωY0

p It is

convenient to enumerate the Lorentz-irreps in which gauge fields ωYgqg take values by

a pair n k of integers Roughly speaking the first integer is related to the numberof the block of Y n = N 0 the second one is related to the relative length ofthe n-th and (n+ 1)-th blocks The so(dminus 1 1)-irreps Yg=0Yg=(sNminus1) are givenby Ynk with n = N k = 0(sN minus 1) of the form

k

sN minus 1pN

s2 minus 1p2

s1 minus 1

p1

(13)

The diagrams Yg with g = sN (sNminus1 minus 1) are given by Ynk with n = N minus 1

4

k = 0(sNminus1 minus sN minus 1) of the form

sNminus1

sN minus 1pN

k

s2 minus 1p2

s1 minus 1

p1

(14)

and analogously for the rest of Yg with g lt s1 The diagrams Yg with g = s1 s1 +1 are given by Ynk with n = 0 k = 0 1 of the form

sN minus 1

sN minus 1pN

s2minuss3minus1

s2 minus 1p2

s1minuss2minus1

s1 minus 1

p1

k + 1

(15)

Gauge fields ωYgqg for g sim n = N k are (p1 + + pN)-forms gauge fields ω

Ygqg for

g sim n = Nminus1 k are (p1+ +pNminus1)-forms gauge fields ωYgqg for g sim n = 0 k

are zero-forms Hence form degree function qg is completely defined The grade g isequal to the element number (starting from zero) in the set of pairs n k orderedby k in increasing order and then by n in decreasing order

Space Wpminus1 which contains the first level gauge parameters of the system is aset of forms with values in the same so(dminus 1 1)-irreps as gauge fields but the form

degree is less by one ie Wpminus1 = ξY0q0minus1 ξ

Y1q1minus1 ξ

Yg

qgminus1 The sector Wgpminus1 for

g ge s1 is trivial du to qg = 0 Analogously spaces Wq for q lt p minus 1 and q gt pcan be defined To sum up the element of space Wpplusmni at grade g sim n k is adegree-(qg plusmn i) form with values in Yg equiv Ynk irrep of the Lorentz algebra

The Minkowski background space is described in terms of vielbein(tetrad) hamicrodxmicro

and Lorentz spin-connection abmicro dxmicro which determines Lorentz-covariant derivative

DL = d+When reduced to Wg

q the full system has the form

DLωYg

qg= σminus

(

ωYg+1qg+1

)

ωYg

qgisin Wg

p ωYg+1qg+1

isin Wg+1p

δωYg

qg= DLξ

Yg

qgminus1 + σminus

(

ξYg+1

qg+1minus1

)

ξYg

qgminus1 isin Wgpminus1 ξ

Yg+1

qg+1minus1 isin Wg+1pminus1

δξYg

qgminus1 = (16)

where operator D is a sum D = DL minus σminus of Lorentz-covariant derivative DL andcertain nilpotent operator σminus

andq otimesYg+1 rarrandq+∆g+1otimesYg ∆g = qg minus qg+1 ge 0

5

(σminus)2 = 0 built of background vielbein hamicrodx

micro which is unambiguously fixed bythe symmetry of Yg and Yg+1 σminus contracts (∆g + 1) vielbeins ha with the tensorrepresenting Yg+1 to obtain the tensor with the symmetry of Yg appropriate Youngsymmetrizers are implied

Since σminus affects tensor indices only it is correctly defined on spin-tensors too anddoes not violate the Γ-tracelessness condition The unfolded equations for fermionshave the same form as for bosons the irreducible tensors are to be replaced withcorresponding spin-tensors

The case of the last block of the length one ie single column is not specialbut requires some comments Since (sN minus 1) = 0 it is not possible to add a cellto the bottom-left of the N -th block of Y0 therefore Yn=Nk=0 equiv Y0 is theonly diagram with n = N and diagram Yn=Nminus1k=0 equiv Yg=1 has the symmetry ofY(s1 minus 1 p1) (sNminus1 minus 1 pNminus1) (1 pN + 1)

Subspace Wnkq with definite n forms an irreducible module of iso(d minus 1 1)

whereas the subspace with definite both n and k forms a finite-dimensional irre-ducible module of so(d minus 1 1) ie an irreducible Lorentz tensor characterized byYg as was stated above The intervals of constancy of qg correspond to gnk withdefinite n ie the set of forms on which a certain irreducible iso(dminus 1 1)-moduleis realized all have the same degree

Let us also note that Wkgep are infinite-dimensional whereas Wkltp are finite-dimensional The higher degree spaces Wkgep correspond to the equations of motion(Wk=p+1) and Bianchi identities (Wkgtp+1) which manifest the gauge symmetriesMost of the equations express higher grade g gt 0 fields via the derivatives of phys-ical field ωY0

q0and only certain elements of Wg=2

k=p+1 impose on ωY0q0

second orderdynamical equations The significance of the fields with g gt 0 is to make all gaugesymmetries be manifest

2 Mixed-Symmetry Fields in Minkowski Space

The types of the Minkowski space particles being by definition in one-to-one corre-spondence with unitary irreducible representations(uirrep) of the Poincare algebraiso(dminus 1 1) in the case of four space-time dimensions were classified by Wigner in[37]

Leaving out the details of the Wignerrsquos construction for recent reviews and forgeneralization to an arbitrary space-time dimension d see [38] important is thatgiven m2 gt 0 and a uirrep Y of the Wignerrsquos little algebra being so(d minus 1) form2 gt 0 and so(d minus 2) for m2 = 0 there exists a standard procedure to constructa uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) which is called a massive(massless) particle of spin-YSo-called continuous or infinite spin particles [37] [39] are not considered in thispaper Therefore physical degrees of freedom for massive and massless particles areclassified by irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) and so(dminus 2) respectively

More elaborated are the two cases of totally-symmetric spin-s particles Y =Ys equiv Y(s 1) [40 1 10] viz scalar vector graviton and of totally anti-symmetric spin-p particles Y = Y(1 p) [12 13 14] The others are referred to col-

6

lectively as mixed-symmetry the simplest one beingY = Y2 1 equiv Y(2 1) (1 1)Yet different problem is to realize a uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) on the solutions of a

wave equation for a field φYM(x) which takes values in a certain representation YM

of the Lorentz algebra so(dminus1 1) ie φYM(x) is a Lorentz tensor or a set of tensors

As field theories free particles can be described in either non-gauge or gauge wayin the former case a uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) is realized on the solutions of the waveequation directly whereas for the latter case a uirrep of iso(dminus1 1) is realized on thequotient of the solutions by certain specific solutions called pure gauge The waveequation (+m2)φYM

(x) = 0 which fixes the quadratic Casimir m2 of iso(dminus1 1)is generally supplemented with a set of algebraicdifferential constraints to singleout an irreducible in the sense of the little algebra component Field φYM

(x) takesvalues in a certain finite-dimensional representation of so(d minus 1 1) which is notirreducible in most cases nevertheless it can be made irreducible when dealing withfree equations of motion only Yet more different problem is to realize an irrep ofiso(d minus 1 1) on the solutions of the variational problem for some action in mostcases the procedure requires a set of auxiliary fields which carry no physical degreesof freedom

The choice of so(dminus 1 1)-representation YM (even if irreducible) in which fieldφYM

(x) takes values is not unique eg a free massless spin-one particle can bedescribed either by a gauge potential Amicro(x) subjected to

Amicro minus partmicropartνAν = 0 δAmicro = partmicroξ (21)

or by a field strength Fmicroν subjected to

partmicroFmicroν = 0 part[microFλρ] = 0 (22)

In the case of a massless spin-two particle (Y = so(dminus2)) in addition to the con-ventional description in terms of the metric gmicroν

Rmicroν minus1

2gmicroνR = 0 (23)

the Weyl tensor Cmicroνλρ known to have the symmetry of 4 can describe a freespin-two in a non gauge way

part[microCmicromicro]νν = 0 partλCmicroλνν = 0 (24)

Another example is a 4d massless scalar particle which can be described eitherby a scalar field φ(x) subjected to φ = 0 or more exotically by an antisymmetricgauge field ωmicroν (so-called notoph [41]) subjected to

ωmicroν minus partmicropartρωρν + partνpart

ρωρmicro = 0 δωmicroν = partmicroξν minus partνξmicro (25)

This equation describes a massless particle with spin- so(dminus2) equiv Y1 1so(dminus2) which

for d = 4 by virtue of the so(d minus 2) Levi-Civita tensor εij is equivalent to a scalar

4In antisymmetric basis Cmicroνλρ satisfies Cmicroνλρ = minusCνmicroλρ Cmicroνλρ = minusCmicroνρλ and C[microνλ]ρ = 0

7

Y1 1so(dminus2) sim Y0 0

so(dminus2) On the other hand a scalar particle can be describedby a rank-d antisymmetric field ωmicro1microd

satisfying ωmicro1microd= 0 where the use of

so(d minus 1 1)-duality is made of ωmicro1microd= εmicro1microd

φ These two types of duality arereferred to as trivial

The general statement is that free particles can be described by an infinite num-ber of ways called dual descriptions [42 43 44 45 46] but dual theories exhibitcertain difficulties while introducing interactions [47 48 49 50] eg despite the factthat free massless spin-one and spin-two particles can be described by the Maxwellfield strength and by the Weyl tensor respectively introducing interactions requiresthe corresponding gauge potentials Amicro and gmicroν to be brought in

There exists a distinguished choice of so(dminus1 1)-irrep YM in which field φYM(x)

takes values that can be referred to as fundamental or minimal For the minimaldescription of a spin-Y particle the spin degrees of freedom and the so(dminus1 1)-irrepYM are characterized by the same Young diagram ie YM = Y eg a spin-oneparticle by Amicro a spin-two by gmicroν All other descriptions are referred to as dual Itis the minimal descriptions that will be discussed further by this reason the termspin-Y particle can be substituted for more accepted spin-Y field

A massive totally symmetric spin-s field can be described [51] by a totally sym-metric tensor field φ(micro1micros) subjected to

(+m2)φmicro1micros= 0

partνφνmicro2micros= 0

φννmicro3micros

= 0

(26)

where the last equation (tracelessness condition) makes the tensor irreducible in theso(d minus 1 1) sense the first one puts the system on-mass-shell and the second oneprojects out the components orthogonal to the momentum restricting φmicro1micros

tocontain only a spin-s irrep of so(dminus 1)

Analogously a massive totally anti-symmetric spin-p field ie Y = Y(1 p)can be described by a totally anti-symmetric tensor field ω[micro1microp] subjected to

(+m2)ωmicro1microp= 0

partνωνmicro2microp= 0

(27)

where the tracelessness condition becomes trivial for anti-symmetric tensorsThese two results are easily generalized to an arbitrary spin-Ys1 snmassive

field which can be minimally described by a symmetric in each group of indicestensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) subjected to

(+m2)φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0

partmicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n]

φmicro1(s1)(microk(sk)microk)microi(siminus1)micron(sn) = 0 k isin [1 nminus 1] k lt i

ηmicroimicrojφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i j isin [1 n]

(28)

where the last two conditions are just the Young symmetry and the tracelessnessconditions which make the field carry an irrep-Ys1 sn of so(dminus 1 1) and can

8

be thought of as the part of the definition of field φYM(x) The first equation puts

the system on-mass-shell the second one projects out all so(dminus1)-irreps which thetensor φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)microp(sp) decomposes into except for the one with the symmetry ofYs1 sn so(dminus 1)-diagram

Let D (m2Ys1 sn) be an iso(d minus 1 1) module extracted by (28) beingirreducible for m2 6= 0 or for Y0 (scalar field) Since minimally described masslessfields are gauge theories a uirrep H (0Ys1 sn) of iso(d minus 1 1) correspondingto a massless spin-Ys1 sn field should be defined as appropriate quotient bythe pure gauge solutions of the form

0 minusrarr gauge solutions minusrarr all solutions minusrarr H (0Ys1 sn) minusrarr 0 (29)

where the sequence is non-split as there is no so(dminus 1 1)-covariant way to extractso(d minus 2)-irrep Ys1 sn from the Lorentz tensor with the same symmetry ofYs1 sn by virtue of a single so(dminus 1 1)-vector the momentum pmicro sim partmicro

A massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described as the quotient of(26) with m2 = 0 by pure gauge solutions of the form δφmicro1micros

= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) where

ξmicro1microsminus1 is a totally symmetric gauge parameter subjected to the equations of thesame form (26) ie on-mass-shell tracelessness and transversality thus belongingto D (0Ysminus 1) The definition of H (0Ys) is given by

0 minusrarr D (0Y(sminus 1 1)) minusrarr D (0Y(s 1)) minusrarr H (0Y(s 1)) minusrarr 0 (210)

There is a bit difference for a totally anti-symmetric spin-p massless field Puregauge solutions are defined analogously as δωmicro1microp

= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] where ξ[micro1micropminus1] is

a rank-(pminus1) antisymmetric gauge parameter subjected to the equation of the sameform (27) and thus belonging to D (0Y(1 pminus 1)) In contrast to a totally sym-metric spin-smassless field the gauge transformations are reducible in the sense thatδωmicro1microp

equiv 0 provided that one transforms gauge parameter δξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1]

with a second level rank-(p minus 2) antisymmetric gauge parameter ξ[micro1micropminus2] and soon Some components (parallel to the momentum) of the first level gauge parameterξmicro1micropminus1 do not contribute to the gauge law for ωmicro1microp

these are represented by thesecond level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 modulo those components of ξmicro1micropminus2 thatdo not contribute to ξmicro1micropminus1 and so on till δξmicro = partmicroξ Gauge parameters ξmicro1micropminus1ξmicro1micropminusk

k isin [1 p] and ξ are referred to as the first level the k-th level and thedeepest level of reducibility respectively The corresponding iso(d minus 1 1)-uirrep isgiven by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0Y(0 0)) minusrarr D (0Y(1 1)) minusrarr

minusrarr D (0Y(1 p)) minusrarr H (0Y(1 p)) minusrarr 0 (211)

For example Maxwell gauge potential Amicro possesses gauge parameters of the firstlevel only as p = 1 in this case

Though a considerable success in describing on-mass-shell massless fields wasachieved for instance within the light-cone approach [52] there are many reasons tohave an off-shell gauge symmetry ie to construct equations that are invariant with

9

respect to gauge transformations with gauge parameters not subjected to ξ = 0To make the symmetry off-shell generally requires to relax the irreducibility of theso(dminus 1 1)-representation in which field φY(x) takes values

For instance a massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described[53] by atraceless rank-s symmetric field φmicro1micros

with an off-shell gauge symmetry

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

(d+2sminus4)η(micro1micro2part

νpartρφνρmicro3micros) = 0 φννmicro3micros

= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1

= 0 partνξνmicro2microsminus1) = 0 (212)

where in order for φmicro1microsto be traceless the gauge parameter has to be not only

traceless but transverse also this still being true for general mixed-symmetry fieldsApparently to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters the trace-lessness constraint for field φmicro1micros

has to be relaxed The same spin-s massless fieldcan be described[1] by field φmicro1micros

subjected to5

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

2part(micro1partmicro2φ

ννmicro3micros) = 0 φνρ

νρmicro5micros= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1

ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1= 0

(213)

where in order to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters a trace-lessness is relaxed to a double-tracelessness ie field φmicro1micros

takes values in thedirect sum of two so(d minus 1 1)-irreps being symmetric traceless tensors of ranks sand (s minus 2) The general statement is that for equations of motion to have an off-shell gauge symmetry the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep in which field φY(x) takes values has tobe reducible with additional direct summands representing certain nonzero tracesThese additional fields are called auxiliary and carry no physical degrees of freedomImposing certain gauge equations (28) can be restored

A massless totally antisymmetric spin-p field can be described by an antisym-metric rank-p tensor field ω[micro1microp] subjected to

ωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1part

νωνmicro2microp] = 0 δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] (214)

where the symmetry at the all levels of reducibility is manifest and off-shell ieδξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1] for the second level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 not subjectedto any differential constraints and analogously for the gauge symmetries at deeperlevels

Much similar to totally anti-symmetric fields mixed-symmetry massless fieldspossess reducible gauge transformations ie for a field φ with equations of motioninvariant under gauge transformations δξ1φ =

sum

i1partξi11 there exist the second level

gauge transformations δξ2ξi11 =

sum

i2partξi22 such that δξ2φ equiv 0 there exist the third

level gauge transformations δξ3ξi22 =

sum

i3partξi33 such that δξ3ξ1 equiv 0 and so on The

difference from totally anti-symmetric fields is in that there are generally more thanone gauge parameters at each level of reducibility (enumerated by index ik at thek-th level)

5Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [1] have the form Gmicro1microsminus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 where Gmicro1microsis equal to (213) the two forms being equiva-

lent

10

For instance the simplest mixed-symmetry massless field has the spin- andcan be minimally described[16 17] by a field φ[micromicro]ν which is anti-symmetric in thefirst two indices and satisfies Young symmetry condition6 φ[micromicroν] = 0 The equationsof motion

φmicromicroλ + 2part[micropartλφmicro]λν minus partνpart

λφmicromicroλ minus 2partνpart[microφλ

micro]λ = 0 (215)

are invariant underδφmicromicroν = part[microξ

Smicro]ν + part[microξ

Amicro]ν minus partνξ

Amicromicro (216)

with symmetric and anti-symmetric gauge parameters ξS(microν) and ξA[microν] Let us stress

that to maintain an off-shell gauge symmetry field φ[micromicro]ν has to take values in a

reducible so(d minus 1 1) representation oplus so does symmetric gauge parameterξS(micromicro) oplus bull which is in accordance with φ ν

microν 6= 0 and ξSνν 6= 0 Analogously tototally anti-symmetric fields there exist second level gauge transformations with avector parameter ξmicro

δφmicromicroν = 0

δξAmicroν = 23(partmicroξν minus partνξmicro)

δξSmicroν = partmicroξν + partνξmicro

(217)

In this case H

(

0)

is given by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

oplusD (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0 (218)

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) field the depthof reducibility of gauge transformations is equal to p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi where p is the height

of the first column of the Young diagram and at the r-th level of reducibility gaugeparameters have the symmetry of

sN minus 1

pNkN

s2 minus 1

p2k2

s1 minus 1

p1

k1

i=Nsum

i=1

ki =

i=Nsum

i=1

pi minus r (219)

This pattern of reducibility of gauge transformations will be of great importancewhile constructing the unfolded formulation in Section 4 As is easily seen at the

6In more detail the field φmicroνλ satisfies φmicroνλ = minusφνmicroλ φmicroνλ+φνλmicro+φλmicroν = 0 Equivalentlya symmetric basis can be used ie φSmicroνλ = φSνmicroλ φ

Smicroνλ + φSνλmicro + φSλmicroν = 0 The two bases are

related by φS(microν)λ = 1radic3(φAmicroλν + φAνλmicro) φ

A[microν]λ = 1radic

3(φSmicroλν minus φ

Sνλmicro)

11

first level of reducibility the gauge parameters are various tensors whose LorentzYoung diagrams are obtained by cutting off one cell from the original so(d minus 2)-diagram in all possible ways ie the number of gauge parameters at the first levelis equal to the number of blocks N eg two for spin- There is only one gaugeparameter at the deepest level of reducibility whose Young diagram is obtained bycutting off the first column from Y eg for spin-

This pattern corresponds of course to on-shell equations ie the gauge param-eters taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of Young symmetry (219) are subjectedto (28)-like equations To obtain an off-shell gauge symmetry the field content hasto be extended to take values in certain reducible so(d minus 1 1)-representations ad-ditional components turn out can be identified with certain traces of a single fieldwith the symmetry of Y as an sl(d)-tensor In general gauge parameters are alsoreducible tensors with the symmetry of (219) In the case of a spin- massless fieldthe trace φ ν

microν in the sector of fields and the trace ξSνν in the sector of gauge param-eters are the additional components In the general case of a spin-Y = Ys1 snmassless field field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) should satisfy [20]

ηmicroimicroiηmicroimicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n] (220)

which is a generalization of the Fronsdalrsquos double-trace condition (213) As it will beshown this condition naturally arises in the unfolded approach Note that double-tracelessness is imposed on each group of symmetric indices and it is not requiredfor cross-traces to vanish

Let a generalized Weyl tensor for a minimally described spin-Y massless field bea gauge-invariant combination of the least order in derivatives of field φY(x) that isallowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell On the other hand it is the generalized Weyltensor that the minimal non-gauge description of a massless spin-Y field is basedon For a spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN)so(dminus2) massless field the generalizedWeyl tensor has the symmetry of Y(s1 p1 + 1) (s2 p2) (sN pN)so(dminus11) and isof the s1-th order in derivatives In the case of spin-one (Y = so(dminus2)) Maxwell field

strength Fmicroν with the symmetry of can be also called a generalized Weyl tensorFermionic mixed-symmetry fields share most features of bosonic ones viz the

reducibility of gauge transformations the enlargement of the field content for theequations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge invariance The difference is thatthe equations for fermions have the first order in derivatives and the irreducibility ofspin-tensors is achieved by the Γ-tracelessness condition7 instead of the tracelessnessone

For example a massless totally symmetric spin-(s + 12) field can be described

7Γmicro are the Clifford algebra generators and satisfy ΓmicroΓν + ΓνΓmicro = 2ηmicroν part equiv Γmicropartmicro Γ-trace isa contraction of a spinor index and one tensor index with Γmicro eg Γνφ

microν equiv Γαν βφ

βmicroν

12

off-shell[54] by a totally symmetric spin-tensor field φα(micro1micros) subjected to8

partφmicro1microsminus spart(micro1

Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros)

ΓνΓρΓλφνρλmicro4micros= 0 Γνξνmicro2microsminus1 = 0

(221)

where in order to get an off-shell gauge invariance the irreducibility of φα(micro1micros) hasto be relaxed to the triple Γ-tracelessness

A massless totally anti-symmetric spin-Y(1 p) 12field can be described off-shell

by a totally anti-symmetric spin-tensor field ωα[micro1microp] subjected to

partωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1Γ

νωνmicro2microp] = 0

δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp]

(222)

Similar to the bosonic case (222) possesses reducible gauge transformations Thedifference is that one can impose the triple Γ-tracelessness on ωα[micro1microp] but thisrestricts the first level gauge parameter to be Γ-traceless Γνξνmicro2micropminus1 = 0 andhence the second order gauge parameter has to be on-mass-shell ie partξmicro1micropminus2 = 0Therefore for equations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge symmetry of allorders no Γ-trace conditions have to be imposed on fieldgauge parameters

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) 12field the

pattern of gauge symmetries is given by the spin-tensors with the tensor part de-scribed by (219) the definition of the Weyl tensor remains unchanged also

The descriptions based on tensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) which is analogous tothe metric gmicroν are referred to as metric-like At least in writing equiv partmicropartνη

microν theexplicit use of metric ηmicroν is made of which complicates the issue of introducinginteractions with gravitation

Let us note that in principle one can verify the gauge invariance of the fieldequations for massless mixed-symmetry fields despite the fact that the very form ofgauge transformation is cumbersome due to Young symmetrizers The advantageof the unfolded approach is in that gauge invariance at all levels of reducibility ismanifest

3 Unfolding Dynamics and σminus Cohomology

In this section we first recall the definition of unfolding and the relation of the sim-plest unfolded systems to Lie algebrasmodules and Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomologywith coefficients Second peculiar properties of unfolded systems that describe freefields and specifically the so-called σminus cohomology concept are recalled Third thevery procedure of constructing the unfolded form is illustrated on the examples ofmassless spin-zero spin-one arbitrary totally symmetric spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2)

fields the relation with the general statement of Section 1 is pointed out in each ofthe examples

8Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [54] have the form Gmicro1microsminus s

2Γ(micro1ΓνGνmicro2micros) minus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 Gmicro1micros= partφmicro1micros

minus spart(micro1Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0 which is equivalent to

(222)

13

31 General Features

Some dynamical system is said to be unfolded [31 32 33] if it has the form

dWA = FA(W ) (31)

whereWA is a set9 of differential forms of degree-qA on some d-dimensional manifoldMd d - exterior differential on Md and FA(W ) is an arbitrary degree-(qA + 1)function of WA assumed to be expandable in terms of exterior (wedge) productsonly10

FA(W ) =infinsum

n=1

sum

qB1++qBn=qA+1

fAB1Bn

W B1 and andW Bn (32)

where fAB1Bn

are constant coefficients satisfying fAB1BiBj Bn

= (minus)qBiqBj fA

B1BjBiBn

Moreover FA(W ) must satisfy the integrability condition (called generalized Jacobiidentity) obtained by applying d to (31)

F B δFA

δW Bequiv 0 (33)

Any solution of (33) defines a free differential algebra (FDA) [55 56 57 58] If Ja-cobi identities (33) are satisfied irrespective ofMd dimension11 the free differentialalgebra is referred to as universal [10 59] It is the universal algebras only that willbe considered further

Equations (31) are invariant under gauge transformations

δWAqA

= dǫAqAminus1 + ǫBqBminus1

δFA

δW B for qA gt 0 (34)

δWA0 = ǫB

prime

0

δFA

δW Bprime

1

Bprime qBprime = 1 for qA = 0 (35)

where ǫAqAminus1 is a degree-(qA minus 1) form taking values in the same space as WAqA

Inits turn δWA

qA= 0 can be treated as unfolded-like system for ǫAqAminus1 ie dǫ

AqAminus1 =

minusǫBqBminus1δFA

δWB there emerge second level gauge transformations

δǫAqAminus1 = dξAqAminus2 minus ξBqBminus2

δFA

δW B (36)

provided that FA(W ) is linear in matter fields and analogously for the gauge trans-formations at deeper levels Therefore the reducibility of gauge transformations ismanifest in the unfolded approach For a degree-qA gauge field WA

qAthere exist qA

levels of gauge transformations

9In this section indices A B C are of arbitrary nature In the cases of practical significance AB C vary over certain irreps of the Lorentz algebra

10The wedge symbol and will be systematically omitted further11As the forms with the rank greater than d are identically zero there exist certain identities

eg Wn andWn equiv 0 for n+m gt d which make the operator δδWA to be ill-behaved

14

The use of the exterior algebra respects diffeomorphisms which is very appropri-ate for introducing interactions with the gravitation The whole information aboutthe dynamics turns out to be contained in FA(W ) and one can even extend anunfolded system to other manifolds[59] simply by changing the exterior differentialthe new unfolded system has literally the same form

Note that introducing enough auxiliary fields it is possible to reformulate anydynamical system in the unfolded form although it may be difficult to unfold someparticular system or to find all unfolded forms

Collected below are some important cases of unfolded systems which have adirect bearing on Lie algebras [55 59]

Lie algebrasFlat connections Let ΩI equiv ΩImicrodx

micro be a subsector of degree-oneforms The only self-closed unfolded equations are of the form

dΩI = minusf IJKΩ

JΩK (37)

Generalized Jacobi identity (33) implies the Jacobi identity f IJKf

JLMΩKΩLΩM equiv

0 for some Lie algebra g with structure constants f IJK Therefore the closed

subsector of one-forms is in one-to-one correspondence with Lie algebras and(37) is the flatness condition for a connection ΩI of g This provides acoordinate-independent framework for describing background geometry Inthe cases of interest g is iso(d minus 1 1) so(d minus 1 2) so(d 1) and sp(2n) [59]Background geometry connection ΩI is assumed to be of order zero whereasall matter fields including dynamical gravitation are of the first order Allequations are assumed to be of the first order in matter fields and hencedescribe free fields only

In this paper g = iso(dminus 1 1) and ΩI = ab ha where ab equiv abmicro dxmicro

is a Lorentz spin-connection and ha equiv hamicrodxmicro is a background vielbein which

defines a non-holonomic basis of a tangent space at each point of the manifoldFlatness equation (37) for iso(dminus 1 1)-connection ΩI reads

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb = 0(38)

The first is the zero torsion equation that expresses the Lorentz spin-connectionvia the first derivative of hamicro The second can be recognized as the zero curva-ture equation For example in Cartesian coordinates the explicit solution isab

micro = 0 and hamicro = δamicro

The advantage of description of background geometry as the flatness conditionfor a connection of the space-time symmetry algebra is in that this way iscoordinate-independent In what follows we assume ab ha to satisfy (38)which is enough if there is no need for the explicit form of the solution in someparticular coordinate system For instance in (anti)-de Sitter space (38) ismodified by the terms proportional to the cosmological constant λ2

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb + λ2hahb = 0(39)

15

and admits no simple solutions with hamicro = δamicro ab = 0 Nevertheless without

giving the explicit solution to imply that ab ha satisfy (39) is sufficient forgeneral analysis eg for constructing Lagrangians [60]

Contractible FDA The simplest equations linear in matter fields of the form

dWAq = fA

BWBq+1 (310)

can be reduced by linear transformations to either

dWAq = WA

q+1 dWAq+1 = 0 (311)

ordWA

q = 0 (312)

where the second equation of (311) is the consequence of Jacobi identities(33) for the first one In the first case by virtue of gauge transformations(34) δWA

q = dξAqminus1 + χAq δW

Bq+1 = dχA

q the field WAq can be gauged away In

both cases by virtue of the Poincarersquos Lemma these equations are dynamicallyempty and correspond to the co-called contractible FDAs [55]

g-modulesCovariant constancy equations Let WAq be a closed subsector of

q-forms of matter gauge fields Linear in matter fields equations may involvethe background g-connection ΩI which is of zeroth order Such equationsreferred to as linearized over g background (described by any solution ΩI of(37)) have the form

dWAq = minusΩIfI

ABW

Bq (313)

Jacobi identity (33) where (37) is also taken into account

ΩJΩK(minusf I

JKfIAB + fJ

ACfK

CB

)W B

q = 0 (314)

implies fIAB to realize a representation of g Therefore the closed subsector

of forms of definite degree is in one-to-one correspondence with g-moduleswhereas

DΩWAq equiv dWA

q + ΩIfIABW

Bq = 0 (315)

is a covariant constancy equation and (DΩ)2 = 0 since the connection is

flat (37) In the cases of interest A runs over certain finite-dimensionalso(d minus 1 1)-irreps ie g-modules decompose with respect to its subalgebraso(dminus 1 1) sub g into a direct sum of certain irreducible tensors This is whywe single out the Lorentz-covariant derivative DL from the whole g-covariantderivative DΩ the remaining part acts vertically (algebraically) In the caseof ΩI being an iso(d minus 1 1) flat connection the Lorentz covariant derivativeDL = d+ satisfy DL

2 = 0 as the exterior differential d does

DLTab = dT ab +a

cTcb +b

cTac + (316)

In Cartesian coordinates DL equiv d and we do not make any distinction betweend and DL whereas in (anti)-de Sitter (DL)

2 6= 0 and the difference between d

16

and DL has to be taken into account Also zero torsion equation (381) canbe rewritten as DLh

a = 0 The remaining part of ΩI which acts algebraicallyand mixes different so(dminus 1 1)-modules into g-modules is associated with thegenerators of translations with gauge field ha

Gluing g-modulesChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology LetWpWq andWr takevalues in g-modules R1 R2 and R3 the representations are realized by oper-ators T1 T2 and T3 respectively Still linear in matter fields but nonlinear inbackground connection ΩI equations are of the form

DΩWp equiv dWp + T1(Ω)Wp = f12(Ω Ω)Wq

DΩWq equiv dWq + T2(Ω)Wq = f23(Ω Ω)Wr

DΩWr equiv

(317)

where the terms forming g-covariant derivative are isolated on the lhs Thetwo g-modules R1 R2 appear to be glued together by the term f12(Ω Ω) isinHom(Λpminusq+1(g) otimes R2R1) Jacobi identity (33) implies f12(Ω Ω) to be aChevalley-Eilenberg cocycle with coefficients in Rlowast

2 otimesR1 where Rlowast2 is a mod-

ule contragradient to R2 and f12(Ω Ω)f23(Ω Ω) = 0 Coboundaries canbe proved to be dynamically empty and can be removed by a field redefini-tion Consequently f12(Ω Ω) should be a nontrivial representative of theChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology group with coefficients in Rlowast

2otimesR1 It followsalso that nothing but zero forms can be joined to zero forms ie the onlypossible linearized unfolded equations on forms of zero degree are (315) withq = 0

For any dynamical system linearized over certain g-background (described byany solution ΩI of (37)) equations of motion (315) along with gauge transforma-tions of all orders of reducibility acquire a very simple form

δξ1 = DΩξ0

δξpminus1 = DΩξpminus2

δWp = DΩξpminus1

DΩWp = 0

(318)

where Wp takes values in certain g-module R DΩ is the associated g-covariantderivative and ξpminusk k isin [1 p] are the gauge parameters of k-th order of reducibilitytaking values in the same g-module R and being forms of degree (p minus k) Thegauge invariance at each order of reducibility and of equations of motion is dueto (DΩ)

2 = 0 In some sense the gauge fields Wp and the gauge parameters ξpminusk

seem to play the same role at the linearized level This uniformity is of essentialimportance when analyzing unfolded systems

In the presence of gluing terms eg when only two modules say R1 and R2 areglued by nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycle fpr(Ω Ω) full chain of equations

17

and gauge transformations (318) is modified to12

δξ11 = DΩξ10

δξ1pminusr = DΩξ1pminusrminus1

δξ1pminusr+1 = DΩξ1pminusr + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

20 δξ21 = DΩξ

20

(319)

δξ1pminus1 = DΩξ1pminus2 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus2 δξ2rminus1 = DΩξ

2rminus2

δW 1p = DΩξpminus1 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus1 δW 2

r = DΩξ2rminus1

DΩW1p = fpr(Ω Ω)W

2r DΩW

2r = 0

where W 1p ξ

1pminusk and W 2

r ξ2rminusm take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively

Important is that the gauge fieldsparameters taking values in R2 contribute to therhs of the equationsgauge transformations for the gauge fieldsparameters takingvalues in R1 but for forms of degree greater than (p minus r) The above two systemsare nothing but the specializations of (31) (34) (36)

Also let us note that there is no strong reason to make any distinction betweenthe terms linear in the background g-connection ΩI which correspond to g-modulesand the terms of higher order in ΩI which correspond to Chevalley-Eilenberg co-cycles Both terms can be combined into a single object the generalized covariant-derivative D = d+T (Ω)+f(Ω Ω) equiv DΩ+f(Ω Ω) with the property D2 = 0Moreover by means of D (319) and (318) can be rewritten in a similar mannerConsequently at the linearized level the most general unfolded equations and gaugetransformations have the form

δξ1 = Dξ0

δξpminus1 = Dξpminus2

δWp = Dξpminus1

DWp = 0

(320)

where D is built of d background connection ΩI and satisfies D2 = 0 The gaugefieldsparameters take values in certain spacesWq viz Wp isin Wp ξpminus1 isin Wpminus1ξ0 isin W0 The elements of Wq are differential forms with values in certain g-modules It is also convenient to define higher degree spaces Wqgtp the equationsRp+1 = DWp = 0 take values in Wp+1 Rp+2 = DRp+1 belongs to Wp+2 andby virtue of D2 = 0 satisfies Rp+2 equiv 0 and so on Therefore there exist certainidentities which belong to Wp+2 for the equations which belong to Wp+1 andthere exist certain identities which belong to Wp+3 for the identities in Wp+2 andso on At the field theoretical level these identities correspond to Bianchi identitiesfor the first level gauge transformations higher identities correspond to the Bianchiidentities for the deeper levels of gauge transformations

12The sign factor (minus)pminusr+1 before fpr(Ω Ω) is ignored and is thought of as the part of thedefinition of fpr(Ω Ω)

18

A remark should be made that the forms belonging to Wq may have differentdegrees if there are Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles present As a result spaces Wq

may contain different number of elements For instance (319) can be reduced to(320) if one defines

Wq =

W 1q q lt pminus r

W 1q W

2qminusp+r q ge (pminus r)

(321)

where W 1q and W 2

qminusp+r take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively In termsof (319) the elements of Wq for q lt (pminus r) were referred to as ξ1q the elements ofWq for q = (pminus r)(pminus 1) to as ξ1q ξ

2qminusp+r the elements ofWq for q = p to as W 1

pW 2

r the elements of Wq for q gt p to as R1q R

2qminusp+r (the equations of motion and

Bianchi identities)

32 Interpretation of Unfolded Systems Describing free Fields

When describing free fields unfolded formulations will be referred to as frame-like [61 60] though the very term frame-like has a more broad definition Thesesystems consist of equations (37) describing background geometry of a finite chainof (317)-like equations describing the gauge fields of the model and of (317)-likeequations with q = 0 glued to gauge forms ie it requires a Lie algebra g (commonlyiso(dminus1 1) so(dminus1 2) or so(d 1)) a set of g-modules R0RN and an appropriateset of nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles f01fNminus1N The physical degreesof freedom are contained in the forms of zero degree and the module RN in whichzero degree forms take values is infinite-dimensional

Since frame-like unfolded systems contain inevitably infinitely many fields mostof them being either auxiliary or Stueckelberg13 there arises a problem of reconstruc-tion a metric-like formulation by a given unfolded formulation or of extracting thedynamical content for a given unfolded system

The questions to be answered are what are the dynamical fields what arethe differential gauge parameters and what are the gauge invariant equations ofmotion These answers are not universal and depend on the chosen scheme ofinterpretation Different interpretations correspond to dual descriptions of the samedynamical system

Frame-like unfolded systems are endowed at the linearized level with additionalstructures providing a natural way for interpretation Indices AB vary overcertain finite dimensional Lorentz irreps ie each of Rn n = 0 N decomposes asRn =

sum

k Pnk where Pnk are certain so(d minus 1 1)-modules characterized by Ynk

Young diagrams of Section 1We say that some frame-like unfolded system is given an interpretation if [62]

1 On the whole space W =oplusinfin

q=0Wq where the matter gauge fields gauge pa-rameters equations of motion and Bianchi identities take values there exists

13A field is called Stueckelberg if it can be gauged away by pure algebraic symmetry

19

a bounded from below grading g = 0 1 ie Wq =oplusinfin

g=0Wgq The ho-

mogeneous element of Wgq is a certain differential form with values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep and is denoted as W gq In simplest cases the grade is just the

rank of the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep the element of Wgq takes values in

2 The closed subsector of one-forms ΩI describes a background geometry vizMinkowski or (anti)-de Sitter The generalized covariant derivative D is to bedivided into three parts the last one not being necessary nontrivial

D = DL minus σminus + σ+ (322)

where DL is a background Lorentz-covariant derivative and has a zero gradeσminus is an operator of grade (minus1) and σ+ contains positive grade operatorsThe only differential part is in DL whereas σplusmn acts vertically and is built ofthe background vielbein ha If two modules are glued the gluing element issupposed to be of grade (minus1) and also denoted as σminus

The equations then have the form

DLWn +

gminusnsum

i=1

σ+(W n+i

)= σminus

(W n+1

) g = 0 1 (323)

and analogously for the gauge transformations In the flat space all operators ofpositive grade appear to be trivial for the massless case As it does not affect theanalysis let us consider a simplified version with σ+ = 0 Then D2 = DL

2+σminusDL+DLσminus + (σminus)

2 = 0 is equivalent to DL2 = 0 (σminus)

2 = 0 and σminusDL +DLσminus = 0 Thefirst is a part of the flatness condition (38) for the iso(d minus 1 1)-connection Thesecond is the nilpotancy condition for σminus The third is satisfied provided that σminus istwisted by the factor (minus)∆g where (∆g + 1) is a degree of σminus which is equal to thenumber of the vielbeins ha that σminus is built of Indeed the vielbeins ha anticommutewith DL and hence the action of σminus is to be twisted by the factor (minus)∆g in orderσminusDL +DLσminus = 0 holds true Without further mention the pure sign factor (minus)∆g

will be though of as a part of the definition of σminusIt is useful to illustrate the action of σminus when for example unfolded equations

on fields with values in two modules R1 and R2 are glued as in (319)

R1︷ ︸︸ ︷

R2︷ ︸︸ ︷ g

q

t t t t

t t t

W 1p

ξ1pminus1

ξ10

W 2r

ξ2rminus1

ξ20

(324)

20

where short arrows stand for the action of σminus within each module and long arrowsfor the action of σminus between two modules (gluing terms) and dots stand for gaugefieldsparameters at different grades bold dots represent the elements of Wp =W 1

pW2r

All information about the dynamics turns out to be concealed in cohomologygroups of σminus [62] H(σminus) =

Ker(σminus)Im(σminus)

Let us analyze unfolded system (320) whichat grade g has the form

δξg1 = DLξg0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 )

δW gp = DLξ

gpminus1 + σminus(ξ

g+1pminus1)

0 = DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p )

(325)

Beginning from the deepest level of gauge transformations and from the lowestgrade it is obvious that those ξg+1

0 that are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueck-elberg(algebraic) gauge parameters for those ξg1 that belong to the image of σminusTherefore those ξg1 that are σminus-exact can be gauged away The leftover gauge sym-metry satisfies δξg1 = DLξ

g0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 ) = 0 so that those ξg+1

0 that belong to thecoimage of σminus are expressed via derivative of ξn0 Having sieved W0 and W1 inthis way only those ξg0 are still independent that are σminus-closed and hence belong toH

0(σminus) since only forms of zero-degree are elements of W0 Then those ξg+11 that

are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueckelberg gauge parameters for those ξg2 thatbelong to the image of σminus Therefore only those ξg1 are still independent that areσminus-closed but not σminus-exact and hence belong to H

1(σminus) Having sievedW0Wpminus1

one after another it turns out that independent differential gauge parameters at thek-th level are given by H

pminusk(σminus) Analogously those fields W gp that are σminus-exact

can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gauge parameters at Wpminus1 Thosefields W g+1

p that are not σminus-closed can be expressed via derivatives of fields at lowergrade by virtue of the equations Rg

p+1 equiv DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p ) = 0 these fields are

called auxiliary Therefore the dynamical fields ie those that are neither aux-iliary nor Stueckelberg are given by H

p(σminus) The nilpotency of D2 equiv 0 impliescertain relations of the form DLR

gp+1 + σminus(R

g+1p+1) = 0 between Rg

p+1 Therefore

auxiliary fields are expressed by virtue of σminus-exact Rgp+1 and σminus-non-closed Rg+1

p+1

are themselves expressed via derivatives of Rgp+1 Consequently the independent

equations on dynamical fields are given by Hp+1(σminus) From the cohomological point

of view higher degree forms correspond to certain nontrivial relations between equa-tions called Bianchi identities and manifest gauge nature of equations As there aregenerally more than one levels of gauge transformations one can expect the highercohomological group to be nontrivial

To sum up

21

cohomology group interpretation

Hpminusk k = 1p differential gauge parameters at the k-th level of re-

ducibilityH

p dynamical fieldsH

p+1 independent gauge invariant equations on dynamicalfields

Hp+k+1 k = 1p Bianchi identities for the k-th order gauge symmetryH

p+k k gt p supposed to be trivial in a regular case

To distinguish fields in cohomological sense the following convention is introduced[63]

Stueckelberg fields(gauge parameters) are those that can be eliminated bypure algebraic symmetry ie these fields are σminus-exact (are those that canbe used to gauge away certain fields ie these parameters are not σminus-closed)

Auxiliary fields are those that can be expressed via derivatives of some otherfields ie these fields are σminus-nonclosed Let us note that this definition isgenerally ambiguous eg in system

partA = B

partB = A(326)

which field is auxiliary is a matter of choice This ambiguity is removed byvirtue of grade[62 63]

Dynamical fields are those that are neither auxiliary nor Stueckelberg ie thesefields are representatives of σminus-cohomology classes

Note that if certain dynamical field given by Hp belongs to the grade-gf subspace

Wgfp and the corresponding equations given by H

p+1 belong to the grade-ge subspaceWge

p+1 the order of equations is equal to ge minus gf + 1If the unfolded system is supposed to admit a lagrangian formulation there has

to be a one-to-one correspondence between the number of dynamical fields and thatof equations k-th level gauge symmetries and k-th level Bianchi identities ie in acertain sense there should be a duality H

pminusk sim Hp+1+k k isin [0 p] This takes place

for all unfolded systems exemplified in this paperSince the operators involved ie DL and σminus are of grade 0 and minus1 only the

fields with the grade greater than g0 for any g0 ge 0 form a quotient module thusdescribing the same system on its own - dual formulations This picture partlybreaks in (A)dSd because of appearance of grade +1 nilpotent operator σ+

D = DL + σminus + λ2σ+ (327)

The specific character of frame-like unfolded systems which will be crucial forus is that by virtue of the inverse background vielbein hmicroa all form indices of any

gauge fieldparameter Wa1(s1)ap(sm)q can be converted to the fiber ones

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (328)

22

The resulting tensor W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is not irreducible and can be decomposedinto so(dminus 1 1)-irreps according to the so(dminus 1 1)-tensor product rule

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] =rArr Ys1 smotimes

so(dminus11)

Y(1 q) =oplus

α

Yα (329)

where one-column Young diagramY(1 q) of height-q represents the anti-symmetricindices d1 dq and Yα are the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the tensor product decomposesinto Having converted all fields (parameters equations) of a given unfolded systemto the fiber tensors one can make the identification of the fields in the unfolded ap-proach and those of the metric-like approach though the general covariance gaugeinvariance and other advantages of the unfolded formalism will be not manifestWhile constructing the unfolded formulations of a known metric-like systems or in-terpreting a given unfolded system in terms of metric-like fields this technique willbe widely used Moreover the calculation of σminus cohomology groups is largely basedon the explicit evaluation of (329)-like expressions Once an unfolded form is knownno use of this technique is needed either to generalize it to other backgrounds or tointroduce interactions

Field W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is traceless in a1 am and d1 dq separatelyHowever the cross traces need not vanish and hence some of Yα represent tracesTo distinguish between the traces of different orders let us introduce the followingthe Y-valued degree-q form WY

q is said to be a trace of the r-th order iff it has theform

WYq = hh

︸︷︷︸

r

hh︸︷︷︸

qminusr

CYprime

0 (330)

for some Yprime-valued degree-0 form CYprime

0 where (q minus r) indices of the backgroundvielbeins ha are contracted with the tensor representing Yprime and r indices are freefor the whole expression to take values in Y the appropriate Young symmetrizeris implied When the indices of WY

q are converted to the fiber ones the expression

takes the form ηη︸ ︷︷ ︸

r

CYprime ie CYprime

represents a trace of the r-th order

Different aspects of unfolding are illustrated on the examples of a massless scalarfield a massless spin-one field and a massless spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2) fields

33 Examples of Unfolding

Example 331 Unfolding a scalar field [31 62] First it should be noted thatit is easy of course to convert the Klein-Gordon equation C = 0 to a system offirst order equations

partmicroC = Cmicro

partmicroCmicro = 0(331)

but when writing the second equation the explicit form of the metric is to be usedhence these equations are not of unfolded form (31)

23

Described in terms of a scalar field C(x) the theory is brought into a non gaugeform therefore zero-forms only are allowed or else there would be some gaugesymmetry according to (34) The most general rhs of dC = has the form

dC = haCa (332)

for some vector-valued zero-form Ca This equation just parameterizes the firstderivative of C(x) and is similar to the first of (331) There are three terms allowedon the rhs of dCa =

dCa = hbCab + hbC

ab + haC prime (333)

with Cab Cab and C prime taking values in antisymmetric symmetric and scalar so(dminus1 1)-irreps ie bull The first term is forbidden by Bianchi identity hadC

a equiv 0To analyze the remaining terms let us decompose dCa into so(dminus 1 1)-irreps

partmicroCahmicrob = otimes = oplus oplus bull (334)

where = part[aCb] = part(aCa) minus 1dηaapartbC

b bull = partaCa = C

The component represents Bianchi identity in the first order reformulation ofthe Klein-Gordon equation Indeed expressing Ca as partaC implies part[aCb] equiv 0 bullrepresents the desired Klein-Gordon equation whereas is the only component al-lowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell Therefore to impose the Klein-Gordon equationthe term haC prime has to be omitted

dCa = hbCab (335)

The only possible rhs for dCaa = compatible with Jacobi identity hbdCab equiv 0

is of the form dCaa = hbCaab for Caaa taking values in a rank-three symmetric

so(d minus 1 1)-irrep ie The process of unfolding continues unambiguously inthis way and results in the full system

dCa(k) = hbCa(k)b equiv F a(k)(C) k = 0 1 (336)

where Ca(k) is rank-k totally symmetric traceless field ie taking values in k

so(dminus 1 1)-irrepTo make a connection with the general statement of Section 1 for Y = Y(0 0)

the general scheme results in

Yg bull

n k 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 0 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore spaces Wq and operator σminus which enters D = DL minus σminus should be definedas

Wq = WqWaq W

aaq (337)

24

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbWa(gminus1)bq g gt 0

(338)

Consequently W is a space of various differential forms with values in totally sym-metric traceless so(d minus 1 1)-tensors graded by the form degree and by the rankof so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Space Wq forms an irreducible iso(d minus 1 1)-module System(336) reads

Dω0 = 0 ω0 isin W0 (339)

The cohomology groups of σminus are easy to find

H0(σminus) = C(x) as the lowest grade field is automatically closed σminus(C) = 0 and it

cannot be exact as a form of zero degree Contrariwise zero-forms with gradegreater than zero are not closed σminus(C

k+1) = hbCa(k)b = 0lArrrArr Ck+1 = 0

H1(σminus) = haB(x)0 for some B(x)0 isin W

00 One-form Ba

1 = haB(x)0 is closedσminus(B

a1) = haB

a1 = hah

aB(x)0 equiv 0 and it cannot be represented as σminus(C2) =

hbCab as far as Cab is traceless The cohomology groups at higher grade are

trivial since σminus(haBa(k)(x)0) 6= 0 for k gt 0

Hqgt1(σminus) = empty as one can make sure

The interpretation in terms of Section 32 is as follows as is expected the dynamicalfield given by H

0 is C(x) The equations are given by the projection of dCa = hbCab

to H1 ie C = 0 The fields with k gt 0 are auxiliary being expressed via

derivatives of C(x) Ca(k) = partapartaC(x) Inasmuch as there is no gauge symmetryin the system the higher cohomology groups are trivial

An infinitely many dual formulations of a massless scalar field are also includedIndeed the fields with k ge k0 gt 0 form a quotient module Rk0 ie one canconsistently write

dCk = σminus(Ck+1) k ge k0 (340)

The first equationdCa(k0) = hbC

a(k0)b (341)

imposes on the dynamical field Ca(k0)

partbCba(k0minus1) = 0

part[bCc]a(k0minus1) = 0(342)

which imply at least locally Ca(k0) =

k0︷ ︸︸ ︷

partaparta C and C = 0 for some fieldC(x) All fields at higher grade are auxiliary This statement is confirmed bythe cohomology analysis H

0(Rk0 σminus) = Ck0 ie scalar is described in termsof a traceless rank-k0 symmetric tensor field subjected to the equations given byH

1(Rk0 σminus) = haBa(k0minus1)0 minus k0(k0minus1)

2(d+2k0minus4)ηaahcB

a(k0minus2)c0 +hcB

a(k0)c0 for B

a(k0minus1)0 B

a(k0)c0

taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps characterized by diagrams k0 minus 1 k0

These two elements represents just the components ofWk0

1 sim k0 otimes with the

25

symmetry of k0 minus 1 (trace) andk0

the third component with the symmetryof k0 + 1 is exact

The above results can be easily extended to (A)dSd background and to a massivescalar field [62]

DLCk = σminus(C

k+1) + σ+(Ckminus1) = 0 (343)

where there appears a nontrivial positive grade operator

σ+(Ckminus1) = (m2 minus λ2k(k + dminus 1))

(

haCa(kminus1) minus(sminus 1)

d+ 2k minus 4ηaahbC

a(kminus1)b

)

(344)

and DL is a Lorentz-covariant derivative in (A)dSd In the (A)dSd case the situationis more interesting due to the appearance of σ+ operator and the possibility of theaccidental degeneracy of σ+ when m2 = λ2kprime(kprime + dminus 1) for some kprime [62]

Example 332 Unfolding Maxwell equations [64 65] An example of masslessspin-one field is more interesting as a gauge system The main object is a one-formAmicro From gauge transformation law

δA1 = dξ0 (345)

it follows that there should not be other forms of rank greater than zero If this werethe case the gauge parameters of these new forms would be involved by virtue of(34) making the gauge law for A1 inappropriate Indeed there are two possibilitiesto introduce higher degree forms on the rhs of dA = (i) dA1 = R2 fora scalar valued degree-two form R2 which possesses its own gauge parameter χ1δR2 = dχ1 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law for A1 is modifiedto δA1 = dξ0 + χ1 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gaugeparameter χ1 This case corresponds to contractible free differential algebras (310)(ii) dA1 = hbω

b1 for a vector valued degree-one form ωa

1 which possesses its owngauge parameter ǫa0 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law forA1 is modified to δA1 = dξ0 + hbǫ

b0 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of

Stueckelberg gauge parameter ǫa0 Consequently in both cases A1 can be made non-dynamical which is not what was expected Therefore the only possibility is tointroduce a zero-form C

[ab]0 anti-symmetric in a b parameterizing by virtue of

dA1 = hahbC[ab]0 (346)

the Maxwell field strength Bianchi identity hahbdC[ab]0 equiv 0 tolerates two terms on

the rhs of dC[ab]0 =

dC[ab]0 = hcC

[ab]c0 + h[aC

b]0 (347)

with C[ab]c0 and Ca

0 taking values in and so(dminus 1 1)-irreps the former taken inantisymmetric basis In order to determine which of the terms should be omittedif any the decomposition of the first derivative of the Maxwell field strength intoLorentz irreps has to be analyzed

C [ab]|c equiv partmicroC[ab]hmicroc = otimes = oplus oplus (348)

26

where = part[aCbc] = partbCab and = partcC [ab] minus part[cCab] + 2

dminus1ηc[apartdC

b]d part[aCbc]

is identically zero provided that C [ab] is expressed via the first derivative of Amicroor represents the second pair of Maxwell equations in terms of field strength C [ab]In both cases this component should be zero and moreover this can not be keptnonzero as there is no hcC

[abc]-like term allowed on the rhs of (347) The secondpartbC

ab is the desired Maxwell equations in terms of Amicro or the first pair of Maxwellequations in terms of the field strength Consequently to impose Maxwell equationsterm h[aCb] has to be omitted whereas the third is the only component allowed tobe nonzero on-mass-shell

Again unfolding continues unambiguously and requires an infinite set of fields

C[ab]c(k)0 taking values14 in

kto be introduced

dC [ab]c(k) = hdC[ab]c(k)d k = 0 1 (349)

The full system has the form

dA1 = hahbCab0 equiv F (AC) δA1 = dξ0

dC[ab]c(k)0 = hdC

[ab]c(k)d0 equiv F [ab]c(k)(C) k = 0 1

(350)

and represents two modules being glued together by the term on the rhs of thefirst equation

For Y = Y(1 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 resultsin

Yg bull

n k 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 1 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore

Wq =

W0 q = 0

WqW[ab]qminus1W

[ab]cqminus1 q gt 0

(351)

let us point out the shortening of W0 The action of σminus on Wq isin Wq is defined as

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hahbW[ab]qminus1 g = 1

hdW[ab]c(gminus2)dqminus1 g gt 1

(352)

With D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (350) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (353)

14The fields C [ab]c(k) are taken in antisymmetric basis ie they are antisymmetric in a bsymmetric in c(k) and C [abd]c(kminus1)equiv0

27

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 0 form a finite-dimensional iso(dminus1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g gt0 form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

Again the cohomology groups are easy to find gauge parameters are given byH

0(σminus) = ξ0 dynamical fields by H1(σminus) = A1 Maxwell equations by H

2(σminus) =

h[aBb]0 and the Bianchi identities for the first order gauge transformations by

H3(σminus) = hahbB0 the rest of groups are empty H

kgt3(σminus) = empty Important is thedirect correspondence between the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2

the gauge parameters in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3There are infinitely many of non-gauge dual formulations based on C [ab]c(k0) eg

for k0 = 0 one recovers the Maxwell equations in terms of the field strength

part[aCbc] = 0

partbCab = 0

(354)

Let us note that the ambiguity at the first step of unfolding (the terms haC prime andh[aCb] in the above two examples) expresses the possibility of introducing a massterm

Example 333 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-s field [31 6466] We start from the metric-like description of a massless spin-s field in termsof a double-traceless symmetric rank-s field φmicro1micros

satisfying (213) the secondorder equations are invariant with respect to the first order gauge transformationwith traceless rank-(s minus 1) gauge parameter ξmicro1microsminus1 Inasmuch as the Young di-agram s of so(d minus 2) is of the height one there are gauge transforma-tions of the first level only Therefore the dynamical field in the unfolded ap-proach has to be a one-form There is only one way to identify φmicro1micros

and ξmicro1microsminus1

with certain ωY01 and ξY0

0 taking values in the same so(d minus 1 1)-irrep Y0 namely

Y0 = sminus 1 ie ωa(sminus1)1 and ξ

a(sminus1)0 takes values in a rank-(s minus 1) symmet-

ric traceless tensors Field φmicro1microsis identified with a totally symmetric part of

ωa(sminus1)1 ie φmicro1micros

= hb1(micro1hbsminus1

microsminus1ωa1asminus1

micros)ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 the double-tracelessness

condition is the consequence of the tracelessness of ωa(sminus1)1 in a1asminus1 ξmicro1microsminus1

is identified with ξa(sminus1)0 directly ξmicro1microsminus1 = hb1micro1

hbsminus1microsminus1

ξa1asminus1ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 andone can make sure that the Fronsdalrsquos gauge transformation law is recovered fromδω

a(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 Field ω

a(sminus1)1 has a redundant component with the symmetry

ofsminus 1

which can be made Stueckelberg by virtue of gauge parameter ξa(sminus1)b

with the same symmetry type ie

δωa(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)c0 (355)

It automatically follows that there is a degree-one gauge field ωa(sminus1)b1 coupled with

ωa(sminus1)1 as

dωa(sminus1)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)c1 (356)

28

The only solution to Bianchi identity hcdωa(sminus1)c1 equiv 0 is15

dωa(sminus1)b1 = hcω

a(sminus1)bc1 (357)

where a new field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

is introduced and so on

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1 (358)

until the field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

for which the Bianchi identity solvesas

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 (359)

where field Ca(s)b(s)0 represents a generalized Weyl tensor and has the symmetry of

s The solution of Bianchi identity hchddC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 equiv 0 has the form

dCa(s)b(s)0 = hc

(

Ca(s)cb(s)0 +

s

2C

a(s)bb(sminus1)c0

)

(360)

where Ca(s+1)b(s)0 has the symmetry of s

s+ 1 The second term on the rhs

of (360) supplements the first one to have a proper Young symmetry Further

unfolding requires a set of degree-zero forms Ca(s+i)b(s)0 taking values in so(dminus1 1)-

irreps characterized by Young diagrams ss+ i

The full system has theform

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1

δωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(k)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)b(k)c0 k isin [0 sminus 2]

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 δω

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0

dCa(s+i)b(s) = hc

(

Ca(s+i)cb(s) +s

i+ 2Ca(s+i)bb(sminus1)c

)

i isin [0infin)

(361)

By the construction the system incorporates Fronsdalrsquos field φmicro1microswith the correct

gauge law but there is still to be proved that the Fronsdalrsquos equations are reallyimposed and that there are no other dynamical fields in the system Let us recon-struct Fronsdalrsquos equations (213) whereas the second statement will be proved asa part of a more general theorem The first two equations of (361) read

partmicroωa(sminus1)ν minus partνω

a(sminus1)micro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)cν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)cmicro (362)

partmicroωa(sminus1)bν minus partνω

a(sminus1)bmicro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)bcν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)bcmicro (363)

It is convenient to convert all world indices to the fiber ones

partcωa(sminus1)|d minus partdωa(sminus1)|c = ωa(sminus1)c|d minus ωa(sminus1)d|c (364)

partcωa(sminus1)b|d minus partdωa(sminus1)b|c = ωa(sminus1)bc|d minus ωa(sminus1)bd|c (365)

15The proof is not given as more general statement about the solutions of such equations isproved in the next Section

29

where ωa(sminus1)|b equiv ωa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro ωa(sminus1)bb|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bbmicro hcmicro

Contracting (365) with ηbd and then symmetrizing c with a1asminus1 results in

partcωa(sminus1)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus1)c|c= 0 (366)

By symmetrizing in (364) a1asminus1 with d

ωa(sminus1)c|a = partcωa(sminus1)|a minus partaωa(sminus1)|c (367)

and then by contracting (364) with ηdasminus1

ωa(sminus1)c|

c= (sminus 1)

(

partcωa(sminus2)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus2)c|c

)

(368)

all the terms of (366) can be expressed via ωa(sminus1)|b Plugging these to (366) gives

ωa(sminus1)|a minus partapartc((sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c

)+ (sminus 1)partapartaω

a(sminus2)c|c= 0 (369)

where ωa(sminus1)|a is to be identified with Fronsdalrsquos field φa(s) as ωa(sminus1)|a = 1sφa(s)

then ωa(sminus2)c|

c= 1

2φa(sminus2)c

c (sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c = φa(sminus1)c and the equation

acquires the Fronsdalrsquos form (213)

φa(s) minus spartapartcφa(sminus1)c + s(sminus1)

2partapartaφ

a(sminus2)cc= 0 (370)

For Y = Y(s 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 results in

Yg sminus 1 sminus 1 s

ss+ 1

n k 1 0 1 sminus 1 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = sminus 1 g = s g = s+ 1

qg q0 = 1 qsminus1 = 1 qs = 0 qs+1 = 0

therefore

Wq =

Wa(sminus1)0 W

a(sminus1)b0 W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0 q = 0

Wa(sminus1)q W

a(sminus1)bq W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)q W

a(s)b(s)qminus1 W

a(s+1)b(s)qminus1 q gt 0

(371)and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hcWa(sminus1)b(gminus1)cq g isin [1 sminus 1]

hchdWa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)dqminus1 g = s

hc

(

Wa(gminussminus1)cb(s)qminus1 + s

gminuss+1W

a(gminussminus1)bb(sminus1)cqminus1

)

g gt s

(372)

With D = DL minus σminus full system (361) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (373)

30

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sminus 1 sim g isin [0 sminus 1]form a finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k =0 1 sim g ge s form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

The representatives of cohomology classes can be chosen as H0 = ξ

a(sminus1)0 H1 =

hbφa(sminus1)b H2 = hbhcG

a(sminus1)c minus hahcGa(sminus2)bc + γηaahahcG

a(sminus4)bcnn+ (βηabhahc +

αηaahbhc)Ga(sminus3)cn

n16 H

3 = hbhahcχa(sminus2)c H

kgt3 = empty where φa(s) and Ga(s) are

double-traceless tensor fields and ξa(sminus1) and χa(sminus1) are traceless H01 are nontrivialat the lowest grade whereas H

23 are nontrivial at grade-one therefore the orderof equations that are imposed on the dynamical field is equal to two It turns outthat there is no need in the explicit form for α β and γ it is sufficient to find outthe Young symmetry of representatives only The uniqueness of Fronsdalrsquos theoryat the level of action was demonstrated in [67] and at the level of equations in[6 53] Consequently there is no need for equations (370) to be found explicitly -those of Fronsdal are the only possible Again there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2 the gauge parameters

in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3 The system contains an infinitely many ofdual formulations those that have field W

a(sminus1)b(k0)1 at the lowest grade are gauge

dual descriptions whereas those that have field Ca(s+k0)b(s) at the lowest grade arenon-gauge Dual description based on field W

a(sminus1)b(1)1 was elaborated in [68]

Example 334 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field[69

70 31] Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field results in literally

the same unfolded system (361 373) but with fields taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that are irreducible spin-tensors with the same tensor part as in the bosoniccase Note that operator σminus is not modified but the σminus cohomology groups areslightly changed such that the equations become of the first order

The Dirac equation Unfolded system (336) or equivalently (339) describesa massless spin-1

2field provided that Ck take values in s 1

2so(dminus1 1)-irreps

ie Ck equiv Cαa(k) and Γαb βC

βba(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equation of (336)

partmicroCα = hmicroaC

αa (374)

with hbmicroΓβb α

gives the Dirac equation

Γαa βpart

aCβ = 0 (375)

the rest of equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives of dynamicalfield Cα

The Rarita-Schwinger equation Unfolded system (350) or equivalently(353) describes a massless spin-3

2field provided that irreducible tensors in (351)

are replaced by the corresponding irreducible tensor-spinors ie A1 equiv Aαmicro C

k equiv

Cα[ab]c(k) and Γαb βC

β[ab]c(k) = 0 Γαd βC

β[ab]dc(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equa-tion of (350)

1

2(partmicroA

αν minus partνA

αmicro) = hmicroahνbC

α[ab] (376)

16α = minus (s(d+sminus5)minusd+6)(sminus2)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6) β = (sminus2)

(d+sminus4) γ = (d+sminus6)(sminus2)(sminus3)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6)

31

with Γ-matrices and converting world indices micro ν to the fiber ones according toAαa equiv Aα

microhamicro gives the Rarita-Schwinger equation

Γαb βpart

bAβa minus partaΓαb βA

βb = 0 δAαa = partaξα (377)

The rest of unfolded equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives ofdynamical field Aα

microThe Fang-Fronsdal equation for a spin-(s + 1

2) massless field Unfolded

system (361) or equivalently (373) describes a massless spin-(s + 12) field pro-

vided that irreducible tensors in (371) are replaced by the corresponding irreducibletensor-spinors With all world indices converted to the fiber ones the first equationof (361) has the form

Gαa(sminus1)|[cd] equiv partcωβa(sminus1)|d minus partdωβa(sminus1)|c = ωβa(sminus1)c|d minus ωβa(sminus1)d|c (378)

where ωαa(sminus1)|b equiv ωαa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωαa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

αa(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro

Analogously to the bosonic case nonsymmetric component of ωβa(sminus1)|d canbe gauged away algebraically Hence the Fronsdalrsquos field φαa(s) is identified asωαa(sminus1)|a = 1

sφαa(s) Then Γα

b βφβa(s) = Γα

b βωβa(sminus1)|b Γα

b βΓβc γφ

γa(sminus2)bc = ηbcωαa(sminus2)b|c

and the Fronsdalrsquos triple Γ-traceless constraint is a consequence of irreducibility ofωαa(sminus1)|b in α a1asminus1 and the lack of any conditions with respect to a1asminus1 andb Since the Fronsdalrsquos field contains three irreducible components with the sym-metry of s 1

2 s-1 1

2and s-2 1

2 the equations of motion has to be

nontrivial in these three sectors too The projector on the dynamical equations issimply Γα

b βGβa(sminus1)b|a and gives

Γαb βpart

bφβa(s) minus spartaΓαb βφ

βa(sminus1)b = 0 (379)

which is in accordance with (222) But we would like to note that there aretwo components with the symmetry of s-1 1

2 namely ηbcG

αa(sminus2)b|ac and

Γαb βΓ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] The correct projector on this component of the equations isgiven by the combination

2(sminus 1)ηbcGαa(sminus2)b|ac minus γαb βγ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] (380)

which is identically zero when Gαa(sminus1)|[bc] is expressed via ωβa(sminus1)c|d by virtue of(378) Therefore it is (380) that does not express certain part of ωβa(sminus1)c|d interms of first derivatives of the dynamical field φαa(s) and thus this is a dynamicalequation Obviously (380) is a representative of σminus cohomology group H

2g=0 In

terms of φαa(s) the representative has the form

Γαb βpart

bΓβc γφ

γa(sminus1)c minus partcφαa(sminus1)c +

(sminus 1)

2partaφ

αa(sminus2)cc= 0 (381)

which is equal to the Γ-trace of (379) The gauge transformations has the form

δφαa(s) = partaξαa(sminus1) (382)

32

where Γαb βξ

βa(sminus2)b = 0Consequently unfolded equations for totally symmetric bosonic fields are proved

to completely determine the unfolded equations for totally symmetric fermionicfields Though σminus is not modified in the fermionic case σminus cohomology groupsare changed since the fermionic dynamical equations are of the first order

4 Unfolding Mixed-Symmetry Fields

First in Section 41 an example of the simplest massless mixed-symmetry field ofspin- is investigated in detail and leading arguments are given for a spin- fieldSecond the general statement on arbitrary mixed-symmetry fields is proved whereastechnical details are collected in Sections 44 and 45 The analysis of the numberof physical degrees of freedom is carried out in Section 43

41 Simplest Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Example 411 Spin- field In the metric-like approach a spin- field is mini-mally described[16 17] by the subjected to (215) field φ[micromicro]ν that takes values in a

reducible so(dminus 1 1)-representation oplus the latter component is identified withthe trace φ ν

microν The gauge transformations (216) has two levels of reducibility with

two gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξA[microν] taking values in oplus bull so(dminus 1 1)-irreps at the

first level and one parameter ξmicro taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irrep at the secondlevel (217)

First the metric-like field φ[micromicro]ν has to be incorporated into certain differentialform eYq which is called a physical vielbein the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y and the degreeq to be defined below To make the symmetries both of the first and of the secondlevel of reducibility manifest the degree of the physical vielbein has to be two atleast

Moreover were the physical vielbein taken to be a degree-one form not all of thegauge symmetries even at the first level would be manifest Indeed there are twopossibilities for physical vielbein eY1 to contain a component with the symmetry of

Namely Y = and Y = since otimes = oplus oplus and otimes = oplus oplus

The associated differential gauge parameter is ξ0 in the first case and ξ0 in thesecond case Inasmuch as the gauge parameters are the forms of degree-zero onlyone of the required two parameters is present in each of the cases

The degree of the physical vielbein has to be not greater than two if the com-ponent associated with the metric-like field φmicromicroν is required not to be a certaintrace part The reason why a dynamical field should not be a certain trace part isexplained in the next Section

Therefore the physical vielbein has to be of degree-two and has to take valuesin so(dminus 1 1)-irrep that belongs to the vector representation ie e2 equiv ea2 equiv eamicroν

The associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξa1 equiv ξamicro contains in its Lorentz decomposition

otimes = oplus oplusbull both anti-symmetric ξAmicroν = ξa[microhbν]ηab and symmetric ξSmicroν = ξa(microh

bν)ηab

33

gauge parameters the latter enters along with the trace ξamicrohmicroa There exists a second

level gauge parameter χa0 which is directly identified with ξmicro as ξmicro = hbmicroχ

aηabThere are no redundant components in the gauge parameter However physicalvielbein e2 contains one redundant component in its decomposition into Lorentz

irreps otimes = oplus oplus The first and the second components are to be associatedwith a traceful φmicromicroν whereas the third one totally anti-symmetric component e[a|bc]

of ea|bc = eamicroνhbmicrohcν is a redundant one and has to be made non-dynamical In order

to do so algebraic gauge parameter ξ[abc]0 with the symmetry of is introduced It

is obvious from pure algebraic gauge law

δea2 = hbhcξ[abc]0 (41)

that the redundant component can be fixed to zero and ea2 can be directly identifiedwith φmicromicroν as e

amicromicro = φmicromicroνh

aν From gauge transformation laws δea2 = dξa1 δξa1 = dχa

0

ie δeamicroν = 12

(partmicroξ

aν minus partνξ

amicro

) δξamicro = partmicroχ

a required gauge transformations (216)(217) for metric-like field φmicromicroν and for the first order gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξ

A[microν]

are easily recoveredSince in the unfolded approach each gauge parameter possesses its own gauge

field and vice-verse associated with ξ[abc]0 gauge field ω

[abc]1 enters as

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 (42)

which determines the first equation Applying d to this equation results in Bianchiidentity hbhcdω

[abc]1 equiv 0 which has a unique solution of the form

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 (43)

with C[abc][df ]0 having the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensor of a spin-

field ie it is anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and C[abcd]f0 equiv 0 To clarify the form of

the solution let C[abc]|[df ]0 be a degree-zero form anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and with

no definite symmetry between these two groups of indices The Bianchi identityimplies hbhchdhfC

[abc]|[df ]0 equiv 0 which is equivalent to C

a[bc|df ]0 equiv 0 since vielbeins

ha anticommute Therefore the solution is parameterized by those components of

C[abc]|[df ]0 sim otimes that has the symmetry of Young diagrams with no more than

three rows since the requirement for total anti-symmetrization of any four indicesto give zero is the characteristic property of Young diagrams with at most three

rows otimes ni is the only component of zero trace order17 with three rows andthere are no components with the number of rows less than three Alternatively one

17Although there are trace components with the number of rows less than four eg theirtensor product by the metric ηab contains components with the symmetry of the sl(d)-Young

diagrams with more than three rows Nontrivial trace with the symmetry of corresponds tothe mass-like term Hence traceful tensors either do not satisfy the Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms

34

could search for the solution in the sector of degree-one forms as dω[abc]1 = hdC

[abc]|d1

with some C[abc]|d1 but Bianchi identity hbhchdC

[abc]|d1 equiv 0 implies that the only

component of C[abc]|d1 sim otimes that is allowed must have less than three rows which

is impossible since [abc] makes Young diagrams of otimes consist of three rows atleast18 Thus one has to search for the solution among the forms of less degree

Further unfolding requires a set of fields C [abc][df ]g(k) with the symmetry ofk

to be introduced and the full system has the form

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 δea2 = dξa1 + hbhcξ

[abc]0 δξa1 = dχa

0

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 δω

[abc]1 = dξ

[abc]0

dC[abc][df ]g(k)0 = hvC

[abc][df ]g(k)v0 (44)

Consequently the unfolded system incorporates field φmicromicroν with all required differ-ential gauge parameters at all levels of reducibility the redundant component of the

physical vielbein does not contribute to the dynamics ω[abc]1 sim otimes = oplus oplus

the first component is a field strength for the redundant field once the field hasbeen gauged away the associated field strength is zero and ω

[abc]ρ = hamicrohbνhcλT[microνλ]ρ

for some T[microνλ]ρ T[microνλρ] equiv 0 which incorporates both and (as the trace) Torecover equations (215) in terms of metric-like fields it is convenient to convert allfiber indices to the world ones in the first two equations

part[microeaνλ] = hb[microhcνω

abcλ] (45)

part[microωabcν] = hd[microhfν]C

abcdf (46)

to substitute Tmicroνλρ and to contract two indices in the second equation

part[microφνλ]ρ = Tmicroνλρ (47)

partρTmicroνρλ minus partλTρ

microνρ = 0 (48)

Plugging (47) in (48) gives equation (215)For Y = Y(2 1) (1 1) ie N = 2 and p = 2 the general scheme of Section

1 results in

Yg

n k 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 1 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

18Again the trace component enters the tensor product as η otimes and has the number of rowsnot less than three

35

therefore

Wq =

W a0 q = 0

W a1 W

[abc]0 q = 1

W aq W

[abc]qminus1 W

[abc][df ]qminus2 W

[abc][df ]gqminus2 q gt 1

(49)

and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbhcW[abc]qminus1 g = 1

hbhcW[aaa][bc]qminus2 g = 2

hdW[aaa][bb]c(gminus3)dqminus2 g gt 2

(410)

with D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (44) can be rewritten as

Dω2 = 0 δω2 = Dξ1 δξ1 = Dξ0 (411)

where ω2 isin W2 ξ1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 2 k = 0 sim g = 0and n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 1 form two finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-moduleswhereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g ge 2 form an infinite-dimensionaliso(dminus 1 1)-module

Example 412 Spin- field (briefly) In the case of a massless spin- fieldthere are two gauge parameters at the first level of reducibility which have the sym-metry19 of and one gauge parameter at the second level with the symmetryof First for Y = Y(3 1) (2 1) the proposed scheme results in

Yg

n k 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3 g = 4

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 2 q2 = 1 q3 = 0 q4 = 0

therefore the physical vielbein has to be a two-form taking values in ie e2 equiv

eaab2 Associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξaab1 has components otimes = oplus oplus the first two having the symmetry of the required gauge parameters with the thirdone being redundant The last three components in the decomposition of the physical

vielbein otimes = oplus oplus oplus are also redundant By virtue of Stueckelberg

symmetry with parameter ξ1 these three components can be gauged away inasmuch

as otimes = oplus oplus The redundant component of the first level gauge

parameter ξ1 also can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg symmetry with

level-two gauge parameter ξ0 Consequently at least the fact that the unfoldedsystem incorporates the metric-like field all the required gauge parameters andredundant components do not contribute to the dynamics is proved

19To simplify the example no consideration is given to the trace components of the fields

36

42 General Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Given a massless field of spin Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) described by a metric-like field φY(x) taking values in the irrep of the Lorentz algebra so(d minus 1 1) withthe same symmetry type(minimal formulation) there exists a unique unfolded systemwith the physical vielbein at the lowest grade and all symmetries being manifest thatreproduces the original metric-like system The system has the form (11)

Sketch of the proof

1 The lowest grade field (physical vielbein) eY0q0

turns out to be completely de-termined by the requirement for it to contain the metric-like field and for itsgauge parameters ξY0

q0minusk k gt 0 to contain all the necessary gauge parametersat all levels of reducibility (219)

2 eY0q0

and its gauge parameters appear to contain redundant components thathave to be made non-dynamical The only way to achieve this is to introduceStueckelberg symmetry δeY0

q0= σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus1) δξ

Y0q0minus1 = σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus2) with certain

ξY1q1minusk k gt 0 which turns out to be unambiguously defined by this requirement

3 ξY1q1minus1 has associated gauge field ωY1

q1and gauge transformations δωY0

q0=

σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) completely determines the first equation deY0

q0= σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) whichimplies Jacobi identity σ1

minus(dωY1q1

) equiv 0 The general solution is proved in Sec-tion 44 to have the form dωY1

q1= σ2

minus(ωY2q2

) with certain ωY2q2

The secondequation implies the second Jacobi identity σ2

minus(dωY2q2

) equiv 0 and so on

4 Once the total unfolded system is defined the proof of the facts that (i)the correct dynamical equations are imposed (ii) there are no other dynamicalfields or other differential gauge symmetries in the system is obtained throughthe calculations of σminus cohomology groups Ignoring the trace pattern of fieldsie for traceful tensors the proof of (ii) can be simplified and is done in thissection Even stronger statement that there exists a duality H

p+1+k sim Hpminusk is

proved in Section 45

First as it is clear from the examples above the metric-like field φYM(x) has

to be incorporated into a differential form eY0q of degree-q taking values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep Y0 (for this reason eY0q is called physical vielbein) Having converted

all world indices to fiber ones in accordance with (329) so(dminus 1 1)-tensor productY0 otimes Y(1 q) of Y0 with one column diagram of the height q must contain thecomponent with the symmetry of YM In the case of the minimal formulationYM = Y where Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) characterizes the spin

It is useful to introduce a notion of the quotient of two Young diagrams let thequotient of two Young diagrams Y1Y2 be a direct sum of those diagrams whoseso(dminus 1 1)-tensor product by Y2 contains Y1 For the first sight given q ge 0 anyelement Q of YMY(1 q) might be chosen as Y0 If q is greater than the heightof YM the component with the symmetry YM in the tensor product QotimesY(1 q)has to be certain trace inevitably

37

Although there is no apparent problems in considering unfolded systems withdynamical field hidden in certain trace component of the physical vielbein egMaxwell gauge potential Amicro might be identified with the trace eamicroνh

microa of two-form

eamicroν However this exotic incorporating of the physical field does not take place inthe already known systems Moreover it can be proved that such exotic systemsdo not exist if irreducible Nevertheless they might be a part of some reduciblesystem which describes more than one field Therefore we require the degree q ofthe physical vielbein to be not greater than the height of YM

Inasmuch as (i) the equations imposed on φY(x) possess reducible gauge trans-formations with the number of levels equal to the height p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi of Y (ii) for

a degree-q gauge field of an unfolded system there exist q levels of gauge transfor-mations the degree q of physical vielbein eY0

q must be equal to pThe quotient YY(1 p) contains only one element (provided φY(x) is for-

bidden to be a trace component) it is the diagram (12) with the symmetry ofY0 = Y(s1 minus 1 p1) (sN minus 1 pN) ie it is equal to Y without the first col-umn Therefore physical vielbein eY0

p is completely defined So does gauge param-

eters ξY0pminusk at the k-th level of reducibility k isin [1 p] The requirement for tensor

product Y0 otimes Y(1 pminus k) to contain all gauge parameters ξik given by (219)at the k-th level of reducibility is also satisfied Consequently the whole patternof fieldsgauge parameters of the metric-like formulation is reproduced Note thatY0 equiv Y0 and q0 = p in the terms of Section 1

Let us note that if one writes down the physical vielbein explicitly as ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

where si are the lengths of the rows ofY and converts the form indices to the tangentones by virtue of inverse background vielbein hmicroa

ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|[d1dp] = ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

hmicro1d1 hmicropdp (412)

dynamical field φY(x) should be identified with ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|a1ap which hasthe symmetry of Y with some traces included Consequently the generalizedLabastidarsquos double-tracelessness condition (220) [20] is obvious inasmuch as thecontraction of two metric tensor ηaiaiηaiai with the i-th group of indices vanishes

Generally in addition to φY(x) decompositionY0otimesY(1 p) of physical vielbeineY0p into Lorentz irreps contains redundant components which must not contributeto the physical degrees of freedom So does Y0 otimesY(1 pminus k) ie in addition toξik it contains a lot of components that can not be made genuine differential gaugeparameters There are only two possible ways to get rid of redundant fields in theunfolded formalism

A redundant components could be directly fixed to zero by algebraic (Stueckel-berg) symmetry

B redundant components might be auxiliary fields for other fields (at lower grade)and so on The process stops since the grade is assumed to be bounded frombelow

We require dynamical fields incorporated in the physical vielbein to be at the lowestgrade Actually (B) takes place for dual gauge descriptions but not for the minimal

38

Therefore the only possibility to make redundant components to be non-dynamicalis to introduce a Stueckelberg symmetry with certain parameters ξY1

q1minusk

δeY0p = dξY0

pminus1 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) (413)

δξY0pminus1 = dξY0

pminus2 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus2) (414)

(415)

where σ1minus is a certain operator built of background vielbein ha that contracts a

number of indices of Y1 with hahc to obtain Y0 Diagram20 Y1 and form degreeq1 can be easily found since Y1 otimes Y1 q1 minus i i gt 0 must contain all redundantcomponents of eY0

p and ξY0pminusk

In the unfolded formalism each gauge field possesses its own gauge parameter andvice-versa Therefore there is a gauge field ωY1

q1 which contributes to the equations

for eY0p as

deY0p = σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) (416)

The first equation determines the first Jacobi identity of the form σ1minus(dω

Y1q1

) equiv 0which can be solved as

dωY1q1

= σ2minus(ω

Y2q2

) (417)

for certain gauge field ωY2q2

and operator σ2minus that satisfies σ1

minusσ2minus equiv 0 The general

solution of Jacobi identities is given in Section 44 From now on let the super-scripts of σminus be omitted The second equation determines the second Jacobi identityσminus(dω

Y2q2

) equiv 0 which can be also solved and so on Consequently the knowledgeof the lowest grade gauge field eY0

p and of the Stueckelberg symmetries required toget rid of redundant components determines the first equation which by virtue ofJacobi identities determines the second and so on The total unfolded system hasthe structure

dωYg

qg= σminus

(

ωYg+1qg+1

)

g = 0 1

δωYg

qg= dξYg

qg+ σminus

(

ξYg+1

qg+1minus1

)

δξYgqg

=

(418)

where σminus is certain algebraic operator built of background vielbein ha and (σminus)2 = 0

The only facts remain to be proved are that there are no other dynamical fieldsand that the proper correspondence (duality) between the cohomology groups holdstrue To this end it is sufficient to analyze only the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps content ofH

qg ie only the symmetry type and the multiplicity of irreducible Lorentz tensors

that by virtue of (330) are the representatives of Hqg

It is proved in the next Section that there is a duality Hpminuskg=0 sim H

p+k+1g=1 between

the σminus cohomology groups which reveals the one-to-one correspondence betweenthe gauge dynamical fields and equations of motion the level-k gauge symmetries

20The specific character of Minkowski massless fields is in that all Stueckelberg parameters canbe incorporated into a single Y1-valued form this not being the case for (anti)-de Sitter masslessfields

39

and the level-k Bianchi identities The representatives of cohomology groups in thesector of fields and gauge symmetries directly correspond to those of metric-likeapproach and there is no other nontrivial cohomology in these sectors

Though the trace pattern of fieldsgauge parameters is also important and thecalculation of σminus cohomology groups provides a comprehensive answer to this ques-tion the very procedure being a bit technical Ignoring the trace pattern of thefields it can be easily proved that the required metric-like field is incorporated inphysical vielbein eY0

q0 all the redundant components of the physical vielbein can be

gauged away by a pure algebraic symmetry and the same holds for differential gaugeparameters ξY0

q0minusk at all levels of reducibility ie the required pattern of gauge pa-rameters is recovered whereas all the redundant components are either Stueckelbergor auxiliary This is the necessary condition only and the traces has to be takeninto account Also it is still to be proved that the correct equations of motionsare imposed Provided that there are no trace conditions on the fields the sys-tem is referred to as off-shell[65] An off-shell system may contain only constraintsthat express auxiliary fields via the derivatives of the dynamical field imposing norestrictions on the latter

The off-shell system Technically ignoring the traces is equivalent to thereplacement of all so(dminus1 1)-irreps by the sl(d)-irreps that are characterized by thesame Young diagrams ie instead of taking so(dminus1 1)-tensor products one needs toapply the sl(d)-tensor productrsquos rules which are much simpler The decompositionof the physical vielbein eY0

q0into sl(d)-irreps is given by diagrams Yαi of the form

αN+1

sN minus 1

pNαN

s2 minus 1

p2α2

s1 minus 1

p1

α1

(419)

where α1+ +αN+1 = q0 = p The decomposition of Stueckelberg gauge parameterξY1q1minus1 for eY0

q0has the components of the same form but with αN+1 ge 1 because

Y1 (13) has already the form of Y0 with one cell in the bottom-left Thereforeall components of eY0

q0except for those with αN+1 = 0 are of Stueckelberg type but

there is only one component of eY0q0

with αN+1 = 0 namely it has αi = pi i isin [1 N ]and hence has the symmetry of Y The decomposition of level-k differential gaugeparameter ξY0

q0minusk has the form (419) with α1 + + αN+1 = p minus k and again all

the components of ξY0q0minusk with αN+1 ge 1 can be gauged away by pure algebraic

symmetry with ξY1q1minuskminus1 Consequently there is a complete matching between (219)

40

and those in ξY0

q0minusk that are not pure gauge themselves It can be easily proved alsothat if ignoring the traces there are no other dynamical fieldsdifferential gaugeparameters at higher grade Consequently

Lemma H(σminus) with respect to sl(d) are given by

Hk(σminus)sl(d) =

Yαi g = 0 α1 + + αN = k αN+1 = 0 k le p

empty k gt p(420)

The triviality of the higher k gt p cohomology groups for sl(d) which shouldcontain equations of motion and Bianchi identities is expected since the system isoff-shell For the equations to have the second order in derivatives the only nontrivialcohomology group H

p+1 must be at the grade-one ie Hp+1g=1 6= empty As is seen from

the examples above the equations correspond to those representatives of Hp+1g=1 that

are certain traces Indeed the total rank |WYgqg | which is equal to the sum qg + |Yg|

of degree qg and rank of Yg is preserved by σminus Therefore |WYgqg | = |W

Y0q0| + g

and |RY1q1+1| = |ω

Y0q0| + 2 = |Y|+ 2 where eY0

q0isin Wg=0

p and RY1q1+1 isin W

g=1p+1 contain

metric-like field φYM(x) and the equations on φY(x) respectively Consequently

the representative of Hp+1g=1 that corresponds to the equations on the traceless part

of φY(x) has to be identified with certain trace of the first order and so on for thetraces of φY(x)

The calculation of σminus cohomology groups carried out in Section 45 implies

1 The only nontrivial cohomology groups are Hpminuskg=0 and H

p+k+1g=1 k = 1 p

Therefore the dynamical fields and independent gauge parameters belong tothe zero grade Wg=0

q subspaces the equations are of the second order and theBianchi identities for the k-th level gauge symmetries are of the (k + 2)-thorder

2 Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 ie there is a one-to-one correspondence between the

elements of Hpminuskg=0 that are traces of the r-th order and the elements of Hp+k+1

g=1

that are traces of the (r + k + 1)-th order Roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1

Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on Therefore there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the dynamical fields and the equations of motion the level-k gaugesymmetries and the k-th Bianchi identities

3 The so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that correspond to the elements of Hpminusk(σminus) and arethe traces of the zeroth order are given by the so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagramsthat have the form (419) with αN+1 = 0 and α1 + + αN = p minus k whichexactly reproduce the required pattern (219) Note that certain higher ordertraces are also the elements of cohomology groups These fields represent thersquoauxiliaryrsquo fields of the metric-like formulation which had to be introduced tomake the gauge symmetry off-shell To prove the theorem it is not necessary toknow the concrete trace pattern the duality between the cohomology groupsis sufficient The details of the trace pattern are in Section 45

41

In the fermionic case the traces are substituted for Γ-traces Important isthat acting on tensor indices only σminus does not break down the irreducibility ofspin-tensors The duality has the form H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 or simply H

pminuskg=0 sim

Hp+k+1g=0 which means that equations are of the first order and the duality between

fieldsequations gauge symmetriesBianchi identities takes place which completesthe proof

Note that Yg=s1 equiv Yn=0k=0 has the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensorfor a spin-Y massless field

sNpN

s2p2

s1

p1 + 1

(421)

Analogously to the examples of Section 33 massless mixed-symmetry fields can bedescribed by the same unfolded system (16) that is restricted to Wg

q with g ge g0ie the system contains infinitely many dual formulations As the generalized Weyltensor and its descendants are non-gauge fields the dual descriptions with g0 ge s1are non-gauge and the dual descriptions with 0 lt g0 lt s1 are gauge

43 Physical Degrees of Freedom Counting

Notwithstanding the simplicity of the unfolded form and the uniqueness of unfoldingthere still might be a question of whether the unfolded equations do describe thecorrect number of physical degrees of freedom

It is well-known that for systems with the first class constraints only with mass-less fields belonging to this class the counting of degrees of freedom is that one firstlevel gauge parameter kills two degrees of freedom one second level gauge parame-ters kills three degrees of freedom and so on For example a spin-two massless fieldpossesses d(dminus3)

2degrees of freedom which is just d(d+1)

2minus 2d d(d+1)

2and d being the

number of components of φmicroν and ξmicroThe complete information concerning the rsquonumberrsquo of fieldsgauge parameters

ie the multiplicity and the symmetry of corresponding tensors is contained inH

kg=0(σminus) for k = 0p Not only can a number of physical degrees of freedom be

calculated but the whole exact sequence that defines an iso(d minus 1 1) irrep can bederived The elements of this sequence are certain so(dminus 1) tensors that define anso(dminus 2) tensor as a quotient of so(d minus 1) tensors eg (218) The decompositionof so(dminus 1 1)-fields into irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) can be done with the aid ofpartmicro or after Fourier transform with the aid of momentum pmicro

For example for a spin-two field the cohomology groups that correspond to thedynamical fieldsdifferential gauge parameters and its decomposition into so(dminus 1)irreps have the form

42

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus bull sim φmicroν φ

νν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2bull

Quick sort of Young diagrams in 0 minusrarr 2H0 minusrarr H1 minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 gives the

correct exact sequence 0 minusrarr minusrarr minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 which defines a masslessspin-two irrep H (0 )

For the simplest mixed-symmetry field the hook- there are two levels of gaugetransformation hence relevant cohomology groups are H

0 H1 and H2

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus oplus bull sim ξAmicroν oplus ξ

Smicroν ξ

Sνν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2 oplus 2bull

H2 oplus sim φmicroνλ φ

νmicroν 6= 0 oplus oplus oplus 2 oplus bull

Again quick sort of diagrams in 0 minusrarr 3H0 minusrarr 2H1 minusrarr H2 minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0

gives exact sequence (218)Consequently the problem of calculation the number of physical degrees of free-

dom to be precise of deriving the exact sequence is effectively reduced to the simplecombinatoric problem of (i) decomposition so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagram representa-tives of H(σminus) to so(dminus 1)-diagrams (ii) cancellation of like terms in sequence

0 minusrarr (p+ 1)H0 minusrarr pH1 minusrarr minusrarr 2Hpminus1 minusrarr Hp minusrarr H (0Y) minusrarr 0 (422)

Skipping combinatoric technicalities we state that in the general case of a spin-Ymassless mixed-symmetry field (422) reduces to the correct exact sequence thatdefines a uirrep H (0Y) of iso(dminus 1 1)

44 Solving the Generalized Jacobi Identities

Unfolding some dynamical system there arises a problem of solving Jacobi identities(33) that have schematically a form hhdω1

q equiv 0 where a number of backgroundvielbeins ha is contracted with the fiber indices of ω1

q The Jacobi identity restrictsdω1

q to have a certain specific form dω1q = hhω2

r where the so(dminus1 1)-irrep inwhich ω2

r takes values the degree r and the projector built of hh are completelydetermined The solutions are given by21

Lemma A Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values inY = Y(s p) (k 1)

so(dminus 1 1)-irrep The general solution of

hcdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq = 0 (423)

21As was pointed out in Section 33 nonzero traces either violate Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms and therefore are ignored

43

has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq k lt s

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1 k = s q ge p + 1

0 k = s q lt p+ 1

(424)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 take values inY(s p) (k + 1 1)

and Y(s+ 1 p+ 1) so(dminus 1 1)-irreps respectively22

Proof The parametrization of dωq by a degree-(q + 1) form taking values in the

same so(dminus 1 1)-irrep dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = R

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q+1 obviously fails to satisfy

(423) Inasmuch as (423) contains a vielbein the solution has to contain a number

of vielbeins too The most general parametrization of dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q with only

one vielbein included has the form dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = hdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)|dq for some

q-form taking values in a tensor product of Y by a vector representation ie thereis no definite symmetry between index d and the rest of the indices

hchdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)c|dq = 0larrrarr ωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)[c|d]

q = 0 (425)

Only those irreps in Yotimes are allowed that have c and d symmetric ie correspondto Y(s p) (k + 1 1) for k lt s This is not possible in the case k = s ie Y =Y(s p+ 1) and the only possibility to have c and d symmetric is to add the whole

column toY which requires dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q to be represented as dω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hchcωa1(sminus1)cap(sminus1)cap+1(sminus1)cqminuspminus1 and therefore q must be large enough Roughly

speaking the proof is based on the fact that the anti-symmetrization of two indicesat the same row of a Young diagram is identically zero the anti-symmetrizationbeing due to contraction with vielbeins

Note that choosing nonmaximal solutions of Jacobi identities results in loweringthe gauge symmetry so that not all redundant components are excluded

Unfolding totally-symmetric massless higher-spin fields the possible rhs termsin dω

a(sminus1)b(t)1 = are restricted by Jacobi identities and an essential use is made

of

Corollary The solution of Jacobi identity

hcdωa(sminus1)b(tminus1)c1 equiv 0 (426)

is of the form

dωa(sminus1)b(t)1 =

hcωa(sminus1)b(t)c1 t lt sminus 1

hchdCa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 t = sminus 1

(427)

22The symmetric basis is used being more convenient in this case as the contracted with vielbeinstensors are already irreducible

44

The following statement is a generalization of the Lemma-A to the case where(s p) (k 1) is a rsquosubdiagramrsquo of a larger Young diagram Y that has a numberof rows precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) Appropriate Young symmetrizershave to be included as the mere contraction of a number of vielbeins breaks theirreducibility of the tensor For instance hcω

a(s1)b(s2minus1)c is already irreducible withthe symmetry of Ys1 s2 minus 1 but this is not the case for hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) which hasto be added one term hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) + 1s1minuss2+1

hcωa(s1)bb(s2minus1)c to get the symmetry

of Ys1 minus 1 s2

Lemma B Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values in Y =

Y( (s p) (k 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irrep where the dots stands for the blocks inY precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) The general solution of

Π[hcdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq

]= 0 (428)

where Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p)(k minus 1 1) has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

Π[

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq

]

k lt s

Π[

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1

]

k = s q ge p+ 1

0 k = s q lt p + 1

(429)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 takes values in

Y (s p) (k + 1 1) and Y (s+ 1 p+ 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irreps respec-tively and Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p) (k 1)

Proof The proof is similar to that of Lemma-A with the only comment that thesymmetrizers do not affect the argumentation that anti-symmetrization of two in-dices in the same row is identically zero

45 Dynamical Content via σminus Cohomology

Before discussing the calculation of σminus cohomology let us first recall necessary factsconcerning the evaluation of so(d minus 1 1)-tensor products Let P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) be anumber of integer partitions k1 + + kN = m of m where ki is constrained byki le ǫi and different rearrangements of ki satisfying the constraints are regarded asdistinct partitions The generating function for the partition P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) is

sum

m

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m)tm =

i=Nprod

i=1

(1minus tǫi+1)

1minus t(430)

These integer partitions gives the multiplicities of irreps in so(dminus 1 1)-tensor prod-ucts (Clebsh-Gordon coefficients) we are interested in [71]

45

The so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary irrep Ylowast = Y(si pi) by aone-column diagram of the height qlowast can be explicitly calculated as

sNpN

s2

p2

s1

p1

otimes

q =sum

αjβi

Nαjβi

αN+1

βN

αN

ǫNpN sN

β2

α2

ǫ2p2 s2

β1

α1

ǫ1p1 s1

(431)

where αi βi αi + βi le pi i isin [1 N ] αN+1 ge 0 and there exist ρ ge 0 such that

qlowast =i=Nsum

i=1

(αi + βi) + αN+1 + 2ρ (432)

The multiplicity Nαjβi of Ylowastαj βi

is given by integer partition

Nαjβi = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ǫi = pi minus αi minus βi (433)

and the total trace order r is

r =i=Nsum

i=1

βi + ρ (434)

Roughly speaking to obtain an element of the tensor product one should first cutoff from bottom-right of the i-th block a column of height βiminusγi pi ge βiminusγi ge 0 (totake different traces) and second add an arbitrary number αi+γi pi ge αi+γi ge 0 ofcells to each block provided the γi cells annihilate ie they are added to the placesfrom which γi cells were removed at the first stage Multiplicity may be differentfrom one due to different rearrangements of γi ie when multiplied by the rest ofq-column different traces can give rise to the same diagram The number of suchrearrangements is given by P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ρ =

sumi=N

i=1 γi For instance sl(n)-tensor

product otimes is given simply by

otimessl(n) = oplus oplus oplus (435)

46

The so(d)-tensor product can be represented as a sum of the form

otimesso(n) = otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

otimessl(n)

oplus

otimessl(n)

︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

oplus

otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

2nd order

=

oplus oplus oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

oplus

oplus 2 oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

︸︷︷︸

2ndorder

(436)

where the sum is over trace order and the boxes that are connected by the arc areto be contracted and then the sl(n)-product rules are to be applied to the rest ofthe diagrams

Evaluating the so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary spinor-irrep Ylowast =Y(si pi) 1

2by a one-column diagram of the height qlowast one can contract any number

of Γ matrices with the indices of the column and then multiply therefore the tensorproduct rule for spin-tensors can be reduced to bosonic rule (431) as

Y(si pi) 12otimesso(n) Y(1 q) =

qsum

k=0

(Y(si pi) otimesso(n) Y(1 q minus k)

)

12

(437)

for example

12otimesso(n) = 1

2oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order Γ-traces

oplus

12oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order Γ-traces

oplus

oplus

2 12

︸︷︷︸

2nd order Γ-traces

oplus

bull 12

︸︷︷︸

3d order Γ-traces

(438)

The multiplicity N12

αjβiof Ylowast

αj βi12

is given by

N12

αjβi=

i=ρsum

i=0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus i) (439)

Let us now analyze the origin of σminus cohomology Its action σminus Wgq rarr W

gminus1q+1

preserves g+ q and hence the whole complex C(W σminus) is a direct sum of complexesC(qprime σminus) where q

prime refers to the end element Wg=0qprime of the complex

C(qprime σminus) 0 minusrarr minusrarr Wg=1qprimeminus1 minusrarrW

g=0qprime minusrarr 0 (440)

47

Moreover σminus preserves the total rank (the form degree + rank of the so(d minus 1 1)-

irrep in which the field takes values) LetWa(s1)a(sm)q be an element ofWg

qprime When

all form indices of Wa(s1)a(sm)q are converted to the fiber ones according to (329)

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (441)

the action of σminus is just an anti-symmetrization of all d1 dq with those indices aithat are extra as compared to Ygminus1 plus some terms to restore the correct Youngsymmetry of Ygminus1 Let the decomposition ofW a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] into so(dminus1 1)-irreps be of the form

Ya1(s1) am(sm)otimes

Y(1 q) =oplus

r=0

oplus

ir

N rirYr

ir (442)

where the summation is over the trace order r and then over ir which enumeratesall so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that enters in the tensor product as the traces of the r-thorder N r

irbeing the multiplicity of Yr

ir The multiplicity of the zeroth order traces

is always equal to one N0i0= 1 In fact the diagrams Y 0

i0can be directly obtained

by the sl(n)-tensor product ruleThe very anti-symmetrization is insensitive to whether a certain component en-

ters as a trace or not When decomposed into so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the elements ofWg

qprime and Wgminus1qprime+1 have a number of components of the same symmetry type The

action of σminus is just a linear transformation that either sends the whole so(dminus 1 1)-irrep to zero23 or sends it to the components of Wgminus1

qprime+1 of the same symmetry typeImportant is that σminus does not act between different so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Thereforecomplex C(qprime σminus) is a direct sum of complexes parameterized by so(dminus 1 1)-irrepsYprime that are given by various tensor products

Ynk

otimes

Y(1 q) (443)

provided that the field WYnkq is an element of Wgprimeminusi

qprime+i for certain i When reducedto such a complex

C(Yprime qprime σminus) 0rarr rarr Vg rarr Vgminus1 rarr rarr 0 (444)

the action of σminus is a linear transformation between the spaces Vg rarr Vgminus1 dimen-

sions of which are equal to the multiplicity of Yprime in the decomposition of WYgqg and

WYgminus1qg+1 The action of σminus is maximally non-degenerate compatible with nilpotency

Therefore to find cohomology groups the dimension of each linear space in everycomplex has to be calculated

Let us note that only the types and multiplicities of so(dminus1 1)-irreps are foundbelow ie no attention is paid to the description of how the corresponding tensorsare contained in the fields WY

qprime This is sufficient for our purposes though it isobvious (412) how the metric-like field φYM

is incorporated in an element ofWg=0p

23provided that the appropriate basis on the space of so(dminus1 1)-irreps with the same symmetrytype is chosen

48

The calculation of σminus cohomology is divided into three cases that cover the wholevariety of so(dminus 1 1)-irreps that can result from the tensor products (443)

In the Lemmas below it is assumed that complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is parameterizedby so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Yprime = Ylowast

αj βiof the form (431) with Ylowast = Ynk q

lowast = q such

that WYnkq isin C(qprime σminus) and ρ is defined according to (432)

In the first case Yprime is an element of Y0 otimesY(1 q)

Lemma 1 The σminus cohomology groups Hqg=0 and H

qg=1 are nontrivial and are given

by

Hqg =

Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βiMαj βi

αN+1 = 0sumi=N

i=0 αi = qq isin [0 p] g = 0

H2pminusqminus1 q isin [p+ 1 2p+ 1] g = 1

empty q gt 2p+ 1 any g

(445)where Mαj βi is the multiplicity of the irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

defined below

Proof From the very form of Yn=N0 equiv Yg=0 equiv Y(si minus 1 pi) it follows that theso(dminus1 1)-irreps that the element ofWg=0

q sim Y0otimesY(1 q) decomposes into may

be contained in Wg=1qminus1 only ie Wg=0

q and Wg=kqminusk contain no so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of

the same symmetry type for k gt 1 Therefore the length of complex C(Yprime q σminus)where Yprime isin Y0otimesY(1 q) is equal to one ie C(Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

q σminus) 0 minusrarrV1 minusrarr V0 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions of V0 and V1 are given by the multiplicitiesof the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

in Wg=1qminus1 and Wg=0

q respectively

dim(V1) =

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus 1) ρ ge 1

0 ρ = 0αN+1 = 0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) αN+1 gt 0

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) (446)

If αN+1 gt 0 the dimensions of V0 and V1 are equal and each irreducible componentof Wg=0

q with αN+1 gt 0 can be gauge away by virtue of the corresponding element

of Wg=1qminus1 thus being exact H

kgt2p+1 = empty inasmuch as ρ le p and the componentsof the forms with rank greater than (2p + 1) must have αN+1 gt 0 thus beingexact If αN+1 = 0 the dimensions are different dim(V1) lt dim(V0) for q le pdim(V1) = dim(V0) for q = p + 1 and dim(V1) gt dim(V0) for q gt p Thereforethe number of those Ysi piαj βi

isin Wg=0q q le p that are not exact is equal to

Mαj βi = |dim(V1) minus dim(V0)| the same is the number of those Ysi piαj βiisin

Wg=1qminus1 q gt p+ 1 that are not exact The obvious property of integer partitions

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ǫ1 + + ǫN minusm) (447)

results in the important duality in the cohomology groups Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 or

roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on

49

The second case is the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) where Yprime is an element of the tensor

product Ynk otimesY(1 q) for certain q ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmaxn minus 1

Lemma 2 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainqprime ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmax

n minus 1 the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The complex has the length two ie 0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr 0 wherethe dimensions are given by dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫN 1|ρ+ 1)dim(V2) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ+ 1) Simple calculations with generating functions resultsin dim(V0) lt dim(V1) dim(V2) lt dim(V1) and dim(V0) minus dim(V1) + dim(V2) = 0and consequently the sequence is exact

Analogously

Lemma 3 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainq ge 0 with k = 0 and n lt N the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The speciality of such Yprime is that the complex has the length three ie0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr V3 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions are given by

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 ǫn + 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V2) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 1) ρ ge ǫn + 1

0 otherwise

dim(V3) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn minus 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 2) ρ ge ǫn + 2

0 otherwise

Again simple calculations with generating functions results in appropriate inequali-ties and dim(V0)minusdim(V1)+dim(V2)minusdim(V3) = 0 and consequently the sequenceis exact

The above three cases covers the whole variety of the so(d minus 1 1)-tensors thatcan result from the tensor products YnkotimesY(1 q) for any n k and q The caseswith sN = 1 and Y = Y0 are special but the calculation of cohomology groupsleads to the same result

In the fermionic case the computations are similar due to the multiplicity givenby (439) The difference is that all nontrivial cohomology is concentrated in gradezero Indeed taking into account (446) where P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) is to be replaced by(439) it follows that dim(V0) ge dim(V1) for all q and H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 where r

is referred to the Γ-trace order or roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 andso on

5 Conclusions

The unfolded system constructed in the paper has a simple form of a covariantconstancy equation and describes arbitrary mixed-symmetry bosonic and fermionic

50

massless fields in d-dimensional Minkowski space The gauge fieldsparameters aredifferential forms with values in certain finite-dimensional irreducible representationsof the Lorentz algebra that are uniquely determined by the generalized spin

The key moment is that all gauge symmetries are manifest within the unfoldedformulation which is of most importance in controlling the number of physicaldegrees of freedom when trying to introduce interactions Unfolded systems areformulated in terms of differential forms which is a natural way to respect diffeo-morphisms and hence to describe systems that include gravity

Though the necessary conditions for the system to have a lagrangian descriptionare satisfied ie the fields are in one-to-one correspondence with the equations andthe k-th level gauge symmetries are in one-to-one correspondence with the k-thBianchi identities the very lagrangian remains to be constructed

Another interesting moment is that the unfolded equations for bosons are thesame as for fermions namely the operators involved ie exterior differential dand σminus remains unmodified when tensors are replaced with spin-tensors Thoughthis nice property partly breaks down in (anti)-de Sitter space within the unfoldedapproach bosons and fermions have much in common the fact being very useful forsupersymmetric theories

The proposed unfolded system includes all non-gauge dual descriptions whichare based on the generalized Weyl tensor and its descendants but not all of gaugedual descriptions It would be interesting to construct an unfolded system thatcontains all dual formulations

The interactions of the totally symmetric massless higher-spin fields are knownto require a nonzero cosmological constant ie are formulated in (anti)-de Sitterspace [2] Mixed-symmetry fields exhibit some interesting features in the presence ofcosmological constant For example not all of the Minkowski gauge symmetries canbe deformed to (anti)-de Sitter [72] As a result massless mixed-symmetry fields havemore degrees of freedom in (anti)-de Sitter compared to its Minkowski counterparts[73] and in the Minkowski limit a massless mixed-symmetry field splits in a certaincollection of massless fields generally Contrariwise a single mixed-symmetry fieldcan not be smoothly deformed to (anti)-de Sitter Another interesting effect is theexistence of the so-called partially-massless fields [74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 8283 84] the fields that have a number of degrees of freedom intermediate betweenthat of massless and massive and split in a set of massless fields in the Minkowskilimit Therefore the extension of the proposed approach to (anti)-de Sitter spaceseems to be non-trivial but nevertheless worth being investigated

In a series of papers [85 61 86 60] it was suggested so-called frame-like approachto the general mixed-symmetry fields in (anti)-de Sitter To generalize the proposedin the present paper unfolded system to (anti)-de Sitter case and to compare to thatof [60] is the next step to perform

We consider the proposed unfolded system as the first stage in constructing thefull interacting theory of mixed-symmetry fields

51

Acknowledgements

The author appreciates sincerely MA Vasiliev for reading the manuscript and mak-ing many detailed and valuable suggestions and illuminating comments the verywork was initiated as the result of discussions with MA Vasiliev The author isalso grateful to RR Metsaev and KB Alkalaev for useful discussions and to OVShaynkman for discussion of the fermionic case The work was supported in partby grants RFBR No 05-02-17654 LSS No 440120062 and INTAS No 05-7928by the Landau Scholarship and by the Scholarship of Dynasty foundation

Appendix A Multi-index convention

The multi-index notations is used a group of indices in which certain tensor issymmetric or is to be symmetrized is denoted either by one letter with the numberof indices indicated in round brackets or by placing a group of indices in roundbrackets eg

T a(s) equiv T a1a2as T a1aiaj as = T a1ajaias (A1)

V aT a(s) equiv V (a1T a2as+1) equiv1

s+ 1(V a1T a2a3as+1 + V a2T a1a3as+1 + + V as+1T a1a2as)

(A2)

V (bT a(s)) equiv V (bT a1as) equiv1

s + 1

(V bT a1a2as + V a1T ba2a3as + + V asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A3)Analogously the group of indices in which certain tensor is anti-symmetric or is tobe anti-symmetrized is denoted by placing indices in square brackets eg

T a[s] equiv T a1a2as T a1aiai+1as = minusT a1ai+1aias (A4)

V [bT a[s]] equiv V [bT a1as] equiv1

s+ 1

(V bT a1a2as minus V a1T ba2a3as + + (minus)sV asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A5)The operators of (anti)-symmetrization are weighted to be projectors (the factor 1

s+1

above)

Appendix B Young diagrams

Comprehensive information on Young diagrams can be found for example in thetextbook [71]

Definition B1 Given an integer partition ie a nonincreasing sequence si i isin[1 n] si ge si+1 of positive integers (or nonnegative when it is convenient to workwith a sequence of a fixed length) associated Young diagram Ys1 s2 sn is agraphical representation consisting of n left-justified rows made of boxes with the

52

i-th row containing si boxes

s10s11

s1s2s3s4

s5s6s7

s8s9

Finite-dimensional irreducible representation(irrep) of sl(d) ie various irre-ducible sl(d)-tensors are in one-to-one correspondence with Young diagrams of theform Ys1 s2 s[ d

2] The associated irreducible tensors

T

s1︷︸︸︷aa

s2︷︸︸︷

bb (B1)

or in condensed notation T a(s1)b(s2) have at most [d2] groups of indices being sym-

metric in each group separately and satisfy the condition that the symmetrizationof any group of indices with one index of any of the subsequent groups is identicallyzero ie

T a(s1)(b(sk)b)c(sjminus1) equiv 0 k lt j (B2)

If s[ d2] 6= 0 and d is even the (anti)-selfduality condition has to be imposed for

appropriate signature (anti)-selfduality is conventionally denoted by the sign factors+(minus) before s[ d

2] In this paper we do not consider (anti)-self dual representations

A scalar representation Y0 0 0 is denoted by bull a vector irrep Y1 0 0by rank-two symmetric tensor irrep by rank-two antisymmetric tensor irrep

by and so onFinite-dimensional irreducible representations of so(d) are of the two types ten-

sor and spin-tensor and are also characterized by Young diagrams which in thecase of spin-tensor irreps refer to the symmetry of the tensor part Young diagramsthat correspond to spin-tensor irreps are labeled by 1

2-subscript Spinor indices

α β γ = 12[d2] are placed first and are separated from tensor indices by rdquordquo For

example a spinor ψα irrep is denoted by bull 12 a vector-spinor irrep Aαaby 1

2and

so on To make tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry conditionthe tracelessness condition with respect to each pair of indices is to be imposed

ηccTa(s1)cb(siminus1)cd(sjminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n j = 1n (B3)

To make spin-tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry condition Γ-tracelessness condition with respect to each tensor index and a spinor index is to beimposed

Γαc βT

βa(s1)cb(siminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n (B4)

where Γαc β satisfy Γα

a βΓβb γ

+ Γαb βΓ

βaγ = 2ηab Additional conditions on spinors viz

Majorana Weyl and Majorana-Weyl are irrelevant to the problems concerned Also

53

in both cases it is required for the sum of the heights of the first two columns ofYoung diagrams to be not greater than d Note that the Γ-tracelessness conditionis stronger than the tracelessness one and applying the Γ-tracelessness twice to twosymmetric indices gives the tracelessness

0 = 2ΓαaβΓ

βb γT γ(ab) = ηabT

αab (B5)

To handle with arbitrary large Young diagrams the so-called block representationis used ie the rows of equal lengths are combined to blocks

Y(s1 p1) (sn pn) equiv Y

p1︷ ︸︸ ︷s1 s1

p2︷ ︸︸ ︷s2 s2

pn︷ ︸︸ ︷sn sn (B6)

References

[1] C Fronsdal ldquoMassless fields with integer spinrdquo Phys Rev D18 (1978) 3624

[2] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoCubic interaction in extended theories ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Nucl Phys B291 (1987) 141

[3] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoOn the gravitational interaction ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Phys Lett B189 (1987) 89ndash95

[4] M A Vasiliev ldquoConsistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in(3+1)-dimensionsrdquo Phys Lett B243 (1990) 378ndash382

[5] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoOn the geometry of higher-spin gauge fieldsrdquoClass Quant Grav 20 (2003) S473ndashS486 hep-th0212185

[6] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoFree geometric equations for higher spinsrdquoPhys Lett B543 (2002) 303ndash310 hep-th0207002

[7] M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear equations for symmetric massless higher spin fieldsin (a)ds(d)rdquo Phys Lett B567 (2003) 139ndash151 hep-th0304049

[8] X Bekaert I L Buchbinder A Pashnev and M Tsulaia ldquoOn higher spintheory Strings brst dimensional reductionsrdquo Class Quant Grav 21 (2004)S1457ndash1464 hep-th0312252

[9] D Sorokin ldquoIntroduction to the classical theory of higher spinsrdquo AIP ConfProc 767 (2005) 172ndash202 hep-th0405069

[10] X Bekaert S Cnockaert C Iazeolla and M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear higherspin theories in various dimensionsrdquo hep-th0503128

[11] A Sagnotti E Sezgin and P Sundell ldquoOn higher spins with a strong sp(2r)conditionrdquo hep-th0501156

[12] P K Townsend ldquoCovariant quantization of antisymmetric tensor gaugefieldsrdquo Phys Lett B88 (1979) 97

54

where W =oplusinfin

q=0Wq is certain graded space D is a nilpotent operator of degree

(+1) D Wq rarr Wq+1 and D2 = 0 Gauge fields take values in Wp where

p =sumi=N

i=1 pi is the height of Young diagram Y the first level gauge parameters inWpminus1 the second level gauge parameters in Wpminus2 and so on The gauge invarianceis manifest by virtue of D2 = 0 The reducibility of gauge transformations is similarto those of totally anti-symmetric fields

SpaceWp which contains the gauge fields of the unfolded system is a graded by

nonnegative integer g = 0 1 set of differential formsWp = ωY0q0 ωY1

q1 ω

Ygqg

q0 = p Diagrams Yg that characterize so(d minus 1 1)-irreducible representations inwhich the fields and gauge parameters take values are uniquely determined by theinitial diagram Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN)( 1

2) of so(dminus 2)

The dynamical field is incorporated in a p-form ωY0p isin Wg=0

p that takes valuesin the irreducible representation(irrep) of the Lorentz algebra so(d minus 1 1) that ischaracterized by Young diagram Y0 of the form

sN minus 1pN

s2 minus 1p2

s1 minus 1

p1

(12)

ie it is obtained by cutting off the first column of Y All other gauge fields inthe system are auxiliary and can be expressed in terms of derivatives of ωY0

p It is

convenient to enumerate the Lorentz-irreps in which gauge fields ωYgqg take values by

a pair n k of integers Roughly speaking the first integer is related to the numberof the block of Y n = N 0 the second one is related to the relative length ofthe n-th and (n+ 1)-th blocks The so(dminus 1 1)-irreps Yg=0Yg=(sNminus1) are givenby Ynk with n = N k = 0(sN minus 1) of the form

k

sN minus 1pN

s2 minus 1p2

s1 minus 1

p1

(13)

The diagrams Yg with g = sN (sNminus1 minus 1) are given by Ynk with n = N minus 1

4

k = 0(sNminus1 minus sN minus 1) of the form

sNminus1

sN minus 1pN

k

s2 minus 1p2

s1 minus 1

p1

(14)

and analogously for the rest of Yg with g lt s1 The diagrams Yg with g = s1 s1 +1 are given by Ynk with n = 0 k = 0 1 of the form

sN minus 1

sN minus 1pN

s2minuss3minus1

s2 minus 1p2

s1minuss2minus1

s1 minus 1

p1

k + 1

(15)

Gauge fields ωYgqg for g sim n = N k are (p1 + + pN)-forms gauge fields ω

Ygqg for

g sim n = Nminus1 k are (p1+ +pNminus1)-forms gauge fields ωYgqg for g sim n = 0 k

are zero-forms Hence form degree function qg is completely defined The grade g isequal to the element number (starting from zero) in the set of pairs n k orderedby k in increasing order and then by n in decreasing order

Space Wpminus1 which contains the first level gauge parameters of the system is aset of forms with values in the same so(dminus 1 1)-irreps as gauge fields but the form

degree is less by one ie Wpminus1 = ξY0q0minus1 ξ

Y1q1minus1 ξ

Yg

qgminus1 The sector Wgpminus1 for

g ge s1 is trivial du to qg = 0 Analogously spaces Wq for q lt p minus 1 and q gt pcan be defined To sum up the element of space Wpplusmni at grade g sim n k is adegree-(qg plusmn i) form with values in Yg equiv Ynk irrep of the Lorentz algebra

The Minkowski background space is described in terms of vielbein(tetrad) hamicrodxmicro

and Lorentz spin-connection abmicro dxmicro which determines Lorentz-covariant derivative

DL = d+When reduced to Wg

q the full system has the form

DLωYg

qg= σminus

(

ωYg+1qg+1

)

ωYg

qgisin Wg

p ωYg+1qg+1

isin Wg+1p

δωYg

qg= DLξ

Yg

qgminus1 + σminus

(

ξYg+1

qg+1minus1

)

ξYg

qgminus1 isin Wgpminus1 ξ

Yg+1

qg+1minus1 isin Wg+1pminus1

δξYg

qgminus1 = (16)

where operator D is a sum D = DL minus σminus of Lorentz-covariant derivative DL andcertain nilpotent operator σminus

andq otimesYg+1 rarrandq+∆g+1otimesYg ∆g = qg minus qg+1 ge 0

5

(σminus)2 = 0 built of background vielbein hamicrodx

micro which is unambiguously fixed bythe symmetry of Yg and Yg+1 σminus contracts (∆g + 1) vielbeins ha with the tensorrepresenting Yg+1 to obtain the tensor with the symmetry of Yg appropriate Youngsymmetrizers are implied

Since σminus affects tensor indices only it is correctly defined on spin-tensors too anddoes not violate the Γ-tracelessness condition The unfolded equations for fermionshave the same form as for bosons the irreducible tensors are to be replaced withcorresponding spin-tensors

The case of the last block of the length one ie single column is not specialbut requires some comments Since (sN minus 1) = 0 it is not possible to add a cellto the bottom-left of the N -th block of Y0 therefore Yn=Nk=0 equiv Y0 is theonly diagram with n = N and diagram Yn=Nminus1k=0 equiv Yg=1 has the symmetry ofY(s1 minus 1 p1) (sNminus1 minus 1 pNminus1) (1 pN + 1)

Subspace Wnkq with definite n forms an irreducible module of iso(d minus 1 1)

whereas the subspace with definite both n and k forms a finite-dimensional irre-ducible module of so(d minus 1 1) ie an irreducible Lorentz tensor characterized byYg as was stated above The intervals of constancy of qg correspond to gnk withdefinite n ie the set of forms on which a certain irreducible iso(dminus 1 1)-moduleis realized all have the same degree

Let us also note that Wkgep are infinite-dimensional whereas Wkltp are finite-dimensional The higher degree spaces Wkgep correspond to the equations of motion(Wk=p+1) and Bianchi identities (Wkgtp+1) which manifest the gauge symmetriesMost of the equations express higher grade g gt 0 fields via the derivatives of phys-ical field ωY0

q0and only certain elements of Wg=2

k=p+1 impose on ωY0q0

second orderdynamical equations The significance of the fields with g gt 0 is to make all gaugesymmetries be manifest

2 Mixed-Symmetry Fields in Minkowski Space

The types of the Minkowski space particles being by definition in one-to-one corre-spondence with unitary irreducible representations(uirrep) of the Poincare algebraiso(dminus 1 1) in the case of four space-time dimensions were classified by Wigner in[37]

Leaving out the details of the Wignerrsquos construction for recent reviews and forgeneralization to an arbitrary space-time dimension d see [38] important is thatgiven m2 gt 0 and a uirrep Y of the Wignerrsquos little algebra being so(d minus 1) form2 gt 0 and so(d minus 2) for m2 = 0 there exists a standard procedure to constructa uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) which is called a massive(massless) particle of spin-YSo-called continuous or infinite spin particles [37] [39] are not considered in thispaper Therefore physical degrees of freedom for massive and massless particles areclassified by irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) and so(dminus 2) respectively

More elaborated are the two cases of totally-symmetric spin-s particles Y =Ys equiv Y(s 1) [40 1 10] viz scalar vector graviton and of totally anti-symmetric spin-p particles Y = Y(1 p) [12 13 14] The others are referred to col-

6

lectively as mixed-symmetry the simplest one beingY = Y2 1 equiv Y(2 1) (1 1)Yet different problem is to realize a uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) on the solutions of a

wave equation for a field φYM(x) which takes values in a certain representation YM

of the Lorentz algebra so(dminus1 1) ie φYM(x) is a Lorentz tensor or a set of tensors

As field theories free particles can be described in either non-gauge or gauge wayin the former case a uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) is realized on the solutions of the waveequation directly whereas for the latter case a uirrep of iso(dminus1 1) is realized on thequotient of the solutions by certain specific solutions called pure gauge The waveequation (+m2)φYM

(x) = 0 which fixes the quadratic Casimir m2 of iso(dminus1 1)is generally supplemented with a set of algebraicdifferential constraints to singleout an irreducible in the sense of the little algebra component Field φYM

(x) takesvalues in a certain finite-dimensional representation of so(d minus 1 1) which is notirreducible in most cases nevertheless it can be made irreducible when dealing withfree equations of motion only Yet more different problem is to realize an irrep ofiso(d minus 1 1) on the solutions of the variational problem for some action in mostcases the procedure requires a set of auxiliary fields which carry no physical degreesof freedom

The choice of so(dminus 1 1)-representation YM (even if irreducible) in which fieldφYM

(x) takes values is not unique eg a free massless spin-one particle can bedescribed either by a gauge potential Amicro(x) subjected to

Amicro minus partmicropartνAν = 0 δAmicro = partmicroξ (21)

or by a field strength Fmicroν subjected to

partmicroFmicroν = 0 part[microFλρ] = 0 (22)

In the case of a massless spin-two particle (Y = so(dminus2)) in addition to the con-ventional description in terms of the metric gmicroν

Rmicroν minus1

2gmicroνR = 0 (23)

the Weyl tensor Cmicroνλρ known to have the symmetry of 4 can describe a freespin-two in a non gauge way

part[microCmicromicro]νν = 0 partλCmicroλνν = 0 (24)

Another example is a 4d massless scalar particle which can be described eitherby a scalar field φ(x) subjected to φ = 0 or more exotically by an antisymmetricgauge field ωmicroν (so-called notoph [41]) subjected to

ωmicroν minus partmicropartρωρν + partνpart

ρωρmicro = 0 δωmicroν = partmicroξν minus partνξmicro (25)

This equation describes a massless particle with spin- so(dminus2) equiv Y1 1so(dminus2) which

for d = 4 by virtue of the so(d minus 2) Levi-Civita tensor εij is equivalent to a scalar

4In antisymmetric basis Cmicroνλρ satisfies Cmicroνλρ = minusCνmicroλρ Cmicroνλρ = minusCmicroνρλ and C[microνλ]ρ = 0

7

Y1 1so(dminus2) sim Y0 0

so(dminus2) On the other hand a scalar particle can be describedby a rank-d antisymmetric field ωmicro1microd

satisfying ωmicro1microd= 0 where the use of

so(d minus 1 1)-duality is made of ωmicro1microd= εmicro1microd

φ These two types of duality arereferred to as trivial

The general statement is that free particles can be described by an infinite num-ber of ways called dual descriptions [42 43 44 45 46] but dual theories exhibitcertain difficulties while introducing interactions [47 48 49 50] eg despite the factthat free massless spin-one and spin-two particles can be described by the Maxwellfield strength and by the Weyl tensor respectively introducing interactions requiresthe corresponding gauge potentials Amicro and gmicroν to be brought in

There exists a distinguished choice of so(dminus1 1)-irrep YM in which field φYM(x)

takes values that can be referred to as fundamental or minimal For the minimaldescription of a spin-Y particle the spin degrees of freedom and the so(dminus1 1)-irrepYM are characterized by the same Young diagram ie YM = Y eg a spin-oneparticle by Amicro a spin-two by gmicroν All other descriptions are referred to as dual Itis the minimal descriptions that will be discussed further by this reason the termspin-Y particle can be substituted for more accepted spin-Y field

A massive totally symmetric spin-s field can be described [51] by a totally sym-metric tensor field φ(micro1micros) subjected to

(+m2)φmicro1micros= 0

partνφνmicro2micros= 0

φννmicro3micros

= 0

(26)

where the last equation (tracelessness condition) makes the tensor irreducible in theso(d minus 1 1) sense the first one puts the system on-mass-shell and the second oneprojects out the components orthogonal to the momentum restricting φmicro1micros

tocontain only a spin-s irrep of so(dminus 1)

Analogously a massive totally anti-symmetric spin-p field ie Y = Y(1 p)can be described by a totally anti-symmetric tensor field ω[micro1microp] subjected to

(+m2)ωmicro1microp= 0

partνωνmicro2microp= 0

(27)

where the tracelessness condition becomes trivial for anti-symmetric tensorsThese two results are easily generalized to an arbitrary spin-Ys1 snmassive

field which can be minimally described by a symmetric in each group of indicestensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) subjected to

(+m2)φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0

partmicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n]

φmicro1(s1)(microk(sk)microk)microi(siminus1)micron(sn) = 0 k isin [1 nminus 1] k lt i

ηmicroimicrojφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i j isin [1 n]

(28)

where the last two conditions are just the Young symmetry and the tracelessnessconditions which make the field carry an irrep-Ys1 sn of so(dminus 1 1) and can

8

be thought of as the part of the definition of field φYM(x) The first equation puts

the system on-mass-shell the second one projects out all so(dminus1)-irreps which thetensor φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)microp(sp) decomposes into except for the one with the symmetry ofYs1 sn so(dminus 1)-diagram

Let D (m2Ys1 sn) be an iso(d minus 1 1) module extracted by (28) beingirreducible for m2 6= 0 or for Y0 (scalar field) Since minimally described masslessfields are gauge theories a uirrep H (0Ys1 sn) of iso(d minus 1 1) correspondingto a massless spin-Ys1 sn field should be defined as appropriate quotient bythe pure gauge solutions of the form

0 minusrarr gauge solutions minusrarr all solutions minusrarr H (0Ys1 sn) minusrarr 0 (29)

where the sequence is non-split as there is no so(dminus 1 1)-covariant way to extractso(d minus 2)-irrep Ys1 sn from the Lorentz tensor with the same symmetry ofYs1 sn by virtue of a single so(dminus 1 1)-vector the momentum pmicro sim partmicro

A massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described as the quotient of(26) with m2 = 0 by pure gauge solutions of the form δφmicro1micros

= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) where

ξmicro1microsminus1 is a totally symmetric gauge parameter subjected to the equations of thesame form (26) ie on-mass-shell tracelessness and transversality thus belongingto D (0Ysminus 1) The definition of H (0Ys) is given by

0 minusrarr D (0Y(sminus 1 1)) minusrarr D (0Y(s 1)) minusrarr H (0Y(s 1)) minusrarr 0 (210)

There is a bit difference for a totally anti-symmetric spin-p massless field Puregauge solutions are defined analogously as δωmicro1microp

= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] where ξ[micro1micropminus1] is

a rank-(pminus1) antisymmetric gauge parameter subjected to the equation of the sameform (27) and thus belonging to D (0Y(1 pminus 1)) In contrast to a totally sym-metric spin-smassless field the gauge transformations are reducible in the sense thatδωmicro1microp

equiv 0 provided that one transforms gauge parameter δξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1]

with a second level rank-(p minus 2) antisymmetric gauge parameter ξ[micro1micropminus2] and soon Some components (parallel to the momentum) of the first level gauge parameterξmicro1micropminus1 do not contribute to the gauge law for ωmicro1microp

these are represented by thesecond level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 modulo those components of ξmicro1micropminus2 thatdo not contribute to ξmicro1micropminus1 and so on till δξmicro = partmicroξ Gauge parameters ξmicro1micropminus1ξmicro1micropminusk

k isin [1 p] and ξ are referred to as the first level the k-th level and thedeepest level of reducibility respectively The corresponding iso(d minus 1 1)-uirrep isgiven by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0Y(0 0)) minusrarr D (0Y(1 1)) minusrarr

minusrarr D (0Y(1 p)) minusrarr H (0Y(1 p)) minusrarr 0 (211)

For example Maxwell gauge potential Amicro possesses gauge parameters of the firstlevel only as p = 1 in this case

Though a considerable success in describing on-mass-shell massless fields wasachieved for instance within the light-cone approach [52] there are many reasons tohave an off-shell gauge symmetry ie to construct equations that are invariant with

9

respect to gauge transformations with gauge parameters not subjected to ξ = 0To make the symmetry off-shell generally requires to relax the irreducibility of theso(dminus 1 1)-representation in which field φY(x) takes values

For instance a massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described[53] by atraceless rank-s symmetric field φmicro1micros

with an off-shell gauge symmetry

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

(d+2sminus4)η(micro1micro2part

νpartρφνρmicro3micros) = 0 φννmicro3micros

= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1

= 0 partνξνmicro2microsminus1) = 0 (212)

where in order for φmicro1microsto be traceless the gauge parameter has to be not only

traceless but transverse also this still being true for general mixed-symmetry fieldsApparently to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters the trace-lessness constraint for field φmicro1micros

has to be relaxed The same spin-s massless fieldcan be described[1] by field φmicro1micros

subjected to5

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

2part(micro1partmicro2φ

ννmicro3micros) = 0 φνρ

νρmicro5micros= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1

ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1= 0

(213)

where in order to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters a trace-lessness is relaxed to a double-tracelessness ie field φmicro1micros

takes values in thedirect sum of two so(d minus 1 1)-irreps being symmetric traceless tensors of ranks sand (s minus 2) The general statement is that for equations of motion to have an off-shell gauge symmetry the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep in which field φY(x) takes values has tobe reducible with additional direct summands representing certain nonzero tracesThese additional fields are called auxiliary and carry no physical degrees of freedomImposing certain gauge equations (28) can be restored

A massless totally antisymmetric spin-p field can be described by an antisym-metric rank-p tensor field ω[micro1microp] subjected to

ωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1part

νωνmicro2microp] = 0 δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] (214)

where the symmetry at the all levels of reducibility is manifest and off-shell ieδξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1] for the second level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 not subjectedto any differential constraints and analogously for the gauge symmetries at deeperlevels

Much similar to totally anti-symmetric fields mixed-symmetry massless fieldspossess reducible gauge transformations ie for a field φ with equations of motioninvariant under gauge transformations δξ1φ =

sum

i1partξi11 there exist the second level

gauge transformations δξ2ξi11 =

sum

i2partξi22 such that δξ2φ equiv 0 there exist the third

level gauge transformations δξ3ξi22 =

sum

i3partξi33 such that δξ3ξ1 equiv 0 and so on The

difference from totally anti-symmetric fields is in that there are generally more thanone gauge parameters at each level of reducibility (enumerated by index ik at thek-th level)

5Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [1] have the form Gmicro1microsminus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 where Gmicro1microsis equal to (213) the two forms being equiva-

lent

10

For instance the simplest mixed-symmetry massless field has the spin- andcan be minimally described[16 17] by a field φ[micromicro]ν which is anti-symmetric in thefirst two indices and satisfies Young symmetry condition6 φ[micromicroν] = 0 The equationsof motion

φmicromicroλ + 2part[micropartλφmicro]λν minus partνpart

λφmicromicroλ minus 2partνpart[microφλ

micro]λ = 0 (215)

are invariant underδφmicromicroν = part[microξ

Smicro]ν + part[microξ

Amicro]ν minus partνξ

Amicromicro (216)

with symmetric and anti-symmetric gauge parameters ξS(microν) and ξA[microν] Let us stress

that to maintain an off-shell gauge symmetry field φ[micromicro]ν has to take values in a

reducible so(d minus 1 1) representation oplus so does symmetric gauge parameterξS(micromicro) oplus bull which is in accordance with φ ν

microν 6= 0 and ξSνν 6= 0 Analogously tototally anti-symmetric fields there exist second level gauge transformations with avector parameter ξmicro

δφmicromicroν = 0

δξAmicroν = 23(partmicroξν minus partνξmicro)

δξSmicroν = partmicroξν + partνξmicro

(217)

In this case H

(

0)

is given by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

oplusD (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0 (218)

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) field the depthof reducibility of gauge transformations is equal to p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi where p is the height

of the first column of the Young diagram and at the r-th level of reducibility gaugeparameters have the symmetry of

sN minus 1

pNkN

s2 minus 1

p2k2

s1 minus 1

p1

k1

i=Nsum

i=1

ki =

i=Nsum

i=1

pi minus r (219)

This pattern of reducibility of gauge transformations will be of great importancewhile constructing the unfolded formulation in Section 4 As is easily seen at the

6In more detail the field φmicroνλ satisfies φmicroνλ = minusφνmicroλ φmicroνλ+φνλmicro+φλmicroν = 0 Equivalentlya symmetric basis can be used ie φSmicroνλ = φSνmicroλ φ

Smicroνλ + φSνλmicro + φSλmicroν = 0 The two bases are

related by φS(microν)λ = 1radic3(φAmicroλν + φAνλmicro) φ

A[microν]λ = 1radic

3(φSmicroλν minus φ

Sνλmicro)

11

first level of reducibility the gauge parameters are various tensors whose LorentzYoung diagrams are obtained by cutting off one cell from the original so(d minus 2)-diagram in all possible ways ie the number of gauge parameters at the first levelis equal to the number of blocks N eg two for spin- There is only one gaugeparameter at the deepest level of reducibility whose Young diagram is obtained bycutting off the first column from Y eg for spin-

This pattern corresponds of course to on-shell equations ie the gauge param-eters taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of Young symmetry (219) are subjectedto (28)-like equations To obtain an off-shell gauge symmetry the field content hasto be extended to take values in certain reducible so(d minus 1 1)-representations ad-ditional components turn out can be identified with certain traces of a single fieldwith the symmetry of Y as an sl(d)-tensor In general gauge parameters are alsoreducible tensors with the symmetry of (219) In the case of a spin- massless fieldthe trace φ ν

microν in the sector of fields and the trace ξSνν in the sector of gauge param-eters are the additional components In the general case of a spin-Y = Ys1 snmassless field field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) should satisfy [20]

ηmicroimicroiηmicroimicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n] (220)

which is a generalization of the Fronsdalrsquos double-trace condition (213) As it will beshown this condition naturally arises in the unfolded approach Note that double-tracelessness is imposed on each group of symmetric indices and it is not requiredfor cross-traces to vanish

Let a generalized Weyl tensor for a minimally described spin-Y massless field bea gauge-invariant combination of the least order in derivatives of field φY(x) that isallowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell On the other hand it is the generalized Weyltensor that the minimal non-gauge description of a massless spin-Y field is basedon For a spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN)so(dminus2) massless field the generalizedWeyl tensor has the symmetry of Y(s1 p1 + 1) (s2 p2) (sN pN)so(dminus11) and isof the s1-th order in derivatives In the case of spin-one (Y = so(dminus2)) Maxwell field

strength Fmicroν with the symmetry of can be also called a generalized Weyl tensorFermionic mixed-symmetry fields share most features of bosonic ones viz the

reducibility of gauge transformations the enlargement of the field content for theequations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge invariance The difference is thatthe equations for fermions have the first order in derivatives and the irreducibility ofspin-tensors is achieved by the Γ-tracelessness condition7 instead of the tracelessnessone

For example a massless totally symmetric spin-(s + 12) field can be described

7Γmicro are the Clifford algebra generators and satisfy ΓmicroΓν + ΓνΓmicro = 2ηmicroν part equiv Γmicropartmicro Γ-trace isa contraction of a spinor index and one tensor index with Γmicro eg Γνφ

microν equiv Γαν βφ

βmicroν

12

off-shell[54] by a totally symmetric spin-tensor field φα(micro1micros) subjected to8

partφmicro1microsminus spart(micro1

Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros)

ΓνΓρΓλφνρλmicro4micros= 0 Γνξνmicro2microsminus1 = 0

(221)

where in order to get an off-shell gauge invariance the irreducibility of φα(micro1micros) hasto be relaxed to the triple Γ-tracelessness

A massless totally anti-symmetric spin-Y(1 p) 12field can be described off-shell

by a totally anti-symmetric spin-tensor field ωα[micro1microp] subjected to

partωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1Γ

νωνmicro2microp] = 0

δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp]

(222)

Similar to the bosonic case (222) possesses reducible gauge transformations Thedifference is that one can impose the triple Γ-tracelessness on ωα[micro1microp] but thisrestricts the first level gauge parameter to be Γ-traceless Γνξνmicro2micropminus1 = 0 andhence the second order gauge parameter has to be on-mass-shell ie partξmicro1micropminus2 = 0Therefore for equations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge symmetry of allorders no Γ-trace conditions have to be imposed on fieldgauge parameters

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) 12field the

pattern of gauge symmetries is given by the spin-tensors with the tensor part de-scribed by (219) the definition of the Weyl tensor remains unchanged also

The descriptions based on tensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) which is analogous tothe metric gmicroν are referred to as metric-like At least in writing equiv partmicropartνη

microν theexplicit use of metric ηmicroν is made of which complicates the issue of introducinginteractions with gravitation

Let us note that in principle one can verify the gauge invariance of the fieldequations for massless mixed-symmetry fields despite the fact that the very form ofgauge transformation is cumbersome due to Young symmetrizers The advantageof the unfolded approach is in that gauge invariance at all levels of reducibility ismanifest

3 Unfolding Dynamics and σminus Cohomology

In this section we first recall the definition of unfolding and the relation of the sim-plest unfolded systems to Lie algebrasmodules and Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomologywith coefficients Second peculiar properties of unfolded systems that describe freefields and specifically the so-called σminus cohomology concept are recalled Third thevery procedure of constructing the unfolded form is illustrated on the examples ofmassless spin-zero spin-one arbitrary totally symmetric spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2)

fields the relation with the general statement of Section 1 is pointed out in each ofthe examples

8Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [54] have the form Gmicro1microsminus s

2Γ(micro1ΓνGνmicro2micros) minus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 Gmicro1micros= partφmicro1micros

minus spart(micro1Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0 which is equivalent to

(222)

13

31 General Features

Some dynamical system is said to be unfolded [31 32 33] if it has the form

dWA = FA(W ) (31)

whereWA is a set9 of differential forms of degree-qA on some d-dimensional manifoldMd d - exterior differential on Md and FA(W ) is an arbitrary degree-(qA + 1)function of WA assumed to be expandable in terms of exterior (wedge) productsonly10

FA(W ) =infinsum

n=1

sum

qB1++qBn=qA+1

fAB1Bn

W B1 and andW Bn (32)

where fAB1Bn

are constant coefficients satisfying fAB1BiBj Bn

= (minus)qBiqBj fA

B1BjBiBn

Moreover FA(W ) must satisfy the integrability condition (called generalized Jacobiidentity) obtained by applying d to (31)

F B δFA

δW Bequiv 0 (33)

Any solution of (33) defines a free differential algebra (FDA) [55 56 57 58] If Ja-cobi identities (33) are satisfied irrespective ofMd dimension11 the free differentialalgebra is referred to as universal [10 59] It is the universal algebras only that willbe considered further

Equations (31) are invariant under gauge transformations

δWAqA

= dǫAqAminus1 + ǫBqBminus1

δFA

δW B for qA gt 0 (34)

δWA0 = ǫB

prime

0

δFA

δW Bprime

1

Bprime qBprime = 1 for qA = 0 (35)

where ǫAqAminus1 is a degree-(qA minus 1) form taking values in the same space as WAqA

Inits turn δWA

qA= 0 can be treated as unfolded-like system for ǫAqAminus1 ie dǫ

AqAminus1 =

minusǫBqBminus1δFA

δWB there emerge second level gauge transformations

δǫAqAminus1 = dξAqAminus2 minus ξBqBminus2

δFA

δW B (36)

provided that FA(W ) is linear in matter fields and analogously for the gauge trans-formations at deeper levels Therefore the reducibility of gauge transformations ismanifest in the unfolded approach For a degree-qA gauge field WA

qAthere exist qA

levels of gauge transformations

9In this section indices A B C are of arbitrary nature In the cases of practical significance AB C vary over certain irreps of the Lorentz algebra

10The wedge symbol and will be systematically omitted further11As the forms with the rank greater than d are identically zero there exist certain identities

eg Wn andWn equiv 0 for n+m gt d which make the operator δδWA to be ill-behaved

14

The use of the exterior algebra respects diffeomorphisms which is very appropri-ate for introducing interactions with the gravitation The whole information aboutthe dynamics turns out to be contained in FA(W ) and one can even extend anunfolded system to other manifolds[59] simply by changing the exterior differentialthe new unfolded system has literally the same form

Note that introducing enough auxiliary fields it is possible to reformulate anydynamical system in the unfolded form although it may be difficult to unfold someparticular system or to find all unfolded forms

Collected below are some important cases of unfolded systems which have adirect bearing on Lie algebras [55 59]

Lie algebrasFlat connections Let ΩI equiv ΩImicrodx

micro be a subsector of degree-oneforms The only self-closed unfolded equations are of the form

dΩI = minusf IJKΩ

JΩK (37)

Generalized Jacobi identity (33) implies the Jacobi identity f IJKf

JLMΩKΩLΩM equiv

0 for some Lie algebra g with structure constants f IJK Therefore the closed

subsector of one-forms is in one-to-one correspondence with Lie algebras and(37) is the flatness condition for a connection ΩI of g This provides acoordinate-independent framework for describing background geometry Inthe cases of interest g is iso(d minus 1 1) so(d minus 1 2) so(d 1) and sp(2n) [59]Background geometry connection ΩI is assumed to be of order zero whereasall matter fields including dynamical gravitation are of the first order Allequations are assumed to be of the first order in matter fields and hencedescribe free fields only

In this paper g = iso(dminus 1 1) and ΩI = ab ha where ab equiv abmicro dxmicro

is a Lorentz spin-connection and ha equiv hamicrodxmicro is a background vielbein which

defines a non-holonomic basis of a tangent space at each point of the manifoldFlatness equation (37) for iso(dminus 1 1)-connection ΩI reads

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb = 0(38)

The first is the zero torsion equation that expresses the Lorentz spin-connectionvia the first derivative of hamicro The second can be recognized as the zero curva-ture equation For example in Cartesian coordinates the explicit solution isab

micro = 0 and hamicro = δamicro

The advantage of description of background geometry as the flatness conditionfor a connection of the space-time symmetry algebra is in that this way iscoordinate-independent In what follows we assume ab ha to satisfy (38)which is enough if there is no need for the explicit form of the solution in someparticular coordinate system For instance in (anti)-de Sitter space (38) ismodified by the terms proportional to the cosmological constant λ2

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb + λ2hahb = 0(39)

15

and admits no simple solutions with hamicro = δamicro ab = 0 Nevertheless without

giving the explicit solution to imply that ab ha satisfy (39) is sufficient forgeneral analysis eg for constructing Lagrangians [60]

Contractible FDA The simplest equations linear in matter fields of the form

dWAq = fA

BWBq+1 (310)

can be reduced by linear transformations to either

dWAq = WA

q+1 dWAq+1 = 0 (311)

ordWA

q = 0 (312)

where the second equation of (311) is the consequence of Jacobi identities(33) for the first one In the first case by virtue of gauge transformations(34) δWA

q = dξAqminus1 + χAq δW

Bq+1 = dχA

q the field WAq can be gauged away In

both cases by virtue of the Poincarersquos Lemma these equations are dynamicallyempty and correspond to the co-called contractible FDAs [55]

g-modulesCovariant constancy equations Let WAq be a closed subsector of

q-forms of matter gauge fields Linear in matter fields equations may involvethe background g-connection ΩI which is of zeroth order Such equationsreferred to as linearized over g background (described by any solution ΩI of(37)) have the form

dWAq = minusΩIfI

ABW

Bq (313)

Jacobi identity (33) where (37) is also taken into account

ΩJΩK(minusf I

JKfIAB + fJ

ACfK

CB

)W B

q = 0 (314)

implies fIAB to realize a representation of g Therefore the closed subsector

of forms of definite degree is in one-to-one correspondence with g-moduleswhereas

DΩWAq equiv dWA

q + ΩIfIABW

Bq = 0 (315)

is a covariant constancy equation and (DΩ)2 = 0 since the connection is

flat (37) In the cases of interest A runs over certain finite-dimensionalso(d minus 1 1)-irreps ie g-modules decompose with respect to its subalgebraso(dminus 1 1) sub g into a direct sum of certain irreducible tensors This is whywe single out the Lorentz-covariant derivative DL from the whole g-covariantderivative DΩ the remaining part acts vertically (algebraically) In the caseof ΩI being an iso(d minus 1 1) flat connection the Lorentz covariant derivativeDL = d+ satisfy DL

2 = 0 as the exterior differential d does

DLTab = dT ab +a

cTcb +b

cTac + (316)

In Cartesian coordinates DL equiv d and we do not make any distinction betweend and DL whereas in (anti)-de Sitter (DL)

2 6= 0 and the difference between d

16

and DL has to be taken into account Also zero torsion equation (381) canbe rewritten as DLh

a = 0 The remaining part of ΩI which acts algebraicallyand mixes different so(dminus 1 1)-modules into g-modules is associated with thegenerators of translations with gauge field ha

Gluing g-modulesChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology LetWpWq andWr takevalues in g-modules R1 R2 and R3 the representations are realized by oper-ators T1 T2 and T3 respectively Still linear in matter fields but nonlinear inbackground connection ΩI equations are of the form

DΩWp equiv dWp + T1(Ω)Wp = f12(Ω Ω)Wq

DΩWq equiv dWq + T2(Ω)Wq = f23(Ω Ω)Wr

DΩWr equiv

(317)

where the terms forming g-covariant derivative are isolated on the lhs Thetwo g-modules R1 R2 appear to be glued together by the term f12(Ω Ω) isinHom(Λpminusq+1(g) otimes R2R1) Jacobi identity (33) implies f12(Ω Ω) to be aChevalley-Eilenberg cocycle with coefficients in Rlowast

2 otimesR1 where Rlowast2 is a mod-

ule contragradient to R2 and f12(Ω Ω)f23(Ω Ω) = 0 Coboundaries canbe proved to be dynamically empty and can be removed by a field redefini-tion Consequently f12(Ω Ω) should be a nontrivial representative of theChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology group with coefficients in Rlowast

2otimesR1 It followsalso that nothing but zero forms can be joined to zero forms ie the onlypossible linearized unfolded equations on forms of zero degree are (315) withq = 0

For any dynamical system linearized over certain g-background (described byany solution ΩI of (37)) equations of motion (315) along with gauge transforma-tions of all orders of reducibility acquire a very simple form

δξ1 = DΩξ0

δξpminus1 = DΩξpminus2

δWp = DΩξpminus1

DΩWp = 0

(318)

where Wp takes values in certain g-module R DΩ is the associated g-covariantderivative and ξpminusk k isin [1 p] are the gauge parameters of k-th order of reducibilitytaking values in the same g-module R and being forms of degree (p minus k) Thegauge invariance at each order of reducibility and of equations of motion is dueto (DΩ)

2 = 0 In some sense the gauge fields Wp and the gauge parameters ξpminusk

seem to play the same role at the linearized level This uniformity is of essentialimportance when analyzing unfolded systems

In the presence of gluing terms eg when only two modules say R1 and R2 areglued by nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycle fpr(Ω Ω) full chain of equations

17

and gauge transformations (318) is modified to12

δξ11 = DΩξ10

δξ1pminusr = DΩξ1pminusrminus1

δξ1pminusr+1 = DΩξ1pminusr + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

20 δξ21 = DΩξ

20

(319)

δξ1pminus1 = DΩξ1pminus2 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus2 δξ2rminus1 = DΩξ

2rminus2

δW 1p = DΩξpminus1 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus1 δW 2

r = DΩξ2rminus1

DΩW1p = fpr(Ω Ω)W

2r DΩW

2r = 0

where W 1p ξ

1pminusk and W 2

r ξ2rminusm take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively

Important is that the gauge fieldsparameters taking values in R2 contribute to therhs of the equationsgauge transformations for the gauge fieldsparameters takingvalues in R1 but for forms of degree greater than (p minus r) The above two systemsare nothing but the specializations of (31) (34) (36)

Also let us note that there is no strong reason to make any distinction betweenthe terms linear in the background g-connection ΩI which correspond to g-modulesand the terms of higher order in ΩI which correspond to Chevalley-Eilenberg co-cycles Both terms can be combined into a single object the generalized covariant-derivative D = d+T (Ω)+f(Ω Ω) equiv DΩ+f(Ω Ω) with the property D2 = 0Moreover by means of D (319) and (318) can be rewritten in a similar mannerConsequently at the linearized level the most general unfolded equations and gaugetransformations have the form

δξ1 = Dξ0

δξpminus1 = Dξpminus2

δWp = Dξpminus1

DWp = 0

(320)

where D is built of d background connection ΩI and satisfies D2 = 0 The gaugefieldsparameters take values in certain spacesWq viz Wp isin Wp ξpminus1 isin Wpminus1ξ0 isin W0 The elements of Wq are differential forms with values in certain g-modules It is also convenient to define higher degree spaces Wqgtp the equationsRp+1 = DWp = 0 take values in Wp+1 Rp+2 = DRp+1 belongs to Wp+2 andby virtue of D2 = 0 satisfies Rp+2 equiv 0 and so on Therefore there exist certainidentities which belong to Wp+2 for the equations which belong to Wp+1 andthere exist certain identities which belong to Wp+3 for the identities in Wp+2 andso on At the field theoretical level these identities correspond to Bianchi identitiesfor the first level gauge transformations higher identities correspond to the Bianchiidentities for the deeper levels of gauge transformations

12The sign factor (minus)pminusr+1 before fpr(Ω Ω) is ignored and is thought of as the part of thedefinition of fpr(Ω Ω)

18

A remark should be made that the forms belonging to Wq may have differentdegrees if there are Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles present As a result spaces Wq

may contain different number of elements For instance (319) can be reduced to(320) if one defines

Wq =

W 1q q lt pminus r

W 1q W

2qminusp+r q ge (pminus r)

(321)

where W 1q and W 2

qminusp+r take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively In termsof (319) the elements of Wq for q lt (pminus r) were referred to as ξ1q the elements ofWq for q = (pminus r)(pminus 1) to as ξ1q ξ

2qminusp+r the elements ofWq for q = p to as W 1

pW 2

r the elements of Wq for q gt p to as R1q R

2qminusp+r (the equations of motion and

Bianchi identities)

32 Interpretation of Unfolded Systems Describing free Fields

When describing free fields unfolded formulations will be referred to as frame-like [61 60] though the very term frame-like has a more broad definition Thesesystems consist of equations (37) describing background geometry of a finite chainof (317)-like equations describing the gauge fields of the model and of (317)-likeequations with q = 0 glued to gauge forms ie it requires a Lie algebra g (commonlyiso(dminus1 1) so(dminus1 2) or so(d 1)) a set of g-modules R0RN and an appropriateset of nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles f01fNminus1N The physical degreesof freedom are contained in the forms of zero degree and the module RN in whichzero degree forms take values is infinite-dimensional

Since frame-like unfolded systems contain inevitably infinitely many fields mostof them being either auxiliary or Stueckelberg13 there arises a problem of reconstruc-tion a metric-like formulation by a given unfolded formulation or of extracting thedynamical content for a given unfolded system

The questions to be answered are what are the dynamical fields what arethe differential gauge parameters and what are the gauge invariant equations ofmotion These answers are not universal and depend on the chosen scheme ofinterpretation Different interpretations correspond to dual descriptions of the samedynamical system

Frame-like unfolded systems are endowed at the linearized level with additionalstructures providing a natural way for interpretation Indices AB vary overcertain finite dimensional Lorentz irreps ie each of Rn n = 0 N decomposes asRn =

sum

k Pnk where Pnk are certain so(d minus 1 1)-modules characterized by Ynk

Young diagrams of Section 1We say that some frame-like unfolded system is given an interpretation if [62]

1 On the whole space W =oplusinfin

q=0Wq where the matter gauge fields gauge pa-rameters equations of motion and Bianchi identities take values there exists

13A field is called Stueckelberg if it can be gauged away by pure algebraic symmetry

19

a bounded from below grading g = 0 1 ie Wq =oplusinfin

g=0Wgq The ho-

mogeneous element of Wgq is a certain differential form with values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep and is denoted as W gq In simplest cases the grade is just the

rank of the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep the element of Wgq takes values in

2 The closed subsector of one-forms ΩI describes a background geometry vizMinkowski or (anti)-de Sitter The generalized covariant derivative D is to bedivided into three parts the last one not being necessary nontrivial

D = DL minus σminus + σ+ (322)

where DL is a background Lorentz-covariant derivative and has a zero gradeσminus is an operator of grade (minus1) and σ+ contains positive grade operatorsThe only differential part is in DL whereas σplusmn acts vertically and is built ofthe background vielbein ha If two modules are glued the gluing element issupposed to be of grade (minus1) and also denoted as σminus

The equations then have the form

DLWn +

gminusnsum

i=1

σ+(W n+i

)= σminus

(W n+1

) g = 0 1 (323)

and analogously for the gauge transformations In the flat space all operators ofpositive grade appear to be trivial for the massless case As it does not affect theanalysis let us consider a simplified version with σ+ = 0 Then D2 = DL

2+σminusDL+DLσminus + (σminus)

2 = 0 is equivalent to DL2 = 0 (σminus)

2 = 0 and σminusDL +DLσminus = 0 Thefirst is a part of the flatness condition (38) for the iso(d minus 1 1)-connection Thesecond is the nilpotancy condition for σminus The third is satisfied provided that σminus istwisted by the factor (minus)∆g where (∆g + 1) is a degree of σminus which is equal to thenumber of the vielbeins ha that σminus is built of Indeed the vielbeins ha anticommutewith DL and hence the action of σminus is to be twisted by the factor (minus)∆g in orderσminusDL +DLσminus = 0 holds true Without further mention the pure sign factor (minus)∆g

will be though of as a part of the definition of σminusIt is useful to illustrate the action of σminus when for example unfolded equations

on fields with values in two modules R1 and R2 are glued as in (319)

R1︷ ︸︸ ︷

R2︷ ︸︸ ︷ g

q

t t t t

t t t

W 1p

ξ1pminus1

ξ10

W 2r

ξ2rminus1

ξ20

(324)

20

where short arrows stand for the action of σminus within each module and long arrowsfor the action of σminus between two modules (gluing terms) and dots stand for gaugefieldsparameters at different grades bold dots represent the elements of Wp =W 1

pW2r

All information about the dynamics turns out to be concealed in cohomologygroups of σminus [62] H(σminus) =

Ker(σminus)Im(σminus)

Let us analyze unfolded system (320) whichat grade g has the form

δξg1 = DLξg0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 )

δW gp = DLξ

gpminus1 + σminus(ξ

g+1pminus1)

0 = DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p )

(325)

Beginning from the deepest level of gauge transformations and from the lowestgrade it is obvious that those ξg+1

0 that are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueck-elberg(algebraic) gauge parameters for those ξg1 that belong to the image of σminusTherefore those ξg1 that are σminus-exact can be gauged away The leftover gauge sym-metry satisfies δξg1 = DLξ

g0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 ) = 0 so that those ξg+1

0 that belong to thecoimage of σminus are expressed via derivative of ξn0 Having sieved W0 and W1 inthis way only those ξg0 are still independent that are σminus-closed and hence belong toH

0(σminus) since only forms of zero-degree are elements of W0 Then those ξg+11 that

are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueckelberg gauge parameters for those ξg2 thatbelong to the image of σminus Therefore only those ξg1 are still independent that areσminus-closed but not σminus-exact and hence belong to H

1(σminus) Having sievedW0Wpminus1

one after another it turns out that independent differential gauge parameters at thek-th level are given by H

pminusk(σminus) Analogously those fields W gp that are σminus-exact

can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gauge parameters at Wpminus1 Thosefields W g+1

p that are not σminus-closed can be expressed via derivatives of fields at lowergrade by virtue of the equations Rg

p+1 equiv DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p ) = 0 these fields are

called auxiliary Therefore the dynamical fields ie those that are neither aux-iliary nor Stueckelberg are given by H

p(σminus) The nilpotency of D2 equiv 0 impliescertain relations of the form DLR

gp+1 + σminus(R

g+1p+1) = 0 between Rg

p+1 Therefore

auxiliary fields are expressed by virtue of σminus-exact Rgp+1 and σminus-non-closed Rg+1

p+1

are themselves expressed via derivatives of Rgp+1 Consequently the independent

equations on dynamical fields are given by Hp+1(σminus) From the cohomological point

of view higher degree forms correspond to certain nontrivial relations between equa-tions called Bianchi identities and manifest gauge nature of equations As there aregenerally more than one levels of gauge transformations one can expect the highercohomological group to be nontrivial

To sum up

21

cohomology group interpretation

Hpminusk k = 1p differential gauge parameters at the k-th level of re-

ducibilityH

p dynamical fieldsH

p+1 independent gauge invariant equations on dynamicalfields

Hp+k+1 k = 1p Bianchi identities for the k-th order gauge symmetryH

p+k k gt p supposed to be trivial in a regular case

To distinguish fields in cohomological sense the following convention is introduced[63]

Stueckelberg fields(gauge parameters) are those that can be eliminated bypure algebraic symmetry ie these fields are σminus-exact (are those that canbe used to gauge away certain fields ie these parameters are not σminus-closed)

Auxiliary fields are those that can be expressed via derivatives of some otherfields ie these fields are σminus-nonclosed Let us note that this definition isgenerally ambiguous eg in system

partA = B

partB = A(326)

which field is auxiliary is a matter of choice This ambiguity is removed byvirtue of grade[62 63]

Dynamical fields are those that are neither auxiliary nor Stueckelberg ie thesefields are representatives of σminus-cohomology classes

Note that if certain dynamical field given by Hp belongs to the grade-gf subspace

Wgfp and the corresponding equations given by H

p+1 belong to the grade-ge subspaceWge

p+1 the order of equations is equal to ge minus gf + 1If the unfolded system is supposed to admit a lagrangian formulation there has

to be a one-to-one correspondence between the number of dynamical fields and thatof equations k-th level gauge symmetries and k-th level Bianchi identities ie in acertain sense there should be a duality H

pminusk sim Hp+1+k k isin [0 p] This takes place

for all unfolded systems exemplified in this paperSince the operators involved ie DL and σminus are of grade 0 and minus1 only the

fields with the grade greater than g0 for any g0 ge 0 form a quotient module thusdescribing the same system on its own - dual formulations This picture partlybreaks in (A)dSd because of appearance of grade +1 nilpotent operator σ+

D = DL + σminus + λ2σ+ (327)

The specific character of frame-like unfolded systems which will be crucial forus is that by virtue of the inverse background vielbein hmicroa all form indices of any

gauge fieldparameter Wa1(s1)ap(sm)q can be converted to the fiber ones

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (328)

22

The resulting tensor W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is not irreducible and can be decomposedinto so(dminus 1 1)-irreps according to the so(dminus 1 1)-tensor product rule

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] =rArr Ys1 smotimes

so(dminus11)

Y(1 q) =oplus

α

Yα (329)

where one-column Young diagramY(1 q) of height-q represents the anti-symmetricindices d1 dq and Yα are the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the tensor product decomposesinto Having converted all fields (parameters equations) of a given unfolded systemto the fiber tensors one can make the identification of the fields in the unfolded ap-proach and those of the metric-like approach though the general covariance gaugeinvariance and other advantages of the unfolded formalism will be not manifestWhile constructing the unfolded formulations of a known metric-like systems or in-terpreting a given unfolded system in terms of metric-like fields this technique willbe widely used Moreover the calculation of σminus cohomology groups is largely basedon the explicit evaluation of (329)-like expressions Once an unfolded form is knownno use of this technique is needed either to generalize it to other backgrounds or tointroduce interactions

Field W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is traceless in a1 am and d1 dq separatelyHowever the cross traces need not vanish and hence some of Yα represent tracesTo distinguish between the traces of different orders let us introduce the followingthe Y-valued degree-q form WY

q is said to be a trace of the r-th order iff it has theform

WYq = hh

︸︷︷︸

r

hh︸︷︷︸

qminusr

CYprime

0 (330)

for some Yprime-valued degree-0 form CYprime

0 where (q minus r) indices of the backgroundvielbeins ha are contracted with the tensor representing Yprime and r indices are freefor the whole expression to take values in Y the appropriate Young symmetrizeris implied When the indices of WY

q are converted to the fiber ones the expression

takes the form ηη︸ ︷︷ ︸

r

CYprime ie CYprime

represents a trace of the r-th order

Different aspects of unfolding are illustrated on the examples of a massless scalarfield a massless spin-one field and a massless spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2) fields

33 Examples of Unfolding

Example 331 Unfolding a scalar field [31 62] First it should be noted thatit is easy of course to convert the Klein-Gordon equation C = 0 to a system offirst order equations

partmicroC = Cmicro

partmicroCmicro = 0(331)

but when writing the second equation the explicit form of the metric is to be usedhence these equations are not of unfolded form (31)

23

Described in terms of a scalar field C(x) the theory is brought into a non gaugeform therefore zero-forms only are allowed or else there would be some gaugesymmetry according to (34) The most general rhs of dC = has the form

dC = haCa (332)

for some vector-valued zero-form Ca This equation just parameterizes the firstderivative of C(x) and is similar to the first of (331) There are three terms allowedon the rhs of dCa =

dCa = hbCab + hbC

ab + haC prime (333)

with Cab Cab and C prime taking values in antisymmetric symmetric and scalar so(dminus1 1)-irreps ie bull The first term is forbidden by Bianchi identity hadC

a equiv 0To analyze the remaining terms let us decompose dCa into so(dminus 1 1)-irreps

partmicroCahmicrob = otimes = oplus oplus bull (334)

where = part[aCb] = part(aCa) minus 1dηaapartbC

b bull = partaCa = C

The component represents Bianchi identity in the first order reformulation ofthe Klein-Gordon equation Indeed expressing Ca as partaC implies part[aCb] equiv 0 bullrepresents the desired Klein-Gordon equation whereas is the only component al-lowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell Therefore to impose the Klein-Gordon equationthe term haC prime has to be omitted

dCa = hbCab (335)

The only possible rhs for dCaa = compatible with Jacobi identity hbdCab equiv 0

is of the form dCaa = hbCaab for Caaa taking values in a rank-three symmetric

so(d minus 1 1)-irrep ie The process of unfolding continues unambiguously inthis way and results in the full system

dCa(k) = hbCa(k)b equiv F a(k)(C) k = 0 1 (336)

where Ca(k) is rank-k totally symmetric traceless field ie taking values in k

so(dminus 1 1)-irrepTo make a connection with the general statement of Section 1 for Y = Y(0 0)

the general scheme results in

Yg bull

n k 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 0 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore spaces Wq and operator σminus which enters D = DL minus σminus should be definedas

Wq = WqWaq W

aaq (337)

24

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbWa(gminus1)bq g gt 0

(338)

Consequently W is a space of various differential forms with values in totally sym-metric traceless so(d minus 1 1)-tensors graded by the form degree and by the rankof so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Space Wq forms an irreducible iso(d minus 1 1)-module System(336) reads

Dω0 = 0 ω0 isin W0 (339)

The cohomology groups of σminus are easy to find

H0(σminus) = C(x) as the lowest grade field is automatically closed σminus(C) = 0 and it

cannot be exact as a form of zero degree Contrariwise zero-forms with gradegreater than zero are not closed σminus(C

k+1) = hbCa(k)b = 0lArrrArr Ck+1 = 0

H1(σminus) = haB(x)0 for some B(x)0 isin W

00 One-form Ba

1 = haB(x)0 is closedσminus(B

a1) = haB

a1 = hah

aB(x)0 equiv 0 and it cannot be represented as σminus(C2) =

hbCab as far as Cab is traceless The cohomology groups at higher grade are

trivial since σminus(haBa(k)(x)0) 6= 0 for k gt 0

Hqgt1(σminus) = empty as one can make sure

The interpretation in terms of Section 32 is as follows as is expected the dynamicalfield given by H

0 is C(x) The equations are given by the projection of dCa = hbCab

to H1 ie C = 0 The fields with k gt 0 are auxiliary being expressed via

derivatives of C(x) Ca(k) = partapartaC(x) Inasmuch as there is no gauge symmetryin the system the higher cohomology groups are trivial

An infinitely many dual formulations of a massless scalar field are also includedIndeed the fields with k ge k0 gt 0 form a quotient module Rk0 ie one canconsistently write

dCk = σminus(Ck+1) k ge k0 (340)

The first equationdCa(k0) = hbC

a(k0)b (341)

imposes on the dynamical field Ca(k0)

partbCba(k0minus1) = 0

part[bCc]a(k0minus1) = 0(342)

which imply at least locally Ca(k0) =

k0︷ ︸︸ ︷

partaparta C and C = 0 for some fieldC(x) All fields at higher grade are auxiliary This statement is confirmed bythe cohomology analysis H

0(Rk0 σminus) = Ck0 ie scalar is described in termsof a traceless rank-k0 symmetric tensor field subjected to the equations given byH

1(Rk0 σminus) = haBa(k0minus1)0 minus k0(k0minus1)

2(d+2k0minus4)ηaahcB

a(k0minus2)c0 +hcB

a(k0)c0 for B

a(k0minus1)0 B

a(k0)c0

taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps characterized by diagrams k0 minus 1 k0

These two elements represents just the components ofWk0

1 sim k0 otimes with the

25

symmetry of k0 minus 1 (trace) andk0

the third component with the symmetryof k0 + 1 is exact

The above results can be easily extended to (A)dSd background and to a massivescalar field [62]

DLCk = σminus(C

k+1) + σ+(Ckminus1) = 0 (343)

where there appears a nontrivial positive grade operator

σ+(Ckminus1) = (m2 minus λ2k(k + dminus 1))

(

haCa(kminus1) minus(sminus 1)

d+ 2k minus 4ηaahbC

a(kminus1)b

)

(344)

and DL is a Lorentz-covariant derivative in (A)dSd In the (A)dSd case the situationis more interesting due to the appearance of σ+ operator and the possibility of theaccidental degeneracy of σ+ when m2 = λ2kprime(kprime + dminus 1) for some kprime [62]

Example 332 Unfolding Maxwell equations [64 65] An example of masslessspin-one field is more interesting as a gauge system The main object is a one-formAmicro From gauge transformation law

δA1 = dξ0 (345)

it follows that there should not be other forms of rank greater than zero If this werethe case the gauge parameters of these new forms would be involved by virtue of(34) making the gauge law for A1 inappropriate Indeed there are two possibilitiesto introduce higher degree forms on the rhs of dA = (i) dA1 = R2 fora scalar valued degree-two form R2 which possesses its own gauge parameter χ1δR2 = dχ1 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law for A1 is modifiedto δA1 = dξ0 + χ1 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gaugeparameter χ1 This case corresponds to contractible free differential algebras (310)(ii) dA1 = hbω

b1 for a vector valued degree-one form ωa

1 which possesses its owngauge parameter ǫa0 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law forA1 is modified to δA1 = dξ0 + hbǫ

b0 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of

Stueckelberg gauge parameter ǫa0 Consequently in both cases A1 can be made non-dynamical which is not what was expected Therefore the only possibility is tointroduce a zero-form C

[ab]0 anti-symmetric in a b parameterizing by virtue of

dA1 = hahbC[ab]0 (346)

the Maxwell field strength Bianchi identity hahbdC[ab]0 equiv 0 tolerates two terms on

the rhs of dC[ab]0 =

dC[ab]0 = hcC

[ab]c0 + h[aC

b]0 (347)

with C[ab]c0 and Ca

0 taking values in and so(dminus 1 1)-irreps the former taken inantisymmetric basis In order to determine which of the terms should be omittedif any the decomposition of the first derivative of the Maxwell field strength intoLorentz irreps has to be analyzed

C [ab]|c equiv partmicroC[ab]hmicroc = otimes = oplus oplus (348)

26

where = part[aCbc] = partbCab and = partcC [ab] minus part[cCab] + 2

dminus1ηc[apartdC

b]d part[aCbc]

is identically zero provided that C [ab] is expressed via the first derivative of Amicroor represents the second pair of Maxwell equations in terms of field strength C [ab]In both cases this component should be zero and moreover this can not be keptnonzero as there is no hcC

[abc]-like term allowed on the rhs of (347) The secondpartbC

ab is the desired Maxwell equations in terms of Amicro or the first pair of Maxwellequations in terms of the field strength Consequently to impose Maxwell equationsterm h[aCb] has to be omitted whereas the third is the only component allowed tobe nonzero on-mass-shell

Again unfolding continues unambiguously and requires an infinite set of fields

C[ab]c(k)0 taking values14 in

kto be introduced

dC [ab]c(k) = hdC[ab]c(k)d k = 0 1 (349)

The full system has the form

dA1 = hahbCab0 equiv F (AC) δA1 = dξ0

dC[ab]c(k)0 = hdC

[ab]c(k)d0 equiv F [ab]c(k)(C) k = 0 1

(350)

and represents two modules being glued together by the term on the rhs of thefirst equation

For Y = Y(1 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 resultsin

Yg bull

n k 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 1 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore

Wq =

W0 q = 0

WqW[ab]qminus1W

[ab]cqminus1 q gt 0

(351)

let us point out the shortening of W0 The action of σminus on Wq isin Wq is defined as

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hahbW[ab]qminus1 g = 1

hdW[ab]c(gminus2)dqminus1 g gt 1

(352)

With D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (350) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (353)

14The fields C [ab]c(k) are taken in antisymmetric basis ie they are antisymmetric in a bsymmetric in c(k) and C [abd]c(kminus1)equiv0

27

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 0 form a finite-dimensional iso(dminus1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g gt0 form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

Again the cohomology groups are easy to find gauge parameters are given byH

0(σminus) = ξ0 dynamical fields by H1(σminus) = A1 Maxwell equations by H

2(σminus) =

h[aBb]0 and the Bianchi identities for the first order gauge transformations by

H3(σminus) = hahbB0 the rest of groups are empty H

kgt3(σminus) = empty Important is thedirect correspondence between the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2

the gauge parameters in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3There are infinitely many of non-gauge dual formulations based on C [ab]c(k0) eg

for k0 = 0 one recovers the Maxwell equations in terms of the field strength

part[aCbc] = 0

partbCab = 0

(354)

Let us note that the ambiguity at the first step of unfolding (the terms haC prime andh[aCb] in the above two examples) expresses the possibility of introducing a massterm

Example 333 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-s field [31 6466] We start from the metric-like description of a massless spin-s field in termsof a double-traceless symmetric rank-s field φmicro1micros

satisfying (213) the secondorder equations are invariant with respect to the first order gauge transformationwith traceless rank-(s minus 1) gauge parameter ξmicro1microsminus1 Inasmuch as the Young di-agram s of so(d minus 2) is of the height one there are gauge transforma-tions of the first level only Therefore the dynamical field in the unfolded ap-proach has to be a one-form There is only one way to identify φmicro1micros

and ξmicro1microsminus1

with certain ωY01 and ξY0

0 taking values in the same so(d minus 1 1)-irrep Y0 namely

Y0 = sminus 1 ie ωa(sminus1)1 and ξ

a(sminus1)0 takes values in a rank-(s minus 1) symmet-

ric traceless tensors Field φmicro1microsis identified with a totally symmetric part of

ωa(sminus1)1 ie φmicro1micros

= hb1(micro1hbsminus1

microsminus1ωa1asminus1

micros)ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 the double-tracelessness

condition is the consequence of the tracelessness of ωa(sminus1)1 in a1asminus1 ξmicro1microsminus1

is identified with ξa(sminus1)0 directly ξmicro1microsminus1 = hb1micro1

hbsminus1microsminus1

ξa1asminus1ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 andone can make sure that the Fronsdalrsquos gauge transformation law is recovered fromδω

a(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 Field ω

a(sminus1)1 has a redundant component with the symmetry

ofsminus 1

which can be made Stueckelberg by virtue of gauge parameter ξa(sminus1)b

with the same symmetry type ie

δωa(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)c0 (355)

It automatically follows that there is a degree-one gauge field ωa(sminus1)b1 coupled with

ωa(sminus1)1 as

dωa(sminus1)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)c1 (356)

28

The only solution to Bianchi identity hcdωa(sminus1)c1 equiv 0 is15

dωa(sminus1)b1 = hcω

a(sminus1)bc1 (357)

where a new field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

is introduced and so on

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1 (358)

until the field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

for which the Bianchi identity solvesas

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 (359)

where field Ca(s)b(s)0 represents a generalized Weyl tensor and has the symmetry of

s The solution of Bianchi identity hchddC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 equiv 0 has the form

dCa(s)b(s)0 = hc

(

Ca(s)cb(s)0 +

s

2C

a(s)bb(sminus1)c0

)

(360)

where Ca(s+1)b(s)0 has the symmetry of s

s+ 1 The second term on the rhs

of (360) supplements the first one to have a proper Young symmetry Further

unfolding requires a set of degree-zero forms Ca(s+i)b(s)0 taking values in so(dminus1 1)-

irreps characterized by Young diagrams ss+ i

The full system has theform

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1

δωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(k)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)b(k)c0 k isin [0 sminus 2]

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 δω

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0

dCa(s+i)b(s) = hc

(

Ca(s+i)cb(s) +s

i+ 2Ca(s+i)bb(sminus1)c

)

i isin [0infin)

(361)

By the construction the system incorporates Fronsdalrsquos field φmicro1microswith the correct

gauge law but there is still to be proved that the Fronsdalrsquos equations are reallyimposed and that there are no other dynamical fields in the system Let us recon-struct Fronsdalrsquos equations (213) whereas the second statement will be proved asa part of a more general theorem The first two equations of (361) read

partmicroωa(sminus1)ν minus partνω

a(sminus1)micro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)cν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)cmicro (362)

partmicroωa(sminus1)bν minus partνω

a(sminus1)bmicro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)bcν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)bcmicro (363)

It is convenient to convert all world indices to the fiber ones

partcωa(sminus1)|d minus partdωa(sminus1)|c = ωa(sminus1)c|d minus ωa(sminus1)d|c (364)

partcωa(sminus1)b|d minus partdωa(sminus1)b|c = ωa(sminus1)bc|d minus ωa(sminus1)bd|c (365)

15The proof is not given as more general statement about the solutions of such equations isproved in the next Section

29

where ωa(sminus1)|b equiv ωa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro ωa(sminus1)bb|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bbmicro hcmicro

Contracting (365) with ηbd and then symmetrizing c with a1asminus1 results in

partcωa(sminus1)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus1)c|c= 0 (366)

By symmetrizing in (364) a1asminus1 with d

ωa(sminus1)c|a = partcωa(sminus1)|a minus partaωa(sminus1)|c (367)

and then by contracting (364) with ηdasminus1

ωa(sminus1)c|

c= (sminus 1)

(

partcωa(sminus2)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus2)c|c

)

(368)

all the terms of (366) can be expressed via ωa(sminus1)|b Plugging these to (366) gives

ωa(sminus1)|a minus partapartc((sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c

)+ (sminus 1)partapartaω

a(sminus2)c|c= 0 (369)

where ωa(sminus1)|a is to be identified with Fronsdalrsquos field φa(s) as ωa(sminus1)|a = 1sφa(s)

then ωa(sminus2)c|

c= 1

2φa(sminus2)c

c (sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c = φa(sminus1)c and the equation

acquires the Fronsdalrsquos form (213)

φa(s) minus spartapartcφa(sminus1)c + s(sminus1)

2partapartaφ

a(sminus2)cc= 0 (370)

For Y = Y(s 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 results in

Yg sminus 1 sminus 1 s

ss+ 1

n k 1 0 1 sminus 1 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = sminus 1 g = s g = s+ 1

qg q0 = 1 qsminus1 = 1 qs = 0 qs+1 = 0

therefore

Wq =

Wa(sminus1)0 W

a(sminus1)b0 W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0 q = 0

Wa(sminus1)q W

a(sminus1)bq W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)q W

a(s)b(s)qminus1 W

a(s+1)b(s)qminus1 q gt 0

(371)and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hcWa(sminus1)b(gminus1)cq g isin [1 sminus 1]

hchdWa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)dqminus1 g = s

hc

(

Wa(gminussminus1)cb(s)qminus1 + s

gminuss+1W

a(gminussminus1)bb(sminus1)cqminus1

)

g gt s

(372)

With D = DL minus σminus full system (361) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (373)

30

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sminus 1 sim g isin [0 sminus 1]form a finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k =0 1 sim g ge s form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

The representatives of cohomology classes can be chosen as H0 = ξ

a(sminus1)0 H1 =

hbφa(sminus1)b H2 = hbhcG

a(sminus1)c minus hahcGa(sminus2)bc + γηaahahcG

a(sminus4)bcnn+ (βηabhahc +

αηaahbhc)Ga(sminus3)cn

n16 H

3 = hbhahcχa(sminus2)c H

kgt3 = empty where φa(s) and Ga(s) are

double-traceless tensor fields and ξa(sminus1) and χa(sminus1) are traceless H01 are nontrivialat the lowest grade whereas H

23 are nontrivial at grade-one therefore the orderof equations that are imposed on the dynamical field is equal to two It turns outthat there is no need in the explicit form for α β and γ it is sufficient to find outthe Young symmetry of representatives only The uniqueness of Fronsdalrsquos theoryat the level of action was demonstrated in [67] and at the level of equations in[6 53] Consequently there is no need for equations (370) to be found explicitly -those of Fronsdal are the only possible Again there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2 the gauge parameters

in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3 The system contains an infinitely many ofdual formulations those that have field W

a(sminus1)b(k0)1 at the lowest grade are gauge

dual descriptions whereas those that have field Ca(s+k0)b(s) at the lowest grade arenon-gauge Dual description based on field W

a(sminus1)b(1)1 was elaborated in [68]

Example 334 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field[69

70 31] Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field results in literally

the same unfolded system (361 373) but with fields taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that are irreducible spin-tensors with the same tensor part as in the bosoniccase Note that operator σminus is not modified but the σminus cohomology groups areslightly changed such that the equations become of the first order

The Dirac equation Unfolded system (336) or equivalently (339) describesa massless spin-1

2field provided that Ck take values in s 1

2so(dminus1 1)-irreps

ie Ck equiv Cαa(k) and Γαb βC

βba(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equation of (336)

partmicroCα = hmicroaC

αa (374)

with hbmicroΓβb α

gives the Dirac equation

Γαa βpart

aCβ = 0 (375)

the rest of equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives of dynamicalfield Cα

The Rarita-Schwinger equation Unfolded system (350) or equivalently(353) describes a massless spin-3

2field provided that irreducible tensors in (351)

are replaced by the corresponding irreducible tensor-spinors ie A1 equiv Aαmicro C

k equiv

Cα[ab]c(k) and Γαb βC

β[ab]c(k) = 0 Γαd βC

β[ab]dc(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equa-tion of (350)

1

2(partmicroA

αν minus partνA

αmicro) = hmicroahνbC

α[ab] (376)

16α = minus (s(d+sminus5)minusd+6)(sminus2)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6) β = (sminus2)

(d+sminus4) γ = (d+sminus6)(sminus2)(sminus3)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6)

31

with Γ-matrices and converting world indices micro ν to the fiber ones according toAαa equiv Aα

microhamicro gives the Rarita-Schwinger equation

Γαb βpart

bAβa minus partaΓαb βA

βb = 0 δAαa = partaξα (377)

The rest of unfolded equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives ofdynamical field Aα

microThe Fang-Fronsdal equation for a spin-(s + 1

2) massless field Unfolded

system (361) or equivalently (373) describes a massless spin-(s + 12) field pro-

vided that irreducible tensors in (371) are replaced by the corresponding irreducibletensor-spinors With all world indices converted to the fiber ones the first equationof (361) has the form

Gαa(sminus1)|[cd] equiv partcωβa(sminus1)|d minus partdωβa(sminus1)|c = ωβa(sminus1)c|d minus ωβa(sminus1)d|c (378)

where ωαa(sminus1)|b equiv ωαa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωαa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

αa(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro

Analogously to the bosonic case nonsymmetric component of ωβa(sminus1)|d canbe gauged away algebraically Hence the Fronsdalrsquos field φαa(s) is identified asωαa(sminus1)|a = 1

sφαa(s) Then Γα

b βφβa(s) = Γα

b βωβa(sminus1)|b Γα

b βΓβc γφ

γa(sminus2)bc = ηbcωαa(sminus2)b|c

and the Fronsdalrsquos triple Γ-traceless constraint is a consequence of irreducibility ofωαa(sminus1)|b in α a1asminus1 and the lack of any conditions with respect to a1asminus1 andb Since the Fronsdalrsquos field contains three irreducible components with the sym-metry of s 1

2 s-1 1

2and s-2 1

2 the equations of motion has to be

nontrivial in these three sectors too The projector on the dynamical equations issimply Γα

b βGβa(sminus1)b|a and gives

Γαb βpart

bφβa(s) minus spartaΓαb βφ

βa(sminus1)b = 0 (379)

which is in accordance with (222) But we would like to note that there aretwo components with the symmetry of s-1 1

2 namely ηbcG

αa(sminus2)b|ac and

Γαb βΓ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] The correct projector on this component of the equations isgiven by the combination

2(sminus 1)ηbcGαa(sminus2)b|ac minus γαb βγ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] (380)

which is identically zero when Gαa(sminus1)|[bc] is expressed via ωβa(sminus1)c|d by virtue of(378) Therefore it is (380) that does not express certain part of ωβa(sminus1)c|d interms of first derivatives of the dynamical field φαa(s) and thus this is a dynamicalequation Obviously (380) is a representative of σminus cohomology group H

2g=0 In

terms of φαa(s) the representative has the form

Γαb βpart

bΓβc γφ

γa(sminus1)c minus partcφαa(sminus1)c +

(sminus 1)

2partaφ

αa(sminus2)cc= 0 (381)

which is equal to the Γ-trace of (379) The gauge transformations has the form

δφαa(s) = partaξαa(sminus1) (382)

32

where Γαb βξ

βa(sminus2)b = 0Consequently unfolded equations for totally symmetric bosonic fields are proved

to completely determine the unfolded equations for totally symmetric fermionicfields Though σminus is not modified in the fermionic case σminus cohomology groupsare changed since the fermionic dynamical equations are of the first order

4 Unfolding Mixed-Symmetry Fields

First in Section 41 an example of the simplest massless mixed-symmetry field ofspin- is investigated in detail and leading arguments are given for a spin- fieldSecond the general statement on arbitrary mixed-symmetry fields is proved whereastechnical details are collected in Sections 44 and 45 The analysis of the numberof physical degrees of freedom is carried out in Section 43

41 Simplest Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Example 411 Spin- field In the metric-like approach a spin- field is mini-mally described[16 17] by the subjected to (215) field φ[micromicro]ν that takes values in a

reducible so(dminus 1 1)-representation oplus the latter component is identified withthe trace φ ν

microν The gauge transformations (216) has two levels of reducibility with

two gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξA[microν] taking values in oplus bull so(dminus 1 1)-irreps at the

first level and one parameter ξmicro taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irrep at the secondlevel (217)

First the metric-like field φ[micromicro]ν has to be incorporated into certain differentialform eYq which is called a physical vielbein the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y and the degreeq to be defined below To make the symmetries both of the first and of the secondlevel of reducibility manifest the degree of the physical vielbein has to be two atleast

Moreover were the physical vielbein taken to be a degree-one form not all of thegauge symmetries even at the first level would be manifest Indeed there are twopossibilities for physical vielbein eY1 to contain a component with the symmetry of

Namely Y = and Y = since otimes = oplus oplus and otimes = oplus oplus

The associated differential gauge parameter is ξ0 in the first case and ξ0 in thesecond case Inasmuch as the gauge parameters are the forms of degree-zero onlyone of the required two parameters is present in each of the cases

The degree of the physical vielbein has to be not greater than two if the com-ponent associated with the metric-like field φmicromicroν is required not to be a certaintrace part The reason why a dynamical field should not be a certain trace part isexplained in the next Section

Therefore the physical vielbein has to be of degree-two and has to take valuesin so(dminus 1 1)-irrep that belongs to the vector representation ie e2 equiv ea2 equiv eamicroν

The associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξa1 equiv ξamicro contains in its Lorentz decomposition

otimes = oplus oplusbull both anti-symmetric ξAmicroν = ξa[microhbν]ηab and symmetric ξSmicroν = ξa(microh

bν)ηab

33

gauge parameters the latter enters along with the trace ξamicrohmicroa There exists a second

level gauge parameter χa0 which is directly identified with ξmicro as ξmicro = hbmicroχ

aηabThere are no redundant components in the gauge parameter However physicalvielbein e2 contains one redundant component in its decomposition into Lorentz

irreps otimes = oplus oplus The first and the second components are to be associatedwith a traceful φmicromicroν whereas the third one totally anti-symmetric component e[a|bc]

of ea|bc = eamicroνhbmicrohcν is a redundant one and has to be made non-dynamical In order

to do so algebraic gauge parameter ξ[abc]0 with the symmetry of is introduced It

is obvious from pure algebraic gauge law

δea2 = hbhcξ[abc]0 (41)

that the redundant component can be fixed to zero and ea2 can be directly identifiedwith φmicromicroν as e

amicromicro = φmicromicroνh

aν From gauge transformation laws δea2 = dξa1 δξa1 = dχa

0

ie δeamicroν = 12

(partmicroξ

aν minus partνξ

amicro

) δξamicro = partmicroχ

a required gauge transformations (216)(217) for metric-like field φmicromicroν and for the first order gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξ

A[microν]

are easily recoveredSince in the unfolded approach each gauge parameter possesses its own gauge

field and vice-verse associated with ξ[abc]0 gauge field ω

[abc]1 enters as

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 (42)

which determines the first equation Applying d to this equation results in Bianchiidentity hbhcdω

[abc]1 equiv 0 which has a unique solution of the form

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 (43)

with C[abc][df ]0 having the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensor of a spin-

field ie it is anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and C[abcd]f0 equiv 0 To clarify the form of

the solution let C[abc]|[df ]0 be a degree-zero form anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and with

no definite symmetry between these two groups of indices The Bianchi identityimplies hbhchdhfC

[abc]|[df ]0 equiv 0 which is equivalent to C

a[bc|df ]0 equiv 0 since vielbeins

ha anticommute Therefore the solution is parameterized by those components of

C[abc]|[df ]0 sim otimes that has the symmetry of Young diagrams with no more than

three rows since the requirement for total anti-symmetrization of any four indicesto give zero is the characteristic property of Young diagrams with at most three

rows otimes ni is the only component of zero trace order17 with three rows andthere are no components with the number of rows less than three Alternatively one

17Although there are trace components with the number of rows less than four eg theirtensor product by the metric ηab contains components with the symmetry of the sl(d)-Young

diagrams with more than three rows Nontrivial trace with the symmetry of corresponds tothe mass-like term Hence traceful tensors either do not satisfy the Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms

34

could search for the solution in the sector of degree-one forms as dω[abc]1 = hdC

[abc]|d1

with some C[abc]|d1 but Bianchi identity hbhchdC

[abc]|d1 equiv 0 implies that the only

component of C[abc]|d1 sim otimes that is allowed must have less than three rows which

is impossible since [abc] makes Young diagrams of otimes consist of three rows atleast18 Thus one has to search for the solution among the forms of less degree

Further unfolding requires a set of fields C [abc][df ]g(k) with the symmetry ofk

to be introduced and the full system has the form

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 δea2 = dξa1 + hbhcξ

[abc]0 δξa1 = dχa

0

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 δω

[abc]1 = dξ

[abc]0

dC[abc][df ]g(k)0 = hvC

[abc][df ]g(k)v0 (44)

Consequently the unfolded system incorporates field φmicromicroν with all required differ-ential gauge parameters at all levels of reducibility the redundant component of the

physical vielbein does not contribute to the dynamics ω[abc]1 sim otimes = oplus oplus

the first component is a field strength for the redundant field once the field hasbeen gauged away the associated field strength is zero and ω

[abc]ρ = hamicrohbνhcλT[microνλ]ρ

for some T[microνλ]ρ T[microνλρ] equiv 0 which incorporates both and (as the trace) Torecover equations (215) in terms of metric-like fields it is convenient to convert allfiber indices to the world ones in the first two equations

part[microeaνλ] = hb[microhcνω

abcλ] (45)

part[microωabcν] = hd[microhfν]C

abcdf (46)

to substitute Tmicroνλρ and to contract two indices in the second equation

part[microφνλ]ρ = Tmicroνλρ (47)

partρTmicroνρλ minus partλTρ

microνρ = 0 (48)

Plugging (47) in (48) gives equation (215)For Y = Y(2 1) (1 1) ie N = 2 and p = 2 the general scheme of Section

1 results in

Yg

n k 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 1 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

18Again the trace component enters the tensor product as η otimes and has the number of rowsnot less than three

35

therefore

Wq =

W a0 q = 0

W a1 W

[abc]0 q = 1

W aq W

[abc]qminus1 W

[abc][df ]qminus2 W

[abc][df ]gqminus2 q gt 1

(49)

and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbhcW[abc]qminus1 g = 1

hbhcW[aaa][bc]qminus2 g = 2

hdW[aaa][bb]c(gminus3)dqminus2 g gt 2

(410)

with D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (44) can be rewritten as

Dω2 = 0 δω2 = Dξ1 δξ1 = Dξ0 (411)

where ω2 isin W2 ξ1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 2 k = 0 sim g = 0and n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 1 form two finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-moduleswhereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g ge 2 form an infinite-dimensionaliso(dminus 1 1)-module

Example 412 Spin- field (briefly) In the case of a massless spin- fieldthere are two gauge parameters at the first level of reducibility which have the sym-metry19 of and one gauge parameter at the second level with the symmetryof First for Y = Y(3 1) (2 1) the proposed scheme results in

Yg

n k 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3 g = 4

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 2 q2 = 1 q3 = 0 q4 = 0

therefore the physical vielbein has to be a two-form taking values in ie e2 equiv

eaab2 Associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξaab1 has components otimes = oplus oplus the first two having the symmetry of the required gauge parameters with the thirdone being redundant The last three components in the decomposition of the physical

vielbein otimes = oplus oplus oplus are also redundant By virtue of Stueckelberg

symmetry with parameter ξ1 these three components can be gauged away inasmuch

as otimes = oplus oplus The redundant component of the first level gauge

parameter ξ1 also can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg symmetry with

level-two gauge parameter ξ0 Consequently at least the fact that the unfoldedsystem incorporates the metric-like field all the required gauge parameters andredundant components do not contribute to the dynamics is proved

19To simplify the example no consideration is given to the trace components of the fields

36

42 General Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Given a massless field of spin Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) described by a metric-like field φY(x) taking values in the irrep of the Lorentz algebra so(d minus 1 1) withthe same symmetry type(minimal formulation) there exists a unique unfolded systemwith the physical vielbein at the lowest grade and all symmetries being manifest thatreproduces the original metric-like system The system has the form (11)

Sketch of the proof

1 The lowest grade field (physical vielbein) eY0q0

turns out to be completely de-termined by the requirement for it to contain the metric-like field and for itsgauge parameters ξY0

q0minusk k gt 0 to contain all the necessary gauge parametersat all levels of reducibility (219)

2 eY0q0

and its gauge parameters appear to contain redundant components thathave to be made non-dynamical The only way to achieve this is to introduceStueckelberg symmetry δeY0

q0= σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus1) δξ

Y0q0minus1 = σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus2) with certain

ξY1q1minusk k gt 0 which turns out to be unambiguously defined by this requirement

3 ξY1q1minus1 has associated gauge field ωY1

q1and gauge transformations δωY0

q0=

σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) completely determines the first equation deY0

q0= σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) whichimplies Jacobi identity σ1

minus(dωY1q1

) equiv 0 The general solution is proved in Sec-tion 44 to have the form dωY1

q1= σ2

minus(ωY2q2

) with certain ωY2q2

The secondequation implies the second Jacobi identity σ2

minus(dωY2q2

) equiv 0 and so on

4 Once the total unfolded system is defined the proof of the facts that (i)the correct dynamical equations are imposed (ii) there are no other dynamicalfields or other differential gauge symmetries in the system is obtained throughthe calculations of σminus cohomology groups Ignoring the trace pattern of fieldsie for traceful tensors the proof of (ii) can be simplified and is done in thissection Even stronger statement that there exists a duality H

p+1+k sim Hpminusk is

proved in Section 45

First as it is clear from the examples above the metric-like field φYM(x) has

to be incorporated into a differential form eY0q of degree-q taking values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep Y0 (for this reason eY0q is called physical vielbein) Having converted

all world indices to fiber ones in accordance with (329) so(dminus 1 1)-tensor productY0 otimes Y(1 q) of Y0 with one column diagram of the height q must contain thecomponent with the symmetry of YM In the case of the minimal formulationYM = Y where Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) characterizes the spin

It is useful to introduce a notion of the quotient of two Young diagrams let thequotient of two Young diagrams Y1Y2 be a direct sum of those diagrams whoseso(dminus 1 1)-tensor product by Y2 contains Y1 For the first sight given q ge 0 anyelement Q of YMY(1 q) might be chosen as Y0 If q is greater than the heightof YM the component with the symmetry YM in the tensor product QotimesY(1 q)has to be certain trace inevitably

37

Although there is no apparent problems in considering unfolded systems withdynamical field hidden in certain trace component of the physical vielbein egMaxwell gauge potential Amicro might be identified with the trace eamicroνh

microa of two-form

eamicroν However this exotic incorporating of the physical field does not take place inthe already known systems Moreover it can be proved that such exotic systemsdo not exist if irreducible Nevertheless they might be a part of some reduciblesystem which describes more than one field Therefore we require the degree q ofthe physical vielbein to be not greater than the height of YM

Inasmuch as (i) the equations imposed on φY(x) possess reducible gauge trans-formations with the number of levels equal to the height p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi of Y (ii) for

a degree-q gauge field of an unfolded system there exist q levels of gauge transfor-mations the degree q of physical vielbein eY0

q must be equal to pThe quotient YY(1 p) contains only one element (provided φY(x) is for-

bidden to be a trace component) it is the diagram (12) with the symmetry ofY0 = Y(s1 minus 1 p1) (sN minus 1 pN) ie it is equal to Y without the first col-umn Therefore physical vielbein eY0

p is completely defined So does gauge param-

eters ξY0pminusk at the k-th level of reducibility k isin [1 p] The requirement for tensor

product Y0 otimes Y(1 pminus k) to contain all gauge parameters ξik given by (219)at the k-th level of reducibility is also satisfied Consequently the whole patternof fieldsgauge parameters of the metric-like formulation is reproduced Note thatY0 equiv Y0 and q0 = p in the terms of Section 1

Let us note that if one writes down the physical vielbein explicitly as ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

where si are the lengths of the rows ofY and converts the form indices to the tangentones by virtue of inverse background vielbein hmicroa

ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|[d1dp] = ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

hmicro1d1 hmicropdp (412)

dynamical field φY(x) should be identified with ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|a1ap which hasthe symmetry of Y with some traces included Consequently the generalizedLabastidarsquos double-tracelessness condition (220) [20] is obvious inasmuch as thecontraction of two metric tensor ηaiaiηaiai with the i-th group of indices vanishes

Generally in addition to φY(x) decompositionY0otimesY(1 p) of physical vielbeineY0p into Lorentz irreps contains redundant components which must not contributeto the physical degrees of freedom So does Y0 otimesY(1 pminus k) ie in addition toξik it contains a lot of components that can not be made genuine differential gaugeparameters There are only two possible ways to get rid of redundant fields in theunfolded formalism

A redundant components could be directly fixed to zero by algebraic (Stueckel-berg) symmetry

B redundant components might be auxiliary fields for other fields (at lower grade)and so on The process stops since the grade is assumed to be bounded frombelow

We require dynamical fields incorporated in the physical vielbein to be at the lowestgrade Actually (B) takes place for dual gauge descriptions but not for the minimal

38

Therefore the only possibility to make redundant components to be non-dynamicalis to introduce a Stueckelberg symmetry with certain parameters ξY1

q1minusk

δeY0p = dξY0

pminus1 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) (413)

δξY0pminus1 = dξY0

pminus2 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus2) (414)

(415)

where σ1minus is a certain operator built of background vielbein ha that contracts a

number of indices of Y1 with hahc to obtain Y0 Diagram20 Y1 and form degreeq1 can be easily found since Y1 otimes Y1 q1 minus i i gt 0 must contain all redundantcomponents of eY0

p and ξY0pminusk

In the unfolded formalism each gauge field possesses its own gauge parameter andvice-versa Therefore there is a gauge field ωY1

q1 which contributes to the equations

for eY0p as

deY0p = σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) (416)

The first equation determines the first Jacobi identity of the form σ1minus(dω

Y1q1

) equiv 0which can be solved as

dωY1q1

= σ2minus(ω

Y2q2

) (417)

for certain gauge field ωY2q2

and operator σ2minus that satisfies σ1

minusσ2minus equiv 0 The general

solution of Jacobi identities is given in Section 44 From now on let the super-scripts of σminus be omitted The second equation determines the second Jacobi identityσminus(dω

Y2q2

) equiv 0 which can be also solved and so on Consequently the knowledgeof the lowest grade gauge field eY0

p and of the Stueckelberg symmetries required toget rid of redundant components determines the first equation which by virtue ofJacobi identities determines the second and so on The total unfolded system hasthe structure

dωYg

qg= σminus

(

ωYg+1qg+1

)

g = 0 1

δωYg

qg= dξYg

qg+ σminus

(

ξYg+1

qg+1minus1

)

δξYgqg

=

(418)

where σminus is certain algebraic operator built of background vielbein ha and (σminus)2 = 0

The only facts remain to be proved are that there are no other dynamical fieldsand that the proper correspondence (duality) between the cohomology groups holdstrue To this end it is sufficient to analyze only the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps content ofH

qg ie only the symmetry type and the multiplicity of irreducible Lorentz tensors

that by virtue of (330) are the representatives of Hqg

It is proved in the next Section that there is a duality Hpminuskg=0 sim H

p+k+1g=1 between

the σminus cohomology groups which reveals the one-to-one correspondence betweenthe gauge dynamical fields and equations of motion the level-k gauge symmetries

20The specific character of Minkowski massless fields is in that all Stueckelberg parameters canbe incorporated into a single Y1-valued form this not being the case for (anti)-de Sitter masslessfields

39

and the level-k Bianchi identities The representatives of cohomology groups in thesector of fields and gauge symmetries directly correspond to those of metric-likeapproach and there is no other nontrivial cohomology in these sectors

Though the trace pattern of fieldsgauge parameters is also important and thecalculation of σminus cohomology groups provides a comprehensive answer to this ques-tion the very procedure being a bit technical Ignoring the trace pattern of thefields it can be easily proved that the required metric-like field is incorporated inphysical vielbein eY0

q0 all the redundant components of the physical vielbein can be

gauged away by a pure algebraic symmetry and the same holds for differential gaugeparameters ξY0

q0minusk at all levels of reducibility ie the required pattern of gauge pa-rameters is recovered whereas all the redundant components are either Stueckelbergor auxiliary This is the necessary condition only and the traces has to be takeninto account Also it is still to be proved that the correct equations of motionsare imposed Provided that there are no trace conditions on the fields the sys-tem is referred to as off-shell[65] An off-shell system may contain only constraintsthat express auxiliary fields via the derivatives of the dynamical field imposing norestrictions on the latter

The off-shell system Technically ignoring the traces is equivalent to thereplacement of all so(dminus1 1)-irreps by the sl(d)-irreps that are characterized by thesame Young diagrams ie instead of taking so(dminus1 1)-tensor products one needs toapply the sl(d)-tensor productrsquos rules which are much simpler The decompositionof the physical vielbein eY0

q0into sl(d)-irreps is given by diagrams Yαi of the form

αN+1

sN minus 1

pNαN

s2 minus 1

p2α2

s1 minus 1

p1

α1

(419)

where α1+ +αN+1 = q0 = p The decomposition of Stueckelberg gauge parameterξY1q1minus1 for eY0

q0has the components of the same form but with αN+1 ge 1 because

Y1 (13) has already the form of Y0 with one cell in the bottom-left Thereforeall components of eY0

q0except for those with αN+1 = 0 are of Stueckelberg type but

there is only one component of eY0q0

with αN+1 = 0 namely it has αi = pi i isin [1 N ]and hence has the symmetry of Y The decomposition of level-k differential gaugeparameter ξY0

q0minusk has the form (419) with α1 + + αN+1 = p minus k and again all

the components of ξY0q0minusk with αN+1 ge 1 can be gauged away by pure algebraic

symmetry with ξY1q1minuskminus1 Consequently there is a complete matching between (219)

40

and those in ξY0

q0minusk that are not pure gauge themselves It can be easily proved alsothat if ignoring the traces there are no other dynamical fieldsdifferential gaugeparameters at higher grade Consequently

Lemma H(σminus) with respect to sl(d) are given by

Hk(σminus)sl(d) =

Yαi g = 0 α1 + + αN = k αN+1 = 0 k le p

empty k gt p(420)

The triviality of the higher k gt p cohomology groups for sl(d) which shouldcontain equations of motion and Bianchi identities is expected since the system isoff-shell For the equations to have the second order in derivatives the only nontrivialcohomology group H

p+1 must be at the grade-one ie Hp+1g=1 6= empty As is seen from

the examples above the equations correspond to those representatives of Hp+1g=1 that

are certain traces Indeed the total rank |WYgqg | which is equal to the sum qg + |Yg|

of degree qg and rank of Yg is preserved by σminus Therefore |WYgqg | = |W

Y0q0| + g

and |RY1q1+1| = |ω

Y0q0| + 2 = |Y|+ 2 where eY0

q0isin Wg=0

p and RY1q1+1 isin W

g=1p+1 contain

metric-like field φYM(x) and the equations on φY(x) respectively Consequently

the representative of Hp+1g=1 that corresponds to the equations on the traceless part

of φY(x) has to be identified with certain trace of the first order and so on for thetraces of φY(x)

The calculation of σminus cohomology groups carried out in Section 45 implies

1 The only nontrivial cohomology groups are Hpminuskg=0 and H

p+k+1g=1 k = 1 p

Therefore the dynamical fields and independent gauge parameters belong tothe zero grade Wg=0

q subspaces the equations are of the second order and theBianchi identities for the k-th level gauge symmetries are of the (k + 2)-thorder

2 Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 ie there is a one-to-one correspondence between the

elements of Hpminuskg=0 that are traces of the r-th order and the elements of Hp+k+1

g=1

that are traces of the (r + k + 1)-th order Roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1

Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on Therefore there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the dynamical fields and the equations of motion the level-k gaugesymmetries and the k-th Bianchi identities

3 The so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that correspond to the elements of Hpminusk(σminus) and arethe traces of the zeroth order are given by the so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagramsthat have the form (419) with αN+1 = 0 and α1 + + αN = p minus k whichexactly reproduce the required pattern (219) Note that certain higher ordertraces are also the elements of cohomology groups These fields represent thersquoauxiliaryrsquo fields of the metric-like formulation which had to be introduced tomake the gauge symmetry off-shell To prove the theorem it is not necessary toknow the concrete trace pattern the duality between the cohomology groupsis sufficient The details of the trace pattern are in Section 45

41

In the fermionic case the traces are substituted for Γ-traces Important isthat acting on tensor indices only σminus does not break down the irreducibility ofspin-tensors The duality has the form H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 or simply H

pminuskg=0 sim

Hp+k+1g=0 which means that equations are of the first order and the duality between

fieldsequations gauge symmetriesBianchi identities takes place which completesthe proof

Note that Yg=s1 equiv Yn=0k=0 has the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensorfor a spin-Y massless field

sNpN

s2p2

s1

p1 + 1

(421)

Analogously to the examples of Section 33 massless mixed-symmetry fields can bedescribed by the same unfolded system (16) that is restricted to Wg

q with g ge g0ie the system contains infinitely many dual formulations As the generalized Weyltensor and its descendants are non-gauge fields the dual descriptions with g0 ge s1are non-gauge and the dual descriptions with 0 lt g0 lt s1 are gauge

43 Physical Degrees of Freedom Counting

Notwithstanding the simplicity of the unfolded form and the uniqueness of unfoldingthere still might be a question of whether the unfolded equations do describe thecorrect number of physical degrees of freedom

It is well-known that for systems with the first class constraints only with mass-less fields belonging to this class the counting of degrees of freedom is that one firstlevel gauge parameter kills two degrees of freedom one second level gauge parame-ters kills three degrees of freedom and so on For example a spin-two massless fieldpossesses d(dminus3)

2degrees of freedom which is just d(d+1)

2minus 2d d(d+1)

2and d being the

number of components of φmicroν and ξmicroThe complete information concerning the rsquonumberrsquo of fieldsgauge parameters

ie the multiplicity and the symmetry of corresponding tensors is contained inH

kg=0(σminus) for k = 0p Not only can a number of physical degrees of freedom be

calculated but the whole exact sequence that defines an iso(d minus 1 1) irrep can bederived The elements of this sequence are certain so(dminus 1) tensors that define anso(dminus 2) tensor as a quotient of so(d minus 1) tensors eg (218) The decompositionof so(dminus 1 1)-fields into irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) can be done with the aid ofpartmicro or after Fourier transform with the aid of momentum pmicro

For example for a spin-two field the cohomology groups that correspond to thedynamical fieldsdifferential gauge parameters and its decomposition into so(dminus 1)irreps have the form

42

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus bull sim φmicroν φ

νν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2bull

Quick sort of Young diagrams in 0 minusrarr 2H0 minusrarr H1 minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 gives the

correct exact sequence 0 minusrarr minusrarr minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 which defines a masslessspin-two irrep H (0 )

For the simplest mixed-symmetry field the hook- there are two levels of gaugetransformation hence relevant cohomology groups are H

0 H1 and H2

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus oplus bull sim ξAmicroν oplus ξ

Smicroν ξ

Sνν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2 oplus 2bull

H2 oplus sim φmicroνλ φ

νmicroν 6= 0 oplus oplus oplus 2 oplus bull

Again quick sort of diagrams in 0 minusrarr 3H0 minusrarr 2H1 minusrarr H2 minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0

gives exact sequence (218)Consequently the problem of calculation the number of physical degrees of free-

dom to be precise of deriving the exact sequence is effectively reduced to the simplecombinatoric problem of (i) decomposition so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagram representa-tives of H(σminus) to so(dminus 1)-diagrams (ii) cancellation of like terms in sequence

0 minusrarr (p+ 1)H0 minusrarr pH1 minusrarr minusrarr 2Hpminus1 minusrarr Hp minusrarr H (0Y) minusrarr 0 (422)

Skipping combinatoric technicalities we state that in the general case of a spin-Ymassless mixed-symmetry field (422) reduces to the correct exact sequence thatdefines a uirrep H (0Y) of iso(dminus 1 1)

44 Solving the Generalized Jacobi Identities

Unfolding some dynamical system there arises a problem of solving Jacobi identities(33) that have schematically a form hhdω1

q equiv 0 where a number of backgroundvielbeins ha is contracted with the fiber indices of ω1

q The Jacobi identity restrictsdω1

q to have a certain specific form dω1q = hhω2

r where the so(dminus1 1)-irrep inwhich ω2

r takes values the degree r and the projector built of hh are completelydetermined The solutions are given by21

Lemma A Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values inY = Y(s p) (k 1)

so(dminus 1 1)-irrep The general solution of

hcdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq = 0 (423)

21As was pointed out in Section 33 nonzero traces either violate Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms and therefore are ignored

43

has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq k lt s

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1 k = s q ge p + 1

0 k = s q lt p+ 1

(424)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 take values inY(s p) (k + 1 1)

and Y(s+ 1 p+ 1) so(dminus 1 1)-irreps respectively22

Proof The parametrization of dωq by a degree-(q + 1) form taking values in the

same so(dminus 1 1)-irrep dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = R

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q+1 obviously fails to satisfy

(423) Inasmuch as (423) contains a vielbein the solution has to contain a number

of vielbeins too The most general parametrization of dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q with only

one vielbein included has the form dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = hdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)|dq for some

q-form taking values in a tensor product of Y by a vector representation ie thereis no definite symmetry between index d and the rest of the indices

hchdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)c|dq = 0larrrarr ωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)[c|d]

q = 0 (425)

Only those irreps in Yotimes are allowed that have c and d symmetric ie correspondto Y(s p) (k + 1 1) for k lt s This is not possible in the case k = s ie Y =Y(s p+ 1) and the only possibility to have c and d symmetric is to add the whole

column toY which requires dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q to be represented as dω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hchcωa1(sminus1)cap(sminus1)cap+1(sminus1)cqminuspminus1 and therefore q must be large enough Roughly

speaking the proof is based on the fact that the anti-symmetrization of two indicesat the same row of a Young diagram is identically zero the anti-symmetrizationbeing due to contraction with vielbeins

Note that choosing nonmaximal solutions of Jacobi identities results in loweringthe gauge symmetry so that not all redundant components are excluded

Unfolding totally-symmetric massless higher-spin fields the possible rhs termsin dω

a(sminus1)b(t)1 = are restricted by Jacobi identities and an essential use is made

of

Corollary The solution of Jacobi identity

hcdωa(sminus1)b(tminus1)c1 equiv 0 (426)

is of the form

dωa(sminus1)b(t)1 =

hcωa(sminus1)b(t)c1 t lt sminus 1

hchdCa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 t = sminus 1

(427)

22The symmetric basis is used being more convenient in this case as the contracted with vielbeinstensors are already irreducible

44

The following statement is a generalization of the Lemma-A to the case where(s p) (k 1) is a rsquosubdiagramrsquo of a larger Young diagram Y that has a numberof rows precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) Appropriate Young symmetrizershave to be included as the mere contraction of a number of vielbeins breaks theirreducibility of the tensor For instance hcω

a(s1)b(s2minus1)c is already irreducible withthe symmetry of Ys1 s2 minus 1 but this is not the case for hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) which hasto be added one term hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) + 1s1minuss2+1

hcωa(s1)bb(s2minus1)c to get the symmetry

of Ys1 minus 1 s2

Lemma B Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values in Y =

Y( (s p) (k 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irrep where the dots stands for the blocks inY precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) The general solution of

Π[hcdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq

]= 0 (428)

where Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p)(k minus 1 1) has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

Π[

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq

]

k lt s

Π[

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1

]

k = s q ge p+ 1

0 k = s q lt p + 1

(429)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 takes values in

Y (s p) (k + 1 1) and Y (s+ 1 p+ 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irreps respec-tively and Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p) (k 1)

Proof The proof is similar to that of Lemma-A with the only comment that thesymmetrizers do not affect the argumentation that anti-symmetrization of two in-dices in the same row is identically zero

45 Dynamical Content via σminus Cohomology

Before discussing the calculation of σminus cohomology let us first recall necessary factsconcerning the evaluation of so(d minus 1 1)-tensor products Let P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) be anumber of integer partitions k1 + + kN = m of m where ki is constrained byki le ǫi and different rearrangements of ki satisfying the constraints are regarded asdistinct partitions The generating function for the partition P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) is

sum

m

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m)tm =

i=Nprod

i=1

(1minus tǫi+1)

1minus t(430)

These integer partitions gives the multiplicities of irreps in so(dminus 1 1)-tensor prod-ucts (Clebsh-Gordon coefficients) we are interested in [71]

45

The so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary irrep Ylowast = Y(si pi) by aone-column diagram of the height qlowast can be explicitly calculated as

sNpN

s2

p2

s1

p1

otimes

q =sum

αjβi

Nαjβi

αN+1

βN

αN

ǫNpN sN

β2

α2

ǫ2p2 s2

β1

α1

ǫ1p1 s1

(431)

where αi βi αi + βi le pi i isin [1 N ] αN+1 ge 0 and there exist ρ ge 0 such that

qlowast =i=Nsum

i=1

(αi + βi) + αN+1 + 2ρ (432)

The multiplicity Nαjβi of Ylowastαj βi

is given by integer partition

Nαjβi = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ǫi = pi minus αi minus βi (433)

and the total trace order r is

r =i=Nsum

i=1

βi + ρ (434)

Roughly speaking to obtain an element of the tensor product one should first cutoff from bottom-right of the i-th block a column of height βiminusγi pi ge βiminusγi ge 0 (totake different traces) and second add an arbitrary number αi+γi pi ge αi+γi ge 0 ofcells to each block provided the γi cells annihilate ie they are added to the placesfrom which γi cells were removed at the first stage Multiplicity may be differentfrom one due to different rearrangements of γi ie when multiplied by the rest ofq-column different traces can give rise to the same diagram The number of suchrearrangements is given by P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ρ =

sumi=N

i=1 γi For instance sl(n)-tensor

product otimes is given simply by

otimessl(n) = oplus oplus oplus (435)

46

The so(d)-tensor product can be represented as a sum of the form

otimesso(n) = otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

otimessl(n)

oplus

otimessl(n)

︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

oplus

otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

2nd order

=

oplus oplus oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

oplus

oplus 2 oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

︸︷︷︸

2ndorder

(436)

where the sum is over trace order and the boxes that are connected by the arc areto be contracted and then the sl(n)-product rules are to be applied to the rest ofthe diagrams

Evaluating the so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary spinor-irrep Ylowast =Y(si pi) 1

2by a one-column diagram of the height qlowast one can contract any number

of Γ matrices with the indices of the column and then multiply therefore the tensorproduct rule for spin-tensors can be reduced to bosonic rule (431) as

Y(si pi) 12otimesso(n) Y(1 q) =

qsum

k=0

(Y(si pi) otimesso(n) Y(1 q minus k)

)

12

(437)

for example

12otimesso(n) = 1

2oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order Γ-traces

oplus

12oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order Γ-traces

oplus

oplus

2 12

︸︷︷︸

2nd order Γ-traces

oplus

bull 12

︸︷︷︸

3d order Γ-traces

(438)

The multiplicity N12

αjβiof Ylowast

αj βi12

is given by

N12

αjβi=

i=ρsum

i=0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus i) (439)

Let us now analyze the origin of σminus cohomology Its action σminus Wgq rarr W

gminus1q+1

preserves g+ q and hence the whole complex C(W σminus) is a direct sum of complexesC(qprime σminus) where q

prime refers to the end element Wg=0qprime of the complex

C(qprime σminus) 0 minusrarr minusrarr Wg=1qprimeminus1 minusrarrW

g=0qprime minusrarr 0 (440)

47

Moreover σminus preserves the total rank (the form degree + rank of the so(d minus 1 1)-

irrep in which the field takes values) LetWa(s1)a(sm)q be an element ofWg

qprime When

all form indices of Wa(s1)a(sm)q are converted to the fiber ones according to (329)

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (441)

the action of σminus is just an anti-symmetrization of all d1 dq with those indices aithat are extra as compared to Ygminus1 plus some terms to restore the correct Youngsymmetry of Ygminus1 Let the decomposition ofW a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] into so(dminus1 1)-irreps be of the form

Ya1(s1) am(sm)otimes

Y(1 q) =oplus

r=0

oplus

ir

N rirYr

ir (442)

where the summation is over the trace order r and then over ir which enumeratesall so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that enters in the tensor product as the traces of the r-thorder N r

irbeing the multiplicity of Yr

ir The multiplicity of the zeroth order traces

is always equal to one N0i0= 1 In fact the diagrams Y 0

i0can be directly obtained

by the sl(n)-tensor product ruleThe very anti-symmetrization is insensitive to whether a certain component en-

ters as a trace or not When decomposed into so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the elements ofWg

qprime and Wgminus1qprime+1 have a number of components of the same symmetry type The

action of σminus is just a linear transformation that either sends the whole so(dminus 1 1)-irrep to zero23 or sends it to the components of Wgminus1

qprime+1 of the same symmetry typeImportant is that σminus does not act between different so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Thereforecomplex C(qprime σminus) is a direct sum of complexes parameterized by so(dminus 1 1)-irrepsYprime that are given by various tensor products

Ynk

otimes

Y(1 q) (443)

provided that the field WYnkq is an element of Wgprimeminusi

qprime+i for certain i When reducedto such a complex

C(Yprime qprime σminus) 0rarr rarr Vg rarr Vgminus1 rarr rarr 0 (444)

the action of σminus is a linear transformation between the spaces Vg rarr Vgminus1 dimen-

sions of which are equal to the multiplicity of Yprime in the decomposition of WYgqg and

WYgminus1qg+1 The action of σminus is maximally non-degenerate compatible with nilpotency

Therefore to find cohomology groups the dimension of each linear space in everycomplex has to be calculated

Let us note that only the types and multiplicities of so(dminus1 1)-irreps are foundbelow ie no attention is paid to the description of how the corresponding tensorsare contained in the fields WY

qprime This is sufficient for our purposes though it isobvious (412) how the metric-like field φYM

is incorporated in an element ofWg=0p

23provided that the appropriate basis on the space of so(dminus1 1)-irreps with the same symmetrytype is chosen

48

The calculation of σminus cohomology is divided into three cases that cover the wholevariety of so(dminus 1 1)-irreps that can result from the tensor products (443)

In the Lemmas below it is assumed that complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is parameterizedby so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Yprime = Ylowast

αj βiof the form (431) with Ylowast = Ynk q

lowast = q such

that WYnkq isin C(qprime σminus) and ρ is defined according to (432)

In the first case Yprime is an element of Y0 otimesY(1 q)

Lemma 1 The σminus cohomology groups Hqg=0 and H

qg=1 are nontrivial and are given

by

Hqg =

Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βiMαj βi

αN+1 = 0sumi=N

i=0 αi = qq isin [0 p] g = 0

H2pminusqminus1 q isin [p+ 1 2p+ 1] g = 1

empty q gt 2p+ 1 any g

(445)where Mαj βi is the multiplicity of the irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

defined below

Proof From the very form of Yn=N0 equiv Yg=0 equiv Y(si minus 1 pi) it follows that theso(dminus1 1)-irreps that the element ofWg=0

q sim Y0otimesY(1 q) decomposes into may

be contained in Wg=1qminus1 only ie Wg=0

q and Wg=kqminusk contain no so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of

the same symmetry type for k gt 1 Therefore the length of complex C(Yprime q σminus)where Yprime isin Y0otimesY(1 q) is equal to one ie C(Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

q σminus) 0 minusrarrV1 minusrarr V0 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions of V0 and V1 are given by the multiplicitiesof the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

in Wg=1qminus1 and Wg=0

q respectively

dim(V1) =

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus 1) ρ ge 1

0 ρ = 0αN+1 = 0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) αN+1 gt 0

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) (446)

If αN+1 gt 0 the dimensions of V0 and V1 are equal and each irreducible componentof Wg=0

q with αN+1 gt 0 can be gauge away by virtue of the corresponding element

of Wg=1qminus1 thus being exact H

kgt2p+1 = empty inasmuch as ρ le p and the componentsof the forms with rank greater than (2p + 1) must have αN+1 gt 0 thus beingexact If αN+1 = 0 the dimensions are different dim(V1) lt dim(V0) for q le pdim(V1) = dim(V0) for q = p + 1 and dim(V1) gt dim(V0) for q gt p Thereforethe number of those Ysi piαj βi

isin Wg=0q q le p that are not exact is equal to

Mαj βi = |dim(V1) minus dim(V0)| the same is the number of those Ysi piαj βiisin

Wg=1qminus1 q gt p+ 1 that are not exact The obvious property of integer partitions

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ǫ1 + + ǫN minusm) (447)

results in the important duality in the cohomology groups Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 or

roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on

49

The second case is the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) where Yprime is an element of the tensor

product Ynk otimesY(1 q) for certain q ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmaxn minus 1

Lemma 2 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainqprime ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmax

n minus 1 the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The complex has the length two ie 0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr 0 wherethe dimensions are given by dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫN 1|ρ+ 1)dim(V2) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ+ 1) Simple calculations with generating functions resultsin dim(V0) lt dim(V1) dim(V2) lt dim(V1) and dim(V0) minus dim(V1) + dim(V2) = 0and consequently the sequence is exact

Analogously

Lemma 3 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainq ge 0 with k = 0 and n lt N the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The speciality of such Yprime is that the complex has the length three ie0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr V3 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions are given by

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 ǫn + 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V2) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 1) ρ ge ǫn + 1

0 otherwise

dim(V3) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn minus 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 2) ρ ge ǫn + 2

0 otherwise

Again simple calculations with generating functions results in appropriate inequali-ties and dim(V0)minusdim(V1)+dim(V2)minusdim(V3) = 0 and consequently the sequenceis exact

The above three cases covers the whole variety of the so(d minus 1 1)-tensors thatcan result from the tensor products YnkotimesY(1 q) for any n k and q The caseswith sN = 1 and Y = Y0 are special but the calculation of cohomology groupsleads to the same result

In the fermionic case the computations are similar due to the multiplicity givenby (439) The difference is that all nontrivial cohomology is concentrated in gradezero Indeed taking into account (446) where P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) is to be replaced by(439) it follows that dim(V0) ge dim(V1) for all q and H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 where r

is referred to the Γ-trace order or roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 andso on

5 Conclusions

The unfolded system constructed in the paper has a simple form of a covariantconstancy equation and describes arbitrary mixed-symmetry bosonic and fermionic

50

massless fields in d-dimensional Minkowski space The gauge fieldsparameters aredifferential forms with values in certain finite-dimensional irreducible representationsof the Lorentz algebra that are uniquely determined by the generalized spin

The key moment is that all gauge symmetries are manifest within the unfoldedformulation which is of most importance in controlling the number of physicaldegrees of freedom when trying to introduce interactions Unfolded systems areformulated in terms of differential forms which is a natural way to respect diffeo-morphisms and hence to describe systems that include gravity

Though the necessary conditions for the system to have a lagrangian descriptionare satisfied ie the fields are in one-to-one correspondence with the equations andthe k-th level gauge symmetries are in one-to-one correspondence with the k-thBianchi identities the very lagrangian remains to be constructed

Another interesting moment is that the unfolded equations for bosons are thesame as for fermions namely the operators involved ie exterior differential dand σminus remains unmodified when tensors are replaced with spin-tensors Thoughthis nice property partly breaks down in (anti)-de Sitter space within the unfoldedapproach bosons and fermions have much in common the fact being very useful forsupersymmetric theories

The proposed unfolded system includes all non-gauge dual descriptions whichare based on the generalized Weyl tensor and its descendants but not all of gaugedual descriptions It would be interesting to construct an unfolded system thatcontains all dual formulations

The interactions of the totally symmetric massless higher-spin fields are knownto require a nonzero cosmological constant ie are formulated in (anti)-de Sitterspace [2] Mixed-symmetry fields exhibit some interesting features in the presence ofcosmological constant For example not all of the Minkowski gauge symmetries canbe deformed to (anti)-de Sitter [72] As a result massless mixed-symmetry fields havemore degrees of freedom in (anti)-de Sitter compared to its Minkowski counterparts[73] and in the Minkowski limit a massless mixed-symmetry field splits in a certaincollection of massless fields generally Contrariwise a single mixed-symmetry fieldcan not be smoothly deformed to (anti)-de Sitter Another interesting effect is theexistence of the so-called partially-massless fields [74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 8283 84] the fields that have a number of degrees of freedom intermediate betweenthat of massless and massive and split in a set of massless fields in the Minkowskilimit Therefore the extension of the proposed approach to (anti)-de Sitter spaceseems to be non-trivial but nevertheless worth being investigated

In a series of papers [85 61 86 60] it was suggested so-called frame-like approachto the general mixed-symmetry fields in (anti)-de Sitter To generalize the proposedin the present paper unfolded system to (anti)-de Sitter case and to compare to thatof [60] is the next step to perform

We consider the proposed unfolded system as the first stage in constructing thefull interacting theory of mixed-symmetry fields

51

Acknowledgements

The author appreciates sincerely MA Vasiliev for reading the manuscript and mak-ing many detailed and valuable suggestions and illuminating comments the verywork was initiated as the result of discussions with MA Vasiliev The author isalso grateful to RR Metsaev and KB Alkalaev for useful discussions and to OVShaynkman for discussion of the fermionic case The work was supported in partby grants RFBR No 05-02-17654 LSS No 440120062 and INTAS No 05-7928by the Landau Scholarship and by the Scholarship of Dynasty foundation

Appendix A Multi-index convention

The multi-index notations is used a group of indices in which certain tensor issymmetric or is to be symmetrized is denoted either by one letter with the numberof indices indicated in round brackets or by placing a group of indices in roundbrackets eg

T a(s) equiv T a1a2as T a1aiaj as = T a1ajaias (A1)

V aT a(s) equiv V (a1T a2as+1) equiv1

s+ 1(V a1T a2a3as+1 + V a2T a1a3as+1 + + V as+1T a1a2as)

(A2)

V (bT a(s)) equiv V (bT a1as) equiv1

s + 1

(V bT a1a2as + V a1T ba2a3as + + V asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A3)Analogously the group of indices in which certain tensor is anti-symmetric or is tobe anti-symmetrized is denoted by placing indices in square brackets eg

T a[s] equiv T a1a2as T a1aiai+1as = minusT a1ai+1aias (A4)

V [bT a[s]] equiv V [bT a1as] equiv1

s+ 1

(V bT a1a2as minus V a1T ba2a3as + + (minus)sV asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A5)The operators of (anti)-symmetrization are weighted to be projectors (the factor 1

s+1

above)

Appendix B Young diagrams

Comprehensive information on Young diagrams can be found for example in thetextbook [71]

Definition B1 Given an integer partition ie a nonincreasing sequence si i isin[1 n] si ge si+1 of positive integers (or nonnegative when it is convenient to workwith a sequence of a fixed length) associated Young diagram Ys1 s2 sn is agraphical representation consisting of n left-justified rows made of boxes with the

52

i-th row containing si boxes

s10s11

s1s2s3s4

s5s6s7

s8s9

Finite-dimensional irreducible representation(irrep) of sl(d) ie various irre-ducible sl(d)-tensors are in one-to-one correspondence with Young diagrams of theform Ys1 s2 s[ d

2] The associated irreducible tensors

T

s1︷︸︸︷aa

s2︷︸︸︷

bb (B1)

or in condensed notation T a(s1)b(s2) have at most [d2] groups of indices being sym-

metric in each group separately and satisfy the condition that the symmetrizationof any group of indices with one index of any of the subsequent groups is identicallyzero ie

T a(s1)(b(sk)b)c(sjminus1) equiv 0 k lt j (B2)

If s[ d2] 6= 0 and d is even the (anti)-selfduality condition has to be imposed for

appropriate signature (anti)-selfduality is conventionally denoted by the sign factors+(minus) before s[ d

2] In this paper we do not consider (anti)-self dual representations

A scalar representation Y0 0 0 is denoted by bull a vector irrep Y1 0 0by rank-two symmetric tensor irrep by rank-two antisymmetric tensor irrep

by and so onFinite-dimensional irreducible representations of so(d) are of the two types ten-

sor and spin-tensor and are also characterized by Young diagrams which in thecase of spin-tensor irreps refer to the symmetry of the tensor part Young diagramsthat correspond to spin-tensor irreps are labeled by 1

2-subscript Spinor indices

α β γ = 12[d2] are placed first and are separated from tensor indices by rdquordquo For

example a spinor ψα irrep is denoted by bull 12 a vector-spinor irrep Aαaby 1

2and

so on To make tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry conditionthe tracelessness condition with respect to each pair of indices is to be imposed

ηccTa(s1)cb(siminus1)cd(sjminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n j = 1n (B3)

To make spin-tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry condition Γ-tracelessness condition with respect to each tensor index and a spinor index is to beimposed

Γαc βT

βa(s1)cb(siminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n (B4)

where Γαc β satisfy Γα

a βΓβb γ

+ Γαb βΓ

βaγ = 2ηab Additional conditions on spinors viz

Majorana Weyl and Majorana-Weyl are irrelevant to the problems concerned Also

53

in both cases it is required for the sum of the heights of the first two columns ofYoung diagrams to be not greater than d Note that the Γ-tracelessness conditionis stronger than the tracelessness one and applying the Γ-tracelessness twice to twosymmetric indices gives the tracelessness

0 = 2ΓαaβΓ

βb γT γ(ab) = ηabT

αab (B5)

To handle with arbitrary large Young diagrams the so-called block representationis used ie the rows of equal lengths are combined to blocks

Y(s1 p1) (sn pn) equiv Y

p1︷ ︸︸ ︷s1 s1

p2︷ ︸︸ ︷s2 s2

pn︷ ︸︸ ︷sn sn (B6)

References

[1] C Fronsdal ldquoMassless fields with integer spinrdquo Phys Rev D18 (1978) 3624

[2] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoCubic interaction in extended theories ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Nucl Phys B291 (1987) 141

[3] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoOn the gravitational interaction ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Phys Lett B189 (1987) 89ndash95

[4] M A Vasiliev ldquoConsistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in(3+1)-dimensionsrdquo Phys Lett B243 (1990) 378ndash382

[5] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoOn the geometry of higher-spin gauge fieldsrdquoClass Quant Grav 20 (2003) S473ndashS486 hep-th0212185

[6] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoFree geometric equations for higher spinsrdquoPhys Lett B543 (2002) 303ndash310 hep-th0207002

[7] M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear equations for symmetric massless higher spin fieldsin (a)ds(d)rdquo Phys Lett B567 (2003) 139ndash151 hep-th0304049

[8] X Bekaert I L Buchbinder A Pashnev and M Tsulaia ldquoOn higher spintheory Strings brst dimensional reductionsrdquo Class Quant Grav 21 (2004)S1457ndash1464 hep-th0312252

[9] D Sorokin ldquoIntroduction to the classical theory of higher spinsrdquo AIP ConfProc 767 (2005) 172ndash202 hep-th0405069

[10] X Bekaert S Cnockaert C Iazeolla and M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear higherspin theories in various dimensionsrdquo hep-th0503128

[11] A Sagnotti E Sezgin and P Sundell ldquoOn higher spins with a strong sp(2r)conditionrdquo hep-th0501156

[12] P K Townsend ldquoCovariant quantization of antisymmetric tensor gaugefieldsrdquo Phys Lett B88 (1979) 97

54

k = 0(sNminus1 minus sN minus 1) of the form

sNminus1

sN minus 1pN

k

s2 minus 1p2

s1 minus 1

p1

(14)

and analogously for the rest of Yg with g lt s1 The diagrams Yg with g = s1 s1 +1 are given by Ynk with n = 0 k = 0 1 of the form

sN minus 1

sN minus 1pN

s2minuss3minus1

s2 minus 1p2

s1minuss2minus1

s1 minus 1

p1

k + 1

(15)

Gauge fields ωYgqg for g sim n = N k are (p1 + + pN)-forms gauge fields ω

Ygqg for

g sim n = Nminus1 k are (p1+ +pNminus1)-forms gauge fields ωYgqg for g sim n = 0 k

are zero-forms Hence form degree function qg is completely defined The grade g isequal to the element number (starting from zero) in the set of pairs n k orderedby k in increasing order and then by n in decreasing order

Space Wpminus1 which contains the first level gauge parameters of the system is aset of forms with values in the same so(dminus 1 1)-irreps as gauge fields but the form

degree is less by one ie Wpminus1 = ξY0q0minus1 ξ

Y1q1minus1 ξ

Yg

qgminus1 The sector Wgpminus1 for

g ge s1 is trivial du to qg = 0 Analogously spaces Wq for q lt p minus 1 and q gt pcan be defined To sum up the element of space Wpplusmni at grade g sim n k is adegree-(qg plusmn i) form with values in Yg equiv Ynk irrep of the Lorentz algebra

The Minkowski background space is described in terms of vielbein(tetrad) hamicrodxmicro

and Lorentz spin-connection abmicro dxmicro which determines Lorentz-covariant derivative

DL = d+When reduced to Wg

q the full system has the form

DLωYg

qg= σminus

(

ωYg+1qg+1

)

ωYg

qgisin Wg

p ωYg+1qg+1

isin Wg+1p

δωYg

qg= DLξ

Yg

qgminus1 + σminus

(

ξYg+1

qg+1minus1

)

ξYg

qgminus1 isin Wgpminus1 ξ

Yg+1

qg+1minus1 isin Wg+1pminus1

δξYg

qgminus1 = (16)

where operator D is a sum D = DL minus σminus of Lorentz-covariant derivative DL andcertain nilpotent operator σminus

andq otimesYg+1 rarrandq+∆g+1otimesYg ∆g = qg minus qg+1 ge 0

5

(σminus)2 = 0 built of background vielbein hamicrodx

micro which is unambiguously fixed bythe symmetry of Yg and Yg+1 σminus contracts (∆g + 1) vielbeins ha with the tensorrepresenting Yg+1 to obtain the tensor with the symmetry of Yg appropriate Youngsymmetrizers are implied

Since σminus affects tensor indices only it is correctly defined on spin-tensors too anddoes not violate the Γ-tracelessness condition The unfolded equations for fermionshave the same form as for bosons the irreducible tensors are to be replaced withcorresponding spin-tensors

The case of the last block of the length one ie single column is not specialbut requires some comments Since (sN minus 1) = 0 it is not possible to add a cellto the bottom-left of the N -th block of Y0 therefore Yn=Nk=0 equiv Y0 is theonly diagram with n = N and diagram Yn=Nminus1k=0 equiv Yg=1 has the symmetry ofY(s1 minus 1 p1) (sNminus1 minus 1 pNminus1) (1 pN + 1)

Subspace Wnkq with definite n forms an irreducible module of iso(d minus 1 1)

whereas the subspace with definite both n and k forms a finite-dimensional irre-ducible module of so(d minus 1 1) ie an irreducible Lorentz tensor characterized byYg as was stated above The intervals of constancy of qg correspond to gnk withdefinite n ie the set of forms on which a certain irreducible iso(dminus 1 1)-moduleis realized all have the same degree

Let us also note that Wkgep are infinite-dimensional whereas Wkltp are finite-dimensional The higher degree spaces Wkgep correspond to the equations of motion(Wk=p+1) and Bianchi identities (Wkgtp+1) which manifest the gauge symmetriesMost of the equations express higher grade g gt 0 fields via the derivatives of phys-ical field ωY0

q0and only certain elements of Wg=2

k=p+1 impose on ωY0q0

second orderdynamical equations The significance of the fields with g gt 0 is to make all gaugesymmetries be manifest

2 Mixed-Symmetry Fields in Minkowski Space

The types of the Minkowski space particles being by definition in one-to-one corre-spondence with unitary irreducible representations(uirrep) of the Poincare algebraiso(dminus 1 1) in the case of four space-time dimensions were classified by Wigner in[37]

Leaving out the details of the Wignerrsquos construction for recent reviews and forgeneralization to an arbitrary space-time dimension d see [38] important is thatgiven m2 gt 0 and a uirrep Y of the Wignerrsquos little algebra being so(d minus 1) form2 gt 0 and so(d minus 2) for m2 = 0 there exists a standard procedure to constructa uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) which is called a massive(massless) particle of spin-YSo-called continuous or infinite spin particles [37] [39] are not considered in thispaper Therefore physical degrees of freedom for massive and massless particles areclassified by irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) and so(dminus 2) respectively

More elaborated are the two cases of totally-symmetric spin-s particles Y =Ys equiv Y(s 1) [40 1 10] viz scalar vector graviton and of totally anti-symmetric spin-p particles Y = Y(1 p) [12 13 14] The others are referred to col-

6

lectively as mixed-symmetry the simplest one beingY = Y2 1 equiv Y(2 1) (1 1)Yet different problem is to realize a uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) on the solutions of a

wave equation for a field φYM(x) which takes values in a certain representation YM

of the Lorentz algebra so(dminus1 1) ie φYM(x) is a Lorentz tensor or a set of tensors

As field theories free particles can be described in either non-gauge or gauge wayin the former case a uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) is realized on the solutions of the waveequation directly whereas for the latter case a uirrep of iso(dminus1 1) is realized on thequotient of the solutions by certain specific solutions called pure gauge The waveequation (+m2)φYM

(x) = 0 which fixes the quadratic Casimir m2 of iso(dminus1 1)is generally supplemented with a set of algebraicdifferential constraints to singleout an irreducible in the sense of the little algebra component Field φYM

(x) takesvalues in a certain finite-dimensional representation of so(d minus 1 1) which is notirreducible in most cases nevertheless it can be made irreducible when dealing withfree equations of motion only Yet more different problem is to realize an irrep ofiso(d minus 1 1) on the solutions of the variational problem for some action in mostcases the procedure requires a set of auxiliary fields which carry no physical degreesof freedom

The choice of so(dminus 1 1)-representation YM (even if irreducible) in which fieldφYM

(x) takes values is not unique eg a free massless spin-one particle can bedescribed either by a gauge potential Amicro(x) subjected to

Amicro minus partmicropartνAν = 0 δAmicro = partmicroξ (21)

or by a field strength Fmicroν subjected to

partmicroFmicroν = 0 part[microFλρ] = 0 (22)

In the case of a massless spin-two particle (Y = so(dminus2)) in addition to the con-ventional description in terms of the metric gmicroν

Rmicroν minus1

2gmicroνR = 0 (23)

the Weyl tensor Cmicroνλρ known to have the symmetry of 4 can describe a freespin-two in a non gauge way

part[microCmicromicro]νν = 0 partλCmicroλνν = 0 (24)

Another example is a 4d massless scalar particle which can be described eitherby a scalar field φ(x) subjected to φ = 0 or more exotically by an antisymmetricgauge field ωmicroν (so-called notoph [41]) subjected to

ωmicroν minus partmicropartρωρν + partνpart

ρωρmicro = 0 δωmicroν = partmicroξν minus partνξmicro (25)

This equation describes a massless particle with spin- so(dminus2) equiv Y1 1so(dminus2) which

for d = 4 by virtue of the so(d minus 2) Levi-Civita tensor εij is equivalent to a scalar

4In antisymmetric basis Cmicroνλρ satisfies Cmicroνλρ = minusCνmicroλρ Cmicroνλρ = minusCmicroνρλ and C[microνλ]ρ = 0

7

Y1 1so(dminus2) sim Y0 0

so(dminus2) On the other hand a scalar particle can be describedby a rank-d antisymmetric field ωmicro1microd

satisfying ωmicro1microd= 0 where the use of

so(d minus 1 1)-duality is made of ωmicro1microd= εmicro1microd

φ These two types of duality arereferred to as trivial

The general statement is that free particles can be described by an infinite num-ber of ways called dual descriptions [42 43 44 45 46] but dual theories exhibitcertain difficulties while introducing interactions [47 48 49 50] eg despite the factthat free massless spin-one and spin-two particles can be described by the Maxwellfield strength and by the Weyl tensor respectively introducing interactions requiresthe corresponding gauge potentials Amicro and gmicroν to be brought in

There exists a distinguished choice of so(dminus1 1)-irrep YM in which field φYM(x)

takes values that can be referred to as fundamental or minimal For the minimaldescription of a spin-Y particle the spin degrees of freedom and the so(dminus1 1)-irrepYM are characterized by the same Young diagram ie YM = Y eg a spin-oneparticle by Amicro a spin-two by gmicroν All other descriptions are referred to as dual Itis the minimal descriptions that will be discussed further by this reason the termspin-Y particle can be substituted for more accepted spin-Y field

A massive totally symmetric spin-s field can be described [51] by a totally sym-metric tensor field φ(micro1micros) subjected to

(+m2)φmicro1micros= 0

partνφνmicro2micros= 0

φννmicro3micros

= 0

(26)

where the last equation (tracelessness condition) makes the tensor irreducible in theso(d minus 1 1) sense the first one puts the system on-mass-shell and the second oneprojects out the components orthogonal to the momentum restricting φmicro1micros

tocontain only a spin-s irrep of so(dminus 1)

Analogously a massive totally anti-symmetric spin-p field ie Y = Y(1 p)can be described by a totally anti-symmetric tensor field ω[micro1microp] subjected to

(+m2)ωmicro1microp= 0

partνωνmicro2microp= 0

(27)

where the tracelessness condition becomes trivial for anti-symmetric tensorsThese two results are easily generalized to an arbitrary spin-Ys1 snmassive

field which can be minimally described by a symmetric in each group of indicestensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) subjected to

(+m2)φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0

partmicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n]

φmicro1(s1)(microk(sk)microk)microi(siminus1)micron(sn) = 0 k isin [1 nminus 1] k lt i

ηmicroimicrojφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i j isin [1 n]

(28)

where the last two conditions are just the Young symmetry and the tracelessnessconditions which make the field carry an irrep-Ys1 sn of so(dminus 1 1) and can

8

be thought of as the part of the definition of field φYM(x) The first equation puts

the system on-mass-shell the second one projects out all so(dminus1)-irreps which thetensor φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)microp(sp) decomposes into except for the one with the symmetry ofYs1 sn so(dminus 1)-diagram

Let D (m2Ys1 sn) be an iso(d minus 1 1) module extracted by (28) beingirreducible for m2 6= 0 or for Y0 (scalar field) Since minimally described masslessfields are gauge theories a uirrep H (0Ys1 sn) of iso(d minus 1 1) correspondingto a massless spin-Ys1 sn field should be defined as appropriate quotient bythe pure gauge solutions of the form

0 minusrarr gauge solutions minusrarr all solutions minusrarr H (0Ys1 sn) minusrarr 0 (29)

where the sequence is non-split as there is no so(dminus 1 1)-covariant way to extractso(d minus 2)-irrep Ys1 sn from the Lorentz tensor with the same symmetry ofYs1 sn by virtue of a single so(dminus 1 1)-vector the momentum pmicro sim partmicro

A massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described as the quotient of(26) with m2 = 0 by pure gauge solutions of the form δφmicro1micros

= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) where

ξmicro1microsminus1 is a totally symmetric gauge parameter subjected to the equations of thesame form (26) ie on-mass-shell tracelessness and transversality thus belongingto D (0Ysminus 1) The definition of H (0Ys) is given by

0 minusrarr D (0Y(sminus 1 1)) minusrarr D (0Y(s 1)) minusrarr H (0Y(s 1)) minusrarr 0 (210)

There is a bit difference for a totally anti-symmetric spin-p massless field Puregauge solutions are defined analogously as δωmicro1microp

= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] where ξ[micro1micropminus1] is

a rank-(pminus1) antisymmetric gauge parameter subjected to the equation of the sameform (27) and thus belonging to D (0Y(1 pminus 1)) In contrast to a totally sym-metric spin-smassless field the gauge transformations are reducible in the sense thatδωmicro1microp

equiv 0 provided that one transforms gauge parameter δξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1]

with a second level rank-(p minus 2) antisymmetric gauge parameter ξ[micro1micropminus2] and soon Some components (parallel to the momentum) of the first level gauge parameterξmicro1micropminus1 do not contribute to the gauge law for ωmicro1microp

these are represented by thesecond level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 modulo those components of ξmicro1micropminus2 thatdo not contribute to ξmicro1micropminus1 and so on till δξmicro = partmicroξ Gauge parameters ξmicro1micropminus1ξmicro1micropminusk

k isin [1 p] and ξ are referred to as the first level the k-th level and thedeepest level of reducibility respectively The corresponding iso(d minus 1 1)-uirrep isgiven by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0Y(0 0)) minusrarr D (0Y(1 1)) minusrarr

minusrarr D (0Y(1 p)) minusrarr H (0Y(1 p)) minusrarr 0 (211)

For example Maxwell gauge potential Amicro possesses gauge parameters of the firstlevel only as p = 1 in this case

Though a considerable success in describing on-mass-shell massless fields wasachieved for instance within the light-cone approach [52] there are many reasons tohave an off-shell gauge symmetry ie to construct equations that are invariant with

9

respect to gauge transformations with gauge parameters not subjected to ξ = 0To make the symmetry off-shell generally requires to relax the irreducibility of theso(dminus 1 1)-representation in which field φY(x) takes values

For instance a massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described[53] by atraceless rank-s symmetric field φmicro1micros

with an off-shell gauge symmetry

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

(d+2sminus4)η(micro1micro2part

νpartρφνρmicro3micros) = 0 φννmicro3micros

= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1

= 0 partνξνmicro2microsminus1) = 0 (212)

where in order for φmicro1microsto be traceless the gauge parameter has to be not only

traceless but transverse also this still being true for general mixed-symmetry fieldsApparently to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters the trace-lessness constraint for field φmicro1micros

has to be relaxed The same spin-s massless fieldcan be described[1] by field φmicro1micros

subjected to5

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

2part(micro1partmicro2φ

ννmicro3micros) = 0 φνρ

νρmicro5micros= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1

ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1= 0

(213)

where in order to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters a trace-lessness is relaxed to a double-tracelessness ie field φmicro1micros

takes values in thedirect sum of two so(d minus 1 1)-irreps being symmetric traceless tensors of ranks sand (s minus 2) The general statement is that for equations of motion to have an off-shell gauge symmetry the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep in which field φY(x) takes values has tobe reducible with additional direct summands representing certain nonzero tracesThese additional fields are called auxiliary and carry no physical degrees of freedomImposing certain gauge equations (28) can be restored

A massless totally antisymmetric spin-p field can be described by an antisym-metric rank-p tensor field ω[micro1microp] subjected to

ωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1part

νωνmicro2microp] = 0 δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] (214)

where the symmetry at the all levels of reducibility is manifest and off-shell ieδξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1] for the second level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 not subjectedto any differential constraints and analogously for the gauge symmetries at deeperlevels

Much similar to totally anti-symmetric fields mixed-symmetry massless fieldspossess reducible gauge transformations ie for a field φ with equations of motioninvariant under gauge transformations δξ1φ =

sum

i1partξi11 there exist the second level

gauge transformations δξ2ξi11 =

sum

i2partξi22 such that δξ2φ equiv 0 there exist the third

level gauge transformations δξ3ξi22 =

sum

i3partξi33 such that δξ3ξ1 equiv 0 and so on The

difference from totally anti-symmetric fields is in that there are generally more thanone gauge parameters at each level of reducibility (enumerated by index ik at thek-th level)

5Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [1] have the form Gmicro1microsminus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 where Gmicro1microsis equal to (213) the two forms being equiva-

lent

10

For instance the simplest mixed-symmetry massless field has the spin- andcan be minimally described[16 17] by a field φ[micromicro]ν which is anti-symmetric in thefirst two indices and satisfies Young symmetry condition6 φ[micromicroν] = 0 The equationsof motion

φmicromicroλ + 2part[micropartλφmicro]λν minus partνpart

λφmicromicroλ minus 2partνpart[microφλ

micro]λ = 0 (215)

are invariant underδφmicromicroν = part[microξ

Smicro]ν + part[microξ

Amicro]ν minus partνξ

Amicromicro (216)

with symmetric and anti-symmetric gauge parameters ξS(microν) and ξA[microν] Let us stress

that to maintain an off-shell gauge symmetry field φ[micromicro]ν has to take values in a

reducible so(d minus 1 1) representation oplus so does symmetric gauge parameterξS(micromicro) oplus bull which is in accordance with φ ν

microν 6= 0 and ξSνν 6= 0 Analogously tototally anti-symmetric fields there exist second level gauge transformations with avector parameter ξmicro

δφmicromicroν = 0

δξAmicroν = 23(partmicroξν minus partνξmicro)

δξSmicroν = partmicroξν + partνξmicro

(217)

In this case H

(

0)

is given by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

oplusD (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0 (218)

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) field the depthof reducibility of gauge transformations is equal to p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi where p is the height

of the first column of the Young diagram and at the r-th level of reducibility gaugeparameters have the symmetry of

sN minus 1

pNkN

s2 minus 1

p2k2

s1 minus 1

p1

k1

i=Nsum

i=1

ki =

i=Nsum

i=1

pi minus r (219)

This pattern of reducibility of gauge transformations will be of great importancewhile constructing the unfolded formulation in Section 4 As is easily seen at the

6In more detail the field φmicroνλ satisfies φmicroνλ = minusφνmicroλ φmicroνλ+φνλmicro+φλmicroν = 0 Equivalentlya symmetric basis can be used ie φSmicroνλ = φSνmicroλ φ

Smicroνλ + φSνλmicro + φSλmicroν = 0 The two bases are

related by φS(microν)λ = 1radic3(φAmicroλν + φAνλmicro) φ

A[microν]λ = 1radic

3(φSmicroλν minus φ

Sνλmicro)

11

first level of reducibility the gauge parameters are various tensors whose LorentzYoung diagrams are obtained by cutting off one cell from the original so(d minus 2)-diagram in all possible ways ie the number of gauge parameters at the first levelis equal to the number of blocks N eg two for spin- There is only one gaugeparameter at the deepest level of reducibility whose Young diagram is obtained bycutting off the first column from Y eg for spin-

This pattern corresponds of course to on-shell equations ie the gauge param-eters taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of Young symmetry (219) are subjectedto (28)-like equations To obtain an off-shell gauge symmetry the field content hasto be extended to take values in certain reducible so(d minus 1 1)-representations ad-ditional components turn out can be identified with certain traces of a single fieldwith the symmetry of Y as an sl(d)-tensor In general gauge parameters are alsoreducible tensors with the symmetry of (219) In the case of a spin- massless fieldthe trace φ ν

microν in the sector of fields and the trace ξSνν in the sector of gauge param-eters are the additional components In the general case of a spin-Y = Ys1 snmassless field field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) should satisfy [20]

ηmicroimicroiηmicroimicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n] (220)

which is a generalization of the Fronsdalrsquos double-trace condition (213) As it will beshown this condition naturally arises in the unfolded approach Note that double-tracelessness is imposed on each group of symmetric indices and it is not requiredfor cross-traces to vanish

Let a generalized Weyl tensor for a minimally described spin-Y massless field bea gauge-invariant combination of the least order in derivatives of field φY(x) that isallowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell On the other hand it is the generalized Weyltensor that the minimal non-gauge description of a massless spin-Y field is basedon For a spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN)so(dminus2) massless field the generalizedWeyl tensor has the symmetry of Y(s1 p1 + 1) (s2 p2) (sN pN)so(dminus11) and isof the s1-th order in derivatives In the case of spin-one (Y = so(dminus2)) Maxwell field

strength Fmicroν with the symmetry of can be also called a generalized Weyl tensorFermionic mixed-symmetry fields share most features of bosonic ones viz the

reducibility of gauge transformations the enlargement of the field content for theequations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge invariance The difference is thatthe equations for fermions have the first order in derivatives and the irreducibility ofspin-tensors is achieved by the Γ-tracelessness condition7 instead of the tracelessnessone

For example a massless totally symmetric spin-(s + 12) field can be described

7Γmicro are the Clifford algebra generators and satisfy ΓmicroΓν + ΓνΓmicro = 2ηmicroν part equiv Γmicropartmicro Γ-trace isa contraction of a spinor index and one tensor index with Γmicro eg Γνφ

microν equiv Γαν βφ

βmicroν

12

off-shell[54] by a totally symmetric spin-tensor field φα(micro1micros) subjected to8

partφmicro1microsminus spart(micro1

Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros)

ΓνΓρΓλφνρλmicro4micros= 0 Γνξνmicro2microsminus1 = 0

(221)

where in order to get an off-shell gauge invariance the irreducibility of φα(micro1micros) hasto be relaxed to the triple Γ-tracelessness

A massless totally anti-symmetric spin-Y(1 p) 12field can be described off-shell

by a totally anti-symmetric spin-tensor field ωα[micro1microp] subjected to

partωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1Γ

νωνmicro2microp] = 0

δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp]

(222)

Similar to the bosonic case (222) possesses reducible gauge transformations Thedifference is that one can impose the triple Γ-tracelessness on ωα[micro1microp] but thisrestricts the first level gauge parameter to be Γ-traceless Γνξνmicro2micropminus1 = 0 andhence the second order gauge parameter has to be on-mass-shell ie partξmicro1micropminus2 = 0Therefore for equations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge symmetry of allorders no Γ-trace conditions have to be imposed on fieldgauge parameters

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) 12field the

pattern of gauge symmetries is given by the spin-tensors with the tensor part de-scribed by (219) the definition of the Weyl tensor remains unchanged also

The descriptions based on tensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) which is analogous tothe metric gmicroν are referred to as metric-like At least in writing equiv partmicropartνη

microν theexplicit use of metric ηmicroν is made of which complicates the issue of introducinginteractions with gravitation

Let us note that in principle one can verify the gauge invariance of the fieldequations for massless mixed-symmetry fields despite the fact that the very form ofgauge transformation is cumbersome due to Young symmetrizers The advantageof the unfolded approach is in that gauge invariance at all levels of reducibility ismanifest

3 Unfolding Dynamics and σminus Cohomology

In this section we first recall the definition of unfolding and the relation of the sim-plest unfolded systems to Lie algebrasmodules and Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomologywith coefficients Second peculiar properties of unfolded systems that describe freefields and specifically the so-called σminus cohomology concept are recalled Third thevery procedure of constructing the unfolded form is illustrated on the examples ofmassless spin-zero spin-one arbitrary totally symmetric spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2)

fields the relation with the general statement of Section 1 is pointed out in each ofthe examples

8Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [54] have the form Gmicro1microsminus s

2Γ(micro1ΓνGνmicro2micros) minus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 Gmicro1micros= partφmicro1micros

minus spart(micro1Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0 which is equivalent to

(222)

13

31 General Features

Some dynamical system is said to be unfolded [31 32 33] if it has the form

dWA = FA(W ) (31)

whereWA is a set9 of differential forms of degree-qA on some d-dimensional manifoldMd d - exterior differential on Md and FA(W ) is an arbitrary degree-(qA + 1)function of WA assumed to be expandable in terms of exterior (wedge) productsonly10

FA(W ) =infinsum

n=1

sum

qB1++qBn=qA+1

fAB1Bn

W B1 and andW Bn (32)

where fAB1Bn

are constant coefficients satisfying fAB1BiBj Bn

= (minus)qBiqBj fA

B1BjBiBn

Moreover FA(W ) must satisfy the integrability condition (called generalized Jacobiidentity) obtained by applying d to (31)

F B δFA

δW Bequiv 0 (33)

Any solution of (33) defines a free differential algebra (FDA) [55 56 57 58] If Ja-cobi identities (33) are satisfied irrespective ofMd dimension11 the free differentialalgebra is referred to as universal [10 59] It is the universal algebras only that willbe considered further

Equations (31) are invariant under gauge transformations

δWAqA

= dǫAqAminus1 + ǫBqBminus1

δFA

δW B for qA gt 0 (34)

δWA0 = ǫB

prime

0

δFA

δW Bprime

1

Bprime qBprime = 1 for qA = 0 (35)

where ǫAqAminus1 is a degree-(qA minus 1) form taking values in the same space as WAqA

Inits turn δWA

qA= 0 can be treated as unfolded-like system for ǫAqAminus1 ie dǫ

AqAminus1 =

minusǫBqBminus1δFA

δWB there emerge second level gauge transformations

δǫAqAminus1 = dξAqAminus2 minus ξBqBminus2

δFA

δW B (36)

provided that FA(W ) is linear in matter fields and analogously for the gauge trans-formations at deeper levels Therefore the reducibility of gauge transformations ismanifest in the unfolded approach For a degree-qA gauge field WA

qAthere exist qA

levels of gauge transformations

9In this section indices A B C are of arbitrary nature In the cases of practical significance AB C vary over certain irreps of the Lorentz algebra

10The wedge symbol and will be systematically omitted further11As the forms with the rank greater than d are identically zero there exist certain identities

eg Wn andWn equiv 0 for n+m gt d which make the operator δδWA to be ill-behaved

14

The use of the exterior algebra respects diffeomorphisms which is very appropri-ate for introducing interactions with the gravitation The whole information aboutthe dynamics turns out to be contained in FA(W ) and one can even extend anunfolded system to other manifolds[59] simply by changing the exterior differentialthe new unfolded system has literally the same form

Note that introducing enough auxiliary fields it is possible to reformulate anydynamical system in the unfolded form although it may be difficult to unfold someparticular system or to find all unfolded forms

Collected below are some important cases of unfolded systems which have adirect bearing on Lie algebras [55 59]

Lie algebrasFlat connections Let ΩI equiv ΩImicrodx

micro be a subsector of degree-oneforms The only self-closed unfolded equations are of the form

dΩI = minusf IJKΩ

JΩK (37)

Generalized Jacobi identity (33) implies the Jacobi identity f IJKf

JLMΩKΩLΩM equiv

0 for some Lie algebra g with structure constants f IJK Therefore the closed

subsector of one-forms is in one-to-one correspondence with Lie algebras and(37) is the flatness condition for a connection ΩI of g This provides acoordinate-independent framework for describing background geometry Inthe cases of interest g is iso(d minus 1 1) so(d minus 1 2) so(d 1) and sp(2n) [59]Background geometry connection ΩI is assumed to be of order zero whereasall matter fields including dynamical gravitation are of the first order Allequations are assumed to be of the first order in matter fields and hencedescribe free fields only

In this paper g = iso(dminus 1 1) and ΩI = ab ha where ab equiv abmicro dxmicro

is a Lorentz spin-connection and ha equiv hamicrodxmicro is a background vielbein which

defines a non-holonomic basis of a tangent space at each point of the manifoldFlatness equation (37) for iso(dminus 1 1)-connection ΩI reads

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb = 0(38)

The first is the zero torsion equation that expresses the Lorentz spin-connectionvia the first derivative of hamicro The second can be recognized as the zero curva-ture equation For example in Cartesian coordinates the explicit solution isab

micro = 0 and hamicro = δamicro

The advantage of description of background geometry as the flatness conditionfor a connection of the space-time symmetry algebra is in that this way iscoordinate-independent In what follows we assume ab ha to satisfy (38)which is enough if there is no need for the explicit form of the solution in someparticular coordinate system For instance in (anti)-de Sitter space (38) ismodified by the terms proportional to the cosmological constant λ2

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb + λ2hahb = 0(39)

15

and admits no simple solutions with hamicro = δamicro ab = 0 Nevertheless without

giving the explicit solution to imply that ab ha satisfy (39) is sufficient forgeneral analysis eg for constructing Lagrangians [60]

Contractible FDA The simplest equations linear in matter fields of the form

dWAq = fA

BWBq+1 (310)

can be reduced by linear transformations to either

dWAq = WA

q+1 dWAq+1 = 0 (311)

ordWA

q = 0 (312)

where the second equation of (311) is the consequence of Jacobi identities(33) for the first one In the first case by virtue of gauge transformations(34) δWA

q = dξAqminus1 + χAq δW

Bq+1 = dχA

q the field WAq can be gauged away In

both cases by virtue of the Poincarersquos Lemma these equations are dynamicallyempty and correspond to the co-called contractible FDAs [55]

g-modulesCovariant constancy equations Let WAq be a closed subsector of

q-forms of matter gauge fields Linear in matter fields equations may involvethe background g-connection ΩI which is of zeroth order Such equationsreferred to as linearized over g background (described by any solution ΩI of(37)) have the form

dWAq = minusΩIfI

ABW

Bq (313)

Jacobi identity (33) where (37) is also taken into account

ΩJΩK(minusf I

JKfIAB + fJ

ACfK

CB

)W B

q = 0 (314)

implies fIAB to realize a representation of g Therefore the closed subsector

of forms of definite degree is in one-to-one correspondence with g-moduleswhereas

DΩWAq equiv dWA

q + ΩIfIABW

Bq = 0 (315)

is a covariant constancy equation and (DΩ)2 = 0 since the connection is

flat (37) In the cases of interest A runs over certain finite-dimensionalso(d minus 1 1)-irreps ie g-modules decompose with respect to its subalgebraso(dminus 1 1) sub g into a direct sum of certain irreducible tensors This is whywe single out the Lorentz-covariant derivative DL from the whole g-covariantderivative DΩ the remaining part acts vertically (algebraically) In the caseof ΩI being an iso(d minus 1 1) flat connection the Lorentz covariant derivativeDL = d+ satisfy DL

2 = 0 as the exterior differential d does

DLTab = dT ab +a

cTcb +b

cTac + (316)

In Cartesian coordinates DL equiv d and we do not make any distinction betweend and DL whereas in (anti)-de Sitter (DL)

2 6= 0 and the difference between d

16

and DL has to be taken into account Also zero torsion equation (381) canbe rewritten as DLh

a = 0 The remaining part of ΩI which acts algebraicallyand mixes different so(dminus 1 1)-modules into g-modules is associated with thegenerators of translations with gauge field ha

Gluing g-modulesChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology LetWpWq andWr takevalues in g-modules R1 R2 and R3 the representations are realized by oper-ators T1 T2 and T3 respectively Still linear in matter fields but nonlinear inbackground connection ΩI equations are of the form

DΩWp equiv dWp + T1(Ω)Wp = f12(Ω Ω)Wq

DΩWq equiv dWq + T2(Ω)Wq = f23(Ω Ω)Wr

DΩWr equiv

(317)

where the terms forming g-covariant derivative are isolated on the lhs Thetwo g-modules R1 R2 appear to be glued together by the term f12(Ω Ω) isinHom(Λpminusq+1(g) otimes R2R1) Jacobi identity (33) implies f12(Ω Ω) to be aChevalley-Eilenberg cocycle with coefficients in Rlowast

2 otimesR1 where Rlowast2 is a mod-

ule contragradient to R2 and f12(Ω Ω)f23(Ω Ω) = 0 Coboundaries canbe proved to be dynamically empty and can be removed by a field redefini-tion Consequently f12(Ω Ω) should be a nontrivial representative of theChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology group with coefficients in Rlowast

2otimesR1 It followsalso that nothing but zero forms can be joined to zero forms ie the onlypossible linearized unfolded equations on forms of zero degree are (315) withq = 0

For any dynamical system linearized over certain g-background (described byany solution ΩI of (37)) equations of motion (315) along with gauge transforma-tions of all orders of reducibility acquire a very simple form

δξ1 = DΩξ0

δξpminus1 = DΩξpminus2

δWp = DΩξpminus1

DΩWp = 0

(318)

where Wp takes values in certain g-module R DΩ is the associated g-covariantderivative and ξpminusk k isin [1 p] are the gauge parameters of k-th order of reducibilitytaking values in the same g-module R and being forms of degree (p minus k) Thegauge invariance at each order of reducibility and of equations of motion is dueto (DΩ)

2 = 0 In some sense the gauge fields Wp and the gauge parameters ξpminusk

seem to play the same role at the linearized level This uniformity is of essentialimportance when analyzing unfolded systems

In the presence of gluing terms eg when only two modules say R1 and R2 areglued by nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycle fpr(Ω Ω) full chain of equations

17

and gauge transformations (318) is modified to12

δξ11 = DΩξ10

δξ1pminusr = DΩξ1pminusrminus1

δξ1pminusr+1 = DΩξ1pminusr + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

20 δξ21 = DΩξ

20

(319)

δξ1pminus1 = DΩξ1pminus2 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus2 δξ2rminus1 = DΩξ

2rminus2

δW 1p = DΩξpminus1 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus1 δW 2

r = DΩξ2rminus1

DΩW1p = fpr(Ω Ω)W

2r DΩW

2r = 0

where W 1p ξ

1pminusk and W 2

r ξ2rminusm take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively

Important is that the gauge fieldsparameters taking values in R2 contribute to therhs of the equationsgauge transformations for the gauge fieldsparameters takingvalues in R1 but for forms of degree greater than (p minus r) The above two systemsare nothing but the specializations of (31) (34) (36)

Also let us note that there is no strong reason to make any distinction betweenthe terms linear in the background g-connection ΩI which correspond to g-modulesand the terms of higher order in ΩI which correspond to Chevalley-Eilenberg co-cycles Both terms can be combined into a single object the generalized covariant-derivative D = d+T (Ω)+f(Ω Ω) equiv DΩ+f(Ω Ω) with the property D2 = 0Moreover by means of D (319) and (318) can be rewritten in a similar mannerConsequently at the linearized level the most general unfolded equations and gaugetransformations have the form

δξ1 = Dξ0

δξpminus1 = Dξpminus2

δWp = Dξpminus1

DWp = 0

(320)

where D is built of d background connection ΩI and satisfies D2 = 0 The gaugefieldsparameters take values in certain spacesWq viz Wp isin Wp ξpminus1 isin Wpminus1ξ0 isin W0 The elements of Wq are differential forms with values in certain g-modules It is also convenient to define higher degree spaces Wqgtp the equationsRp+1 = DWp = 0 take values in Wp+1 Rp+2 = DRp+1 belongs to Wp+2 andby virtue of D2 = 0 satisfies Rp+2 equiv 0 and so on Therefore there exist certainidentities which belong to Wp+2 for the equations which belong to Wp+1 andthere exist certain identities which belong to Wp+3 for the identities in Wp+2 andso on At the field theoretical level these identities correspond to Bianchi identitiesfor the first level gauge transformations higher identities correspond to the Bianchiidentities for the deeper levels of gauge transformations

12The sign factor (minus)pminusr+1 before fpr(Ω Ω) is ignored and is thought of as the part of thedefinition of fpr(Ω Ω)

18

A remark should be made that the forms belonging to Wq may have differentdegrees if there are Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles present As a result spaces Wq

may contain different number of elements For instance (319) can be reduced to(320) if one defines

Wq =

W 1q q lt pminus r

W 1q W

2qminusp+r q ge (pminus r)

(321)

where W 1q and W 2

qminusp+r take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively In termsof (319) the elements of Wq for q lt (pminus r) were referred to as ξ1q the elements ofWq for q = (pminus r)(pminus 1) to as ξ1q ξ

2qminusp+r the elements ofWq for q = p to as W 1

pW 2

r the elements of Wq for q gt p to as R1q R

2qminusp+r (the equations of motion and

Bianchi identities)

32 Interpretation of Unfolded Systems Describing free Fields

When describing free fields unfolded formulations will be referred to as frame-like [61 60] though the very term frame-like has a more broad definition Thesesystems consist of equations (37) describing background geometry of a finite chainof (317)-like equations describing the gauge fields of the model and of (317)-likeequations with q = 0 glued to gauge forms ie it requires a Lie algebra g (commonlyiso(dminus1 1) so(dminus1 2) or so(d 1)) a set of g-modules R0RN and an appropriateset of nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles f01fNminus1N The physical degreesof freedom are contained in the forms of zero degree and the module RN in whichzero degree forms take values is infinite-dimensional

Since frame-like unfolded systems contain inevitably infinitely many fields mostof them being either auxiliary or Stueckelberg13 there arises a problem of reconstruc-tion a metric-like formulation by a given unfolded formulation or of extracting thedynamical content for a given unfolded system

The questions to be answered are what are the dynamical fields what arethe differential gauge parameters and what are the gauge invariant equations ofmotion These answers are not universal and depend on the chosen scheme ofinterpretation Different interpretations correspond to dual descriptions of the samedynamical system

Frame-like unfolded systems are endowed at the linearized level with additionalstructures providing a natural way for interpretation Indices AB vary overcertain finite dimensional Lorentz irreps ie each of Rn n = 0 N decomposes asRn =

sum

k Pnk where Pnk are certain so(d minus 1 1)-modules characterized by Ynk

Young diagrams of Section 1We say that some frame-like unfolded system is given an interpretation if [62]

1 On the whole space W =oplusinfin

q=0Wq where the matter gauge fields gauge pa-rameters equations of motion and Bianchi identities take values there exists

13A field is called Stueckelberg if it can be gauged away by pure algebraic symmetry

19

a bounded from below grading g = 0 1 ie Wq =oplusinfin

g=0Wgq The ho-

mogeneous element of Wgq is a certain differential form with values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep and is denoted as W gq In simplest cases the grade is just the

rank of the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep the element of Wgq takes values in

2 The closed subsector of one-forms ΩI describes a background geometry vizMinkowski or (anti)-de Sitter The generalized covariant derivative D is to bedivided into three parts the last one not being necessary nontrivial

D = DL minus σminus + σ+ (322)

where DL is a background Lorentz-covariant derivative and has a zero gradeσminus is an operator of grade (minus1) and σ+ contains positive grade operatorsThe only differential part is in DL whereas σplusmn acts vertically and is built ofthe background vielbein ha If two modules are glued the gluing element issupposed to be of grade (minus1) and also denoted as σminus

The equations then have the form

DLWn +

gminusnsum

i=1

σ+(W n+i

)= σminus

(W n+1

) g = 0 1 (323)

and analogously for the gauge transformations In the flat space all operators ofpositive grade appear to be trivial for the massless case As it does not affect theanalysis let us consider a simplified version with σ+ = 0 Then D2 = DL

2+σminusDL+DLσminus + (σminus)

2 = 0 is equivalent to DL2 = 0 (σminus)

2 = 0 and σminusDL +DLσminus = 0 Thefirst is a part of the flatness condition (38) for the iso(d minus 1 1)-connection Thesecond is the nilpotancy condition for σminus The third is satisfied provided that σminus istwisted by the factor (minus)∆g where (∆g + 1) is a degree of σminus which is equal to thenumber of the vielbeins ha that σminus is built of Indeed the vielbeins ha anticommutewith DL and hence the action of σminus is to be twisted by the factor (minus)∆g in orderσminusDL +DLσminus = 0 holds true Without further mention the pure sign factor (minus)∆g

will be though of as a part of the definition of σminusIt is useful to illustrate the action of σminus when for example unfolded equations

on fields with values in two modules R1 and R2 are glued as in (319)

R1︷ ︸︸ ︷

R2︷ ︸︸ ︷ g

q

t t t t

t t t

W 1p

ξ1pminus1

ξ10

W 2r

ξ2rminus1

ξ20

(324)

20

where short arrows stand for the action of σminus within each module and long arrowsfor the action of σminus between two modules (gluing terms) and dots stand for gaugefieldsparameters at different grades bold dots represent the elements of Wp =W 1

pW2r

All information about the dynamics turns out to be concealed in cohomologygroups of σminus [62] H(σminus) =

Ker(σminus)Im(σminus)

Let us analyze unfolded system (320) whichat grade g has the form

δξg1 = DLξg0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 )

δW gp = DLξ

gpminus1 + σminus(ξ

g+1pminus1)

0 = DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p )

(325)

Beginning from the deepest level of gauge transformations and from the lowestgrade it is obvious that those ξg+1

0 that are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueck-elberg(algebraic) gauge parameters for those ξg1 that belong to the image of σminusTherefore those ξg1 that are σminus-exact can be gauged away The leftover gauge sym-metry satisfies δξg1 = DLξ

g0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 ) = 0 so that those ξg+1

0 that belong to thecoimage of σminus are expressed via derivative of ξn0 Having sieved W0 and W1 inthis way only those ξg0 are still independent that are σminus-closed and hence belong toH

0(σminus) since only forms of zero-degree are elements of W0 Then those ξg+11 that

are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueckelberg gauge parameters for those ξg2 thatbelong to the image of σminus Therefore only those ξg1 are still independent that areσminus-closed but not σminus-exact and hence belong to H

1(σminus) Having sievedW0Wpminus1

one after another it turns out that independent differential gauge parameters at thek-th level are given by H

pminusk(σminus) Analogously those fields W gp that are σminus-exact

can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gauge parameters at Wpminus1 Thosefields W g+1

p that are not σminus-closed can be expressed via derivatives of fields at lowergrade by virtue of the equations Rg

p+1 equiv DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p ) = 0 these fields are

called auxiliary Therefore the dynamical fields ie those that are neither aux-iliary nor Stueckelberg are given by H

p(σminus) The nilpotency of D2 equiv 0 impliescertain relations of the form DLR

gp+1 + σminus(R

g+1p+1) = 0 between Rg

p+1 Therefore

auxiliary fields are expressed by virtue of σminus-exact Rgp+1 and σminus-non-closed Rg+1

p+1

are themselves expressed via derivatives of Rgp+1 Consequently the independent

equations on dynamical fields are given by Hp+1(σminus) From the cohomological point

of view higher degree forms correspond to certain nontrivial relations between equa-tions called Bianchi identities and manifest gauge nature of equations As there aregenerally more than one levels of gauge transformations one can expect the highercohomological group to be nontrivial

To sum up

21

cohomology group interpretation

Hpminusk k = 1p differential gauge parameters at the k-th level of re-

ducibilityH

p dynamical fieldsH

p+1 independent gauge invariant equations on dynamicalfields

Hp+k+1 k = 1p Bianchi identities for the k-th order gauge symmetryH

p+k k gt p supposed to be trivial in a regular case

To distinguish fields in cohomological sense the following convention is introduced[63]

Stueckelberg fields(gauge parameters) are those that can be eliminated bypure algebraic symmetry ie these fields are σminus-exact (are those that canbe used to gauge away certain fields ie these parameters are not σminus-closed)

Auxiliary fields are those that can be expressed via derivatives of some otherfields ie these fields are σminus-nonclosed Let us note that this definition isgenerally ambiguous eg in system

partA = B

partB = A(326)

which field is auxiliary is a matter of choice This ambiguity is removed byvirtue of grade[62 63]

Dynamical fields are those that are neither auxiliary nor Stueckelberg ie thesefields are representatives of σminus-cohomology classes

Note that if certain dynamical field given by Hp belongs to the grade-gf subspace

Wgfp and the corresponding equations given by H

p+1 belong to the grade-ge subspaceWge

p+1 the order of equations is equal to ge minus gf + 1If the unfolded system is supposed to admit a lagrangian formulation there has

to be a one-to-one correspondence between the number of dynamical fields and thatof equations k-th level gauge symmetries and k-th level Bianchi identities ie in acertain sense there should be a duality H

pminusk sim Hp+1+k k isin [0 p] This takes place

for all unfolded systems exemplified in this paperSince the operators involved ie DL and σminus are of grade 0 and minus1 only the

fields with the grade greater than g0 for any g0 ge 0 form a quotient module thusdescribing the same system on its own - dual formulations This picture partlybreaks in (A)dSd because of appearance of grade +1 nilpotent operator σ+

D = DL + σminus + λ2σ+ (327)

The specific character of frame-like unfolded systems which will be crucial forus is that by virtue of the inverse background vielbein hmicroa all form indices of any

gauge fieldparameter Wa1(s1)ap(sm)q can be converted to the fiber ones

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (328)

22

The resulting tensor W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is not irreducible and can be decomposedinto so(dminus 1 1)-irreps according to the so(dminus 1 1)-tensor product rule

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] =rArr Ys1 smotimes

so(dminus11)

Y(1 q) =oplus

α

Yα (329)

where one-column Young diagramY(1 q) of height-q represents the anti-symmetricindices d1 dq and Yα are the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the tensor product decomposesinto Having converted all fields (parameters equations) of a given unfolded systemto the fiber tensors one can make the identification of the fields in the unfolded ap-proach and those of the metric-like approach though the general covariance gaugeinvariance and other advantages of the unfolded formalism will be not manifestWhile constructing the unfolded formulations of a known metric-like systems or in-terpreting a given unfolded system in terms of metric-like fields this technique willbe widely used Moreover the calculation of σminus cohomology groups is largely basedon the explicit evaluation of (329)-like expressions Once an unfolded form is knownno use of this technique is needed either to generalize it to other backgrounds or tointroduce interactions

Field W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is traceless in a1 am and d1 dq separatelyHowever the cross traces need not vanish and hence some of Yα represent tracesTo distinguish between the traces of different orders let us introduce the followingthe Y-valued degree-q form WY

q is said to be a trace of the r-th order iff it has theform

WYq = hh

︸︷︷︸

r

hh︸︷︷︸

qminusr

CYprime

0 (330)

for some Yprime-valued degree-0 form CYprime

0 where (q minus r) indices of the backgroundvielbeins ha are contracted with the tensor representing Yprime and r indices are freefor the whole expression to take values in Y the appropriate Young symmetrizeris implied When the indices of WY

q are converted to the fiber ones the expression

takes the form ηη︸ ︷︷ ︸

r

CYprime ie CYprime

represents a trace of the r-th order

Different aspects of unfolding are illustrated on the examples of a massless scalarfield a massless spin-one field and a massless spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2) fields

33 Examples of Unfolding

Example 331 Unfolding a scalar field [31 62] First it should be noted thatit is easy of course to convert the Klein-Gordon equation C = 0 to a system offirst order equations

partmicroC = Cmicro

partmicroCmicro = 0(331)

but when writing the second equation the explicit form of the metric is to be usedhence these equations are not of unfolded form (31)

23

Described in terms of a scalar field C(x) the theory is brought into a non gaugeform therefore zero-forms only are allowed or else there would be some gaugesymmetry according to (34) The most general rhs of dC = has the form

dC = haCa (332)

for some vector-valued zero-form Ca This equation just parameterizes the firstderivative of C(x) and is similar to the first of (331) There are three terms allowedon the rhs of dCa =

dCa = hbCab + hbC

ab + haC prime (333)

with Cab Cab and C prime taking values in antisymmetric symmetric and scalar so(dminus1 1)-irreps ie bull The first term is forbidden by Bianchi identity hadC

a equiv 0To analyze the remaining terms let us decompose dCa into so(dminus 1 1)-irreps

partmicroCahmicrob = otimes = oplus oplus bull (334)

where = part[aCb] = part(aCa) minus 1dηaapartbC

b bull = partaCa = C

The component represents Bianchi identity in the first order reformulation ofthe Klein-Gordon equation Indeed expressing Ca as partaC implies part[aCb] equiv 0 bullrepresents the desired Klein-Gordon equation whereas is the only component al-lowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell Therefore to impose the Klein-Gordon equationthe term haC prime has to be omitted

dCa = hbCab (335)

The only possible rhs for dCaa = compatible with Jacobi identity hbdCab equiv 0

is of the form dCaa = hbCaab for Caaa taking values in a rank-three symmetric

so(d minus 1 1)-irrep ie The process of unfolding continues unambiguously inthis way and results in the full system

dCa(k) = hbCa(k)b equiv F a(k)(C) k = 0 1 (336)

where Ca(k) is rank-k totally symmetric traceless field ie taking values in k

so(dminus 1 1)-irrepTo make a connection with the general statement of Section 1 for Y = Y(0 0)

the general scheme results in

Yg bull

n k 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 0 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore spaces Wq and operator σminus which enters D = DL minus σminus should be definedas

Wq = WqWaq W

aaq (337)

24

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbWa(gminus1)bq g gt 0

(338)

Consequently W is a space of various differential forms with values in totally sym-metric traceless so(d minus 1 1)-tensors graded by the form degree and by the rankof so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Space Wq forms an irreducible iso(d minus 1 1)-module System(336) reads

Dω0 = 0 ω0 isin W0 (339)

The cohomology groups of σminus are easy to find

H0(σminus) = C(x) as the lowest grade field is automatically closed σminus(C) = 0 and it

cannot be exact as a form of zero degree Contrariwise zero-forms with gradegreater than zero are not closed σminus(C

k+1) = hbCa(k)b = 0lArrrArr Ck+1 = 0

H1(σminus) = haB(x)0 for some B(x)0 isin W

00 One-form Ba

1 = haB(x)0 is closedσminus(B

a1) = haB

a1 = hah

aB(x)0 equiv 0 and it cannot be represented as σminus(C2) =

hbCab as far as Cab is traceless The cohomology groups at higher grade are

trivial since σminus(haBa(k)(x)0) 6= 0 for k gt 0

Hqgt1(σminus) = empty as one can make sure

The interpretation in terms of Section 32 is as follows as is expected the dynamicalfield given by H

0 is C(x) The equations are given by the projection of dCa = hbCab

to H1 ie C = 0 The fields with k gt 0 are auxiliary being expressed via

derivatives of C(x) Ca(k) = partapartaC(x) Inasmuch as there is no gauge symmetryin the system the higher cohomology groups are trivial

An infinitely many dual formulations of a massless scalar field are also includedIndeed the fields with k ge k0 gt 0 form a quotient module Rk0 ie one canconsistently write

dCk = σminus(Ck+1) k ge k0 (340)

The first equationdCa(k0) = hbC

a(k0)b (341)

imposes on the dynamical field Ca(k0)

partbCba(k0minus1) = 0

part[bCc]a(k0minus1) = 0(342)

which imply at least locally Ca(k0) =

k0︷ ︸︸ ︷

partaparta C and C = 0 for some fieldC(x) All fields at higher grade are auxiliary This statement is confirmed bythe cohomology analysis H

0(Rk0 σminus) = Ck0 ie scalar is described in termsof a traceless rank-k0 symmetric tensor field subjected to the equations given byH

1(Rk0 σminus) = haBa(k0minus1)0 minus k0(k0minus1)

2(d+2k0minus4)ηaahcB

a(k0minus2)c0 +hcB

a(k0)c0 for B

a(k0minus1)0 B

a(k0)c0

taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps characterized by diagrams k0 minus 1 k0

These two elements represents just the components ofWk0

1 sim k0 otimes with the

25

symmetry of k0 minus 1 (trace) andk0

the third component with the symmetryof k0 + 1 is exact

The above results can be easily extended to (A)dSd background and to a massivescalar field [62]

DLCk = σminus(C

k+1) + σ+(Ckminus1) = 0 (343)

where there appears a nontrivial positive grade operator

σ+(Ckminus1) = (m2 minus λ2k(k + dminus 1))

(

haCa(kminus1) minus(sminus 1)

d+ 2k minus 4ηaahbC

a(kminus1)b

)

(344)

and DL is a Lorentz-covariant derivative in (A)dSd In the (A)dSd case the situationis more interesting due to the appearance of σ+ operator and the possibility of theaccidental degeneracy of σ+ when m2 = λ2kprime(kprime + dminus 1) for some kprime [62]

Example 332 Unfolding Maxwell equations [64 65] An example of masslessspin-one field is more interesting as a gauge system The main object is a one-formAmicro From gauge transformation law

δA1 = dξ0 (345)

it follows that there should not be other forms of rank greater than zero If this werethe case the gauge parameters of these new forms would be involved by virtue of(34) making the gauge law for A1 inappropriate Indeed there are two possibilitiesto introduce higher degree forms on the rhs of dA = (i) dA1 = R2 fora scalar valued degree-two form R2 which possesses its own gauge parameter χ1δR2 = dχ1 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law for A1 is modifiedto δA1 = dξ0 + χ1 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gaugeparameter χ1 This case corresponds to contractible free differential algebras (310)(ii) dA1 = hbω

b1 for a vector valued degree-one form ωa

1 which possesses its owngauge parameter ǫa0 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law forA1 is modified to δA1 = dξ0 + hbǫ

b0 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of

Stueckelberg gauge parameter ǫa0 Consequently in both cases A1 can be made non-dynamical which is not what was expected Therefore the only possibility is tointroduce a zero-form C

[ab]0 anti-symmetric in a b parameterizing by virtue of

dA1 = hahbC[ab]0 (346)

the Maxwell field strength Bianchi identity hahbdC[ab]0 equiv 0 tolerates two terms on

the rhs of dC[ab]0 =

dC[ab]0 = hcC

[ab]c0 + h[aC

b]0 (347)

with C[ab]c0 and Ca

0 taking values in and so(dminus 1 1)-irreps the former taken inantisymmetric basis In order to determine which of the terms should be omittedif any the decomposition of the first derivative of the Maxwell field strength intoLorentz irreps has to be analyzed

C [ab]|c equiv partmicroC[ab]hmicroc = otimes = oplus oplus (348)

26

where = part[aCbc] = partbCab and = partcC [ab] minus part[cCab] + 2

dminus1ηc[apartdC

b]d part[aCbc]

is identically zero provided that C [ab] is expressed via the first derivative of Amicroor represents the second pair of Maxwell equations in terms of field strength C [ab]In both cases this component should be zero and moreover this can not be keptnonzero as there is no hcC

[abc]-like term allowed on the rhs of (347) The secondpartbC

ab is the desired Maxwell equations in terms of Amicro or the first pair of Maxwellequations in terms of the field strength Consequently to impose Maxwell equationsterm h[aCb] has to be omitted whereas the third is the only component allowed tobe nonzero on-mass-shell

Again unfolding continues unambiguously and requires an infinite set of fields

C[ab]c(k)0 taking values14 in

kto be introduced

dC [ab]c(k) = hdC[ab]c(k)d k = 0 1 (349)

The full system has the form

dA1 = hahbCab0 equiv F (AC) δA1 = dξ0

dC[ab]c(k)0 = hdC

[ab]c(k)d0 equiv F [ab]c(k)(C) k = 0 1

(350)

and represents two modules being glued together by the term on the rhs of thefirst equation

For Y = Y(1 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 resultsin

Yg bull

n k 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 1 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore

Wq =

W0 q = 0

WqW[ab]qminus1W

[ab]cqminus1 q gt 0

(351)

let us point out the shortening of W0 The action of σminus on Wq isin Wq is defined as

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hahbW[ab]qminus1 g = 1

hdW[ab]c(gminus2)dqminus1 g gt 1

(352)

With D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (350) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (353)

14The fields C [ab]c(k) are taken in antisymmetric basis ie they are antisymmetric in a bsymmetric in c(k) and C [abd]c(kminus1)equiv0

27

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 0 form a finite-dimensional iso(dminus1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g gt0 form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

Again the cohomology groups are easy to find gauge parameters are given byH

0(σminus) = ξ0 dynamical fields by H1(σminus) = A1 Maxwell equations by H

2(σminus) =

h[aBb]0 and the Bianchi identities for the first order gauge transformations by

H3(σminus) = hahbB0 the rest of groups are empty H

kgt3(σminus) = empty Important is thedirect correspondence between the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2

the gauge parameters in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3There are infinitely many of non-gauge dual formulations based on C [ab]c(k0) eg

for k0 = 0 one recovers the Maxwell equations in terms of the field strength

part[aCbc] = 0

partbCab = 0

(354)

Let us note that the ambiguity at the first step of unfolding (the terms haC prime andh[aCb] in the above two examples) expresses the possibility of introducing a massterm

Example 333 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-s field [31 6466] We start from the metric-like description of a massless spin-s field in termsof a double-traceless symmetric rank-s field φmicro1micros

satisfying (213) the secondorder equations are invariant with respect to the first order gauge transformationwith traceless rank-(s minus 1) gauge parameter ξmicro1microsminus1 Inasmuch as the Young di-agram s of so(d minus 2) is of the height one there are gauge transforma-tions of the first level only Therefore the dynamical field in the unfolded ap-proach has to be a one-form There is only one way to identify φmicro1micros

and ξmicro1microsminus1

with certain ωY01 and ξY0

0 taking values in the same so(d minus 1 1)-irrep Y0 namely

Y0 = sminus 1 ie ωa(sminus1)1 and ξ

a(sminus1)0 takes values in a rank-(s minus 1) symmet-

ric traceless tensors Field φmicro1microsis identified with a totally symmetric part of

ωa(sminus1)1 ie φmicro1micros

= hb1(micro1hbsminus1

microsminus1ωa1asminus1

micros)ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 the double-tracelessness

condition is the consequence of the tracelessness of ωa(sminus1)1 in a1asminus1 ξmicro1microsminus1

is identified with ξa(sminus1)0 directly ξmicro1microsminus1 = hb1micro1

hbsminus1microsminus1

ξa1asminus1ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 andone can make sure that the Fronsdalrsquos gauge transformation law is recovered fromδω

a(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 Field ω

a(sminus1)1 has a redundant component with the symmetry

ofsminus 1

which can be made Stueckelberg by virtue of gauge parameter ξa(sminus1)b

with the same symmetry type ie

δωa(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)c0 (355)

It automatically follows that there is a degree-one gauge field ωa(sminus1)b1 coupled with

ωa(sminus1)1 as

dωa(sminus1)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)c1 (356)

28

The only solution to Bianchi identity hcdωa(sminus1)c1 equiv 0 is15

dωa(sminus1)b1 = hcω

a(sminus1)bc1 (357)

where a new field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

is introduced and so on

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1 (358)

until the field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

for which the Bianchi identity solvesas

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 (359)

where field Ca(s)b(s)0 represents a generalized Weyl tensor and has the symmetry of

s The solution of Bianchi identity hchddC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 equiv 0 has the form

dCa(s)b(s)0 = hc

(

Ca(s)cb(s)0 +

s

2C

a(s)bb(sminus1)c0

)

(360)

where Ca(s+1)b(s)0 has the symmetry of s

s+ 1 The second term on the rhs

of (360) supplements the first one to have a proper Young symmetry Further

unfolding requires a set of degree-zero forms Ca(s+i)b(s)0 taking values in so(dminus1 1)-

irreps characterized by Young diagrams ss+ i

The full system has theform

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1

δωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(k)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)b(k)c0 k isin [0 sminus 2]

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 δω

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0

dCa(s+i)b(s) = hc

(

Ca(s+i)cb(s) +s

i+ 2Ca(s+i)bb(sminus1)c

)

i isin [0infin)

(361)

By the construction the system incorporates Fronsdalrsquos field φmicro1microswith the correct

gauge law but there is still to be proved that the Fronsdalrsquos equations are reallyimposed and that there are no other dynamical fields in the system Let us recon-struct Fronsdalrsquos equations (213) whereas the second statement will be proved asa part of a more general theorem The first two equations of (361) read

partmicroωa(sminus1)ν minus partνω

a(sminus1)micro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)cν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)cmicro (362)

partmicroωa(sminus1)bν minus partνω

a(sminus1)bmicro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)bcν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)bcmicro (363)

It is convenient to convert all world indices to the fiber ones

partcωa(sminus1)|d minus partdωa(sminus1)|c = ωa(sminus1)c|d minus ωa(sminus1)d|c (364)

partcωa(sminus1)b|d minus partdωa(sminus1)b|c = ωa(sminus1)bc|d minus ωa(sminus1)bd|c (365)

15The proof is not given as more general statement about the solutions of such equations isproved in the next Section

29

where ωa(sminus1)|b equiv ωa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro ωa(sminus1)bb|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bbmicro hcmicro

Contracting (365) with ηbd and then symmetrizing c with a1asminus1 results in

partcωa(sminus1)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus1)c|c= 0 (366)

By symmetrizing in (364) a1asminus1 with d

ωa(sminus1)c|a = partcωa(sminus1)|a minus partaωa(sminus1)|c (367)

and then by contracting (364) with ηdasminus1

ωa(sminus1)c|

c= (sminus 1)

(

partcωa(sminus2)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus2)c|c

)

(368)

all the terms of (366) can be expressed via ωa(sminus1)|b Plugging these to (366) gives

ωa(sminus1)|a minus partapartc((sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c

)+ (sminus 1)partapartaω

a(sminus2)c|c= 0 (369)

where ωa(sminus1)|a is to be identified with Fronsdalrsquos field φa(s) as ωa(sminus1)|a = 1sφa(s)

then ωa(sminus2)c|

c= 1

2φa(sminus2)c

c (sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c = φa(sminus1)c and the equation

acquires the Fronsdalrsquos form (213)

φa(s) minus spartapartcφa(sminus1)c + s(sminus1)

2partapartaφ

a(sminus2)cc= 0 (370)

For Y = Y(s 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 results in

Yg sminus 1 sminus 1 s

ss+ 1

n k 1 0 1 sminus 1 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = sminus 1 g = s g = s+ 1

qg q0 = 1 qsminus1 = 1 qs = 0 qs+1 = 0

therefore

Wq =

Wa(sminus1)0 W

a(sminus1)b0 W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0 q = 0

Wa(sminus1)q W

a(sminus1)bq W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)q W

a(s)b(s)qminus1 W

a(s+1)b(s)qminus1 q gt 0

(371)and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hcWa(sminus1)b(gminus1)cq g isin [1 sminus 1]

hchdWa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)dqminus1 g = s

hc

(

Wa(gminussminus1)cb(s)qminus1 + s

gminuss+1W

a(gminussminus1)bb(sminus1)cqminus1

)

g gt s

(372)

With D = DL minus σminus full system (361) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (373)

30

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sminus 1 sim g isin [0 sminus 1]form a finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k =0 1 sim g ge s form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

The representatives of cohomology classes can be chosen as H0 = ξ

a(sminus1)0 H1 =

hbφa(sminus1)b H2 = hbhcG

a(sminus1)c minus hahcGa(sminus2)bc + γηaahahcG

a(sminus4)bcnn+ (βηabhahc +

αηaahbhc)Ga(sminus3)cn

n16 H

3 = hbhahcχa(sminus2)c H

kgt3 = empty where φa(s) and Ga(s) are

double-traceless tensor fields and ξa(sminus1) and χa(sminus1) are traceless H01 are nontrivialat the lowest grade whereas H

23 are nontrivial at grade-one therefore the orderof equations that are imposed on the dynamical field is equal to two It turns outthat there is no need in the explicit form for α β and γ it is sufficient to find outthe Young symmetry of representatives only The uniqueness of Fronsdalrsquos theoryat the level of action was demonstrated in [67] and at the level of equations in[6 53] Consequently there is no need for equations (370) to be found explicitly -those of Fronsdal are the only possible Again there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2 the gauge parameters

in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3 The system contains an infinitely many ofdual formulations those that have field W

a(sminus1)b(k0)1 at the lowest grade are gauge

dual descriptions whereas those that have field Ca(s+k0)b(s) at the lowest grade arenon-gauge Dual description based on field W

a(sminus1)b(1)1 was elaborated in [68]

Example 334 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field[69

70 31] Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field results in literally

the same unfolded system (361 373) but with fields taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that are irreducible spin-tensors with the same tensor part as in the bosoniccase Note that operator σminus is not modified but the σminus cohomology groups areslightly changed such that the equations become of the first order

The Dirac equation Unfolded system (336) or equivalently (339) describesa massless spin-1

2field provided that Ck take values in s 1

2so(dminus1 1)-irreps

ie Ck equiv Cαa(k) and Γαb βC

βba(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equation of (336)

partmicroCα = hmicroaC

αa (374)

with hbmicroΓβb α

gives the Dirac equation

Γαa βpart

aCβ = 0 (375)

the rest of equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives of dynamicalfield Cα

The Rarita-Schwinger equation Unfolded system (350) or equivalently(353) describes a massless spin-3

2field provided that irreducible tensors in (351)

are replaced by the corresponding irreducible tensor-spinors ie A1 equiv Aαmicro C

k equiv

Cα[ab]c(k) and Γαb βC

β[ab]c(k) = 0 Γαd βC

β[ab]dc(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equa-tion of (350)

1

2(partmicroA

αν minus partνA

αmicro) = hmicroahνbC

α[ab] (376)

16α = minus (s(d+sminus5)minusd+6)(sminus2)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6) β = (sminus2)

(d+sminus4) γ = (d+sminus6)(sminus2)(sminus3)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6)

31

with Γ-matrices and converting world indices micro ν to the fiber ones according toAαa equiv Aα

microhamicro gives the Rarita-Schwinger equation

Γαb βpart

bAβa minus partaΓαb βA

βb = 0 δAαa = partaξα (377)

The rest of unfolded equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives ofdynamical field Aα

microThe Fang-Fronsdal equation for a spin-(s + 1

2) massless field Unfolded

system (361) or equivalently (373) describes a massless spin-(s + 12) field pro-

vided that irreducible tensors in (371) are replaced by the corresponding irreducibletensor-spinors With all world indices converted to the fiber ones the first equationof (361) has the form

Gαa(sminus1)|[cd] equiv partcωβa(sminus1)|d minus partdωβa(sminus1)|c = ωβa(sminus1)c|d minus ωβa(sminus1)d|c (378)

where ωαa(sminus1)|b equiv ωαa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωαa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

αa(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro

Analogously to the bosonic case nonsymmetric component of ωβa(sminus1)|d canbe gauged away algebraically Hence the Fronsdalrsquos field φαa(s) is identified asωαa(sminus1)|a = 1

sφαa(s) Then Γα

b βφβa(s) = Γα

b βωβa(sminus1)|b Γα

b βΓβc γφ

γa(sminus2)bc = ηbcωαa(sminus2)b|c

and the Fronsdalrsquos triple Γ-traceless constraint is a consequence of irreducibility ofωαa(sminus1)|b in α a1asminus1 and the lack of any conditions with respect to a1asminus1 andb Since the Fronsdalrsquos field contains three irreducible components with the sym-metry of s 1

2 s-1 1

2and s-2 1

2 the equations of motion has to be

nontrivial in these three sectors too The projector on the dynamical equations issimply Γα

b βGβa(sminus1)b|a and gives

Γαb βpart

bφβa(s) minus spartaΓαb βφ

βa(sminus1)b = 0 (379)

which is in accordance with (222) But we would like to note that there aretwo components with the symmetry of s-1 1

2 namely ηbcG

αa(sminus2)b|ac and

Γαb βΓ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] The correct projector on this component of the equations isgiven by the combination

2(sminus 1)ηbcGαa(sminus2)b|ac minus γαb βγ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] (380)

which is identically zero when Gαa(sminus1)|[bc] is expressed via ωβa(sminus1)c|d by virtue of(378) Therefore it is (380) that does not express certain part of ωβa(sminus1)c|d interms of first derivatives of the dynamical field φαa(s) and thus this is a dynamicalequation Obviously (380) is a representative of σminus cohomology group H

2g=0 In

terms of φαa(s) the representative has the form

Γαb βpart

bΓβc γφ

γa(sminus1)c minus partcφαa(sminus1)c +

(sminus 1)

2partaφ

αa(sminus2)cc= 0 (381)

which is equal to the Γ-trace of (379) The gauge transformations has the form

δφαa(s) = partaξαa(sminus1) (382)

32

where Γαb βξ

βa(sminus2)b = 0Consequently unfolded equations for totally symmetric bosonic fields are proved

to completely determine the unfolded equations for totally symmetric fermionicfields Though σminus is not modified in the fermionic case σminus cohomology groupsare changed since the fermionic dynamical equations are of the first order

4 Unfolding Mixed-Symmetry Fields

First in Section 41 an example of the simplest massless mixed-symmetry field ofspin- is investigated in detail and leading arguments are given for a spin- fieldSecond the general statement on arbitrary mixed-symmetry fields is proved whereastechnical details are collected in Sections 44 and 45 The analysis of the numberof physical degrees of freedom is carried out in Section 43

41 Simplest Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Example 411 Spin- field In the metric-like approach a spin- field is mini-mally described[16 17] by the subjected to (215) field φ[micromicro]ν that takes values in a

reducible so(dminus 1 1)-representation oplus the latter component is identified withthe trace φ ν

microν The gauge transformations (216) has two levels of reducibility with

two gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξA[microν] taking values in oplus bull so(dminus 1 1)-irreps at the

first level and one parameter ξmicro taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irrep at the secondlevel (217)

First the metric-like field φ[micromicro]ν has to be incorporated into certain differentialform eYq which is called a physical vielbein the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y and the degreeq to be defined below To make the symmetries both of the first and of the secondlevel of reducibility manifest the degree of the physical vielbein has to be two atleast

Moreover were the physical vielbein taken to be a degree-one form not all of thegauge symmetries even at the first level would be manifest Indeed there are twopossibilities for physical vielbein eY1 to contain a component with the symmetry of

Namely Y = and Y = since otimes = oplus oplus and otimes = oplus oplus

The associated differential gauge parameter is ξ0 in the first case and ξ0 in thesecond case Inasmuch as the gauge parameters are the forms of degree-zero onlyone of the required two parameters is present in each of the cases

The degree of the physical vielbein has to be not greater than two if the com-ponent associated with the metric-like field φmicromicroν is required not to be a certaintrace part The reason why a dynamical field should not be a certain trace part isexplained in the next Section

Therefore the physical vielbein has to be of degree-two and has to take valuesin so(dminus 1 1)-irrep that belongs to the vector representation ie e2 equiv ea2 equiv eamicroν

The associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξa1 equiv ξamicro contains in its Lorentz decomposition

otimes = oplus oplusbull both anti-symmetric ξAmicroν = ξa[microhbν]ηab and symmetric ξSmicroν = ξa(microh

bν)ηab

33

gauge parameters the latter enters along with the trace ξamicrohmicroa There exists a second

level gauge parameter χa0 which is directly identified with ξmicro as ξmicro = hbmicroχ

aηabThere are no redundant components in the gauge parameter However physicalvielbein e2 contains one redundant component in its decomposition into Lorentz

irreps otimes = oplus oplus The first and the second components are to be associatedwith a traceful φmicromicroν whereas the third one totally anti-symmetric component e[a|bc]

of ea|bc = eamicroνhbmicrohcν is a redundant one and has to be made non-dynamical In order

to do so algebraic gauge parameter ξ[abc]0 with the symmetry of is introduced It

is obvious from pure algebraic gauge law

δea2 = hbhcξ[abc]0 (41)

that the redundant component can be fixed to zero and ea2 can be directly identifiedwith φmicromicroν as e

amicromicro = φmicromicroνh

aν From gauge transformation laws δea2 = dξa1 δξa1 = dχa

0

ie δeamicroν = 12

(partmicroξ

aν minus partνξ

amicro

) δξamicro = partmicroχ

a required gauge transformations (216)(217) for metric-like field φmicromicroν and for the first order gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξ

A[microν]

are easily recoveredSince in the unfolded approach each gauge parameter possesses its own gauge

field and vice-verse associated with ξ[abc]0 gauge field ω

[abc]1 enters as

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 (42)

which determines the first equation Applying d to this equation results in Bianchiidentity hbhcdω

[abc]1 equiv 0 which has a unique solution of the form

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 (43)

with C[abc][df ]0 having the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensor of a spin-

field ie it is anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and C[abcd]f0 equiv 0 To clarify the form of

the solution let C[abc]|[df ]0 be a degree-zero form anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and with

no definite symmetry between these two groups of indices The Bianchi identityimplies hbhchdhfC

[abc]|[df ]0 equiv 0 which is equivalent to C

a[bc|df ]0 equiv 0 since vielbeins

ha anticommute Therefore the solution is parameterized by those components of

C[abc]|[df ]0 sim otimes that has the symmetry of Young diagrams with no more than

three rows since the requirement for total anti-symmetrization of any four indicesto give zero is the characteristic property of Young diagrams with at most three

rows otimes ni is the only component of zero trace order17 with three rows andthere are no components with the number of rows less than three Alternatively one

17Although there are trace components with the number of rows less than four eg theirtensor product by the metric ηab contains components with the symmetry of the sl(d)-Young

diagrams with more than three rows Nontrivial trace with the symmetry of corresponds tothe mass-like term Hence traceful tensors either do not satisfy the Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms

34

could search for the solution in the sector of degree-one forms as dω[abc]1 = hdC

[abc]|d1

with some C[abc]|d1 but Bianchi identity hbhchdC

[abc]|d1 equiv 0 implies that the only

component of C[abc]|d1 sim otimes that is allowed must have less than three rows which

is impossible since [abc] makes Young diagrams of otimes consist of three rows atleast18 Thus one has to search for the solution among the forms of less degree

Further unfolding requires a set of fields C [abc][df ]g(k) with the symmetry ofk

to be introduced and the full system has the form

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 δea2 = dξa1 + hbhcξ

[abc]0 δξa1 = dχa

0

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 δω

[abc]1 = dξ

[abc]0

dC[abc][df ]g(k)0 = hvC

[abc][df ]g(k)v0 (44)

Consequently the unfolded system incorporates field φmicromicroν with all required differ-ential gauge parameters at all levels of reducibility the redundant component of the

physical vielbein does not contribute to the dynamics ω[abc]1 sim otimes = oplus oplus

the first component is a field strength for the redundant field once the field hasbeen gauged away the associated field strength is zero and ω

[abc]ρ = hamicrohbνhcλT[microνλ]ρ

for some T[microνλ]ρ T[microνλρ] equiv 0 which incorporates both and (as the trace) Torecover equations (215) in terms of metric-like fields it is convenient to convert allfiber indices to the world ones in the first two equations

part[microeaνλ] = hb[microhcνω

abcλ] (45)

part[microωabcν] = hd[microhfν]C

abcdf (46)

to substitute Tmicroνλρ and to contract two indices in the second equation

part[microφνλ]ρ = Tmicroνλρ (47)

partρTmicroνρλ minus partλTρ

microνρ = 0 (48)

Plugging (47) in (48) gives equation (215)For Y = Y(2 1) (1 1) ie N = 2 and p = 2 the general scheme of Section

1 results in

Yg

n k 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 1 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

18Again the trace component enters the tensor product as η otimes and has the number of rowsnot less than three

35

therefore

Wq =

W a0 q = 0

W a1 W

[abc]0 q = 1

W aq W

[abc]qminus1 W

[abc][df ]qminus2 W

[abc][df ]gqminus2 q gt 1

(49)

and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbhcW[abc]qminus1 g = 1

hbhcW[aaa][bc]qminus2 g = 2

hdW[aaa][bb]c(gminus3)dqminus2 g gt 2

(410)

with D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (44) can be rewritten as

Dω2 = 0 δω2 = Dξ1 δξ1 = Dξ0 (411)

where ω2 isin W2 ξ1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 2 k = 0 sim g = 0and n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 1 form two finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-moduleswhereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g ge 2 form an infinite-dimensionaliso(dminus 1 1)-module

Example 412 Spin- field (briefly) In the case of a massless spin- fieldthere are two gauge parameters at the first level of reducibility which have the sym-metry19 of and one gauge parameter at the second level with the symmetryof First for Y = Y(3 1) (2 1) the proposed scheme results in

Yg

n k 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3 g = 4

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 2 q2 = 1 q3 = 0 q4 = 0

therefore the physical vielbein has to be a two-form taking values in ie e2 equiv

eaab2 Associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξaab1 has components otimes = oplus oplus the first two having the symmetry of the required gauge parameters with the thirdone being redundant The last three components in the decomposition of the physical

vielbein otimes = oplus oplus oplus are also redundant By virtue of Stueckelberg

symmetry with parameter ξ1 these three components can be gauged away inasmuch

as otimes = oplus oplus The redundant component of the first level gauge

parameter ξ1 also can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg symmetry with

level-two gauge parameter ξ0 Consequently at least the fact that the unfoldedsystem incorporates the metric-like field all the required gauge parameters andredundant components do not contribute to the dynamics is proved

19To simplify the example no consideration is given to the trace components of the fields

36

42 General Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Given a massless field of spin Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) described by a metric-like field φY(x) taking values in the irrep of the Lorentz algebra so(d minus 1 1) withthe same symmetry type(minimal formulation) there exists a unique unfolded systemwith the physical vielbein at the lowest grade and all symmetries being manifest thatreproduces the original metric-like system The system has the form (11)

Sketch of the proof

1 The lowest grade field (physical vielbein) eY0q0

turns out to be completely de-termined by the requirement for it to contain the metric-like field and for itsgauge parameters ξY0

q0minusk k gt 0 to contain all the necessary gauge parametersat all levels of reducibility (219)

2 eY0q0

and its gauge parameters appear to contain redundant components thathave to be made non-dynamical The only way to achieve this is to introduceStueckelberg symmetry δeY0

q0= σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus1) δξ

Y0q0minus1 = σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus2) with certain

ξY1q1minusk k gt 0 which turns out to be unambiguously defined by this requirement

3 ξY1q1minus1 has associated gauge field ωY1

q1and gauge transformations δωY0

q0=

σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) completely determines the first equation deY0

q0= σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) whichimplies Jacobi identity σ1

minus(dωY1q1

) equiv 0 The general solution is proved in Sec-tion 44 to have the form dωY1

q1= σ2

minus(ωY2q2

) with certain ωY2q2

The secondequation implies the second Jacobi identity σ2

minus(dωY2q2

) equiv 0 and so on

4 Once the total unfolded system is defined the proof of the facts that (i)the correct dynamical equations are imposed (ii) there are no other dynamicalfields or other differential gauge symmetries in the system is obtained throughthe calculations of σminus cohomology groups Ignoring the trace pattern of fieldsie for traceful tensors the proof of (ii) can be simplified and is done in thissection Even stronger statement that there exists a duality H

p+1+k sim Hpminusk is

proved in Section 45

First as it is clear from the examples above the metric-like field φYM(x) has

to be incorporated into a differential form eY0q of degree-q taking values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep Y0 (for this reason eY0q is called physical vielbein) Having converted

all world indices to fiber ones in accordance with (329) so(dminus 1 1)-tensor productY0 otimes Y(1 q) of Y0 with one column diagram of the height q must contain thecomponent with the symmetry of YM In the case of the minimal formulationYM = Y where Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) characterizes the spin

It is useful to introduce a notion of the quotient of two Young diagrams let thequotient of two Young diagrams Y1Y2 be a direct sum of those diagrams whoseso(dminus 1 1)-tensor product by Y2 contains Y1 For the first sight given q ge 0 anyelement Q of YMY(1 q) might be chosen as Y0 If q is greater than the heightof YM the component with the symmetry YM in the tensor product QotimesY(1 q)has to be certain trace inevitably

37

Although there is no apparent problems in considering unfolded systems withdynamical field hidden in certain trace component of the physical vielbein egMaxwell gauge potential Amicro might be identified with the trace eamicroνh

microa of two-form

eamicroν However this exotic incorporating of the physical field does not take place inthe already known systems Moreover it can be proved that such exotic systemsdo not exist if irreducible Nevertheless they might be a part of some reduciblesystem which describes more than one field Therefore we require the degree q ofthe physical vielbein to be not greater than the height of YM

Inasmuch as (i) the equations imposed on φY(x) possess reducible gauge trans-formations with the number of levels equal to the height p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi of Y (ii) for

a degree-q gauge field of an unfolded system there exist q levels of gauge transfor-mations the degree q of physical vielbein eY0

q must be equal to pThe quotient YY(1 p) contains only one element (provided φY(x) is for-

bidden to be a trace component) it is the diagram (12) with the symmetry ofY0 = Y(s1 minus 1 p1) (sN minus 1 pN) ie it is equal to Y without the first col-umn Therefore physical vielbein eY0

p is completely defined So does gauge param-

eters ξY0pminusk at the k-th level of reducibility k isin [1 p] The requirement for tensor

product Y0 otimes Y(1 pminus k) to contain all gauge parameters ξik given by (219)at the k-th level of reducibility is also satisfied Consequently the whole patternof fieldsgauge parameters of the metric-like formulation is reproduced Note thatY0 equiv Y0 and q0 = p in the terms of Section 1

Let us note that if one writes down the physical vielbein explicitly as ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

where si are the lengths of the rows ofY and converts the form indices to the tangentones by virtue of inverse background vielbein hmicroa

ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|[d1dp] = ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

hmicro1d1 hmicropdp (412)

dynamical field φY(x) should be identified with ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|a1ap which hasthe symmetry of Y with some traces included Consequently the generalizedLabastidarsquos double-tracelessness condition (220) [20] is obvious inasmuch as thecontraction of two metric tensor ηaiaiηaiai with the i-th group of indices vanishes

Generally in addition to φY(x) decompositionY0otimesY(1 p) of physical vielbeineY0p into Lorentz irreps contains redundant components which must not contributeto the physical degrees of freedom So does Y0 otimesY(1 pminus k) ie in addition toξik it contains a lot of components that can not be made genuine differential gaugeparameters There are only two possible ways to get rid of redundant fields in theunfolded formalism

A redundant components could be directly fixed to zero by algebraic (Stueckel-berg) symmetry

B redundant components might be auxiliary fields for other fields (at lower grade)and so on The process stops since the grade is assumed to be bounded frombelow

We require dynamical fields incorporated in the physical vielbein to be at the lowestgrade Actually (B) takes place for dual gauge descriptions but not for the minimal

38

Therefore the only possibility to make redundant components to be non-dynamicalis to introduce a Stueckelberg symmetry with certain parameters ξY1

q1minusk

δeY0p = dξY0

pminus1 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) (413)

δξY0pminus1 = dξY0

pminus2 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus2) (414)

(415)

where σ1minus is a certain operator built of background vielbein ha that contracts a

number of indices of Y1 with hahc to obtain Y0 Diagram20 Y1 and form degreeq1 can be easily found since Y1 otimes Y1 q1 minus i i gt 0 must contain all redundantcomponents of eY0

p and ξY0pminusk

In the unfolded formalism each gauge field possesses its own gauge parameter andvice-versa Therefore there is a gauge field ωY1

q1 which contributes to the equations

for eY0p as

deY0p = σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) (416)

The first equation determines the first Jacobi identity of the form σ1minus(dω

Y1q1

) equiv 0which can be solved as

dωY1q1

= σ2minus(ω

Y2q2

) (417)

for certain gauge field ωY2q2

and operator σ2minus that satisfies σ1

minusσ2minus equiv 0 The general

solution of Jacobi identities is given in Section 44 From now on let the super-scripts of σminus be omitted The second equation determines the second Jacobi identityσminus(dω

Y2q2

) equiv 0 which can be also solved and so on Consequently the knowledgeof the lowest grade gauge field eY0

p and of the Stueckelberg symmetries required toget rid of redundant components determines the first equation which by virtue ofJacobi identities determines the second and so on The total unfolded system hasthe structure

dωYg

qg= σminus

(

ωYg+1qg+1

)

g = 0 1

δωYg

qg= dξYg

qg+ σminus

(

ξYg+1

qg+1minus1

)

δξYgqg

=

(418)

where σminus is certain algebraic operator built of background vielbein ha and (σminus)2 = 0

The only facts remain to be proved are that there are no other dynamical fieldsand that the proper correspondence (duality) between the cohomology groups holdstrue To this end it is sufficient to analyze only the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps content ofH

qg ie only the symmetry type and the multiplicity of irreducible Lorentz tensors

that by virtue of (330) are the representatives of Hqg

It is proved in the next Section that there is a duality Hpminuskg=0 sim H

p+k+1g=1 between

the σminus cohomology groups which reveals the one-to-one correspondence betweenthe gauge dynamical fields and equations of motion the level-k gauge symmetries

20The specific character of Minkowski massless fields is in that all Stueckelberg parameters canbe incorporated into a single Y1-valued form this not being the case for (anti)-de Sitter masslessfields

39

and the level-k Bianchi identities The representatives of cohomology groups in thesector of fields and gauge symmetries directly correspond to those of metric-likeapproach and there is no other nontrivial cohomology in these sectors

Though the trace pattern of fieldsgauge parameters is also important and thecalculation of σminus cohomology groups provides a comprehensive answer to this ques-tion the very procedure being a bit technical Ignoring the trace pattern of thefields it can be easily proved that the required metric-like field is incorporated inphysical vielbein eY0

q0 all the redundant components of the physical vielbein can be

gauged away by a pure algebraic symmetry and the same holds for differential gaugeparameters ξY0

q0minusk at all levels of reducibility ie the required pattern of gauge pa-rameters is recovered whereas all the redundant components are either Stueckelbergor auxiliary This is the necessary condition only and the traces has to be takeninto account Also it is still to be proved that the correct equations of motionsare imposed Provided that there are no trace conditions on the fields the sys-tem is referred to as off-shell[65] An off-shell system may contain only constraintsthat express auxiliary fields via the derivatives of the dynamical field imposing norestrictions on the latter

The off-shell system Technically ignoring the traces is equivalent to thereplacement of all so(dminus1 1)-irreps by the sl(d)-irreps that are characterized by thesame Young diagrams ie instead of taking so(dminus1 1)-tensor products one needs toapply the sl(d)-tensor productrsquos rules which are much simpler The decompositionof the physical vielbein eY0

q0into sl(d)-irreps is given by diagrams Yαi of the form

αN+1

sN minus 1

pNαN

s2 minus 1

p2α2

s1 minus 1

p1

α1

(419)

where α1+ +αN+1 = q0 = p The decomposition of Stueckelberg gauge parameterξY1q1minus1 for eY0

q0has the components of the same form but with αN+1 ge 1 because

Y1 (13) has already the form of Y0 with one cell in the bottom-left Thereforeall components of eY0

q0except for those with αN+1 = 0 are of Stueckelberg type but

there is only one component of eY0q0

with αN+1 = 0 namely it has αi = pi i isin [1 N ]and hence has the symmetry of Y The decomposition of level-k differential gaugeparameter ξY0

q0minusk has the form (419) with α1 + + αN+1 = p minus k and again all

the components of ξY0q0minusk with αN+1 ge 1 can be gauged away by pure algebraic

symmetry with ξY1q1minuskminus1 Consequently there is a complete matching between (219)

40

and those in ξY0

q0minusk that are not pure gauge themselves It can be easily proved alsothat if ignoring the traces there are no other dynamical fieldsdifferential gaugeparameters at higher grade Consequently

Lemma H(σminus) with respect to sl(d) are given by

Hk(σminus)sl(d) =

Yαi g = 0 α1 + + αN = k αN+1 = 0 k le p

empty k gt p(420)

The triviality of the higher k gt p cohomology groups for sl(d) which shouldcontain equations of motion and Bianchi identities is expected since the system isoff-shell For the equations to have the second order in derivatives the only nontrivialcohomology group H

p+1 must be at the grade-one ie Hp+1g=1 6= empty As is seen from

the examples above the equations correspond to those representatives of Hp+1g=1 that

are certain traces Indeed the total rank |WYgqg | which is equal to the sum qg + |Yg|

of degree qg and rank of Yg is preserved by σminus Therefore |WYgqg | = |W

Y0q0| + g

and |RY1q1+1| = |ω

Y0q0| + 2 = |Y|+ 2 where eY0

q0isin Wg=0

p and RY1q1+1 isin W

g=1p+1 contain

metric-like field φYM(x) and the equations on φY(x) respectively Consequently

the representative of Hp+1g=1 that corresponds to the equations on the traceless part

of φY(x) has to be identified with certain trace of the first order and so on for thetraces of φY(x)

The calculation of σminus cohomology groups carried out in Section 45 implies

1 The only nontrivial cohomology groups are Hpminuskg=0 and H

p+k+1g=1 k = 1 p

Therefore the dynamical fields and independent gauge parameters belong tothe zero grade Wg=0

q subspaces the equations are of the second order and theBianchi identities for the k-th level gauge symmetries are of the (k + 2)-thorder

2 Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 ie there is a one-to-one correspondence between the

elements of Hpminuskg=0 that are traces of the r-th order and the elements of Hp+k+1

g=1

that are traces of the (r + k + 1)-th order Roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1

Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on Therefore there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the dynamical fields and the equations of motion the level-k gaugesymmetries and the k-th Bianchi identities

3 The so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that correspond to the elements of Hpminusk(σminus) and arethe traces of the zeroth order are given by the so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagramsthat have the form (419) with αN+1 = 0 and α1 + + αN = p minus k whichexactly reproduce the required pattern (219) Note that certain higher ordertraces are also the elements of cohomology groups These fields represent thersquoauxiliaryrsquo fields of the metric-like formulation which had to be introduced tomake the gauge symmetry off-shell To prove the theorem it is not necessary toknow the concrete trace pattern the duality between the cohomology groupsis sufficient The details of the trace pattern are in Section 45

41

In the fermionic case the traces are substituted for Γ-traces Important isthat acting on tensor indices only σminus does not break down the irreducibility ofspin-tensors The duality has the form H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 or simply H

pminuskg=0 sim

Hp+k+1g=0 which means that equations are of the first order and the duality between

fieldsequations gauge symmetriesBianchi identities takes place which completesthe proof

Note that Yg=s1 equiv Yn=0k=0 has the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensorfor a spin-Y massless field

sNpN

s2p2

s1

p1 + 1

(421)

Analogously to the examples of Section 33 massless mixed-symmetry fields can bedescribed by the same unfolded system (16) that is restricted to Wg

q with g ge g0ie the system contains infinitely many dual formulations As the generalized Weyltensor and its descendants are non-gauge fields the dual descriptions with g0 ge s1are non-gauge and the dual descriptions with 0 lt g0 lt s1 are gauge

43 Physical Degrees of Freedom Counting

Notwithstanding the simplicity of the unfolded form and the uniqueness of unfoldingthere still might be a question of whether the unfolded equations do describe thecorrect number of physical degrees of freedom

It is well-known that for systems with the first class constraints only with mass-less fields belonging to this class the counting of degrees of freedom is that one firstlevel gauge parameter kills two degrees of freedom one second level gauge parame-ters kills three degrees of freedom and so on For example a spin-two massless fieldpossesses d(dminus3)

2degrees of freedom which is just d(d+1)

2minus 2d d(d+1)

2and d being the

number of components of φmicroν and ξmicroThe complete information concerning the rsquonumberrsquo of fieldsgauge parameters

ie the multiplicity and the symmetry of corresponding tensors is contained inH

kg=0(σminus) for k = 0p Not only can a number of physical degrees of freedom be

calculated but the whole exact sequence that defines an iso(d minus 1 1) irrep can bederived The elements of this sequence are certain so(dminus 1) tensors that define anso(dminus 2) tensor as a quotient of so(d minus 1) tensors eg (218) The decompositionof so(dminus 1 1)-fields into irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) can be done with the aid ofpartmicro or after Fourier transform with the aid of momentum pmicro

For example for a spin-two field the cohomology groups that correspond to thedynamical fieldsdifferential gauge parameters and its decomposition into so(dminus 1)irreps have the form

42

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus bull sim φmicroν φ

νν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2bull

Quick sort of Young diagrams in 0 minusrarr 2H0 minusrarr H1 minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 gives the

correct exact sequence 0 minusrarr minusrarr minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 which defines a masslessspin-two irrep H (0 )

For the simplest mixed-symmetry field the hook- there are two levels of gaugetransformation hence relevant cohomology groups are H

0 H1 and H2

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus oplus bull sim ξAmicroν oplus ξ

Smicroν ξ

Sνν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2 oplus 2bull

H2 oplus sim φmicroνλ φ

νmicroν 6= 0 oplus oplus oplus 2 oplus bull

Again quick sort of diagrams in 0 minusrarr 3H0 minusrarr 2H1 minusrarr H2 minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0

gives exact sequence (218)Consequently the problem of calculation the number of physical degrees of free-

dom to be precise of deriving the exact sequence is effectively reduced to the simplecombinatoric problem of (i) decomposition so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagram representa-tives of H(σminus) to so(dminus 1)-diagrams (ii) cancellation of like terms in sequence

0 minusrarr (p+ 1)H0 minusrarr pH1 minusrarr minusrarr 2Hpminus1 minusrarr Hp minusrarr H (0Y) minusrarr 0 (422)

Skipping combinatoric technicalities we state that in the general case of a spin-Ymassless mixed-symmetry field (422) reduces to the correct exact sequence thatdefines a uirrep H (0Y) of iso(dminus 1 1)

44 Solving the Generalized Jacobi Identities

Unfolding some dynamical system there arises a problem of solving Jacobi identities(33) that have schematically a form hhdω1

q equiv 0 where a number of backgroundvielbeins ha is contracted with the fiber indices of ω1

q The Jacobi identity restrictsdω1

q to have a certain specific form dω1q = hhω2

r where the so(dminus1 1)-irrep inwhich ω2

r takes values the degree r and the projector built of hh are completelydetermined The solutions are given by21

Lemma A Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values inY = Y(s p) (k 1)

so(dminus 1 1)-irrep The general solution of

hcdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq = 0 (423)

21As was pointed out in Section 33 nonzero traces either violate Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms and therefore are ignored

43

has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq k lt s

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1 k = s q ge p + 1

0 k = s q lt p+ 1

(424)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 take values inY(s p) (k + 1 1)

and Y(s+ 1 p+ 1) so(dminus 1 1)-irreps respectively22

Proof The parametrization of dωq by a degree-(q + 1) form taking values in the

same so(dminus 1 1)-irrep dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = R

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q+1 obviously fails to satisfy

(423) Inasmuch as (423) contains a vielbein the solution has to contain a number

of vielbeins too The most general parametrization of dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q with only

one vielbein included has the form dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = hdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)|dq for some

q-form taking values in a tensor product of Y by a vector representation ie thereis no definite symmetry between index d and the rest of the indices

hchdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)c|dq = 0larrrarr ωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)[c|d]

q = 0 (425)

Only those irreps in Yotimes are allowed that have c and d symmetric ie correspondto Y(s p) (k + 1 1) for k lt s This is not possible in the case k = s ie Y =Y(s p+ 1) and the only possibility to have c and d symmetric is to add the whole

column toY which requires dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q to be represented as dω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hchcωa1(sminus1)cap(sminus1)cap+1(sminus1)cqminuspminus1 and therefore q must be large enough Roughly

speaking the proof is based on the fact that the anti-symmetrization of two indicesat the same row of a Young diagram is identically zero the anti-symmetrizationbeing due to contraction with vielbeins

Note that choosing nonmaximal solutions of Jacobi identities results in loweringthe gauge symmetry so that not all redundant components are excluded

Unfolding totally-symmetric massless higher-spin fields the possible rhs termsin dω

a(sminus1)b(t)1 = are restricted by Jacobi identities and an essential use is made

of

Corollary The solution of Jacobi identity

hcdωa(sminus1)b(tminus1)c1 equiv 0 (426)

is of the form

dωa(sminus1)b(t)1 =

hcωa(sminus1)b(t)c1 t lt sminus 1

hchdCa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 t = sminus 1

(427)

22The symmetric basis is used being more convenient in this case as the contracted with vielbeinstensors are already irreducible

44

The following statement is a generalization of the Lemma-A to the case where(s p) (k 1) is a rsquosubdiagramrsquo of a larger Young diagram Y that has a numberof rows precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) Appropriate Young symmetrizershave to be included as the mere contraction of a number of vielbeins breaks theirreducibility of the tensor For instance hcω

a(s1)b(s2minus1)c is already irreducible withthe symmetry of Ys1 s2 minus 1 but this is not the case for hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) which hasto be added one term hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) + 1s1minuss2+1

hcωa(s1)bb(s2minus1)c to get the symmetry

of Ys1 minus 1 s2

Lemma B Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values in Y =

Y( (s p) (k 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irrep where the dots stands for the blocks inY precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) The general solution of

Π[hcdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq

]= 0 (428)

where Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p)(k minus 1 1) has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

Π[

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq

]

k lt s

Π[

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1

]

k = s q ge p+ 1

0 k = s q lt p + 1

(429)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 takes values in

Y (s p) (k + 1 1) and Y (s+ 1 p+ 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irreps respec-tively and Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p) (k 1)

Proof The proof is similar to that of Lemma-A with the only comment that thesymmetrizers do not affect the argumentation that anti-symmetrization of two in-dices in the same row is identically zero

45 Dynamical Content via σminus Cohomology

Before discussing the calculation of σminus cohomology let us first recall necessary factsconcerning the evaluation of so(d minus 1 1)-tensor products Let P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) be anumber of integer partitions k1 + + kN = m of m where ki is constrained byki le ǫi and different rearrangements of ki satisfying the constraints are regarded asdistinct partitions The generating function for the partition P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) is

sum

m

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m)tm =

i=Nprod

i=1

(1minus tǫi+1)

1minus t(430)

These integer partitions gives the multiplicities of irreps in so(dminus 1 1)-tensor prod-ucts (Clebsh-Gordon coefficients) we are interested in [71]

45

The so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary irrep Ylowast = Y(si pi) by aone-column diagram of the height qlowast can be explicitly calculated as

sNpN

s2

p2

s1

p1

otimes

q =sum

αjβi

Nαjβi

αN+1

βN

αN

ǫNpN sN

β2

α2

ǫ2p2 s2

β1

α1

ǫ1p1 s1

(431)

where αi βi αi + βi le pi i isin [1 N ] αN+1 ge 0 and there exist ρ ge 0 such that

qlowast =i=Nsum

i=1

(αi + βi) + αN+1 + 2ρ (432)

The multiplicity Nαjβi of Ylowastαj βi

is given by integer partition

Nαjβi = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ǫi = pi minus αi minus βi (433)

and the total trace order r is

r =i=Nsum

i=1

βi + ρ (434)

Roughly speaking to obtain an element of the tensor product one should first cutoff from bottom-right of the i-th block a column of height βiminusγi pi ge βiminusγi ge 0 (totake different traces) and second add an arbitrary number αi+γi pi ge αi+γi ge 0 ofcells to each block provided the γi cells annihilate ie they are added to the placesfrom which γi cells were removed at the first stage Multiplicity may be differentfrom one due to different rearrangements of γi ie when multiplied by the rest ofq-column different traces can give rise to the same diagram The number of suchrearrangements is given by P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ρ =

sumi=N

i=1 γi For instance sl(n)-tensor

product otimes is given simply by

otimessl(n) = oplus oplus oplus (435)

46

The so(d)-tensor product can be represented as a sum of the form

otimesso(n) = otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

otimessl(n)

oplus

otimessl(n)

︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

oplus

otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

2nd order

=

oplus oplus oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

oplus

oplus 2 oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

︸︷︷︸

2ndorder

(436)

where the sum is over trace order and the boxes that are connected by the arc areto be contracted and then the sl(n)-product rules are to be applied to the rest ofthe diagrams

Evaluating the so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary spinor-irrep Ylowast =Y(si pi) 1

2by a one-column diagram of the height qlowast one can contract any number

of Γ matrices with the indices of the column and then multiply therefore the tensorproduct rule for spin-tensors can be reduced to bosonic rule (431) as

Y(si pi) 12otimesso(n) Y(1 q) =

qsum

k=0

(Y(si pi) otimesso(n) Y(1 q minus k)

)

12

(437)

for example

12otimesso(n) = 1

2oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order Γ-traces

oplus

12oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order Γ-traces

oplus

oplus

2 12

︸︷︷︸

2nd order Γ-traces

oplus

bull 12

︸︷︷︸

3d order Γ-traces

(438)

The multiplicity N12

αjβiof Ylowast

αj βi12

is given by

N12

αjβi=

i=ρsum

i=0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus i) (439)

Let us now analyze the origin of σminus cohomology Its action σminus Wgq rarr W

gminus1q+1

preserves g+ q and hence the whole complex C(W σminus) is a direct sum of complexesC(qprime σminus) where q

prime refers to the end element Wg=0qprime of the complex

C(qprime σminus) 0 minusrarr minusrarr Wg=1qprimeminus1 minusrarrW

g=0qprime minusrarr 0 (440)

47

Moreover σminus preserves the total rank (the form degree + rank of the so(d minus 1 1)-

irrep in which the field takes values) LetWa(s1)a(sm)q be an element ofWg

qprime When

all form indices of Wa(s1)a(sm)q are converted to the fiber ones according to (329)

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (441)

the action of σminus is just an anti-symmetrization of all d1 dq with those indices aithat are extra as compared to Ygminus1 plus some terms to restore the correct Youngsymmetry of Ygminus1 Let the decomposition ofW a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] into so(dminus1 1)-irreps be of the form

Ya1(s1) am(sm)otimes

Y(1 q) =oplus

r=0

oplus

ir

N rirYr

ir (442)

where the summation is over the trace order r and then over ir which enumeratesall so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that enters in the tensor product as the traces of the r-thorder N r

irbeing the multiplicity of Yr

ir The multiplicity of the zeroth order traces

is always equal to one N0i0= 1 In fact the diagrams Y 0

i0can be directly obtained

by the sl(n)-tensor product ruleThe very anti-symmetrization is insensitive to whether a certain component en-

ters as a trace or not When decomposed into so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the elements ofWg

qprime and Wgminus1qprime+1 have a number of components of the same symmetry type The

action of σminus is just a linear transformation that either sends the whole so(dminus 1 1)-irrep to zero23 or sends it to the components of Wgminus1

qprime+1 of the same symmetry typeImportant is that σminus does not act between different so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Thereforecomplex C(qprime σminus) is a direct sum of complexes parameterized by so(dminus 1 1)-irrepsYprime that are given by various tensor products

Ynk

otimes

Y(1 q) (443)

provided that the field WYnkq is an element of Wgprimeminusi

qprime+i for certain i When reducedto such a complex

C(Yprime qprime σminus) 0rarr rarr Vg rarr Vgminus1 rarr rarr 0 (444)

the action of σminus is a linear transformation between the spaces Vg rarr Vgminus1 dimen-

sions of which are equal to the multiplicity of Yprime in the decomposition of WYgqg and

WYgminus1qg+1 The action of σminus is maximally non-degenerate compatible with nilpotency

Therefore to find cohomology groups the dimension of each linear space in everycomplex has to be calculated

Let us note that only the types and multiplicities of so(dminus1 1)-irreps are foundbelow ie no attention is paid to the description of how the corresponding tensorsare contained in the fields WY

qprime This is sufficient for our purposes though it isobvious (412) how the metric-like field φYM

is incorporated in an element ofWg=0p

23provided that the appropriate basis on the space of so(dminus1 1)-irreps with the same symmetrytype is chosen

48

The calculation of σminus cohomology is divided into three cases that cover the wholevariety of so(dminus 1 1)-irreps that can result from the tensor products (443)

In the Lemmas below it is assumed that complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is parameterizedby so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Yprime = Ylowast

αj βiof the form (431) with Ylowast = Ynk q

lowast = q such

that WYnkq isin C(qprime σminus) and ρ is defined according to (432)

In the first case Yprime is an element of Y0 otimesY(1 q)

Lemma 1 The σminus cohomology groups Hqg=0 and H

qg=1 are nontrivial and are given

by

Hqg =

Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βiMαj βi

αN+1 = 0sumi=N

i=0 αi = qq isin [0 p] g = 0

H2pminusqminus1 q isin [p+ 1 2p+ 1] g = 1

empty q gt 2p+ 1 any g

(445)where Mαj βi is the multiplicity of the irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

defined below

Proof From the very form of Yn=N0 equiv Yg=0 equiv Y(si minus 1 pi) it follows that theso(dminus1 1)-irreps that the element ofWg=0

q sim Y0otimesY(1 q) decomposes into may

be contained in Wg=1qminus1 only ie Wg=0

q and Wg=kqminusk contain no so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of

the same symmetry type for k gt 1 Therefore the length of complex C(Yprime q σminus)where Yprime isin Y0otimesY(1 q) is equal to one ie C(Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

q σminus) 0 minusrarrV1 minusrarr V0 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions of V0 and V1 are given by the multiplicitiesof the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

in Wg=1qminus1 and Wg=0

q respectively

dim(V1) =

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus 1) ρ ge 1

0 ρ = 0αN+1 = 0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) αN+1 gt 0

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) (446)

If αN+1 gt 0 the dimensions of V0 and V1 are equal and each irreducible componentof Wg=0

q with αN+1 gt 0 can be gauge away by virtue of the corresponding element

of Wg=1qminus1 thus being exact H

kgt2p+1 = empty inasmuch as ρ le p and the componentsof the forms with rank greater than (2p + 1) must have αN+1 gt 0 thus beingexact If αN+1 = 0 the dimensions are different dim(V1) lt dim(V0) for q le pdim(V1) = dim(V0) for q = p + 1 and dim(V1) gt dim(V0) for q gt p Thereforethe number of those Ysi piαj βi

isin Wg=0q q le p that are not exact is equal to

Mαj βi = |dim(V1) minus dim(V0)| the same is the number of those Ysi piαj βiisin

Wg=1qminus1 q gt p+ 1 that are not exact The obvious property of integer partitions

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ǫ1 + + ǫN minusm) (447)

results in the important duality in the cohomology groups Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 or

roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on

49

The second case is the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) where Yprime is an element of the tensor

product Ynk otimesY(1 q) for certain q ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmaxn minus 1

Lemma 2 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainqprime ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmax

n minus 1 the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The complex has the length two ie 0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr 0 wherethe dimensions are given by dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫN 1|ρ+ 1)dim(V2) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ+ 1) Simple calculations with generating functions resultsin dim(V0) lt dim(V1) dim(V2) lt dim(V1) and dim(V0) minus dim(V1) + dim(V2) = 0and consequently the sequence is exact

Analogously

Lemma 3 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainq ge 0 with k = 0 and n lt N the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The speciality of such Yprime is that the complex has the length three ie0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr V3 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions are given by

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 ǫn + 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V2) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 1) ρ ge ǫn + 1

0 otherwise

dim(V3) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn minus 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 2) ρ ge ǫn + 2

0 otherwise

Again simple calculations with generating functions results in appropriate inequali-ties and dim(V0)minusdim(V1)+dim(V2)minusdim(V3) = 0 and consequently the sequenceis exact

The above three cases covers the whole variety of the so(d minus 1 1)-tensors thatcan result from the tensor products YnkotimesY(1 q) for any n k and q The caseswith sN = 1 and Y = Y0 are special but the calculation of cohomology groupsleads to the same result

In the fermionic case the computations are similar due to the multiplicity givenby (439) The difference is that all nontrivial cohomology is concentrated in gradezero Indeed taking into account (446) where P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) is to be replaced by(439) it follows that dim(V0) ge dim(V1) for all q and H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 where r

is referred to the Γ-trace order or roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 andso on

5 Conclusions

The unfolded system constructed in the paper has a simple form of a covariantconstancy equation and describes arbitrary mixed-symmetry bosonic and fermionic

50

massless fields in d-dimensional Minkowski space The gauge fieldsparameters aredifferential forms with values in certain finite-dimensional irreducible representationsof the Lorentz algebra that are uniquely determined by the generalized spin

The key moment is that all gauge symmetries are manifest within the unfoldedformulation which is of most importance in controlling the number of physicaldegrees of freedom when trying to introduce interactions Unfolded systems areformulated in terms of differential forms which is a natural way to respect diffeo-morphisms and hence to describe systems that include gravity

Though the necessary conditions for the system to have a lagrangian descriptionare satisfied ie the fields are in one-to-one correspondence with the equations andthe k-th level gauge symmetries are in one-to-one correspondence with the k-thBianchi identities the very lagrangian remains to be constructed

Another interesting moment is that the unfolded equations for bosons are thesame as for fermions namely the operators involved ie exterior differential dand σminus remains unmodified when tensors are replaced with spin-tensors Thoughthis nice property partly breaks down in (anti)-de Sitter space within the unfoldedapproach bosons and fermions have much in common the fact being very useful forsupersymmetric theories

The proposed unfolded system includes all non-gauge dual descriptions whichare based on the generalized Weyl tensor and its descendants but not all of gaugedual descriptions It would be interesting to construct an unfolded system thatcontains all dual formulations

The interactions of the totally symmetric massless higher-spin fields are knownto require a nonzero cosmological constant ie are formulated in (anti)-de Sitterspace [2] Mixed-symmetry fields exhibit some interesting features in the presence ofcosmological constant For example not all of the Minkowski gauge symmetries canbe deformed to (anti)-de Sitter [72] As a result massless mixed-symmetry fields havemore degrees of freedom in (anti)-de Sitter compared to its Minkowski counterparts[73] and in the Minkowski limit a massless mixed-symmetry field splits in a certaincollection of massless fields generally Contrariwise a single mixed-symmetry fieldcan not be smoothly deformed to (anti)-de Sitter Another interesting effect is theexistence of the so-called partially-massless fields [74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 8283 84] the fields that have a number of degrees of freedom intermediate betweenthat of massless and massive and split in a set of massless fields in the Minkowskilimit Therefore the extension of the proposed approach to (anti)-de Sitter spaceseems to be non-trivial but nevertheless worth being investigated

In a series of papers [85 61 86 60] it was suggested so-called frame-like approachto the general mixed-symmetry fields in (anti)-de Sitter To generalize the proposedin the present paper unfolded system to (anti)-de Sitter case and to compare to thatof [60] is the next step to perform

We consider the proposed unfolded system as the first stage in constructing thefull interacting theory of mixed-symmetry fields

51

Acknowledgements

The author appreciates sincerely MA Vasiliev for reading the manuscript and mak-ing many detailed and valuable suggestions and illuminating comments the verywork was initiated as the result of discussions with MA Vasiliev The author isalso grateful to RR Metsaev and KB Alkalaev for useful discussions and to OVShaynkman for discussion of the fermionic case The work was supported in partby grants RFBR No 05-02-17654 LSS No 440120062 and INTAS No 05-7928by the Landau Scholarship and by the Scholarship of Dynasty foundation

Appendix A Multi-index convention

The multi-index notations is used a group of indices in which certain tensor issymmetric or is to be symmetrized is denoted either by one letter with the numberof indices indicated in round brackets or by placing a group of indices in roundbrackets eg

T a(s) equiv T a1a2as T a1aiaj as = T a1ajaias (A1)

V aT a(s) equiv V (a1T a2as+1) equiv1

s+ 1(V a1T a2a3as+1 + V a2T a1a3as+1 + + V as+1T a1a2as)

(A2)

V (bT a(s)) equiv V (bT a1as) equiv1

s + 1

(V bT a1a2as + V a1T ba2a3as + + V asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A3)Analogously the group of indices in which certain tensor is anti-symmetric or is tobe anti-symmetrized is denoted by placing indices in square brackets eg

T a[s] equiv T a1a2as T a1aiai+1as = minusT a1ai+1aias (A4)

V [bT a[s]] equiv V [bT a1as] equiv1

s+ 1

(V bT a1a2as minus V a1T ba2a3as + + (minus)sV asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A5)The operators of (anti)-symmetrization are weighted to be projectors (the factor 1

s+1

above)

Appendix B Young diagrams

Comprehensive information on Young diagrams can be found for example in thetextbook [71]

Definition B1 Given an integer partition ie a nonincreasing sequence si i isin[1 n] si ge si+1 of positive integers (or nonnegative when it is convenient to workwith a sequence of a fixed length) associated Young diagram Ys1 s2 sn is agraphical representation consisting of n left-justified rows made of boxes with the

52

i-th row containing si boxes

s10s11

s1s2s3s4

s5s6s7

s8s9

Finite-dimensional irreducible representation(irrep) of sl(d) ie various irre-ducible sl(d)-tensors are in one-to-one correspondence with Young diagrams of theform Ys1 s2 s[ d

2] The associated irreducible tensors

T

s1︷︸︸︷aa

s2︷︸︸︷

bb (B1)

or in condensed notation T a(s1)b(s2) have at most [d2] groups of indices being sym-

metric in each group separately and satisfy the condition that the symmetrizationof any group of indices with one index of any of the subsequent groups is identicallyzero ie

T a(s1)(b(sk)b)c(sjminus1) equiv 0 k lt j (B2)

If s[ d2] 6= 0 and d is even the (anti)-selfduality condition has to be imposed for

appropriate signature (anti)-selfduality is conventionally denoted by the sign factors+(minus) before s[ d

2] In this paper we do not consider (anti)-self dual representations

A scalar representation Y0 0 0 is denoted by bull a vector irrep Y1 0 0by rank-two symmetric tensor irrep by rank-two antisymmetric tensor irrep

by and so onFinite-dimensional irreducible representations of so(d) are of the two types ten-

sor and spin-tensor and are also characterized by Young diagrams which in thecase of spin-tensor irreps refer to the symmetry of the tensor part Young diagramsthat correspond to spin-tensor irreps are labeled by 1

2-subscript Spinor indices

α β γ = 12[d2] are placed first and are separated from tensor indices by rdquordquo For

example a spinor ψα irrep is denoted by bull 12 a vector-spinor irrep Aαaby 1

2and

so on To make tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry conditionthe tracelessness condition with respect to each pair of indices is to be imposed

ηccTa(s1)cb(siminus1)cd(sjminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n j = 1n (B3)

To make spin-tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry condition Γ-tracelessness condition with respect to each tensor index and a spinor index is to beimposed

Γαc βT

βa(s1)cb(siminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n (B4)

where Γαc β satisfy Γα

a βΓβb γ

+ Γαb βΓ

βaγ = 2ηab Additional conditions on spinors viz

Majorana Weyl and Majorana-Weyl are irrelevant to the problems concerned Also

53

in both cases it is required for the sum of the heights of the first two columns ofYoung diagrams to be not greater than d Note that the Γ-tracelessness conditionis stronger than the tracelessness one and applying the Γ-tracelessness twice to twosymmetric indices gives the tracelessness

0 = 2ΓαaβΓ

βb γT γ(ab) = ηabT

αab (B5)

To handle with arbitrary large Young diagrams the so-called block representationis used ie the rows of equal lengths are combined to blocks

Y(s1 p1) (sn pn) equiv Y

p1︷ ︸︸ ︷s1 s1

p2︷ ︸︸ ︷s2 s2

pn︷ ︸︸ ︷sn sn (B6)

References

[1] C Fronsdal ldquoMassless fields with integer spinrdquo Phys Rev D18 (1978) 3624

[2] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoCubic interaction in extended theories ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Nucl Phys B291 (1987) 141

[3] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoOn the gravitational interaction ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Phys Lett B189 (1987) 89ndash95

[4] M A Vasiliev ldquoConsistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in(3+1)-dimensionsrdquo Phys Lett B243 (1990) 378ndash382

[5] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoOn the geometry of higher-spin gauge fieldsrdquoClass Quant Grav 20 (2003) S473ndashS486 hep-th0212185

[6] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoFree geometric equations for higher spinsrdquoPhys Lett B543 (2002) 303ndash310 hep-th0207002

[7] M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear equations for symmetric massless higher spin fieldsin (a)ds(d)rdquo Phys Lett B567 (2003) 139ndash151 hep-th0304049

[8] X Bekaert I L Buchbinder A Pashnev and M Tsulaia ldquoOn higher spintheory Strings brst dimensional reductionsrdquo Class Quant Grav 21 (2004)S1457ndash1464 hep-th0312252

[9] D Sorokin ldquoIntroduction to the classical theory of higher spinsrdquo AIP ConfProc 767 (2005) 172ndash202 hep-th0405069

[10] X Bekaert S Cnockaert C Iazeolla and M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear higherspin theories in various dimensionsrdquo hep-th0503128

[11] A Sagnotti E Sezgin and P Sundell ldquoOn higher spins with a strong sp(2r)conditionrdquo hep-th0501156

[12] P K Townsend ldquoCovariant quantization of antisymmetric tensor gaugefieldsrdquo Phys Lett B88 (1979) 97

54

(σminus)2 = 0 built of background vielbein hamicrodx

micro which is unambiguously fixed bythe symmetry of Yg and Yg+1 σminus contracts (∆g + 1) vielbeins ha with the tensorrepresenting Yg+1 to obtain the tensor with the symmetry of Yg appropriate Youngsymmetrizers are implied

Since σminus affects tensor indices only it is correctly defined on spin-tensors too anddoes not violate the Γ-tracelessness condition The unfolded equations for fermionshave the same form as for bosons the irreducible tensors are to be replaced withcorresponding spin-tensors

The case of the last block of the length one ie single column is not specialbut requires some comments Since (sN minus 1) = 0 it is not possible to add a cellto the bottom-left of the N -th block of Y0 therefore Yn=Nk=0 equiv Y0 is theonly diagram with n = N and diagram Yn=Nminus1k=0 equiv Yg=1 has the symmetry ofY(s1 minus 1 p1) (sNminus1 minus 1 pNminus1) (1 pN + 1)

Subspace Wnkq with definite n forms an irreducible module of iso(d minus 1 1)

whereas the subspace with definite both n and k forms a finite-dimensional irre-ducible module of so(d minus 1 1) ie an irreducible Lorentz tensor characterized byYg as was stated above The intervals of constancy of qg correspond to gnk withdefinite n ie the set of forms on which a certain irreducible iso(dminus 1 1)-moduleis realized all have the same degree

Let us also note that Wkgep are infinite-dimensional whereas Wkltp are finite-dimensional The higher degree spaces Wkgep correspond to the equations of motion(Wk=p+1) and Bianchi identities (Wkgtp+1) which manifest the gauge symmetriesMost of the equations express higher grade g gt 0 fields via the derivatives of phys-ical field ωY0

q0and only certain elements of Wg=2

k=p+1 impose on ωY0q0

second orderdynamical equations The significance of the fields with g gt 0 is to make all gaugesymmetries be manifest

2 Mixed-Symmetry Fields in Minkowski Space

The types of the Minkowski space particles being by definition in one-to-one corre-spondence with unitary irreducible representations(uirrep) of the Poincare algebraiso(dminus 1 1) in the case of four space-time dimensions were classified by Wigner in[37]

Leaving out the details of the Wignerrsquos construction for recent reviews and forgeneralization to an arbitrary space-time dimension d see [38] important is thatgiven m2 gt 0 and a uirrep Y of the Wignerrsquos little algebra being so(d minus 1) form2 gt 0 and so(d minus 2) for m2 = 0 there exists a standard procedure to constructa uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) which is called a massive(massless) particle of spin-YSo-called continuous or infinite spin particles [37] [39] are not considered in thispaper Therefore physical degrees of freedom for massive and massless particles areclassified by irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) and so(dminus 2) respectively

More elaborated are the two cases of totally-symmetric spin-s particles Y =Ys equiv Y(s 1) [40 1 10] viz scalar vector graviton and of totally anti-symmetric spin-p particles Y = Y(1 p) [12 13 14] The others are referred to col-

6

lectively as mixed-symmetry the simplest one beingY = Y2 1 equiv Y(2 1) (1 1)Yet different problem is to realize a uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) on the solutions of a

wave equation for a field φYM(x) which takes values in a certain representation YM

of the Lorentz algebra so(dminus1 1) ie φYM(x) is a Lorentz tensor or a set of tensors

As field theories free particles can be described in either non-gauge or gauge wayin the former case a uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) is realized on the solutions of the waveequation directly whereas for the latter case a uirrep of iso(dminus1 1) is realized on thequotient of the solutions by certain specific solutions called pure gauge The waveequation (+m2)φYM

(x) = 0 which fixes the quadratic Casimir m2 of iso(dminus1 1)is generally supplemented with a set of algebraicdifferential constraints to singleout an irreducible in the sense of the little algebra component Field φYM

(x) takesvalues in a certain finite-dimensional representation of so(d minus 1 1) which is notirreducible in most cases nevertheless it can be made irreducible when dealing withfree equations of motion only Yet more different problem is to realize an irrep ofiso(d minus 1 1) on the solutions of the variational problem for some action in mostcases the procedure requires a set of auxiliary fields which carry no physical degreesof freedom

The choice of so(dminus 1 1)-representation YM (even if irreducible) in which fieldφYM

(x) takes values is not unique eg a free massless spin-one particle can bedescribed either by a gauge potential Amicro(x) subjected to

Amicro minus partmicropartνAν = 0 δAmicro = partmicroξ (21)

or by a field strength Fmicroν subjected to

partmicroFmicroν = 0 part[microFλρ] = 0 (22)

In the case of a massless spin-two particle (Y = so(dminus2)) in addition to the con-ventional description in terms of the metric gmicroν

Rmicroν minus1

2gmicroνR = 0 (23)

the Weyl tensor Cmicroνλρ known to have the symmetry of 4 can describe a freespin-two in a non gauge way

part[microCmicromicro]νν = 0 partλCmicroλνν = 0 (24)

Another example is a 4d massless scalar particle which can be described eitherby a scalar field φ(x) subjected to φ = 0 or more exotically by an antisymmetricgauge field ωmicroν (so-called notoph [41]) subjected to

ωmicroν minus partmicropartρωρν + partνpart

ρωρmicro = 0 δωmicroν = partmicroξν minus partνξmicro (25)

This equation describes a massless particle with spin- so(dminus2) equiv Y1 1so(dminus2) which

for d = 4 by virtue of the so(d minus 2) Levi-Civita tensor εij is equivalent to a scalar

4In antisymmetric basis Cmicroνλρ satisfies Cmicroνλρ = minusCνmicroλρ Cmicroνλρ = minusCmicroνρλ and C[microνλ]ρ = 0

7

Y1 1so(dminus2) sim Y0 0

so(dminus2) On the other hand a scalar particle can be describedby a rank-d antisymmetric field ωmicro1microd

satisfying ωmicro1microd= 0 where the use of

so(d minus 1 1)-duality is made of ωmicro1microd= εmicro1microd

φ These two types of duality arereferred to as trivial

The general statement is that free particles can be described by an infinite num-ber of ways called dual descriptions [42 43 44 45 46] but dual theories exhibitcertain difficulties while introducing interactions [47 48 49 50] eg despite the factthat free massless spin-one and spin-two particles can be described by the Maxwellfield strength and by the Weyl tensor respectively introducing interactions requiresthe corresponding gauge potentials Amicro and gmicroν to be brought in

There exists a distinguished choice of so(dminus1 1)-irrep YM in which field φYM(x)

takes values that can be referred to as fundamental or minimal For the minimaldescription of a spin-Y particle the spin degrees of freedom and the so(dminus1 1)-irrepYM are characterized by the same Young diagram ie YM = Y eg a spin-oneparticle by Amicro a spin-two by gmicroν All other descriptions are referred to as dual Itis the minimal descriptions that will be discussed further by this reason the termspin-Y particle can be substituted for more accepted spin-Y field

A massive totally symmetric spin-s field can be described [51] by a totally sym-metric tensor field φ(micro1micros) subjected to

(+m2)φmicro1micros= 0

partνφνmicro2micros= 0

φννmicro3micros

= 0

(26)

where the last equation (tracelessness condition) makes the tensor irreducible in theso(d minus 1 1) sense the first one puts the system on-mass-shell and the second oneprojects out the components orthogonal to the momentum restricting φmicro1micros

tocontain only a spin-s irrep of so(dminus 1)

Analogously a massive totally anti-symmetric spin-p field ie Y = Y(1 p)can be described by a totally anti-symmetric tensor field ω[micro1microp] subjected to

(+m2)ωmicro1microp= 0

partνωνmicro2microp= 0

(27)

where the tracelessness condition becomes trivial for anti-symmetric tensorsThese two results are easily generalized to an arbitrary spin-Ys1 snmassive

field which can be minimally described by a symmetric in each group of indicestensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) subjected to

(+m2)φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0

partmicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n]

φmicro1(s1)(microk(sk)microk)microi(siminus1)micron(sn) = 0 k isin [1 nminus 1] k lt i

ηmicroimicrojφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i j isin [1 n]

(28)

where the last two conditions are just the Young symmetry and the tracelessnessconditions which make the field carry an irrep-Ys1 sn of so(dminus 1 1) and can

8

be thought of as the part of the definition of field φYM(x) The first equation puts

the system on-mass-shell the second one projects out all so(dminus1)-irreps which thetensor φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)microp(sp) decomposes into except for the one with the symmetry ofYs1 sn so(dminus 1)-diagram

Let D (m2Ys1 sn) be an iso(d minus 1 1) module extracted by (28) beingirreducible for m2 6= 0 or for Y0 (scalar field) Since minimally described masslessfields are gauge theories a uirrep H (0Ys1 sn) of iso(d minus 1 1) correspondingto a massless spin-Ys1 sn field should be defined as appropriate quotient bythe pure gauge solutions of the form

0 minusrarr gauge solutions minusrarr all solutions minusrarr H (0Ys1 sn) minusrarr 0 (29)

where the sequence is non-split as there is no so(dminus 1 1)-covariant way to extractso(d minus 2)-irrep Ys1 sn from the Lorentz tensor with the same symmetry ofYs1 sn by virtue of a single so(dminus 1 1)-vector the momentum pmicro sim partmicro

A massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described as the quotient of(26) with m2 = 0 by pure gauge solutions of the form δφmicro1micros

= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) where

ξmicro1microsminus1 is a totally symmetric gauge parameter subjected to the equations of thesame form (26) ie on-mass-shell tracelessness and transversality thus belongingto D (0Ysminus 1) The definition of H (0Ys) is given by

0 minusrarr D (0Y(sminus 1 1)) minusrarr D (0Y(s 1)) minusrarr H (0Y(s 1)) minusrarr 0 (210)

There is a bit difference for a totally anti-symmetric spin-p massless field Puregauge solutions are defined analogously as δωmicro1microp

= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] where ξ[micro1micropminus1] is

a rank-(pminus1) antisymmetric gauge parameter subjected to the equation of the sameform (27) and thus belonging to D (0Y(1 pminus 1)) In contrast to a totally sym-metric spin-smassless field the gauge transformations are reducible in the sense thatδωmicro1microp

equiv 0 provided that one transforms gauge parameter δξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1]

with a second level rank-(p minus 2) antisymmetric gauge parameter ξ[micro1micropminus2] and soon Some components (parallel to the momentum) of the first level gauge parameterξmicro1micropminus1 do not contribute to the gauge law for ωmicro1microp

these are represented by thesecond level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 modulo those components of ξmicro1micropminus2 thatdo not contribute to ξmicro1micropminus1 and so on till δξmicro = partmicroξ Gauge parameters ξmicro1micropminus1ξmicro1micropminusk

k isin [1 p] and ξ are referred to as the first level the k-th level and thedeepest level of reducibility respectively The corresponding iso(d minus 1 1)-uirrep isgiven by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0Y(0 0)) minusrarr D (0Y(1 1)) minusrarr

minusrarr D (0Y(1 p)) minusrarr H (0Y(1 p)) minusrarr 0 (211)

For example Maxwell gauge potential Amicro possesses gauge parameters of the firstlevel only as p = 1 in this case

Though a considerable success in describing on-mass-shell massless fields wasachieved for instance within the light-cone approach [52] there are many reasons tohave an off-shell gauge symmetry ie to construct equations that are invariant with

9

respect to gauge transformations with gauge parameters not subjected to ξ = 0To make the symmetry off-shell generally requires to relax the irreducibility of theso(dminus 1 1)-representation in which field φY(x) takes values

For instance a massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described[53] by atraceless rank-s symmetric field φmicro1micros

with an off-shell gauge symmetry

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

(d+2sminus4)η(micro1micro2part

νpartρφνρmicro3micros) = 0 φννmicro3micros

= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1

= 0 partνξνmicro2microsminus1) = 0 (212)

where in order for φmicro1microsto be traceless the gauge parameter has to be not only

traceless but transverse also this still being true for general mixed-symmetry fieldsApparently to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters the trace-lessness constraint for field φmicro1micros

has to be relaxed The same spin-s massless fieldcan be described[1] by field φmicro1micros

subjected to5

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

2part(micro1partmicro2φ

ννmicro3micros) = 0 φνρ

νρmicro5micros= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1

ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1= 0

(213)

where in order to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters a trace-lessness is relaxed to a double-tracelessness ie field φmicro1micros

takes values in thedirect sum of two so(d minus 1 1)-irreps being symmetric traceless tensors of ranks sand (s minus 2) The general statement is that for equations of motion to have an off-shell gauge symmetry the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep in which field φY(x) takes values has tobe reducible with additional direct summands representing certain nonzero tracesThese additional fields are called auxiliary and carry no physical degrees of freedomImposing certain gauge equations (28) can be restored

A massless totally antisymmetric spin-p field can be described by an antisym-metric rank-p tensor field ω[micro1microp] subjected to

ωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1part

νωνmicro2microp] = 0 δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] (214)

where the symmetry at the all levels of reducibility is manifest and off-shell ieδξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1] for the second level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 not subjectedto any differential constraints and analogously for the gauge symmetries at deeperlevels

Much similar to totally anti-symmetric fields mixed-symmetry massless fieldspossess reducible gauge transformations ie for a field φ with equations of motioninvariant under gauge transformations δξ1φ =

sum

i1partξi11 there exist the second level

gauge transformations δξ2ξi11 =

sum

i2partξi22 such that δξ2φ equiv 0 there exist the third

level gauge transformations δξ3ξi22 =

sum

i3partξi33 such that δξ3ξ1 equiv 0 and so on The

difference from totally anti-symmetric fields is in that there are generally more thanone gauge parameters at each level of reducibility (enumerated by index ik at thek-th level)

5Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [1] have the form Gmicro1microsminus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 where Gmicro1microsis equal to (213) the two forms being equiva-

lent

10

For instance the simplest mixed-symmetry massless field has the spin- andcan be minimally described[16 17] by a field φ[micromicro]ν which is anti-symmetric in thefirst two indices and satisfies Young symmetry condition6 φ[micromicroν] = 0 The equationsof motion

φmicromicroλ + 2part[micropartλφmicro]λν minus partνpart

λφmicromicroλ minus 2partνpart[microφλ

micro]λ = 0 (215)

are invariant underδφmicromicroν = part[microξ

Smicro]ν + part[microξ

Amicro]ν minus partνξ

Amicromicro (216)

with symmetric and anti-symmetric gauge parameters ξS(microν) and ξA[microν] Let us stress

that to maintain an off-shell gauge symmetry field φ[micromicro]ν has to take values in a

reducible so(d minus 1 1) representation oplus so does symmetric gauge parameterξS(micromicro) oplus bull which is in accordance with φ ν

microν 6= 0 and ξSνν 6= 0 Analogously tototally anti-symmetric fields there exist second level gauge transformations with avector parameter ξmicro

δφmicromicroν = 0

δξAmicroν = 23(partmicroξν minus partνξmicro)

δξSmicroν = partmicroξν + partνξmicro

(217)

In this case H

(

0)

is given by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

oplusD (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0 (218)

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) field the depthof reducibility of gauge transformations is equal to p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi where p is the height

of the first column of the Young diagram and at the r-th level of reducibility gaugeparameters have the symmetry of

sN minus 1

pNkN

s2 minus 1

p2k2

s1 minus 1

p1

k1

i=Nsum

i=1

ki =

i=Nsum

i=1

pi minus r (219)

This pattern of reducibility of gauge transformations will be of great importancewhile constructing the unfolded formulation in Section 4 As is easily seen at the

6In more detail the field φmicroνλ satisfies φmicroνλ = minusφνmicroλ φmicroνλ+φνλmicro+φλmicroν = 0 Equivalentlya symmetric basis can be used ie φSmicroνλ = φSνmicroλ φ

Smicroνλ + φSνλmicro + φSλmicroν = 0 The two bases are

related by φS(microν)λ = 1radic3(φAmicroλν + φAνλmicro) φ

A[microν]λ = 1radic

3(φSmicroλν minus φ

Sνλmicro)

11

first level of reducibility the gauge parameters are various tensors whose LorentzYoung diagrams are obtained by cutting off one cell from the original so(d minus 2)-diagram in all possible ways ie the number of gauge parameters at the first levelis equal to the number of blocks N eg two for spin- There is only one gaugeparameter at the deepest level of reducibility whose Young diagram is obtained bycutting off the first column from Y eg for spin-

This pattern corresponds of course to on-shell equations ie the gauge param-eters taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of Young symmetry (219) are subjectedto (28)-like equations To obtain an off-shell gauge symmetry the field content hasto be extended to take values in certain reducible so(d minus 1 1)-representations ad-ditional components turn out can be identified with certain traces of a single fieldwith the symmetry of Y as an sl(d)-tensor In general gauge parameters are alsoreducible tensors with the symmetry of (219) In the case of a spin- massless fieldthe trace φ ν

microν in the sector of fields and the trace ξSνν in the sector of gauge param-eters are the additional components In the general case of a spin-Y = Ys1 snmassless field field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) should satisfy [20]

ηmicroimicroiηmicroimicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n] (220)

which is a generalization of the Fronsdalrsquos double-trace condition (213) As it will beshown this condition naturally arises in the unfolded approach Note that double-tracelessness is imposed on each group of symmetric indices and it is not requiredfor cross-traces to vanish

Let a generalized Weyl tensor for a minimally described spin-Y massless field bea gauge-invariant combination of the least order in derivatives of field φY(x) that isallowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell On the other hand it is the generalized Weyltensor that the minimal non-gauge description of a massless spin-Y field is basedon For a spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN)so(dminus2) massless field the generalizedWeyl tensor has the symmetry of Y(s1 p1 + 1) (s2 p2) (sN pN)so(dminus11) and isof the s1-th order in derivatives In the case of spin-one (Y = so(dminus2)) Maxwell field

strength Fmicroν with the symmetry of can be also called a generalized Weyl tensorFermionic mixed-symmetry fields share most features of bosonic ones viz the

reducibility of gauge transformations the enlargement of the field content for theequations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge invariance The difference is thatthe equations for fermions have the first order in derivatives and the irreducibility ofspin-tensors is achieved by the Γ-tracelessness condition7 instead of the tracelessnessone

For example a massless totally symmetric spin-(s + 12) field can be described

7Γmicro are the Clifford algebra generators and satisfy ΓmicroΓν + ΓνΓmicro = 2ηmicroν part equiv Γmicropartmicro Γ-trace isa contraction of a spinor index and one tensor index with Γmicro eg Γνφ

microν equiv Γαν βφ

βmicroν

12

off-shell[54] by a totally symmetric spin-tensor field φα(micro1micros) subjected to8

partφmicro1microsminus spart(micro1

Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros)

ΓνΓρΓλφνρλmicro4micros= 0 Γνξνmicro2microsminus1 = 0

(221)

where in order to get an off-shell gauge invariance the irreducibility of φα(micro1micros) hasto be relaxed to the triple Γ-tracelessness

A massless totally anti-symmetric spin-Y(1 p) 12field can be described off-shell

by a totally anti-symmetric spin-tensor field ωα[micro1microp] subjected to

partωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1Γ

νωνmicro2microp] = 0

δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp]

(222)

Similar to the bosonic case (222) possesses reducible gauge transformations Thedifference is that one can impose the triple Γ-tracelessness on ωα[micro1microp] but thisrestricts the first level gauge parameter to be Γ-traceless Γνξνmicro2micropminus1 = 0 andhence the second order gauge parameter has to be on-mass-shell ie partξmicro1micropminus2 = 0Therefore for equations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge symmetry of allorders no Γ-trace conditions have to be imposed on fieldgauge parameters

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) 12field the

pattern of gauge symmetries is given by the spin-tensors with the tensor part de-scribed by (219) the definition of the Weyl tensor remains unchanged also

The descriptions based on tensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) which is analogous tothe metric gmicroν are referred to as metric-like At least in writing equiv partmicropartνη

microν theexplicit use of metric ηmicroν is made of which complicates the issue of introducinginteractions with gravitation

Let us note that in principle one can verify the gauge invariance of the fieldequations for massless mixed-symmetry fields despite the fact that the very form ofgauge transformation is cumbersome due to Young symmetrizers The advantageof the unfolded approach is in that gauge invariance at all levels of reducibility ismanifest

3 Unfolding Dynamics and σminus Cohomology

In this section we first recall the definition of unfolding and the relation of the sim-plest unfolded systems to Lie algebrasmodules and Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomologywith coefficients Second peculiar properties of unfolded systems that describe freefields and specifically the so-called σminus cohomology concept are recalled Third thevery procedure of constructing the unfolded form is illustrated on the examples ofmassless spin-zero spin-one arbitrary totally symmetric spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2)

fields the relation with the general statement of Section 1 is pointed out in each ofthe examples

8Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [54] have the form Gmicro1microsminus s

2Γ(micro1ΓνGνmicro2micros) minus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 Gmicro1micros= partφmicro1micros

minus spart(micro1Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0 which is equivalent to

(222)

13

31 General Features

Some dynamical system is said to be unfolded [31 32 33] if it has the form

dWA = FA(W ) (31)

whereWA is a set9 of differential forms of degree-qA on some d-dimensional manifoldMd d - exterior differential on Md and FA(W ) is an arbitrary degree-(qA + 1)function of WA assumed to be expandable in terms of exterior (wedge) productsonly10

FA(W ) =infinsum

n=1

sum

qB1++qBn=qA+1

fAB1Bn

W B1 and andW Bn (32)

where fAB1Bn

are constant coefficients satisfying fAB1BiBj Bn

= (minus)qBiqBj fA

B1BjBiBn

Moreover FA(W ) must satisfy the integrability condition (called generalized Jacobiidentity) obtained by applying d to (31)

F B δFA

δW Bequiv 0 (33)

Any solution of (33) defines a free differential algebra (FDA) [55 56 57 58] If Ja-cobi identities (33) are satisfied irrespective ofMd dimension11 the free differentialalgebra is referred to as universal [10 59] It is the universal algebras only that willbe considered further

Equations (31) are invariant under gauge transformations

δWAqA

= dǫAqAminus1 + ǫBqBminus1

δFA

δW B for qA gt 0 (34)

δWA0 = ǫB

prime

0

δFA

δW Bprime

1

Bprime qBprime = 1 for qA = 0 (35)

where ǫAqAminus1 is a degree-(qA minus 1) form taking values in the same space as WAqA

Inits turn δWA

qA= 0 can be treated as unfolded-like system for ǫAqAminus1 ie dǫ

AqAminus1 =

minusǫBqBminus1δFA

δWB there emerge second level gauge transformations

δǫAqAminus1 = dξAqAminus2 minus ξBqBminus2

δFA

δW B (36)

provided that FA(W ) is linear in matter fields and analogously for the gauge trans-formations at deeper levels Therefore the reducibility of gauge transformations ismanifest in the unfolded approach For a degree-qA gauge field WA

qAthere exist qA

levels of gauge transformations

9In this section indices A B C are of arbitrary nature In the cases of practical significance AB C vary over certain irreps of the Lorentz algebra

10The wedge symbol and will be systematically omitted further11As the forms with the rank greater than d are identically zero there exist certain identities

eg Wn andWn equiv 0 for n+m gt d which make the operator δδWA to be ill-behaved

14

The use of the exterior algebra respects diffeomorphisms which is very appropri-ate for introducing interactions with the gravitation The whole information aboutthe dynamics turns out to be contained in FA(W ) and one can even extend anunfolded system to other manifolds[59] simply by changing the exterior differentialthe new unfolded system has literally the same form

Note that introducing enough auxiliary fields it is possible to reformulate anydynamical system in the unfolded form although it may be difficult to unfold someparticular system or to find all unfolded forms

Collected below are some important cases of unfolded systems which have adirect bearing on Lie algebras [55 59]

Lie algebrasFlat connections Let ΩI equiv ΩImicrodx

micro be a subsector of degree-oneforms The only self-closed unfolded equations are of the form

dΩI = minusf IJKΩ

JΩK (37)

Generalized Jacobi identity (33) implies the Jacobi identity f IJKf

JLMΩKΩLΩM equiv

0 for some Lie algebra g with structure constants f IJK Therefore the closed

subsector of one-forms is in one-to-one correspondence with Lie algebras and(37) is the flatness condition for a connection ΩI of g This provides acoordinate-independent framework for describing background geometry Inthe cases of interest g is iso(d minus 1 1) so(d minus 1 2) so(d 1) and sp(2n) [59]Background geometry connection ΩI is assumed to be of order zero whereasall matter fields including dynamical gravitation are of the first order Allequations are assumed to be of the first order in matter fields and hencedescribe free fields only

In this paper g = iso(dminus 1 1) and ΩI = ab ha where ab equiv abmicro dxmicro

is a Lorentz spin-connection and ha equiv hamicrodxmicro is a background vielbein which

defines a non-holonomic basis of a tangent space at each point of the manifoldFlatness equation (37) for iso(dminus 1 1)-connection ΩI reads

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb = 0(38)

The first is the zero torsion equation that expresses the Lorentz spin-connectionvia the first derivative of hamicro The second can be recognized as the zero curva-ture equation For example in Cartesian coordinates the explicit solution isab

micro = 0 and hamicro = δamicro

The advantage of description of background geometry as the flatness conditionfor a connection of the space-time symmetry algebra is in that this way iscoordinate-independent In what follows we assume ab ha to satisfy (38)which is enough if there is no need for the explicit form of the solution in someparticular coordinate system For instance in (anti)-de Sitter space (38) ismodified by the terms proportional to the cosmological constant λ2

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb + λ2hahb = 0(39)

15

and admits no simple solutions with hamicro = δamicro ab = 0 Nevertheless without

giving the explicit solution to imply that ab ha satisfy (39) is sufficient forgeneral analysis eg for constructing Lagrangians [60]

Contractible FDA The simplest equations linear in matter fields of the form

dWAq = fA

BWBq+1 (310)

can be reduced by linear transformations to either

dWAq = WA

q+1 dWAq+1 = 0 (311)

ordWA

q = 0 (312)

where the second equation of (311) is the consequence of Jacobi identities(33) for the first one In the first case by virtue of gauge transformations(34) δWA

q = dξAqminus1 + χAq δW

Bq+1 = dχA

q the field WAq can be gauged away In

both cases by virtue of the Poincarersquos Lemma these equations are dynamicallyempty and correspond to the co-called contractible FDAs [55]

g-modulesCovariant constancy equations Let WAq be a closed subsector of

q-forms of matter gauge fields Linear in matter fields equations may involvethe background g-connection ΩI which is of zeroth order Such equationsreferred to as linearized over g background (described by any solution ΩI of(37)) have the form

dWAq = minusΩIfI

ABW

Bq (313)

Jacobi identity (33) where (37) is also taken into account

ΩJΩK(minusf I

JKfIAB + fJ

ACfK

CB

)W B

q = 0 (314)

implies fIAB to realize a representation of g Therefore the closed subsector

of forms of definite degree is in one-to-one correspondence with g-moduleswhereas

DΩWAq equiv dWA

q + ΩIfIABW

Bq = 0 (315)

is a covariant constancy equation and (DΩ)2 = 0 since the connection is

flat (37) In the cases of interest A runs over certain finite-dimensionalso(d minus 1 1)-irreps ie g-modules decompose with respect to its subalgebraso(dminus 1 1) sub g into a direct sum of certain irreducible tensors This is whywe single out the Lorentz-covariant derivative DL from the whole g-covariantderivative DΩ the remaining part acts vertically (algebraically) In the caseof ΩI being an iso(d minus 1 1) flat connection the Lorentz covariant derivativeDL = d+ satisfy DL

2 = 0 as the exterior differential d does

DLTab = dT ab +a

cTcb +b

cTac + (316)

In Cartesian coordinates DL equiv d and we do not make any distinction betweend and DL whereas in (anti)-de Sitter (DL)

2 6= 0 and the difference between d

16

and DL has to be taken into account Also zero torsion equation (381) canbe rewritten as DLh

a = 0 The remaining part of ΩI which acts algebraicallyand mixes different so(dminus 1 1)-modules into g-modules is associated with thegenerators of translations with gauge field ha

Gluing g-modulesChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology LetWpWq andWr takevalues in g-modules R1 R2 and R3 the representations are realized by oper-ators T1 T2 and T3 respectively Still linear in matter fields but nonlinear inbackground connection ΩI equations are of the form

DΩWp equiv dWp + T1(Ω)Wp = f12(Ω Ω)Wq

DΩWq equiv dWq + T2(Ω)Wq = f23(Ω Ω)Wr

DΩWr equiv

(317)

where the terms forming g-covariant derivative are isolated on the lhs Thetwo g-modules R1 R2 appear to be glued together by the term f12(Ω Ω) isinHom(Λpminusq+1(g) otimes R2R1) Jacobi identity (33) implies f12(Ω Ω) to be aChevalley-Eilenberg cocycle with coefficients in Rlowast

2 otimesR1 where Rlowast2 is a mod-

ule contragradient to R2 and f12(Ω Ω)f23(Ω Ω) = 0 Coboundaries canbe proved to be dynamically empty and can be removed by a field redefini-tion Consequently f12(Ω Ω) should be a nontrivial representative of theChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology group with coefficients in Rlowast

2otimesR1 It followsalso that nothing but zero forms can be joined to zero forms ie the onlypossible linearized unfolded equations on forms of zero degree are (315) withq = 0

For any dynamical system linearized over certain g-background (described byany solution ΩI of (37)) equations of motion (315) along with gauge transforma-tions of all orders of reducibility acquire a very simple form

δξ1 = DΩξ0

δξpminus1 = DΩξpminus2

δWp = DΩξpminus1

DΩWp = 0

(318)

where Wp takes values in certain g-module R DΩ is the associated g-covariantderivative and ξpminusk k isin [1 p] are the gauge parameters of k-th order of reducibilitytaking values in the same g-module R and being forms of degree (p minus k) Thegauge invariance at each order of reducibility and of equations of motion is dueto (DΩ)

2 = 0 In some sense the gauge fields Wp and the gauge parameters ξpminusk

seem to play the same role at the linearized level This uniformity is of essentialimportance when analyzing unfolded systems

In the presence of gluing terms eg when only two modules say R1 and R2 areglued by nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycle fpr(Ω Ω) full chain of equations

17

and gauge transformations (318) is modified to12

δξ11 = DΩξ10

δξ1pminusr = DΩξ1pminusrminus1

δξ1pminusr+1 = DΩξ1pminusr + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

20 δξ21 = DΩξ

20

(319)

δξ1pminus1 = DΩξ1pminus2 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus2 δξ2rminus1 = DΩξ

2rminus2

δW 1p = DΩξpminus1 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus1 δW 2

r = DΩξ2rminus1

DΩW1p = fpr(Ω Ω)W

2r DΩW

2r = 0

where W 1p ξ

1pminusk and W 2

r ξ2rminusm take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively

Important is that the gauge fieldsparameters taking values in R2 contribute to therhs of the equationsgauge transformations for the gauge fieldsparameters takingvalues in R1 but for forms of degree greater than (p minus r) The above two systemsare nothing but the specializations of (31) (34) (36)

Also let us note that there is no strong reason to make any distinction betweenthe terms linear in the background g-connection ΩI which correspond to g-modulesand the terms of higher order in ΩI which correspond to Chevalley-Eilenberg co-cycles Both terms can be combined into a single object the generalized covariant-derivative D = d+T (Ω)+f(Ω Ω) equiv DΩ+f(Ω Ω) with the property D2 = 0Moreover by means of D (319) and (318) can be rewritten in a similar mannerConsequently at the linearized level the most general unfolded equations and gaugetransformations have the form

δξ1 = Dξ0

δξpminus1 = Dξpminus2

δWp = Dξpminus1

DWp = 0

(320)

where D is built of d background connection ΩI and satisfies D2 = 0 The gaugefieldsparameters take values in certain spacesWq viz Wp isin Wp ξpminus1 isin Wpminus1ξ0 isin W0 The elements of Wq are differential forms with values in certain g-modules It is also convenient to define higher degree spaces Wqgtp the equationsRp+1 = DWp = 0 take values in Wp+1 Rp+2 = DRp+1 belongs to Wp+2 andby virtue of D2 = 0 satisfies Rp+2 equiv 0 and so on Therefore there exist certainidentities which belong to Wp+2 for the equations which belong to Wp+1 andthere exist certain identities which belong to Wp+3 for the identities in Wp+2 andso on At the field theoretical level these identities correspond to Bianchi identitiesfor the first level gauge transformations higher identities correspond to the Bianchiidentities for the deeper levels of gauge transformations

12The sign factor (minus)pminusr+1 before fpr(Ω Ω) is ignored and is thought of as the part of thedefinition of fpr(Ω Ω)

18

A remark should be made that the forms belonging to Wq may have differentdegrees if there are Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles present As a result spaces Wq

may contain different number of elements For instance (319) can be reduced to(320) if one defines

Wq =

W 1q q lt pminus r

W 1q W

2qminusp+r q ge (pminus r)

(321)

where W 1q and W 2

qminusp+r take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively In termsof (319) the elements of Wq for q lt (pminus r) were referred to as ξ1q the elements ofWq for q = (pminus r)(pminus 1) to as ξ1q ξ

2qminusp+r the elements ofWq for q = p to as W 1

pW 2

r the elements of Wq for q gt p to as R1q R

2qminusp+r (the equations of motion and

Bianchi identities)

32 Interpretation of Unfolded Systems Describing free Fields

When describing free fields unfolded formulations will be referred to as frame-like [61 60] though the very term frame-like has a more broad definition Thesesystems consist of equations (37) describing background geometry of a finite chainof (317)-like equations describing the gauge fields of the model and of (317)-likeequations with q = 0 glued to gauge forms ie it requires a Lie algebra g (commonlyiso(dminus1 1) so(dminus1 2) or so(d 1)) a set of g-modules R0RN and an appropriateset of nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles f01fNminus1N The physical degreesof freedom are contained in the forms of zero degree and the module RN in whichzero degree forms take values is infinite-dimensional

Since frame-like unfolded systems contain inevitably infinitely many fields mostof them being either auxiliary or Stueckelberg13 there arises a problem of reconstruc-tion a metric-like formulation by a given unfolded formulation or of extracting thedynamical content for a given unfolded system

The questions to be answered are what are the dynamical fields what arethe differential gauge parameters and what are the gauge invariant equations ofmotion These answers are not universal and depend on the chosen scheme ofinterpretation Different interpretations correspond to dual descriptions of the samedynamical system

Frame-like unfolded systems are endowed at the linearized level with additionalstructures providing a natural way for interpretation Indices AB vary overcertain finite dimensional Lorentz irreps ie each of Rn n = 0 N decomposes asRn =

sum

k Pnk where Pnk are certain so(d minus 1 1)-modules characterized by Ynk

Young diagrams of Section 1We say that some frame-like unfolded system is given an interpretation if [62]

1 On the whole space W =oplusinfin

q=0Wq where the matter gauge fields gauge pa-rameters equations of motion and Bianchi identities take values there exists

13A field is called Stueckelberg if it can be gauged away by pure algebraic symmetry

19

a bounded from below grading g = 0 1 ie Wq =oplusinfin

g=0Wgq The ho-

mogeneous element of Wgq is a certain differential form with values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep and is denoted as W gq In simplest cases the grade is just the

rank of the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep the element of Wgq takes values in

2 The closed subsector of one-forms ΩI describes a background geometry vizMinkowski or (anti)-de Sitter The generalized covariant derivative D is to bedivided into three parts the last one not being necessary nontrivial

D = DL minus σminus + σ+ (322)

where DL is a background Lorentz-covariant derivative and has a zero gradeσminus is an operator of grade (minus1) and σ+ contains positive grade operatorsThe only differential part is in DL whereas σplusmn acts vertically and is built ofthe background vielbein ha If two modules are glued the gluing element issupposed to be of grade (minus1) and also denoted as σminus

The equations then have the form

DLWn +

gminusnsum

i=1

σ+(W n+i

)= σminus

(W n+1

) g = 0 1 (323)

and analogously for the gauge transformations In the flat space all operators ofpositive grade appear to be trivial for the massless case As it does not affect theanalysis let us consider a simplified version with σ+ = 0 Then D2 = DL

2+σminusDL+DLσminus + (σminus)

2 = 0 is equivalent to DL2 = 0 (σminus)

2 = 0 and σminusDL +DLσminus = 0 Thefirst is a part of the flatness condition (38) for the iso(d minus 1 1)-connection Thesecond is the nilpotancy condition for σminus The third is satisfied provided that σminus istwisted by the factor (minus)∆g where (∆g + 1) is a degree of σminus which is equal to thenumber of the vielbeins ha that σminus is built of Indeed the vielbeins ha anticommutewith DL and hence the action of σminus is to be twisted by the factor (minus)∆g in orderσminusDL +DLσminus = 0 holds true Without further mention the pure sign factor (minus)∆g

will be though of as a part of the definition of σminusIt is useful to illustrate the action of σminus when for example unfolded equations

on fields with values in two modules R1 and R2 are glued as in (319)

R1︷ ︸︸ ︷

R2︷ ︸︸ ︷ g

q

t t t t

t t t

W 1p

ξ1pminus1

ξ10

W 2r

ξ2rminus1

ξ20

(324)

20

where short arrows stand for the action of σminus within each module and long arrowsfor the action of σminus between two modules (gluing terms) and dots stand for gaugefieldsparameters at different grades bold dots represent the elements of Wp =W 1

pW2r

All information about the dynamics turns out to be concealed in cohomologygroups of σminus [62] H(σminus) =

Ker(σminus)Im(σminus)

Let us analyze unfolded system (320) whichat grade g has the form

δξg1 = DLξg0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 )

δW gp = DLξ

gpminus1 + σminus(ξ

g+1pminus1)

0 = DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p )

(325)

Beginning from the deepest level of gauge transformations and from the lowestgrade it is obvious that those ξg+1

0 that are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueck-elberg(algebraic) gauge parameters for those ξg1 that belong to the image of σminusTherefore those ξg1 that are σminus-exact can be gauged away The leftover gauge sym-metry satisfies δξg1 = DLξ

g0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 ) = 0 so that those ξg+1

0 that belong to thecoimage of σminus are expressed via derivative of ξn0 Having sieved W0 and W1 inthis way only those ξg0 are still independent that are σminus-closed and hence belong toH

0(σminus) since only forms of zero-degree are elements of W0 Then those ξg+11 that

are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueckelberg gauge parameters for those ξg2 thatbelong to the image of σminus Therefore only those ξg1 are still independent that areσminus-closed but not σminus-exact and hence belong to H

1(σminus) Having sievedW0Wpminus1

one after another it turns out that independent differential gauge parameters at thek-th level are given by H

pminusk(σminus) Analogously those fields W gp that are σminus-exact

can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gauge parameters at Wpminus1 Thosefields W g+1

p that are not σminus-closed can be expressed via derivatives of fields at lowergrade by virtue of the equations Rg

p+1 equiv DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p ) = 0 these fields are

called auxiliary Therefore the dynamical fields ie those that are neither aux-iliary nor Stueckelberg are given by H

p(σminus) The nilpotency of D2 equiv 0 impliescertain relations of the form DLR

gp+1 + σminus(R

g+1p+1) = 0 between Rg

p+1 Therefore

auxiliary fields are expressed by virtue of σminus-exact Rgp+1 and σminus-non-closed Rg+1

p+1

are themselves expressed via derivatives of Rgp+1 Consequently the independent

equations on dynamical fields are given by Hp+1(σminus) From the cohomological point

of view higher degree forms correspond to certain nontrivial relations between equa-tions called Bianchi identities and manifest gauge nature of equations As there aregenerally more than one levels of gauge transformations one can expect the highercohomological group to be nontrivial

To sum up

21

cohomology group interpretation

Hpminusk k = 1p differential gauge parameters at the k-th level of re-

ducibilityH

p dynamical fieldsH

p+1 independent gauge invariant equations on dynamicalfields

Hp+k+1 k = 1p Bianchi identities for the k-th order gauge symmetryH

p+k k gt p supposed to be trivial in a regular case

To distinguish fields in cohomological sense the following convention is introduced[63]

Stueckelberg fields(gauge parameters) are those that can be eliminated bypure algebraic symmetry ie these fields are σminus-exact (are those that canbe used to gauge away certain fields ie these parameters are not σminus-closed)

Auxiliary fields are those that can be expressed via derivatives of some otherfields ie these fields are σminus-nonclosed Let us note that this definition isgenerally ambiguous eg in system

partA = B

partB = A(326)

which field is auxiliary is a matter of choice This ambiguity is removed byvirtue of grade[62 63]

Dynamical fields are those that are neither auxiliary nor Stueckelberg ie thesefields are representatives of σminus-cohomology classes

Note that if certain dynamical field given by Hp belongs to the grade-gf subspace

Wgfp and the corresponding equations given by H

p+1 belong to the grade-ge subspaceWge

p+1 the order of equations is equal to ge minus gf + 1If the unfolded system is supposed to admit a lagrangian formulation there has

to be a one-to-one correspondence between the number of dynamical fields and thatof equations k-th level gauge symmetries and k-th level Bianchi identities ie in acertain sense there should be a duality H

pminusk sim Hp+1+k k isin [0 p] This takes place

for all unfolded systems exemplified in this paperSince the operators involved ie DL and σminus are of grade 0 and minus1 only the

fields with the grade greater than g0 for any g0 ge 0 form a quotient module thusdescribing the same system on its own - dual formulations This picture partlybreaks in (A)dSd because of appearance of grade +1 nilpotent operator σ+

D = DL + σminus + λ2σ+ (327)

The specific character of frame-like unfolded systems which will be crucial forus is that by virtue of the inverse background vielbein hmicroa all form indices of any

gauge fieldparameter Wa1(s1)ap(sm)q can be converted to the fiber ones

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (328)

22

The resulting tensor W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is not irreducible and can be decomposedinto so(dminus 1 1)-irreps according to the so(dminus 1 1)-tensor product rule

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] =rArr Ys1 smotimes

so(dminus11)

Y(1 q) =oplus

α

Yα (329)

where one-column Young diagramY(1 q) of height-q represents the anti-symmetricindices d1 dq and Yα are the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the tensor product decomposesinto Having converted all fields (parameters equations) of a given unfolded systemto the fiber tensors one can make the identification of the fields in the unfolded ap-proach and those of the metric-like approach though the general covariance gaugeinvariance and other advantages of the unfolded formalism will be not manifestWhile constructing the unfolded formulations of a known metric-like systems or in-terpreting a given unfolded system in terms of metric-like fields this technique willbe widely used Moreover the calculation of σminus cohomology groups is largely basedon the explicit evaluation of (329)-like expressions Once an unfolded form is knownno use of this technique is needed either to generalize it to other backgrounds or tointroduce interactions

Field W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is traceless in a1 am and d1 dq separatelyHowever the cross traces need not vanish and hence some of Yα represent tracesTo distinguish between the traces of different orders let us introduce the followingthe Y-valued degree-q form WY

q is said to be a trace of the r-th order iff it has theform

WYq = hh

︸︷︷︸

r

hh︸︷︷︸

qminusr

CYprime

0 (330)

for some Yprime-valued degree-0 form CYprime

0 where (q minus r) indices of the backgroundvielbeins ha are contracted with the tensor representing Yprime and r indices are freefor the whole expression to take values in Y the appropriate Young symmetrizeris implied When the indices of WY

q are converted to the fiber ones the expression

takes the form ηη︸ ︷︷ ︸

r

CYprime ie CYprime

represents a trace of the r-th order

Different aspects of unfolding are illustrated on the examples of a massless scalarfield a massless spin-one field and a massless spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2) fields

33 Examples of Unfolding

Example 331 Unfolding a scalar field [31 62] First it should be noted thatit is easy of course to convert the Klein-Gordon equation C = 0 to a system offirst order equations

partmicroC = Cmicro

partmicroCmicro = 0(331)

but when writing the second equation the explicit form of the metric is to be usedhence these equations are not of unfolded form (31)

23

Described in terms of a scalar field C(x) the theory is brought into a non gaugeform therefore zero-forms only are allowed or else there would be some gaugesymmetry according to (34) The most general rhs of dC = has the form

dC = haCa (332)

for some vector-valued zero-form Ca This equation just parameterizes the firstderivative of C(x) and is similar to the first of (331) There are three terms allowedon the rhs of dCa =

dCa = hbCab + hbC

ab + haC prime (333)

with Cab Cab and C prime taking values in antisymmetric symmetric and scalar so(dminus1 1)-irreps ie bull The first term is forbidden by Bianchi identity hadC

a equiv 0To analyze the remaining terms let us decompose dCa into so(dminus 1 1)-irreps

partmicroCahmicrob = otimes = oplus oplus bull (334)

where = part[aCb] = part(aCa) minus 1dηaapartbC

b bull = partaCa = C

The component represents Bianchi identity in the first order reformulation ofthe Klein-Gordon equation Indeed expressing Ca as partaC implies part[aCb] equiv 0 bullrepresents the desired Klein-Gordon equation whereas is the only component al-lowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell Therefore to impose the Klein-Gordon equationthe term haC prime has to be omitted

dCa = hbCab (335)

The only possible rhs for dCaa = compatible with Jacobi identity hbdCab equiv 0

is of the form dCaa = hbCaab for Caaa taking values in a rank-three symmetric

so(d minus 1 1)-irrep ie The process of unfolding continues unambiguously inthis way and results in the full system

dCa(k) = hbCa(k)b equiv F a(k)(C) k = 0 1 (336)

where Ca(k) is rank-k totally symmetric traceless field ie taking values in k

so(dminus 1 1)-irrepTo make a connection with the general statement of Section 1 for Y = Y(0 0)

the general scheme results in

Yg bull

n k 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 0 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore spaces Wq and operator σminus which enters D = DL minus σminus should be definedas

Wq = WqWaq W

aaq (337)

24

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbWa(gminus1)bq g gt 0

(338)

Consequently W is a space of various differential forms with values in totally sym-metric traceless so(d minus 1 1)-tensors graded by the form degree and by the rankof so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Space Wq forms an irreducible iso(d minus 1 1)-module System(336) reads

Dω0 = 0 ω0 isin W0 (339)

The cohomology groups of σminus are easy to find

H0(σminus) = C(x) as the lowest grade field is automatically closed σminus(C) = 0 and it

cannot be exact as a form of zero degree Contrariwise zero-forms with gradegreater than zero are not closed σminus(C

k+1) = hbCa(k)b = 0lArrrArr Ck+1 = 0

H1(σminus) = haB(x)0 for some B(x)0 isin W

00 One-form Ba

1 = haB(x)0 is closedσminus(B

a1) = haB

a1 = hah

aB(x)0 equiv 0 and it cannot be represented as σminus(C2) =

hbCab as far as Cab is traceless The cohomology groups at higher grade are

trivial since σminus(haBa(k)(x)0) 6= 0 for k gt 0

Hqgt1(σminus) = empty as one can make sure

The interpretation in terms of Section 32 is as follows as is expected the dynamicalfield given by H

0 is C(x) The equations are given by the projection of dCa = hbCab

to H1 ie C = 0 The fields with k gt 0 are auxiliary being expressed via

derivatives of C(x) Ca(k) = partapartaC(x) Inasmuch as there is no gauge symmetryin the system the higher cohomology groups are trivial

An infinitely many dual formulations of a massless scalar field are also includedIndeed the fields with k ge k0 gt 0 form a quotient module Rk0 ie one canconsistently write

dCk = σminus(Ck+1) k ge k0 (340)

The first equationdCa(k0) = hbC

a(k0)b (341)

imposes on the dynamical field Ca(k0)

partbCba(k0minus1) = 0

part[bCc]a(k0minus1) = 0(342)

which imply at least locally Ca(k0) =

k0︷ ︸︸ ︷

partaparta C and C = 0 for some fieldC(x) All fields at higher grade are auxiliary This statement is confirmed bythe cohomology analysis H

0(Rk0 σminus) = Ck0 ie scalar is described in termsof a traceless rank-k0 symmetric tensor field subjected to the equations given byH

1(Rk0 σminus) = haBa(k0minus1)0 minus k0(k0minus1)

2(d+2k0minus4)ηaahcB

a(k0minus2)c0 +hcB

a(k0)c0 for B

a(k0minus1)0 B

a(k0)c0

taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps characterized by diagrams k0 minus 1 k0

These two elements represents just the components ofWk0

1 sim k0 otimes with the

25

symmetry of k0 minus 1 (trace) andk0

the third component with the symmetryof k0 + 1 is exact

The above results can be easily extended to (A)dSd background and to a massivescalar field [62]

DLCk = σminus(C

k+1) + σ+(Ckminus1) = 0 (343)

where there appears a nontrivial positive grade operator

σ+(Ckminus1) = (m2 minus λ2k(k + dminus 1))

(

haCa(kminus1) minus(sminus 1)

d+ 2k minus 4ηaahbC

a(kminus1)b

)

(344)

and DL is a Lorentz-covariant derivative in (A)dSd In the (A)dSd case the situationis more interesting due to the appearance of σ+ operator and the possibility of theaccidental degeneracy of σ+ when m2 = λ2kprime(kprime + dminus 1) for some kprime [62]

Example 332 Unfolding Maxwell equations [64 65] An example of masslessspin-one field is more interesting as a gauge system The main object is a one-formAmicro From gauge transformation law

δA1 = dξ0 (345)

it follows that there should not be other forms of rank greater than zero If this werethe case the gauge parameters of these new forms would be involved by virtue of(34) making the gauge law for A1 inappropriate Indeed there are two possibilitiesto introduce higher degree forms on the rhs of dA = (i) dA1 = R2 fora scalar valued degree-two form R2 which possesses its own gauge parameter χ1δR2 = dχ1 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law for A1 is modifiedto δA1 = dξ0 + χ1 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gaugeparameter χ1 This case corresponds to contractible free differential algebras (310)(ii) dA1 = hbω

b1 for a vector valued degree-one form ωa

1 which possesses its owngauge parameter ǫa0 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law forA1 is modified to δA1 = dξ0 + hbǫ

b0 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of

Stueckelberg gauge parameter ǫa0 Consequently in both cases A1 can be made non-dynamical which is not what was expected Therefore the only possibility is tointroduce a zero-form C

[ab]0 anti-symmetric in a b parameterizing by virtue of

dA1 = hahbC[ab]0 (346)

the Maxwell field strength Bianchi identity hahbdC[ab]0 equiv 0 tolerates two terms on

the rhs of dC[ab]0 =

dC[ab]0 = hcC

[ab]c0 + h[aC

b]0 (347)

with C[ab]c0 and Ca

0 taking values in and so(dminus 1 1)-irreps the former taken inantisymmetric basis In order to determine which of the terms should be omittedif any the decomposition of the first derivative of the Maxwell field strength intoLorentz irreps has to be analyzed

C [ab]|c equiv partmicroC[ab]hmicroc = otimes = oplus oplus (348)

26

where = part[aCbc] = partbCab and = partcC [ab] minus part[cCab] + 2

dminus1ηc[apartdC

b]d part[aCbc]

is identically zero provided that C [ab] is expressed via the first derivative of Amicroor represents the second pair of Maxwell equations in terms of field strength C [ab]In both cases this component should be zero and moreover this can not be keptnonzero as there is no hcC

[abc]-like term allowed on the rhs of (347) The secondpartbC

ab is the desired Maxwell equations in terms of Amicro or the first pair of Maxwellequations in terms of the field strength Consequently to impose Maxwell equationsterm h[aCb] has to be omitted whereas the third is the only component allowed tobe nonzero on-mass-shell

Again unfolding continues unambiguously and requires an infinite set of fields

C[ab]c(k)0 taking values14 in

kto be introduced

dC [ab]c(k) = hdC[ab]c(k)d k = 0 1 (349)

The full system has the form

dA1 = hahbCab0 equiv F (AC) δA1 = dξ0

dC[ab]c(k)0 = hdC

[ab]c(k)d0 equiv F [ab]c(k)(C) k = 0 1

(350)

and represents two modules being glued together by the term on the rhs of thefirst equation

For Y = Y(1 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 resultsin

Yg bull

n k 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 1 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore

Wq =

W0 q = 0

WqW[ab]qminus1W

[ab]cqminus1 q gt 0

(351)

let us point out the shortening of W0 The action of σminus on Wq isin Wq is defined as

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hahbW[ab]qminus1 g = 1

hdW[ab]c(gminus2)dqminus1 g gt 1

(352)

With D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (350) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (353)

14The fields C [ab]c(k) are taken in antisymmetric basis ie they are antisymmetric in a bsymmetric in c(k) and C [abd]c(kminus1)equiv0

27

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 0 form a finite-dimensional iso(dminus1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g gt0 form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

Again the cohomology groups are easy to find gauge parameters are given byH

0(σminus) = ξ0 dynamical fields by H1(σminus) = A1 Maxwell equations by H

2(σminus) =

h[aBb]0 and the Bianchi identities for the first order gauge transformations by

H3(σminus) = hahbB0 the rest of groups are empty H

kgt3(σminus) = empty Important is thedirect correspondence between the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2

the gauge parameters in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3There are infinitely many of non-gauge dual formulations based on C [ab]c(k0) eg

for k0 = 0 one recovers the Maxwell equations in terms of the field strength

part[aCbc] = 0

partbCab = 0

(354)

Let us note that the ambiguity at the first step of unfolding (the terms haC prime andh[aCb] in the above two examples) expresses the possibility of introducing a massterm

Example 333 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-s field [31 6466] We start from the metric-like description of a massless spin-s field in termsof a double-traceless symmetric rank-s field φmicro1micros

satisfying (213) the secondorder equations are invariant with respect to the first order gauge transformationwith traceless rank-(s minus 1) gauge parameter ξmicro1microsminus1 Inasmuch as the Young di-agram s of so(d minus 2) is of the height one there are gauge transforma-tions of the first level only Therefore the dynamical field in the unfolded ap-proach has to be a one-form There is only one way to identify φmicro1micros

and ξmicro1microsminus1

with certain ωY01 and ξY0

0 taking values in the same so(d minus 1 1)-irrep Y0 namely

Y0 = sminus 1 ie ωa(sminus1)1 and ξ

a(sminus1)0 takes values in a rank-(s minus 1) symmet-

ric traceless tensors Field φmicro1microsis identified with a totally symmetric part of

ωa(sminus1)1 ie φmicro1micros

= hb1(micro1hbsminus1

microsminus1ωa1asminus1

micros)ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 the double-tracelessness

condition is the consequence of the tracelessness of ωa(sminus1)1 in a1asminus1 ξmicro1microsminus1

is identified with ξa(sminus1)0 directly ξmicro1microsminus1 = hb1micro1

hbsminus1microsminus1

ξa1asminus1ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 andone can make sure that the Fronsdalrsquos gauge transformation law is recovered fromδω

a(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 Field ω

a(sminus1)1 has a redundant component with the symmetry

ofsminus 1

which can be made Stueckelberg by virtue of gauge parameter ξa(sminus1)b

with the same symmetry type ie

δωa(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)c0 (355)

It automatically follows that there is a degree-one gauge field ωa(sminus1)b1 coupled with

ωa(sminus1)1 as

dωa(sminus1)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)c1 (356)

28

The only solution to Bianchi identity hcdωa(sminus1)c1 equiv 0 is15

dωa(sminus1)b1 = hcω

a(sminus1)bc1 (357)

where a new field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

is introduced and so on

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1 (358)

until the field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

for which the Bianchi identity solvesas

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 (359)

where field Ca(s)b(s)0 represents a generalized Weyl tensor and has the symmetry of

s The solution of Bianchi identity hchddC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 equiv 0 has the form

dCa(s)b(s)0 = hc

(

Ca(s)cb(s)0 +

s

2C

a(s)bb(sminus1)c0

)

(360)

where Ca(s+1)b(s)0 has the symmetry of s

s+ 1 The second term on the rhs

of (360) supplements the first one to have a proper Young symmetry Further

unfolding requires a set of degree-zero forms Ca(s+i)b(s)0 taking values in so(dminus1 1)-

irreps characterized by Young diagrams ss+ i

The full system has theform

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1

δωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(k)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)b(k)c0 k isin [0 sminus 2]

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 δω

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0

dCa(s+i)b(s) = hc

(

Ca(s+i)cb(s) +s

i+ 2Ca(s+i)bb(sminus1)c

)

i isin [0infin)

(361)

By the construction the system incorporates Fronsdalrsquos field φmicro1microswith the correct

gauge law but there is still to be proved that the Fronsdalrsquos equations are reallyimposed and that there are no other dynamical fields in the system Let us recon-struct Fronsdalrsquos equations (213) whereas the second statement will be proved asa part of a more general theorem The first two equations of (361) read

partmicroωa(sminus1)ν minus partνω

a(sminus1)micro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)cν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)cmicro (362)

partmicroωa(sminus1)bν minus partνω

a(sminus1)bmicro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)bcν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)bcmicro (363)

It is convenient to convert all world indices to the fiber ones

partcωa(sminus1)|d minus partdωa(sminus1)|c = ωa(sminus1)c|d minus ωa(sminus1)d|c (364)

partcωa(sminus1)b|d minus partdωa(sminus1)b|c = ωa(sminus1)bc|d minus ωa(sminus1)bd|c (365)

15The proof is not given as more general statement about the solutions of such equations isproved in the next Section

29

where ωa(sminus1)|b equiv ωa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro ωa(sminus1)bb|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bbmicro hcmicro

Contracting (365) with ηbd and then symmetrizing c with a1asminus1 results in

partcωa(sminus1)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus1)c|c= 0 (366)

By symmetrizing in (364) a1asminus1 with d

ωa(sminus1)c|a = partcωa(sminus1)|a minus partaωa(sminus1)|c (367)

and then by contracting (364) with ηdasminus1

ωa(sminus1)c|

c= (sminus 1)

(

partcωa(sminus2)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus2)c|c

)

(368)

all the terms of (366) can be expressed via ωa(sminus1)|b Plugging these to (366) gives

ωa(sminus1)|a minus partapartc((sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c

)+ (sminus 1)partapartaω

a(sminus2)c|c= 0 (369)

where ωa(sminus1)|a is to be identified with Fronsdalrsquos field φa(s) as ωa(sminus1)|a = 1sφa(s)

then ωa(sminus2)c|

c= 1

2φa(sminus2)c

c (sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c = φa(sminus1)c and the equation

acquires the Fronsdalrsquos form (213)

φa(s) minus spartapartcφa(sminus1)c + s(sminus1)

2partapartaφ

a(sminus2)cc= 0 (370)

For Y = Y(s 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 results in

Yg sminus 1 sminus 1 s

ss+ 1

n k 1 0 1 sminus 1 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = sminus 1 g = s g = s+ 1

qg q0 = 1 qsminus1 = 1 qs = 0 qs+1 = 0

therefore

Wq =

Wa(sminus1)0 W

a(sminus1)b0 W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0 q = 0

Wa(sminus1)q W

a(sminus1)bq W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)q W

a(s)b(s)qminus1 W

a(s+1)b(s)qminus1 q gt 0

(371)and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hcWa(sminus1)b(gminus1)cq g isin [1 sminus 1]

hchdWa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)dqminus1 g = s

hc

(

Wa(gminussminus1)cb(s)qminus1 + s

gminuss+1W

a(gminussminus1)bb(sminus1)cqminus1

)

g gt s

(372)

With D = DL minus σminus full system (361) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (373)

30

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sminus 1 sim g isin [0 sminus 1]form a finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k =0 1 sim g ge s form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

The representatives of cohomology classes can be chosen as H0 = ξ

a(sminus1)0 H1 =

hbφa(sminus1)b H2 = hbhcG

a(sminus1)c minus hahcGa(sminus2)bc + γηaahahcG

a(sminus4)bcnn+ (βηabhahc +

αηaahbhc)Ga(sminus3)cn

n16 H

3 = hbhahcχa(sminus2)c H

kgt3 = empty where φa(s) and Ga(s) are

double-traceless tensor fields and ξa(sminus1) and χa(sminus1) are traceless H01 are nontrivialat the lowest grade whereas H

23 are nontrivial at grade-one therefore the orderof equations that are imposed on the dynamical field is equal to two It turns outthat there is no need in the explicit form for α β and γ it is sufficient to find outthe Young symmetry of representatives only The uniqueness of Fronsdalrsquos theoryat the level of action was demonstrated in [67] and at the level of equations in[6 53] Consequently there is no need for equations (370) to be found explicitly -those of Fronsdal are the only possible Again there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2 the gauge parameters

in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3 The system contains an infinitely many ofdual formulations those that have field W

a(sminus1)b(k0)1 at the lowest grade are gauge

dual descriptions whereas those that have field Ca(s+k0)b(s) at the lowest grade arenon-gauge Dual description based on field W

a(sminus1)b(1)1 was elaborated in [68]

Example 334 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field[69

70 31] Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field results in literally

the same unfolded system (361 373) but with fields taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that are irreducible spin-tensors with the same tensor part as in the bosoniccase Note that operator σminus is not modified but the σminus cohomology groups areslightly changed such that the equations become of the first order

The Dirac equation Unfolded system (336) or equivalently (339) describesa massless spin-1

2field provided that Ck take values in s 1

2so(dminus1 1)-irreps

ie Ck equiv Cαa(k) and Γαb βC

βba(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equation of (336)

partmicroCα = hmicroaC

αa (374)

with hbmicroΓβb α

gives the Dirac equation

Γαa βpart

aCβ = 0 (375)

the rest of equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives of dynamicalfield Cα

The Rarita-Schwinger equation Unfolded system (350) or equivalently(353) describes a massless spin-3

2field provided that irreducible tensors in (351)

are replaced by the corresponding irreducible tensor-spinors ie A1 equiv Aαmicro C

k equiv

Cα[ab]c(k) and Γαb βC

β[ab]c(k) = 0 Γαd βC

β[ab]dc(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equa-tion of (350)

1

2(partmicroA

αν minus partνA

αmicro) = hmicroahνbC

α[ab] (376)

16α = minus (s(d+sminus5)minusd+6)(sminus2)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6) β = (sminus2)

(d+sminus4) γ = (d+sminus6)(sminus2)(sminus3)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6)

31

with Γ-matrices and converting world indices micro ν to the fiber ones according toAαa equiv Aα

microhamicro gives the Rarita-Schwinger equation

Γαb βpart

bAβa minus partaΓαb βA

βb = 0 δAαa = partaξα (377)

The rest of unfolded equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives ofdynamical field Aα

microThe Fang-Fronsdal equation for a spin-(s + 1

2) massless field Unfolded

system (361) or equivalently (373) describes a massless spin-(s + 12) field pro-

vided that irreducible tensors in (371) are replaced by the corresponding irreducibletensor-spinors With all world indices converted to the fiber ones the first equationof (361) has the form

Gαa(sminus1)|[cd] equiv partcωβa(sminus1)|d minus partdωβa(sminus1)|c = ωβa(sminus1)c|d minus ωβa(sminus1)d|c (378)

where ωαa(sminus1)|b equiv ωαa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωαa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

αa(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro

Analogously to the bosonic case nonsymmetric component of ωβa(sminus1)|d canbe gauged away algebraically Hence the Fronsdalrsquos field φαa(s) is identified asωαa(sminus1)|a = 1

sφαa(s) Then Γα

b βφβa(s) = Γα

b βωβa(sminus1)|b Γα

b βΓβc γφ

γa(sminus2)bc = ηbcωαa(sminus2)b|c

and the Fronsdalrsquos triple Γ-traceless constraint is a consequence of irreducibility ofωαa(sminus1)|b in α a1asminus1 and the lack of any conditions with respect to a1asminus1 andb Since the Fronsdalrsquos field contains three irreducible components with the sym-metry of s 1

2 s-1 1

2and s-2 1

2 the equations of motion has to be

nontrivial in these three sectors too The projector on the dynamical equations issimply Γα

b βGβa(sminus1)b|a and gives

Γαb βpart

bφβa(s) minus spartaΓαb βφ

βa(sminus1)b = 0 (379)

which is in accordance with (222) But we would like to note that there aretwo components with the symmetry of s-1 1

2 namely ηbcG

αa(sminus2)b|ac and

Γαb βΓ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] The correct projector on this component of the equations isgiven by the combination

2(sminus 1)ηbcGαa(sminus2)b|ac minus γαb βγ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] (380)

which is identically zero when Gαa(sminus1)|[bc] is expressed via ωβa(sminus1)c|d by virtue of(378) Therefore it is (380) that does not express certain part of ωβa(sminus1)c|d interms of first derivatives of the dynamical field φαa(s) and thus this is a dynamicalequation Obviously (380) is a representative of σminus cohomology group H

2g=0 In

terms of φαa(s) the representative has the form

Γαb βpart

bΓβc γφ

γa(sminus1)c minus partcφαa(sminus1)c +

(sminus 1)

2partaφ

αa(sminus2)cc= 0 (381)

which is equal to the Γ-trace of (379) The gauge transformations has the form

δφαa(s) = partaξαa(sminus1) (382)

32

where Γαb βξ

βa(sminus2)b = 0Consequently unfolded equations for totally symmetric bosonic fields are proved

to completely determine the unfolded equations for totally symmetric fermionicfields Though σminus is not modified in the fermionic case σminus cohomology groupsare changed since the fermionic dynamical equations are of the first order

4 Unfolding Mixed-Symmetry Fields

First in Section 41 an example of the simplest massless mixed-symmetry field ofspin- is investigated in detail and leading arguments are given for a spin- fieldSecond the general statement on arbitrary mixed-symmetry fields is proved whereastechnical details are collected in Sections 44 and 45 The analysis of the numberof physical degrees of freedom is carried out in Section 43

41 Simplest Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Example 411 Spin- field In the metric-like approach a spin- field is mini-mally described[16 17] by the subjected to (215) field φ[micromicro]ν that takes values in a

reducible so(dminus 1 1)-representation oplus the latter component is identified withthe trace φ ν

microν The gauge transformations (216) has two levels of reducibility with

two gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξA[microν] taking values in oplus bull so(dminus 1 1)-irreps at the

first level and one parameter ξmicro taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irrep at the secondlevel (217)

First the metric-like field φ[micromicro]ν has to be incorporated into certain differentialform eYq which is called a physical vielbein the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y and the degreeq to be defined below To make the symmetries both of the first and of the secondlevel of reducibility manifest the degree of the physical vielbein has to be two atleast

Moreover were the physical vielbein taken to be a degree-one form not all of thegauge symmetries even at the first level would be manifest Indeed there are twopossibilities for physical vielbein eY1 to contain a component with the symmetry of

Namely Y = and Y = since otimes = oplus oplus and otimes = oplus oplus

The associated differential gauge parameter is ξ0 in the first case and ξ0 in thesecond case Inasmuch as the gauge parameters are the forms of degree-zero onlyone of the required two parameters is present in each of the cases

The degree of the physical vielbein has to be not greater than two if the com-ponent associated with the metric-like field φmicromicroν is required not to be a certaintrace part The reason why a dynamical field should not be a certain trace part isexplained in the next Section

Therefore the physical vielbein has to be of degree-two and has to take valuesin so(dminus 1 1)-irrep that belongs to the vector representation ie e2 equiv ea2 equiv eamicroν

The associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξa1 equiv ξamicro contains in its Lorentz decomposition

otimes = oplus oplusbull both anti-symmetric ξAmicroν = ξa[microhbν]ηab and symmetric ξSmicroν = ξa(microh

bν)ηab

33

gauge parameters the latter enters along with the trace ξamicrohmicroa There exists a second

level gauge parameter χa0 which is directly identified with ξmicro as ξmicro = hbmicroχ

aηabThere are no redundant components in the gauge parameter However physicalvielbein e2 contains one redundant component in its decomposition into Lorentz

irreps otimes = oplus oplus The first and the second components are to be associatedwith a traceful φmicromicroν whereas the third one totally anti-symmetric component e[a|bc]

of ea|bc = eamicroνhbmicrohcν is a redundant one and has to be made non-dynamical In order

to do so algebraic gauge parameter ξ[abc]0 with the symmetry of is introduced It

is obvious from pure algebraic gauge law

δea2 = hbhcξ[abc]0 (41)

that the redundant component can be fixed to zero and ea2 can be directly identifiedwith φmicromicroν as e

amicromicro = φmicromicroνh

aν From gauge transformation laws δea2 = dξa1 δξa1 = dχa

0

ie δeamicroν = 12

(partmicroξ

aν minus partνξ

amicro

) δξamicro = partmicroχ

a required gauge transformations (216)(217) for metric-like field φmicromicroν and for the first order gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξ

A[microν]

are easily recoveredSince in the unfolded approach each gauge parameter possesses its own gauge

field and vice-verse associated with ξ[abc]0 gauge field ω

[abc]1 enters as

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 (42)

which determines the first equation Applying d to this equation results in Bianchiidentity hbhcdω

[abc]1 equiv 0 which has a unique solution of the form

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 (43)

with C[abc][df ]0 having the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensor of a spin-

field ie it is anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and C[abcd]f0 equiv 0 To clarify the form of

the solution let C[abc]|[df ]0 be a degree-zero form anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and with

no definite symmetry between these two groups of indices The Bianchi identityimplies hbhchdhfC

[abc]|[df ]0 equiv 0 which is equivalent to C

a[bc|df ]0 equiv 0 since vielbeins

ha anticommute Therefore the solution is parameterized by those components of

C[abc]|[df ]0 sim otimes that has the symmetry of Young diagrams with no more than

three rows since the requirement for total anti-symmetrization of any four indicesto give zero is the characteristic property of Young diagrams with at most three

rows otimes ni is the only component of zero trace order17 with three rows andthere are no components with the number of rows less than three Alternatively one

17Although there are trace components with the number of rows less than four eg theirtensor product by the metric ηab contains components with the symmetry of the sl(d)-Young

diagrams with more than three rows Nontrivial trace with the symmetry of corresponds tothe mass-like term Hence traceful tensors either do not satisfy the Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms

34

could search for the solution in the sector of degree-one forms as dω[abc]1 = hdC

[abc]|d1

with some C[abc]|d1 but Bianchi identity hbhchdC

[abc]|d1 equiv 0 implies that the only

component of C[abc]|d1 sim otimes that is allowed must have less than three rows which

is impossible since [abc] makes Young diagrams of otimes consist of three rows atleast18 Thus one has to search for the solution among the forms of less degree

Further unfolding requires a set of fields C [abc][df ]g(k) with the symmetry ofk

to be introduced and the full system has the form

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 δea2 = dξa1 + hbhcξ

[abc]0 δξa1 = dχa

0

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 δω

[abc]1 = dξ

[abc]0

dC[abc][df ]g(k)0 = hvC

[abc][df ]g(k)v0 (44)

Consequently the unfolded system incorporates field φmicromicroν with all required differ-ential gauge parameters at all levels of reducibility the redundant component of the

physical vielbein does not contribute to the dynamics ω[abc]1 sim otimes = oplus oplus

the first component is a field strength for the redundant field once the field hasbeen gauged away the associated field strength is zero and ω

[abc]ρ = hamicrohbνhcλT[microνλ]ρ

for some T[microνλ]ρ T[microνλρ] equiv 0 which incorporates both and (as the trace) Torecover equations (215) in terms of metric-like fields it is convenient to convert allfiber indices to the world ones in the first two equations

part[microeaνλ] = hb[microhcνω

abcλ] (45)

part[microωabcν] = hd[microhfν]C

abcdf (46)

to substitute Tmicroνλρ and to contract two indices in the second equation

part[microφνλ]ρ = Tmicroνλρ (47)

partρTmicroνρλ minus partλTρ

microνρ = 0 (48)

Plugging (47) in (48) gives equation (215)For Y = Y(2 1) (1 1) ie N = 2 and p = 2 the general scheme of Section

1 results in

Yg

n k 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 1 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

18Again the trace component enters the tensor product as η otimes and has the number of rowsnot less than three

35

therefore

Wq =

W a0 q = 0

W a1 W

[abc]0 q = 1

W aq W

[abc]qminus1 W

[abc][df ]qminus2 W

[abc][df ]gqminus2 q gt 1

(49)

and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbhcW[abc]qminus1 g = 1

hbhcW[aaa][bc]qminus2 g = 2

hdW[aaa][bb]c(gminus3)dqminus2 g gt 2

(410)

with D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (44) can be rewritten as

Dω2 = 0 δω2 = Dξ1 δξ1 = Dξ0 (411)

where ω2 isin W2 ξ1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 2 k = 0 sim g = 0and n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 1 form two finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-moduleswhereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g ge 2 form an infinite-dimensionaliso(dminus 1 1)-module

Example 412 Spin- field (briefly) In the case of a massless spin- fieldthere are two gauge parameters at the first level of reducibility which have the sym-metry19 of and one gauge parameter at the second level with the symmetryof First for Y = Y(3 1) (2 1) the proposed scheme results in

Yg

n k 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3 g = 4

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 2 q2 = 1 q3 = 0 q4 = 0

therefore the physical vielbein has to be a two-form taking values in ie e2 equiv

eaab2 Associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξaab1 has components otimes = oplus oplus the first two having the symmetry of the required gauge parameters with the thirdone being redundant The last three components in the decomposition of the physical

vielbein otimes = oplus oplus oplus are also redundant By virtue of Stueckelberg

symmetry with parameter ξ1 these three components can be gauged away inasmuch

as otimes = oplus oplus The redundant component of the first level gauge

parameter ξ1 also can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg symmetry with

level-two gauge parameter ξ0 Consequently at least the fact that the unfoldedsystem incorporates the metric-like field all the required gauge parameters andredundant components do not contribute to the dynamics is proved

19To simplify the example no consideration is given to the trace components of the fields

36

42 General Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Given a massless field of spin Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) described by a metric-like field φY(x) taking values in the irrep of the Lorentz algebra so(d minus 1 1) withthe same symmetry type(minimal formulation) there exists a unique unfolded systemwith the physical vielbein at the lowest grade and all symmetries being manifest thatreproduces the original metric-like system The system has the form (11)

Sketch of the proof

1 The lowest grade field (physical vielbein) eY0q0

turns out to be completely de-termined by the requirement for it to contain the metric-like field and for itsgauge parameters ξY0

q0minusk k gt 0 to contain all the necessary gauge parametersat all levels of reducibility (219)

2 eY0q0

and its gauge parameters appear to contain redundant components thathave to be made non-dynamical The only way to achieve this is to introduceStueckelberg symmetry δeY0

q0= σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus1) δξ

Y0q0minus1 = σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus2) with certain

ξY1q1minusk k gt 0 which turns out to be unambiguously defined by this requirement

3 ξY1q1minus1 has associated gauge field ωY1

q1and gauge transformations δωY0

q0=

σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) completely determines the first equation deY0

q0= σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) whichimplies Jacobi identity σ1

minus(dωY1q1

) equiv 0 The general solution is proved in Sec-tion 44 to have the form dωY1

q1= σ2

minus(ωY2q2

) with certain ωY2q2

The secondequation implies the second Jacobi identity σ2

minus(dωY2q2

) equiv 0 and so on

4 Once the total unfolded system is defined the proof of the facts that (i)the correct dynamical equations are imposed (ii) there are no other dynamicalfields or other differential gauge symmetries in the system is obtained throughthe calculations of σminus cohomology groups Ignoring the trace pattern of fieldsie for traceful tensors the proof of (ii) can be simplified and is done in thissection Even stronger statement that there exists a duality H

p+1+k sim Hpminusk is

proved in Section 45

First as it is clear from the examples above the metric-like field φYM(x) has

to be incorporated into a differential form eY0q of degree-q taking values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep Y0 (for this reason eY0q is called physical vielbein) Having converted

all world indices to fiber ones in accordance with (329) so(dminus 1 1)-tensor productY0 otimes Y(1 q) of Y0 with one column diagram of the height q must contain thecomponent with the symmetry of YM In the case of the minimal formulationYM = Y where Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) characterizes the spin

It is useful to introduce a notion of the quotient of two Young diagrams let thequotient of two Young diagrams Y1Y2 be a direct sum of those diagrams whoseso(dminus 1 1)-tensor product by Y2 contains Y1 For the first sight given q ge 0 anyelement Q of YMY(1 q) might be chosen as Y0 If q is greater than the heightof YM the component with the symmetry YM in the tensor product QotimesY(1 q)has to be certain trace inevitably

37

Although there is no apparent problems in considering unfolded systems withdynamical field hidden in certain trace component of the physical vielbein egMaxwell gauge potential Amicro might be identified with the trace eamicroνh

microa of two-form

eamicroν However this exotic incorporating of the physical field does not take place inthe already known systems Moreover it can be proved that such exotic systemsdo not exist if irreducible Nevertheless they might be a part of some reduciblesystem which describes more than one field Therefore we require the degree q ofthe physical vielbein to be not greater than the height of YM

Inasmuch as (i) the equations imposed on φY(x) possess reducible gauge trans-formations with the number of levels equal to the height p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi of Y (ii) for

a degree-q gauge field of an unfolded system there exist q levels of gauge transfor-mations the degree q of physical vielbein eY0

q must be equal to pThe quotient YY(1 p) contains only one element (provided φY(x) is for-

bidden to be a trace component) it is the diagram (12) with the symmetry ofY0 = Y(s1 minus 1 p1) (sN minus 1 pN) ie it is equal to Y without the first col-umn Therefore physical vielbein eY0

p is completely defined So does gauge param-

eters ξY0pminusk at the k-th level of reducibility k isin [1 p] The requirement for tensor

product Y0 otimes Y(1 pminus k) to contain all gauge parameters ξik given by (219)at the k-th level of reducibility is also satisfied Consequently the whole patternof fieldsgauge parameters of the metric-like formulation is reproduced Note thatY0 equiv Y0 and q0 = p in the terms of Section 1

Let us note that if one writes down the physical vielbein explicitly as ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

where si are the lengths of the rows ofY and converts the form indices to the tangentones by virtue of inverse background vielbein hmicroa

ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|[d1dp] = ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

hmicro1d1 hmicropdp (412)

dynamical field φY(x) should be identified with ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|a1ap which hasthe symmetry of Y with some traces included Consequently the generalizedLabastidarsquos double-tracelessness condition (220) [20] is obvious inasmuch as thecontraction of two metric tensor ηaiaiηaiai with the i-th group of indices vanishes

Generally in addition to φY(x) decompositionY0otimesY(1 p) of physical vielbeineY0p into Lorentz irreps contains redundant components which must not contributeto the physical degrees of freedom So does Y0 otimesY(1 pminus k) ie in addition toξik it contains a lot of components that can not be made genuine differential gaugeparameters There are only two possible ways to get rid of redundant fields in theunfolded formalism

A redundant components could be directly fixed to zero by algebraic (Stueckel-berg) symmetry

B redundant components might be auxiliary fields for other fields (at lower grade)and so on The process stops since the grade is assumed to be bounded frombelow

We require dynamical fields incorporated in the physical vielbein to be at the lowestgrade Actually (B) takes place for dual gauge descriptions but not for the minimal

38

Therefore the only possibility to make redundant components to be non-dynamicalis to introduce a Stueckelberg symmetry with certain parameters ξY1

q1minusk

δeY0p = dξY0

pminus1 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) (413)

δξY0pminus1 = dξY0

pminus2 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus2) (414)

(415)

where σ1minus is a certain operator built of background vielbein ha that contracts a

number of indices of Y1 with hahc to obtain Y0 Diagram20 Y1 and form degreeq1 can be easily found since Y1 otimes Y1 q1 minus i i gt 0 must contain all redundantcomponents of eY0

p and ξY0pminusk

In the unfolded formalism each gauge field possesses its own gauge parameter andvice-versa Therefore there is a gauge field ωY1

q1 which contributes to the equations

for eY0p as

deY0p = σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) (416)

The first equation determines the first Jacobi identity of the form σ1minus(dω

Y1q1

) equiv 0which can be solved as

dωY1q1

= σ2minus(ω

Y2q2

) (417)

for certain gauge field ωY2q2

and operator σ2minus that satisfies σ1

minusσ2minus equiv 0 The general

solution of Jacobi identities is given in Section 44 From now on let the super-scripts of σminus be omitted The second equation determines the second Jacobi identityσminus(dω

Y2q2

) equiv 0 which can be also solved and so on Consequently the knowledgeof the lowest grade gauge field eY0

p and of the Stueckelberg symmetries required toget rid of redundant components determines the first equation which by virtue ofJacobi identities determines the second and so on The total unfolded system hasthe structure

dωYg

qg= σminus

(

ωYg+1qg+1

)

g = 0 1

δωYg

qg= dξYg

qg+ σminus

(

ξYg+1

qg+1minus1

)

δξYgqg

=

(418)

where σminus is certain algebraic operator built of background vielbein ha and (σminus)2 = 0

The only facts remain to be proved are that there are no other dynamical fieldsand that the proper correspondence (duality) between the cohomology groups holdstrue To this end it is sufficient to analyze only the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps content ofH

qg ie only the symmetry type and the multiplicity of irreducible Lorentz tensors

that by virtue of (330) are the representatives of Hqg

It is proved in the next Section that there is a duality Hpminuskg=0 sim H

p+k+1g=1 between

the σminus cohomology groups which reveals the one-to-one correspondence betweenthe gauge dynamical fields and equations of motion the level-k gauge symmetries

20The specific character of Minkowski massless fields is in that all Stueckelberg parameters canbe incorporated into a single Y1-valued form this not being the case for (anti)-de Sitter masslessfields

39

and the level-k Bianchi identities The representatives of cohomology groups in thesector of fields and gauge symmetries directly correspond to those of metric-likeapproach and there is no other nontrivial cohomology in these sectors

Though the trace pattern of fieldsgauge parameters is also important and thecalculation of σminus cohomology groups provides a comprehensive answer to this ques-tion the very procedure being a bit technical Ignoring the trace pattern of thefields it can be easily proved that the required metric-like field is incorporated inphysical vielbein eY0

q0 all the redundant components of the physical vielbein can be

gauged away by a pure algebraic symmetry and the same holds for differential gaugeparameters ξY0

q0minusk at all levels of reducibility ie the required pattern of gauge pa-rameters is recovered whereas all the redundant components are either Stueckelbergor auxiliary This is the necessary condition only and the traces has to be takeninto account Also it is still to be proved that the correct equations of motionsare imposed Provided that there are no trace conditions on the fields the sys-tem is referred to as off-shell[65] An off-shell system may contain only constraintsthat express auxiliary fields via the derivatives of the dynamical field imposing norestrictions on the latter

The off-shell system Technically ignoring the traces is equivalent to thereplacement of all so(dminus1 1)-irreps by the sl(d)-irreps that are characterized by thesame Young diagrams ie instead of taking so(dminus1 1)-tensor products one needs toapply the sl(d)-tensor productrsquos rules which are much simpler The decompositionof the physical vielbein eY0

q0into sl(d)-irreps is given by diagrams Yαi of the form

αN+1

sN minus 1

pNαN

s2 minus 1

p2α2

s1 minus 1

p1

α1

(419)

where α1+ +αN+1 = q0 = p The decomposition of Stueckelberg gauge parameterξY1q1minus1 for eY0

q0has the components of the same form but with αN+1 ge 1 because

Y1 (13) has already the form of Y0 with one cell in the bottom-left Thereforeall components of eY0

q0except for those with αN+1 = 0 are of Stueckelberg type but

there is only one component of eY0q0

with αN+1 = 0 namely it has αi = pi i isin [1 N ]and hence has the symmetry of Y The decomposition of level-k differential gaugeparameter ξY0

q0minusk has the form (419) with α1 + + αN+1 = p minus k and again all

the components of ξY0q0minusk with αN+1 ge 1 can be gauged away by pure algebraic

symmetry with ξY1q1minuskminus1 Consequently there is a complete matching between (219)

40

and those in ξY0

q0minusk that are not pure gauge themselves It can be easily proved alsothat if ignoring the traces there are no other dynamical fieldsdifferential gaugeparameters at higher grade Consequently

Lemma H(σminus) with respect to sl(d) are given by

Hk(σminus)sl(d) =

Yαi g = 0 α1 + + αN = k αN+1 = 0 k le p

empty k gt p(420)

The triviality of the higher k gt p cohomology groups for sl(d) which shouldcontain equations of motion and Bianchi identities is expected since the system isoff-shell For the equations to have the second order in derivatives the only nontrivialcohomology group H

p+1 must be at the grade-one ie Hp+1g=1 6= empty As is seen from

the examples above the equations correspond to those representatives of Hp+1g=1 that

are certain traces Indeed the total rank |WYgqg | which is equal to the sum qg + |Yg|

of degree qg and rank of Yg is preserved by σminus Therefore |WYgqg | = |W

Y0q0| + g

and |RY1q1+1| = |ω

Y0q0| + 2 = |Y|+ 2 where eY0

q0isin Wg=0

p and RY1q1+1 isin W

g=1p+1 contain

metric-like field φYM(x) and the equations on φY(x) respectively Consequently

the representative of Hp+1g=1 that corresponds to the equations on the traceless part

of φY(x) has to be identified with certain trace of the first order and so on for thetraces of φY(x)

The calculation of σminus cohomology groups carried out in Section 45 implies

1 The only nontrivial cohomology groups are Hpminuskg=0 and H

p+k+1g=1 k = 1 p

Therefore the dynamical fields and independent gauge parameters belong tothe zero grade Wg=0

q subspaces the equations are of the second order and theBianchi identities for the k-th level gauge symmetries are of the (k + 2)-thorder

2 Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 ie there is a one-to-one correspondence between the

elements of Hpminuskg=0 that are traces of the r-th order and the elements of Hp+k+1

g=1

that are traces of the (r + k + 1)-th order Roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1

Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on Therefore there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the dynamical fields and the equations of motion the level-k gaugesymmetries and the k-th Bianchi identities

3 The so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that correspond to the elements of Hpminusk(σminus) and arethe traces of the zeroth order are given by the so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagramsthat have the form (419) with αN+1 = 0 and α1 + + αN = p minus k whichexactly reproduce the required pattern (219) Note that certain higher ordertraces are also the elements of cohomology groups These fields represent thersquoauxiliaryrsquo fields of the metric-like formulation which had to be introduced tomake the gauge symmetry off-shell To prove the theorem it is not necessary toknow the concrete trace pattern the duality between the cohomology groupsis sufficient The details of the trace pattern are in Section 45

41

In the fermionic case the traces are substituted for Γ-traces Important isthat acting on tensor indices only σminus does not break down the irreducibility ofspin-tensors The duality has the form H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 or simply H

pminuskg=0 sim

Hp+k+1g=0 which means that equations are of the first order and the duality between

fieldsequations gauge symmetriesBianchi identities takes place which completesthe proof

Note that Yg=s1 equiv Yn=0k=0 has the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensorfor a spin-Y massless field

sNpN

s2p2

s1

p1 + 1

(421)

Analogously to the examples of Section 33 massless mixed-symmetry fields can bedescribed by the same unfolded system (16) that is restricted to Wg

q with g ge g0ie the system contains infinitely many dual formulations As the generalized Weyltensor and its descendants are non-gauge fields the dual descriptions with g0 ge s1are non-gauge and the dual descriptions with 0 lt g0 lt s1 are gauge

43 Physical Degrees of Freedom Counting

Notwithstanding the simplicity of the unfolded form and the uniqueness of unfoldingthere still might be a question of whether the unfolded equations do describe thecorrect number of physical degrees of freedom

It is well-known that for systems with the first class constraints only with mass-less fields belonging to this class the counting of degrees of freedom is that one firstlevel gauge parameter kills two degrees of freedom one second level gauge parame-ters kills three degrees of freedom and so on For example a spin-two massless fieldpossesses d(dminus3)

2degrees of freedom which is just d(d+1)

2minus 2d d(d+1)

2and d being the

number of components of φmicroν and ξmicroThe complete information concerning the rsquonumberrsquo of fieldsgauge parameters

ie the multiplicity and the symmetry of corresponding tensors is contained inH

kg=0(σminus) for k = 0p Not only can a number of physical degrees of freedom be

calculated but the whole exact sequence that defines an iso(d minus 1 1) irrep can bederived The elements of this sequence are certain so(dminus 1) tensors that define anso(dminus 2) tensor as a quotient of so(d minus 1) tensors eg (218) The decompositionof so(dminus 1 1)-fields into irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) can be done with the aid ofpartmicro or after Fourier transform with the aid of momentum pmicro

For example for a spin-two field the cohomology groups that correspond to thedynamical fieldsdifferential gauge parameters and its decomposition into so(dminus 1)irreps have the form

42

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus bull sim φmicroν φ

νν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2bull

Quick sort of Young diagrams in 0 minusrarr 2H0 minusrarr H1 minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 gives the

correct exact sequence 0 minusrarr minusrarr minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 which defines a masslessspin-two irrep H (0 )

For the simplest mixed-symmetry field the hook- there are two levels of gaugetransformation hence relevant cohomology groups are H

0 H1 and H2

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus oplus bull sim ξAmicroν oplus ξ

Smicroν ξ

Sνν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2 oplus 2bull

H2 oplus sim φmicroνλ φ

νmicroν 6= 0 oplus oplus oplus 2 oplus bull

Again quick sort of diagrams in 0 minusrarr 3H0 minusrarr 2H1 minusrarr H2 minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0

gives exact sequence (218)Consequently the problem of calculation the number of physical degrees of free-

dom to be precise of deriving the exact sequence is effectively reduced to the simplecombinatoric problem of (i) decomposition so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagram representa-tives of H(σminus) to so(dminus 1)-diagrams (ii) cancellation of like terms in sequence

0 minusrarr (p+ 1)H0 minusrarr pH1 minusrarr minusrarr 2Hpminus1 minusrarr Hp minusrarr H (0Y) minusrarr 0 (422)

Skipping combinatoric technicalities we state that in the general case of a spin-Ymassless mixed-symmetry field (422) reduces to the correct exact sequence thatdefines a uirrep H (0Y) of iso(dminus 1 1)

44 Solving the Generalized Jacobi Identities

Unfolding some dynamical system there arises a problem of solving Jacobi identities(33) that have schematically a form hhdω1

q equiv 0 where a number of backgroundvielbeins ha is contracted with the fiber indices of ω1

q The Jacobi identity restrictsdω1

q to have a certain specific form dω1q = hhω2

r where the so(dminus1 1)-irrep inwhich ω2

r takes values the degree r and the projector built of hh are completelydetermined The solutions are given by21

Lemma A Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values inY = Y(s p) (k 1)

so(dminus 1 1)-irrep The general solution of

hcdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq = 0 (423)

21As was pointed out in Section 33 nonzero traces either violate Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms and therefore are ignored

43

has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq k lt s

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1 k = s q ge p + 1

0 k = s q lt p+ 1

(424)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 take values inY(s p) (k + 1 1)

and Y(s+ 1 p+ 1) so(dminus 1 1)-irreps respectively22

Proof The parametrization of dωq by a degree-(q + 1) form taking values in the

same so(dminus 1 1)-irrep dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = R

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q+1 obviously fails to satisfy

(423) Inasmuch as (423) contains a vielbein the solution has to contain a number

of vielbeins too The most general parametrization of dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q with only

one vielbein included has the form dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = hdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)|dq for some

q-form taking values in a tensor product of Y by a vector representation ie thereis no definite symmetry between index d and the rest of the indices

hchdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)c|dq = 0larrrarr ωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)[c|d]

q = 0 (425)

Only those irreps in Yotimes are allowed that have c and d symmetric ie correspondto Y(s p) (k + 1 1) for k lt s This is not possible in the case k = s ie Y =Y(s p+ 1) and the only possibility to have c and d symmetric is to add the whole

column toY which requires dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q to be represented as dω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hchcωa1(sminus1)cap(sminus1)cap+1(sminus1)cqminuspminus1 and therefore q must be large enough Roughly

speaking the proof is based on the fact that the anti-symmetrization of two indicesat the same row of a Young diagram is identically zero the anti-symmetrizationbeing due to contraction with vielbeins

Note that choosing nonmaximal solutions of Jacobi identities results in loweringthe gauge symmetry so that not all redundant components are excluded

Unfolding totally-symmetric massless higher-spin fields the possible rhs termsin dω

a(sminus1)b(t)1 = are restricted by Jacobi identities and an essential use is made

of

Corollary The solution of Jacobi identity

hcdωa(sminus1)b(tminus1)c1 equiv 0 (426)

is of the form

dωa(sminus1)b(t)1 =

hcωa(sminus1)b(t)c1 t lt sminus 1

hchdCa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 t = sminus 1

(427)

22The symmetric basis is used being more convenient in this case as the contracted with vielbeinstensors are already irreducible

44

The following statement is a generalization of the Lemma-A to the case where(s p) (k 1) is a rsquosubdiagramrsquo of a larger Young diagram Y that has a numberof rows precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) Appropriate Young symmetrizershave to be included as the mere contraction of a number of vielbeins breaks theirreducibility of the tensor For instance hcω

a(s1)b(s2minus1)c is already irreducible withthe symmetry of Ys1 s2 minus 1 but this is not the case for hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) which hasto be added one term hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) + 1s1minuss2+1

hcωa(s1)bb(s2minus1)c to get the symmetry

of Ys1 minus 1 s2

Lemma B Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values in Y =

Y( (s p) (k 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irrep where the dots stands for the blocks inY precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) The general solution of

Π[hcdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq

]= 0 (428)

where Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p)(k minus 1 1) has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

Π[

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq

]

k lt s

Π[

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1

]

k = s q ge p+ 1

0 k = s q lt p + 1

(429)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 takes values in

Y (s p) (k + 1 1) and Y (s+ 1 p+ 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irreps respec-tively and Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p) (k 1)

Proof The proof is similar to that of Lemma-A with the only comment that thesymmetrizers do not affect the argumentation that anti-symmetrization of two in-dices in the same row is identically zero

45 Dynamical Content via σminus Cohomology

Before discussing the calculation of σminus cohomology let us first recall necessary factsconcerning the evaluation of so(d minus 1 1)-tensor products Let P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) be anumber of integer partitions k1 + + kN = m of m where ki is constrained byki le ǫi and different rearrangements of ki satisfying the constraints are regarded asdistinct partitions The generating function for the partition P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) is

sum

m

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m)tm =

i=Nprod

i=1

(1minus tǫi+1)

1minus t(430)

These integer partitions gives the multiplicities of irreps in so(dminus 1 1)-tensor prod-ucts (Clebsh-Gordon coefficients) we are interested in [71]

45

The so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary irrep Ylowast = Y(si pi) by aone-column diagram of the height qlowast can be explicitly calculated as

sNpN

s2

p2

s1

p1

otimes

q =sum

αjβi

Nαjβi

αN+1

βN

αN

ǫNpN sN

β2

α2

ǫ2p2 s2

β1

α1

ǫ1p1 s1

(431)

where αi βi αi + βi le pi i isin [1 N ] αN+1 ge 0 and there exist ρ ge 0 such that

qlowast =i=Nsum

i=1

(αi + βi) + αN+1 + 2ρ (432)

The multiplicity Nαjβi of Ylowastαj βi

is given by integer partition

Nαjβi = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ǫi = pi minus αi minus βi (433)

and the total trace order r is

r =i=Nsum

i=1

βi + ρ (434)

Roughly speaking to obtain an element of the tensor product one should first cutoff from bottom-right of the i-th block a column of height βiminusγi pi ge βiminusγi ge 0 (totake different traces) and second add an arbitrary number αi+γi pi ge αi+γi ge 0 ofcells to each block provided the γi cells annihilate ie they are added to the placesfrom which γi cells were removed at the first stage Multiplicity may be differentfrom one due to different rearrangements of γi ie when multiplied by the rest ofq-column different traces can give rise to the same diagram The number of suchrearrangements is given by P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ρ =

sumi=N

i=1 γi For instance sl(n)-tensor

product otimes is given simply by

otimessl(n) = oplus oplus oplus (435)

46

The so(d)-tensor product can be represented as a sum of the form

otimesso(n) = otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

otimessl(n)

oplus

otimessl(n)

︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

oplus

otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

2nd order

=

oplus oplus oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

oplus

oplus 2 oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

︸︷︷︸

2ndorder

(436)

where the sum is over trace order and the boxes that are connected by the arc areto be contracted and then the sl(n)-product rules are to be applied to the rest ofthe diagrams

Evaluating the so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary spinor-irrep Ylowast =Y(si pi) 1

2by a one-column diagram of the height qlowast one can contract any number

of Γ matrices with the indices of the column and then multiply therefore the tensorproduct rule for spin-tensors can be reduced to bosonic rule (431) as

Y(si pi) 12otimesso(n) Y(1 q) =

qsum

k=0

(Y(si pi) otimesso(n) Y(1 q minus k)

)

12

(437)

for example

12otimesso(n) = 1

2oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order Γ-traces

oplus

12oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order Γ-traces

oplus

oplus

2 12

︸︷︷︸

2nd order Γ-traces

oplus

bull 12

︸︷︷︸

3d order Γ-traces

(438)

The multiplicity N12

αjβiof Ylowast

αj βi12

is given by

N12

αjβi=

i=ρsum

i=0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus i) (439)

Let us now analyze the origin of σminus cohomology Its action σminus Wgq rarr W

gminus1q+1

preserves g+ q and hence the whole complex C(W σminus) is a direct sum of complexesC(qprime σminus) where q

prime refers to the end element Wg=0qprime of the complex

C(qprime σminus) 0 minusrarr minusrarr Wg=1qprimeminus1 minusrarrW

g=0qprime minusrarr 0 (440)

47

Moreover σminus preserves the total rank (the form degree + rank of the so(d minus 1 1)-

irrep in which the field takes values) LetWa(s1)a(sm)q be an element ofWg

qprime When

all form indices of Wa(s1)a(sm)q are converted to the fiber ones according to (329)

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (441)

the action of σminus is just an anti-symmetrization of all d1 dq with those indices aithat are extra as compared to Ygminus1 plus some terms to restore the correct Youngsymmetry of Ygminus1 Let the decomposition ofW a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] into so(dminus1 1)-irreps be of the form

Ya1(s1) am(sm)otimes

Y(1 q) =oplus

r=0

oplus

ir

N rirYr

ir (442)

where the summation is over the trace order r and then over ir which enumeratesall so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that enters in the tensor product as the traces of the r-thorder N r

irbeing the multiplicity of Yr

ir The multiplicity of the zeroth order traces

is always equal to one N0i0= 1 In fact the diagrams Y 0

i0can be directly obtained

by the sl(n)-tensor product ruleThe very anti-symmetrization is insensitive to whether a certain component en-

ters as a trace or not When decomposed into so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the elements ofWg

qprime and Wgminus1qprime+1 have a number of components of the same symmetry type The

action of σminus is just a linear transformation that either sends the whole so(dminus 1 1)-irrep to zero23 or sends it to the components of Wgminus1

qprime+1 of the same symmetry typeImportant is that σminus does not act between different so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Thereforecomplex C(qprime σminus) is a direct sum of complexes parameterized by so(dminus 1 1)-irrepsYprime that are given by various tensor products

Ynk

otimes

Y(1 q) (443)

provided that the field WYnkq is an element of Wgprimeminusi

qprime+i for certain i When reducedto such a complex

C(Yprime qprime σminus) 0rarr rarr Vg rarr Vgminus1 rarr rarr 0 (444)

the action of σminus is a linear transformation between the spaces Vg rarr Vgminus1 dimen-

sions of which are equal to the multiplicity of Yprime in the decomposition of WYgqg and

WYgminus1qg+1 The action of σminus is maximally non-degenerate compatible with nilpotency

Therefore to find cohomology groups the dimension of each linear space in everycomplex has to be calculated

Let us note that only the types and multiplicities of so(dminus1 1)-irreps are foundbelow ie no attention is paid to the description of how the corresponding tensorsare contained in the fields WY

qprime This is sufficient for our purposes though it isobvious (412) how the metric-like field φYM

is incorporated in an element ofWg=0p

23provided that the appropriate basis on the space of so(dminus1 1)-irreps with the same symmetrytype is chosen

48

The calculation of σminus cohomology is divided into three cases that cover the wholevariety of so(dminus 1 1)-irreps that can result from the tensor products (443)

In the Lemmas below it is assumed that complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is parameterizedby so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Yprime = Ylowast

αj βiof the form (431) with Ylowast = Ynk q

lowast = q such

that WYnkq isin C(qprime σminus) and ρ is defined according to (432)

In the first case Yprime is an element of Y0 otimesY(1 q)

Lemma 1 The σminus cohomology groups Hqg=0 and H

qg=1 are nontrivial and are given

by

Hqg =

Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βiMαj βi

αN+1 = 0sumi=N

i=0 αi = qq isin [0 p] g = 0

H2pminusqminus1 q isin [p+ 1 2p+ 1] g = 1

empty q gt 2p+ 1 any g

(445)where Mαj βi is the multiplicity of the irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

defined below

Proof From the very form of Yn=N0 equiv Yg=0 equiv Y(si minus 1 pi) it follows that theso(dminus1 1)-irreps that the element ofWg=0

q sim Y0otimesY(1 q) decomposes into may

be contained in Wg=1qminus1 only ie Wg=0

q and Wg=kqminusk contain no so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of

the same symmetry type for k gt 1 Therefore the length of complex C(Yprime q σminus)where Yprime isin Y0otimesY(1 q) is equal to one ie C(Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

q σminus) 0 minusrarrV1 minusrarr V0 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions of V0 and V1 are given by the multiplicitiesof the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

in Wg=1qminus1 and Wg=0

q respectively

dim(V1) =

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus 1) ρ ge 1

0 ρ = 0αN+1 = 0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) αN+1 gt 0

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) (446)

If αN+1 gt 0 the dimensions of V0 and V1 are equal and each irreducible componentof Wg=0

q with αN+1 gt 0 can be gauge away by virtue of the corresponding element

of Wg=1qminus1 thus being exact H

kgt2p+1 = empty inasmuch as ρ le p and the componentsof the forms with rank greater than (2p + 1) must have αN+1 gt 0 thus beingexact If αN+1 = 0 the dimensions are different dim(V1) lt dim(V0) for q le pdim(V1) = dim(V0) for q = p + 1 and dim(V1) gt dim(V0) for q gt p Thereforethe number of those Ysi piαj βi

isin Wg=0q q le p that are not exact is equal to

Mαj βi = |dim(V1) minus dim(V0)| the same is the number of those Ysi piαj βiisin

Wg=1qminus1 q gt p+ 1 that are not exact The obvious property of integer partitions

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ǫ1 + + ǫN minusm) (447)

results in the important duality in the cohomology groups Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 or

roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on

49

The second case is the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) where Yprime is an element of the tensor

product Ynk otimesY(1 q) for certain q ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmaxn minus 1

Lemma 2 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainqprime ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmax

n minus 1 the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The complex has the length two ie 0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr 0 wherethe dimensions are given by dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫN 1|ρ+ 1)dim(V2) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ+ 1) Simple calculations with generating functions resultsin dim(V0) lt dim(V1) dim(V2) lt dim(V1) and dim(V0) minus dim(V1) + dim(V2) = 0and consequently the sequence is exact

Analogously

Lemma 3 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainq ge 0 with k = 0 and n lt N the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The speciality of such Yprime is that the complex has the length three ie0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr V3 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions are given by

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 ǫn + 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V2) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 1) ρ ge ǫn + 1

0 otherwise

dim(V3) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn minus 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 2) ρ ge ǫn + 2

0 otherwise

Again simple calculations with generating functions results in appropriate inequali-ties and dim(V0)minusdim(V1)+dim(V2)minusdim(V3) = 0 and consequently the sequenceis exact

The above three cases covers the whole variety of the so(d minus 1 1)-tensors thatcan result from the tensor products YnkotimesY(1 q) for any n k and q The caseswith sN = 1 and Y = Y0 are special but the calculation of cohomology groupsleads to the same result

In the fermionic case the computations are similar due to the multiplicity givenby (439) The difference is that all nontrivial cohomology is concentrated in gradezero Indeed taking into account (446) where P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) is to be replaced by(439) it follows that dim(V0) ge dim(V1) for all q and H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 where r

is referred to the Γ-trace order or roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 andso on

5 Conclusions

The unfolded system constructed in the paper has a simple form of a covariantconstancy equation and describes arbitrary mixed-symmetry bosonic and fermionic

50

massless fields in d-dimensional Minkowski space The gauge fieldsparameters aredifferential forms with values in certain finite-dimensional irreducible representationsof the Lorentz algebra that are uniquely determined by the generalized spin

The key moment is that all gauge symmetries are manifest within the unfoldedformulation which is of most importance in controlling the number of physicaldegrees of freedom when trying to introduce interactions Unfolded systems areformulated in terms of differential forms which is a natural way to respect diffeo-morphisms and hence to describe systems that include gravity

Though the necessary conditions for the system to have a lagrangian descriptionare satisfied ie the fields are in one-to-one correspondence with the equations andthe k-th level gauge symmetries are in one-to-one correspondence with the k-thBianchi identities the very lagrangian remains to be constructed

Another interesting moment is that the unfolded equations for bosons are thesame as for fermions namely the operators involved ie exterior differential dand σminus remains unmodified when tensors are replaced with spin-tensors Thoughthis nice property partly breaks down in (anti)-de Sitter space within the unfoldedapproach bosons and fermions have much in common the fact being very useful forsupersymmetric theories

The proposed unfolded system includes all non-gauge dual descriptions whichare based on the generalized Weyl tensor and its descendants but not all of gaugedual descriptions It would be interesting to construct an unfolded system thatcontains all dual formulations

The interactions of the totally symmetric massless higher-spin fields are knownto require a nonzero cosmological constant ie are formulated in (anti)-de Sitterspace [2] Mixed-symmetry fields exhibit some interesting features in the presence ofcosmological constant For example not all of the Minkowski gauge symmetries canbe deformed to (anti)-de Sitter [72] As a result massless mixed-symmetry fields havemore degrees of freedom in (anti)-de Sitter compared to its Minkowski counterparts[73] and in the Minkowski limit a massless mixed-symmetry field splits in a certaincollection of massless fields generally Contrariwise a single mixed-symmetry fieldcan not be smoothly deformed to (anti)-de Sitter Another interesting effect is theexistence of the so-called partially-massless fields [74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 8283 84] the fields that have a number of degrees of freedom intermediate betweenthat of massless and massive and split in a set of massless fields in the Minkowskilimit Therefore the extension of the proposed approach to (anti)-de Sitter spaceseems to be non-trivial but nevertheless worth being investigated

In a series of papers [85 61 86 60] it was suggested so-called frame-like approachto the general mixed-symmetry fields in (anti)-de Sitter To generalize the proposedin the present paper unfolded system to (anti)-de Sitter case and to compare to thatof [60] is the next step to perform

We consider the proposed unfolded system as the first stage in constructing thefull interacting theory of mixed-symmetry fields

51

Acknowledgements

The author appreciates sincerely MA Vasiliev for reading the manuscript and mak-ing many detailed and valuable suggestions and illuminating comments the verywork was initiated as the result of discussions with MA Vasiliev The author isalso grateful to RR Metsaev and KB Alkalaev for useful discussions and to OVShaynkman for discussion of the fermionic case The work was supported in partby grants RFBR No 05-02-17654 LSS No 440120062 and INTAS No 05-7928by the Landau Scholarship and by the Scholarship of Dynasty foundation

Appendix A Multi-index convention

The multi-index notations is used a group of indices in which certain tensor issymmetric or is to be symmetrized is denoted either by one letter with the numberof indices indicated in round brackets or by placing a group of indices in roundbrackets eg

T a(s) equiv T a1a2as T a1aiaj as = T a1ajaias (A1)

V aT a(s) equiv V (a1T a2as+1) equiv1

s+ 1(V a1T a2a3as+1 + V a2T a1a3as+1 + + V as+1T a1a2as)

(A2)

V (bT a(s)) equiv V (bT a1as) equiv1

s + 1

(V bT a1a2as + V a1T ba2a3as + + V asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A3)Analogously the group of indices in which certain tensor is anti-symmetric or is tobe anti-symmetrized is denoted by placing indices in square brackets eg

T a[s] equiv T a1a2as T a1aiai+1as = minusT a1ai+1aias (A4)

V [bT a[s]] equiv V [bT a1as] equiv1

s+ 1

(V bT a1a2as minus V a1T ba2a3as + + (minus)sV asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A5)The operators of (anti)-symmetrization are weighted to be projectors (the factor 1

s+1

above)

Appendix B Young diagrams

Comprehensive information on Young diagrams can be found for example in thetextbook [71]

Definition B1 Given an integer partition ie a nonincreasing sequence si i isin[1 n] si ge si+1 of positive integers (or nonnegative when it is convenient to workwith a sequence of a fixed length) associated Young diagram Ys1 s2 sn is agraphical representation consisting of n left-justified rows made of boxes with the

52

i-th row containing si boxes

s10s11

s1s2s3s4

s5s6s7

s8s9

Finite-dimensional irreducible representation(irrep) of sl(d) ie various irre-ducible sl(d)-tensors are in one-to-one correspondence with Young diagrams of theform Ys1 s2 s[ d

2] The associated irreducible tensors

T

s1︷︸︸︷aa

s2︷︸︸︷

bb (B1)

or in condensed notation T a(s1)b(s2) have at most [d2] groups of indices being sym-

metric in each group separately and satisfy the condition that the symmetrizationof any group of indices with one index of any of the subsequent groups is identicallyzero ie

T a(s1)(b(sk)b)c(sjminus1) equiv 0 k lt j (B2)

If s[ d2] 6= 0 and d is even the (anti)-selfduality condition has to be imposed for

appropriate signature (anti)-selfduality is conventionally denoted by the sign factors+(minus) before s[ d

2] In this paper we do not consider (anti)-self dual representations

A scalar representation Y0 0 0 is denoted by bull a vector irrep Y1 0 0by rank-two symmetric tensor irrep by rank-two antisymmetric tensor irrep

by and so onFinite-dimensional irreducible representations of so(d) are of the two types ten-

sor and spin-tensor and are also characterized by Young diagrams which in thecase of spin-tensor irreps refer to the symmetry of the tensor part Young diagramsthat correspond to spin-tensor irreps are labeled by 1

2-subscript Spinor indices

α β γ = 12[d2] are placed first and are separated from tensor indices by rdquordquo For

example a spinor ψα irrep is denoted by bull 12 a vector-spinor irrep Aαaby 1

2and

so on To make tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry conditionthe tracelessness condition with respect to each pair of indices is to be imposed

ηccTa(s1)cb(siminus1)cd(sjminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n j = 1n (B3)

To make spin-tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry condition Γ-tracelessness condition with respect to each tensor index and a spinor index is to beimposed

Γαc βT

βa(s1)cb(siminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n (B4)

where Γαc β satisfy Γα

a βΓβb γ

+ Γαb βΓ

βaγ = 2ηab Additional conditions on spinors viz

Majorana Weyl and Majorana-Weyl are irrelevant to the problems concerned Also

53

in both cases it is required for the sum of the heights of the first two columns ofYoung diagrams to be not greater than d Note that the Γ-tracelessness conditionis stronger than the tracelessness one and applying the Γ-tracelessness twice to twosymmetric indices gives the tracelessness

0 = 2ΓαaβΓ

βb γT γ(ab) = ηabT

αab (B5)

To handle with arbitrary large Young diagrams the so-called block representationis used ie the rows of equal lengths are combined to blocks

Y(s1 p1) (sn pn) equiv Y

p1︷ ︸︸ ︷s1 s1

p2︷ ︸︸ ︷s2 s2

pn︷ ︸︸ ︷sn sn (B6)

References

[1] C Fronsdal ldquoMassless fields with integer spinrdquo Phys Rev D18 (1978) 3624

[2] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoCubic interaction in extended theories ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Nucl Phys B291 (1987) 141

[3] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoOn the gravitational interaction ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Phys Lett B189 (1987) 89ndash95

[4] M A Vasiliev ldquoConsistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in(3+1)-dimensionsrdquo Phys Lett B243 (1990) 378ndash382

[5] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoOn the geometry of higher-spin gauge fieldsrdquoClass Quant Grav 20 (2003) S473ndashS486 hep-th0212185

[6] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoFree geometric equations for higher spinsrdquoPhys Lett B543 (2002) 303ndash310 hep-th0207002

[7] M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear equations for symmetric massless higher spin fieldsin (a)ds(d)rdquo Phys Lett B567 (2003) 139ndash151 hep-th0304049

[8] X Bekaert I L Buchbinder A Pashnev and M Tsulaia ldquoOn higher spintheory Strings brst dimensional reductionsrdquo Class Quant Grav 21 (2004)S1457ndash1464 hep-th0312252

[9] D Sorokin ldquoIntroduction to the classical theory of higher spinsrdquo AIP ConfProc 767 (2005) 172ndash202 hep-th0405069

[10] X Bekaert S Cnockaert C Iazeolla and M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear higherspin theories in various dimensionsrdquo hep-th0503128

[11] A Sagnotti E Sezgin and P Sundell ldquoOn higher spins with a strong sp(2r)conditionrdquo hep-th0501156

[12] P K Townsend ldquoCovariant quantization of antisymmetric tensor gaugefieldsrdquo Phys Lett B88 (1979) 97

54

lectively as mixed-symmetry the simplest one beingY = Y2 1 equiv Y(2 1) (1 1)Yet different problem is to realize a uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) on the solutions of a

wave equation for a field φYM(x) which takes values in a certain representation YM

of the Lorentz algebra so(dminus1 1) ie φYM(x) is a Lorentz tensor or a set of tensors

As field theories free particles can be described in either non-gauge or gauge wayin the former case a uirrep of iso(d minus 1 1) is realized on the solutions of the waveequation directly whereas for the latter case a uirrep of iso(dminus1 1) is realized on thequotient of the solutions by certain specific solutions called pure gauge The waveequation (+m2)φYM

(x) = 0 which fixes the quadratic Casimir m2 of iso(dminus1 1)is generally supplemented with a set of algebraicdifferential constraints to singleout an irreducible in the sense of the little algebra component Field φYM

(x) takesvalues in a certain finite-dimensional representation of so(d minus 1 1) which is notirreducible in most cases nevertheless it can be made irreducible when dealing withfree equations of motion only Yet more different problem is to realize an irrep ofiso(d minus 1 1) on the solutions of the variational problem for some action in mostcases the procedure requires a set of auxiliary fields which carry no physical degreesof freedom

The choice of so(dminus 1 1)-representation YM (even if irreducible) in which fieldφYM

(x) takes values is not unique eg a free massless spin-one particle can bedescribed either by a gauge potential Amicro(x) subjected to

Amicro minus partmicropartνAν = 0 δAmicro = partmicroξ (21)

or by a field strength Fmicroν subjected to

partmicroFmicroν = 0 part[microFλρ] = 0 (22)

In the case of a massless spin-two particle (Y = so(dminus2)) in addition to the con-ventional description in terms of the metric gmicroν

Rmicroν minus1

2gmicroνR = 0 (23)

the Weyl tensor Cmicroνλρ known to have the symmetry of 4 can describe a freespin-two in a non gauge way

part[microCmicromicro]νν = 0 partλCmicroλνν = 0 (24)

Another example is a 4d massless scalar particle which can be described eitherby a scalar field φ(x) subjected to φ = 0 or more exotically by an antisymmetricgauge field ωmicroν (so-called notoph [41]) subjected to

ωmicroν minus partmicropartρωρν + partνpart

ρωρmicro = 0 δωmicroν = partmicroξν minus partνξmicro (25)

This equation describes a massless particle with spin- so(dminus2) equiv Y1 1so(dminus2) which

for d = 4 by virtue of the so(d minus 2) Levi-Civita tensor εij is equivalent to a scalar

4In antisymmetric basis Cmicroνλρ satisfies Cmicroνλρ = minusCνmicroλρ Cmicroνλρ = minusCmicroνρλ and C[microνλ]ρ = 0

7

Y1 1so(dminus2) sim Y0 0

so(dminus2) On the other hand a scalar particle can be describedby a rank-d antisymmetric field ωmicro1microd

satisfying ωmicro1microd= 0 where the use of

so(d minus 1 1)-duality is made of ωmicro1microd= εmicro1microd

φ These two types of duality arereferred to as trivial

The general statement is that free particles can be described by an infinite num-ber of ways called dual descriptions [42 43 44 45 46] but dual theories exhibitcertain difficulties while introducing interactions [47 48 49 50] eg despite the factthat free massless spin-one and spin-two particles can be described by the Maxwellfield strength and by the Weyl tensor respectively introducing interactions requiresthe corresponding gauge potentials Amicro and gmicroν to be brought in

There exists a distinguished choice of so(dminus1 1)-irrep YM in which field φYM(x)

takes values that can be referred to as fundamental or minimal For the minimaldescription of a spin-Y particle the spin degrees of freedom and the so(dminus1 1)-irrepYM are characterized by the same Young diagram ie YM = Y eg a spin-oneparticle by Amicro a spin-two by gmicroν All other descriptions are referred to as dual Itis the minimal descriptions that will be discussed further by this reason the termspin-Y particle can be substituted for more accepted spin-Y field

A massive totally symmetric spin-s field can be described [51] by a totally sym-metric tensor field φ(micro1micros) subjected to

(+m2)φmicro1micros= 0

partνφνmicro2micros= 0

φννmicro3micros

= 0

(26)

where the last equation (tracelessness condition) makes the tensor irreducible in theso(d minus 1 1) sense the first one puts the system on-mass-shell and the second oneprojects out the components orthogonal to the momentum restricting φmicro1micros

tocontain only a spin-s irrep of so(dminus 1)

Analogously a massive totally anti-symmetric spin-p field ie Y = Y(1 p)can be described by a totally anti-symmetric tensor field ω[micro1microp] subjected to

(+m2)ωmicro1microp= 0

partνωνmicro2microp= 0

(27)

where the tracelessness condition becomes trivial for anti-symmetric tensorsThese two results are easily generalized to an arbitrary spin-Ys1 snmassive

field which can be minimally described by a symmetric in each group of indicestensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) subjected to

(+m2)φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0

partmicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n]

φmicro1(s1)(microk(sk)microk)microi(siminus1)micron(sn) = 0 k isin [1 nminus 1] k lt i

ηmicroimicrojφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i j isin [1 n]

(28)

where the last two conditions are just the Young symmetry and the tracelessnessconditions which make the field carry an irrep-Ys1 sn of so(dminus 1 1) and can

8

be thought of as the part of the definition of field φYM(x) The first equation puts

the system on-mass-shell the second one projects out all so(dminus1)-irreps which thetensor φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)microp(sp) decomposes into except for the one with the symmetry ofYs1 sn so(dminus 1)-diagram

Let D (m2Ys1 sn) be an iso(d minus 1 1) module extracted by (28) beingirreducible for m2 6= 0 or for Y0 (scalar field) Since minimally described masslessfields are gauge theories a uirrep H (0Ys1 sn) of iso(d minus 1 1) correspondingto a massless spin-Ys1 sn field should be defined as appropriate quotient bythe pure gauge solutions of the form

0 minusrarr gauge solutions minusrarr all solutions minusrarr H (0Ys1 sn) minusrarr 0 (29)

where the sequence is non-split as there is no so(dminus 1 1)-covariant way to extractso(d minus 2)-irrep Ys1 sn from the Lorentz tensor with the same symmetry ofYs1 sn by virtue of a single so(dminus 1 1)-vector the momentum pmicro sim partmicro

A massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described as the quotient of(26) with m2 = 0 by pure gauge solutions of the form δφmicro1micros

= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) where

ξmicro1microsminus1 is a totally symmetric gauge parameter subjected to the equations of thesame form (26) ie on-mass-shell tracelessness and transversality thus belongingto D (0Ysminus 1) The definition of H (0Ys) is given by

0 minusrarr D (0Y(sminus 1 1)) minusrarr D (0Y(s 1)) minusrarr H (0Y(s 1)) minusrarr 0 (210)

There is a bit difference for a totally anti-symmetric spin-p massless field Puregauge solutions are defined analogously as δωmicro1microp

= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] where ξ[micro1micropminus1] is

a rank-(pminus1) antisymmetric gauge parameter subjected to the equation of the sameform (27) and thus belonging to D (0Y(1 pminus 1)) In contrast to a totally sym-metric spin-smassless field the gauge transformations are reducible in the sense thatδωmicro1microp

equiv 0 provided that one transforms gauge parameter δξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1]

with a second level rank-(p minus 2) antisymmetric gauge parameter ξ[micro1micropminus2] and soon Some components (parallel to the momentum) of the first level gauge parameterξmicro1micropminus1 do not contribute to the gauge law for ωmicro1microp

these are represented by thesecond level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 modulo those components of ξmicro1micropminus2 thatdo not contribute to ξmicro1micropminus1 and so on till δξmicro = partmicroξ Gauge parameters ξmicro1micropminus1ξmicro1micropminusk

k isin [1 p] and ξ are referred to as the first level the k-th level and thedeepest level of reducibility respectively The corresponding iso(d minus 1 1)-uirrep isgiven by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0Y(0 0)) minusrarr D (0Y(1 1)) minusrarr

minusrarr D (0Y(1 p)) minusrarr H (0Y(1 p)) minusrarr 0 (211)

For example Maxwell gauge potential Amicro possesses gauge parameters of the firstlevel only as p = 1 in this case

Though a considerable success in describing on-mass-shell massless fields wasachieved for instance within the light-cone approach [52] there are many reasons tohave an off-shell gauge symmetry ie to construct equations that are invariant with

9

respect to gauge transformations with gauge parameters not subjected to ξ = 0To make the symmetry off-shell generally requires to relax the irreducibility of theso(dminus 1 1)-representation in which field φY(x) takes values

For instance a massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described[53] by atraceless rank-s symmetric field φmicro1micros

with an off-shell gauge symmetry

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

(d+2sminus4)η(micro1micro2part

νpartρφνρmicro3micros) = 0 φννmicro3micros

= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1

= 0 partνξνmicro2microsminus1) = 0 (212)

where in order for φmicro1microsto be traceless the gauge parameter has to be not only

traceless but transverse also this still being true for general mixed-symmetry fieldsApparently to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters the trace-lessness constraint for field φmicro1micros

has to be relaxed The same spin-s massless fieldcan be described[1] by field φmicro1micros

subjected to5

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

2part(micro1partmicro2φ

ννmicro3micros) = 0 φνρ

νρmicro5micros= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1

ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1= 0

(213)

where in order to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters a trace-lessness is relaxed to a double-tracelessness ie field φmicro1micros

takes values in thedirect sum of two so(d minus 1 1)-irreps being symmetric traceless tensors of ranks sand (s minus 2) The general statement is that for equations of motion to have an off-shell gauge symmetry the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep in which field φY(x) takes values has tobe reducible with additional direct summands representing certain nonzero tracesThese additional fields are called auxiliary and carry no physical degrees of freedomImposing certain gauge equations (28) can be restored

A massless totally antisymmetric spin-p field can be described by an antisym-metric rank-p tensor field ω[micro1microp] subjected to

ωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1part

νωνmicro2microp] = 0 δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] (214)

where the symmetry at the all levels of reducibility is manifest and off-shell ieδξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1] for the second level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 not subjectedto any differential constraints and analogously for the gauge symmetries at deeperlevels

Much similar to totally anti-symmetric fields mixed-symmetry massless fieldspossess reducible gauge transformations ie for a field φ with equations of motioninvariant under gauge transformations δξ1φ =

sum

i1partξi11 there exist the second level

gauge transformations δξ2ξi11 =

sum

i2partξi22 such that δξ2φ equiv 0 there exist the third

level gauge transformations δξ3ξi22 =

sum

i3partξi33 such that δξ3ξ1 equiv 0 and so on The

difference from totally anti-symmetric fields is in that there are generally more thanone gauge parameters at each level of reducibility (enumerated by index ik at thek-th level)

5Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [1] have the form Gmicro1microsminus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 where Gmicro1microsis equal to (213) the two forms being equiva-

lent

10

For instance the simplest mixed-symmetry massless field has the spin- andcan be minimally described[16 17] by a field φ[micromicro]ν which is anti-symmetric in thefirst two indices and satisfies Young symmetry condition6 φ[micromicroν] = 0 The equationsof motion

φmicromicroλ + 2part[micropartλφmicro]λν minus partνpart

λφmicromicroλ minus 2partνpart[microφλ

micro]λ = 0 (215)

are invariant underδφmicromicroν = part[microξ

Smicro]ν + part[microξ

Amicro]ν minus partνξ

Amicromicro (216)

with symmetric and anti-symmetric gauge parameters ξS(microν) and ξA[microν] Let us stress

that to maintain an off-shell gauge symmetry field φ[micromicro]ν has to take values in a

reducible so(d minus 1 1) representation oplus so does symmetric gauge parameterξS(micromicro) oplus bull which is in accordance with φ ν

microν 6= 0 and ξSνν 6= 0 Analogously tototally anti-symmetric fields there exist second level gauge transformations with avector parameter ξmicro

δφmicromicroν = 0

δξAmicroν = 23(partmicroξν minus partνξmicro)

δξSmicroν = partmicroξν + partνξmicro

(217)

In this case H

(

0)

is given by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

oplusD (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0 (218)

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) field the depthof reducibility of gauge transformations is equal to p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi where p is the height

of the first column of the Young diagram and at the r-th level of reducibility gaugeparameters have the symmetry of

sN minus 1

pNkN

s2 minus 1

p2k2

s1 minus 1

p1

k1

i=Nsum

i=1

ki =

i=Nsum

i=1

pi minus r (219)

This pattern of reducibility of gauge transformations will be of great importancewhile constructing the unfolded formulation in Section 4 As is easily seen at the

6In more detail the field φmicroνλ satisfies φmicroνλ = minusφνmicroλ φmicroνλ+φνλmicro+φλmicroν = 0 Equivalentlya symmetric basis can be used ie φSmicroνλ = φSνmicroλ φ

Smicroνλ + φSνλmicro + φSλmicroν = 0 The two bases are

related by φS(microν)λ = 1radic3(φAmicroλν + φAνλmicro) φ

A[microν]λ = 1radic

3(φSmicroλν minus φ

Sνλmicro)

11

first level of reducibility the gauge parameters are various tensors whose LorentzYoung diagrams are obtained by cutting off one cell from the original so(d minus 2)-diagram in all possible ways ie the number of gauge parameters at the first levelis equal to the number of blocks N eg two for spin- There is only one gaugeparameter at the deepest level of reducibility whose Young diagram is obtained bycutting off the first column from Y eg for spin-

This pattern corresponds of course to on-shell equations ie the gauge param-eters taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of Young symmetry (219) are subjectedto (28)-like equations To obtain an off-shell gauge symmetry the field content hasto be extended to take values in certain reducible so(d minus 1 1)-representations ad-ditional components turn out can be identified with certain traces of a single fieldwith the symmetry of Y as an sl(d)-tensor In general gauge parameters are alsoreducible tensors with the symmetry of (219) In the case of a spin- massless fieldthe trace φ ν

microν in the sector of fields and the trace ξSνν in the sector of gauge param-eters are the additional components In the general case of a spin-Y = Ys1 snmassless field field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) should satisfy [20]

ηmicroimicroiηmicroimicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n] (220)

which is a generalization of the Fronsdalrsquos double-trace condition (213) As it will beshown this condition naturally arises in the unfolded approach Note that double-tracelessness is imposed on each group of symmetric indices and it is not requiredfor cross-traces to vanish

Let a generalized Weyl tensor for a minimally described spin-Y massless field bea gauge-invariant combination of the least order in derivatives of field φY(x) that isallowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell On the other hand it is the generalized Weyltensor that the minimal non-gauge description of a massless spin-Y field is basedon For a spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN)so(dminus2) massless field the generalizedWeyl tensor has the symmetry of Y(s1 p1 + 1) (s2 p2) (sN pN)so(dminus11) and isof the s1-th order in derivatives In the case of spin-one (Y = so(dminus2)) Maxwell field

strength Fmicroν with the symmetry of can be also called a generalized Weyl tensorFermionic mixed-symmetry fields share most features of bosonic ones viz the

reducibility of gauge transformations the enlargement of the field content for theequations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge invariance The difference is thatthe equations for fermions have the first order in derivatives and the irreducibility ofspin-tensors is achieved by the Γ-tracelessness condition7 instead of the tracelessnessone

For example a massless totally symmetric spin-(s + 12) field can be described

7Γmicro are the Clifford algebra generators and satisfy ΓmicroΓν + ΓνΓmicro = 2ηmicroν part equiv Γmicropartmicro Γ-trace isa contraction of a spinor index and one tensor index with Γmicro eg Γνφ

microν equiv Γαν βφ

βmicroν

12

off-shell[54] by a totally symmetric spin-tensor field φα(micro1micros) subjected to8

partφmicro1microsminus spart(micro1

Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros)

ΓνΓρΓλφνρλmicro4micros= 0 Γνξνmicro2microsminus1 = 0

(221)

where in order to get an off-shell gauge invariance the irreducibility of φα(micro1micros) hasto be relaxed to the triple Γ-tracelessness

A massless totally anti-symmetric spin-Y(1 p) 12field can be described off-shell

by a totally anti-symmetric spin-tensor field ωα[micro1microp] subjected to

partωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1Γ

νωνmicro2microp] = 0

δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp]

(222)

Similar to the bosonic case (222) possesses reducible gauge transformations Thedifference is that one can impose the triple Γ-tracelessness on ωα[micro1microp] but thisrestricts the first level gauge parameter to be Γ-traceless Γνξνmicro2micropminus1 = 0 andhence the second order gauge parameter has to be on-mass-shell ie partξmicro1micropminus2 = 0Therefore for equations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge symmetry of allorders no Γ-trace conditions have to be imposed on fieldgauge parameters

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) 12field the

pattern of gauge symmetries is given by the spin-tensors with the tensor part de-scribed by (219) the definition of the Weyl tensor remains unchanged also

The descriptions based on tensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) which is analogous tothe metric gmicroν are referred to as metric-like At least in writing equiv partmicropartνη

microν theexplicit use of metric ηmicroν is made of which complicates the issue of introducinginteractions with gravitation

Let us note that in principle one can verify the gauge invariance of the fieldequations for massless mixed-symmetry fields despite the fact that the very form ofgauge transformation is cumbersome due to Young symmetrizers The advantageof the unfolded approach is in that gauge invariance at all levels of reducibility ismanifest

3 Unfolding Dynamics and σminus Cohomology

In this section we first recall the definition of unfolding and the relation of the sim-plest unfolded systems to Lie algebrasmodules and Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomologywith coefficients Second peculiar properties of unfolded systems that describe freefields and specifically the so-called σminus cohomology concept are recalled Third thevery procedure of constructing the unfolded form is illustrated on the examples ofmassless spin-zero spin-one arbitrary totally symmetric spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2)

fields the relation with the general statement of Section 1 is pointed out in each ofthe examples

8Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [54] have the form Gmicro1microsminus s

2Γ(micro1ΓνGνmicro2micros) minus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 Gmicro1micros= partφmicro1micros

minus spart(micro1Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0 which is equivalent to

(222)

13

31 General Features

Some dynamical system is said to be unfolded [31 32 33] if it has the form

dWA = FA(W ) (31)

whereWA is a set9 of differential forms of degree-qA on some d-dimensional manifoldMd d - exterior differential on Md and FA(W ) is an arbitrary degree-(qA + 1)function of WA assumed to be expandable in terms of exterior (wedge) productsonly10

FA(W ) =infinsum

n=1

sum

qB1++qBn=qA+1

fAB1Bn

W B1 and andW Bn (32)

where fAB1Bn

are constant coefficients satisfying fAB1BiBj Bn

= (minus)qBiqBj fA

B1BjBiBn

Moreover FA(W ) must satisfy the integrability condition (called generalized Jacobiidentity) obtained by applying d to (31)

F B δFA

δW Bequiv 0 (33)

Any solution of (33) defines a free differential algebra (FDA) [55 56 57 58] If Ja-cobi identities (33) are satisfied irrespective ofMd dimension11 the free differentialalgebra is referred to as universal [10 59] It is the universal algebras only that willbe considered further

Equations (31) are invariant under gauge transformations

δWAqA

= dǫAqAminus1 + ǫBqBminus1

δFA

δW B for qA gt 0 (34)

δWA0 = ǫB

prime

0

δFA

δW Bprime

1

Bprime qBprime = 1 for qA = 0 (35)

where ǫAqAminus1 is a degree-(qA minus 1) form taking values in the same space as WAqA

Inits turn δWA

qA= 0 can be treated as unfolded-like system for ǫAqAminus1 ie dǫ

AqAminus1 =

minusǫBqBminus1δFA

δWB there emerge second level gauge transformations

δǫAqAminus1 = dξAqAminus2 minus ξBqBminus2

δFA

δW B (36)

provided that FA(W ) is linear in matter fields and analogously for the gauge trans-formations at deeper levels Therefore the reducibility of gauge transformations ismanifest in the unfolded approach For a degree-qA gauge field WA

qAthere exist qA

levels of gauge transformations

9In this section indices A B C are of arbitrary nature In the cases of practical significance AB C vary over certain irreps of the Lorentz algebra

10The wedge symbol and will be systematically omitted further11As the forms with the rank greater than d are identically zero there exist certain identities

eg Wn andWn equiv 0 for n+m gt d which make the operator δδWA to be ill-behaved

14

The use of the exterior algebra respects diffeomorphisms which is very appropri-ate for introducing interactions with the gravitation The whole information aboutthe dynamics turns out to be contained in FA(W ) and one can even extend anunfolded system to other manifolds[59] simply by changing the exterior differentialthe new unfolded system has literally the same form

Note that introducing enough auxiliary fields it is possible to reformulate anydynamical system in the unfolded form although it may be difficult to unfold someparticular system or to find all unfolded forms

Collected below are some important cases of unfolded systems which have adirect bearing on Lie algebras [55 59]

Lie algebrasFlat connections Let ΩI equiv ΩImicrodx

micro be a subsector of degree-oneforms The only self-closed unfolded equations are of the form

dΩI = minusf IJKΩ

JΩK (37)

Generalized Jacobi identity (33) implies the Jacobi identity f IJKf

JLMΩKΩLΩM equiv

0 for some Lie algebra g with structure constants f IJK Therefore the closed

subsector of one-forms is in one-to-one correspondence with Lie algebras and(37) is the flatness condition for a connection ΩI of g This provides acoordinate-independent framework for describing background geometry Inthe cases of interest g is iso(d minus 1 1) so(d minus 1 2) so(d 1) and sp(2n) [59]Background geometry connection ΩI is assumed to be of order zero whereasall matter fields including dynamical gravitation are of the first order Allequations are assumed to be of the first order in matter fields and hencedescribe free fields only

In this paper g = iso(dminus 1 1) and ΩI = ab ha where ab equiv abmicro dxmicro

is a Lorentz spin-connection and ha equiv hamicrodxmicro is a background vielbein which

defines a non-holonomic basis of a tangent space at each point of the manifoldFlatness equation (37) for iso(dminus 1 1)-connection ΩI reads

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb = 0(38)

The first is the zero torsion equation that expresses the Lorentz spin-connectionvia the first derivative of hamicro The second can be recognized as the zero curva-ture equation For example in Cartesian coordinates the explicit solution isab

micro = 0 and hamicro = δamicro

The advantage of description of background geometry as the flatness conditionfor a connection of the space-time symmetry algebra is in that this way iscoordinate-independent In what follows we assume ab ha to satisfy (38)which is enough if there is no need for the explicit form of the solution in someparticular coordinate system For instance in (anti)-de Sitter space (38) ismodified by the terms proportional to the cosmological constant λ2

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb + λ2hahb = 0(39)

15

and admits no simple solutions with hamicro = δamicro ab = 0 Nevertheless without

giving the explicit solution to imply that ab ha satisfy (39) is sufficient forgeneral analysis eg for constructing Lagrangians [60]

Contractible FDA The simplest equations linear in matter fields of the form

dWAq = fA

BWBq+1 (310)

can be reduced by linear transformations to either

dWAq = WA

q+1 dWAq+1 = 0 (311)

ordWA

q = 0 (312)

where the second equation of (311) is the consequence of Jacobi identities(33) for the first one In the first case by virtue of gauge transformations(34) δWA

q = dξAqminus1 + χAq δW

Bq+1 = dχA

q the field WAq can be gauged away In

both cases by virtue of the Poincarersquos Lemma these equations are dynamicallyempty and correspond to the co-called contractible FDAs [55]

g-modulesCovariant constancy equations Let WAq be a closed subsector of

q-forms of matter gauge fields Linear in matter fields equations may involvethe background g-connection ΩI which is of zeroth order Such equationsreferred to as linearized over g background (described by any solution ΩI of(37)) have the form

dWAq = minusΩIfI

ABW

Bq (313)

Jacobi identity (33) where (37) is also taken into account

ΩJΩK(minusf I

JKfIAB + fJ

ACfK

CB

)W B

q = 0 (314)

implies fIAB to realize a representation of g Therefore the closed subsector

of forms of definite degree is in one-to-one correspondence with g-moduleswhereas

DΩWAq equiv dWA

q + ΩIfIABW

Bq = 0 (315)

is a covariant constancy equation and (DΩ)2 = 0 since the connection is

flat (37) In the cases of interest A runs over certain finite-dimensionalso(d minus 1 1)-irreps ie g-modules decompose with respect to its subalgebraso(dminus 1 1) sub g into a direct sum of certain irreducible tensors This is whywe single out the Lorentz-covariant derivative DL from the whole g-covariantderivative DΩ the remaining part acts vertically (algebraically) In the caseof ΩI being an iso(d minus 1 1) flat connection the Lorentz covariant derivativeDL = d+ satisfy DL

2 = 0 as the exterior differential d does

DLTab = dT ab +a

cTcb +b

cTac + (316)

In Cartesian coordinates DL equiv d and we do not make any distinction betweend and DL whereas in (anti)-de Sitter (DL)

2 6= 0 and the difference between d

16

and DL has to be taken into account Also zero torsion equation (381) canbe rewritten as DLh

a = 0 The remaining part of ΩI which acts algebraicallyand mixes different so(dminus 1 1)-modules into g-modules is associated with thegenerators of translations with gauge field ha

Gluing g-modulesChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology LetWpWq andWr takevalues in g-modules R1 R2 and R3 the representations are realized by oper-ators T1 T2 and T3 respectively Still linear in matter fields but nonlinear inbackground connection ΩI equations are of the form

DΩWp equiv dWp + T1(Ω)Wp = f12(Ω Ω)Wq

DΩWq equiv dWq + T2(Ω)Wq = f23(Ω Ω)Wr

DΩWr equiv

(317)

where the terms forming g-covariant derivative are isolated on the lhs Thetwo g-modules R1 R2 appear to be glued together by the term f12(Ω Ω) isinHom(Λpminusq+1(g) otimes R2R1) Jacobi identity (33) implies f12(Ω Ω) to be aChevalley-Eilenberg cocycle with coefficients in Rlowast

2 otimesR1 where Rlowast2 is a mod-

ule contragradient to R2 and f12(Ω Ω)f23(Ω Ω) = 0 Coboundaries canbe proved to be dynamically empty and can be removed by a field redefini-tion Consequently f12(Ω Ω) should be a nontrivial representative of theChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology group with coefficients in Rlowast

2otimesR1 It followsalso that nothing but zero forms can be joined to zero forms ie the onlypossible linearized unfolded equations on forms of zero degree are (315) withq = 0

For any dynamical system linearized over certain g-background (described byany solution ΩI of (37)) equations of motion (315) along with gauge transforma-tions of all orders of reducibility acquire a very simple form

δξ1 = DΩξ0

δξpminus1 = DΩξpminus2

δWp = DΩξpminus1

DΩWp = 0

(318)

where Wp takes values in certain g-module R DΩ is the associated g-covariantderivative and ξpminusk k isin [1 p] are the gauge parameters of k-th order of reducibilitytaking values in the same g-module R and being forms of degree (p minus k) Thegauge invariance at each order of reducibility and of equations of motion is dueto (DΩ)

2 = 0 In some sense the gauge fields Wp and the gauge parameters ξpminusk

seem to play the same role at the linearized level This uniformity is of essentialimportance when analyzing unfolded systems

In the presence of gluing terms eg when only two modules say R1 and R2 areglued by nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycle fpr(Ω Ω) full chain of equations

17

and gauge transformations (318) is modified to12

δξ11 = DΩξ10

δξ1pminusr = DΩξ1pminusrminus1

δξ1pminusr+1 = DΩξ1pminusr + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

20 δξ21 = DΩξ

20

(319)

δξ1pminus1 = DΩξ1pminus2 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus2 δξ2rminus1 = DΩξ

2rminus2

δW 1p = DΩξpminus1 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus1 δW 2

r = DΩξ2rminus1

DΩW1p = fpr(Ω Ω)W

2r DΩW

2r = 0

where W 1p ξ

1pminusk and W 2

r ξ2rminusm take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively

Important is that the gauge fieldsparameters taking values in R2 contribute to therhs of the equationsgauge transformations for the gauge fieldsparameters takingvalues in R1 but for forms of degree greater than (p minus r) The above two systemsare nothing but the specializations of (31) (34) (36)

Also let us note that there is no strong reason to make any distinction betweenthe terms linear in the background g-connection ΩI which correspond to g-modulesand the terms of higher order in ΩI which correspond to Chevalley-Eilenberg co-cycles Both terms can be combined into a single object the generalized covariant-derivative D = d+T (Ω)+f(Ω Ω) equiv DΩ+f(Ω Ω) with the property D2 = 0Moreover by means of D (319) and (318) can be rewritten in a similar mannerConsequently at the linearized level the most general unfolded equations and gaugetransformations have the form

δξ1 = Dξ0

δξpminus1 = Dξpminus2

δWp = Dξpminus1

DWp = 0

(320)

where D is built of d background connection ΩI and satisfies D2 = 0 The gaugefieldsparameters take values in certain spacesWq viz Wp isin Wp ξpminus1 isin Wpminus1ξ0 isin W0 The elements of Wq are differential forms with values in certain g-modules It is also convenient to define higher degree spaces Wqgtp the equationsRp+1 = DWp = 0 take values in Wp+1 Rp+2 = DRp+1 belongs to Wp+2 andby virtue of D2 = 0 satisfies Rp+2 equiv 0 and so on Therefore there exist certainidentities which belong to Wp+2 for the equations which belong to Wp+1 andthere exist certain identities which belong to Wp+3 for the identities in Wp+2 andso on At the field theoretical level these identities correspond to Bianchi identitiesfor the first level gauge transformations higher identities correspond to the Bianchiidentities for the deeper levels of gauge transformations

12The sign factor (minus)pminusr+1 before fpr(Ω Ω) is ignored and is thought of as the part of thedefinition of fpr(Ω Ω)

18

A remark should be made that the forms belonging to Wq may have differentdegrees if there are Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles present As a result spaces Wq

may contain different number of elements For instance (319) can be reduced to(320) if one defines

Wq =

W 1q q lt pminus r

W 1q W

2qminusp+r q ge (pminus r)

(321)

where W 1q and W 2

qminusp+r take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively In termsof (319) the elements of Wq for q lt (pminus r) were referred to as ξ1q the elements ofWq for q = (pminus r)(pminus 1) to as ξ1q ξ

2qminusp+r the elements ofWq for q = p to as W 1

pW 2

r the elements of Wq for q gt p to as R1q R

2qminusp+r (the equations of motion and

Bianchi identities)

32 Interpretation of Unfolded Systems Describing free Fields

When describing free fields unfolded formulations will be referred to as frame-like [61 60] though the very term frame-like has a more broad definition Thesesystems consist of equations (37) describing background geometry of a finite chainof (317)-like equations describing the gauge fields of the model and of (317)-likeequations with q = 0 glued to gauge forms ie it requires a Lie algebra g (commonlyiso(dminus1 1) so(dminus1 2) or so(d 1)) a set of g-modules R0RN and an appropriateset of nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles f01fNminus1N The physical degreesof freedom are contained in the forms of zero degree and the module RN in whichzero degree forms take values is infinite-dimensional

Since frame-like unfolded systems contain inevitably infinitely many fields mostof them being either auxiliary or Stueckelberg13 there arises a problem of reconstruc-tion a metric-like formulation by a given unfolded formulation or of extracting thedynamical content for a given unfolded system

The questions to be answered are what are the dynamical fields what arethe differential gauge parameters and what are the gauge invariant equations ofmotion These answers are not universal and depend on the chosen scheme ofinterpretation Different interpretations correspond to dual descriptions of the samedynamical system

Frame-like unfolded systems are endowed at the linearized level with additionalstructures providing a natural way for interpretation Indices AB vary overcertain finite dimensional Lorentz irreps ie each of Rn n = 0 N decomposes asRn =

sum

k Pnk where Pnk are certain so(d minus 1 1)-modules characterized by Ynk

Young diagrams of Section 1We say that some frame-like unfolded system is given an interpretation if [62]

1 On the whole space W =oplusinfin

q=0Wq where the matter gauge fields gauge pa-rameters equations of motion and Bianchi identities take values there exists

13A field is called Stueckelberg if it can be gauged away by pure algebraic symmetry

19

a bounded from below grading g = 0 1 ie Wq =oplusinfin

g=0Wgq The ho-

mogeneous element of Wgq is a certain differential form with values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep and is denoted as W gq In simplest cases the grade is just the

rank of the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep the element of Wgq takes values in

2 The closed subsector of one-forms ΩI describes a background geometry vizMinkowski or (anti)-de Sitter The generalized covariant derivative D is to bedivided into three parts the last one not being necessary nontrivial

D = DL minus σminus + σ+ (322)

where DL is a background Lorentz-covariant derivative and has a zero gradeσminus is an operator of grade (minus1) and σ+ contains positive grade operatorsThe only differential part is in DL whereas σplusmn acts vertically and is built ofthe background vielbein ha If two modules are glued the gluing element issupposed to be of grade (minus1) and also denoted as σminus

The equations then have the form

DLWn +

gminusnsum

i=1

σ+(W n+i

)= σminus

(W n+1

) g = 0 1 (323)

and analogously for the gauge transformations In the flat space all operators ofpositive grade appear to be trivial for the massless case As it does not affect theanalysis let us consider a simplified version with σ+ = 0 Then D2 = DL

2+σminusDL+DLσminus + (σminus)

2 = 0 is equivalent to DL2 = 0 (σminus)

2 = 0 and σminusDL +DLσminus = 0 Thefirst is a part of the flatness condition (38) for the iso(d minus 1 1)-connection Thesecond is the nilpotancy condition for σminus The third is satisfied provided that σminus istwisted by the factor (minus)∆g where (∆g + 1) is a degree of σminus which is equal to thenumber of the vielbeins ha that σminus is built of Indeed the vielbeins ha anticommutewith DL and hence the action of σminus is to be twisted by the factor (minus)∆g in orderσminusDL +DLσminus = 0 holds true Without further mention the pure sign factor (minus)∆g

will be though of as a part of the definition of σminusIt is useful to illustrate the action of σminus when for example unfolded equations

on fields with values in two modules R1 and R2 are glued as in (319)

R1︷ ︸︸ ︷

R2︷ ︸︸ ︷ g

q

t t t t

t t t

W 1p

ξ1pminus1

ξ10

W 2r

ξ2rminus1

ξ20

(324)

20

where short arrows stand for the action of σminus within each module and long arrowsfor the action of σminus between two modules (gluing terms) and dots stand for gaugefieldsparameters at different grades bold dots represent the elements of Wp =W 1

pW2r

All information about the dynamics turns out to be concealed in cohomologygroups of σminus [62] H(σminus) =

Ker(σminus)Im(σminus)

Let us analyze unfolded system (320) whichat grade g has the form

δξg1 = DLξg0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 )

δW gp = DLξ

gpminus1 + σminus(ξ

g+1pminus1)

0 = DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p )

(325)

Beginning from the deepest level of gauge transformations and from the lowestgrade it is obvious that those ξg+1

0 that are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueck-elberg(algebraic) gauge parameters for those ξg1 that belong to the image of σminusTherefore those ξg1 that are σminus-exact can be gauged away The leftover gauge sym-metry satisfies δξg1 = DLξ

g0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 ) = 0 so that those ξg+1

0 that belong to thecoimage of σminus are expressed via derivative of ξn0 Having sieved W0 and W1 inthis way only those ξg0 are still independent that are σminus-closed and hence belong toH

0(σminus) since only forms of zero-degree are elements of W0 Then those ξg+11 that

are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueckelberg gauge parameters for those ξg2 thatbelong to the image of σminus Therefore only those ξg1 are still independent that areσminus-closed but not σminus-exact and hence belong to H

1(σminus) Having sievedW0Wpminus1

one after another it turns out that independent differential gauge parameters at thek-th level are given by H

pminusk(σminus) Analogously those fields W gp that are σminus-exact

can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gauge parameters at Wpminus1 Thosefields W g+1

p that are not σminus-closed can be expressed via derivatives of fields at lowergrade by virtue of the equations Rg

p+1 equiv DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p ) = 0 these fields are

called auxiliary Therefore the dynamical fields ie those that are neither aux-iliary nor Stueckelberg are given by H

p(σminus) The nilpotency of D2 equiv 0 impliescertain relations of the form DLR

gp+1 + σminus(R

g+1p+1) = 0 between Rg

p+1 Therefore

auxiliary fields are expressed by virtue of σminus-exact Rgp+1 and σminus-non-closed Rg+1

p+1

are themselves expressed via derivatives of Rgp+1 Consequently the independent

equations on dynamical fields are given by Hp+1(σminus) From the cohomological point

of view higher degree forms correspond to certain nontrivial relations between equa-tions called Bianchi identities and manifest gauge nature of equations As there aregenerally more than one levels of gauge transformations one can expect the highercohomological group to be nontrivial

To sum up

21

cohomology group interpretation

Hpminusk k = 1p differential gauge parameters at the k-th level of re-

ducibilityH

p dynamical fieldsH

p+1 independent gauge invariant equations on dynamicalfields

Hp+k+1 k = 1p Bianchi identities for the k-th order gauge symmetryH

p+k k gt p supposed to be trivial in a regular case

To distinguish fields in cohomological sense the following convention is introduced[63]

Stueckelberg fields(gauge parameters) are those that can be eliminated bypure algebraic symmetry ie these fields are σminus-exact (are those that canbe used to gauge away certain fields ie these parameters are not σminus-closed)

Auxiliary fields are those that can be expressed via derivatives of some otherfields ie these fields are σminus-nonclosed Let us note that this definition isgenerally ambiguous eg in system

partA = B

partB = A(326)

which field is auxiliary is a matter of choice This ambiguity is removed byvirtue of grade[62 63]

Dynamical fields are those that are neither auxiliary nor Stueckelberg ie thesefields are representatives of σminus-cohomology classes

Note that if certain dynamical field given by Hp belongs to the grade-gf subspace

Wgfp and the corresponding equations given by H

p+1 belong to the grade-ge subspaceWge

p+1 the order of equations is equal to ge minus gf + 1If the unfolded system is supposed to admit a lagrangian formulation there has

to be a one-to-one correspondence between the number of dynamical fields and thatof equations k-th level gauge symmetries and k-th level Bianchi identities ie in acertain sense there should be a duality H

pminusk sim Hp+1+k k isin [0 p] This takes place

for all unfolded systems exemplified in this paperSince the operators involved ie DL and σminus are of grade 0 and minus1 only the

fields with the grade greater than g0 for any g0 ge 0 form a quotient module thusdescribing the same system on its own - dual formulations This picture partlybreaks in (A)dSd because of appearance of grade +1 nilpotent operator σ+

D = DL + σminus + λ2σ+ (327)

The specific character of frame-like unfolded systems which will be crucial forus is that by virtue of the inverse background vielbein hmicroa all form indices of any

gauge fieldparameter Wa1(s1)ap(sm)q can be converted to the fiber ones

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (328)

22

The resulting tensor W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is not irreducible and can be decomposedinto so(dminus 1 1)-irreps according to the so(dminus 1 1)-tensor product rule

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] =rArr Ys1 smotimes

so(dminus11)

Y(1 q) =oplus

α

Yα (329)

where one-column Young diagramY(1 q) of height-q represents the anti-symmetricindices d1 dq and Yα are the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the tensor product decomposesinto Having converted all fields (parameters equations) of a given unfolded systemto the fiber tensors one can make the identification of the fields in the unfolded ap-proach and those of the metric-like approach though the general covariance gaugeinvariance and other advantages of the unfolded formalism will be not manifestWhile constructing the unfolded formulations of a known metric-like systems or in-terpreting a given unfolded system in terms of metric-like fields this technique willbe widely used Moreover the calculation of σminus cohomology groups is largely basedon the explicit evaluation of (329)-like expressions Once an unfolded form is knownno use of this technique is needed either to generalize it to other backgrounds or tointroduce interactions

Field W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is traceless in a1 am and d1 dq separatelyHowever the cross traces need not vanish and hence some of Yα represent tracesTo distinguish between the traces of different orders let us introduce the followingthe Y-valued degree-q form WY

q is said to be a trace of the r-th order iff it has theform

WYq = hh

︸︷︷︸

r

hh︸︷︷︸

qminusr

CYprime

0 (330)

for some Yprime-valued degree-0 form CYprime

0 where (q minus r) indices of the backgroundvielbeins ha are contracted with the tensor representing Yprime and r indices are freefor the whole expression to take values in Y the appropriate Young symmetrizeris implied When the indices of WY

q are converted to the fiber ones the expression

takes the form ηη︸ ︷︷ ︸

r

CYprime ie CYprime

represents a trace of the r-th order

Different aspects of unfolding are illustrated on the examples of a massless scalarfield a massless spin-one field and a massless spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2) fields

33 Examples of Unfolding

Example 331 Unfolding a scalar field [31 62] First it should be noted thatit is easy of course to convert the Klein-Gordon equation C = 0 to a system offirst order equations

partmicroC = Cmicro

partmicroCmicro = 0(331)

but when writing the second equation the explicit form of the metric is to be usedhence these equations are not of unfolded form (31)

23

Described in terms of a scalar field C(x) the theory is brought into a non gaugeform therefore zero-forms only are allowed or else there would be some gaugesymmetry according to (34) The most general rhs of dC = has the form

dC = haCa (332)

for some vector-valued zero-form Ca This equation just parameterizes the firstderivative of C(x) and is similar to the first of (331) There are three terms allowedon the rhs of dCa =

dCa = hbCab + hbC

ab + haC prime (333)

with Cab Cab and C prime taking values in antisymmetric symmetric and scalar so(dminus1 1)-irreps ie bull The first term is forbidden by Bianchi identity hadC

a equiv 0To analyze the remaining terms let us decompose dCa into so(dminus 1 1)-irreps

partmicroCahmicrob = otimes = oplus oplus bull (334)

where = part[aCb] = part(aCa) minus 1dηaapartbC

b bull = partaCa = C

The component represents Bianchi identity in the first order reformulation ofthe Klein-Gordon equation Indeed expressing Ca as partaC implies part[aCb] equiv 0 bullrepresents the desired Klein-Gordon equation whereas is the only component al-lowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell Therefore to impose the Klein-Gordon equationthe term haC prime has to be omitted

dCa = hbCab (335)

The only possible rhs for dCaa = compatible with Jacobi identity hbdCab equiv 0

is of the form dCaa = hbCaab for Caaa taking values in a rank-three symmetric

so(d minus 1 1)-irrep ie The process of unfolding continues unambiguously inthis way and results in the full system

dCa(k) = hbCa(k)b equiv F a(k)(C) k = 0 1 (336)

where Ca(k) is rank-k totally symmetric traceless field ie taking values in k

so(dminus 1 1)-irrepTo make a connection with the general statement of Section 1 for Y = Y(0 0)

the general scheme results in

Yg bull

n k 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 0 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore spaces Wq and operator σminus which enters D = DL minus σminus should be definedas

Wq = WqWaq W

aaq (337)

24

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbWa(gminus1)bq g gt 0

(338)

Consequently W is a space of various differential forms with values in totally sym-metric traceless so(d minus 1 1)-tensors graded by the form degree and by the rankof so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Space Wq forms an irreducible iso(d minus 1 1)-module System(336) reads

Dω0 = 0 ω0 isin W0 (339)

The cohomology groups of σminus are easy to find

H0(σminus) = C(x) as the lowest grade field is automatically closed σminus(C) = 0 and it

cannot be exact as a form of zero degree Contrariwise zero-forms with gradegreater than zero are not closed σminus(C

k+1) = hbCa(k)b = 0lArrrArr Ck+1 = 0

H1(σminus) = haB(x)0 for some B(x)0 isin W

00 One-form Ba

1 = haB(x)0 is closedσminus(B

a1) = haB

a1 = hah

aB(x)0 equiv 0 and it cannot be represented as σminus(C2) =

hbCab as far as Cab is traceless The cohomology groups at higher grade are

trivial since σminus(haBa(k)(x)0) 6= 0 for k gt 0

Hqgt1(σminus) = empty as one can make sure

The interpretation in terms of Section 32 is as follows as is expected the dynamicalfield given by H

0 is C(x) The equations are given by the projection of dCa = hbCab

to H1 ie C = 0 The fields with k gt 0 are auxiliary being expressed via

derivatives of C(x) Ca(k) = partapartaC(x) Inasmuch as there is no gauge symmetryin the system the higher cohomology groups are trivial

An infinitely many dual formulations of a massless scalar field are also includedIndeed the fields with k ge k0 gt 0 form a quotient module Rk0 ie one canconsistently write

dCk = σminus(Ck+1) k ge k0 (340)

The first equationdCa(k0) = hbC

a(k0)b (341)

imposes on the dynamical field Ca(k0)

partbCba(k0minus1) = 0

part[bCc]a(k0minus1) = 0(342)

which imply at least locally Ca(k0) =

k0︷ ︸︸ ︷

partaparta C and C = 0 for some fieldC(x) All fields at higher grade are auxiliary This statement is confirmed bythe cohomology analysis H

0(Rk0 σminus) = Ck0 ie scalar is described in termsof a traceless rank-k0 symmetric tensor field subjected to the equations given byH

1(Rk0 σminus) = haBa(k0minus1)0 minus k0(k0minus1)

2(d+2k0minus4)ηaahcB

a(k0minus2)c0 +hcB

a(k0)c0 for B

a(k0minus1)0 B

a(k0)c0

taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps characterized by diagrams k0 minus 1 k0

These two elements represents just the components ofWk0

1 sim k0 otimes with the

25

symmetry of k0 minus 1 (trace) andk0

the third component with the symmetryof k0 + 1 is exact

The above results can be easily extended to (A)dSd background and to a massivescalar field [62]

DLCk = σminus(C

k+1) + σ+(Ckminus1) = 0 (343)

where there appears a nontrivial positive grade operator

σ+(Ckminus1) = (m2 minus λ2k(k + dminus 1))

(

haCa(kminus1) minus(sminus 1)

d+ 2k minus 4ηaahbC

a(kminus1)b

)

(344)

and DL is a Lorentz-covariant derivative in (A)dSd In the (A)dSd case the situationis more interesting due to the appearance of σ+ operator and the possibility of theaccidental degeneracy of σ+ when m2 = λ2kprime(kprime + dminus 1) for some kprime [62]

Example 332 Unfolding Maxwell equations [64 65] An example of masslessspin-one field is more interesting as a gauge system The main object is a one-formAmicro From gauge transformation law

δA1 = dξ0 (345)

it follows that there should not be other forms of rank greater than zero If this werethe case the gauge parameters of these new forms would be involved by virtue of(34) making the gauge law for A1 inappropriate Indeed there are two possibilitiesto introduce higher degree forms on the rhs of dA = (i) dA1 = R2 fora scalar valued degree-two form R2 which possesses its own gauge parameter χ1δR2 = dχ1 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law for A1 is modifiedto δA1 = dξ0 + χ1 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gaugeparameter χ1 This case corresponds to contractible free differential algebras (310)(ii) dA1 = hbω

b1 for a vector valued degree-one form ωa

1 which possesses its owngauge parameter ǫa0 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law forA1 is modified to δA1 = dξ0 + hbǫ

b0 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of

Stueckelberg gauge parameter ǫa0 Consequently in both cases A1 can be made non-dynamical which is not what was expected Therefore the only possibility is tointroduce a zero-form C

[ab]0 anti-symmetric in a b parameterizing by virtue of

dA1 = hahbC[ab]0 (346)

the Maxwell field strength Bianchi identity hahbdC[ab]0 equiv 0 tolerates two terms on

the rhs of dC[ab]0 =

dC[ab]0 = hcC

[ab]c0 + h[aC

b]0 (347)

with C[ab]c0 and Ca

0 taking values in and so(dminus 1 1)-irreps the former taken inantisymmetric basis In order to determine which of the terms should be omittedif any the decomposition of the first derivative of the Maxwell field strength intoLorentz irreps has to be analyzed

C [ab]|c equiv partmicroC[ab]hmicroc = otimes = oplus oplus (348)

26

where = part[aCbc] = partbCab and = partcC [ab] minus part[cCab] + 2

dminus1ηc[apartdC

b]d part[aCbc]

is identically zero provided that C [ab] is expressed via the first derivative of Amicroor represents the second pair of Maxwell equations in terms of field strength C [ab]In both cases this component should be zero and moreover this can not be keptnonzero as there is no hcC

[abc]-like term allowed on the rhs of (347) The secondpartbC

ab is the desired Maxwell equations in terms of Amicro or the first pair of Maxwellequations in terms of the field strength Consequently to impose Maxwell equationsterm h[aCb] has to be omitted whereas the third is the only component allowed tobe nonzero on-mass-shell

Again unfolding continues unambiguously and requires an infinite set of fields

C[ab]c(k)0 taking values14 in

kto be introduced

dC [ab]c(k) = hdC[ab]c(k)d k = 0 1 (349)

The full system has the form

dA1 = hahbCab0 equiv F (AC) δA1 = dξ0

dC[ab]c(k)0 = hdC

[ab]c(k)d0 equiv F [ab]c(k)(C) k = 0 1

(350)

and represents two modules being glued together by the term on the rhs of thefirst equation

For Y = Y(1 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 resultsin

Yg bull

n k 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 1 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore

Wq =

W0 q = 0

WqW[ab]qminus1W

[ab]cqminus1 q gt 0

(351)

let us point out the shortening of W0 The action of σminus on Wq isin Wq is defined as

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hahbW[ab]qminus1 g = 1

hdW[ab]c(gminus2)dqminus1 g gt 1

(352)

With D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (350) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (353)

14The fields C [ab]c(k) are taken in antisymmetric basis ie they are antisymmetric in a bsymmetric in c(k) and C [abd]c(kminus1)equiv0

27

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 0 form a finite-dimensional iso(dminus1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g gt0 form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

Again the cohomology groups are easy to find gauge parameters are given byH

0(σminus) = ξ0 dynamical fields by H1(σminus) = A1 Maxwell equations by H

2(σminus) =

h[aBb]0 and the Bianchi identities for the first order gauge transformations by

H3(σminus) = hahbB0 the rest of groups are empty H

kgt3(σminus) = empty Important is thedirect correspondence between the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2

the gauge parameters in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3There are infinitely many of non-gauge dual formulations based on C [ab]c(k0) eg

for k0 = 0 one recovers the Maxwell equations in terms of the field strength

part[aCbc] = 0

partbCab = 0

(354)

Let us note that the ambiguity at the first step of unfolding (the terms haC prime andh[aCb] in the above two examples) expresses the possibility of introducing a massterm

Example 333 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-s field [31 6466] We start from the metric-like description of a massless spin-s field in termsof a double-traceless symmetric rank-s field φmicro1micros

satisfying (213) the secondorder equations are invariant with respect to the first order gauge transformationwith traceless rank-(s minus 1) gauge parameter ξmicro1microsminus1 Inasmuch as the Young di-agram s of so(d minus 2) is of the height one there are gauge transforma-tions of the first level only Therefore the dynamical field in the unfolded ap-proach has to be a one-form There is only one way to identify φmicro1micros

and ξmicro1microsminus1

with certain ωY01 and ξY0

0 taking values in the same so(d minus 1 1)-irrep Y0 namely

Y0 = sminus 1 ie ωa(sminus1)1 and ξ

a(sminus1)0 takes values in a rank-(s minus 1) symmet-

ric traceless tensors Field φmicro1microsis identified with a totally symmetric part of

ωa(sminus1)1 ie φmicro1micros

= hb1(micro1hbsminus1

microsminus1ωa1asminus1

micros)ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 the double-tracelessness

condition is the consequence of the tracelessness of ωa(sminus1)1 in a1asminus1 ξmicro1microsminus1

is identified with ξa(sminus1)0 directly ξmicro1microsminus1 = hb1micro1

hbsminus1microsminus1

ξa1asminus1ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 andone can make sure that the Fronsdalrsquos gauge transformation law is recovered fromδω

a(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 Field ω

a(sminus1)1 has a redundant component with the symmetry

ofsminus 1

which can be made Stueckelberg by virtue of gauge parameter ξa(sminus1)b

with the same symmetry type ie

δωa(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)c0 (355)

It automatically follows that there is a degree-one gauge field ωa(sminus1)b1 coupled with

ωa(sminus1)1 as

dωa(sminus1)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)c1 (356)

28

The only solution to Bianchi identity hcdωa(sminus1)c1 equiv 0 is15

dωa(sminus1)b1 = hcω

a(sminus1)bc1 (357)

where a new field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

is introduced and so on

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1 (358)

until the field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

for which the Bianchi identity solvesas

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 (359)

where field Ca(s)b(s)0 represents a generalized Weyl tensor and has the symmetry of

s The solution of Bianchi identity hchddC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 equiv 0 has the form

dCa(s)b(s)0 = hc

(

Ca(s)cb(s)0 +

s

2C

a(s)bb(sminus1)c0

)

(360)

where Ca(s+1)b(s)0 has the symmetry of s

s+ 1 The second term on the rhs

of (360) supplements the first one to have a proper Young symmetry Further

unfolding requires a set of degree-zero forms Ca(s+i)b(s)0 taking values in so(dminus1 1)-

irreps characterized by Young diagrams ss+ i

The full system has theform

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1

δωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(k)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)b(k)c0 k isin [0 sminus 2]

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 δω

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0

dCa(s+i)b(s) = hc

(

Ca(s+i)cb(s) +s

i+ 2Ca(s+i)bb(sminus1)c

)

i isin [0infin)

(361)

By the construction the system incorporates Fronsdalrsquos field φmicro1microswith the correct

gauge law but there is still to be proved that the Fronsdalrsquos equations are reallyimposed and that there are no other dynamical fields in the system Let us recon-struct Fronsdalrsquos equations (213) whereas the second statement will be proved asa part of a more general theorem The first two equations of (361) read

partmicroωa(sminus1)ν minus partνω

a(sminus1)micro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)cν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)cmicro (362)

partmicroωa(sminus1)bν minus partνω

a(sminus1)bmicro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)bcν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)bcmicro (363)

It is convenient to convert all world indices to the fiber ones

partcωa(sminus1)|d minus partdωa(sminus1)|c = ωa(sminus1)c|d minus ωa(sminus1)d|c (364)

partcωa(sminus1)b|d minus partdωa(sminus1)b|c = ωa(sminus1)bc|d minus ωa(sminus1)bd|c (365)

15The proof is not given as more general statement about the solutions of such equations isproved in the next Section

29

where ωa(sminus1)|b equiv ωa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro ωa(sminus1)bb|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bbmicro hcmicro

Contracting (365) with ηbd and then symmetrizing c with a1asminus1 results in

partcωa(sminus1)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus1)c|c= 0 (366)

By symmetrizing in (364) a1asminus1 with d

ωa(sminus1)c|a = partcωa(sminus1)|a minus partaωa(sminus1)|c (367)

and then by contracting (364) with ηdasminus1

ωa(sminus1)c|

c= (sminus 1)

(

partcωa(sminus2)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus2)c|c

)

(368)

all the terms of (366) can be expressed via ωa(sminus1)|b Plugging these to (366) gives

ωa(sminus1)|a minus partapartc((sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c

)+ (sminus 1)partapartaω

a(sminus2)c|c= 0 (369)

where ωa(sminus1)|a is to be identified with Fronsdalrsquos field φa(s) as ωa(sminus1)|a = 1sφa(s)

then ωa(sminus2)c|

c= 1

2φa(sminus2)c

c (sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c = φa(sminus1)c and the equation

acquires the Fronsdalrsquos form (213)

φa(s) minus spartapartcφa(sminus1)c + s(sminus1)

2partapartaφ

a(sminus2)cc= 0 (370)

For Y = Y(s 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 results in

Yg sminus 1 sminus 1 s

ss+ 1

n k 1 0 1 sminus 1 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = sminus 1 g = s g = s+ 1

qg q0 = 1 qsminus1 = 1 qs = 0 qs+1 = 0

therefore

Wq =

Wa(sminus1)0 W

a(sminus1)b0 W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0 q = 0

Wa(sminus1)q W

a(sminus1)bq W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)q W

a(s)b(s)qminus1 W

a(s+1)b(s)qminus1 q gt 0

(371)and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hcWa(sminus1)b(gminus1)cq g isin [1 sminus 1]

hchdWa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)dqminus1 g = s

hc

(

Wa(gminussminus1)cb(s)qminus1 + s

gminuss+1W

a(gminussminus1)bb(sminus1)cqminus1

)

g gt s

(372)

With D = DL minus σminus full system (361) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (373)

30

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sminus 1 sim g isin [0 sminus 1]form a finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k =0 1 sim g ge s form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

The representatives of cohomology classes can be chosen as H0 = ξ

a(sminus1)0 H1 =

hbφa(sminus1)b H2 = hbhcG

a(sminus1)c minus hahcGa(sminus2)bc + γηaahahcG

a(sminus4)bcnn+ (βηabhahc +

αηaahbhc)Ga(sminus3)cn

n16 H

3 = hbhahcχa(sminus2)c H

kgt3 = empty where φa(s) and Ga(s) are

double-traceless tensor fields and ξa(sminus1) and χa(sminus1) are traceless H01 are nontrivialat the lowest grade whereas H

23 are nontrivial at grade-one therefore the orderof equations that are imposed on the dynamical field is equal to two It turns outthat there is no need in the explicit form for α β and γ it is sufficient to find outthe Young symmetry of representatives only The uniqueness of Fronsdalrsquos theoryat the level of action was demonstrated in [67] and at the level of equations in[6 53] Consequently there is no need for equations (370) to be found explicitly -those of Fronsdal are the only possible Again there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2 the gauge parameters

in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3 The system contains an infinitely many ofdual formulations those that have field W

a(sminus1)b(k0)1 at the lowest grade are gauge

dual descriptions whereas those that have field Ca(s+k0)b(s) at the lowest grade arenon-gauge Dual description based on field W

a(sminus1)b(1)1 was elaborated in [68]

Example 334 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field[69

70 31] Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field results in literally

the same unfolded system (361 373) but with fields taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that are irreducible spin-tensors with the same tensor part as in the bosoniccase Note that operator σminus is not modified but the σminus cohomology groups areslightly changed such that the equations become of the first order

The Dirac equation Unfolded system (336) or equivalently (339) describesa massless spin-1

2field provided that Ck take values in s 1

2so(dminus1 1)-irreps

ie Ck equiv Cαa(k) and Γαb βC

βba(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equation of (336)

partmicroCα = hmicroaC

αa (374)

with hbmicroΓβb α

gives the Dirac equation

Γαa βpart

aCβ = 0 (375)

the rest of equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives of dynamicalfield Cα

The Rarita-Schwinger equation Unfolded system (350) or equivalently(353) describes a massless spin-3

2field provided that irreducible tensors in (351)

are replaced by the corresponding irreducible tensor-spinors ie A1 equiv Aαmicro C

k equiv

Cα[ab]c(k) and Γαb βC

β[ab]c(k) = 0 Γαd βC

β[ab]dc(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equa-tion of (350)

1

2(partmicroA

αν minus partνA

αmicro) = hmicroahνbC

α[ab] (376)

16α = minus (s(d+sminus5)minusd+6)(sminus2)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6) β = (sminus2)

(d+sminus4) γ = (d+sminus6)(sminus2)(sminus3)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6)

31

with Γ-matrices and converting world indices micro ν to the fiber ones according toAαa equiv Aα

microhamicro gives the Rarita-Schwinger equation

Γαb βpart

bAβa minus partaΓαb βA

βb = 0 δAαa = partaξα (377)

The rest of unfolded equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives ofdynamical field Aα

microThe Fang-Fronsdal equation for a spin-(s + 1

2) massless field Unfolded

system (361) or equivalently (373) describes a massless spin-(s + 12) field pro-

vided that irreducible tensors in (371) are replaced by the corresponding irreducibletensor-spinors With all world indices converted to the fiber ones the first equationof (361) has the form

Gαa(sminus1)|[cd] equiv partcωβa(sminus1)|d minus partdωβa(sminus1)|c = ωβa(sminus1)c|d minus ωβa(sminus1)d|c (378)

where ωαa(sminus1)|b equiv ωαa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωαa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

αa(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro

Analogously to the bosonic case nonsymmetric component of ωβa(sminus1)|d canbe gauged away algebraically Hence the Fronsdalrsquos field φαa(s) is identified asωαa(sminus1)|a = 1

sφαa(s) Then Γα

b βφβa(s) = Γα

b βωβa(sminus1)|b Γα

b βΓβc γφ

γa(sminus2)bc = ηbcωαa(sminus2)b|c

and the Fronsdalrsquos triple Γ-traceless constraint is a consequence of irreducibility ofωαa(sminus1)|b in α a1asminus1 and the lack of any conditions with respect to a1asminus1 andb Since the Fronsdalrsquos field contains three irreducible components with the sym-metry of s 1

2 s-1 1

2and s-2 1

2 the equations of motion has to be

nontrivial in these three sectors too The projector on the dynamical equations issimply Γα

b βGβa(sminus1)b|a and gives

Γαb βpart

bφβa(s) minus spartaΓαb βφ

βa(sminus1)b = 0 (379)

which is in accordance with (222) But we would like to note that there aretwo components with the symmetry of s-1 1

2 namely ηbcG

αa(sminus2)b|ac and

Γαb βΓ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] The correct projector on this component of the equations isgiven by the combination

2(sminus 1)ηbcGαa(sminus2)b|ac minus γαb βγ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] (380)

which is identically zero when Gαa(sminus1)|[bc] is expressed via ωβa(sminus1)c|d by virtue of(378) Therefore it is (380) that does not express certain part of ωβa(sminus1)c|d interms of first derivatives of the dynamical field φαa(s) and thus this is a dynamicalequation Obviously (380) is a representative of σminus cohomology group H

2g=0 In

terms of φαa(s) the representative has the form

Γαb βpart

bΓβc γφ

γa(sminus1)c minus partcφαa(sminus1)c +

(sminus 1)

2partaφ

αa(sminus2)cc= 0 (381)

which is equal to the Γ-trace of (379) The gauge transformations has the form

δφαa(s) = partaξαa(sminus1) (382)

32

where Γαb βξ

βa(sminus2)b = 0Consequently unfolded equations for totally symmetric bosonic fields are proved

to completely determine the unfolded equations for totally symmetric fermionicfields Though σminus is not modified in the fermionic case σminus cohomology groupsare changed since the fermionic dynamical equations are of the first order

4 Unfolding Mixed-Symmetry Fields

First in Section 41 an example of the simplest massless mixed-symmetry field ofspin- is investigated in detail and leading arguments are given for a spin- fieldSecond the general statement on arbitrary mixed-symmetry fields is proved whereastechnical details are collected in Sections 44 and 45 The analysis of the numberof physical degrees of freedom is carried out in Section 43

41 Simplest Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Example 411 Spin- field In the metric-like approach a spin- field is mini-mally described[16 17] by the subjected to (215) field φ[micromicro]ν that takes values in a

reducible so(dminus 1 1)-representation oplus the latter component is identified withthe trace φ ν

microν The gauge transformations (216) has two levels of reducibility with

two gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξA[microν] taking values in oplus bull so(dminus 1 1)-irreps at the

first level and one parameter ξmicro taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irrep at the secondlevel (217)

First the metric-like field φ[micromicro]ν has to be incorporated into certain differentialform eYq which is called a physical vielbein the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y and the degreeq to be defined below To make the symmetries both of the first and of the secondlevel of reducibility manifest the degree of the physical vielbein has to be two atleast

Moreover were the physical vielbein taken to be a degree-one form not all of thegauge symmetries even at the first level would be manifest Indeed there are twopossibilities for physical vielbein eY1 to contain a component with the symmetry of

Namely Y = and Y = since otimes = oplus oplus and otimes = oplus oplus

The associated differential gauge parameter is ξ0 in the first case and ξ0 in thesecond case Inasmuch as the gauge parameters are the forms of degree-zero onlyone of the required two parameters is present in each of the cases

The degree of the physical vielbein has to be not greater than two if the com-ponent associated with the metric-like field φmicromicroν is required not to be a certaintrace part The reason why a dynamical field should not be a certain trace part isexplained in the next Section

Therefore the physical vielbein has to be of degree-two and has to take valuesin so(dminus 1 1)-irrep that belongs to the vector representation ie e2 equiv ea2 equiv eamicroν

The associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξa1 equiv ξamicro contains in its Lorentz decomposition

otimes = oplus oplusbull both anti-symmetric ξAmicroν = ξa[microhbν]ηab and symmetric ξSmicroν = ξa(microh

bν)ηab

33

gauge parameters the latter enters along with the trace ξamicrohmicroa There exists a second

level gauge parameter χa0 which is directly identified with ξmicro as ξmicro = hbmicroχ

aηabThere are no redundant components in the gauge parameter However physicalvielbein e2 contains one redundant component in its decomposition into Lorentz

irreps otimes = oplus oplus The first and the second components are to be associatedwith a traceful φmicromicroν whereas the third one totally anti-symmetric component e[a|bc]

of ea|bc = eamicroνhbmicrohcν is a redundant one and has to be made non-dynamical In order

to do so algebraic gauge parameter ξ[abc]0 with the symmetry of is introduced It

is obvious from pure algebraic gauge law

δea2 = hbhcξ[abc]0 (41)

that the redundant component can be fixed to zero and ea2 can be directly identifiedwith φmicromicroν as e

amicromicro = φmicromicroνh

aν From gauge transformation laws δea2 = dξa1 δξa1 = dχa

0

ie δeamicroν = 12

(partmicroξ

aν minus partνξ

amicro

) δξamicro = partmicroχ

a required gauge transformations (216)(217) for metric-like field φmicromicroν and for the first order gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξ

A[microν]

are easily recoveredSince in the unfolded approach each gauge parameter possesses its own gauge

field and vice-verse associated with ξ[abc]0 gauge field ω

[abc]1 enters as

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 (42)

which determines the first equation Applying d to this equation results in Bianchiidentity hbhcdω

[abc]1 equiv 0 which has a unique solution of the form

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 (43)

with C[abc][df ]0 having the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensor of a spin-

field ie it is anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and C[abcd]f0 equiv 0 To clarify the form of

the solution let C[abc]|[df ]0 be a degree-zero form anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and with

no definite symmetry between these two groups of indices The Bianchi identityimplies hbhchdhfC

[abc]|[df ]0 equiv 0 which is equivalent to C

a[bc|df ]0 equiv 0 since vielbeins

ha anticommute Therefore the solution is parameterized by those components of

C[abc]|[df ]0 sim otimes that has the symmetry of Young diagrams with no more than

three rows since the requirement for total anti-symmetrization of any four indicesto give zero is the characteristic property of Young diagrams with at most three

rows otimes ni is the only component of zero trace order17 with three rows andthere are no components with the number of rows less than three Alternatively one

17Although there are trace components with the number of rows less than four eg theirtensor product by the metric ηab contains components with the symmetry of the sl(d)-Young

diagrams with more than three rows Nontrivial trace with the symmetry of corresponds tothe mass-like term Hence traceful tensors either do not satisfy the Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms

34

could search for the solution in the sector of degree-one forms as dω[abc]1 = hdC

[abc]|d1

with some C[abc]|d1 but Bianchi identity hbhchdC

[abc]|d1 equiv 0 implies that the only

component of C[abc]|d1 sim otimes that is allowed must have less than three rows which

is impossible since [abc] makes Young diagrams of otimes consist of three rows atleast18 Thus one has to search for the solution among the forms of less degree

Further unfolding requires a set of fields C [abc][df ]g(k) with the symmetry ofk

to be introduced and the full system has the form

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 δea2 = dξa1 + hbhcξ

[abc]0 δξa1 = dχa

0

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 δω

[abc]1 = dξ

[abc]0

dC[abc][df ]g(k)0 = hvC

[abc][df ]g(k)v0 (44)

Consequently the unfolded system incorporates field φmicromicroν with all required differ-ential gauge parameters at all levels of reducibility the redundant component of the

physical vielbein does not contribute to the dynamics ω[abc]1 sim otimes = oplus oplus

the first component is a field strength for the redundant field once the field hasbeen gauged away the associated field strength is zero and ω

[abc]ρ = hamicrohbνhcλT[microνλ]ρ

for some T[microνλ]ρ T[microνλρ] equiv 0 which incorporates both and (as the trace) Torecover equations (215) in terms of metric-like fields it is convenient to convert allfiber indices to the world ones in the first two equations

part[microeaνλ] = hb[microhcνω

abcλ] (45)

part[microωabcν] = hd[microhfν]C

abcdf (46)

to substitute Tmicroνλρ and to contract two indices in the second equation

part[microφνλ]ρ = Tmicroνλρ (47)

partρTmicroνρλ minus partλTρ

microνρ = 0 (48)

Plugging (47) in (48) gives equation (215)For Y = Y(2 1) (1 1) ie N = 2 and p = 2 the general scheme of Section

1 results in

Yg

n k 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 1 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

18Again the trace component enters the tensor product as η otimes and has the number of rowsnot less than three

35

therefore

Wq =

W a0 q = 0

W a1 W

[abc]0 q = 1

W aq W

[abc]qminus1 W

[abc][df ]qminus2 W

[abc][df ]gqminus2 q gt 1

(49)

and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbhcW[abc]qminus1 g = 1

hbhcW[aaa][bc]qminus2 g = 2

hdW[aaa][bb]c(gminus3)dqminus2 g gt 2

(410)

with D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (44) can be rewritten as

Dω2 = 0 δω2 = Dξ1 δξ1 = Dξ0 (411)

where ω2 isin W2 ξ1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 2 k = 0 sim g = 0and n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 1 form two finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-moduleswhereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g ge 2 form an infinite-dimensionaliso(dminus 1 1)-module

Example 412 Spin- field (briefly) In the case of a massless spin- fieldthere are two gauge parameters at the first level of reducibility which have the sym-metry19 of and one gauge parameter at the second level with the symmetryof First for Y = Y(3 1) (2 1) the proposed scheme results in

Yg

n k 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3 g = 4

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 2 q2 = 1 q3 = 0 q4 = 0

therefore the physical vielbein has to be a two-form taking values in ie e2 equiv

eaab2 Associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξaab1 has components otimes = oplus oplus the first two having the symmetry of the required gauge parameters with the thirdone being redundant The last three components in the decomposition of the physical

vielbein otimes = oplus oplus oplus are also redundant By virtue of Stueckelberg

symmetry with parameter ξ1 these three components can be gauged away inasmuch

as otimes = oplus oplus The redundant component of the first level gauge

parameter ξ1 also can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg symmetry with

level-two gauge parameter ξ0 Consequently at least the fact that the unfoldedsystem incorporates the metric-like field all the required gauge parameters andredundant components do not contribute to the dynamics is proved

19To simplify the example no consideration is given to the trace components of the fields

36

42 General Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Given a massless field of spin Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) described by a metric-like field φY(x) taking values in the irrep of the Lorentz algebra so(d minus 1 1) withthe same symmetry type(minimal formulation) there exists a unique unfolded systemwith the physical vielbein at the lowest grade and all symmetries being manifest thatreproduces the original metric-like system The system has the form (11)

Sketch of the proof

1 The lowest grade field (physical vielbein) eY0q0

turns out to be completely de-termined by the requirement for it to contain the metric-like field and for itsgauge parameters ξY0

q0minusk k gt 0 to contain all the necessary gauge parametersat all levels of reducibility (219)

2 eY0q0

and its gauge parameters appear to contain redundant components thathave to be made non-dynamical The only way to achieve this is to introduceStueckelberg symmetry δeY0

q0= σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus1) δξ

Y0q0minus1 = σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus2) with certain

ξY1q1minusk k gt 0 which turns out to be unambiguously defined by this requirement

3 ξY1q1minus1 has associated gauge field ωY1

q1and gauge transformations δωY0

q0=

σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) completely determines the first equation deY0

q0= σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) whichimplies Jacobi identity σ1

minus(dωY1q1

) equiv 0 The general solution is proved in Sec-tion 44 to have the form dωY1

q1= σ2

minus(ωY2q2

) with certain ωY2q2

The secondequation implies the second Jacobi identity σ2

minus(dωY2q2

) equiv 0 and so on

4 Once the total unfolded system is defined the proof of the facts that (i)the correct dynamical equations are imposed (ii) there are no other dynamicalfields or other differential gauge symmetries in the system is obtained throughthe calculations of σminus cohomology groups Ignoring the trace pattern of fieldsie for traceful tensors the proof of (ii) can be simplified and is done in thissection Even stronger statement that there exists a duality H

p+1+k sim Hpminusk is

proved in Section 45

First as it is clear from the examples above the metric-like field φYM(x) has

to be incorporated into a differential form eY0q of degree-q taking values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep Y0 (for this reason eY0q is called physical vielbein) Having converted

all world indices to fiber ones in accordance with (329) so(dminus 1 1)-tensor productY0 otimes Y(1 q) of Y0 with one column diagram of the height q must contain thecomponent with the symmetry of YM In the case of the minimal formulationYM = Y where Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) characterizes the spin

It is useful to introduce a notion of the quotient of two Young diagrams let thequotient of two Young diagrams Y1Y2 be a direct sum of those diagrams whoseso(dminus 1 1)-tensor product by Y2 contains Y1 For the first sight given q ge 0 anyelement Q of YMY(1 q) might be chosen as Y0 If q is greater than the heightof YM the component with the symmetry YM in the tensor product QotimesY(1 q)has to be certain trace inevitably

37

Although there is no apparent problems in considering unfolded systems withdynamical field hidden in certain trace component of the physical vielbein egMaxwell gauge potential Amicro might be identified with the trace eamicroνh

microa of two-form

eamicroν However this exotic incorporating of the physical field does not take place inthe already known systems Moreover it can be proved that such exotic systemsdo not exist if irreducible Nevertheless they might be a part of some reduciblesystem which describes more than one field Therefore we require the degree q ofthe physical vielbein to be not greater than the height of YM

Inasmuch as (i) the equations imposed on φY(x) possess reducible gauge trans-formations with the number of levels equal to the height p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi of Y (ii) for

a degree-q gauge field of an unfolded system there exist q levels of gauge transfor-mations the degree q of physical vielbein eY0

q must be equal to pThe quotient YY(1 p) contains only one element (provided φY(x) is for-

bidden to be a trace component) it is the diagram (12) with the symmetry ofY0 = Y(s1 minus 1 p1) (sN minus 1 pN) ie it is equal to Y without the first col-umn Therefore physical vielbein eY0

p is completely defined So does gauge param-

eters ξY0pminusk at the k-th level of reducibility k isin [1 p] The requirement for tensor

product Y0 otimes Y(1 pminus k) to contain all gauge parameters ξik given by (219)at the k-th level of reducibility is also satisfied Consequently the whole patternof fieldsgauge parameters of the metric-like formulation is reproduced Note thatY0 equiv Y0 and q0 = p in the terms of Section 1

Let us note that if one writes down the physical vielbein explicitly as ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

where si are the lengths of the rows ofY and converts the form indices to the tangentones by virtue of inverse background vielbein hmicroa

ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|[d1dp] = ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

hmicro1d1 hmicropdp (412)

dynamical field φY(x) should be identified with ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|a1ap which hasthe symmetry of Y with some traces included Consequently the generalizedLabastidarsquos double-tracelessness condition (220) [20] is obvious inasmuch as thecontraction of two metric tensor ηaiaiηaiai with the i-th group of indices vanishes

Generally in addition to φY(x) decompositionY0otimesY(1 p) of physical vielbeineY0p into Lorentz irreps contains redundant components which must not contributeto the physical degrees of freedom So does Y0 otimesY(1 pminus k) ie in addition toξik it contains a lot of components that can not be made genuine differential gaugeparameters There are only two possible ways to get rid of redundant fields in theunfolded formalism

A redundant components could be directly fixed to zero by algebraic (Stueckel-berg) symmetry

B redundant components might be auxiliary fields for other fields (at lower grade)and so on The process stops since the grade is assumed to be bounded frombelow

We require dynamical fields incorporated in the physical vielbein to be at the lowestgrade Actually (B) takes place for dual gauge descriptions but not for the minimal

38

Therefore the only possibility to make redundant components to be non-dynamicalis to introduce a Stueckelberg symmetry with certain parameters ξY1

q1minusk

δeY0p = dξY0

pminus1 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) (413)

δξY0pminus1 = dξY0

pminus2 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus2) (414)

(415)

where σ1minus is a certain operator built of background vielbein ha that contracts a

number of indices of Y1 with hahc to obtain Y0 Diagram20 Y1 and form degreeq1 can be easily found since Y1 otimes Y1 q1 minus i i gt 0 must contain all redundantcomponents of eY0

p and ξY0pminusk

In the unfolded formalism each gauge field possesses its own gauge parameter andvice-versa Therefore there is a gauge field ωY1

q1 which contributes to the equations

for eY0p as

deY0p = σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) (416)

The first equation determines the first Jacobi identity of the form σ1minus(dω

Y1q1

) equiv 0which can be solved as

dωY1q1

= σ2minus(ω

Y2q2

) (417)

for certain gauge field ωY2q2

and operator σ2minus that satisfies σ1

minusσ2minus equiv 0 The general

solution of Jacobi identities is given in Section 44 From now on let the super-scripts of σminus be omitted The second equation determines the second Jacobi identityσminus(dω

Y2q2

) equiv 0 which can be also solved and so on Consequently the knowledgeof the lowest grade gauge field eY0

p and of the Stueckelberg symmetries required toget rid of redundant components determines the first equation which by virtue ofJacobi identities determines the second and so on The total unfolded system hasthe structure

dωYg

qg= σminus

(

ωYg+1qg+1

)

g = 0 1

δωYg

qg= dξYg

qg+ σminus

(

ξYg+1

qg+1minus1

)

δξYgqg

=

(418)

where σminus is certain algebraic operator built of background vielbein ha and (σminus)2 = 0

The only facts remain to be proved are that there are no other dynamical fieldsand that the proper correspondence (duality) between the cohomology groups holdstrue To this end it is sufficient to analyze only the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps content ofH

qg ie only the symmetry type and the multiplicity of irreducible Lorentz tensors

that by virtue of (330) are the representatives of Hqg

It is proved in the next Section that there is a duality Hpminuskg=0 sim H

p+k+1g=1 between

the σminus cohomology groups which reveals the one-to-one correspondence betweenthe gauge dynamical fields and equations of motion the level-k gauge symmetries

20The specific character of Minkowski massless fields is in that all Stueckelberg parameters canbe incorporated into a single Y1-valued form this not being the case for (anti)-de Sitter masslessfields

39

and the level-k Bianchi identities The representatives of cohomology groups in thesector of fields and gauge symmetries directly correspond to those of metric-likeapproach and there is no other nontrivial cohomology in these sectors

Though the trace pattern of fieldsgauge parameters is also important and thecalculation of σminus cohomology groups provides a comprehensive answer to this ques-tion the very procedure being a bit technical Ignoring the trace pattern of thefields it can be easily proved that the required metric-like field is incorporated inphysical vielbein eY0

q0 all the redundant components of the physical vielbein can be

gauged away by a pure algebraic symmetry and the same holds for differential gaugeparameters ξY0

q0minusk at all levels of reducibility ie the required pattern of gauge pa-rameters is recovered whereas all the redundant components are either Stueckelbergor auxiliary This is the necessary condition only and the traces has to be takeninto account Also it is still to be proved that the correct equations of motionsare imposed Provided that there are no trace conditions on the fields the sys-tem is referred to as off-shell[65] An off-shell system may contain only constraintsthat express auxiliary fields via the derivatives of the dynamical field imposing norestrictions on the latter

The off-shell system Technically ignoring the traces is equivalent to thereplacement of all so(dminus1 1)-irreps by the sl(d)-irreps that are characterized by thesame Young diagrams ie instead of taking so(dminus1 1)-tensor products one needs toapply the sl(d)-tensor productrsquos rules which are much simpler The decompositionof the physical vielbein eY0

q0into sl(d)-irreps is given by diagrams Yαi of the form

αN+1

sN minus 1

pNαN

s2 minus 1

p2α2

s1 minus 1

p1

α1

(419)

where α1+ +αN+1 = q0 = p The decomposition of Stueckelberg gauge parameterξY1q1minus1 for eY0

q0has the components of the same form but with αN+1 ge 1 because

Y1 (13) has already the form of Y0 with one cell in the bottom-left Thereforeall components of eY0

q0except for those with αN+1 = 0 are of Stueckelberg type but

there is only one component of eY0q0

with αN+1 = 0 namely it has αi = pi i isin [1 N ]and hence has the symmetry of Y The decomposition of level-k differential gaugeparameter ξY0

q0minusk has the form (419) with α1 + + αN+1 = p minus k and again all

the components of ξY0q0minusk with αN+1 ge 1 can be gauged away by pure algebraic

symmetry with ξY1q1minuskminus1 Consequently there is a complete matching between (219)

40

and those in ξY0

q0minusk that are not pure gauge themselves It can be easily proved alsothat if ignoring the traces there are no other dynamical fieldsdifferential gaugeparameters at higher grade Consequently

Lemma H(σminus) with respect to sl(d) are given by

Hk(σminus)sl(d) =

Yαi g = 0 α1 + + αN = k αN+1 = 0 k le p

empty k gt p(420)

The triviality of the higher k gt p cohomology groups for sl(d) which shouldcontain equations of motion and Bianchi identities is expected since the system isoff-shell For the equations to have the second order in derivatives the only nontrivialcohomology group H

p+1 must be at the grade-one ie Hp+1g=1 6= empty As is seen from

the examples above the equations correspond to those representatives of Hp+1g=1 that

are certain traces Indeed the total rank |WYgqg | which is equal to the sum qg + |Yg|

of degree qg and rank of Yg is preserved by σminus Therefore |WYgqg | = |W

Y0q0| + g

and |RY1q1+1| = |ω

Y0q0| + 2 = |Y|+ 2 where eY0

q0isin Wg=0

p and RY1q1+1 isin W

g=1p+1 contain

metric-like field φYM(x) and the equations on φY(x) respectively Consequently

the representative of Hp+1g=1 that corresponds to the equations on the traceless part

of φY(x) has to be identified with certain trace of the first order and so on for thetraces of φY(x)

The calculation of σminus cohomology groups carried out in Section 45 implies

1 The only nontrivial cohomology groups are Hpminuskg=0 and H

p+k+1g=1 k = 1 p

Therefore the dynamical fields and independent gauge parameters belong tothe zero grade Wg=0

q subspaces the equations are of the second order and theBianchi identities for the k-th level gauge symmetries are of the (k + 2)-thorder

2 Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 ie there is a one-to-one correspondence between the

elements of Hpminuskg=0 that are traces of the r-th order and the elements of Hp+k+1

g=1

that are traces of the (r + k + 1)-th order Roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1

Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on Therefore there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the dynamical fields and the equations of motion the level-k gaugesymmetries and the k-th Bianchi identities

3 The so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that correspond to the elements of Hpminusk(σminus) and arethe traces of the zeroth order are given by the so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagramsthat have the form (419) with αN+1 = 0 and α1 + + αN = p minus k whichexactly reproduce the required pattern (219) Note that certain higher ordertraces are also the elements of cohomology groups These fields represent thersquoauxiliaryrsquo fields of the metric-like formulation which had to be introduced tomake the gauge symmetry off-shell To prove the theorem it is not necessary toknow the concrete trace pattern the duality between the cohomology groupsis sufficient The details of the trace pattern are in Section 45

41

In the fermionic case the traces are substituted for Γ-traces Important isthat acting on tensor indices only σminus does not break down the irreducibility ofspin-tensors The duality has the form H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 or simply H

pminuskg=0 sim

Hp+k+1g=0 which means that equations are of the first order and the duality between

fieldsequations gauge symmetriesBianchi identities takes place which completesthe proof

Note that Yg=s1 equiv Yn=0k=0 has the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensorfor a spin-Y massless field

sNpN

s2p2

s1

p1 + 1

(421)

Analogously to the examples of Section 33 massless mixed-symmetry fields can bedescribed by the same unfolded system (16) that is restricted to Wg

q with g ge g0ie the system contains infinitely many dual formulations As the generalized Weyltensor and its descendants are non-gauge fields the dual descriptions with g0 ge s1are non-gauge and the dual descriptions with 0 lt g0 lt s1 are gauge

43 Physical Degrees of Freedom Counting

Notwithstanding the simplicity of the unfolded form and the uniqueness of unfoldingthere still might be a question of whether the unfolded equations do describe thecorrect number of physical degrees of freedom

It is well-known that for systems with the first class constraints only with mass-less fields belonging to this class the counting of degrees of freedom is that one firstlevel gauge parameter kills two degrees of freedom one second level gauge parame-ters kills three degrees of freedom and so on For example a spin-two massless fieldpossesses d(dminus3)

2degrees of freedom which is just d(d+1)

2minus 2d d(d+1)

2and d being the

number of components of φmicroν and ξmicroThe complete information concerning the rsquonumberrsquo of fieldsgauge parameters

ie the multiplicity and the symmetry of corresponding tensors is contained inH

kg=0(σminus) for k = 0p Not only can a number of physical degrees of freedom be

calculated but the whole exact sequence that defines an iso(d minus 1 1) irrep can bederived The elements of this sequence are certain so(dminus 1) tensors that define anso(dminus 2) tensor as a quotient of so(d minus 1) tensors eg (218) The decompositionof so(dminus 1 1)-fields into irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) can be done with the aid ofpartmicro or after Fourier transform with the aid of momentum pmicro

For example for a spin-two field the cohomology groups that correspond to thedynamical fieldsdifferential gauge parameters and its decomposition into so(dminus 1)irreps have the form

42

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus bull sim φmicroν φ

νν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2bull

Quick sort of Young diagrams in 0 minusrarr 2H0 minusrarr H1 minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 gives the

correct exact sequence 0 minusrarr minusrarr minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 which defines a masslessspin-two irrep H (0 )

For the simplest mixed-symmetry field the hook- there are two levels of gaugetransformation hence relevant cohomology groups are H

0 H1 and H2

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus oplus bull sim ξAmicroν oplus ξ

Smicroν ξ

Sνν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2 oplus 2bull

H2 oplus sim φmicroνλ φ

νmicroν 6= 0 oplus oplus oplus 2 oplus bull

Again quick sort of diagrams in 0 minusrarr 3H0 minusrarr 2H1 minusrarr H2 minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0

gives exact sequence (218)Consequently the problem of calculation the number of physical degrees of free-

dom to be precise of deriving the exact sequence is effectively reduced to the simplecombinatoric problem of (i) decomposition so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagram representa-tives of H(σminus) to so(dminus 1)-diagrams (ii) cancellation of like terms in sequence

0 minusrarr (p+ 1)H0 minusrarr pH1 minusrarr minusrarr 2Hpminus1 minusrarr Hp minusrarr H (0Y) minusrarr 0 (422)

Skipping combinatoric technicalities we state that in the general case of a spin-Ymassless mixed-symmetry field (422) reduces to the correct exact sequence thatdefines a uirrep H (0Y) of iso(dminus 1 1)

44 Solving the Generalized Jacobi Identities

Unfolding some dynamical system there arises a problem of solving Jacobi identities(33) that have schematically a form hhdω1

q equiv 0 where a number of backgroundvielbeins ha is contracted with the fiber indices of ω1

q The Jacobi identity restrictsdω1

q to have a certain specific form dω1q = hhω2

r where the so(dminus1 1)-irrep inwhich ω2

r takes values the degree r and the projector built of hh are completelydetermined The solutions are given by21

Lemma A Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values inY = Y(s p) (k 1)

so(dminus 1 1)-irrep The general solution of

hcdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq = 0 (423)

21As was pointed out in Section 33 nonzero traces either violate Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms and therefore are ignored

43

has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq k lt s

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1 k = s q ge p + 1

0 k = s q lt p+ 1

(424)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 take values inY(s p) (k + 1 1)

and Y(s+ 1 p+ 1) so(dminus 1 1)-irreps respectively22

Proof The parametrization of dωq by a degree-(q + 1) form taking values in the

same so(dminus 1 1)-irrep dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = R

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q+1 obviously fails to satisfy

(423) Inasmuch as (423) contains a vielbein the solution has to contain a number

of vielbeins too The most general parametrization of dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q with only

one vielbein included has the form dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = hdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)|dq for some

q-form taking values in a tensor product of Y by a vector representation ie thereis no definite symmetry between index d and the rest of the indices

hchdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)c|dq = 0larrrarr ωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)[c|d]

q = 0 (425)

Only those irreps in Yotimes are allowed that have c and d symmetric ie correspondto Y(s p) (k + 1 1) for k lt s This is not possible in the case k = s ie Y =Y(s p+ 1) and the only possibility to have c and d symmetric is to add the whole

column toY which requires dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q to be represented as dω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hchcωa1(sminus1)cap(sminus1)cap+1(sminus1)cqminuspminus1 and therefore q must be large enough Roughly

speaking the proof is based on the fact that the anti-symmetrization of two indicesat the same row of a Young diagram is identically zero the anti-symmetrizationbeing due to contraction with vielbeins

Note that choosing nonmaximal solutions of Jacobi identities results in loweringthe gauge symmetry so that not all redundant components are excluded

Unfolding totally-symmetric massless higher-spin fields the possible rhs termsin dω

a(sminus1)b(t)1 = are restricted by Jacobi identities and an essential use is made

of

Corollary The solution of Jacobi identity

hcdωa(sminus1)b(tminus1)c1 equiv 0 (426)

is of the form

dωa(sminus1)b(t)1 =

hcωa(sminus1)b(t)c1 t lt sminus 1

hchdCa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 t = sminus 1

(427)

22The symmetric basis is used being more convenient in this case as the contracted with vielbeinstensors are already irreducible

44

The following statement is a generalization of the Lemma-A to the case where(s p) (k 1) is a rsquosubdiagramrsquo of a larger Young diagram Y that has a numberof rows precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) Appropriate Young symmetrizershave to be included as the mere contraction of a number of vielbeins breaks theirreducibility of the tensor For instance hcω

a(s1)b(s2minus1)c is already irreducible withthe symmetry of Ys1 s2 minus 1 but this is not the case for hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) which hasto be added one term hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) + 1s1minuss2+1

hcωa(s1)bb(s2minus1)c to get the symmetry

of Ys1 minus 1 s2

Lemma B Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values in Y =

Y( (s p) (k 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irrep where the dots stands for the blocks inY precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) The general solution of

Π[hcdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq

]= 0 (428)

where Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p)(k minus 1 1) has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

Π[

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq

]

k lt s

Π[

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1

]

k = s q ge p+ 1

0 k = s q lt p + 1

(429)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 takes values in

Y (s p) (k + 1 1) and Y (s+ 1 p+ 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irreps respec-tively and Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p) (k 1)

Proof The proof is similar to that of Lemma-A with the only comment that thesymmetrizers do not affect the argumentation that anti-symmetrization of two in-dices in the same row is identically zero

45 Dynamical Content via σminus Cohomology

Before discussing the calculation of σminus cohomology let us first recall necessary factsconcerning the evaluation of so(d minus 1 1)-tensor products Let P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) be anumber of integer partitions k1 + + kN = m of m where ki is constrained byki le ǫi and different rearrangements of ki satisfying the constraints are regarded asdistinct partitions The generating function for the partition P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) is

sum

m

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m)tm =

i=Nprod

i=1

(1minus tǫi+1)

1minus t(430)

These integer partitions gives the multiplicities of irreps in so(dminus 1 1)-tensor prod-ucts (Clebsh-Gordon coefficients) we are interested in [71]

45

The so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary irrep Ylowast = Y(si pi) by aone-column diagram of the height qlowast can be explicitly calculated as

sNpN

s2

p2

s1

p1

otimes

q =sum

αjβi

Nαjβi

αN+1

βN

αN

ǫNpN sN

β2

α2

ǫ2p2 s2

β1

α1

ǫ1p1 s1

(431)

where αi βi αi + βi le pi i isin [1 N ] αN+1 ge 0 and there exist ρ ge 0 such that

qlowast =i=Nsum

i=1

(αi + βi) + αN+1 + 2ρ (432)

The multiplicity Nαjβi of Ylowastαj βi

is given by integer partition

Nαjβi = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ǫi = pi minus αi minus βi (433)

and the total trace order r is

r =i=Nsum

i=1

βi + ρ (434)

Roughly speaking to obtain an element of the tensor product one should first cutoff from bottom-right of the i-th block a column of height βiminusγi pi ge βiminusγi ge 0 (totake different traces) and second add an arbitrary number αi+γi pi ge αi+γi ge 0 ofcells to each block provided the γi cells annihilate ie they are added to the placesfrom which γi cells were removed at the first stage Multiplicity may be differentfrom one due to different rearrangements of γi ie when multiplied by the rest ofq-column different traces can give rise to the same diagram The number of suchrearrangements is given by P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ρ =

sumi=N

i=1 γi For instance sl(n)-tensor

product otimes is given simply by

otimessl(n) = oplus oplus oplus (435)

46

The so(d)-tensor product can be represented as a sum of the form

otimesso(n) = otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

otimessl(n)

oplus

otimessl(n)

︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

oplus

otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

2nd order

=

oplus oplus oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

oplus

oplus 2 oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

︸︷︷︸

2ndorder

(436)

where the sum is over trace order and the boxes that are connected by the arc areto be contracted and then the sl(n)-product rules are to be applied to the rest ofthe diagrams

Evaluating the so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary spinor-irrep Ylowast =Y(si pi) 1

2by a one-column diagram of the height qlowast one can contract any number

of Γ matrices with the indices of the column and then multiply therefore the tensorproduct rule for spin-tensors can be reduced to bosonic rule (431) as

Y(si pi) 12otimesso(n) Y(1 q) =

qsum

k=0

(Y(si pi) otimesso(n) Y(1 q minus k)

)

12

(437)

for example

12otimesso(n) = 1

2oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order Γ-traces

oplus

12oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order Γ-traces

oplus

oplus

2 12

︸︷︷︸

2nd order Γ-traces

oplus

bull 12

︸︷︷︸

3d order Γ-traces

(438)

The multiplicity N12

αjβiof Ylowast

αj βi12

is given by

N12

αjβi=

i=ρsum

i=0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus i) (439)

Let us now analyze the origin of σminus cohomology Its action σminus Wgq rarr W

gminus1q+1

preserves g+ q and hence the whole complex C(W σminus) is a direct sum of complexesC(qprime σminus) where q

prime refers to the end element Wg=0qprime of the complex

C(qprime σminus) 0 minusrarr minusrarr Wg=1qprimeminus1 minusrarrW

g=0qprime minusrarr 0 (440)

47

Moreover σminus preserves the total rank (the form degree + rank of the so(d minus 1 1)-

irrep in which the field takes values) LetWa(s1)a(sm)q be an element ofWg

qprime When

all form indices of Wa(s1)a(sm)q are converted to the fiber ones according to (329)

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (441)

the action of σminus is just an anti-symmetrization of all d1 dq with those indices aithat are extra as compared to Ygminus1 plus some terms to restore the correct Youngsymmetry of Ygminus1 Let the decomposition ofW a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] into so(dminus1 1)-irreps be of the form

Ya1(s1) am(sm)otimes

Y(1 q) =oplus

r=0

oplus

ir

N rirYr

ir (442)

where the summation is over the trace order r and then over ir which enumeratesall so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that enters in the tensor product as the traces of the r-thorder N r

irbeing the multiplicity of Yr

ir The multiplicity of the zeroth order traces

is always equal to one N0i0= 1 In fact the diagrams Y 0

i0can be directly obtained

by the sl(n)-tensor product ruleThe very anti-symmetrization is insensitive to whether a certain component en-

ters as a trace or not When decomposed into so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the elements ofWg

qprime and Wgminus1qprime+1 have a number of components of the same symmetry type The

action of σminus is just a linear transformation that either sends the whole so(dminus 1 1)-irrep to zero23 or sends it to the components of Wgminus1

qprime+1 of the same symmetry typeImportant is that σminus does not act between different so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Thereforecomplex C(qprime σminus) is a direct sum of complexes parameterized by so(dminus 1 1)-irrepsYprime that are given by various tensor products

Ynk

otimes

Y(1 q) (443)

provided that the field WYnkq is an element of Wgprimeminusi

qprime+i for certain i When reducedto such a complex

C(Yprime qprime σminus) 0rarr rarr Vg rarr Vgminus1 rarr rarr 0 (444)

the action of σminus is a linear transformation between the spaces Vg rarr Vgminus1 dimen-

sions of which are equal to the multiplicity of Yprime in the decomposition of WYgqg and

WYgminus1qg+1 The action of σminus is maximally non-degenerate compatible with nilpotency

Therefore to find cohomology groups the dimension of each linear space in everycomplex has to be calculated

Let us note that only the types and multiplicities of so(dminus1 1)-irreps are foundbelow ie no attention is paid to the description of how the corresponding tensorsare contained in the fields WY

qprime This is sufficient for our purposes though it isobvious (412) how the metric-like field φYM

is incorporated in an element ofWg=0p

23provided that the appropriate basis on the space of so(dminus1 1)-irreps with the same symmetrytype is chosen

48

The calculation of σminus cohomology is divided into three cases that cover the wholevariety of so(dminus 1 1)-irreps that can result from the tensor products (443)

In the Lemmas below it is assumed that complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is parameterizedby so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Yprime = Ylowast

αj βiof the form (431) with Ylowast = Ynk q

lowast = q such

that WYnkq isin C(qprime σminus) and ρ is defined according to (432)

In the first case Yprime is an element of Y0 otimesY(1 q)

Lemma 1 The σminus cohomology groups Hqg=0 and H

qg=1 are nontrivial and are given

by

Hqg =

Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βiMαj βi

αN+1 = 0sumi=N

i=0 αi = qq isin [0 p] g = 0

H2pminusqminus1 q isin [p+ 1 2p+ 1] g = 1

empty q gt 2p+ 1 any g

(445)where Mαj βi is the multiplicity of the irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

defined below

Proof From the very form of Yn=N0 equiv Yg=0 equiv Y(si minus 1 pi) it follows that theso(dminus1 1)-irreps that the element ofWg=0

q sim Y0otimesY(1 q) decomposes into may

be contained in Wg=1qminus1 only ie Wg=0

q and Wg=kqminusk contain no so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of

the same symmetry type for k gt 1 Therefore the length of complex C(Yprime q σminus)where Yprime isin Y0otimesY(1 q) is equal to one ie C(Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

q σminus) 0 minusrarrV1 minusrarr V0 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions of V0 and V1 are given by the multiplicitiesof the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

in Wg=1qminus1 and Wg=0

q respectively

dim(V1) =

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus 1) ρ ge 1

0 ρ = 0αN+1 = 0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) αN+1 gt 0

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) (446)

If αN+1 gt 0 the dimensions of V0 and V1 are equal and each irreducible componentof Wg=0

q with αN+1 gt 0 can be gauge away by virtue of the corresponding element

of Wg=1qminus1 thus being exact H

kgt2p+1 = empty inasmuch as ρ le p and the componentsof the forms with rank greater than (2p + 1) must have αN+1 gt 0 thus beingexact If αN+1 = 0 the dimensions are different dim(V1) lt dim(V0) for q le pdim(V1) = dim(V0) for q = p + 1 and dim(V1) gt dim(V0) for q gt p Thereforethe number of those Ysi piαj βi

isin Wg=0q q le p that are not exact is equal to

Mαj βi = |dim(V1) minus dim(V0)| the same is the number of those Ysi piαj βiisin

Wg=1qminus1 q gt p+ 1 that are not exact The obvious property of integer partitions

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ǫ1 + + ǫN minusm) (447)

results in the important duality in the cohomology groups Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 or

roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on

49

The second case is the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) where Yprime is an element of the tensor

product Ynk otimesY(1 q) for certain q ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmaxn minus 1

Lemma 2 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainqprime ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmax

n minus 1 the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The complex has the length two ie 0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr 0 wherethe dimensions are given by dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫN 1|ρ+ 1)dim(V2) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ+ 1) Simple calculations with generating functions resultsin dim(V0) lt dim(V1) dim(V2) lt dim(V1) and dim(V0) minus dim(V1) + dim(V2) = 0and consequently the sequence is exact

Analogously

Lemma 3 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainq ge 0 with k = 0 and n lt N the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The speciality of such Yprime is that the complex has the length three ie0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr V3 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions are given by

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 ǫn + 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V2) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 1) ρ ge ǫn + 1

0 otherwise

dim(V3) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn minus 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 2) ρ ge ǫn + 2

0 otherwise

Again simple calculations with generating functions results in appropriate inequali-ties and dim(V0)minusdim(V1)+dim(V2)minusdim(V3) = 0 and consequently the sequenceis exact

The above three cases covers the whole variety of the so(d minus 1 1)-tensors thatcan result from the tensor products YnkotimesY(1 q) for any n k and q The caseswith sN = 1 and Y = Y0 are special but the calculation of cohomology groupsleads to the same result

In the fermionic case the computations are similar due to the multiplicity givenby (439) The difference is that all nontrivial cohomology is concentrated in gradezero Indeed taking into account (446) where P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) is to be replaced by(439) it follows that dim(V0) ge dim(V1) for all q and H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 where r

is referred to the Γ-trace order or roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 andso on

5 Conclusions

The unfolded system constructed in the paper has a simple form of a covariantconstancy equation and describes arbitrary mixed-symmetry bosonic and fermionic

50

massless fields in d-dimensional Minkowski space The gauge fieldsparameters aredifferential forms with values in certain finite-dimensional irreducible representationsof the Lorentz algebra that are uniquely determined by the generalized spin

The key moment is that all gauge symmetries are manifest within the unfoldedformulation which is of most importance in controlling the number of physicaldegrees of freedom when trying to introduce interactions Unfolded systems areformulated in terms of differential forms which is a natural way to respect diffeo-morphisms and hence to describe systems that include gravity

Though the necessary conditions for the system to have a lagrangian descriptionare satisfied ie the fields are in one-to-one correspondence with the equations andthe k-th level gauge symmetries are in one-to-one correspondence with the k-thBianchi identities the very lagrangian remains to be constructed

Another interesting moment is that the unfolded equations for bosons are thesame as for fermions namely the operators involved ie exterior differential dand σminus remains unmodified when tensors are replaced with spin-tensors Thoughthis nice property partly breaks down in (anti)-de Sitter space within the unfoldedapproach bosons and fermions have much in common the fact being very useful forsupersymmetric theories

The proposed unfolded system includes all non-gauge dual descriptions whichare based on the generalized Weyl tensor and its descendants but not all of gaugedual descriptions It would be interesting to construct an unfolded system thatcontains all dual formulations

The interactions of the totally symmetric massless higher-spin fields are knownto require a nonzero cosmological constant ie are formulated in (anti)-de Sitterspace [2] Mixed-symmetry fields exhibit some interesting features in the presence ofcosmological constant For example not all of the Minkowski gauge symmetries canbe deformed to (anti)-de Sitter [72] As a result massless mixed-symmetry fields havemore degrees of freedom in (anti)-de Sitter compared to its Minkowski counterparts[73] and in the Minkowski limit a massless mixed-symmetry field splits in a certaincollection of massless fields generally Contrariwise a single mixed-symmetry fieldcan not be smoothly deformed to (anti)-de Sitter Another interesting effect is theexistence of the so-called partially-massless fields [74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 8283 84] the fields that have a number of degrees of freedom intermediate betweenthat of massless and massive and split in a set of massless fields in the Minkowskilimit Therefore the extension of the proposed approach to (anti)-de Sitter spaceseems to be non-trivial but nevertheless worth being investigated

In a series of papers [85 61 86 60] it was suggested so-called frame-like approachto the general mixed-symmetry fields in (anti)-de Sitter To generalize the proposedin the present paper unfolded system to (anti)-de Sitter case and to compare to thatof [60] is the next step to perform

We consider the proposed unfolded system as the first stage in constructing thefull interacting theory of mixed-symmetry fields

51

Acknowledgements

The author appreciates sincerely MA Vasiliev for reading the manuscript and mak-ing many detailed and valuable suggestions and illuminating comments the verywork was initiated as the result of discussions with MA Vasiliev The author isalso grateful to RR Metsaev and KB Alkalaev for useful discussions and to OVShaynkman for discussion of the fermionic case The work was supported in partby grants RFBR No 05-02-17654 LSS No 440120062 and INTAS No 05-7928by the Landau Scholarship and by the Scholarship of Dynasty foundation

Appendix A Multi-index convention

The multi-index notations is used a group of indices in which certain tensor issymmetric or is to be symmetrized is denoted either by one letter with the numberof indices indicated in round brackets or by placing a group of indices in roundbrackets eg

T a(s) equiv T a1a2as T a1aiaj as = T a1ajaias (A1)

V aT a(s) equiv V (a1T a2as+1) equiv1

s+ 1(V a1T a2a3as+1 + V a2T a1a3as+1 + + V as+1T a1a2as)

(A2)

V (bT a(s)) equiv V (bT a1as) equiv1

s + 1

(V bT a1a2as + V a1T ba2a3as + + V asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A3)Analogously the group of indices in which certain tensor is anti-symmetric or is tobe anti-symmetrized is denoted by placing indices in square brackets eg

T a[s] equiv T a1a2as T a1aiai+1as = minusT a1ai+1aias (A4)

V [bT a[s]] equiv V [bT a1as] equiv1

s+ 1

(V bT a1a2as minus V a1T ba2a3as + + (minus)sV asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A5)The operators of (anti)-symmetrization are weighted to be projectors (the factor 1

s+1

above)

Appendix B Young diagrams

Comprehensive information on Young diagrams can be found for example in thetextbook [71]

Definition B1 Given an integer partition ie a nonincreasing sequence si i isin[1 n] si ge si+1 of positive integers (or nonnegative when it is convenient to workwith a sequence of a fixed length) associated Young diagram Ys1 s2 sn is agraphical representation consisting of n left-justified rows made of boxes with the

52

i-th row containing si boxes

s10s11

s1s2s3s4

s5s6s7

s8s9

Finite-dimensional irreducible representation(irrep) of sl(d) ie various irre-ducible sl(d)-tensors are in one-to-one correspondence with Young diagrams of theform Ys1 s2 s[ d

2] The associated irreducible tensors

T

s1︷︸︸︷aa

s2︷︸︸︷

bb (B1)

or in condensed notation T a(s1)b(s2) have at most [d2] groups of indices being sym-

metric in each group separately and satisfy the condition that the symmetrizationof any group of indices with one index of any of the subsequent groups is identicallyzero ie

T a(s1)(b(sk)b)c(sjminus1) equiv 0 k lt j (B2)

If s[ d2] 6= 0 and d is even the (anti)-selfduality condition has to be imposed for

appropriate signature (anti)-selfduality is conventionally denoted by the sign factors+(minus) before s[ d

2] In this paper we do not consider (anti)-self dual representations

A scalar representation Y0 0 0 is denoted by bull a vector irrep Y1 0 0by rank-two symmetric tensor irrep by rank-two antisymmetric tensor irrep

by and so onFinite-dimensional irreducible representations of so(d) are of the two types ten-

sor and spin-tensor and are also characterized by Young diagrams which in thecase of spin-tensor irreps refer to the symmetry of the tensor part Young diagramsthat correspond to spin-tensor irreps are labeled by 1

2-subscript Spinor indices

α β γ = 12[d2] are placed first and are separated from tensor indices by rdquordquo For

example a spinor ψα irrep is denoted by bull 12 a vector-spinor irrep Aαaby 1

2and

so on To make tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry conditionthe tracelessness condition with respect to each pair of indices is to be imposed

ηccTa(s1)cb(siminus1)cd(sjminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n j = 1n (B3)

To make spin-tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry condition Γ-tracelessness condition with respect to each tensor index and a spinor index is to beimposed

Γαc βT

βa(s1)cb(siminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n (B4)

where Γαc β satisfy Γα

a βΓβb γ

+ Γαb βΓ

βaγ = 2ηab Additional conditions on spinors viz

Majorana Weyl and Majorana-Weyl are irrelevant to the problems concerned Also

53

in both cases it is required for the sum of the heights of the first two columns ofYoung diagrams to be not greater than d Note that the Γ-tracelessness conditionis stronger than the tracelessness one and applying the Γ-tracelessness twice to twosymmetric indices gives the tracelessness

0 = 2ΓαaβΓ

βb γT γ(ab) = ηabT

αab (B5)

To handle with arbitrary large Young diagrams the so-called block representationis used ie the rows of equal lengths are combined to blocks

Y(s1 p1) (sn pn) equiv Y

p1︷ ︸︸ ︷s1 s1

p2︷ ︸︸ ︷s2 s2

pn︷ ︸︸ ︷sn sn (B6)

References

[1] C Fronsdal ldquoMassless fields with integer spinrdquo Phys Rev D18 (1978) 3624

[2] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoCubic interaction in extended theories ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Nucl Phys B291 (1987) 141

[3] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoOn the gravitational interaction ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Phys Lett B189 (1987) 89ndash95

[4] M A Vasiliev ldquoConsistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in(3+1)-dimensionsrdquo Phys Lett B243 (1990) 378ndash382

[5] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoOn the geometry of higher-spin gauge fieldsrdquoClass Quant Grav 20 (2003) S473ndashS486 hep-th0212185

[6] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoFree geometric equations for higher spinsrdquoPhys Lett B543 (2002) 303ndash310 hep-th0207002

[7] M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear equations for symmetric massless higher spin fieldsin (a)ds(d)rdquo Phys Lett B567 (2003) 139ndash151 hep-th0304049

[8] X Bekaert I L Buchbinder A Pashnev and M Tsulaia ldquoOn higher spintheory Strings brst dimensional reductionsrdquo Class Quant Grav 21 (2004)S1457ndash1464 hep-th0312252

[9] D Sorokin ldquoIntroduction to the classical theory of higher spinsrdquo AIP ConfProc 767 (2005) 172ndash202 hep-th0405069

[10] X Bekaert S Cnockaert C Iazeolla and M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear higherspin theories in various dimensionsrdquo hep-th0503128

[11] A Sagnotti E Sezgin and P Sundell ldquoOn higher spins with a strong sp(2r)conditionrdquo hep-th0501156

[12] P K Townsend ldquoCovariant quantization of antisymmetric tensor gaugefieldsrdquo Phys Lett B88 (1979) 97

54

Y1 1so(dminus2) sim Y0 0

so(dminus2) On the other hand a scalar particle can be describedby a rank-d antisymmetric field ωmicro1microd

satisfying ωmicro1microd= 0 where the use of

so(d minus 1 1)-duality is made of ωmicro1microd= εmicro1microd

φ These two types of duality arereferred to as trivial

The general statement is that free particles can be described by an infinite num-ber of ways called dual descriptions [42 43 44 45 46] but dual theories exhibitcertain difficulties while introducing interactions [47 48 49 50] eg despite the factthat free massless spin-one and spin-two particles can be described by the Maxwellfield strength and by the Weyl tensor respectively introducing interactions requiresthe corresponding gauge potentials Amicro and gmicroν to be brought in

There exists a distinguished choice of so(dminus1 1)-irrep YM in which field φYM(x)

takes values that can be referred to as fundamental or minimal For the minimaldescription of a spin-Y particle the spin degrees of freedom and the so(dminus1 1)-irrepYM are characterized by the same Young diagram ie YM = Y eg a spin-oneparticle by Amicro a spin-two by gmicroν All other descriptions are referred to as dual Itis the minimal descriptions that will be discussed further by this reason the termspin-Y particle can be substituted for more accepted spin-Y field

A massive totally symmetric spin-s field can be described [51] by a totally sym-metric tensor field φ(micro1micros) subjected to

(+m2)φmicro1micros= 0

partνφνmicro2micros= 0

φννmicro3micros

= 0

(26)

where the last equation (tracelessness condition) makes the tensor irreducible in theso(d minus 1 1) sense the first one puts the system on-mass-shell and the second oneprojects out the components orthogonal to the momentum restricting φmicro1micros

tocontain only a spin-s irrep of so(dminus 1)

Analogously a massive totally anti-symmetric spin-p field ie Y = Y(1 p)can be described by a totally anti-symmetric tensor field ω[micro1microp] subjected to

(+m2)ωmicro1microp= 0

partνωνmicro2microp= 0

(27)

where the tracelessness condition becomes trivial for anti-symmetric tensorsThese two results are easily generalized to an arbitrary spin-Ys1 snmassive

field which can be minimally described by a symmetric in each group of indicestensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) subjected to

(+m2)φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0

partmicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n]

φmicro1(s1)(microk(sk)microk)microi(siminus1)micron(sn) = 0 k isin [1 nminus 1] k lt i

ηmicroimicrojφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i j isin [1 n]

(28)

where the last two conditions are just the Young symmetry and the tracelessnessconditions which make the field carry an irrep-Ys1 sn of so(dminus 1 1) and can

8

be thought of as the part of the definition of field φYM(x) The first equation puts

the system on-mass-shell the second one projects out all so(dminus1)-irreps which thetensor φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)microp(sp) decomposes into except for the one with the symmetry ofYs1 sn so(dminus 1)-diagram

Let D (m2Ys1 sn) be an iso(d minus 1 1) module extracted by (28) beingirreducible for m2 6= 0 or for Y0 (scalar field) Since minimally described masslessfields are gauge theories a uirrep H (0Ys1 sn) of iso(d minus 1 1) correspondingto a massless spin-Ys1 sn field should be defined as appropriate quotient bythe pure gauge solutions of the form

0 minusrarr gauge solutions minusrarr all solutions minusrarr H (0Ys1 sn) minusrarr 0 (29)

where the sequence is non-split as there is no so(dminus 1 1)-covariant way to extractso(d minus 2)-irrep Ys1 sn from the Lorentz tensor with the same symmetry ofYs1 sn by virtue of a single so(dminus 1 1)-vector the momentum pmicro sim partmicro

A massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described as the quotient of(26) with m2 = 0 by pure gauge solutions of the form δφmicro1micros

= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) where

ξmicro1microsminus1 is a totally symmetric gauge parameter subjected to the equations of thesame form (26) ie on-mass-shell tracelessness and transversality thus belongingto D (0Ysminus 1) The definition of H (0Ys) is given by

0 minusrarr D (0Y(sminus 1 1)) minusrarr D (0Y(s 1)) minusrarr H (0Y(s 1)) minusrarr 0 (210)

There is a bit difference for a totally anti-symmetric spin-p massless field Puregauge solutions are defined analogously as δωmicro1microp

= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] where ξ[micro1micropminus1] is

a rank-(pminus1) antisymmetric gauge parameter subjected to the equation of the sameform (27) and thus belonging to D (0Y(1 pminus 1)) In contrast to a totally sym-metric spin-smassless field the gauge transformations are reducible in the sense thatδωmicro1microp

equiv 0 provided that one transforms gauge parameter δξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1]

with a second level rank-(p minus 2) antisymmetric gauge parameter ξ[micro1micropminus2] and soon Some components (parallel to the momentum) of the first level gauge parameterξmicro1micropminus1 do not contribute to the gauge law for ωmicro1microp

these are represented by thesecond level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 modulo those components of ξmicro1micropminus2 thatdo not contribute to ξmicro1micropminus1 and so on till δξmicro = partmicroξ Gauge parameters ξmicro1micropminus1ξmicro1micropminusk

k isin [1 p] and ξ are referred to as the first level the k-th level and thedeepest level of reducibility respectively The corresponding iso(d minus 1 1)-uirrep isgiven by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0Y(0 0)) minusrarr D (0Y(1 1)) minusrarr

minusrarr D (0Y(1 p)) minusrarr H (0Y(1 p)) minusrarr 0 (211)

For example Maxwell gauge potential Amicro possesses gauge parameters of the firstlevel only as p = 1 in this case

Though a considerable success in describing on-mass-shell massless fields wasachieved for instance within the light-cone approach [52] there are many reasons tohave an off-shell gauge symmetry ie to construct equations that are invariant with

9

respect to gauge transformations with gauge parameters not subjected to ξ = 0To make the symmetry off-shell generally requires to relax the irreducibility of theso(dminus 1 1)-representation in which field φY(x) takes values

For instance a massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described[53] by atraceless rank-s symmetric field φmicro1micros

with an off-shell gauge symmetry

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

(d+2sminus4)η(micro1micro2part

νpartρφνρmicro3micros) = 0 φννmicro3micros

= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1

= 0 partνξνmicro2microsminus1) = 0 (212)

where in order for φmicro1microsto be traceless the gauge parameter has to be not only

traceless but transverse also this still being true for general mixed-symmetry fieldsApparently to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters the trace-lessness constraint for field φmicro1micros

has to be relaxed The same spin-s massless fieldcan be described[1] by field φmicro1micros

subjected to5

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

2part(micro1partmicro2φ

ννmicro3micros) = 0 φνρ

νρmicro5micros= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1

ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1= 0

(213)

where in order to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters a trace-lessness is relaxed to a double-tracelessness ie field φmicro1micros

takes values in thedirect sum of two so(d minus 1 1)-irreps being symmetric traceless tensors of ranks sand (s minus 2) The general statement is that for equations of motion to have an off-shell gauge symmetry the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep in which field φY(x) takes values has tobe reducible with additional direct summands representing certain nonzero tracesThese additional fields are called auxiliary and carry no physical degrees of freedomImposing certain gauge equations (28) can be restored

A massless totally antisymmetric spin-p field can be described by an antisym-metric rank-p tensor field ω[micro1microp] subjected to

ωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1part

νωνmicro2microp] = 0 δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] (214)

where the symmetry at the all levels of reducibility is manifest and off-shell ieδξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1] for the second level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 not subjectedto any differential constraints and analogously for the gauge symmetries at deeperlevels

Much similar to totally anti-symmetric fields mixed-symmetry massless fieldspossess reducible gauge transformations ie for a field φ with equations of motioninvariant under gauge transformations δξ1φ =

sum

i1partξi11 there exist the second level

gauge transformations δξ2ξi11 =

sum

i2partξi22 such that δξ2φ equiv 0 there exist the third

level gauge transformations δξ3ξi22 =

sum

i3partξi33 such that δξ3ξ1 equiv 0 and so on The

difference from totally anti-symmetric fields is in that there are generally more thanone gauge parameters at each level of reducibility (enumerated by index ik at thek-th level)

5Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [1] have the form Gmicro1microsminus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 where Gmicro1microsis equal to (213) the two forms being equiva-

lent

10

For instance the simplest mixed-symmetry massless field has the spin- andcan be minimally described[16 17] by a field φ[micromicro]ν which is anti-symmetric in thefirst two indices and satisfies Young symmetry condition6 φ[micromicroν] = 0 The equationsof motion

φmicromicroλ + 2part[micropartλφmicro]λν minus partνpart

λφmicromicroλ minus 2partνpart[microφλ

micro]λ = 0 (215)

are invariant underδφmicromicroν = part[microξ

Smicro]ν + part[microξ

Amicro]ν minus partνξ

Amicromicro (216)

with symmetric and anti-symmetric gauge parameters ξS(microν) and ξA[microν] Let us stress

that to maintain an off-shell gauge symmetry field φ[micromicro]ν has to take values in a

reducible so(d minus 1 1) representation oplus so does symmetric gauge parameterξS(micromicro) oplus bull which is in accordance with φ ν

microν 6= 0 and ξSνν 6= 0 Analogously tototally anti-symmetric fields there exist second level gauge transformations with avector parameter ξmicro

δφmicromicroν = 0

δξAmicroν = 23(partmicroξν minus partνξmicro)

δξSmicroν = partmicroξν + partνξmicro

(217)

In this case H

(

0)

is given by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

oplusD (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0 (218)

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) field the depthof reducibility of gauge transformations is equal to p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi where p is the height

of the first column of the Young diagram and at the r-th level of reducibility gaugeparameters have the symmetry of

sN minus 1

pNkN

s2 minus 1

p2k2

s1 minus 1

p1

k1

i=Nsum

i=1

ki =

i=Nsum

i=1

pi minus r (219)

This pattern of reducibility of gauge transformations will be of great importancewhile constructing the unfolded formulation in Section 4 As is easily seen at the

6In more detail the field φmicroνλ satisfies φmicroνλ = minusφνmicroλ φmicroνλ+φνλmicro+φλmicroν = 0 Equivalentlya symmetric basis can be used ie φSmicroνλ = φSνmicroλ φ

Smicroνλ + φSνλmicro + φSλmicroν = 0 The two bases are

related by φS(microν)λ = 1radic3(φAmicroλν + φAνλmicro) φ

A[microν]λ = 1radic

3(φSmicroλν minus φ

Sνλmicro)

11

first level of reducibility the gauge parameters are various tensors whose LorentzYoung diagrams are obtained by cutting off one cell from the original so(d minus 2)-diagram in all possible ways ie the number of gauge parameters at the first levelis equal to the number of blocks N eg two for spin- There is only one gaugeparameter at the deepest level of reducibility whose Young diagram is obtained bycutting off the first column from Y eg for spin-

This pattern corresponds of course to on-shell equations ie the gauge param-eters taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of Young symmetry (219) are subjectedto (28)-like equations To obtain an off-shell gauge symmetry the field content hasto be extended to take values in certain reducible so(d minus 1 1)-representations ad-ditional components turn out can be identified with certain traces of a single fieldwith the symmetry of Y as an sl(d)-tensor In general gauge parameters are alsoreducible tensors with the symmetry of (219) In the case of a spin- massless fieldthe trace φ ν

microν in the sector of fields and the trace ξSνν in the sector of gauge param-eters are the additional components In the general case of a spin-Y = Ys1 snmassless field field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) should satisfy [20]

ηmicroimicroiηmicroimicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n] (220)

which is a generalization of the Fronsdalrsquos double-trace condition (213) As it will beshown this condition naturally arises in the unfolded approach Note that double-tracelessness is imposed on each group of symmetric indices and it is not requiredfor cross-traces to vanish

Let a generalized Weyl tensor for a minimally described spin-Y massless field bea gauge-invariant combination of the least order in derivatives of field φY(x) that isallowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell On the other hand it is the generalized Weyltensor that the minimal non-gauge description of a massless spin-Y field is basedon For a spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN)so(dminus2) massless field the generalizedWeyl tensor has the symmetry of Y(s1 p1 + 1) (s2 p2) (sN pN)so(dminus11) and isof the s1-th order in derivatives In the case of spin-one (Y = so(dminus2)) Maxwell field

strength Fmicroν with the symmetry of can be also called a generalized Weyl tensorFermionic mixed-symmetry fields share most features of bosonic ones viz the

reducibility of gauge transformations the enlargement of the field content for theequations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge invariance The difference is thatthe equations for fermions have the first order in derivatives and the irreducibility ofspin-tensors is achieved by the Γ-tracelessness condition7 instead of the tracelessnessone

For example a massless totally symmetric spin-(s + 12) field can be described

7Γmicro are the Clifford algebra generators and satisfy ΓmicroΓν + ΓνΓmicro = 2ηmicroν part equiv Γmicropartmicro Γ-trace isa contraction of a spinor index and one tensor index with Γmicro eg Γνφ

microν equiv Γαν βφ

βmicroν

12

off-shell[54] by a totally symmetric spin-tensor field φα(micro1micros) subjected to8

partφmicro1microsminus spart(micro1

Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros)

ΓνΓρΓλφνρλmicro4micros= 0 Γνξνmicro2microsminus1 = 0

(221)

where in order to get an off-shell gauge invariance the irreducibility of φα(micro1micros) hasto be relaxed to the triple Γ-tracelessness

A massless totally anti-symmetric spin-Y(1 p) 12field can be described off-shell

by a totally anti-symmetric spin-tensor field ωα[micro1microp] subjected to

partωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1Γ

νωνmicro2microp] = 0

δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp]

(222)

Similar to the bosonic case (222) possesses reducible gauge transformations Thedifference is that one can impose the triple Γ-tracelessness on ωα[micro1microp] but thisrestricts the first level gauge parameter to be Γ-traceless Γνξνmicro2micropminus1 = 0 andhence the second order gauge parameter has to be on-mass-shell ie partξmicro1micropminus2 = 0Therefore for equations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge symmetry of allorders no Γ-trace conditions have to be imposed on fieldgauge parameters

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) 12field the

pattern of gauge symmetries is given by the spin-tensors with the tensor part de-scribed by (219) the definition of the Weyl tensor remains unchanged also

The descriptions based on tensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) which is analogous tothe metric gmicroν are referred to as metric-like At least in writing equiv partmicropartνη

microν theexplicit use of metric ηmicroν is made of which complicates the issue of introducinginteractions with gravitation

Let us note that in principle one can verify the gauge invariance of the fieldequations for massless mixed-symmetry fields despite the fact that the very form ofgauge transformation is cumbersome due to Young symmetrizers The advantageof the unfolded approach is in that gauge invariance at all levels of reducibility ismanifest

3 Unfolding Dynamics and σminus Cohomology

In this section we first recall the definition of unfolding and the relation of the sim-plest unfolded systems to Lie algebrasmodules and Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomologywith coefficients Second peculiar properties of unfolded systems that describe freefields and specifically the so-called σminus cohomology concept are recalled Third thevery procedure of constructing the unfolded form is illustrated on the examples ofmassless spin-zero spin-one arbitrary totally symmetric spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2)

fields the relation with the general statement of Section 1 is pointed out in each ofthe examples

8Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [54] have the form Gmicro1microsminus s

2Γ(micro1ΓνGνmicro2micros) minus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 Gmicro1micros= partφmicro1micros

minus spart(micro1Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0 which is equivalent to

(222)

13

31 General Features

Some dynamical system is said to be unfolded [31 32 33] if it has the form

dWA = FA(W ) (31)

whereWA is a set9 of differential forms of degree-qA on some d-dimensional manifoldMd d - exterior differential on Md and FA(W ) is an arbitrary degree-(qA + 1)function of WA assumed to be expandable in terms of exterior (wedge) productsonly10

FA(W ) =infinsum

n=1

sum

qB1++qBn=qA+1

fAB1Bn

W B1 and andW Bn (32)

where fAB1Bn

are constant coefficients satisfying fAB1BiBj Bn

= (minus)qBiqBj fA

B1BjBiBn

Moreover FA(W ) must satisfy the integrability condition (called generalized Jacobiidentity) obtained by applying d to (31)

F B δFA

δW Bequiv 0 (33)

Any solution of (33) defines a free differential algebra (FDA) [55 56 57 58] If Ja-cobi identities (33) are satisfied irrespective ofMd dimension11 the free differentialalgebra is referred to as universal [10 59] It is the universal algebras only that willbe considered further

Equations (31) are invariant under gauge transformations

δWAqA

= dǫAqAminus1 + ǫBqBminus1

δFA

δW B for qA gt 0 (34)

δWA0 = ǫB

prime

0

δFA

δW Bprime

1

Bprime qBprime = 1 for qA = 0 (35)

where ǫAqAminus1 is a degree-(qA minus 1) form taking values in the same space as WAqA

Inits turn δWA

qA= 0 can be treated as unfolded-like system for ǫAqAminus1 ie dǫ

AqAminus1 =

minusǫBqBminus1δFA

δWB there emerge second level gauge transformations

δǫAqAminus1 = dξAqAminus2 minus ξBqBminus2

δFA

δW B (36)

provided that FA(W ) is linear in matter fields and analogously for the gauge trans-formations at deeper levels Therefore the reducibility of gauge transformations ismanifest in the unfolded approach For a degree-qA gauge field WA

qAthere exist qA

levels of gauge transformations

9In this section indices A B C are of arbitrary nature In the cases of practical significance AB C vary over certain irreps of the Lorentz algebra

10The wedge symbol and will be systematically omitted further11As the forms with the rank greater than d are identically zero there exist certain identities

eg Wn andWn equiv 0 for n+m gt d which make the operator δδWA to be ill-behaved

14

The use of the exterior algebra respects diffeomorphisms which is very appropri-ate for introducing interactions with the gravitation The whole information aboutthe dynamics turns out to be contained in FA(W ) and one can even extend anunfolded system to other manifolds[59] simply by changing the exterior differentialthe new unfolded system has literally the same form

Note that introducing enough auxiliary fields it is possible to reformulate anydynamical system in the unfolded form although it may be difficult to unfold someparticular system or to find all unfolded forms

Collected below are some important cases of unfolded systems which have adirect bearing on Lie algebras [55 59]

Lie algebrasFlat connections Let ΩI equiv ΩImicrodx

micro be a subsector of degree-oneforms The only self-closed unfolded equations are of the form

dΩI = minusf IJKΩ

JΩK (37)

Generalized Jacobi identity (33) implies the Jacobi identity f IJKf

JLMΩKΩLΩM equiv

0 for some Lie algebra g with structure constants f IJK Therefore the closed

subsector of one-forms is in one-to-one correspondence with Lie algebras and(37) is the flatness condition for a connection ΩI of g This provides acoordinate-independent framework for describing background geometry Inthe cases of interest g is iso(d minus 1 1) so(d minus 1 2) so(d 1) and sp(2n) [59]Background geometry connection ΩI is assumed to be of order zero whereasall matter fields including dynamical gravitation are of the first order Allequations are assumed to be of the first order in matter fields and hencedescribe free fields only

In this paper g = iso(dminus 1 1) and ΩI = ab ha where ab equiv abmicro dxmicro

is a Lorentz spin-connection and ha equiv hamicrodxmicro is a background vielbein which

defines a non-holonomic basis of a tangent space at each point of the manifoldFlatness equation (37) for iso(dminus 1 1)-connection ΩI reads

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb = 0(38)

The first is the zero torsion equation that expresses the Lorentz spin-connectionvia the first derivative of hamicro The second can be recognized as the zero curva-ture equation For example in Cartesian coordinates the explicit solution isab

micro = 0 and hamicro = δamicro

The advantage of description of background geometry as the flatness conditionfor a connection of the space-time symmetry algebra is in that this way iscoordinate-independent In what follows we assume ab ha to satisfy (38)which is enough if there is no need for the explicit form of the solution in someparticular coordinate system For instance in (anti)-de Sitter space (38) ismodified by the terms proportional to the cosmological constant λ2

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb + λ2hahb = 0(39)

15

and admits no simple solutions with hamicro = δamicro ab = 0 Nevertheless without

giving the explicit solution to imply that ab ha satisfy (39) is sufficient forgeneral analysis eg for constructing Lagrangians [60]

Contractible FDA The simplest equations linear in matter fields of the form

dWAq = fA

BWBq+1 (310)

can be reduced by linear transformations to either

dWAq = WA

q+1 dWAq+1 = 0 (311)

ordWA

q = 0 (312)

where the second equation of (311) is the consequence of Jacobi identities(33) for the first one In the first case by virtue of gauge transformations(34) δWA

q = dξAqminus1 + χAq δW

Bq+1 = dχA

q the field WAq can be gauged away In

both cases by virtue of the Poincarersquos Lemma these equations are dynamicallyempty and correspond to the co-called contractible FDAs [55]

g-modulesCovariant constancy equations Let WAq be a closed subsector of

q-forms of matter gauge fields Linear in matter fields equations may involvethe background g-connection ΩI which is of zeroth order Such equationsreferred to as linearized over g background (described by any solution ΩI of(37)) have the form

dWAq = minusΩIfI

ABW

Bq (313)

Jacobi identity (33) where (37) is also taken into account

ΩJΩK(minusf I

JKfIAB + fJ

ACfK

CB

)W B

q = 0 (314)

implies fIAB to realize a representation of g Therefore the closed subsector

of forms of definite degree is in one-to-one correspondence with g-moduleswhereas

DΩWAq equiv dWA

q + ΩIfIABW

Bq = 0 (315)

is a covariant constancy equation and (DΩ)2 = 0 since the connection is

flat (37) In the cases of interest A runs over certain finite-dimensionalso(d minus 1 1)-irreps ie g-modules decompose with respect to its subalgebraso(dminus 1 1) sub g into a direct sum of certain irreducible tensors This is whywe single out the Lorentz-covariant derivative DL from the whole g-covariantderivative DΩ the remaining part acts vertically (algebraically) In the caseof ΩI being an iso(d minus 1 1) flat connection the Lorentz covariant derivativeDL = d+ satisfy DL

2 = 0 as the exterior differential d does

DLTab = dT ab +a

cTcb +b

cTac + (316)

In Cartesian coordinates DL equiv d and we do not make any distinction betweend and DL whereas in (anti)-de Sitter (DL)

2 6= 0 and the difference between d

16

and DL has to be taken into account Also zero torsion equation (381) canbe rewritten as DLh

a = 0 The remaining part of ΩI which acts algebraicallyand mixes different so(dminus 1 1)-modules into g-modules is associated with thegenerators of translations with gauge field ha

Gluing g-modulesChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology LetWpWq andWr takevalues in g-modules R1 R2 and R3 the representations are realized by oper-ators T1 T2 and T3 respectively Still linear in matter fields but nonlinear inbackground connection ΩI equations are of the form

DΩWp equiv dWp + T1(Ω)Wp = f12(Ω Ω)Wq

DΩWq equiv dWq + T2(Ω)Wq = f23(Ω Ω)Wr

DΩWr equiv

(317)

where the terms forming g-covariant derivative are isolated on the lhs Thetwo g-modules R1 R2 appear to be glued together by the term f12(Ω Ω) isinHom(Λpminusq+1(g) otimes R2R1) Jacobi identity (33) implies f12(Ω Ω) to be aChevalley-Eilenberg cocycle with coefficients in Rlowast

2 otimesR1 where Rlowast2 is a mod-

ule contragradient to R2 and f12(Ω Ω)f23(Ω Ω) = 0 Coboundaries canbe proved to be dynamically empty and can be removed by a field redefini-tion Consequently f12(Ω Ω) should be a nontrivial representative of theChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology group with coefficients in Rlowast

2otimesR1 It followsalso that nothing but zero forms can be joined to zero forms ie the onlypossible linearized unfolded equations on forms of zero degree are (315) withq = 0

For any dynamical system linearized over certain g-background (described byany solution ΩI of (37)) equations of motion (315) along with gauge transforma-tions of all orders of reducibility acquire a very simple form

δξ1 = DΩξ0

δξpminus1 = DΩξpminus2

δWp = DΩξpminus1

DΩWp = 0

(318)

where Wp takes values in certain g-module R DΩ is the associated g-covariantderivative and ξpminusk k isin [1 p] are the gauge parameters of k-th order of reducibilitytaking values in the same g-module R and being forms of degree (p minus k) Thegauge invariance at each order of reducibility and of equations of motion is dueto (DΩ)

2 = 0 In some sense the gauge fields Wp and the gauge parameters ξpminusk

seem to play the same role at the linearized level This uniformity is of essentialimportance when analyzing unfolded systems

In the presence of gluing terms eg when only two modules say R1 and R2 areglued by nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycle fpr(Ω Ω) full chain of equations

17

and gauge transformations (318) is modified to12

δξ11 = DΩξ10

δξ1pminusr = DΩξ1pminusrminus1

δξ1pminusr+1 = DΩξ1pminusr + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

20 δξ21 = DΩξ

20

(319)

δξ1pminus1 = DΩξ1pminus2 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus2 δξ2rminus1 = DΩξ

2rminus2

δW 1p = DΩξpminus1 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus1 δW 2

r = DΩξ2rminus1

DΩW1p = fpr(Ω Ω)W

2r DΩW

2r = 0

where W 1p ξ

1pminusk and W 2

r ξ2rminusm take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively

Important is that the gauge fieldsparameters taking values in R2 contribute to therhs of the equationsgauge transformations for the gauge fieldsparameters takingvalues in R1 but for forms of degree greater than (p minus r) The above two systemsare nothing but the specializations of (31) (34) (36)

Also let us note that there is no strong reason to make any distinction betweenthe terms linear in the background g-connection ΩI which correspond to g-modulesand the terms of higher order in ΩI which correspond to Chevalley-Eilenberg co-cycles Both terms can be combined into a single object the generalized covariant-derivative D = d+T (Ω)+f(Ω Ω) equiv DΩ+f(Ω Ω) with the property D2 = 0Moreover by means of D (319) and (318) can be rewritten in a similar mannerConsequently at the linearized level the most general unfolded equations and gaugetransformations have the form

δξ1 = Dξ0

δξpminus1 = Dξpminus2

δWp = Dξpminus1

DWp = 0

(320)

where D is built of d background connection ΩI and satisfies D2 = 0 The gaugefieldsparameters take values in certain spacesWq viz Wp isin Wp ξpminus1 isin Wpminus1ξ0 isin W0 The elements of Wq are differential forms with values in certain g-modules It is also convenient to define higher degree spaces Wqgtp the equationsRp+1 = DWp = 0 take values in Wp+1 Rp+2 = DRp+1 belongs to Wp+2 andby virtue of D2 = 0 satisfies Rp+2 equiv 0 and so on Therefore there exist certainidentities which belong to Wp+2 for the equations which belong to Wp+1 andthere exist certain identities which belong to Wp+3 for the identities in Wp+2 andso on At the field theoretical level these identities correspond to Bianchi identitiesfor the first level gauge transformations higher identities correspond to the Bianchiidentities for the deeper levels of gauge transformations

12The sign factor (minus)pminusr+1 before fpr(Ω Ω) is ignored and is thought of as the part of thedefinition of fpr(Ω Ω)

18

A remark should be made that the forms belonging to Wq may have differentdegrees if there are Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles present As a result spaces Wq

may contain different number of elements For instance (319) can be reduced to(320) if one defines

Wq =

W 1q q lt pminus r

W 1q W

2qminusp+r q ge (pminus r)

(321)

where W 1q and W 2

qminusp+r take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively In termsof (319) the elements of Wq for q lt (pminus r) were referred to as ξ1q the elements ofWq for q = (pminus r)(pminus 1) to as ξ1q ξ

2qminusp+r the elements ofWq for q = p to as W 1

pW 2

r the elements of Wq for q gt p to as R1q R

2qminusp+r (the equations of motion and

Bianchi identities)

32 Interpretation of Unfolded Systems Describing free Fields

When describing free fields unfolded formulations will be referred to as frame-like [61 60] though the very term frame-like has a more broad definition Thesesystems consist of equations (37) describing background geometry of a finite chainof (317)-like equations describing the gauge fields of the model and of (317)-likeequations with q = 0 glued to gauge forms ie it requires a Lie algebra g (commonlyiso(dminus1 1) so(dminus1 2) or so(d 1)) a set of g-modules R0RN and an appropriateset of nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles f01fNminus1N The physical degreesof freedom are contained in the forms of zero degree and the module RN in whichzero degree forms take values is infinite-dimensional

Since frame-like unfolded systems contain inevitably infinitely many fields mostof them being either auxiliary or Stueckelberg13 there arises a problem of reconstruc-tion a metric-like formulation by a given unfolded formulation or of extracting thedynamical content for a given unfolded system

The questions to be answered are what are the dynamical fields what arethe differential gauge parameters and what are the gauge invariant equations ofmotion These answers are not universal and depend on the chosen scheme ofinterpretation Different interpretations correspond to dual descriptions of the samedynamical system

Frame-like unfolded systems are endowed at the linearized level with additionalstructures providing a natural way for interpretation Indices AB vary overcertain finite dimensional Lorentz irreps ie each of Rn n = 0 N decomposes asRn =

sum

k Pnk where Pnk are certain so(d minus 1 1)-modules characterized by Ynk

Young diagrams of Section 1We say that some frame-like unfolded system is given an interpretation if [62]

1 On the whole space W =oplusinfin

q=0Wq where the matter gauge fields gauge pa-rameters equations of motion and Bianchi identities take values there exists

13A field is called Stueckelberg if it can be gauged away by pure algebraic symmetry

19

a bounded from below grading g = 0 1 ie Wq =oplusinfin

g=0Wgq The ho-

mogeneous element of Wgq is a certain differential form with values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep and is denoted as W gq In simplest cases the grade is just the

rank of the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep the element of Wgq takes values in

2 The closed subsector of one-forms ΩI describes a background geometry vizMinkowski or (anti)-de Sitter The generalized covariant derivative D is to bedivided into three parts the last one not being necessary nontrivial

D = DL minus σminus + σ+ (322)

where DL is a background Lorentz-covariant derivative and has a zero gradeσminus is an operator of grade (minus1) and σ+ contains positive grade operatorsThe only differential part is in DL whereas σplusmn acts vertically and is built ofthe background vielbein ha If two modules are glued the gluing element issupposed to be of grade (minus1) and also denoted as σminus

The equations then have the form

DLWn +

gminusnsum

i=1

σ+(W n+i

)= σminus

(W n+1

) g = 0 1 (323)

and analogously for the gauge transformations In the flat space all operators ofpositive grade appear to be trivial for the massless case As it does not affect theanalysis let us consider a simplified version with σ+ = 0 Then D2 = DL

2+σminusDL+DLσminus + (σminus)

2 = 0 is equivalent to DL2 = 0 (σminus)

2 = 0 and σminusDL +DLσminus = 0 Thefirst is a part of the flatness condition (38) for the iso(d minus 1 1)-connection Thesecond is the nilpotancy condition for σminus The third is satisfied provided that σminus istwisted by the factor (minus)∆g where (∆g + 1) is a degree of σminus which is equal to thenumber of the vielbeins ha that σminus is built of Indeed the vielbeins ha anticommutewith DL and hence the action of σminus is to be twisted by the factor (minus)∆g in orderσminusDL +DLσminus = 0 holds true Without further mention the pure sign factor (minus)∆g

will be though of as a part of the definition of σminusIt is useful to illustrate the action of σminus when for example unfolded equations

on fields with values in two modules R1 and R2 are glued as in (319)

R1︷ ︸︸ ︷

R2︷ ︸︸ ︷ g

q

t t t t

t t t

W 1p

ξ1pminus1

ξ10

W 2r

ξ2rminus1

ξ20

(324)

20

where short arrows stand for the action of σminus within each module and long arrowsfor the action of σminus between two modules (gluing terms) and dots stand for gaugefieldsparameters at different grades bold dots represent the elements of Wp =W 1

pW2r

All information about the dynamics turns out to be concealed in cohomologygroups of σminus [62] H(σminus) =

Ker(σminus)Im(σminus)

Let us analyze unfolded system (320) whichat grade g has the form

δξg1 = DLξg0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 )

δW gp = DLξ

gpminus1 + σminus(ξ

g+1pminus1)

0 = DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p )

(325)

Beginning from the deepest level of gauge transformations and from the lowestgrade it is obvious that those ξg+1

0 that are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueck-elberg(algebraic) gauge parameters for those ξg1 that belong to the image of σminusTherefore those ξg1 that are σminus-exact can be gauged away The leftover gauge sym-metry satisfies δξg1 = DLξ

g0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 ) = 0 so that those ξg+1

0 that belong to thecoimage of σminus are expressed via derivative of ξn0 Having sieved W0 and W1 inthis way only those ξg0 are still independent that are σminus-closed and hence belong toH

0(σminus) since only forms of zero-degree are elements of W0 Then those ξg+11 that

are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueckelberg gauge parameters for those ξg2 thatbelong to the image of σminus Therefore only those ξg1 are still independent that areσminus-closed but not σminus-exact and hence belong to H

1(σminus) Having sievedW0Wpminus1

one after another it turns out that independent differential gauge parameters at thek-th level are given by H

pminusk(σminus) Analogously those fields W gp that are σminus-exact

can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gauge parameters at Wpminus1 Thosefields W g+1

p that are not σminus-closed can be expressed via derivatives of fields at lowergrade by virtue of the equations Rg

p+1 equiv DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p ) = 0 these fields are

called auxiliary Therefore the dynamical fields ie those that are neither aux-iliary nor Stueckelberg are given by H

p(σminus) The nilpotency of D2 equiv 0 impliescertain relations of the form DLR

gp+1 + σminus(R

g+1p+1) = 0 between Rg

p+1 Therefore

auxiliary fields are expressed by virtue of σminus-exact Rgp+1 and σminus-non-closed Rg+1

p+1

are themselves expressed via derivatives of Rgp+1 Consequently the independent

equations on dynamical fields are given by Hp+1(σminus) From the cohomological point

of view higher degree forms correspond to certain nontrivial relations between equa-tions called Bianchi identities and manifest gauge nature of equations As there aregenerally more than one levels of gauge transformations one can expect the highercohomological group to be nontrivial

To sum up

21

cohomology group interpretation

Hpminusk k = 1p differential gauge parameters at the k-th level of re-

ducibilityH

p dynamical fieldsH

p+1 independent gauge invariant equations on dynamicalfields

Hp+k+1 k = 1p Bianchi identities for the k-th order gauge symmetryH

p+k k gt p supposed to be trivial in a regular case

To distinguish fields in cohomological sense the following convention is introduced[63]

Stueckelberg fields(gauge parameters) are those that can be eliminated bypure algebraic symmetry ie these fields are σminus-exact (are those that canbe used to gauge away certain fields ie these parameters are not σminus-closed)

Auxiliary fields are those that can be expressed via derivatives of some otherfields ie these fields are σminus-nonclosed Let us note that this definition isgenerally ambiguous eg in system

partA = B

partB = A(326)

which field is auxiliary is a matter of choice This ambiguity is removed byvirtue of grade[62 63]

Dynamical fields are those that are neither auxiliary nor Stueckelberg ie thesefields are representatives of σminus-cohomology classes

Note that if certain dynamical field given by Hp belongs to the grade-gf subspace

Wgfp and the corresponding equations given by H

p+1 belong to the grade-ge subspaceWge

p+1 the order of equations is equal to ge minus gf + 1If the unfolded system is supposed to admit a lagrangian formulation there has

to be a one-to-one correspondence between the number of dynamical fields and thatof equations k-th level gauge symmetries and k-th level Bianchi identities ie in acertain sense there should be a duality H

pminusk sim Hp+1+k k isin [0 p] This takes place

for all unfolded systems exemplified in this paperSince the operators involved ie DL and σminus are of grade 0 and minus1 only the

fields with the grade greater than g0 for any g0 ge 0 form a quotient module thusdescribing the same system on its own - dual formulations This picture partlybreaks in (A)dSd because of appearance of grade +1 nilpotent operator σ+

D = DL + σminus + λ2σ+ (327)

The specific character of frame-like unfolded systems which will be crucial forus is that by virtue of the inverse background vielbein hmicroa all form indices of any

gauge fieldparameter Wa1(s1)ap(sm)q can be converted to the fiber ones

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (328)

22

The resulting tensor W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is not irreducible and can be decomposedinto so(dminus 1 1)-irreps according to the so(dminus 1 1)-tensor product rule

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] =rArr Ys1 smotimes

so(dminus11)

Y(1 q) =oplus

α

Yα (329)

where one-column Young diagramY(1 q) of height-q represents the anti-symmetricindices d1 dq and Yα are the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the tensor product decomposesinto Having converted all fields (parameters equations) of a given unfolded systemto the fiber tensors one can make the identification of the fields in the unfolded ap-proach and those of the metric-like approach though the general covariance gaugeinvariance and other advantages of the unfolded formalism will be not manifestWhile constructing the unfolded formulations of a known metric-like systems or in-terpreting a given unfolded system in terms of metric-like fields this technique willbe widely used Moreover the calculation of σminus cohomology groups is largely basedon the explicit evaluation of (329)-like expressions Once an unfolded form is knownno use of this technique is needed either to generalize it to other backgrounds or tointroduce interactions

Field W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is traceless in a1 am and d1 dq separatelyHowever the cross traces need not vanish and hence some of Yα represent tracesTo distinguish between the traces of different orders let us introduce the followingthe Y-valued degree-q form WY

q is said to be a trace of the r-th order iff it has theform

WYq = hh

︸︷︷︸

r

hh︸︷︷︸

qminusr

CYprime

0 (330)

for some Yprime-valued degree-0 form CYprime

0 where (q minus r) indices of the backgroundvielbeins ha are contracted with the tensor representing Yprime and r indices are freefor the whole expression to take values in Y the appropriate Young symmetrizeris implied When the indices of WY

q are converted to the fiber ones the expression

takes the form ηη︸ ︷︷ ︸

r

CYprime ie CYprime

represents a trace of the r-th order

Different aspects of unfolding are illustrated on the examples of a massless scalarfield a massless spin-one field and a massless spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2) fields

33 Examples of Unfolding

Example 331 Unfolding a scalar field [31 62] First it should be noted thatit is easy of course to convert the Klein-Gordon equation C = 0 to a system offirst order equations

partmicroC = Cmicro

partmicroCmicro = 0(331)

but when writing the second equation the explicit form of the metric is to be usedhence these equations are not of unfolded form (31)

23

Described in terms of a scalar field C(x) the theory is brought into a non gaugeform therefore zero-forms only are allowed or else there would be some gaugesymmetry according to (34) The most general rhs of dC = has the form

dC = haCa (332)

for some vector-valued zero-form Ca This equation just parameterizes the firstderivative of C(x) and is similar to the first of (331) There are three terms allowedon the rhs of dCa =

dCa = hbCab + hbC

ab + haC prime (333)

with Cab Cab and C prime taking values in antisymmetric symmetric and scalar so(dminus1 1)-irreps ie bull The first term is forbidden by Bianchi identity hadC

a equiv 0To analyze the remaining terms let us decompose dCa into so(dminus 1 1)-irreps

partmicroCahmicrob = otimes = oplus oplus bull (334)

where = part[aCb] = part(aCa) minus 1dηaapartbC

b bull = partaCa = C

The component represents Bianchi identity in the first order reformulation ofthe Klein-Gordon equation Indeed expressing Ca as partaC implies part[aCb] equiv 0 bullrepresents the desired Klein-Gordon equation whereas is the only component al-lowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell Therefore to impose the Klein-Gordon equationthe term haC prime has to be omitted

dCa = hbCab (335)

The only possible rhs for dCaa = compatible with Jacobi identity hbdCab equiv 0

is of the form dCaa = hbCaab for Caaa taking values in a rank-three symmetric

so(d minus 1 1)-irrep ie The process of unfolding continues unambiguously inthis way and results in the full system

dCa(k) = hbCa(k)b equiv F a(k)(C) k = 0 1 (336)

where Ca(k) is rank-k totally symmetric traceless field ie taking values in k

so(dminus 1 1)-irrepTo make a connection with the general statement of Section 1 for Y = Y(0 0)

the general scheme results in

Yg bull

n k 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 0 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore spaces Wq and operator σminus which enters D = DL minus σminus should be definedas

Wq = WqWaq W

aaq (337)

24

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbWa(gminus1)bq g gt 0

(338)

Consequently W is a space of various differential forms with values in totally sym-metric traceless so(d minus 1 1)-tensors graded by the form degree and by the rankof so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Space Wq forms an irreducible iso(d minus 1 1)-module System(336) reads

Dω0 = 0 ω0 isin W0 (339)

The cohomology groups of σminus are easy to find

H0(σminus) = C(x) as the lowest grade field is automatically closed σminus(C) = 0 and it

cannot be exact as a form of zero degree Contrariwise zero-forms with gradegreater than zero are not closed σminus(C

k+1) = hbCa(k)b = 0lArrrArr Ck+1 = 0

H1(σminus) = haB(x)0 for some B(x)0 isin W

00 One-form Ba

1 = haB(x)0 is closedσminus(B

a1) = haB

a1 = hah

aB(x)0 equiv 0 and it cannot be represented as σminus(C2) =

hbCab as far as Cab is traceless The cohomology groups at higher grade are

trivial since σminus(haBa(k)(x)0) 6= 0 for k gt 0

Hqgt1(σminus) = empty as one can make sure

The interpretation in terms of Section 32 is as follows as is expected the dynamicalfield given by H

0 is C(x) The equations are given by the projection of dCa = hbCab

to H1 ie C = 0 The fields with k gt 0 are auxiliary being expressed via

derivatives of C(x) Ca(k) = partapartaC(x) Inasmuch as there is no gauge symmetryin the system the higher cohomology groups are trivial

An infinitely many dual formulations of a massless scalar field are also includedIndeed the fields with k ge k0 gt 0 form a quotient module Rk0 ie one canconsistently write

dCk = σminus(Ck+1) k ge k0 (340)

The first equationdCa(k0) = hbC

a(k0)b (341)

imposes on the dynamical field Ca(k0)

partbCba(k0minus1) = 0

part[bCc]a(k0minus1) = 0(342)

which imply at least locally Ca(k0) =

k0︷ ︸︸ ︷

partaparta C and C = 0 for some fieldC(x) All fields at higher grade are auxiliary This statement is confirmed bythe cohomology analysis H

0(Rk0 σminus) = Ck0 ie scalar is described in termsof a traceless rank-k0 symmetric tensor field subjected to the equations given byH

1(Rk0 σminus) = haBa(k0minus1)0 minus k0(k0minus1)

2(d+2k0minus4)ηaahcB

a(k0minus2)c0 +hcB

a(k0)c0 for B

a(k0minus1)0 B

a(k0)c0

taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps characterized by diagrams k0 minus 1 k0

These two elements represents just the components ofWk0

1 sim k0 otimes with the

25

symmetry of k0 minus 1 (trace) andk0

the third component with the symmetryof k0 + 1 is exact

The above results can be easily extended to (A)dSd background and to a massivescalar field [62]

DLCk = σminus(C

k+1) + σ+(Ckminus1) = 0 (343)

where there appears a nontrivial positive grade operator

σ+(Ckminus1) = (m2 minus λ2k(k + dminus 1))

(

haCa(kminus1) minus(sminus 1)

d+ 2k minus 4ηaahbC

a(kminus1)b

)

(344)

and DL is a Lorentz-covariant derivative in (A)dSd In the (A)dSd case the situationis more interesting due to the appearance of σ+ operator and the possibility of theaccidental degeneracy of σ+ when m2 = λ2kprime(kprime + dminus 1) for some kprime [62]

Example 332 Unfolding Maxwell equations [64 65] An example of masslessspin-one field is more interesting as a gauge system The main object is a one-formAmicro From gauge transformation law

δA1 = dξ0 (345)

it follows that there should not be other forms of rank greater than zero If this werethe case the gauge parameters of these new forms would be involved by virtue of(34) making the gauge law for A1 inappropriate Indeed there are two possibilitiesto introduce higher degree forms on the rhs of dA = (i) dA1 = R2 fora scalar valued degree-two form R2 which possesses its own gauge parameter χ1δR2 = dχ1 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law for A1 is modifiedto δA1 = dξ0 + χ1 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gaugeparameter χ1 This case corresponds to contractible free differential algebras (310)(ii) dA1 = hbω

b1 for a vector valued degree-one form ωa

1 which possesses its owngauge parameter ǫa0 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law forA1 is modified to δA1 = dξ0 + hbǫ

b0 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of

Stueckelberg gauge parameter ǫa0 Consequently in both cases A1 can be made non-dynamical which is not what was expected Therefore the only possibility is tointroduce a zero-form C

[ab]0 anti-symmetric in a b parameterizing by virtue of

dA1 = hahbC[ab]0 (346)

the Maxwell field strength Bianchi identity hahbdC[ab]0 equiv 0 tolerates two terms on

the rhs of dC[ab]0 =

dC[ab]0 = hcC

[ab]c0 + h[aC

b]0 (347)

with C[ab]c0 and Ca

0 taking values in and so(dminus 1 1)-irreps the former taken inantisymmetric basis In order to determine which of the terms should be omittedif any the decomposition of the first derivative of the Maxwell field strength intoLorentz irreps has to be analyzed

C [ab]|c equiv partmicroC[ab]hmicroc = otimes = oplus oplus (348)

26

where = part[aCbc] = partbCab and = partcC [ab] minus part[cCab] + 2

dminus1ηc[apartdC

b]d part[aCbc]

is identically zero provided that C [ab] is expressed via the first derivative of Amicroor represents the second pair of Maxwell equations in terms of field strength C [ab]In both cases this component should be zero and moreover this can not be keptnonzero as there is no hcC

[abc]-like term allowed on the rhs of (347) The secondpartbC

ab is the desired Maxwell equations in terms of Amicro or the first pair of Maxwellequations in terms of the field strength Consequently to impose Maxwell equationsterm h[aCb] has to be omitted whereas the third is the only component allowed tobe nonzero on-mass-shell

Again unfolding continues unambiguously and requires an infinite set of fields

C[ab]c(k)0 taking values14 in

kto be introduced

dC [ab]c(k) = hdC[ab]c(k)d k = 0 1 (349)

The full system has the form

dA1 = hahbCab0 equiv F (AC) δA1 = dξ0

dC[ab]c(k)0 = hdC

[ab]c(k)d0 equiv F [ab]c(k)(C) k = 0 1

(350)

and represents two modules being glued together by the term on the rhs of thefirst equation

For Y = Y(1 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 resultsin

Yg bull

n k 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 1 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore

Wq =

W0 q = 0

WqW[ab]qminus1W

[ab]cqminus1 q gt 0

(351)

let us point out the shortening of W0 The action of σminus on Wq isin Wq is defined as

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hahbW[ab]qminus1 g = 1

hdW[ab]c(gminus2)dqminus1 g gt 1

(352)

With D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (350) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (353)

14The fields C [ab]c(k) are taken in antisymmetric basis ie they are antisymmetric in a bsymmetric in c(k) and C [abd]c(kminus1)equiv0

27

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 0 form a finite-dimensional iso(dminus1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g gt0 form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

Again the cohomology groups are easy to find gauge parameters are given byH

0(σminus) = ξ0 dynamical fields by H1(σminus) = A1 Maxwell equations by H

2(σminus) =

h[aBb]0 and the Bianchi identities for the first order gauge transformations by

H3(σminus) = hahbB0 the rest of groups are empty H

kgt3(σminus) = empty Important is thedirect correspondence between the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2

the gauge parameters in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3There are infinitely many of non-gauge dual formulations based on C [ab]c(k0) eg

for k0 = 0 one recovers the Maxwell equations in terms of the field strength

part[aCbc] = 0

partbCab = 0

(354)

Let us note that the ambiguity at the first step of unfolding (the terms haC prime andh[aCb] in the above two examples) expresses the possibility of introducing a massterm

Example 333 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-s field [31 6466] We start from the metric-like description of a massless spin-s field in termsof a double-traceless symmetric rank-s field φmicro1micros

satisfying (213) the secondorder equations are invariant with respect to the first order gauge transformationwith traceless rank-(s minus 1) gauge parameter ξmicro1microsminus1 Inasmuch as the Young di-agram s of so(d minus 2) is of the height one there are gauge transforma-tions of the first level only Therefore the dynamical field in the unfolded ap-proach has to be a one-form There is only one way to identify φmicro1micros

and ξmicro1microsminus1

with certain ωY01 and ξY0

0 taking values in the same so(d minus 1 1)-irrep Y0 namely

Y0 = sminus 1 ie ωa(sminus1)1 and ξ

a(sminus1)0 takes values in a rank-(s minus 1) symmet-

ric traceless tensors Field φmicro1microsis identified with a totally symmetric part of

ωa(sminus1)1 ie φmicro1micros

= hb1(micro1hbsminus1

microsminus1ωa1asminus1

micros)ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 the double-tracelessness

condition is the consequence of the tracelessness of ωa(sminus1)1 in a1asminus1 ξmicro1microsminus1

is identified with ξa(sminus1)0 directly ξmicro1microsminus1 = hb1micro1

hbsminus1microsminus1

ξa1asminus1ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 andone can make sure that the Fronsdalrsquos gauge transformation law is recovered fromδω

a(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 Field ω

a(sminus1)1 has a redundant component with the symmetry

ofsminus 1

which can be made Stueckelberg by virtue of gauge parameter ξa(sminus1)b

with the same symmetry type ie

δωa(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)c0 (355)

It automatically follows that there is a degree-one gauge field ωa(sminus1)b1 coupled with

ωa(sminus1)1 as

dωa(sminus1)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)c1 (356)

28

The only solution to Bianchi identity hcdωa(sminus1)c1 equiv 0 is15

dωa(sminus1)b1 = hcω

a(sminus1)bc1 (357)

where a new field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

is introduced and so on

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1 (358)

until the field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

for which the Bianchi identity solvesas

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 (359)

where field Ca(s)b(s)0 represents a generalized Weyl tensor and has the symmetry of

s The solution of Bianchi identity hchddC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 equiv 0 has the form

dCa(s)b(s)0 = hc

(

Ca(s)cb(s)0 +

s

2C

a(s)bb(sminus1)c0

)

(360)

where Ca(s+1)b(s)0 has the symmetry of s

s+ 1 The second term on the rhs

of (360) supplements the first one to have a proper Young symmetry Further

unfolding requires a set of degree-zero forms Ca(s+i)b(s)0 taking values in so(dminus1 1)-

irreps characterized by Young diagrams ss+ i

The full system has theform

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1

δωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(k)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)b(k)c0 k isin [0 sminus 2]

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 δω

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0

dCa(s+i)b(s) = hc

(

Ca(s+i)cb(s) +s

i+ 2Ca(s+i)bb(sminus1)c

)

i isin [0infin)

(361)

By the construction the system incorporates Fronsdalrsquos field φmicro1microswith the correct

gauge law but there is still to be proved that the Fronsdalrsquos equations are reallyimposed and that there are no other dynamical fields in the system Let us recon-struct Fronsdalrsquos equations (213) whereas the second statement will be proved asa part of a more general theorem The first two equations of (361) read

partmicroωa(sminus1)ν minus partνω

a(sminus1)micro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)cν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)cmicro (362)

partmicroωa(sminus1)bν minus partνω

a(sminus1)bmicro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)bcν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)bcmicro (363)

It is convenient to convert all world indices to the fiber ones

partcωa(sminus1)|d minus partdωa(sminus1)|c = ωa(sminus1)c|d minus ωa(sminus1)d|c (364)

partcωa(sminus1)b|d minus partdωa(sminus1)b|c = ωa(sminus1)bc|d minus ωa(sminus1)bd|c (365)

15The proof is not given as more general statement about the solutions of such equations isproved in the next Section

29

where ωa(sminus1)|b equiv ωa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro ωa(sminus1)bb|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bbmicro hcmicro

Contracting (365) with ηbd and then symmetrizing c with a1asminus1 results in

partcωa(sminus1)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus1)c|c= 0 (366)

By symmetrizing in (364) a1asminus1 with d

ωa(sminus1)c|a = partcωa(sminus1)|a minus partaωa(sminus1)|c (367)

and then by contracting (364) with ηdasminus1

ωa(sminus1)c|

c= (sminus 1)

(

partcωa(sminus2)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus2)c|c

)

(368)

all the terms of (366) can be expressed via ωa(sminus1)|b Plugging these to (366) gives

ωa(sminus1)|a minus partapartc((sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c

)+ (sminus 1)partapartaω

a(sminus2)c|c= 0 (369)

where ωa(sminus1)|a is to be identified with Fronsdalrsquos field φa(s) as ωa(sminus1)|a = 1sφa(s)

then ωa(sminus2)c|

c= 1

2φa(sminus2)c

c (sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c = φa(sminus1)c and the equation

acquires the Fronsdalrsquos form (213)

φa(s) minus spartapartcφa(sminus1)c + s(sminus1)

2partapartaφ

a(sminus2)cc= 0 (370)

For Y = Y(s 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 results in

Yg sminus 1 sminus 1 s

ss+ 1

n k 1 0 1 sminus 1 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = sminus 1 g = s g = s+ 1

qg q0 = 1 qsminus1 = 1 qs = 0 qs+1 = 0

therefore

Wq =

Wa(sminus1)0 W

a(sminus1)b0 W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0 q = 0

Wa(sminus1)q W

a(sminus1)bq W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)q W

a(s)b(s)qminus1 W

a(s+1)b(s)qminus1 q gt 0

(371)and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hcWa(sminus1)b(gminus1)cq g isin [1 sminus 1]

hchdWa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)dqminus1 g = s

hc

(

Wa(gminussminus1)cb(s)qminus1 + s

gminuss+1W

a(gminussminus1)bb(sminus1)cqminus1

)

g gt s

(372)

With D = DL minus σminus full system (361) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (373)

30

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sminus 1 sim g isin [0 sminus 1]form a finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k =0 1 sim g ge s form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

The representatives of cohomology classes can be chosen as H0 = ξ

a(sminus1)0 H1 =

hbφa(sminus1)b H2 = hbhcG

a(sminus1)c minus hahcGa(sminus2)bc + γηaahahcG

a(sminus4)bcnn+ (βηabhahc +

αηaahbhc)Ga(sminus3)cn

n16 H

3 = hbhahcχa(sminus2)c H

kgt3 = empty where φa(s) and Ga(s) are

double-traceless tensor fields and ξa(sminus1) and χa(sminus1) are traceless H01 are nontrivialat the lowest grade whereas H

23 are nontrivial at grade-one therefore the orderof equations that are imposed on the dynamical field is equal to two It turns outthat there is no need in the explicit form for α β and γ it is sufficient to find outthe Young symmetry of representatives only The uniqueness of Fronsdalrsquos theoryat the level of action was demonstrated in [67] and at the level of equations in[6 53] Consequently there is no need for equations (370) to be found explicitly -those of Fronsdal are the only possible Again there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2 the gauge parameters

in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3 The system contains an infinitely many ofdual formulations those that have field W

a(sminus1)b(k0)1 at the lowest grade are gauge

dual descriptions whereas those that have field Ca(s+k0)b(s) at the lowest grade arenon-gauge Dual description based on field W

a(sminus1)b(1)1 was elaborated in [68]

Example 334 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field[69

70 31] Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field results in literally

the same unfolded system (361 373) but with fields taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that are irreducible spin-tensors with the same tensor part as in the bosoniccase Note that operator σminus is not modified but the σminus cohomology groups areslightly changed such that the equations become of the first order

The Dirac equation Unfolded system (336) or equivalently (339) describesa massless spin-1

2field provided that Ck take values in s 1

2so(dminus1 1)-irreps

ie Ck equiv Cαa(k) and Γαb βC

βba(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equation of (336)

partmicroCα = hmicroaC

αa (374)

with hbmicroΓβb α

gives the Dirac equation

Γαa βpart

aCβ = 0 (375)

the rest of equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives of dynamicalfield Cα

The Rarita-Schwinger equation Unfolded system (350) or equivalently(353) describes a massless spin-3

2field provided that irreducible tensors in (351)

are replaced by the corresponding irreducible tensor-spinors ie A1 equiv Aαmicro C

k equiv

Cα[ab]c(k) and Γαb βC

β[ab]c(k) = 0 Γαd βC

β[ab]dc(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equa-tion of (350)

1

2(partmicroA

αν minus partνA

αmicro) = hmicroahνbC

α[ab] (376)

16α = minus (s(d+sminus5)minusd+6)(sminus2)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6) β = (sminus2)

(d+sminus4) γ = (d+sminus6)(sminus2)(sminus3)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6)

31

with Γ-matrices and converting world indices micro ν to the fiber ones according toAαa equiv Aα

microhamicro gives the Rarita-Schwinger equation

Γαb βpart

bAβa minus partaΓαb βA

βb = 0 δAαa = partaξα (377)

The rest of unfolded equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives ofdynamical field Aα

microThe Fang-Fronsdal equation for a spin-(s + 1

2) massless field Unfolded

system (361) or equivalently (373) describes a massless spin-(s + 12) field pro-

vided that irreducible tensors in (371) are replaced by the corresponding irreducibletensor-spinors With all world indices converted to the fiber ones the first equationof (361) has the form

Gαa(sminus1)|[cd] equiv partcωβa(sminus1)|d minus partdωβa(sminus1)|c = ωβa(sminus1)c|d minus ωβa(sminus1)d|c (378)

where ωαa(sminus1)|b equiv ωαa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωαa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

αa(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro

Analogously to the bosonic case nonsymmetric component of ωβa(sminus1)|d canbe gauged away algebraically Hence the Fronsdalrsquos field φαa(s) is identified asωαa(sminus1)|a = 1

sφαa(s) Then Γα

b βφβa(s) = Γα

b βωβa(sminus1)|b Γα

b βΓβc γφ

γa(sminus2)bc = ηbcωαa(sminus2)b|c

and the Fronsdalrsquos triple Γ-traceless constraint is a consequence of irreducibility ofωαa(sminus1)|b in α a1asminus1 and the lack of any conditions with respect to a1asminus1 andb Since the Fronsdalrsquos field contains three irreducible components with the sym-metry of s 1

2 s-1 1

2and s-2 1

2 the equations of motion has to be

nontrivial in these three sectors too The projector on the dynamical equations issimply Γα

b βGβa(sminus1)b|a and gives

Γαb βpart

bφβa(s) minus spartaΓαb βφ

βa(sminus1)b = 0 (379)

which is in accordance with (222) But we would like to note that there aretwo components with the symmetry of s-1 1

2 namely ηbcG

αa(sminus2)b|ac and

Γαb βΓ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] The correct projector on this component of the equations isgiven by the combination

2(sminus 1)ηbcGαa(sminus2)b|ac minus γαb βγ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] (380)

which is identically zero when Gαa(sminus1)|[bc] is expressed via ωβa(sminus1)c|d by virtue of(378) Therefore it is (380) that does not express certain part of ωβa(sminus1)c|d interms of first derivatives of the dynamical field φαa(s) and thus this is a dynamicalequation Obviously (380) is a representative of σminus cohomology group H

2g=0 In

terms of φαa(s) the representative has the form

Γαb βpart

bΓβc γφ

γa(sminus1)c minus partcφαa(sminus1)c +

(sminus 1)

2partaφ

αa(sminus2)cc= 0 (381)

which is equal to the Γ-trace of (379) The gauge transformations has the form

δφαa(s) = partaξαa(sminus1) (382)

32

where Γαb βξ

βa(sminus2)b = 0Consequently unfolded equations for totally symmetric bosonic fields are proved

to completely determine the unfolded equations for totally symmetric fermionicfields Though σminus is not modified in the fermionic case σminus cohomology groupsare changed since the fermionic dynamical equations are of the first order

4 Unfolding Mixed-Symmetry Fields

First in Section 41 an example of the simplest massless mixed-symmetry field ofspin- is investigated in detail and leading arguments are given for a spin- fieldSecond the general statement on arbitrary mixed-symmetry fields is proved whereastechnical details are collected in Sections 44 and 45 The analysis of the numberof physical degrees of freedom is carried out in Section 43

41 Simplest Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Example 411 Spin- field In the metric-like approach a spin- field is mini-mally described[16 17] by the subjected to (215) field φ[micromicro]ν that takes values in a

reducible so(dminus 1 1)-representation oplus the latter component is identified withthe trace φ ν

microν The gauge transformations (216) has two levels of reducibility with

two gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξA[microν] taking values in oplus bull so(dminus 1 1)-irreps at the

first level and one parameter ξmicro taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irrep at the secondlevel (217)

First the metric-like field φ[micromicro]ν has to be incorporated into certain differentialform eYq which is called a physical vielbein the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y and the degreeq to be defined below To make the symmetries both of the first and of the secondlevel of reducibility manifest the degree of the physical vielbein has to be two atleast

Moreover were the physical vielbein taken to be a degree-one form not all of thegauge symmetries even at the first level would be manifest Indeed there are twopossibilities for physical vielbein eY1 to contain a component with the symmetry of

Namely Y = and Y = since otimes = oplus oplus and otimes = oplus oplus

The associated differential gauge parameter is ξ0 in the first case and ξ0 in thesecond case Inasmuch as the gauge parameters are the forms of degree-zero onlyone of the required two parameters is present in each of the cases

The degree of the physical vielbein has to be not greater than two if the com-ponent associated with the metric-like field φmicromicroν is required not to be a certaintrace part The reason why a dynamical field should not be a certain trace part isexplained in the next Section

Therefore the physical vielbein has to be of degree-two and has to take valuesin so(dminus 1 1)-irrep that belongs to the vector representation ie e2 equiv ea2 equiv eamicroν

The associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξa1 equiv ξamicro contains in its Lorentz decomposition

otimes = oplus oplusbull both anti-symmetric ξAmicroν = ξa[microhbν]ηab and symmetric ξSmicroν = ξa(microh

bν)ηab

33

gauge parameters the latter enters along with the trace ξamicrohmicroa There exists a second

level gauge parameter χa0 which is directly identified with ξmicro as ξmicro = hbmicroχ

aηabThere are no redundant components in the gauge parameter However physicalvielbein e2 contains one redundant component in its decomposition into Lorentz

irreps otimes = oplus oplus The first and the second components are to be associatedwith a traceful φmicromicroν whereas the third one totally anti-symmetric component e[a|bc]

of ea|bc = eamicroνhbmicrohcν is a redundant one and has to be made non-dynamical In order

to do so algebraic gauge parameter ξ[abc]0 with the symmetry of is introduced It

is obvious from pure algebraic gauge law

δea2 = hbhcξ[abc]0 (41)

that the redundant component can be fixed to zero and ea2 can be directly identifiedwith φmicromicroν as e

amicromicro = φmicromicroνh

aν From gauge transformation laws δea2 = dξa1 δξa1 = dχa

0

ie δeamicroν = 12

(partmicroξ

aν minus partνξ

amicro

) δξamicro = partmicroχ

a required gauge transformations (216)(217) for metric-like field φmicromicroν and for the first order gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξ

A[microν]

are easily recoveredSince in the unfolded approach each gauge parameter possesses its own gauge

field and vice-verse associated with ξ[abc]0 gauge field ω

[abc]1 enters as

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 (42)

which determines the first equation Applying d to this equation results in Bianchiidentity hbhcdω

[abc]1 equiv 0 which has a unique solution of the form

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 (43)

with C[abc][df ]0 having the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensor of a spin-

field ie it is anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and C[abcd]f0 equiv 0 To clarify the form of

the solution let C[abc]|[df ]0 be a degree-zero form anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and with

no definite symmetry between these two groups of indices The Bianchi identityimplies hbhchdhfC

[abc]|[df ]0 equiv 0 which is equivalent to C

a[bc|df ]0 equiv 0 since vielbeins

ha anticommute Therefore the solution is parameterized by those components of

C[abc]|[df ]0 sim otimes that has the symmetry of Young diagrams with no more than

three rows since the requirement for total anti-symmetrization of any four indicesto give zero is the characteristic property of Young diagrams with at most three

rows otimes ni is the only component of zero trace order17 with three rows andthere are no components with the number of rows less than three Alternatively one

17Although there are trace components with the number of rows less than four eg theirtensor product by the metric ηab contains components with the symmetry of the sl(d)-Young

diagrams with more than three rows Nontrivial trace with the symmetry of corresponds tothe mass-like term Hence traceful tensors either do not satisfy the Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms

34

could search for the solution in the sector of degree-one forms as dω[abc]1 = hdC

[abc]|d1

with some C[abc]|d1 but Bianchi identity hbhchdC

[abc]|d1 equiv 0 implies that the only

component of C[abc]|d1 sim otimes that is allowed must have less than three rows which

is impossible since [abc] makes Young diagrams of otimes consist of three rows atleast18 Thus one has to search for the solution among the forms of less degree

Further unfolding requires a set of fields C [abc][df ]g(k) with the symmetry ofk

to be introduced and the full system has the form

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 δea2 = dξa1 + hbhcξ

[abc]0 δξa1 = dχa

0

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 δω

[abc]1 = dξ

[abc]0

dC[abc][df ]g(k)0 = hvC

[abc][df ]g(k)v0 (44)

Consequently the unfolded system incorporates field φmicromicroν with all required differ-ential gauge parameters at all levels of reducibility the redundant component of the

physical vielbein does not contribute to the dynamics ω[abc]1 sim otimes = oplus oplus

the first component is a field strength for the redundant field once the field hasbeen gauged away the associated field strength is zero and ω

[abc]ρ = hamicrohbνhcλT[microνλ]ρ

for some T[microνλ]ρ T[microνλρ] equiv 0 which incorporates both and (as the trace) Torecover equations (215) in terms of metric-like fields it is convenient to convert allfiber indices to the world ones in the first two equations

part[microeaνλ] = hb[microhcνω

abcλ] (45)

part[microωabcν] = hd[microhfν]C

abcdf (46)

to substitute Tmicroνλρ and to contract two indices in the second equation

part[microφνλ]ρ = Tmicroνλρ (47)

partρTmicroνρλ minus partλTρ

microνρ = 0 (48)

Plugging (47) in (48) gives equation (215)For Y = Y(2 1) (1 1) ie N = 2 and p = 2 the general scheme of Section

1 results in

Yg

n k 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 1 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

18Again the trace component enters the tensor product as η otimes and has the number of rowsnot less than three

35

therefore

Wq =

W a0 q = 0

W a1 W

[abc]0 q = 1

W aq W

[abc]qminus1 W

[abc][df ]qminus2 W

[abc][df ]gqminus2 q gt 1

(49)

and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbhcW[abc]qminus1 g = 1

hbhcW[aaa][bc]qminus2 g = 2

hdW[aaa][bb]c(gminus3)dqminus2 g gt 2

(410)

with D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (44) can be rewritten as

Dω2 = 0 δω2 = Dξ1 δξ1 = Dξ0 (411)

where ω2 isin W2 ξ1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 2 k = 0 sim g = 0and n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 1 form two finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-moduleswhereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g ge 2 form an infinite-dimensionaliso(dminus 1 1)-module

Example 412 Spin- field (briefly) In the case of a massless spin- fieldthere are two gauge parameters at the first level of reducibility which have the sym-metry19 of and one gauge parameter at the second level with the symmetryof First for Y = Y(3 1) (2 1) the proposed scheme results in

Yg

n k 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3 g = 4

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 2 q2 = 1 q3 = 0 q4 = 0

therefore the physical vielbein has to be a two-form taking values in ie e2 equiv

eaab2 Associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξaab1 has components otimes = oplus oplus the first two having the symmetry of the required gauge parameters with the thirdone being redundant The last three components in the decomposition of the physical

vielbein otimes = oplus oplus oplus are also redundant By virtue of Stueckelberg

symmetry with parameter ξ1 these three components can be gauged away inasmuch

as otimes = oplus oplus The redundant component of the first level gauge

parameter ξ1 also can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg symmetry with

level-two gauge parameter ξ0 Consequently at least the fact that the unfoldedsystem incorporates the metric-like field all the required gauge parameters andredundant components do not contribute to the dynamics is proved

19To simplify the example no consideration is given to the trace components of the fields

36

42 General Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Given a massless field of spin Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) described by a metric-like field φY(x) taking values in the irrep of the Lorentz algebra so(d minus 1 1) withthe same symmetry type(minimal formulation) there exists a unique unfolded systemwith the physical vielbein at the lowest grade and all symmetries being manifest thatreproduces the original metric-like system The system has the form (11)

Sketch of the proof

1 The lowest grade field (physical vielbein) eY0q0

turns out to be completely de-termined by the requirement for it to contain the metric-like field and for itsgauge parameters ξY0

q0minusk k gt 0 to contain all the necessary gauge parametersat all levels of reducibility (219)

2 eY0q0

and its gauge parameters appear to contain redundant components thathave to be made non-dynamical The only way to achieve this is to introduceStueckelberg symmetry δeY0

q0= σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus1) δξ

Y0q0minus1 = σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus2) with certain

ξY1q1minusk k gt 0 which turns out to be unambiguously defined by this requirement

3 ξY1q1minus1 has associated gauge field ωY1

q1and gauge transformations δωY0

q0=

σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) completely determines the first equation deY0

q0= σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) whichimplies Jacobi identity σ1

minus(dωY1q1

) equiv 0 The general solution is proved in Sec-tion 44 to have the form dωY1

q1= σ2

minus(ωY2q2

) with certain ωY2q2

The secondequation implies the second Jacobi identity σ2

minus(dωY2q2

) equiv 0 and so on

4 Once the total unfolded system is defined the proof of the facts that (i)the correct dynamical equations are imposed (ii) there are no other dynamicalfields or other differential gauge symmetries in the system is obtained throughthe calculations of σminus cohomology groups Ignoring the trace pattern of fieldsie for traceful tensors the proof of (ii) can be simplified and is done in thissection Even stronger statement that there exists a duality H

p+1+k sim Hpminusk is

proved in Section 45

First as it is clear from the examples above the metric-like field φYM(x) has

to be incorporated into a differential form eY0q of degree-q taking values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep Y0 (for this reason eY0q is called physical vielbein) Having converted

all world indices to fiber ones in accordance with (329) so(dminus 1 1)-tensor productY0 otimes Y(1 q) of Y0 with one column diagram of the height q must contain thecomponent with the symmetry of YM In the case of the minimal formulationYM = Y where Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) characterizes the spin

It is useful to introduce a notion of the quotient of two Young diagrams let thequotient of two Young diagrams Y1Y2 be a direct sum of those diagrams whoseso(dminus 1 1)-tensor product by Y2 contains Y1 For the first sight given q ge 0 anyelement Q of YMY(1 q) might be chosen as Y0 If q is greater than the heightof YM the component with the symmetry YM in the tensor product QotimesY(1 q)has to be certain trace inevitably

37

Although there is no apparent problems in considering unfolded systems withdynamical field hidden in certain trace component of the physical vielbein egMaxwell gauge potential Amicro might be identified with the trace eamicroνh

microa of two-form

eamicroν However this exotic incorporating of the physical field does not take place inthe already known systems Moreover it can be proved that such exotic systemsdo not exist if irreducible Nevertheless they might be a part of some reduciblesystem which describes more than one field Therefore we require the degree q ofthe physical vielbein to be not greater than the height of YM

Inasmuch as (i) the equations imposed on φY(x) possess reducible gauge trans-formations with the number of levels equal to the height p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi of Y (ii) for

a degree-q gauge field of an unfolded system there exist q levels of gauge transfor-mations the degree q of physical vielbein eY0

q must be equal to pThe quotient YY(1 p) contains only one element (provided φY(x) is for-

bidden to be a trace component) it is the diagram (12) with the symmetry ofY0 = Y(s1 minus 1 p1) (sN minus 1 pN) ie it is equal to Y without the first col-umn Therefore physical vielbein eY0

p is completely defined So does gauge param-

eters ξY0pminusk at the k-th level of reducibility k isin [1 p] The requirement for tensor

product Y0 otimes Y(1 pminus k) to contain all gauge parameters ξik given by (219)at the k-th level of reducibility is also satisfied Consequently the whole patternof fieldsgauge parameters of the metric-like formulation is reproduced Note thatY0 equiv Y0 and q0 = p in the terms of Section 1

Let us note that if one writes down the physical vielbein explicitly as ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

where si are the lengths of the rows ofY and converts the form indices to the tangentones by virtue of inverse background vielbein hmicroa

ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|[d1dp] = ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

hmicro1d1 hmicropdp (412)

dynamical field φY(x) should be identified with ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|a1ap which hasthe symmetry of Y with some traces included Consequently the generalizedLabastidarsquos double-tracelessness condition (220) [20] is obvious inasmuch as thecontraction of two metric tensor ηaiaiηaiai with the i-th group of indices vanishes

Generally in addition to φY(x) decompositionY0otimesY(1 p) of physical vielbeineY0p into Lorentz irreps contains redundant components which must not contributeto the physical degrees of freedom So does Y0 otimesY(1 pminus k) ie in addition toξik it contains a lot of components that can not be made genuine differential gaugeparameters There are only two possible ways to get rid of redundant fields in theunfolded formalism

A redundant components could be directly fixed to zero by algebraic (Stueckel-berg) symmetry

B redundant components might be auxiliary fields for other fields (at lower grade)and so on The process stops since the grade is assumed to be bounded frombelow

We require dynamical fields incorporated in the physical vielbein to be at the lowestgrade Actually (B) takes place for dual gauge descriptions but not for the minimal

38

Therefore the only possibility to make redundant components to be non-dynamicalis to introduce a Stueckelberg symmetry with certain parameters ξY1

q1minusk

δeY0p = dξY0

pminus1 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) (413)

δξY0pminus1 = dξY0

pminus2 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus2) (414)

(415)

where σ1minus is a certain operator built of background vielbein ha that contracts a

number of indices of Y1 with hahc to obtain Y0 Diagram20 Y1 and form degreeq1 can be easily found since Y1 otimes Y1 q1 minus i i gt 0 must contain all redundantcomponents of eY0

p and ξY0pminusk

In the unfolded formalism each gauge field possesses its own gauge parameter andvice-versa Therefore there is a gauge field ωY1

q1 which contributes to the equations

for eY0p as

deY0p = σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) (416)

The first equation determines the first Jacobi identity of the form σ1minus(dω

Y1q1

) equiv 0which can be solved as

dωY1q1

= σ2minus(ω

Y2q2

) (417)

for certain gauge field ωY2q2

and operator σ2minus that satisfies σ1

minusσ2minus equiv 0 The general

solution of Jacobi identities is given in Section 44 From now on let the super-scripts of σminus be omitted The second equation determines the second Jacobi identityσminus(dω

Y2q2

) equiv 0 which can be also solved and so on Consequently the knowledgeof the lowest grade gauge field eY0

p and of the Stueckelberg symmetries required toget rid of redundant components determines the first equation which by virtue ofJacobi identities determines the second and so on The total unfolded system hasthe structure

dωYg

qg= σminus

(

ωYg+1qg+1

)

g = 0 1

δωYg

qg= dξYg

qg+ σminus

(

ξYg+1

qg+1minus1

)

δξYgqg

=

(418)

where σminus is certain algebraic operator built of background vielbein ha and (σminus)2 = 0

The only facts remain to be proved are that there are no other dynamical fieldsand that the proper correspondence (duality) between the cohomology groups holdstrue To this end it is sufficient to analyze only the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps content ofH

qg ie only the symmetry type and the multiplicity of irreducible Lorentz tensors

that by virtue of (330) are the representatives of Hqg

It is proved in the next Section that there is a duality Hpminuskg=0 sim H

p+k+1g=1 between

the σminus cohomology groups which reveals the one-to-one correspondence betweenthe gauge dynamical fields and equations of motion the level-k gauge symmetries

20The specific character of Minkowski massless fields is in that all Stueckelberg parameters canbe incorporated into a single Y1-valued form this not being the case for (anti)-de Sitter masslessfields

39

and the level-k Bianchi identities The representatives of cohomology groups in thesector of fields and gauge symmetries directly correspond to those of metric-likeapproach and there is no other nontrivial cohomology in these sectors

Though the trace pattern of fieldsgauge parameters is also important and thecalculation of σminus cohomology groups provides a comprehensive answer to this ques-tion the very procedure being a bit technical Ignoring the trace pattern of thefields it can be easily proved that the required metric-like field is incorporated inphysical vielbein eY0

q0 all the redundant components of the physical vielbein can be

gauged away by a pure algebraic symmetry and the same holds for differential gaugeparameters ξY0

q0minusk at all levels of reducibility ie the required pattern of gauge pa-rameters is recovered whereas all the redundant components are either Stueckelbergor auxiliary This is the necessary condition only and the traces has to be takeninto account Also it is still to be proved that the correct equations of motionsare imposed Provided that there are no trace conditions on the fields the sys-tem is referred to as off-shell[65] An off-shell system may contain only constraintsthat express auxiliary fields via the derivatives of the dynamical field imposing norestrictions on the latter

The off-shell system Technically ignoring the traces is equivalent to thereplacement of all so(dminus1 1)-irreps by the sl(d)-irreps that are characterized by thesame Young diagrams ie instead of taking so(dminus1 1)-tensor products one needs toapply the sl(d)-tensor productrsquos rules which are much simpler The decompositionof the physical vielbein eY0

q0into sl(d)-irreps is given by diagrams Yαi of the form

αN+1

sN minus 1

pNαN

s2 minus 1

p2α2

s1 minus 1

p1

α1

(419)

where α1+ +αN+1 = q0 = p The decomposition of Stueckelberg gauge parameterξY1q1minus1 for eY0

q0has the components of the same form but with αN+1 ge 1 because

Y1 (13) has already the form of Y0 with one cell in the bottom-left Thereforeall components of eY0

q0except for those with αN+1 = 0 are of Stueckelberg type but

there is only one component of eY0q0

with αN+1 = 0 namely it has αi = pi i isin [1 N ]and hence has the symmetry of Y The decomposition of level-k differential gaugeparameter ξY0

q0minusk has the form (419) with α1 + + αN+1 = p minus k and again all

the components of ξY0q0minusk with αN+1 ge 1 can be gauged away by pure algebraic

symmetry with ξY1q1minuskminus1 Consequently there is a complete matching between (219)

40

and those in ξY0

q0minusk that are not pure gauge themselves It can be easily proved alsothat if ignoring the traces there are no other dynamical fieldsdifferential gaugeparameters at higher grade Consequently

Lemma H(σminus) with respect to sl(d) are given by

Hk(σminus)sl(d) =

Yαi g = 0 α1 + + αN = k αN+1 = 0 k le p

empty k gt p(420)

The triviality of the higher k gt p cohomology groups for sl(d) which shouldcontain equations of motion and Bianchi identities is expected since the system isoff-shell For the equations to have the second order in derivatives the only nontrivialcohomology group H

p+1 must be at the grade-one ie Hp+1g=1 6= empty As is seen from

the examples above the equations correspond to those representatives of Hp+1g=1 that

are certain traces Indeed the total rank |WYgqg | which is equal to the sum qg + |Yg|

of degree qg and rank of Yg is preserved by σminus Therefore |WYgqg | = |W

Y0q0| + g

and |RY1q1+1| = |ω

Y0q0| + 2 = |Y|+ 2 where eY0

q0isin Wg=0

p and RY1q1+1 isin W

g=1p+1 contain

metric-like field φYM(x) and the equations on φY(x) respectively Consequently

the representative of Hp+1g=1 that corresponds to the equations on the traceless part

of φY(x) has to be identified with certain trace of the first order and so on for thetraces of φY(x)

The calculation of σminus cohomology groups carried out in Section 45 implies

1 The only nontrivial cohomology groups are Hpminuskg=0 and H

p+k+1g=1 k = 1 p

Therefore the dynamical fields and independent gauge parameters belong tothe zero grade Wg=0

q subspaces the equations are of the second order and theBianchi identities for the k-th level gauge symmetries are of the (k + 2)-thorder

2 Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 ie there is a one-to-one correspondence between the

elements of Hpminuskg=0 that are traces of the r-th order and the elements of Hp+k+1

g=1

that are traces of the (r + k + 1)-th order Roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1

Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on Therefore there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the dynamical fields and the equations of motion the level-k gaugesymmetries and the k-th Bianchi identities

3 The so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that correspond to the elements of Hpminusk(σminus) and arethe traces of the zeroth order are given by the so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagramsthat have the form (419) with αN+1 = 0 and α1 + + αN = p minus k whichexactly reproduce the required pattern (219) Note that certain higher ordertraces are also the elements of cohomology groups These fields represent thersquoauxiliaryrsquo fields of the metric-like formulation which had to be introduced tomake the gauge symmetry off-shell To prove the theorem it is not necessary toknow the concrete trace pattern the duality between the cohomology groupsis sufficient The details of the trace pattern are in Section 45

41

In the fermionic case the traces are substituted for Γ-traces Important isthat acting on tensor indices only σminus does not break down the irreducibility ofspin-tensors The duality has the form H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 or simply H

pminuskg=0 sim

Hp+k+1g=0 which means that equations are of the first order and the duality between

fieldsequations gauge symmetriesBianchi identities takes place which completesthe proof

Note that Yg=s1 equiv Yn=0k=0 has the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensorfor a spin-Y massless field

sNpN

s2p2

s1

p1 + 1

(421)

Analogously to the examples of Section 33 massless mixed-symmetry fields can bedescribed by the same unfolded system (16) that is restricted to Wg

q with g ge g0ie the system contains infinitely many dual formulations As the generalized Weyltensor and its descendants are non-gauge fields the dual descriptions with g0 ge s1are non-gauge and the dual descriptions with 0 lt g0 lt s1 are gauge

43 Physical Degrees of Freedom Counting

Notwithstanding the simplicity of the unfolded form and the uniqueness of unfoldingthere still might be a question of whether the unfolded equations do describe thecorrect number of physical degrees of freedom

It is well-known that for systems with the first class constraints only with mass-less fields belonging to this class the counting of degrees of freedom is that one firstlevel gauge parameter kills two degrees of freedom one second level gauge parame-ters kills three degrees of freedom and so on For example a spin-two massless fieldpossesses d(dminus3)

2degrees of freedom which is just d(d+1)

2minus 2d d(d+1)

2and d being the

number of components of φmicroν and ξmicroThe complete information concerning the rsquonumberrsquo of fieldsgauge parameters

ie the multiplicity and the symmetry of corresponding tensors is contained inH

kg=0(σminus) for k = 0p Not only can a number of physical degrees of freedom be

calculated but the whole exact sequence that defines an iso(d minus 1 1) irrep can bederived The elements of this sequence are certain so(dminus 1) tensors that define anso(dminus 2) tensor as a quotient of so(d minus 1) tensors eg (218) The decompositionof so(dminus 1 1)-fields into irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) can be done with the aid ofpartmicro or after Fourier transform with the aid of momentum pmicro

For example for a spin-two field the cohomology groups that correspond to thedynamical fieldsdifferential gauge parameters and its decomposition into so(dminus 1)irreps have the form

42

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus bull sim φmicroν φ

νν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2bull

Quick sort of Young diagrams in 0 minusrarr 2H0 minusrarr H1 minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 gives the

correct exact sequence 0 minusrarr minusrarr minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 which defines a masslessspin-two irrep H (0 )

For the simplest mixed-symmetry field the hook- there are two levels of gaugetransformation hence relevant cohomology groups are H

0 H1 and H2

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus oplus bull sim ξAmicroν oplus ξ

Smicroν ξ

Sνν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2 oplus 2bull

H2 oplus sim φmicroνλ φ

νmicroν 6= 0 oplus oplus oplus 2 oplus bull

Again quick sort of diagrams in 0 minusrarr 3H0 minusrarr 2H1 minusrarr H2 minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0

gives exact sequence (218)Consequently the problem of calculation the number of physical degrees of free-

dom to be precise of deriving the exact sequence is effectively reduced to the simplecombinatoric problem of (i) decomposition so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagram representa-tives of H(σminus) to so(dminus 1)-diagrams (ii) cancellation of like terms in sequence

0 minusrarr (p+ 1)H0 minusrarr pH1 minusrarr minusrarr 2Hpminus1 minusrarr Hp minusrarr H (0Y) minusrarr 0 (422)

Skipping combinatoric technicalities we state that in the general case of a spin-Ymassless mixed-symmetry field (422) reduces to the correct exact sequence thatdefines a uirrep H (0Y) of iso(dminus 1 1)

44 Solving the Generalized Jacobi Identities

Unfolding some dynamical system there arises a problem of solving Jacobi identities(33) that have schematically a form hhdω1

q equiv 0 where a number of backgroundvielbeins ha is contracted with the fiber indices of ω1

q The Jacobi identity restrictsdω1

q to have a certain specific form dω1q = hhω2

r where the so(dminus1 1)-irrep inwhich ω2

r takes values the degree r and the projector built of hh are completelydetermined The solutions are given by21

Lemma A Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values inY = Y(s p) (k 1)

so(dminus 1 1)-irrep The general solution of

hcdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq = 0 (423)

21As was pointed out in Section 33 nonzero traces either violate Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms and therefore are ignored

43

has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq k lt s

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1 k = s q ge p + 1

0 k = s q lt p+ 1

(424)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 take values inY(s p) (k + 1 1)

and Y(s+ 1 p+ 1) so(dminus 1 1)-irreps respectively22

Proof The parametrization of dωq by a degree-(q + 1) form taking values in the

same so(dminus 1 1)-irrep dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = R

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q+1 obviously fails to satisfy

(423) Inasmuch as (423) contains a vielbein the solution has to contain a number

of vielbeins too The most general parametrization of dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q with only

one vielbein included has the form dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = hdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)|dq for some

q-form taking values in a tensor product of Y by a vector representation ie thereis no definite symmetry between index d and the rest of the indices

hchdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)c|dq = 0larrrarr ωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)[c|d]

q = 0 (425)

Only those irreps in Yotimes are allowed that have c and d symmetric ie correspondto Y(s p) (k + 1 1) for k lt s This is not possible in the case k = s ie Y =Y(s p+ 1) and the only possibility to have c and d symmetric is to add the whole

column toY which requires dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q to be represented as dω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hchcωa1(sminus1)cap(sminus1)cap+1(sminus1)cqminuspminus1 and therefore q must be large enough Roughly

speaking the proof is based on the fact that the anti-symmetrization of two indicesat the same row of a Young diagram is identically zero the anti-symmetrizationbeing due to contraction with vielbeins

Note that choosing nonmaximal solutions of Jacobi identities results in loweringthe gauge symmetry so that not all redundant components are excluded

Unfolding totally-symmetric massless higher-spin fields the possible rhs termsin dω

a(sminus1)b(t)1 = are restricted by Jacobi identities and an essential use is made

of

Corollary The solution of Jacobi identity

hcdωa(sminus1)b(tminus1)c1 equiv 0 (426)

is of the form

dωa(sminus1)b(t)1 =

hcωa(sminus1)b(t)c1 t lt sminus 1

hchdCa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 t = sminus 1

(427)

22The symmetric basis is used being more convenient in this case as the contracted with vielbeinstensors are already irreducible

44

The following statement is a generalization of the Lemma-A to the case where(s p) (k 1) is a rsquosubdiagramrsquo of a larger Young diagram Y that has a numberof rows precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) Appropriate Young symmetrizershave to be included as the mere contraction of a number of vielbeins breaks theirreducibility of the tensor For instance hcω

a(s1)b(s2minus1)c is already irreducible withthe symmetry of Ys1 s2 minus 1 but this is not the case for hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) which hasto be added one term hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) + 1s1minuss2+1

hcωa(s1)bb(s2minus1)c to get the symmetry

of Ys1 minus 1 s2

Lemma B Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values in Y =

Y( (s p) (k 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irrep where the dots stands for the blocks inY precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) The general solution of

Π[hcdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq

]= 0 (428)

where Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p)(k minus 1 1) has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

Π[

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq

]

k lt s

Π[

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1

]

k = s q ge p+ 1

0 k = s q lt p + 1

(429)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 takes values in

Y (s p) (k + 1 1) and Y (s+ 1 p+ 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irreps respec-tively and Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p) (k 1)

Proof The proof is similar to that of Lemma-A with the only comment that thesymmetrizers do not affect the argumentation that anti-symmetrization of two in-dices in the same row is identically zero

45 Dynamical Content via σminus Cohomology

Before discussing the calculation of σminus cohomology let us first recall necessary factsconcerning the evaluation of so(d minus 1 1)-tensor products Let P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) be anumber of integer partitions k1 + + kN = m of m where ki is constrained byki le ǫi and different rearrangements of ki satisfying the constraints are regarded asdistinct partitions The generating function for the partition P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) is

sum

m

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m)tm =

i=Nprod

i=1

(1minus tǫi+1)

1minus t(430)

These integer partitions gives the multiplicities of irreps in so(dminus 1 1)-tensor prod-ucts (Clebsh-Gordon coefficients) we are interested in [71]

45

The so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary irrep Ylowast = Y(si pi) by aone-column diagram of the height qlowast can be explicitly calculated as

sNpN

s2

p2

s1

p1

otimes

q =sum

αjβi

Nαjβi

αN+1

βN

αN

ǫNpN sN

β2

α2

ǫ2p2 s2

β1

α1

ǫ1p1 s1

(431)

where αi βi αi + βi le pi i isin [1 N ] αN+1 ge 0 and there exist ρ ge 0 such that

qlowast =i=Nsum

i=1

(αi + βi) + αN+1 + 2ρ (432)

The multiplicity Nαjβi of Ylowastαj βi

is given by integer partition

Nαjβi = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ǫi = pi minus αi minus βi (433)

and the total trace order r is

r =i=Nsum

i=1

βi + ρ (434)

Roughly speaking to obtain an element of the tensor product one should first cutoff from bottom-right of the i-th block a column of height βiminusγi pi ge βiminusγi ge 0 (totake different traces) and second add an arbitrary number αi+γi pi ge αi+γi ge 0 ofcells to each block provided the γi cells annihilate ie they are added to the placesfrom which γi cells were removed at the first stage Multiplicity may be differentfrom one due to different rearrangements of γi ie when multiplied by the rest ofq-column different traces can give rise to the same diagram The number of suchrearrangements is given by P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ρ =

sumi=N

i=1 γi For instance sl(n)-tensor

product otimes is given simply by

otimessl(n) = oplus oplus oplus (435)

46

The so(d)-tensor product can be represented as a sum of the form

otimesso(n) = otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

otimessl(n)

oplus

otimessl(n)

︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

oplus

otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

2nd order

=

oplus oplus oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

oplus

oplus 2 oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

︸︷︷︸

2ndorder

(436)

where the sum is over trace order and the boxes that are connected by the arc areto be contracted and then the sl(n)-product rules are to be applied to the rest ofthe diagrams

Evaluating the so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary spinor-irrep Ylowast =Y(si pi) 1

2by a one-column diagram of the height qlowast one can contract any number

of Γ matrices with the indices of the column and then multiply therefore the tensorproduct rule for spin-tensors can be reduced to bosonic rule (431) as

Y(si pi) 12otimesso(n) Y(1 q) =

qsum

k=0

(Y(si pi) otimesso(n) Y(1 q minus k)

)

12

(437)

for example

12otimesso(n) = 1

2oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order Γ-traces

oplus

12oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order Γ-traces

oplus

oplus

2 12

︸︷︷︸

2nd order Γ-traces

oplus

bull 12

︸︷︷︸

3d order Γ-traces

(438)

The multiplicity N12

αjβiof Ylowast

αj βi12

is given by

N12

αjβi=

i=ρsum

i=0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus i) (439)

Let us now analyze the origin of σminus cohomology Its action σminus Wgq rarr W

gminus1q+1

preserves g+ q and hence the whole complex C(W σminus) is a direct sum of complexesC(qprime σminus) where q

prime refers to the end element Wg=0qprime of the complex

C(qprime σminus) 0 minusrarr minusrarr Wg=1qprimeminus1 minusrarrW

g=0qprime minusrarr 0 (440)

47

Moreover σminus preserves the total rank (the form degree + rank of the so(d minus 1 1)-

irrep in which the field takes values) LetWa(s1)a(sm)q be an element ofWg

qprime When

all form indices of Wa(s1)a(sm)q are converted to the fiber ones according to (329)

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (441)

the action of σminus is just an anti-symmetrization of all d1 dq with those indices aithat are extra as compared to Ygminus1 plus some terms to restore the correct Youngsymmetry of Ygminus1 Let the decomposition ofW a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] into so(dminus1 1)-irreps be of the form

Ya1(s1) am(sm)otimes

Y(1 q) =oplus

r=0

oplus

ir

N rirYr

ir (442)

where the summation is over the trace order r and then over ir which enumeratesall so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that enters in the tensor product as the traces of the r-thorder N r

irbeing the multiplicity of Yr

ir The multiplicity of the zeroth order traces

is always equal to one N0i0= 1 In fact the diagrams Y 0

i0can be directly obtained

by the sl(n)-tensor product ruleThe very anti-symmetrization is insensitive to whether a certain component en-

ters as a trace or not When decomposed into so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the elements ofWg

qprime and Wgminus1qprime+1 have a number of components of the same symmetry type The

action of σminus is just a linear transformation that either sends the whole so(dminus 1 1)-irrep to zero23 or sends it to the components of Wgminus1

qprime+1 of the same symmetry typeImportant is that σminus does not act between different so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Thereforecomplex C(qprime σminus) is a direct sum of complexes parameterized by so(dminus 1 1)-irrepsYprime that are given by various tensor products

Ynk

otimes

Y(1 q) (443)

provided that the field WYnkq is an element of Wgprimeminusi

qprime+i for certain i When reducedto such a complex

C(Yprime qprime σminus) 0rarr rarr Vg rarr Vgminus1 rarr rarr 0 (444)

the action of σminus is a linear transformation between the spaces Vg rarr Vgminus1 dimen-

sions of which are equal to the multiplicity of Yprime in the decomposition of WYgqg and

WYgminus1qg+1 The action of σminus is maximally non-degenerate compatible with nilpotency

Therefore to find cohomology groups the dimension of each linear space in everycomplex has to be calculated

Let us note that only the types and multiplicities of so(dminus1 1)-irreps are foundbelow ie no attention is paid to the description of how the corresponding tensorsare contained in the fields WY

qprime This is sufficient for our purposes though it isobvious (412) how the metric-like field φYM

is incorporated in an element ofWg=0p

23provided that the appropriate basis on the space of so(dminus1 1)-irreps with the same symmetrytype is chosen

48

The calculation of σminus cohomology is divided into three cases that cover the wholevariety of so(dminus 1 1)-irreps that can result from the tensor products (443)

In the Lemmas below it is assumed that complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is parameterizedby so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Yprime = Ylowast

αj βiof the form (431) with Ylowast = Ynk q

lowast = q such

that WYnkq isin C(qprime σminus) and ρ is defined according to (432)

In the first case Yprime is an element of Y0 otimesY(1 q)

Lemma 1 The σminus cohomology groups Hqg=0 and H

qg=1 are nontrivial and are given

by

Hqg =

Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βiMαj βi

αN+1 = 0sumi=N

i=0 αi = qq isin [0 p] g = 0

H2pminusqminus1 q isin [p+ 1 2p+ 1] g = 1

empty q gt 2p+ 1 any g

(445)where Mαj βi is the multiplicity of the irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

defined below

Proof From the very form of Yn=N0 equiv Yg=0 equiv Y(si minus 1 pi) it follows that theso(dminus1 1)-irreps that the element ofWg=0

q sim Y0otimesY(1 q) decomposes into may

be contained in Wg=1qminus1 only ie Wg=0

q and Wg=kqminusk contain no so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of

the same symmetry type for k gt 1 Therefore the length of complex C(Yprime q σminus)where Yprime isin Y0otimesY(1 q) is equal to one ie C(Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

q σminus) 0 minusrarrV1 minusrarr V0 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions of V0 and V1 are given by the multiplicitiesof the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

in Wg=1qminus1 and Wg=0

q respectively

dim(V1) =

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus 1) ρ ge 1

0 ρ = 0αN+1 = 0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) αN+1 gt 0

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) (446)

If αN+1 gt 0 the dimensions of V0 and V1 are equal and each irreducible componentof Wg=0

q with αN+1 gt 0 can be gauge away by virtue of the corresponding element

of Wg=1qminus1 thus being exact H

kgt2p+1 = empty inasmuch as ρ le p and the componentsof the forms with rank greater than (2p + 1) must have αN+1 gt 0 thus beingexact If αN+1 = 0 the dimensions are different dim(V1) lt dim(V0) for q le pdim(V1) = dim(V0) for q = p + 1 and dim(V1) gt dim(V0) for q gt p Thereforethe number of those Ysi piαj βi

isin Wg=0q q le p that are not exact is equal to

Mαj βi = |dim(V1) minus dim(V0)| the same is the number of those Ysi piαj βiisin

Wg=1qminus1 q gt p+ 1 that are not exact The obvious property of integer partitions

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ǫ1 + + ǫN minusm) (447)

results in the important duality in the cohomology groups Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 or

roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on

49

The second case is the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) where Yprime is an element of the tensor

product Ynk otimesY(1 q) for certain q ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmaxn minus 1

Lemma 2 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainqprime ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmax

n minus 1 the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The complex has the length two ie 0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr 0 wherethe dimensions are given by dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫN 1|ρ+ 1)dim(V2) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ+ 1) Simple calculations with generating functions resultsin dim(V0) lt dim(V1) dim(V2) lt dim(V1) and dim(V0) minus dim(V1) + dim(V2) = 0and consequently the sequence is exact

Analogously

Lemma 3 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainq ge 0 with k = 0 and n lt N the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The speciality of such Yprime is that the complex has the length three ie0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr V3 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions are given by

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 ǫn + 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V2) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 1) ρ ge ǫn + 1

0 otherwise

dim(V3) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn minus 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 2) ρ ge ǫn + 2

0 otherwise

Again simple calculations with generating functions results in appropriate inequali-ties and dim(V0)minusdim(V1)+dim(V2)minusdim(V3) = 0 and consequently the sequenceis exact

The above three cases covers the whole variety of the so(d minus 1 1)-tensors thatcan result from the tensor products YnkotimesY(1 q) for any n k and q The caseswith sN = 1 and Y = Y0 are special but the calculation of cohomology groupsleads to the same result

In the fermionic case the computations are similar due to the multiplicity givenby (439) The difference is that all nontrivial cohomology is concentrated in gradezero Indeed taking into account (446) where P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) is to be replaced by(439) it follows that dim(V0) ge dim(V1) for all q and H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 where r

is referred to the Γ-trace order or roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 andso on

5 Conclusions

The unfolded system constructed in the paper has a simple form of a covariantconstancy equation and describes arbitrary mixed-symmetry bosonic and fermionic

50

massless fields in d-dimensional Minkowski space The gauge fieldsparameters aredifferential forms with values in certain finite-dimensional irreducible representationsof the Lorentz algebra that are uniquely determined by the generalized spin

The key moment is that all gauge symmetries are manifest within the unfoldedformulation which is of most importance in controlling the number of physicaldegrees of freedom when trying to introduce interactions Unfolded systems areformulated in terms of differential forms which is a natural way to respect diffeo-morphisms and hence to describe systems that include gravity

Though the necessary conditions for the system to have a lagrangian descriptionare satisfied ie the fields are in one-to-one correspondence with the equations andthe k-th level gauge symmetries are in one-to-one correspondence with the k-thBianchi identities the very lagrangian remains to be constructed

Another interesting moment is that the unfolded equations for bosons are thesame as for fermions namely the operators involved ie exterior differential dand σminus remains unmodified when tensors are replaced with spin-tensors Thoughthis nice property partly breaks down in (anti)-de Sitter space within the unfoldedapproach bosons and fermions have much in common the fact being very useful forsupersymmetric theories

The proposed unfolded system includes all non-gauge dual descriptions whichare based on the generalized Weyl tensor and its descendants but not all of gaugedual descriptions It would be interesting to construct an unfolded system thatcontains all dual formulations

The interactions of the totally symmetric massless higher-spin fields are knownto require a nonzero cosmological constant ie are formulated in (anti)-de Sitterspace [2] Mixed-symmetry fields exhibit some interesting features in the presence ofcosmological constant For example not all of the Minkowski gauge symmetries canbe deformed to (anti)-de Sitter [72] As a result massless mixed-symmetry fields havemore degrees of freedom in (anti)-de Sitter compared to its Minkowski counterparts[73] and in the Minkowski limit a massless mixed-symmetry field splits in a certaincollection of massless fields generally Contrariwise a single mixed-symmetry fieldcan not be smoothly deformed to (anti)-de Sitter Another interesting effect is theexistence of the so-called partially-massless fields [74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 8283 84] the fields that have a number of degrees of freedom intermediate betweenthat of massless and massive and split in a set of massless fields in the Minkowskilimit Therefore the extension of the proposed approach to (anti)-de Sitter spaceseems to be non-trivial but nevertheless worth being investigated

In a series of papers [85 61 86 60] it was suggested so-called frame-like approachto the general mixed-symmetry fields in (anti)-de Sitter To generalize the proposedin the present paper unfolded system to (anti)-de Sitter case and to compare to thatof [60] is the next step to perform

We consider the proposed unfolded system as the first stage in constructing thefull interacting theory of mixed-symmetry fields

51

Acknowledgements

The author appreciates sincerely MA Vasiliev for reading the manuscript and mak-ing many detailed and valuable suggestions and illuminating comments the verywork was initiated as the result of discussions with MA Vasiliev The author isalso grateful to RR Metsaev and KB Alkalaev for useful discussions and to OVShaynkman for discussion of the fermionic case The work was supported in partby grants RFBR No 05-02-17654 LSS No 440120062 and INTAS No 05-7928by the Landau Scholarship and by the Scholarship of Dynasty foundation

Appendix A Multi-index convention

The multi-index notations is used a group of indices in which certain tensor issymmetric or is to be symmetrized is denoted either by one letter with the numberof indices indicated in round brackets or by placing a group of indices in roundbrackets eg

T a(s) equiv T a1a2as T a1aiaj as = T a1ajaias (A1)

V aT a(s) equiv V (a1T a2as+1) equiv1

s+ 1(V a1T a2a3as+1 + V a2T a1a3as+1 + + V as+1T a1a2as)

(A2)

V (bT a(s)) equiv V (bT a1as) equiv1

s + 1

(V bT a1a2as + V a1T ba2a3as + + V asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A3)Analogously the group of indices in which certain tensor is anti-symmetric or is tobe anti-symmetrized is denoted by placing indices in square brackets eg

T a[s] equiv T a1a2as T a1aiai+1as = minusT a1ai+1aias (A4)

V [bT a[s]] equiv V [bT a1as] equiv1

s+ 1

(V bT a1a2as minus V a1T ba2a3as + + (minus)sV asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A5)The operators of (anti)-symmetrization are weighted to be projectors (the factor 1

s+1

above)

Appendix B Young diagrams

Comprehensive information on Young diagrams can be found for example in thetextbook [71]

Definition B1 Given an integer partition ie a nonincreasing sequence si i isin[1 n] si ge si+1 of positive integers (or nonnegative when it is convenient to workwith a sequence of a fixed length) associated Young diagram Ys1 s2 sn is agraphical representation consisting of n left-justified rows made of boxes with the

52

i-th row containing si boxes

s10s11

s1s2s3s4

s5s6s7

s8s9

Finite-dimensional irreducible representation(irrep) of sl(d) ie various irre-ducible sl(d)-tensors are in one-to-one correspondence with Young diagrams of theform Ys1 s2 s[ d

2] The associated irreducible tensors

T

s1︷︸︸︷aa

s2︷︸︸︷

bb (B1)

or in condensed notation T a(s1)b(s2) have at most [d2] groups of indices being sym-

metric in each group separately and satisfy the condition that the symmetrizationof any group of indices with one index of any of the subsequent groups is identicallyzero ie

T a(s1)(b(sk)b)c(sjminus1) equiv 0 k lt j (B2)

If s[ d2] 6= 0 and d is even the (anti)-selfduality condition has to be imposed for

appropriate signature (anti)-selfduality is conventionally denoted by the sign factors+(minus) before s[ d

2] In this paper we do not consider (anti)-self dual representations

A scalar representation Y0 0 0 is denoted by bull a vector irrep Y1 0 0by rank-two symmetric tensor irrep by rank-two antisymmetric tensor irrep

by and so onFinite-dimensional irreducible representations of so(d) are of the two types ten-

sor and spin-tensor and are also characterized by Young diagrams which in thecase of spin-tensor irreps refer to the symmetry of the tensor part Young diagramsthat correspond to spin-tensor irreps are labeled by 1

2-subscript Spinor indices

α β γ = 12[d2] are placed first and are separated from tensor indices by rdquordquo For

example a spinor ψα irrep is denoted by bull 12 a vector-spinor irrep Aαaby 1

2and

so on To make tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry conditionthe tracelessness condition with respect to each pair of indices is to be imposed

ηccTa(s1)cb(siminus1)cd(sjminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n j = 1n (B3)

To make spin-tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry condition Γ-tracelessness condition with respect to each tensor index and a spinor index is to beimposed

Γαc βT

βa(s1)cb(siminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n (B4)

where Γαc β satisfy Γα

a βΓβb γ

+ Γαb βΓ

βaγ = 2ηab Additional conditions on spinors viz

Majorana Weyl and Majorana-Weyl are irrelevant to the problems concerned Also

53

in both cases it is required for the sum of the heights of the first two columns ofYoung diagrams to be not greater than d Note that the Γ-tracelessness conditionis stronger than the tracelessness one and applying the Γ-tracelessness twice to twosymmetric indices gives the tracelessness

0 = 2ΓαaβΓ

βb γT γ(ab) = ηabT

αab (B5)

To handle with arbitrary large Young diagrams the so-called block representationis used ie the rows of equal lengths are combined to blocks

Y(s1 p1) (sn pn) equiv Y

p1︷ ︸︸ ︷s1 s1

p2︷ ︸︸ ︷s2 s2

pn︷ ︸︸ ︷sn sn (B6)

References

[1] C Fronsdal ldquoMassless fields with integer spinrdquo Phys Rev D18 (1978) 3624

[2] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoCubic interaction in extended theories ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Nucl Phys B291 (1987) 141

[3] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoOn the gravitational interaction ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Phys Lett B189 (1987) 89ndash95

[4] M A Vasiliev ldquoConsistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in(3+1)-dimensionsrdquo Phys Lett B243 (1990) 378ndash382

[5] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoOn the geometry of higher-spin gauge fieldsrdquoClass Quant Grav 20 (2003) S473ndashS486 hep-th0212185

[6] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoFree geometric equations for higher spinsrdquoPhys Lett B543 (2002) 303ndash310 hep-th0207002

[7] M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear equations for symmetric massless higher spin fieldsin (a)ds(d)rdquo Phys Lett B567 (2003) 139ndash151 hep-th0304049

[8] X Bekaert I L Buchbinder A Pashnev and M Tsulaia ldquoOn higher spintheory Strings brst dimensional reductionsrdquo Class Quant Grav 21 (2004)S1457ndash1464 hep-th0312252

[9] D Sorokin ldquoIntroduction to the classical theory of higher spinsrdquo AIP ConfProc 767 (2005) 172ndash202 hep-th0405069

[10] X Bekaert S Cnockaert C Iazeolla and M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear higherspin theories in various dimensionsrdquo hep-th0503128

[11] A Sagnotti E Sezgin and P Sundell ldquoOn higher spins with a strong sp(2r)conditionrdquo hep-th0501156

[12] P K Townsend ldquoCovariant quantization of antisymmetric tensor gaugefieldsrdquo Phys Lett B88 (1979) 97

54

be thought of as the part of the definition of field φYM(x) The first equation puts

the system on-mass-shell the second one projects out all so(dminus1)-irreps which thetensor φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)microp(sp) decomposes into except for the one with the symmetry ofYs1 sn so(dminus 1)-diagram

Let D (m2Ys1 sn) be an iso(d minus 1 1) module extracted by (28) beingirreducible for m2 6= 0 or for Y0 (scalar field) Since minimally described masslessfields are gauge theories a uirrep H (0Ys1 sn) of iso(d minus 1 1) correspondingto a massless spin-Ys1 sn field should be defined as appropriate quotient bythe pure gauge solutions of the form

0 minusrarr gauge solutions minusrarr all solutions minusrarr H (0Ys1 sn) minusrarr 0 (29)

where the sequence is non-split as there is no so(dminus 1 1)-covariant way to extractso(d minus 2)-irrep Ys1 sn from the Lorentz tensor with the same symmetry ofYs1 sn by virtue of a single so(dminus 1 1)-vector the momentum pmicro sim partmicro

A massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described as the quotient of(26) with m2 = 0 by pure gauge solutions of the form δφmicro1micros

= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) where

ξmicro1microsminus1 is a totally symmetric gauge parameter subjected to the equations of thesame form (26) ie on-mass-shell tracelessness and transversality thus belongingto D (0Ysminus 1) The definition of H (0Ys) is given by

0 minusrarr D (0Y(sminus 1 1)) minusrarr D (0Y(s 1)) minusrarr H (0Y(s 1)) minusrarr 0 (210)

There is a bit difference for a totally anti-symmetric spin-p massless field Puregauge solutions are defined analogously as δωmicro1microp

= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] where ξ[micro1micropminus1] is

a rank-(pminus1) antisymmetric gauge parameter subjected to the equation of the sameform (27) and thus belonging to D (0Y(1 pminus 1)) In contrast to a totally sym-metric spin-smassless field the gauge transformations are reducible in the sense thatδωmicro1microp

equiv 0 provided that one transforms gauge parameter δξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1]

with a second level rank-(p minus 2) antisymmetric gauge parameter ξ[micro1micropminus2] and soon Some components (parallel to the momentum) of the first level gauge parameterξmicro1micropminus1 do not contribute to the gauge law for ωmicro1microp

these are represented by thesecond level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 modulo those components of ξmicro1micropminus2 thatdo not contribute to ξmicro1micropminus1 and so on till δξmicro = partmicroξ Gauge parameters ξmicro1micropminus1ξmicro1micropminusk

k isin [1 p] and ξ are referred to as the first level the k-th level and thedeepest level of reducibility respectively The corresponding iso(d minus 1 1)-uirrep isgiven by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0Y(0 0)) minusrarr D (0Y(1 1)) minusrarr

minusrarr D (0Y(1 p)) minusrarr H (0Y(1 p)) minusrarr 0 (211)

For example Maxwell gauge potential Amicro possesses gauge parameters of the firstlevel only as p = 1 in this case

Though a considerable success in describing on-mass-shell massless fields wasachieved for instance within the light-cone approach [52] there are many reasons tohave an off-shell gauge symmetry ie to construct equations that are invariant with

9

respect to gauge transformations with gauge parameters not subjected to ξ = 0To make the symmetry off-shell generally requires to relax the irreducibility of theso(dminus 1 1)-representation in which field φY(x) takes values

For instance a massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described[53] by atraceless rank-s symmetric field φmicro1micros

with an off-shell gauge symmetry

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

(d+2sminus4)η(micro1micro2part

νpartρφνρmicro3micros) = 0 φννmicro3micros

= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1

= 0 partνξνmicro2microsminus1) = 0 (212)

where in order for φmicro1microsto be traceless the gauge parameter has to be not only

traceless but transverse also this still being true for general mixed-symmetry fieldsApparently to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters the trace-lessness constraint for field φmicro1micros

has to be relaxed The same spin-s massless fieldcan be described[1] by field φmicro1micros

subjected to5

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

2part(micro1partmicro2φ

ννmicro3micros) = 0 φνρ

νρmicro5micros= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1

ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1= 0

(213)

where in order to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters a trace-lessness is relaxed to a double-tracelessness ie field φmicro1micros

takes values in thedirect sum of two so(d minus 1 1)-irreps being symmetric traceless tensors of ranks sand (s minus 2) The general statement is that for equations of motion to have an off-shell gauge symmetry the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep in which field φY(x) takes values has tobe reducible with additional direct summands representing certain nonzero tracesThese additional fields are called auxiliary and carry no physical degrees of freedomImposing certain gauge equations (28) can be restored

A massless totally antisymmetric spin-p field can be described by an antisym-metric rank-p tensor field ω[micro1microp] subjected to

ωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1part

νωνmicro2microp] = 0 δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] (214)

where the symmetry at the all levels of reducibility is manifest and off-shell ieδξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1] for the second level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 not subjectedto any differential constraints and analogously for the gauge symmetries at deeperlevels

Much similar to totally anti-symmetric fields mixed-symmetry massless fieldspossess reducible gauge transformations ie for a field φ with equations of motioninvariant under gauge transformations δξ1φ =

sum

i1partξi11 there exist the second level

gauge transformations δξ2ξi11 =

sum

i2partξi22 such that δξ2φ equiv 0 there exist the third

level gauge transformations δξ3ξi22 =

sum

i3partξi33 such that δξ3ξ1 equiv 0 and so on The

difference from totally anti-symmetric fields is in that there are generally more thanone gauge parameters at each level of reducibility (enumerated by index ik at thek-th level)

5Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [1] have the form Gmicro1microsminus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 where Gmicro1microsis equal to (213) the two forms being equiva-

lent

10

For instance the simplest mixed-symmetry massless field has the spin- andcan be minimally described[16 17] by a field φ[micromicro]ν which is anti-symmetric in thefirst two indices and satisfies Young symmetry condition6 φ[micromicroν] = 0 The equationsof motion

φmicromicroλ + 2part[micropartλφmicro]λν minus partνpart

λφmicromicroλ minus 2partνpart[microφλ

micro]λ = 0 (215)

are invariant underδφmicromicroν = part[microξ

Smicro]ν + part[microξ

Amicro]ν minus partνξ

Amicromicro (216)

with symmetric and anti-symmetric gauge parameters ξS(microν) and ξA[microν] Let us stress

that to maintain an off-shell gauge symmetry field φ[micromicro]ν has to take values in a

reducible so(d minus 1 1) representation oplus so does symmetric gauge parameterξS(micromicro) oplus bull which is in accordance with φ ν

microν 6= 0 and ξSνν 6= 0 Analogously tototally anti-symmetric fields there exist second level gauge transformations with avector parameter ξmicro

δφmicromicroν = 0

δξAmicroν = 23(partmicroξν minus partνξmicro)

δξSmicroν = partmicroξν + partνξmicro

(217)

In this case H

(

0)

is given by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

oplusD (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0 (218)

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) field the depthof reducibility of gauge transformations is equal to p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi where p is the height

of the first column of the Young diagram and at the r-th level of reducibility gaugeparameters have the symmetry of

sN minus 1

pNkN

s2 minus 1

p2k2

s1 minus 1

p1

k1

i=Nsum

i=1

ki =

i=Nsum

i=1

pi minus r (219)

This pattern of reducibility of gauge transformations will be of great importancewhile constructing the unfolded formulation in Section 4 As is easily seen at the

6In more detail the field φmicroνλ satisfies φmicroνλ = minusφνmicroλ φmicroνλ+φνλmicro+φλmicroν = 0 Equivalentlya symmetric basis can be used ie φSmicroνλ = φSνmicroλ φ

Smicroνλ + φSνλmicro + φSλmicroν = 0 The two bases are

related by φS(microν)λ = 1radic3(φAmicroλν + φAνλmicro) φ

A[microν]λ = 1radic

3(φSmicroλν minus φ

Sνλmicro)

11

first level of reducibility the gauge parameters are various tensors whose LorentzYoung diagrams are obtained by cutting off one cell from the original so(d minus 2)-diagram in all possible ways ie the number of gauge parameters at the first levelis equal to the number of blocks N eg two for spin- There is only one gaugeparameter at the deepest level of reducibility whose Young diagram is obtained bycutting off the first column from Y eg for spin-

This pattern corresponds of course to on-shell equations ie the gauge param-eters taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of Young symmetry (219) are subjectedto (28)-like equations To obtain an off-shell gauge symmetry the field content hasto be extended to take values in certain reducible so(d minus 1 1)-representations ad-ditional components turn out can be identified with certain traces of a single fieldwith the symmetry of Y as an sl(d)-tensor In general gauge parameters are alsoreducible tensors with the symmetry of (219) In the case of a spin- massless fieldthe trace φ ν

microν in the sector of fields and the trace ξSνν in the sector of gauge param-eters are the additional components In the general case of a spin-Y = Ys1 snmassless field field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) should satisfy [20]

ηmicroimicroiηmicroimicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n] (220)

which is a generalization of the Fronsdalrsquos double-trace condition (213) As it will beshown this condition naturally arises in the unfolded approach Note that double-tracelessness is imposed on each group of symmetric indices and it is not requiredfor cross-traces to vanish

Let a generalized Weyl tensor for a minimally described spin-Y massless field bea gauge-invariant combination of the least order in derivatives of field φY(x) that isallowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell On the other hand it is the generalized Weyltensor that the minimal non-gauge description of a massless spin-Y field is basedon For a spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN)so(dminus2) massless field the generalizedWeyl tensor has the symmetry of Y(s1 p1 + 1) (s2 p2) (sN pN)so(dminus11) and isof the s1-th order in derivatives In the case of spin-one (Y = so(dminus2)) Maxwell field

strength Fmicroν with the symmetry of can be also called a generalized Weyl tensorFermionic mixed-symmetry fields share most features of bosonic ones viz the

reducibility of gauge transformations the enlargement of the field content for theequations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge invariance The difference is thatthe equations for fermions have the first order in derivatives and the irreducibility ofspin-tensors is achieved by the Γ-tracelessness condition7 instead of the tracelessnessone

For example a massless totally symmetric spin-(s + 12) field can be described

7Γmicro are the Clifford algebra generators and satisfy ΓmicroΓν + ΓνΓmicro = 2ηmicroν part equiv Γmicropartmicro Γ-trace isa contraction of a spinor index and one tensor index with Γmicro eg Γνφ

microν equiv Γαν βφ

βmicroν

12

off-shell[54] by a totally symmetric spin-tensor field φα(micro1micros) subjected to8

partφmicro1microsminus spart(micro1

Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros)

ΓνΓρΓλφνρλmicro4micros= 0 Γνξνmicro2microsminus1 = 0

(221)

where in order to get an off-shell gauge invariance the irreducibility of φα(micro1micros) hasto be relaxed to the triple Γ-tracelessness

A massless totally anti-symmetric spin-Y(1 p) 12field can be described off-shell

by a totally anti-symmetric spin-tensor field ωα[micro1microp] subjected to

partωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1Γ

νωνmicro2microp] = 0

δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp]

(222)

Similar to the bosonic case (222) possesses reducible gauge transformations Thedifference is that one can impose the triple Γ-tracelessness on ωα[micro1microp] but thisrestricts the first level gauge parameter to be Γ-traceless Γνξνmicro2micropminus1 = 0 andhence the second order gauge parameter has to be on-mass-shell ie partξmicro1micropminus2 = 0Therefore for equations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge symmetry of allorders no Γ-trace conditions have to be imposed on fieldgauge parameters

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) 12field the

pattern of gauge symmetries is given by the spin-tensors with the tensor part de-scribed by (219) the definition of the Weyl tensor remains unchanged also

The descriptions based on tensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) which is analogous tothe metric gmicroν are referred to as metric-like At least in writing equiv partmicropartνη

microν theexplicit use of metric ηmicroν is made of which complicates the issue of introducinginteractions with gravitation

Let us note that in principle one can verify the gauge invariance of the fieldequations for massless mixed-symmetry fields despite the fact that the very form ofgauge transformation is cumbersome due to Young symmetrizers The advantageof the unfolded approach is in that gauge invariance at all levels of reducibility ismanifest

3 Unfolding Dynamics and σminus Cohomology

In this section we first recall the definition of unfolding and the relation of the sim-plest unfolded systems to Lie algebrasmodules and Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomologywith coefficients Second peculiar properties of unfolded systems that describe freefields and specifically the so-called σminus cohomology concept are recalled Third thevery procedure of constructing the unfolded form is illustrated on the examples ofmassless spin-zero spin-one arbitrary totally symmetric spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2)

fields the relation with the general statement of Section 1 is pointed out in each ofthe examples

8Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [54] have the form Gmicro1microsminus s

2Γ(micro1ΓνGνmicro2micros) minus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 Gmicro1micros= partφmicro1micros

minus spart(micro1Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0 which is equivalent to

(222)

13

31 General Features

Some dynamical system is said to be unfolded [31 32 33] if it has the form

dWA = FA(W ) (31)

whereWA is a set9 of differential forms of degree-qA on some d-dimensional manifoldMd d - exterior differential on Md and FA(W ) is an arbitrary degree-(qA + 1)function of WA assumed to be expandable in terms of exterior (wedge) productsonly10

FA(W ) =infinsum

n=1

sum

qB1++qBn=qA+1

fAB1Bn

W B1 and andW Bn (32)

where fAB1Bn

are constant coefficients satisfying fAB1BiBj Bn

= (minus)qBiqBj fA

B1BjBiBn

Moreover FA(W ) must satisfy the integrability condition (called generalized Jacobiidentity) obtained by applying d to (31)

F B δFA

δW Bequiv 0 (33)

Any solution of (33) defines a free differential algebra (FDA) [55 56 57 58] If Ja-cobi identities (33) are satisfied irrespective ofMd dimension11 the free differentialalgebra is referred to as universal [10 59] It is the universal algebras only that willbe considered further

Equations (31) are invariant under gauge transformations

δWAqA

= dǫAqAminus1 + ǫBqBminus1

δFA

δW B for qA gt 0 (34)

δWA0 = ǫB

prime

0

δFA

δW Bprime

1

Bprime qBprime = 1 for qA = 0 (35)

where ǫAqAminus1 is a degree-(qA minus 1) form taking values in the same space as WAqA

Inits turn δWA

qA= 0 can be treated as unfolded-like system for ǫAqAminus1 ie dǫ

AqAminus1 =

minusǫBqBminus1δFA

δWB there emerge second level gauge transformations

δǫAqAminus1 = dξAqAminus2 minus ξBqBminus2

δFA

δW B (36)

provided that FA(W ) is linear in matter fields and analogously for the gauge trans-formations at deeper levels Therefore the reducibility of gauge transformations ismanifest in the unfolded approach For a degree-qA gauge field WA

qAthere exist qA

levels of gauge transformations

9In this section indices A B C are of arbitrary nature In the cases of practical significance AB C vary over certain irreps of the Lorentz algebra

10The wedge symbol and will be systematically omitted further11As the forms with the rank greater than d are identically zero there exist certain identities

eg Wn andWn equiv 0 for n+m gt d which make the operator δδWA to be ill-behaved

14

The use of the exterior algebra respects diffeomorphisms which is very appropri-ate for introducing interactions with the gravitation The whole information aboutthe dynamics turns out to be contained in FA(W ) and one can even extend anunfolded system to other manifolds[59] simply by changing the exterior differentialthe new unfolded system has literally the same form

Note that introducing enough auxiliary fields it is possible to reformulate anydynamical system in the unfolded form although it may be difficult to unfold someparticular system or to find all unfolded forms

Collected below are some important cases of unfolded systems which have adirect bearing on Lie algebras [55 59]

Lie algebrasFlat connections Let ΩI equiv ΩImicrodx

micro be a subsector of degree-oneforms The only self-closed unfolded equations are of the form

dΩI = minusf IJKΩ

JΩK (37)

Generalized Jacobi identity (33) implies the Jacobi identity f IJKf

JLMΩKΩLΩM equiv

0 for some Lie algebra g with structure constants f IJK Therefore the closed

subsector of one-forms is in one-to-one correspondence with Lie algebras and(37) is the flatness condition for a connection ΩI of g This provides acoordinate-independent framework for describing background geometry Inthe cases of interest g is iso(d minus 1 1) so(d minus 1 2) so(d 1) and sp(2n) [59]Background geometry connection ΩI is assumed to be of order zero whereasall matter fields including dynamical gravitation are of the first order Allequations are assumed to be of the first order in matter fields and hencedescribe free fields only

In this paper g = iso(dminus 1 1) and ΩI = ab ha where ab equiv abmicro dxmicro

is a Lorentz spin-connection and ha equiv hamicrodxmicro is a background vielbein which

defines a non-holonomic basis of a tangent space at each point of the manifoldFlatness equation (37) for iso(dminus 1 1)-connection ΩI reads

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb = 0(38)

The first is the zero torsion equation that expresses the Lorentz spin-connectionvia the first derivative of hamicro The second can be recognized as the zero curva-ture equation For example in Cartesian coordinates the explicit solution isab

micro = 0 and hamicro = δamicro

The advantage of description of background geometry as the flatness conditionfor a connection of the space-time symmetry algebra is in that this way iscoordinate-independent In what follows we assume ab ha to satisfy (38)which is enough if there is no need for the explicit form of the solution in someparticular coordinate system For instance in (anti)-de Sitter space (38) ismodified by the terms proportional to the cosmological constant λ2

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb + λ2hahb = 0(39)

15

and admits no simple solutions with hamicro = δamicro ab = 0 Nevertheless without

giving the explicit solution to imply that ab ha satisfy (39) is sufficient forgeneral analysis eg for constructing Lagrangians [60]

Contractible FDA The simplest equations linear in matter fields of the form

dWAq = fA

BWBq+1 (310)

can be reduced by linear transformations to either

dWAq = WA

q+1 dWAq+1 = 0 (311)

ordWA

q = 0 (312)

where the second equation of (311) is the consequence of Jacobi identities(33) for the first one In the first case by virtue of gauge transformations(34) δWA

q = dξAqminus1 + χAq δW

Bq+1 = dχA

q the field WAq can be gauged away In

both cases by virtue of the Poincarersquos Lemma these equations are dynamicallyempty and correspond to the co-called contractible FDAs [55]

g-modulesCovariant constancy equations Let WAq be a closed subsector of

q-forms of matter gauge fields Linear in matter fields equations may involvethe background g-connection ΩI which is of zeroth order Such equationsreferred to as linearized over g background (described by any solution ΩI of(37)) have the form

dWAq = minusΩIfI

ABW

Bq (313)

Jacobi identity (33) where (37) is also taken into account

ΩJΩK(minusf I

JKfIAB + fJ

ACfK

CB

)W B

q = 0 (314)

implies fIAB to realize a representation of g Therefore the closed subsector

of forms of definite degree is in one-to-one correspondence with g-moduleswhereas

DΩWAq equiv dWA

q + ΩIfIABW

Bq = 0 (315)

is a covariant constancy equation and (DΩ)2 = 0 since the connection is

flat (37) In the cases of interest A runs over certain finite-dimensionalso(d minus 1 1)-irreps ie g-modules decompose with respect to its subalgebraso(dminus 1 1) sub g into a direct sum of certain irreducible tensors This is whywe single out the Lorentz-covariant derivative DL from the whole g-covariantderivative DΩ the remaining part acts vertically (algebraically) In the caseof ΩI being an iso(d minus 1 1) flat connection the Lorentz covariant derivativeDL = d+ satisfy DL

2 = 0 as the exterior differential d does

DLTab = dT ab +a

cTcb +b

cTac + (316)

In Cartesian coordinates DL equiv d and we do not make any distinction betweend and DL whereas in (anti)-de Sitter (DL)

2 6= 0 and the difference between d

16

and DL has to be taken into account Also zero torsion equation (381) canbe rewritten as DLh

a = 0 The remaining part of ΩI which acts algebraicallyand mixes different so(dminus 1 1)-modules into g-modules is associated with thegenerators of translations with gauge field ha

Gluing g-modulesChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology LetWpWq andWr takevalues in g-modules R1 R2 and R3 the representations are realized by oper-ators T1 T2 and T3 respectively Still linear in matter fields but nonlinear inbackground connection ΩI equations are of the form

DΩWp equiv dWp + T1(Ω)Wp = f12(Ω Ω)Wq

DΩWq equiv dWq + T2(Ω)Wq = f23(Ω Ω)Wr

DΩWr equiv

(317)

where the terms forming g-covariant derivative are isolated on the lhs Thetwo g-modules R1 R2 appear to be glued together by the term f12(Ω Ω) isinHom(Λpminusq+1(g) otimes R2R1) Jacobi identity (33) implies f12(Ω Ω) to be aChevalley-Eilenberg cocycle with coefficients in Rlowast

2 otimesR1 where Rlowast2 is a mod-

ule contragradient to R2 and f12(Ω Ω)f23(Ω Ω) = 0 Coboundaries canbe proved to be dynamically empty and can be removed by a field redefini-tion Consequently f12(Ω Ω) should be a nontrivial representative of theChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology group with coefficients in Rlowast

2otimesR1 It followsalso that nothing but zero forms can be joined to zero forms ie the onlypossible linearized unfolded equations on forms of zero degree are (315) withq = 0

For any dynamical system linearized over certain g-background (described byany solution ΩI of (37)) equations of motion (315) along with gauge transforma-tions of all orders of reducibility acquire a very simple form

δξ1 = DΩξ0

δξpminus1 = DΩξpminus2

δWp = DΩξpminus1

DΩWp = 0

(318)

where Wp takes values in certain g-module R DΩ is the associated g-covariantderivative and ξpminusk k isin [1 p] are the gauge parameters of k-th order of reducibilitytaking values in the same g-module R and being forms of degree (p minus k) Thegauge invariance at each order of reducibility and of equations of motion is dueto (DΩ)

2 = 0 In some sense the gauge fields Wp and the gauge parameters ξpminusk

seem to play the same role at the linearized level This uniformity is of essentialimportance when analyzing unfolded systems

In the presence of gluing terms eg when only two modules say R1 and R2 areglued by nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycle fpr(Ω Ω) full chain of equations

17

and gauge transformations (318) is modified to12

δξ11 = DΩξ10

δξ1pminusr = DΩξ1pminusrminus1

δξ1pminusr+1 = DΩξ1pminusr + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

20 δξ21 = DΩξ

20

(319)

δξ1pminus1 = DΩξ1pminus2 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus2 δξ2rminus1 = DΩξ

2rminus2

δW 1p = DΩξpminus1 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus1 δW 2

r = DΩξ2rminus1

DΩW1p = fpr(Ω Ω)W

2r DΩW

2r = 0

where W 1p ξ

1pminusk and W 2

r ξ2rminusm take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively

Important is that the gauge fieldsparameters taking values in R2 contribute to therhs of the equationsgauge transformations for the gauge fieldsparameters takingvalues in R1 but for forms of degree greater than (p minus r) The above two systemsare nothing but the specializations of (31) (34) (36)

Also let us note that there is no strong reason to make any distinction betweenthe terms linear in the background g-connection ΩI which correspond to g-modulesand the terms of higher order in ΩI which correspond to Chevalley-Eilenberg co-cycles Both terms can be combined into a single object the generalized covariant-derivative D = d+T (Ω)+f(Ω Ω) equiv DΩ+f(Ω Ω) with the property D2 = 0Moreover by means of D (319) and (318) can be rewritten in a similar mannerConsequently at the linearized level the most general unfolded equations and gaugetransformations have the form

δξ1 = Dξ0

δξpminus1 = Dξpminus2

δWp = Dξpminus1

DWp = 0

(320)

where D is built of d background connection ΩI and satisfies D2 = 0 The gaugefieldsparameters take values in certain spacesWq viz Wp isin Wp ξpminus1 isin Wpminus1ξ0 isin W0 The elements of Wq are differential forms with values in certain g-modules It is also convenient to define higher degree spaces Wqgtp the equationsRp+1 = DWp = 0 take values in Wp+1 Rp+2 = DRp+1 belongs to Wp+2 andby virtue of D2 = 0 satisfies Rp+2 equiv 0 and so on Therefore there exist certainidentities which belong to Wp+2 for the equations which belong to Wp+1 andthere exist certain identities which belong to Wp+3 for the identities in Wp+2 andso on At the field theoretical level these identities correspond to Bianchi identitiesfor the first level gauge transformations higher identities correspond to the Bianchiidentities for the deeper levels of gauge transformations

12The sign factor (minus)pminusr+1 before fpr(Ω Ω) is ignored and is thought of as the part of thedefinition of fpr(Ω Ω)

18

A remark should be made that the forms belonging to Wq may have differentdegrees if there are Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles present As a result spaces Wq

may contain different number of elements For instance (319) can be reduced to(320) if one defines

Wq =

W 1q q lt pminus r

W 1q W

2qminusp+r q ge (pminus r)

(321)

where W 1q and W 2

qminusp+r take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively In termsof (319) the elements of Wq for q lt (pminus r) were referred to as ξ1q the elements ofWq for q = (pminus r)(pminus 1) to as ξ1q ξ

2qminusp+r the elements ofWq for q = p to as W 1

pW 2

r the elements of Wq for q gt p to as R1q R

2qminusp+r (the equations of motion and

Bianchi identities)

32 Interpretation of Unfolded Systems Describing free Fields

When describing free fields unfolded formulations will be referred to as frame-like [61 60] though the very term frame-like has a more broad definition Thesesystems consist of equations (37) describing background geometry of a finite chainof (317)-like equations describing the gauge fields of the model and of (317)-likeequations with q = 0 glued to gauge forms ie it requires a Lie algebra g (commonlyiso(dminus1 1) so(dminus1 2) or so(d 1)) a set of g-modules R0RN and an appropriateset of nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles f01fNminus1N The physical degreesof freedom are contained in the forms of zero degree and the module RN in whichzero degree forms take values is infinite-dimensional

Since frame-like unfolded systems contain inevitably infinitely many fields mostof them being either auxiliary or Stueckelberg13 there arises a problem of reconstruc-tion a metric-like formulation by a given unfolded formulation or of extracting thedynamical content for a given unfolded system

The questions to be answered are what are the dynamical fields what arethe differential gauge parameters and what are the gauge invariant equations ofmotion These answers are not universal and depend on the chosen scheme ofinterpretation Different interpretations correspond to dual descriptions of the samedynamical system

Frame-like unfolded systems are endowed at the linearized level with additionalstructures providing a natural way for interpretation Indices AB vary overcertain finite dimensional Lorentz irreps ie each of Rn n = 0 N decomposes asRn =

sum

k Pnk where Pnk are certain so(d minus 1 1)-modules characterized by Ynk

Young diagrams of Section 1We say that some frame-like unfolded system is given an interpretation if [62]

1 On the whole space W =oplusinfin

q=0Wq where the matter gauge fields gauge pa-rameters equations of motion and Bianchi identities take values there exists

13A field is called Stueckelberg if it can be gauged away by pure algebraic symmetry

19

a bounded from below grading g = 0 1 ie Wq =oplusinfin

g=0Wgq The ho-

mogeneous element of Wgq is a certain differential form with values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep and is denoted as W gq In simplest cases the grade is just the

rank of the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep the element of Wgq takes values in

2 The closed subsector of one-forms ΩI describes a background geometry vizMinkowski or (anti)-de Sitter The generalized covariant derivative D is to bedivided into three parts the last one not being necessary nontrivial

D = DL minus σminus + σ+ (322)

where DL is a background Lorentz-covariant derivative and has a zero gradeσminus is an operator of grade (minus1) and σ+ contains positive grade operatorsThe only differential part is in DL whereas σplusmn acts vertically and is built ofthe background vielbein ha If two modules are glued the gluing element issupposed to be of grade (minus1) and also denoted as σminus

The equations then have the form

DLWn +

gminusnsum

i=1

σ+(W n+i

)= σminus

(W n+1

) g = 0 1 (323)

and analogously for the gauge transformations In the flat space all operators ofpositive grade appear to be trivial for the massless case As it does not affect theanalysis let us consider a simplified version with σ+ = 0 Then D2 = DL

2+σminusDL+DLσminus + (σminus)

2 = 0 is equivalent to DL2 = 0 (σminus)

2 = 0 and σminusDL +DLσminus = 0 Thefirst is a part of the flatness condition (38) for the iso(d minus 1 1)-connection Thesecond is the nilpotancy condition for σminus The third is satisfied provided that σminus istwisted by the factor (minus)∆g where (∆g + 1) is a degree of σminus which is equal to thenumber of the vielbeins ha that σminus is built of Indeed the vielbeins ha anticommutewith DL and hence the action of σminus is to be twisted by the factor (minus)∆g in orderσminusDL +DLσminus = 0 holds true Without further mention the pure sign factor (minus)∆g

will be though of as a part of the definition of σminusIt is useful to illustrate the action of σminus when for example unfolded equations

on fields with values in two modules R1 and R2 are glued as in (319)

R1︷ ︸︸ ︷

R2︷ ︸︸ ︷ g

q

t t t t

t t t

W 1p

ξ1pminus1

ξ10

W 2r

ξ2rminus1

ξ20

(324)

20

where short arrows stand for the action of σminus within each module and long arrowsfor the action of σminus between two modules (gluing terms) and dots stand for gaugefieldsparameters at different grades bold dots represent the elements of Wp =W 1

pW2r

All information about the dynamics turns out to be concealed in cohomologygroups of σminus [62] H(σminus) =

Ker(σminus)Im(σminus)

Let us analyze unfolded system (320) whichat grade g has the form

δξg1 = DLξg0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 )

δW gp = DLξ

gpminus1 + σminus(ξ

g+1pminus1)

0 = DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p )

(325)

Beginning from the deepest level of gauge transformations and from the lowestgrade it is obvious that those ξg+1

0 that are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueck-elberg(algebraic) gauge parameters for those ξg1 that belong to the image of σminusTherefore those ξg1 that are σminus-exact can be gauged away The leftover gauge sym-metry satisfies δξg1 = DLξ

g0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 ) = 0 so that those ξg+1

0 that belong to thecoimage of σminus are expressed via derivative of ξn0 Having sieved W0 and W1 inthis way only those ξg0 are still independent that are σminus-closed and hence belong toH

0(σminus) since only forms of zero-degree are elements of W0 Then those ξg+11 that

are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueckelberg gauge parameters for those ξg2 thatbelong to the image of σminus Therefore only those ξg1 are still independent that areσminus-closed but not σminus-exact and hence belong to H

1(σminus) Having sievedW0Wpminus1

one after another it turns out that independent differential gauge parameters at thek-th level are given by H

pminusk(σminus) Analogously those fields W gp that are σminus-exact

can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gauge parameters at Wpminus1 Thosefields W g+1

p that are not σminus-closed can be expressed via derivatives of fields at lowergrade by virtue of the equations Rg

p+1 equiv DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p ) = 0 these fields are

called auxiliary Therefore the dynamical fields ie those that are neither aux-iliary nor Stueckelberg are given by H

p(σminus) The nilpotency of D2 equiv 0 impliescertain relations of the form DLR

gp+1 + σminus(R

g+1p+1) = 0 between Rg

p+1 Therefore

auxiliary fields are expressed by virtue of σminus-exact Rgp+1 and σminus-non-closed Rg+1

p+1

are themselves expressed via derivatives of Rgp+1 Consequently the independent

equations on dynamical fields are given by Hp+1(σminus) From the cohomological point

of view higher degree forms correspond to certain nontrivial relations between equa-tions called Bianchi identities and manifest gauge nature of equations As there aregenerally more than one levels of gauge transformations one can expect the highercohomological group to be nontrivial

To sum up

21

cohomology group interpretation

Hpminusk k = 1p differential gauge parameters at the k-th level of re-

ducibilityH

p dynamical fieldsH

p+1 independent gauge invariant equations on dynamicalfields

Hp+k+1 k = 1p Bianchi identities for the k-th order gauge symmetryH

p+k k gt p supposed to be trivial in a regular case

To distinguish fields in cohomological sense the following convention is introduced[63]

Stueckelberg fields(gauge parameters) are those that can be eliminated bypure algebraic symmetry ie these fields are σminus-exact (are those that canbe used to gauge away certain fields ie these parameters are not σminus-closed)

Auxiliary fields are those that can be expressed via derivatives of some otherfields ie these fields are σminus-nonclosed Let us note that this definition isgenerally ambiguous eg in system

partA = B

partB = A(326)

which field is auxiliary is a matter of choice This ambiguity is removed byvirtue of grade[62 63]

Dynamical fields are those that are neither auxiliary nor Stueckelberg ie thesefields are representatives of σminus-cohomology classes

Note that if certain dynamical field given by Hp belongs to the grade-gf subspace

Wgfp and the corresponding equations given by H

p+1 belong to the grade-ge subspaceWge

p+1 the order of equations is equal to ge minus gf + 1If the unfolded system is supposed to admit a lagrangian formulation there has

to be a one-to-one correspondence between the number of dynamical fields and thatof equations k-th level gauge symmetries and k-th level Bianchi identities ie in acertain sense there should be a duality H

pminusk sim Hp+1+k k isin [0 p] This takes place

for all unfolded systems exemplified in this paperSince the operators involved ie DL and σminus are of grade 0 and minus1 only the

fields with the grade greater than g0 for any g0 ge 0 form a quotient module thusdescribing the same system on its own - dual formulations This picture partlybreaks in (A)dSd because of appearance of grade +1 nilpotent operator σ+

D = DL + σminus + λ2σ+ (327)

The specific character of frame-like unfolded systems which will be crucial forus is that by virtue of the inverse background vielbein hmicroa all form indices of any

gauge fieldparameter Wa1(s1)ap(sm)q can be converted to the fiber ones

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (328)

22

The resulting tensor W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is not irreducible and can be decomposedinto so(dminus 1 1)-irreps according to the so(dminus 1 1)-tensor product rule

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] =rArr Ys1 smotimes

so(dminus11)

Y(1 q) =oplus

α

Yα (329)

where one-column Young diagramY(1 q) of height-q represents the anti-symmetricindices d1 dq and Yα are the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the tensor product decomposesinto Having converted all fields (parameters equations) of a given unfolded systemto the fiber tensors one can make the identification of the fields in the unfolded ap-proach and those of the metric-like approach though the general covariance gaugeinvariance and other advantages of the unfolded formalism will be not manifestWhile constructing the unfolded formulations of a known metric-like systems or in-terpreting a given unfolded system in terms of metric-like fields this technique willbe widely used Moreover the calculation of σminus cohomology groups is largely basedon the explicit evaluation of (329)-like expressions Once an unfolded form is knownno use of this technique is needed either to generalize it to other backgrounds or tointroduce interactions

Field W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is traceless in a1 am and d1 dq separatelyHowever the cross traces need not vanish and hence some of Yα represent tracesTo distinguish between the traces of different orders let us introduce the followingthe Y-valued degree-q form WY

q is said to be a trace of the r-th order iff it has theform

WYq = hh

︸︷︷︸

r

hh︸︷︷︸

qminusr

CYprime

0 (330)

for some Yprime-valued degree-0 form CYprime

0 where (q minus r) indices of the backgroundvielbeins ha are contracted with the tensor representing Yprime and r indices are freefor the whole expression to take values in Y the appropriate Young symmetrizeris implied When the indices of WY

q are converted to the fiber ones the expression

takes the form ηη︸ ︷︷ ︸

r

CYprime ie CYprime

represents a trace of the r-th order

Different aspects of unfolding are illustrated on the examples of a massless scalarfield a massless spin-one field and a massless spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2) fields

33 Examples of Unfolding

Example 331 Unfolding a scalar field [31 62] First it should be noted thatit is easy of course to convert the Klein-Gordon equation C = 0 to a system offirst order equations

partmicroC = Cmicro

partmicroCmicro = 0(331)

but when writing the second equation the explicit form of the metric is to be usedhence these equations are not of unfolded form (31)

23

Described in terms of a scalar field C(x) the theory is brought into a non gaugeform therefore zero-forms only are allowed or else there would be some gaugesymmetry according to (34) The most general rhs of dC = has the form

dC = haCa (332)

for some vector-valued zero-form Ca This equation just parameterizes the firstderivative of C(x) and is similar to the first of (331) There are three terms allowedon the rhs of dCa =

dCa = hbCab + hbC

ab + haC prime (333)

with Cab Cab and C prime taking values in antisymmetric symmetric and scalar so(dminus1 1)-irreps ie bull The first term is forbidden by Bianchi identity hadC

a equiv 0To analyze the remaining terms let us decompose dCa into so(dminus 1 1)-irreps

partmicroCahmicrob = otimes = oplus oplus bull (334)

where = part[aCb] = part(aCa) minus 1dηaapartbC

b bull = partaCa = C

The component represents Bianchi identity in the first order reformulation ofthe Klein-Gordon equation Indeed expressing Ca as partaC implies part[aCb] equiv 0 bullrepresents the desired Klein-Gordon equation whereas is the only component al-lowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell Therefore to impose the Klein-Gordon equationthe term haC prime has to be omitted

dCa = hbCab (335)

The only possible rhs for dCaa = compatible with Jacobi identity hbdCab equiv 0

is of the form dCaa = hbCaab for Caaa taking values in a rank-three symmetric

so(d minus 1 1)-irrep ie The process of unfolding continues unambiguously inthis way and results in the full system

dCa(k) = hbCa(k)b equiv F a(k)(C) k = 0 1 (336)

where Ca(k) is rank-k totally symmetric traceless field ie taking values in k

so(dminus 1 1)-irrepTo make a connection with the general statement of Section 1 for Y = Y(0 0)

the general scheme results in

Yg bull

n k 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 0 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore spaces Wq and operator σminus which enters D = DL minus σminus should be definedas

Wq = WqWaq W

aaq (337)

24

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbWa(gminus1)bq g gt 0

(338)

Consequently W is a space of various differential forms with values in totally sym-metric traceless so(d minus 1 1)-tensors graded by the form degree and by the rankof so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Space Wq forms an irreducible iso(d minus 1 1)-module System(336) reads

Dω0 = 0 ω0 isin W0 (339)

The cohomology groups of σminus are easy to find

H0(σminus) = C(x) as the lowest grade field is automatically closed σminus(C) = 0 and it

cannot be exact as a form of zero degree Contrariwise zero-forms with gradegreater than zero are not closed σminus(C

k+1) = hbCa(k)b = 0lArrrArr Ck+1 = 0

H1(σminus) = haB(x)0 for some B(x)0 isin W

00 One-form Ba

1 = haB(x)0 is closedσminus(B

a1) = haB

a1 = hah

aB(x)0 equiv 0 and it cannot be represented as σminus(C2) =

hbCab as far as Cab is traceless The cohomology groups at higher grade are

trivial since σminus(haBa(k)(x)0) 6= 0 for k gt 0

Hqgt1(σminus) = empty as one can make sure

The interpretation in terms of Section 32 is as follows as is expected the dynamicalfield given by H

0 is C(x) The equations are given by the projection of dCa = hbCab

to H1 ie C = 0 The fields with k gt 0 are auxiliary being expressed via

derivatives of C(x) Ca(k) = partapartaC(x) Inasmuch as there is no gauge symmetryin the system the higher cohomology groups are trivial

An infinitely many dual formulations of a massless scalar field are also includedIndeed the fields with k ge k0 gt 0 form a quotient module Rk0 ie one canconsistently write

dCk = σminus(Ck+1) k ge k0 (340)

The first equationdCa(k0) = hbC

a(k0)b (341)

imposes on the dynamical field Ca(k0)

partbCba(k0minus1) = 0

part[bCc]a(k0minus1) = 0(342)

which imply at least locally Ca(k0) =

k0︷ ︸︸ ︷

partaparta C and C = 0 for some fieldC(x) All fields at higher grade are auxiliary This statement is confirmed bythe cohomology analysis H

0(Rk0 σminus) = Ck0 ie scalar is described in termsof a traceless rank-k0 symmetric tensor field subjected to the equations given byH

1(Rk0 σminus) = haBa(k0minus1)0 minus k0(k0minus1)

2(d+2k0minus4)ηaahcB

a(k0minus2)c0 +hcB

a(k0)c0 for B

a(k0minus1)0 B

a(k0)c0

taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps characterized by diagrams k0 minus 1 k0

These two elements represents just the components ofWk0

1 sim k0 otimes with the

25

symmetry of k0 minus 1 (trace) andk0

the third component with the symmetryof k0 + 1 is exact

The above results can be easily extended to (A)dSd background and to a massivescalar field [62]

DLCk = σminus(C

k+1) + σ+(Ckminus1) = 0 (343)

where there appears a nontrivial positive grade operator

σ+(Ckminus1) = (m2 minus λ2k(k + dminus 1))

(

haCa(kminus1) minus(sminus 1)

d+ 2k minus 4ηaahbC

a(kminus1)b

)

(344)

and DL is a Lorentz-covariant derivative in (A)dSd In the (A)dSd case the situationis more interesting due to the appearance of σ+ operator and the possibility of theaccidental degeneracy of σ+ when m2 = λ2kprime(kprime + dminus 1) for some kprime [62]

Example 332 Unfolding Maxwell equations [64 65] An example of masslessspin-one field is more interesting as a gauge system The main object is a one-formAmicro From gauge transformation law

δA1 = dξ0 (345)

it follows that there should not be other forms of rank greater than zero If this werethe case the gauge parameters of these new forms would be involved by virtue of(34) making the gauge law for A1 inappropriate Indeed there are two possibilitiesto introduce higher degree forms on the rhs of dA = (i) dA1 = R2 fora scalar valued degree-two form R2 which possesses its own gauge parameter χ1δR2 = dχ1 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law for A1 is modifiedto δA1 = dξ0 + χ1 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gaugeparameter χ1 This case corresponds to contractible free differential algebras (310)(ii) dA1 = hbω

b1 for a vector valued degree-one form ωa

1 which possesses its owngauge parameter ǫa0 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law forA1 is modified to δA1 = dξ0 + hbǫ

b0 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of

Stueckelberg gauge parameter ǫa0 Consequently in both cases A1 can be made non-dynamical which is not what was expected Therefore the only possibility is tointroduce a zero-form C

[ab]0 anti-symmetric in a b parameterizing by virtue of

dA1 = hahbC[ab]0 (346)

the Maxwell field strength Bianchi identity hahbdC[ab]0 equiv 0 tolerates two terms on

the rhs of dC[ab]0 =

dC[ab]0 = hcC

[ab]c0 + h[aC

b]0 (347)

with C[ab]c0 and Ca

0 taking values in and so(dminus 1 1)-irreps the former taken inantisymmetric basis In order to determine which of the terms should be omittedif any the decomposition of the first derivative of the Maxwell field strength intoLorentz irreps has to be analyzed

C [ab]|c equiv partmicroC[ab]hmicroc = otimes = oplus oplus (348)

26

where = part[aCbc] = partbCab and = partcC [ab] minus part[cCab] + 2

dminus1ηc[apartdC

b]d part[aCbc]

is identically zero provided that C [ab] is expressed via the first derivative of Amicroor represents the second pair of Maxwell equations in terms of field strength C [ab]In both cases this component should be zero and moreover this can not be keptnonzero as there is no hcC

[abc]-like term allowed on the rhs of (347) The secondpartbC

ab is the desired Maxwell equations in terms of Amicro or the first pair of Maxwellequations in terms of the field strength Consequently to impose Maxwell equationsterm h[aCb] has to be omitted whereas the third is the only component allowed tobe nonzero on-mass-shell

Again unfolding continues unambiguously and requires an infinite set of fields

C[ab]c(k)0 taking values14 in

kto be introduced

dC [ab]c(k) = hdC[ab]c(k)d k = 0 1 (349)

The full system has the form

dA1 = hahbCab0 equiv F (AC) δA1 = dξ0

dC[ab]c(k)0 = hdC

[ab]c(k)d0 equiv F [ab]c(k)(C) k = 0 1

(350)

and represents two modules being glued together by the term on the rhs of thefirst equation

For Y = Y(1 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 resultsin

Yg bull

n k 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 1 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore

Wq =

W0 q = 0

WqW[ab]qminus1W

[ab]cqminus1 q gt 0

(351)

let us point out the shortening of W0 The action of σminus on Wq isin Wq is defined as

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hahbW[ab]qminus1 g = 1

hdW[ab]c(gminus2)dqminus1 g gt 1

(352)

With D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (350) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (353)

14The fields C [ab]c(k) are taken in antisymmetric basis ie they are antisymmetric in a bsymmetric in c(k) and C [abd]c(kminus1)equiv0

27

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 0 form a finite-dimensional iso(dminus1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g gt0 form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

Again the cohomology groups are easy to find gauge parameters are given byH

0(σminus) = ξ0 dynamical fields by H1(σminus) = A1 Maxwell equations by H

2(σminus) =

h[aBb]0 and the Bianchi identities for the first order gauge transformations by

H3(σminus) = hahbB0 the rest of groups are empty H

kgt3(σminus) = empty Important is thedirect correspondence between the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2

the gauge parameters in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3There are infinitely many of non-gauge dual formulations based on C [ab]c(k0) eg

for k0 = 0 one recovers the Maxwell equations in terms of the field strength

part[aCbc] = 0

partbCab = 0

(354)

Let us note that the ambiguity at the first step of unfolding (the terms haC prime andh[aCb] in the above two examples) expresses the possibility of introducing a massterm

Example 333 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-s field [31 6466] We start from the metric-like description of a massless spin-s field in termsof a double-traceless symmetric rank-s field φmicro1micros

satisfying (213) the secondorder equations are invariant with respect to the first order gauge transformationwith traceless rank-(s minus 1) gauge parameter ξmicro1microsminus1 Inasmuch as the Young di-agram s of so(d minus 2) is of the height one there are gauge transforma-tions of the first level only Therefore the dynamical field in the unfolded ap-proach has to be a one-form There is only one way to identify φmicro1micros

and ξmicro1microsminus1

with certain ωY01 and ξY0

0 taking values in the same so(d minus 1 1)-irrep Y0 namely

Y0 = sminus 1 ie ωa(sminus1)1 and ξ

a(sminus1)0 takes values in a rank-(s minus 1) symmet-

ric traceless tensors Field φmicro1microsis identified with a totally symmetric part of

ωa(sminus1)1 ie φmicro1micros

= hb1(micro1hbsminus1

microsminus1ωa1asminus1

micros)ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 the double-tracelessness

condition is the consequence of the tracelessness of ωa(sminus1)1 in a1asminus1 ξmicro1microsminus1

is identified with ξa(sminus1)0 directly ξmicro1microsminus1 = hb1micro1

hbsminus1microsminus1

ξa1asminus1ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 andone can make sure that the Fronsdalrsquos gauge transformation law is recovered fromδω

a(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 Field ω

a(sminus1)1 has a redundant component with the symmetry

ofsminus 1

which can be made Stueckelberg by virtue of gauge parameter ξa(sminus1)b

with the same symmetry type ie

δωa(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)c0 (355)

It automatically follows that there is a degree-one gauge field ωa(sminus1)b1 coupled with

ωa(sminus1)1 as

dωa(sminus1)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)c1 (356)

28

The only solution to Bianchi identity hcdωa(sminus1)c1 equiv 0 is15

dωa(sminus1)b1 = hcω

a(sminus1)bc1 (357)

where a new field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

is introduced and so on

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1 (358)

until the field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

for which the Bianchi identity solvesas

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 (359)

where field Ca(s)b(s)0 represents a generalized Weyl tensor and has the symmetry of

s The solution of Bianchi identity hchddC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 equiv 0 has the form

dCa(s)b(s)0 = hc

(

Ca(s)cb(s)0 +

s

2C

a(s)bb(sminus1)c0

)

(360)

where Ca(s+1)b(s)0 has the symmetry of s

s+ 1 The second term on the rhs

of (360) supplements the first one to have a proper Young symmetry Further

unfolding requires a set of degree-zero forms Ca(s+i)b(s)0 taking values in so(dminus1 1)-

irreps characterized by Young diagrams ss+ i

The full system has theform

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1

δωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(k)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)b(k)c0 k isin [0 sminus 2]

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 δω

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0

dCa(s+i)b(s) = hc

(

Ca(s+i)cb(s) +s

i+ 2Ca(s+i)bb(sminus1)c

)

i isin [0infin)

(361)

By the construction the system incorporates Fronsdalrsquos field φmicro1microswith the correct

gauge law but there is still to be proved that the Fronsdalrsquos equations are reallyimposed and that there are no other dynamical fields in the system Let us recon-struct Fronsdalrsquos equations (213) whereas the second statement will be proved asa part of a more general theorem The first two equations of (361) read

partmicroωa(sminus1)ν minus partνω

a(sminus1)micro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)cν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)cmicro (362)

partmicroωa(sminus1)bν minus partνω

a(sminus1)bmicro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)bcν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)bcmicro (363)

It is convenient to convert all world indices to the fiber ones

partcωa(sminus1)|d minus partdωa(sminus1)|c = ωa(sminus1)c|d minus ωa(sminus1)d|c (364)

partcωa(sminus1)b|d minus partdωa(sminus1)b|c = ωa(sminus1)bc|d minus ωa(sminus1)bd|c (365)

15The proof is not given as more general statement about the solutions of such equations isproved in the next Section

29

where ωa(sminus1)|b equiv ωa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro ωa(sminus1)bb|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bbmicro hcmicro

Contracting (365) with ηbd and then symmetrizing c with a1asminus1 results in

partcωa(sminus1)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus1)c|c= 0 (366)

By symmetrizing in (364) a1asminus1 with d

ωa(sminus1)c|a = partcωa(sminus1)|a minus partaωa(sminus1)|c (367)

and then by contracting (364) with ηdasminus1

ωa(sminus1)c|

c= (sminus 1)

(

partcωa(sminus2)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus2)c|c

)

(368)

all the terms of (366) can be expressed via ωa(sminus1)|b Plugging these to (366) gives

ωa(sminus1)|a minus partapartc((sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c

)+ (sminus 1)partapartaω

a(sminus2)c|c= 0 (369)

where ωa(sminus1)|a is to be identified with Fronsdalrsquos field φa(s) as ωa(sminus1)|a = 1sφa(s)

then ωa(sminus2)c|

c= 1

2φa(sminus2)c

c (sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c = φa(sminus1)c and the equation

acquires the Fronsdalrsquos form (213)

φa(s) minus spartapartcφa(sminus1)c + s(sminus1)

2partapartaφ

a(sminus2)cc= 0 (370)

For Y = Y(s 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 results in

Yg sminus 1 sminus 1 s

ss+ 1

n k 1 0 1 sminus 1 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = sminus 1 g = s g = s+ 1

qg q0 = 1 qsminus1 = 1 qs = 0 qs+1 = 0

therefore

Wq =

Wa(sminus1)0 W

a(sminus1)b0 W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0 q = 0

Wa(sminus1)q W

a(sminus1)bq W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)q W

a(s)b(s)qminus1 W

a(s+1)b(s)qminus1 q gt 0

(371)and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hcWa(sminus1)b(gminus1)cq g isin [1 sminus 1]

hchdWa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)dqminus1 g = s

hc

(

Wa(gminussminus1)cb(s)qminus1 + s

gminuss+1W

a(gminussminus1)bb(sminus1)cqminus1

)

g gt s

(372)

With D = DL minus σminus full system (361) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (373)

30

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sminus 1 sim g isin [0 sminus 1]form a finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k =0 1 sim g ge s form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

The representatives of cohomology classes can be chosen as H0 = ξ

a(sminus1)0 H1 =

hbφa(sminus1)b H2 = hbhcG

a(sminus1)c minus hahcGa(sminus2)bc + γηaahahcG

a(sminus4)bcnn+ (βηabhahc +

αηaahbhc)Ga(sminus3)cn

n16 H

3 = hbhahcχa(sminus2)c H

kgt3 = empty where φa(s) and Ga(s) are

double-traceless tensor fields and ξa(sminus1) and χa(sminus1) are traceless H01 are nontrivialat the lowest grade whereas H

23 are nontrivial at grade-one therefore the orderof equations that are imposed on the dynamical field is equal to two It turns outthat there is no need in the explicit form for α β and γ it is sufficient to find outthe Young symmetry of representatives only The uniqueness of Fronsdalrsquos theoryat the level of action was demonstrated in [67] and at the level of equations in[6 53] Consequently there is no need for equations (370) to be found explicitly -those of Fronsdal are the only possible Again there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2 the gauge parameters

in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3 The system contains an infinitely many ofdual formulations those that have field W

a(sminus1)b(k0)1 at the lowest grade are gauge

dual descriptions whereas those that have field Ca(s+k0)b(s) at the lowest grade arenon-gauge Dual description based on field W

a(sminus1)b(1)1 was elaborated in [68]

Example 334 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field[69

70 31] Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field results in literally

the same unfolded system (361 373) but with fields taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that are irreducible spin-tensors with the same tensor part as in the bosoniccase Note that operator σminus is not modified but the σminus cohomology groups areslightly changed such that the equations become of the first order

The Dirac equation Unfolded system (336) or equivalently (339) describesa massless spin-1

2field provided that Ck take values in s 1

2so(dminus1 1)-irreps

ie Ck equiv Cαa(k) and Γαb βC

βba(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equation of (336)

partmicroCα = hmicroaC

αa (374)

with hbmicroΓβb α

gives the Dirac equation

Γαa βpart

aCβ = 0 (375)

the rest of equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives of dynamicalfield Cα

The Rarita-Schwinger equation Unfolded system (350) or equivalently(353) describes a massless spin-3

2field provided that irreducible tensors in (351)

are replaced by the corresponding irreducible tensor-spinors ie A1 equiv Aαmicro C

k equiv

Cα[ab]c(k) and Γαb βC

β[ab]c(k) = 0 Γαd βC

β[ab]dc(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equa-tion of (350)

1

2(partmicroA

αν minus partνA

αmicro) = hmicroahνbC

α[ab] (376)

16α = minus (s(d+sminus5)minusd+6)(sminus2)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6) β = (sminus2)

(d+sminus4) γ = (d+sminus6)(sminus2)(sminus3)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6)

31

with Γ-matrices and converting world indices micro ν to the fiber ones according toAαa equiv Aα

microhamicro gives the Rarita-Schwinger equation

Γαb βpart

bAβa minus partaΓαb βA

βb = 0 δAαa = partaξα (377)

The rest of unfolded equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives ofdynamical field Aα

microThe Fang-Fronsdal equation for a spin-(s + 1

2) massless field Unfolded

system (361) or equivalently (373) describes a massless spin-(s + 12) field pro-

vided that irreducible tensors in (371) are replaced by the corresponding irreducibletensor-spinors With all world indices converted to the fiber ones the first equationof (361) has the form

Gαa(sminus1)|[cd] equiv partcωβa(sminus1)|d minus partdωβa(sminus1)|c = ωβa(sminus1)c|d minus ωβa(sminus1)d|c (378)

where ωαa(sminus1)|b equiv ωαa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωαa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

αa(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro

Analogously to the bosonic case nonsymmetric component of ωβa(sminus1)|d canbe gauged away algebraically Hence the Fronsdalrsquos field φαa(s) is identified asωαa(sminus1)|a = 1

sφαa(s) Then Γα

b βφβa(s) = Γα

b βωβa(sminus1)|b Γα

b βΓβc γφ

γa(sminus2)bc = ηbcωαa(sminus2)b|c

and the Fronsdalrsquos triple Γ-traceless constraint is a consequence of irreducibility ofωαa(sminus1)|b in α a1asminus1 and the lack of any conditions with respect to a1asminus1 andb Since the Fronsdalrsquos field contains three irreducible components with the sym-metry of s 1

2 s-1 1

2and s-2 1

2 the equations of motion has to be

nontrivial in these three sectors too The projector on the dynamical equations issimply Γα

b βGβa(sminus1)b|a and gives

Γαb βpart

bφβa(s) minus spartaΓαb βφ

βa(sminus1)b = 0 (379)

which is in accordance with (222) But we would like to note that there aretwo components with the symmetry of s-1 1

2 namely ηbcG

αa(sminus2)b|ac and

Γαb βΓ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] The correct projector on this component of the equations isgiven by the combination

2(sminus 1)ηbcGαa(sminus2)b|ac minus γαb βγ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] (380)

which is identically zero when Gαa(sminus1)|[bc] is expressed via ωβa(sminus1)c|d by virtue of(378) Therefore it is (380) that does not express certain part of ωβa(sminus1)c|d interms of first derivatives of the dynamical field φαa(s) and thus this is a dynamicalequation Obviously (380) is a representative of σminus cohomology group H

2g=0 In

terms of φαa(s) the representative has the form

Γαb βpart

bΓβc γφ

γa(sminus1)c minus partcφαa(sminus1)c +

(sminus 1)

2partaφ

αa(sminus2)cc= 0 (381)

which is equal to the Γ-trace of (379) The gauge transformations has the form

δφαa(s) = partaξαa(sminus1) (382)

32

where Γαb βξ

βa(sminus2)b = 0Consequently unfolded equations for totally symmetric bosonic fields are proved

to completely determine the unfolded equations for totally symmetric fermionicfields Though σminus is not modified in the fermionic case σminus cohomology groupsare changed since the fermionic dynamical equations are of the first order

4 Unfolding Mixed-Symmetry Fields

First in Section 41 an example of the simplest massless mixed-symmetry field ofspin- is investigated in detail and leading arguments are given for a spin- fieldSecond the general statement on arbitrary mixed-symmetry fields is proved whereastechnical details are collected in Sections 44 and 45 The analysis of the numberof physical degrees of freedom is carried out in Section 43

41 Simplest Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Example 411 Spin- field In the metric-like approach a spin- field is mini-mally described[16 17] by the subjected to (215) field φ[micromicro]ν that takes values in a

reducible so(dminus 1 1)-representation oplus the latter component is identified withthe trace φ ν

microν The gauge transformations (216) has two levels of reducibility with

two gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξA[microν] taking values in oplus bull so(dminus 1 1)-irreps at the

first level and one parameter ξmicro taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irrep at the secondlevel (217)

First the metric-like field φ[micromicro]ν has to be incorporated into certain differentialform eYq which is called a physical vielbein the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y and the degreeq to be defined below To make the symmetries both of the first and of the secondlevel of reducibility manifest the degree of the physical vielbein has to be two atleast

Moreover were the physical vielbein taken to be a degree-one form not all of thegauge symmetries even at the first level would be manifest Indeed there are twopossibilities for physical vielbein eY1 to contain a component with the symmetry of

Namely Y = and Y = since otimes = oplus oplus and otimes = oplus oplus

The associated differential gauge parameter is ξ0 in the first case and ξ0 in thesecond case Inasmuch as the gauge parameters are the forms of degree-zero onlyone of the required two parameters is present in each of the cases

The degree of the physical vielbein has to be not greater than two if the com-ponent associated with the metric-like field φmicromicroν is required not to be a certaintrace part The reason why a dynamical field should not be a certain trace part isexplained in the next Section

Therefore the physical vielbein has to be of degree-two and has to take valuesin so(dminus 1 1)-irrep that belongs to the vector representation ie e2 equiv ea2 equiv eamicroν

The associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξa1 equiv ξamicro contains in its Lorentz decomposition

otimes = oplus oplusbull both anti-symmetric ξAmicroν = ξa[microhbν]ηab and symmetric ξSmicroν = ξa(microh

bν)ηab

33

gauge parameters the latter enters along with the trace ξamicrohmicroa There exists a second

level gauge parameter χa0 which is directly identified with ξmicro as ξmicro = hbmicroχ

aηabThere are no redundant components in the gauge parameter However physicalvielbein e2 contains one redundant component in its decomposition into Lorentz

irreps otimes = oplus oplus The first and the second components are to be associatedwith a traceful φmicromicroν whereas the third one totally anti-symmetric component e[a|bc]

of ea|bc = eamicroνhbmicrohcν is a redundant one and has to be made non-dynamical In order

to do so algebraic gauge parameter ξ[abc]0 with the symmetry of is introduced It

is obvious from pure algebraic gauge law

δea2 = hbhcξ[abc]0 (41)

that the redundant component can be fixed to zero and ea2 can be directly identifiedwith φmicromicroν as e

amicromicro = φmicromicroνh

aν From gauge transformation laws δea2 = dξa1 δξa1 = dχa

0

ie δeamicroν = 12

(partmicroξ

aν minus partνξ

amicro

) δξamicro = partmicroχ

a required gauge transformations (216)(217) for metric-like field φmicromicroν and for the first order gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξ

A[microν]

are easily recoveredSince in the unfolded approach each gauge parameter possesses its own gauge

field and vice-verse associated with ξ[abc]0 gauge field ω

[abc]1 enters as

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 (42)

which determines the first equation Applying d to this equation results in Bianchiidentity hbhcdω

[abc]1 equiv 0 which has a unique solution of the form

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 (43)

with C[abc][df ]0 having the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensor of a spin-

field ie it is anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and C[abcd]f0 equiv 0 To clarify the form of

the solution let C[abc]|[df ]0 be a degree-zero form anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and with

no definite symmetry between these two groups of indices The Bianchi identityimplies hbhchdhfC

[abc]|[df ]0 equiv 0 which is equivalent to C

a[bc|df ]0 equiv 0 since vielbeins

ha anticommute Therefore the solution is parameterized by those components of

C[abc]|[df ]0 sim otimes that has the symmetry of Young diagrams with no more than

three rows since the requirement for total anti-symmetrization of any four indicesto give zero is the characteristic property of Young diagrams with at most three

rows otimes ni is the only component of zero trace order17 with three rows andthere are no components with the number of rows less than three Alternatively one

17Although there are trace components with the number of rows less than four eg theirtensor product by the metric ηab contains components with the symmetry of the sl(d)-Young

diagrams with more than three rows Nontrivial trace with the symmetry of corresponds tothe mass-like term Hence traceful tensors either do not satisfy the Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms

34

could search for the solution in the sector of degree-one forms as dω[abc]1 = hdC

[abc]|d1

with some C[abc]|d1 but Bianchi identity hbhchdC

[abc]|d1 equiv 0 implies that the only

component of C[abc]|d1 sim otimes that is allowed must have less than three rows which

is impossible since [abc] makes Young diagrams of otimes consist of three rows atleast18 Thus one has to search for the solution among the forms of less degree

Further unfolding requires a set of fields C [abc][df ]g(k) with the symmetry ofk

to be introduced and the full system has the form

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 δea2 = dξa1 + hbhcξ

[abc]0 δξa1 = dχa

0

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 δω

[abc]1 = dξ

[abc]0

dC[abc][df ]g(k)0 = hvC

[abc][df ]g(k)v0 (44)

Consequently the unfolded system incorporates field φmicromicroν with all required differ-ential gauge parameters at all levels of reducibility the redundant component of the

physical vielbein does not contribute to the dynamics ω[abc]1 sim otimes = oplus oplus

the first component is a field strength for the redundant field once the field hasbeen gauged away the associated field strength is zero and ω

[abc]ρ = hamicrohbνhcλT[microνλ]ρ

for some T[microνλ]ρ T[microνλρ] equiv 0 which incorporates both and (as the trace) Torecover equations (215) in terms of metric-like fields it is convenient to convert allfiber indices to the world ones in the first two equations

part[microeaνλ] = hb[microhcνω

abcλ] (45)

part[microωabcν] = hd[microhfν]C

abcdf (46)

to substitute Tmicroνλρ and to contract two indices in the second equation

part[microφνλ]ρ = Tmicroνλρ (47)

partρTmicroνρλ minus partλTρ

microνρ = 0 (48)

Plugging (47) in (48) gives equation (215)For Y = Y(2 1) (1 1) ie N = 2 and p = 2 the general scheme of Section

1 results in

Yg

n k 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 1 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

18Again the trace component enters the tensor product as η otimes and has the number of rowsnot less than three

35

therefore

Wq =

W a0 q = 0

W a1 W

[abc]0 q = 1

W aq W

[abc]qminus1 W

[abc][df ]qminus2 W

[abc][df ]gqminus2 q gt 1

(49)

and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbhcW[abc]qminus1 g = 1

hbhcW[aaa][bc]qminus2 g = 2

hdW[aaa][bb]c(gminus3)dqminus2 g gt 2

(410)

with D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (44) can be rewritten as

Dω2 = 0 δω2 = Dξ1 δξ1 = Dξ0 (411)

where ω2 isin W2 ξ1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 2 k = 0 sim g = 0and n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 1 form two finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-moduleswhereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g ge 2 form an infinite-dimensionaliso(dminus 1 1)-module

Example 412 Spin- field (briefly) In the case of a massless spin- fieldthere are two gauge parameters at the first level of reducibility which have the sym-metry19 of and one gauge parameter at the second level with the symmetryof First for Y = Y(3 1) (2 1) the proposed scheme results in

Yg

n k 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3 g = 4

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 2 q2 = 1 q3 = 0 q4 = 0

therefore the physical vielbein has to be a two-form taking values in ie e2 equiv

eaab2 Associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξaab1 has components otimes = oplus oplus the first two having the symmetry of the required gauge parameters with the thirdone being redundant The last three components in the decomposition of the physical

vielbein otimes = oplus oplus oplus are also redundant By virtue of Stueckelberg

symmetry with parameter ξ1 these three components can be gauged away inasmuch

as otimes = oplus oplus The redundant component of the first level gauge

parameter ξ1 also can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg symmetry with

level-two gauge parameter ξ0 Consequently at least the fact that the unfoldedsystem incorporates the metric-like field all the required gauge parameters andredundant components do not contribute to the dynamics is proved

19To simplify the example no consideration is given to the trace components of the fields

36

42 General Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Given a massless field of spin Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) described by a metric-like field φY(x) taking values in the irrep of the Lorentz algebra so(d minus 1 1) withthe same symmetry type(minimal formulation) there exists a unique unfolded systemwith the physical vielbein at the lowest grade and all symmetries being manifest thatreproduces the original metric-like system The system has the form (11)

Sketch of the proof

1 The lowest grade field (physical vielbein) eY0q0

turns out to be completely de-termined by the requirement for it to contain the metric-like field and for itsgauge parameters ξY0

q0minusk k gt 0 to contain all the necessary gauge parametersat all levels of reducibility (219)

2 eY0q0

and its gauge parameters appear to contain redundant components thathave to be made non-dynamical The only way to achieve this is to introduceStueckelberg symmetry δeY0

q0= σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus1) δξ

Y0q0minus1 = σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus2) with certain

ξY1q1minusk k gt 0 which turns out to be unambiguously defined by this requirement

3 ξY1q1minus1 has associated gauge field ωY1

q1and gauge transformations δωY0

q0=

σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) completely determines the first equation deY0

q0= σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) whichimplies Jacobi identity σ1

minus(dωY1q1

) equiv 0 The general solution is proved in Sec-tion 44 to have the form dωY1

q1= σ2

minus(ωY2q2

) with certain ωY2q2

The secondequation implies the second Jacobi identity σ2

minus(dωY2q2

) equiv 0 and so on

4 Once the total unfolded system is defined the proof of the facts that (i)the correct dynamical equations are imposed (ii) there are no other dynamicalfields or other differential gauge symmetries in the system is obtained throughthe calculations of σminus cohomology groups Ignoring the trace pattern of fieldsie for traceful tensors the proof of (ii) can be simplified and is done in thissection Even stronger statement that there exists a duality H

p+1+k sim Hpminusk is

proved in Section 45

First as it is clear from the examples above the metric-like field φYM(x) has

to be incorporated into a differential form eY0q of degree-q taking values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep Y0 (for this reason eY0q is called physical vielbein) Having converted

all world indices to fiber ones in accordance with (329) so(dminus 1 1)-tensor productY0 otimes Y(1 q) of Y0 with one column diagram of the height q must contain thecomponent with the symmetry of YM In the case of the minimal formulationYM = Y where Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) characterizes the spin

It is useful to introduce a notion of the quotient of two Young diagrams let thequotient of two Young diagrams Y1Y2 be a direct sum of those diagrams whoseso(dminus 1 1)-tensor product by Y2 contains Y1 For the first sight given q ge 0 anyelement Q of YMY(1 q) might be chosen as Y0 If q is greater than the heightof YM the component with the symmetry YM in the tensor product QotimesY(1 q)has to be certain trace inevitably

37

Although there is no apparent problems in considering unfolded systems withdynamical field hidden in certain trace component of the physical vielbein egMaxwell gauge potential Amicro might be identified with the trace eamicroνh

microa of two-form

eamicroν However this exotic incorporating of the physical field does not take place inthe already known systems Moreover it can be proved that such exotic systemsdo not exist if irreducible Nevertheless they might be a part of some reduciblesystem which describes more than one field Therefore we require the degree q ofthe physical vielbein to be not greater than the height of YM

Inasmuch as (i) the equations imposed on φY(x) possess reducible gauge trans-formations with the number of levels equal to the height p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi of Y (ii) for

a degree-q gauge field of an unfolded system there exist q levels of gauge transfor-mations the degree q of physical vielbein eY0

q must be equal to pThe quotient YY(1 p) contains only one element (provided φY(x) is for-

bidden to be a trace component) it is the diagram (12) with the symmetry ofY0 = Y(s1 minus 1 p1) (sN minus 1 pN) ie it is equal to Y without the first col-umn Therefore physical vielbein eY0

p is completely defined So does gauge param-

eters ξY0pminusk at the k-th level of reducibility k isin [1 p] The requirement for tensor

product Y0 otimes Y(1 pminus k) to contain all gauge parameters ξik given by (219)at the k-th level of reducibility is also satisfied Consequently the whole patternof fieldsgauge parameters of the metric-like formulation is reproduced Note thatY0 equiv Y0 and q0 = p in the terms of Section 1

Let us note that if one writes down the physical vielbein explicitly as ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

where si are the lengths of the rows ofY and converts the form indices to the tangentones by virtue of inverse background vielbein hmicroa

ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|[d1dp] = ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

hmicro1d1 hmicropdp (412)

dynamical field φY(x) should be identified with ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|a1ap which hasthe symmetry of Y with some traces included Consequently the generalizedLabastidarsquos double-tracelessness condition (220) [20] is obvious inasmuch as thecontraction of two metric tensor ηaiaiηaiai with the i-th group of indices vanishes

Generally in addition to φY(x) decompositionY0otimesY(1 p) of physical vielbeineY0p into Lorentz irreps contains redundant components which must not contributeto the physical degrees of freedom So does Y0 otimesY(1 pminus k) ie in addition toξik it contains a lot of components that can not be made genuine differential gaugeparameters There are only two possible ways to get rid of redundant fields in theunfolded formalism

A redundant components could be directly fixed to zero by algebraic (Stueckel-berg) symmetry

B redundant components might be auxiliary fields for other fields (at lower grade)and so on The process stops since the grade is assumed to be bounded frombelow

We require dynamical fields incorporated in the physical vielbein to be at the lowestgrade Actually (B) takes place for dual gauge descriptions but not for the minimal

38

Therefore the only possibility to make redundant components to be non-dynamicalis to introduce a Stueckelberg symmetry with certain parameters ξY1

q1minusk

δeY0p = dξY0

pminus1 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) (413)

δξY0pminus1 = dξY0

pminus2 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus2) (414)

(415)

where σ1minus is a certain operator built of background vielbein ha that contracts a

number of indices of Y1 with hahc to obtain Y0 Diagram20 Y1 and form degreeq1 can be easily found since Y1 otimes Y1 q1 minus i i gt 0 must contain all redundantcomponents of eY0

p and ξY0pminusk

In the unfolded formalism each gauge field possesses its own gauge parameter andvice-versa Therefore there is a gauge field ωY1

q1 which contributes to the equations

for eY0p as

deY0p = σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) (416)

The first equation determines the first Jacobi identity of the form σ1minus(dω

Y1q1

) equiv 0which can be solved as

dωY1q1

= σ2minus(ω

Y2q2

) (417)

for certain gauge field ωY2q2

and operator σ2minus that satisfies σ1

minusσ2minus equiv 0 The general

solution of Jacobi identities is given in Section 44 From now on let the super-scripts of σminus be omitted The second equation determines the second Jacobi identityσminus(dω

Y2q2

) equiv 0 which can be also solved and so on Consequently the knowledgeof the lowest grade gauge field eY0

p and of the Stueckelberg symmetries required toget rid of redundant components determines the first equation which by virtue ofJacobi identities determines the second and so on The total unfolded system hasthe structure

dωYg

qg= σminus

(

ωYg+1qg+1

)

g = 0 1

δωYg

qg= dξYg

qg+ σminus

(

ξYg+1

qg+1minus1

)

δξYgqg

=

(418)

where σminus is certain algebraic operator built of background vielbein ha and (σminus)2 = 0

The only facts remain to be proved are that there are no other dynamical fieldsand that the proper correspondence (duality) between the cohomology groups holdstrue To this end it is sufficient to analyze only the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps content ofH

qg ie only the symmetry type and the multiplicity of irreducible Lorentz tensors

that by virtue of (330) are the representatives of Hqg

It is proved in the next Section that there is a duality Hpminuskg=0 sim H

p+k+1g=1 between

the σminus cohomology groups which reveals the one-to-one correspondence betweenthe gauge dynamical fields and equations of motion the level-k gauge symmetries

20The specific character of Minkowski massless fields is in that all Stueckelberg parameters canbe incorporated into a single Y1-valued form this not being the case for (anti)-de Sitter masslessfields

39

and the level-k Bianchi identities The representatives of cohomology groups in thesector of fields and gauge symmetries directly correspond to those of metric-likeapproach and there is no other nontrivial cohomology in these sectors

Though the trace pattern of fieldsgauge parameters is also important and thecalculation of σminus cohomology groups provides a comprehensive answer to this ques-tion the very procedure being a bit technical Ignoring the trace pattern of thefields it can be easily proved that the required metric-like field is incorporated inphysical vielbein eY0

q0 all the redundant components of the physical vielbein can be

gauged away by a pure algebraic symmetry and the same holds for differential gaugeparameters ξY0

q0minusk at all levels of reducibility ie the required pattern of gauge pa-rameters is recovered whereas all the redundant components are either Stueckelbergor auxiliary This is the necessary condition only and the traces has to be takeninto account Also it is still to be proved that the correct equations of motionsare imposed Provided that there are no trace conditions on the fields the sys-tem is referred to as off-shell[65] An off-shell system may contain only constraintsthat express auxiliary fields via the derivatives of the dynamical field imposing norestrictions on the latter

The off-shell system Technically ignoring the traces is equivalent to thereplacement of all so(dminus1 1)-irreps by the sl(d)-irreps that are characterized by thesame Young diagrams ie instead of taking so(dminus1 1)-tensor products one needs toapply the sl(d)-tensor productrsquos rules which are much simpler The decompositionof the physical vielbein eY0

q0into sl(d)-irreps is given by diagrams Yαi of the form

αN+1

sN minus 1

pNαN

s2 minus 1

p2α2

s1 minus 1

p1

α1

(419)

where α1+ +αN+1 = q0 = p The decomposition of Stueckelberg gauge parameterξY1q1minus1 for eY0

q0has the components of the same form but with αN+1 ge 1 because

Y1 (13) has already the form of Y0 with one cell in the bottom-left Thereforeall components of eY0

q0except for those with αN+1 = 0 are of Stueckelberg type but

there is only one component of eY0q0

with αN+1 = 0 namely it has αi = pi i isin [1 N ]and hence has the symmetry of Y The decomposition of level-k differential gaugeparameter ξY0

q0minusk has the form (419) with α1 + + αN+1 = p minus k and again all

the components of ξY0q0minusk with αN+1 ge 1 can be gauged away by pure algebraic

symmetry with ξY1q1minuskminus1 Consequently there is a complete matching between (219)

40

and those in ξY0

q0minusk that are not pure gauge themselves It can be easily proved alsothat if ignoring the traces there are no other dynamical fieldsdifferential gaugeparameters at higher grade Consequently

Lemma H(σminus) with respect to sl(d) are given by

Hk(σminus)sl(d) =

Yαi g = 0 α1 + + αN = k αN+1 = 0 k le p

empty k gt p(420)

The triviality of the higher k gt p cohomology groups for sl(d) which shouldcontain equations of motion and Bianchi identities is expected since the system isoff-shell For the equations to have the second order in derivatives the only nontrivialcohomology group H

p+1 must be at the grade-one ie Hp+1g=1 6= empty As is seen from

the examples above the equations correspond to those representatives of Hp+1g=1 that

are certain traces Indeed the total rank |WYgqg | which is equal to the sum qg + |Yg|

of degree qg and rank of Yg is preserved by σminus Therefore |WYgqg | = |W

Y0q0| + g

and |RY1q1+1| = |ω

Y0q0| + 2 = |Y|+ 2 where eY0

q0isin Wg=0

p and RY1q1+1 isin W

g=1p+1 contain

metric-like field φYM(x) and the equations on φY(x) respectively Consequently

the representative of Hp+1g=1 that corresponds to the equations on the traceless part

of φY(x) has to be identified with certain trace of the first order and so on for thetraces of φY(x)

The calculation of σminus cohomology groups carried out in Section 45 implies

1 The only nontrivial cohomology groups are Hpminuskg=0 and H

p+k+1g=1 k = 1 p

Therefore the dynamical fields and independent gauge parameters belong tothe zero grade Wg=0

q subspaces the equations are of the second order and theBianchi identities for the k-th level gauge symmetries are of the (k + 2)-thorder

2 Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 ie there is a one-to-one correspondence between the

elements of Hpminuskg=0 that are traces of the r-th order and the elements of Hp+k+1

g=1

that are traces of the (r + k + 1)-th order Roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1

Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on Therefore there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the dynamical fields and the equations of motion the level-k gaugesymmetries and the k-th Bianchi identities

3 The so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that correspond to the elements of Hpminusk(σminus) and arethe traces of the zeroth order are given by the so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagramsthat have the form (419) with αN+1 = 0 and α1 + + αN = p minus k whichexactly reproduce the required pattern (219) Note that certain higher ordertraces are also the elements of cohomology groups These fields represent thersquoauxiliaryrsquo fields of the metric-like formulation which had to be introduced tomake the gauge symmetry off-shell To prove the theorem it is not necessary toknow the concrete trace pattern the duality between the cohomology groupsis sufficient The details of the trace pattern are in Section 45

41

In the fermionic case the traces are substituted for Γ-traces Important isthat acting on tensor indices only σminus does not break down the irreducibility ofspin-tensors The duality has the form H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 or simply H

pminuskg=0 sim

Hp+k+1g=0 which means that equations are of the first order and the duality between

fieldsequations gauge symmetriesBianchi identities takes place which completesthe proof

Note that Yg=s1 equiv Yn=0k=0 has the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensorfor a spin-Y massless field

sNpN

s2p2

s1

p1 + 1

(421)

Analogously to the examples of Section 33 massless mixed-symmetry fields can bedescribed by the same unfolded system (16) that is restricted to Wg

q with g ge g0ie the system contains infinitely many dual formulations As the generalized Weyltensor and its descendants are non-gauge fields the dual descriptions with g0 ge s1are non-gauge and the dual descriptions with 0 lt g0 lt s1 are gauge

43 Physical Degrees of Freedom Counting

Notwithstanding the simplicity of the unfolded form and the uniqueness of unfoldingthere still might be a question of whether the unfolded equations do describe thecorrect number of physical degrees of freedom

It is well-known that for systems with the first class constraints only with mass-less fields belonging to this class the counting of degrees of freedom is that one firstlevel gauge parameter kills two degrees of freedom one second level gauge parame-ters kills three degrees of freedom and so on For example a spin-two massless fieldpossesses d(dminus3)

2degrees of freedom which is just d(d+1)

2minus 2d d(d+1)

2and d being the

number of components of φmicroν and ξmicroThe complete information concerning the rsquonumberrsquo of fieldsgauge parameters

ie the multiplicity and the symmetry of corresponding tensors is contained inH

kg=0(σminus) for k = 0p Not only can a number of physical degrees of freedom be

calculated but the whole exact sequence that defines an iso(d minus 1 1) irrep can bederived The elements of this sequence are certain so(dminus 1) tensors that define anso(dminus 2) tensor as a quotient of so(d minus 1) tensors eg (218) The decompositionof so(dminus 1 1)-fields into irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) can be done with the aid ofpartmicro or after Fourier transform with the aid of momentum pmicro

For example for a spin-two field the cohomology groups that correspond to thedynamical fieldsdifferential gauge parameters and its decomposition into so(dminus 1)irreps have the form

42

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus bull sim φmicroν φ

νν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2bull

Quick sort of Young diagrams in 0 minusrarr 2H0 minusrarr H1 minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 gives the

correct exact sequence 0 minusrarr minusrarr minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 which defines a masslessspin-two irrep H (0 )

For the simplest mixed-symmetry field the hook- there are two levels of gaugetransformation hence relevant cohomology groups are H

0 H1 and H2

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus oplus bull sim ξAmicroν oplus ξ

Smicroν ξ

Sνν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2 oplus 2bull

H2 oplus sim φmicroνλ φ

νmicroν 6= 0 oplus oplus oplus 2 oplus bull

Again quick sort of diagrams in 0 minusrarr 3H0 minusrarr 2H1 minusrarr H2 minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0

gives exact sequence (218)Consequently the problem of calculation the number of physical degrees of free-

dom to be precise of deriving the exact sequence is effectively reduced to the simplecombinatoric problem of (i) decomposition so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagram representa-tives of H(σminus) to so(dminus 1)-diagrams (ii) cancellation of like terms in sequence

0 minusrarr (p+ 1)H0 minusrarr pH1 minusrarr minusrarr 2Hpminus1 minusrarr Hp minusrarr H (0Y) minusrarr 0 (422)

Skipping combinatoric technicalities we state that in the general case of a spin-Ymassless mixed-symmetry field (422) reduces to the correct exact sequence thatdefines a uirrep H (0Y) of iso(dminus 1 1)

44 Solving the Generalized Jacobi Identities

Unfolding some dynamical system there arises a problem of solving Jacobi identities(33) that have schematically a form hhdω1

q equiv 0 where a number of backgroundvielbeins ha is contracted with the fiber indices of ω1

q The Jacobi identity restrictsdω1

q to have a certain specific form dω1q = hhω2

r where the so(dminus1 1)-irrep inwhich ω2

r takes values the degree r and the projector built of hh are completelydetermined The solutions are given by21

Lemma A Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values inY = Y(s p) (k 1)

so(dminus 1 1)-irrep The general solution of

hcdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq = 0 (423)

21As was pointed out in Section 33 nonzero traces either violate Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms and therefore are ignored

43

has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq k lt s

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1 k = s q ge p + 1

0 k = s q lt p+ 1

(424)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 take values inY(s p) (k + 1 1)

and Y(s+ 1 p+ 1) so(dminus 1 1)-irreps respectively22

Proof The parametrization of dωq by a degree-(q + 1) form taking values in the

same so(dminus 1 1)-irrep dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = R

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q+1 obviously fails to satisfy

(423) Inasmuch as (423) contains a vielbein the solution has to contain a number

of vielbeins too The most general parametrization of dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q with only

one vielbein included has the form dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = hdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)|dq for some

q-form taking values in a tensor product of Y by a vector representation ie thereis no definite symmetry between index d and the rest of the indices

hchdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)c|dq = 0larrrarr ωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)[c|d]

q = 0 (425)

Only those irreps in Yotimes are allowed that have c and d symmetric ie correspondto Y(s p) (k + 1 1) for k lt s This is not possible in the case k = s ie Y =Y(s p+ 1) and the only possibility to have c and d symmetric is to add the whole

column toY which requires dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q to be represented as dω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hchcωa1(sminus1)cap(sminus1)cap+1(sminus1)cqminuspminus1 and therefore q must be large enough Roughly

speaking the proof is based on the fact that the anti-symmetrization of two indicesat the same row of a Young diagram is identically zero the anti-symmetrizationbeing due to contraction with vielbeins

Note that choosing nonmaximal solutions of Jacobi identities results in loweringthe gauge symmetry so that not all redundant components are excluded

Unfolding totally-symmetric massless higher-spin fields the possible rhs termsin dω

a(sminus1)b(t)1 = are restricted by Jacobi identities and an essential use is made

of

Corollary The solution of Jacobi identity

hcdωa(sminus1)b(tminus1)c1 equiv 0 (426)

is of the form

dωa(sminus1)b(t)1 =

hcωa(sminus1)b(t)c1 t lt sminus 1

hchdCa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 t = sminus 1

(427)

22The symmetric basis is used being more convenient in this case as the contracted with vielbeinstensors are already irreducible

44

The following statement is a generalization of the Lemma-A to the case where(s p) (k 1) is a rsquosubdiagramrsquo of a larger Young diagram Y that has a numberof rows precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) Appropriate Young symmetrizershave to be included as the mere contraction of a number of vielbeins breaks theirreducibility of the tensor For instance hcω

a(s1)b(s2minus1)c is already irreducible withthe symmetry of Ys1 s2 minus 1 but this is not the case for hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) which hasto be added one term hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) + 1s1minuss2+1

hcωa(s1)bb(s2minus1)c to get the symmetry

of Ys1 minus 1 s2

Lemma B Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values in Y =

Y( (s p) (k 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irrep where the dots stands for the blocks inY precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) The general solution of

Π[hcdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq

]= 0 (428)

where Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p)(k minus 1 1) has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

Π[

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq

]

k lt s

Π[

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1

]

k = s q ge p+ 1

0 k = s q lt p + 1

(429)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 takes values in

Y (s p) (k + 1 1) and Y (s+ 1 p+ 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irreps respec-tively and Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p) (k 1)

Proof The proof is similar to that of Lemma-A with the only comment that thesymmetrizers do not affect the argumentation that anti-symmetrization of two in-dices in the same row is identically zero

45 Dynamical Content via σminus Cohomology

Before discussing the calculation of σminus cohomology let us first recall necessary factsconcerning the evaluation of so(d minus 1 1)-tensor products Let P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) be anumber of integer partitions k1 + + kN = m of m where ki is constrained byki le ǫi and different rearrangements of ki satisfying the constraints are regarded asdistinct partitions The generating function for the partition P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) is

sum

m

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m)tm =

i=Nprod

i=1

(1minus tǫi+1)

1minus t(430)

These integer partitions gives the multiplicities of irreps in so(dminus 1 1)-tensor prod-ucts (Clebsh-Gordon coefficients) we are interested in [71]

45

The so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary irrep Ylowast = Y(si pi) by aone-column diagram of the height qlowast can be explicitly calculated as

sNpN

s2

p2

s1

p1

otimes

q =sum

αjβi

Nαjβi

αN+1

βN

αN

ǫNpN sN

β2

α2

ǫ2p2 s2

β1

α1

ǫ1p1 s1

(431)

where αi βi αi + βi le pi i isin [1 N ] αN+1 ge 0 and there exist ρ ge 0 such that

qlowast =i=Nsum

i=1

(αi + βi) + αN+1 + 2ρ (432)

The multiplicity Nαjβi of Ylowastαj βi

is given by integer partition

Nαjβi = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ǫi = pi minus αi minus βi (433)

and the total trace order r is

r =i=Nsum

i=1

βi + ρ (434)

Roughly speaking to obtain an element of the tensor product one should first cutoff from bottom-right of the i-th block a column of height βiminusγi pi ge βiminusγi ge 0 (totake different traces) and second add an arbitrary number αi+γi pi ge αi+γi ge 0 ofcells to each block provided the γi cells annihilate ie they are added to the placesfrom which γi cells were removed at the first stage Multiplicity may be differentfrom one due to different rearrangements of γi ie when multiplied by the rest ofq-column different traces can give rise to the same diagram The number of suchrearrangements is given by P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ρ =

sumi=N

i=1 γi For instance sl(n)-tensor

product otimes is given simply by

otimessl(n) = oplus oplus oplus (435)

46

The so(d)-tensor product can be represented as a sum of the form

otimesso(n) = otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

otimessl(n)

oplus

otimessl(n)

︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

oplus

otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

2nd order

=

oplus oplus oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

oplus

oplus 2 oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

︸︷︷︸

2ndorder

(436)

where the sum is over trace order and the boxes that are connected by the arc areto be contracted and then the sl(n)-product rules are to be applied to the rest ofthe diagrams

Evaluating the so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary spinor-irrep Ylowast =Y(si pi) 1

2by a one-column diagram of the height qlowast one can contract any number

of Γ matrices with the indices of the column and then multiply therefore the tensorproduct rule for spin-tensors can be reduced to bosonic rule (431) as

Y(si pi) 12otimesso(n) Y(1 q) =

qsum

k=0

(Y(si pi) otimesso(n) Y(1 q minus k)

)

12

(437)

for example

12otimesso(n) = 1

2oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order Γ-traces

oplus

12oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order Γ-traces

oplus

oplus

2 12

︸︷︷︸

2nd order Γ-traces

oplus

bull 12

︸︷︷︸

3d order Γ-traces

(438)

The multiplicity N12

αjβiof Ylowast

αj βi12

is given by

N12

αjβi=

i=ρsum

i=0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus i) (439)

Let us now analyze the origin of σminus cohomology Its action σminus Wgq rarr W

gminus1q+1

preserves g+ q and hence the whole complex C(W σminus) is a direct sum of complexesC(qprime σminus) where q

prime refers to the end element Wg=0qprime of the complex

C(qprime σminus) 0 minusrarr minusrarr Wg=1qprimeminus1 minusrarrW

g=0qprime minusrarr 0 (440)

47

Moreover σminus preserves the total rank (the form degree + rank of the so(d minus 1 1)-

irrep in which the field takes values) LetWa(s1)a(sm)q be an element ofWg

qprime When

all form indices of Wa(s1)a(sm)q are converted to the fiber ones according to (329)

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (441)

the action of σminus is just an anti-symmetrization of all d1 dq with those indices aithat are extra as compared to Ygminus1 plus some terms to restore the correct Youngsymmetry of Ygminus1 Let the decomposition ofW a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] into so(dminus1 1)-irreps be of the form

Ya1(s1) am(sm)otimes

Y(1 q) =oplus

r=0

oplus

ir

N rirYr

ir (442)

where the summation is over the trace order r and then over ir which enumeratesall so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that enters in the tensor product as the traces of the r-thorder N r

irbeing the multiplicity of Yr

ir The multiplicity of the zeroth order traces

is always equal to one N0i0= 1 In fact the diagrams Y 0

i0can be directly obtained

by the sl(n)-tensor product ruleThe very anti-symmetrization is insensitive to whether a certain component en-

ters as a trace or not When decomposed into so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the elements ofWg

qprime and Wgminus1qprime+1 have a number of components of the same symmetry type The

action of σminus is just a linear transformation that either sends the whole so(dminus 1 1)-irrep to zero23 or sends it to the components of Wgminus1

qprime+1 of the same symmetry typeImportant is that σminus does not act between different so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Thereforecomplex C(qprime σminus) is a direct sum of complexes parameterized by so(dminus 1 1)-irrepsYprime that are given by various tensor products

Ynk

otimes

Y(1 q) (443)

provided that the field WYnkq is an element of Wgprimeminusi

qprime+i for certain i When reducedto such a complex

C(Yprime qprime σminus) 0rarr rarr Vg rarr Vgminus1 rarr rarr 0 (444)

the action of σminus is a linear transformation between the spaces Vg rarr Vgminus1 dimen-

sions of which are equal to the multiplicity of Yprime in the decomposition of WYgqg and

WYgminus1qg+1 The action of σminus is maximally non-degenerate compatible with nilpotency

Therefore to find cohomology groups the dimension of each linear space in everycomplex has to be calculated

Let us note that only the types and multiplicities of so(dminus1 1)-irreps are foundbelow ie no attention is paid to the description of how the corresponding tensorsare contained in the fields WY

qprime This is sufficient for our purposes though it isobvious (412) how the metric-like field φYM

is incorporated in an element ofWg=0p

23provided that the appropriate basis on the space of so(dminus1 1)-irreps with the same symmetrytype is chosen

48

The calculation of σminus cohomology is divided into three cases that cover the wholevariety of so(dminus 1 1)-irreps that can result from the tensor products (443)

In the Lemmas below it is assumed that complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is parameterizedby so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Yprime = Ylowast

αj βiof the form (431) with Ylowast = Ynk q

lowast = q such

that WYnkq isin C(qprime σminus) and ρ is defined according to (432)

In the first case Yprime is an element of Y0 otimesY(1 q)

Lemma 1 The σminus cohomology groups Hqg=0 and H

qg=1 are nontrivial and are given

by

Hqg =

Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βiMαj βi

αN+1 = 0sumi=N

i=0 αi = qq isin [0 p] g = 0

H2pminusqminus1 q isin [p+ 1 2p+ 1] g = 1

empty q gt 2p+ 1 any g

(445)where Mαj βi is the multiplicity of the irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

defined below

Proof From the very form of Yn=N0 equiv Yg=0 equiv Y(si minus 1 pi) it follows that theso(dminus1 1)-irreps that the element ofWg=0

q sim Y0otimesY(1 q) decomposes into may

be contained in Wg=1qminus1 only ie Wg=0

q and Wg=kqminusk contain no so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of

the same symmetry type for k gt 1 Therefore the length of complex C(Yprime q σminus)where Yprime isin Y0otimesY(1 q) is equal to one ie C(Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

q σminus) 0 minusrarrV1 minusrarr V0 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions of V0 and V1 are given by the multiplicitiesof the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

in Wg=1qminus1 and Wg=0

q respectively

dim(V1) =

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus 1) ρ ge 1

0 ρ = 0αN+1 = 0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) αN+1 gt 0

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) (446)

If αN+1 gt 0 the dimensions of V0 and V1 are equal and each irreducible componentof Wg=0

q with αN+1 gt 0 can be gauge away by virtue of the corresponding element

of Wg=1qminus1 thus being exact H

kgt2p+1 = empty inasmuch as ρ le p and the componentsof the forms with rank greater than (2p + 1) must have αN+1 gt 0 thus beingexact If αN+1 = 0 the dimensions are different dim(V1) lt dim(V0) for q le pdim(V1) = dim(V0) for q = p + 1 and dim(V1) gt dim(V0) for q gt p Thereforethe number of those Ysi piαj βi

isin Wg=0q q le p that are not exact is equal to

Mαj βi = |dim(V1) minus dim(V0)| the same is the number of those Ysi piαj βiisin

Wg=1qminus1 q gt p+ 1 that are not exact The obvious property of integer partitions

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ǫ1 + + ǫN minusm) (447)

results in the important duality in the cohomology groups Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 or

roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on

49

The second case is the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) where Yprime is an element of the tensor

product Ynk otimesY(1 q) for certain q ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmaxn minus 1

Lemma 2 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainqprime ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmax

n minus 1 the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The complex has the length two ie 0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr 0 wherethe dimensions are given by dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫN 1|ρ+ 1)dim(V2) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ+ 1) Simple calculations with generating functions resultsin dim(V0) lt dim(V1) dim(V2) lt dim(V1) and dim(V0) minus dim(V1) + dim(V2) = 0and consequently the sequence is exact

Analogously

Lemma 3 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainq ge 0 with k = 0 and n lt N the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The speciality of such Yprime is that the complex has the length three ie0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr V3 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions are given by

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 ǫn + 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V2) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 1) ρ ge ǫn + 1

0 otherwise

dim(V3) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn minus 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 2) ρ ge ǫn + 2

0 otherwise

Again simple calculations with generating functions results in appropriate inequali-ties and dim(V0)minusdim(V1)+dim(V2)minusdim(V3) = 0 and consequently the sequenceis exact

The above three cases covers the whole variety of the so(d minus 1 1)-tensors thatcan result from the tensor products YnkotimesY(1 q) for any n k and q The caseswith sN = 1 and Y = Y0 are special but the calculation of cohomology groupsleads to the same result

In the fermionic case the computations are similar due to the multiplicity givenby (439) The difference is that all nontrivial cohomology is concentrated in gradezero Indeed taking into account (446) where P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) is to be replaced by(439) it follows that dim(V0) ge dim(V1) for all q and H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 where r

is referred to the Γ-trace order or roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 andso on

5 Conclusions

The unfolded system constructed in the paper has a simple form of a covariantconstancy equation and describes arbitrary mixed-symmetry bosonic and fermionic

50

massless fields in d-dimensional Minkowski space The gauge fieldsparameters aredifferential forms with values in certain finite-dimensional irreducible representationsof the Lorentz algebra that are uniquely determined by the generalized spin

The key moment is that all gauge symmetries are manifest within the unfoldedformulation which is of most importance in controlling the number of physicaldegrees of freedom when trying to introduce interactions Unfolded systems areformulated in terms of differential forms which is a natural way to respect diffeo-morphisms and hence to describe systems that include gravity

Though the necessary conditions for the system to have a lagrangian descriptionare satisfied ie the fields are in one-to-one correspondence with the equations andthe k-th level gauge symmetries are in one-to-one correspondence with the k-thBianchi identities the very lagrangian remains to be constructed

Another interesting moment is that the unfolded equations for bosons are thesame as for fermions namely the operators involved ie exterior differential dand σminus remains unmodified when tensors are replaced with spin-tensors Thoughthis nice property partly breaks down in (anti)-de Sitter space within the unfoldedapproach bosons and fermions have much in common the fact being very useful forsupersymmetric theories

The proposed unfolded system includes all non-gauge dual descriptions whichare based on the generalized Weyl tensor and its descendants but not all of gaugedual descriptions It would be interesting to construct an unfolded system thatcontains all dual formulations

The interactions of the totally symmetric massless higher-spin fields are knownto require a nonzero cosmological constant ie are formulated in (anti)-de Sitterspace [2] Mixed-symmetry fields exhibit some interesting features in the presence ofcosmological constant For example not all of the Minkowski gauge symmetries canbe deformed to (anti)-de Sitter [72] As a result massless mixed-symmetry fields havemore degrees of freedom in (anti)-de Sitter compared to its Minkowski counterparts[73] and in the Minkowski limit a massless mixed-symmetry field splits in a certaincollection of massless fields generally Contrariwise a single mixed-symmetry fieldcan not be smoothly deformed to (anti)-de Sitter Another interesting effect is theexistence of the so-called partially-massless fields [74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 8283 84] the fields that have a number of degrees of freedom intermediate betweenthat of massless and massive and split in a set of massless fields in the Minkowskilimit Therefore the extension of the proposed approach to (anti)-de Sitter spaceseems to be non-trivial but nevertheless worth being investigated

In a series of papers [85 61 86 60] it was suggested so-called frame-like approachto the general mixed-symmetry fields in (anti)-de Sitter To generalize the proposedin the present paper unfolded system to (anti)-de Sitter case and to compare to thatof [60] is the next step to perform

We consider the proposed unfolded system as the first stage in constructing thefull interacting theory of mixed-symmetry fields

51

Acknowledgements

The author appreciates sincerely MA Vasiliev for reading the manuscript and mak-ing many detailed and valuable suggestions and illuminating comments the verywork was initiated as the result of discussions with MA Vasiliev The author isalso grateful to RR Metsaev and KB Alkalaev for useful discussions and to OVShaynkman for discussion of the fermionic case The work was supported in partby grants RFBR No 05-02-17654 LSS No 440120062 and INTAS No 05-7928by the Landau Scholarship and by the Scholarship of Dynasty foundation

Appendix A Multi-index convention

The multi-index notations is used a group of indices in which certain tensor issymmetric or is to be symmetrized is denoted either by one letter with the numberof indices indicated in round brackets or by placing a group of indices in roundbrackets eg

T a(s) equiv T a1a2as T a1aiaj as = T a1ajaias (A1)

V aT a(s) equiv V (a1T a2as+1) equiv1

s+ 1(V a1T a2a3as+1 + V a2T a1a3as+1 + + V as+1T a1a2as)

(A2)

V (bT a(s)) equiv V (bT a1as) equiv1

s + 1

(V bT a1a2as + V a1T ba2a3as + + V asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A3)Analogously the group of indices in which certain tensor is anti-symmetric or is tobe anti-symmetrized is denoted by placing indices in square brackets eg

T a[s] equiv T a1a2as T a1aiai+1as = minusT a1ai+1aias (A4)

V [bT a[s]] equiv V [bT a1as] equiv1

s+ 1

(V bT a1a2as minus V a1T ba2a3as + + (minus)sV asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A5)The operators of (anti)-symmetrization are weighted to be projectors (the factor 1

s+1

above)

Appendix B Young diagrams

Comprehensive information on Young diagrams can be found for example in thetextbook [71]

Definition B1 Given an integer partition ie a nonincreasing sequence si i isin[1 n] si ge si+1 of positive integers (or nonnegative when it is convenient to workwith a sequence of a fixed length) associated Young diagram Ys1 s2 sn is agraphical representation consisting of n left-justified rows made of boxes with the

52

i-th row containing si boxes

s10s11

s1s2s3s4

s5s6s7

s8s9

Finite-dimensional irreducible representation(irrep) of sl(d) ie various irre-ducible sl(d)-tensors are in one-to-one correspondence with Young diagrams of theform Ys1 s2 s[ d

2] The associated irreducible tensors

T

s1︷︸︸︷aa

s2︷︸︸︷

bb (B1)

or in condensed notation T a(s1)b(s2) have at most [d2] groups of indices being sym-

metric in each group separately and satisfy the condition that the symmetrizationof any group of indices with one index of any of the subsequent groups is identicallyzero ie

T a(s1)(b(sk)b)c(sjminus1) equiv 0 k lt j (B2)

If s[ d2] 6= 0 and d is even the (anti)-selfduality condition has to be imposed for

appropriate signature (anti)-selfduality is conventionally denoted by the sign factors+(minus) before s[ d

2] In this paper we do not consider (anti)-self dual representations

A scalar representation Y0 0 0 is denoted by bull a vector irrep Y1 0 0by rank-two symmetric tensor irrep by rank-two antisymmetric tensor irrep

by and so onFinite-dimensional irreducible representations of so(d) are of the two types ten-

sor and spin-tensor and are also characterized by Young diagrams which in thecase of spin-tensor irreps refer to the symmetry of the tensor part Young diagramsthat correspond to spin-tensor irreps are labeled by 1

2-subscript Spinor indices

α β γ = 12[d2] are placed first and are separated from tensor indices by rdquordquo For

example a spinor ψα irrep is denoted by bull 12 a vector-spinor irrep Aαaby 1

2and

so on To make tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry conditionthe tracelessness condition with respect to each pair of indices is to be imposed

ηccTa(s1)cb(siminus1)cd(sjminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n j = 1n (B3)

To make spin-tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry condition Γ-tracelessness condition with respect to each tensor index and a spinor index is to beimposed

Γαc βT

βa(s1)cb(siminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n (B4)

where Γαc β satisfy Γα

a βΓβb γ

+ Γαb βΓ

βaγ = 2ηab Additional conditions on spinors viz

Majorana Weyl and Majorana-Weyl are irrelevant to the problems concerned Also

53

in both cases it is required for the sum of the heights of the first two columns ofYoung diagrams to be not greater than d Note that the Γ-tracelessness conditionis stronger than the tracelessness one and applying the Γ-tracelessness twice to twosymmetric indices gives the tracelessness

0 = 2ΓαaβΓ

βb γT γ(ab) = ηabT

αab (B5)

To handle with arbitrary large Young diagrams the so-called block representationis used ie the rows of equal lengths are combined to blocks

Y(s1 p1) (sn pn) equiv Y

p1︷ ︸︸ ︷s1 s1

p2︷ ︸︸ ︷s2 s2

pn︷ ︸︸ ︷sn sn (B6)

References

[1] C Fronsdal ldquoMassless fields with integer spinrdquo Phys Rev D18 (1978) 3624

[2] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoCubic interaction in extended theories ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Nucl Phys B291 (1987) 141

[3] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoOn the gravitational interaction ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Phys Lett B189 (1987) 89ndash95

[4] M A Vasiliev ldquoConsistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in(3+1)-dimensionsrdquo Phys Lett B243 (1990) 378ndash382

[5] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoOn the geometry of higher-spin gauge fieldsrdquoClass Quant Grav 20 (2003) S473ndashS486 hep-th0212185

[6] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoFree geometric equations for higher spinsrdquoPhys Lett B543 (2002) 303ndash310 hep-th0207002

[7] M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear equations for symmetric massless higher spin fieldsin (a)ds(d)rdquo Phys Lett B567 (2003) 139ndash151 hep-th0304049

[8] X Bekaert I L Buchbinder A Pashnev and M Tsulaia ldquoOn higher spintheory Strings brst dimensional reductionsrdquo Class Quant Grav 21 (2004)S1457ndash1464 hep-th0312252

[9] D Sorokin ldquoIntroduction to the classical theory of higher spinsrdquo AIP ConfProc 767 (2005) 172ndash202 hep-th0405069

[10] X Bekaert S Cnockaert C Iazeolla and M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear higherspin theories in various dimensionsrdquo hep-th0503128

[11] A Sagnotti E Sezgin and P Sundell ldquoOn higher spins with a strong sp(2r)conditionrdquo hep-th0501156

[12] P K Townsend ldquoCovariant quantization of antisymmetric tensor gaugefieldsrdquo Phys Lett B88 (1979) 97

54

respect to gauge transformations with gauge parameters not subjected to ξ = 0To make the symmetry off-shell generally requires to relax the irreducibility of theso(dminus 1 1)-representation in which field φY(x) takes values

For instance a massless totally symmetric spin-s field can be described[53] by atraceless rank-s symmetric field φmicro1micros

with an off-shell gauge symmetry

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

(d+2sminus4)η(micro1micro2part

νpartρφνρmicro3micros) = 0 φννmicro3micros

= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1

= 0 partνξνmicro2microsminus1) = 0 (212)

where in order for φmicro1microsto be traceless the gauge parameter has to be not only

traceless but transverse also this still being true for general mixed-symmetry fieldsApparently to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters the trace-lessness constraint for field φmicro1micros

has to be relaxed The same spin-s massless fieldcan be described[1] by field φmicro1micros

subjected to5

φmicro1microsminus spart(micro1part

νφνmicro2micros) +s(sminus1)

2part(micro1partmicro2φ

ννmicro3micros) = 0 φνρ

νρmicro5micros= 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1

ξmicro2micros) ξννmicro3microsminus1= 0

(213)

where in order to get rid of any differential constraints on gauge parameters a trace-lessness is relaxed to a double-tracelessness ie field φmicro1micros

takes values in thedirect sum of two so(d minus 1 1)-irreps being symmetric traceless tensors of ranks sand (s minus 2) The general statement is that for equations of motion to have an off-shell gauge symmetry the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep in which field φY(x) takes values has tobe reducible with additional direct summands representing certain nonzero tracesThese additional fields are called auxiliary and carry no physical degrees of freedomImposing certain gauge equations (28) can be restored

A massless totally antisymmetric spin-p field can be described by an antisym-metric rank-p tensor field ω[micro1microp] subjected to

ωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1part

νωνmicro2microp] = 0 δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp] (214)

where the symmetry at the all levels of reducibility is manifest and off-shell ieδξmicro1micropminus1 = part[micro1ξmicro2micropminus1] for the second level gauge parameter ξmicro1micropminus2 not subjectedto any differential constraints and analogously for the gauge symmetries at deeperlevels

Much similar to totally anti-symmetric fields mixed-symmetry massless fieldspossess reducible gauge transformations ie for a field φ with equations of motioninvariant under gauge transformations δξ1φ =

sum

i1partξi11 there exist the second level

gauge transformations δξ2ξi11 =

sum

i2partξi22 such that δξ2φ equiv 0 there exist the third

level gauge transformations δξ3ξi22 =

sum

i3partξi33 such that δξ3ξ1 equiv 0 and so on The

difference from totally anti-symmetric fields is in that there are generally more thanone gauge parameters at each level of reducibility (enumerated by index ik at thek-th level)

5Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [1] have the form Gmicro1microsminus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 where Gmicro1microsis equal to (213) the two forms being equiva-

lent

10

For instance the simplest mixed-symmetry massless field has the spin- andcan be minimally described[16 17] by a field φ[micromicro]ν which is anti-symmetric in thefirst two indices and satisfies Young symmetry condition6 φ[micromicroν] = 0 The equationsof motion

φmicromicroλ + 2part[micropartλφmicro]λν minus partνpart

λφmicromicroλ minus 2partνpart[microφλ

micro]λ = 0 (215)

are invariant underδφmicromicroν = part[microξ

Smicro]ν + part[microξ

Amicro]ν minus partνξ

Amicromicro (216)

with symmetric and anti-symmetric gauge parameters ξS(microν) and ξA[microν] Let us stress

that to maintain an off-shell gauge symmetry field φ[micromicro]ν has to take values in a

reducible so(d minus 1 1) representation oplus so does symmetric gauge parameterξS(micromicro) oplus bull which is in accordance with φ ν

microν 6= 0 and ξSνν 6= 0 Analogously tototally anti-symmetric fields there exist second level gauge transformations with avector parameter ξmicro

δφmicromicroν = 0

δξAmicroν = 23(partmicroξν minus partνξmicro)

δξSmicroν = partmicroξν + partνξmicro

(217)

In this case H

(

0)

is given by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

oplusD (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0 (218)

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) field the depthof reducibility of gauge transformations is equal to p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi where p is the height

of the first column of the Young diagram and at the r-th level of reducibility gaugeparameters have the symmetry of

sN minus 1

pNkN

s2 minus 1

p2k2

s1 minus 1

p1

k1

i=Nsum

i=1

ki =

i=Nsum

i=1

pi minus r (219)

This pattern of reducibility of gauge transformations will be of great importancewhile constructing the unfolded formulation in Section 4 As is easily seen at the

6In more detail the field φmicroνλ satisfies φmicroνλ = minusφνmicroλ φmicroνλ+φνλmicro+φλmicroν = 0 Equivalentlya symmetric basis can be used ie φSmicroνλ = φSνmicroλ φ

Smicroνλ + φSνλmicro + φSλmicroν = 0 The two bases are

related by φS(microν)λ = 1radic3(φAmicroλν + φAνλmicro) φ

A[microν]λ = 1radic

3(φSmicroλν minus φ

Sνλmicro)

11

first level of reducibility the gauge parameters are various tensors whose LorentzYoung diagrams are obtained by cutting off one cell from the original so(d minus 2)-diagram in all possible ways ie the number of gauge parameters at the first levelis equal to the number of blocks N eg two for spin- There is only one gaugeparameter at the deepest level of reducibility whose Young diagram is obtained bycutting off the first column from Y eg for spin-

This pattern corresponds of course to on-shell equations ie the gauge param-eters taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of Young symmetry (219) are subjectedto (28)-like equations To obtain an off-shell gauge symmetry the field content hasto be extended to take values in certain reducible so(d minus 1 1)-representations ad-ditional components turn out can be identified with certain traces of a single fieldwith the symmetry of Y as an sl(d)-tensor In general gauge parameters are alsoreducible tensors with the symmetry of (219) In the case of a spin- massless fieldthe trace φ ν

microν in the sector of fields and the trace ξSνν in the sector of gauge param-eters are the additional components In the general case of a spin-Y = Ys1 snmassless field field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) should satisfy [20]

ηmicroimicroiηmicroimicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n] (220)

which is a generalization of the Fronsdalrsquos double-trace condition (213) As it will beshown this condition naturally arises in the unfolded approach Note that double-tracelessness is imposed on each group of symmetric indices and it is not requiredfor cross-traces to vanish

Let a generalized Weyl tensor for a minimally described spin-Y massless field bea gauge-invariant combination of the least order in derivatives of field φY(x) that isallowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell On the other hand it is the generalized Weyltensor that the minimal non-gauge description of a massless spin-Y field is basedon For a spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN)so(dminus2) massless field the generalizedWeyl tensor has the symmetry of Y(s1 p1 + 1) (s2 p2) (sN pN)so(dminus11) and isof the s1-th order in derivatives In the case of spin-one (Y = so(dminus2)) Maxwell field

strength Fmicroν with the symmetry of can be also called a generalized Weyl tensorFermionic mixed-symmetry fields share most features of bosonic ones viz the

reducibility of gauge transformations the enlargement of the field content for theequations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge invariance The difference is thatthe equations for fermions have the first order in derivatives and the irreducibility ofspin-tensors is achieved by the Γ-tracelessness condition7 instead of the tracelessnessone

For example a massless totally symmetric spin-(s + 12) field can be described

7Γmicro are the Clifford algebra generators and satisfy ΓmicroΓν + ΓνΓmicro = 2ηmicroν part equiv Γmicropartmicro Γ-trace isa contraction of a spinor index and one tensor index with Γmicro eg Γνφ

microν equiv Γαν βφ

βmicroν

12

off-shell[54] by a totally symmetric spin-tensor field φα(micro1micros) subjected to8

partφmicro1microsminus spart(micro1

Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros)

ΓνΓρΓλφνρλmicro4micros= 0 Γνξνmicro2microsminus1 = 0

(221)

where in order to get an off-shell gauge invariance the irreducibility of φα(micro1micros) hasto be relaxed to the triple Γ-tracelessness

A massless totally anti-symmetric spin-Y(1 p) 12field can be described off-shell

by a totally anti-symmetric spin-tensor field ωα[micro1microp] subjected to

partωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1Γ

νωνmicro2microp] = 0

δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp]

(222)

Similar to the bosonic case (222) possesses reducible gauge transformations Thedifference is that one can impose the triple Γ-tracelessness on ωα[micro1microp] but thisrestricts the first level gauge parameter to be Γ-traceless Γνξνmicro2micropminus1 = 0 andhence the second order gauge parameter has to be on-mass-shell ie partξmicro1micropminus2 = 0Therefore for equations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge symmetry of allorders no Γ-trace conditions have to be imposed on fieldgauge parameters

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) 12field the

pattern of gauge symmetries is given by the spin-tensors with the tensor part de-scribed by (219) the definition of the Weyl tensor remains unchanged also

The descriptions based on tensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) which is analogous tothe metric gmicroν are referred to as metric-like At least in writing equiv partmicropartνη

microν theexplicit use of metric ηmicroν is made of which complicates the issue of introducinginteractions with gravitation

Let us note that in principle one can verify the gauge invariance of the fieldequations for massless mixed-symmetry fields despite the fact that the very form ofgauge transformation is cumbersome due to Young symmetrizers The advantageof the unfolded approach is in that gauge invariance at all levels of reducibility ismanifest

3 Unfolding Dynamics and σminus Cohomology

In this section we first recall the definition of unfolding and the relation of the sim-plest unfolded systems to Lie algebrasmodules and Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomologywith coefficients Second peculiar properties of unfolded systems that describe freefields and specifically the so-called σminus cohomology concept are recalled Third thevery procedure of constructing the unfolded form is illustrated on the examples ofmassless spin-zero spin-one arbitrary totally symmetric spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2)

fields the relation with the general statement of Section 1 is pointed out in each ofthe examples

8Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [54] have the form Gmicro1microsminus s

2Γ(micro1ΓνGνmicro2micros) minus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 Gmicro1micros= partφmicro1micros

minus spart(micro1Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0 which is equivalent to

(222)

13

31 General Features

Some dynamical system is said to be unfolded [31 32 33] if it has the form

dWA = FA(W ) (31)

whereWA is a set9 of differential forms of degree-qA on some d-dimensional manifoldMd d - exterior differential on Md and FA(W ) is an arbitrary degree-(qA + 1)function of WA assumed to be expandable in terms of exterior (wedge) productsonly10

FA(W ) =infinsum

n=1

sum

qB1++qBn=qA+1

fAB1Bn

W B1 and andW Bn (32)

where fAB1Bn

are constant coefficients satisfying fAB1BiBj Bn

= (minus)qBiqBj fA

B1BjBiBn

Moreover FA(W ) must satisfy the integrability condition (called generalized Jacobiidentity) obtained by applying d to (31)

F B δFA

δW Bequiv 0 (33)

Any solution of (33) defines a free differential algebra (FDA) [55 56 57 58] If Ja-cobi identities (33) are satisfied irrespective ofMd dimension11 the free differentialalgebra is referred to as universal [10 59] It is the universal algebras only that willbe considered further

Equations (31) are invariant under gauge transformations

δWAqA

= dǫAqAminus1 + ǫBqBminus1

δFA

δW B for qA gt 0 (34)

δWA0 = ǫB

prime

0

δFA

δW Bprime

1

Bprime qBprime = 1 for qA = 0 (35)

where ǫAqAminus1 is a degree-(qA minus 1) form taking values in the same space as WAqA

Inits turn δWA

qA= 0 can be treated as unfolded-like system for ǫAqAminus1 ie dǫ

AqAminus1 =

minusǫBqBminus1δFA

δWB there emerge second level gauge transformations

δǫAqAminus1 = dξAqAminus2 minus ξBqBminus2

δFA

δW B (36)

provided that FA(W ) is linear in matter fields and analogously for the gauge trans-formations at deeper levels Therefore the reducibility of gauge transformations ismanifest in the unfolded approach For a degree-qA gauge field WA

qAthere exist qA

levels of gauge transformations

9In this section indices A B C are of arbitrary nature In the cases of practical significance AB C vary over certain irreps of the Lorentz algebra

10The wedge symbol and will be systematically omitted further11As the forms with the rank greater than d are identically zero there exist certain identities

eg Wn andWn equiv 0 for n+m gt d which make the operator δδWA to be ill-behaved

14

The use of the exterior algebra respects diffeomorphisms which is very appropri-ate for introducing interactions with the gravitation The whole information aboutthe dynamics turns out to be contained in FA(W ) and one can even extend anunfolded system to other manifolds[59] simply by changing the exterior differentialthe new unfolded system has literally the same form

Note that introducing enough auxiliary fields it is possible to reformulate anydynamical system in the unfolded form although it may be difficult to unfold someparticular system or to find all unfolded forms

Collected below are some important cases of unfolded systems which have adirect bearing on Lie algebras [55 59]

Lie algebrasFlat connections Let ΩI equiv ΩImicrodx

micro be a subsector of degree-oneforms The only self-closed unfolded equations are of the form

dΩI = minusf IJKΩ

JΩK (37)

Generalized Jacobi identity (33) implies the Jacobi identity f IJKf

JLMΩKΩLΩM equiv

0 for some Lie algebra g with structure constants f IJK Therefore the closed

subsector of one-forms is in one-to-one correspondence with Lie algebras and(37) is the flatness condition for a connection ΩI of g This provides acoordinate-independent framework for describing background geometry Inthe cases of interest g is iso(d minus 1 1) so(d minus 1 2) so(d 1) and sp(2n) [59]Background geometry connection ΩI is assumed to be of order zero whereasall matter fields including dynamical gravitation are of the first order Allequations are assumed to be of the first order in matter fields and hencedescribe free fields only

In this paper g = iso(dminus 1 1) and ΩI = ab ha where ab equiv abmicro dxmicro

is a Lorentz spin-connection and ha equiv hamicrodxmicro is a background vielbein which

defines a non-holonomic basis of a tangent space at each point of the manifoldFlatness equation (37) for iso(dminus 1 1)-connection ΩI reads

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb = 0(38)

The first is the zero torsion equation that expresses the Lorentz spin-connectionvia the first derivative of hamicro The second can be recognized as the zero curva-ture equation For example in Cartesian coordinates the explicit solution isab

micro = 0 and hamicro = δamicro

The advantage of description of background geometry as the flatness conditionfor a connection of the space-time symmetry algebra is in that this way iscoordinate-independent In what follows we assume ab ha to satisfy (38)which is enough if there is no need for the explicit form of the solution in someparticular coordinate system For instance in (anti)-de Sitter space (38) ismodified by the terms proportional to the cosmological constant λ2

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb + λ2hahb = 0(39)

15

and admits no simple solutions with hamicro = δamicro ab = 0 Nevertheless without

giving the explicit solution to imply that ab ha satisfy (39) is sufficient forgeneral analysis eg for constructing Lagrangians [60]

Contractible FDA The simplest equations linear in matter fields of the form

dWAq = fA

BWBq+1 (310)

can be reduced by linear transformations to either

dWAq = WA

q+1 dWAq+1 = 0 (311)

ordWA

q = 0 (312)

where the second equation of (311) is the consequence of Jacobi identities(33) for the first one In the first case by virtue of gauge transformations(34) δWA

q = dξAqminus1 + χAq δW

Bq+1 = dχA

q the field WAq can be gauged away In

both cases by virtue of the Poincarersquos Lemma these equations are dynamicallyempty and correspond to the co-called contractible FDAs [55]

g-modulesCovariant constancy equations Let WAq be a closed subsector of

q-forms of matter gauge fields Linear in matter fields equations may involvethe background g-connection ΩI which is of zeroth order Such equationsreferred to as linearized over g background (described by any solution ΩI of(37)) have the form

dWAq = minusΩIfI

ABW

Bq (313)

Jacobi identity (33) where (37) is also taken into account

ΩJΩK(minusf I

JKfIAB + fJ

ACfK

CB

)W B

q = 0 (314)

implies fIAB to realize a representation of g Therefore the closed subsector

of forms of definite degree is in one-to-one correspondence with g-moduleswhereas

DΩWAq equiv dWA

q + ΩIfIABW

Bq = 0 (315)

is a covariant constancy equation and (DΩ)2 = 0 since the connection is

flat (37) In the cases of interest A runs over certain finite-dimensionalso(d minus 1 1)-irreps ie g-modules decompose with respect to its subalgebraso(dminus 1 1) sub g into a direct sum of certain irreducible tensors This is whywe single out the Lorentz-covariant derivative DL from the whole g-covariantderivative DΩ the remaining part acts vertically (algebraically) In the caseof ΩI being an iso(d minus 1 1) flat connection the Lorentz covariant derivativeDL = d+ satisfy DL

2 = 0 as the exterior differential d does

DLTab = dT ab +a

cTcb +b

cTac + (316)

In Cartesian coordinates DL equiv d and we do not make any distinction betweend and DL whereas in (anti)-de Sitter (DL)

2 6= 0 and the difference between d

16

and DL has to be taken into account Also zero torsion equation (381) canbe rewritten as DLh

a = 0 The remaining part of ΩI which acts algebraicallyand mixes different so(dminus 1 1)-modules into g-modules is associated with thegenerators of translations with gauge field ha

Gluing g-modulesChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology LetWpWq andWr takevalues in g-modules R1 R2 and R3 the representations are realized by oper-ators T1 T2 and T3 respectively Still linear in matter fields but nonlinear inbackground connection ΩI equations are of the form

DΩWp equiv dWp + T1(Ω)Wp = f12(Ω Ω)Wq

DΩWq equiv dWq + T2(Ω)Wq = f23(Ω Ω)Wr

DΩWr equiv

(317)

where the terms forming g-covariant derivative are isolated on the lhs Thetwo g-modules R1 R2 appear to be glued together by the term f12(Ω Ω) isinHom(Λpminusq+1(g) otimes R2R1) Jacobi identity (33) implies f12(Ω Ω) to be aChevalley-Eilenberg cocycle with coefficients in Rlowast

2 otimesR1 where Rlowast2 is a mod-

ule contragradient to R2 and f12(Ω Ω)f23(Ω Ω) = 0 Coboundaries canbe proved to be dynamically empty and can be removed by a field redefini-tion Consequently f12(Ω Ω) should be a nontrivial representative of theChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology group with coefficients in Rlowast

2otimesR1 It followsalso that nothing but zero forms can be joined to zero forms ie the onlypossible linearized unfolded equations on forms of zero degree are (315) withq = 0

For any dynamical system linearized over certain g-background (described byany solution ΩI of (37)) equations of motion (315) along with gauge transforma-tions of all orders of reducibility acquire a very simple form

δξ1 = DΩξ0

δξpminus1 = DΩξpminus2

δWp = DΩξpminus1

DΩWp = 0

(318)

where Wp takes values in certain g-module R DΩ is the associated g-covariantderivative and ξpminusk k isin [1 p] are the gauge parameters of k-th order of reducibilitytaking values in the same g-module R and being forms of degree (p minus k) Thegauge invariance at each order of reducibility and of equations of motion is dueto (DΩ)

2 = 0 In some sense the gauge fields Wp and the gauge parameters ξpminusk

seem to play the same role at the linearized level This uniformity is of essentialimportance when analyzing unfolded systems

In the presence of gluing terms eg when only two modules say R1 and R2 areglued by nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycle fpr(Ω Ω) full chain of equations

17

and gauge transformations (318) is modified to12

δξ11 = DΩξ10

δξ1pminusr = DΩξ1pminusrminus1

δξ1pminusr+1 = DΩξ1pminusr + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

20 δξ21 = DΩξ

20

(319)

δξ1pminus1 = DΩξ1pminus2 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus2 δξ2rminus1 = DΩξ

2rminus2

δW 1p = DΩξpminus1 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus1 δW 2

r = DΩξ2rminus1

DΩW1p = fpr(Ω Ω)W

2r DΩW

2r = 0

where W 1p ξ

1pminusk and W 2

r ξ2rminusm take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively

Important is that the gauge fieldsparameters taking values in R2 contribute to therhs of the equationsgauge transformations for the gauge fieldsparameters takingvalues in R1 but for forms of degree greater than (p minus r) The above two systemsare nothing but the specializations of (31) (34) (36)

Also let us note that there is no strong reason to make any distinction betweenthe terms linear in the background g-connection ΩI which correspond to g-modulesand the terms of higher order in ΩI which correspond to Chevalley-Eilenberg co-cycles Both terms can be combined into a single object the generalized covariant-derivative D = d+T (Ω)+f(Ω Ω) equiv DΩ+f(Ω Ω) with the property D2 = 0Moreover by means of D (319) and (318) can be rewritten in a similar mannerConsequently at the linearized level the most general unfolded equations and gaugetransformations have the form

δξ1 = Dξ0

δξpminus1 = Dξpminus2

δWp = Dξpminus1

DWp = 0

(320)

where D is built of d background connection ΩI and satisfies D2 = 0 The gaugefieldsparameters take values in certain spacesWq viz Wp isin Wp ξpminus1 isin Wpminus1ξ0 isin W0 The elements of Wq are differential forms with values in certain g-modules It is also convenient to define higher degree spaces Wqgtp the equationsRp+1 = DWp = 0 take values in Wp+1 Rp+2 = DRp+1 belongs to Wp+2 andby virtue of D2 = 0 satisfies Rp+2 equiv 0 and so on Therefore there exist certainidentities which belong to Wp+2 for the equations which belong to Wp+1 andthere exist certain identities which belong to Wp+3 for the identities in Wp+2 andso on At the field theoretical level these identities correspond to Bianchi identitiesfor the first level gauge transformations higher identities correspond to the Bianchiidentities for the deeper levels of gauge transformations

12The sign factor (minus)pminusr+1 before fpr(Ω Ω) is ignored and is thought of as the part of thedefinition of fpr(Ω Ω)

18

A remark should be made that the forms belonging to Wq may have differentdegrees if there are Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles present As a result spaces Wq

may contain different number of elements For instance (319) can be reduced to(320) if one defines

Wq =

W 1q q lt pminus r

W 1q W

2qminusp+r q ge (pminus r)

(321)

where W 1q and W 2

qminusp+r take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively In termsof (319) the elements of Wq for q lt (pminus r) were referred to as ξ1q the elements ofWq for q = (pminus r)(pminus 1) to as ξ1q ξ

2qminusp+r the elements ofWq for q = p to as W 1

pW 2

r the elements of Wq for q gt p to as R1q R

2qminusp+r (the equations of motion and

Bianchi identities)

32 Interpretation of Unfolded Systems Describing free Fields

When describing free fields unfolded formulations will be referred to as frame-like [61 60] though the very term frame-like has a more broad definition Thesesystems consist of equations (37) describing background geometry of a finite chainof (317)-like equations describing the gauge fields of the model and of (317)-likeequations with q = 0 glued to gauge forms ie it requires a Lie algebra g (commonlyiso(dminus1 1) so(dminus1 2) or so(d 1)) a set of g-modules R0RN and an appropriateset of nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles f01fNminus1N The physical degreesof freedom are contained in the forms of zero degree and the module RN in whichzero degree forms take values is infinite-dimensional

Since frame-like unfolded systems contain inevitably infinitely many fields mostof them being either auxiliary or Stueckelberg13 there arises a problem of reconstruc-tion a metric-like formulation by a given unfolded formulation or of extracting thedynamical content for a given unfolded system

The questions to be answered are what are the dynamical fields what arethe differential gauge parameters and what are the gauge invariant equations ofmotion These answers are not universal and depend on the chosen scheme ofinterpretation Different interpretations correspond to dual descriptions of the samedynamical system

Frame-like unfolded systems are endowed at the linearized level with additionalstructures providing a natural way for interpretation Indices AB vary overcertain finite dimensional Lorentz irreps ie each of Rn n = 0 N decomposes asRn =

sum

k Pnk where Pnk are certain so(d minus 1 1)-modules characterized by Ynk

Young diagrams of Section 1We say that some frame-like unfolded system is given an interpretation if [62]

1 On the whole space W =oplusinfin

q=0Wq where the matter gauge fields gauge pa-rameters equations of motion and Bianchi identities take values there exists

13A field is called Stueckelberg if it can be gauged away by pure algebraic symmetry

19

a bounded from below grading g = 0 1 ie Wq =oplusinfin

g=0Wgq The ho-

mogeneous element of Wgq is a certain differential form with values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep and is denoted as W gq In simplest cases the grade is just the

rank of the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep the element of Wgq takes values in

2 The closed subsector of one-forms ΩI describes a background geometry vizMinkowski or (anti)-de Sitter The generalized covariant derivative D is to bedivided into three parts the last one not being necessary nontrivial

D = DL minus σminus + σ+ (322)

where DL is a background Lorentz-covariant derivative and has a zero gradeσminus is an operator of grade (minus1) and σ+ contains positive grade operatorsThe only differential part is in DL whereas σplusmn acts vertically and is built ofthe background vielbein ha If two modules are glued the gluing element issupposed to be of grade (minus1) and also denoted as σminus

The equations then have the form

DLWn +

gminusnsum

i=1

σ+(W n+i

)= σminus

(W n+1

) g = 0 1 (323)

and analogously for the gauge transformations In the flat space all operators ofpositive grade appear to be trivial for the massless case As it does not affect theanalysis let us consider a simplified version with σ+ = 0 Then D2 = DL

2+σminusDL+DLσminus + (σminus)

2 = 0 is equivalent to DL2 = 0 (σminus)

2 = 0 and σminusDL +DLσminus = 0 Thefirst is a part of the flatness condition (38) for the iso(d minus 1 1)-connection Thesecond is the nilpotancy condition for σminus The third is satisfied provided that σminus istwisted by the factor (minus)∆g where (∆g + 1) is a degree of σminus which is equal to thenumber of the vielbeins ha that σminus is built of Indeed the vielbeins ha anticommutewith DL and hence the action of σminus is to be twisted by the factor (minus)∆g in orderσminusDL +DLσminus = 0 holds true Without further mention the pure sign factor (minus)∆g

will be though of as a part of the definition of σminusIt is useful to illustrate the action of σminus when for example unfolded equations

on fields with values in two modules R1 and R2 are glued as in (319)

R1︷ ︸︸ ︷

R2︷ ︸︸ ︷ g

q

t t t t

t t t

W 1p

ξ1pminus1

ξ10

W 2r

ξ2rminus1

ξ20

(324)

20

where short arrows stand for the action of σminus within each module and long arrowsfor the action of σminus between two modules (gluing terms) and dots stand for gaugefieldsparameters at different grades bold dots represent the elements of Wp =W 1

pW2r

All information about the dynamics turns out to be concealed in cohomologygroups of σminus [62] H(σminus) =

Ker(σminus)Im(σminus)

Let us analyze unfolded system (320) whichat grade g has the form

δξg1 = DLξg0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 )

δW gp = DLξ

gpminus1 + σminus(ξ

g+1pminus1)

0 = DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p )

(325)

Beginning from the deepest level of gauge transformations and from the lowestgrade it is obvious that those ξg+1

0 that are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueck-elberg(algebraic) gauge parameters for those ξg1 that belong to the image of σminusTherefore those ξg1 that are σminus-exact can be gauged away The leftover gauge sym-metry satisfies δξg1 = DLξ

g0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 ) = 0 so that those ξg+1

0 that belong to thecoimage of σminus are expressed via derivative of ξn0 Having sieved W0 and W1 inthis way only those ξg0 are still independent that are σminus-closed and hence belong toH

0(σminus) since only forms of zero-degree are elements of W0 Then those ξg+11 that

are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueckelberg gauge parameters for those ξg2 thatbelong to the image of σminus Therefore only those ξg1 are still independent that areσminus-closed but not σminus-exact and hence belong to H

1(σminus) Having sievedW0Wpminus1

one after another it turns out that independent differential gauge parameters at thek-th level are given by H

pminusk(σminus) Analogously those fields W gp that are σminus-exact

can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gauge parameters at Wpminus1 Thosefields W g+1

p that are not σminus-closed can be expressed via derivatives of fields at lowergrade by virtue of the equations Rg

p+1 equiv DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p ) = 0 these fields are

called auxiliary Therefore the dynamical fields ie those that are neither aux-iliary nor Stueckelberg are given by H

p(σminus) The nilpotency of D2 equiv 0 impliescertain relations of the form DLR

gp+1 + σminus(R

g+1p+1) = 0 between Rg

p+1 Therefore

auxiliary fields are expressed by virtue of σminus-exact Rgp+1 and σminus-non-closed Rg+1

p+1

are themselves expressed via derivatives of Rgp+1 Consequently the independent

equations on dynamical fields are given by Hp+1(σminus) From the cohomological point

of view higher degree forms correspond to certain nontrivial relations between equa-tions called Bianchi identities and manifest gauge nature of equations As there aregenerally more than one levels of gauge transformations one can expect the highercohomological group to be nontrivial

To sum up

21

cohomology group interpretation

Hpminusk k = 1p differential gauge parameters at the k-th level of re-

ducibilityH

p dynamical fieldsH

p+1 independent gauge invariant equations on dynamicalfields

Hp+k+1 k = 1p Bianchi identities for the k-th order gauge symmetryH

p+k k gt p supposed to be trivial in a regular case

To distinguish fields in cohomological sense the following convention is introduced[63]

Stueckelberg fields(gauge parameters) are those that can be eliminated bypure algebraic symmetry ie these fields are σminus-exact (are those that canbe used to gauge away certain fields ie these parameters are not σminus-closed)

Auxiliary fields are those that can be expressed via derivatives of some otherfields ie these fields are σminus-nonclosed Let us note that this definition isgenerally ambiguous eg in system

partA = B

partB = A(326)

which field is auxiliary is a matter of choice This ambiguity is removed byvirtue of grade[62 63]

Dynamical fields are those that are neither auxiliary nor Stueckelberg ie thesefields are representatives of σminus-cohomology classes

Note that if certain dynamical field given by Hp belongs to the grade-gf subspace

Wgfp and the corresponding equations given by H

p+1 belong to the grade-ge subspaceWge

p+1 the order of equations is equal to ge minus gf + 1If the unfolded system is supposed to admit a lagrangian formulation there has

to be a one-to-one correspondence between the number of dynamical fields and thatof equations k-th level gauge symmetries and k-th level Bianchi identities ie in acertain sense there should be a duality H

pminusk sim Hp+1+k k isin [0 p] This takes place

for all unfolded systems exemplified in this paperSince the operators involved ie DL and σminus are of grade 0 and minus1 only the

fields with the grade greater than g0 for any g0 ge 0 form a quotient module thusdescribing the same system on its own - dual formulations This picture partlybreaks in (A)dSd because of appearance of grade +1 nilpotent operator σ+

D = DL + σminus + λ2σ+ (327)

The specific character of frame-like unfolded systems which will be crucial forus is that by virtue of the inverse background vielbein hmicroa all form indices of any

gauge fieldparameter Wa1(s1)ap(sm)q can be converted to the fiber ones

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (328)

22

The resulting tensor W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is not irreducible and can be decomposedinto so(dminus 1 1)-irreps according to the so(dminus 1 1)-tensor product rule

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] =rArr Ys1 smotimes

so(dminus11)

Y(1 q) =oplus

α

Yα (329)

where one-column Young diagramY(1 q) of height-q represents the anti-symmetricindices d1 dq and Yα are the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the tensor product decomposesinto Having converted all fields (parameters equations) of a given unfolded systemto the fiber tensors one can make the identification of the fields in the unfolded ap-proach and those of the metric-like approach though the general covariance gaugeinvariance and other advantages of the unfolded formalism will be not manifestWhile constructing the unfolded formulations of a known metric-like systems or in-terpreting a given unfolded system in terms of metric-like fields this technique willbe widely used Moreover the calculation of σminus cohomology groups is largely basedon the explicit evaluation of (329)-like expressions Once an unfolded form is knownno use of this technique is needed either to generalize it to other backgrounds or tointroduce interactions

Field W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is traceless in a1 am and d1 dq separatelyHowever the cross traces need not vanish and hence some of Yα represent tracesTo distinguish between the traces of different orders let us introduce the followingthe Y-valued degree-q form WY

q is said to be a trace of the r-th order iff it has theform

WYq = hh

︸︷︷︸

r

hh︸︷︷︸

qminusr

CYprime

0 (330)

for some Yprime-valued degree-0 form CYprime

0 where (q minus r) indices of the backgroundvielbeins ha are contracted with the tensor representing Yprime and r indices are freefor the whole expression to take values in Y the appropriate Young symmetrizeris implied When the indices of WY

q are converted to the fiber ones the expression

takes the form ηη︸ ︷︷ ︸

r

CYprime ie CYprime

represents a trace of the r-th order

Different aspects of unfolding are illustrated on the examples of a massless scalarfield a massless spin-one field and a massless spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2) fields

33 Examples of Unfolding

Example 331 Unfolding a scalar field [31 62] First it should be noted thatit is easy of course to convert the Klein-Gordon equation C = 0 to a system offirst order equations

partmicroC = Cmicro

partmicroCmicro = 0(331)

but when writing the second equation the explicit form of the metric is to be usedhence these equations are not of unfolded form (31)

23

Described in terms of a scalar field C(x) the theory is brought into a non gaugeform therefore zero-forms only are allowed or else there would be some gaugesymmetry according to (34) The most general rhs of dC = has the form

dC = haCa (332)

for some vector-valued zero-form Ca This equation just parameterizes the firstderivative of C(x) and is similar to the first of (331) There are three terms allowedon the rhs of dCa =

dCa = hbCab + hbC

ab + haC prime (333)

with Cab Cab and C prime taking values in antisymmetric symmetric and scalar so(dminus1 1)-irreps ie bull The first term is forbidden by Bianchi identity hadC

a equiv 0To analyze the remaining terms let us decompose dCa into so(dminus 1 1)-irreps

partmicroCahmicrob = otimes = oplus oplus bull (334)

where = part[aCb] = part(aCa) minus 1dηaapartbC

b bull = partaCa = C

The component represents Bianchi identity in the first order reformulation ofthe Klein-Gordon equation Indeed expressing Ca as partaC implies part[aCb] equiv 0 bullrepresents the desired Klein-Gordon equation whereas is the only component al-lowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell Therefore to impose the Klein-Gordon equationthe term haC prime has to be omitted

dCa = hbCab (335)

The only possible rhs for dCaa = compatible with Jacobi identity hbdCab equiv 0

is of the form dCaa = hbCaab for Caaa taking values in a rank-three symmetric

so(d minus 1 1)-irrep ie The process of unfolding continues unambiguously inthis way and results in the full system

dCa(k) = hbCa(k)b equiv F a(k)(C) k = 0 1 (336)

where Ca(k) is rank-k totally symmetric traceless field ie taking values in k

so(dminus 1 1)-irrepTo make a connection with the general statement of Section 1 for Y = Y(0 0)

the general scheme results in

Yg bull

n k 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 0 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore spaces Wq and operator σminus which enters D = DL minus σminus should be definedas

Wq = WqWaq W

aaq (337)

24

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbWa(gminus1)bq g gt 0

(338)

Consequently W is a space of various differential forms with values in totally sym-metric traceless so(d minus 1 1)-tensors graded by the form degree and by the rankof so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Space Wq forms an irreducible iso(d minus 1 1)-module System(336) reads

Dω0 = 0 ω0 isin W0 (339)

The cohomology groups of σminus are easy to find

H0(σminus) = C(x) as the lowest grade field is automatically closed σminus(C) = 0 and it

cannot be exact as a form of zero degree Contrariwise zero-forms with gradegreater than zero are not closed σminus(C

k+1) = hbCa(k)b = 0lArrrArr Ck+1 = 0

H1(σminus) = haB(x)0 for some B(x)0 isin W

00 One-form Ba

1 = haB(x)0 is closedσminus(B

a1) = haB

a1 = hah

aB(x)0 equiv 0 and it cannot be represented as σminus(C2) =

hbCab as far as Cab is traceless The cohomology groups at higher grade are

trivial since σminus(haBa(k)(x)0) 6= 0 for k gt 0

Hqgt1(σminus) = empty as one can make sure

The interpretation in terms of Section 32 is as follows as is expected the dynamicalfield given by H

0 is C(x) The equations are given by the projection of dCa = hbCab

to H1 ie C = 0 The fields with k gt 0 are auxiliary being expressed via

derivatives of C(x) Ca(k) = partapartaC(x) Inasmuch as there is no gauge symmetryin the system the higher cohomology groups are trivial

An infinitely many dual formulations of a massless scalar field are also includedIndeed the fields with k ge k0 gt 0 form a quotient module Rk0 ie one canconsistently write

dCk = σminus(Ck+1) k ge k0 (340)

The first equationdCa(k0) = hbC

a(k0)b (341)

imposes on the dynamical field Ca(k0)

partbCba(k0minus1) = 0

part[bCc]a(k0minus1) = 0(342)

which imply at least locally Ca(k0) =

k0︷ ︸︸ ︷

partaparta C and C = 0 for some fieldC(x) All fields at higher grade are auxiliary This statement is confirmed bythe cohomology analysis H

0(Rk0 σminus) = Ck0 ie scalar is described in termsof a traceless rank-k0 symmetric tensor field subjected to the equations given byH

1(Rk0 σminus) = haBa(k0minus1)0 minus k0(k0minus1)

2(d+2k0minus4)ηaahcB

a(k0minus2)c0 +hcB

a(k0)c0 for B

a(k0minus1)0 B

a(k0)c0

taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps characterized by diagrams k0 minus 1 k0

These two elements represents just the components ofWk0

1 sim k0 otimes with the

25

symmetry of k0 minus 1 (trace) andk0

the third component with the symmetryof k0 + 1 is exact

The above results can be easily extended to (A)dSd background and to a massivescalar field [62]

DLCk = σminus(C

k+1) + σ+(Ckminus1) = 0 (343)

where there appears a nontrivial positive grade operator

σ+(Ckminus1) = (m2 minus λ2k(k + dminus 1))

(

haCa(kminus1) minus(sminus 1)

d+ 2k minus 4ηaahbC

a(kminus1)b

)

(344)

and DL is a Lorentz-covariant derivative in (A)dSd In the (A)dSd case the situationis more interesting due to the appearance of σ+ operator and the possibility of theaccidental degeneracy of σ+ when m2 = λ2kprime(kprime + dminus 1) for some kprime [62]

Example 332 Unfolding Maxwell equations [64 65] An example of masslessspin-one field is more interesting as a gauge system The main object is a one-formAmicro From gauge transformation law

δA1 = dξ0 (345)

it follows that there should not be other forms of rank greater than zero If this werethe case the gauge parameters of these new forms would be involved by virtue of(34) making the gauge law for A1 inappropriate Indeed there are two possibilitiesto introduce higher degree forms on the rhs of dA = (i) dA1 = R2 fora scalar valued degree-two form R2 which possesses its own gauge parameter χ1δR2 = dχ1 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law for A1 is modifiedto δA1 = dξ0 + χ1 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gaugeparameter χ1 This case corresponds to contractible free differential algebras (310)(ii) dA1 = hbω

b1 for a vector valued degree-one form ωa

1 which possesses its owngauge parameter ǫa0 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law forA1 is modified to δA1 = dξ0 + hbǫ

b0 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of

Stueckelberg gauge parameter ǫa0 Consequently in both cases A1 can be made non-dynamical which is not what was expected Therefore the only possibility is tointroduce a zero-form C

[ab]0 anti-symmetric in a b parameterizing by virtue of

dA1 = hahbC[ab]0 (346)

the Maxwell field strength Bianchi identity hahbdC[ab]0 equiv 0 tolerates two terms on

the rhs of dC[ab]0 =

dC[ab]0 = hcC

[ab]c0 + h[aC

b]0 (347)

with C[ab]c0 and Ca

0 taking values in and so(dminus 1 1)-irreps the former taken inantisymmetric basis In order to determine which of the terms should be omittedif any the decomposition of the first derivative of the Maxwell field strength intoLorentz irreps has to be analyzed

C [ab]|c equiv partmicroC[ab]hmicroc = otimes = oplus oplus (348)

26

where = part[aCbc] = partbCab and = partcC [ab] minus part[cCab] + 2

dminus1ηc[apartdC

b]d part[aCbc]

is identically zero provided that C [ab] is expressed via the first derivative of Amicroor represents the second pair of Maxwell equations in terms of field strength C [ab]In both cases this component should be zero and moreover this can not be keptnonzero as there is no hcC

[abc]-like term allowed on the rhs of (347) The secondpartbC

ab is the desired Maxwell equations in terms of Amicro or the first pair of Maxwellequations in terms of the field strength Consequently to impose Maxwell equationsterm h[aCb] has to be omitted whereas the third is the only component allowed tobe nonzero on-mass-shell

Again unfolding continues unambiguously and requires an infinite set of fields

C[ab]c(k)0 taking values14 in

kto be introduced

dC [ab]c(k) = hdC[ab]c(k)d k = 0 1 (349)

The full system has the form

dA1 = hahbCab0 equiv F (AC) δA1 = dξ0

dC[ab]c(k)0 = hdC

[ab]c(k)d0 equiv F [ab]c(k)(C) k = 0 1

(350)

and represents two modules being glued together by the term on the rhs of thefirst equation

For Y = Y(1 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 resultsin

Yg bull

n k 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 1 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore

Wq =

W0 q = 0

WqW[ab]qminus1W

[ab]cqminus1 q gt 0

(351)

let us point out the shortening of W0 The action of σminus on Wq isin Wq is defined as

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hahbW[ab]qminus1 g = 1

hdW[ab]c(gminus2)dqminus1 g gt 1

(352)

With D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (350) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (353)

14The fields C [ab]c(k) are taken in antisymmetric basis ie they are antisymmetric in a bsymmetric in c(k) and C [abd]c(kminus1)equiv0

27

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 0 form a finite-dimensional iso(dminus1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g gt0 form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

Again the cohomology groups are easy to find gauge parameters are given byH

0(σminus) = ξ0 dynamical fields by H1(σminus) = A1 Maxwell equations by H

2(σminus) =

h[aBb]0 and the Bianchi identities for the first order gauge transformations by

H3(σminus) = hahbB0 the rest of groups are empty H

kgt3(σminus) = empty Important is thedirect correspondence between the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2

the gauge parameters in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3There are infinitely many of non-gauge dual formulations based on C [ab]c(k0) eg

for k0 = 0 one recovers the Maxwell equations in terms of the field strength

part[aCbc] = 0

partbCab = 0

(354)

Let us note that the ambiguity at the first step of unfolding (the terms haC prime andh[aCb] in the above two examples) expresses the possibility of introducing a massterm

Example 333 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-s field [31 6466] We start from the metric-like description of a massless spin-s field in termsof a double-traceless symmetric rank-s field φmicro1micros

satisfying (213) the secondorder equations are invariant with respect to the first order gauge transformationwith traceless rank-(s minus 1) gauge parameter ξmicro1microsminus1 Inasmuch as the Young di-agram s of so(d minus 2) is of the height one there are gauge transforma-tions of the first level only Therefore the dynamical field in the unfolded ap-proach has to be a one-form There is only one way to identify φmicro1micros

and ξmicro1microsminus1

with certain ωY01 and ξY0

0 taking values in the same so(d minus 1 1)-irrep Y0 namely

Y0 = sminus 1 ie ωa(sminus1)1 and ξ

a(sminus1)0 takes values in a rank-(s minus 1) symmet-

ric traceless tensors Field φmicro1microsis identified with a totally symmetric part of

ωa(sminus1)1 ie φmicro1micros

= hb1(micro1hbsminus1

microsminus1ωa1asminus1

micros)ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 the double-tracelessness

condition is the consequence of the tracelessness of ωa(sminus1)1 in a1asminus1 ξmicro1microsminus1

is identified with ξa(sminus1)0 directly ξmicro1microsminus1 = hb1micro1

hbsminus1microsminus1

ξa1asminus1ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 andone can make sure that the Fronsdalrsquos gauge transformation law is recovered fromδω

a(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 Field ω

a(sminus1)1 has a redundant component with the symmetry

ofsminus 1

which can be made Stueckelberg by virtue of gauge parameter ξa(sminus1)b

with the same symmetry type ie

δωa(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)c0 (355)

It automatically follows that there is a degree-one gauge field ωa(sminus1)b1 coupled with

ωa(sminus1)1 as

dωa(sminus1)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)c1 (356)

28

The only solution to Bianchi identity hcdωa(sminus1)c1 equiv 0 is15

dωa(sminus1)b1 = hcω

a(sminus1)bc1 (357)

where a new field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

is introduced and so on

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1 (358)

until the field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

for which the Bianchi identity solvesas

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 (359)

where field Ca(s)b(s)0 represents a generalized Weyl tensor and has the symmetry of

s The solution of Bianchi identity hchddC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 equiv 0 has the form

dCa(s)b(s)0 = hc

(

Ca(s)cb(s)0 +

s

2C

a(s)bb(sminus1)c0

)

(360)

where Ca(s+1)b(s)0 has the symmetry of s

s+ 1 The second term on the rhs

of (360) supplements the first one to have a proper Young symmetry Further

unfolding requires a set of degree-zero forms Ca(s+i)b(s)0 taking values in so(dminus1 1)-

irreps characterized by Young diagrams ss+ i

The full system has theform

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1

δωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(k)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)b(k)c0 k isin [0 sminus 2]

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 δω

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0

dCa(s+i)b(s) = hc

(

Ca(s+i)cb(s) +s

i+ 2Ca(s+i)bb(sminus1)c

)

i isin [0infin)

(361)

By the construction the system incorporates Fronsdalrsquos field φmicro1microswith the correct

gauge law but there is still to be proved that the Fronsdalrsquos equations are reallyimposed and that there are no other dynamical fields in the system Let us recon-struct Fronsdalrsquos equations (213) whereas the second statement will be proved asa part of a more general theorem The first two equations of (361) read

partmicroωa(sminus1)ν minus partνω

a(sminus1)micro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)cν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)cmicro (362)

partmicroωa(sminus1)bν minus partνω

a(sminus1)bmicro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)bcν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)bcmicro (363)

It is convenient to convert all world indices to the fiber ones

partcωa(sminus1)|d minus partdωa(sminus1)|c = ωa(sminus1)c|d minus ωa(sminus1)d|c (364)

partcωa(sminus1)b|d minus partdωa(sminus1)b|c = ωa(sminus1)bc|d minus ωa(sminus1)bd|c (365)

15The proof is not given as more general statement about the solutions of such equations isproved in the next Section

29

where ωa(sminus1)|b equiv ωa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro ωa(sminus1)bb|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bbmicro hcmicro

Contracting (365) with ηbd and then symmetrizing c with a1asminus1 results in

partcωa(sminus1)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus1)c|c= 0 (366)

By symmetrizing in (364) a1asminus1 with d

ωa(sminus1)c|a = partcωa(sminus1)|a minus partaωa(sminus1)|c (367)

and then by contracting (364) with ηdasminus1

ωa(sminus1)c|

c= (sminus 1)

(

partcωa(sminus2)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus2)c|c

)

(368)

all the terms of (366) can be expressed via ωa(sminus1)|b Plugging these to (366) gives

ωa(sminus1)|a minus partapartc((sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c

)+ (sminus 1)partapartaω

a(sminus2)c|c= 0 (369)

where ωa(sminus1)|a is to be identified with Fronsdalrsquos field φa(s) as ωa(sminus1)|a = 1sφa(s)

then ωa(sminus2)c|

c= 1

2φa(sminus2)c

c (sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c = φa(sminus1)c and the equation

acquires the Fronsdalrsquos form (213)

φa(s) minus spartapartcφa(sminus1)c + s(sminus1)

2partapartaφ

a(sminus2)cc= 0 (370)

For Y = Y(s 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 results in

Yg sminus 1 sminus 1 s

ss+ 1

n k 1 0 1 sminus 1 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = sminus 1 g = s g = s+ 1

qg q0 = 1 qsminus1 = 1 qs = 0 qs+1 = 0

therefore

Wq =

Wa(sminus1)0 W

a(sminus1)b0 W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0 q = 0

Wa(sminus1)q W

a(sminus1)bq W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)q W

a(s)b(s)qminus1 W

a(s+1)b(s)qminus1 q gt 0

(371)and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hcWa(sminus1)b(gminus1)cq g isin [1 sminus 1]

hchdWa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)dqminus1 g = s

hc

(

Wa(gminussminus1)cb(s)qminus1 + s

gminuss+1W

a(gminussminus1)bb(sminus1)cqminus1

)

g gt s

(372)

With D = DL minus σminus full system (361) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (373)

30

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sminus 1 sim g isin [0 sminus 1]form a finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k =0 1 sim g ge s form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

The representatives of cohomology classes can be chosen as H0 = ξ

a(sminus1)0 H1 =

hbφa(sminus1)b H2 = hbhcG

a(sminus1)c minus hahcGa(sminus2)bc + γηaahahcG

a(sminus4)bcnn+ (βηabhahc +

αηaahbhc)Ga(sminus3)cn

n16 H

3 = hbhahcχa(sminus2)c H

kgt3 = empty where φa(s) and Ga(s) are

double-traceless tensor fields and ξa(sminus1) and χa(sminus1) are traceless H01 are nontrivialat the lowest grade whereas H

23 are nontrivial at grade-one therefore the orderof equations that are imposed on the dynamical field is equal to two It turns outthat there is no need in the explicit form for α β and γ it is sufficient to find outthe Young symmetry of representatives only The uniqueness of Fronsdalrsquos theoryat the level of action was demonstrated in [67] and at the level of equations in[6 53] Consequently there is no need for equations (370) to be found explicitly -those of Fronsdal are the only possible Again there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2 the gauge parameters

in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3 The system contains an infinitely many ofdual formulations those that have field W

a(sminus1)b(k0)1 at the lowest grade are gauge

dual descriptions whereas those that have field Ca(s+k0)b(s) at the lowest grade arenon-gauge Dual description based on field W

a(sminus1)b(1)1 was elaborated in [68]

Example 334 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field[69

70 31] Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field results in literally

the same unfolded system (361 373) but with fields taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that are irreducible spin-tensors with the same tensor part as in the bosoniccase Note that operator σminus is not modified but the σminus cohomology groups areslightly changed such that the equations become of the first order

The Dirac equation Unfolded system (336) or equivalently (339) describesa massless spin-1

2field provided that Ck take values in s 1

2so(dminus1 1)-irreps

ie Ck equiv Cαa(k) and Γαb βC

βba(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equation of (336)

partmicroCα = hmicroaC

αa (374)

with hbmicroΓβb α

gives the Dirac equation

Γαa βpart

aCβ = 0 (375)

the rest of equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives of dynamicalfield Cα

The Rarita-Schwinger equation Unfolded system (350) or equivalently(353) describes a massless spin-3

2field provided that irreducible tensors in (351)

are replaced by the corresponding irreducible tensor-spinors ie A1 equiv Aαmicro C

k equiv

Cα[ab]c(k) and Γαb βC

β[ab]c(k) = 0 Γαd βC

β[ab]dc(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equa-tion of (350)

1

2(partmicroA

αν minus partνA

αmicro) = hmicroahνbC

α[ab] (376)

16α = minus (s(d+sminus5)minusd+6)(sminus2)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6) β = (sminus2)

(d+sminus4) γ = (d+sminus6)(sminus2)(sminus3)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6)

31

with Γ-matrices and converting world indices micro ν to the fiber ones according toAαa equiv Aα

microhamicro gives the Rarita-Schwinger equation

Γαb βpart

bAβa minus partaΓαb βA

βb = 0 δAαa = partaξα (377)

The rest of unfolded equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives ofdynamical field Aα

microThe Fang-Fronsdal equation for a spin-(s + 1

2) massless field Unfolded

system (361) or equivalently (373) describes a massless spin-(s + 12) field pro-

vided that irreducible tensors in (371) are replaced by the corresponding irreducibletensor-spinors With all world indices converted to the fiber ones the first equationof (361) has the form

Gαa(sminus1)|[cd] equiv partcωβa(sminus1)|d minus partdωβa(sminus1)|c = ωβa(sminus1)c|d minus ωβa(sminus1)d|c (378)

where ωαa(sminus1)|b equiv ωαa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωαa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

αa(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro

Analogously to the bosonic case nonsymmetric component of ωβa(sminus1)|d canbe gauged away algebraically Hence the Fronsdalrsquos field φαa(s) is identified asωαa(sminus1)|a = 1

sφαa(s) Then Γα

b βφβa(s) = Γα

b βωβa(sminus1)|b Γα

b βΓβc γφ

γa(sminus2)bc = ηbcωαa(sminus2)b|c

and the Fronsdalrsquos triple Γ-traceless constraint is a consequence of irreducibility ofωαa(sminus1)|b in α a1asminus1 and the lack of any conditions with respect to a1asminus1 andb Since the Fronsdalrsquos field contains three irreducible components with the sym-metry of s 1

2 s-1 1

2and s-2 1

2 the equations of motion has to be

nontrivial in these three sectors too The projector on the dynamical equations issimply Γα

b βGβa(sminus1)b|a and gives

Γαb βpart

bφβa(s) minus spartaΓαb βφ

βa(sminus1)b = 0 (379)

which is in accordance with (222) But we would like to note that there aretwo components with the symmetry of s-1 1

2 namely ηbcG

αa(sminus2)b|ac and

Γαb βΓ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] The correct projector on this component of the equations isgiven by the combination

2(sminus 1)ηbcGαa(sminus2)b|ac minus γαb βγ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] (380)

which is identically zero when Gαa(sminus1)|[bc] is expressed via ωβa(sminus1)c|d by virtue of(378) Therefore it is (380) that does not express certain part of ωβa(sminus1)c|d interms of first derivatives of the dynamical field φαa(s) and thus this is a dynamicalequation Obviously (380) is a representative of σminus cohomology group H

2g=0 In

terms of φαa(s) the representative has the form

Γαb βpart

bΓβc γφ

γa(sminus1)c minus partcφαa(sminus1)c +

(sminus 1)

2partaφ

αa(sminus2)cc= 0 (381)

which is equal to the Γ-trace of (379) The gauge transformations has the form

δφαa(s) = partaξαa(sminus1) (382)

32

where Γαb βξ

βa(sminus2)b = 0Consequently unfolded equations for totally symmetric bosonic fields are proved

to completely determine the unfolded equations for totally symmetric fermionicfields Though σminus is not modified in the fermionic case σminus cohomology groupsare changed since the fermionic dynamical equations are of the first order

4 Unfolding Mixed-Symmetry Fields

First in Section 41 an example of the simplest massless mixed-symmetry field ofspin- is investigated in detail and leading arguments are given for a spin- fieldSecond the general statement on arbitrary mixed-symmetry fields is proved whereastechnical details are collected in Sections 44 and 45 The analysis of the numberof physical degrees of freedom is carried out in Section 43

41 Simplest Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Example 411 Spin- field In the metric-like approach a spin- field is mini-mally described[16 17] by the subjected to (215) field φ[micromicro]ν that takes values in a

reducible so(dminus 1 1)-representation oplus the latter component is identified withthe trace φ ν

microν The gauge transformations (216) has two levels of reducibility with

two gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξA[microν] taking values in oplus bull so(dminus 1 1)-irreps at the

first level and one parameter ξmicro taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irrep at the secondlevel (217)

First the metric-like field φ[micromicro]ν has to be incorporated into certain differentialform eYq which is called a physical vielbein the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y and the degreeq to be defined below To make the symmetries both of the first and of the secondlevel of reducibility manifest the degree of the physical vielbein has to be two atleast

Moreover were the physical vielbein taken to be a degree-one form not all of thegauge symmetries even at the first level would be manifest Indeed there are twopossibilities for physical vielbein eY1 to contain a component with the symmetry of

Namely Y = and Y = since otimes = oplus oplus and otimes = oplus oplus

The associated differential gauge parameter is ξ0 in the first case and ξ0 in thesecond case Inasmuch as the gauge parameters are the forms of degree-zero onlyone of the required two parameters is present in each of the cases

The degree of the physical vielbein has to be not greater than two if the com-ponent associated with the metric-like field φmicromicroν is required not to be a certaintrace part The reason why a dynamical field should not be a certain trace part isexplained in the next Section

Therefore the physical vielbein has to be of degree-two and has to take valuesin so(dminus 1 1)-irrep that belongs to the vector representation ie e2 equiv ea2 equiv eamicroν

The associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξa1 equiv ξamicro contains in its Lorentz decomposition

otimes = oplus oplusbull both anti-symmetric ξAmicroν = ξa[microhbν]ηab and symmetric ξSmicroν = ξa(microh

bν)ηab

33

gauge parameters the latter enters along with the trace ξamicrohmicroa There exists a second

level gauge parameter χa0 which is directly identified with ξmicro as ξmicro = hbmicroχ

aηabThere are no redundant components in the gauge parameter However physicalvielbein e2 contains one redundant component in its decomposition into Lorentz

irreps otimes = oplus oplus The first and the second components are to be associatedwith a traceful φmicromicroν whereas the third one totally anti-symmetric component e[a|bc]

of ea|bc = eamicroνhbmicrohcν is a redundant one and has to be made non-dynamical In order

to do so algebraic gauge parameter ξ[abc]0 with the symmetry of is introduced It

is obvious from pure algebraic gauge law

δea2 = hbhcξ[abc]0 (41)

that the redundant component can be fixed to zero and ea2 can be directly identifiedwith φmicromicroν as e

amicromicro = φmicromicroνh

aν From gauge transformation laws δea2 = dξa1 δξa1 = dχa

0

ie δeamicroν = 12

(partmicroξ

aν minus partνξ

amicro

) δξamicro = partmicroχ

a required gauge transformations (216)(217) for metric-like field φmicromicroν and for the first order gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξ

A[microν]

are easily recoveredSince in the unfolded approach each gauge parameter possesses its own gauge

field and vice-verse associated with ξ[abc]0 gauge field ω

[abc]1 enters as

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 (42)

which determines the first equation Applying d to this equation results in Bianchiidentity hbhcdω

[abc]1 equiv 0 which has a unique solution of the form

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 (43)

with C[abc][df ]0 having the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensor of a spin-

field ie it is anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and C[abcd]f0 equiv 0 To clarify the form of

the solution let C[abc]|[df ]0 be a degree-zero form anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and with

no definite symmetry between these two groups of indices The Bianchi identityimplies hbhchdhfC

[abc]|[df ]0 equiv 0 which is equivalent to C

a[bc|df ]0 equiv 0 since vielbeins

ha anticommute Therefore the solution is parameterized by those components of

C[abc]|[df ]0 sim otimes that has the symmetry of Young diagrams with no more than

three rows since the requirement for total anti-symmetrization of any four indicesto give zero is the characteristic property of Young diagrams with at most three

rows otimes ni is the only component of zero trace order17 with three rows andthere are no components with the number of rows less than three Alternatively one

17Although there are trace components with the number of rows less than four eg theirtensor product by the metric ηab contains components with the symmetry of the sl(d)-Young

diagrams with more than three rows Nontrivial trace with the symmetry of corresponds tothe mass-like term Hence traceful tensors either do not satisfy the Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms

34

could search for the solution in the sector of degree-one forms as dω[abc]1 = hdC

[abc]|d1

with some C[abc]|d1 but Bianchi identity hbhchdC

[abc]|d1 equiv 0 implies that the only

component of C[abc]|d1 sim otimes that is allowed must have less than three rows which

is impossible since [abc] makes Young diagrams of otimes consist of three rows atleast18 Thus one has to search for the solution among the forms of less degree

Further unfolding requires a set of fields C [abc][df ]g(k) with the symmetry ofk

to be introduced and the full system has the form

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 δea2 = dξa1 + hbhcξ

[abc]0 δξa1 = dχa

0

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 δω

[abc]1 = dξ

[abc]0

dC[abc][df ]g(k)0 = hvC

[abc][df ]g(k)v0 (44)

Consequently the unfolded system incorporates field φmicromicroν with all required differ-ential gauge parameters at all levels of reducibility the redundant component of the

physical vielbein does not contribute to the dynamics ω[abc]1 sim otimes = oplus oplus

the first component is a field strength for the redundant field once the field hasbeen gauged away the associated field strength is zero and ω

[abc]ρ = hamicrohbνhcλT[microνλ]ρ

for some T[microνλ]ρ T[microνλρ] equiv 0 which incorporates both and (as the trace) Torecover equations (215) in terms of metric-like fields it is convenient to convert allfiber indices to the world ones in the first two equations

part[microeaνλ] = hb[microhcνω

abcλ] (45)

part[microωabcν] = hd[microhfν]C

abcdf (46)

to substitute Tmicroνλρ and to contract two indices in the second equation

part[microφνλ]ρ = Tmicroνλρ (47)

partρTmicroνρλ minus partλTρ

microνρ = 0 (48)

Plugging (47) in (48) gives equation (215)For Y = Y(2 1) (1 1) ie N = 2 and p = 2 the general scheme of Section

1 results in

Yg

n k 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 1 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

18Again the trace component enters the tensor product as η otimes and has the number of rowsnot less than three

35

therefore

Wq =

W a0 q = 0

W a1 W

[abc]0 q = 1

W aq W

[abc]qminus1 W

[abc][df ]qminus2 W

[abc][df ]gqminus2 q gt 1

(49)

and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbhcW[abc]qminus1 g = 1

hbhcW[aaa][bc]qminus2 g = 2

hdW[aaa][bb]c(gminus3)dqminus2 g gt 2

(410)

with D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (44) can be rewritten as

Dω2 = 0 δω2 = Dξ1 δξ1 = Dξ0 (411)

where ω2 isin W2 ξ1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 2 k = 0 sim g = 0and n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 1 form two finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-moduleswhereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g ge 2 form an infinite-dimensionaliso(dminus 1 1)-module

Example 412 Spin- field (briefly) In the case of a massless spin- fieldthere are two gauge parameters at the first level of reducibility which have the sym-metry19 of and one gauge parameter at the second level with the symmetryof First for Y = Y(3 1) (2 1) the proposed scheme results in

Yg

n k 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3 g = 4

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 2 q2 = 1 q3 = 0 q4 = 0

therefore the physical vielbein has to be a two-form taking values in ie e2 equiv

eaab2 Associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξaab1 has components otimes = oplus oplus the first two having the symmetry of the required gauge parameters with the thirdone being redundant The last three components in the decomposition of the physical

vielbein otimes = oplus oplus oplus are also redundant By virtue of Stueckelberg

symmetry with parameter ξ1 these three components can be gauged away inasmuch

as otimes = oplus oplus The redundant component of the first level gauge

parameter ξ1 also can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg symmetry with

level-two gauge parameter ξ0 Consequently at least the fact that the unfoldedsystem incorporates the metric-like field all the required gauge parameters andredundant components do not contribute to the dynamics is proved

19To simplify the example no consideration is given to the trace components of the fields

36

42 General Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Given a massless field of spin Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) described by a metric-like field φY(x) taking values in the irrep of the Lorentz algebra so(d minus 1 1) withthe same symmetry type(minimal formulation) there exists a unique unfolded systemwith the physical vielbein at the lowest grade and all symmetries being manifest thatreproduces the original metric-like system The system has the form (11)

Sketch of the proof

1 The lowest grade field (physical vielbein) eY0q0

turns out to be completely de-termined by the requirement for it to contain the metric-like field and for itsgauge parameters ξY0

q0minusk k gt 0 to contain all the necessary gauge parametersat all levels of reducibility (219)

2 eY0q0

and its gauge parameters appear to contain redundant components thathave to be made non-dynamical The only way to achieve this is to introduceStueckelberg symmetry δeY0

q0= σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus1) δξ

Y0q0minus1 = σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus2) with certain

ξY1q1minusk k gt 0 which turns out to be unambiguously defined by this requirement

3 ξY1q1minus1 has associated gauge field ωY1

q1and gauge transformations δωY0

q0=

σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) completely determines the first equation deY0

q0= σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) whichimplies Jacobi identity σ1

minus(dωY1q1

) equiv 0 The general solution is proved in Sec-tion 44 to have the form dωY1

q1= σ2

minus(ωY2q2

) with certain ωY2q2

The secondequation implies the second Jacobi identity σ2

minus(dωY2q2

) equiv 0 and so on

4 Once the total unfolded system is defined the proof of the facts that (i)the correct dynamical equations are imposed (ii) there are no other dynamicalfields or other differential gauge symmetries in the system is obtained throughthe calculations of σminus cohomology groups Ignoring the trace pattern of fieldsie for traceful tensors the proof of (ii) can be simplified and is done in thissection Even stronger statement that there exists a duality H

p+1+k sim Hpminusk is

proved in Section 45

First as it is clear from the examples above the metric-like field φYM(x) has

to be incorporated into a differential form eY0q of degree-q taking values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep Y0 (for this reason eY0q is called physical vielbein) Having converted

all world indices to fiber ones in accordance with (329) so(dminus 1 1)-tensor productY0 otimes Y(1 q) of Y0 with one column diagram of the height q must contain thecomponent with the symmetry of YM In the case of the minimal formulationYM = Y where Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) characterizes the spin

It is useful to introduce a notion of the quotient of two Young diagrams let thequotient of two Young diagrams Y1Y2 be a direct sum of those diagrams whoseso(dminus 1 1)-tensor product by Y2 contains Y1 For the first sight given q ge 0 anyelement Q of YMY(1 q) might be chosen as Y0 If q is greater than the heightof YM the component with the symmetry YM in the tensor product QotimesY(1 q)has to be certain trace inevitably

37

Although there is no apparent problems in considering unfolded systems withdynamical field hidden in certain trace component of the physical vielbein egMaxwell gauge potential Amicro might be identified with the trace eamicroνh

microa of two-form

eamicroν However this exotic incorporating of the physical field does not take place inthe already known systems Moreover it can be proved that such exotic systemsdo not exist if irreducible Nevertheless they might be a part of some reduciblesystem which describes more than one field Therefore we require the degree q ofthe physical vielbein to be not greater than the height of YM

Inasmuch as (i) the equations imposed on φY(x) possess reducible gauge trans-formations with the number of levels equal to the height p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi of Y (ii) for

a degree-q gauge field of an unfolded system there exist q levels of gauge transfor-mations the degree q of physical vielbein eY0

q must be equal to pThe quotient YY(1 p) contains only one element (provided φY(x) is for-

bidden to be a trace component) it is the diagram (12) with the symmetry ofY0 = Y(s1 minus 1 p1) (sN minus 1 pN) ie it is equal to Y without the first col-umn Therefore physical vielbein eY0

p is completely defined So does gauge param-

eters ξY0pminusk at the k-th level of reducibility k isin [1 p] The requirement for tensor

product Y0 otimes Y(1 pminus k) to contain all gauge parameters ξik given by (219)at the k-th level of reducibility is also satisfied Consequently the whole patternof fieldsgauge parameters of the metric-like formulation is reproduced Note thatY0 equiv Y0 and q0 = p in the terms of Section 1

Let us note that if one writes down the physical vielbein explicitly as ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

where si are the lengths of the rows ofY and converts the form indices to the tangentones by virtue of inverse background vielbein hmicroa

ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|[d1dp] = ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

hmicro1d1 hmicropdp (412)

dynamical field φY(x) should be identified with ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|a1ap which hasthe symmetry of Y with some traces included Consequently the generalizedLabastidarsquos double-tracelessness condition (220) [20] is obvious inasmuch as thecontraction of two metric tensor ηaiaiηaiai with the i-th group of indices vanishes

Generally in addition to φY(x) decompositionY0otimesY(1 p) of physical vielbeineY0p into Lorentz irreps contains redundant components which must not contributeto the physical degrees of freedom So does Y0 otimesY(1 pminus k) ie in addition toξik it contains a lot of components that can not be made genuine differential gaugeparameters There are only two possible ways to get rid of redundant fields in theunfolded formalism

A redundant components could be directly fixed to zero by algebraic (Stueckel-berg) symmetry

B redundant components might be auxiliary fields for other fields (at lower grade)and so on The process stops since the grade is assumed to be bounded frombelow

We require dynamical fields incorporated in the physical vielbein to be at the lowestgrade Actually (B) takes place for dual gauge descriptions but not for the minimal

38

Therefore the only possibility to make redundant components to be non-dynamicalis to introduce a Stueckelberg symmetry with certain parameters ξY1

q1minusk

δeY0p = dξY0

pminus1 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) (413)

δξY0pminus1 = dξY0

pminus2 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus2) (414)

(415)

where σ1minus is a certain operator built of background vielbein ha that contracts a

number of indices of Y1 with hahc to obtain Y0 Diagram20 Y1 and form degreeq1 can be easily found since Y1 otimes Y1 q1 minus i i gt 0 must contain all redundantcomponents of eY0

p and ξY0pminusk

In the unfolded formalism each gauge field possesses its own gauge parameter andvice-versa Therefore there is a gauge field ωY1

q1 which contributes to the equations

for eY0p as

deY0p = σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) (416)

The first equation determines the first Jacobi identity of the form σ1minus(dω

Y1q1

) equiv 0which can be solved as

dωY1q1

= σ2minus(ω

Y2q2

) (417)

for certain gauge field ωY2q2

and operator σ2minus that satisfies σ1

minusσ2minus equiv 0 The general

solution of Jacobi identities is given in Section 44 From now on let the super-scripts of σminus be omitted The second equation determines the second Jacobi identityσminus(dω

Y2q2

) equiv 0 which can be also solved and so on Consequently the knowledgeof the lowest grade gauge field eY0

p and of the Stueckelberg symmetries required toget rid of redundant components determines the first equation which by virtue ofJacobi identities determines the second and so on The total unfolded system hasthe structure

dωYg

qg= σminus

(

ωYg+1qg+1

)

g = 0 1

δωYg

qg= dξYg

qg+ σminus

(

ξYg+1

qg+1minus1

)

δξYgqg

=

(418)

where σminus is certain algebraic operator built of background vielbein ha and (σminus)2 = 0

The only facts remain to be proved are that there are no other dynamical fieldsand that the proper correspondence (duality) between the cohomology groups holdstrue To this end it is sufficient to analyze only the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps content ofH

qg ie only the symmetry type and the multiplicity of irreducible Lorentz tensors

that by virtue of (330) are the representatives of Hqg

It is proved in the next Section that there is a duality Hpminuskg=0 sim H

p+k+1g=1 between

the σminus cohomology groups which reveals the one-to-one correspondence betweenthe gauge dynamical fields and equations of motion the level-k gauge symmetries

20The specific character of Minkowski massless fields is in that all Stueckelberg parameters canbe incorporated into a single Y1-valued form this not being the case for (anti)-de Sitter masslessfields

39

and the level-k Bianchi identities The representatives of cohomology groups in thesector of fields and gauge symmetries directly correspond to those of metric-likeapproach and there is no other nontrivial cohomology in these sectors

Though the trace pattern of fieldsgauge parameters is also important and thecalculation of σminus cohomology groups provides a comprehensive answer to this ques-tion the very procedure being a bit technical Ignoring the trace pattern of thefields it can be easily proved that the required metric-like field is incorporated inphysical vielbein eY0

q0 all the redundant components of the physical vielbein can be

gauged away by a pure algebraic symmetry and the same holds for differential gaugeparameters ξY0

q0minusk at all levels of reducibility ie the required pattern of gauge pa-rameters is recovered whereas all the redundant components are either Stueckelbergor auxiliary This is the necessary condition only and the traces has to be takeninto account Also it is still to be proved that the correct equations of motionsare imposed Provided that there are no trace conditions on the fields the sys-tem is referred to as off-shell[65] An off-shell system may contain only constraintsthat express auxiliary fields via the derivatives of the dynamical field imposing norestrictions on the latter

The off-shell system Technically ignoring the traces is equivalent to thereplacement of all so(dminus1 1)-irreps by the sl(d)-irreps that are characterized by thesame Young diagrams ie instead of taking so(dminus1 1)-tensor products one needs toapply the sl(d)-tensor productrsquos rules which are much simpler The decompositionof the physical vielbein eY0

q0into sl(d)-irreps is given by diagrams Yαi of the form

αN+1

sN minus 1

pNαN

s2 minus 1

p2α2

s1 minus 1

p1

α1

(419)

where α1+ +αN+1 = q0 = p The decomposition of Stueckelberg gauge parameterξY1q1minus1 for eY0

q0has the components of the same form but with αN+1 ge 1 because

Y1 (13) has already the form of Y0 with one cell in the bottom-left Thereforeall components of eY0

q0except for those with αN+1 = 0 are of Stueckelberg type but

there is only one component of eY0q0

with αN+1 = 0 namely it has αi = pi i isin [1 N ]and hence has the symmetry of Y The decomposition of level-k differential gaugeparameter ξY0

q0minusk has the form (419) with α1 + + αN+1 = p minus k and again all

the components of ξY0q0minusk with αN+1 ge 1 can be gauged away by pure algebraic

symmetry with ξY1q1minuskminus1 Consequently there is a complete matching between (219)

40

and those in ξY0

q0minusk that are not pure gauge themselves It can be easily proved alsothat if ignoring the traces there are no other dynamical fieldsdifferential gaugeparameters at higher grade Consequently

Lemma H(σminus) with respect to sl(d) are given by

Hk(σminus)sl(d) =

Yαi g = 0 α1 + + αN = k αN+1 = 0 k le p

empty k gt p(420)

The triviality of the higher k gt p cohomology groups for sl(d) which shouldcontain equations of motion and Bianchi identities is expected since the system isoff-shell For the equations to have the second order in derivatives the only nontrivialcohomology group H

p+1 must be at the grade-one ie Hp+1g=1 6= empty As is seen from

the examples above the equations correspond to those representatives of Hp+1g=1 that

are certain traces Indeed the total rank |WYgqg | which is equal to the sum qg + |Yg|

of degree qg and rank of Yg is preserved by σminus Therefore |WYgqg | = |W

Y0q0| + g

and |RY1q1+1| = |ω

Y0q0| + 2 = |Y|+ 2 where eY0

q0isin Wg=0

p and RY1q1+1 isin W

g=1p+1 contain

metric-like field φYM(x) and the equations on φY(x) respectively Consequently

the representative of Hp+1g=1 that corresponds to the equations on the traceless part

of φY(x) has to be identified with certain trace of the first order and so on for thetraces of φY(x)

The calculation of σminus cohomology groups carried out in Section 45 implies

1 The only nontrivial cohomology groups are Hpminuskg=0 and H

p+k+1g=1 k = 1 p

Therefore the dynamical fields and independent gauge parameters belong tothe zero grade Wg=0

q subspaces the equations are of the second order and theBianchi identities for the k-th level gauge symmetries are of the (k + 2)-thorder

2 Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 ie there is a one-to-one correspondence between the

elements of Hpminuskg=0 that are traces of the r-th order and the elements of Hp+k+1

g=1

that are traces of the (r + k + 1)-th order Roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1

Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on Therefore there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the dynamical fields and the equations of motion the level-k gaugesymmetries and the k-th Bianchi identities

3 The so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that correspond to the elements of Hpminusk(σminus) and arethe traces of the zeroth order are given by the so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagramsthat have the form (419) with αN+1 = 0 and α1 + + αN = p minus k whichexactly reproduce the required pattern (219) Note that certain higher ordertraces are also the elements of cohomology groups These fields represent thersquoauxiliaryrsquo fields of the metric-like formulation which had to be introduced tomake the gauge symmetry off-shell To prove the theorem it is not necessary toknow the concrete trace pattern the duality between the cohomology groupsis sufficient The details of the trace pattern are in Section 45

41

In the fermionic case the traces are substituted for Γ-traces Important isthat acting on tensor indices only σminus does not break down the irreducibility ofspin-tensors The duality has the form H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 or simply H

pminuskg=0 sim

Hp+k+1g=0 which means that equations are of the first order and the duality between

fieldsequations gauge symmetriesBianchi identities takes place which completesthe proof

Note that Yg=s1 equiv Yn=0k=0 has the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensorfor a spin-Y massless field

sNpN

s2p2

s1

p1 + 1

(421)

Analogously to the examples of Section 33 massless mixed-symmetry fields can bedescribed by the same unfolded system (16) that is restricted to Wg

q with g ge g0ie the system contains infinitely many dual formulations As the generalized Weyltensor and its descendants are non-gauge fields the dual descriptions with g0 ge s1are non-gauge and the dual descriptions with 0 lt g0 lt s1 are gauge

43 Physical Degrees of Freedom Counting

Notwithstanding the simplicity of the unfolded form and the uniqueness of unfoldingthere still might be a question of whether the unfolded equations do describe thecorrect number of physical degrees of freedom

It is well-known that for systems with the first class constraints only with mass-less fields belonging to this class the counting of degrees of freedom is that one firstlevel gauge parameter kills two degrees of freedom one second level gauge parame-ters kills three degrees of freedom and so on For example a spin-two massless fieldpossesses d(dminus3)

2degrees of freedom which is just d(d+1)

2minus 2d d(d+1)

2and d being the

number of components of φmicroν and ξmicroThe complete information concerning the rsquonumberrsquo of fieldsgauge parameters

ie the multiplicity and the symmetry of corresponding tensors is contained inH

kg=0(σminus) for k = 0p Not only can a number of physical degrees of freedom be

calculated but the whole exact sequence that defines an iso(d minus 1 1) irrep can bederived The elements of this sequence are certain so(dminus 1) tensors that define anso(dminus 2) tensor as a quotient of so(d minus 1) tensors eg (218) The decompositionof so(dminus 1 1)-fields into irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) can be done with the aid ofpartmicro or after Fourier transform with the aid of momentum pmicro

For example for a spin-two field the cohomology groups that correspond to thedynamical fieldsdifferential gauge parameters and its decomposition into so(dminus 1)irreps have the form

42

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus bull sim φmicroν φ

νν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2bull

Quick sort of Young diagrams in 0 minusrarr 2H0 minusrarr H1 minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 gives the

correct exact sequence 0 minusrarr minusrarr minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 which defines a masslessspin-two irrep H (0 )

For the simplest mixed-symmetry field the hook- there are two levels of gaugetransformation hence relevant cohomology groups are H

0 H1 and H2

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus oplus bull sim ξAmicroν oplus ξ

Smicroν ξ

Sνν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2 oplus 2bull

H2 oplus sim φmicroνλ φ

νmicroν 6= 0 oplus oplus oplus 2 oplus bull

Again quick sort of diagrams in 0 minusrarr 3H0 minusrarr 2H1 minusrarr H2 minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0

gives exact sequence (218)Consequently the problem of calculation the number of physical degrees of free-

dom to be precise of deriving the exact sequence is effectively reduced to the simplecombinatoric problem of (i) decomposition so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagram representa-tives of H(σminus) to so(dminus 1)-diagrams (ii) cancellation of like terms in sequence

0 minusrarr (p+ 1)H0 minusrarr pH1 minusrarr minusrarr 2Hpminus1 minusrarr Hp minusrarr H (0Y) minusrarr 0 (422)

Skipping combinatoric technicalities we state that in the general case of a spin-Ymassless mixed-symmetry field (422) reduces to the correct exact sequence thatdefines a uirrep H (0Y) of iso(dminus 1 1)

44 Solving the Generalized Jacobi Identities

Unfolding some dynamical system there arises a problem of solving Jacobi identities(33) that have schematically a form hhdω1

q equiv 0 where a number of backgroundvielbeins ha is contracted with the fiber indices of ω1

q The Jacobi identity restrictsdω1

q to have a certain specific form dω1q = hhω2

r where the so(dminus1 1)-irrep inwhich ω2

r takes values the degree r and the projector built of hh are completelydetermined The solutions are given by21

Lemma A Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values inY = Y(s p) (k 1)

so(dminus 1 1)-irrep The general solution of

hcdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq = 0 (423)

21As was pointed out in Section 33 nonzero traces either violate Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms and therefore are ignored

43

has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq k lt s

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1 k = s q ge p + 1

0 k = s q lt p+ 1

(424)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 take values inY(s p) (k + 1 1)

and Y(s+ 1 p+ 1) so(dminus 1 1)-irreps respectively22

Proof The parametrization of dωq by a degree-(q + 1) form taking values in the

same so(dminus 1 1)-irrep dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = R

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q+1 obviously fails to satisfy

(423) Inasmuch as (423) contains a vielbein the solution has to contain a number

of vielbeins too The most general parametrization of dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q with only

one vielbein included has the form dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = hdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)|dq for some

q-form taking values in a tensor product of Y by a vector representation ie thereis no definite symmetry between index d and the rest of the indices

hchdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)c|dq = 0larrrarr ωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)[c|d]

q = 0 (425)

Only those irreps in Yotimes are allowed that have c and d symmetric ie correspondto Y(s p) (k + 1 1) for k lt s This is not possible in the case k = s ie Y =Y(s p+ 1) and the only possibility to have c and d symmetric is to add the whole

column toY which requires dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q to be represented as dω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hchcωa1(sminus1)cap(sminus1)cap+1(sminus1)cqminuspminus1 and therefore q must be large enough Roughly

speaking the proof is based on the fact that the anti-symmetrization of two indicesat the same row of a Young diagram is identically zero the anti-symmetrizationbeing due to contraction with vielbeins

Note that choosing nonmaximal solutions of Jacobi identities results in loweringthe gauge symmetry so that not all redundant components are excluded

Unfolding totally-symmetric massless higher-spin fields the possible rhs termsin dω

a(sminus1)b(t)1 = are restricted by Jacobi identities and an essential use is made

of

Corollary The solution of Jacobi identity

hcdωa(sminus1)b(tminus1)c1 equiv 0 (426)

is of the form

dωa(sminus1)b(t)1 =

hcωa(sminus1)b(t)c1 t lt sminus 1

hchdCa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 t = sminus 1

(427)

22The symmetric basis is used being more convenient in this case as the contracted with vielbeinstensors are already irreducible

44

The following statement is a generalization of the Lemma-A to the case where(s p) (k 1) is a rsquosubdiagramrsquo of a larger Young diagram Y that has a numberof rows precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) Appropriate Young symmetrizershave to be included as the mere contraction of a number of vielbeins breaks theirreducibility of the tensor For instance hcω

a(s1)b(s2minus1)c is already irreducible withthe symmetry of Ys1 s2 minus 1 but this is not the case for hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) which hasto be added one term hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) + 1s1minuss2+1

hcωa(s1)bb(s2minus1)c to get the symmetry

of Ys1 minus 1 s2

Lemma B Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values in Y =

Y( (s p) (k 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irrep where the dots stands for the blocks inY precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) The general solution of

Π[hcdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq

]= 0 (428)

where Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p)(k minus 1 1) has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

Π[

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq

]

k lt s

Π[

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1

]

k = s q ge p+ 1

0 k = s q lt p + 1

(429)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 takes values in

Y (s p) (k + 1 1) and Y (s+ 1 p+ 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irreps respec-tively and Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p) (k 1)

Proof The proof is similar to that of Lemma-A with the only comment that thesymmetrizers do not affect the argumentation that anti-symmetrization of two in-dices in the same row is identically zero

45 Dynamical Content via σminus Cohomology

Before discussing the calculation of σminus cohomology let us first recall necessary factsconcerning the evaluation of so(d minus 1 1)-tensor products Let P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) be anumber of integer partitions k1 + + kN = m of m where ki is constrained byki le ǫi and different rearrangements of ki satisfying the constraints are regarded asdistinct partitions The generating function for the partition P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) is

sum

m

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m)tm =

i=Nprod

i=1

(1minus tǫi+1)

1minus t(430)

These integer partitions gives the multiplicities of irreps in so(dminus 1 1)-tensor prod-ucts (Clebsh-Gordon coefficients) we are interested in [71]

45

The so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary irrep Ylowast = Y(si pi) by aone-column diagram of the height qlowast can be explicitly calculated as

sNpN

s2

p2

s1

p1

otimes

q =sum

αjβi

Nαjβi

αN+1

βN

αN

ǫNpN sN

β2

α2

ǫ2p2 s2

β1

α1

ǫ1p1 s1

(431)

where αi βi αi + βi le pi i isin [1 N ] αN+1 ge 0 and there exist ρ ge 0 such that

qlowast =i=Nsum

i=1

(αi + βi) + αN+1 + 2ρ (432)

The multiplicity Nαjβi of Ylowastαj βi

is given by integer partition

Nαjβi = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ǫi = pi minus αi minus βi (433)

and the total trace order r is

r =i=Nsum

i=1

βi + ρ (434)

Roughly speaking to obtain an element of the tensor product one should first cutoff from bottom-right of the i-th block a column of height βiminusγi pi ge βiminusγi ge 0 (totake different traces) and second add an arbitrary number αi+γi pi ge αi+γi ge 0 ofcells to each block provided the γi cells annihilate ie they are added to the placesfrom which γi cells were removed at the first stage Multiplicity may be differentfrom one due to different rearrangements of γi ie when multiplied by the rest ofq-column different traces can give rise to the same diagram The number of suchrearrangements is given by P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ρ =

sumi=N

i=1 γi For instance sl(n)-tensor

product otimes is given simply by

otimessl(n) = oplus oplus oplus (435)

46

The so(d)-tensor product can be represented as a sum of the form

otimesso(n) = otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

otimessl(n)

oplus

otimessl(n)

︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

oplus

otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

2nd order

=

oplus oplus oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

oplus

oplus 2 oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

︸︷︷︸

2ndorder

(436)

where the sum is over trace order and the boxes that are connected by the arc areto be contracted and then the sl(n)-product rules are to be applied to the rest ofthe diagrams

Evaluating the so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary spinor-irrep Ylowast =Y(si pi) 1

2by a one-column diagram of the height qlowast one can contract any number

of Γ matrices with the indices of the column and then multiply therefore the tensorproduct rule for spin-tensors can be reduced to bosonic rule (431) as

Y(si pi) 12otimesso(n) Y(1 q) =

qsum

k=0

(Y(si pi) otimesso(n) Y(1 q minus k)

)

12

(437)

for example

12otimesso(n) = 1

2oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order Γ-traces

oplus

12oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order Γ-traces

oplus

oplus

2 12

︸︷︷︸

2nd order Γ-traces

oplus

bull 12

︸︷︷︸

3d order Γ-traces

(438)

The multiplicity N12

αjβiof Ylowast

αj βi12

is given by

N12

αjβi=

i=ρsum

i=0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus i) (439)

Let us now analyze the origin of σminus cohomology Its action σminus Wgq rarr W

gminus1q+1

preserves g+ q and hence the whole complex C(W σminus) is a direct sum of complexesC(qprime σminus) where q

prime refers to the end element Wg=0qprime of the complex

C(qprime σminus) 0 minusrarr minusrarr Wg=1qprimeminus1 minusrarrW

g=0qprime minusrarr 0 (440)

47

Moreover σminus preserves the total rank (the form degree + rank of the so(d minus 1 1)-

irrep in which the field takes values) LetWa(s1)a(sm)q be an element ofWg

qprime When

all form indices of Wa(s1)a(sm)q are converted to the fiber ones according to (329)

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (441)

the action of σminus is just an anti-symmetrization of all d1 dq with those indices aithat are extra as compared to Ygminus1 plus some terms to restore the correct Youngsymmetry of Ygminus1 Let the decomposition ofW a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] into so(dminus1 1)-irreps be of the form

Ya1(s1) am(sm)otimes

Y(1 q) =oplus

r=0

oplus

ir

N rirYr

ir (442)

where the summation is over the trace order r and then over ir which enumeratesall so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that enters in the tensor product as the traces of the r-thorder N r

irbeing the multiplicity of Yr

ir The multiplicity of the zeroth order traces

is always equal to one N0i0= 1 In fact the diagrams Y 0

i0can be directly obtained

by the sl(n)-tensor product ruleThe very anti-symmetrization is insensitive to whether a certain component en-

ters as a trace or not When decomposed into so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the elements ofWg

qprime and Wgminus1qprime+1 have a number of components of the same symmetry type The

action of σminus is just a linear transformation that either sends the whole so(dminus 1 1)-irrep to zero23 or sends it to the components of Wgminus1

qprime+1 of the same symmetry typeImportant is that σminus does not act between different so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Thereforecomplex C(qprime σminus) is a direct sum of complexes parameterized by so(dminus 1 1)-irrepsYprime that are given by various tensor products

Ynk

otimes

Y(1 q) (443)

provided that the field WYnkq is an element of Wgprimeminusi

qprime+i for certain i When reducedto such a complex

C(Yprime qprime σminus) 0rarr rarr Vg rarr Vgminus1 rarr rarr 0 (444)

the action of σminus is a linear transformation between the spaces Vg rarr Vgminus1 dimen-

sions of which are equal to the multiplicity of Yprime in the decomposition of WYgqg and

WYgminus1qg+1 The action of σminus is maximally non-degenerate compatible with nilpotency

Therefore to find cohomology groups the dimension of each linear space in everycomplex has to be calculated

Let us note that only the types and multiplicities of so(dminus1 1)-irreps are foundbelow ie no attention is paid to the description of how the corresponding tensorsare contained in the fields WY

qprime This is sufficient for our purposes though it isobvious (412) how the metric-like field φYM

is incorporated in an element ofWg=0p

23provided that the appropriate basis on the space of so(dminus1 1)-irreps with the same symmetrytype is chosen

48

The calculation of σminus cohomology is divided into three cases that cover the wholevariety of so(dminus 1 1)-irreps that can result from the tensor products (443)

In the Lemmas below it is assumed that complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is parameterizedby so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Yprime = Ylowast

αj βiof the form (431) with Ylowast = Ynk q

lowast = q such

that WYnkq isin C(qprime σminus) and ρ is defined according to (432)

In the first case Yprime is an element of Y0 otimesY(1 q)

Lemma 1 The σminus cohomology groups Hqg=0 and H

qg=1 are nontrivial and are given

by

Hqg =

Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βiMαj βi

αN+1 = 0sumi=N

i=0 αi = qq isin [0 p] g = 0

H2pminusqminus1 q isin [p+ 1 2p+ 1] g = 1

empty q gt 2p+ 1 any g

(445)where Mαj βi is the multiplicity of the irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

defined below

Proof From the very form of Yn=N0 equiv Yg=0 equiv Y(si minus 1 pi) it follows that theso(dminus1 1)-irreps that the element ofWg=0

q sim Y0otimesY(1 q) decomposes into may

be contained in Wg=1qminus1 only ie Wg=0

q and Wg=kqminusk contain no so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of

the same symmetry type for k gt 1 Therefore the length of complex C(Yprime q σminus)where Yprime isin Y0otimesY(1 q) is equal to one ie C(Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

q σminus) 0 minusrarrV1 minusrarr V0 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions of V0 and V1 are given by the multiplicitiesof the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

in Wg=1qminus1 and Wg=0

q respectively

dim(V1) =

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus 1) ρ ge 1

0 ρ = 0αN+1 = 0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) αN+1 gt 0

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) (446)

If αN+1 gt 0 the dimensions of V0 and V1 are equal and each irreducible componentof Wg=0

q with αN+1 gt 0 can be gauge away by virtue of the corresponding element

of Wg=1qminus1 thus being exact H

kgt2p+1 = empty inasmuch as ρ le p and the componentsof the forms with rank greater than (2p + 1) must have αN+1 gt 0 thus beingexact If αN+1 = 0 the dimensions are different dim(V1) lt dim(V0) for q le pdim(V1) = dim(V0) for q = p + 1 and dim(V1) gt dim(V0) for q gt p Thereforethe number of those Ysi piαj βi

isin Wg=0q q le p that are not exact is equal to

Mαj βi = |dim(V1) minus dim(V0)| the same is the number of those Ysi piαj βiisin

Wg=1qminus1 q gt p+ 1 that are not exact The obvious property of integer partitions

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ǫ1 + + ǫN minusm) (447)

results in the important duality in the cohomology groups Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 or

roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on

49

The second case is the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) where Yprime is an element of the tensor

product Ynk otimesY(1 q) for certain q ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmaxn minus 1

Lemma 2 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainqprime ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmax

n minus 1 the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The complex has the length two ie 0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr 0 wherethe dimensions are given by dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫN 1|ρ+ 1)dim(V2) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ+ 1) Simple calculations with generating functions resultsin dim(V0) lt dim(V1) dim(V2) lt dim(V1) and dim(V0) minus dim(V1) + dim(V2) = 0and consequently the sequence is exact

Analogously

Lemma 3 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainq ge 0 with k = 0 and n lt N the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The speciality of such Yprime is that the complex has the length three ie0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr V3 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions are given by

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 ǫn + 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V2) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 1) ρ ge ǫn + 1

0 otherwise

dim(V3) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn minus 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 2) ρ ge ǫn + 2

0 otherwise

Again simple calculations with generating functions results in appropriate inequali-ties and dim(V0)minusdim(V1)+dim(V2)minusdim(V3) = 0 and consequently the sequenceis exact

The above three cases covers the whole variety of the so(d minus 1 1)-tensors thatcan result from the tensor products YnkotimesY(1 q) for any n k and q The caseswith sN = 1 and Y = Y0 are special but the calculation of cohomology groupsleads to the same result

In the fermionic case the computations are similar due to the multiplicity givenby (439) The difference is that all nontrivial cohomology is concentrated in gradezero Indeed taking into account (446) where P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) is to be replaced by(439) it follows that dim(V0) ge dim(V1) for all q and H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 where r

is referred to the Γ-trace order or roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 andso on

5 Conclusions

The unfolded system constructed in the paper has a simple form of a covariantconstancy equation and describes arbitrary mixed-symmetry bosonic and fermionic

50

massless fields in d-dimensional Minkowski space The gauge fieldsparameters aredifferential forms with values in certain finite-dimensional irreducible representationsof the Lorentz algebra that are uniquely determined by the generalized spin

The key moment is that all gauge symmetries are manifest within the unfoldedformulation which is of most importance in controlling the number of physicaldegrees of freedom when trying to introduce interactions Unfolded systems areformulated in terms of differential forms which is a natural way to respect diffeo-morphisms and hence to describe systems that include gravity

Though the necessary conditions for the system to have a lagrangian descriptionare satisfied ie the fields are in one-to-one correspondence with the equations andthe k-th level gauge symmetries are in one-to-one correspondence with the k-thBianchi identities the very lagrangian remains to be constructed

Another interesting moment is that the unfolded equations for bosons are thesame as for fermions namely the operators involved ie exterior differential dand σminus remains unmodified when tensors are replaced with spin-tensors Thoughthis nice property partly breaks down in (anti)-de Sitter space within the unfoldedapproach bosons and fermions have much in common the fact being very useful forsupersymmetric theories

The proposed unfolded system includes all non-gauge dual descriptions whichare based on the generalized Weyl tensor and its descendants but not all of gaugedual descriptions It would be interesting to construct an unfolded system thatcontains all dual formulations

The interactions of the totally symmetric massless higher-spin fields are knownto require a nonzero cosmological constant ie are formulated in (anti)-de Sitterspace [2] Mixed-symmetry fields exhibit some interesting features in the presence ofcosmological constant For example not all of the Minkowski gauge symmetries canbe deformed to (anti)-de Sitter [72] As a result massless mixed-symmetry fields havemore degrees of freedom in (anti)-de Sitter compared to its Minkowski counterparts[73] and in the Minkowski limit a massless mixed-symmetry field splits in a certaincollection of massless fields generally Contrariwise a single mixed-symmetry fieldcan not be smoothly deformed to (anti)-de Sitter Another interesting effect is theexistence of the so-called partially-massless fields [74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 8283 84] the fields that have a number of degrees of freedom intermediate betweenthat of massless and massive and split in a set of massless fields in the Minkowskilimit Therefore the extension of the proposed approach to (anti)-de Sitter spaceseems to be non-trivial but nevertheless worth being investigated

In a series of papers [85 61 86 60] it was suggested so-called frame-like approachto the general mixed-symmetry fields in (anti)-de Sitter To generalize the proposedin the present paper unfolded system to (anti)-de Sitter case and to compare to thatof [60] is the next step to perform

We consider the proposed unfolded system as the first stage in constructing thefull interacting theory of mixed-symmetry fields

51

Acknowledgements

The author appreciates sincerely MA Vasiliev for reading the manuscript and mak-ing many detailed and valuable suggestions and illuminating comments the verywork was initiated as the result of discussions with MA Vasiliev The author isalso grateful to RR Metsaev and KB Alkalaev for useful discussions and to OVShaynkman for discussion of the fermionic case The work was supported in partby grants RFBR No 05-02-17654 LSS No 440120062 and INTAS No 05-7928by the Landau Scholarship and by the Scholarship of Dynasty foundation

Appendix A Multi-index convention

The multi-index notations is used a group of indices in which certain tensor issymmetric or is to be symmetrized is denoted either by one letter with the numberof indices indicated in round brackets or by placing a group of indices in roundbrackets eg

T a(s) equiv T a1a2as T a1aiaj as = T a1ajaias (A1)

V aT a(s) equiv V (a1T a2as+1) equiv1

s+ 1(V a1T a2a3as+1 + V a2T a1a3as+1 + + V as+1T a1a2as)

(A2)

V (bT a(s)) equiv V (bT a1as) equiv1

s + 1

(V bT a1a2as + V a1T ba2a3as + + V asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A3)Analogously the group of indices in which certain tensor is anti-symmetric or is tobe anti-symmetrized is denoted by placing indices in square brackets eg

T a[s] equiv T a1a2as T a1aiai+1as = minusT a1ai+1aias (A4)

V [bT a[s]] equiv V [bT a1as] equiv1

s+ 1

(V bT a1a2as minus V a1T ba2a3as + + (minus)sV asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A5)The operators of (anti)-symmetrization are weighted to be projectors (the factor 1

s+1

above)

Appendix B Young diagrams

Comprehensive information on Young diagrams can be found for example in thetextbook [71]

Definition B1 Given an integer partition ie a nonincreasing sequence si i isin[1 n] si ge si+1 of positive integers (or nonnegative when it is convenient to workwith a sequence of a fixed length) associated Young diagram Ys1 s2 sn is agraphical representation consisting of n left-justified rows made of boxes with the

52

i-th row containing si boxes

s10s11

s1s2s3s4

s5s6s7

s8s9

Finite-dimensional irreducible representation(irrep) of sl(d) ie various irre-ducible sl(d)-tensors are in one-to-one correspondence with Young diagrams of theform Ys1 s2 s[ d

2] The associated irreducible tensors

T

s1︷︸︸︷aa

s2︷︸︸︷

bb (B1)

or in condensed notation T a(s1)b(s2) have at most [d2] groups of indices being sym-

metric in each group separately and satisfy the condition that the symmetrizationof any group of indices with one index of any of the subsequent groups is identicallyzero ie

T a(s1)(b(sk)b)c(sjminus1) equiv 0 k lt j (B2)

If s[ d2] 6= 0 and d is even the (anti)-selfduality condition has to be imposed for

appropriate signature (anti)-selfduality is conventionally denoted by the sign factors+(minus) before s[ d

2] In this paper we do not consider (anti)-self dual representations

A scalar representation Y0 0 0 is denoted by bull a vector irrep Y1 0 0by rank-two symmetric tensor irrep by rank-two antisymmetric tensor irrep

by and so onFinite-dimensional irreducible representations of so(d) are of the two types ten-

sor and spin-tensor and are also characterized by Young diagrams which in thecase of spin-tensor irreps refer to the symmetry of the tensor part Young diagramsthat correspond to spin-tensor irreps are labeled by 1

2-subscript Spinor indices

α β γ = 12[d2] are placed first and are separated from tensor indices by rdquordquo For

example a spinor ψα irrep is denoted by bull 12 a vector-spinor irrep Aαaby 1

2and

so on To make tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry conditionthe tracelessness condition with respect to each pair of indices is to be imposed

ηccTa(s1)cb(siminus1)cd(sjminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n j = 1n (B3)

To make spin-tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry condition Γ-tracelessness condition with respect to each tensor index and a spinor index is to beimposed

Γαc βT

βa(s1)cb(siminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n (B4)

where Γαc β satisfy Γα

a βΓβb γ

+ Γαb βΓ

βaγ = 2ηab Additional conditions on spinors viz

Majorana Weyl and Majorana-Weyl are irrelevant to the problems concerned Also

53

in both cases it is required for the sum of the heights of the first two columns ofYoung diagrams to be not greater than d Note that the Γ-tracelessness conditionis stronger than the tracelessness one and applying the Γ-tracelessness twice to twosymmetric indices gives the tracelessness

0 = 2ΓαaβΓ

βb γT γ(ab) = ηabT

αab (B5)

To handle with arbitrary large Young diagrams the so-called block representationis used ie the rows of equal lengths are combined to blocks

Y(s1 p1) (sn pn) equiv Y

p1︷ ︸︸ ︷s1 s1

p2︷ ︸︸ ︷s2 s2

pn︷ ︸︸ ︷sn sn (B6)

References

[1] C Fronsdal ldquoMassless fields with integer spinrdquo Phys Rev D18 (1978) 3624

[2] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoCubic interaction in extended theories ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Nucl Phys B291 (1987) 141

[3] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoOn the gravitational interaction ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Phys Lett B189 (1987) 89ndash95

[4] M A Vasiliev ldquoConsistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in(3+1)-dimensionsrdquo Phys Lett B243 (1990) 378ndash382

[5] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoOn the geometry of higher-spin gauge fieldsrdquoClass Quant Grav 20 (2003) S473ndashS486 hep-th0212185

[6] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoFree geometric equations for higher spinsrdquoPhys Lett B543 (2002) 303ndash310 hep-th0207002

[7] M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear equations for symmetric massless higher spin fieldsin (a)ds(d)rdquo Phys Lett B567 (2003) 139ndash151 hep-th0304049

[8] X Bekaert I L Buchbinder A Pashnev and M Tsulaia ldquoOn higher spintheory Strings brst dimensional reductionsrdquo Class Quant Grav 21 (2004)S1457ndash1464 hep-th0312252

[9] D Sorokin ldquoIntroduction to the classical theory of higher spinsrdquo AIP ConfProc 767 (2005) 172ndash202 hep-th0405069

[10] X Bekaert S Cnockaert C Iazeolla and M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear higherspin theories in various dimensionsrdquo hep-th0503128

[11] A Sagnotti E Sezgin and P Sundell ldquoOn higher spins with a strong sp(2r)conditionrdquo hep-th0501156

[12] P K Townsend ldquoCovariant quantization of antisymmetric tensor gaugefieldsrdquo Phys Lett B88 (1979) 97

54

For instance the simplest mixed-symmetry massless field has the spin- andcan be minimally described[16 17] by a field φ[micromicro]ν which is anti-symmetric in thefirst two indices and satisfies Young symmetry condition6 φ[micromicroν] = 0 The equationsof motion

φmicromicroλ + 2part[micropartλφmicro]λν minus partνpart

λφmicromicroλ minus 2partνpart[microφλ

micro]λ = 0 (215)

are invariant underδφmicromicroν = part[microξ

Smicro]ν + part[microξ

Amicro]ν minus partνξ

Amicromicro (216)

with symmetric and anti-symmetric gauge parameters ξS(microν) and ξA[microν] Let us stress

that to maintain an off-shell gauge symmetry field φ[micromicro]ν has to take values in a

reducible so(d minus 1 1) representation oplus so does symmetric gauge parameterξS(micromicro) oplus bull which is in accordance with φ ν

microν 6= 0 and ξSνν 6= 0 Analogously tototally anti-symmetric fields there exist second level gauge transformations with avector parameter ξmicro

δφmicromicroν = 0

δξAmicroν = 23(partmicroξν minus partνξmicro)

δξSmicroν = partmicroξν + partνξmicro

(217)

In this case H

(

0)

is given by a non-split exact sequence of the form

0 minusrarr D (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

oplusD (0 ) minusrarr D

(

0)

minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0 (218)

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) field the depthof reducibility of gauge transformations is equal to p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi where p is the height

of the first column of the Young diagram and at the r-th level of reducibility gaugeparameters have the symmetry of

sN minus 1

pNkN

s2 minus 1

p2k2

s1 minus 1

p1

k1

i=Nsum

i=1

ki =

i=Nsum

i=1

pi minus r (219)

This pattern of reducibility of gauge transformations will be of great importancewhile constructing the unfolded formulation in Section 4 As is easily seen at the

6In more detail the field φmicroνλ satisfies φmicroνλ = minusφνmicroλ φmicroνλ+φνλmicro+φλmicroν = 0 Equivalentlya symmetric basis can be used ie φSmicroνλ = φSνmicroλ φ

Smicroνλ + φSνλmicro + φSλmicroν = 0 The two bases are

related by φS(microν)λ = 1radic3(φAmicroλν + φAνλmicro) φ

A[microν]λ = 1radic

3(φSmicroλν minus φ

Sνλmicro)

11

first level of reducibility the gauge parameters are various tensors whose LorentzYoung diagrams are obtained by cutting off one cell from the original so(d minus 2)-diagram in all possible ways ie the number of gauge parameters at the first levelis equal to the number of blocks N eg two for spin- There is only one gaugeparameter at the deepest level of reducibility whose Young diagram is obtained bycutting off the first column from Y eg for spin-

This pattern corresponds of course to on-shell equations ie the gauge param-eters taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of Young symmetry (219) are subjectedto (28)-like equations To obtain an off-shell gauge symmetry the field content hasto be extended to take values in certain reducible so(d minus 1 1)-representations ad-ditional components turn out can be identified with certain traces of a single fieldwith the symmetry of Y as an sl(d)-tensor In general gauge parameters are alsoreducible tensors with the symmetry of (219) In the case of a spin- massless fieldthe trace φ ν

microν in the sector of fields and the trace ξSνν in the sector of gauge param-eters are the additional components In the general case of a spin-Y = Ys1 snmassless field field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) should satisfy [20]

ηmicroimicroiηmicroimicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n] (220)

which is a generalization of the Fronsdalrsquos double-trace condition (213) As it will beshown this condition naturally arises in the unfolded approach Note that double-tracelessness is imposed on each group of symmetric indices and it is not requiredfor cross-traces to vanish

Let a generalized Weyl tensor for a minimally described spin-Y massless field bea gauge-invariant combination of the least order in derivatives of field φY(x) that isallowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell On the other hand it is the generalized Weyltensor that the minimal non-gauge description of a massless spin-Y field is basedon For a spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN)so(dminus2) massless field the generalizedWeyl tensor has the symmetry of Y(s1 p1 + 1) (s2 p2) (sN pN)so(dminus11) and isof the s1-th order in derivatives In the case of spin-one (Y = so(dminus2)) Maxwell field

strength Fmicroν with the symmetry of can be also called a generalized Weyl tensorFermionic mixed-symmetry fields share most features of bosonic ones viz the

reducibility of gauge transformations the enlargement of the field content for theequations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge invariance The difference is thatthe equations for fermions have the first order in derivatives and the irreducibility ofspin-tensors is achieved by the Γ-tracelessness condition7 instead of the tracelessnessone

For example a massless totally symmetric spin-(s + 12) field can be described

7Γmicro are the Clifford algebra generators and satisfy ΓmicroΓν + ΓνΓmicro = 2ηmicroν part equiv Γmicropartmicro Γ-trace isa contraction of a spinor index and one tensor index with Γmicro eg Γνφ

microν equiv Γαν βφ

βmicroν

12

off-shell[54] by a totally symmetric spin-tensor field φα(micro1micros) subjected to8

partφmicro1microsminus spart(micro1

Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros)

ΓνΓρΓλφνρλmicro4micros= 0 Γνξνmicro2microsminus1 = 0

(221)

where in order to get an off-shell gauge invariance the irreducibility of φα(micro1micros) hasto be relaxed to the triple Γ-tracelessness

A massless totally anti-symmetric spin-Y(1 p) 12field can be described off-shell

by a totally anti-symmetric spin-tensor field ωα[micro1microp] subjected to

partωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1Γ

νωνmicro2microp] = 0

δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp]

(222)

Similar to the bosonic case (222) possesses reducible gauge transformations Thedifference is that one can impose the triple Γ-tracelessness on ωα[micro1microp] but thisrestricts the first level gauge parameter to be Γ-traceless Γνξνmicro2micropminus1 = 0 andhence the second order gauge parameter has to be on-mass-shell ie partξmicro1micropminus2 = 0Therefore for equations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge symmetry of allorders no Γ-trace conditions have to be imposed on fieldgauge parameters

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) 12field the

pattern of gauge symmetries is given by the spin-tensors with the tensor part de-scribed by (219) the definition of the Weyl tensor remains unchanged also

The descriptions based on tensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) which is analogous tothe metric gmicroν are referred to as metric-like At least in writing equiv partmicropartνη

microν theexplicit use of metric ηmicroν is made of which complicates the issue of introducinginteractions with gravitation

Let us note that in principle one can verify the gauge invariance of the fieldequations for massless mixed-symmetry fields despite the fact that the very form ofgauge transformation is cumbersome due to Young symmetrizers The advantageof the unfolded approach is in that gauge invariance at all levels of reducibility ismanifest

3 Unfolding Dynamics and σminus Cohomology

In this section we first recall the definition of unfolding and the relation of the sim-plest unfolded systems to Lie algebrasmodules and Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomologywith coefficients Second peculiar properties of unfolded systems that describe freefields and specifically the so-called σminus cohomology concept are recalled Third thevery procedure of constructing the unfolded form is illustrated on the examples ofmassless spin-zero spin-one arbitrary totally symmetric spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2)

fields the relation with the general statement of Section 1 is pointed out in each ofthe examples

8Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [54] have the form Gmicro1microsminus s

2Γ(micro1ΓνGνmicro2micros) minus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 Gmicro1micros= partφmicro1micros

minus spart(micro1Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0 which is equivalent to

(222)

13

31 General Features

Some dynamical system is said to be unfolded [31 32 33] if it has the form

dWA = FA(W ) (31)

whereWA is a set9 of differential forms of degree-qA on some d-dimensional manifoldMd d - exterior differential on Md and FA(W ) is an arbitrary degree-(qA + 1)function of WA assumed to be expandable in terms of exterior (wedge) productsonly10

FA(W ) =infinsum

n=1

sum

qB1++qBn=qA+1

fAB1Bn

W B1 and andW Bn (32)

where fAB1Bn

are constant coefficients satisfying fAB1BiBj Bn

= (minus)qBiqBj fA

B1BjBiBn

Moreover FA(W ) must satisfy the integrability condition (called generalized Jacobiidentity) obtained by applying d to (31)

F B δFA

δW Bequiv 0 (33)

Any solution of (33) defines a free differential algebra (FDA) [55 56 57 58] If Ja-cobi identities (33) are satisfied irrespective ofMd dimension11 the free differentialalgebra is referred to as universal [10 59] It is the universal algebras only that willbe considered further

Equations (31) are invariant under gauge transformations

δWAqA

= dǫAqAminus1 + ǫBqBminus1

δFA

δW B for qA gt 0 (34)

δWA0 = ǫB

prime

0

δFA

δW Bprime

1

Bprime qBprime = 1 for qA = 0 (35)

where ǫAqAminus1 is a degree-(qA minus 1) form taking values in the same space as WAqA

Inits turn δWA

qA= 0 can be treated as unfolded-like system for ǫAqAminus1 ie dǫ

AqAminus1 =

minusǫBqBminus1δFA

δWB there emerge second level gauge transformations

δǫAqAminus1 = dξAqAminus2 minus ξBqBminus2

δFA

δW B (36)

provided that FA(W ) is linear in matter fields and analogously for the gauge trans-formations at deeper levels Therefore the reducibility of gauge transformations ismanifest in the unfolded approach For a degree-qA gauge field WA

qAthere exist qA

levels of gauge transformations

9In this section indices A B C are of arbitrary nature In the cases of practical significance AB C vary over certain irreps of the Lorentz algebra

10The wedge symbol and will be systematically omitted further11As the forms with the rank greater than d are identically zero there exist certain identities

eg Wn andWn equiv 0 for n+m gt d which make the operator δδWA to be ill-behaved

14

The use of the exterior algebra respects diffeomorphisms which is very appropri-ate for introducing interactions with the gravitation The whole information aboutthe dynamics turns out to be contained in FA(W ) and one can even extend anunfolded system to other manifolds[59] simply by changing the exterior differentialthe new unfolded system has literally the same form

Note that introducing enough auxiliary fields it is possible to reformulate anydynamical system in the unfolded form although it may be difficult to unfold someparticular system or to find all unfolded forms

Collected below are some important cases of unfolded systems which have adirect bearing on Lie algebras [55 59]

Lie algebrasFlat connections Let ΩI equiv ΩImicrodx

micro be a subsector of degree-oneforms The only self-closed unfolded equations are of the form

dΩI = minusf IJKΩ

JΩK (37)

Generalized Jacobi identity (33) implies the Jacobi identity f IJKf

JLMΩKΩLΩM equiv

0 for some Lie algebra g with structure constants f IJK Therefore the closed

subsector of one-forms is in one-to-one correspondence with Lie algebras and(37) is the flatness condition for a connection ΩI of g This provides acoordinate-independent framework for describing background geometry Inthe cases of interest g is iso(d minus 1 1) so(d minus 1 2) so(d 1) and sp(2n) [59]Background geometry connection ΩI is assumed to be of order zero whereasall matter fields including dynamical gravitation are of the first order Allequations are assumed to be of the first order in matter fields and hencedescribe free fields only

In this paper g = iso(dminus 1 1) and ΩI = ab ha where ab equiv abmicro dxmicro

is a Lorentz spin-connection and ha equiv hamicrodxmicro is a background vielbein which

defines a non-holonomic basis of a tangent space at each point of the manifoldFlatness equation (37) for iso(dminus 1 1)-connection ΩI reads

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb = 0(38)

The first is the zero torsion equation that expresses the Lorentz spin-connectionvia the first derivative of hamicro The second can be recognized as the zero curva-ture equation For example in Cartesian coordinates the explicit solution isab

micro = 0 and hamicro = δamicro

The advantage of description of background geometry as the flatness conditionfor a connection of the space-time symmetry algebra is in that this way iscoordinate-independent In what follows we assume ab ha to satisfy (38)which is enough if there is no need for the explicit form of the solution in someparticular coordinate system For instance in (anti)-de Sitter space (38) ismodified by the terms proportional to the cosmological constant λ2

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb + λ2hahb = 0(39)

15

and admits no simple solutions with hamicro = δamicro ab = 0 Nevertheless without

giving the explicit solution to imply that ab ha satisfy (39) is sufficient forgeneral analysis eg for constructing Lagrangians [60]

Contractible FDA The simplest equations linear in matter fields of the form

dWAq = fA

BWBq+1 (310)

can be reduced by linear transformations to either

dWAq = WA

q+1 dWAq+1 = 0 (311)

ordWA

q = 0 (312)

where the second equation of (311) is the consequence of Jacobi identities(33) for the first one In the first case by virtue of gauge transformations(34) δWA

q = dξAqminus1 + χAq δW

Bq+1 = dχA

q the field WAq can be gauged away In

both cases by virtue of the Poincarersquos Lemma these equations are dynamicallyempty and correspond to the co-called contractible FDAs [55]

g-modulesCovariant constancy equations Let WAq be a closed subsector of

q-forms of matter gauge fields Linear in matter fields equations may involvethe background g-connection ΩI which is of zeroth order Such equationsreferred to as linearized over g background (described by any solution ΩI of(37)) have the form

dWAq = minusΩIfI

ABW

Bq (313)

Jacobi identity (33) where (37) is also taken into account

ΩJΩK(minusf I

JKfIAB + fJ

ACfK

CB

)W B

q = 0 (314)

implies fIAB to realize a representation of g Therefore the closed subsector

of forms of definite degree is in one-to-one correspondence with g-moduleswhereas

DΩWAq equiv dWA

q + ΩIfIABW

Bq = 0 (315)

is a covariant constancy equation and (DΩ)2 = 0 since the connection is

flat (37) In the cases of interest A runs over certain finite-dimensionalso(d minus 1 1)-irreps ie g-modules decompose with respect to its subalgebraso(dminus 1 1) sub g into a direct sum of certain irreducible tensors This is whywe single out the Lorentz-covariant derivative DL from the whole g-covariantderivative DΩ the remaining part acts vertically (algebraically) In the caseof ΩI being an iso(d minus 1 1) flat connection the Lorentz covariant derivativeDL = d+ satisfy DL

2 = 0 as the exterior differential d does

DLTab = dT ab +a

cTcb +b

cTac + (316)

In Cartesian coordinates DL equiv d and we do not make any distinction betweend and DL whereas in (anti)-de Sitter (DL)

2 6= 0 and the difference between d

16

and DL has to be taken into account Also zero torsion equation (381) canbe rewritten as DLh

a = 0 The remaining part of ΩI which acts algebraicallyand mixes different so(dminus 1 1)-modules into g-modules is associated with thegenerators of translations with gauge field ha

Gluing g-modulesChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology LetWpWq andWr takevalues in g-modules R1 R2 and R3 the representations are realized by oper-ators T1 T2 and T3 respectively Still linear in matter fields but nonlinear inbackground connection ΩI equations are of the form

DΩWp equiv dWp + T1(Ω)Wp = f12(Ω Ω)Wq

DΩWq equiv dWq + T2(Ω)Wq = f23(Ω Ω)Wr

DΩWr equiv

(317)

where the terms forming g-covariant derivative are isolated on the lhs Thetwo g-modules R1 R2 appear to be glued together by the term f12(Ω Ω) isinHom(Λpminusq+1(g) otimes R2R1) Jacobi identity (33) implies f12(Ω Ω) to be aChevalley-Eilenberg cocycle with coefficients in Rlowast

2 otimesR1 where Rlowast2 is a mod-

ule contragradient to R2 and f12(Ω Ω)f23(Ω Ω) = 0 Coboundaries canbe proved to be dynamically empty and can be removed by a field redefini-tion Consequently f12(Ω Ω) should be a nontrivial representative of theChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology group with coefficients in Rlowast

2otimesR1 It followsalso that nothing but zero forms can be joined to zero forms ie the onlypossible linearized unfolded equations on forms of zero degree are (315) withq = 0

For any dynamical system linearized over certain g-background (described byany solution ΩI of (37)) equations of motion (315) along with gauge transforma-tions of all orders of reducibility acquire a very simple form

δξ1 = DΩξ0

δξpminus1 = DΩξpminus2

δWp = DΩξpminus1

DΩWp = 0

(318)

where Wp takes values in certain g-module R DΩ is the associated g-covariantderivative and ξpminusk k isin [1 p] are the gauge parameters of k-th order of reducibilitytaking values in the same g-module R and being forms of degree (p minus k) Thegauge invariance at each order of reducibility and of equations of motion is dueto (DΩ)

2 = 0 In some sense the gauge fields Wp and the gauge parameters ξpminusk

seem to play the same role at the linearized level This uniformity is of essentialimportance when analyzing unfolded systems

In the presence of gluing terms eg when only two modules say R1 and R2 areglued by nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycle fpr(Ω Ω) full chain of equations

17

and gauge transformations (318) is modified to12

δξ11 = DΩξ10

δξ1pminusr = DΩξ1pminusrminus1

δξ1pminusr+1 = DΩξ1pminusr + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

20 δξ21 = DΩξ

20

(319)

δξ1pminus1 = DΩξ1pminus2 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus2 δξ2rminus1 = DΩξ

2rminus2

δW 1p = DΩξpminus1 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus1 δW 2

r = DΩξ2rminus1

DΩW1p = fpr(Ω Ω)W

2r DΩW

2r = 0

where W 1p ξ

1pminusk and W 2

r ξ2rminusm take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively

Important is that the gauge fieldsparameters taking values in R2 contribute to therhs of the equationsgauge transformations for the gauge fieldsparameters takingvalues in R1 but for forms of degree greater than (p minus r) The above two systemsare nothing but the specializations of (31) (34) (36)

Also let us note that there is no strong reason to make any distinction betweenthe terms linear in the background g-connection ΩI which correspond to g-modulesand the terms of higher order in ΩI which correspond to Chevalley-Eilenberg co-cycles Both terms can be combined into a single object the generalized covariant-derivative D = d+T (Ω)+f(Ω Ω) equiv DΩ+f(Ω Ω) with the property D2 = 0Moreover by means of D (319) and (318) can be rewritten in a similar mannerConsequently at the linearized level the most general unfolded equations and gaugetransformations have the form

δξ1 = Dξ0

δξpminus1 = Dξpminus2

δWp = Dξpminus1

DWp = 0

(320)

where D is built of d background connection ΩI and satisfies D2 = 0 The gaugefieldsparameters take values in certain spacesWq viz Wp isin Wp ξpminus1 isin Wpminus1ξ0 isin W0 The elements of Wq are differential forms with values in certain g-modules It is also convenient to define higher degree spaces Wqgtp the equationsRp+1 = DWp = 0 take values in Wp+1 Rp+2 = DRp+1 belongs to Wp+2 andby virtue of D2 = 0 satisfies Rp+2 equiv 0 and so on Therefore there exist certainidentities which belong to Wp+2 for the equations which belong to Wp+1 andthere exist certain identities which belong to Wp+3 for the identities in Wp+2 andso on At the field theoretical level these identities correspond to Bianchi identitiesfor the first level gauge transformations higher identities correspond to the Bianchiidentities for the deeper levels of gauge transformations

12The sign factor (minus)pminusr+1 before fpr(Ω Ω) is ignored and is thought of as the part of thedefinition of fpr(Ω Ω)

18

A remark should be made that the forms belonging to Wq may have differentdegrees if there are Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles present As a result spaces Wq

may contain different number of elements For instance (319) can be reduced to(320) if one defines

Wq =

W 1q q lt pminus r

W 1q W

2qminusp+r q ge (pminus r)

(321)

where W 1q and W 2

qminusp+r take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively In termsof (319) the elements of Wq for q lt (pminus r) were referred to as ξ1q the elements ofWq for q = (pminus r)(pminus 1) to as ξ1q ξ

2qminusp+r the elements ofWq for q = p to as W 1

pW 2

r the elements of Wq for q gt p to as R1q R

2qminusp+r (the equations of motion and

Bianchi identities)

32 Interpretation of Unfolded Systems Describing free Fields

When describing free fields unfolded formulations will be referred to as frame-like [61 60] though the very term frame-like has a more broad definition Thesesystems consist of equations (37) describing background geometry of a finite chainof (317)-like equations describing the gauge fields of the model and of (317)-likeequations with q = 0 glued to gauge forms ie it requires a Lie algebra g (commonlyiso(dminus1 1) so(dminus1 2) or so(d 1)) a set of g-modules R0RN and an appropriateset of nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles f01fNminus1N The physical degreesof freedom are contained in the forms of zero degree and the module RN in whichzero degree forms take values is infinite-dimensional

Since frame-like unfolded systems contain inevitably infinitely many fields mostof them being either auxiliary or Stueckelberg13 there arises a problem of reconstruc-tion a metric-like formulation by a given unfolded formulation or of extracting thedynamical content for a given unfolded system

The questions to be answered are what are the dynamical fields what arethe differential gauge parameters and what are the gauge invariant equations ofmotion These answers are not universal and depend on the chosen scheme ofinterpretation Different interpretations correspond to dual descriptions of the samedynamical system

Frame-like unfolded systems are endowed at the linearized level with additionalstructures providing a natural way for interpretation Indices AB vary overcertain finite dimensional Lorentz irreps ie each of Rn n = 0 N decomposes asRn =

sum

k Pnk where Pnk are certain so(d minus 1 1)-modules characterized by Ynk

Young diagrams of Section 1We say that some frame-like unfolded system is given an interpretation if [62]

1 On the whole space W =oplusinfin

q=0Wq where the matter gauge fields gauge pa-rameters equations of motion and Bianchi identities take values there exists

13A field is called Stueckelberg if it can be gauged away by pure algebraic symmetry

19

a bounded from below grading g = 0 1 ie Wq =oplusinfin

g=0Wgq The ho-

mogeneous element of Wgq is a certain differential form with values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep and is denoted as W gq In simplest cases the grade is just the

rank of the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep the element of Wgq takes values in

2 The closed subsector of one-forms ΩI describes a background geometry vizMinkowski or (anti)-de Sitter The generalized covariant derivative D is to bedivided into three parts the last one not being necessary nontrivial

D = DL minus σminus + σ+ (322)

where DL is a background Lorentz-covariant derivative and has a zero gradeσminus is an operator of grade (minus1) and σ+ contains positive grade operatorsThe only differential part is in DL whereas σplusmn acts vertically and is built ofthe background vielbein ha If two modules are glued the gluing element issupposed to be of grade (minus1) and also denoted as σminus

The equations then have the form

DLWn +

gminusnsum

i=1

σ+(W n+i

)= σminus

(W n+1

) g = 0 1 (323)

and analogously for the gauge transformations In the flat space all operators ofpositive grade appear to be trivial for the massless case As it does not affect theanalysis let us consider a simplified version with σ+ = 0 Then D2 = DL

2+σminusDL+DLσminus + (σminus)

2 = 0 is equivalent to DL2 = 0 (σminus)

2 = 0 and σminusDL +DLσminus = 0 Thefirst is a part of the flatness condition (38) for the iso(d minus 1 1)-connection Thesecond is the nilpotancy condition for σminus The third is satisfied provided that σminus istwisted by the factor (minus)∆g where (∆g + 1) is a degree of σminus which is equal to thenumber of the vielbeins ha that σminus is built of Indeed the vielbeins ha anticommutewith DL and hence the action of σminus is to be twisted by the factor (minus)∆g in orderσminusDL +DLσminus = 0 holds true Without further mention the pure sign factor (minus)∆g

will be though of as a part of the definition of σminusIt is useful to illustrate the action of σminus when for example unfolded equations

on fields with values in two modules R1 and R2 are glued as in (319)

R1︷ ︸︸ ︷

R2︷ ︸︸ ︷ g

q

t t t t

t t t

W 1p

ξ1pminus1

ξ10

W 2r

ξ2rminus1

ξ20

(324)

20

where short arrows stand for the action of σminus within each module and long arrowsfor the action of σminus between two modules (gluing terms) and dots stand for gaugefieldsparameters at different grades bold dots represent the elements of Wp =W 1

pW2r

All information about the dynamics turns out to be concealed in cohomologygroups of σminus [62] H(σminus) =

Ker(σminus)Im(σminus)

Let us analyze unfolded system (320) whichat grade g has the form

δξg1 = DLξg0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 )

δW gp = DLξ

gpminus1 + σminus(ξ

g+1pminus1)

0 = DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p )

(325)

Beginning from the deepest level of gauge transformations and from the lowestgrade it is obvious that those ξg+1

0 that are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueck-elberg(algebraic) gauge parameters for those ξg1 that belong to the image of σminusTherefore those ξg1 that are σminus-exact can be gauged away The leftover gauge sym-metry satisfies δξg1 = DLξ

g0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 ) = 0 so that those ξg+1

0 that belong to thecoimage of σminus are expressed via derivative of ξn0 Having sieved W0 and W1 inthis way only those ξg0 are still independent that are σminus-closed and hence belong toH

0(σminus) since only forms of zero-degree are elements of W0 Then those ξg+11 that

are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueckelberg gauge parameters for those ξg2 thatbelong to the image of σminus Therefore only those ξg1 are still independent that areσminus-closed but not σminus-exact and hence belong to H

1(σminus) Having sievedW0Wpminus1

one after another it turns out that independent differential gauge parameters at thek-th level are given by H

pminusk(σminus) Analogously those fields W gp that are σminus-exact

can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gauge parameters at Wpminus1 Thosefields W g+1

p that are not σminus-closed can be expressed via derivatives of fields at lowergrade by virtue of the equations Rg

p+1 equiv DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p ) = 0 these fields are

called auxiliary Therefore the dynamical fields ie those that are neither aux-iliary nor Stueckelberg are given by H

p(σminus) The nilpotency of D2 equiv 0 impliescertain relations of the form DLR

gp+1 + σminus(R

g+1p+1) = 0 between Rg

p+1 Therefore

auxiliary fields are expressed by virtue of σminus-exact Rgp+1 and σminus-non-closed Rg+1

p+1

are themselves expressed via derivatives of Rgp+1 Consequently the independent

equations on dynamical fields are given by Hp+1(σminus) From the cohomological point

of view higher degree forms correspond to certain nontrivial relations between equa-tions called Bianchi identities and manifest gauge nature of equations As there aregenerally more than one levels of gauge transformations one can expect the highercohomological group to be nontrivial

To sum up

21

cohomology group interpretation

Hpminusk k = 1p differential gauge parameters at the k-th level of re-

ducibilityH

p dynamical fieldsH

p+1 independent gauge invariant equations on dynamicalfields

Hp+k+1 k = 1p Bianchi identities for the k-th order gauge symmetryH

p+k k gt p supposed to be trivial in a regular case

To distinguish fields in cohomological sense the following convention is introduced[63]

Stueckelberg fields(gauge parameters) are those that can be eliminated bypure algebraic symmetry ie these fields are σminus-exact (are those that canbe used to gauge away certain fields ie these parameters are not σminus-closed)

Auxiliary fields are those that can be expressed via derivatives of some otherfields ie these fields are σminus-nonclosed Let us note that this definition isgenerally ambiguous eg in system

partA = B

partB = A(326)

which field is auxiliary is a matter of choice This ambiguity is removed byvirtue of grade[62 63]

Dynamical fields are those that are neither auxiliary nor Stueckelberg ie thesefields are representatives of σminus-cohomology classes

Note that if certain dynamical field given by Hp belongs to the grade-gf subspace

Wgfp and the corresponding equations given by H

p+1 belong to the grade-ge subspaceWge

p+1 the order of equations is equal to ge minus gf + 1If the unfolded system is supposed to admit a lagrangian formulation there has

to be a one-to-one correspondence between the number of dynamical fields and thatof equations k-th level gauge symmetries and k-th level Bianchi identities ie in acertain sense there should be a duality H

pminusk sim Hp+1+k k isin [0 p] This takes place

for all unfolded systems exemplified in this paperSince the operators involved ie DL and σminus are of grade 0 and minus1 only the

fields with the grade greater than g0 for any g0 ge 0 form a quotient module thusdescribing the same system on its own - dual formulations This picture partlybreaks in (A)dSd because of appearance of grade +1 nilpotent operator σ+

D = DL + σminus + λ2σ+ (327)

The specific character of frame-like unfolded systems which will be crucial forus is that by virtue of the inverse background vielbein hmicroa all form indices of any

gauge fieldparameter Wa1(s1)ap(sm)q can be converted to the fiber ones

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (328)

22

The resulting tensor W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is not irreducible and can be decomposedinto so(dminus 1 1)-irreps according to the so(dminus 1 1)-tensor product rule

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] =rArr Ys1 smotimes

so(dminus11)

Y(1 q) =oplus

α

Yα (329)

where one-column Young diagramY(1 q) of height-q represents the anti-symmetricindices d1 dq and Yα are the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the tensor product decomposesinto Having converted all fields (parameters equations) of a given unfolded systemto the fiber tensors one can make the identification of the fields in the unfolded ap-proach and those of the metric-like approach though the general covariance gaugeinvariance and other advantages of the unfolded formalism will be not manifestWhile constructing the unfolded formulations of a known metric-like systems or in-terpreting a given unfolded system in terms of metric-like fields this technique willbe widely used Moreover the calculation of σminus cohomology groups is largely basedon the explicit evaluation of (329)-like expressions Once an unfolded form is knownno use of this technique is needed either to generalize it to other backgrounds or tointroduce interactions

Field W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is traceless in a1 am and d1 dq separatelyHowever the cross traces need not vanish and hence some of Yα represent tracesTo distinguish between the traces of different orders let us introduce the followingthe Y-valued degree-q form WY

q is said to be a trace of the r-th order iff it has theform

WYq = hh

︸︷︷︸

r

hh︸︷︷︸

qminusr

CYprime

0 (330)

for some Yprime-valued degree-0 form CYprime

0 where (q minus r) indices of the backgroundvielbeins ha are contracted with the tensor representing Yprime and r indices are freefor the whole expression to take values in Y the appropriate Young symmetrizeris implied When the indices of WY

q are converted to the fiber ones the expression

takes the form ηη︸ ︷︷ ︸

r

CYprime ie CYprime

represents a trace of the r-th order

Different aspects of unfolding are illustrated on the examples of a massless scalarfield a massless spin-one field and a massless spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2) fields

33 Examples of Unfolding

Example 331 Unfolding a scalar field [31 62] First it should be noted thatit is easy of course to convert the Klein-Gordon equation C = 0 to a system offirst order equations

partmicroC = Cmicro

partmicroCmicro = 0(331)

but when writing the second equation the explicit form of the metric is to be usedhence these equations are not of unfolded form (31)

23

Described in terms of a scalar field C(x) the theory is brought into a non gaugeform therefore zero-forms only are allowed or else there would be some gaugesymmetry according to (34) The most general rhs of dC = has the form

dC = haCa (332)

for some vector-valued zero-form Ca This equation just parameterizes the firstderivative of C(x) and is similar to the first of (331) There are three terms allowedon the rhs of dCa =

dCa = hbCab + hbC

ab + haC prime (333)

with Cab Cab and C prime taking values in antisymmetric symmetric and scalar so(dminus1 1)-irreps ie bull The first term is forbidden by Bianchi identity hadC

a equiv 0To analyze the remaining terms let us decompose dCa into so(dminus 1 1)-irreps

partmicroCahmicrob = otimes = oplus oplus bull (334)

where = part[aCb] = part(aCa) minus 1dηaapartbC

b bull = partaCa = C

The component represents Bianchi identity in the first order reformulation ofthe Klein-Gordon equation Indeed expressing Ca as partaC implies part[aCb] equiv 0 bullrepresents the desired Klein-Gordon equation whereas is the only component al-lowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell Therefore to impose the Klein-Gordon equationthe term haC prime has to be omitted

dCa = hbCab (335)

The only possible rhs for dCaa = compatible with Jacobi identity hbdCab equiv 0

is of the form dCaa = hbCaab for Caaa taking values in a rank-three symmetric

so(d minus 1 1)-irrep ie The process of unfolding continues unambiguously inthis way and results in the full system

dCa(k) = hbCa(k)b equiv F a(k)(C) k = 0 1 (336)

where Ca(k) is rank-k totally symmetric traceless field ie taking values in k

so(dminus 1 1)-irrepTo make a connection with the general statement of Section 1 for Y = Y(0 0)

the general scheme results in

Yg bull

n k 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 0 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore spaces Wq and operator σminus which enters D = DL minus σminus should be definedas

Wq = WqWaq W

aaq (337)

24

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbWa(gminus1)bq g gt 0

(338)

Consequently W is a space of various differential forms with values in totally sym-metric traceless so(d minus 1 1)-tensors graded by the form degree and by the rankof so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Space Wq forms an irreducible iso(d minus 1 1)-module System(336) reads

Dω0 = 0 ω0 isin W0 (339)

The cohomology groups of σminus are easy to find

H0(σminus) = C(x) as the lowest grade field is automatically closed σminus(C) = 0 and it

cannot be exact as a form of zero degree Contrariwise zero-forms with gradegreater than zero are not closed σminus(C

k+1) = hbCa(k)b = 0lArrrArr Ck+1 = 0

H1(σminus) = haB(x)0 for some B(x)0 isin W

00 One-form Ba

1 = haB(x)0 is closedσminus(B

a1) = haB

a1 = hah

aB(x)0 equiv 0 and it cannot be represented as σminus(C2) =

hbCab as far as Cab is traceless The cohomology groups at higher grade are

trivial since σminus(haBa(k)(x)0) 6= 0 for k gt 0

Hqgt1(σminus) = empty as one can make sure

The interpretation in terms of Section 32 is as follows as is expected the dynamicalfield given by H

0 is C(x) The equations are given by the projection of dCa = hbCab

to H1 ie C = 0 The fields with k gt 0 are auxiliary being expressed via

derivatives of C(x) Ca(k) = partapartaC(x) Inasmuch as there is no gauge symmetryin the system the higher cohomology groups are trivial

An infinitely many dual formulations of a massless scalar field are also includedIndeed the fields with k ge k0 gt 0 form a quotient module Rk0 ie one canconsistently write

dCk = σminus(Ck+1) k ge k0 (340)

The first equationdCa(k0) = hbC

a(k0)b (341)

imposes on the dynamical field Ca(k0)

partbCba(k0minus1) = 0

part[bCc]a(k0minus1) = 0(342)

which imply at least locally Ca(k0) =

k0︷ ︸︸ ︷

partaparta C and C = 0 for some fieldC(x) All fields at higher grade are auxiliary This statement is confirmed bythe cohomology analysis H

0(Rk0 σminus) = Ck0 ie scalar is described in termsof a traceless rank-k0 symmetric tensor field subjected to the equations given byH

1(Rk0 σminus) = haBa(k0minus1)0 minus k0(k0minus1)

2(d+2k0minus4)ηaahcB

a(k0minus2)c0 +hcB

a(k0)c0 for B

a(k0minus1)0 B

a(k0)c0

taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps characterized by diagrams k0 minus 1 k0

These two elements represents just the components ofWk0

1 sim k0 otimes with the

25

symmetry of k0 minus 1 (trace) andk0

the third component with the symmetryof k0 + 1 is exact

The above results can be easily extended to (A)dSd background and to a massivescalar field [62]

DLCk = σminus(C

k+1) + σ+(Ckminus1) = 0 (343)

where there appears a nontrivial positive grade operator

σ+(Ckminus1) = (m2 minus λ2k(k + dminus 1))

(

haCa(kminus1) minus(sminus 1)

d+ 2k minus 4ηaahbC

a(kminus1)b

)

(344)

and DL is a Lorentz-covariant derivative in (A)dSd In the (A)dSd case the situationis more interesting due to the appearance of σ+ operator and the possibility of theaccidental degeneracy of σ+ when m2 = λ2kprime(kprime + dminus 1) for some kprime [62]

Example 332 Unfolding Maxwell equations [64 65] An example of masslessspin-one field is more interesting as a gauge system The main object is a one-formAmicro From gauge transformation law

δA1 = dξ0 (345)

it follows that there should not be other forms of rank greater than zero If this werethe case the gauge parameters of these new forms would be involved by virtue of(34) making the gauge law for A1 inappropriate Indeed there are two possibilitiesto introduce higher degree forms on the rhs of dA = (i) dA1 = R2 fora scalar valued degree-two form R2 which possesses its own gauge parameter χ1δR2 = dχ1 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law for A1 is modifiedto δA1 = dξ0 + χ1 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gaugeparameter χ1 This case corresponds to contractible free differential algebras (310)(ii) dA1 = hbω

b1 for a vector valued degree-one form ωa

1 which possesses its owngauge parameter ǫa0 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law forA1 is modified to δA1 = dξ0 + hbǫ

b0 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of

Stueckelberg gauge parameter ǫa0 Consequently in both cases A1 can be made non-dynamical which is not what was expected Therefore the only possibility is tointroduce a zero-form C

[ab]0 anti-symmetric in a b parameterizing by virtue of

dA1 = hahbC[ab]0 (346)

the Maxwell field strength Bianchi identity hahbdC[ab]0 equiv 0 tolerates two terms on

the rhs of dC[ab]0 =

dC[ab]0 = hcC

[ab]c0 + h[aC

b]0 (347)

with C[ab]c0 and Ca

0 taking values in and so(dminus 1 1)-irreps the former taken inantisymmetric basis In order to determine which of the terms should be omittedif any the decomposition of the first derivative of the Maxwell field strength intoLorentz irreps has to be analyzed

C [ab]|c equiv partmicroC[ab]hmicroc = otimes = oplus oplus (348)

26

where = part[aCbc] = partbCab and = partcC [ab] minus part[cCab] + 2

dminus1ηc[apartdC

b]d part[aCbc]

is identically zero provided that C [ab] is expressed via the first derivative of Amicroor represents the second pair of Maxwell equations in terms of field strength C [ab]In both cases this component should be zero and moreover this can not be keptnonzero as there is no hcC

[abc]-like term allowed on the rhs of (347) The secondpartbC

ab is the desired Maxwell equations in terms of Amicro or the first pair of Maxwellequations in terms of the field strength Consequently to impose Maxwell equationsterm h[aCb] has to be omitted whereas the third is the only component allowed tobe nonzero on-mass-shell

Again unfolding continues unambiguously and requires an infinite set of fields

C[ab]c(k)0 taking values14 in

kto be introduced

dC [ab]c(k) = hdC[ab]c(k)d k = 0 1 (349)

The full system has the form

dA1 = hahbCab0 equiv F (AC) δA1 = dξ0

dC[ab]c(k)0 = hdC

[ab]c(k)d0 equiv F [ab]c(k)(C) k = 0 1

(350)

and represents two modules being glued together by the term on the rhs of thefirst equation

For Y = Y(1 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 resultsin

Yg bull

n k 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 1 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore

Wq =

W0 q = 0

WqW[ab]qminus1W

[ab]cqminus1 q gt 0

(351)

let us point out the shortening of W0 The action of σminus on Wq isin Wq is defined as

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hahbW[ab]qminus1 g = 1

hdW[ab]c(gminus2)dqminus1 g gt 1

(352)

With D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (350) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (353)

14The fields C [ab]c(k) are taken in antisymmetric basis ie they are antisymmetric in a bsymmetric in c(k) and C [abd]c(kminus1)equiv0

27

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 0 form a finite-dimensional iso(dminus1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g gt0 form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

Again the cohomology groups are easy to find gauge parameters are given byH

0(σminus) = ξ0 dynamical fields by H1(σminus) = A1 Maxwell equations by H

2(σminus) =

h[aBb]0 and the Bianchi identities for the first order gauge transformations by

H3(σminus) = hahbB0 the rest of groups are empty H

kgt3(σminus) = empty Important is thedirect correspondence between the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2

the gauge parameters in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3There are infinitely many of non-gauge dual formulations based on C [ab]c(k0) eg

for k0 = 0 one recovers the Maxwell equations in terms of the field strength

part[aCbc] = 0

partbCab = 0

(354)

Let us note that the ambiguity at the first step of unfolding (the terms haC prime andh[aCb] in the above two examples) expresses the possibility of introducing a massterm

Example 333 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-s field [31 6466] We start from the metric-like description of a massless spin-s field in termsof a double-traceless symmetric rank-s field φmicro1micros

satisfying (213) the secondorder equations are invariant with respect to the first order gauge transformationwith traceless rank-(s minus 1) gauge parameter ξmicro1microsminus1 Inasmuch as the Young di-agram s of so(d minus 2) is of the height one there are gauge transforma-tions of the first level only Therefore the dynamical field in the unfolded ap-proach has to be a one-form There is only one way to identify φmicro1micros

and ξmicro1microsminus1

with certain ωY01 and ξY0

0 taking values in the same so(d minus 1 1)-irrep Y0 namely

Y0 = sminus 1 ie ωa(sminus1)1 and ξ

a(sminus1)0 takes values in a rank-(s minus 1) symmet-

ric traceless tensors Field φmicro1microsis identified with a totally symmetric part of

ωa(sminus1)1 ie φmicro1micros

= hb1(micro1hbsminus1

microsminus1ωa1asminus1

micros)ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 the double-tracelessness

condition is the consequence of the tracelessness of ωa(sminus1)1 in a1asminus1 ξmicro1microsminus1

is identified with ξa(sminus1)0 directly ξmicro1microsminus1 = hb1micro1

hbsminus1microsminus1

ξa1asminus1ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 andone can make sure that the Fronsdalrsquos gauge transformation law is recovered fromδω

a(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 Field ω

a(sminus1)1 has a redundant component with the symmetry

ofsminus 1

which can be made Stueckelberg by virtue of gauge parameter ξa(sminus1)b

with the same symmetry type ie

δωa(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)c0 (355)

It automatically follows that there is a degree-one gauge field ωa(sminus1)b1 coupled with

ωa(sminus1)1 as

dωa(sminus1)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)c1 (356)

28

The only solution to Bianchi identity hcdωa(sminus1)c1 equiv 0 is15

dωa(sminus1)b1 = hcω

a(sminus1)bc1 (357)

where a new field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

is introduced and so on

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1 (358)

until the field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

for which the Bianchi identity solvesas

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 (359)

where field Ca(s)b(s)0 represents a generalized Weyl tensor and has the symmetry of

s The solution of Bianchi identity hchddC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 equiv 0 has the form

dCa(s)b(s)0 = hc

(

Ca(s)cb(s)0 +

s

2C

a(s)bb(sminus1)c0

)

(360)

where Ca(s+1)b(s)0 has the symmetry of s

s+ 1 The second term on the rhs

of (360) supplements the first one to have a proper Young symmetry Further

unfolding requires a set of degree-zero forms Ca(s+i)b(s)0 taking values in so(dminus1 1)-

irreps characterized by Young diagrams ss+ i

The full system has theform

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1

δωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(k)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)b(k)c0 k isin [0 sminus 2]

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 δω

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0

dCa(s+i)b(s) = hc

(

Ca(s+i)cb(s) +s

i+ 2Ca(s+i)bb(sminus1)c

)

i isin [0infin)

(361)

By the construction the system incorporates Fronsdalrsquos field φmicro1microswith the correct

gauge law but there is still to be proved that the Fronsdalrsquos equations are reallyimposed and that there are no other dynamical fields in the system Let us recon-struct Fronsdalrsquos equations (213) whereas the second statement will be proved asa part of a more general theorem The first two equations of (361) read

partmicroωa(sminus1)ν minus partνω

a(sminus1)micro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)cν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)cmicro (362)

partmicroωa(sminus1)bν minus partνω

a(sminus1)bmicro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)bcν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)bcmicro (363)

It is convenient to convert all world indices to the fiber ones

partcωa(sminus1)|d minus partdωa(sminus1)|c = ωa(sminus1)c|d minus ωa(sminus1)d|c (364)

partcωa(sminus1)b|d minus partdωa(sminus1)b|c = ωa(sminus1)bc|d minus ωa(sminus1)bd|c (365)

15The proof is not given as more general statement about the solutions of such equations isproved in the next Section

29

where ωa(sminus1)|b equiv ωa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro ωa(sminus1)bb|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bbmicro hcmicro

Contracting (365) with ηbd and then symmetrizing c with a1asminus1 results in

partcωa(sminus1)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus1)c|c= 0 (366)

By symmetrizing in (364) a1asminus1 with d

ωa(sminus1)c|a = partcωa(sminus1)|a minus partaωa(sminus1)|c (367)

and then by contracting (364) with ηdasminus1

ωa(sminus1)c|

c= (sminus 1)

(

partcωa(sminus2)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus2)c|c

)

(368)

all the terms of (366) can be expressed via ωa(sminus1)|b Plugging these to (366) gives

ωa(sminus1)|a minus partapartc((sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c

)+ (sminus 1)partapartaω

a(sminus2)c|c= 0 (369)

where ωa(sminus1)|a is to be identified with Fronsdalrsquos field φa(s) as ωa(sminus1)|a = 1sφa(s)

then ωa(sminus2)c|

c= 1

2φa(sminus2)c

c (sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c = φa(sminus1)c and the equation

acquires the Fronsdalrsquos form (213)

φa(s) minus spartapartcφa(sminus1)c + s(sminus1)

2partapartaφ

a(sminus2)cc= 0 (370)

For Y = Y(s 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 results in

Yg sminus 1 sminus 1 s

ss+ 1

n k 1 0 1 sminus 1 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = sminus 1 g = s g = s+ 1

qg q0 = 1 qsminus1 = 1 qs = 0 qs+1 = 0

therefore

Wq =

Wa(sminus1)0 W

a(sminus1)b0 W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0 q = 0

Wa(sminus1)q W

a(sminus1)bq W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)q W

a(s)b(s)qminus1 W

a(s+1)b(s)qminus1 q gt 0

(371)and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hcWa(sminus1)b(gminus1)cq g isin [1 sminus 1]

hchdWa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)dqminus1 g = s

hc

(

Wa(gminussminus1)cb(s)qminus1 + s

gminuss+1W

a(gminussminus1)bb(sminus1)cqminus1

)

g gt s

(372)

With D = DL minus σminus full system (361) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (373)

30

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sminus 1 sim g isin [0 sminus 1]form a finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k =0 1 sim g ge s form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

The representatives of cohomology classes can be chosen as H0 = ξ

a(sminus1)0 H1 =

hbφa(sminus1)b H2 = hbhcG

a(sminus1)c minus hahcGa(sminus2)bc + γηaahahcG

a(sminus4)bcnn+ (βηabhahc +

αηaahbhc)Ga(sminus3)cn

n16 H

3 = hbhahcχa(sminus2)c H

kgt3 = empty where φa(s) and Ga(s) are

double-traceless tensor fields and ξa(sminus1) and χa(sminus1) are traceless H01 are nontrivialat the lowest grade whereas H

23 are nontrivial at grade-one therefore the orderof equations that are imposed on the dynamical field is equal to two It turns outthat there is no need in the explicit form for α β and γ it is sufficient to find outthe Young symmetry of representatives only The uniqueness of Fronsdalrsquos theoryat the level of action was demonstrated in [67] and at the level of equations in[6 53] Consequently there is no need for equations (370) to be found explicitly -those of Fronsdal are the only possible Again there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2 the gauge parameters

in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3 The system contains an infinitely many ofdual formulations those that have field W

a(sminus1)b(k0)1 at the lowest grade are gauge

dual descriptions whereas those that have field Ca(s+k0)b(s) at the lowest grade arenon-gauge Dual description based on field W

a(sminus1)b(1)1 was elaborated in [68]

Example 334 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field[69

70 31] Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field results in literally

the same unfolded system (361 373) but with fields taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that are irreducible spin-tensors with the same tensor part as in the bosoniccase Note that operator σminus is not modified but the σminus cohomology groups areslightly changed such that the equations become of the first order

The Dirac equation Unfolded system (336) or equivalently (339) describesa massless spin-1

2field provided that Ck take values in s 1

2so(dminus1 1)-irreps

ie Ck equiv Cαa(k) and Γαb βC

βba(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equation of (336)

partmicroCα = hmicroaC

αa (374)

with hbmicroΓβb α

gives the Dirac equation

Γαa βpart

aCβ = 0 (375)

the rest of equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives of dynamicalfield Cα

The Rarita-Schwinger equation Unfolded system (350) or equivalently(353) describes a massless spin-3

2field provided that irreducible tensors in (351)

are replaced by the corresponding irreducible tensor-spinors ie A1 equiv Aαmicro C

k equiv

Cα[ab]c(k) and Γαb βC

β[ab]c(k) = 0 Γαd βC

β[ab]dc(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equa-tion of (350)

1

2(partmicroA

αν minus partνA

αmicro) = hmicroahνbC

α[ab] (376)

16α = minus (s(d+sminus5)minusd+6)(sminus2)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6) β = (sminus2)

(d+sminus4) γ = (d+sminus6)(sminus2)(sminus3)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6)

31

with Γ-matrices and converting world indices micro ν to the fiber ones according toAαa equiv Aα

microhamicro gives the Rarita-Schwinger equation

Γαb βpart

bAβa minus partaΓαb βA

βb = 0 δAαa = partaξα (377)

The rest of unfolded equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives ofdynamical field Aα

microThe Fang-Fronsdal equation for a spin-(s + 1

2) massless field Unfolded

system (361) or equivalently (373) describes a massless spin-(s + 12) field pro-

vided that irreducible tensors in (371) are replaced by the corresponding irreducibletensor-spinors With all world indices converted to the fiber ones the first equationof (361) has the form

Gαa(sminus1)|[cd] equiv partcωβa(sminus1)|d minus partdωβa(sminus1)|c = ωβa(sminus1)c|d minus ωβa(sminus1)d|c (378)

where ωαa(sminus1)|b equiv ωαa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωαa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

αa(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro

Analogously to the bosonic case nonsymmetric component of ωβa(sminus1)|d canbe gauged away algebraically Hence the Fronsdalrsquos field φαa(s) is identified asωαa(sminus1)|a = 1

sφαa(s) Then Γα

b βφβa(s) = Γα

b βωβa(sminus1)|b Γα

b βΓβc γφ

γa(sminus2)bc = ηbcωαa(sminus2)b|c

and the Fronsdalrsquos triple Γ-traceless constraint is a consequence of irreducibility ofωαa(sminus1)|b in α a1asminus1 and the lack of any conditions with respect to a1asminus1 andb Since the Fronsdalrsquos field contains three irreducible components with the sym-metry of s 1

2 s-1 1

2and s-2 1

2 the equations of motion has to be

nontrivial in these three sectors too The projector on the dynamical equations issimply Γα

b βGβa(sminus1)b|a and gives

Γαb βpart

bφβa(s) minus spartaΓαb βφ

βa(sminus1)b = 0 (379)

which is in accordance with (222) But we would like to note that there aretwo components with the symmetry of s-1 1

2 namely ηbcG

αa(sminus2)b|ac and

Γαb βΓ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] The correct projector on this component of the equations isgiven by the combination

2(sminus 1)ηbcGαa(sminus2)b|ac minus γαb βγ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] (380)

which is identically zero when Gαa(sminus1)|[bc] is expressed via ωβa(sminus1)c|d by virtue of(378) Therefore it is (380) that does not express certain part of ωβa(sminus1)c|d interms of first derivatives of the dynamical field φαa(s) and thus this is a dynamicalequation Obviously (380) is a representative of σminus cohomology group H

2g=0 In

terms of φαa(s) the representative has the form

Γαb βpart

bΓβc γφ

γa(sminus1)c minus partcφαa(sminus1)c +

(sminus 1)

2partaφ

αa(sminus2)cc= 0 (381)

which is equal to the Γ-trace of (379) The gauge transformations has the form

δφαa(s) = partaξαa(sminus1) (382)

32

where Γαb βξ

βa(sminus2)b = 0Consequently unfolded equations for totally symmetric bosonic fields are proved

to completely determine the unfolded equations for totally symmetric fermionicfields Though σminus is not modified in the fermionic case σminus cohomology groupsare changed since the fermionic dynamical equations are of the first order

4 Unfolding Mixed-Symmetry Fields

First in Section 41 an example of the simplest massless mixed-symmetry field ofspin- is investigated in detail and leading arguments are given for a spin- fieldSecond the general statement on arbitrary mixed-symmetry fields is proved whereastechnical details are collected in Sections 44 and 45 The analysis of the numberof physical degrees of freedom is carried out in Section 43

41 Simplest Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Example 411 Spin- field In the metric-like approach a spin- field is mini-mally described[16 17] by the subjected to (215) field φ[micromicro]ν that takes values in a

reducible so(dminus 1 1)-representation oplus the latter component is identified withthe trace φ ν

microν The gauge transformations (216) has two levels of reducibility with

two gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξA[microν] taking values in oplus bull so(dminus 1 1)-irreps at the

first level and one parameter ξmicro taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irrep at the secondlevel (217)

First the metric-like field φ[micromicro]ν has to be incorporated into certain differentialform eYq which is called a physical vielbein the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y and the degreeq to be defined below To make the symmetries both of the first and of the secondlevel of reducibility manifest the degree of the physical vielbein has to be two atleast

Moreover were the physical vielbein taken to be a degree-one form not all of thegauge symmetries even at the first level would be manifest Indeed there are twopossibilities for physical vielbein eY1 to contain a component with the symmetry of

Namely Y = and Y = since otimes = oplus oplus and otimes = oplus oplus

The associated differential gauge parameter is ξ0 in the first case and ξ0 in thesecond case Inasmuch as the gauge parameters are the forms of degree-zero onlyone of the required two parameters is present in each of the cases

The degree of the physical vielbein has to be not greater than two if the com-ponent associated with the metric-like field φmicromicroν is required not to be a certaintrace part The reason why a dynamical field should not be a certain trace part isexplained in the next Section

Therefore the physical vielbein has to be of degree-two and has to take valuesin so(dminus 1 1)-irrep that belongs to the vector representation ie e2 equiv ea2 equiv eamicroν

The associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξa1 equiv ξamicro contains in its Lorentz decomposition

otimes = oplus oplusbull both anti-symmetric ξAmicroν = ξa[microhbν]ηab and symmetric ξSmicroν = ξa(microh

bν)ηab

33

gauge parameters the latter enters along with the trace ξamicrohmicroa There exists a second

level gauge parameter χa0 which is directly identified with ξmicro as ξmicro = hbmicroχ

aηabThere are no redundant components in the gauge parameter However physicalvielbein e2 contains one redundant component in its decomposition into Lorentz

irreps otimes = oplus oplus The first and the second components are to be associatedwith a traceful φmicromicroν whereas the third one totally anti-symmetric component e[a|bc]

of ea|bc = eamicroνhbmicrohcν is a redundant one and has to be made non-dynamical In order

to do so algebraic gauge parameter ξ[abc]0 with the symmetry of is introduced It

is obvious from pure algebraic gauge law

δea2 = hbhcξ[abc]0 (41)

that the redundant component can be fixed to zero and ea2 can be directly identifiedwith φmicromicroν as e

amicromicro = φmicromicroνh

aν From gauge transformation laws δea2 = dξa1 δξa1 = dχa

0

ie δeamicroν = 12

(partmicroξ

aν minus partνξ

amicro

) δξamicro = partmicroχ

a required gauge transformations (216)(217) for metric-like field φmicromicroν and for the first order gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξ

A[microν]

are easily recoveredSince in the unfolded approach each gauge parameter possesses its own gauge

field and vice-verse associated with ξ[abc]0 gauge field ω

[abc]1 enters as

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 (42)

which determines the first equation Applying d to this equation results in Bianchiidentity hbhcdω

[abc]1 equiv 0 which has a unique solution of the form

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 (43)

with C[abc][df ]0 having the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensor of a spin-

field ie it is anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and C[abcd]f0 equiv 0 To clarify the form of

the solution let C[abc]|[df ]0 be a degree-zero form anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and with

no definite symmetry between these two groups of indices The Bianchi identityimplies hbhchdhfC

[abc]|[df ]0 equiv 0 which is equivalent to C

a[bc|df ]0 equiv 0 since vielbeins

ha anticommute Therefore the solution is parameterized by those components of

C[abc]|[df ]0 sim otimes that has the symmetry of Young diagrams with no more than

three rows since the requirement for total anti-symmetrization of any four indicesto give zero is the characteristic property of Young diagrams with at most three

rows otimes ni is the only component of zero trace order17 with three rows andthere are no components with the number of rows less than three Alternatively one

17Although there are trace components with the number of rows less than four eg theirtensor product by the metric ηab contains components with the symmetry of the sl(d)-Young

diagrams with more than three rows Nontrivial trace with the symmetry of corresponds tothe mass-like term Hence traceful tensors either do not satisfy the Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms

34

could search for the solution in the sector of degree-one forms as dω[abc]1 = hdC

[abc]|d1

with some C[abc]|d1 but Bianchi identity hbhchdC

[abc]|d1 equiv 0 implies that the only

component of C[abc]|d1 sim otimes that is allowed must have less than three rows which

is impossible since [abc] makes Young diagrams of otimes consist of three rows atleast18 Thus one has to search for the solution among the forms of less degree

Further unfolding requires a set of fields C [abc][df ]g(k) with the symmetry ofk

to be introduced and the full system has the form

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 δea2 = dξa1 + hbhcξ

[abc]0 δξa1 = dχa

0

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 δω

[abc]1 = dξ

[abc]0

dC[abc][df ]g(k)0 = hvC

[abc][df ]g(k)v0 (44)

Consequently the unfolded system incorporates field φmicromicroν with all required differ-ential gauge parameters at all levels of reducibility the redundant component of the

physical vielbein does not contribute to the dynamics ω[abc]1 sim otimes = oplus oplus

the first component is a field strength for the redundant field once the field hasbeen gauged away the associated field strength is zero and ω

[abc]ρ = hamicrohbνhcλT[microνλ]ρ

for some T[microνλ]ρ T[microνλρ] equiv 0 which incorporates both and (as the trace) Torecover equations (215) in terms of metric-like fields it is convenient to convert allfiber indices to the world ones in the first two equations

part[microeaνλ] = hb[microhcνω

abcλ] (45)

part[microωabcν] = hd[microhfν]C

abcdf (46)

to substitute Tmicroνλρ and to contract two indices in the second equation

part[microφνλ]ρ = Tmicroνλρ (47)

partρTmicroνρλ minus partλTρ

microνρ = 0 (48)

Plugging (47) in (48) gives equation (215)For Y = Y(2 1) (1 1) ie N = 2 and p = 2 the general scheme of Section

1 results in

Yg

n k 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 1 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

18Again the trace component enters the tensor product as η otimes and has the number of rowsnot less than three

35

therefore

Wq =

W a0 q = 0

W a1 W

[abc]0 q = 1

W aq W

[abc]qminus1 W

[abc][df ]qminus2 W

[abc][df ]gqminus2 q gt 1

(49)

and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbhcW[abc]qminus1 g = 1

hbhcW[aaa][bc]qminus2 g = 2

hdW[aaa][bb]c(gminus3)dqminus2 g gt 2

(410)

with D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (44) can be rewritten as

Dω2 = 0 δω2 = Dξ1 δξ1 = Dξ0 (411)

where ω2 isin W2 ξ1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 2 k = 0 sim g = 0and n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 1 form two finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-moduleswhereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g ge 2 form an infinite-dimensionaliso(dminus 1 1)-module

Example 412 Spin- field (briefly) In the case of a massless spin- fieldthere are two gauge parameters at the first level of reducibility which have the sym-metry19 of and one gauge parameter at the second level with the symmetryof First for Y = Y(3 1) (2 1) the proposed scheme results in

Yg

n k 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3 g = 4

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 2 q2 = 1 q3 = 0 q4 = 0

therefore the physical vielbein has to be a two-form taking values in ie e2 equiv

eaab2 Associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξaab1 has components otimes = oplus oplus the first two having the symmetry of the required gauge parameters with the thirdone being redundant The last three components in the decomposition of the physical

vielbein otimes = oplus oplus oplus are also redundant By virtue of Stueckelberg

symmetry with parameter ξ1 these three components can be gauged away inasmuch

as otimes = oplus oplus The redundant component of the first level gauge

parameter ξ1 also can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg symmetry with

level-two gauge parameter ξ0 Consequently at least the fact that the unfoldedsystem incorporates the metric-like field all the required gauge parameters andredundant components do not contribute to the dynamics is proved

19To simplify the example no consideration is given to the trace components of the fields

36

42 General Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Given a massless field of spin Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) described by a metric-like field φY(x) taking values in the irrep of the Lorentz algebra so(d minus 1 1) withthe same symmetry type(minimal formulation) there exists a unique unfolded systemwith the physical vielbein at the lowest grade and all symmetries being manifest thatreproduces the original metric-like system The system has the form (11)

Sketch of the proof

1 The lowest grade field (physical vielbein) eY0q0

turns out to be completely de-termined by the requirement for it to contain the metric-like field and for itsgauge parameters ξY0

q0minusk k gt 0 to contain all the necessary gauge parametersat all levels of reducibility (219)

2 eY0q0

and its gauge parameters appear to contain redundant components thathave to be made non-dynamical The only way to achieve this is to introduceStueckelberg symmetry δeY0

q0= σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus1) δξ

Y0q0minus1 = σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus2) with certain

ξY1q1minusk k gt 0 which turns out to be unambiguously defined by this requirement

3 ξY1q1minus1 has associated gauge field ωY1

q1and gauge transformations δωY0

q0=

σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) completely determines the first equation deY0

q0= σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) whichimplies Jacobi identity σ1

minus(dωY1q1

) equiv 0 The general solution is proved in Sec-tion 44 to have the form dωY1

q1= σ2

minus(ωY2q2

) with certain ωY2q2

The secondequation implies the second Jacobi identity σ2

minus(dωY2q2

) equiv 0 and so on

4 Once the total unfolded system is defined the proof of the facts that (i)the correct dynamical equations are imposed (ii) there are no other dynamicalfields or other differential gauge symmetries in the system is obtained throughthe calculations of σminus cohomology groups Ignoring the trace pattern of fieldsie for traceful tensors the proof of (ii) can be simplified and is done in thissection Even stronger statement that there exists a duality H

p+1+k sim Hpminusk is

proved in Section 45

First as it is clear from the examples above the metric-like field φYM(x) has

to be incorporated into a differential form eY0q of degree-q taking values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep Y0 (for this reason eY0q is called physical vielbein) Having converted

all world indices to fiber ones in accordance with (329) so(dminus 1 1)-tensor productY0 otimes Y(1 q) of Y0 with one column diagram of the height q must contain thecomponent with the symmetry of YM In the case of the minimal formulationYM = Y where Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) characterizes the spin

It is useful to introduce a notion of the quotient of two Young diagrams let thequotient of two Young diagrams Y1Y2 be a direct sum of those diagrams whoseso(dminus 1 1)-tensor product by Y2 contains Y1 For the first sight given q ge 0 anyelement Q of YMY(1 q) might be chosen as Y0 If q is greater than the heightof YM the component with the symmetry YM in the tensor product QotimesY(1 q)has to be certain trace inevitably

37

Although there is no apparent problems in considering unfolded systems withdynamical field hidden in certain trace component of the physical vielbein egMaxwell gauge potential Amicro might be identified with the trace eamicroνh

microa of two-form

eamicroν However this exotic incorporating of the physical field does not take place inthe already known systems Moreover it can be proved that such exotic systemsdo not exist if irreducible Nevertheless they might be a part of some reduciblesystem which describes more than one field Therefore we require the degree q ofthe physical vielbein to be not greater than the height of YM

Inasmuch as (i) the equations imposed on φY(x) possess reducible gauge trans-formations with the number of levels equal to the height p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi of Y (ii) for

a degree-q gauge field of an unfolded system there exist q levels of gauge transfor-mations the degree q of physical vielbein eY0

q must be equal to pThe quotient YY(1 p) contains only one element (provided φY(x) is for-

bidden to be a trace component) it is the diagram (12) with the symmetry ofY0 = Y(s1 minus 1 p1) (sN minus 1 pN) ie it is equal to Y without the first col-umn Therefore physical vielbein eY0

p is completely defined So does gauge param-

eters ξY0pminusk at the k-th level of reducibility k isin [1 p] The requirement for tensor

product Y0 otimes Y(1 pminus k) to contain all gauge parameters ξik given by (219)at the k-th level of reducibility is also satisfied Consequently the whole patternof fieldsgauge parameters of the metric-like formulation is reproduced Note thatY0 equiv Y0 and q0 = p in the terms of Section 1

Let us note that if one writes down the physical vielbein explicitly as ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

where si are the lengths of the rows ofY and converts the form indices to the tangentones by virtue of inverse background vielbein hmicroa

ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|[d1dp] = ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

hmicro1d1 hmicropdp (412)

dynamical field φY(x) should be identified with ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|a1ap which hasthe symmetry of Y with some traces included Consequently the generalizedLabastidarsquos double-tracelessness condition (220) [20] is obvious inasmuch as thecontraction of two metric tensor ηaiaiηaiai with the i-th group of indices vanishes

Generally in addition to φY(x) decompositionY0otimesY(1 p) of physical vielbeineY0p into Lorentz irreps contains redundant components which must not contributeto the physical degrees of freedom So does Y0 otimesY(1 pminus k) ie in addition toξik it contains a lot of components that can not be made genuine differential gaugeparameters There are only two possible ways to get rid of redundant fields in theunfolded formalism

A redundant components could be directly fixed to zero by algebraic (Stueckel-berg) symmetry

B redundant components might be auxiliary fields for other fields (at lower grade)and so on The process stops since the grade is assumed to be bounded frombelow

We require dynamical fields incorporated in the physical vielbein to be at the lowestgrade Actually (B) takes place for dual gauge descriptions but not for the minimal

38

Therefore the only possibility to make redundant components to be non-dynamicalis to introduce a Stueckelberg symmetry with certain parameters ξY1

q1minusk

δeY0p = dξY0

pminus1 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) (413)

δξY0pminus1 = dξY0

pminus2 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus2) (414)

(415)

where σ1minus is a certain operator built of background vielbein ha that contracts a

number of indices of Y1 with hahc to obtain Y0 Diagram20 Y1 and form degreeq1 can be easily found since Y1 otimes Y1 q1 minus i i gt 0 must contain all redundantcomponents of eY0

p and ξY0pminusk

In the unfolded formalism each gauge field possesses its own gauge parameter andvice-versa Therefore there is a gauge field ωY1

q1 which contributes to the equations

for eY0p as

deY0p = σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) (416)

The first equation determines the first Jacobi identity of the form σ1minus(dω

Y1q1

) equiv 0which can be solved as

dωY1q1

= σ2minus(ω

Y2q2

) (417)

for certain gauge field ωY2q2

and operator σ2minus that satisfies σ1

minusσ2minus equiv 0 The general

solution of Jacobi identities is given in Section 44 From now on let the super-scripts of σminus be omitted The second equation determines the second Jacobi identityσminus(dω

Y2q2

) equiv 0 which can be also solved and so on Consequently the knowledgeof the lowest grade gauge field eY0

p and of the Stueckelberg symmetries required toget rid of redundant components determines the first equation which by virtue ofJacobi identities determines the second and so on The total unfolded system hasthe structure

dωYg

qg= σminus

(

ωYg+1qg+1

)

g = 0 1

δωYg

qg= dξYg

qg+ σminus

(

ξYg+1

qg+1minus1

)

δξYgqg

=

(418)

where σminus is certain algebraic operator built of background vielbein ha and (σminus)2 = 0

The only facts remain to be proved are that there are no other dynamical fieldsand that the proper correspondence (duality) between the cohomology groups holdstrue To this end it is sufficient to analyze only the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps content ofH

qg ie only the symmetry type and the multiplicity of irreducible Lorentz tensors

that by virtue of (330) are the representatives of Hqg

It is proved in the next Section that there is a duality Hpminuskg=0 sim H

p+k+1g=1 between

the σminus cohomology groups which reveals the one-to-one correspondence betweenthe gauge dynamical fields and equations of motion the level-k gauge symmetries

20The specific character of Minkowski massless fields is in that all Stueckelberg parameters canbe incorporated into a single Y1-valued form this not being the case for (anti)-de Sitter masslessfields

39

and the level-k Bianchi identities The representatives of cohomology groups in thesector of fields and gauge symmetries directly correspond to those of metric-likeapproach and there is no other nontrivial cohomology in these sectors

Though the trace pattern of fieldsgauge parameters is also important and thecalculation of σminus cohomology groups provides a comprehensive answer to this ques-tion the very procedure being a bit technical Ignoring the trace pattern of thefields it can be easily proved that the required metric-like field is incorporated inphysical vielbein eY0

q0 all the redundant components of the physical vielbein can be

gauged away by a pure algebraic symmetry and the same holds for differential gaugeparameters ξY0

q0minusk at all levels of reducibility ie the required pattern of gauge pa-rameters is recovered whereas all the redundant components are either Stueckelbergor auxiliary This is the necessary condition only and the traces has to be takeninto account Also it is still to be proved that the correct equations of motionsare imposed Provided that there are no trace conditions on the fields the sys-tem is referred to as off-shell[65] An off-shell system may contain only constraintsthat express auxiliary fields via the derivatives of the dynamical field imposing norestrictions on the latter

The off-shell system Technically ignoring the traces is equivalent to thereplacement of all so(dminus1 1)-irreps by the sl(d)-irreps that are characterized by thesame Young diagrams ie instead of taking so(dminus1 1)-tensor products one needs toapply the sl(d)-tensor productrsquos rules which are much simpler The decompositionof the physical vielbein eY0

q0into sl(d)-irreps is given by diagrams Yαi of the form

αN+1

sN minus 1

pNαN

s2 minus 1

p2α2

s1 minus 1

p1

α1

(419)

where α1+ +αN+1 = q0 = p The decomposition of Stueckelberg gauge parameterξY1q1minus1 for eY0

q0has the components of the same form but with αN+1 ge 1 because

Y1 (13) has already the form of Y0 with one cell in the bottom-left Thereforeall components of eY0

q0except for those with αN+1 = 0 are of Stueckelberg type but

there is only one component of eY0q0

with αN+1 = 0 namely it has αi = pi i isin [1 N ]and hence has the symmetry of Y The decomposition of level-k differential gaugeparameter ξY0

q0minusk has the form (419) with α1 + + αN+1 = p minus k and again all

the components of ξY0q0minusk with αN+1 ge 1 can be gauged away by pure algebraic

symmetry with ξY1q1minuskminus1 Consequently there is a complete matching between (219)

40

and those in ξY0

q0minusk that are not pure gauge themselves It can be easily proved alsothat if ignoring the traces there are no other dynamical fieldsdifferential gaugeparameters at higher grade Consequently

Lemma H(σminus) with respect to sl(d) are given by

Hk(σminus)sl(d) =

Yαi g = 0 α1 + + αN = k αN+1 = 0 k le p

empty k gt p(420)

The triviality of the higher k gt p cohomology groups for sl(d) which shouldcontain equations of motion and Bianchi identities is expected since the system isoff-shell For the equations to have the second order in derivatives the only nontrivialcohomology group H

p+1 must be at the grade-one ie Hp+1g=1 6= empty As is seen from

the examples above the equations correspond to those representatives of Hp+1g=1 that

are certain traces Indeed the total rank |WYgqg | which is equal to the sum qg + |Yg|

of degree qg and rank of Yg is preserved by σminus Therefore |WYgqg | = |W

Y0q0| + g

and |RY1q1+1| = |ω

Y0q0| + 2 = |Y|+ 2 where eY0

q0isin Wg=0

p and RY1q1+1 isin W

g=1p+1 contain

metric-like field φYM(x) and the equations on φY(x) respectively Consequently

the representative of Hp+1g=1 that corresponds to the equations on the traceless part

of φY(x) has to be identified with certain trace of the first order and so on for thetraces of φY(x)

The calculation of σminus cohomology groups carried out in Section 45 implies

1 The only nontrivial cohomology groups are Hpminuskg=0 and H

p+k+1g=1 k = 1 p

Therefore the dynamical fields and independent gauge parameters belong tothe zero grade Wg=0

q subspaces the equations are of the second order and theBianchi identities for the k-th level gauge symmetries are of the (k + 2)-thorder

2 Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 ie there is a one-to-one correspondence between the

elements of Hpminuskg=0 that are traces of the r-th order and the elements of Hp+k+1

g=1

that are traces of the (r + k + 1)-th order Roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1

Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on Therefore there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the dynamical fields and the equations of motion the level-k gaugesymmetries and the k-th Bianchi identities

3 The so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that correspond to the elements of Hpminusk(σminus) and arethe traces of the zeroth order are given by the so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagramsthat have the form (419) with αN+1 = 0 and α1 + + αN = p minus k whichexactly reproduce the required pattern (219) Note that certain higher ordertraces are also the elements of cohomology groups These fields represent thersquoauxiliaryrsquo fields of the metric-like formulation which had to be introduced tomake the gauge symmetry off-shell To prove the theorem it is not necessary toknow the concrete trace pattern the duality between the cohomology groupsis sufficient The details of the trace pattern are in Section 45

41

In the fermionic case the traces are substituted for Γ-traces Important isthat acting on tensor indices only σminus does not break down the irreducibility ofspin-tensors The duality has the form H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 or simply H

pminuskg=0 sim

Hp+k+1g=0 which means that equations are of the first order and the duality between

fieldsequations gauge symmetriesBianchi identities takes place which completesthe proof

Note that Yg=s1 equiv Yn=0k=0 has the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensorfor a spin-Y massless field

sNpN

s2p2

s1

p1 + 1

(421)

Analogously to the examples of Section 33 massless mixed-symmetry fields can bedescribed by the same unfolded system (16) that is restricted to Wg

q with g ge g0ie the system contains infinitely many dual formulations As the generalized Weyltensor and its descendants are non-gauge fields the dual descriptions with g0 ge s1are non-gauge and the dual descriptions with 0 lt g0 lt s1 are gauge

43 Physical Degrees of Freedom Counting

Notwithstanding the simplicity of the unfolded form and the uniqueness of unfoldingthere still might be a question of whether the unfolded equations do describe thecorrect number of physical degrees of freedom

It is well-known that for systems with the first class constraints only with mass-less fields belonging to this class the counting of degrees of freedom is that one firstlevel gauge parameter kills two degrees of freedom one second level gauge parame-ters kills three degrees of freedom and so on For example a spin-two massless fieldpossesses d(dminus3)

2degrees of freedom which is just d(d+1)

2minus 2d d(d+1)

2and d being the

number of components of φmicroν and ξmicroThe complete information concerning the rsquonumberrsquo of fieldsgauge parameters

ie the multiplicity and the symmetry of corresponding tensors is contained inH

kg=0(σminus) for k = 0p Not only can a number of physical degrees of freedom be

calculated but the whole exact sequence that defines an iso(d minus 1 1) irrep can bederived The elements of this sequence are certain so(dminus 1) tensors that define anso(dminus 2) tensor as a quotient of so(d minus 1) tensors eg (218) The decompositionof so(dminus 1 1)-fields into irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) can be done with the aid ofpartmicro or after Fourier transform with the aid of momentum pmicro

For example for a spin-two field the cohomology groups that correspond to thedynamical fieldsdifferential gauge parameters and its decomposition into so(dminus 1)irreps have the form

42

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus bull sim φmicroν φ

νν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2bull

Quick sort of Young diagrams in 0 minusrarr 2H0 minusrarr H1 minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 gives the

correct exact sequence 0 minusrarr minusrarr minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 which defines a masslessspin-two irrep H (0 )

For the simplest mixed-symmetry field the hook- there are two levels of gaugetransformation hence relevant cohomology groups are H

0 H1 and H2

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus oplus bull sim ξAmicroν oplus ξ

Smicroν ξ

Sνν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2 oplus 2bull

H2 oplus sim φmicroνλ φ

νmicroν 6= 0 oplus oplus oplus 2 oplus bull

Again quick sort of diagrams in 0 minusrarr 3H0 minusrarr 2H1 minusrarr H2 minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0

gives exact sequence (218)Consequently the problem of calculation the number of physical degrees of free-

dom to be precise of deriving the exact sequence is effectively reduced to the simplecombinatoric problem of (i) decomposition so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagram representa-tives of H(σminus) to so(dminus 1)-diagrams (ii) cancellation of like terms in sequence

0 minusrarr (p+ 1)H0 minusrarr pH1 minusrarr minusrarr 2Hpminus1 minusrarr Hp minusrarr H (0Y) minusrarr 0 (422)

Skipping combinatoric technicalities we state that in the general case of a spin-Ymassless mixed-symmetry field (422) reduces to the correct exact sequence thatdefines a uirrep H (0Y) of iso(dminus 1 1)

44 Solving the Generalized Jacobi Identities

Unfolding some dynamical system there arises a problem of solving Jacobi identities(33) that have schematically a form hhdω1

q equiv 0 where a number of backgroundvielbeins ha is contracted with the fiber indices of ω1

q The Jacobi identity restrictsdω1

q to have a certain specific form dω1q = hhω2

r where the so(dminus1 1)-irrep inwhich ω2

r takes values the degree r and the projector built of hh are completelydetermined The solutions are given by21

Lemma A Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values inY = Y(s p) (k 1)

so(dminus 1 1)-irrep The general solution of

hcdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq = 0 (423)

21As was pointed out in Section 33 nonzero traces either violate Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms and therefore are ignored

43

has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq k lt s

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1 k = s q ge p + 1

0 k = s q lt p+ 1

(424)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 take values inY(s p) (k + 1 1)

and Y(s+ 1 p+ 1) so(dminus 1 1)-irreps respectively22

Proof The parametrization of dωq by a degree-(q + 1) form taking values in the

same so(dminus 1 1)-irrep dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = R

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q+1 obviously fails to satisfy

(423) Inasmuch as (423) contains a vielbein the solution has to contain a number

of vielbeins too The most general parametrization of dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q with only

one vielbein included has the form dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = hdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)|dq for some

q-form taking values in a tensor product of Y by a vector representation ie thereis no definite symmetry between index d and the rest of the indices

hchdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)c|dq = 0larrrarr ωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)[c|d]

q = 0 (425)

Only those irreps in Yotimes are allowed that have c and d symmetric ie correspondto Y(s p) (k + 1 1) for k lt s This is not possible in the case k = s ie Y =Y(s p+ 1) and the only possibility to have c and d symmetric is to add the whole

column toY which requires dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q to be represented as dω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hchcωa1(sminus1)cap(sminus1)cap+1(sminus1)cqminuspminus1 and therefore q must be large enough Roughly

speaking the proof is based on the fact that the anti-symmetrization of two indicesat the same row of a Young diagram is identically zero the anti-symmetrizationbeing due to contraction with vielbeins

Note that choosing nonmaximal solutions of Jacobi identities results in loweringthe gauge symmetry so that not all redundant components are excluded

Unfolding totally-symmetric massless higher-spin fields the possible rhs termsin dω

a(sminus1)b(t)1 = are restricted by Jacobi identities and an essential use is made

of

Corollary The solution of Jacobi identity

hcdωa(sminus1)b(tminus1)c1 equiv 0 (426)

is of the form

dωa(sminus1)b(t)1 =

hcωa(sminus1)b(t)c1 t lt sminus 1

hchdCa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 t = sminus 1

(427)

22The symmetric basis is used being more convenient in this case as the contracted with vielbeinstensors are already irreducible

44

The following statement is a generalization of the Lemma-A to the case where(s p) (k 1) is a rsquosubdiagramrsquo of a larger Young diagram Y that has a numberof rows precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) Appropriate Young symmetrizershave to be included as the mere contraction of a number of vielbeins breaks theirreducibility of the tensor For instance hcω

a(s1)b(s2minus1)c is already irreducible withthe symmetry of Ys1 s2 minus 1 but this is not the case for hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) which hasto be added one term hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) + 1s1minuss2+1

hcωa(s1)bb(s2minus1)c to get the symmetry

of Ys1 minus 1 s2

Lemma B Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values in Y =

Y( (s p) (k 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irrep where the dots stands for the blocks inY precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) The general solution of

Π[hcdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq

]= 0 (428)

where Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p)(k minus 1 1) has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

Π[

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq

]

k lt s

Π[

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1

]

k = s q ge p+ 1

0 k = s q lt p + 1

(429)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 takes values in

Y (s p) (k + 1 1) and Y (s+ 1 p+ 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irreps respec-tively and Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p) (k 1)

Proof The proof is similar to that of Lemma-A with the only comment that thesymmetrizers do not affect the argumentation that anti-symmetrization of two in-dices in the same row is identically zero

45 Dynamical Content via σminus Cohomology

Before discussing the calculation of σminus cohomology let us first recall necessary factsconcerning the evaluation of so(d minus 1 1)-tensor products Let P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) be anumber of integer partitions k1 + + kN = m of m where ki is constrained byki le ǫi and different rearrangements of ki satisfying the constraints are regarded asdistinct partitions The generating function for the partition P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) is

sum

m

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m)tm =

i=Nprod

i=1

(1minus tǫi+1)

1minus t(430)

These integer partitions gives the multiplicities of irreps in so(dminus 1 1)-tensor prod-ucts (Clebsh-Gordon coefficients) we are interested in [71]

45

The so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary irrep Ylowast = Y(si pi) by aone-column diagram of the height qlowast can be explicitly calculated as

sNpN

s2

p2

s1

p1

otimes

q =sum

αjβi

Nαjβi

αN+1

βN

αN

ǫNpN sN

β2

α2

ǫ2p2 s2

β1

α1

ǫ1p1 s1

(431)

where αi βi αi + βi le pi i isin [1 N ] αN+1 ge 0 and there exist ρ ge 0 such that

qlowast =i=Nsum

i=1

(αi + βi) + αN+1 + 2ρ (432)

The multiplicity Nαjβi of Ylowastαj βi

is given by integer partition

Nαjβi = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ǫi = pi minus αi minus βi (433)

and the total trace order r is

r =i=Nsum

i=1

βi + ρ (434)

Roughly speaking to obtain an element of the tensor product one should first cutoff from bottom-right of the i-th block a column of height βiminusγi pi ge βiminusγi ge 0 (totake different traces) and second add an arbitrary number αi+γi pi ge αi+γi ge 0 ofcells to each block provided the γi cells annihilate ie they are added to the placesfrom which γi cells were removed at the first stage Multiplicity may be differentfrom one due to different rearrangements of γi ie when multiplied by the rest ofq-column different traces can give rise to the same diagram The number of suchrearrangements is given by P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ρ =

sumi=N

i=1 γi For instance sl(n)-tensor

product otimes is given simply by

otimessl(n) = oplus oplus oplus (435)

46

The so(d)-tensor product can be represented as a sum of the form

otimesso(n) = otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

otimessl(n)

oplus

otimessl(n)

︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

oplus

otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

2nd order

=

oplus oplus oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

oplus

oplus 2 oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

︸︷︷︸

2ndorder

(436)

where the sum is over trace order and the boxes that are connected by the arc areto be contracted and then the sl(n)-product rules are to be applied to the rest ofthe diagrams

Evaluating the so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary spinor-irrep Ylowast =Y(si pi) 1

2by a one-column diagram of the height qlowast one can contract any number

of Γ matrices with the indices of the column and then multiply therefore the tensorproduct rule for spin-tensors can be reduced to bosonic rule (431) as

Y(si pi) 12otimesso(n) Y(1 q) =

qsum

k=0

(Y(si pi) otimesso(n) Y(1 q minus k)

)

12

(437)

for example

12otimesso(n) = 1

2oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order Γ-traces

oplus

12oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order Γ-traces

oplus

oplus

2 12

︸︷︷︸

2nd order Γ-traces

oplus

bull 12

︸︷︷︸

3d order Γ-traces

(438)

The multiplicity N12

αjβiof Ylowast

αj βi12

is given by

N12

αjβi=

i=ρsum

i=0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus i) (439)

Let us now analyze the origin of σminus cohomology Its action σminus Wgq rarr W

gminus1q+1

preserves g+ q and hence the whole complex C(W σminus) is a direct sum of complexesC(qprime σminus) where q

prime refers to the end element Wg=0qprime of the complex

C(qprime σminus) 0 minusrarr minusrarr Wg=1qprimeminus1 minusrarrW

g=0qprime minusrarr 0 (440)

47

Moreover σminus preserves the total rank (the form degree + rank of the so(d minus 1 1)-

irrep in which the field takes values) LetWa(s1)a(sm)q be an element ofWg

qprime When

all form indices of Wa(s1)a(sm)q are converted to the fiber ones according to (329)

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (441)

the action of σminus is just an anti-symmetrization of all d1 dq with those indices aithat are extra as compared to Ygminus1 plus some terms to restore the correct Youngsymmetry of Ygminus1 Let the decomposition ofW a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] into so(dminus1 1)-irreps be of the form

Ya1(s1) am(sm)otimes

Y(1 q) =oplus

r=0

oplus

ir

N rirYr

ir (442)

where the summation is over the trace order r and then over ir which enumeratesall so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that enters in the tensor product as the traces of the r-thorder N r

irbeing the multiplicity of Yr

ir The multiplicity of the zeroth order traces

is always equal to one N0i0= 1 In fact the diagrams Y 0

i0can be directly obtained

by the sl(n)-tensor product ruleThe very anti-symmetrization is insensitive to whether a certain component en-

ters as a trace or not When decomposed into so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the elements ofWg

qprime and Wgminus1qprime+1 have a number of components of the same symmetry type The

action of σminus is just a linear transformation that either sends the whole so(dminus 1 1)-irrep to zero23 or sends it to the components of Wgminus1

qprime+1 of the same symmetry typeImportant is that σminus does not act between different so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Thereforecomplex C(qprime σminus) is a direct sum of complexes parameterized by so(dminus 1 1)-irrepsYprime that are given by various tensor products

Ynk

otimes

Y(1 q) (443)

provided that the field WYnkq is an element of Wgprimeminusi

qprime+i for certain i When reducedto such a complex

C(Yprime qprime σminus) 0rarr rarr Vg rarr Vgminus1 rarr rarr 0 (444)

the action of σminus is a linear transformation between the spaces Vg rarr Vgminus1 dimen-

sions of which are equal to the multiplicity of Yprime in the decomposition of WYgqg and

WYgminus1qg+1 The action of σminus is maximally non-degenerate compatible with nilpotency

Therefore to find cohomology groups the dimension of each linear space in everycomplex has to be calculated

Let us note that only the types and multiplicities of so(dminus1 1)-irreps are foundbelow ie no attention is paid to the description of how the corresponding tensorsare contained in the fields WY

qprime This is sufficient for our purposes though it isobvious (412) how the metric-like field φYM

is incorporated in an element ofWg=0p

23provided that the appropriate basis on the space of so(dminus1 1)-irreps with the same symmetrytype is chosen

48

The calculation of σminus cohomology is divided into three cases that cover the wholevariety of so(dminus 1 1)-irreps that can result from the tensor products (443)

In the Lemmas below it is assumed that complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is parameterizedby so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Yprime = Ylowast

αj βiof the form (431) with Ylowast = Ynk q

lowast = q such

that WYnkq isin C(qprime σminus) and ρ is defined according to (432)

In the first case Yprime is an element of Y0 otimesY(1 q)

Lemma 1 The σminus cohomology groups Hqg=0 and H

qg=1 are nontrivial and are given

by

Hqg =

Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βiMαj βi

αN+1 = 0sumi=N

i=0 αi = qq isin [0 p] g = 0

H2pminusqminus1 q isin [p+ 1 2p+ 1] g = 1

empty q gt 2p+ 1 any g

(445)where Mαj βi is the multiplicity of the irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

defined below

Proof From the very form of Yn=N0 equiv Yg=0 equiv Y(si minus 1 pi) it follows that theso(dminus1 1)-irreps that the element ofWg=0

q sim Y0otimesY(1 q) decomposes into may

be contained in Wg=1qminus1 only ie Wg=0

q and Wg=kqminusk contain no so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of

the same symmetry type for k gt 1 Therefore the length of complex C(Yprime q σminus)where Yprime isin Y0otimesY(1 q) is equal to one ie C(Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

q σminus) 0 minusrarrV1 minusrarr V0 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions of V0 and V1 are given by the multiplicitiesof the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

in Wg=1qminus1 and Wg=0

q respectively

dim(V1) =

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus 1) ρ ge 1

0 ρ = 0αN+1 = 0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) αN+1 gt 0

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) (446)

If αN+1 gt 0 the dimensions of V0 and V1 are equal and each irreducible componentof Wg=0

q with αN+1 gt 0 can be gauge away by virtue of the corresponding element

of Wg=1qminus1 thus being exact H

kgt2p+1 = empty inasmuch as ρ le p and the componentsof the forms with rank greater than (2p + 1) must have αN+1 gt 0 thus beingexact If αN+1 = 0 the dimensions are different dim(V1) lt dim(V0) for q le pdim(V1) = dim(V0) for q = p + 1 and dim(V1) gt dim(V0) for q gt p Thereforethe number of those Ysi piαj βi

isin Wg=0q q le p that are not exact is equal to

Mαj βi = |dim(V1) minus dim(V0)| the same is the number of those Ysi piαj βiisin

Wg=1qminus1 q gt p+ 1 that are not exact The obvious property of integer partitions

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ǫ1 + + ǫN minusm) (447)

results in the important duality in the cohomology groups Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 or

roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on

49

The second case is the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) where Yprime is an element of the tensor

product Ynk otimesY(1 q) for certain q ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmaxn minus 1

Lemma 2 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainqprime ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmax

n minus 1 the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The complex has the length two ie 0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr 0 wherethe dimensions are given by dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫN 1|ρ+ 1)dim(V2) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ+ 1) Simple calculations with generating functions resultsin dim(V0) lt dim(V1) dim(V2) lt dim(V1) and dim(V0) minus dim(V1) + dim(V2) = 0and consequently the sequence is exact

Analogously

Lemma 3 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainq ge 0 with k = 0 and n lt N the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The speciality of such Yprime is that the complex has the length three ie0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr V3 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions are given by

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 ǫn + 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V2) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 1) ρ ge ǫn + 1

0 otherwise

dim(V3) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn minus 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 2) ρ ge ǫn + 2

0 otherwise

Again simple calculations with generating functions results in appropriate inequali-ties and dim(V0)minusdim(V1)+dim(V2)minusdim(V3) = 0 and consequently the sequenceis exact

The above three cases covers the whole variety of the so(d minus 1 1)-tensors thatcan result from the tensor products YnkotimesY(1 q) for any n k and q The caseswith sN = 1 and Y = Y0 are special but the calculation of cohomology groupsleads to the same result

In the fermionic case the computations are similar due to the multiplicity givenby (439) The difference is that all nontrivial cohomology is concentrated in gradezero Indeed taking into account (446) where P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) is to be replaced by(439) it follows that dim(V0) ge dim(V1) for all q and H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 where r

is referred to the Γ-trace order or roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 andso on

5 Conclusions

The unfolded system constructed in the paper has a simple form of a covariantconstancy equation and describes arbitrary mixed-symmetry bosonic and fermionic

50

massless fields in d-dimensional Minkowski space The gauge fieldsparameters aredifferential forms with values in certain finite-dimensional irreducible representationsof the Lorentz algebra that are uniquely determined by the generalized spin

The key moment is that all gauge symmetries are manifest within the unfoldedformulation which is of most importance in controlling the number of physicaldegrees of freedom when trying to introduce interactions Unfolded systems areformulated in terms of differential forms which is a natural way to respect diffeo-morphisms and hence to describe systems that include gravity

Though the necessary conditions for the system to have a lagrangian descriptionare satisfied ie the fields are in one-to-one correspondence with the equations andthe k-th level gauge symmetries are in one-to-one correspondence with the k-thBianchi identities the very lagrangian remains to be constructed

Another interesting moment is that the unfolded equations for bosons are thesame as for fermions namely the operators involved ie exterior differential dand σminus remains unmodified when tensors are replaced with spin-tensors Thoughthis nice property partly breaks down in (anti)-de Sitter space within the unfoldedapproach bosons and fermions have much in common the fact being very useful forsupersymmetric theories

The proposed unfolded system includes all non-gauge dual descriptions whichare based on the generalized Weyl tensor and its descendants but not all of gaugedual descriptions It would be interesting to construct an unfolded system thatcontains all dual formulations

The interactions of the totally symmetric massless higher-spin fields are knownto require a nonzero cosmological constant ie are formulated in (anti)-de Sitterspace [2] Mixed-symmetry fields exhibit some interesting features in the presence ofcosmological constant For example not all of the Minkowski gauge symmetries canbe deformed to (anti)-de Sitter [72] As a result massless mixed-symmetry fields havemore degrees of freedom in (anti)-de Sitter compared to its Minkowski counterparts[73] and in the Minkowski limit a massless mixed-symmetry field splits in a certaincollection of massless fields generally Contrariwise a single mixed-symmetry fieldcan not be smoothly deformed to (anti)-de Sitter Another interesting effect is theexistence of the so-called partially-massless fields [74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 8283 84] the fields that have a number of degrees of freedom intermediate betweenthat of massless and massive and split in a set of massless fields in the Minkowskilimit Therefore the extension of the proposed approach to (anti)-de Sitter spaceseems to be non-trivial but nevertheless worth being investigated

In a series of papers [85 61 86 60] it was suggested so-called frame-like approachto the general mixed-symmetry fields in (anti)-de Sitter To generalize the proposedin the present paper unfolded system to (anti)-de Sitter case and to compare to thatof [60] is the next step to perform

We consider the proposed unfolded system as the first stage in constructing thefull interacting theory of mixed-symmetry fields

51

Acknowledgements

The author appreciates sincerely MA Vasiliev for reading the manuscript and mak-ing many detailed and valuable suggestions and illuminating comments the verywork was initiated as the result of discussions with MA Vasiliev The author isalso grateful to RR Metsaev and KB Alkalaev for useful discussions and to OVShaynkman for discussion of the fermionic case The work was supported in partby grants RFBR No 05-02-17654 LSS No 440120062 and INTAS No 05-7928by the Landau Scholarship and by the Scholarship of Dynasty foundation

Appendix A Multi-index convention

The multi-index notations is used a group of indices in which certain tensor issymmetric or is to be symmetrized is denoted either by one letter with the numberof indices indicated in round brackets or by placing a group of indices in roundbrackets eg

T a(s) equiv T a1a2as T a1aiaj as = T a1ajaias (A1)

V aT a(s) equiv V (a1T a2as+1) equiv1

s+ 1(V a1T a2a3as+1 + V a2T a1a3as+1 + + V as+1T a1a2as)

(A2)

V (bT a(s)) equiv V (bT a1as) equiv1

s + 1

(V bT a1a2as + V a1T ba2a3as + + V asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A3)Analogously the group of indices in which certain tensor is anti-symmetric or is tobe anti-symmetrized is denoted by placing indices in square brackets eg

T a[s] equiv T a1a2as T a1aiai+1as = minusT a1ai+1aias (A4)

V [bT a[s]] equiv V [bT a1as] equiv1

s+ 1

(V bT a1a2as minus V a1T ba2a3as + + (minus)sV asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A5)The operators of (anti)-symmetrization are weighted to be projectors (the factor 1

s+1

above)

Appendix B Young diagrams

Comprehensive information on Young diagrams can be found for example in thetextbook [71]

Definition B1 Given an integer partition ie a nonincreasing sequence si i isin[1 n] si ge si+1 of positive integers (or nonnegative when it is convenient to workwith a sequence of a fixed length) associated Young diagram Ys1 s2 sn is agraphical representation consisting of n left-justified rows made of boxes with the

52

i-th row containing si boxes

s10s11

s1s2s3s4

s5s6s7

s8s9

Finite-dimensional irreducible representation(irrep) of sl(d) ie various irre-ducible sl(d)-tensors are in one-to-one correspondence with Young diagrams of theform Ys1 s2 s[ d

2] The associated irreducible tensors

T

s1︷︸︸︷aa

s2︷︸︸︷

bb (B1)

or in condensed notation T a(s1)b(s2) have at most [d2] groups of indices being sym-

metric in each group separately and satisfy the condition that the symmetrizationof any group of indices with one index of any of the subsequent groups is identicallyzero ie

T a(s1)(b(sk)b)c(sjminus1) equiv 0 k lt j (B2)

If s[ d2] 6= 0 and d is even the (anti)-selfduality condition has to be imposed for

appropriate signature (anti)-selfduality is conventionally denoted by the sign factors+(minus) before s[ d

2] In this paper we do not consider (anti)-self dual representations

A scalar representation Y0 0 0 is denoted by bull a vector irrep Y1 0 0by rank-two symmetric tensor irrep by rank-two antisymmetric tensor irrep

by and so onFinite-dimensional irreducible representations of so(d) are of the two types ten-

sor and spin-tensor and are also characterized by Young diagrams which in thecase of spin-tensor irreps refer to the symmetry of the tensor part Young diagramsthat correspond to spin-tensor irreps are labeled by 1

2-subscript Spinor indices

α β γ = 12[d2] are placed first and are separated from tensor indices by rdquordquo For

example a spinor ψα irrep is denoted by bull 12 a vector-spinor irrep Aαaby 1

2and

so on To make tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry conditionthe tracelessness condition with respect to each pair of indices is to be imposed

ηccTa(s1)cb(siminus1)cd(sjminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n j = 1n (B3)

To make spin-tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry condition Γ-tracelessness condition with respect to each tensor index and a spinor index is to beimposed

Γαc βT

βa(s1)cb(siminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n (B4)

where Γαc β satisfy Γα

a βΓβb γ

+ Γαb βΓ

βaγ = 2ηab Additional conditions on spinors viz

Majorana Weyl and Majorana-Weyl are irrelevant to the problems concerned Also

53

in both cases it is required for the sum of the heights of the first two columns ofYoung diagrams to be not greater than d Note that the Γ-tracelessness conditionis stronger than the tracelessness one and applying the Γ-tracelessness twice to twosymmetric indices gives the tracelessness

0 = 2ΓαaβΓ

βb γT γ(ab) = ηabT

αab (B5)

To handle with arbitrary large Young diagrams the so-called block representationis used ie the rows of equal lengths are combined to blocks

Y(s1 p1) (sn pn) equiv Y

p1︷ ︸︸ ︷s1 s1

p2︷ ︸︸ ︷s2 s2

pn︷ ︸︸ ︷sn sn (B6)

References

[1] C Fronsdal ldquoMassless fields with integer spinrdquo Phys Rev D18 (1978) 3624

[2] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoCubic interaction in extended theories ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Nucl Phys B291 (1987) 141

[3] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoOn the gravitational interaction ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Phys Lett B189 (1987) 89ndash95

[4] M A Vasiliev ldquoConsistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in(3+1)-dimensionsrdquo Phys Lett B243 (1990) 378ndash382

[5] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoOn the geometry of higher-spin gauge fieldsrdquoClass Quant Grav 20 (2003) S473ndashS486 hep-th0212185

[6] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoFree geometric equations for higher spinsrdquoPhys Lett B543 (2002) 303ndash310 hep-th0207002

[7] M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear equations for symmetric massless higher spin fieldsin (a)ds(d)rdquo Phys Lett B567 (2003) 139ndash151 hep-th0304049

[8] X Bekaert I L Buchbinder A Pashnev and M Tsulaia ldquoOn higher spintheory Strings brst dimensional reductionsrdquo Class Quant Grav 21 (2004)S1457ndash1464 hep-th0312252

[9] D Sorokin ldquoIntroduction to the classical theory of higher spinsrdquo AIP ConfProc 767 (2005) 172ndash202 hep-th0405069

[10] X Bekaert S Cnockaert C Iazeolla and M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear higherspin theories in various dimensionsrdquo hep-th0503128

[11] A Sagnotti E Sezgin and P Sundell ldquoOn higher spins with a strong sp(2r)conditionrdquo hep-th0501156

[12] P K Townsend ldquoCovariant quantization of antisymmetric tensor gaugefieldsrdquo Phys Lett B88 (1979) 97

54

first level of reducibility the gauge parameters are various tensors whose LorentzYoung diagrams are obtained by cutting off one cell from the original so(d minus 2)-diagram in all possible ways ie the number of gauge parameters at the first levelis equal to the number of blocks N eg two for spin- There is only one gaugeparameter at the deepest level of reducibility whose Young diagram is obtained bycutting off the first column from Y eg for spin-

This pattern corresponds of course to on-shell equations ie the gauge param-eters taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of Young symmetry (219) are subjectedto (28)-like equations To obtain an off-shell gauge symmetry the field content hasto be extended to take values in certain reducible so(d minus 1 1)-representations ad-ditional components turn out can be identified with certain traces of a single fieldwith the symmetry of Y as an sl(d)-tensor In general gauge parameters are alsoreducible tensors with the symmetry of (219) In the case of a spin- massless fieldthe trace φ ν

microν in the sector of fields and the trace ξSνν in the sector of gauge param-eters are the additional components In the general case of a spin-Y = Ys1 snmassless field field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) should satisfy [20]

ηmicroimicroiηmicroimicroiφmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) = 0 i isin [1 n] (220)

which is a generalization of the Fronsdalrsquos double-trace condition (213) As it will beshown this condition naturally arises in the unfolded approach Note that double-tracelessness is imposed on each group of symmetric indices and it is not requiredfor cross-traces to vanish

Let a generalized Weyl tensor for a minimally described spin-Y massless field bea gauge-invariant combination of the least order in derivatives of field φY(x) that isallowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell On the other hand it is the generalized Weyltensor that the minimal non-gauge description of a massless spin-Y field is basedon For a spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN)so(dminus2) massless field the generalizedWeyl tensor has the symmetry of Y(s1 p1 + 1) (s2 p2) (sN pN)so(dminus11) and isof the s1-th order in derivatives In the case of spin-one (Y = so(dminus2)) Maxwell field

strength Fmicroν with the symmetry of can be also called a generalized Weyl tensorFermionic mixed-symmetry fields share most features of bosonic ones viz the

reducibility of gauge transformations the enlargement of the field content for theequations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge invariance The difference is thatthe equations for fermions have the first order in derivatives and the irreducibility ofspin-tensors is achieved by the Γ-tracelessness condition7 instead of the tracelessnessone

For example a massless totally symmetric spin-(s + 12) field can be described

7Γmicro are the Clifford algebra generators and satisfy ΓmicroΓν + ΓνΓmicro = 2ηmicroν part equiv Γmicropartmicro Γ-trace isa contraction of a spinor index and one tensor index with Γmicro eg Γνφ

microν equiv Γαν βφ

βmicroν

12

off-shell[54] by a totally symmetric spin-tensor field φα(micro1micros) subjected to8

partφmicro1microsminus spart(micro1

Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros)

ΓνΓρΓλφνρλmicro4micros= 0 Γνξνmicro2microsminus1 = 0

(221)

where in order to get an off-shell gauge invariance the irreducibility of φα(micro1micros) hasto be relaxed to the triple Γ-tracelessness

A massless totally anti-symmetric spin-Y(1 p) 12field can be described off-shell

by a totally anti-symmetric spin-tensor field ωα[micro1microp] subjected to

partωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1Γ

νωνmicro2microp] = 0

δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp]

(222)

Similar to the bosonic case (222) possesses reducible gauge transformations Thedifference is that one can impose the triple Γ-tracelessness on ωα[micro1microp] but thisrestricts the first level gauge parameter to be Γ-traceless Γνξνmicro2micropminus1 = 0 andhence the second order gauge parameter has to be on-mass-shell ie partξmicro1micropminus2 = 0Therefore for equations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge symmetry of allorders no Γ-trace conditions have to be imposed on fieldgauge parameters

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) 12field the

pattern of gauge symmetries is given by the spin-tensors with the tensor part de-scribed by (219) the definition of the Weyl tensor remains unchanged also

The descriptions based on tensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) which is analogous tothe metric gmicroν are referred to as metric-like At least in writing equiv partmicropartνη

microν theexplicit use of metric ηmicroν is made of which complicates the issue of introducinginteractions with gravitation

Let us note that in principle one can verify the gauge invariance of the fieldequations for massless mixed-symmetry fields despite the fact that the very form ofgauge transformation is cumbersome due to Young symmetrizers The advantageof the unfolded approach is in that gauge invariance at all levels of reducibility ismanifest

3 Unfolding Dynamics and σminus Cohomology

In this section we first recall the definition of unfolding and the relation of the sim-plest unfolded systems to Lie algebrasmodules and Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomologywith coefficients Second peculiar properties of unfolded systems that describe freefields and specifically the so-called σminus cohomology concept are recalled Third thevery procedure of constructing the unfolded form is illustrated on the examples ofmassless spin-zero spin-one arbitrary totally symmetric spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2)

fields the relation with the general statement of Section 1 is pointed out in each ofthe examples

8Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [54] have the form Gmicro1microsminus s

2Γ(micro1ΓνGνmicro2micros) minus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 Gmicro1micros= partφmicro1micros

minus spart(micro1Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0 which is equivalent to

(222)

13

31 General Features

Some dynamical system is said to be unfolded [31 32 33] if it has the form

dWA = FA(W ) (31)

whereWA is a set9 of differential forms of degree-qA on some d-dimensional manifoldMd d - exterior differential on Md and FA(W ) is an arbitrary degree-(qA + 1)function of WA assumed to be expandable in terms of exterior (wedge) productsonly10

FA(W ) =infinsum

n=1

sum

qB1++qBn=qA+1

fAB1Bn

W B1 and andW Bn (32)

where fAB1Bn

are constant coefficients satisfying fAB1BiBj Bn

= (minus)qBiqBj fA

B1BjBiBn

Moreover FA(W ) must satisfy the integrability condition (called generalized Jacobiidentity) obtained by applying d to (31)

F B δFA

δW Bequiv 0 (33)

Any solution of (33) defines a free differential algebra (FDA) [55 56 57 58] If Ja-cobi identities (33) are satisfied irrespective ofMd dimension11 the free differentialalgebra is referred to as universal [10 59] It is the universal algebras only that willbe considered further

Equations (31) are invariant under gauge transformations

δWAqA

= dǫAqAminus1 + ǫBqBminus1

δFA

δW B for qA gt 0 (34)

δWA0 = ǫB

prime

0

δFA

δW Bprime

1

Bprime qBprime = 1 for qA = 0 (35)

where ǫAqAminus1 is a degree-(qA minus 1) form taking values in the same space as WAqA

Inits turn δWA

qA= 0 can be treated as unfolded-like system for ǫAqAminus1 ie dǫ

AqAminus1 =

minusǫBqBminus1δFA

δWB there emerge second level gauge transformations

δǫAqAminus1 = dξAqAminus2 minus ξBqBminus2

δFA

δW B (36)

provided that FA(W ) is linear in matter fields and analogously for the gauge trans-formations at deeper levels Therefore the reducibility of gauge transformations ismanifest in the unfolded approach For a degree-qA gauge field WA

qAthere exist qA

levels of gauge transformations

9In this section indices A B C are of arbitrary nature In the cases of practical significance AB C vary over certain irreps of the Lorentz algebra

10The wedge symbol and will be systematically omitted further11As the forms with the rank greater than d are identically zero there exist certain identities

eg Wn andWn equiv 0 for n+m gt d which make the operator δδWA to be ill-behaved

14

The use of the exterior algebra respects diffeomorphisms which is very appropri-ate for introducing interactions with the gravitation The whole information aboutthe dynamics turns out to be contained in FA(W ) and one can even extend anunfolded system to other manifolds[59] simply by changing the exterior differentialthe new unfolded system has literally the same form

Note that introducing enough auxiliary fields it is possible to reformulate anydynamical system in the unfolded form although it may be difficult to unfold someparticular system or to find all unfolded forms

Collected below are some important cases of unfolded systems which have adirect bearing on Lie algebras [55 59]

Lie algebrasFlat connections Let ΩI equiv ΩImicrodx

micro be a subsector of degree-oneforms The only self-closed unfolded equations are of the form

dΩI = minusf IJKΩ

JΩK (37)

Generalized Jacobi identity (33) implies the Jacobi identity f IJKf

JLMΩKΩLΩM equiv

0 for some Lie algebra g with structure constants f IJK Therefore the closed

subsector of one-forms is in one-to-one correspondence with Lie algebras and(37) is the flatness condition for a connection ΩI of g This provides acoordinate-independent framework for describing background geometry Inthe cases of interest g is iso(d minus 1 1) so(d minus 1 2) so(d 1) and sp(2n) [59]Background geometry connection ΩI is assumed to be of order zero whereasall matter fields including dynamical gravitation are of the first order Allequations are assumed to be of the first order in matter fields and hencedescribe free fields only

In this paper g = iso(dminus 1 1) and ΩI = ab ha where ab equiv abmicro dxmicro

is a Lorentz spin-connection and ha equiv hamicrodxmicro is a background vielbein which

defines a non-holonomic basis of a tangent space at each point of the manifoldFlatness equation (37) for iso(dminus 1 1)-connection ΩI reads

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb = 0(38)

The first is the zero torsion equation that expresses the Lorentz spin-connectionvia the first derivative of hamicro The second can be recognized as the zero curva-ture equation For example in Cartesian coordinates the explicit solution isab

micro = 0 and hamicro = δamicro

The advantage of description of background geometry as the flatness conditionfor a connection of the space-time symmetry algebra is in that this way iscoordinate-independent In what follows we assume ab ha to satisfy (38)which is enough if there is no need for the explicit form of the solution in someparticular coordinate system For instance in (anti)-de Sitter space (38) ismodified by the terms proportional to the cosmological constant λ2

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb + λ2hahb = 0(39)

15

and admits no simple solutions with hamicro = δamicro ab = 0 Nevertheless without

giving the explicit solution to imply that ab ha satisfy (39) is sufficient forgeneral analysis eg for constructing Lagrangians [60]

Contractible FDA The simplest equations linear in matter fields of the form

dWAq = fA

BWBq+1 (310)

can be reduced by linear transformations to either

dWAq = WA

q+1 dWAq+1 = 0 (311)

ordWA

q = 0 (312)

where the second equation of (311) is the consequence of Jacobi identities(33) for the first one In the first case by virtue of gauge transformations(34) δWA

q = dξAqminus1 + χAq δW

Bq+1 = dχA

q the field WAq can be gauged away In

both cases by virtue of the Poincarersquos Lemma these equations are dynamicallyempty and correspond to the co-called contractible FDAs [55]

g-modulesCovariant constancy equations Let WAq be a closed subsector of

q-forms of matter gauge fields Linear in matter fields equations may involvethe background g-connection ΩI which is of zeroth order Such equationsreferred to as linearized over g background (described by any solution ΩI of(37)) have the form

dWAq = minusΩIfI

ABW

Bq (313)

Jacobi identity (33) where (37) is also taken into account

ΩJΩK(minusf I

JKfIAB + fJ

ACfK

CB

)W B

q = 0 (314)

implies fIAB to realize a representation of g Therefore the closed subsector

of forms of definite degree is in one-to-one correspondence with g-moduleswhereas

DΩWAq equiv dWA

q + ΩIfIABW

Bq = 0 (315)

is a covariant constancy equation and (DΩ)2 = 0 since the connection is

flat (37) In the cases of interest A runs over certain finite-dimensionalso(d minus 1 1)-irreps ie g-modules decompose with respect to its subalgebraso(dminus 1 1) sub g into a direct sum of certain irreducible tensors This is whywe single out the Lorentz-covariant derivative DL from the whole g-covariantderivative DΩ the remaining part acts vertically (algebraically) In the caseof ΩI being an iso(d minus 1 1) flat connection the Lorentz covariant derivativeDL = d+ satisfy DL

2 = 0 as the exterior differential d does

DLTab = dT ab +a

cTcb +b

cTac + (316)

In Cartesian coordinates DL equiv d and we do not make any distinction betweend and DL whereas in (anti)-de Sitter (DL)

2 6= 0 and the difference between d

16

and DL has to be taken into account Also zero torsion equation (381) canbe rewritten as DLh

a = 0 The remaining part of ΩI which acts algebraicallyand mixes different so(dminus 1 1)-modules into g-modules is associated with thegenerators of translations with gauge field ha

Gluing g-modulesChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology LetWpWq andWr takevalues in g-modules R1 R2 and R3 the representations are realized by oper-ators T1 T2 and T3 respectively Still linear in matter fields but nonlinear inbackground connection ΩI equations are of the form

DΩWp equiv dWp + T1(Ω)Wp = f12(Ω Ω)Wq

DΩWq equiv dWq + T2(Ω)Wq = f23(Ω Ω)Wr

DΩWr equiv

(317)

where the terms forming g-covariant derivative are isolated on the lhs Thetwo g-modules R1 R2 appear to be glued together by the term f12(Ω Ω) isinHom(Λpminusq+1(g) otimes R2R1) Jacobi identity (33) implies f12(Ω Ω) to be aChevalley-Eilenberg cocycle with coefficients in Rlowast

2 otimesR1 where Rlowast2 is a mod-

ule contragradient to R2 and f12(Ω Ω)f23(Ω Ω) = 0 Coboundaries canbe proved to be dynamically empty and can be removed by a field redefini-tion Consequently f12(Ω Ω) should be a nontrivial representative of theChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology group with coefficients in Rlowast

2otimesR1 It followsalso that nothing but zero forms can be joined to zero forms ie the onlypossible linearized unfolded equations on forms of zero degree are (315) withq = 0

For any dynamical system linearized over certain g-background (described byany solution ΩI of (37)) equations of motion (315) along with gauge transforma-tions of all orders of reducibility acquire a very simple form

δξ1 = DΩξ0

δξpminus1 = DΩξpminus2

δWp = DΩξpminus1

DΩWp = 0

(318)

where Wp takes values in certain g-module R DΩ is the associated g-covariantderivative and ξpminusk k isin [1 p] are the gauge parameters of k-th order of reducibilitytaking values in the same g-module R and being forms of degree (p minus k) Thegauge invariance at each order of reducibility and of equations of motion is dueto (DΩ)

2 = 0 In some sense the gauge fields Wp and the gauge parameters ξpminusk

seem to play the same role at the linearized level This uniformity is of essentialimportance when analyzing unfolded systems

In the presence of gluing terms eg when only two modules say R1 and R2 areglued by nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycle fpr(Ω Ω) full chain of equations

17

and gauge transformations (318) is modified to12

δξ11 = DΩξ10

δξ1pminusr = DΩξ1pminusrminus1

δξ1pminusr+1 = DΩξ1pminusr + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

20 δξ21 = DΩξ

20

(319)

δξ1pminus1 = DΩξ1pminus2 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus2 δξ2rminus1 = DΩξ

2rminus2

δW 1p = DΩξpminus1 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus1 δW 2

r = DΩξ2rminus1

DΩW1p = fpr(Ω Ω)W

2r DΩW

2r = 0

where W 1p ξ

1pminusk and W 2

r ξ2rminusm take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively

Important is that the gauge fieldsparameters taking values in R2 contribute to therhs of the equationsgauge transformations for the gauge fieldsparameters takingvalues in R1 but for forms of degree greater than (p minus r) The above two systemsare nothing but the specializations of (31) (34) (36)

Also let us note that there is no strong reason to make any distinction betweenthe terms linear in the background g-connection ΩI which correspond to g-modulesand the terms of higher order in ΩI which correspond to Chevalley-Eilenberg co-cycles Both terms can be combined into a single object the generalized covariant-derivative D = d+T (Ω)+f(Ω Ω) equiv DΩ+f(Ω Ω) with the property D2 = 0Moreover by means of D (319) and (318) can be rewritten in a similar mannerConsequently at the linearized level the most general unfolded equations and gaugetransformations have the form

δξ1 = Dξ0

δξpminus1 = Dξpminus2

δWp = Dξpminus1

DWp = 0

(320)

where D is built of d background connection ΩI and satisfies D2 = 0 The gaugefieldsparameters take values in certain spacesWq viz Wp isin Wp ξpminus1 isin Wpminus1ξ0 isin W0 The elements of Wq are differential forms with values in certain g-modules It is also convenient to define higher degree spaces Wqgtp the equationsRp+1 = DWp = 0 take values in Wp+1 Rp+2 = DRp+1 belongs to Wp+2 andby virtue of D2 = 0 satisfies Rp+2 equiv 0 and so on Therefore there exist certainidentities which belong to Wp+2 for the equations which belong to Wp+1 andthere exist certain identities which belong to Wp+3 for the identities in Wp+2 andso on At the field theoretical level these identities correspond to Bianchi identitiesfor the first level gauge transformations higher identities correspond to the Bianchiidentities for the deeper levels of gauge transformations

12The sign factor (minus)pminusr+1 before fpr(Ω Ω) is ignored and is thought of as the part of thedefinition of fpr(Ω Ω)

18

A remark should be made that the forms belonging to Wq may have differentdegrees if there are Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles present As a result spaces Wq

may contain different number of elements For instance (319) can be reduced to(320) if one defines

Wq =

W 1q q lt pminus r

W 1q W

2qminusp+r q ge (pminus r)

(321)

where W 1q and W 2

qminusp+r take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively In termsof (319) the elements of Wq for q lt (pminus r) were referred to as ξ1q the elements ofWq for q = (pminus r)(pminus 1) to as ξ1q ξ

2qminusp+r the elements ofWq for q = p to as W 1

pW 2

r the elements of Wq for q gt p to as R1q R

2qminusp+r (the equations of motion and

Bianchi identities)

32 Interpretation of Unfolded Systems Describing free Fields

When describing free fields unfolded formulations will be referred to as frame-like [61 60] though the very term frame-like has a more broad definition Thesesystems consist of equations (37) describing background geometry of a finite chainof (317)-like equations describing the gauge fields of the model and of (317)-likeequations with q = 0 glued to gauge forms ie it requires a Lie algebra g (commonlyiso(dminus1 1) so(dminus1 2) or so(d 1)) a set of g-modules R0RN and an appropriateset of nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles f01fNminus1N The physical degreesof freedom are contained in the forms of zero degree and the module RN in whichzero degree forms take values is infinite-dimensional

Since frame-like unfolded systems contain inevitably infinitely many fields mostof them being either auxiliary or Stueckelberg13 there arises a problem of reconstruc-tion a metric-like formulation by a given unfolded formulation or of extracting thedynamical content for a given unfolded system

The questions to be answered are what are the dynamical fields what arethe differential gauge parameters and what are the gauge invariant equations ofmotion These answers are not universal and depend on the chosen scheme ofinterpretation Different interpretations correspond to dual descriptions of the samedynamical system

Frame-like unfolded systems are endowed at the linearized level with additionalstructures providing a natural way for interpretation Indices AB vary overcertain finite dimensional Lorentz irreps ie each of Rn n = 0 N decomposes asRn =

sum

k Pnk where Pnk are certain so(d minus 1 1)-modules characterized by Ynk

Young diagrams of Section 1We say that some frame-like unfolded system is given an interpretation if [62]

1 On the whole space W =oplusinfin

q=0Wq where the matter gauge fields gauge pa-rameters equations of motion and Bianchi identities take values there exists

13A field is called Stueckelberg if it can be gauged away by pure algebraic symmetry

19

a bounded from below grading g = 0 1 ie Wq =oplusinfin

g=0Wgq The ho-

mogeneous element of Wgq is a certain differential form with values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep and is denoted as W gq In simplest cases the grade is just the

rank of the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep the element of Wgq takes values in

2 The closed subsector of one-forms ΩI describes a background geometry vizMinkowski or (anti)-de Sitter The generalized covariant derivative D is to bedivided into three parts the last one not being necessary nontrivial

D = DL minus σminus + σ+ (322)

where DL is a background Lorentz-covariant derivative and has a zero gradeσminus is an operator of grade (minus1) and σ+ contains positive grade operatorsThe only differential part is in DL whereas σplusmn acts vertically and is built ofthe background vielbein ha If two modules are glued the gluing element issupposed to be of grade (minus1) and also denoted as σminus

The equations then have the form

DLWn +

gminusnsum

i=1

σ+(W n+i

)= σminus

(W n+1

) g = 0 1 (323)

and analogously for the gauge transformations In the flat space all operators ofpositive grade appear to be trivial for the massless case As it does not affect theanalysis let us consider a simplified version with σ+ = 0 Then D2 = DL

2+σminusDL+DLσminus + (σminus)

2 = 0 is equivalent to DL2 = 0 (σminus)

2 = 0 and σminusDL +DLσminus = 0 Thefirst is a part of the flatness condition (38) for the iso(d minus 1 1)-connection Thesecond is the nilpotancy condition for σminus The third is satisfied provided that σminus istwisted by the factor (minus)∆g where (∆g + 1) is a degree of σminus which is equal to thenumber of the vielbeins ha that σminus is built of Indeed the vielbeins ha anticommutewith DL and hence the action of σminus is to be twisted by the factor (minus)∆g in orderσminusDL +DLσminus = 0 holds true Without further mention the pure sign factor (minus)∆g

will be though of as a part of the definition of σminusIt is useful to illustrate the action of σminus when for example unfolded equations

on fields with values in two modules R1 and R2 are glued as in (319)

R1︷ ︸︸ ︷

R2︷ ︸︸ ︷ g

q

t t t t

t t t

W 1p

ξ1pminus1

ξ10

W 2r

ξ2rminus1

ξ20

(324)

20

where short arrows stand for the action of σminus within each module and long arrowsfor the action of σminus between two modules (gluing terms) and dots stand for gaugefieldsparameters at different grades bold dots represent the elements of Wp =W 1

pW2r

All information about the dynamics turns out to be concealed in cohomologygroups of σminus [62] H(σminus) =

Ker(σminus)Im(σminus)

Let us analyze unfolded system (320) whichat grade g has the form

δξg1 = DLξg0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 )

δW gp = DLξ

gpminus1 + σminus(ξ

g+1pminus1)

0 = DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p )

(325)

Beginning from the deepest level of gauge transformations and from the lowestgrade it is obvious that those ξg+1

0 that are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueck-elberg(algebraic) gauge parameters for those ξg1 that belong to the image of σminusTherefore those ξg1 that are σminus-exact can be gauged away The leftover gauge sym-metry satisfies δξg1 = DLξ

g0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 ) = 0 so that those ξg+1

0 that belong to thecoimage of σminus are expressed via derivative of ξn0 Having sieved W0 and W1 inthis way only those ξg0 are still independent that are σminus-closed and hence belong toH

0(σminus) since only forms of zero-degree are elements of W0 Then those ξg+11 that

are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueckelberg gauge parameters for those ξg2 thatbelong to the image of σminus Therefore only those ξg1 are still independent that areσminus-closed but not σminus-exact and hence belong to H

1(σminus) Having sievedW0Wpminus1

one after another it turns out that independent differential gauge parameters at thek-th level are given by H

pminusk(σminus) Analogously those fields W gp that are σminus-exact

can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gauge parameters at Wpminus1 Thosefields W g+1

p that are not σminus-closed can be expressed via derivatives of fields at lowergrade by virtue of the equations Rg

p+1 equiv DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p ) = 0 these fields are

called auxiliary Therefore the dynamical fields ie those that are neither aux-iliary nor Stueckelberg are given by H

p(σminus) The nilpotency of D2 equiv 0 impliescertain relations of the form DLR

gp+1 + σminus(R

g+1p+1) = 0 between Rg

p+1 Therefore

auxiliary fields are expressed by virtue of σminus-exact Rgp+1 and σminus-non-closed Rg+1

p+1

are themselves expressed via derivatives of Rgp+1 Consequently the independent

equations on dynamical fields are given by Hp+1(σminus) From the cohomological point

of view higher degree forms correspond to certain nontrivial relations between equa-tions called Bianchi identities and manifest gauge nature of equations As there aregenerally more than one levels of gauge transformations one can expect the highercohomological group to be nontrivial

To sum up

21

cohomology group interpretation

Hpminusk k = 1p differential gauge parameters at the k-th level of re-

ducibilityH

p dynamical fieldsH

p+1 independent gauge invariant equations on dynamicalfields

Hp+k+1 k = 1p Bianchi identities for the k-th order gauge symmetryH

p+k k gt p supposed to be trivial in a regular case

To distinguish fields in cohomological sense the following convention is introduced[63]

Stueckelberg fields(gauge parameters) are those that can be eliminated bypure algebraic symmetry ie these fields are σminus-exact (are those that canbe used to gauge away certain fields ie these parameters are not σminus-closed)

Auxiliary fields are those that can be expressed via derivatives of some otherfields ie these fields are σminus-nonclosed Let us note that this definition isgenerally ambiguous eg in system

partA = B

partB = A(326)

which field is auxiliary is a matter of choice This ambiguity is removed byvirtue of grade[62 63]

Dynamical fields are those that are neither auxiliary nor Stueckelberg ie thesefields are representatives of σminus-cohomology classes

Note that if certain dynamical field given by Hp belongs to the grade-gf subspace

Wgfp and the corresponding equations given by H

p+1 belong to the grade-ge subspaceWge

p+1 the order of equations is equal to ge minus gf + 1If the unfolded system is supposed to admit a lagrangian formulation there has

to be a one-to-one correspondence between the number of dynamical fields and thatof equations k-th level gauge symmetries and k-th level Bianchi identities ie in acertain sense there should be a duality H

pminusk sim Hp+1+k k isin [0 p] This takes place

for all unfolded systems exemplified in this paperSince the operators involved ie DL and σminus are of grade 0 and minus1 only the

fields with the grade greater than g0 for any g0 ge 0 form a quotient module thusdescribing the same system on its own - dual formulations This picture partlybreaks in (A)dSd because of appearance of grade +1 nilpotent operator σ+

D = DL + σminus + λ2σ+ (327)

The specific character of frame-like unfolded systems which will be crucial forus is that by virtue of the inverse background vielbein hmicroa all form indices of any

gauge fieldparameter Wa1(s1)ap(sm)q can be converted to the fiber ones

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (328)

22

The resulting tensor W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is not irreducible and can be decomposedinto so(dminus 1 1)-irreps according to the so(dminus 1 1)-tensor product rule

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] =rArr Ys1 smotimes

so(dminus11)

Y(1 q) =oplus

α

Yα (329)

where one-column Young diagramY(1 q) of height-q represents the anti-symmetricindices d1 dq and Yα are the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the tensor product decomposesinto Having converted all fields (parameters equations) of a given unfolded systemto the fiber tensors one can make the identification of the fields in the unfolded ap-proach and those of the metric-like approach though the general covariance gaugeinvariance and other advantages of the unfolded formalism will be not manifestWhile constructing the unfolded formulations of a known metric-like systems or in-terpreting a given unfolded system in terms of metric-like fields this technique willbe widely used Moreover the calculation of σminus cohomology groups is largely basedon the explicit evaluation of (329)-like expressions Once an unfolded form is knownno use of this technique is needed either to generalize it to other backgrounds or tointroduce interactions

Field W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is traceless in a1 am and d1 dq separatelyHowever the cross traces need not vanish and hence some of Yα represent tracesTo distinguish between the traces of different orders let us introduce the followingthe Y-valued degree-q form WY

q is said to be a trace of the r-th order iff it has theform

WYq = hh

︸︷︷︸

r

hh︸︷︷︸

qminusr

CYprime

0 (330)

for some Yprime-valued degree-0 form CYprime

0 where (q minus r) indices of the backgroundvielbeins ha are contracted with the tensor representing Yprime and r indices are freefor the whole expression to take values in Y the appropriate Young symmetrizeris implied When the indices of WY

q are converted to the fiber ones the expression

takes the form ηη︸ ︷︷ ︸

r

CYprime ie CYprime

represents a trace of the r-th order

Different aspects of unfolding are illustrated on the examples of a massless scalarfield a massless spin-one field and a massless spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2) fields

33 Examples of Unfolding

Example 331 Unfolding a scalar field [31 62] First it should be noted thatit is easy of course to convert the Klein-Gordon equation C = 0 to a system offirst order equations

partmicroC = Cmicro

partmicroCmicro = 0(331)

but when writing the second equation the explicit form of the metric is to be usedhence these equations are not of unfolded form (31)

23

Described in terms of a scalar field C(x) the theory is brought into a non gaugeform therefore zero-forms only are allowed or else there would be some gaugesymmetry according to (34) The most general rhs of dC = has the form

dC = haCa (332)

for some vector-valued zero-form Ca This equation just parameterizes the firstderivative of C(x) and is similar to the first of (331) There are three terms allowedon the rhs of dCa =

dCa = hbCab + hbC

ab + haC prime (333)

with Cab Cab and C prime taking values in antisymmetric symmetric and scalar so(dminus1 1)-irreps ie bull The first term is forbidden by Bianchi identity hadC

a equiv 0To analyze the remaining terms let us decompose dCa into so(dminus 1 1)-irreps

partmicroCahmicrob = otimes = oplus oplus bull (334)

where = part[aCb] = part(aCa) minus 1dηaapartbC

b bull = partaCa = C

The component represents Bianchi identity in the first order reformulation ofthe Klein-Gordon equation Indeed expressing Ca as partaC implies part[aCb] equiv 0 bullrepresents the desired Klein-Gordon equation whereas is the only component al-lowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell Therefore to impose the Klein-Gordon equationthe term haC prime has to be omitted

dCa = hbCab (335)

The only possible rhs for dCaa = compatible with Jacobi identity hbdCab equiv 0

is of the form dCaa = hbCaab for Caaa taking values in a rank-three symmetric

so(d minus 1 1)-irrep ie The process of unfolding continues unambiguously inthis way and results in the full system

dCa(k) = hbCa(k)b equiv F a(k)(C) k = 0 1 (336)

where Ca(k) is rank-k totally symmetric traceless field ie taking values in k

so(dminus 1 1)-irrepTo make a connection with the general statement of Section 1 for Y = Y(0 0)

the general scheme results in

Yg bull

n k 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 0 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore spaces Wq and operator σminus which enters D = DL minus σminus should be definedas

Wq = WqWaq W

aaq (337)

24

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbWa(gminus1)bq g gt 0

(338)

Consequently W is a space of various differential forms with values in totally sym-metric traceless so(d minus 1 1)-tensors graded by the form degree and by the rankof so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Space Wq forms an irreducible iso(d minus 1 1)-module System(336) reads

Dω0 = 0 ω0 isin W0 (339)

The cohomology groups of σminus are easy to find

H0(σminus) = C(x) as the lowest grade field is automatically closed σminus(C) = 0 and it

cannot be exact as a form of zero degree Contrariwise zero-forms with gradegreater than zero are not closed σminus(C

k+1) = hbCa(k)b = 0lArrrArr Ck+1 = 0

H1(σminus) = haB(x)0 for some B(x)0 isin W

00 One-form Ba

1 = haB(x)0 is closedσminus(B

a1) = haB

a1 = hah

aB(x)0 equiv 0 and it cannot be represented as σminus(C2) =

hbCab as far as Cab is traceless The cohomology groups at higher grade are

trivial since σminus(haBa(k)(x)0) 6= 0 for k gt 0

Hqgt1(σminus) = empty as one can make sure

The interpretation in terms of Section 32 is as follows as is expected the dynamicalfield given by H

0 is C(x) The equations are given by the projection of dCa = hbCab

to H1 ie C = 0 The fields with k gt 0 are auxiliary being expressed via

derivatives of C(x) Ca(k) = partapartaC(x) Inasmuch as there is no gauge symmetryin the system the higher cohomology groups are trivial

An infinitely many dual formulations of a massless scalar field are also includedIndeed the fields with k ge k0 gt 0 form a quotient module Rk0 ie one canconsistently write

dCk = σminus(Ck+1) k ge k0 (340)

The first equationdCa(k0) = hbC

a(k0)b (341)

imposes on the dynamical field Ca(k0)

partbCba(k0minus1) = 0

part[bCc]a(k0minus1) = 0(342)

which imply at least locally Ca(k0) =

k0︷ ︸︸ ︷

partaparta C and C = 0 for some fieldC(x) All fields at higher grade are auxiliary This statement is confirmed bythe cohomology analysis H

0(Rk0 σminus) = Ck0 ie scalar is described in termsof a traceless rank-k0 symmetric tensor field subjected to the equations given byH

1(Rk0 σminus) = haBa(k0minus1)0 minus k0(k0minus1)

2(d+2k0minus4)ηaahcB

a(k0minus2)c0 +hcB

a(k0)c0 for B

a(k0minus1)0 B

a(k0)c0

taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps characterized by diagrams k0 minus 1 k0

These two elements represents just the components ofWk0

1 sim k0 otimes with the

25

symmetry of k0 minus 1 (trace) andk0

the third component with the symmetryof k0 + 1 is exact

The above results can be easily extended to (A)dSd background and to a massivescalar field [62]

DLCk = σminus(C

k+1) + σ+(Ckminus1) = 0 (343)

where there appears a nontrivial positive grade operator

σ+(Ckminus1) = (m2 minus λ2k(k + dminus 1))

(

haCa(kminus1) minus(sminus 1)

d+ 2k minus 4ηaahbC

a(kminus1)b

)

(344)

and DL is a Lorentz-covariant derivative in (A)dSd In the (A)dSd case the situationis more interesting due to the appearance of σ+ operator and the possibility of theaccidental degeneracy of σ+ when m2 = λ2kprime(kprime + dminus 1) for some kprime [62]

Example 332 Unfolding Maxwell equations [64 65] An example of masslessspin-one field is more interesting as a gauge system The main object is a one-formAmicro From gauge transformation law

δA1 = dξ0 (345)

it follows that there should not be other forms of rank greater than zero If this werethe case the gauge parameters of these new forms would be involved by virtue of(34) making the gauge law for A1 inappropriate Indeed there are two possibilitiesto introduce higher degree forms on the rhs of dA = (i) dA1 = R2 fora scalar valued degree-two form R2 which possesses its own gauge parameter χ1δR2 = dχ1 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law for A1 is modifiedto δA1 = dξ0 + χ1 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gaugeparameter χ1 This case corresponds to contractible free differential algebras (310)(ii) dA1 = hbω

b1 for a vector valued degree-one form ωa

1 which possesses its owngauge parameter ǫa0 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law forA1 is modified to δA1 = dξ0 + hbǫ

b0 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of

Stueckelberg gauge parameter ǫa0 Consequently in both cases A1 can be made non-dynamical which is not what was expected Therefore the only possibility is tointroduce a zero-form C

[ab]0 anti-symmetric in a b parameterizing by virtue of

dA1 = hahbC[ab]0 (346)

the Maxwell field strength Bianchi identity hahbdC[ab]0 equiv 0 tolerates two terms on

the rhs of dC[ab]0 =

dC[ab]0 = hcC

[ab]c0 + h[aC

b]0 (347)

with C[ab]c0 and Ca

0 taking values in and so(dminus 1 1)-irreps the former taken inantisymmetric basis In order to determine which of the terms should be omittedif any the decomposition of the first derivative of the Maxwell field strength intoLorentz irreps has to be analyzed

C [ab]|c equiv partmicroC[ab]hmicroc = otimes = oplus oplus (348)

26

where = part[aCbc] = partbCab and = partcC [ab] minus part[cCab] + 2

dminus1ηc[apartdC

b]d part[aCbc]

is identically zero provided that C [ab] is expressed via the first derivative of Amicroor represents the second pair of Maxwell equations in terms of field strength C [ab]In both cases this component should be zero and moreover this can not be keptnonzero as there is no hcC

[abc]-like term allowed on the rhs of (347) The secondpartbC

ab is the desired Maxwell equations in terms of Amicro or the first pair of Maxwellequations in terms of the field strength Consequently to impose Maxwell equationsterm h[aCb] has to be omitted whereas the third is the only component allowed tobe nonzero on-mass-shell

Again unfolding continues unambiguously and requires an infinite set of fields

C[ab]c(k)0 taking values14 in

kto be introduced

dC [ab]c(k) = hdC[ab]c(k)d k = 0 1 (349)

The full system has the form

dA1 = hahbCab0 equiv F (AC) δA1 = dξ0

dC[ab]c(k)0 = hdC

[ab]c(k)d0 equiv F [ab]c(k)(C) k = 0 1

(350)

and represents two modules being glued together by the term on the rhs of thefirst equation

For Y = Y(1 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 resultsin

Yg bull

n k 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 1 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore

Wq =

W0 q = 0

WqW[ab]qminus1W

[ab]cqminus1 q gt 0

(351)

let us point out the shortening of W0 The action of σminus on Wq isin Wq is defined as

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hahbW[ab]qminus1 g = 1

hdW[ab]c(gminus2)dqminus1 g gt 1

(352)

With D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (350) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (353)

14The fields C [ab]c(k) are taken in antisymmetric basis ie they are antisymmetric in a bsymmetric in c(k) and C [abd]c(kminus1)equiv0

27

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 0 form a finite-dimensional iso(dminus1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g gt0 form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

Again the cohomology groups are easy to find gauge parameters are given byH

0(σminus) = ξ0 dynamical fields by H1(σminus) = A1 Maxwell equations by H

2(σminus) =

h[aBb]0 and the Bianchi identities for the first order gauge transformations by

H3(σminus) = hahbB0 the rest of groups are empty H

kgt3(σminus) = empty Important is thedirect correspondence between the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2

the gauge parameters in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3There are infinitely many of non-gauge dual formulations based on C [ab]c(k0) eg

for k0 = 0 one recovers the Maxwell equations in terms of the field strength

part[aCbc] = 0

partbCab = 0

(354)

Let us note that the ambiguity at the first step of unfolding (the terms haC prime andh[aCb] in the above two examples) expresses the possibility of introducing a massterm

Example 333 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-s field [31 6466] We start from the metric-like description of a massless spin-s field in termsof a double-traceless symmetric rank-s field φmicro1micros

satisfying (213) the secondorder equations are invariant with respect to the first order gauge transformationwith traceless rank-(s minus 1) gauge parameter ξmicro1microsminus1 Inasmuch as the Young di-agram s of so(d minus 2) is of the height one there are gauge transforma-tions of the first level only Therefore the dynamical field in the unfolded ap-proach has to be a one-form There is only one way to identify φmicro1micros

and ξmicro1microsminus1

with certain ωY01 and ξY0

0 taking values in the same so(d minus 1 1)-irrep Y0 namely

Y0 = sminus 1 ie ωa(sminus1)1 and ξ

a(sminus1)0 takes values in a rank-(s minus 1) symmet-

ric traceless tensors Field φmicro1microsis identified with a totally symmetric part of

ωa(sminus1)1 ie φmicro1micros

= hb1(micro1hbsminus1

microsminus1ωa1asminus1

micros)ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 the double-tracelessness

condition is the consequence of the tracelessness of ωa(sminus1)1 in a1asminus1 ξmicro1microsminus1

is identified with ξa(sminus1)0 directly ξmicro1microsminus1 = hb1micro1

hbsminus1microsminus1

ξa1asminus1ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 andone can make sure that the Fronsdalrsquos gauge transformation law is recovered fromδω

a(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 Field ω

a(sminus1)1 has a redundant component with the symmetry

ofsminus 1

which can be made Stueckelberg by virtue of gauge parameter ξa(sminus1)b

with the same symmetry type ie

δωa(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)c0 (355)

It automatically follows that there is a degree-one gauge field ωa(sminus1)b1 coupled with

ωa(sminus1)1 as

dωa(sminus1)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)c1 (356)

28

The only solution to Bianchi identity hcdωa(sminus1)c1 equiv 0 is15

dωa(sminus1)b1 = hcω

a(sminus1)bc1 (357)

where a new field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

is introduced and so on

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1 (358)

until the field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

for which the Bianchi identity solvesas

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 (359)

where field Ca(s)b(s)0 represents a generalized Weyl tensor and has the symmetry of

s The solution of Bianchi identity hchddC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 equiv 0 has the form

dCa(s)b(s)0 = hc

(

Ca(s)cb(s)0 +

s

2C

a(s)bb(sminus1)c0

)

(360)

where Ca(s+1)b(s)0 has the symmetry of s

s+ 1 The second term on the rhs

of (360) supplements the first one to have a proper Young symmetry Further

unfolding requires a set of degree-zero forms Ca(s+i)b(s)0 taking values in so(dminus1 1)-

irreps characterized by Young diagrams ss+ i

The full system has theform

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1

δωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(k)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)b(k)c0 k isin [0 sminus 2]

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 δω

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0

dCa(s+i)b(s) = hc

(

Ca(s+i)cb(s) +s

i+ 2Ca(s+i)bb(sminus1)c

)

i isin [0infin)

(361)

By the construction the system incorporates Fronsdalrsquos field φmicro1microswith the correct

gauge law but there is still to be proved that the Fronsdalrsquos equations are reallyimposed and that there are no other dynamical fields in the system Let us recon-struct Fronsdalrsquos equations (213) whereas the second statement will be proved asa part of a more general theorem The first two equations of (361) read

partmicroωa(sminus1)ν minus partνω

a(sminus1)micro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)cν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)cmicro (362)

partmicroωa(sminus1)bν minus partνω

a(sminus1)bmicro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)bcν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)bcmicro (363)

It is convenient to convert all world indices to the fiber ones

partcωa(sminus1)|d minus partdωa(sminus1)|c = ωa(sminus1)c|d minus ωa(sminus1)d|c (364)

partcωa(sminus1)b|d minus partdωa(sminus1)b|c = ωa(sminus1)bc|d minus ωa(sminus1)bd|c (365)

15The proof is not given as more general statement about the solutions of such equations isproved in the next Section

29

where ωa(sminus1)|b equiv ωa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro ωa(sminus1)bb|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bbmicro hcmicro

Contracting (365) with ηbd and then symmetrizing c with a1asminus1 results in

partcωa(sminus1)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus1)c|c= 0 (366)

By symmetrizing in (364) a1asminus1 with d

ωa(sminus1)c|a = partcωa(sminus1)|a minus partaωa(sminus1)|c (367)

and then by contracting (364) with ηdasminus1

ωa(sminus1)c|

c= (sminus 1)

(

partcωa(sminus2)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus2)c|c

)

(368)

all the terms of (366) can be expressed via ωa(sminus1)|b Plugging these to (366) gives

ωa(sminus1)|a minus partapartc((sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c

)+ (sminus 1)partapartaω

a(sminus2)c|c= 0 (369)

where ωa(sminus1)|a is to be identified with Fronsdalrsquos field φa(s) as ωa(sminus1)|a = 1sφa(s)

then ωa(sminus2)c|

c= 1

2φa(sminus2)c

c (sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c = φa(sminus1)c and the equation

acquires the Fronsdalrsquos form (213)

φa(s) minus spartapartcφa(sminus1)c + s(sminus1)

2partapartaφ

a(sminus2)cc= 0 (370)

For Y = Y(s 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 results in

Yg sminus 1 sminus 1 s

ss+ 1

n k 1 0 1 sminus 1 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = sminus 1 g = s g = s+ 1

qg q0 = 1 qsminus1 = 1 qs = 0 qs+1 = 0

therefore

Wq =

Wa(sminus1)0 W

a(sminus1)b0 W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0 q = 0

Wa(sminus1)q W

a(sminus1)bq W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)q W

a(s)b(s)qminus1 W

a(s+1)b(s)qminus1 q gt 0

(371)and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hcWa(sminus1)b(gminus1)cq g isin [1 sminus 1]

hchdWa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)dqminus1 g = s

hc

(

Wa(gminussminus1)cb(s)qminus1 + s

gminuss+1W

a(gminussminus1)bb(sminus1)cqminus1

)

g gt s

(372)

With D = DL minus σminus full system (361) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (373)

30

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sminus 1 sim g isin [0 sminus 1]form a finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k =0 1 sim g ge s form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

The representatives of cohomology classes can be chosen as H0 = ξ

a(sminus1)0 H1 =

hbφa(sminus1)b H2 = hbhcG

a(sminus1)c minus hahcGa(sminus2)bc + γηaahahcG

a(sminus4)bcnn+ (βηabhahc +

αηaahbhc)Ga(sminus3)cn

n16 H

3 = hbhahcχa(sminus2)c H

kgt3 = empty where φa(s) and Ga(s) are

double-traceless tensor fields and ξa(sminus1) and χa(sminus1) are traceless H01 are nontrivialat the lowest grade whereas H

23 are nontrivial at grade-one therefore the orderof equations that are imposed on the dynamical field is equal to two It turns outthat there is no need in the explicit form for α β and γ it is sufficient to find outthe Young symmetry of representatives only The uniqueness of Fronsdalrsquos theoryat the level of action was demonstrated in [67] and at the level of equations in[6 53] Consequently there is no need for equations (370) to be found explicitly -those of Fronsdal are the only possible Again there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2 the gauge parameters

in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3 The system contains an infinitely many ofdual formulations those that have field W

a(sminus1)b(k0)1 at the lowest grade are gauge

dual descriptions whereas those that have field Ca(s+k0)b(s) at the lowest grade arenon-gauge Dual description based on field W

a(sminus1)b(1)1 was elaborated in [68]

Example 334 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field[69

70 31] Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field results in literally

the same unfolded system (361 373) but with fields taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that are irreducible spin-tensors with the same tensor part as in the bosoniccase Note that operator σminus is not modified but the σminus cohomology groups areslightly changed such that the equations become of the first order

The Dirac equation Unfolded system (336) or equivalently (339) describesa massless spin-1

2field provided that Ck take values in s 1

2so(dminus1 1)-irreps

ie Ck equiv Cαa(k) and Γαb βC

βba(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equation of (336)

partmicroCα = hmicroaC

αa (374)

with hbmicroΓβb α

gives the Dirac equation

Γαa βpart

aCβ = 0 (375)

the rest of equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives of dynamicalfield Cα

The Rarita-Schwinger equation Unfolded system (350) or equivalently(353) describes a massless spin-3

2field provided that irreducible tensors in (351)

are replaced by the corresponding irreducible tensor-spinors ie A1 equiv Aαmicro C

k equiv

Cα[ab]c(k) and Γαb βC

β[ab]c(k) = 0 Γαd βC

β[ab]dc(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equa-tion of (350)

1

2(partmicroA

αν minus partνA

αmicro) = hmicroahνbC

α[ab] (376)

16α = minus (s(d+sminus5)minusd+6)(sminus2)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6) β = (sminus2)

(d+sminus4) γ = (d+sminus6)(sminus2)(sminus3)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6)

31

with Γ-matrices and converting world indices micro ν to the fiber ones according toAαa equiv Aα

microhamicro gives the Rarita-Schwinger equation

Γαb βpart

bAβa minus partaΓαb βA

βb = 0 δAαa = partaξα (377)

The rest of unfolded equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives ofdynamical field Aα

microThe Fang-Fronsdal equation for a spin-(s + 1

2) massless field Unfolded

system (361) or equivalently (373) describes a massless spin-(s + 12) field pro-

vided that irreducible tensors in (371) are replaced by the corresponding irreducibletensor-spinors With all world indices converted to the fiber ones the first equationof (361) has the form

Gαa(sminus1)|[cd] equiv partcωβa(sminus1)|d minus partdωβa(sminus1)|c = ωβa(sminus1)c|d minus ωβa(sminus1)d|c (378)

where ωαa(sminus1)|b equiv ωαa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωαa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

αa(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro

Analogously to the bosonic case nonsymmetric component of ωβa(sminus1)|d canbe gauged away algebraically Hence the Fronsdalrsquos field φαa(s) is identified asωαa(sminus1)|a = 1

sφαa(s) Then Γα

b βφβa(s) = Γα

b βωβa(sminus1)|b Γα

b βΓβc γφ

γa(sminus2)bc = ηbcωαa(sminus2)b|c

and the Fronsdalrsquos triple Γ-traceless constraint is a consequence of irreducibility ofωαa(sminus1)|b in α a1asminus1 and the lack of any conditions with respect to a1asminus1 andb Since the Fronsdalrsquos field contains three irreducible components with the sym-metry of s 1

2 s-1 1

2and s-2 1

2 the equations of motion has to be

nontrivial in these three sectors too The projector on the dynamical equations issimply Γα

b βGβa(sminus1)b|a and gives

Γαb βpart

bφβa(s) minus spartaΓαb βφ

βa(sminus1)b = 0 (379)

which is in accordance with (222) But we would like to note that there aretwo components with the symmetry of s-1 1

2 namely ηbcG

αa(sminus2)b|ac and

Γαb βΓ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] The correct projector on this component of the equations isgiven by the combination

2(sminus 1)ηbcGαa(sminus2)b|ac minus γαb βγ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] (380)

which is identically zero when Gαa(sminus1)|[bc] is expressed via ωβa(sminus1)c|d by virtue of(378) Therefore it is (380) that does not express certain part of ωβa(sminus1)c|d interms of first derivatives of the dynamical field φαa(s) and thus this is a dynamicalequation Obviously (380) is a representative of σminus cohomology group H

2g=0 In

terms of φαa(s) the representative has the form

Γαb βpart

bΓβc γφ

γa(sminus1)c minus partcφαa(sminus1)c +

(sminus 1)

2partaφ

αa(sminus2)cc= 0 (381)

which is equal to the Γ-trace of (379) The gauge transformations has the form

δφαa(s) = partaξαa(sminus1) (382)

32

where Γαb βξ

βa(sminus2)b = 0Consequently unfolded equations for totally symmetric bosonic fields are proved

to completely determine the unfolded equations for totally symmetric fermionicfields Though σminus is not modified in the fermionic case σminus cohomology groupsare changed since the fermionic dynamical equations are of the first order

4 Unfolding Mixed-Symmetry Fields

First in Section 41 an example of the simplest massless mixed-symmetry field ofspin- is investigated in detail and leading arguments are given for a spin- fieldSecond the general statement on arbitrary mixed-symmetry fields is proved whereastechnical details are collected in Sections 44 and 45 The analysis of the numberof physical degrees of freedom is carried out in Section 43

41 Simplest Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Example 411 Spin- field In the metric-like approach a spin- field is mini-mally described[16 17] by the subjected to (215) field φ[micromicro]ν that takes values in a

reducible so(dminus 1 1)-representation oplus the latter component is identified withthe trace φ ν

microν The gauge transformations (216) has two levels of reducibility with

two gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξA[microν] taking values in oplus bull so(dminus 1 1)-irreps at the

first level and one parameter ξmicro taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irrep at the secondlevel (217)

First the metric-like field φ[micromicro]ν has to be incorporated into certain differentialform eYq which is called a physical vielbein the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y and the degreeq to be defined below To make the symmetries both of the first and of the secondlevel of reducibility manifest the degree of the physical vielbein has to be two atleast

Moreover were the physical vielbein taken to be a degree-one form not all of thegauge symmetries even at the first level would be manifest Indeed there are twopossibilities for physical vielbein eY1 to contain a component with the symmetry of

Namely Y = and Y = since otimes = oplus oplus and otimes = oplus oplus

The associated differential gauge parameter is ξ0 in the first case and ξ0 in thesecond case Inasmuch as the gauge parameters are the forms of degree-zero onlyone of the required two parameters is present in each of the cases

The degree of the physical vielbein has to be not greater than two if the com-ponent associated with the metric-like field φmicromicroν is required not to be a certaintrace part The reason why a dynamical field should not be a certain trace part isexplained in the next Section

Therefore the physical vielbein has to be of degree-two and has to take valuesin so(dminus 1 1)-irrep that belongs to the vector representation ie e2 equiv ea2 equiv eamicroν

The associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξa1 equiv ξamicro contains in its Lorentz decomposition

otimes = oplus oplusbull both anti-symmetric ξAmicroν = ξa[microhbν]ηab and symmetric ξSmicroν = ξa(microh

bν)ηab

33

gauge parameters the latter enters along with the trace ξamicrohmicroa There exists a second

level gauge parameter χa0 which is directly identified with ξmicro as ξmicro = hbmicroχ

aηabThere are no redundant components in the gauge parameter However physicalvielbein e2 contains one redundant component in its decomposition into Lorentz

irreps otimes = oplus oplus The first and the second components are to be associatedwith a traceful φmicromicroν whereas the third one totally anti-symmetric component e[a|bc]

of ea|bc = eamicroνhbmicrohcν is a redundant one and has to be made non-dynamical In order

to do so algebraic gauge parameter ξ[abc]0 with the symmetry of is introduced It

is obvious from pure algebraic gauge law

δea2 = hbhcξ[abc]0 (41)

that the redundant component can be fixed to zero and ea2 can be directly identifiedwith φmicromicroν as e

amicromicro = φmicromicroνh

aν From gauge transformation laws δea2 = dξa1 δξa1 = dχa

0

ie δeamicroν = 12

(partmicroξ

aν minus partνξ

amicro

) δξamicro = partmicroχ

a required gauge transformations (216)(217) for metric-like field φmicromicroν and for the first order gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξ

A[microν]

are easily recoveredSince in the unfolded approach each gauge parameter possesses its own gauge

field and vice-verse associated with ξ[abc]0 gauge field ω

[abc]1 enters as

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 (42)

which determines the first equation Applying d to this equation results in Bianchiidentity hbhcdω

[abc]1 equiv 0 which has a unique solution of the form

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 (43)

with C[abc][df ]0 having the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensor of a spin-

field ie it is anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and C[abcd]f0 equiv 0 To clarify the form of

the solution let C[abc]|[df ]0 be a degree-zero form anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and with

no definite symmetry between these two groups of indices The Bianchi identityimplies hbhchdhfC

[abc]|[df ]0 equiv 0 which is equivalent to C

a[bc|df ]0 equiv 0 since vielbeins

ha anticommute Therefore the solution is parameterized by those components of

C[abc]|[df ]0 sim otimes that has the symmetry of Young diagrams with no more than

three rows since the requirement for total anti-symmetrization of any four indicesto give zero is the characteristic property of Young diagrams with at most three

rows otimes ni is the only component of zero trace order17 with three rows andthere are no components with the number of rows less than three Alternatively one

17Although there are trace components with the number of rows less than four eg theirtensor product by the metric ηab contains components with the symmetry of the sl(d)-Young

diagrams with more than three rows Nontrivial trace with the symmetry of corresponds tothe mass-like term Hence traceful tensors either do not satisfy the Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms

34

could search for the solution in the sector of degree-one forms as dω[abc]1 = hdC

[abc]|d1

with some C[abc]|d1 but Bianchi identity hbhchdC

[abc]|d1 equiv 0 implies that the only

component of C[abc]|d1 sim otimes that is allowed must have less than three rows which

is impossible since [abc] makes Young diagrams of otimes consist of three rows atleast18 Thus one has to search for the solution among the forms of less degree

Further unfolding requires a set of fields C [abc][df ]g(k) with the symmetry ofk

to be introduced and the full system has the form

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 δea2 = dξa1 + hbhcξ

[abc]0 δξa1 = dχa

0

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 δω

[abc]1 = dξ

[abc]0

dC[abc][df ]g(k)0 = hvC

[abc][df ]g(k)v0 (44)

Consequently the unfolded system incorporates field φmicromicroν with all required differ-ential gauge parameters at all levels of reducibility the redundant component of the

physical vielbein does not contribute to the dynamics ω[abc]1 sim otimes = oplus oplus

the first component is a field strength for the redundant field once the field hasbeen gauged away the associated field strength is zero and ω

[abc]ρ = hamicrohbνhcλT[microνλ]ρ

for some T[microνλ]ρ T[microνλρ] equiv 0 which incorporates both and (as the trace) Torecover equations (215) in terms of metric-like fields it is convenient to convert allfiber indices to the world ones in the first two equations

part[microeaνλ] = hb[microhcνω

abcλ] (45)

part[microωabcν] = hd[microhfν]C

abcdf (46)

to substitute Tmicroνλρ and to contract two indices in the second equation

part[microφνλ]ρ = Tmicroνλρ (47)

partρTmicroνρλ minus partλTρ

microνρ = 0 (48)

Plugging (47) in (48) gives equation (215)For Y = Y(2 1) (1 1) ie N = 2 and p = 2 the general scheme of Section

1 results in

Yg

n k 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 1 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

18Again the trace component enters the tensor product as η otimes and has the number of rowsnot less than three

35

therefore

Wq =

W a0 q = 0

W a1 W

[abc]0 q = 1

W aq W

[abc]qminus1 W

[abc][df ]qminus2 W

[abc][df ]gqminus2 q gt 1

(49)

and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbhcW[abc]qminus1 g = 1

hbhcW[aaa][bc]qminus2 g = 2

hdW[aaa][bb]c(gminus3)dqminus2 g gt 2

(410)

with D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (44) can be rewritten as

Dω2 = 0 δω2 = Dξ1 δξ1 = Dξ0 (411)

where ω2 isin W2 ξ1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 2 k = 0 sim g = 0and n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 1 form two finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-moduleswhereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g ge 2 form an infinite-dimensionaliso(dminus 1 1)-module

Example 412 Spin- field (briefly) In the case of a massless spin- fieldthere are two gauge parameters at the first level of reducibility which have the sym-metry19 of and one gauge parameter at the second level with the symmetryof First for Y = Y(3 1) (2 1) the proposed scheme results in

Yg

n k 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3 g = 4

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 2 q2 = 1 q3 = 0 q4 = 0

therefore the physical vielbein has to be a two-form taking values in ie e2 equiv

eaab2 Associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξaab1 has components otimes = oplus oplus the first two having the symmetry of the required gauge parameters with the thirdone being redundant The last three components in the decomposition of the physical

vielbein otimes = oplus oplus oplus are also redundant By virtue of Stueckelberg

symmetry with parameter ξ1 these three components can be gauged away inasmuch

as otimes = oplus oplus The redundant component of the first level gauge

parameter ξ1 also can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg symmetry with

level-two gauge parameter ξ0 Consequently at least the fact that the unfoldedsystem incorporates the metric-like field all the required gauge parameters andredundant components do not contribute to the dynamics is proved

19To simplify the example no consideration is given to the trace components of the fields

36

42 General Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Given a massless field of spin Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) described by a metric-like field φY(x) taking values in the irrep of the Lorentz algebra so(d minus 1 1) withthe same symmetry type(minimal formulation) there exists a unique unfolded systemwith the physical vielbein at the lowest grade and all symmetries being manifest thatreproduces the original metric-like system The system has the form (11)

Sketch of the proof

1 The lowest grade field (physical vielbein) eY0q0

turns out to be completely de-termined by the requirement for it to contain the metric-like field and for itsgauge parameters ξY0

q0minusk k gt 0 to contain all the necessary gauge parametersat all levels of reducibility (219)

2 eY0q0

and its gauge parameters appear to contain redundant components thathave to be made non-dynamical The only way to achieve this is to introduceStueckelberg symmetry δeY0

q0= σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus1) δξ

Y0q0minus1 = σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus2) with certain

ξY1q1minusk k gt 0 which turns out to be unambiguously defined by this requirement

3 ξY1q1minus1 has associated gauge field ωY1

q1and gauge transformations δωY0

q0=

σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) completely determines the first equation deY0

q0= σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) whichimplies Jacobi identity σ1

minus(dωY1q1

) equiv 0 The general solution is proved in Sec-tion 44 to have the form dωY1

q1= σ2

minus(ωY2q2

) with certain ωY2q2

The secondequation implies the second Jacobi identity σ2

minus(dωY2q2

) equiv 0 and so on

4 Once the total unfolded system is defined the proof of the facts that (i)the correct dynamical equations are imposed (ii) there are no other dynamicalfields or other differential gauge symmetries in the system is obtained throughthe calculations of σminus cohomology groups Ignoring the trace pattern of fieldsie for traceful tensors the proof of (ii) can be simplified and is done in thissection Even stronger statement that there exists a duality H

p+1+k sim Hpminusk is

proved in Section 45

First as it is clear from the examples above the metric-like field φYM(x) has

to be incorporated into a differential form eY0q of degree-q taking values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep Y0 (for this reason eY0q is called physical vielbein) Having converted

all world indices to fiber ones in accordance with (329) so(dminus 1 1)-tensor productY0 otimes Y(1 q) of Y0 with one column diagram of the height q must contain thecomponent with the symmetry of YM In the case of the minimal formulationYM = Y where Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) characterizes the spin

It is useful to introduce a notion of the quotient of two Young diagrams let thequotient of two Young diagrams Y1Y2 be a direct sum of those diagrams whoseso(dminus 1 1)-tensor product by Y2 contains Y1 For the first sight given q ge 0 anyelement Q of YMY(1 q) might be chosen as Y0 If q is greater than the heightof YM the component with the symmetry YM in the tensor product QotimesY(1 q)has to be certain trace inevitably

37

Although there is no apparent problems in considering unfolded systems withdynamical field hidden in certain trace component of the physical vielbein egMaxwell gauge potential Amicro might be identified with the trace eamicroνh

microa of two-form

eamicroν However this exotic incorporating of the physical field does not take place inthe already known systems Moreover it can be proved that such exotic systemsdo not exist if irreducible Nevertheless they might be a part of some reduciblesystem which describes more than one field Therefore we require the degree q ofthe physical vielbein to be not greater than the height of YM

Inasmuch as (i) the equations imposed on φY(x) possess reducible gauge trans-formations with the number of levels equal to the height p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi of Y (ii) for

a degree-q gauge field of an unfolded system there exist q levels of gauge transfor-mations the degree q of physical vielbein eY0

q must be equal to pThe quotient YY(1 p) contains only one element (provided φY(x) is for-

bidden to be a trace component) it is the diagram (12) with the symmetry ofY0 = Y(s1 minus 1 p1) (sN minus 1 pN) ie it is equal to Y without the first col-umn Therefore physical vielbein eY0

p is completely defined So does gauge param-

eters ξY0pminusk at the k-th level of reducibility k isin [1 p] The requirement for tensor

product Y0 otimes Y(1 pminus k) to contain all gauge parameters ξik given by (219)at the k-th level of reducibility is also satisfied Consequently the whole patternof fieldsgauge parameters of the metric-like formulation is reproduced Note thatY0 equiv Y0 and q0 = p in the terms of Section 1

Let us note that if one writes down the physical vielbein explicitly as ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

where si are the lengths of the rows ofY and converts the form indices to the tangentones by virtue of inverse background vielbein hmicroa

ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|[d1dp] = ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

hmicro1d1 hmicropdp (412)

dynamical field φY(x) should be identified with ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|a1ap which hasthe symmetry of Y with some traces included Consequently the generalizedLabastidarsquos double-tracelessness condition (220) [20] is obvious inasmuch as thecontraction of two metric tensor ηaiaiηaiai with the i-th group of indices vanishes

Generally in addition to φY(x) decompositionY0otimesY(1 p) of physical vielbeineY0p into Lorentz irreps contains redundant components which must not contributeto the physical degrees of freedom So does Y0 otimesY(1 pminus k) ie in addition toξik it contains a lot of components that can not be made genuine differential gaugeparameters There are only two possible ways to get rid of redundant fields in theunfolded formalism

A redundant components could be directly fixed to zero by algebraic (Stueckel-berg) symmetry

B redundant components might be auxiliary fields for other fields (at lower grade)and so on The process stops since the grade is assumed to be bounded frombelow

We require dynamical fields incorporated in the physical vielbein to be at the lowestgrade Actually (B) takes place for dual gauge descriptions but not for the minimal

38

Therefore the only possibility to make redundant components to be non-dynamicalis to introduce a Stueckelberg symmetry with certain parameters ξY1

q1minusk

δeY0p = dξY0

pminus1 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) (413)

δξY0pminus1 = dξY0

pminus2 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus2) (414)

(415)

where σ1minus is a certain operator built of background vielbein ha that contracts a

number of indices of Y1 with hahc to obtain Y0 Diagram20 Y1 and form degreeq1 can be easily found since Y1 otimes Y1 q1 minus i i gt 0 must contain all redundantcomponents of eY0

p and ξY0pminusk

In the unfolded formalism each gauge field possesses its own gauge parameter andvice-versa Therefore there is a gauge field ωY1

q1 which contributes to the equations

for eY0p as

deY0p = σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) (416)

The first equation determines the first Jacobi identity of the form σ1minus(dω

Y1q1

) equiv 0which can be solved as

dωY1q1

= σ2minus(ω

Y2q2

) (417)

for certain gauge field ωY2q2

and operator σ2minus that satisfies σ1

minusσ2minus equiv 0 The general

solution of Jacobi identities is given in Section 44 From now on let the super-scripts of σminus be omitted The second equation determines the second Jacobi identityσminus(dω

Y2q2

) equiv 0 which can be also solved and so on Consequently the knowledgeof the lowest grade gauge field eY0

p and of the Stueckelberg symmetries required toget rid of redundant components determines the first equation which by virtue ofJacobi identities determines the second and so on The total unfolded system hasthe structure

dωYg

qg= σminus

(

ωYg+1qg+1

)

g = 0 1

δωYg

qg= dξYg

qg+ σminus

(

ξYg+1

qg+1minus1

)

δξYgqg

=

(418)

where σminus is certain algebraic operator built of background vielbein ha and (σminus)2 = 0

The only facts remain to be proved are that there are no other dynamical fieldsand that the proper correspondence (duality) between the cohomology groups holdstrue To this end it is sufficient to analyze only the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps content ofH

qg ie only the symmetry type and the multiplicity of irreducible Lorentz tensors

that by virtue of (330) are the representatives of Hqg

It is proved in the next Section that there is a duality Hpminuskg=0 sim H

p+k+1g=1 between

the σminus cohomology groups which reveals the one-to-one correspondence betweenthe gauge dynamical fields and equations of motion the level-k gauge symmetries

20The specific character of Minkowski massless fields is in that all Stueckelberg parameters canbe incorporated into a single Y1-valued form this not being the case for (anti)-de Sitter masslessfields

39

and the level-k Bianchi identities The representatives of cohomology groups in thesector of fields and gauge symmetries directly correspond to those of metric-likeapproach and there is no other nontrivial cohomology in these sectors

Though the trace pattern of fieldsgauge parameters is also important and thecalculation of σminus cohomology groups provides a comprehensive answer to this ques-tion the very procedure being a bit technical Ignoring the trace pattern of thefields it can be easily proved that the required metric-like field is incorporated inphysical vielbein eY0

q0 all the redundant components of the physical vielbein can be

gauged away by a pure algebraic symmetry and the same holds for differential gaugeparameters ξY0

q0minusk at all levels of reducibility ie the required pattern of gauge pa-rameters is recovered whereas all the redundant components are either Stueckelbergor auxiliary This is the necessary condition only and the traces has to be takeninto account Also it is still to be proved that the correct equations of motionsare imposed Provided that there are no trace conditions on the fields the sys-tem is referred to as off-shell[65] An off-shell system may contain only constraintsthat express auxiliary fields via the derivatives of the dynamical field imposing norestrictions on the latter

The off-shell system Technically ignoring the traces is equivalent to thereplacement of all so(dminus1 1)-irreps by the sl(d)-irreps that are characterized by thesame Young diagrams ie instead of taking so(dminus1 1)-tensor products one needs toapply the sl(d)-tensor productrsquos rules which are much simpler The decompositionof the physical vielbein eY0

q0into sl(d)-irreps is given by diagrams Yαi of the form

αN+1

sN minus 1

pNαN

s2 minus 1

p2α2

s1 minus 1

p1

α1

(419)

where α1+ +αN+1 = q0 = p The decomposition of Stueckelberg gauge parameterξY1q1minus1 for eY0

q0has the components of the same form but with αN+1 ge 1 because

Y1 (13) has already the form of Y0 with one cell in the bottom-left Thereforeall components of eY0

q0except for those with αN+1 = 0 are of Stueckelberg type but

there is only one component of eY0q0

with αN+1 = 0 namely it has αi = pi i isin [1 N ]and hence has the symmetry of Y The decomposition of level-k differential gaugeparameter ξY0

q0minusk has the form (419) with α1 + + αN+1 = p minus k and again all

the components of ξY0q0minusk with αN+1 ge 1 can be gauged away by pure algebraic

symmetry with ξY1q1minuskminus1 Consequently there is a complete matching between (219)

40

and those in ξY0

q0minusk that are not pure gauge themselves It can be easily proved alsothat if ignoring the traces there are no other dynamical fieldsdifferential gaugeparameters at higher grade Consequently

Lemma H(σminus) with respect to sl(d) are given by

Hk(σminus)sl(d) =

Yαi g = 0 α1 + + αN = k αN+1 = 0 k le p

empty k gt p(420)

The triviality of the higher k gt p cohomology groups for sl(d) which shouldcontain equations of motion and Bianchi identities is expected since the system isoff-shell For the equations to have the second order in derivatives the only nontrivialcohomology group H

p+1 must be at the grade-one ie Hp+1g=1 6= empty As is seen from

the examples above the equations correspond to those representatives of Hp+1g=1 that

are certain traces Indeed the total rank |WYgqg | which is equal to the sum qg + |Yg|

of degree qg and rank of Yg is preserved by σminus Therefore |WYgqg | = |W

Y0q0| + g

and |RY1q1+1| = |ω

Y0q0| + 2 = |Y|+ 2 where eY0

q0isin Wg=0

p and RY1q1+1 isin W

g=1p+1 contain

metric-like field φYM(x) and the equations on φY(x) respectively Consequently

the representative of Hp+1g=1 that corresponds to the equations on the traceless part

of φY(x) has to be identified with certain trace of the first order and so on for thetraces of φY(x)

The calculation of σminus cohomology groups carried out in Section 45 implies

1 The only nontrivial cohomology groups are Hpminuskg=0 and H

p+k+1g=1 k = 1 p

Therefore the dynamical fields and independent gauge parameters belong tothe zero grade Wg=0

q subspaces the equations are of the second order and theBianchi identities for the k-th level gauge symmetries are of the (k + 2)-thorder

2 Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 ie there is a one-to-one correspondence between the

elements of Hpminuskg=0 that are traces of the r-th order and the elements of Hp+k+1

g=1

that are traces of the (r + k + 1)-th order Roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1

Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on Therefore there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the dynamical fields and the equations of motion the level-k gaugesymmetries and the k-th Bianchi identities

3 The so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that correspond to the elements of Hpminusk(σminus) and arethe traces of the zeroth order are given by the so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagramsthat have the form (419) with αN+1 = 0 and α1 + + αN = p minus k whichexactly reproduce the required pattern (219) Note that certain higher ordertraces are also the elements of cohomology groups These fields represent thersquoauxiliaryrsquo fields of the metric-like formulation which had to be introduced tomake the gauge symmetry off-shell To prove the theorem it is not necessary toknow the concrete trace pattern the duality between the cohomology groupsis sufficient The details of the trace pattern are in Section 45

41

In the fermionic case the traces are substituted for Γ-traces Important isthat acting on tensor indices only σminus does not break down the irreducibility ofspin-tensors The duality has the form H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 or simply H

pminuskg=0 sim

Hp+k+1g=0 which means that equations are of the first order and the duality between

fieldsequations gauge symmetriesBianchi identities takes place which completesthe proof

Note that Yg=s1 equiv Yn=0k=0 has the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensorfor a spin-Y massless field

sNpN

s2p2

s1

p1 + 1

(421)

Analogously to the examples of Section 33 massless mixed-symmetry fields can bedescribed by the same unfolded system (16) that is restricted to Wg

q with g ge g0ie the system contains infinitely many dual formulations As the generalized Weyltensor and its descendants are non-gauge fields the dual descriptions with g0 ge s1are non-gauge and the dual descriptions with 0 lt g0 lt s1 are gauge

43 Physical Degrees of Freedom Counting

Notwithstanding the simplicity of the unfolded form and the uniqueness of unfoldingthere still might be a question of whether the unfolded equations do describe thecorrect number of physical degrees of freedom

It is well-known that for systems with the first class constraints only with mass-less fields belonging to this class the counting of degrees of freedom is that one firstlevel gauge parameter kills two degrees of freedom one second level gauge parame-ters kills three degrees of freedom and so on For example a spin-two massless fieldpossesses d(dminus3)

2degrees of freedom which is just d(d+1)

2minus 2d d(d+1)

2and d being the

number of components of φmicroν and ξmicroThe complete information concerning the rsquonumberrsquo of fieldsgauge parameters

ie the multiplicity and the symmetry of corresponding tensors is contained inH

kg=0(σminus) for k = 0p Not only can a number of physical degrees of freedom be

calculated but the whole exact sequence that defines an iso(d minus 1 1) irrep can bederived The elements of this sequence are certain so(dminus 1) tensors that define anso(dminus 2) tensor as a quotient of so(d minus 1) tensors eg (218) The decompositionof so(dminus 1 1)-fields into irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) can be done with the aid ofpartmicro or after Fourier transform with the aid of momentum pmicro

For example for a spin-two field the cohomology groups that correspond to thedynamical fieldsdifferential gauge parameters and its decomposition into so(dminus 1)irreps have the form

42

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus bull sim φmicroν φ

νν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2bull

Quick sort of Young diagrams in 0 minusrarr 2H0 minusrarr H1 minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 gives the

correct exact sequence 0 minusrarr minusrarr minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 which defines a masslessspin-two irrep H (0 )

For the simplest mixed-symmetry field the hook- there are two levels of gaugetransformation hence relevant cohomology groups are H

0 H1 and H2

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus oplus bull sim ξAmicroν oplus ξ

Smicroν ξ

Sνν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2 oplus 2bull

H2 oplus sim φmicroνλ φ

νmicroν 6= 0 oplus oplus oplus 2 oplus bull

Again quick sort of diagrams in 0 minusrarr 3H0 minusrarr 2H1 minusrarr H2 minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0

gives exact sequence (218)Consequently the problem of calculation the number of physical degrees of free-

dom to be precise of deriving the exact sequence is effectively reduced to the simplecombinatoric problem of (i) decomposition so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagram representa-tives of H(σminus) to so(dminus 1)-diagrams (ii) cancellation of like terms in sequence

0 minusrarr (p+ 1)H0 minusrarr pH1 minusrarr minusrarr 2Hpminus1 minusrarr Hp minusrarr H (0Y) minusrarr 0 (422)

Skipping combinatoric technicalities we state that in the general case of a spin-Ymassless mixed-symmetry field (422) reduces to the correct exact sequence thatdefines a uirrep H (0Y) of iso(dminus 1 1)

44 Solving the Generalized Jacobi Identities

Unfolding some dynamical system there arises a problem of solving Jacobi identities(33) that have schematically a form hhdω1

q equiv 0 where a number of backgroundvielbeins ha is contracted with the fiber indices of ω1

q The Jacobi identity restrictsdω1

q to have a certain specific form dω1q = hhω2

r where the so(dminus1 1)-irrep inwhich ω2

r takes values the degree r and the projector built of hh are completelydetermined The solutions are given by21

Lemma A Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values inY = Y(s p) (k 1)

so(dminus 1 1)-irrep The general solution of

hcdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq = 0 (423)

21As was pointed out in Section 33 nonzero traces either violate Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms and therefore are ignored

43

has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq k lt s

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1 k = s q ge p + 1

0 k = s q lt p+ 1

(424)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 take values inY(s p) (k + 1 1)

and Y(s+ 1 p+ 1) so(dminus 1 1)-irreps respectively22

Proof The parametrization of dωq by a degree-(q + 1) form taking values in the

same so(dminus 1 1)-irrep dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = R

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q+1 obviously fails to satisfy

(423) Inasmuch as (423) contains a vielbein the solution has to contain a number

of vielbeins too The most general parametrization of dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q with only

one vielbein included has the form dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = hdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)|dq for some

q-form taking values in a tensor product of Y by a vector representation ie thereis no definite symmetry between index d and the rest of the indices

hchdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)c|dq = 0larrrarr ωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)[c|d]

q = 0 (425)

Only those irreps in Yotimes are allowed that have c and d symmetric ie correspondto Y(s p) (k + 1 1) for k lt s This is not possible in the case k = s ie Y =Y(s p+ 1) and the only possibility to have c and d symmetric is to add the whole

column toY which requires dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q to be represented as dω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hchcωa1(sminus1)cap(sminus1)cap+1(sminus1)cqminuspminus1 and therefore q must be large enough Roughly

speaking the proof is based on the fact that the anti-symmetrization of two indicesat the same row of a Young diagram is identically zero the anti-symmetrizationbeing due to contraction with vielbeins

Note that choosing nonmaximal solutions of Jacobi identities results in loweringthe gauge symmetry so that not all redundant components are excluded

Unfolding totally-symmetric massless higher-spin fields the possible rhs termsin dω

a(sminus1)b(t)1 = are restricted by Jacobi identities and an essential use is made

of

Corollary The solution of Jacobi identity

hcdωa(sminus1)b(tminus1)c1 equiv 0 (426)

is of the form

dωa(sminus1)b(t)1 =

hcωa(sminus1)b(t)c1 t lt sminus 1

hchdCa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 t = sminus 1

(427)

22The symmetric basis is used being more convenient in this case as the contracted with vielbeinstensors are already irreducible

44

The following statement is a generalization of the Lemma-A to the case where(s p) (k 1) is a rsquosubdiagramrsquo of a larger Young diagram Y that has a numberof rows precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) Appropriate Young symmetrizershave to be included as the mere contraction of a number of vielbeins breaks theirreducibility of the tensor For instance hcω

a(s1)b(s2minus1)c is already irreducible withthe symmetry of Ys1 s2 minus 1 but this is not the case for hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) which hasto be added one term hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) + 1s1minuss2+1

hcωa(s1)bb(s2minus1)c to get the symmetry

of Ys1 minus 1 s2

Lemma B Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values in Y =

Y( (s p) (k 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irrep where the dots stands for the blocks inY precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) The general solution of

Π[hcdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq

]= 0 (428)

where Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p)(k minus 1 1) has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

Π[

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq

]

k lt s

Π[

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1

]

k = s q ge p+ 1

0 k = s q lt p + 1

(429)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 takes values in

Y (s p) (k + 1 1) and Y (s+ 1 p+ 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irreps respec-tively and Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p) (k 1)

Proof The proof is similar to that of Lemma-A with the only comment that thesymmetrizers do not affect the argumentation that anti-symmetrization of two in-dices in the same row is identically zero

45 Dynamical Content via σminus Cohomology

Before discussing the calculation of σminus cohomology let us first recall necessary factsconcerning the evaluation of so(d minus 1 1)-tensor products Let P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) be anumber of integer partitions k1 + + kN = m of m where ki is constrained byki le ǫi and different rearrangements of ki satisfying the constraints are regarded asdistinct partitions The generating function for the partition P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) is

sum

m

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m)tm =

i=Nprod

i=1

(1minus tǫi+1)

1minus t(430)

These integer partitions gives the multiplicities of irreps in so(dminus 1 1)-tensor prod-ucts (Clebsh-Gordon coefficients) we are interested in [71]

45

The so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary irrep Ylowast = Y(si pi) by aone-column diagram of the height qlowast can be explicitly calculated as

sNpN

s2

p2

s1

p1

otimes

q =sum

αjβi

Nαjβi

αN+1

βN

αN

ǫNpN sN

β2

α2

ǫ2p2 s2

β1

α1

ǫ1p1 s1

(431)

where αi βi αi + βi le pi i isin [1 N ] αN+1 ge 0 and there exist ρ ge 0 such that

qlowast =i=Nsum

i=1

(αi + βi) + αN+1 + 2ρ (432)

The multiplicity Nαjβi of Ylowastαj βi

is given by integer partition

Nαjβi = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ǫi = pi minus αi minus βi (433)

and the total trace order r is

r =i=Nsum

i=1

βi + ρ (434)

Roughly speaking to obtain an element of the tensor product one should first cutoff from bottom-right of the i-th block a column of height βiminusγi pi ge βiminusγi ge 0 (totake different traces) and second add an arbitrary number αi+γi pi ge αi+γi ge 0 ofcells to each block provided the γi cells annihilate ie they are added to the placesfrom which γi cells were removed at the first stage Multiplicity may be differentfrom one due to different rearrangements of γi ie when multiplied by the rest ofq-column different traces can give rise to the same diagram The number of suchrearrangements is given by P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ρ =

sumi=N

i=1 γi For instance sl(n)-tensor

product otimes is given simply by

otimessl(n) = oplus oplus oplus (435)

46

The so(d)-tensor product can be represented as a sum of the form

otimesso(n) = otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

otimessl(n)

oplus

otimessl(n)

︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

oplus

otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

2nd order

=

oplus oplus oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

oplus

oplus 2 oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

︸︷︷︸

2ndorder

(436)

where the sum is over trace order and the boxes that are connected by the arc areto be contracted and then the sl(n)-product rules are to be applied to the rest ofthe diagrams

Evaluating the so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary spinor-irrep Ylowast =Y(si pi) 1

2by a one-column diagram of the height qlowast one can contract any number

of Γ matrices with the indices of the column and then multiply therefore the tensorproduct rule for spin-tensors can be reduced to bosonic rule (431) as

Y(si pi) 12otimesso(n) Y(1 q) =

qsum

k=0

(Y(si pi) otimesso(n) Y(1 q minus k)

)

12

(437)

for example

12otimesso(n) = 1

2oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order Γ-traces

oplus

12oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order Γ-traces

oplus

oplus

2 12

︸︷︷︸

2nd order Γ-traces

oplus

bull 12

︸︷︷︸

3d order Γ-traces

(438)

The multiplicity N12

αjβiof Ylowast

αj βi12

is given by

N12

αjβi=

i=ρsum

i=0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus i) (439)

Let us now analyze the origin of σminus cohomology Its action σminus Wgq rarr W

gminus1q+1

preserves g+ q and hence the whole complex C(W σminus) is a direct sum of complexesC(qprime σminus) where q

prime refers to the end element Wg=0qprime of the complex

C(qprime σminus) 0 minusrarr minusrarr Wg=1qprimeminus1 minusrarrW

g=0qprime minusrarr 0 (440)

47

Moreover σminus preserves the total rank (the form degree + rank of the so(d minus 1 1)-

irrep in which the field takes values) LetWa(s1)a(sm)q be an element ofWg

qprime When

all form indices of Wa(s1)a(sm)q are converted to the fiber ones according to (329)

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (441)

the action of σminus is just an anti-symmetrization of all d1 dq with those indices aithat are extra as compared to Ygminus1 plus some terms to restore the correct Youngsymmetry of Ygminus1 Let the decomposition ofW a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] into so(dminus1 1)-irreps be of the form

Ya1(s1) am(sm)otimes

Y(1 q) =oplus

r=0

oplus

ir

N rirYr

ir (442)

where the summation is over the trace order r and then over ir which enumeratesall so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that enters in the tensor product as the traces of the r-thorder N r

irbeing the multiplicity of Yr

ir The multiplicity of the zeroth order traces

is always equal to one N0i0= 1 In fact the diagrams Y 0

i0can be directly obtained

by the sl(n)-tensor product ruleThe very anti-symmetrization is insensitive to whether a certain component en-

ters as a trace or not When decomposed into so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the elements ofWg

qprime and Wgminus1qprime+1 have a number of components of the same symmetry type The

action of σminus is just a linear transformation that either sends the whole so(dminus 1 1)-irrep to zero23 or sends it to the components of Wgminus1

qprime+1 of the same symmetry typeImportant is that σminus does not act between different so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Thereforecomplex C(qprime σminus) is a direct sum of complexes parameterized by so(dminus 1 1)-irrepsYprime that are given by various tensor products

Ynk

otimes

Y(1 q) (443)

provided that the field WYnkq is an element of Wgprimeminusi

qprime+i for certain i When reducedto such a complex

C(Yprime qprime σminus) 0rarr rarr Vg rarr Vgminus1 rarr rarr 0 (444)

the action of σminus is a linear transformation between the spaces Vg rarr Vgminus1 dimen-

sions of which are equal to the multiplicity of Yprime in the decomposition of WYgqg and

WYgminus1qg+1 The action of σminus is maximally non-degenerate compatible with nilpotency

Therefore to find cohomology groups the dimension of each linear space in everycomplex has to be calculated

Let us note that only the types and multiplicities of so(dminus1 1)-irreps are foundbelow ie no attention is paid to the description of how the corresponding tensorsare contained in the fields WY

qprime This is sufficient for our purposes though it isobvious (412) how the metric-like field φYM

is incorporated in an element ofWg=0p

23provided that the appropriate basis on the space of so(dminus1 1)-irreps with the same symmetrytype is chosen

48

The calculation of σminus cohomology is divided into three cases that cover the wholevariety of so(dminus 1 1)-irreps that can result from the tensor products (443)

In the Lemmas below it is assumed that complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is parameterizedby so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Yprime = Ylowast

αj βiof the form (431) with Ylowast = Ynk q

lowast = q such

that WYnkq isin C(qprime σminus) and ρ is defined according to (432)

In the first case Yprime is an element of Y0 otimesY(1 q)

Lemma 1 The σminus cohomology groups Hqg=0 and H

qg=1 are nontrivial and are given

by

Hqg =

Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βiMαj βi

αN+1 = 0sumi=N

i=0 αi = qq isin [0 p] g = 0

H2pminusqminus1 q isin [p+ 1 2p+ 1] g = 1

empty q gt 2p+ 1 any g

(445)where Mαj βi is the multiplicity of the irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

defined below

Proof From the very form of Yn=N0 equiv Yg=0 equiv Y(si minus 1 pi) it follows that theso(dminus1 1)-irreps that the element ofWg=0

q sim Y0otimesY(1 q) decomposes into may

be contained in Wg=1qminus1 only ie Wg=0

q and Wg=kqminusk contain no so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of

the same symmetry type for k gt 1 Therefore the length of complex C(Yprime q σminus)where Yprime isin Y0otimesY(1 q) is equal to one ie C(Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

q σminus) 0 minusrarrV1 minusrarr V0 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions of V0 and V1 are given by the multiplicitiesof the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

in Wg=1qminus1 and Wg=0

q respectively

dim(V1) =

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus 1) ρ ge 1

0 ρ = 0αN+1 = 0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) αN+1 gt 0

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) (446)

If αN+1 gt 0 the dimensions of V0 and V1 are equal and each irreducible componentof Wg=0

q with αN+1 gt 0 can be gauge away by virtue of the corresponding element

of Wg=1qminus1 thus being exact H

kgt2p+1 = empty inasmuch as ρ le p and the componentsof the forms with rank greater than (2p + 1) must have αN+1 gt 0 thus beingexact If αN+1 = 0 the dimensions are different dim(V1) lt dim(V0) for q le pdim(V1) = dim(V0) for q = p + 1 and dim(V1) gt dim(V0) for q gt p Thereforethe number of those Ysi piαj βi

isin Wg=0q q le p that are not exact is equal to

Mαj βi = |dim(V1) minus dim(V0)| the same is the number of those Ysi piαj βiisin

Wg=1qminus1 q gt p+ 1 that are not exact The obvious property of integer partitions

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ǫ1 + + ǫN minusm) (447)

results in the important duality in the cohomology groups Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 or

roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on

49

The second case is the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) where Yprime is an element of the tensor

product Ynk otimesY(1 q) for certain q ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmaxn minus 1

Lemma 2 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainqprime ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmax

n minus 1 the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The complex has the length two ie 0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr 0 wherethe dimensions are given by dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫN 1|ρ+ 1)dim(V2) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ+ 1) Simple calculations with generating functions resultsin dim(V0) lt dim(V1) dim(V2) lt dim(V1) and dim(V0) minus dim(V1) + dim(V2) = 0and consequently the sequence is exact

Analogously

Lemma 3 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainq ge 0 with k = 0 and n lt N the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The speciality of such Yprime is that the complex has the length three ie0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr V3 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions are given by

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 ǫn + 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V2) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 1) ρ ge ǫn + 1

0 otherwise

dim(V3) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn minus 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 2) ρ ge ǫn + 2

0 otherwise

Again simple calculations with generating functions results in appropriate inequali-ties and dim(V0)minusdim(V1)+dim(V2)minusdim(V3) = 0 and consequently the sequenceis exact

The above three cases covers the whole variety of the so(d minus 1 1)-tensors thatcan result from the tensor products YnkotimesY(1 q) for any n k and q The caseswith sN = 1 and Y = Y0 are special but the calculation of cohomology groupsleads to the same result

In the fermionic case the computations are similar due to the multiplicity givenby (439) The difference is that all nontrivial cohomology is concentrated in gradezero Indeed taking into account (446) where P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) is to be replaced by(439) it follows that dim(V0) ge dim(V1) for all q and H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 where r

is referred to the Γ-trace order or roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 andso on

5 Conclusions

The unfolded system constructed in the paper has a simple form of a covariantconstancy equation and describes arbitrary mixed-symmetry bosonic and fermionic

50

massless fields in d-dimensional Minkowski space The gauge fieldsparameters aredifferential forms with values in certain finite-dimensional irreducible representationsof the Lorentz algebra that are uniquely determined by the generalized spin

The key moment is that all gauge symmetries are manifest within the unfoldedformulation which is of most importance in controlling the number of physicaldegrees of freedom when trying to introduce interactions Unfolded systems areformulated in terms of differential forms which is a natural way to respect diffeo-morphisms and hence to describe systems that include gravity

Though the necessary conditions for the system to have a lagrangian descriptionare satisfied ie the fields are in one-to-one correspondence with the equations andthe k-th level gauge symmetries are in one-to-one correspondence with the k-thBianchi identities the very lagrangian remains to be constructed

Another interesting moment is that the unfolded equations for bosons are thesame as for fermions namely the operators involved ie exterior differential dand σminus remains unmodified when tensors are replaced with spin-tensors Thoughthis nice property partly breaks down in (anti)-de Sitter space within the unfoldedapproach bosons and fermions have much in common the fact being very useful forsupersymmetric theories

The proposed unfolded system includes all non-gauge dual descriptions whichare based on the generalized Weyl tensor and its descendants but not all of gaugedual descriptions It would be interesting to construct an unfolded system thatcontains all dual formulations

The interactions of the totally symmetric massless higher-spin fields are knownto require a nonzero cosmological constant ie are formulated in (anti)-de Sitterspace [2] Mixed-symmetry fields exhibit some interesting features in the presence ofcosmological constant For example not all of the Minkowski gauge symmetries canbe deformed to (anti)-de Sitter [72] As a result massless mixed-symmetry fields havemore degrees of freedom in (anti)-de Sitter compared to its Minkowski counterparts[73] and in the Minkowski limit a massless mixed-symmetry field splits in a certaincollection of massless fields generally Contrariwise a single mixed-symmetry fieldcan not be smoothly deformed to (anti)-de Sitter Another interesting effect is theexistence of the so-called partially-massless fields [74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 8283 84] the fields that have a number of degrees of freedom intermediate betweenthat of massless and massive and split in a set of massless fields in the Minkowskilimit Therefore the extension of the proposed approach to (anti)-de Sitter spaceseems to be non-trivial but nevertheless worth being investigated

In a series of papers [85 61 86 60] it was suggested so-called frame-like approachto the general mixed-symmetry fields in (anti)-de Sitter To generalize the proposedin the present paper unfolded system to (anti)-de Sitter case and to compare to thatof [60] is the next step to perform

We consider the proposed unfolded system as the first stage in constructing thefull interacting theory of mixed-symmetry fields

51

Acknowledgements

The author appreciates sincerely MA Vasiliev for reading the manuscript and mak-ing many detailed and valuable suggestions and illuminating comments the verywork was initiated as the result of discussions with MA Vasiliev The author isalso grateful to RR Metsaev and KB Alkalaev for useful discussions and to OVShaynkman for discussion of the fermionic case The work was supported in partby grants RFBR No 05-02-17654 LSS No 440120062 and INTAS No 05-7928by the Landau Scholarship and by the Scholarship of Dynasty foundation

Appendix A Multi-index convention

The multi-index notations is used a group of indices in which certain tensor issymmetric or is to be symmetrized is denoted either by one letter with the numberof indices indicated in round brackets or by placing a group of indices in roundbrackets eg

T a(s) equiv T a1a2as T a1aiaj as = T a1ajaias (A1)

V aT a(s) equiv V (a1T a2as+1) equiv1

s+ 1(V a1T a2a3as+1 + V a2T a1a3as+1 + + V as+1T a1a2as)

(A2)

V (bT a(s)) equiv V (bT a1as) equiv1

s + 1

(V bT a1a2as + V a1T ba2a3as + + V asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A3)Analogously the group of indices in which certain tensor is anti-symmetric or is tobe anti-symmetrized is denoted by placing indices in square brackets eg

T a[s] equiv T a1a2as T a1aiai+1as = minusT a1ai+1aias (A4)

V [bT a[s]] equiv V [bT a1as] equiv1

s+ 1

(V bT a1a2as minus V a1T ba2a3as + + (minus)sV asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A5)The operators of (anti)-symmetrization are weighted to be projectors (the factor 1

s+1

above)

Appendix B Young diagrams

Comprehensive information on Young diagrams can be found for example in thetextbook [71]

Definition B1 Given an integer partition ie a nonincreasing sequence si i isin[1 n] si ge si+1 of positive integers (or nonnegative when it is convenient to workwith a sequence of a fixed length) associated Young diagram Ys1 s2 sn is agraphical representation consisting of n left-justified rows made of boxes with the

52

i-th row containing si boxes

s10s11

s1s2s3s4

s5s6s7

s8s9

Finite-dimensional irreducible representation(irrep) of sl(d) ie various irre-ducible sl(d)-tensors are in one-to-one correspondence with Young diagrams of theform Ys1 s2 s[ d

2] The associated irreducible tensors

T

s1︷︸︸︷aa

s2︷︸︸︷

bb (B1)

or in condensed notation T a(s1)b(s2) have at most [d2] groups of indices being sym-

metric in each group separately and satisfy the condition that the symmetrizationof any group of indices with one index of any of the subsequent groups is identicallyzero ie

T a(s1)(b(sk)b)c(sjminus1) equiv 0 k lt j (B2)

If s[ d2] 6= 0 and d is even the (anti)-selfduality condition has to be imposed for

appropriate signature (anti)-selfduality is conventionally denoted by the sign factors+(minus) before s[ d

2] In this paper we do not consider (anti)-self dual representations

A scalar representation Y0 0 0 is denoted by bull a vector irrep Y1 0 0by rank-two symmetric tensor irrep by rank-two antisymmetric tensor irrep

by and so onFinite-dimensional irreducible representations of so(d) are of the two types ten-

sor and spin-tensor and are also characterized by Young diagrams which in thecase of spin-tensor irreps refer to the symmetry of the tensor part Young diagramsthat correspond to spin-tensor irreps are labeled by 1

2-subscript Spinor indices

α β γ = 12[d2] are placed first and are separated from tensor indices by rdquordquo For

example a spinor ψα irrep is denoted by bull 12 a vector-spinor irrep Aαaby 1

2and

so on To make tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry conditionthe tracelessness condition with respect to each pair of indices is to be imposed

ηccTa(s1)cb(siminus1)cd(sjminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n j = 1n (B3)

To make spin-tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry condition Γ-tracelessness condition with respect to each tensor index and a spinor index is to beimposed

Γαc βT

βa(s1)cb(siminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n (B4)

where Γαc β satisfy Γα

a βΓβb γ

+ Γαb βΓ

βaγ = 2ηab Additional conditions on spinors viz

Majorana Weyl and Majorana-Weyl are irrelevant to the problems concerned Also

53

in both cases it is required for the sum of the heights of the first two columns ofYoung diagrams to be not greater than d Note that the Γ-tracelessness conditionis stronger than the tracelessness one and applying the Γ-tracelessness twice to twosymmetric indices gives the tracelessness

0 = 2ΓαaβΓ

βb γT γ(ab) = ηabT

αab (B5)

To handle with arbitrary large Young diagrams the so-called block representationis used ie the rows of equal lengths are combined to blocks

Y(s1 p1) (sn pn) equiv Y

p1︷ ︸︸ ︷s1 s1

p2︷ ︸︸ ︷s2 s2

pn︷ ︸︸ ︷sn sn (B6)

References

[1] C Fronsdal ldquoMassless fields with integer spinrdquo Phys Rev D18 (1978) 3624

[2] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoCubic interaction in extended theories ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Nucl Phys B291 (1987) 141

[3] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoOn the gravitational interaction ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Phys Lett B189 (1987) 89ndash95

[4] M A Vasiliev ldquoConsistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in(3+1)-dimensionsrdquo Phys Lett B243 (1990) 378ndash382

[5] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoOn the geometry of higher-spin gauge fieldsrdquoClass Quant Grav 20 (2003) S473ndashS486 hep-th0212185

[6] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoFree geometric equations for higher spinsrdquoPhys Lett B543 (2002) 303ndash310 hep-th0207002

[7] M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear equations for symmetric massless higher spin fieldsin (a)ds(d)rdquo Phys Lett B567 (2003) 139ndash151 hep-th0304049

[8] X Bekaert I L Buchbinder A Pashnev and M Tsulaia ldquoOn higher spintheory Strings brst dimensional reductionsrdquo Class Quant Grav 21 (2004)S1457ndash1464 hep-th0312252

[9] D Sorokin ldquoIntroduction to the classical theory of higher spinsrdquo AIP ConfProc 767 (2005) 172ndash202 hep-th0405069

[10] X Bekaert S Cnockaert C Iazeolla and M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear higherspin theories in various dimensionsrdquo hep-th0503128

[11] A Sagnotti E Sezgin and P Sundell ldquoOn higher spins with a strong sp(2r)conditionrdquo hep-th0501156

[12] P K Townsend ldquoCovariant quantization of antisymmetric tensor gaugefieldsrdquo Phys Lett B88 (1979) 97

54

off-shell[54] by a totally symmetric spin-tensor field φα(micro1micros) subjected to8

partφmicro1microsminus spart(micro1

Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0

δφmicro1micros= part(micro1ξmicro2micros)

ΓνΓρΓλφνρλmicro4micros= 0 Γνξνmicro2microsminus1 = 0

(221)

where in order to get an off-shell gauge invariance the irreducibility of φα(micro1micros) hasto be relaxed to the triple Γ-tracelessness

A massless totally anti-symmetric spin-Y(1 p) 12field can be described off-shell

by a totally anti-symmetric spin-tensor field ωα[micro1microp] subjected to

partωmicro1micropminus ppart[micro1Γ

νωνmicro2microp] = 0

δωmicro1microp= part[micro1ξmicro2microp]

(222)

Similar to the bosonic case (222) possesses reducible gauge transformations Thedifference is that one can impose the triple Γ-tracelessness on ωα[micro1microp] but thisrestricts the first level gauge parameter to be Γ-traceless Γνξνmicro2micropminus1 = 0 andhence the second order gauge parameter has to be on-mass-shell ie partξmicro1micropminus2 = 0Therefore for equations of motion to possess an off-shell gauge symmetry of allorders no Γ-trace conditions have to be imposed on fieldgauge parameters

In the general case of a massless spin-Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) 12field the

pattern of gauge symmetries is given by the spin-tensors with the tensor part de-scribed by (219) the definition of the Weyl tensor remains unchanged also

The descriptions based on tensor field φmicro1(s1)micro2(s2)micron(sn) which is analogous tothe metric gmicroν are referred to as metric-like At least in writing equiv partmicropartνη

microν theexplicit use of metric ηmicroν is made of which complicates the issue of introducinginteractions with gravitation

Let us note that in principle one can verify the gauge invariance of the fieldequations for massless mixed-symmetry fields despite the fact that the very form ofgauge transformation is cumbersome due to Young symmetrizers The advantageof the unfolded approach is in that gauge invariance at all levels of reducibility ismanifest

3 Unfolding Dynamics and σminus Cohomology

In this section we first recall the definition of unfolding and the relation of the sim-plest unfolded systems to Lie algebrasmodules and Chevalley-Eilenberg cohomologywith coefficients Second peculiar properties of unfolded systems that describe freefields and specifically the so-called σminus cohomology concept are recalled Third thevery procedure of constructing the unfolded form is illustrated on the examples ofmassless spin-zero spin-one arbitrary totally symmetric spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2)

fields the relation with the general statement of Section 1 is pointed out in each ofthe examples

8Obtained from the Lagrangian equations of [54] have the form Gmicro1microsminus s

2Γ(micro1ΓνGνmicro2micros) minus

s(sminus1)4 η(micro1micro2

Gννmicro3micros)

= 0 Gmicro1micros= partφmicro1micros

minus spart(micro1Γνφνmicro2micros) = 0 which is equivalent to

(222)

13

31 General Features

Some dynamical system is said to be unfolded [31 32 33] if it has the form

dWA = FA(W ) (31)

whereWA is a set9 of differential forms of degree-qA on some d-dimensional manifoldMd d - exterior differential on Md and FA(W ) is an arbitrary degree-(qA + 1)function of WA assumed to be expandable in terms of exterior (wedge) productsonly10

FA(W ) =infinsum

n=1

sum

qB1++qBn=qA+1

fAB1Bn

W B1 and andW Bn (32)

where fAB1Bn

are constant coefficients satisfying fAB1BiBj Bn

= (minus)qBiqBj fA

B1BjBiBn

Moreover FA(W ) must satisfy the integrability condition (called generalized Jacobiidentity) obtained by applying d to (31)

F B δFA

δW Bequiv 0 (33)

Any solution of (33) defines a free differential algebra (FDA) [55 56 57 58] If Ja-cobi identities (33) are satisfied irrespective ofMd dimension11 the free differentialalgebra is referred to as universal [10 59] It is the universal algebras only that willbe considered further

Equations (31) are invariant under gauge transformations

δWAqA

= dǫAqAminus1 + ǫBqBminus1

δFA

δW B for qA gt 0 (34)

δWA0 = ǫB

prime

0

δFA

δW Bprime

1

Bprime qBprime = 1 for qA = 0 (35)

where ǫAqAminus1 is a degree-(qA minus 1) form taking values in the same space as WAqA

Inits turn δWA

qA= 0 can be treated as unfolded-like system for ǫAqAminus1 ie dǫ

AqAminus1 =

minusǫBqBminus1δFA

δWB there emerge second level gauge transformations

δǫAqAminus1 = dξAqAminus2 minus ξBqBminus2

δFA

δW B (36)

provided that FA(W ) is linear in matter fields and analogously for the gauge trans-formations at deeper levels Therefore the reducibility of gauge transformations ismanifest in the unfolded approach For a degree-qA gauge field WA

qAthere exist qA

levels of gauge transformations

9In this section indices A B C are of arbitrary nature In the cases of practical significance AB C vary over certain irreps of the Lorentz algebra

10The wedge symbol and will be systematically omitted further11As the forms with the rank greater than d are identically zero there exist certain identities

eg Wn andWn equiv 0 for n+m gt d which make the operator δδWA to be ill-behaved

14

The use of the exterior algebra respects diffeomorphisms which is very appropri-ate for introducing interactions with the gravitation The whole information aboutthe dynamics turns out to be contained in FA(W ) and one can even extend anunfolded system to other manifolds[59] simply by changing the exterior differentialthe new unfolded system has literally the same form

Note that introducing enough auxiliary fields it is possible to reformulate anydynamical system in the unfolded form although it may be difficult to unfold someparticular system or to find all unfolded forms

Collected below are some important cases of unfolded systems which have adirect bearing on Lie algebras [55 59]

Lie algebrasFlat connections Let ΩI equiv ΩImicrodx

micro be a subsector of degree-oneforms The only self-closed unfolded equations are of the form

dΩI = minusf IJKΩ

JΩK (37)

Generalized Jacobi identity (33) implies the Jacobi identity f IJKf

JLMΩKΩLΩM equiv

0 for some Lie algebra g with structure constants f IJK Therefore the closed

subsector of one-forms is in one-to-one correspondence with Lie algebras and(37) is the flatness condition for a connection ΩI of g This provides acoordinate-independent framework for describing background geometry Inthe cases of interest g is iso(d minus 1 1) so(d minus 1 2) so(d 1) and sp(2n) [59]Background geometry connection ΩI is assumed to be of order zero whereasall matter fields including dynamical gravitation are of the first order Allequations are assumed to be of the first order in matter fields and hencedescribe free fields only

In this paper g = iso(dminus 1 1) and ΩI = ab ha where ab equiv abmicro dxmicro

is a Lorentz spin-connection and ha equiv hamicrodxmicro is a background vielbein which

defines a non-holonomic basis of a tangent space at each point of the manifoldFlatness equation (37) for iso(dminus 1 1)-connection ΩI reads

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb = 0(38)

The first is the zero torsion equation that expresses the Lorentz spin-connectionvia the first derivative of hamicro The second can be recognized as the zero curva-ture equation For example in Cartesian coordinates the explicit solution isab

micro = 0 and hamicro = δamicro

The advantage of description of background geometry as the flatness conditionfor a connection of the space-time symmetry algebra is in that this way iscoordinate-independent In what follows we assume ab ha to satisfy (38)which is enough if there is no need for the explicit form of the solution in someparticular coordinate system For instance in (anti)-de Sitter space (38) ismodified by the terms proportional to the cosmological constant λ2

dha +abh

b = 0

dab +ac

cb + λ2hahb = 0(39)

15

and admits no simple solutions with hamicro = δamicro ab = 0 Nevertheless without

giving the explicit solution to imply that ab ha satisfy (39) is sufficient forgeneral analysis eg for constructing Lagrangians [60]

Contractible FDA The simplest equations linear in matter fields of the form

dWAq = fA

BWBq+1 (310)

can be reduced by linear transformations to either

dWAq = WA

q+1 dWAq+1 = 0 (311)

ordWA

q = 0 (312)

where the second equation of (311) is the consequence of Jacobi identities(33) for the first one In the first case by virtue of gauge transformations(34) δWA

q = dξAqminus1 + χAq δW

Bq+1 = dχA

q the field WAq can be gauged away In

both cases by virtue of the Poincarersquos Lemma these equations are dynamicallyempty and correspond to the co-called contractible FDAs [55]

g-modulesCovariant constancy equations Let WAq be a closed subsector of

q-forms of matter gauge fields Linear in matter fields equations may involvethe background g-connection ΩI which is of zeroth order Such equationsreferred to as linearized over g background (described by any solution ΩI of(37)) have the form

dWAq = minusΩIfI

ABW

Bq (313)

Jacobi identity (33) where (37) is also taken into account

ΩJΩK(minusf I

JKfIAB + fJ

ACfK

CB

)W B

q = 0 (314)

implies fIAB to realize a representation of g Therefore the closed subsector

of forms of definite degree is in one-to-one correspondence with g-moduleswhereas

DΩWAq equiv dWA

q + ΩIfIABW

Bq = 0 (315)

is a covariant constancy equation and (DΩ)2 = 0 since the connection is

flat (37) In the cases of interest A runs over certain finite-dimensionalso(d minus 1 1)-irreps ie g-modules decompose with respect to its subalgebraso(dminus 1 1) sub g into a direct sum of certain irreducible tensors This is whywe single out the Lorentz-covariant derivative DL from the whole g-covariantderivative DΩ the remaining part acts vertically (algebraically) In the caseof ΩI being an iso(d minus 1 1) flat connection the Lorentz covariant derivativeDL = d+ satisfy DL

2 = 0 as the exterior differential d does

DLTab = dT ab +a

cTcb +b

cTac + (316)

In Cartesian coordinates DL equiv d and we do not make any distinction betweend and DL whereas in (anti)-de Sitter (DL)

2 6= 0 and the difference between d

16

and DL has to be taken into account Also zero torsion equation (381) canbe rewritten as DLh

a = 0 The remaining part of ΩI which acts algebraicallyand mixes different so(dminus 1 1)-modules into g-modules is associated with thegenerators of translations with gauge field ha

Gluing g-modulesChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology LetWpWq andWr takevalues in g-modules R1 R2 and R3 the representations are realized by oper-ators T1 T2 and T3 respectively Still linear in matter fields but nonlinear inbackground connection ΩI equations are of the form

DΩWp equiv dWp + T1(Ω)Wp = f12(Ω Ω)Wq

DΩWq equiv dWq + T2(Ω)Wq = f23(Ω Ω)Wr

DΩWr equiv

(317)

where the terms forming g-covariant derivative are isolated on the lhs Thetwo g-modules R1 R2 appear to be glued together by the term f12(Ω Ω) isinHom(Λpminusq+1(g) otimes R2R1) Jacobi identity (33) implies f12(Ω Ω) to be aChevalley-Eilenberg cocycle with coefficients in Rlowast

2 otimesR1 where Rlowast2 is a mod-

ule contragradient to R2 and f12(Ω Ω)f23(Ω Ω) = 0 Coboundaries canbe proved to be dynamically empty and can be removed by a field redefini-tion Consequently f12(Ω Ω) should be a nontrivial representative of theChevalley-Eilenberg cohomology group with coefficients in Rlowast

2otimesR1 It followsalso that nothing but zero forms can be joined to zero forms ie the onlypossible linearized unfolded equations on forms of zero degree are (315) withq = 0

For any dynamical system linearized over certain g-background (described byany solution ΩI of (37)) equations of motion (315) along with gauge transforma-tions of all orders of reducibility acquire a very simple form

δξ1 = DΩξ0

δξpminus1 = DΩξpminus2

δWp = DΩξpminus1

DΩWp = 0

(318)

where Wp takes values in certain g-module R DΩ is the associated g-covariantderivative and ξpminusk k isin [1 p] are the gauge parameters of k-th order of reducibilitytaking values in the same g-module R and being forms of degree (p minus k) Thegauge invariance at each order of reducibility and of equations of motion is dueto (DΩ)

2 = 0 In some sense the gauge fields Wp and the gauge parameters ξpminusk

seem to play the same role at the linearized level This uniformity is of essentialimportance when analyzing unfolded systems

In the presence of gluing terms eg when only two modules say R1 and R2 areglued by nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycle fpr(Ω Ω) full chain of equations

17

and gauge transformations (318) is modified to12

δξ11 = DΩξ10

δξ1pminusr = DΩξ1pminusrminus1

δξ1pminusr+1 = DΩξ1pminusr + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

20 δξ21 = DΩξ

20

(319)

δξ1pminus1 = DΩξ1pminus2 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus2 δξ2rminus1 = DΩξ

2rminus2

δW 1p = DΩξpminus1 + fpr(Ω Ω)ξ

2rminus1 δW 2

r = DΩξ2rminus1

DΩW1p = fpr(Ω Ω)W

2r DΩW

2r = 0

where W 1p ξ

1pminusk and W 2

r ξ2rminusm take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively

Important is that the gauge fieldsparameters taking values in R2 contribute to therhs of the equationsgauge transformations for the gauge fieldsparameters takingvalues in R1 but for forms of degree greater than (p minus r) The above two systemsare nothing but the specializations of (31) (34) (36)

Also let us note that there is no strong reason to make any distinction betweenthe terms linear in the background g-connection ΩI which correspond to g-modulesand the terms of higher order in ΩI which correspond to Chevalley-Eilenberg co-cycles Both terms can be combined into a single object the generalized covariant-derivative D = d+T (Ω)+f(Ω Ω) equiv DΩ+f(Ω Ω) with the property D2 = 0Moreover by means of D (319) and (318) can be rewritten in a similar mannerConsequently at the linearized level the most general unfolded equations and gaugetransformations have the form

δξ1 = Dξ0

δξpminus1 = Dξpminus2

δWp = Dξpminus1

DWp = 0

(320)

where D is built of d background connection ΩI and satisfies D2 = 0 The gaugefieldsparameters take values in certain spacesWq viz Wp isin Wp ξpminus1 isin Wpminus1ξ0 isin W0 The elements of Wq are differential forms with values in certain g-modules It is also convenient to define higher degree spaces Wqgtp the equationsRp+1 = DWp = 0 take values in Wp+1 Rp+2 = DRp+1 belongs to Wp+2 andby virtue of D2 = 0 satisfies Rp+2 equiv 0 and so on Therefore there exist certainidentities which belong to Wp+2 for the equations which belong to Wp+1 andthere exist certain identities which belong to Wp+3 for the identities in Wp+2 andso on At the field theoretical level these identities correspond to Bianchi identitiesfor the first level gauge transformations higher identities correspond to the Bianchiidentities for the deeper levels of gauge transformations

12The sign factor (minus)pminusr+1 before fpr(Ω Ω) is ignored and is thought of as the part of thedefinition of fpr(Ω Ω)

18

A remark should be made that the forms belonging to Wq may have differentdegrees if there are Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles present As a result spaces Wq

may contain different number of elements For instance (319) can be reduced to(320) if one defines

Wq =

W 1q q lt pminus r

W 1q W

2qminusp+r q ge (pminus r)

(321)

where W 1q and W 2

qminusp+r take values in g-modules R1 and R2 respectively In termsof (319) the elements of Wq for q lt (pminus r) were referred to as ξ1q the elements ofWq for q = (pminus r)(pminus 1) to as ξ1q ξ

2qminusp+r the elements ofWq for q = p to as W 1

pW 2

r the elements of Wq for q gt p to as R1q R

2qminusp+r (the equations of motion and

Bianchi identities)

32 Interpretation of Unfolded Systems Describing free Fields

When describing free fields unfolded formulations will be referred to as frame-like [61 60] though the very term frame-like has a more broad definition Thesesystems consist of equations (37) describing background geometry of a finite chainof (317)-like equations describing the gauge fields of the model and of (317)-likeequations with q = 0 glued to gauge forms ie it requires a Lie algebra g (commonlyiso(dminus1 1) so(dminus1 2) or so(d 1)) a set of g-modules R0RN and an appropriateset of nontrivial Chevalley-Eilenberg cocycles f01fNminus1N The physical degreesof freedom are contained in the forms of zero degree and the module RN in whichzero degree forms take values is infinite-dimensional

Since frame-like unfolded systems contain inevitably infinitely many fields mostof them being either auxiliary or Stueckelberg13 there arises a problem of reconstruc-tion a metric-like formulation by a given unfolded formulation or of extracting thedynamical content for a given unfolded system

The questions to be answered are what are the dynamical fields what arethe differential gauge parameters and what are the gauge invariant equations ofmotion These answers are not universal and depend on the chosen scheme ofinterpretation Different interpretations correspond to dual descriptions of the samedynamical system

Frame-like unfolded systems are endowed at the linearized level with additionalstructures providing a natural way for interpretation Indices AB vary overcertain finite dimensional Lorentz irreps ie each of Rn n = 0 N decomposes asRn =

sum

k Pnk where Pnk are certain so(d minus 1 1)-modules characterized by Ynk

Young diagrams of Section 1We say that some frame-like unfolded system is given an interpretation if [62]

1 On the whole space W =oplusinfin

q=0Wq where the matter gauge fields gauge pa-rameters equations of motion and Bianchi identities take values there exists

13A field is called Stueckelberg if it can be gauged away by pure algebraic symmetry

19

a bounded from below grading g = 0 1 ie Wq =oplusinfin

g=0Wgq The ho-

mogeneous element of Wgq is a certain differential form with values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep and is denoted as W gq In simplest cases the grade is just the

rank of the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep the element of Wgq takes values in

2 The closed subsector of one-forms ΩI describes a background geometry vizMinkowski or (anti)-de Sitter The generalized covariant derivative D is to bedivided into three parts the last one not being necessary nontrivial

D = DL minus σminus + σ+ (322)

where DL is a background Lorentz-covariant derivative and has a zero gradeσminus is an operator of grade (minus1) and σ+ contains positive grade operatorsThe only differential part is in DL whereas σplusmn acts vertically and is built ofthe background vielbein ha If two modules are glued the gluing element issupposed to be of grade (minus1) and also denoted as σminus

The equations then have the form

DLWn +

gminusnsum

i=1

σ+(W n+i

)= σminus

(W n+1

) g = 0 1 (323)

and analogously for the gauge transformations In the flat space all operators ofpositive grade appear to be trivial for the massless case As it does not affect theanalysis let us consider a simplified version with σ+ = 0 Then D2 = DL

2+σminusDL+DLσminus + (σminus)

2 = 0 is equivalent to DL2 = 0 (σminus)

2 = 0 and σminusDL +DLσminus = 0 Thefirst is a part of the flatness condition (38) for the iso(d minus 1 1)-connection Thesecond is the nilpotancy condition for σminus The third is satisfied provided that σminus istwisted by the factor (minus)∆g where (∆g + 1) is a degree of σminus which is equal to thenumber of the vielbeins ha that σminus is built of Indeed the vielbeins ha anticommutewith DL and hence the action of σminus is to be twisted by the factor (minus)∆g in orderσminusDL +DLσminus = 0 holds true Without further mention the pure sign factor (minus)∆g

will be though of as a part of the definition of σminusIt is useful to illustrate the action of σminus when for example unfolded equations

on fields with values in two modules R1 and R2 are glued as in (319)

R1︷ ︸︸ ︷

R2︷ ︸︸ ︷ g

q

t t t t

t t t

W 1p

ξ1pminus1

ξ10

W 2r

ξ2rminus1

ξ20

(324)

20

where short arrows stand for the action of σminus within each module and long arrowsfor the action of σminus between two modules (gluing terms) and dots stand for gaugefieldsparameters at different grades bold dots represent the elements of Wp =W 1

pW2r

All information about the dynamics turns out to be concealed in cohomologygroups of σminus [62] H(σminus) =

Ker(σminus)Im(σminus)

Let us analyze unfolded system (320) whichat grade g has the form

δξg1 = DLξg0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 )

δW gp = DLξ

gpminus1 + σminus(ξ

g+1pminus1)

0 = DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p )

(325)

Beginning from the deepest level of gauge transformations and from the lowestgrade it is obvious that those ξg+1

0 that are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueck-elberg(algebraic) gauge parameters for those ξg1 that belong to the image of σminusTherefore those ξg1 that are σminus-exact can be gauged away The leftover gauge sym-metry satisfies δξg1 = DLξ

g0 + σminus(ξ

g+10 ) = 0 so that those ξg+1

0 that belong to thecoimage of σminus are expressed via derivative of ξn0 Having sieved W0 and W1 inthis way only those ξg0 are still independent that are σminus-closed and hence belong toH

0(σminus) since only forms of zero-degree are elements of W0 Then those ξg+11 that

are not σminus-closed can be treated as Stueckelberg gauge parameters for those ξg2 thatbelong to the image of σminus Therefore only those ξg1 are still independent that areσminus-closed but not σminus-exact and hence belong to H

1(σminus) Having sievedW0Wpminus1

one after another it turns out that independent differential gauge parameters at thek-th level are given by H

pminusk(σminus) Analogously those fields W gp that are σminus-exact

can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gauge parameters at Wpminus1 Thosefields W g+1

p that are not σminus-closed can be expressed via derivatives of fields at lowergrade by virtue of the equations Rg

p+1 equiv DLWgp + σminus(W

g+1p ) = 0 these fields are

called auxiliary Therefore the dynamical fields ie those that are neither aux-iliary nor Stueckelberg are given by H

p(σminus) The nilpotency of D2 equiv 0 impliescertain relations of the form DLR

gp+1 + σminus(R

g+1p+1) = 0 between Rg

p+1 Therefore

auxiliary fields are expressed by virtue of σminus-exact Rgp+1 and σminus-non-closed Rg+1

p+1

are themselves expressed via derivatives of Rgp+1 Consequently the independent

equations on dynamical fields are given by Hp+1(σminus) From the cohomological point

of view higher degree forms correspond to certain nontrivial relations between equa-tions called Bianchi identities and manifest gauge nature of equations As there aregenerally more than one levels of gauge transformations one can expect the highercohomological group to be nontrivial

To sum up

21

cohomology group interpretation

Hpminusk k = 1p differential gauge parameters at the k-th level of re-

ducibilityH

p dynamical fieldsH

p+1 independent gauge invariant equations on dynamicalfields

Hp+k+1 k = 1p Bianchi identities for the k-th order gauge symmetryH

p+k k gt p supposed to be trivial in a regular case

To distinguish fields in cohomological sense the following convention is introduced[63]

Stueckelberg fields(gauge parameters) are those that can be eliminated bypure algebraic symmetry ie these fields are σminus-exact (are those that canbe used to gauge away certain fields ie these parameters are not σminus-closed)

Auxiliary fields are those that can be expressed via derivatives of some otherfields ie these fields are σminus-nonclosed Let us note that this definition isgenerally ambiguous eg in system

partA = B

partB = A(326)

which field is auxiliary is a matter of choice This ambiguity is removed byvirtue of grade[62 63]

Dynamical fields are those that are neither auxiliary nor Stueckelberg ie thesefields are representatives of σminus-cohomology classes

Note that if certain dynamical field given by Hp belongs to the grade-gf subspace

Wgfp and the corresponding equations given by H

p+1 belong to the grade-ge subspaceWge

p+1 the order of equations is equal to ge minus gf + 1If the unfolded system is supposed to admit a lagrangian formulation there has

to be a one-to-one correspondence between the number of dynamical fields and thatof equations k-th level gauge symmetries and k-th level Bianchi identities ie in acertain sense there should be a duality H

pminusk sim Hp+1+k k isin [0 p] This takes place

for all unfolded systems exemplified in this paperSince the operators involved ie DL and σminus are of grade 0 and minus1 only the

fields with the grade greater than g0 for any g0 ge 0 form a quotient module thusdescribing the same system on its own - dual formulations This picture partlybreaks in (A)dSd because of appearance of grade +1 nilpotent operator σ+

D = DL + σminus + λ2σ+ (327)

The specific character of frame-like unfolded systems which will be crucial forus is that by virtue of the inverse background vielbein hmicroa all form indices of any

gauge fieldparameter Wa1(s1)ap(sm)q can be converted to the fiber ones

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (328)

22

The resulting tensor W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is not irreducible and can be decomposedinto so(dminus 1 1)-irreps according to the so(dminus 1 1)-tensor product rule

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] =rArr Ys1 smotimes

so(dminus11)

Y(1 q) =oplus

α

Yα (329)

where one-column Young diagramY(1 q) of height-q represents the anti-symmetricindices d1 dq and Yα are the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the tensor product decomposesinto Having converted all fields (parameters equations) of a given unfolded systemto the fiber tensors one can make the identification of the fields in the unfolded ap-proach and those of the metric-like approach though the general covariance gaugeinvariance and other advantages of the unfolded formalism will be not manifestWhile constructing the unfolded formulations of a known metric-like systems or in-terpreting a given unfolded system in terms of metric-like fields this technique willbe widely used Moreover the calculation of σminus cohomology groups is largely basedon the explicit evaluation of (329)-like expressions Once an unfolded form is knownno use of this technique is needed either to generalize it to other backgrounds or tointroduce interactions

Field W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] is traceless in a1 am and d1 dq separatelyHowever the cross traces need not vanish and hence some of Yα represent tracesTo distinguish between the traces of different orders let us introduce the followingthe Y-valued degree-q form WY

q is said to be a trace of the r-th order iff it has theform

WYq = hh

︸︷︷︸

r

hh︸︷︷︸

qminusr

CYprime

0 (330)

for some Yprime-valued degree-0 form CYprime

0 where (q minus r) indices of the backgroundvielbeins ha are contracted with the tensor representing Yprime and r indices are freefor the whole expression to take values in Y the appropriate Young symmetrizeris implied When the indices of WY

q are converted to the fiber ones the expression

takes the form ηη︸ ︷︷ ︸

r

CYprime ie CYprime

represents a trace of the r-th order

Different aspects of unfolding are illustrated on the examples of a massless scalarfield a massless spin-one field and a massless spin-s and spin-(s + 1

2) fields

33 Examples of Unfolding

Example 331 Unfolding a scalar field [31 62] First it should be noted thatit is easy of course to convert the Klein-Gordon equation C = 0 to a system offirst order equations

partmicroC = Cmicro

partmicroCmicro = 0(331)

but when writing the second equation the explicit form of the metric is to be usedhence these equations are not of unfolded form (31)

23

Described in terms of a scalar field C(x) the theory is brought into a non gaugeform therefore zero-forms only are allowed or else there would be some gaugesymmetry according to (34) The most general rhs of dC = has the form

dC = haCa (332)

for some vector-valued zero-form Ca This equation just parameterizes the firstderivative of C(x) and is similar to the first of (331) There are three terms allowedon the rhs of dCa =

dCa = hbCab + hbC

ab + haC prime (333)

with Cab Cab and C prime taking values in antisymmetric symmetric and scalar so(dminus1 1)-irreps ie bull The first term is forbidden by Bianchi identity hadC

a equiv 0To analyze the remaining terms let us decompose dCa into so(dminus 1 1)-irreps

partmicroCahmicrob = otimes = oplus oplus bull (334)

where = part[aCb] = part(aCa) minus 1dηaapartbC

b bull = partaCa = C

The component represents Bianchi identity in the first order reformulation ofthe Klein-Gordon equation Indeed expressing Ca as partaC implies part[aCb] equiv 0 bullrepresents the desired Klein-Gordon equation whereas is the only component al-lowed to be nonzero on-mass-shell Therefore to impose the Klein-Gordon equationthe term haC prime has to be omitted

dCa = hbCab (335)

The only possible rhs for dCaa = compatible with Jacobi identity hbdCab equiv 0

is of the form dCaa = hbCaab for Caaa taking values in a rank-three symmetric

so(d minus 1 1)-irrep ie The process of unfolding continues unambiguously inthis way and results in the full system

dCa(k) = hbCa(k)b equiv F a(k)(C) k = 0 1 (336)

where Ca(k) is rank-k totally symmetric traceless field ie taking values in k

so(dminus 1 1)-irrepTo make a connection with the general statement of Section 1 for Y = Y(0 0)

the general scheme results in

Yg bull

n k 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 0 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore spaces Wq and operator σminus which enters D = DL minus σminus should be definedas

Wq = WqWaq W

aaq (337)

24

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbWa(gminus1)bq g gt 0

(338)

Consequently W is a space of various differential forms with values in totally sym-metric traceless so(d minus 1 1)-tensors graded by the form degree and by the rankof so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Space Wq forms an irreducible iso(d minus 1 1)-module System(336) reads

Dω0 = 0 ω0 isin W0 (339)

The cohomology groups of σminus are easy to find

H0(σminus) = C(x) as the lowest grade field is automatically closed σminus(C) = 0 and it

cannot be exact as a form of zero degree Contrariwise zero-forms with gradegreater than zero are not closed σminus(C

k+1) = hbCa(k)b = 0lArrrArr Ck+1 = 0

H1(σminus) = haB(x)0 for some B(x)0 isin W

00 One-form Ba

1 = haB(x)0 is closedσminus(B

a1) = haB

a1 = hah

aB(x)0 equiv 0 and it cannot be represented as σminus(C2) =

hbCab as far as Cab is traceless The cohomology groups at higher grade are

trivial since σminus(haBa(k)(x)0) 6= 0 for k gt 0

Hqgt1(σminus) = empty as one can make sure

The interpretation in terms of Section 32 is as follows as is expected the dynamicalfield given by H

0 is C(x) The equations are given by the projection of dCa = hbCab

to H1 ie C = 0 The fields with k gt 0 are auxiliary being expressed via

derivatives of C(x) Ca(k) = partapartaC(x) Inasmuch as there is no gauge symmetryin the system the higher cohomology groups are trivial

An infinitely many dual formulations of a massless scalar field are also includedIndeed the fields with k ge k0 gt 0 form a quotient module Rk0 ie one canconsistently write

dCk = σminus(Ck+1) k ge k0 (340)

The first equationdCa(k0) = hbC

a(k0)b (341)

imposes on the dynamical field Ca(k0)

partbCba(k0minus1) = 0

part[bCc]a(k0minus1) = 0(342)

which imply at least locally Ca(k0) =

k0︷ ︸︸ ︷

partaparta C and C = 0 for some fieldC(x) All fields at higher grade are auxiliary This statement is confirmed bythe cohomology analysis H

0(Rk0 σminus) = Ck0 ie scalar is described in termsof a traceless rank-k0 symmetric tensor field subjected to the equations given byH

1(Rk0 σminus) = haBa(k0minus1)0 minus k0(k0minus1)

2(d+2k0minus4)ηaahcB

a(k0minus2)c0 +hcB

a(k0)c0 for B

a(k0minus1)0 B

a(k0)c0

taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps characterized by diagrams k0 minus 1 k0

These two elements represents just the components ofWk0

1 sim k0 otimes with the

25

symmetry of k0 minus 1 (trace) andk0

the third component with the symmetryof k0 + 1 is exact

The above results can be easily extended to (A)dSd background and to a massivescalar field [62]

DLCk = σminus(C

k+1) + σ+(Ckminus1) = 0 (343)

where there appears a nontrivial positive grade operator

σ+(Ckminus1) = (m2 minus λ2k(k + dminus 1))

(

haCa(kminus1) minus(sminus 1)

d+ 2k minus 4ηaahbC

a(kminus1)b

)

(344)

and DL is a Lorentz-covariant derivative in (A)dSd In the (A)dSd case the situationis more interesting due to the appearance of σ+ operator and the possibility of theaccidental degeneracy of σ+ when m2 = λ2kprime(kprime + dminus 1) for some kprime [62]

Example 332 Unfolding Maxwell equations [64 65] An example of masslessspin-one field is more interesting as a gauge system The main object is a one-formAmicro From gauge transformation law

δA1 = dξ0 (345)

it follows that there should not be other forms of rank greater than zero If this werethe case the gauge parameters of these new forms would be involved by virtue of(34) making the gauge law for A1 inappropriate Indeed there are two possibilitiesto introduce higher degree forms on the rhs of dA = (i) dA1 = R2 fora scalar valued degree-two form R2 which possesses its own gauge parameter χ1δR2 = dχ1 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law for A1 is modifiedto δA1 = dξ0 + χ1 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg gaugeparameter χ1 This case corresponds to contractible free differential algebras (310)(ii) dA1 = hbω

b1 for a vector valued degree-one form ωa

1 which possesses its owngauge parameter ǫa0 In accordance with (34) the gauge transformation law forA1 is modified to δA1 = dξ0 + hbǫ

b0 so that A1 can be gauged away by virtue of

Stueckelberg gauge parameter ǫa0 Consequently in both cases A1 can be made non-dynamical which is not what was expected Therefore the only possibility is tointroduce a zero-form C

[ab]0 anti-symmetric in a b parameterizing by virtue of

dA1 = hahbC[ab]0 (346)

the Maxwell field strength Bianchi identity hahbdC[ab]0 equiv 0 tolerates two terms on

the rhs of dC[ab]0 =

dC[ab]0 = hcC

[ab]c0 + h[aC

b]0 (347)

with C[ab]c0 and Ca

0 taking values in and so(dminus 1 1)-irreps the former taken inantisymmetric basis In order to determine which of the terms should be omittedif any the decomposition of the first derivative of the Maxwell field strength intoLorentz irreps has to be analyzed

C [ab]|c equiv partmicroC[ab]hmicroc = otimes = oplus oplus (348)

26

where = part[aCbc] = partbCab and = partcC [ab] minus part[cCab] + 2

dminus1ηc[apartdC

b]d part[aCbc]

is identically zero provided that C [ab] is expressed via the first derivative of Amicroor represents the second pair of Maxwell equations in terms of field strength C [ab]In both cases this component should be zero and moreover this can not be keptnonzero as there is no hcC

[abc]-like term allowed on the rhs of (347) The secondpartbC

ab is the desired Maxwell equations in terms of Amicro or the first pair of Maxwellequations in terms of the field strength Consequently to impose Maxwell equationsterm h[aCb] has to be omitted whereas the third is the only component allowed tobe nonzero on-mass-shell

Again unfolding continues unambiguously and requires an infinite set of fields

C[ab]c(k)0 taking values14 in

kto be introduced

dC [ab]c(k) = hdC[ab]c(k)d k = 0 1 (349)

The full system has the form

dA1 = hahbCab0 equiv F (AC) δA1 = dξ0

dC[ab]c(k)0 = hdC

[ab]c(k)d0 equiv F [ab]c(k)(C) k = 0 1

(350)

and represents two modules being glued together by the term on the rhs of thefirst equation

For Y = Y(1 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 resultsin

Yg bull

n k 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 1 q1 = 0 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

therefore

Wq =

W0 q = 0

WqW[ab]qminus1W

[ab]cqminus1 q gt 0

(351)

let us point out the shortening of W0 The action of σminus on Wq isin Wq is defined as

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hahbW[ab]qminus1 g = 1

hdW[ab]c(gminus2)dqminus1 g gt 1

(352)

With D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (350) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (353)

14The fields C [ab]c(k) are taken in antisymmetric basis ie they are antisymmetric in a bsymmetric in c(k) and C [abd]c(kminus1)equiv0

27

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 0 form a finite-dimensional iso(dminus1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g gt0 form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

Again the cohomology groups are easy to find gauge parameters are given byH

0(σminus) = ξ0 dynamical fields by H1(σminus) = A1 Maxwell equations by H

2(σminus) =

h[aBb]0 and the Bianchi identities for the first order gauge transformations by

H3(σminus) = hahbB0 the rest of groups are empty H

kgt3(σminus) = empty Important is thedirect correspondence between the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2

the gauge parameters in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3There are infinitely many of non-gauge dual formulations based on C [ab]c(k0) eg

for k0 = 0 one recovers the Maxwell equations in terms of the field strength

part[aCbc] = 0

partbCab = 0

(354)

Let us note that the ambiguity at the first step of unfolding (the terms haC prime andh[aCb] in the above two examples) expresses the possibility of introducing a massterm

Example 333 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-s field [31 6466] We start from the metric-like description of a massless spin-s field in termsof a double-traceless symmetric rank-s field φmicro1micros

satisfying (213) the secondorder equations are invariant with respect to the first order gauge transformationwith traceless rank-(s minus 1) gauge parameter ξmicro1microsminus1 Inasmuch as the Young di-agram s of so(d minus 2) is of the height one there are gauge transforma-tions of the first level only Therefore the dynamical field in the unfolded ap-proach has to be a one-form There is only one way to identify φmicro1micros

and ξmicro1microsminus1

with certain ωY01 and ξY0

0 taking values in the same so(d minus 1 1)-irrep Y0 namely

Y0 = sminus 1 ie ωa(sminus1)1 and ξ

a(sminus1)0 takes values in a rank-(s minus 1) symmet-

ric traceless tensors Field φmicro1microsis identified with a totally symmetric part of

ωa(sminus1)1 ie φmicro1micros

= hb1(micro1hbsminus1

microsminus1ωa1asminus1

micros)ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 the double-tracelessness

condition is the consequence of the tracelessness of ωa(sminus1)1 in a1asminus1 ξmicro1microsminus1

is identified with ξa(sminus1)0 directly ξmicro1microsminus1 = hb1micro1

hbsminus1microsminus1

ξa1asminus1ηa1b1 ηasminus1bsminus1 andone can make sure that the Fronsdalrsquos gauge transformation law is recovered fromδω

a(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 Field ω

a(sminus1)1 has a redundant component with the symmetry

ofsminus 1

which can be made Stueckelberg by virtue of gauge parameter ξa(sminus1)b

with the same symmetry type ie

δωa(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)c0 (355)

It automatically follows that there is a degree-one gauge field ωa(sminus1)b1 coupled with

ωa(sminus1)1 as

dωa(sminus1)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)c1 (356)

28

The only solution to Bianchi identity hcdωa(sminus1)c1 equiv 0 is15

dωa(sminus1)b1 = hcω

a(sminus1)bc1 (357)

where a new field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

is introduced and so on

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1 (358)

until the field with the symmetry ofsminus 1

for which the Bianchi identity solvesas

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 (359)

where field Ca(s)b(s)0 represents a generalized Weyl tensor and has the symmetry of

s The solution of Bianchi identity hchddC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 equiv 0 has the form

dCa(s)b(s)0 = hc

(

Ca(s)cb(s)0 +

s

2C

a(s)bb(sminus1)c0

)

(360)

where Ca(s+1)b(s)0 has the symmetry of s

s+ 1 The second term on the rhs

of (360) supplements the first one to have a proper Young symmetry Further

unfolding requires a set of degree-zero forms Ca(s+i)b(s)0 taking values in so(dminus1 1)-

irreps characterized by Young diagrams ss+ i

The full system has theform

dωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = hcω

a(sminus1)b(k)c1

δωa(sminus1)b(k)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(k)0 + hcξ

a(sminus1)b(k)c0 k isin [0 sminus 2]

dωa(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = hchdC

a(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 δω

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)1 = dξ

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0

dCa(s+i)b(s) = hc

(

Ca(s+i)cb(s) +s

i+ 2Ca(s+i)bb(sminus1)c

)

i isin [0infin)

(361)

By the construction the system incorporates Fronsdalrsquos field φmicro1microswith the correct

gauge law but there is still to be proved that the Fronsdalrsquos equations are reallyimposed and that there are no other dynamical fields in the system Let us recon-struct Fronsdalrsquos equations (213) whereas the second statement will be proved asa part of a more general theorem The first two equations of (361) read

partmicroωa(sminus1)ν minus partνω

a(sminus1)micro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)cν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)cmicro (362)

partmicroωa(sminus1)bν minus partνω

a(sminus1)bmicro = hcmicroω

a(sminus1)bcν minus hcνω

a(sminus1)bcmicro (363)

It is convenient to convert all world indices to the fiber ones

partcωa(sminus1)|d minus partdωa(sminus1)|c = ωa(sminus1)c|d minus ωa(sminus1)d|c (364)

partcωa(sminus1)b|d minus partdωa(sminus1)b|c = ωa(sminus1)bc|d minus ωa(sminus1)bd|c (365)

15The proof is not given as more general statement about the solutions of such equations isproved in the next Section

29

where ωa(sminus1)|b equiv ωa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro ωa(sminus1)bb|c equiv ω

a(sminus1)bbmicro hcmicro

Contracting (365) with ηbd and then symmetrizing c with a1asminus1 results in

partcωa(sminus1)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus1)c|c= 0 (366)

By symmetrizing in (364) a1asminus1 with d

ωa(sminus1)c|a = partcωa(sminus1)|a minus partaωa(sminus1)|c (367)

and then by contracting (364) with ηdasminus1

ωa(sminus1)c|

c= (sminus 1)

(

partcωa(sminus2)c|a minus partaω

a(sminus2)c|c

)

(368)

all the terms of (366) can be expressed via ωa(sminus1)|b Plugging these to (366) gives

ωa(sminus1)|a minus partapartc((sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c

)+ (sminus 1)partapartaω

a(sminus2)c|c= 0 (369)

where ωa(sminus1)|a is to be identified with Fronsdalrsquos field φa(s) as ωa(sminus1)|a = 1sφa(s)

then ωa(sminus2)c|

c= 1

2φa(sminus2)c

c (sminus 1)ωa(sminus2)c|a + ωa(sminus1)|c = φa(sminus1)c and the equation

acquires the Fronsdalrsquos form (213)

φa(s) minus spartapartcφa(sminus1)c + s(sminus1)

2partapartaφ

a(sminus2)cc= 0 (370)

For Y = Y(s 1) ie N = 1 and p = 1 the general scheme of Section 1 results in

Yg sminus 1 sminus 1 s

ss+ 1

n k 1 0 1 sminus 1 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = sminus 1 g = s g = s+ 1

qg q0 = 1 qsminus1 = 1 qs = 0 qs+1 = 0

therefore

Wq =

Wa(sminus1)0 W

a(sminus1)b0 W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)0 q = 0

Wa(sminus1)q W

a(sminus1)bq W

a(sminus1)b(sminus1)q W

a(s)b(s)qminus1 W

a(s+1)b(s)qminus1 q gt 0

(371)and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hcWa(sminus1)b(gminus1)cq g isin [1 sminus 1]

hchdWa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)dqminus1 g = s

hc

(

Wa(gminussminus1)cb(s)qminus1 + s

gminuss+1W

a(gminussminus1)bb(sminus1)cqminus1

)

g gt s

(372)

With D = DL minus σminus full system (361) can be rewritten as

Dω1 = 0 δω1 = Dξ0 (373)

30

where ω1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 1 k = 0 sminus 1 sim g isin [0 sminus 1]form a finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-module whereas the fields with n = 0 k =0 1 sim g ge s form an infinite-dimensional iso(dminus 1 1)-module

The representatives of cohomology classes can be chosen as H0 = ξ

a(sminus1)0 H1 =

hbφa(sminus1)b H2 = hbhcG

a(sminus1)c minus hahcGa(sminus2)bc + γηaahahcG

a(sminus4)bcnn+ (βηabhahc +

αηaahbhc)Ga(sminus3)cn

n16 H

3 = hbhahcχa(sminus2)c H

kgt3 = empty where φa(s) and Ga(s) are

double-traceless tensor fields and ξa(sminus1) and χa(sminus1) are traceless H01 are nontrivialat the lowest grade whereas H

23 are nontrivial at grade-one therefore the orderof equations that are imposed on the dynamical field is equal to two It turns outthat there is no need in the explicit form for α β and γ it is sufficient to find outthe Young symmetry of representatives only The uniqueness of Fronsdalrsquos theoryat the level of action was demonstrated in [67] and at the level of equations in[6 53] Consequently there is no need for equations (370) to be found explicitly -those of Fronsdal are the only possible Again there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the number of fields in H

1 and the equations in H2 the gauge parameters

in H0 and the Bianchi identities in H

3 The system contains an infinitely many ofdual formulations those that have field W

a(sminus1)b(k0)1 at the lowest grade are gauge

dual descriptions whereas those that have field Ca(s+k0)b(s) at the lowest grade arenon-gauge Dual description based on field W

a(sminus1)b(1)1 was elaborated in [68]

Example 334 Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field[69

70 31] Unfolding a totally symmetric massless spin-(s+ 12) field results in literally

the same unfolded system (361 373) but with fields taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that are irreducible spin-tensors with the same tensor part as in the bosoniccase Note that operator σminus is not modified but the σminus cohomology groups areslightly changed such that the equations become of the first order

The Dirac equation Unfolded system (336) or equivalently (339) describesa massless spin-1

2field provided that Ck take values in s 1

2so(dminus1 1)-irreps

ie Ck equiv Cαa(k) and Γαb βC

βba(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equation of (336)

partmicroCα = hmicroaC

αa (374)

with hbmicroΓβb α

gives the Dirac equation

Γαa βpart

aCβ = 0 (375)

the rest of equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives of dynamicalfield Cα

The Rarita-Schwinger equation Unfolded system (350) or equivalently(353) describes a massless spin-3

2field provided that irreducible tensors in (351)

are replaced by the corresponding irreducible tensor-spinors ie A1 equiv Aαmicro C

k equiv

Cα[ab]c(k) and Γαb βC

β[ab]c(k) = 0 Γαd βC

β[ab]dc(kminus1) = 0 Contracting the first equa-tion of (350)

1

2(partmicroA

αν minus partνA

αmicro) = hmicroahνbC

α[ab] (376)

16α = minus (s(d+sminus5)minusd+6)(sminus2)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6) β = (sminus2)

(d+sminus4) γ = (d+sminus6)(sminus2)(sminus3)2(d+sminus4)(d+2sminus6)

31

with Γ-matrices and converting world indices micro ν to the fiber ones according toAαa equiv Aα

microhamicro gives the Rarita-Schwinger equation

Γαb βpart

bAβa minus partaΓαb βA

βb = 0 δAαa = partaξα (377)

The rest of unfolded equations express auxiliary fields in terms of derivatives ofdynamical field Aα

microThe Fang-Fronsdal equation for a spin-(s + 1

2) massless field Unfolded

system (361) or equivalently (373) describes a massless spin-(s + 12) field pro-

vided that irreducible tensors in (371) are replaced by the corresponding irreducibletensor-spinors With all world indices converted to the fiber ones the first equationof (361) has the form

Gαa(sminus1)|[cd] equiv partcωβa(sminus1)|d minus partdωβa(sminus1)|c = ωβa(sminus1)c|d minus ωβa(sminus1)d|c (378)

where ωαa(sminus1)|b equiv ωαa(sminus1)micro hbmicro ωαa(sminus1)b|c equiv ω

αa(sminus1)bmicro hcmicro

Analogously to the bosonic case nonsymmetric component of ωβa(sminus1)|d canbe gauged away algebraically Hence the Fronsdalrsquos field φαa(s) is identified asωαa(sminus1)|a = 1

sφαa(s) Then Γα

b βφβa(s) = Γα

b βωβa(sminus1)|b Γα

b βΓβc γφ

γa(sminus2)bc = ηbcωαa(sminus2)b|c

and the Fronsdalrsquos triple Γ-traceless constraint is a consequence of irreducibility ofωαa(sminus1)|b in α a1asminus1 and the lack of any conditions with respect to a1asminus1 andb Since the Fronsdalrsquos field contains three irreducible components with the sym-metry of s 1

2 s-1 1

2and s-2 1

2 the equations of motion has to be

nontrivial in these three sectors too The projector on the dynamical equations issimply Γα

b βGβa(sminus1)b|a and gives

Γαb βpart

bφβa(s) minus spartaΓαb βφ

βa(sminus1)b = 0 (379)

which is in accordance with (222) But we would like to note that there aretwo components with the symmetry of s-1 1

2 namely ηbcG

αa(sminus2)b|ac and

Γαb βΓ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] The correct projector on this component of the equations isgiven by the combination

2(sminus 1)ηbcGαa(sminus2)b|ac minus γαb βγ

βc γG

γa(sminus1)|[bc] (380)

which is identically zero when Gαa(sminus1)|[bc] is expressed via ωβa(sminus1)c|d by virtue of(378) Therefore it is (380) that does not express certain part of ωβa(sminus1)c|d interms of first derivatives of the dynamical field φαa(s) and thus this is a dynamicalequation Obviously (380) is a representative of σminus cohomology group H

2g=0 In

terms of φαa(s) the representative has the form

Γαb βpart

bΓβc γφ

γa(sminus1)c minus partcφαa(sminus1)c +

(sminus 1)

2partaφ

αa(sminus2)cc= 0 (381)

which is equal to the Γ-trace of (379) The gauge transformations has the form

δφαa(s) = partaξαa(sminus1) (382)

32

where Γαb βξ

βa(sminus2)b = 0Consequently unfolded equations for totally symmetric bosonic fields are proved

to completely determine the unfolded equations for totally symmetric fermionicfields Though σminus is not modified in the fermionic case σminus cohomology groupsare changed since the fermionic dynamical equations are of the first order

4 Unfolding Mixed-Symmetry Fields

First in Section 41 an example of the simplest massless mixed-symmetry field ofspin- is investigated in detail and leading arguments are given for a spin- fieldSecond the general statement on arbitrary mixed-symmetry fields is proved whereastechnical details are collected in Sections 44 and 45 The analysis of the numberof physical degrees of freedom is carried out in Section 43

41 Simplest Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Example 411 Spin- field In the metric-like approach a spin- field is mini-mally described[16 17] by the subjected to (215) field φ[micromicro]ν that takes values in a

reducible so(dminus 1 1)-representation oplus the latter component is identified withthe trace φ ν

microν The gauge transformations (216) has two levels of reducibility with

two gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξA[microν] taking values in oplus bull so(dminus 1 1)-irreps at the

first level and one parameter ξmicro taking values in so(d minus 1 1)-irrep at the secondlevel (217)

First the metric-like field φ[micromicro]ν has to be incorporated into certain differentialform eYq which is called a physical vielbein the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y and the degreeq to be defined below To make the symmetries both of the first and of the secondlevel of reducibility manifest the degree of the physical vielbein has to be two atleast

Moreover were the physical vielbein taken to be a degree-one form not all of thegauge symmetries even at the first level would be manifest Indeed there are twopossibilities for physical vielbein eY1 to contain a component with the symmetry of

Namely Y = and Y = since otimes = oplus oplus and otimes = oplus oplus

The associated differential gauge parameter is ξ0 in the first case and ξ0 in thesecond case Inasmuch as the gauge parameters are the forms of degree-zero onlyone of the required two parameters is present in each of the cases

The degree of the physical vielbein has to be not greater than two if the com-ponent associated with the metric-like field φmicromicroν is required not to be a certaintrace part The reason why a dynamical field should not be a certain trace part isexplained in the next Section

Therefore the physical vielbein has to be of degree-two and has to take valuesin so(dminus 1 1)-irrep that belongs to the vector representation ie e2 equiv ea2 equiv eamicroν

The associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξa1 equiv ξamicro contains in its Lorentz decomposition

otimes = oplus oplusbull both anti-symmetric ξAmicroν = ξa[microhbν]ηab and symmetric ξSmicroν = ξa(microh

bν)ηab

33

gauge parameters the latter enters along with the trace ξamicrohmicroa There exists a second

level gauge parameter χa0 which is directly identified with ξmicro as ξmicro = hbmicroχ

aηabThere are no redundant components in the gauge parameter However physicalvielbein e2 contains one redundant component in its decomposition into Lorentz

irreps otimes = oplus oplus The first and the second components are to be associatedwith a traceful φmicromicroν whereas the third one totally anti-symmetric component e[a|bc]

of ea|bc = eamicroνhbmicrohcν is a redundant one and has to be made non-dynamical In order

to do so algebraic gauge parameter ξ[abc]0 with the symmetry of is introduced It

is obvious from pure algebraic gauge law

δea2 = hbhcξ[abc]0 (41)

that the redundant component can be fixed to zero and ea2 can be directly identifiedwith φmicromicroν as e

amicromicro = φmicromicroνh

aν From gauge transformation laws δea2 = dξa1 δξa1 = dχa

0

ie δeamicroν = 12

(partmicroξ

aν minus partνξ

amicro

) δξamicro = partmicroχ

a required gauge transformations (216)(217) for metric-like field φmicromicroν and for the first order gauge parameters ξS(microν) ξ

A[microν]

are easily recoveredSince in the unfolded approach each gauge parameter possesses its own gauge

field and vice-verse associated with ξ[abc]0 gauge field ω

[abc]1 enters as

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 (42)

which determines the first equation Applying d to this equation results in Bianchiidentity hbhcdω

[abc]1 equiv 0 which has a unique solution of the form

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 (43)

with C[abc][df ]0 having the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensor of a spin-

field ie it is anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and C[abcd]f0 equiv 0 To clarify the form of

the solution let C[abc]|[df ]0 be a degree-zero form anti-symmetric in [abc] [df ] and with

no definite symmetry between these two groups of indices The Bianchi identityimplies hbhchdhfC

[abc]|[df ]0 equiv 0 which is equivalent to C

a[bc|df ]0 equiv 0 since vielbeins

ha anticommute Therefore the solution is parameterized by those components of

C[abc]|[df ]0 sim otimes that has the symmetry of Young diagrams with no more than

three rows since the requirement for total anti-symmetrization of any four indicesto give zero is the characteristic property of Young diagrams with at most three

rows otimes ni is the only component of zero trace order17 with three rows andthere are no components with the number of rows less than three Alternatively one

17Although there are trace components with the number of rows less than four eg theirtensor product by the metric ηab contains components with the symmetry of the sl(d)-Young

diagrams with more than three rows Nontrivial trace with the symmetry of corresponds tothe mass-like term Hence traceful tensors either do not satisfy the Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms

34

could search for the solution in the sector of degree-one forms as dω[abc]1 = hdC

[abc]|d1

with some C[abc]|d1 but Bianchi identity hbhchdC

[abc]|d1 equiv 0 implies that the only

component of C[abc]|d1 sim otimes that is allowed must have less than three rows which

is impossible since [abc] makes Young diagrams of otimes consist of three rows atleast18 Thus one has to search for the solution among the forms of less degree

Further unfolding requires a set of fields C [abc][df ]g(k) with the symmetry ofk

to be introduced and the full system has the form

dea2 = hbhcω[abc]1 δea2 = dξa1 + hbhcξ

[abc]0 δξa1 = dχa

0

dω[abc]1 = hdhfC

[abc][df ]0 δω

[abc]1 = dξ

[abc]0

dC[abc][df ]g(k)0 = hvC

[abc][df ]g(k)v0 (44)

Consequently the unfolded system incorporates field φmicromicroν with all required differ-ential gauge parameters at all levels of reducibility the redundant component of the

physical vielbein does not contribute to the dynamics ω[abc]1 sim otimes = oplus oplus

the first component is a field strength for the redundant field once the field hasbeen gauged away the associated field strength is zero and ω

[abc]ρ = hamicrohbνhcλT[microνλ]ρ

for some T[microνλ]ρ T[microνλρ] equiv 0 which incorporates both and (as the trace) Torecover equations (215) in terms of metric-like fields it is convenient to convert allfiber indices to the world ones in the first two equations

part[microeaνλ] = hb[microhcνω

abcλ] (45)

part[microωabcν] = hd[microhfν]C

abcdf (46)

to substitute Tmicroνλρ and to contract two indices in the second equation

part[microφνλ]ρ = Tmicroνλρ (47)

partρTmicroνρλ minus partλTρ

microνρ = 0 (48)

Plugging (47) in (48) gives equation (215)For Y = Y(2 1) (1 1) ie N = 2 and p = 2 the general scheme of Section

1 results in

Yg

n k 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 1 q2 = 0 q3 = 0

18Again the trace component enters the tensor product as η otimes and has the number of rowsnot less than three

35

therefore

Wq =

W a0 q = 0

W a1 W

[abc]0 q = 1

W aq W

[abc]qminus1 W

[abc][df ]qminus2 W

[abc][df ]gqminus2 q gt 1

(49)

and

σminus(Wgq) =

0 g = 0

hbhcW[abc]qminus1 g = 1

hbhcW[aaa][bc]qminus2 g = 2

hdW[aaa][bb]c(gminus3)dqminus2 g gt 2

(410)

with D = DL minus σminus unfolded system (44) can be rewritten as

Dω2 = 0 δω2 = Dξ1 δξ1 = Dξ0 (411)

where ω2 isin W2 ξ1 isin W1 and ξ0 isin W0 The fields at n = 2 k = 0 sim g = 0and n = 1 k = 0 sim g = 1 form two finite-dimensional iso(d minus 1 1)-moduleswhereas the fields with n = 0 k = 0 1 sim g ge 2 form an infinite-dimensionaliso(dminus 1 1)-module

Example 412 Spin- field (briefly) In the case of a massless spin- fieldthere are two gauge parameters at the first level of reducibility which have the sym-metry19 of and one gauge parameter at the second level with the symmetryof First for Y = Y(3 1) (2 1) the proposed scheme results in

Yg

n k 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

g g = 0 g = 1 g = 2 g = 3 g = 4

qg q0 = 2 q1 = 2 q2 = 1 q3 = 0 q4 = 0

therefore the physical vielbein has to be a two-form taking values in ie e2 equiv

eaab2 Associated gauge parameter ξ1 equiv ξaab1 has components otimes = oplus oplus the first two having the symmetry of the required gauge parameters with the thirdone being redundant The last three components in the decomposition of the physical

vielbein otimes = oplus oplus oplus are also redundant By virtue of Stueckelberg

symmetry with parameter ξ1 these three components can be gauged away inasmuch

as otimes = oplus oplus The redundant component of the first level gauge

parameter ξ1 also can be gauged away by virtue of Stueckelberg symmetry with

level-two gauge parameter ξ0 Consequently at least the fact that the unfoldedsystem incorporates the metric-like field all the required gauge parameters andredundant components do not contribute to the dynamics is proved

19To simplify the example no consideration is given to the trace components of the fields

36

42 General Mixed-Symmetry Fields

Given a massless field of spin Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) described by a metric-like field φY(x) taking values in the irrep of the Lorentz algebra so(d minus 1 1) withthe same symmetry type(minimal formulation) there exists a unique unfolded systemwith the physical vielbein at the lowest grade and all symmetries being manifest thatreproduces the original metric-like system The system has the form (11)

Sketch of the proof

1 The lowest grade field (physical vielbein) eY0q0

turns out to be completely de-termined by the requirement for it to contain the metric-like field and for itsgauge parameters ξY0

q0minusk k gt 0 to contain all the necessary gauge parametersat all levels of reducibility (219)

2 eY0q0

and its gauge parameters appear to contain redundant components thathave to be made non-dynamical The only way to achieve this is to introduceStueckelberg symmetry δeY0

q0= σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus1) δξ

Y0q0minus1 = σ1

minus(ξY1q1minus2) with certain

ξY1q1minusk k gt 0 which turns out to be unambiguously defined by this requirement

3 ξY1q1minus1 has associated gauge field ωY1

q1and gauge transformations δωY0

q0=

σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) completely determines the first equation deY0

q0= σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) whichimplies Jacobi identity σ1

minus(dωY1q1

) equiv 0 The general solution is proved in Sec-tion 44 to have the form dωY1

q1= σ2

minus(ωY2q2

) with certain ωY2q2

The secondequation implies the second Jacobi identity σ2

minus(dωY2q2

) equiv 0 and so on

4 Once the total unfolded system is defined the proof of the facts that (i)the correct dynamical equations are imposed (ii) there are no other dynamicalfields or other differential gauge symmetries in the system is obtained throughthe calculations of σminus cohomology groups Ignoring the trace pattern of fieldsie for traceful tensors the proof of (ii) can be simplified and is done in thissection Even stronger statement that there exists a duality H

p+1+k sim Hpminusk is

proved in Section 45

First as it is clear from the examples above the metric-like field φYM(x) has

to be incorporated into a differential form eY0q of degree-q taking values in certain

so(dminus1 1)-irrep Y0 (for this reason eY0q is called physical vielbein) Having converted

all world indices to fiber ones in accordance with (329) so(dminus 1 1)-tensor productY0 otimes Y(1 q) of Y0 with one column diagram of the height q must contain thecomponent with the symmetry of YM In the case of the minimal formulationYM = Y where Y = Y(s1 p1) (sN pN) characterizes the spin

It is useful to introduce a notion of the quotient of two Young diagrams let thequotient of two Young diagrams Y1Y2 be a direct sum of those diagrams whoseso(dminus 1 1)-tensor product by Y2 contains Y1 For the first sight given q ge 0 anyelement Q of YMY(1 q) might be chosen as Y0 If q is greater than the heightof YM the component with the symmetry YM in the tensor product QotimesY(1 q)has to be certain trace inevitably

37

Although there is no apparent problems in considering unfolded systems withdynamical field hidden in certain trace component of the physical vielbein egMaxwell gauge potential Amicro might be identified with the trace eamicroνh

microa of two-form

eamicroν However this exotic incorporating of the physical field does not take place inthe already known systems Moreover it can be proved that such exotic systemsdo not exist if irreducible Nevertheless they might be a part of some reduciblesystem which describes more than one field Therefore we require the degree q ofthe physical vielbein to be not greater than the height of YM

Inasmuch as (i) the equations imposed on φY(x) possess reducible gauge trans-formations with the number of levels equal to the height p =

sumi=Ni=1 pi of Y (ii) for

a degree-q gauge field of an unfolded system there exist q levels of gauge transfor-mations the degree q of physical vielbein eY0

q must be equal to pThe quotient YY(1 p) contains only one element (provided φY(x) is for-

bidden to be a trace component) it is the diagram (12) with the symmetry ofY0 = Y(s1 minus 1 p1) (sN minus 1 pN) ie it is equal to Y without the first col-umn Therefore physical vielbein eY0

p is completely defined So does gauge param-

eters ξY0pminusk at the k-th level of reducibility k isin [1 p] The requirement for tensor

product Y0 otimes Y(1 pminus k) to contain all gauge parameters ξik given by (219)at the k-th level of reducibility is also satisfied Consequently the whole patternof fieldsgauge parameters of the metric-like formulation is reproduced Note thatY0 equiv Y0 and q0 = p in the terms of Section 1

Let us note that if one writes down the physical vielbein explicitly as ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

where si are the lengths of the rows ofY and converts the form indices to the tangentones by virtue of inverse background vielbein hmicroa

ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|[d1dp] = ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)micro1microp

hmicro1d1 hmicropdp (412)

dynamical field φY(x) should be identified with ea1(s1minus1)ap(spminus1)|a1ap which hasthe symmetry of Y with some traces included Consequently the generalizedLabastidarsquos double-tracelessness condition (220) [20] is obvious inasmuch as thecontraction of two metric tensor ηaiaiηaiai with the i-th group of indices vanishes

Generally in addition to φY(x) decompositionY0otimesY(1 p) of physical vielbeineY0p into Lorentz irreps contains redundant components which must not contributeto the physical degrees of freedom So does Y0 otimesY(1 pminus k) ie in addition toξik it contains a lot of components that can not be made genuine differential gaugeparameters There are only two possible ways to get rid of redundant fields in theunfolded formalism

A redundant components could be directly fixed to zero by algebraic (Stueckel-berg) symmetry

B redundant components might be auxiliary fields for other fields (at lower grade)and so on The process stops since the grade is assumed to be bounded frombelow

We require dynamical fields incorporated in the physical vielbein to be at the lowestgrade Actually (B) takes place for dual gauge descriptions but not for the minimal

38

Therefore the only possibility to make redundant components to be non-dynamicalis to introduce a Stueckelberg symmetry with certain parameters ξY1

q1minusk

δeY0p = dξY0

pminus1 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus1) (413)

δξY0pminus1 = dξY0

pminus2 + σ1minus(ξ

Y1q1minus2) (414)

(415)

where σ1minus is a certain operator built of background vielbein ha that contracts a

number of indices of Y1 with hahc to obtain Y0 Diagram20 Y1 and form degreeq1 can be easily found since Y1 otimes Y1 q1 minus i i gt 0 must contain all redundantcomponents of eY0

p and ξY0pminusk

In the unfolded formalism each gauge field possesses its own gauge parameter andvice-versa Therefore there is a gauge field ωY1

q1 which contributes to the equations

for eY0p as

deY0p = σ1

minus(ωY1q1

) (416)

The first equation determines the first Jacobi identity of the form σ1minus(dω

Y1q1

) equiv 0which can be solved as

dωY1q1

= σ2minus(ω

Y2q2

) (417)

for certain gauge field ωY2q2

and operator σ2minus that satisfies σ1

minusσ2minus equiv 0 The general

solution of Jacobi identities is given in Section 44 From now on let the super-scripts of σminus be omitted The second equation determines the second Jacobi identityσminus(dω

Y2q2

) equiv 0 which can be also solved and so on Consequently the knowledgeof the lowest grade gauge field eY0

p and of the Stueckelberg symmetries required toget rid of redundant components determines the first equation which by virtue ofJacobi identities determines the second and so on The total unfolded system hasthe structure

dωYg

qg= σminus

(

ωYg+1qg+1

)

g = 0 1

δωYg

qg= dξYg

qg+ σminus

(

ξYg+1

qg+1minus1

)

δξYgqg

=

(418)

where σminus is certain algebraic operator built of background vielbein ha and (σminus)2 = 0

The only facts remain to be proved are that there are no other dynamical fieldsand that the proper correspondence (duality) between the cohomology groups holdstrue To this end it is sufficient to analyze only the so(d minus 1 1)-irreps content ofH

qg ie only the symmetry type and the multiplicity of irreducible Lorentz tensors

that by virtue of (330) are the representatives of Hqg

It is proved in the next Section that there is a duality Hpminuskg=0 sim H

p+k+1g=1 between

the σminus cohomology groups which reveals the one-to-one correspondence betweenthe gauge dynamical fields and equations of motion the level-k gauge symmetries

20The specific character of Minkowski massless fields is in that all Stueckelberg parameters canbe incorporated into a single Y1-valued form this not being the case for (anti)-de Sitter masslessfields

39

and the level-k Bianchi identities The representatives of cohomology groups in thesector of fields and gauge symmetries directly correspond to those of metric-likeapproach and there is no other nontrivial cohomology in these sectors

Though the trace pattern of fieldsgauge parameters is also important and thecalculation of σminus cohomology groups provides a comprehensive answer to this ques-tion the very procedure being a bit technical Ignoring the trace pattern of thefields it can be easily proved that the required metric-like field is incorporated inphysical vielbein eY0

q0 all the redundant components of the physical vielbein can be

gauged away by a pure algebraic symmetry and the same holds for differential gaugeparameters ξY0

q0minusk at all levels of reducibility ie the required pattern of gauge pa-rameters is recovered whereas all the redundant components are either Stueckelbergor auxiliary This is the necessary condition only and the traces has to be takeninto account Also it is still to be proved that the correct equations of motionsare imposed Provided that there are no trace conditions on the fields the sys-tem is referred to as off-shell[65] An off-shell system may contain only constraintsthat express auxiliary fields via the derivatives of the dynamical field imposing norestrictions on the latter

The off-shell system Technically ignoring the traces is equivalent to thereplacement of all so(dminus1 1)-irreps by the sl(d)-irreps that are characterized by thesame Young diagrams ie instead of taking so(dminus1 1)-tensor products one needs toapply the sl(d)-tensor productrsquos rules which are much simpler The decompositionof the physical vielbein eY0

q0into sl(d)-irreps is given by diagrams Yαi of the form

αN+1

sN minus 1

pNαN

s2 minus 1

p2α2

s1 minus 1

p1

α1

(419)

where α1+ +αN+1 = q0 = p The decomposition of Stueckelberg gauge parameterξY1q1minus1 for eY0

q0has the components of the same form but with αN+1 ge 1 because

Y1 (13) has already the form of Y0 with one cell in the bottom-left Thereforeall components of eY0

q0except for those with αN+1 = 0 are of Stueckelberg type but

there is only one component of eY0q0

with αN+1 = 0 namely it has αi = pi i isin [1 N ]and hence has the symmetry of Y The decomposition of level-k differential gaugeparameter ξY0

q0minusk has the form (419) with α1 + + αN+1 = p minus k and again all

the components of ξY0q0minusk with αN+1 ge 1 can be gauged away by pure algebraic

symmetry with ξY1q1minuskminus1 Consequently there is a complete matching between (219)

40

and those in ξY0

q0minusk that are not pure gauge themselves It can be easily proved alsothat if ignoring the traces there are no other dynamical fieldsdifferential gaugeparameters at higher grade Consequently

Lemma H(σminus) with respect to sl(d) are given by

Hk(σminus)sl(d) =

Yαi g = 0 α1 + + αN = k αN+1 = 0 k le p

empty k gt p(420)

The triviality of the higher k gt p cohomology groups for sl(d) which shouldcontain equations of motion and Bianchi identities is expected since the system isoff-shell For the equations to have the second order in derivatives the only nontrivialcohomology group H

p+1 must be at the grade-one ie Hp+1g=1 6= empty As is seen from

the examples above the equations correspond to those representatives of Hp+1g=1 that

are certain traces Indeed the total rank |WYgqg | which is equal to the sum qg + |Yg|

of degree qg and rank of Yg is preserved by σminus Therefore |WYgqg | = |W

Y0q0| + g

and |RY1q1+1| = |ω

Y0q0| + 2 = |Y|+ 2 where eY0

q0isin Wg=0

p and RY1q1+1 isin W

g=1p+1 contain

metric-like field φYM(x) and the equations on φY(x) respectively Consequently

the representative of Hp+1g=1 that corresponds to the equations on the traceless part

of φY(x) has to be identified with certain trace of the first order and so on for thetraces of φY(x)

The calculation of σminus cohomology groups carried out in Section 45 implies

1 The only nontrivial cohomology groups are Hpminuskg=0 and H

p+k+1g=1 k = 1 p

Therefore the dynamical fields and independent gauge parameters belong tothe zero grade Wg=0

q subspaces the equations are of the second order and theBianchi identities for the k-th level gauge symmetries are of the (k + 2)-thorder

2 Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 ie there is a one-to-one correspondence between the

elements of Hpminuskg=0 that are traces of the r-th order and the elements of Hp+k+1

g=1

that are traces of the (r + k + 1)-th order Roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1

Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on Therefore there is a one-to-one correspondencebetween the dynamical fields and the equations of motion the level-k gaugesymmetries and the k-th Bianchi identities

3 The so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that correspond to the elements of Hpminusk(σminus) and arethe traces of the zeroth order are given by the so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagramsthat have the form (419) with αN+1 = 0 and α1 + + αN = p minus k whichexactly reproduce the required pattern (219) Note that certain higher ordertraces are also the elements of cohomology groups These fields represent thersquoauxiliaryrsquo fields of the metric-like formulation which had to be introduced tomake the gauge symmetry off-shell To prove the theorem it is not necessary toknow the concrete trace pattern the duality between the cohomology groupsis sufficient The details of the trace pattern are in Section 45

41

In the fermionic case the traces are substituted for Γ-traces Important isthat acting on tensor indices only σminus does not break down the irreducibility ofspin-tensors The duality has the form H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 or simply H

pminuskg=0 sim

Hp+k+1g=0 which means that equations are of the first order and the duality between

fieldsequations gauge symmetriesBianchi identities takes place which completesthe proof

Note that Yg=s1 equiv Yn=0k=0 has the symmetry of the generalized Weyl tensorfor a spin-Y massless field

sNpN

s2p2

s1

p1 + 1

(421)

Analogously to the examples of Section 33 massless mixed-symmetry fields can bedescribed by the same unfolded system (16) that is restricted to Wg

q with g ge g0ie the system contains infinitely many dual formulations As the generalized Weyltensor and its descendants are non-gauge fields the dual descriptions with g0 ge s1are non-gauge and the dual descriptions with 0 lt g0 lt s1 are gauge

43 Physical Degrees of Freedom Counting

Notwithstanding the simplicity of the unfolded form and the uniqueness of unfoldingthere still might be a question of whether the unfolded equations do describe thecorrect number of physical degrees of freedom

It is well-known that for systems with the first class constraints only with mass-less fields belonging to this class the counting of degrees of freedom is that one firstlevel gauge parameter kills two degrees of freedom one second level gauge parame-ters kills three degrees of freedom and so on For example a spin-two massless fieldpossesses d(dminus3)

2degrees of freedom which is just d(d+1)

2minus 2d d(d+1)

2and d being the

number of components of φmicroν and ξmicroThe complete information concerning the rsquonumberrsquo of fieldsgauge parameters

ie the multiplicity and the symmetry of corresponding tensors is contained inH

kg=0(σminus) for k = 0p Not only can a number of physical degrees of freedom be

calculated but the whole exact sequence that defines an iso(d minus 1 1) irrep can bederived The elements of this sequence are certain so(dminus 1) tensors that define anso(dminus 2) tensor as a quotient of so(d minus 1) tensors eg (218) The decompositionof so(dminus 1 1)-fields into irreducible tensors of so(dminus 1) can be done with the aid ofpartmicro or after Fourier transform with the aid of momentum pmicro

For example for a spin-two field the cohomology groups that correspond to thedynamical fieldsdifferential gauge parameters and its decomposition into so(dminus 1)irreps have the form

42

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus bull sim φmicroν φ

νν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2bull

Quick sort of Young diagrams in 0 minusrarr 2H0 minusrarr H1 minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 gives the

correct exact sequence 0 minusrarr minusrarr minusrarr H (0 ) minusrarr 0 which defines a masslessspin-two irrep H (0 )

For the simplest mixed-symmetry field the hook- there are two levels of gaugetransformation hence relevant cohomology groups are H

0 H1 and H2

so(dminus 1 1)-representatives reduction from so(dminus 1 1) to so(dminus 1)

H0 sim ξmicro oplus bull

H1 oplus oplus bull sim ξAmicroν oplus ξ

Smicroν ξ

Sνν 6= 0 oplus oplus 2 oplus 2bull

H2 oplus sim φmicroνλ φ

νmicroν 6= 0 oplus oplus oplus 2 oplus bull

Again quick sort of diagrams in 0 minusrarr 3H0 minusrarr 2H1 minusrarr H2 minusrarr H

(

0)

minusrarr 0

gives exact sequence (218)Consequently the problem of calculation the number of physical degrees of free-

dom to be precise of deriving the exact sequence is effectively reduced to the simplecombinatoric problem of (i) decomposition so(d minus 1 1)-Young diagram representa-tives of H(σminus) to so(dminus 1)-diagrams (ii) cancellation of like terms in sequence

0 minusrarr (p+ 1)H0 minusrarr pH1 minusrarr minusrarr 2Hpminus1 minusrarr Hp minusrarr H (0Y) minusrarr 0 (422)

Skipping combinatoric technicalities we state that in the general case of a spin-Ymassless mixed-symmetry field (422) reduces to the correct exact sequence thatdefines a uirrep H (0Y) of iso(dminus 1 1)

44 Solving the Generalized Jacobi Identities

Unfolding some dynamical system there arises a problem of solving Jacobi identities(33) that have schematically a form hhdω1

q equiv 0 where a number of backgroundvielbeins ha is contracted with the fiber indices of ω1

q The Jacobi identity restrictsdω1

q to have a certain specific form dω1q = hhω2

r where the so(dminus1 1)-irrep inwhich ω2

r takes values the degree r and the projector built of hh are completelydetermined The solutions are given by21

Lemma A Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values inY = Y(s p) (k 1)

so(dminus 1 1)-irrep The general solution of

hcdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq = 0 (423)

21As was pointed out in Section 33 nonzero traces either violate Bianchi identities or introducemass-like terms and therefore are ignored

43

has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq k lt s

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1 k = s q ge p + 1

0 k = s q lt p+ 1

(424)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 take values inY(s p) (k + 1 1)

and Y(s+ 1 p+ 1) so(dminus 1 1)-irreps respectively22

Proof The parametrization of dωq by a degree-(q + 1) form taking values in the

same so(dminus 1 1)-irrep dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = R

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q+1 obviously fails to satisfy

(423) Inasmuch as (423) contains a vielbein the solution has to contain a number

of vielbeins too The most general parametrization of dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q with only

one vielbein included has the form dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q = hdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)|dq for some

q-form taking values in a tensor product of Y by a vector representation ie thereis no definite symmetry between index d and the rest of the indices

hchdωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)c|dq = 0larrrarr ωa1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)[c|d]

q = 0 (425)

Only those irreps in Yotimes are allowed that have c and d symmetric ie correspondto Y(s p) (k + 1 1) for k lt s This is not possible in the case k = s ie Y =Y(s p+ 1) and the only possibility to have c and d symmetric is to add the whole

column toY which requires dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q to be represented as dω

a1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

hchcωa1(sminus1)cap(sminus1)cap+1(sminus1)cqminuspminus1 and therefore q must be large enough Roughly

speaking the proof is based on the fact that the anti-symmetrization of two indicesat the same row of a Young diagram is identically zero the anti-symmetrizationbeing due to contraction with vielbeins

Note that choosing nonmaximal solutions of Jacobi identities results in loweringthe gauge symmetry so that not all redundant components are excluded

Unfolding totally-symmetric massless higher-spin fields the possible rhs termsin dω

a(sminus1)b(t)1 = are restricted by Jacobi identities and an essential use is made

of

Corollary The solution of Jacobi identity

hcdωa(sminus1)b(tminus1)c1 equiv 0 (426)

is of the form

dωa(sminus1)b(t)1 =

hcωa(sminus1)b(t)c1 t lt sminus 1

hchdCa(sminus1)cb(sminus1)d0 t = sminus 1

(427)

22The symmetric basis is used being more convenient in this case as the contracted with vielbeinstensors are already irreducible

44

The following statement is a generalization of the Lemma-A to the case where(s p) (k 1) is a rsquosubdiagramrsquo of a larger Young diagram Y that has a numberof rows precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) Appropriate Young symmetrizershave to be included as the mere contraction of a number of vielbeins breaks theirreducibility of the tensor For instance hcω

a(s1)b(s2minus1)c is already irreducible withthe symmetry of Ys1 s2 minus 1 but this is not the case for hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) which hasto be added one term hcω

a(s1minus1)cb(s2) + 1s1minuss2+1

hcωa(s1)bb(s2minus1)c to get the symmetry

of Ys1 minus 1 s2

Lemma B Let ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q be a degree-q form taking values in Y =

Y( (s p) (k 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irrep where the dots stands for the blocks inY precedentsuccedent to (s p) (k 1) The general solution of

Π[hcdω

a1(s)ap(s)b(kminus1)cq

]= 0 (428)

where Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p)(k minus 1 1) has the form

dωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)q =

Π[

hcωa1(s)ap(s)b(k)cq

]

k lt s

Π[

hchcωa1(s)cap(s)cap+1(s)cqminuspminus1

]

k = s q ge p+ 1

0 k = s q lt p + 1

(429)

where ωa1(s)ap(s)b(k+1)q and ω

a1(s+1)ap(s+1)ap+1(s+1)qminuspminus1 takes values in

Y (s p) (k + 1 1) and Y (s+ 1 p+ 1) so(d minus 1 1)-irreps respec-tively and Π [] is a Young symmetrizer to Y (s p) (k 1)

Proof The proof is similar to that of Lemma-A with the only comment that thesymmetrizers do not affect the argumentation that anti-symmetrization of two in-dices in the same row is identically zero

45 Dynamical Content via σminus Cohomology

Before discussing the calculation of σminus cohomology let us first recall necessary factsconcerning the evaluation of so(d minus 1 1)-tensor products Let P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) be anumber of integer partitions k1 + + kN = m of m where ki is constrained byki le ǫi and different rearrangements of ki satisfying the constraints are regarded asdistinct partitions The generating function for the partition P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) is

sum

m

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m)tm =

i=Nprod

i=1

(1minus tǫi+1)

1minus t(430)

These integer partitions gives the multiplicities of irreps in so(dminus 1 1)-tensor prod-ucts (Clebsh-Gordon coefficients) we are interested in [71]

45

The so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary irrep Ylowast = Y(si pi) by aone-column diagram of the height qlowast can be explicitly calculated as

sNpN

s2

p2

s1

p1

otimes

q =sum

αjβi

Nαjβi

αN+1

βN

αN

ǫNpN sN

β2

α2

ǫ2p2 s2

β1

α1

ǫ1p1 s1

(431)

where αi βi αi + βi le pi i isin [1 N ] αN+1 ge 0 and there exist ρ ge 0 such that

qlowast =i=Nsum

i=1

(αi + βi) + αN+1 + 2ρ (432)

The multiplicity Nαjβi of Ylowastαj βi

is given by integer partition

Nαjβi = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ǫi = pi minus αi minus βi (433)

and the total trace order r is

r =i=Nsum

i=1

βi + ρ (434)

Roughly speaking to obtain an element of the tensor product one should first cutoff from bottom-right of the i-th block a column of height βiminusγi pi ge βiminusγi ge 0 (totake different traces) and second add an arbitrary number αi+γi pi ge αi+γi ge 0 ofcells to each block provided the γi cells annihilate ie they are added to the placesfrom which γi cells were removed at the first stage Multiplicity may be differentfrom one due to different rearrangements of γi ie when multiplied by the rest ofq-column different traces can give rise to the same diagram The number of suchrearrangements is given by P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) ρ =

sumi=N

i=1 γi For instance sl(n)-tensor

product otimes is given simply by

otimessl(n) = oplus oplus oplus (435)

46

The so(d)-tensor product can be represented as a sum of the form

otimesso(n) = otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

otimessl(n)

oplus

otimessl(n)

︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

oplus

otimessl(n)︸ ︷︷ ︸

2nd order

=

oplus oplus oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order traces

oplus

oplus

oplus 2 oplus︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order traces

oplus

︸︷︷︸

2ndorder

(436)

where the sum is over trace order and the boxes that are connected by the arc areto be contracted and then the sl(n)-product rules are to be applied to the rest ofthe diagrams

Evaluating the so(d minus 1 1)-tensor product of an arbitrary spinor-irrep Ylowast =Y(si pi) 1

2by a one-column diagram of the height qlowast one can contract any number

of Γ matrices with the indices of the column and then multiply therefore the tensorproduct rule for spin-tensors can be reduced to bosonic rule (431) as

Y(si pi) 12otimesso(n) Y(1 q) =

qsum

k=0

(Y(si pi) otimesso(n) Y(1 q minus k)

)

12

(437)

for example

12otimesso(n) = 1

2oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

zeroth order Γ-traces

oplus

12oplus 1

2︸ ︷︷ ︸

first order Γ-traces

oplus

oplus

2 12

︸︷︷︸

2nd order Γ-traces

oplus

bull 12

︸︷︷︸

3d order Γ-traces

(438)

The multiplicity N12

αjβiof Ylowast

αj βi12

is given by

N12

αjβi=

i=ρsum

i=0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus i) (439)

Let us now analyze the origin of σminus cohomology Its action σminus Wgq rarr W

gminus1q+1

preserves g+ q and hence the whole complex C(W σminus) is a direct sum of complexesC(qprime σminus) where q

prime refers to the end element Wg=0qprime of the complex

C(qprime σminus) 0 minusrarr minusrarr Wg=1qprimeminus1 minusrarrW

g=0qprime minusrarr 0 (440)

47

Moreover σminus preserves the total rank (the form degree + rank of the so(d minus 1 1)-

irrep in which the field takes values) LetWa(s1)a(sm)q be an element ofWg

qprime When

all form indices of Wa(s1)a(sm)q are converted to the fiber ones according to (329)

W a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] = W a1(s1)am(sm)micro1microq

hmicro1d1 hmicroqdq (441)

the action of σminus is just an anti-symmetrization of all d1 dq with those indices aithat are extra as compared to Ygminus1 plus some terms to restore the correct Youngsymmetry of Ygminus1 Let the decomposition ofW a1(s1)am(sm)|[d1dq] into so(dminus1 1)-irreps be of the form

Ya1(s1) am(sm)otimes

Y(1 q) =oplus

r=0

oplus

ir

N rirYr

ir (442)

where the summation is over the trace order r and then over ir which enumeratesall so(d minus 1 1)-irreps that enters in the tensor product as the traces of the r-thorder N r

irbeing the multiplicity of Yr

ir The multiplicity of the zeroth order traces

is always equal to one N0i0= 1 In fact the diagrams Y 0

i0can be directly obtained

by the sl(n)-tensor product ruleThe very anti-symmetrization is insensitive to whether a certain component en-

ters as a trace or not When decomposed into so(d minus 1 1)-irreps the elements ofWg

qprime and Wgminus1qprime+1 have a number of components of the same symmetry type The

action of σminus is just a linear transformation that either sends the whole so(dminus 1 1)-irrep to zero23 or sends it to the components of Wgminus1

qprime+1 of the same symmetry typeImportant is that σminus does not act between different so(d minus 1 1)-irreps Thereforecomplex C(qprime σminus) is a direct sum of complexes parameterized by so(dminus 1 1)-irrepsYprime that are given by various tensor products

Ynk

otimes

Y(1 q) (443)

provided that the field WYnkq is an element of Wgprimeminusi

qprime+i for certain i When reducedto such a complex

C(Yprime qprime σminus) 0rarr rarr Vg rarr Vgminus1 rarr rarr 0 (444)

the action of σminus is a linear transformation between the spaces Vg rarr Vgminus1 dimen-

sions of which are equal to the multiplicity of Yprime in the decomposition of WYgqg and

WYgminus1qg+1 The action of σminus is maximally non-degenerate compatible with nilpotency

Therefore to find cohomology groups the dimension of each linear space in everycomplex has to be calculated

Let us note that only the types and multiplicities of so(dminus1 1)-irreps are foundbelow ie no attention is paid to the description of how the corresponding tensorsare contained in the fields WY

qprime This is sufficient for our purposes though it isobvious (412) how the metric-like field φYM

is incorporated in an element ofWg=0p

23provided that the appropriate basis on the space of so(dminus1 1)-irreps with the same symmetrytype is chosen

48

The calculation of σminus cohomology is divided into three cases that cover the wholevariety of so(dminus 1 1)-irreps that can result from the tensor products (443)

In the Lemmas below it is assumed that complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is parameterizedby so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Yprime = Ylowast

αj βiof the form (431) with Ylowast = Ynk q

lowast = q such

that WYnkq isin C(qprime σminus) and ρ is defined according to (432)

In the first case Yprime is an element of Y0 otimesY(1 q)

Lemma 1 The σminus cohomology groups Hqg=0 and H

qg=1 are nontrivial and are given

by

Hqg =

Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βiMαj βi

αN+1 = 0sumi=N

i=0 αi = qq isin [0 p] g = 0

H2pminusqminus1 q isin [p+ 1 2p+ 1] g = 1

empty q gt 2p+ 1 any g

(445)where Mαj βi is the multiplicity of the irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

defined below

Proof From the very form of Yn=N0 equiv Yg=0 equiv Y(si minus 1 pi) it follows that theso(dminus1 1)-irreps that the element ofWg=0

q sim Y0otimesY(1 q) decomposes into may

be contained in Wg=1qminus1 only ie Wg=0

q and Wg=kqminusk contain no so(d minus 1 1)-irreps of

the same symmetry type for k gt 1 Therefore the length of complex C(Yprime q σminus)where Yprime isin Y0otimesY(1 q) is equal to one ie C(Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

q σminus) 0 minusrarrV1 minusrarr V0 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions of V0 and V1 are given by the multiplicitiesof the so(dminus 1 1)-irrep Y(si minus 1 pi)αj βi

in Wg=1qminus1 and Wg=0

q respectively

dim(V1) =

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρminus 1) ρ ge 1

0 ρ = 0αN+1 = 0

P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) αN+1 gt 0

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) (446)

If αN+1 gt 0 the dimensions of V0 and V1 are equal and each irreducible componentof Wg=0

q with αN+1 gt 0 can be gauge away by virtue of the corresponding element

of Wg=1qminus1 thus being exact H

kgt2p+1 = empty inasmuch as ρ le p and the componentsof the forms with rank greater than (2p + 1) must have αN+1 gt 0 thus beingexact If αN+1 = 0 the dimensions are different dim(V1) lt dim(V0) for q le pdim(V1) = dim(V0) for q = p + 1 and dim(V1) gt dim(V0) for q gt p Thereforethe number of those Ysi piαj βi

isin Wg=0q q le p that are not exact is equal to

Mαj βi = |dim(V1) minus dim(V0)| the same is the number of those Ysi piαj βiisin

Wg=1qminus1 q gt p+ 1 that are not exact The obvious property of integer partitions

P(ǫ1 ǫN |m) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ǫ1 + + ǫN minusm) (447)

results in the important duality in the cohomology groups Hpminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=1 or

roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 and so on

49

The second case is the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) where Yprime is an element of the tensor

product Ynk otimesY(1 q) for certain q ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmaxn minus 1

Lemma 2 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainqprime ge 0 with 1 lt k lt kmax

n minus 1 the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The complex has the length two ie 0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr 0 wherethe dimensions are given by dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫN 1|ρ+ 1)dim(V2) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ+ 1) Simple calculations with generating functions resultsin dim(V0) lt dim(V1) dim(V2) lt dim(V1) and dim(V0) minus dim(V1) + dim(V2) = 0and consequently the sequence is exact

Analogously

Lemma 3 If Yprime is an element of the tensor product YnkotimesY(1 q) for certainq ge 0 with k = 0 and n lt N the complex C(Yprime qprime σminus) is acyclic

Proof The speciality of such Yprime is that the complex has the length three ie0 minusrarr V0 minusrarr V1 minusrarr V2 minusrarr V3 minusrarr 0 where the dimensions are given by

dim(V0) = P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V1) = P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 ǫn + 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρ)

dim(V2) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 1) ρ ge ǫn + 1

0 otherwise

dim(V3) =

P(ǫ1 ǫnminus1 pn minus ǫn minus 1 ǫn+1 ǫN |ρminus ǫn minus 2) ρ ge ǫn + 2

0 otherwise

Again simple calculations with generating functions results in appropriate inequali-ties and dim(V0)minusdim(V1)+dim(V2)minusdim(V3) = 0 and consequently the sequenceis exact

The above three cases covers the whole variety of the so(d minus 1 1)-tensors thatcan result from the tensor products YnkotimesY(1 q) for any n k and q The caseswith sN = 1 and Y = Y0 are special but the calculation of cohomology groupsleads to the same result

In the fermionic case the computations are similar due to the multiplicity givenby (439) The difference is that all nontrivial cohomology is concentrated in gradezero Indeed taking into account (446) where P(ǫ1 ǫN |ρ) is to be replaced by(439) it follows that dim(V0) ge dim(V1) for all q and H

pminuskrg=0 sim H

p+k+1r+k+1g=0 where r

is referred to the Γ-trace order or roughly speaking Hp sim Hp+1 Hpminus1 sim H

p+2 andso on

5 Conclusions

The unfolded system constructed in the paper has a simple form of a covariantconstancy equation and describes arbitrary mixed-symmetry bosonic and fermionic

50

massless fields in d-dimensional Minkowski space The gauge fieldsparameters aredifferential forms with values in certain finite-dimensional irreducible representationsof the Lorentz algebra that are uniquely determined by the generalized spin

The key moment is that all gauge symmetries are manifest within the unfoldedformulation which is of most importance in controlling the number of physicaldegrees of freedom when trying to introduce interactions Unfolded systems areformulated in terms of differential forms which is a natural way to respect diffeo-morphisms and hence to describe systems that include gravity

Though the necessary conditions for the system to have a lagrangian descriptionare satisfied ie the fields are in one-to-one correspondence with the equations andthe k-th level gauge symmetries are in one-to-one correspondence with the k-thBianchi identities the very lagrangian remains to be constructed

Another interesting moment is that the unfolded equations for bosons are thesame as for fermions namely the operators involved ie exterior differential dand σminus remains unmodified when tensors are replaced with spin-tensors Thoughthis nice property partly breaks down in (anti)-de Sitter space within the unfoldedapproach bosons and fermions have much in common the fact being very useful forsupersymmetric theories

The proposed unfolded system includes all non-gauge dual descriptions whichare based on the generalized Weyl tensor and its descendants but not all of gaugedual descriptions It would be interesting to construct an unfolded system thatcontains all dual formulations

The interactions of the totally symmetric massless higher-spin fields are knownto require a nonzero cosmological constant ie are formulated in (anti)-de Sitterspace [2] Mixed-symmetry fields exhibit some interesting features in the presence ofcosmological constant For example not all of the Minkowski gauge symmetries canbe deformed to (anti)-de Sitter [72] As a result massless mixed-symmetry fields havemore degrees of freedom in (anti)-de Sitter compared to its Minkowski counterparts[73] and in the Minkowski limit a massless mixed-symmetry field splits in a certaincollection of massless fields generally Contrariwise a single mixed-symmetry fieldcan not be smoothly deformed to (anti)-de Sitter Another interesting effect is theexistence of the so-called partially-massless fields [74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 8283 84] the fields that have a number of degrees of freedom intermediate betweenthat of massless and massive and split in a set of massless fields in the Minkowskilimit Therefore the extension of the proposed approach to (anti)-de Sitter spaceseems to be non-trivial but nevertheless worth being investigated

In a series of papers [85 61 86 60] it was suggested so-called frame-like approachto the general mixed-symmetry fields in (anti)-de Sitter To generalize the proposedin the present paper unfolded system to (anti)-de Sitter case and to compare to thatof [60] is the next step to perform

We consider the proposed unfolded system as the first stage in constructing thefull interacting theory of mixed-symmetry fields

51

Acknowledgements

The author appreciates sincerely MA Vasiliev for reading the manuscript and mak-ing many detailed and valuable suggestions and illuminating comments the verywork was initiated as the result of discussions with MA Vasiliev The author isalso grateful to RR Metsaev and KB Alkalaev for useful discussions and to OVShaynkman for discussion of the fermionic case The work was supported in partby grants RFBR No 05-02-17654 LSS No 440120062 and INTAS No 05-7928by the Landau Scholarship and by the Scholarship of Dynasty foundation

Appendix A Multi-index convention

The multi-index notations is used a group of indices in which certain tensor issymmetric or is to be symmetrized is denoted either by one letter with the numberof indices indicated in round brackets or by placing a group of indices in roundbrackets eg

T a(s) equiv T a1a2as T a1aiaj as = T a1ajaias (A1)

V aT a(s) equiv V (a1T a2as+1) equiv1

s+ 1(V a1T a2a3as+1 + V a2T a1a3as+1 + + V as+1T a1a2as)

(A2)

V (bT a(s)) equiv V (bT a1as) equiv1

s + 1

(V bT a1a2as + V a1T ba2a3as + + V asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A3)Analogously the group of indices in which certain tensor is anti-symmetric or is tobe anti-symmetrized is denoted by placing indices in square brackets eg

T a[s] equiv T a1a2as T a1aiai+1as = minusT a1ai+1aias (A4)

V [bT a[s]] equiv V [bT a1as] equiv1

s+ 1

(V bT a1a2as minus V a1T ba2a3as + + (minus)sV asT ba1a2asminus1

)

(A5)The operators of (anti)-symmetrization are weighted to be projectors (the factor 1

s+1

above)

Appendix B Young diagrams

Comprehensive information on Young diagrams can be found for example in thetextbook [71]

Definition B1 Given an integer partition ie a nonincreasing sequence si i isin[1 n] si ge si+1 of positive integers (or nonnegative when it is convenient to workwith a sequence of a fixed length) associated Young diagram Ys1 s2 sn is agraphical representation consisting of n left-justified rows made of boxes with the

52

i-th row containing si boxes

s10s11

s1s2s3s4

s5s6s7

s8s9

Finite-dimensional irreducible representation(irrep) of sl(d) ie various irre-ducible sl(d)-tensors are in one-to-one correspondence with Young diagrams of theform Ys1 s2 s[ d

2] The associated irreducible tensors

T

s1︷︸︸︷aa

s2︷︸︸︷

bb (B1)

or in condensed notation T a(s1)b(s2) have at most [d2] groups of indices being sym-

metric in each group separately and satisfy the condition that the symmetrizationof any group of indices with one index of any of the subsequent groups is identicallyzero ie

T a(s1)(b(sk)b)c(sjminus1) equiv 0 k lt j (B2)

If s[ d2] 6= 0 and d is even the (anti)-selfduality condition has to be imposed for

appropriate signature (anti)-selfduality is conventionally denoted by the sign factors+(minus) before s[ d

2] In this paper we do not consider (anti)-self dual representations

A scalar representation Y0 0 0 is denoted by bull a vector irrep Y1 0 0by rank-two symmetric tensor irrep by rank-two antisymmetric tensor irrep

by and so onFinite-dimensional irreducible representations of so(d) are of the two types ten-

sor and spin-tensor and are also characterized by Young diagrams which in thecase of spin-tensor irreps refer to the symmetry of the tensor part Young diagramsthat correspond to spin-tensor irreps are labeled by 1

2-subscript Spinor indices

α β γ = 12[d2] are placed first and are separated from tensor indices by rdquordquo For

example a spinor ψα irrep is denoted by bull 12 a vector-spinor irrep Aαaby 1

2and

so on To make tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry conditionthe tracelessness condition with respect to each pair of indices is to be imposed

ηccTa(s1)cb(siminus1)cd(sjminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n j = 1n (B3)

To make spin-tensors irreducible in addition to the Young symmetry condition Γ-tracelessness condition with respect to each tensor index and a spinor index is to beimposed

Γαc βT

βa(s1)cb(siminus1)f(sn) equiv 0 i = 1n (B4)

where Γαc β satisfy Γα

a βΓβb γ

+ Γαb βΓ

βaγ = 2ηab Additional conditions on spinors viz

Majorana Weyl and Majorana-Weyl are irrelevant to the problems concerned Also

53

in both cases it is required for the sum of the heights of the first two columns ofYoung diagrams to be not greater than d Note that the Γ-tracelessness conditionis stronger than the tracelessness one and applying the Γ-tracelessness twice to twosymmetric indices gives the tracelessness

0 = 2ΓαaβΓ

βb γT γ(ab) = ηabT

αab (B5)

To handle with arbitrary large Young diagrams the so-called block representationis used ie the rows of equal lengths are combined to blocks

Y(s1 p1) (sn pn) equiv Y

p1︷ ︸︸ ︷s1 s1

p2︷ ︸︸ ︷s2 s2

pn︷ ︸︸ ︷sn sn (B6)

References

[1] C Fronsdal ldquoMassless fields with integer spinrdquo Phys Rev D18 (1978) 3624

[2] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoCubic interaction in extended theories ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Nucl Phys B291 (1987) 141

[3] E S Fradkin and M A Vasiliev ldquoOn the gravitational interaction ofmassless higher spin fieldsrdquo Phys Lett B189 (1987) 89ndash95

[4] M A Vasiliev ldquoConsistent equation for interacting gauge fields of all spins in(3+1)-dimensionsrdquo Phys Lett B243 (1990) 378ndash382

[5] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoOn the geometry of higher-spin gauge fieldsrdquoClass Quant Grav 20 (2003) S473ndashS486 hep-th0212185

[6] D Francia and A Sagnotti ldquoFree geometric equations for higher spinsrdquoPhys Lett B543 (2002) 303ndash310 hep-th0207002

[7] M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear equations for symmetric massless higher spin fieldsin (a)ds(d)rdquo Phys Lett B567 (2003) 139ndash151 hep-th0304049

[8] X Bekaert I L Buchbinder A Pashnev and M Tsulaia ldquoOn higher spintheory Strings brst dimensional reductionsrdquo Class Quant Grav 21 (2004)S1457ndash1464 hep-th0312252

[9] D Sorokin ldquoIntroduction to the classical theory of higher spinsrdquo AIP ConfProc 767 (2005) 172ndash202 hep-th0405069

[10] X Bekaert S Cnockaert C Iazeolla and M A Vasiliev ldquoNonlinear higherspin theories in various dimensionsrdquo hep-th0503128

[11] A Sagnotti E Sezgin and P Sundell ldquoOn higher spins with a strong sp(2r)conditionrdquo hep-th0501156

[12] P K Townsend ldquoCovariant quantization of antisymmetric tensor gaugefieldsrdquo Phys Lett B88 (1979) 97

54