as canada report template 3yearstatus, important memories, favourite stories, daily routines,...

Accreditation Report Quality Improvement Plan & Benchmarking Data

Prepared for St. Joseph’s Villa of Sudbury

Three-Year AccreditationThree-Year Accreditation

Accreditation Decision

Three-Year Accreditation Expiration: November 30, 2018

Organization

St. Joseph’s Villa of Sudbury (SJV) 1250 South Bay Road Sudbury ON P3E 6L9 CANADA

Organizational Leadership

Jo-Anne Palkovits, Administrator

Survey Dates

October 29-30, 2015

Survey Team

Avanthi Goddard, BBA Hon., Dip Adult Ed., Administrative Surveyor Bruce Hartshorne, CASP, Program Surveyor

Programs/Services Surveyed

Person-Centred Long-Term Care Community Governance Standards Applied

Previous Survey

November 1-2, 2012 Three-Year Accreditation

Survey Summary

Areas of Strength

St. Joseph’s Villa of Sudbury (SJV) has strengths in many areas.

The person-centred philosophy is led, embedded, and implemented through the mission and values of the organization that has a strong and long spiritual history.

The volunteer program has gone from 35 volunteers to approximately 120 volunteers in less than three years. The effective strategies of engaging the community; the strong reputation in the city and region of the program and its parent organization; and the family-like, respectful, and engaging work environment have contributed to the success of volunteer recruitment and retention.

The board of directors implements a framework of governance that is well supported by its by-laws and extensive policies, and demonstrates an effective governance model that leads and is passionate about the mission, values, and vision.

The staff members at the organization have a strong team culture that is supportive of each other and person focused. This is evidenced by the positive energy and innovative ways of engaging persons served daily in “having fun,” “enjoying coming to work,” and feeling appreciated even through a difficult workload and financial challenges.

There are many examples of quality improvement initiatives that demonstrate effectiveness and efficiency of both the business processes and improving the living experience, safety, and outcomes of persons served. These include, but are not limited to, the improved safety strategies for a growing population with dementia, improved clinical scores for wound management, falls, incontinence, and building and space utilization. Peer evaluation and auditing techniques have been used to ensure that quality standards are being met.

It is evident that the management seeks to hire highly motivated and qualified employees and then encourages them to use their skills and creativity to come up with solutions for effectiveness, efficiency, and business function. The staff members have responded well to the encouragement by providing many new initiatives in the areas of supplies savings, work order control, cost and control accounting, etc.

Infection control practices are very diligent as evidenced by the fact that the home has managed to have only one outbreak in the past year that closed the program to visitors for only a short duration.

Innovative and leading-edge programs and frameworks have been implemented that have and will continue to create quality improvements. In addition, the Quality Framework and its mapping from operations to strategic direction is a unique system of supporting the achievement of quality goals and targets through the use of an accountability framework of committees that is linked from operational committees to committees of the board of directors who are accountable for the mission and vision of the organization. The organization has been recognized for this unique system by Health Quality Ontario; was asked to present at the Health Quality Transformation 2013 conference; and was visited by the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care, Ontario, to acknowledge the innovative way the organization has engaged the board and its managers in being accountable for quality improvement and achieving its targets.

St. Joseph's Villa of Sudbury Accreditation Report 1

Areas for Improvement

SJV should seek improvement in the following areas.

The emergency plan does not identify essential services and the continuation of essential services. The organization is urged to update written emergency procedures to address the identification and the continuation of essential services.

Only evacuation and fire procedures have been tested annually on all shifts. The organization is urged to conduct unannounced tests of all emergency procedures on each shift. Tests should be analyzed for performance that addresses areas needing improvement, actions to be taken, results of performance improvement plans, and necessary education and training of personnel, and should be evidenced in writing.

The organization uses analysis of each incident to identify corrective and preventative action, but does not trend critical incidents over a long enough time period to identify trends and is therefore urged to address trends in its annual written analysis of all critical incidents.

The program should review its scope of services at least annually to ensure that capacity and competency of the organization are able to meet the changing and complex needs of the persons served.

Although the organization was able to verbalize how refunds are to be handled, the person’s written agreement did not reflect the practice. The person’s written agreement should contain information regarding the refund policies.

The program’s written philosophy of health and wellness should address aging in place. Although the effectiveness of education is reviewed and educational plans and content are changed as

needed, performance targets have not been established. The organization should measure the effectiveness of the learning techniques used in the learning environment for personnel against a performance target.

The organization should provide documented competency-based training for personnel at orientation and at regular intervals that includes the gathering of information about the person’s history, current status, important memories, favourite stories, daily routines, comfort/reminiscence objects, and people of importance.

Although the organization has a policy that addresses visiting hours and this information is included in the handbook for persons served, the policy indicates that visiting 24/7 is only by exception. The organization should develop policies and written procedures that allow the opportunity for the persons served to receive visitors 24 hours a day, if desired and the visit does not infringe upon the health, safety, or rights of any persons served and not just by exception.

2 St. Joseph's Villa of Sudbury Accreditation Report

Accreditation Decision

St. Joseph’s Villa of Sudbury has earned a Three-Year Accreditation. On balance, SJV has demonstrated substantial conformance to the CARF standards and has used the standards to improve effectively over time. The organization has a well-informed leadership team that implements best practices and leads the industry in the region with cutting-edge and innovative ways of being effective and efficient to its mission. The organization has a culture of quality improvements at all levels. The organization appears to have the commitment and resources to address the opportunities for improvement noted in this report and is encouraged to continue to use the CARF standards to further enhance the provision of its services.


Consultation

Section 1. ASPIRE to Excellence®

A. Leadership The leadership is encouraged to expand its assessment and learning of the organization’s cultural

competency and diversity gaps that demonstrate its awareness of the diversity of the key stakeholders. The organization has some written procedures on how to deal with allegations of violations of ethical

codes in documents, such as union contracts and board by-laws. These procedures do not relate to the ethical codes directly and the procedure is not easily accessed should a violation occur. The organization may want to include the violation procedure with the code of ethics and conduct documents.

E. Legal Requirements The staff and volunteer paper format files are maintained in file folders. The sections are divided by

loose sheets of paper and the documents are loosely filed and not secured, with a potential of being lost or missed during a review process. The organization may want to consider a way to secure the paper through mechanisms such as clips or fasteners to ensure the security of the paper files.

J. Technology The organization may want to include the disaster recovery preparedness plan with the emergency

manual to ensure consistency in direction and ease of access for leading the implementation of the emergency plan.

Consultation does not indicate non-conformance to standards but is offered as a suggestion for further quality improvement.


Standards Conformance This section of the Accreditation Report displays the specific reasons for any partial or non-conformance to standards identified as a result of the survey. The standards listed in this section are addressed in the organization’s Quality Improvement Plan, which can be accessed at customerconnect.carf.org.

Below are the possible reasons for partial or non-conformance to standards, along with an explanation of why each reason is cited.

To receive the information contained in this section in an alternate format, please contact [email protected].

Reason for partial or non-conformance Is cited:

Credentials inadequate When a standard element requires that an individual possess a specific credential or level of credential, the specific credential is not possessed, or the credential possessed is below the specified level.

Data or information necessary to address conformance not collected and/or evaluated

When the issue addressed by the standard element has not been considered and, consequently, the information necessary to address conformance has not been collected and/or evaluated in connection with the issue addressed.

Documentation inadequate When a standard element requires documentation or that documentation contain specific information, the documentation either does not exist or does not contain the specific information.

Effort not comprehensive When a standard element requires an activity to occur, the performance of the activity is insufficient to address the full scope of the activity.

Financial ratio calculation below the median

When the standard element rating is based on the calculation of a specific financial ratio, such ratio is below the 50th percentile.

Forms inadequate When a standard element requires use of a specific form or that the form contain specific information, the form is not used or does not contain the specific information.

Frequency inadequate When a standard element requires that an activity occur with a specific frequency or some unspecified regularity, the performance of the activity does not occur, occurs less frequently than required, or occurs less frequently than appropriate if regularity unspecified.

Information not communicated understandably

When a standard element requires that information be shared with certain persons, the information is either not shared or not shared in a manner that allows for comprehension by the recipient.

Involvement by appropriate person(s) inadequate

When a standard element requires the involvement of certain persons, those persons are either not involved or not involved in a sufficient manner.

Non-compliance with law, regulation, or other rule

When a standard element requires compliance with a legal requirement or a process for achieving legal compliance, sufficient evidence of compliance or the compliance process is not demonstrated.

Policy/plan/procedure/practice not consistently implemented

When a standard element requires a policy/plan/procedure/practice, it exists but the actual performance does not occur with sufficient regularity to be deemed standard operating procedure.

Policy/plan/procedure/practice not developed

When a standard element requires a policy/plan/procedure/practice, it is not in existence.

Policy/plan/procedure/practice not implemented

When a standard element requires a policy/plan/procedure/practice, it exists but there is no actual performance.

Policy/plan/procedure/practice recently implemented

When a standard element requires a policy/plan/procedure/practice, it exists but the actual performance has not been in place for sufficient time to establish a track record.

Training inadequate When a standard element requires that certain training occur, it either does not occur or does not occur with sufficient regularity to be deemed standard operating procedure.

Evidence of conformance inadequate When the requirement of a standard element is not satisfied, or is inconsistently satisfied and no other reasons apply.


Standard Number Standard Text

Cre

de

ntia

ls in

ad

eq

ua

te

Da

ta o

r in

form

atio

n n

ece

ssa

ry to

ad

dre

ss c

on

form

an

ce n

ot

colle

cte

d a

nd

/or

eva

lua

ted

Do

cum

en

tatio

n in

ad

eq

ua

te

Effo

rt n

ot c

om

pre

he

nsi

ve

Fin

an

cia

l ra

tio c

alc

ula

tion

be

low

me

dia

n

Fre

qu

en

cy in

ad

eq

ua

te

Info

rma

tion

no

t co

mm

un

ica

ted

un

de

rsta

nd

ab

ly

Invo

lve

me

nt b

y a

pp

rop

ria

te p

ers

on

(s)

ina

de

qu

ate

No

n-c

om

plia

nce

with

law

, re

gu

latio

n, o

r o

the

r ru

le

Po

licy/

pla

n/p

roce

du

re/p

ract

ice

no

t co

nsi

ste

ntly

imp

lem

en

ted

Po

licy/

pla

n n

ot d

eve

lop

ed

Pro

ced

ure

/pra

ctic

e n

ot d

eve

lop

ed

Po

licy/

pla

n/p

roce

du

re/p

ract

ice

no

t im

ple

me

nte

d

Po

licy/

pla

n/p

roce

du

re/p

ract

ice

re

cen

tly im

ple

me

nte

d

Tra

inin

g in

ad

eq

ua

te

Evi

de

nce

of c

on

form

an

ce in

ad

eq

ua

te

1.H.5.c.(7) There are written emergency procedures: That address, as follows: Identification of essential services.

X X

1.H.5.c.(8) There are written emergency procedures: That address, as follows: Continuation of essential services.

X X

1.H.7.a.(1) Unannounced tests of all emergency procedures: Are conducted at least annually: On each shift.

X X

1.H.7.c.(1) Unannounced tests of all emergency procedures: Are analyzed for performance that addresses: Areas needing improvement.

X

1.H.7.c.(2) Unannounced tests of all emergency procedures: Are analyzed for performance that addresses: Actions to be taken.

X

1.H.7.c.(3) Unannounced tests of all emergency procedures: Are analyzed for performance that addresses: Results of performance improvement plans.

X

1.H.7.d. Unannounced tests of all emergency procedures: Are evidenced in writing, including the analysis.

X X

1.H.10.a. A written analysis of all critical incidents is provided to or conducted by the leadership: At least annually.

X X

2.A.1.c. Each program/service: Reviews the scope of services at least annually and updates it as necessary.

X

2.A.10.e.(7) Based on the scope of services, there is a written agreement: That contains information regarding: Refund policies.

X

2.A.32.b. Based on its scope of services, the program has a written philosophy of health and wellness for the persons served that: Addresses aging in place.

X

2.A.42.c. Leadership fosters a continuous learning environment for personnel that: Measures the effectiveness of the techniques used in the learning environment against a performance target.

X

Reasons for Partial or Non-conformance



Cre

de

ntia

ls in

ad

eq

ua

te

Da

ta o

r in

form

atio

n n

ece

ssa

ry to

ad

dre

ss c

on

form

an

ce n

ot

colle

cte

d a

nd

/or

eva

lua

ted

Do

cum

en

tatio

n in

ad

eq

ua

te

Effo

rt n

ot c

om

pre

he

nsi

ve

Fin

an

cia

l ra

tio c

alc

ula

tion

be

low

me

dia

n

Fre

qu

en

cy in

ad

eq

ua

te

Info

rma

tion

no

t co

mm

un

ica

ted

un

de

rsta

nd

ab

ly

Invo

lve

me

nt b

y a

pp

rop

ria

te p

ers

on

(s)

ina

de

qu

ate

No

n-c

om

plia

nce

with

law

, re

gu

latio

n, o

r o

the

r ru

le

Po

licy/

pla

n/p

roce

du

re/p

ract

ice

no

t co

nsi

ste

ntly

imp

lem

en

ted

Po

licy/

pla

n n

ot d

eve

lop

ed

Pro

ced

ure

/pra

ctic

e n

ot d

eve

lop

ed

Po

licy/

pla

n/p

roce

du

re/p

ract

ice

no

t im

ple

me

nte

d

Po

licy/

pla

n/p

roce

du

re/p

ract

ice

re

cen

tly im

ple

me

nte

d

Tra

inin

g in

ad

eq

ua

te

Evi

de

nce

of c

on

form

an

ce in

ad

eq

ua

te


2.A.51.a.(1) The organization provides documented competency-based training for personnel, as appropriate to their roles: At: Orientation.

X

2.A.51.a.(2) The organization provides documented competency-based training for personnel, as appropriate to their roles: At: Regular intervals.

X X

2.A.51.b.(12)(a) The organization provides documented competency-based training for personnel, as appropriate to their roles: That includes: Gathering information about the person served in the following areas: History.

X X X

2.A.51.b.(12)(b) The organization provides documented competency-based training for personnel, as appropriate to their roles: That includes: Gathering information about the person served in the following areas: Current status.

X X X

2.A.51.b.(12)(c) The organization provides documented competency-based training for personnel, as appropriate to their roles: That includes: Gathering information about the person served in the following areas: Important memories.

X X X

2.A.51.b.(12)(d) The organization provides documented competency-based training for personnel, as appropriate to their roles: That includes: Gathering information about the person served in the following areas: Favorite stories.

X X X

2.A.51.b.(12)(e) The organization provides documented competency-based training for personnel, as appropriate to their roles: That includes: Gathering information about the person served in the following areas: Daily routines.

X X X

2.A.51.b.(12)(f) The organization provides documented competency-based training for personnel, as appropriate to their roles: That includes: Gathering information about the person served in the following areas: Comfort/reminiscence objects.

X X X



Cre

de

ntia

ls in

ad

eq

ua

te

Da

ta o

r in

form

atio

n n

ece

ssa

ry to

ad

dre

ss c

on

form

an

ce n

ot

colle

cte

d a

nd

/or

eva

lua

ted

Do

cum

en

tatio

n in

ad

eq

ua

te

Effo

rt n

ot c

om

pre

he

nsi

ve

Fin

an

cia

l ra

tio c

alc

ula

tion

be

low

me

dia

n

Fre

qu

en

cy in

ad

eq

ua

te

Info

rma

tion

no

t co

mm

un

ica

ted

un

de

rsta

nd

ab

ly

Invo

lve

me

nt b

y a

pp

rop

ria

te p

ers

on

(s)

ina

de

qu

ate

No

n-c

om

plia

nce

with

law

, re

gu

latio

n, o

r o

the

r ru

le

Po

licy/

pla

n/p

roce

du

re/p

ract

ice

no

t co

nsi

ste

ntly

imp

lem

en

ted

Po

licy/

pla

n n

ot d

eve

lop

ed

Pro

ced

ure

/pra

ctic

e n

ot d

eve

lop

ed

Po

licy/

pla

n/p

roce

du

re/p

ract

ice

no

t im

ple

me

nte

d

Po

licy/

pla

n/p

roce

du

re/p

ract

ice

re

cen

tly im

ple

me

nte

d

Tra

inin

g in

ad

eq

ua

te

Evi

de

nce

of c

on

form

an

ce in

ad

eq

ua

te


2.A.51.b.(12)(g) The organization provides documented competency-based training for personnel, as appropriate to their roles: That includes: Gathering information about the person served in the following areas: People of importance.

X X X

2.B.10. Policies and written procedures allow the opportunity for the persons served to receive visitors 24 hours a day, if desired and the visit does not infringe upon the health, safety, or rights of any persons served.

X


Benchmarking This section of the Accreditation Report benchmarks your organization’s conformance to standards. By comparing strengths and areas for improvement with various comparator groups, benchmarking encourages your organization to improve effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction, and access. This information should also stimulate discussions among stakeholders focused on better meeting the needs and preferences of the persons served. In addition, benchmarking:

Encourages a culture of continuous evaluation and improvement. Accelerates understanding of and agreement on areas for improvement. Helps prioritize improvement opportunities. Shifts internal thinking toward a focus on outcomes. Provides a reference to increase performance expectations. Motivates your team to work collaboratively to surpass benchmarks.

This report provides benchmarks (mean % of conformance) for each section of the ASPIRE to Excellence® quality framework.* When available, benchmark comparison groups include:

All surveyed organizations. All surveyed organizations in the same primary CARF customer service unit. Surveyed organizations with the same ownership type. Surveyed organizations in the same geographic region. Surveyed organizations with similar number of persons served annually. Surveyed organizations with similar staff size.

In addition, standards conformance for each organization undergoing resurvey is benchmarked against its previous survey in all standards areas.

Benchmark Comparison Groups

Primary area of accreditation: Aging Services (AS)

Ownership type: Private, Not for Profit

Geographic region: Canada–ON

Staff size (FTEs): 100–499

Persons served annually: 100–499

To receive the information contained in this section in an alternate format, please contact [email protected].

* Excluding Governance.


All surveyed organizations

79.3%

88.7%

98.1%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Nonaccreditation

CARF One-Year Accreditation

CARF Three-Year Accreditation

SJV

% of Conformance

Lead

ersh

ip

A: Assess the Environment

46.3%

81.7%

98.3%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Nonaccreditation



SJV

% of Conformance

Stra

tegi

c Pl

anni

ng

S: Set Strategy


All surveyed organizations — continued

60.0%

83.4%

99.8%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Nonaccreditation



SJV

% of Conformance

Inp

ut fr

om S

take

hold

ers

P: Persons Served and Other Stakeholders - Obtain Input

88.7%

94.7%

99.5%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Nonaccreditation



SJV

% of Conformance

Lega

l Req

uire

men

ts

I: Implement the Plan



69.2%

91.7%

99.2%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Nonaccreditation



SJV

% of ConformanceFina

ncia

l Pla

nnin

g an

d M

anag

emen

t


56.0%

79.7%

97.4%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Nonaccreditation



SJV

% of Conformance

Risk

Man

agem

ent




74.3%

84.0%

96.7%

95.6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Nonaccreditation



SJV

% of Conformance

Hea

lth

and

Saf

ety


72.9%

87.5%

97.6%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Nonaccreditation



SJV

% of Conformance

Hum

an R

esou

rces




63.8%

85.2%

99.0%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Nonaccreditation



SJV

% of Conformance

Tech

nolo

gy


86.5%

93.4%

98.6%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Nonaccreditation



SJV

% of Conformance

Righ

ts o

f Per

sons

Ser

ved




50.5%

74.7%

96.3%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Nonaccreditation



SJV

% of Conformance

Acc

essi

bili

ty


41.9%

70.0%

97.3%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Nonaccreditation



SJV

% of Conformance

Perf

orm

ance

Mea

sure

men

t an

d

Man

agem

ent

R: Review Results



22.0%

41.7%

92.9%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Nonaccreditation



SJV

% of Conformance

Perf

orm

ance

Im

pro

vem

ent

E: Effect Change


Other benchmarks

97.2%

97.8%

95.7%

96.8%

95.7%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

100 to 499 Persons Served

100 to 499 FTEs

Ontario

Private, Not for Profit

Aging Services

SJV

% of Conformance

Lead

ersh

ipA: Assess the Environment

97.8%

99.1%

98.1%

98.1%

96.9%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


100 to 499 FTEs

Ontario


Aging Services

SJV

% of Conformance

Stra

tegi

c Pl

anni

ng

S: Set Strategy


Other benchmarks — continued

99.6%

99.9%

99.8%

99.7%

99.7%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


100 to 499 FTEs

Ontario


Aging Services

SJV

% of Conformance

Inp

ut fr

om S

take

hold

ers

P: Persons Served and Other Stakeholders -Obtain Input

99.5%

99.7%

99.6%

99.3%

99.5%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


100 to 499 FTEs

Ontario


Aging Services

SJV

% of Conformance

Lega

l Req

uire

men

ts




99.1%

99.4%

99.1%

99.3%

99.1%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


100 to 499 FTEs

Ontario


Aging Services

SJV

% of Conformance

Fina

ncia

l Pla

nnin

g an

d M

anag

emen

tI: Implement the Plan

97.3%

98.2%

97.9%

96.7%

97.4%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


100 to 499 FTEs

Ontario


Aging Services

SJV

% of Conformance

Risk

Man

agem

ent




96.3%

96.8%

95.9%

95.8%

96.0%

95.6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


100 to 499 FTEs

Ontario


Aging Services

SJV

% of Conformance

Hea

lth

& S

afet

yI: Implement the Plan

97.1%

98.1%

97.0%

97.2%

97.3%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


100 to 499 FTEs

Ontario


Aging Services

SJV

% of Conformance

Hum

an R

esou

rces




98.8%

99.5%

98.7%

98.7%

98.6%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


100 to 499 FTEs

Ontario


Aging Services

SJV

% of Conformance

Tech

nolo

gyI: Implement the Plan

98.5%

98.6%

98.4%

98.3%

98.3%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


100 to 499 FTEs

Ontario


Aging Services

SJV

% of Conformance

Righ

ts o

f Per

sons

Ser

ved




96.4%

97.6%

95.5%

95.6%

94.0%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


100 to 499 FTEs

Ontario


Aging Services

SJV

% of Conformance

Acc

essi

bili

tyI: Implement the Plan

97.3%

98.2%

98.3%

96.8%

99.2%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


100 to 499 FTEs

Ontario


Aging Services

SJV

% of Conformance

Perf

orm

ance

Mea

sure

men

t an

d

Man

agem

ent

R: Review Results



92.5%

95.4%

94.0%

91.1%

96.8%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


100 to 499 FTEs

Ontario


Aging Services

SJV

% of Conformance

Perf

orm

ance

Im

pro

vem

ent

E: Effect Change


Previous survey

100.0%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Previous Survey

Current Survey

% of Conformance

Lead

ersh

ip

A: Assess the Environment

100.0%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Previous Survey

Current Survey

% of Conformance

Stra

tegi

c Pl

anni

ng

S: Set Strategy


Previous survey — continued

100.0%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Previous Survey

Current Survey

% of Conformance

Inp

ut fr

om S

take

hold

ers

P: Persons Served and Other Stakeholders - Obtain Input

100.0%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Previous Survey

Current Survey

% of Conformance

Lega

l Req

uire

men

ts




91.8%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Previous Survey

Current Survey

% of Conformance

Fina

ncia

l Pla

nnin

g an

d M

anag

emen

t


65.6%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Previous Survey

Current Survey

% of Conformance

Risk

Man

agem

ent




91.9%

95.6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Previous Survey

Current Survey

% of Conformance

Hea

lth

and

Saf

ety


96.2%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Previous Survey

Current Survey

% of Conformance

Hum

an R

esou

rces




100.0%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Previous Survey

Current Survey

% of Conformance

Tech

nolo

gy


100.0%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Previous Survey

Current Survey

% of Conformance

Righ

ts o

f Per

sons

Ser

ved




100.0%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Previous Survey

Current Survey

% of Conformance

Acc

essi

bili

ty


100.0%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Previous Survey

Current Survey

% of Conformance

Perf

orm

ance

Mea

sure

men

t an

d M

anag

emen

t

R: Review Results



100.0%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Previous Survey

Current Survey

% of Conformance

Perf

orm

ance

Im

pro

vem

ent

E: Effect Change

98.3%

98.2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Previous Survey

Current Survey

% of Conformance

A. P

rogr

am/S

ervi

ce S

truc

ture

Section 2. Care Process for the Persons Served



100.0%

99.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Previous Survey

Current Survey

% of Conformance

B. C

ongr

egat

e Re

sid

enti

al P

rogr

ams

Section 2. Care Process for the Persons Served

100.0%

100.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Previous Survey

Current Survey

% of Conformance

D. P

erso

n-C

entr

ed L

ong-

Term

Car

e C

omm

unit

y

Section 3. Program Specific Standards


as canada report template 3yearstatus, important memories, favourite stories, daily routines,...

Documents