assessment and grading in the differentiated classroom fair isn’t always equal

153
Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Upload: keeley-belknap

Post on 13-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated

Classroom

Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Page 2: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

For further conversation about any of these topics:

Rick [email protected]

703-620-2447Herndon, Virginia, USA(Eastern Standard Time Zone)

Page 3: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Mindset: What we teach is irrelevant. It’s what students carry forward after their time with us that matters.

Page 4: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

1. Are we willing to teach in whatever way is necessary for students to learn best, even if that approach doesn’t match our own preferences?

2. Do we have the courage to do what works, not just what’s easiest?

3. Do we actively seek to understand our students’ knowledge, skills, and talents so we can provide an appropriate match for their learning needs? And once we discover their strengths and weaknesses, do we actually adapt our instruction to respond to their needs?

4. Do we continually build a large and diverse repertoire of instructional strategies so we have more than one way to teach?

5. Do we organize our classrooms for students’ learning or for our teaching?

Are we successfully differentiating teachers?

Page 5: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

6. Do we keep up to date on the latest research about learning, students’ developmental growth, and our content specialty areas?

7. Do we ceaselessly self-analyze and reflect on our lessons — including our assessments — searching for ways to improve?

8. Are we open to critique?9. Do we push students to become their own

education advocates and give them the tools to do so?

10. Do we regularly close the gap between knowing what to do and really doing it?

Are we successfully differentiating teachers?

Page 6: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

No Wonder We Need to Differentiate in our Schools:

In the world beyond school, we don’t have to be good at everything. We have specific skills that match the needs of a specific job, and we have plenty of adult experience and maturity.

As children in school, however, we have to be good at everything regardless of our skill set or background, and we have little experience or maturity.

Page 7: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Differentiated instruction and standardized tests –

‘NOT an oxymoron!

The only way students will do well on tests is if they learn the material. DI maximizes what students learn over what could otherwise have been learned with one-size-fits-all approaches. DI and standardized testing are mutually beneficial.

Page 8: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Definition

Differentiating instruction is doing what’s fair for students. It’s a collection of best practices strategically employed to maximize students’ learning at every turn, including giving them the tools to handle anything that is undifferentiated. It requires us to do different things for different students some, or a lot, of the time. It’s whatever works to advance the student if the regular classroom approach doesn’t meet students’ needs. It’s highly effective teaching.

Page 9: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

What is fair…

…isn’t always equal.

Page 10: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

[Artist Unknown]“

Page 11: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Define Each Grade

A:

B:

C:

D:

E or F:

Page 12: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

A Perspective that Changes our Thinking:

“A ‘D’ is a coward’s ‘F.’ The student failed, but you didn’t

have enough guts to tell him.”

-- Doug Reeves

Page 13: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

• A

• B

• C

• I, IP, NE, or NTY

Once we cross over into D and F(E) zones, does it really matter? We’ll do the same two things: Personally investigate and take corrective action

Page 14: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Prompt:

Write a well-crafted essay that provides an accurate overview of what we’ve learned about DNA in our class so far. You may use any resources you wish, but make sure to explain each of the aspects of DNA we’ve discussed.

Student’s Response:

Deoxyribonucleic Acid, or DNA, is the blueprint for who we are. Its structure was discovered by Watson and Crick in 1961. Watson was an American studying in Great Britain. Crick was British (He died last year). DNA is shaped like a twisting ladder. It is made of two nucleotide chains bonded to each other. The poles of the ladder are made of sugar and phosphate but the rungs of the ladder are made of four bases. They are thymine, guanine, and cytosine, and adenine. The amount of adenine is equal to the amount of thymine (A=T). It’s the same with cytosine and guanine (C=G).

(Continued on the next slide)

Page 15: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

The sequence of these bases makes us who we are. We now know how to rearrange the DNA sequences in human embryos to create whatever characteristics we want in new babies – like blue eyes, brown hair, and so on, or even how to remove hereditary diseases, but many people think it’s unethical (playing God) to do this, so we don’t do it. When DNA unzips to bond with other DNA when it reproduces, it sometimes misses the re-zipping order and this causes mutations. In humans, the DNA of one cell would equal 1.7 meters if you laid it out straight. If you laid out all the DNA in all the cells of one human, you could reach the moon 6,000 times!

Page 16: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

‘Interesting:

“The score a student receives on a test is more dependent on who scores the test and how they score it than it is on what the student knows and understands.”

-- Marzano, Classroom Assessment & Grading That Work (CAGTW), p. 30

Page 17: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Conclusions from Sample DNA Essay Marking

The fact that a range of marks occurs among teacherswho mark the same product suggests that: • Assessment can only be done against commonly

accepted and clearly understood criteria.• Grades are relative. • Teachers have to be knowledgeable in their subject

area in order to assess students properly. • Marks are subjective and can vary from teacher to

teacher.• Marks are not always accurate indicators of mastery.

Page 18: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Avoid hunt-and-peck, call-on-just-a-sampling-of-students-to-indicate-the-whole-class’s-understanding assumptions:

“Does everyone understand?”

“Does anyone have any questions?”

“These two students have it right, so the rest of you must understand it as well.”

Get evidence from every individual!

Page 19: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

What is Mastery?

“Tim was so learned, that he could name a horse in nine languages; so ignorant, that he bought a cow to ride on.”

Ben Franklin, 1750, Poor Richard’s Almanac

Page 20: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

“Understanding involves the appropriate application of concepts and principles to questions or problems posed.”

-- Howard Gardner, 1991

“Real comprehension of a notion or a theory -- implies the reinvention of this theory by the student…True understanding manifests itself by spontaneous applications.” -- Jean Piaget

Page 21: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

From the Center for Media Literacy inNew Mexico –

“If we are literate in our subject, we can:

access (understand and find meaning in), analyze, evaluate, and create the subject or medium.”

Page 22: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

From Understanding By Design

(Wiggins, McTighe)

The Six Facets of True Understanding:

Explanation

Interpretation

Application

Perspective

Empathy

Self-knowledge

Page 23: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Working Definition of Mastery(Wormeli)

Students have mastered content when theydemonstrate a thorough understanding asevidenced by doing something substantivewith the content beyond merely echoing it.Anyone can repeat information; it’s themasterful student who can break content intoits component pieces, explain it and alternativeperspectives regarding it cogently to others,and use it purposefully in new situations.

Page 24: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Non-Mastery…

• The student can repeat the multiplication tables through the 12’s

Page 25: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

…and Mastery

• The student can hear or read about a situation that requires repeated addition and identifies it as a multiplication opportunity, then uses multiplication accurately to shorten the solution process.

Page 26: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Non-mastery…

• A student prepares an agar culture for bacterial growth by following a specific procedure given to her by her teacher. She calls the experiment a failure when unknown factors or substances contaminate the culture after several weeks of observation.

Page 27: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

…and Mastery

• A student accounts for potentially contaminating variables by taking extra steps to prevent anything from affecting an agar culture on bacterial growth she’s preparing, and if accidental contamination occurs, she adjusts the experiment’s protocols when she repeats the experiment so that the sources of the contamination are no longer a factor.

Page 28: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Non-mastery…

• The student uses primarily the bounce pass in the basketball game regardless of its potential effectiveness because that’s all he knows how to do.

Page 29: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

…and Mastery

• The student uses a variety of basketball passes during a game, depending on the most advantageous strategy at that moment in the game.

Page 30: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Non-mastery…

• The students can match each of the following terms to its definition accurately: noun, pronoun, verb, adverb, adjective, preposition, conjunction, gerund, and interjection.

Page 31: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

…and Mastery

• The student can point to any word in the sentence and explain its role (impact) in the sentence, and explain how the word may change its role, depending on where it’s placed in the sentence.

Page 32: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

What is the standard of excellence when it comes to tying a shoe?

Now describe the evaluative criteria for someone who excels beyond the standard of excellence for tying a shoe. What can they do?

Page 33: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Consider Gradations of Understanding and

Performance from Introductory to Sophisticated

Introductory Level Understanding:

Student walks through the classroom door while wearing a heavy coat. Snow is piled on his shoulders, and he exclaims, “Brrrr!” From depiction, we can infer that it is cold outside.

Sophisticated level of understanding:

Ask students to analyze more abstract inferences about government propaganda made by Remarque in his wonderful book, All Quiet on the Western Front.

Page 34: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

• Determine the surface area of a cube. • Determine the surface area of a rectangular prism.• Determine the amount of wrapping paper needed for

another rectangular box, keeping in mind the need to have regular places of overlapping paper so you can tape down the corners neatly

• If one can of paint covers this amount of area, how many cans of paint will you need to paint an entire Chicago skyscraper with the following dimensions, minus the negative space for windows, doorways, external air vents, the gravel roof top, and the three satellite dishes on the roof? ____________________________________________

• Define vocabulary terms.• Compare vocabulary terms.• Use the vocabulary terms correctly.• Use the vocabulary terms strategically to obtain a

particular result.

Page 35: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

• Identify characteristics of Ancient Sumer• Explore the interwoven nature between religion and

government in Sumer • Explain the rise and fall of city-states in Mesopotamia• Trace modern structures/ideas back to their roots in the

birthplace of civilization, the Fertile Crescent. _______________________________________________• Identify parts of a cell.• Explain systems within a cell and what functions they

perform.• Explain how a cell is part of a larger system of cells that

form a tissue • Demonstrate how a cell replicates itself.• Identify what can go wrong in mitosis.• List what we know about how cells determine what kind

of cell they will become. • Explain how knowledge of cells helps us understand

other physiology.

Page 36: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

There’s a big difference: What are we really trying to assess?

• “Explain the second law of thermodynamics” vs. “Which of the following situations shows the second law of thermodynamics in action?”

• “What is the function of a kidney?” vs. “Suppose we gave a frog a diet that no impurities – fresh organic flies, no pesticides, nothing impure. Would the frog still need a kidney?”

• “Explain Keynes’s economic theory” vs. “ Explain today’s downturn in the stock market in light of Keynes’s economic theory.”

From, Teaching the Large College Class, Frank Heppner, 2007, Wiley and Sons

Page 37: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Choose the best assessment:1. On the sphere provided, draw a latitude/longitude

coordinate grid. Label all major components. 2. Given the listed latitude/longitude coordinates,

identify the countries. Then, identify the latitude and longitude of the world capitols and bodies of water that are listed.

3. Write an essay about how the latitude/longitude system came to be.

4. In an audio-visual presentation, explain how our system of latitude and longitude would need to be adjusted if Earth was in the shape of a peanut? (narrow middle, wider edges)

5. Create a collage or mural that represents the importance of latitude and longitude in the modern world.

Page 38: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

“The student will compare the United States Constitution system in 1789 with forms of democracy that developed in ancient Greece and Rome, in England, and in the American colonies and states in the 18th century.”

--Virginia, Grade 12, United States and Virginia Government

Page 39: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

What will you and your colleagues accept as evidence of full mastery and of almost mastery?

• Spelling test non-example• No echoing or parroting• Regular conversations with

subject-like colleagues• Other teachers grading your

students’ work• Pacing Guides and Common

Assessments?

Page 40: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

A. Steps to take before designing the learning experiences:

1. Identify your essential understandings, questions, benchmarks, objectives, skills, standards, and/or learner outcomes.

2. Identify your students with unique needs, and get an early look at what they will need in order to learn and achieve.

3. Design your formative and summative assessments. 4. Design and deliver your pre-assessments based on the

summative assessments and identified objectives. 5. Adjust assessments or objectives based on your further

thinking discovered while designing the assessments.

Quick Reference: Differentiated Lesson Planning Sequence

Page 41: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

B. Steps to take while designing the learning experiences:

1. Design the learning experiences for students based on pre-assessments, your knowledge of your students, and your expertise with the curriculum, cognitive theory, and students at this stage of human development.

2. Run a mental tape of each step in the lesson sequence to make sure things make sense for your diverse group of students and that the lesson will run smoothly.

3. Review your plans with a colleague. 4. Obtain/Create materials needed for the lesson.5. Conduct the lesson.6. Adjust formative and summative assessments and

objectives as necessary based on observations and data collected while teaching.

Page 42: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

C. Steps to take after providing the learning experiences:

1. Evaluate the lesson’s success with students. What evidence do you have that the lesson was successful? What worked and what didn’t, and why?

2. Record advice on lesson changes for yourself for when you do this lesson in future years.

Page 43: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

To Get Guidance on What is Essential and Enduring, Consult:

• standards of learning (What skills and content within this standard will be necessary to teach students in order for them to demonstrate mastery of the standard?)

• programs of study• curriculum guides• pacing guides • other teacher’s tests• professional journals• Mentor or colleague teachers• textbook scope and sequence• textbook end-of-chapter reviews and tests• subject-specific on-line listservs• professional organizations• quiet reflection

Page 44: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal
Page 45: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Consider:

• The Latin root of assessment is, “assidere,” which means, “to sit beside.”

• From Assessment expert, Doug Reeves:

“Too often, educational tests, grades, and report cards are treated by teachers as autopsies when they should be viewed as physicals.”

Page 46: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Feedback vs Assessment

Feedback: Holding up a mirror to students, showing them what they did and comparing it what they should have done. There’s no evaluative component! Comments only, no grades or percentages.

Assessment: Gathering data so we can make a decision

Greatest Impact on Student Success:

Formative feedback

Page 47: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

What does our understanding of feedback mean for our use of homework?

Is homework more formative or summative in nature? Whichever it is, its role in determining grades will be dramatically different.

Page 48: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

“If we don’t count homework heavily,

students won’t do it.”

Do you agree with this?Does this sentiment cross a line?

Page 49: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Two Homework Extremes that Focus Our Thinking

• If a student does none of the homework assignments, yet earns an “A” (top grade) on every formal assessment we give, does he earn anything less than an “A” on his report card?

• If a student does all of the homework well yet bombs every formal assessment, isn’t that also a red flag that something is amiss, and we need to take corrective action?

Page 50: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Be clear: We mark or grade against outcomes, not routes students take or techniques teachers use to achieve those outcomes.

What does this mean we should do with class participation, discussion, or group project marks?

Page 51: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

High Final Grade Accuracy

Low Final Grade Accuracy

Low Use of Formative Scoresin the Final Grade

High Use of Formative Scores in the Final Grade

Use of F

ormativ

e

Assess

ment

Scores i

n the Final

Grade

Accuracy of Final

Report Card Grade

Accuracy of the Final Report Card Grade versus the Level of Use of Formative Assessment Scores in the Final

Report Grade

Page 52: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Assessment OF Learning

• Still very important

• Summative, final declaration of proficiency, literacy, mastery

• Letter grades used

• Little impact on learning from feedback

Page 53: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Assessment AS/FOR Learning• Letter grades not used • Comments and some non-judgement

symbols used • Share learning goals with students from the

beginning• Make adjustments in teaching a result of

formative assessment data• Provide descriptive feedback to students• Provide opportunities for student for self-and

peer assessment -- O’Connor, Wormeli

Page 54: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Teacher Action

Result on Student Achievement

Just telling students # correct and incorrect

Negative influence on achievement

Clarifying the scoring criteria Increase of 16 percentile points

Providing explanations as to why their responses are correct or incorrect

Increase of 20 percentile points

Asking students to continue responding to an assessment until they correctly answer the items

Increase of 20 percentile points

Graphically portraying student achievement

Increase of 26 percentile points

-- Marzano, CAGTW, pgs 5-6

Page 55: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Item

Topic or

Proficiency Right Wrong

Simple Mistake?

Really Don’t Understand

1 Dividing fractions

2 Dividing Fractions

3 Multiplying Fractions

4 Multiplying fractions

5 Reducing to Smplst trms

6 Reducing to Smplst trms

7Reciprocals

8Reciprocals

9Reciprocals

Page 56: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

The chart on the previous slide is based on an idea found in the article below:

Stiggins, Rick. “Assessment Through the Student’s Eyes,” Educational Leadership, May 2007, Vol. 64, No. 8, pages 22 – 26, ASCD

Page 57: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Benefits of Students Self Assessing• Students better understand the standards and

outcomes• Students are less dependent on teachers for

feedback; they independently monitor their own progress

• Students develop metacognitive skills and adjust what they are doing to improve their work

• Students broaden learning when they see how peers approach tasks

• Students develop communication and social skills when required to provide feedback to others.

-- from Manitoba’s Communicating Student Learning, 2008

Page 58: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

From NASSP’s Principal’s Research Review, January 2009:

When anyone is trying to learn, feedback about the effort has three elements: recognition of the desired goal, evidence about present position, and some understanding of a way to close the gap between the two” (p. 143, Black)

Page 59: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Carol Dweck (2007) distinguishes between students with a fixed intelligence mindset who believe that intelligence is innate and unchangeable and those with a growth mindset who believe that their achievement can improve through effort and learning…Teaching students a growth mindset results in increased motivation, better grades, and higher achievement test results.”

(p.6, Principal’s Research Review, January 2009, NASSP)

Page 60: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Pre-Assessments

Used to indicate students’ readiness for content and skill development. Used to guide instructional decisions.

Page 61: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Formative Assessments

These are in-route checkpoints, frequently done. They provide ongoing and clear feedback to students and the teacher, informing instruction and reflecting subsets of the essential and enduring knowledge. They are where successful differentiating teachers spend most of their energy – assessing formatively and providing timely feedback to students and practice.

Page 62: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Summative Assessments

These are given to students at the end of the learning to document growth and mastery. They match the learning objectives and experiences, and they are negotiable if the product is not the literal learner outcome. They reflect most, if not all, of the essential and enduring knowledge. They are not very helpful forms of feedback.

Page 63: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Tips for Planning Assessments

• Correlate all formal assessments with objectives.

• While summative assessments may be large and complex, pre-assessments usually are not.

• Get ideas for pre- and formative assessments from summative assessments.

• Spend the majority of your time designing/emphasizing formative assessments and the feedback they provide.

Page 64: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Tips for Planning Assessments – Planning Sequence

• Design summative assessments first, then design your pre- and formative assessments.

• Give pre-assessments several days or a week PRIOR to starting the unit.

• Design your lesson plans AFTER reviewing pre-assessment data.

Page 65: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Evaluating the Usefulnessof Assessments

• What are your essential and enduring skills and content you’re trying to assess?

• How does this assessment allow students to demonstrate their mastery?

• Is every component of that objective accounted for in the assessment?

• Can students respond another way and still satisfy the requirements of the assessment task? Would this alternative way reveal a student’s mastery more truthfully?

• Is this assessment more a test of process or content? Is that what you’re after?

Page 66: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Clear and Consistent Evidence

We want an accurate portrayal of a student’s mastery, not something clouded by a useless format or distorted by only one opportunity to reveal understanding.

Differentiating teachers require accurate assessments in order to differentiate successfully.

Page 67: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Great differentiated assessment is never kept in the dark.

“Students can hit any target they can see and which stands still for them.”-- Rick Stiggins, Educator and Assessment expert

If a child ever asks, “Will this be on the test?”.….we haven’t done our job.

Page 68: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Successful Assessment is Authentic in Two Ways

• The assessment is close to how students will apply their learning in real-world applications. (not mandatory)

• The assessment must be authentic to how students are learning. (mandatory)

Page 69: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Successful Assessments are Varied and They are Done Over Time

• Assessments are often snapshot-in-time, inferences of mastery, not absolute declarations of exact mastery

• When we assess students through more than one format, we see different sides to their understanding. Some students’ mindmaps of their analyses of Renaissance art rivals the most cogent, written versions of their classmates.

Page 70: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Potential distractions on assessment day:

growling stomach, thirst, exhaustion, illness, emotional angst over: parents/friends/identity/tests/college/politics/birthday/sex/blogs/parties/sports/projects/

homework/self-esteem/acne/holiday/report cards/future career/money/disease

It’s reasonable to allow students every opportunity to show their best side, not just one opportunity.

Page 71: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Portfolios

Portfolios can be as simple as a folder of collected works for one year or as complex as multi-year, selected and analyzed works from different areas of a student’s life. portfolios are often showcases in which students and teachers include representative samples of students’ achievement regarding standards and learning objectives over time. They can be on hardcopy or electronic, and they can contain non-paper artifacts as well. They can be places to store records, attributes, and accomplishments of a student, as well as a place to reveal areas in need of growth. They can be maintained by students, teachers, or a combination of both. Though they are stored most days in the classroom, portfolios are sent home for parent review at least once a grading period.

Page 72: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Guiding Questions for Rubric Design:

• Does the rubric account for everything we want to assess?

• Is a rubric the best way to assess this product?• Is the rubric tiered for this student group’s

readiness level?• Is the rubric clearly written so anyone doing a

“cold” reading of it will understand what is expected of the student?

• Can a student understand the content yet score poorly on the rubric? If so, why, and how can we change the rubric to make sure it doesn’t happen?

Page 73: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Guiding Questions for Rubric Design:

• Can a student understand very little content yet score well on the rubric? If so, how can we change that so it doesn’t happen?

• What are the benefits to us as teachers of this topic to create a rubric for our students?

• How do the elements of this rubric support differentiated instruction?

• What should we do differently the next time we create this rubric?

Page 74: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

“Metarubric Summary”To determine the quality of a rubric, examine the:

• Content -- Does it assess the important material and leave out the unimportant material?

• Clarity -- Can the student understand what’s being asked of him, Is everything clearly defined, including examples and non-examples?

• Practicality -- Is it easy to use by both teachers and students?

• Technical quality/fairness -- Is it reliable and valid?• Sampling -- How well does the task represent the

breadth and depth of the target being assessed?

(p. 220). Rick Stiggins and his co-authors of Classroom Assessment for Student Learning (2005)

Page 75: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Holistic or Analytic?

Task: Write an expository paragraph.

• Holistic: One descriptor for the highest score lists all the elements and attributes that are required.

• Analytic: Create separate rubrics (levels of accomplishment with descriptors) within the larger one for each subset of skills, all outlined in one chart. Examples for the paragraph prompt: Content, Punctuation and Usage, Supportive Details, Organization, Accuracy, and Use of Relevant Information.

Page 76: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Holistic or Analytic?

Task: Create a drawing and explanation of atoms.

• Holistic: One descriptor for the highest score lists all the features we want them to identify accurately.

• Analytic: Create separate rubrics for each subset of features – – Anatomical Features: protons, neutrons, electrons

and their ceaseless motion, ions, valence– Periodic Chart Identifiers: atomic number, mass

number, period– Relationships and Bonds with other Atoms: isotopes,

molecules, shielding, metal/non-metal/metalloid families, bonds – covalent, ionic, and metallic.

Page 77: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Rubric for the Historical Fiction Book Project – Holistic-style

5.0 Standard of Excellence:

• All material relating to the novel was accurate• Demonstrated full understanding of the story and its characters• Demonstrated attention to quality and craftsmanship in the

product• Product is a realistic portrayal of media used (examples:

postcards look like postcards, calendar looks like a real calendar, placemats can function as real placemats)

• Writing is free of errors in punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and grammar

• Had all components listed for the project as described in the task

4.5, 4.0, 3.5, 3.0, 2.5, 2.0, 1.5, 1.0, .5, and 0 are awarded in cases in which students’ projects do not fully achieve all criteria described for excellence. Circled items are areas for improvement.

Keep the important ideas in sight and in mind.

Page 78: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Two Rubric Ideas to Consider:

• Only give the fully written description for the standard of excellence. This way students won’t set their sights on something lower.

• 4.0 rubrics carry so much automatic, emotional baggage, parents and students rarely read and internalize the descriptors. Make it easier for them: Use anything except the 4.0 rubric – 2.0, 3.0, 5.0, 6.0.

Page 79: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Why Do We Mark or Grade Students’ Work?

• Provide feedback• Document progress• Guide instructional decisions---------------------------------------------• Motivate• Punish• Sort students

What about incorporating attendance, effort, and behavior in the final mark?

Page 80: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

“We err gravely when we call compliance and politeness, ‘algebra’ and ‘English,’ or any other label that conflates proficiency with behavior.”

-- Doug Reeves, 2006 as quoted in the forthcoming 3rd edition

of Ken O’Connor’s How to Grade for Learning, Corwin Press, 2008)

Page 81: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

‘Time to Change the Metaphor:

Grades and marks are NOT compensation. Grades and marks are communication: They are an accurate report of what happened.

Page 82: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Consider…• Teaching and learning can and do occur

without grades.• We do not give students grades in order to

teach them.• Letter grades/marks reference summative

experiences only – cumulative tests, projects, demonstrations, NOT formative experiences.

• Students can learn without letter grades, but they must have feedback.

• Grades/marks are inferences based upon a sampling of student’s work in one snapshot moment in time. As such they are highly subjective and relative.

Page 83: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Premise

A grade or mark represents a valid and undiluted

indicator of what a student knows

and is able to do – mastery.

With grades/marks, we document progress in students and our teaching, we provide feedback to students and their parents, and we make instructional decisions.

Page 84: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

10 Practices to Avoid in a Differentiated Classroom

[They Dilute a Grade’s Validity and Effectiveness]

• Penalizing students’ multiple attempts at mastery

• Grading practice (daily homework) as students come to know concepts [Feedback, not grading, is needed]

• Withholding assistance (not scaffolding or differentiating) in the learning when it’s needed

• Group marks or grades• Incorporating non-academic factors

(behavior, attendance, and effort)

Page 85: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

• Assessing students in ways that do not accurately indicate students’ mastery (student responses are hindered by the assessment format)

• Marking/Grading on a curve• Allowing Extra Credit• Defining supposedly criterion-based marks

in terms of norm-referenced descriptions (“above average,” “average”, etc.)

• Recording zeroes on the 100.0 scale for work not done

Page 86: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

0 or 50 (or 60)?

100-pt. Scale: 0, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100 -- 83% (C+)

60, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100 -- 93% (B+)

When working with students,

do we choose the most hurtful,

unrecoverable end of the “F”

range, or the most

constructive, recoverable end

of the “F” range?

Page 87: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Be clear: Students are not getting points for having done nothing. The student still gets an F. We’re simply equalizing the influence of the each mark in the overall grade and responding in a way that leads to learning.

Page 88: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Imagine the Reverse…

A = 100 – 40

B = 39 – 30

C = 29 – 20

D = 19 – 10

F = 9 – 0

What if we reversed the proportional influences of the marks? That “A” would have a huge, yet undue, inflationary effect on the overall grade. Just as we wouldn’t want an “A” to have an inaccurate effect, we don’t want an “F” grade to have such an undue, deflationary, and inaccurate effect. Keeping zeroes on a 100-pt. scale is just as absurd as the scale seen here.

Page 89: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

A (0) on a 100-pt. scale is a (-6) on a 4-pt. scale. If a student does no work, he should get nothing, not something worse than nothing. How instructive is it to tell a student that he earned six times less than absolute failure? Choose to be instructive, not punitive. [Based on an idea by Doug Reeves, The Learning Leader, ASCD, 2006]

100

90

80

70

60

4

3

2

1

0

-1

-2

-3

-4

-5

-6

50

40

30

20

10

0

Consider the Correlation

Page 90: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Temperature Readings for Norfolk, VA:85, 87, 88, 84, 0 (‘Forgot to take the reading)

Average: 68.8 degrees

This is inaccurate for what really happened, and therefore, unusable.

Page 91: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Clarification:

When we’re talking about converting zeroes to 50’s or higher, we’re referring to zeroes earned on major projects and assessments, not homework, as well as anything graded on a 100-point scale. It’s okay to give zeroes on homework or on small scales, such as a 4.0 scale. Zeroes recorded for homework assignments do not refer to final, accurate declarations of mastery, and those zeroes don’t have the undue influence on small grading scales.

Page 92: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Standards-based Grading Impacts Behavior, not just Report Cards:

“When schools improve grading policies – for example, by disconnecting grades from behavior – student achievement increases and behavior improves dramatically.”

(Doug Reeves, ASCD’s Educational Leadership, 2008, p. 90,

Reeves)

Page 93: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Marking Late Work

• One whole letter grade down for each day late is punitive. It does not teach students, and it removes hope.

• A few points off for each day late is instructive; there’s hope.

• Yes, the world beyond school is like this.

Page 94: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

“Teachers who accept late work tell me that students are more likely to complete their assignments if they know it will not be graded down. It also communicates to students that all class assignments have a legitimate educational purpose that must be fulfilled.”

-- Forest Gathercoal, Judicious Discipline (2004), as quoted in forthcoming Ken O’Connor 3rd edition of How to Grade

for Learning, Corwin Press, 2008)

Page 95: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

“We are faced with the irony that a policy that may be grounded in the belief of holding students accountable (giving zeroes) actually allows some students to escape accountability for learning.” -- O’Connor, p. 86

Page 96: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Helpful Consideration for Dealing with Student’s Late Work:

Is it chronic….

…or is it occasional?

We respond differently, depending on which one it is.

Page 97: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Are we interested more in holding students accountable

or making sure they learn?

Avoid, “learn or I will hurt you” measures. (Nancy Doda)

Page 98: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

This quarter, you’ve taught:

• 4-quadrant graphing• Slope and Y-intercept• Multiplying binomials• Ratios/Proportions• 3-dimensional solids• Area and Circumference of a circle.

The student’s mark: B

What does this mark tell us about the student’s proficiency with each of the topics you’ve taught?

Page 99: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Unidimensionality – A single score on a test represents a single dimension or trait that has been assessed

Student

Dimension A

Dimension B Total Score

1 2 10 12

2 10 2 12

3 6 6 12

Problem: Most tests use a single score to assess multiple dimensions and traits. The resulting score is often invalid and

useless. -- Marzano, CAGTW, page 13

Page 100: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Setting Up Gradebooks ina Differentiated Classroom

• Avoid setting up gradebooks according to formats or media used to demonstrate mastery: tests, quizzes, homework, projects, writings, performances

• Instead, set up gradebooks according to mastery: objectives, benchmarks, standards, learner outcomes

Page 101: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Set up your gradebook into two sections:

Formative Summative

Assignments and assessments Final declaration

completed on the way to of mastery or

mastery or proficiency proficiency

Page 102: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Summative Assessments Student: ______________________________

Standards/ Outcomes

XYZ Test, part 1

PQR Project

EFG Observ.

XYZ Test, part 2

GHIPerf. Task

Most Consistent Level

1.1 [Descriptor] 3.5 3.5 3.5

1.2 [Descriptor] 2.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 4.5

1.3 [Descriptor] 4.5 3.5 3.0 3.5 3.5

1.4 [Descriptor] 3.5 3.5 3.5

1.5 [Descriptor] 2.0 1.5 1.75

Page 103: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Responsive Report Formats

Adjusted/Modified/Alternative

Curriculum Approach:

Mark the student against his own progression, but indicate that the mark reflects an adjusted curriculum. Place an asterisk next to the mark

or check a box on the report card indicating such, and include a narrative comment in the

cumulative folder that explains the adjustments.

Page 104: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Responsive Report Formats

Progression and Outcomes Approach:

Grade the student with two marks, one indicating his performance with the learner outcomes and another indicating his own progression. A, B, C, D, or F indicates the

student’s progress against provincial outcomes, while 3, 2, or 1 indicates his

personal progression.

Page 105: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Responsive Report Formats

Multiple Categories Within Subjects Approach:

Divide the mark into its component pieces. For example, a “B” in Science class can be subdivided into specific outcomes or

benchmarks such as, “Demonstrates proper lab procedure,” “Successfully employs the

scientific method,” or “Uses proper nomenclature and/or taxonomic references.”

The more we try to aggregate into a single symbol, the less reliable that symbol is as a true expression of

what a student knows and is able to do.

Page 106: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Report Cards without Grades

Course: Standard Standards RatingEnglish 9 Descriptor (1) (2) (3) (4)_____________________________________________________________________Outcome 1 Usage/Punct/Spelling ----------------------2.5Outcome 2 Analysis of Literature ------------1.75Outcome 3 Six + 1 Traits of Writing --------------------------------3.25Outcome 4 Reading Comprehension --------------------------------3.25Outcome 5 Listening/Speaking ----------------2.0Outcome 6 Research Skills ------------------------------------------4.0

Additional Comments from Teachers:

Health and Maturity Records for the Grading Period:

Page 107: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

For this kind of electronic gradebook and reporting, Robert Marzano and ASCD recommend The Pinnacle Plus system by Excelsior Software.

Page 108: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Choose the student comment to his parents we hope he will use:

1. “If I could just understand the

Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, I could do better on that test.”

(or)

2. “If I could just get four more problems right, I could do better on that test.”

Page 109: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

100 point scale or 4.0 Scale?

• A 4.0 scale has a high inter-rater reliability. Students’ work is connected to a detailed descriptor and growth and achievement rally around listed benchmarks.

• In 100-point or larger scales, the grades are more subjective. In classes in which teachers use percentages or points, students, teachers, and parents more often rally around grade point averages, not learning.

Page 110: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Consider:

• Pure mathematical averages of marks for a marking period are inaccurate indicators of students’ true mastery.

• A teacher’s professional judgment via clear descriptors on a rubric actually increases the accuracy of a student’s final mark as an indicator of what he learned.

• A teacher’s judgment via rubrics has a stronger correlation with outside standardized tests than point or average calculations do.

(Marzano)

Page 111: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Office of Educational Research and Improvement Study (1994):

Students in impoverished communities that receive high marks in English earn the same scores as C and D students in

affluent communities. Math was the same: High marks in

impoverished schools equaled only the D students’ performance

in affluent schools.

Page 112: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Accurate marks/grades are based on the most consistent evidence. We look at the pattern of achievement, including trends, not the average of the data. This means we focus on the median and mode, not mean, and the most recent scores are weighed heavier than earlier scores.

Median: The middle test score of a distribution, above and below which lie an

equal number of test scoresMode: The score occurring most frequently in

a series of observations or test data

Page 113: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Suggested Language to Use in Parents’ Handbook:

Parents, as we are basing students' grades on

standards for each discipline, final grades are first and

foremost determined by our teachers' professional

opinion of your child's work against those standards,

not by mathematical calculations. Teachers have

been trained in analyzing student products against

standards and in finding evidence of that learning

using a variety of methods. Please don't hesitate to

inquire how grades for your child were determined if

you are unsure.

Page 114: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Allowing Students to Re-do Assignments and Tests for Full Credit:

• Always, “…at teacher discretion.”

• It must be within reason.

• Students must have been giving a sincere effort.

• Require parents to sign the original assignment or test, requesting the re-do.

• Require students to submit a plan of study that will enable them to improve their performance the second time around.

Page 115: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Allow Students to Re-do Assignments and Tests for Full Credit:

• Identify a day by which time this will be accomplished or the grade is permanent.

• With the student, create a calendar of completion that will help them achieve it.

• Require students to submit original with the re-done version so you can keep track of their development

• Reserve the right to give alternative versions

• No-re-do’s the last week of the grading period • Sometimes the greater gift is to deny the option.

Page 116: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

If we do not allow students to re-do work, we deny the growth mindset so vital to student maturation,

and we are declaring to the student:

• This assignment had no legitimate educational value.

• It’s okay if you don’t do this work.

• It’s okay if you don’t learn this content or skill.

None of these is acceptable to the highly accomplished, professional educator.

Page 117: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Grading Inclusion Students

Question #1:

“Are the standards/outcomes set for the whole class also developmentally appropriate for this student?”

• If they are appropriate, proceed to Question #2.• If they are not appropriate, identify which

standards/outcomes are appropriate, making sure they are as close as possible to the original standards/outcomes. Then go to question #2.

Page 118: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Grading Inclusion Students

Question #2:

“Will these learning experiences (processes) we’re using with the general class work with the inclusion student as well?”

• If they will work, then proceed to Question #3.• If they will not work, identify alternative pathways

to learning that will work. Then go to Question #3.

Page 119: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Grading Inclusion StudentsQuestion #3:

“Will this assessment instrument we’re using to get an accurate rendering of what general education students know and are able to do regarding the standards/outcome also provide an accurate rendering of what this inclusion student knows and is able to do regarding the same outcome?

• If the instrument will provide an accurate rendering of the inclusion student’s mastery, then use it just as you do with the rest of the class.

• If it will not provide an accurate rendering of the inclusion student’s mastery, then identify a product that will provide that accuracy, and make sure it holds the student accountable for the same universal factors as your are asking of the other students.

Page 120: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Grading Gifted/Talented Students

• Insure grade-level material is learned.• If it’s enrichment material only, the grade still

represents mastery of on-grade-level material. An addendum report card or the comment section provides feedback on advanced material.

• If the course name indicates advanced material (Algebra I Honors, Biology II), then we grade against those advanced outcomes.

• If the student has accelerated a grade level or more, he is graded against the same standards/outcomes as his older classmates.

Page 121: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Your Own Grading Philosophy Statement

Write a one- to two-page document that describes your marking/grading policies. Write it as if parents, administrators, colleagues, and the School Board would be reading it with a critical eye. Share this document with others.

Your pedagogy becomes real and has impact only after it has been defended and criticized publicly. Otherwise, it’s just an opinion or assumption. Our teaching core values are revealed and potentially transformed in the negotiation of these points with others, not in the recording of our thoughts individually.

Page 122: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

GPS Format 1. 1-2 sentence statement of your

philosophy. Ex: “Homework will count 5% in this class.”

2. 1-5 sentences of rationale as to why this is your policy. Ex: “Homework is meant to be practice as students learn a topic, not a declaration of summative mastery of that topic. Since letter grades are reserved only for summative declarations of mastery, homework should not be a major portion of the final grade for the marking period.”

Page 123: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Include in your statement your philosophy on the following:

Differentiated and fair gradingRubricsModified or adjusted curriculumStudent self-assessment Extra creditWhat marks/grades meanDefinitions of individual gradesGrading scales (100 vs 4.0)Formative vs summative assessmentsAveraging grades vs using median/modeMarking classworkMarking homeworkThe purpose of homework How much curriculum should be on one test and tiering tests

The role of alternative assessmentsWeighting marksThe percent influence of varied assessmentsDealing with late workSetting up the gradebook according to categories, assessment formats or outcomesRe-doing work or tests for full creditThe purpose of marks/grades and marking/grading

Page 124: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Sample Formative AssessmentsTopic: Verb Conjugation

Sample Formative Assessments:

• Conjugate five regular verbs. • Conjugate five irregular verbs.• Conjugate a verb in Spanish, then do its parallel in

English• Answer: Why do we conjugate verbs?• Answer: What advice would you give a student

learning to conjugate verbs?• Examine the following 10 verb conjugations and

identify which ones are done incorrectly.

Page 125: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Sample Formative Assessments

Topic: Balancing Chemical Equations

Formative Assessments:

• Define reactants and products, and identify them in the equations provided.

• Critique how Jason calculated the number of moles of each reactant.

• Balance these sample, unbalanced equations.• Answer: What do we mean by balancing equations?• Explain to your lab partner how knowledge of

stoichiometric coefficients help us balance equations• Prepare a mini-poster that explains the differences

among combination, decomposition, and displacement reactions.

Page 126: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Samples of Formative Assessment

• Solve these four math problems.• What three factors led to the government’s decision to…• Draw a symbol that best portrays this book’s character

as you now understand him (her), and write a brief explanation as to why you chose the symbol you did.

• Record your answer to this question on your dry-erase board and hold it above your head for me to see.

• Prepare a rough draft of the letter you’re going to write.• What is your definition of…?• Who had a more pivotal role in this historical situation,

______________ or ________________, and why do you believe as you do?

Page 127: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Samples of Formative Assessment

• Identify at least five steps you need to take in order to solve math problems like these.

• How would you help a friend keep the differences between amphibians and reptiles clear in his mind?

• Write a paragraph of 3 to 5 lines that uses a demonstrative pronoun in each sentence and circle each example.

• Play the F sharp scale.• In a quick paragraph, describe the impact of the

Lusitania’s sinking • Create a web or outline that captures what we’ve learned

today about….

Page 128: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Additional Formative Assessment Ideas:

• “Reader’s Theater” -- Turn text, video, lecture, field trip, etc. into script and perform it

• Virtual Metaphors (Graphic Organizers)

• Projects, dioramas, non-linguistic represenations

• Multiple Choice questions followed by, “Why did you answer the way you did?”

• Correct false items on True-false tests.

Page 129: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

3-2-13 – Identify three characteristics of Renaissance art that differed from art of the Middle Ages2 – List two important scientific debates that occurred during the Renaissance1 – Provide one good reason why “rebirth” is an appropriate term to describe the Renaissance

3 – List three applications for slope, y-intercept knowledge in the professional world2 – Identify two skills students must have in order to determine slope and y-intercept from a set of points on a plane1 – If (x1, y1) are the coordinates of a point W in a plane, and (x2, y2) are the coordinates of a different

point Y, then the slope of line WY is what?

Page 130: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Exclusion Brainstorming

The student identifies the word/concept that does not belong with the others, then either orally or in writing explains his reasoning:

• Mixtures – plural, separable, dissolves, no formula • Compounds – chemically combined, new properties,

has formula, no composition• Solutions – heterogeneous mixture, dissolved

particles, saturated and unsaturated, heat increases • Suspensions – clear, no dissolving, settles upon

standing, larger than molecules

Page 131: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

The Frayer Model[Frayer, Frederick, Klausmeier, 1969]

Essential Characteristics

Non- Essential Characteristics

Examples Non-examples

< Topic >

Page 132: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Sorting CardsTeach something that has multiple

categories, like types of government, multiple ideologies, cycles in science, systems of the body, taxonomic nomenclature, or multiple theorems in geometry. Then display the categories.

Provide students with index cards or Post-it notes with individual facts, concepts, and attributes of the categories recorded on them. Ask students to work in groups to place each fact, concept, or attribute in its correct category. The conversation among group members is just as important to the learning experience as the placement of the cards, so let students defend their reasoning orally and often.

Page 133: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Change the VerbAnalyze… Explain…Construct… Revise…Decide between… Argue against…Why did… Argue for…Defend… Examine…Contrast… Devise…Identify… Plan…Classify… Critique…Define… Rank…Compose… Organize…Interpret… Interview…Expand… Find support for…Predict… Develop…Categorize… Suppose…Invent… Imagine…Recommend… 

Page 134: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Synectics(William J. Gordon)

“The joining together of different and apparently irrelevant elements,” or put more

simply, “Making the familiar strange.”

1. Teach a topic to students. 2. Ask students to describe the topic, focusing on

descriptive words and critical attributes.3. Teacher identifies an unrelated category to compare

to the descriptions in #2. (Think of a sport that reminds you of these words. Explain why you chose that sport.) Students can choose the category, too.

4. Students write or express the analogy between the two: The endocrine system is like playing zones in basketball. Each player or gland is responsible for his area of the game.

Page 135: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

4-Square Synectics1. Brainstorm four objects from a particular category

(examples: kitchen appliances, household items, the circus, forests, shopping malls).

2. In small groups, brainstorm what part of today’s learning is similar in some way to the objects listed.

3. Create four analogies, one for each object. Example: How is the human digestive system like each

household item: sink, old carpet, microwave, broom

Example: How is the Pythagorean Theorem like each musical instrument: piano, drum set, electric guitar, trumpet?

Page 136: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

T-List or T-Chart: Wilson’s 14 Points

Reasons President Wilson Designed the Plan for Peace

Three Immediate Effects on U.S. Allies

Three Structures/Protocols created by the Plans

Main Ideas Details/Examples

1.

2.

3.

1.

2.

3.

1.

2.

3

Page 137: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Summarization Pyramid

__________

______________

____________________

_________________________

______________________________

___________________________________

Great prompts for each line: Synonym, analogy, question, three attributes, alternative title, causes, effects, reasons, arguments, ingredients, opinion, larger category, formula/sequence, insight, tools, misinterpretation, sample, people, future of the topic

Page 138: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

One-Word Summaries

“The new government regulations for the meat-packing industry in the 1920’s could be seen as an opportunity…,”

“Picasso’s work is actually an argument for….,” “NASA’s battle with Rockwell industries over the

warnings about frozen temperatures and the O-rings on the space shuttle were trench warfare….”

Basic Idea: Argue for or against the word as a good description for the topic.

Page 139: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Taboo Cards

Photosynthesis

LightGreenWaterSun

ChlorophyllPlant

Produce

Page 140: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Line-up

• Groups of students line up according to criteria. Each student holds an index card identifying what he or she is portraying.

• Students discuss everyone’s position with one another -- posing questions, disagreeing, and explaining rationales.

Page 141: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Line-up

Students can line-up according to:

chronology, sequences in math problems, components of an essay, equations,

sentences, verb tense, scientific process/cycle, patterns: alternating,

category/example, increasing/decreasing degree, chromatic scale, sequence of events,

cause/effect, components of a larger topic, opposites, synonyms

Page 142: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Statues (Body Sculpture)

Students work in small groups

using every groupmember’s body

to symbolically portray concepts

in frozen tableau.

Where does the learning occur?

Page 143: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

“Awards”(p. 68, Checking for Understanding, ASCD, 2007)

• Students recommend someone or something for an award that they or the teacher have created based on their understanding of the topic:“Busiest Part of Speech” Award

“Most Likely Mistake We Make while Graphing Data” Award

“Most Important Literary Device in this Novel” Award

Page 144: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Quick Checks

• Dry-Erase Slates (or something similar): Students record responses on them and hold them above their heads

• Thumbs up, sideways, or down according to their level of understanding

• Fingers: 5 = Agree or Understand completely, 3 = Disagree but will accept the group’s decision or ‘still confused about one part, 1 = Disagree strongly or “I don’t understand yet”

• “Pisa Assessment” – Students lean left, sit up straight, or lean right according to their level of understanding

• ARS – Audience Response Systems (electronic devices students use to respond to teacher questions, tabulated on screen for students and teachers)

Page 145: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Accountable Talk (p.23, Checking for Understanding, ASCD, 2007)

• Press for clarification – “Could you describe what you mean?”

• Require justification – “Where did you find that information?”

• Recognize and challenge misconceptions – “I don’t agree because…”

• Demand evidence for claims – “Can you give me an example?”

• Interpret and use others’ statements – “David suggested that….”

Page 146: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

“Whip Around”(p.34 Checking for Understanding, ASCD, 2007)

• Students record three ideas or facts from the lesson on scrap paper, then stand up.

• Each student reads his list of facts, but only the ones that have not yet been mentioned by others.

• As classmates hear facts included on their own lists, they cross them off.

• When all three are crossed off their lists, students sit down.

• Students continue until the last classmate has shared.

• Teacher notes what was and was not mentioned.

Page 147: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Great New Books on Feedback, Assessment, and Grading:• Differentiated Assessment for Middle and High School Classrooms , Deborah Blaz, Eye on Education, 2008• How to Give Feedback to Your Students, Susan M. Brookhart, ASCD, 2008• Developing Performance-Based Assessments, Grades 6-12, Nancy P. Gallavan, Corwin Press, 2009• Measuring Up: What Educational Testing Really Tells Us, Daniel Koretz, Harvard University Press, 2008• Assessment Essentials for Stnadards-Based Education, Second Edition , James H. McMillan, Corwin Press, 2008

Page 148: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Recommended Reading on Assessment and Grading

• Arter, Judith A.; McTighe, Jay; Scoring Rubrics in the Classroom : Using Performance Criteria for Assessing and Improving Student Performance, Corwin Press, 2000

• Benjamin, Amy. Differentiating Instruction: A Guide for Middle and High School Teachers, Eye on Education, 2002

• Black, Paul; William, Dylan. 1998. “Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment,” Phi Delta kappan, 80(2): 139-148

• Borich, Gary D.; Tombari, Martin L. Educational Assessment for the Elementary and Middle School Classroom (2nd Edition), Prentice Hall, 2003

• Brookhart, Susan. 2004. Grading. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall

Page 149: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Recommended Reading on Assessment and Grading

• Fisher, Douglas; Frey, Nancy. Checking for Understanding: Formative Assessment Techniques for your Classroom, ASCD, 2007

• www.exemplars.com• Heacox, Diane, Ed.D. Differentiated Instruction in the Regular

Classroom, Grades 3 – 12, Free Spirit Publishing, 2000• Lewin, Larry; Shoemaker, Betty Jean. Great Performances:

Creating Classroom-Based Assessment Tasks, John Wiley & Sons, 1998

• Marzano, Robert. Transforming Classroom Grading, ASCD 2001• Marzano, Robert. Classroom Assessment and Grading that Work,

ASCD 2006• Marzano, Robert; McTighe, Jay; and Pickering, Debra. Assessing

Student Outcomes: Performance Assessment Using the Dimensions of Learning Model, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1993

Page 150: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

Recommended Reading

• Millan, James H. Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective Instruction (2nd Edition), Allyn & Bacon, 2000

• Manitoba, Canada Ministry of Education. Communicating Students’ Learning, 2008

• O’Connor, Ken; How to Grade for Learning, 2nd Edition, Thousand Oaks, CA, Corwin Press (3rd edition coming in 2009)

• O’Connor, Ken; A Repair Kit for Grading: 15 Fixes for Broken Grades, ETS publishers, 2007

• O’Connor, Ken. “Reforming Grading Practices in Secondary Schools,” Principal’s Research Review, Volume 4, Issue 1, January 2009, NASSP

• Popham, W. James; Test Better, Teach Better: The Intsructional Role of Assessment, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2003

• Popham, W. James; Classroom Assessment : What Teachers Need to Know (4th Edition), Pearson Education, 2004

• Stiggins, Richard J. Student-Involved Classroom Assessment (3rd Edition), Prentice Hall, 2000

Page 151: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

• Wiggins, Grant; Educative assessment: Assessment to Inform and Improve Performance, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1997Grant Wiggins Web site and organization:Center on Learning, Assessment, and School Structure (CLASS)[email protected] www.classnj.org [email protected]

• Wormeli, Rick. Fair Isn’t Always Equal: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom. Stenhouse Publishers, 2006

Page 152: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

“I was put on earth by God in order to accomplish a certain

number of things… right now I am so far behind…

I will never die!”

-Calvin and Hobbes

Page 153: Assessment and Grading in the Differentiated Classroom Fair Isn’t Always Equal

“Even a man on the right track will get run over if he just stands there.”

-- Will Rogers

“Don’t let anything hit you in the rear end.”

-- Rick Wormeli