‘save as you sail’ energy efficiency upgrade financial ......fuel consumption rt-flex82c engines...

39
‘Save As You Sail’ Energy efficiency upgrade financial modelling tool Prepared by: Marinos Magoulas, Deloitte Will Dawson, Forum for the Future SSI Members involved in the workstream Knowledge Partners to the workstream

Upload: others

Post on 07-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • ‘Save As You Sail’ Energy

    efficiency upgrade

    financial modelling tool

    Prepared by:

    Marinos Magoulas, Deloitte

    Will Dawson, Forum for the Future

    SSI Members involved in the workstream

    Knowledge Partners to the workstream

  • Introduction

    This slide deck presents the workings of the Excel financial modelling tool for the Sustainable

    Shipping Initiative’s Save As You Sail financing mechanism. It shows how the model operates

    and how you can use the tool to better understand and discuss financing for efficiency upgrades

    using the SAYS model. Please read the disclaimer before using the model.

    The model and further information about SAYS can be found here: http://ssi2040.org/what-we-

    do/workstreams/finance

    http://ssi2040.org/what-we-do/workstreams/financehttp://ssi2040.org/what-we-do/workstreams/financehttp://ssi2040.org/what-we-do/workstreams/financehttp://ssi2040.org/what-we-do/workstreams/financehttp://ssi2040.org/what-we-do/workstreams/financehttp://ssi2040.org/what-we-do/workstreams/finance

  • Disclaimer

  • 1. About Save As You Sail

    2. The role of Deloitte in the financial modelling

    tool

    3. Worked example overview of technologies

    4. Guide to Excel tool and worked examples

    results

    5. Opportunities for you to be involved

    Contents

  • What the SSI has achieved

    The members of the

    financing work stream have

    worked together to develop

    Save As You Sail (SAYS) –

    a robust financing package

    that will enable both owners

    and charterers to benefit

    from efficiency upgrades

    with transparent

    understanding of expected

    savings, and new financing

    facilities to fund upfront

    costs.

  • Save As You Sail for short term charters (

  • Five reasons for Save As You Sail

    1. The technology options are proven, available and used

    widely

    2. There are split incentive barriers in the time charter market

    - over 85% of time charters are for less than 12 months

    3. Shipping companies are struggling to gain access to

    finance – Moody’s

    4. The full cost savings are not passed through in time charter

    rates – University College London

    5. Bunker prices have stayed high

  • Section 2 Role of Deloitte

  • 9

    The Role of Deloitte

    Sustainable Shipping Initiative – 29 May 2013, Athens

    Evaluate

    SAYS

    Conduct

    Sensitivity

    Analysis

    on Critical

    Inputs

    Discuss

    Findings &

    Improve the

    Financial

    Model

    Review the

    Financial

    Model

    Developed by

    the SSI Team

    Understand the

    Save as you

    Sail (SAYS)

    Concept

  • 10

    Save as you Sail (SAYS) at a glance

    Sustainable Shipping Initiative – 29 May 2013, Athens

    Financing via Loan

    Efficiency premium agreed

    Fuel Savings are generated

    Loan Repayment

    Baseline Measurements & Monitoring

    Upgrade of the Ship Engine and/or Hull

    Owner receives

    enhanced charter

    rates

  • 11

    How does the quantitative financial model work?

    Sustainable Shipping Initiative – 29 May 2013, Athens

    KEY INPUTS

    Upgrade costs

    (USD)

    Fuel Price

    (USD/tonne)

    Charterer’s expected

    savings

    (% of expected fuel cost

    savings retained by

    charterer)

    Loan Profile

    (loan to value, duration,

    interest rate)

    Fuel saving

    (% fuel consumption

    reduction)

    Expected Fuel Cost

    Savings (USD/day)

    Owner’s Loan Payments Owner net profit,

    NPV, IRR

    Efficiency premium

    (increase in charter rate

    post upgrade)

    PRIMARY OUTPUTS CALCULATIONS

    Pre-upgrade fuel

    consumption rate

    (tonnes/day)

    Charterer

    Net profit

  • 12

    Deloitte’s financial Model Review Procedures

    Sustainable Shipping Initiative – 29 May 2013, Athens

    Data provided by Wartsila/AkzoNobel

    Input tested

    Investment Appraisal

    • Fuel Savings as %

    • Cost of Upgrade

    • Other technological inputs

    • Fuel Price Volatility

    • Sailing Time

    • Efficiency Premium

    • Loan Profile

    ‒ Interest, duration

    • Investment Appraisal

    Criteria Developed

    ‒ Discounted (and simple)

    Payback Period

    ‒ Net Present Value

    ‒ Internal Rate of Return

    • Sensitivity Analyses on:

    ‒ “Heavy” Factors:

    • Sailing Time

    • Fuel Price Volatility

    • Charter rate premium

    ‒ “Soft” Factors:

    • Loan Profile (interest,

    duration)

    • Loan to Value

  • 13

    Save as you Sail (SAYS) Pilot Deloitte’s Future Role

    • Monitor the Fuel Savings Figures

    • Collect Data from Real Life Examples

    • Update the Model with Actual Data

    • Monitor & Refine the Model to Better Ascertain the Implied

    Return

    Deloitte Future

    Role

  • Section 3 Worked example overview of technologies

  • 15

    Save as you Sail (SAYS) Pilot - Worked Examples

    Sustainable Shipping Initiative – 29 May 2013, Athens

    Worked example 1: Slow steaming

    and intelligent combustion

    retrofitted to a container vessel

    Worked example 2: Advanced

    fluoropolymer foul release coating,

    optimised propeller and propulsion

    efficiency optimiser fitted to a handymax

    dry bulker in dry dock

  • 25 September 2013 Customer Webinar 16 © Wärtsilä

    Fuel Consumption RT-flex82C engines

    Tier ll tuning

    With TC type

    A100 or MET-

    MB

    6.3 g/kWh 7.5 g/kWh 9.7 g/kWh

    RT-flex Delta Tuning and Low Load

    RTA vs. RT-flex LLT up to 6.4%

    RT-flex Std. vs. LLT up to 2.7%

    Technologies in Worked Example 1 Slow Steaming & Intelligence Combustion

  • 25 September 2013 Customer Webinar 17 © Wärtsilä

    Computational Fluid Dynamics

    Solutions are calculated by the CFD department

    Wakefield measurements of existing model test

    helps determine calculation parameters

    CFD is used for

    determination of strut angle

    Calculating and comparing efficiency

    Propeller and Propulsion Technologies in Example 2 Optimised Propeller Design

  • All products supplied and technical advice or recommendations given are subject to our standard Conditions of Sale.

    Advanced Foul Release Coatings

    Creates a very smooth surface reducing skin friction and improving

    vessel efficiency

    Biocide-free & high solids reducing environmental footprint & waste

    Hull coating technologies in Example 2

  • Section 3 Guide to Excel tool and worked examples results The following slides show the results of running the financial model in the two worked examples. In the slide with four tables, each table alters one of the inputs that has a significant impact on the business case for the vessel owner – fuel price, sailing time or efficiency charter rate premium. In each of the runs of the model the follow factors that have a low impact on the owner’s return are kept constant as follows: Loan details: 5% fixed interest repayment rate, paid quarterly over a 3 year term Cash investment from the owner: 20% of the project cost Discount rate: is the ship owner’s Weighted Average Cost of Capital, which is modelled on the average cost of capital for Greek shipping owning companies Investment period: cashflows are calculated over 10 years, the hull coating has an additional cost after 5 years to recoat included in the model.

  • 20

    Save as you Sail (SAYS) Pilot Screenshot of Excel model of Save As You Sail

    For discussion purposes only

  • 21

    Save as you Sail (SAYS) Pilot Case study details location

    Case studies in the model

    For discussion purposes only

  • 22

    Save as you Sail (SAYS) Pilot Screenshot of Case studies included

    For discussion purposes only

  • 23

    Save as you Sail (SAYS) Pilot Location of scenario input variables

    Input variables

    For discussion purposes only

  • 24

    Save as you Sail (SAYS) Pilot Scenario inputs assumptions shown in orange cells

    For discussion purposes only

  • 25

    Save as you Sail (SAYS) Pilot Input variables and calculations for sensitivity analysis

    Input variables

    For discussion purposes only

  • 26

    Save as you Sail (SAYS) Pilot Input variables for sensitivity analysis (shown in orange cells )

    For discussion purposes only

  • 27

    Save as you Sail (SAYS) Pilot Summary of project cash flows model outputs displayed

    For discussion purposes only

  • 28

    Save as you Sail (SAYS) Pilot Summary of investment appraisal analysis outputs

    For discussion purposes only

  • 29

    Assumptions

    Sailing Time 250 days

    Fuel Price $ 611 per tonne

    Charter rate premium 50% of Expected Fuel Savings

    Investment Appraisal

    Payback Period (Years) 2.5 years

    Net Present Value ($ ‘000) 522

    Internal Rate of Return (%) 82%

    Assumptions

    Sailing Time 208 days

    Fuel Price $ 611 per tonne

    Charter rate premium 50% of Expected Fuel Savings

    Investment Appraisal

    Payback Period (Years) 3.0 years

    Net Present Value ($ ‘000) 380

    Internal Rate of Return (%) 59%

    Assumptions

    Sailing Time 250 days

    Fuel Price $ 458 per tonne (-25%)

    Charter rate premium 50% of Expected Fuel Savings

    Investment Appraisal

    Payback Period (Years) 3.5 years

    Net Present Value ($ ‘000) 309

    Internal Rate of Return (%) 49%

    Assumptions

    Sailing Time 250 days

    Fuel Price $ 611 per tonne

    Charter rate premium 40% of Expected Fuel Savings

    Investment Appraisal

    Payback Period (Years) 3.3 years

    Net Present Value ($ ‘000) 352

    Internal Rate of Return (%) 55%

    Save as you Sail (SAYS) Pilot Worked Example 1 Results and Sensitivity Test –

    Intelligence Combustion & Slow Streaming Upgrade Kit

    For discussion purposes only

  • 30

    Sailing Days:

    250 Charter rate premium (% of Expected Fuel Savings)

    100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

    Fuel

    Price

    (USD

    per

    tonne)

    733 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.5 3.3 4.5 8.3 > 10

    703 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.8 2.3 2.8 3.5 4.8 9.0 > 10

    672 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.8 3.5 5.3 9.8 > 10

    642 1.5 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.8 5.5 > 10 > 10

    611 1.5 1.8 1.8 2.3 2.5 3.0 4.0 6.0 > 10 > 10

    580 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.8 3.3 4.3 6.3 > 10 > 10

    550 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.5 2.8 3.5 4.5 7.0 > 10 > 10

    519 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.5 3.0 3.8 5.0 7.5 > 10 > 10

    489 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.8 3.3 4.0 5.5 8.3 > 10 > 10

    DISCOUNTED PAYBACK PERIOD (in years) results when altering the charter rate premium and

    the fuel price from which this is calculated. The Red box shows the default fuel price.

    Investment Cost: $ 370k

    Save as you Sail (SAYS) Pilot Sensitivity Tables – Intelligence Combustion & Slow Streaming Upgrade Kit

    For discussion purposes only

  • 31

    Save as you Sail (SAYS) Pilot Sensitivity Tables – Intelligence Combustion & Slow Streaming Upgrade Kit

    Sailing Days:

    250 Charter rate premium (% of Expected Fuel Savings)

    100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

    Fuel

    Price

    (USD

    per

    tonne)

    733 1,717 1,512 1,307 1,102 898 693 488 283 79 (126)

    703 1,631 1,435 1,239 1,043 846 650 454 258 61 (135)

    672 1,546 1,358 1,171 983 795 607 420 232 44 (143)

    642 1,461 1,281 1,102 923 744 565 386 207 27 (152)

    611 1,375 1,205 1,034 863 693 522 352 181 10 (160)

    580 1,290 1,128 966 804 642 480 317 155 (7) (169)

    550 1,205 1,051 898 744 590 437 283 130 (24) (177)

    519 1,119 974 829 684 539 394 249 104 (41) (186)

    489 1,034 898 761 625 488 352 215 79 (58) (194)

    NET PRESENT VALUE

    (in 000s USD)

    Investment Cost: $ 370k

    These results show that there is a positive investment

    case for the owner in this scenario at current fuel prices if

    they can negotiate an increase in charter rates equivalent

    to 20% of the charterer’s expected savings on bunker

    costs or at 30% if fuel prices fall to $489/tonne

    For discussion purposes only

  • 32

    Save as you Sail (SAYS) Pilot Worked Example 2 Results and Sensitivity Test –

    Advanced Coating & Optimised Propeller

    Assumptions

    Sailing Time 250 days

    Fuel Price $ 611 per tonne

    Charter rate premium 50% of Expected Fuel Savings

    Investment Appraisal

    Payback Period (Years) 3.0 years

    Net Present Value ($ ‘000) 713

    Internal Rate of Return (%) 66%

    Assumptions

    Sailing Time 208 days

    Fuel Price $ 611 per tonne

    Charter rate premium 50% of Expected Fuel Savings

    Investment Appraisal

    Payback Period (Years) 3.5 years

    Net Present Value ($ ‘000) 479

    Internal Rate of Return (%) 48%

    Assumptions

    Sailing Time 250 days

    Fuel Price $ 458 per tonne (-25%)

    Charter rate premium 50% of Expected Fuel Savings

    Investment Appraisal

    Payback Period (Years) 3.8 years

    Net Present Value ($ ‘000) 362

    Internal Rate of Return (%) 39%

    Assumptions

    Sailing Time 250 days

    Fuel Price $ 611 per tonne

    Charter rate premium 40% of Expected Fuel Savings

    Investment Appraisal

    Payback Period (Years) 3.5 years

    Net Present Value ($ ‘000) 432

    Internal Rate of Return (%) 44%

    For discussion purposes only

  • 33

    Save as you Sail (SAYS) Pilot Sensitivity Tables – Advanced Coating & Optimised Propeller

    Sailing Days:

    250 Charter rate premium (% of Expected Fuel Savings)

    100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

    Fuel

    Price

    (USD

    per

    tonne)

    733 1.5 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.3 3.0 3.8 5.5 > 10 > 10

    703 1.5 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.5 3.0 4.0 5.8 > 10 > 10

    672 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.5 3.3 4.3 6.0 > 10 > 10

    642 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.8 3.3 4.5 6.5 > 10 > 10

    611 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.8 7.0 > 10 > 10

    580 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.5 3.0 3.8 5.0 7.8 > 10 > 10

    550 1.8 2.0 2.3 2.8 3.3 4.0 5.5 8.3 > 10 > 10

    519 2.0 2.3 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.3 5.8 9.3 > 10 > 10

    489 2.0 2.3 2.8 3.0 3.8 4.8 6.5 > 10 > 10 > 10

    DISCOUNTED PAYBACK PERIOD

    (in years)

    Investment Cost: $ 680k

    For discussion purposes only

  • 34

    Save as you Sail (SAYS) Pilot Sensitivity Tables – Advanced Coating & Optimised Propeller

    Sailing Days:

    250 Charter rate premium (% of Expected Fuel Savings)

    100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%

    Fuel

    Price

    (USD

    per

    tonne)

    733 2,675 2,338 2,002 1,666 1,329 993 657 320 (16) (353)

    703 2,535 2,212 1,890 1,568 1,245 923 600 278 (44) (367)

    672 2,394 2,086 1,778 1,469 1,161 853 544 236 (72) (381)

    642 2,254 1,960 1,666 1,371 1,077 783 488 194 (100) (395)

    611 2,114 1,834 1,554 1,273 993 713 432 152 (128) (409)

    580 1,974 1,708 1,441 1,175 909 643 376 110 (156) (423)

    550 1,834 1,582 1,329 1,077 825 572 320 68 (184) (437)

    519 1,694 1,455 1,217 979 741 502 264 26 (212) (451)

    489 1,554 1,329 1,105 881 657 432 208 (16) (240) (465)

    NET PRESENT VALUE (in USD)

    Investment Cost: $ 680k

    These results show that there is a positive investment

    case for the owner in this scenario at current fuel prices if

    they can negotiate an increase in charter rates equivalent

    to 22% of the charterer’s expected savings on bunker

    costs or at 30% if fuel prices fall to $519/tonne

    For discussion purposes only

  • The opportunity

  • Be involved in the pilot

    1. Higher value ship, attracting higher charter

    and resale rates

    2. Retrofit loan from ABN AMRO

    3. Higher quality performance data to use in

    marketing

    4. Increased income during and after the loan

    period

    5. Support from 21 SSI members, Deloitte and

    HFW

    6. Dedicated SSI communications support to

    showcase your leadership with articles and

    presentations targeting top-tier channels

  • Further resources for you…

    1. A summary document that sets out SAYS

    in more detail and includes two worked

    examples

    2. An Excel financial model with explanatory

    slides produced by Deloitte

    3. Contractual guidance summary by HFW

    4. Contacts with ABN AMRO to discuss

    financing options*

    5. Contacts with Akzo Nobel and Wartsila to

    discuss technology options*

    *SAYS can be used with other finance and

    technology providers

    To access the resources visit

    www.ssi2040.org

    To express interest in using SAYS contact

    [email protected]

    To reach Will Dawson: [email protected]

    0044 7824 692 149

    Forum for the Future

    Sustainable Shipping Initiative (SSI)

    Inputs / Outputs Sheet Back Button

    UPGRADE OPTIONS PMI1 TCCO1 PMI1+TCCO1 Bubble hull

    Technology Inputs Calculation Metric

    Sailing Time Per Annum [1] Hours per Year 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000

    Vessel Maximum Power Output [2] KW 48,000 48,000 48,000 48,000

    Average Power Output as % of Maximum Power [3] % 40% 40% 40% 40%

    Average Power Output [4] = [2] X [3] KW 19,200 19,200 19,200 19,200

    Energy Use per Year [5] = [1] X [4] KWh 115,200,000 115,200,000 115,200,000 115,200,000

    Fuel Savings [6] g/KWh 2.0 3.5 5.5 14.0

    Fuel Savings (in tonnes per year) [7] = [5] X [6] Tonnes/Year 230 401 631 1,613

    Fuel Price [8] USD/Tonne 626 626 626 626

    Fuel Savings (in financial terms) [9] = [7] X [8] USD/Year 144,230 250,961 395,191 1,009,613

    Cost of Upgrade Option USD 117,000 250,000 367,000 683,000

    CONTROL PANEL (SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS SELECTION)

    Upgrade Option PMI1

    Sailing Time (in hours per year) 6,000

    Fuel Price Reduction 0%

    Fuel Price 626

    Fuel Savings 144,230

    Fuel Savings Split (Owner's share) 50%

    Cost of Upgrade 117,000

    Loan to Value 80%

    Loan 93,600

    Cash 23,400

    Loan Profile

    Loan Interest Rate (annual) 5%

    Loan Interest Rate (effective) 1.3%

    Loan Installments (number) 12

    INVESTMENT APPRAISAL CRITERIA (OWNER)

    Payback Period (in months) 9 0.8

    Discounted Payback Period (in months) 9 0.8

    Average Cost Savings / month (during loan period; after loan payments) 3,215

    Average Cost Savings / month (after loan period) 6,010

    Equity IRR [Internal Rate of Return] (%) 169% Should be compared to Cost of Equity

    Net Present Value (in USD) 294,542 Should be positive to Accept

    Project IRR [Internal Rate of Return] (%) 61% Should be compared to Weighted Cost of Capital

    3 years; Interest Payments every 3 months

    Sailing Time (in days per year): 250

    Payback Period (in years)

    Discounted Payback Period (in years)

    http://www.ssi2040.org/mailto:[email protected]:[email protected] Model_Deloitte version_v7.xlsm

  • Contacts

    Technology providers

    Maarten Van der Klip of Wartsila : [email protected] : +31 38 425 3109

    John Wilsher of AkzoNobel : [email protected] ; +44 191 401 2564

    Finance provider

    Gust Biesbroeck - ABN AMRO [email protected] : +31.10.4019701

    Wider information

    Will Dawson – Forum for the Future : [email protected] +44 7824 692 149

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • www.ssi2040.org

    Registered charity no:

    GB 162 3473 19 Will Dawson

    [email protected]

    SSI Members involved in the workstream

    Knowledge Partners to the workstream