assessing impacts and benefits - relevance of co-benefits for namas and indcs

10
Assessing impacts and benefits – relevance of co-benefits for NAMAs and INDCs Frauke Roeser, [email protected] Thomas Day, [email protected] MitigationMomentum Side Event 1 December 2015, Paris COP 21

Upload: newclimate-institute

Post on 09-Jan-2017

234 views

Category:

Environment


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Assessing impacts and benefits - relevance of co-benefits for NAMAs and INDCs

Assessing impacts and benefits – relevance of co-benefits for NAMAs and INDCs

Frauke Roeser, [email protected]

Thomas Day, [email protected]

MitigationMomentum Side Event

1 December 2015, Paris COP 21

Page 2: Assessing impacts and benefits - relevance of co-benefits for NAMAs and INDCs

NAMAs – The challenge of implementation

Sustainable development key characteristic of NAMAs

Mitigation is co-benefit in many sectors

However, this is not reflected in NAMA development practice where co-benefits are still often afterthoughts

Key challenge for NAMAs: moving from planning to implementation

Sectors and line ministries play a fundamental role

Structured co-benefits assessment can support transition to implementation

Page 3: Assessing impacts and benefits - relevance of co-benefits for NAMAs and INDCs

INDCs – The challenge of ambition

Demonstrate how co-benefits could be used to incentivise ambitious GHG reductions

Assessment of missed benefits that could have been achieved if INDC in line with 2°C pathway: 100% renewables by 2050 compared to current policies

Illustrative results for USA, China, EU, Canada, Japan, Chile, South Africa, India

Page 4: Assessing impacts and benefits - relevance of co-benefits for NAMAs and INDCs

Methodology

Co- benefits consideredReduced fossil fuel imports – savings in US$

Reduced air pollution – human health: number of premature deaths per year

Creating green jobs – number of jobs in energy sector

Results only illustrative – due to complexity and uncertainty associated with quantification of co-benefits

Use of three scenarios for each country:Current policies

INDC – assumptions on sector implications

100% renewables by 2050 – inline with below 2°C

Page 5: Assessing impacts and benefits - relevance of co-benefits for NAMAs and INDCs

Example – EU Natural gas demand

Page 6: Assessing impacts and benefits - relevance of co-benefits for NAMAs and INDCs

Example – China job creation

Page 7: Assessing impacts and benefits - relevance of co-benefits for NAMAs and INDCs

Illustrative results – Fossil fuel imports

Page 8: Assessing impacts and benefits - relevance of co-benefits for NAMAs and INDCs

Illustrative results – air pollution

Page 9: Assessing impacts and benefits - relevance of co-benefits for NAMAs and INDCs

Illustrative results – job creation

Page 10: Assessing impacts and benefits - relevance of co-benefits for NAMAs and INDCs

Key conclusions

Highlighting co-benefits in the design of INDCs & NAMAs could increase the willingness to undertake and implement ambitious mitigation actions

The joint consideration of mitigation actions and co-benefits could increase the cost-effectiveness of policies

Consideration of co-benefits could speed up the implementation of mitigation actions and thereby reduce the costs of climate change mitigation.