assessing international sem results
DESCRIPTION
Assessing International SEM Results. Clayton Smith, Ed.D . Vice-Provost, Students & International University of Windsor [email protected]. Topics. A bit about SEM The University of Windsor Story Lessons Learned Resources. Enrolment Management: The Classical Definition. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Clayton Smith, Ed.D.Vice-Provost, Students & International
University of [email protected]
Assessing International SEM Results
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Topics A bit about SEM The University of Windsor Story• Lessons Learned• Resources
2
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
3
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Enrolment Management: The Classical Definition
Enrollment management is an organizational concept and a systematic set of activities designed to enable educational institutions to exert more influence over their student enrollments. Organized by strategic planning and supported by institutional research, enrollment management activities concern student college choice, transition to college, student attrition and retention, and student outcomes. These processes are studied to guide institutional practices in the areas of new student recruitment and financial aid, student support services, curriculum development and other academic areas that affect enrollments, student persistence and student outcomes from college.
- Hossler, 1990
4
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
5
What is International Strategic Enrolment Management?
Using SEM principles in the context of international students and how they relate to your institution’s mission and the educational goals of the students recruited and enrolled.
-Braxton & Conroy, 2008
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
SEM is Achieved by… Establishing clear goals for the number & types of students
Promoting student academic success by improving access, transition, retention, & graduation
Enabling effective strategic & financial planning
Supporting the delivery of effective academic programs
6
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
SEM is Achieved by (Cont’d)… Creating a data-rich environment to inform decisions &
evaluate strategies
Improving process & organizational efficiency
Establishing top quality student-centred service
Strengthening communications & collaboration among departments across the campus
7
- Bontrager, 2004
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
SEM Ethos A shared responsibility Integrated institutional planning A focus on service Accountability Research & evaluation For the long haul
-Henderson, 2005
8
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Importance of Assessment
9
DATA - What puts the “S” in “SEM”
Transactional data
Recruitment and retention analysis
Assessment of strategies, services and outcomes
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
10
10
Creating a Data-Driven Enrollment Plan
ActiveAlumni
Graduated
Engaged,Satisfied
Retained
Enrolled
Deposited
Applied/Admitted
Prospective Students
Alumni Research
Placement DataGraduate Rates
Retention DataStudent Surveys
Yield DataAdmission Statistics
Competitive AnalysisMarket Research
The EnrollmentData Agenda
Financial Aid Analysis
Enrollment Strategies
Alumniengagement
Graduation/Career Development
Yield
Recruitment
Marketing
First Year Exp. &Retention Programs
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
11
The University of Windsor Story
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
12
University of WindsorComprehensive university9 Faculties16,000 students10% international studentsA border city (Canada/US)
2 of our top 5 priorities include enhancing the student experience and internationalization
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
13
Africa16%
Amer-icas6%
Asia31%
Europe6%
Middle East11%
Oceania1%
South Asia30%
Geographic Origin of International Students, Fall 2011
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
BackgroundOverall, international enrolments declined from 601 in
fall 1992 to 375 in fall 1998. Since the University had no existing international
student recruitment effort in place, it was determined that we should hire one or more firms to represent us abroad. In early 1998, hired one recruitment firmSubsequently added a second firm in China
14
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Enrolment Statistics: ESL
15
ELIP 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011ELIP F 33 11 0 15 73ELIP 1 66 64 54 51 120ELIP 2 126 120 78 87 166ELIP 3 173 136 121 88 189
Subtotal 398 331 253 241 548
Some considerable ESL growth
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
New FT UG Statistics
16
Faculty 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011FASS 77 53 35 16 26 15 12Business 38 39 71 50 46 31 21Engineering 72 62 59 91 50 48 62Human Kinetics - - 1 - 1 - 2
Interfaculty - 3 1 2 2 2 2
Nursing 5 - 1 - - - -Science 52 59 44 44 20 18 9Subtotal 244 216 212 203 145 114 108
After being flat-lined for 4 years, FT UG enrollment has declined by nearly half in recent years.
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
New International Student Enrollment
17
UG/Grad FT/PT 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11UG FT 412 398 398 372 266 279UG PT 204 131 97 72 111 132UG ALL 616 529 495 444 377 411Grad FT 107 156 227 223 275 287Grad PT 0 0 0 0 0 2Grad ALL 107 156 227 223 275 289 TOTAL 723 547 768 648 722 601
Since 2005-06, the University’s entering international enrolment has decreased. Undergraduate enrolment has declined from while graduate enrolment has increased.
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Total International Student Enrollment
18
UG/Grad FT/PT 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011UG FT 1014 1033 1044 1054 903 866 836UG PT 356 298 313 256 279 249 284UG ALL 1370 1331 1357 1310 1182 1115 1120Grad FT 210 312 367 405 414 484 547Grad PT 4 2 4 2 2 4 7Grad ALL 214 314 371 407 416 488 554 TOTAL 1584 1645 1728 1717 1598 1603 1674
Undergraduate enrollment has declined while graduate enrollment has increased.
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
19
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
60 65 70 75 80 85
76.9
70.1
71.7
80.7
69.8
70.7
72.5
74.7
76.4
81.8
1st to 2nd Year International Student Retention
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
20
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 20080
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1st to 2nd Year Student Retention
International Students Ontario High School GradsOther All
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
21
Proposed Changes to International Student Recruitment
Report of the Working Group on International Student Recruitment
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Recruitment Review MethodologyInternal challengesExternal challengesConducted a financial audit and operational reviewCommissioned an external benchmarking study from a
US-based higher education consulting firmObtained consulting services from a UK-based
international higher education consulting firm
22
Formed Working Group in 2010
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Internal ChallengesIncreased turnaround time in admission letters is
paramountProgram planning and pricing are important issues for
the international student recruitment program.The University’s original recruitment model saw our
recruitment firm performing all student recruitment responsibilities. Many more players today.
23
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
External ChallengesInternational recruitment for the University of
Windsor continues to be plagued from the effects of⁻ the global economic downturn, ⁻ the strengthened Canadian dollar, ⁻ increased competition in the international student
recruitment field, ⁻ a set of natural disasters, and ⁻ a myriad of market specific matters.
Canada’s profile as a higher education destination still very much trails the reputations of the U.S., U.K. and Australia.
24
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
External Challenges (Cont’d)The Ontario provincial government has endorsed
increasing international enrolment in post-secondary institutions by 50 percent over five years with the hope that many will stay in Ontario after graduation (Government of Ontario, 2010).
Ontario’s decision to increase international enrolment corresponds with a growing market for these students. By 2025, global demand for international education is predicted to grow from 1.9 million to 7.2 million students (OECD, 2006).
25
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Financial AuditThe Finance Department produced a report that
shows the funds the University has paid to our primary recruitment firms.
A partial reason why we have increased University payments is due to the per-student recruitment fee increasing over this period. So while undergraduate enrolment has decreased, payments increased by replacing undergraduate enrolment fees with those billed for graduate and ESL student enrolments.
There has also been an overall increase in the fees we pay for admissions support.
26
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Operational ReviewWe were unable to conduct an operational review of
our recruitment activities due to a lack of data from the recruitment firms.
This is impacted by the screening process (which we requested and support) our recruitment firm has developed which results in only qualified applications being submitted to the University.
27
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
External Benchmarking StudyConducted by Washington, DC-based Education
Advisory BoardThe institutions that participated included Michigan
State University, Ohio State University, Portland State University, Syracuse University, University of Western Ontario, University of Winnipeg and Wayne State University.
The EAB was very helpful in shaping the parameters of this study.
28
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
External Consulting ReportProvided by UK-based Global Higher Educational
Consulting, Inc.Made 2 campus visits.Issued 2 reports:
⁻ The first report focused on the competitive context, which has changed considerably in recent years
⁻ The second report emphasized how we might go about implementing a new international student recruitment model and its related strategies
29
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Recommendations1. Adopt a broad-based student recruitment model that
discontinues exclusivity with a single recruitment firm and identifies major student recruitment agencies that operate successfully in key markets, such as China, India, the Middle East and South Asia.
2. Develop in-house capacity to encourage direct applications and to manage applications and offers efficiently. This will involve making infrastructure investments in such areas as web and social media, international marketing, admissions, and study permit advice.
30
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Recommendations (Cont’d)3. Develop a range of transfer articulation agreements
with university partners around the world that will permit students to enter the University (both graduate and undergraduate) with advanced standing through 1+3, 2+2 and 3+1 links.
4. Establish local University offices in key markets, such as India and China, to market and recruit students directly. Such offices could also support in-country university partnership and research development, alumni outreach and institutional advancement.
31
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Recommendations (Cont’d)5. Develop a University pathways program for students
who have not reached the University’s entrance requirements. This will involve teaching English language, study skills, and some academic coursework. This could also result in the development of a pre-master’s pathways program.
6. Explore the delivery of part or whole programs outside Canada. This will result in brand awareness and the development of articulation links in other countries.
32
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Recommendations (Cont’d)7. Develop ways to use alumni as ambassadors for the
University in recruiting new students (e.g., recruitment fairs abroad).
8. Create more connectivity between the recruitment program and the Faculties, especially the deans, and senior administration to ensure both transparency and accountability.
33
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
34
University of Windsor International Student Recruitment Infrastructure/In-house Capacity
(R#2)
Regional Office (R#4)
AgentAgent
Alumni
Fairs
Regional Office (R#4)
AgentAgent
Regional Office (R#4)
AgentAgent
Articulations (R#3)
Pathways(R#5)
Overseas Programs (R#6)
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
35
Solving the International Student Retention Puzzle
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
36
With Appreciation
Tanya Demjanenko, M.Ed.Research Assistant
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
37
Our Purpose
• To identify the factors that contribute to attrition of international students at the University of Windsor to determine what might be done to improve the success and persistence of international students academically, through support initiatives and in our student recruitment program.
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
38
MethodologyPre-Study environmental scanPilot studyFocus groups Service provider interviewsFaculty interviewsOn-line survey: studentsOn-line survey: facultyOn-line survey: service providers
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
39
Study ParticipantsRecruited from sample populations at the University of
Windsor:International studentsInternational student groupsService providers to international studentsFaculty who instruct international students
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
40
ParticipantsQualitative:
Faculty interviews, 15Service provider
interviews, 12Student group
representative interviews, 3
Students in focus groups, 17
Quantitative:Faculty members, 31
(response rate – 2.63%) Service providers, 47
(response rate – 3.7%)Students, 22 (response
rate – 1.28%)
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
41
International Students9/2010 10/2010 11/2010 12/2010
- - Focus Group AFocus Group B
Focus Group A
1/2011 2/2011 3/2011 4/2011
Focus Group A Student Group Interviews
Focus Group AFocus Group CFocus Group DStudent Group Interviews
Results to Participants
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
42
Service Providers9/2010 10/2010 11/2010 12/2010
- - Interviews InterviewsSurvey
1/2011 2/2011 3/2011 4/2011
- Interviews InterviewsSurvey
Results to Participants
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
43
Faculty9/2010 10/2010 11/2010 12/2010
- - Interviews InterviewsSurvey
1/2011 2/2011 3/2011 4/2011
- Interviews InterviewsSurvey
Results to Participants
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
44
Pilot Study• Areas of Concern Attendance Academics Finances Misinformation Racism & discrimination Missed connections Other plans Cultural adjustment Psychological issues
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
45
Themes - FacultyLanguageCultureRacism and discrimination
Themes – Service Providers
• Language• Culture• Racism and discrimination
Themes – Students
• Culture• Frustration, Disorientation &
Confusion• Facilities & Services• Racism & Discrimination
Differing PerspectivesFactor Faculty Service
ProvidersStudents
Language 1 1 -
Culture 2 2 1
Racism & Discrimination 3 3 4
Frustration, Disorientation & Confusion
- - 2
Facilities & Services - - 3
...but agreement on Language and Culture
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
49
A Model of International Student Success and Retention
International Student
Social
Linguistic
Economic
CulturalAcademic
Familial
Environmental
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Australia Malaysia
Canada Netherlands
Estonia New Zealand
Finland Singapore
Germany South Africa
Hong Kong Sweden
Ireland UK
Italy USA
209,422 international students responded to the 2011 survey from 238 institutions in 16 countries ; 6.227 students surveyed at Ontario universities
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Satisfaction UW vs. ISB UW vs. Ontario UW vs. Canada
Benchmark 2010 2011 Change 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011
Arrival 82% 82.4% 0.4% 1 -0.4 1 -0.6 - -0.5
Support 85% 89.2% 4.2% -3 -0.8 2 1.3 - 0.9
Learning 83% 82.7% -0.3% -1 -2.1 1 -2 - -2
Living 74% 76.2% 2.2% -3 -2.6 1 -1.3 - -1.6
The ISB: University of Windsor, Ontario Universities & Canada
Our strengths are arrival and support
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
ArrivalAreas of Strength:
RegistrationUniversity orientationFinancial (banking) information
Areas of Improvement:First nightCondition of accommodationMeeting faculty membersSocial activities
i-graduate, 2011
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
SupportHigh Institutional Usage/High Satisfaction:
Student CentreInternational Students’ CentreStudent Health Services
High Institutional Usage/Low Satisfaction:CashiersGraduate StudiesMarket Place (Student Centre)
i-graduate, 2011
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
LearningHigh Institutional Usage/High Satisfaction:
Quality lecturesLearning supportLearning spaces
High Institutional Usage/Low Satisfaction:Work experienceCareer advice (faculty)Research activity
i-graduate, 2011
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
LivingHigh Institutional Usage/High Satisfaction:
Sports facilitiesSocial activitiesEco-friendly
High Institutional Usage/Low Satisfaction:Financial supportTransport linksEarning money
i-graduate, 2011
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Opportunities for ImprovementArrival:
First nightCondition of accommodationMeeting faculty membersSocial activities
Support:CashiersGraduate StudiesMarket Place (Student Centre)
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Opportunities for Improvement (Cont’d)Learning:
Work experienceCareer advice (faculty)Research activity
Living:Financial supportTransport linksEarning money
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Lessons Learned
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Lessons Learned1. Assessment is key to determining the success of
initiatives we undertake. We need to benchmark progress and let data drive decision-making
2. Resources must be allocated to ensure that the strategies put in place have a lasting impact on students. This demonstrates institutional commitment to campus internationalization
3. The enrolment funnel and student life cycle experience may be different for different groups of international students. Strategies need to be customized to meet the needs of each targeted student population group.
59
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Lessons Learned (Cont’d)4. We need to work collaboratively across our
campuses to develop shared, institution-wide definition of campus internationalization.
5. Retention is another word for “home away from home”
6. Racism draws a distinction between experiences in which international students thrive or survive the student experience
60
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Your toolkit
61
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Resources British Council
http://www.britishcouncil.org/ Canadian Bureau of International Education
http://www.cbie-bcei.ca/ Canadian SEM Website
www.uwindsor.ca/sem I-Graduate: International Student Barometer
http://www.i-graduate.org/services/international-student-barometer-and-student-barometer/
NAFSAhttp://www.nafsa.org/
62
SEM CONFERENCE– Orlando, 2012
Comments & Questions
63