assessment and future challenges for pan-european corridors iv, v, and vii dr. vasileios zeimpekis...

10
Assessment and future challenges for Pan- European Corridors IV, V, and VII Dr. Vasileios Zeimpekis Design, Operations & Productions Systems Lab Department of Financial & Management Engineering University of the Aegean [email protected] 11th Southeast European Freight Forwarders and Logistics Providers Congress «SOUTHEAST EUROPEAN INTERMODALITY» 16 th & 17 th May, 2013

Upload: clarissa-greene

Post on 17-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Assessment and future challenges for Pan-European Corridors IV, V, and VII

Dr. Vasileios ZeimpekisDesign, Operations & Productions Systems Lab

Department of Financial & Management EngineeringUniversity of the [email protected]

11th Southeast European Freight Forwarders and Logistics Providers Congress«SOUTHEAST EUROPEAN INTERMODALITY» 16th & 17th May, 2013

Agenda

• The GIFT project: Main aim & objectives

• Assessment Methodology

• List of Key Performance Indicators

• Assessment results

• Proposals for green intermodal freight transport in the S.E.E. region

Main aim & objectives

.

• The main aim of the current project is:– to map, analyze, and evaluate the status of the transport sector in

the GIFT transport network,– propose new policies and strategies in infrastructure, processes,

assets, ICT, legislation, norms and harmonization/ standardization issues, and

– Develop tools & methodologies for CO2 emissions monitoring

…..in order to promote innovative green intermodal freight transport corridors.

• Main objectives

– Identify current status of the freight transport sector

– Improve interoperability and intermodality of freight transport on land, IWW,

and sea

– Identify green corridors in the SEE region by promoting technical innovation

and a shift towards the least polluting and most efficient modes of transport

– Develop an ICT tool for CO2 footprint monitoring & certification

– Develop agreements & MoUs on multi-modal connections

Assessment methodology

o Use of KPIs for the assessment of the corridors based on 6 categories: service quality & efficiency, infrastructure, environmental sustainability, ICT, and Transport market/ Business players

o Collection of data from :o EUROSTAT, EL.STAT., OECDo Operational data from Key players /stakeholders from S.E.E.

regiono EU reports and National Transport studies/roadmapso Data from NGOs and Int. Organizations (π.χ. W.H.O)o Studies from consulting companies (McKinsey, Deloitte)

o Use of transportation models for the calculation of results in Corridor Level

Categorization of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

Service Efficiency

• Relative unit cost• Transport time• Frequency of service

Service Quality

• Delay risk• Cargo loss• Cargo damage• Reliability

Environmental Sustainability

• Noise Protection• Polluter CO2

• Polluter SO2

Infrastructure

• Refueling stations• Infrastructure charges• Number of accidents• Electrification• Capacity utilization

Transport market- Business players

• Corridor Competitiveness

• Corridor Freight market

ICT

• Cargo monitoring

Assessment Results (1/3)

Service Efficiency

• Relative unit cost (EUR/ton-Km)• Transport time (h/100Km)• Frequency of service (no. of services/week)

Service Quality• Delay risk (min/100Km)• Cargo loss Scale (1-4)• Cargo damage Scale (1-4)• Reliability (%)

Corridor IV Corridor V Corridor VII

RoadRail

0.0400.033

RoadRail

1.491.47

RoadRail

309

RoadRail

25.7425.82

RoadRail

21

RoadRail

21

RoadRail

96.592.9

RoadRail

0.0480.031

RoadRail

1.401.83

RoadRail

50105

RoadRail

10.48*

50.31

RoadRail

1*

1

RoadRail

21

RoadRail

98.474.6

* Italy is not included

IWW 0.02

IWW 10

IWW 2.51

1 Romania is not included

IWW 93.392

IWW 13

IWW 13

IWW 91.32

2 Hungary and Romania not included3 Serbia is not included

Assessment results (2/3)

Corridor IV Corridor V Corridor VIIInfrastructure

• Refueling stations (stations/Km)• Infrastructure charges

• Number of accidents (%)

• Capacity utilization

• Electrification(%)

ICT• Cargo monitoring

Road 0.06

Road (€/km)Rail (€/ton-km)

0.0000.003

Road (serious)Road (non-serious)Rail (serious)Rail (non-serious)

0.110.380.040.19

Road (HCM)*Rail (%)

244.1

Rail 89.3

* HCM-> Road capacity expressed in HCM level of service (A, B, C, D, E, F) / 2: describes reasonable free-flow operations

RoadRail

36.021.2

Road 0.09

Road (€/km)Rail(€/ton-km

0.1371

0.0011

Road (serious)Road (non-serious)Rail (serious)Rail (non-serious)

0.001

1.130.001

1.65

Road (HCM)*Rail (%)

256.52

Rail 88.93

1 Italy is not Included2 Slovakia is not included3 Slovakia and Croatia are included

RoadRail

----

IWW N/A

IWW (€/ton-km) 0.01

IWW (serious)IWW (non-serious)

0.001

0.002

IWW (%) 40.32

IWW N/A

1 Serbia and Hungary are not included2 Serbia is not included

RoadRail

----

Assessment results (3/3)

Corridor IV Corridor V Corridor VIIEnvironmental Sustainability

• Noise Protection (Scale 1-5)• Polluter CO2

(gr/tn-Km)• Polluter SO2

(gr/tn-Km)

Transport market- Business players• Corridor

Competitiveness (no. of providers)• Corridor Freight

market(%) of annual turnover that comes

from international transport

RoadRail

2*2*

RoadRail

72.7619.66

RoadRail

0.090.06

* : Scale 2 -> 20% - 40% protected population along the section

Rail 3

RoadRail

3263.3

RoadRail

31

22

RoadRail

68.6417.65

RoadRail

0.090.09

1 Slovakia is included2 Italy is not included and Slovakia is included

Rail 51

Rail 61.01

1 Italy is not included

IWW 41

IWW 56.961

IWW 0.251

1 Slovakia is included

IWW 7

IWW 57.81

1 Romania is not Included

Proposals for green intermodal freight transport in the S.E.E. region

Infrastructure / State• Finalization of the electrification of the

rail network• Simplification of custom formalities and

minimization of borders-crossing time• Establishment of logistics areas (Greece)• Creation of new logistics hubs / freight

villages that support combined transport operations

• Creation of a stable tax environment

ICT• Use of integrated information systems

• Track & trace• Proof of Delivery (PoD)

• Rail network: Introduction of ERTMS

Environment• Financial incentives for new generation

truck fleets (EURO V) • Green certification and measurement of

carbon footprint• Shift to co-modality

Stakeholders / Transport market• Increase vehicle utilization by:

o Decreasing the proportion of empty running miles

Increase authorized vehicle weights (44Tn trucks)

Deliver only when a truck is fully loadedo Increasing the payloads

Flexibility in pick-up & delivery time windows

Cooperation between logistics service providers

• Improve scheduling & routing

Dr. Vasileios Zeimpekis ([email protected]) Design, Operations, & Production Systems LabUniversity of the Aegean

Green Intermodal Freight Transport (GIFT) projecthttp://www.gift-project.eu