assessing for outcomes not inputs - a&dc for outcomes not inputs hannah hemmingham & marija...

15
Assessing for Outcomes Not Inputs Hannah Hemmingham & Marija Potter, IBM

Upload: lamtruc

Post on 16-May-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Assessing for Outcomes Not Inputs - a&dc for Outcomes Not Inputs Hannah Hemmingham & Marija Potter, IBM

Assessing for Outcomes Not InputsHannah Hemmingham & Marija Potter, IBM

Page 2: Assessing for Outcomes Not Inputs - a&dc for Outcomes Not Inputs Hannah Hemmingham & Marija Potter, IBM

© 2014 IBM Corporation2

Session overview

• Today’s organisational context

• Proposed solutions to today’s challenges

• Introducing GSK Expectations

• Assessing for Outcomes

Page 3: Assessing for Outcomes Not Inputs - a&dc for Outcomes Not Inputs Hannah Hemmingham & Marija Potter, IBM

© 2014 IBM Corporation3

Today’s organisational context

• Volatility

• Uncertainty

• Complexity

• Ambiguity

Page 4: Assessing for Outcomes Not Inputs - a&dc for Outcomes Not Inputs Hannah Hemmingham & Marija Potter, IBM

© 2014 IBM Corporation4

Changes in organisational structure to enable increased adaptability

• High specialisation

• Rigid departmentalisation

• Clear chain of command• Narrow spans of control

• Centralisation• High formalisation

The mechanistic model

• Cross functional teams

• Cross hierarchical teams

• Free flow of information• Wide spans of control

• De-centalisation• Low formalisation

The organic model

Page 5: Assessing for Outcomes Not Inputs - a&dc for Outcomes Not Inputs Hannah Hemmingham & Marija Potter, IBM

© 2014 IBM Corporation5

Moving from Control to Open in Performance Management

Control

Organisation

Open Organisations

Page 6: Assessing for Outcomes Not Inputs - a&dc for Outcomes Not Inputs Hannah Hemmingham & Marija Potter, IBM

© 2014 IBM Corporation6

Open Organisations

• CEOs believe their organisations will be impacted more by the pressure to be

open than the need to control.

• The emphasis on openness is 30 percent higher among outperformers

Control Organisations Balance between

openness and

control

Open Organisations

Outperformers

Underperformers

Page 7: Assessing for Outcomes Not Inputs - a&dc for Outcomes Not Inputs Hannah Hemmingham & Marija Potter, IBM

© 2014 IBM Corporation7

What does this mean for defining performance?

7

Behaviours Impact and Outcomes

Control Organisation

Prescriptive

What has to be achieved in

line with the Organisations Values

The day to day actions that

you take to achieve

Open Organisation

Judgement & Trust

Page 8: Assessing for Outcomes Not Inputs - a&dc for Outcomes Not Inputs Hannah Hemmingham & Marija Potter, IBM

© 2014 IBM Corporation8

How are your clients

reacting to the VUCA world?

What does this mean for assessing performance?

Page 9: Assessing for Outcomes Not Inputs - a&dc for Outcomes Not Inputs Hannah Hemmingham & Marija Potter, IBM

GSK Case Study

Page 10: Assessing for Outcomes Not Inputs - a&dc for Outcomes Not Inputs Hannah Hemmingham & Marija Potter, IBM

© 2014 IBM Corporation10

Introduction of GSK Expectations

Set direction

& inspire

Work across

boundaries

Release

energy

Develop

capability

& talent

Drive

performance

Live our

values

Page 11: Assessing for Outcomes Not Inputs - a&dc for Outcomes Not Inputs Hannah Hemmingham & Marija Potter, IBM

© 2014 IBM Corporation11

What are we measuring?

Competencies = BARS Expectations = Impact Rating Scales

Open

OrganisationControl

OrganisationGuiding

Principles

How would you expect someone

high performing to behave?What would you expect someone

high performing to achieve?

Page 12: Assessing for Outcomes Not Inputs - a&dc for Outcomes Not Inputs Hannah Hemmingham & Marija Potter, IBM

© 2014 IBM Corporation12

Writing the IRSs

Guiding Principles Exercise Scenarios Impact Rating Statement

Set Direction and Inspire:

Using sound judgement to set a clear and compelling vision that shows your people how their work contributes to delivering our strategy and mission

Product

Proposal

Lee understood how the

changes related to the

regions strategyAlignment: Goals contribute to the wider

team/ organisational

strategy

Role Play

Links between the proposed product and the pharmaceutical strategy were clear

Page 13: Assessing for Outcomes Not Inputs - a&dc for Outcomes Not Inputs Hannah Hemmingham & Marija Potter, IBM

© 2014 IBM Corporation13

Where did IRSs feel most different?

Group Exercises Role Play

• The candidate’s inputs enabled the team to…..

• Impact to the character

• Impact to the issue

Page 14: Assessing for Outcomes Not Inputs - a&dc for Outcomes Not Inputs Hannah Hemmingham & Marija Potter, IBM

© 2014 IBM Corporation14

Our Learning

• Unlearning and re-learning for Design

• Unlearning and re-learning for Assessors

• Simplification can be complicated

• Feedback from assessors has been that the IRSs are simple and easy to use

• Inter-rater reliability is high

Page 15: Assessing for Outcomes Not Inputs - a&dc for Outcomes Not Inputs Hannah Hemmingham & Marija Potter, IBM

© 2014 IBM Corporation15

Questions