assessing the political economy of tourism development kwaku adutwum boakye, ucc & foster...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Assessing the political economy of tourism development
Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC&
Foster Frempong, KNUST
1Boakye and Frempong, 2012
![Page 2: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Tourism in context
• Increasing recognition of its properties as a tool for development– used as a devt strategy by over 80% of world’s poor
countries (WB, 2008)
– Expected to engender devt through the multiplier concept: • Injected tst income-increased business for both tsps, and
other services provided by poor people- increased intersectoral dd , leading to growth in income across board
Boakye and Frempong, 2012 2
![Page 3: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
A quick snap shot
• Generally lying along a trajectory of growth• Last two decades have been most ‘active’ since
independence• Marked by steady growth in arrivals and receipts ;
increasing contribution to GDP; employment etc• Inspite of these impressive figures, tourism’s
ability to deliver development remains challenged (BOG, 2009)
• Sector grew by -11% in 2010-11 fiscal year (MOFEP)
Boakye and Frempong, 2012 3
![Page 4: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Why?
• Disproportionate emphasis on the private sector as being expected to engineer the growth of tourism
• Answer may lie in an understanding of the PE• Does not gain much attention in literature but
provides a useful context for understanding the role of tourism as a development tool
Boakye and Frempong, 2012 4
![Page 5: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
PET in a tourism context
• PET focuses on the context rather than content • Seeks to understand the context within which
tourism ‘production’ and administration occurs• PE emphasises the role of the public sector/state in
managing tourism– Elicits two key questions:• Under what environment do individual tourism/hosp
businesses operate?• What are the challenges the state institutions face in
playing their role within the tourism delivery system?
5Boakye and Frempong, 2012
![Page 6: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Public vs Private sector?
• Tsm must be managed by the public sector for two reasons: – fragilty of poor economies and their vulnerability
to the dictates of core-perphery theory (aka globalisation)
Private sector ‘s limitations in three mkt failures: – Externalities– Monopolies– Public goods
Boakye and Frempong, 2012 6
![Page 7: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• Private sector’s myriad of problems proscribe it from leading the tourism devt process– High taxes (President of GHA, Sept, 2011)- repeal
of LI 1817– Limited access to credit, (Chairperson, Hospitality
Institute, October, 2011)– Weak/inconsistent supervision from GTA (Kissi,
2011)– Irony is that public sector has answers to private
sector concerns
![Page 8: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Theoretical role of public sectorUNWTO
• creation of a conducive macro econo-political environment for tourism to thrive through:– Creation of a policy framework– Monitoring of standards– Provision of infrastructure– Training– Marketing– Attraction development– Facilitation and guiding of private sector activities
Boakye and Frempong, 2012 8
![Page 9: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Some public sector interventions during the period
• 15 yr devt plan 1996-2010- yet to be evaluated
• 5 yr strategic plan 2002-2007• Tourism Act 2011• Training- Hotcatt floundering• Numerous workshops/conferences• Limited marketing camapaigns
9Boakye and Frempong, 2012
![Page 10: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Past public sector interventions(largely externally funded)
• NRCHP• TCDI• SNV• PPP
10Boakye and Frempong, 2012
![Page 11: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The tourism environment
Ownership lacuna• Ownership of the tourism management process not
entirely in hands of MOT• Classic example of the major attractions: (Kakum
National Park, and three UNESCO World Heritage Sites)
• Presence of many line players with differing mandates normally not related to the core business of tourism
Boakye and Frempong, 2012 11
![Page 12: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Examples of agencies which have major influences on tourism but dont have tourism as their core business
• Ghana Civil Aviation Authority; Bank of Ghana Ghana Immigration Service
• Customs Exercise and Preventive Services; Internal Revenue Services; VAT Secretariat ;National Development Planning Commission
• Ghana Investment Promotion Service; Ministry of TradeIndustries & PSI; Metropolitan, Municipal and District Assemblies; Ministry of Energy
• Ministry of Roads and Highways; Minstry of Environment Science and Technology; Ministry for Water Resources, Works and Housing
• Ministry of Interior; Ministry of DefenceBoakye and Frempong, 2012 12
![Page 13: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
tourism environment ctd
Identity challenge• Tourism suffers from an ‘identity crisis’– Traditional vs non traditional export?– Who is its main clientele– What is its major product?
• This crisis is root of ‘second rate treatment’ (in terms of personnel (political apptees) and resource allocation
13Boakye and Frempong, 2012
![Page 14: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Figure 1: Tourism Budget: 2011source: MOT
14
![Page 15: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Tourism environment ctd
• Weak governmental support– Infrastructural support• Provision of utilities to (esp. access roads to receptive
facilities e.g road to Mole Nat. Park; kakum Nat park; unreliable water, electricity, internet, telephone etc)
– Fiscal policy• E.g repeal of LI1817 in 2010 which removes tax waivers
for imports of hospitality operations
15Boakye and Frempong, 2012
![Page 16: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Tourism environment
– Weak unempowered coordination from MOT placing tourism in a lobbyist rather than controlling position• Manifests in
– Haphazard development– Weak planning; little or adherence to plans; no
framework for control of impacts and their distribution– Weak linkages between (1) sectors and (2)stakeholders
(esp academia, policy and industry)
•
Boakye and Frempong, 2012 16
![Page 17: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Macro environment(4)
• Weak data base (e.g CAN 2008) premised on a flawed defintion of a tourist .– Erroneous emphasis on hotels as a gauge of
tourism– Inclusion of Ghanaians returning home
Boakye and Frempong, 2012 17
![Page 18: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Preliminary conclusions
Country’s tourism PE can currently be at best described as being weak, disorganized and structurally deficient
a pressing need to reorganize public sector’s role in delivering tourism.
It also calls for strengthening (capacity-wise, financial and operational) of the public organizations mandated to develop tourism.
18Boakye and Frempong, 2012
![Page 19: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
A cue from the Moroccan example
• Official prioritisation• High level involvement (tourism coordinated
from office of pres who serves as chm of coordinating cttee)
• Integrated and Coordinated planning (e.g creation of tsm land banks, etc)
• High levels of professionalism/service delivery• Clear policy directives towards supporting
tourism businesses19Boakye and Frempong, 2012
![Page 20: Assessing the political economy of tourism development Kwaku Adutwum Boakye, UCC & Foster Frempong, KNUST 1Boakye and Frempong, 2012](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022081816/56649eb55503460f94bbd573/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The way forward• A functional and operational recognition (by both public and private
sector)of tourism as a major economic tool• Need for an empowered central coordinating unit for managing tourism• A vibrant environment characterised by:– Well coordinated and integrated high level tourism planning and
implementation– Proper supervision of service delivery– Improving the tourism product
• Better hospitality service delivery• Enhanced attractions
20Boakye and Frempong, 2012