assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics

42
Assessing Mobile Touch Interfaces for Tetraplegics Tiago Guerreiro Hugo Nicolau Joaquim Jorge Daniel Gonçalves

Upload: hugo-nicolau

Post on 04-Jul-2015

245 views

Category:

Entertainment & Humor


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Assessing Mobile Touch Interfaces

for Tetraplegics

Tiago Guerreiro

Hugo Nicolau Joaquim Jorge

Daniel Gonçalves

Page 2: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Mobile evolution …

Page 3: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Touch Interfaces

Leading to …

Page 4: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

pleasant

Page 5: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Tactile feedback

loss of tactile feedback

Page 6: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Loss of physical stability

Page 7: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

hard to select targets

Page 8: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

it occurs to everyone

Page 9: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

… and motor impaired

Page 10: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

require less strength

Page 11: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Adapt to users’ needs

Page 12: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Provide the knowledge to build better touch interfaces

Page 13: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

We performed …

Page 14: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Tested several …

Interaction Techniques

Page 15: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Screen areas …

… corners

Page 16: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Screen areas …

… edges

Page 17: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

7 mm

… and target sizes

12 mm 17 mm

Page 18: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Tapping

Page 19: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Crossing

Page 20: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Exiting

Page 21: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Gesturing

Page 22: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

15 participants 28-64 years old

C4-C7 lesion level 6 left-handed

never used touchscreens

Page 23: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Focus on …

Tapping

Page 24: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Target Size

H0 Target size has no influence

on task errors

Page 25: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Target Size

Page 26: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Target Size

H0 Target size has no influence

on task errors

[F=25.110 p<.001]

Page 27: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Corner Targets

H0 Task errors are not dependent on the target’s position (corner vs center)

Page 28: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

7mm 12mm 17mm

35% 35% 27% 27% 22% 22%

45% 24% 20%

35% 35% 27% 27% 22% 22%

Corner Targets

Page 29: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Corner Targets

H0 Task errors are not dependent on the target’s position (corner vs center)

[p>.05]

Page 30: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Edge Targets

H0 Task errors are not

dependent on the target’s

position (edge vs center)

Page 31: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

7mm 12mm 17mm

45% 23% 22%

45% 40%

45% 23% 26%

23% 22% 19%

22%

45% 23% 22%

Edge Targets

Page 32: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Edge Targets

H0 Task errors are not

dependent on the target’s

position (edge vs center)

[p>.05]

Page 33: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

7mm 12mm 17mm

Edge Targets

53% 27% 20%

61% 33% 28% 11% 24% 22% 11% 11% 22%

37% 30% 13%

44% 33% 31%

37% 44% 41% 41% 27% 7% 52% 23% 18%

53% 11% 7%

Left

Right

Page 34: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Vertical Areas

H0 Task errors are not

dependent on the target’s

position (top vs bottom vs

center)

Page 35: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

45% 28% 27%

39% 28% 24%

43% 19% 12%

7mm 12mm 17mm

Vertical Areas

Page 36: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Vertical Areas

H0 Task errors are not

dependent on the target’s

position (top vs bottom vs

center)

Largest [p<.05] Medium [p<.01]

Page 37: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Suggestions for...

Tapping

Page 38: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Regarding target size …

12 mm

Page 39: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

However, error rates are still …

High

Page 40: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Regarding target position …

Support

Page 41: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

Remaining interaction techniques Differences between able-bodied and tetraplegics

Future Work

Page 42: Assessing Mobile  Touch Interfaces  for Tetraplegics

The End Hugo Nicolau [email protected]