assessing teach-back utilization in an urban downtown medical … · 2020-02-12 · using...

1
Introduction The teach-back method, also called “closing the loop,” is a patient- provider centered communication method that reinforces and demonstrates patient comprehension 1 . Patients exhibit their understanding of given instructions and medication directions by explaining them in their own words. This allows for any errors in communication to be addressed prior to leaving the hospital 2-4 . The teach-back method has been advocated as a means to assist all patient populations in understanding health information 2,5 . The Health Literacy Institute was created at our facility in 2007. An interdisciplinary team was initially trained in health literacy (HL) principles, including the use of teach-back, through the American Medical Association’s Train the Trainer program 6 . Members of the team have since trained all clinical staff in the use of plain language and teach-back. The Patient and Family Education Policy at St. Vincent Charity Medical Center directs staff to provide all patients with easy to understand written and verbal communication 7 . This policy establishes goals for medical staff to work in an interdisciplinary and collaborative manner to include the following: Use plain language to ensure information is understood by patients at all levels of health literacy Use the teach-back method for all patient education to ensure understanding. Address the needs of patients, such as deaf patients, those with limited English proficiency, patients with learning disabilities, or those with other health issues that would require alternative teaching methods. This policy was initially adopted in 2009 and was last revised in August 2017. Previous random audits assessed whether or not staff was documenting use of teach-back, but assessment of actual use has not been done. Additionally, the patient retention of education via this strategy has not been assessed. Methods The Plan-Do-Study-Act format was implemented to test the use of the teach-back method by nurses and resident physicians. Nurses and resident physicians completed an online survey regarding their use of teach-back with patients. They also gave opinions and feedback on teach-back as a tool for patient communication as well as perceived barriers to its use. Survey data was then integrated into nursing and resident training for health literacy and performing teach-back with patients. Finally, random inpatients were surveyed to assess for acknowledgment of teach-back, and whether they felt talking to providers was beneficial. Data from patients and providers was then compiled utilizing standard statistical analysis software. Results Provider Survey The teach-back method should be used frequently or always according to 96.3% of providers surveyed (Q5). By contrast, only 195 out of 244 of these same respondents (79.9%) said they actually use teach-back (Q4). Providers judged the importance of using teach-back as a 9.22 (Likert scale 1- 10 with 10 being very important) (Q6). The average provider’s confidence in using teach-back was 9.15 out of 10 (Q7). In addition, barriers to the use of teach-back were reported with 2 of the top 4 being time and language issues. Patient Survey Patient surveys were obtained for 135 out of 200 queried patients. Patients were asked if they had used their own words to explain what they were taught with mixed results. (See table at left). Conclusions Nurses and resident physicians at this facility report they are familiar with teach-back and most feel that they utilize this method frequently or always and that teach-back is important. They also report confidence in using this technique. In addition, perceived barriers were identified by the providers which were then addressed during training sessions. An unforeseen benefit of this was the ability to remedy any misconceptions related to utilizing teach-back. In our study, 79% of providers reported using teach-back, however, only 46% of patients surveyed recalled the use of this technique. Factors that may have impacted these results included patient demographics and the timing of the survey. Patients were chosen at random, therefore, may have been surveyed shortly after admission and had not yet had an opportunity for patient teaching. Future studies are needed to assess the use of teach-back with patients just prior to discharge as well as post discharge. References 1. Slater BA, Huang Y, Dalawari P. The Impact of Teach-Back Method on Retention of Key Domains of Emergency Department Discharge Instructions. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2017 Nov;53(5):e59-e65. 2. Kornburger C, Gibson C, Sadowski S, Maletta K, and Klingbeil C. Using “teach-back” to promote a safe transition from hospital to home: an evidence-based approach to improving the discharge process. J Pediatr Nurs. 2013;28:282-291. 3. Samuels-Kalow M, Hardy E, Rhodes K, Mollen C. “Like a dialogue”: teach-back in the emergency department. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99:549-554. 4. Samuels-Kalow ME, Stack AM, Porter SC. Effective discharge communication in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60:152-159. 5. Caplin M, Saunders T. Utilizing teach-back to reinforce patient education: a step-by-step approach. Orthop Nurs. 2015;34:365-368. 6. AMA Foundation, (2007) Health Literacy and Patient Safety: Help Patients Understand. https://commerce.ama- assn.org/store/catalog/productDetail.jsp?skuId=sku1240015&productId=prod1240006 7. Komondor, K. Patient and Family Education Plan. Retrieved 02/22/2018. St. Vincent Charity Medical Center. https://www.stvincentcharity.policystat.com/policy/3970762/ Assessing Teach-back Utilization in an Urban Downtown Medical Center Karen Komondor, Ryan Choudhury, Health Literacy Committee St. Vincent Charity Medical Center, Cleveland, OH Patient survey: Were you asked to explain back what you were taught? Yes No Do not remember No response Patient Survey Demographics Total Surveys N = 200 Age Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum 61.41 15.95 20 98 Gender Female % Male % 125 62.50% 75 37.50% Interviewed Yes No Incomplete 135 63 2 Patient Survey Results Total Surveys N = 200 Age Mean Std. Dev Minimum Maximum 61.41 15.95 20 98 Sex Female % Male % 125 62.50% 75 37.50% Interviewed Yes No Incomplete 135 63 2 Question 1. Has someone talked to you about your medicines and health problems while you have been in the hospital? Yes No Do Not Remember 123 11 1 Question 2. If someone has talked with you, do you remember who they were? Doctor Nurse Both Other 29 22 63 1 No Response Doctor, Nurse, Other Do Not Remember 7 11 2 Question 3. Did the person who talked to you ask you to explain back what you learned? Yes No Don’t Know No Response 56 62 9 8 Question 4. Do you think talking with someone about your health problems is helpful? Yes No Don’t Know No Response 114 12 5 4 Specifics Mean Std. Dev Minimum Maximum 1.02 1.00 0 5

Upload: others

Post on 12-Jul-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Assessing Teach-back Utilization in an Urban Downtown Medical … · 2020-02-12 · Using “teach-back” to promote a safe transition from hospital to home: an evidence-based approach

Introduction

The teach-back method, also called “closing the loop,” is a patient-

provider centered communication method that reinforces and demonstrates

patient comprehension1. Patients exhibit their understanding of given

instructions and medication directions by explaining them in their own words.

This allows for any errors in communication to be addressed prior to leaving

the hospital 2-4. The teach-back method has been advocated as a means to

assist all patient populations in understanding health information 2,5.

The Health Literacy Institute was created at our facility in 2007. An

interdisciplinary team was initially trained in health literacy (HL) principles,

including the use of teach-back, through the American Medical Association’s

Train the Trainer program 6. Members of the team have since trained all

clinical staff in the use of plain language and teach-back.

The Patient and Family Education Policy at St. Vincent Charity

Medical Center directs staff to provide all patients with easy to understand

written and verbal communication 7. This policy establishes goals for medical

staff to work in an interdisciplinary and collaborative manner to include the

following:

• Use plain language to ensure information is understood by patients at all

levels of health literacy

• Use the teach-back method for all patient education to ensure

understanding.

• Address the needs of patients, such as deaf patients, those with limited

English proficiency, patients with learning disabilities, or those with other

health issues that would require alternative teaching methods.

This policy was initially adopted in 2009 and was last revised in

August 2017. Previous random audits assessed whether or not staff was

documenting use of teach-back, but assessment of actual use has not been

done. Additionally, the patient retention of education via this strategy has not

been assessed.

Methods

The Plan-Do-Study-Act format was implemented to test the use of

the teach-back method by nurses and resident physicians. Nurses and resident

physicians completed an online survey regarding their use of teach-back with

patients. They also gave opinions and feedback on teach-back as a tool for

patient communication as well as perceived barriers to its use. Survey data

was then integrated into nursing and resident training for health literacy and

performing teach-back with patients. Finally, random inpatients were

surveyed to assess for acknowledgment of teach-back, and whether they felt

talking to providers was beneficial. Data from patients and providers was then

compiled utilizing standard statistical analysis software.

Results

Provider Survey

The teach-back method should be used frequently or always according to 96.3%

of providers surveyed (Q5). By contrast, only 195 out of 244 of these same respondents

(79.9%) said they actually use teach-back (Q4).

Providers judged the importance of using teach-back as a 9.22 (Likert scale 1-

10 with 10 being very important) (Q6). The average provider’s confidence in using

teach-back was 9.15 out of 10 (Q7). In addition, barriers to the use of teach-back were

reported with 2 of the top 4 being time and language issues.

Patient Survey

Patient surveys were obtained for 135 out of 200 queried patients. Patients

were asked if they had used their own words to explain what they were taught with

mixed results. (See table at left).

Conclusions

Nurses and resident physicians at this facility report they are familiar with

teach-back and most feel that they utilize this method frequently or always and that

teach-back is important. They also report confidence in using this technique. In addition,

perceived barriers were identified by the providers which were then addressed during

training sessions. An unforeseen benefit of this was the ability to remedy any

misconceptions related to utilizing teach-back. In our study, 79% of providers reported

using teach-back, however, only 46% of patients surveyed recalled the use of this

technique. Factors that may have impacted these results included patient demographics

and the timing of the survey. Patients were chosen at random, therefore, may have been

surveyed shortly after admission and had not yet had an opportunity for patient teaching.

Future studies are needed to assess the use of teach-back with patients just prior to

discharge as well as post discharge.

References

1. Slater BA, Huang Y, Dalawari P. The Impact of Teach-Back Method on Retention of Key Domains of Emergency Department Discharge Instructions. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2017 Nov;53(5):e59-e65.2. Kornburger C, Gibson C, Sadowski S, Maletta K, and Klingbeil C. Using “teach-back” to promote a safe transition from hospital to home: an evidence-based approach to improving the discharge process. J PediatrNurs. 2013;28:282-291.3. Samuels-Kalow M, Hardy E, Rhodes K, Mollen C. “Like a dialogue”: teach-back in the emergency department. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99:549-554.4. Samuels-Kalow ME, Stack AM, Porter SC. Effective discharge communication in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60:152-159.5. Caplin M, Saunders T. Utilizing teach-back to reinforce patient education: a step-by-step approach. OrthopNurs. 2015;34:365-368.6. AMA Foundation, (2007) Health Literacy and Patient Safety: Help Patients Understand. https://commerce.ama-assn.org/store/catalog/productDetail.jsp?skuId=sku1240015&productId=prod12400067. Komondor, K. Patient and Family Education Plan. Retrieved 02/22/2018. St. Vincent Charity Medical

Center. https://www.stvincentcharity.policystat.com/policy/3970762/

Assessing Teach-back Utilization in an Urban Downtown Medical Center

Karen Komondor, Ryan Choudhury, Health Literacy Committee

St. Vincent Charity Medical Center, Cleveland, OH

Patient survey: Were you asked to explain back what you were taught?

Yes

No

Do not remember

No response

Patient Survey Demographics

Total Surveys

N = 200

Age

Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum

61.41 15.95 20 98

Gender

Female % Male %

125 62.50% 75 37.50%

Interviewed

Yes No Incomplete

135 63 2

Patient Survey Results

Total Surveys N = 200

Age

Mean Std. Dev Minimum Maximum

61.41 15.95 20 98

Sex

Female % Male %

125 62.50% 75 37.50%

Interviewed

Yes No Incomplete

135 63 2

Question 1.

Has someone talked to you

about your medicines and

health problems while you

have been in the hospital?

Yes No Do Not Remember

123 11 1

Question 2.

If someone has talked with

you, do you remember who

they were?

Doctor Nurse Both Other

29 22 63 1

No Response Doctor, Nurse,

OtherDo Not Remember

7 11 2

Question 3.

Did the person who talked to

you ask you to explain back

what you learned?

Yes No Don’t Know No Response

56 62 9 8

Question 4.

Do you think talking with

someone about your health

problems is helpful?

Yes No Don’t Know No Response

114 12 5 4

Specifics Mean Std. Dev Minimum Maximum

1.02 1.00 0 5