assessment of sites and areas for waste management facilities in

H A M P S H I R E

CITIES OF PORTSMOUTH & SOUTHAMPTON

AND NEW FOREST & SOUTH DOWNS NATIONAL PARKS

Hampshire Minerals & Waste

Plan

AN ASSESSMENT OF SITES AND AREAS FOR WASTE

MANAGEMENT FACILITIES IN HAMPSHIRE

Version 5 (Submission)

February 2012

All Plans reproduced within this document meet copyright of the data suppliers Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationary Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution of civil proceedings. HCC 100019180 2012. © Environment Agency Copyright 2012. All rights reserved. Reproduced from the British Geological Survey Map data at the original scale of 1:100,000. Licence 2008/202 British Geological Survey. © NERC. All rights reserved.

Executive summary

3Executive summary

12Background and Introduction1

121.1 Study Purpose131.2 Structure of the study141.3 Links to other studies151.4 Policy Context

18Methodology for site selection and assessment2

27Deliverability considerations3

28Key Findings4

36Existing sites nominated for extension5

63Nominated sites currently allocated for employment uses6

121Other nominated sites7

201Sites in areas of planned development8

209Sites nominated for disposal to land9

Glossary and Abbreviations

218Glossary and Abbreviations

Appendices

223Extract from PPS10 - Site suitability criteria1

225Broad categories of waste management facilities2

244Nominated sites considered less suitable3

264List of nominated sites by local authority area4

2644.1 Basingstoke2644.2 East Hampshire2654.3 Eastleigh2664.4 Fareham2664.5 Gosport2664.6 Hart2674.7 Havant2674.8 New Forest and New Forest National Park Authority2684.9 Portsmouth2694.10 Rushmoor2694.11 Southampton2704.12 Test Valley2704.13 Winchester

Assessment of Sites and Areas for Waste Management Facilities in Hampshire (v5)

Maps46Map 1 Existing waste sites with potential to imcrease waste management capacity

50Map 2 Existing aggregate recycling operations with potential to increase aggregate recyclingcapacity

56Map 3 Existing aggregate recycling operations with potential to diversify waste managementoperations

61Map 4 Other minerals and waste sites with potential to diversify operations (includingexisting landfill operations, former mineral extraction operations etc)

120Map 5 Nominated sites currently allocated for employment uses.200Map 6 Other nominated sites in Hampshire.208Map 7 Sites located within areas of planned development.216Map 8 Sites nominated for disposal to land (landfilling)

228Map 9 Distribution of Category 1: Activities requiring open sites or ancillary open areas(involving biological treatment)

231Map 10 Distribution of Category 2: Activities requiring open sites or ancillary open areas(not involving biological treatment)

236Map 11 Distribution of Category 3 and 4: Activities requiring enclosed industrial premises241Map 12 Distribution of Category 5 and 6: Activities requiring enclosed building with stack263Map 13 Sites ruled out from further assessment

Tables4Table 1 List of nominated sites in study

22Table 2 Environmental and amenity criteria considered when assessing the suitability ofsites and areas (based on Planning Policy Statement (PPS) 10 Annex E).

37Table 3 Existing waste sites (excluding aggregate recycling and landfill) with potential toincrease waste management capacity

48Table 4 Existing aggregate recycling operations with potential to increase aggregate recyclingcapacity

51Table 5 Existing aggregate recycling operations with potential to diversify waste managementoperations

58Table 6 Other minerals and waste sites with potential to diversify operations (includingexisting landfill operations, former mineral extraction operations etc)

245Table 8 Nominated sites considered less suitable removed at an early stage (listed by localauthority area)

264Table 9 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Basingstoke &Deane264Table 10 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in East Hampshire265Table 11 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Eastleigh266Table 12 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Fareham266Table 13 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Gosport266Table 14 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Hart267Table 15 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Havant267Table 16 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in New Forest268Table 17 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Portsmouth269Table 18 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Rushmoor269Table 19 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Southampton270Table 20 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Test Valley270Table 21 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Winchester

Assessment of Sites and Areas for Waste Management Facilities in Hampshire (v5)

Executive summary

The need to identify sites and areas for new waste management facilities

There is a recognised need for a step-change in the recycling, composting and recovery of all types of waste alongsidea reduction in the landfilling of waste. New development will be necessary to meet these objectives. To supportthe delivery of sustainable waste management, Waste Planning Authorities are required to indicate where wastemanagement developments and facilities are to be located; when they are to be provided; and how they will bedelivered. This should be based on robust evidence of what potential there is for delivering sustainable wastemanagement in the area.

What is the purpose of this study?

This study presents the findings of an ongoing process whereby areas of land have been assessed to determinetheir potential to accommodate different types of future waste management development. These sites includethose put forward for consideration by waste operators and landowners. This study does not propose or ‘allocate’locations, but identifies sites where waste development may in principle be supported (subject to a range ofenvironmental and amenity criteria).

Accompanying this study are other reports which have been prepared to assess the need for additional wastemanagement facilities in Hampshire(1). Also a study has been prepared which assesses the suitability of all theindustrial estates in Hampshire to host waste management facilities.(2)

What methodology was used?

Themethodology used for this study involves assessing areas of land, including those put forward for considerationby waste operators and landowners, against a set of criteria to determine their potential to accommodate the differenttypes of future waste management development. The assessment criteria are set out in national guidance. Wastemanagement facilities have been categorised into seven broad development types for the purposes of this study.

What types of sites were identified?

A large number of sites have been nominated for assessment and have been grouped into five sections in this study(see sections 5-9). Firstly, a number of existing waste management facilities have been nominated as the operatorsconsider these sites to have potential to provide additional waste management capacity. Secondly, a number ofsites which are already in use or allocated for employment/ industrial activities have been nominated. Certain wastemanagement activities are compatible with these types of land uses, and so it may be more appropriate to prioritisethis land for the location of future waste management facilities.

Thirdly, a number of other vacant or redundant sites have been nominated and identified. Many of these siteshave not previously been developed, but are in well-screened locations away from residential areas, and may provideopportunities for locating certain types of facilities. Fourthly, there are broad areas in Hampshire which have beenidentified for major planned mixed-use development (which may incorporate supporting waste infrastructure).

The sites shown in these sections have been considered for waste recycling and recovery facilities. The final sectiontherefore concentrates on sites which have been nominated as potentially providing landfill void in future, for thelimited amount of disposal that will be required.

1 1.3 'Links to other studies'2 The Suitability of Industrial Areas for Waste Management in Hampshire

3Assessment of Sites and Areas for Waste Management Facilities in Hampshire (v5)

List of nominated sites

The table below shows all waste site nominations that are considered within this document and what study sectionthey can be found in.

Table 1 List of nominated sites in study

Pagenumber

Studysection

Site name and nomination codeDistrict

244Appendix 4BSD 002 Wade Road, BasingstokeBasingstoke

244Appendix 4BSD 003 Beech Arms Service Station, Andover Road, OakleyBasingstoke

64Section 6BSD 004 Kingsclere Chippings Depot, KingsclereBasingstoke

244Appendix 4BSD 005 Land adjoining Beggarwood Lane, KempshottBasingstoke

244Appendix 4BSD 007 German Road, BramleyBasingstoke

122Section 7BSD 008 Basingstoke Sidings, BasingstokeBasingstoke

58Section 5BSD 013 Kingsclere Lime QuarryBasingstoke

245Appendix 4BSD 015 Land at Gresley Road, BasingstokeBasingstoke

125Section 7BSD 016/ BSD 022 Peak Copse, Dummer/ Peak Copse 2 Caravan siteBasingstoke

245Appendix 4BSD 017 Land adjacent to Chineham energy recovery facilityBasingstoke

245Appendix 4BSD 018 Kempshott Industrial ParkBasingstoke

245Appendix 4BSD 020 Former SSSI SiteBasingstoke

128Section 7BSD 021/ BSD 025 Land at Apsley Estate, adj. To former landfill, AndoverBasingstoke

131Section 7BSD 023 Carousel Dairy Farm, Manor Farm, Farleigh WallopBasingstoke

37Section 5BSD 024 Bessemer ParkBasingstoke

48Section 5EHS 003 Alton Sewage Treatment Works, AltonEast Hampshire

133Section 7EHS 004 Spaniard InnEast Hampshire

246Appendix 4EHS 005 Lasham Coal Yard, Lasham, AltonEast Hampshire

246Appendix 4EHS 006 Ex Gas Works SiteEast Hampshire

246Appendix 4EHS 007 Ex Water Pumping StationEast Hampshire

246Appendix 4EHS 008 Buriton SawmillEast Hampshire

136Section 7EHS 011 Army cadet SiteEast Hampshire

246Appendix 4EHS 012 Batching SiteEast Hampshire

58Section 5EHS 023 Butser Lime Quarry, former chalk quarryEast Hampshire

138Section 7EHS 026/ 030 Land east and west of Alton MRFEast Hampshire

247Appendix 4EHS 027 Land to the south of Woolmer Trading EstateEast Hampshire

201Section 8EHS 029 Bordon/ Whitehill eco townEast Hampshire

58Section 5EHS 031 Selbourne BrickworksEast Hampshire

37Section 5EHS 032 Home Farm, RopleyEast Hampshire

247Appendix 4EHS 033 Bordon Sandpit, Sleaford, BordonEast Hampshire

Assessment of Sites and Areas for Waste Management Facilities in Hampshire (v5)4

Pagenumber

Studysection


59Section 5EHS 034 Land at Frithend Quarry, Sleaford, BordonEast Hampshire

141Section 7EHS 036 Land at Hazleton Farm, nr HorndeanEast Hampshire

247Appendix 4ELH 002/ 003/ 005 Alstom/ EWS Sidings/ Network Rail Land, EastleighEastleigh

51Section 5ELH 004 Eastleigh Rail Aggregates Terminal, EastleighEastleigh

66Section 6ELH 006 Site Adjacent to Waste Water Treatment Works, EastleighEastleigh

247Appendix 4ELH 009 Botley Road Site, West EndEastleigh

248Appendix 4ELH 011 Eastleigh Rail linked SiteEastleigh

69Section 6ELH 014 Land at Dutton Lane, EastleighEastleigh

248Appendix 4ELH 015 Brickfield Lane, Chandlers FordEastleigh

144Section 7ELH 016 Land off Chestnut Avenue, EastleighEastleigh

72Section 6ELH 017 Avalon, Parham Drive, Boyatt WoodEastleigh

37Section 5ELH 018 Netley Transfer StationEastleigh

59Section 5ELH 019 East Horton FarmEastleigh

147Section 7ELH 020 Withys Farm, Dutton LaneEastleigh

60Section 5FHM 001 Fareham Depot, FarehamFareham

248Appendix 4FHM 005 Rear of Argyle Crescent, FarehamFareham

74Section 6FHM 006/ FHM 009 Little Park Farm Road, Park GateFareham

202Section 8FHM 007 Fareham SDA Area of SearchFareham

38Section 5FHM 008 Charity FarmFareham

37Section 5FHM 010 Downend QuarryFareham

38Section 5FHM 011 Wallington Transfer Station, FarehamFareham

77Section 6FHM 012 Land to the South of Railway, SegensworthFareham

79Section 6FHM 013 Pinks Industrial Estate, CrockerhillFareham

249Appendix 4GPT 002 Brockhurst Industrial Estate Extension, Gunners WayGosport

82Section 6GPT 003 Site at Quay Lane Industrial EstateGosport

249Appendix 4GPT 004 Proposed Gosport SHLRT DepotGosport

39Section 5HRT 002 Calf Lane Quarry and adjacent landHart

39Section 5HRT 003 Eversley Star HillHart

149Section 7HRT 006 Hook Depot, HookHart

38Section 5HRT 007 Hart DepotHart

151Section 7HRT 008 Mattingley DepotHart

244Appendix 4HRT 010 Bramshill DepotHart

153Section 7HRT 017 Land at Minley, BlackbusheHart

249Appendix 4HRT 018 Spencers PitHart

88Section 6HRT 019 /HRT 026 Hartland Park & adjacent land, Pyestock HillHart


Pagenumber

Studysection


39 and52Section 5HRT 021 Eversley Storage DepotHart

85Section 6HRT 024 Clarks Farm, YateleyHart

51Section 5HRT 025 Beacon HillHart

48Section 5HRT 027 Land at Warren Heath, BramshillHart

156Section 7HVT 001 Simonds Hill/Nevilles Park, West HulbertHavant

250Appendix 4HVT 002 New Lane Waste Transfer and RecyclingHavant

41Section 5HVT 003 Farlington Redoubt, Portsdown HillHavant

245Appendix 4HVT 004 Proctor & GambleHavant

92Section 6HVT 005 Solent Road, HavantHavant

94Section 6HVT 006 / HVT 010 Sites at Harts Farm Way, HavantHavant

250Appendix 4HVT 008 Former Harts Farm Depot, HavantHavant

251Appendix 4HVT 009 Penner RoadHavant

97Section 6HVT 011 Land at Solent Road Trade Park, BrockhamptonHavant

159Section 7NFP 001 Giddings Sawmill Site (New Forest National Park)New Forest NationalPark Authority

42Section 5NFP 002 Former MoD Depot, Fawley (New Forest National Park)New Forest NationalPark Authority

42Section 5NFP 003 Pound Bottom, Redlynch, Wiltshire (New Forest National Park)New Forest NationalPark Authority

41Section 5NFT 001 Manor Farm, PenningtonNew Forest

53 and60Section 5NFT 003 Marchwood Quarry extension, MarchwoodNew Forest

251Appendix 4NFT 004 Downton Manor Farm BuildingsNew Forest

209Section 9NFT 011 Land at Verwood Road (Purple Haze)New Forest

252Appendix 4NFT 012 Ringwood STWNew Forest

252Appendix 4NFT 013 Fordingbridge STW, Frog Lane, FordingbridgeNew Forest

161Section 7NFT 016 Charleston Road, FawleyNew Forest

252Appendix 4NFT 020 Eling Wharf, TottonNew Forest

53 and60Section 5NFT 021 Bury Farm, MarchwoodNew Forest

53Section 5NFT 022 Blashford Processing Plant, BlashfordNew Forest

253Appendix 4NFT 024 Eling Wharf 2, Totton (north of NFT020)New Forest

40Section 5NFT 035 Marchwood Incinerator SiteNew Forest

253Appendix 4NFT 036 Land adjacent to Slowhill Copse Wastewater Treatment Works, Normandy Way,Marchwood, Southampton

New Forest

164Section 7NFT 037 Totton Yard, TottonNew Forest

211Section 9NFT 047 Blue Haze (North), Ringwood ForestNew Forest


Pagenumber

Studysection


254Appendix 4NFT 054 Land east of MoD Depot, FawleyNew Forest

254Appendix 4NFT 055 Cork's Farm, Normandy Way, MarchwoodNew Forest

53 and60Section 5NFT 060 Marchwood QuarryNew Forest

255Appendix 4NFT 063 Land at Dibden Bay (ABP Land)New Forest

41Section 5NFT 064 Ambervale FarmNew Forest

41Section 5NFT 065 Tower ViewNew Forest

42Section 5NFT 066 Holbury/Lime Kiln LaneNew Forest

40Section 5NFT 067 Caird AvenueNew Forest

100Section 6NFT 068 Husbands Shipyard Site, Cracknore LaneNew Forest

255Appendix 4PCC 002 Portsmouth Main, James Callaghan Drive / Southwick Road, Ports DownPortsmouth

256Appendix 4PCC 003 Goldsmith Avenue, Central Southsea, PortsmouthPortsmouth

103Section 6PCC 004 Site at Voyager Park, Portfield Road, CopnorPortsmouth

167Section 7PCC 005 Fratton Freight Site, PortsmouthPortsmouth

169Section 7PCC 010 Burrfields RoadPortsmouth

105Section 6PCC 011 Robinson Way, QuatremainePortsmouth

43Section 5PCC 012 Port Way HWRC SitePortsmouth

43Section 5PCC 013 Site at Quartremaine RoadPortsmouth

107Section 6PCC 014 Site Adjacent to Military RoadPortsmouth

171Section 7RMR 001 Gold Lane, AldershotRushmoor

203Section 8RMR 002 Aldershot Urban Extension Site, AldershotRushmoor

43Section 5RMR 003 Newman's SiteRushmoor

174Section 7RMR 004 Site on Hollybush Lane, North Camp (Lafarge, former Redland plant)Rushmoor

48Section 5RMR 006 Hollybush LaneRushmoor

109Section 6RMR 007 Hawley Lane West, HawleyRushmoor

256Appendix 4SCC 001 Marine Parade & Belvidere Road, Belvidere, SouthamptonSouthampton

44Section 5SCC 002 Empress Road, SouthamptonSouthampton

256Appendix 4SCC 003 Part of Southampton Docks (ABP land)Southampton

111Section 6SCC 004 Network Rail site, Beavois Park, SouthamptonSouthampton

111Section 6SCC 005 Network rail site, Mount Pleasant Road, St LukesSouthampton

257Appendix 4SCC 006 Former British Rail Works, Redbridge, SouthamptonSouthampton

258Appendix 4SCC 007 Test Lane SouthSouthampton

258Appendix 4SCC 008 Woolston Sewage Treatment Works (STW), SouthamptonSouthampton

114Section 6SCC 010 Whites Wharf, Hazel Road, Woolston, SouthamptonSouthampton

53Section 5SCC 011 Network Rail site, Empress RoadSouthampton


Pagenumber

Studysection


177Section 7SCC 012 Land between M271 and Redbridge Lane, NurslingSouthampton

259Appendix 4SCC 013 Trucks Holding Site, Ashley CrescentSouthampton

180Section 7SCC 018 Associated British Port Land, Southampton Docks area near MillbrookSouthampton

54Section 5TTV 002 Lee Lane Recycling Plant, NurslingTest Valley

44Section 5TTV 004 Casbrook ParkTest Valley

259Appendix 4TTV 006 Luzborough Road DepotTest Valley

260Appendix 4TTV 012 Long term car park, Shephers Spring Lane, AndoverTest Valley

184Section 7TTV 013 Foxcotte Lane, AndoverTest Valley

54Section 5TTV 022 Recycling site at Bunny Lane, TimsburyTest Valley

49Section 5TTV 024 Thruxton Airfield, ThruxtonTest Valley

44Section 5TTV 026 Ashfield SawmillTest Valley

213Section 9TTV 027 Squabb WoodTest Valley

44Section 5TTV 028 Site near Longparish, of off the A303, AndoverTest Valley

117Section 6TTV 029 Land adjacent to Abbey Park Site, RomseyTest Valley

260Appendix 4TTV 030 Site adjacent to Yokesford Hill Industrial Park, BelbinsTest Valley

177Section 7TTV 037 Land South of Brownhill Way, NurslingTest Valley

187Section 7TTV 038 Site at Dunwood NurseriesTest Valley

55Section 5TTV 039 Hunts Farm SandpitTest Valley

45Section 5WCC 002 Pegham Industrial Park, Unit D Laveys Lane, TitchfieldWinchester

261Appendix 4WCC 003 Micheldever Mill, Overton Road, MicheldeverWinchester

44Section 5WCC 004 Otterbourne Incinerator Site, OtterbourneWinchester

261Appendix 4WCC 005 Land on Sheep Pond Lane, DroxfordWinchester

204Section 8WCC 006 Land West of WaterloovilleWinchester

261Appendix 4WCC 007 Bishop's Sutton Chipping Depot, Northside LaneWinchester

60Section 5WCC 008 Botley Depot, BotleyWinchester

190Section 7WCC 014 Micheldever StationWinchester

193Section 7WCC 015 Hydro Chafer, Larkwhistle Road, MicheldeverWinchester

195Section 7WCC 018 Bishops Waltham DepotWinchester

197Section 7WCC 019 Winnall Down FarmWinchester

205Section 8WCC 020 North of Whitley MDA, WinchesterWinchester


1 The map below shows the spatial distribution of all the waste sites considered within this study.

2 Please note that some of the sites shown on the map may be hidden.


Summary of key findings:

Geography/ Impacts / Location

It is important to consider the cumulative effect of previous waste disposal facilities on a community’swellbeing.The waste industry nominated a range of land use types including: vehicle depots; redundant agriculturalland and buildings; brownfield sites at major transport junctions; rail sidings; former MoD land; andland at the fringes of industrial estates.Certain waste management activities are similar to agricultural practices and have little option but tobe located in more rural locations.Locations for waste management activity depend on the availability of vacant land which is consideredfeasible for development by the waste industry.Hampshire has very limited opportunities to accommodate landfill sites due to its environmentalconstraints and other characteristics.Whilst a number of sites are well-located in terms of their proximity to urban areas, the deliverabilityand viability of developing some of these for waste management uses remains uncertain.

Capacity

Opportunities exist to maximise waste management provision at proven suitable locations for wastemanagement activities.Further evidence is required to support any assumptions about how extending existing capacity mightmeet identified needs.Site extensions could be a source of additional waste management capacity in Hampshire.Nominated sites in section 7 may be able to provide additional waste management capacity for themain North Hampshire and South Hampshire market areas.Five planned development areas have potential to accommodate supporting waste managementinfrastructure.

Sites

A number of existing sites are considered suitable for additional or enhanced waste managementactivities in principle (subject to the consideration of any planning application).Sites currently allocated for employment uses can often be appropriate as locations for wastemanagement development- particularly for smaller enclosed development and waste transfer stations.It is not feasible to locate all types of waste development on industrial estates.Two existing landfill sites and one proposed landfill site are listed in section 9 have been consideredsuitable in principle for landfill with non-hazardous waste (subject to addressing deliverability issues).A proportion of sites identified were ruled out early in the process.


Next steps

This document is part of the evidence base supporting the approach laid out in the Hampshire Minerals & WastePlan. This plan contains a number of policies in relation to the location of waste facilities which have been informedby the information in this document. The Hampshire Minerals & Waste Plan will be subject to an 'examination' byan Inspector in due course after the consultation on its 'soundness' has taken place. Following that examination,the Inspector will report his findings and state whether the Plan (possibly with amendments), is 'sound' (or fit forpurpose) and can proceed towards 'adoption' (by the planning authorities).

Further Information

For a summary on all wastes managed in Hampshire, please see the:Assessment of Need for Waste Management Facilities in Hampshire: Waste Data Summary Report.

To view a report on the Industrial areas in Hampshire, please see the:Suitability of Industrial Areas for Waste Management in Hampshire Report.

To view a report on the need for landfill and surcharging in Hampshire, please see the:Assessment of Need for Waste Management Facilities in Hampshire: Landfill & Surcharging Report.

To view a report on the need for specialist wastes facilities in Hampshire, please see the: Assessment of Needfor Waste Management Facilities in Hampshire: Specialist Waste Facilities Report.

For further information on this study, the Minerals and Waste Plan and supporting documents please see:

visit the website at: http://www3.hants.gov.uk/planning-policy-home.htm

visit the consultation portal at: http://consult.hants.gov.uk/portal

Contact Us:

County PlanningEconomy, Transport & Environment DepartmentHampshire County CouncilFloor 1, Elizabeth II Court WestThe CastleWinchesterSO23 8UD

Email: [email protected]: 0845 603 5634 (Contact Centre - Hantsdirect)


http://www3.hants.gov.uk/planning/mineralsandwaste/planning-policy.htm

http://www3.hants.gov.uk/planning/mineralsandwaste/planning-policy.htm

mailto:[email protected]

Section 1 Background and Introduction

1.1 Study Purpose

3 This study has been prepared to provide background evidence to inform the Hampshire Minerals and WastePlan(3). Where necessary the plan will indicate what waste management developments and facilities arerequired in Hampshire and the most suitable locations for these facilities. Identifying what potential thereis for delivering sustainable waste management is important because positive planning is concerned withopportunities and not just constraints(4). Plans must be justifiable; founded on a robust and credible evidencebase which should be as up-to-date as practical(5). This study therefore builds on previous work undertakento identify the locations needed to deliver the waste management requirements in Hampshire(6)

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the potential to accommodate a range of new and enhancedwaste management infrastructure in suitable locations in Hampshire. Areas of land, including thoseput forward for consideration by waste operators and landowners, have been assessed to determinetheir potential to accommodate the different types of future waste management development. Thisstudy reports the findings of an iterative assessment process used to classify sites by their potentialsuitability.

The inclusion of sites in this document does notmean that proposals will obtain planning permissionand the necessary consents to allow development to proceed.

The objectives of this study are:1. To provide an 'audit trail' detailing which sites were nominated throughout the evidence gathering stage of

plan preparation; and how these were assessed;

2. To demonstrate the realistic prospect of delivery of waste management uses on suitable sites in Hampshire;

3. To highlight identified constraints, and where possible provide information on how these constraints couldbe overcome;

4. To provide an account of the decision-making process leading to the identification of 'most suitable' sitesfor further consideration;

5. To help demonstrate that sufficient developable sites are likely to be available during the plan period.

3 Hampshire County Council is the Minerals andWaste Planning Authority responsible for the planning of minerals and waste development in Hampshire. HampshireCounty Council in partnership with Southampton City Council, Portsmouth City Council and the New Forest National Park Authority are the 'Joint Plan MakingAuthorities' responsible for producing the Hampshire Minerals and Waste Development Framework. The Minerals & Waste Development Framework applies toa 'plan area' which covers the areas administered by the joint plan-making authorities, including a small part of the National Park which is in Wiltshire.

4 PAS (2009)Waste content of Core Strategies (DCLG Plan-making manual) [online].5 (DCLG, 2009) Planning Policy Statement 12: creating strong safe and prosperous communities through Local Spatial Planning.6 For example: Hampshire Minerals Plan and Hampshire Waste Management Plan Issues and Options – Sites Discussion Paper (September 2006).


1.2 Structure of the study

4 Following this introduction,

section 2 describes and justifies themethodology chosen to initially assess identified sites for theirsuitability.

Section 3 provides further contextual information by explaining the importance of 'deliverability'in deciding whether nominated sites should go forward for further appraisal and potential allocation.

Section 4 presents key findings from this report, the options for plan preparation, and describes thenext steps in the assessment and decision-making process.

Section 5 provides information on sites currently permitted for waste uses (existing sites), and thepotential to extend or expand these sites to provide further waste management capacity during theplan period.

Section 6 provides information on nominated sites which are already allocated for employmentuses, and how these will be considered as part of the plan preparation.

Section 7 provides information about other nominated sites judged suitable for waste facilities inprinciple (prior to further consultation and appraisal). The identified opportunities and constraints tobe addressed, are discussed.

Section 8 provides information on the potential of areas of planned new development in Hampshire,in terms of accommodating waste management sites.

Section 9 provides information on sites nominated for disposal to land.

5 Relevant information is also shown in appendices at the end of this study. Notably, Appendix 3 'Nominatedsites considered less suitable' provides information about the sites which have been deemed unsuitable andthus eliminated from any further appraisal. The appendices will be referred to throughout the study whereappropriate.

Most of the nominations for potential new site opportunities are shown in sections 6 and 7. The informationprovided in these sections seeks to:

Explain how the site was identified and nominated for inclusion in the assessment process;Provide some factual information about the sites, (including the identified development constraints);Specify the outcome form the assessment undertaken to date;Where possible, identify the type or types of waste management facility that would be appropriatelylocated on the site/ area;Articulate the main issues which would need to be overcome in order for the sites to be considereddeliverable;Suggest the most likely potential uses on the sites, taking into account their characteristics.


1.3 Links to other studies

6 This study is a key part of the evidence base for the Hampshire Minerals & Waste Development Framework,which includes a number of other studies. These should be considered alongside this study:

The Suitability of Industrial Areas for Waste Management in Hampshire. This assessment ison industrial estates and employment land that will be used to inform the assessment of certainnominated sites (see Section 6 'Nominated sites currently allocated for employment uses').

Assessment of Need for Waste Management Facilities in Hampshire: Waste Data SummaryReport. This will be used to help test the provision of sites against the long term requirement forfacilities in Hampshire, in order to establish whether the needs can be met.

Assessment of need forWasteManagement Facilities inHampshire: Landfill and SurchargingReport. This background study will be used to inform sites nominated for disposal to land (see Section9 'Sites nominated for disposal to land').

Assessment Under the Habitats Regulations - Habitats Regulations Assessment ScreeningReport. This report describes part of the Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) screening stageundertaken for the emerging Hampshire Minerals & Waste Plan, in particular the screeningconclusions.(7)

Strategic Landscape and Visual Assessment. This assessment looks at the landscape characterand visual impact assessments.

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment. This study is to assess and map the different levels and types offlood risk within the geographic areas covered.

Strategic Traffic and Transport Assessment. This assessment looks at the management andmonitoring of the major transportation infrastructure network that lies throughout and acrossHampshire.

Integrated Sustainability Appraisal Report. This report uses a set of agreed criteria and objectivesagainst which reasonable policy options will be appraised.

7 This report should be read in conjunction with the Hampshire Minerals & Waste Plan, as well as the HRA methodology and baseline report


1.4 Policy Context

7 The following explains the national and local policy context for considering sites for waste managementuses. This policy context has influenced the approach to the site assessment as explained in Section 2'Methodology for site selection and assessment'. Planning Policy Statement 10: Planning for Sustainable WasteManagement (revised March 2011) provides policy and guidance on identifying suitable sites and areas forwaste management. Paragraphs 20-21 state:

Identifying suitable sites and areas

In searching for sites and areas suitable for new or enhanced waste management facilities, waste planningauthorities should consider:

opportunities for on-site management of waste where it arises;a broad range of locations including industrial sites, looking for opportunities to co-locate facilitiestogether and with complementary activities.

In deciding which sites and areas to identify for waste management facilities, waste planning authorities should:

(i) assess their suitability for development against each of the following criteria:

the extent to which they support the policies in this PPS;the physical and environmental constraints on development, including existing and proposed neighbouringland uses (see Annex E);the cumulative effect of previous waste disposal facilities on the well-being of the local community,including any significant adverse impacts on environmental quality, social cohesion and inclusion oreconomic potential;the capacity of existing and potential transport infrastructure to support the sustainable movement ofwaste, and products arising from resource recovery, seeking when practicable and beneficial to use modesother than road transport.

(ii) give priority to the re-use of previously-developed land, and redundant agricultural and forestry buildingsand their curtilages.

8 The above extract mentions Annex E. This annex has been used to form the basis of the site suitabilityassessments used in this study (see Section 2 'Methodology for site selection and assessment'). Annex E isshown in Appendix 1 'Extract from PPS10 - Site suitability criteria'.

9 Whilst the South East Plan (published in 2009) is now due to be revoked, the waste planning policies itcontained are still of interest in terms of background context. There are two policies in the South East Planwhich are particularly relevant in terms of providing a policy context for identifying and assessing suitablewaste sites. The locational requirements of different waste management activities are emphasised by policyW7; and policy W17 emphasises the importance of good transport connections and compatible land useswhen considering the suitability of sites:


Extract from policy W7: Waste Management Capacity Requirements

In bringing forward and safeguarding sites for waste management facilities, WPAs should consider the type,size and mix of facilities that will be required, taking into account:

activities requiring largely open sites, such as aggregate recycling and open windrow compostingactivities of an industrial nature dealing with largely segregated materials and requiring enclosed premises,such as materials recovery facilities, dis-assembly and re-manufacturing plants, and reprocessing industriesactivities dealing with mixed materials requiring enclosed industrial premises, such as mechanical-biologicaltreatment, anaerobic digestion and energy from waste facilitieshybrid activities requiring sites with buildings and open storage areas, including re-use facilities andenclosed composting systems.

In areas of major new developments consideration should be given to identifying sites for integrated resourcerecovery facilities and new resource parks accommodating a mix of activities where they meet environmental,technical and operational objectives.

Policy W17: Location of Waste Management Facilities(8).

Waste development documents will, in identifying locations for waste management facilities, give priority tosafeguarding and expanding suitable sites with an existing waste management use and good transportconnections. The suitability of existing sites and potential new sites should be assessed on the basis of thefollowing characteristics:

i. good accessibility from existing urban areas or major new or planned developmentii. good transport connections including, where possible, rail or wateriii. compatible land uses, namely:

active mineral working sitesprevious or existing industrial land usecontaminated or derelict landland adjoining sewage treatment worksredundant farm buildings and their curtilages

iv. be capable of meeting a range of locally based environmental and amenity criteria.

Waste management facilities should not be precluded from the Green Belt. Small-scale waste managementfacilities for local needs should not be precluded from Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty and NationalParks where the development would not compromise the objectives of the designation.

8 (Criteria in W17 also applies to all proposals for mineral recycling facilities).


10 At the local planing level is Hampshire's Minerals & Waste Core Strategy which was adopted in 2007. TheCore Strategy sets out a 'spatial vision' for future minerals and waste planning in Hampshire, and specificallyincludes a locational policy which states that strategic facilities, shall be located within North East Hampshireor South Hampshire, thus ensuring as far as possible, waste will be managed near to where it is produced.These growth areas are therefore expected to provide the bulk of capacity for Hampshire’s waste managementinfrastructure – excluding landfill and composting facilities because of their extensive nature – by theprovision of large strategic sites. It is expected that the needs of rural areas will generally be met by smaller,more community-based facilities.

11 The Core Strategy (2007)states large strategic sites, other than composting, landfill and construction wasteprocessing, will only be permitted elsewhere in the plan area on ‘windfall’ (e.g. unexpectedly available)brownfield land with good transport access. This framework for considering the location of future wastemanagement, will be taken into account when determining the preferred approach to identified sites andareas as part of the new plan (see Section 4 'Key Findings').


Section 2 Methodology for site selection and assessment

Introduction: Identifying and assessing site 'options'

12 The typical approach to assessing the suitability of sites to accommodate different types of future wastemanagement development, involves using a set of criteria. This helps categorise sites by their suitability, asthere can be a range of different 'options' proposed at the initial stages. Potential sites (often nominatedby landowners) can be filtered, until a ‘short list’ of reasonable sites is generated for consultation andmore detailed assessment. This study demonstrates how different site options have been considered early ontherefore, and the rationale for taking forward and rejecting site options at the initial stages of planpreparation.

13 This initial assessment helps identify site options which are "realistic and genuinely implementable inpractice"(9), and is the basis for the site suitability assessment stage (stage 6) (and thus this study). Theprocess of identifying sites and undertaking the initial suitability assessment is summarised in the diagrambelow, and explained in more detail in the remainder of this section.

Figure 1 Simplified diagram showing stages of the site identificationand assessment process

9 Scott Wilson (2008) Local Development Frameworks: Options Generation & Appraisal.


Stage 1: Identifying potential sites

14 Although the search for sites for waste management has traditionally focused on opportunities for landfilland on existing waste management facilities, this study is primarily concerned with sites for waste recycling,composting, treatment or disposal.

Potential sites were identified using a number of sources, including:

Sites nominated by landowners, agencies and industry following invitations to nominate sites as part ofthe preparation of the Hampshire Minerals & Waste Development Framework(10);Sites nominated by minerals and waste industry operators;'Saved' preferred sites in the Hampshire, Portsmouth & Southampton Minerals & Waste Local Plan (1998);Sites identified by the Councils through examination of existing waste management facilities;Sites allocated in local authority plans as employment land (industrial locations);National Land Use Database(11).

Stage 2: Initial evaluation of all identified sites

15 All the nominated and identified sites were subject to a desk-top study by Hampshire County Councilofficers specialising in landscape, archaeology and ecology. Discussions were also held with minerals andwaste planning officers within the County Council who have extensive knowledge of Hampshire and itsexisting waste infrastructure. The information gathered was used to eliminate sites identified as havingsignificant constraints that were unlikely to be overcome (see stage 3).

Stage 3: Removing 'problematic' sites

16 The reason for ruling a site out is typically based on its performance against exclusionary constraints. Theseact as a 'sieve' to identify key constraints which would prevent waste development from taking place, andrepresent a means of removing unsuitable areas from further assessment in the early stages. For instance,sites that were found to have unacceptable impacts were removed from the process at the outset. SeeAppendix 3 'Nominated sites considered less suitable' for the justification for ruling these sites out early inthe process.

Stages 4 & 5: Seeking comments & further nominations

17 Early informal consultation on the options for sites took place between September and November 2006.Subsequently, a number of further nominations were received, as well as information about existing wastesites with potential for extension,and further consultation therefore took place during May-June 2007. Theinitial sites were set out in a Sites Discussion Paper (and subsequent addendum, as part of ongoing consultation).This ‘Issues and Options’ stage provided an opportunity for Statutory Consultees and other interestedparties to express their views on all sites identified.

10 Letters were sent to landowners and industry in 2005, 2007, 2008 and 2010.11 Officers interrogated the National Land Use Database. This database contains information on previously developed land and buildings in England that may

be available for development and is updated annually. See http://www.homesandcommunities.co.uk/NLUD


http://www.homesandcommunities.co.uk/NLUD

Stage 6: Site suitability assessment

18 Following the removal of problematic sites and some initial consultation, the remaining sites were takenforward to stage 6 which involves a more detailed desktop evaluation, the results of which are reported inthis study.

The sites are classified by site status depending on the nature of the site as follows:

1. Existing sites nominated for extensions2. Sites currently allocated for employment uses3. Other nominated sites (for further appraisal)4. Sites in areas of planned development5. Sites nominated for disposal to land (non-hazardous landfill or backfilling with inert materials)6. Nominated sites considered less suitable

NOTE: Each site referred to in this study has a unique site code (e.g. BSD 004). This code is purely for the purposes of thisstudy and should not be confused with sites codes used for other purposes (such as Planning Application references). The sitecodes are not in consecutive order since they were attributed as the sites were nominated (prior to theclassification as described above). Nominations for mineral extraction were also attributed with codes (andthese are not included in this study).

19 The 'suitability assessment' involved an appraisal of the physical and environmental constraints ondevelopment (including existing and proposed neighbouring land uses). The factors considered whenexamining constraints are set out in the table below along with an explanatory commentary. The assessmentprocess highlights the characteristics of the site and its constraints. This information was then usedto determine what types of waste management development could potentially be suitably for sites. Sitesmay be suitable for some types of waste management facility within a category, but not others. Proposalswill be subject to further assessment and control at the planning application stage. Seven broad categoriesof waste management facilities were used for this (for details see Appendix 2 'Broad categories of wastemanagement facilities' for details):

Category 1: Activities requiring open sites or ancillary open areas (involving biological treatment)Category 2: Activities requiring open sites or ancillary open areas (not involving biological treatment)Category 3: Activities requiring enclosed industrial premises (small scale)Category 4: Activities requiring enclosed industrial premises (large scale)Category 5: Activities requiring enclosed building with stack (small scale)Category 6: Activities requiring enclosed building with stack (large scale)Category 7: Landfilling

20 The suitability of sites and areas was assessed using a number of criteria set out in national planning policy(12).The framework for this study is therefore adapted from Annex E of Planning Policy Statement 10(13).

12 ODPM (2005) Planning Policy Statement 10: Planning for Sustainable Waste Management.13 The detailed criteria shown in Annex E of PPS10 is shown in Extract from PPS10 - Site suitability criteria. Two criteria from Annex E have been 'scoped out' for

the purposes of this assessment. 'Litter' can be a concern at some facilities (but this issue is dealt with at planning application stage if necessary). 'Land instability'as a criteria has also been 'scoped out'. Areas liable to be affected by land instability are not normally suitable for waste uses. However, Hampshire does not havea history of underground mining or industrial areas located on previous extraction sites/ eroding coastline etc.


21 Site information was gathered using GIS (Geographical Information Systems) and information providedwith the site nomination and comments received from previous consultation. National policy also statessites and areas should be assessed for the cumulative effect of previous waste facilities on the well-beingof the local community, including any significant adverse impacts on environmental quality, social cohesionand inclusion or economic potential. Planning history for the sites was therefore considered where relevant.

This assessment process was used to suggest the broad waste management categories which would be suitableon each of the sites (and similarly those which would be unsuitable). For example, sites within sensitivelandscape settings should not be considered for activities within large scale buildings. It is also unlikely thatsites close to sensitive habitats would be suitable for activities requiring open sites as it is more difficult tocontrol dust emissions and noise at such sites.


Table2Enviro

nmentaland

amenity

criteria

considered

whenassessingthesuitabilityofsitesandareas(based

onPlanning

PolicyStatem

ent(PP

S)10

Ann

exE).

Sourcesofinform

ation

Con

straintson

thelocatio

nofwastemanagem

entd

evelop

ment

Con

sideratio

nsCriteria

a)Protectio

nof

water

resources

GIS

Wastemanagem

entactivitieslocatedinclosep

roximity

towater

bodies(surface

andgroundwater),with

thepo

tentialtorelease

Con

siderproximity

toSource

Protectio

nZon

esor

principal/secondaryaquifers.

Floo

dRisk

Assessm

entd

ata

hazardousm

aterials.

E.g.

waterquality

canbe

affected

byCon

siderproximity

tovulnerablewaterbo

dies.

Planning

PolicyStatem

ent

(PPS

)25

eutro

phication(which

may

becaused

byleachateor

efflu

ent

from

wastedisposalsystem

s).

Areas

subjecttoflo

odingneed

closeconsideration.

Wastefacilities(includingbuiltdevelopm

ent)inflo

odriskareas

areatriskfrom

sufferingdamageto

infrastructure.

Sitesinflo

odzone

3areinareasw

itha'highprob

abilityof

flooding'(based

onEnviro

nmentA

gencyflood

zone

mapping).

Floo

dZon

e2ismedium

prob

ability.

Installatio

nsrequiring

hazardoussubstance

consentare

considered

highlyvulnerableinfunctio

nalfloodplains

(see

PPS25Ann

exD).

b)Visu

alintrusion

GIS

Thesignificanceofanylandscape

andvisualimpactisdependent

upon

anumbero

fsite

specificissuessuchas:

Con

siderpo

tentialimpacton

impo

rtantlandscapes.

Con

sultatio

nwith

landscape

specialists

Directeffectso

nlandscapefabrice.g

.rem

ovalof

trees

etc

Proximity

oflandscapedesig

natio

nsProximity

ofsensitive

view

points

Presence

ofexistinglargebuiltstructures

Existinglandform

andnatureof

existinglandscape

Presence/absence

ofscreeningfeatures

(trees,hedges

etc)

LandscapeTypesa

ndLandscapeCharacterAreas

canbe

referred

towhenundertakingmoredetailedassessmento

fthe

abovepo

ints.

c)Natureconservatio

nGIS

Noise

andvibrations

released

asaresultof

theop

erations

ofthewastedevelopm

entm

ayhave

animpacton

thephysiology

Con

siderproximity

tosites

ofinternational/natio

nal

impo

rtance

forn

atureconservatio

n,andpo

tentialfor

anyadverseeffects.

Con

sultatio

nwith

ecologists

andbehaviouro

fnearbywildlifedependingon

theop

eration

type

andits

proximity

toconservatio

nareas.

Inform

ationcanhelpinform

HabitatsRe

gulatio

nsAssessm

ent.

Somenearby

speciesm

ayno

tbeableto

toleratechangesto

theirh

abitatrequirementscaused

byland

disturbances.

Sustain

edoperatingn

oisecanhave

anegativeimpacton

amenity

anddisturbwildlife.

Theh

ealth

ofecosystemsm

ayalsobe

atriskfrom

airem

issions.


Sourcesofinform

ation

Con

straintson

thelocatio

nofwastemanagem

entd

evelop

ment

Con

sideratio

nsCriteria

d)Historicenvironm

ent

andbuiltheritage

GIS

Vibratio

nsassociated

with

vehiclemovem

entsor

thewaste

operationitselfcouldbe

apo

tentialthreattothehistoricbuilt

environm

ent(physicaldamage).

Con

siderproximity

toaRe

gistered

Park

orGardenor

site/

buildingwith

anationally

recogniseddesig

natio

n.Con

sultatio

nwith

historic

environm

entspecialists

Theinfrastructureof

thewastedevelopm

entitselfm

aycould

potentially

beathreatto

archaeologicalremains,particularly

durin

gtheconstructio

nph

aseof

thedevelopm

ent.

Thesig

nificance

ofanyimpactisdependentu

ponsitespecific

issuesrelated

tositesettin

g,forexamplethe

proximity

oflisted

buildings

and/or

conservatio

nareas.

e)Traffic

andaccess

Officerassessment

'Goodaccess'is

norm

allyd

efined

aswithin2kmofthatnetwork.

Con

sideraccessto

themineralsa

ndwastelorryroute.

Con

sidersuitabilityof

road

networkandrelianceon

localroads

toaccesssite.

GIS

Considerdistancetowastesource(builtup/urbanareas)('good

distance'defined

as2km).

Traffic

studiesw

here

relevant

Relianceon

localroads

may

notb

eapprop

riateincertain

locatio

nsdueto

theunsuitabilityof

theroad

network.

Con

siderlocalcon

gestion/

suitabilityof

conn

ectin

groads/

condition

ofroads.

Thetypeso

fheavyandlargegoodsv

ehiclesa

ssociatedwith

wastemanagem

entd

evelop

mentsmay

have

adverseimpacts

Thecapacityof

existingtra

nspo

rtinfrastructure

(includingmodesotherthanroad

transpo

rt)tosupp

ort

thesustainablemovem

ento

fwaste

(i.e.interm

odal

transpo

rtop

portunities);

onroad

network,especiallyroadsw

hich

may

notb

edesig

ned,

orideally

suitedto

supp

ortin

gheavyloads.

Heavy

andlargegoodsv

ehiclesp

assin

gthroughdenseurban

areasc

anraise

safetyconcerns

aswellasimpactingthewell

beingof

localcom

munities.

f)Airem

issions

GIS

(toascertainproximity

tosensitive

receptors)

Pollutantsreleasedfrom

wastemanagem

entfacilitiesm

ayhave

adverseimpactso

nthehealth

oflocalcom

munities

(and

thereforerequire

mon

itorin

gandmitigatio

nmeasures).

Adverse

emissions

canbe

aconcernatsomefacilities

(dealtwith

atplanning

applicationstageifnecessary

throughuseof

controls).

Airem

issions

also

have

thepo

tentialtocausevisib

ility

impairm

ent(throughparticulates),aesthetic

damage.

Con

siderproximity

tosensitive

human

receptors

(resid

entialareas)and

sensitive

environm

entalreceptors.

Airquality

canbe

affected

byacidificatio

n,ozon

ecreatio

n,toxicity(hum

anandaquatic).Wastemanagem

ento

ptions

can

affectacidificatio

nthroughem

issions

from

energy

use,and

emissions

ofnitro

genoxides

andhydrocarbo

ns.

g)Odours

Thereleaseof

bioaerosolsfrom

somewastemanagem

ent

activities

have

potentialtoimpacthuman

andanimalhealth,

particularlyrespiratory

health.

Odour

canbe

aconcernatsomefacilities(dealtw

ithatplanning

applicationstageifnecessarythroughuse

ofcontrols).

GIS


tosensitive

receptors)

Odoursreleasedfrom

somewasteactivitiesmay

also

affectthe

wellbeing

ofcommunities,depending

ontheseverity.

Con

siderproximity

tosensitive

receptors(resid

ential

areas).


Sourcesofinform

ation

Con

straintson

thelocatio

nofwastemanagem

entd

evelop

ment

Con

sideratio

nsCriteria

h)Ve

rminandbirds

(proximity

toaerodrom

esafeguarding

areas)

GIS


tosensitive

receptors)

Thepo

tentialattractio

nof

wasteactivities

tobirdsand

verm

inmay

potentially

createabird

aircraftstrik

ehazard

(BASH

),which

couldaffectthesafetyof

airp

assengersa

swellastho

seon

theground.

Somefacilities(acceptingorganicwaste)can

attra

ctverm

inandbirds.

Con

siderproximity

tosensitive

receptors(resid

ential

areas)andaerodrom

esafeguarding

areas.

Aerodromeconsultatio

nareas

Thesiz

eanddesig

nof

thewastefacilitymay

impacton

radar

operations

Verm

incarriesthe

potentialtoadverselyimpacthealthandwell

beingof

nearby

communities.

i)Noise

andvibration

Increasednoise

andvibrationlevelsfrom

transportmovem

ents

andwasteop

erations

may

have

thep

otentialtoadverselya

ffect

Operatio

nsatsomelargewastemanagem

entfacilities

canproduceno

ise(which

may

need

tobe

kept

toacceptablelevels).

GIS


tosensitive

receptors)

human

andanimalhealth

aswellasthe

wellbeing

oflocal

resid

ents.

Con

siderproximity

tosensitive

receptors(resid

ential

areas).

Theo

peratio

nof

large

wastemanagem

entfacilitiesinparticular

canproduceno

isebo

thinsid

eandoutsidebuildings.

j)Po

tentiallanduse

conflict

LocalD

evelop

ment

Fram

eworks

forH

ampshire

Prop

osed

wastemanagem

entactivities

may

bepartof,orn

ear

to,anarea

which

hasb

eenidentifiedforregenerationor

Take

accounto

flikelyprop

osed

developm

entinthe

vicinityof

thesite.

authorities

(evidencebase,

improvem

ents(in

volvingdevelopm

entsuchas

housing,

recreatio

nor

econ

omicdevelopm

ent).

With

advancem

entinmitigationtechniques,som

ewaste

facilitiesm

ayalso

beconsidered

aslight

industrialin

natureandthereforecompatib

lewith

resid

ential

developm

ent.

includingStrategicHousin

gLand

Availability

Assessm

ents).

Sitesm

aybe

identified

inlocalplan

ning

documentsor

'allocated'

foro

therno

n-wasteuses

therefore.

Liaisonwith

localplann

ing

authorities.

Thepresence

ofrecreatio

nandpublicrightso

fway

shouldalso

beconsidered

GIS

Opp

ortunitiesfor

co-lo

catio

nof

mineralsa

ndwaste

facilitiessho

uldbe

considered

favourablywhere

reductioninvehiclemovem

entscanbe

show

nas

aresult.


Stages 7 & 8: Further appraisal & next steps

22 Following this site suitability assessment potential sites were subject to further 'testing' (except for thosewhich were considered less suitable and 'ruled out'). From this 'short list' further appraisal was required forany potential site identified in the Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan. This further appraisal seeks todemonstrate that these sites are considered 'sustainable' when considered against other alternative sites.Following the assessment process which has been reported in this study therefore, sites considered to havesignificant potential to meet future waste management needs will be appraised against a set of factors. Thesefactors are set out in an established appraisal framework known as Integrated Sustainability Appraisal(ISA) which uses a set of agreed criteria and objectives. For more details about how sites will be subjectto ISA, see Hampshire County Council (2010)Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan Draft Integrated SustainabilityAppraisal Scoping Report (Revised).

The Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report includes a set of objectives and criteria against which reasonablepolicy options will be appraised. There are similarities between these criteria and the site assessmentmethodology used in this study (see Table 2 ' Environmental and amenity criteria considered when assessingthe suitability of sites and areas (based on Planning Policy Statement (PPS) 10 Annex E).'). This suggests thatthe assessments in this study have already begun to satisfy some of the appraisal requirements, and the findingscan be used to inform the more detailed ISA process at the next stage.

23 Evaluation of the sites against the factors will help to identify any significant effects or potential enhancementopportunities that the site may have, prior to its inclusion in the Plan. Other assessment tools which caninform this decision-making are transport assessment, landscape impact assessment and Strategic flood RiskAssessment.

24 Another important tool for assessing the suitability of plans isHabitats Regulations Assessment (HRA).This is a legal requirement for all land-use plans will be undertaken prior to the inclusion of any sites andareas in the final Hampshire Minerals & Waste Plan. The first stage of this process is the preparation of aScreening Assessment which reports any 'likely significant effects' of the potential sites considered for theinclusion in a Plan. Several sites and areas assessed in this study are within 2.5 km of European natureconservation designations. Significant effects on these designated sites may be likely (or uncertain) for thoseidentified sites within 2.5 km, and thus it is likely that these will be flagged up in the Screening Assessment(14).

NOTE: If any of the sites are eventually included in the Hampshire Minerals & Waste Plan, proposals wouldneed to obtain planning permission and the necessary consents to allow development to proceed. Includinga site in the Plan would help provide a 'steer' for those considering planning applications, by demonstratingthat the site can be developed in principle during the plan period, and it would help satisfy identified need.

14 Different types of impacts can travel different distances however, and nature conservation sites which are sensitive to changes in hydrology or contamination viawater pathways could require greater distances. This will be explored in more detail in the Screening Report.


Study Limitations

25 The methodology and approach used for this study has provided a clear framework for assessing sites.However, it is useful to recognise the limitations of the approach, for example:

Criteria b) and i) from PPS10 Annex E were 'scoped out' from the assessment of site suitabilityassessment (see Table 2 ' Environmental and amenity criteria considered when assessing the suitabilityof sites and areas (based on Planning Policy Statement (PPS) 10 Annex E).').The available information on the assessed sites is variable, some sites have more information ondeliverability issues than others.The information about the potential available capacity for existing sites (see Section 5 'Existing sitesnominated for extension') are judgements based on the limited information available. Accurateassessments of capacity are only likely to be undertaken at the planning application level, when moredetailed information would be made available.Use of standardised ‘buffers’ (i.e. distances from sites) when interrogating GIS data is crude, andrequires application of local knowledge.A number of smaller scale facilities will be needed in Hampshire, such as waste transfer and recyclingsites. However, due to their size and nature, these sites are unlikely to be identified specificallyconsidering the strategic nature of the plan. Only sites greater than 1 hectare have typically beenincluded in the site selection process (unless there is a specialised facility being promoted on thatparticular site due to its unique characteristics).


Section 3 Deliverability considerations

26 It is important to demonstrate that there are not regulatory or other barriers to the delivery of potentialsites. This study therefore considers sites against 'deliverability criteria' (e.g. landownership, access, planninghistory, size etc.); all of which may have a bearing on whether or not the site is deliverable as a location forwaste management. It is important to avoid unrealistic assumptions on the prospects for the developmentof waste management facilities, or of particular sites or areas. Ownership constraints are identified forexample because of the concern that sites may not in reality come forward for waste management withoutwilling land owners.

27 Where there are recognised constraints to the deliverability of development, it is also important to specifyhow these issues could be overcome. This could include the ‘lead in’ times that may arise from newinfrastructure required to service sites, which although capable of resolution towards the end of the planperiod, could affect deliverability in the shorter term.

28 The type or types of waste management facility that would be appropriately located on an allocated site orin the allocated area should be identified where possible. Government guidance(15) explains that plansshould avoid unnecessary prescription, particularly where this could stifle innovation in line with the wastehierarchy. It states prescription could be justified where necessary however to ensure;

the delivery of the plan in line with national planning policy or the delivery of facilities required by theMunicipal Waste Management Strategy;the suitable use of sites given their location or other constraints, i.e a site may be suitable for only oneparticular type of waste management facility.

29 Facilities in Hampshire tend to be located on previously developed land, which have had a range of formeruses. For example, a large majority of the facilities in Portsmouth, Southampton and Rushmoor are onindustrial sites/ estates. By contrast, Hart, Eastleigh and Basingstoke & Deane currently have a lowproportion of existing facilities in such locations.

30 Marchwood Energy fromWaste Facility is located on a former power station. Facilities are also commonlylocated on former aggregate workings, such as the waste transfer facility at the Farlington Redoubt formerchalk quarry. Facilities are also located on former Ministry of Defence sites (such as the waste transferfacility at Fawley), and former shipyards (such as construction waste recycling at Willments shipyard,Woolston).

31 In terms of site location, it is clear that existing facilities are clustered along key road transport routes andjunctions in Hampshire (notably the M3, A303, A3 and M27). In terms of site size, any sites smaller than1 hectare have been 'ruled out' predominantly on economic viability grounds (see appendix 4). However,there are a small number of sites which are smaller than 1 hectare which have been included as potentialallocations due to the following reasons:

Nomination site although smaller than 1 hectare, is part of a wider business/ industrial area;Site has current or existing industrial/ waste uses undertaken on it;Site is located away from housing and other sensitive receptors;Site has key transport access such as a rail link or direct access onto the minerals and waste routenetwork.

15 DCLG (2006) Planning for Sustainable Waste Management: Companion Guide to Planning Policy Statement 10.


Section 4 Key Findings

Existing site extensions

32 It is recognised that site extensions could be a source of additional waste management capacity. Indeed,waste planning authorities should identify sites and areas suitable for new or enhanced waste managementfacilities.

33 Section 5 illustrates that a range of existing operations have been nominated by the waste industry, includinga number with potential for enhancement or further expansion. As explained previously, it is important toconsider the extent to which extensions to existing and consented waste management capacity not yetoperational would satisfy identified waste management needs. The existing sites in section 5 illustrate howthe capacity of existing sites may potentially be maximised. Most of the nominated sites have been identifiedfor their potential to increase the activities currently operating within the existing site. For instance, severalnominees expressed the importance of gaining permanent permission, as this can enable operators to justifyincreased investment at the site (thus improving its long term viability). In particular, long life, if notpermanent, facilities are needed to attract sufficient investment to enable the manufacture of recycledaggregates to the high standards required for use in construction.

34 A number of operators of existing landfill operations and/or former mineral extraction operations haveidentified the potential to accommodate generic waste management uses and aggregate recycling operationsat these locations. An important consideration in this regard is that mineral or landfill sites which arerestored or are due to be restored, are not included under the definition of previously developed land. Thissuggests that 'existing' landfill and extraction sites should not be considered in the same way as other 'existing'waste management sites for policy purposes.

35 The information obtained about nominated existing operations varies however, and further evidence wouldbe required to support any assumptions about how extending existing capacity might meet identified needs.In particular, further information would be required on the estimated additional capacity such sites couldprovide. Additional capacity does not necessarily require additional built development however, and someoperators identified opportunities to reconfigure sites within the existing footprint of the operation (subjectto gaining the necessary permissions). Such reconfiguration may increase the ability to handle a greatervolume of waste due to the use of more advanced technologies or more efficient processes.

36 When considering maximising capacity at existing operations, it is important not to assume that because aparticular area has hosted, or hosts, waste disposal facilities it is appropriate or acceptable to add to theseor extend their life. It is important to consider the cumulative effect of previous waste disposal facilities ona community’s wellbeing. Indeed a number of existing minerals and waste sites are poorly located in relationto the road network, and those sites considered unsuitable for increased extension (prior to considering anyplanning application) have been identified in section 5. Indeed, some of the existing sites nominated forextensions have since been subject to planning applications and have either been refused or permitted.

37 Elsewhere this study identifies sites which are adjacent to existing waste management facilities, indicatingpotential opportunities for existing operations to expand onto nearby land. An example is Land East &West of Alton MRF, Holyborne (A31) (nominations EHS 026/ 030). Such sites are not considered'extensions' for the purposes of this study, as they are not included within the footprint of the adjacentexisting waste management facilities. It is noted however, that opportunities exist to maximise wastemanagement provision at proven suitable locations for waste management activities, as in the case of Holybornewhere Alton Materials Recovery Facility is located.


38 Section 5 illustrates Hampshire's existing network of waste management infrastructure. The operationslisted however are only those which have been nominated, and Hampshire hosts many more facilities(16).The nominated existing sites in this study could be referred to therefore as evidence in support of anyparticular policy to maximise capacity at existing sites (in preference over new sites). The study indicatesthat a number of sites would be considered suitable for additional or enhanced waste management activitiesin principle (subject to the consideration of any planning application). Based on the crude assessment insection 5, examples of such sites are as follows (including existing category):

i. Bury Farm (Marchwood Quarry), Marchwood (Category 1: Activities requiring large sites)ii. Warren Farm and Downend Quarry, near Fareham (Category 1: Activities requiring large open sites)iii. Charity Farm, Fareham (Category 2: Activities requiring sites with buildings, plant and ancillary open areas)iv. Former Marchwood Incinerator site, Bury Road, Marchwood (Category 3: Activities requiring enclosed

industrial premises (small scale))

39 Other approaches to how this evidence on existing sites may be used to inform policy are set out in thebox below.

Policy recommendations

The study has identified a number of options to provide extensions to existing waste management facilities.

The HMWP should include a policy to enable sustainable management of waste through provision of additionalcapacity at suitable existing waste management sites (included in Policies 26 & 28).

40 Finally, another planning issue which relates to existing sites is 'safeguarding'. This seeks to provide protectionfor facilities against encroachment by incompatible development, or indeed the site being lost to competingland uses. Based on evidence about existing sites (their capacity, potential to expand, acceptability etc), astudy has been prepared which looks at the criteria which could be applied to existing sites to decide whetherthey should be safeguarded (i.e protected for future waste management activity), or appropriate to releasefor alternative uses(17).

Sites allocated for employment uses

41 As shown in section 6, a number of sites allocated for employment uses in Local Plans have been nominatedfor their potential to host waste management facilities in Hampshire. Whilst not all of these sites arebrownfield (i.e. previously developed), the allocation for employment uses suggests a presumption in favourof development in those locations. The sites are considered developable (and thus deliverable) in principletherefore. As explained in section 6, sites currently allocated for employment uses can often be appropriateas locations for waste management development- particularly for smaller enclosed development and wastetransfer stations. Allocations in Local Plans can be restricted to particular types of employment uses however,such as office development (for example in the case of Clark's Farm (site nomination HRT 024)). This maylimit the policy support for industrial-type waste management development potentially provided by allocatedemployment sites.

16 The existing capacity provided by waste management facilities in Hampshire is described in The Assessment of Need for waste Management Uses: Waste Data Summary(Hampshire County Council).

17 Minerals & Waste Safeguarding Study.


42 Another study has been prepared which assesses the suitability of industrial estates in Hampshire to hostwaste management facilities(18). This study further demonstrates that Hampshire has a range of suitableand available industrial/ employment land which could potentially accommodate such development facilities.Industrial and employment sites also provide opportunities to co-locate waste management withcomplementary activities (and thus reduce the amount of materials transported around the county). It isnot feasible to locate all types of waste development on industrial estates however (notably activities requiringlarge open sites such as composting, which are more appropriately located further away from neighbouringland uses such as residential).

43 Finally, it should be recognised that certain allocated employment sites and industrial areas exist as a resultof historic and established land uses but they may not necessarily be the most sustainable locations. Forexample, there are sites with established employment uses that are now surrounded by residential developmentor other sensitive receptors. Whilst permission for waste management activities may be applied for on suchsites, it is not necessarily appropriate to intentionally plan to locate such activities at these locations. Indeed,the current Minerals & Waste Core Strategy (2007) states that large waste management sites should only bepermitted in countryside locations on ‘windfall’ (e.g. unexpectedly available) brownfield land with goodaccess to the main highway network.

44 The following nominated sites from section 6 are examples of those considered to have potential foraccommodating industrial-type waste management uses (mainly due to their size and location). It isrecommended that these sites are subject to further appraisal (see option 2 below):

i. Site Adjacent to Waste Water Treatment Works, Eastleighii. Little Park Farm Road, Segensworth (also adjacent site FHM 012)iii. Hartland Park & adjacent land, Pyestock Hilliv. Land Adjacent to Military Road, Royal Naval Dockyard, Portsmouthv. Land East of Abbey Park Industrial Estate, Romsey


The study into the suitability of industrial areas in Hampshire for waste management facilities has identifieda range of suitable industrial/employment land across Hampshire for provision of new waste managementfacilities.

The HMWP should include a policy to enable use of suitable land for waste management purposes (includedin Policy 28)

Other nominated sites for further appraisal

45 Section 7 includes a range of sites across each of the administrative (district) areas in Hampshire nominatedfor their potential to host waste management facilities. Most of the sites were nominated by landownersor prospective site operators which illustrates commercial interest in these locations. Not all of the nominatedsites are brownfield land, and most are in more rural locations or land which has not previously beendeveloped. The suitability of these undeveloped sites for waste management is instead based on opportunitiesprovided by their strategic location, proximity to markets (urban areas), opportunities for co-location withexisting waste management operations, or opportunities to transport materials by rail or sea. Examples ofthese sites are discussed below.

18 The Suitability of Industrial Areas for Waste Management in Hampshire.


46 Whilst the general expectation is to encourage waste management close to its generation source, it shouldbe recognised that smaller scale waste uses should not be precluded from rural areas. Indeed, the wastemanagement needs of rural areas will generally be met by smaller, more community-based facilities. Thereuse of previously developed land includes the reuse of redundant agricultural and forestry buildings(including their curtilages)(19). In summary, certain waste management activities which are comparable toagricultural practices may suitably be located in those more rural locations. Such activities can support farmdiversification and provide products for environmental or agricultural benefit, as well as low-carbon energywhich can support the rural economy(20).

47 Section 7 illustrates that locations for waste management activity can often be opportunistic, in that theydepend on the availability of vacant land which is considered feasible for development for the waste industry.The nominated sites suggest the types of land uses in Hampshire which the industry considers have potentialto host waste management uses. These uses include: vehicle depots; redundant agricultural land and buildings;brownfield sites at major transport junctions; rail sidings (see below); former MoD land; and land at thefringes of industrial estates. The range of land use types nominated is likely to reflect the different locationalneeds of different waste management activities (as demonstrated by the development categories suggestedin this study (see Appendix 2).

48 The site assessments shown in section 7 reveal that there are some constraints on what the nominated sitescould suitably be used for. This is typically due to the sites' surrounding land uses and proximity to sensitivereceptors (such as residential areas). Site size is another key consideration, and the findings suggest thatthe majority of sites are less than three hectares in area (i.e. the indicative land size required for larger scalewaste management facilities). Indeed, whilst a number of sites are well-located in terms of their proximityto urban areas, the deliverability and viability of developing some of these for waste management usesremains uncertain. The key deliverability issues for each of the nominated sites are set out in section 7, andmainly relate to the need to demonstrate how environmental constraints can be appropriately managed ormitigated against. Issues related to access and transport restrictions; ecological sensitivities; and the potentialfor incompatible neighbouring land uses in future were identified for many of the sites.

49 Sites with potential to accommodate a range of different types and sizes of waste management facilitiesshould ideally be identified, in order to provide flexibility for industry in response to changing wastemanagement needs. From the initial site assessment and approach to categorisation(21) it is evident that thenominated sites in section 6 have potential to provide opportunities for each of the categories. Some sitescover less than 1 hectare and are arguably not worth identification for planning purposes. However, insome cases these sites are in isolated locations (away from sensitive receptors) and could provide opportunitiesto accommodate waste management activities for handling specialist wastes. Depending on identified wastemanagement needs, it may be appropriate to safeguard these sites against competing land uses. Examplesof these sites from section 7 include:

i. Spaniard Inn, Liphookii. Withys Meadow, Dutton Lane, Eastleighiii. Mattingley Depot, Heckfieldiv. Hydro Chafer site, Larkwhistle Road, Micheldever

19 This may include the demolition of the building to make way for an ‘open air’ activity, demolition and rebuilding of the building or alteration of the building.20 For example see Defra (2010) Accelerating the Uptake of Anaerobic Digestion in England: an Implementation Plan (Defra Publications: London).21 See Broad categories of waste management facilities


50 It may also be appropriate to identify sites which present opportunities for the transhipment of wastematerials by rail (due to their proximity to rail sidings). Based on the assessments in section 7, the followingsites offer such opportunities (subject to further investigation):

i. Land East & West of Alton MRFii. Site Adjacent to Waste Water Treatment Works, Eastleighiii. Land at Dutton Lane, Eastleighiv. Land South of Railway, Segensworthv. Totton Yardvi. Fratton Freight site, Portsmouthvii. Gold Lane site off Government Road, Aldershotviii. Associated British Port Land, Southampton Docks area near Millbrookix. Micheldever Station

51 The sites in Southampton's Western Docks (ABP land) have been nominated and shown in section 7.Southampton’s Core Strategy (adopted January 2010) safeguards the port for port related development.To conform to this policy, any proposals to accept waste materials (e.g. for energy recovery) should betransported predominately by ship. This requirement will also limit the impact of such a plant onSouthampton’s road network. It is likely that a preference for land transport to import materials will be railbased. Waste management activity which is not port-related is unlikely to be supported in the WesternDocks due to the safeguarding of this land in Southampton's plan(22)

52 Finally, notwithstanding the geographic distribution of these potential site opportunities, it is recognisedthat the two key market areas for waste management infrastructure are the urban settlements in the northand south of Hampshire. As discussed below, there is potential to accommodate additional wastemanagement needs to support the growth in the South Hampshire area through planned developmentareas. Nominated sites in section 7 may also be able to provide additional waste management capacity forSouth Hampshire. It is important to recognise however these sites may be suitable for other competingland uses. Examples of these sites include;

i. Sites at Redbridge Lane, Nursling, Southamptonii. Simonds Hill, West Hulbert (Havant)iii. Land at Hazelton Farm, near Horndean

53 In the north of the county, the main market areas for waste management facilities are the urban areas ofFarnborough and Aldershot, Basingstoke and Andover. In addition to the various industrial areas andemployment allocations which have been identified elsewhere(23), nominated sites in section 7 may also beable to provide additional waste management capacity for the North Hampshire area, for example:

i. Peak Copse, Dummerii. Land Adjacent to Energy Recovery Facility, Chinehamiii. Land adjacent to Apsley Farm, near Andoveriv. Land off Foxcotte Lane, Andover

54 The box below sets out how this evidence on nominated sites has been used to develop options and informthe preparation of the Plan

22 Southampton City Council's Core Strategy (policy CS 9 Port of Southampton).23 The Suitability of Industrial Areas for Waste Management in Hampshire.



The study has demonstrated the availability of sites in the North and South of Hampshire that provideopportunities to accommodate a range of different types and sizes of waste facilities.

The HMWP should include policies to support new waste development on existing and new sites (includedin Policy 26).

Sites in areas of planned development

55 It is recognised that population growth in Hampshire will place further pressure on land around existingareas of development, particularly in the planned growth areas of South Hampshire and North EastHampshire. This is likely to result in increasing competition for sites that might be needed for wastemanagement uses. Indeed, Hampshire’s adopted Minerals & Waste Core Strategy (2007) states that all areasof major new development should accommodate an appropriate proportion of the waste managementcapacity for recycling, composting or recovery and treatment. As explained in section 8, five identifiedplanned development areas have been identified as having potential to accommodate supporting wastemanagement infrastructure. Prior to detailed information on site layout and design being available therefore,most of these sites could only be identified as broad locations for waste facilities. Locating waste managementdevelopment as part of planned new development provides the opportunity to ensure such supportinginfrastructure is integral to the 'master planning' of the new settlements and thus the community benefitsof products (including energy) recovered from waste management activities can be be maximised.


The HMWP should include a policy to enable waste development as part of planned new development areas(included in Policy 28).

Household Waste Recycling Centres

56 The approach used in this study has been to categorise different waste management activities by theirdevelopment requirements. Notwithstanding this approach, it is recognised that HouseholdWaste RecyclingCentres (HWRCs) have specific locational requirements which are unique to other facility types. The mainissue is the need for these sites to be accessible by the public and able to accommodate higher numbers ofvehicles entering the site than other facilities. Indeed, several sites were nominated specifically for theirpotential to accommodate an HWRC. For example, plans to relocate an HWRC to a site at Dock Gate 20in Southampton from the Town Depot site has now been built and was opened in December 2011.


57 HWRCs are also unique in that they are operated as municipal facilities (i.e on behalf of the public sector)(24).There is more certainty therefore for planning authorities about where new locations for such facilities willbe sought. The demand for new HWRCs in certain locations in Hampshire will be informed by a ServiceReview undertaken in 2010-11. This will review the entire HWRC network in Hampshire and assess thecatchment areas for the existing HWRCs. This will help identify parts of Hampshire considered 'servicegaps', and a site search (which may be informed by this evidence study) would be undertaken to identifypriority areas and potential new locations for HWRCs. It may be the case that particular existing HWRCsneed to be relocated (as in the case of TownDepot HWRC in Southampton). Several HWRCs in Hampshireare located on industrial estates and it is likely that accessible previously developed sites (minimum of 0.6hectares) would need to be identified if new locations were required following the Service Review.


The study has identified a range of sites suitable to accommodate newHWRCs, particularly in identified servicegap areas, or where HWRCs need to be re-located.

The HMWP should safeguard existing HWRC sites and include a policy to enable new sites to be established(included in Policies 25 and 28 respectively).

Sites nominated for disposal to land

58 Currently about 82% of Hampshire's non-hazardous waste is diverted from landfill however there will bea continued, but diminishing role for landfill. It is likely that the amount of waste going to landfill will bevery limited in quantity and biodegradable content by the end of the plan period however it is still necessaryto make provision for the limited amount of non-recoverable waste which requires disposal to land(25).Hampshire has very limited opportunities to accommodate landfill sites due to its environmental constraintsand other characteristics. The areas considered and their suitability for landfill is explained in more detailelsewhere (26). The areas deemed most suitable are highlighted in section 9.

59 The Assessment of Need for Waste Management Facilities:Hampshire Landfill and Surcharging Report lists a numberof nominations for additional landfill capacity (see category 9: Activities requiring landfill void). Most of thesenominations were based on associated nominations to extract mineral at those locations (i.e. to provide avoid capacity). For planning purposes however it is not appropriate to consider the opportunities at thosesites, particularly where mineral extraction is not supported. Further, not all sand and gravel sites are suitablefor restoration by landfill because of hydro-geological conditions, access and other environmental protectionreasons.

60 One existing landfill site listed in section 9 has been considered suitable in principle for landfill withnon-hazardous waste: Squabb Wood (nomination code TTV 027). The viability of surcharging on top of theexisting void at SquabbWood is still to be determined (the alternative option is to seek to extend the existingsite). The opportunity at Squabb Wood would be subject to further appraisal and the ability to satisfyspecific environmental protection criteria (and ultimately a planning application). Land at Verwood Road(Purple Haze, Ringwood Forest - site NFT 011) has also been identified for its potential to provide non-hazardouslandfill capacity in the longer term, if sand and gravel extraction occurs in this proposed area.

24 There is a network of HWRCs in Hampshire (currently 24 HWRCs in Hampshire, and one in both Southampton and Portsmouth).25 Assessment of Need for Waste Management Facilities: Waste Data Summary Report.26 Assessment of need for Waste Management Facilities in Hampshire: Landfill and Surcharging Report


61 It is estimated that the majority of inert waste which is not recycled or recovered in another way, will beused to restore mineral workings or used in civil engineering and other infrastructure projects, preferablyat the site of production. In sum, evidence indicates that there is a surplus in void capacity for inert wastematerials and therefore no requirement to actively promote new inert landfill sites(27).


Only one existing site has been considered suitable in principle for additional landfill, highlighting the difficultyin finding unconstrained and suitable sites in Hampshire.

Together with existing landfill void capacity, the site is expected to provide sufficient capacity for landfillrequirements over the plan period.

The HMWP should include a policy to provide for limited amount of landfill required in Hampshire andreflect the policy prescription against landfill as a suitable waste treatment option (included in Policy 32).

Sites considered less suitable

62 Finally, a proportion of sites identified were considered less suitable ('ruled out') early in the process asexplained in the methodology and shown in Appendix 4. The fact that these sites have been eliminatedfrom any further appraisal process does not preclude them from being considered for waste managementactivity in future, if an applicant wished to pursue a proposal. It is however considered inappropriate toidentify these sites as potential opportunities, as many are considered to have major constraints on futurewaste management development. Whilst these less suitable sites are considered 'unreasonable options',Appendix 4 demonstrates that a range of different sites have been considered, and the reasons for theirunsuitability. The main reasons sites were considered undeliverable relate to: the physical constraints ondevelopment (e.g the site is less than 0.5 hectare); the lack of suitable access; incompatible neighbouringland uses; a history of poor management of the sites; and lack of interest from the waste industry. Further,a number of these nominated sites have subsequently been subject to planning applications for other uses(such as residential or mixed-use development), and thus are no longer deliverable for waste managementactivity.

27 Assessment of Need for Waste Management Facilities: Waste Data Summary Report.


Section 5 Existing sites nominated for extension

63 Waste planning authorities are required to plan for the delivery of sites and areas suitable for wastemanagement to fill the 'capacity gap' between existing and required waste management capacity. This gapmay increase in the longer term as existing facilities reach the end of their useful lives. A number of'time-limited' recycling and composting sites have been nominated for instance which may be suitable forpermanent operation. It is therefore important to consider the extent to which existing, and consentedwaste management capacity not yet operational would satisfy identified needs. Sites were nominated byowners and operators indicating plans or aspirations to extend sites in terms of:

footprint (i.e. size) (potential to accommodate additional waste infrastructure on site)the operations which were taking place at the site (i.e. incorporate additional activities onsite)(28).the life of the operation (i.e. potential to extend time-bound permissions, or gain permanentpermission)

64 The nominated sites are set out in the following tables(29):

Table 3 lists sites potential to increase waste management capacity (Excluding aggregaterecycling and landfill)(30) nominated as having potential to increase capacity for these uses.Table 4 lists sites permitted for existing aggregate recycling operations with potential to increaseaggregate recycling capacity (including extensions to time, expansion of site, aspiration for sitepermanency etc).Table 5 lists sites permitted for existing aggregate recycling operations with potential to diversifywaste management operationsTable 6 identifies sites permitted for other minerals and waste sites with potential to diversifyoperations (inc existing landfill operations, former mineral extraction operations etc)

The final column in each of the tables provides a broad indication of whether the nominated sites are consideredto have potential to provide additional waste management capacity. This judgement has been illustrated usingthe symbols shown below.

NOTE: the nominated existing sites included in this study would be required to gain the necessary licenses and permissions priorto any extensions (including varying conditions attached to permissions). The assessment undertaken below is intendedonly to demonstrate the prospect of maximising existing waste management infrastructure to provide futurecapacity. This is discussed further in Section 4 'Key Findings'.

●Site considered to have limited or no potential to provide additional capacity

●●Potential to provide additional capacity is considered uncertain (e.g dependent on overcomingsite constraints)

●●●Site considered to have potential to provide additional capacity (subject to detailed assessment)

28 This may include the potential to handle increased volumes of waste on site. For example, operators may seek to vary conditions to allow increased lorry movements(and thus accept greater volumes of waste), or receive different types of waste.

29 This section excludes nominations for increasing landfill capacity (see Section 9 'Sites nominated for disposal to land').30 Includes the recycling, composting, processing, and recovery of all wastes, plus waste storage and transfer.


Table3Existingwastesites(excluding

aggregaterecyclingandland

fill)with

potentialtoincrease

wastemanagem

entcapacity

Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations

Identifiedpotentialextension

(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite

(plann

ingsitecode)

●●Th

esiteop

eratorscon

tacted

Ham

pshireCounty

CouncilinMarch

2007,statingthatalthoughthey

hadno

currentp

lans

toexpand,theymay

wish

tointhefuture.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:BSD

024

Sitecurrently

existsa

sanactivewaste

transferstatio

n(permitted

2004),with

emph

asison

electro

nicandelectrical

equipm

entw

aste.A

llcurrentw

aste

activities

aresited

onan

industrialestate.

Bessem

erPark,

Basin

gstoke

(BA119)

Siteliesincloseproximity

toresid

entialpropertiesa

ndliesw

ithin

anurbansetting.

Scho

olslieincloseproximity

tothe

site.

●●●

WhiteYo

ungGreen

(WYG

)nom

inated

siteon

behalfof

BarfordSkipsinApril2007

tosuggest

Thesite

currently

existsasanactivew

aste

transferstatio

n(permitted

2003).

Hom

eFarm

,PetersfieldRo

ad,

Ropley

(EH113)

Accessissues.

Smallsite.

thatthesite

maybe

suitablefor

expansiontohost

Sitecurrently

haslorry

movem

ent

restrictio

nsarangeof

extra

wastemanagem

enttechn

ologies

including,aggregaterecycling,woo

drecycling,

SiteoverliesW

aterSource

Protectio

nZon

es.

wastestorageandtra

nsferand

agriculturalw

aste

processin

g.Suggestedpo

tentialtoincrease

capacityto

25,000

tonn

esperannum

(tpa).

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:EHS032

Networkof

footpathsliecloseto

the

site.

●●Th

esiteop

eratorsn

ominated

thesitein

Decem

ber2008foranextensiontoits

temporary

Restored

non-inertlandfillinaftercare

nowintempo

rary

useas

awastetra

nsfer

station(permitted

2002)and

ahouseho

ldwasterecyclingcentre(permitted

1991).

Activebiogasfacilityalso

currently

exists

onsite(permitted

1995).

NetleyFarm

,Po

rtsm

outh

Road,

Netley(EA027)

SINCsand

conservatio

narealie

close

tothesite.

planning

perm

ission.

Theperm

issioncurrently

expiresinJune

2011

orwhentra

nsferstatio

nis

notlon

gerrequired,which

everisthesoon

er.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:ELH

018

Rightsof

wayexist

inclosep

roximity.

Locatedwith

inastrategicgapbut

wastetra

nsferstatio

nisvisually

unob

trusive.

Housin

galon

gaccessroad

tosite.

●●●

Oncecompo

stingop

erations

have

ceased,this

willleavevoidspacevacant,w

ithVe

olia,the

currento

perator,identifying

inDecem

ber2

008,

arangeof

alternativewasteuses

forthe

site.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:FH

M010

Thissiteisdividedinto

twosections

bytheM27;T

heno

rthern

sectionho

stsa

wastetra

nsferstatio

nto

accommodatea

rangeof

wastetypes,from

dryrecyclable

tocivicam

enity

waste(permitted

2006).

WarrenFarm

(FA025)

Dow

nend

Quarry,

nearFareham

(FA025)

Land

may

notb

esuitablefor

buildings,although

hardstanding

does

exist

foro

penstorage.

●Afootpath

liesa

djacenttothewest

ofthesite

Thesouthern

partof

thesiteisknow

nas

Dow

nend

Quarryand

hosted

greenwaste

compo

sting(permitted

1998),untill

Decem

ber2

011.

Europeanenvironm

entaldesignations

lieincloseproximity

tothesouthof

thesite.


Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations


(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite

(plann

ingsitecode)

Perm

issionwas

grantedinNovem

ber

2010

fora

change

ofuseof

theexisting

WasteTransferStationto

useas

aMaterialsRe

cyclingFacilityforthe

productio

nof

aSolidRecoveredFu

el(th

eno

rthern

partof

thesite).

Previous

objections

raisedrelatedto

potentialfor

noise

affectinglocal

resid

ents.

Somehistoricconcerns

relatedto

the

operationof

theDow

nend

Quarry

Com

postingFacilityandem

issionof

odours.

Planning

perm

issionwas

grantedinJuly

2011

forchangeof

use,to

compo

siteuse

ofwoo

dwastestorage,storageand

transferh

ighw

ayssaltstoreandbin

storage.

●●●

OperatorsSITA

UKsuggestedinDecem

ber2008

thatthesitewouldpo

tentially

besuitableto

also

Siteconsistso

fawastetra

nsferstatio

n(permitted

2002)and

also

asoilscreening

plant(perm

itted

2005).Siteislocatedin

Fareham

IndustrialPark,adjacent

tothe

existingFo

rtWallington

IndustrialE

state.

Wallington

Recycling

Centre,M

ilitaryRo

ad,

Wallington

(FA064)

SiteoverliesS

ourceP

rotectionZones.

Footpathsliecloseto

thesite.

accommodatewoo

dprocessin

g,anaerobic

digestion,biom

assa

ndthermalrecovery.

Operatorh

asrecentlyexpressedan

interestin

developing

asiteon

thesouthcoast.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:FH

M011

Wallington

does

have

room

forsom

eexpansion,po

ssiblyinto

adjoining

field.

●●TJ

Waste,the

siteop

erators,have

expressedan

interestinextendingthisfacilityto

incorporate

Sitehasp

lann

ingperm

ission(granted

2009)for

theconstructio

nof

aMaterial

RecyclingFacility(M

RF)tohandlea

maximum

throughp

utof

75,000

tpaof

constructio

n,demolition

andskipwaste.

Thesite

remain

sinactiveaso

perations

are

yettobe

implem

enteddueto

therecent

perm

ission.

CharityFarm

,Fareham

(FA078)

Siteliesa

djacenttotheprop

osed

North

ofFareham

Strategic

Develop

mentA

rea(SDA)

furthertechn

ologiesand

increasethethroughput

ofthesite.

Potentialidentified

forh

andlingup

to125,000tpaof

constructio

n,demolition

and

skipwaste.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:FH

M008

Footpathsliecloseto

thesite.

Extensio

non

togreenfieldsite.

●●●

Potentialextensio

ntothesite,tho

ughaccessno

tgood.Green

uses

onthesitecouldbe

linkedto

Siteisinuseas

aHouseho

ldWaste

RecyclingCentre

(HWRC

)(perm

itted

pre-1991),which

liesa

djacenttosewage

works.Th

esitewas

improved

and

extended

in2004.

HartleyWintney

HWRC

,Springw

ell

Lane,H

artley

Wintney(H

artD

epot)

(HR0

08)

Siteaccessroad

isrelativelynarrow

andthea

ccidentrecordon

theA

30is

very

poor.

theadjacent

sewagetre

atmentw

orks.CHP

wouldbe

advantageous.T

heonlyimpactislikely

tobe

lorries.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:HRT007

Smallsite.

Close

proximity

tonatio

naland

Europ

eandesig

natio

ns.


Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations


(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite

(plann

ingsitecode)

●●In

Decem

ber2

008,consultantsn

ominated

the

siteo

nbehalfof

theE

lvethamEstate,expressin

gan

interestby

highlightingcurrentstatuso

fland

tothesouthof

thewastemanagem

entfacility,

which

iscurrently

leasedtoHCC

bytheE

lvetham

Estate.

TheElvetham

Estatestated

thatatthe

endof

thelease,it'sp

ropo

sedthatthesitebe

used

toaccommodateextensionof

existing

facilityor

beused

todevelopcomplimentary

wasteactivities.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:HRT003

Sitecontains

awastetra

nsferstatio

n(permitted

pre-1991)and

recyclingfacility

forcon

struction,demolition

and

non-hazardousindustrialwastes

(permitted

pre-1991).Sitelieso

nthe

previous

siteof

asawmill.

StarhillSawmills,

HartleyWintney

(HR0

34)

Siteliesadjacenttoagypsy/caravan

park

tothesouth,on

land

currently

leased

toHCC.

TheTh

ames

Basin

Heath

SPAlies

immediatelyno

rthof

thesite.

Caravan

park

islocatedadjacent

tothesouth

●Th

issitewasoriginallyidentifiedby

CGCom

ley

andSons

Ltdin2005.Th

esitewas

nominated

inMarch

2007

toindicateaspiratio

nsto

toinvest

andexpand

wastemanagem

entactivities

atthe

site.

Suggestedthesitecouldhandleup

to100,000tpaof

demolition

waste.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:HRT002

Sitehasexisted

asan

activew

astetra

nsfer

stationandho

ldsa

Certificateof

Lawful

Use

forinertandlowlevelhazardous

wasterecycling(app

rox40,000

tpa)

perm

itted

in2009.

CalfLane

Quarry,Rye

Com

mon

(HR0

78)

Siteisconsidered

toosm

alltocontain

asig

nificantfacility.

Sitelacksg

oodaccessandliesw

ithin

aruralsettin

g.Siteoverliesa

principalaquiferand

Source

Protectio

nZon

es.

●●Th

esite

wasnominated

inFebruary2010

bySL

RCon

sulting

onbehalfof

thesiteop

erator,R

.Collard,toprom

oteop

portunities

fora

perm

anentw

astemanagem

entfacility.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:HRT021

R.Collard

Ltdcurrently

operates

aMaterialsRe

covery

Facility(M

RF)and

associated

developm

entsatunits

3,4and

8ofthestorage

depot.Units1-8obtained

perm

anentp

lann

ingperm

issionviaa

LawfulD

evelop

mentC

ertificate.

EversleyStorage

Depot,F

leetRo

ad,

Eversley(H

R085)

Siteoverliesa

secondaryaquifer.

Sitesurrounded

byTh

ames

Basin

HeathsS

PAandbo

thBram

shill

Castle

Botto

mto

Yateleya

ndHaw

ley

Com

mon

sSSSI.

Inan

aerodrom

esafeguarding

zone.

Adjacenttoexistingm

ineralextraction

site.

App

licationsubm

itted

inOctob

er2010

forp

ermanency

oftheexistingfacilities

anderectio

nof

aWasteRe

ception

Buildingwas

grantedMarch

2011.


Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations


(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite

(plann

ingsitecode)

●●Siteno

minated

inMarch

2007

onbehalfof

Lift

andShift

SkipHire

Ltdto

expressa

ninterestin

expanding/increasin

gthecapacityof

thesite.

Arangeof

wastemanagem

entactivities

may

besuitable,inadditio

nto

thecurrentsite

operations.

Thesitecontains

anactivewastetra

nsfer

stationforskipwastes(perm

itted

2001)

includingthestorageandprocessin

g,by

screenerandconcretecrusher,ofsoilsand

secondaryaggregate(permitted

2003

-2004).

FarlingtonRe

doubt,

Portsdow

nHill

(HV017)

Land

ownershipissuesrestrictingsite's

abilityforexpansio

nSitecurrently

producesah

igham

ount

ofno

ise.

Con

cernsregarding

height

increases

andvisualissues.

Theactivewastetra

nsferstatio

nlies

onahistoricredoubt(fortor

fort

system

).Proposals

form

inor

modificatio

nstothee

xisting

wasterecyclingfacilityweregranted(subjectto

alegalagreement)inJuly2010.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:HVT003

Operatio

nsrestrictedto

handlinga

maximum

of80,000

tonn

esof

waste

peryear.

●●●

Land

andMineralManagem

entn

ominated

the

siteinFebruary2010

suggestin

gthatthesitehas

potentialfor

additio

naluses,such

as;W

EEE

disassem

bly.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:NFT

067

Activesand

andgravelprocessin

gplant

siteandwastetra

nsferstatio

n(permitted

1994)forconstructionanddemolition

and

non-hazardousindustrialwastes.

Perm

issionwasgrantedin2005

torelocate

theWasteTransferStationwith

inthesite

boundary.

Caird

Avenue,Solent

IndustrialE

state,

New

Milton

(NF0

02)

Sitehasb

eenidentifiedas

apo

ssible

locatio

nforh

ousin

g.Siteliesw

ithingreenbelt.

SINCse

xistincloseproximity

tothe

site.

Neighbo

uringresid

entshave

previouslyraisedconcerns

over

possiblelocalamenity

impacts

includingwaterpo

llutio

n,no

ise,

fumes,dustand

increasedlorry

movem

ents.

●●●

Thesiteisof

sufficient

sizeto

hostarangeof

minor

andenclosed

wastemanagem

ent

operations

andwasno

minated

forsuchpo

tential

inFebruary

2006.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:NFT

035

Thesiteserves

asaHWRC

(permitted

pre-1991)and

also

hostsa

tempo

rary

wastetra

nsferstatio

n(permitted

1996),

acceptingno

n-inertw

astes,sin

cethe

form

erincineratorstopp

edop

eratingin

1996.

Form

erMarchwoo

dIncineratorsite,B

ury

Road,M

archwoo

d(N

F018)

Europ

eannatureconservatio

nsites

lieincloseproximity

Resid

entialpropertieslienearby

Siteliesw

ithinan

aerodrom

esafeguarding

area.

Needto

considerimpacton

Rushington

Roundabout;off-peak

use

wouldbe

advised.

Marchwoo

dandBu

ryRo

adalso

have

issuesw

ithHGVtra

ffic.


Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations


(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite

(plann

ingsitecode)

●●Siteno

minated

onbehalfof

New

Milton

Sand

andBa

llastinFebruary2010,toprom

otethe

site

assuitableforh

ostin

gavarietyof

additio

nal

wasteactivities,suchas;com

posting,recycling,

recovery

andtre

atmentfacilities,as

wellas

specialistw

astemanagem

entfacilitiessuchas

WEEEdisassem

blyor

sortingandstorageof

recycla

bles.T

hemanagem

entofhazardous

waste

was

also

suggested.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:NFT

001

Siteho

stsa

landfillsite

forthe

acceptance

ofinertm

aterial

(permitted

pre-1991)and

incineratorb

ottom

ash(IBA

),awaste

transferstatio

n(permitted

1994),an

HWRC

,alandfillgas

energy

recovery

plant(perm

itted

2003)and

wastewater

treatmentp

lant

(permitted

1994)along

with

capacityforaggregaterecycling

(permitted

1993).

Manor

Farm

,Penn

ington

,Lymington

(NF0

42)

Siteisalreadyintensivelyused

for

wasteuses-theremay

bepo

tentialto

upgradeexistingfacilities(lim

ited

scop

efore.g.

physicalextension

however).Con

cernsregarding

the

site's

impacton

greenbelt.


toEurop


ndesig

natio

ns.

Networkof

footpathse

xistcloseto

thesite.

Floo

dzone

issues.

●Th

esiteop

eratorsn

ominated

thesitein

Decem

ber2

007indicatin

gthatthesiteis

currently

operatingat50%

ofits

currentcapacity,

dueto

arestrictio

nof

lorrymovem

ents.

The

operatorso

fthe

sitedrew

attentionto

existing

buildings

locatedon

halfof

thesite,which

they

believe

couldbe

used

foro

therwaste

managem

entactivities,suchas

WasteElectrical

andElec

tronicE

quipment(WEEE)disassem

bly.

Identifiedforp

otentialtohandleapproximately

11,000

tpaof

CDEwaste.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:NFT

064

Planning

perm

issionwas

grantedon

appealin2004

forthe

useof

thesiteas

aninertw

astematerial

transferstationand

recyclingfacility.

App

licationto

increase

thenumbero

fdaily

vehiclemovem

entswas

refusedin

2008.

AmbervaleFarm

,Pitm

oreLane,Sway

(NF0

75)

Issuewith

access

SiteisclosetoPassford

Water(SIN

C)

Siteiscurrently

contrary

topo

licy

NFN

PArecentlyrefused(2010)

anotherapp

licationto

increase

movem

ents.

Farm

erappealed

again

butlosto

nfurtherapp

ealthisy

ear.

●Siteno

minated

inApril2007

indicatin

ginterest

inpo

tentially

expandingthissiteforrecycling

activities.Also

mentio

nedwerethefour

acres

ofland

adjoiningthee

xistingsite.Iftheo

perator

wasabletoob

tainperm

issionforsufficientextra

lorrym

ovem

entsforthe

sitea

tAmbervaleF

arm

(see

above),thentherewouldbe

lesspressureto

expand

TowerView.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:NFT

065

Sitecurrently

holdsa

CLU

fora

waste

transferstatio

n(permitted

1994).Th

isperm

itsthestorage

anddistrib

utionofthe

followingspecified

materials;

topsoil,

crushedconcrete,brickrubb

le,scalpings,

hoggin,pathgravelandsand.

TowerView,

Crabb

swoo

dLane,

Sway

(NF2

02)

Sitehasissuesw

ithregardstoaccess.

Siteliesw

ithinaruralsettin

g.Europ


ndesig

natio

nslie

incloseproximity

totheno

rthof

thesite.

Improvem

entsto

highway

infrastructuremaybe

required.


Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations


(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite

(plann

ingsitecode)

●Land

andMineralManagem

entn

ominated

the

sitein2010

tosuggestthatthe

sitecouldbe

suitablefor;recycling,recovery

andtre

atment

facilitiesa

swellasspecialist

wastemanagem

ent

activities

such

asWEEE,orthe

similarstorage

and/or

sortingof

dryrecyclablew

aste.T

heuse

ofhazardousw

asteas

athroughp

utto

thesite

was

also

suggested.

Identifiedforp

otentialto

handleup

to50,000

tpa.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:NFT

066

Siteisop

erated

bySM

SSkipsa

sparto

fNew

Milton

Sand

andBallast'soperation.

Siteho

ldsa

Certificateof

Lawful

Develop

ment(CLD

)for

theuseof

land

asaskipbusin

essd

epotandwastetransfer

stationforthe

acceptance

ofconstructio

nanddemolition,in

dustrialand

commercia

lwastes(perm

itted

1996).Sitealso

operates

awasterecyclingop

erationof

skipwaste(permitted

2000),which

has

since

been

enclosed

(permitted

2005).

LimeKiln

Lane,

Holbury,Faw

ley

(NF2

18)

Smallsite.

LieswithinNew

ForestNationalPark.

Europ

eanandnatio

nalhabitat

desig

natio

nslie

incloseproximity

tothesite.

Siteisscreened

from

adjoiningland

uses

andthehighway

byabeltof

maturetre

es,and

thereareno

resid

entialdwellingsinclo

seproximity

tothesite.

●Agentsn

ominated

siteon

behalfof

theop

erator

inJuly2006

toindicateaspiratio

nsto

expand

existingactivities

onthesite.

Anexistingwastetre

atmentfacilityused

forcom

postingandscreeningsoils

(permitted

2003),inertw

oodwasteand

greenwaste(permitted

2009).Perm

ission

fora

resource

recycling,recovery

and

transferfacility(ofsoils)

was

originally

refusedandgrantedon

appealin2008.

Form

erMOD

Oil

StorageDepot,

NorthernAccess

Road,Faw

leyPo

wer

Station

(NF2

35)

Siteliesw

ithintheNew

Forest

NationalPark.

Siteliesa

djacenttoan

existingAir

QualityManagem

entA

rea(AQMA).

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:NFP

002

Footpath

runs

adjacent

tothesite.

Viewsfrom

thewater-local

desig

natio

ns.

Thesitecomprisesa

pproximately0.8

hectares,situated

betweenFawleyPo

wer

StationandtheAshlettCreek

Waste

WaterTreatm

entW

orks.

●Siteno

minated

onbehalfof

Cleansin

gService

Group

(CSG

)Ltd

inMarch

2010

providing

indicativeplansidentifyingthepo

ssiblelocatio

nof

afurtherMaterialsR

ecoveryF

acilityatthesite.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:NFP

003

Activehazardousa

ndno

n-hazardous

landfill,MRF

(permitted

2004)and

green

wastecompo

stsite(perm

itted

2002)w

ithbo

thlandfillleachateandbiogasfacilities

(permitted

2007).

PoundBo

ttom

LandfillSite,

Redlynch,near

Salisbury

(NFN

P001)

Potentialimpacton

Europ

eannature

conservatio

ndesig

natio

nsandSSSIs,

ecologicalsurvey

willbe

required.

Potentialimpactso

nhydrology.

Potentialtrafficimplications

with

increasedfacilitiesa

tthe

site;tra

ffic

assessmentw

illbe

required.

Siteliesw

ithintheNew

Forest

NationalPark.

Localcom

munity

concerns.


Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations


(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite

(plann

ingsitecode)

●●Limitedscop

eforexpansio

nas

siteisadjacent

toaform

erlandfill,although

theremay

bepotential

tohostadditio

nalw

astefacilitieso

nsite

(i.eintensificatio

nof

uses).

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:PC

C012

Siteexistso

nap

reviouslandfillsite,which

also

hoststechn

ologyto

extra

ctlandfill

biogas.Perm

issiongrantedin1997

for

operationof

recyclingfacility,comprising

concretecrushing,sortin

gandscreening

ofconstructio

nwastes.

PortWay

HWRC

,Paulsgrove

landfill

site,Po

rtsm

outh

(PT0

01)

Europ


ndesig

natio

nandSSSI

sites

lieinclose

proximity.

Sitemay

beatriskfrom

flooding.

Siteisheavily

contam

inated

dueto

form

erlandfill.

HWRC

iscurrently

being

redeveloped.

Perm

issionin2009

forretentio

nand

continueduseo

flandforh

ouseholdwaste

recyclingcentre(due

toexpire2013).

●●Po

rtsm

outh

City

Councilsuggestedthatthissite

wouldbe

suitableto

considerinstallingfurther

wasteop

erations

onsite,inordertomakeuseof

co-lo

catio

nop

portunities.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:PC

C013

Siteisan

activewastetra

nsferstatio

nfor

constructio

n,demolition

andindustrial

wastes(perm

itted

1996).Otherwaste

activities

inthevicinityincludethermal

treatmentand

metalrecycling.

Quartremaine

Road,

Portsm

outh

(PT0

53)

Industrialestatelocatio

n.Cum

ulativeaffectsfrom

increased

lorrymovem

entsmay

bean

issue.


toEurop


ndesig

natio

nsto

theeast.

Theexistingsiteop

eratorsS

ITA,

nominated

thesiteinDecem

ber2

008for

anextensionto

accommodatewoo

dprocessin

g.Lo

catednextto

Portsm

outh

ERF

/MRF

onindustrialestate.

Floo

dZon

eissues.

Sitecloseto

Adm

iralL

ordNelson

SecondaryScho

ol.

●●Th

esite

operatornominated

thesite

inDecem

ber

2008,toidentifythe

siteatG

oldFarm

assuitable

fora

MRF

andaggregaterecycling.In

early

2010

thesitewas

nominated

againas

suitablefor

additio

nalresourcerecovery

andwaste

managem

entu

ses.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:RMR003

Siteisactivelyused

forthe

recyclingof

inertm

aterial,viascreening

andcrushing,

toproducesoils

andsecondaryaggregate

(permissionrefusedin2004).Sitehas

Certificateof

LawfulU

sefrom

thelocal

planning

authority

forstorage.

Land

atGoldFarm

,Aldershot(N

ewman's

Site)

(RM030)


toa

conservationarea(Basingstoke

Canal).

Accessissues.

Land

ownershipissues.


toenvironm

entaldesignatio

ns.

Visibilityfromtheexistingsitea

ccess

isreduceddueto

abridge

and

accident

record

isvery

poor.


Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations


(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite

(plann

ingsitecode)

Road

accessisviaresid

entialareas.

Potentialfor

wasteusesbuth

ighw

ays

constra

intsto

beaddressed.

●/●●

Sitewas

nominated

bySITA

inDecem

ber2

008

fora

potentialextensio

nto

thethen

activewaste

Siteiscurrently

occupied

bySITA

and

operated

asacom

mercia

ltransportdepot.

Form

erlyrunas

awasterecyclingfacility

forcom

mercialandindustrialw

astes.

Activities

onthissitedeterm

ined

bySouthampton

City

Council.

ImperialH

ouse,

EmpressR

oad,

Southampton

(SN060)

Siteiswith

inFloo

dRisk

Zon

es2and

3.tra

nsferstatio

n.Th

esiteisalso

allocatedfor

industrialusesinSouthampton

City

Council's

LocalD

evelop

mentF

ramew

ork,Lo

calP

lan

(2006)andispreviouslydevelopedindustrialla

nd.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:SC

C002

Resid

entialpropertiesw

ithin100m

.Mount

Pleasant

Junior

Scho

olop

posite.

●/●●

BKPno

minated

thissiteinMarch

2007,w

iththe

intentionford

evelop

ingawasteto

energy

plant

inthefuture.Fu

rthertothis,

ascreeningand

scop

ingop

inionwith

regardstoap

otentialw

aste

toenergy

planto

nthesite,hasb

eensought

byBK

PinJuly2010.

Existingwastetra

nsferstatio

nperm

itted

toreceiveinertand

liquidconstructio

nanddemolition

waste(permitted

1991).

Casbroo

kHWRC

isadjacent

tothissite

(TV024)

Casbroo

kPark,

Bunn

yLane,

Timsbury

(TV153)

SiteoverliesS

ourceProtectio

nZon

e4. SINCsa

ndancientw

oodlands

liein

closeproximity

tothesite.


toresid

entialproperties.

Problemofaccesstosite.Bu

nnyL

ane

cann

otaccommodateincrease

inIftheHWRC

isrelocatedlongerterm

,there

couldbe

potential

toreconfigurethe

site(ifaccess

was

improved).

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:TTV004

traffic(th

elane

narrow

stow

ards

this

site).

●Sitewasidentifiedby

Ham

pshireCountyC

ouncil

in2007

asitwasbeinglooked

atasalocationfor

anew

HWRC

.How

everthesite

hassubsequently

received

perm

issionfortyrestorage.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:TTV026

Activetyrerecyclingfacilityused

for

storage,mechanicalshredding,granulating

andbailing

oftyresand

storageo

frecycled

tyreproducts(permitted

2007).

Form

erAshfield

Sawmill,R

omsey

(TV228)

Traffic

issues.

Siteliesa

djacenttoaSINCand

ancientw

oodland.

Siteliesc

lose

tofootpath.

Limitedpo

tentialfor

expansion.

●●Onyx(now

Veolia)

nominated

thissitefor

furth

erwastemanagem

entusesin2007,due

tothevoid

ofspaceavailableon

site.

Siteexistsa

sanactivewastetra

nsfer

station(permitted

pre-1991)and

Materials

RecyclingFacility.

Incineratorw

asdemolish

edin1996.

Otterbourne

IncineratorS

ite(W

R018)

Routeof

lorriesa

pproaching

thesite

may

beof

someconcern

Footpath

existsn

earsite

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:WCC004

Lorrylim

itinplacedueto

legal

agreem

ent.Any

futureprop

osals

shouldkeep

with

inlim

it.


Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations


(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite

(plann

ingsitecode)

Perm

issiongrantedin2010

foralteratio

nsandchange

ofuseof

existingMaterials

RecyclingFacilitybuildingto

usefor

storageof

WEEEandhazardousw

aste.

●●WasteManagem

entSystemsL

td.(Hippo

Waste),

thesiteop

eratorsn

ominated

thesiteinMarch

2007

toexpressinterestinextendingthissiteto

theno

rthto

obtainspaceforthe

storageof

non-hazardousw

aste.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:WCC002

Siteiscurrently

activeas

awastetra

nsfer

andrecyclingsite,forthe

storage,

recyclingandtre

atmento

fwaste

(permitted

2003).

Thesitewas

takenoverinNovem

ber

2009

byLiftandShift

(now

L&SWaste

Managem

ent),

who

nowop

eratethesite.

UnitD

,Pegham

IndustrialE

state,

Laveys

Lane,

Tichfield(W

R192)

Thesitehasa

historyof

road

traffic

accidents

Conflictofinterestw

ithregardstothe

futureof

thesite's

activity.

Siteislocatedinstrategicgap.

Mainconstra

intisthe

lorrytra

fficon

localroads.


65 Map showing the distribution of existing waste sites (excluding aggregate recycling and landfill) with potentialto increase waste management capacity looked at within table 3.

Map 1 Existing waste sites with potential to imcrease waste management capacity


Site NameSite CodeDistrict

Bessemer ParkBSD 024Basingstoke

Home Farm, RopleyEHS 032East Hants

Netley Transfer StationELH 018Eastleigh

Charity FarmFHM 008Fareham

Downend QuarryFHM 010Fareham



Wallington Transfer Station, FarehamFHM 011Fareham

Calf Lane Quarry and adjacent landHRT 002Hart

Eversley Star HillHRT 003Hart

Hart DepotHRT 007Hart

Eversley Storage DepotHRT 021Hart

Farlington Redoubt, Portsdown HillHVT 003Havant

Former MoD Depot, FawleyNFP 002New Forest National Park

Pound Bottom, Redlynch, WiltshireNFP 003New Forest National Park

Manor Farm, PenningtonNFT 001New Forest

Marchwood Incinerator SiteNFT 035New Forest

Ambervale FarmNFT 064New Forest

Tower ViewNFT 065New Forest

Holbury/Lime Kiln LaneNFT 066New Forest

Caird AvenueNFT 067New Forest

Port Way HWRC SitePCC 012Portsmouth

Quartermaine RoadPCC 013Portsmouth

Newman's SiteRMR 003Rushmoor

Empress Road, SouthamptonSCC 002Southampton

Casbrook ParkTTV 004Test Valley

Ashfield SawmillTTV 026Test Valley

Pegham Industrial ParkWCC 002Winchester

Otterbourne Incinerator Site, OtterbourneWCC 004Winchester


Table4Existingaggregaterecyclingop

erations

with

potentialtoincrease

aggregaterecyclingcapacity

Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations

Identifiedpo

tentialextension

(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite

(plann

ingsitecode)

Nolonger

applicable

Perm

issiongrantedin2010

forthe

retentionof

WasteRe

cycling

Centre

forcon

structionand

demolition

waste(perm

anent

permission

subjecttoalegalagreement).

Nom

inationSiteCode:EHS003

Site(2.2hectares)identified

in2005

foritspo

tential

torecycleaggregates.Th

esitecomprisesa

narea

ofform

erderelictsew

agetre

atmentw

orks

(operatio

nal

asan

inertw

asterecyclingfacility).

Planning

perm

issionsubm

itted

inMarch

2010

(propo

saltoop

eratean

inertcon

structionand

demolition

wasterecyclingfacilityinvolving

impo

rtationof

approximately100,000tonn

esof

constructio

nanddemolition

wasteayear.T

heapplica

tionwasinpartretro

spectiveasrecyclinga

ctivity

was

ongoing).

Form

erpartof

Sewage

Treatm

entW

orks,

Waterbroo

kRo

ad,

Alto

n(EH156)

Sitehasb

enefitof

vario

usplanning

perm

issions

forbusiness

uses

(B1,B2

andB8

Needtolim

itho

urso

foperatio

n.

●●●

Theaggregaterecyclingfacilityis

subjecttotempo

rary

perm

ission

andtheop

eratorsw

ishforthese

activities

tobecomeperm

anent,

involvingsubstantialinvestm

ent

inthefacility.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:HRT

027

Sitenowcontrolledby

R.Collard

Ltd.Perm

issionfor

developm

entand

operationof

asecondaryaggregate

recyclingfacilitygrantedinMarch

2007.Operatio

nwas

timelim

itedto

wheneverthe

Cem

exquarry

finish

edor

2016

whicheverwas

soon

er,itn

owseem

sthatthiswillbe

2016

astheextensionto

Cem

ex’s

quarryingactivities

hasn

owbeen

approved

to2016.

Land

atWarrenHeath,

Bram

shill(H

R042)

App

licationto

removeexisting

timelimiton

theo

peratio

nof

the

siteandseek

perm

anent

perm

issionforp

ermitted

operations

was

refusedin2008.

Accesstositethroughhaulroad

isgood.

App

ropriatescreeningand

avoidanceo

fimpactso

ntheright

ofway

totheno

rthwouldbe

required.

●●Th

eaggregaterecyclingfacilityis

subjecttotempo

rary

perm

ission

Thesiteop

erates

asan

activewastetra

nsferstatio

n(permitted

1995)and

aggregates

recyclingfacility

(permitted

pre-1991).Th

esite's

concretecrusheris

tempo

rary

untilDecem

ber2

018.

Thisisinlinewith

asiteinSurrey

wherethecrusherreceivesfeedstock

from

.The

wastetransferstationisap

ermanentfacility.

Land

atHollybush

IndustrialPark,

Hollybush

Lane,

Aldershot

(RM025)

Industrialparkhostsa

numbero

f'bad

neighb

ouru

ses'.

andtheop

eratorsw

ishforthese

activities

tobecomeperm

anent

andsupportedby

localplan

policy.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:RMR

006

Siteliesw

ithinEAFloo

dZon

e2andadjacent

tozone

3.


Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations

Identifiedpo

tentialextension

(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite

(plann

ingsitecode)


toEurop

eanenvironm

ental

desig

natio

ns.

Siteliesw

ithinaerodrom

esafeguarding

area.

●Nom

inated

in2006

seekingto

maketheperm

issionperm

anent.

Thishassubsequently

been

superseded

byan

extended

perm

issionforaggregaterecycling

untilNovem

ber2

014.

Nom

inationSiteCode:TTV024

Siteop

erates

anumbero

factivewastefacilities

inclu

ding

aninertlandfill,awastetransferand

recycling

facilityandaconstructio

nanddemolition

waste

recyclingfacilitytoproducesecondaryaggregate.New

perm

issionallowsp

rocessingof

60,000

tpa.

Thruxton

Airfield,

Thruxton

,Andover

(TV009)

Con

figurationof

waste

managem

entactivities

isrelated

tolocationofengineeringw

orks/

race

track

onthesite.

Siteoverliesa

principalaquifer

andsource

protectio

nzone

2.Needto

avoidsig

nificantvisu

alimpacts.

Limitedscop

eto

impo

rtmore

materialsforinfill.

●●●

Theop

erator,R

aymon

dBrow

nno

minated

thesiteinOctob

er2008,toexpressinterestinbo

thsafeguarding

thesiteand

recommending

itforexpansio

n.Subsequent

tothishowever,a

perm

anentfacilityforrecycling

constructio

nanddemolition

waste

was

perm

itted

inOctob

er2009.

Siteisinop

erationasaw

astetra

nsferstatio

nforfarm,

constructio

nanddemolition

waste,including

soil

screening,concretecrushing,m

aterialand

container

storage(permitted

2006).

Land

offA

303,

NearL

ongparish

(RecyclingFacility,

Drayton

Road,B

arton

Stacey)

(TV231)

Sitecurrently

restrictedby

operatingho

urs.

Sitelieso

nap

rincipalaquiferand

incloseproximity

toFloo

dZon

es2and3andSource

Protectio

nZon

es.


toSINC.

Locatedaw

ayfrom

housing.

Goo

dlocatio

ninterm

sof

transpo

rt.

App

licationsubm

itted

in2010

for

variatio

nof

condition

s(including

varyingperm

itted

wastetoinclude

commercial&industrialw

aste).

Granted

March

2011.

Nom

inationSiteCode:TTV028


67 Map showing the distribution of existing aggregate recycling operations with potential to increase aggregaterecycling capacity looked at within table 4.

Map 2 Existing aggregate recycling operations with potential to increase aggregate recycling capacity


Former part of Sewage Treatment Works, Waterbrook Road,Alton

EHS 003East Hampshire

Land at Warren Heath, BramshillHRT 027Hart

HollyBush LaneRMR 006Rushmoor

Thruxton Airfield, ThruxtonTTV 024Test Valley

Near Longparish, AndoverTTV 028Test Valley


Table5Existingaggregaterecyclingop

erations

with

potentialtodiversify

wastemanagem

ento

peratio

ns

Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations

Identifiedpo

tentialextension

(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite

(plann

ingsitecode)

●Siteidentified

in2005

byHam

pshireCo

untyCo

uncil

foritspo

tentialtoho

stafacilityto

process

IncineratorB

ottom

Ash.

Sitecurrently

operates

anaggregates

raildepo

t(perm

itted

pre-1991)and

aggregaterecyclingplant(perm

itted

1995).

TowerLane

Industrial

Estate,Chickenhall

Lane,E

astleigh(EA046)

Potentialimpactof

vehicles

ontheam

enity

oflocalhouses

(noise

anddisturbance

dependingon

timeof

day)isa

keyconsideration.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:ELH

004

Thesiteliesw

ithinan

existing

industrialareaandislessthan

1hectare.

Sitebo

undedto

thewestb

ya

railw

aylineandto

theeastand

southby

twomanufacturin

gcompanies.

Impo

rtationof

concretein2003.

Con

cretebatching

plan

perm

itted

February

2010.A

ctualoperatio

nal

hourstocommence

at5amperm

itted

in2010.

May

conflictw

ithfuture

aspiratio

nsforindustrialsite.

SINCandSSSI

locatedwith

incloseenvirons.

Lies

with

inSouthampton

Airp

ortaerodromesafeguarding

area.

Planning

perm

issionsought

inSeptem

ber2

010forthe

variatio

nof

acondition

toextend

theho

urso

fworking

was

grantedinNovem

ber

2010.

PUSH

area

ofredevelopm

ent-

'Watersid

e'

●●Th

esitewas

nominated

inMarch

2007

andwas

prom

oted

fora

rangeof

furtherw

asteactivities

onsite.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:HRT025

Thesitehasa

nActiveCertificateof

LawfulU

seforp

artofthe

landforthe

recyclingof

constructio

nand

demolition

wastesa

ndsoils

andthe

storageanddistrib

utionof

aggregates

(permitted

2002).Th

esitealso

hasa

dorm

antp

ermissionforsandand

gravelextraction(permitted

pre-1991).

Beacon

HillPits,

Beacon

HillRo

ad,E

wshot

(HR0

05)

Goo

dsiteaccess

Nobuiltdevelopm

ento

n-site.

Bridleway

andfootpath

lieadjacenttothesite'sbo

undaries.

AnSPAliesadjacenttothesite,

whilst

aSINCandancient

woo

dlandexist

onsite.

Siteliesw

ithinan

aerodrom

esafeguarding

area.


Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations

Identifiedpo

tentialextension

(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite

(plann

ingsitecode)

●●●

Nom

inated

inFebruary2008

andFebruary2010

for

allocationasap

ermanentw

astemanagem

entfacility.

Land

isop

positeHaw

kersLo

dgeand

thesite

currently

hastem

poraryuseo

fland

forrecyclingof

inertm

aterialto

producesoils

and

EversleyHaulage

Park,

Eversley,Hook(H

R085)

Existinghaulagepark

(where

otheru

sesa

relikelyto

becompatib

le).

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:HRT021

Adjacenttoexistingmineral

extra

ctionsite.

secondaryaggregates,including

the

useof

screeningandcrushing

equipm

ent(perm

itted

2002)and

the

useo

fawastesortingplant(perm

itted

2004).Units1-8ob

tained

perm

anent

planning

perm

issionviaaLawful

Develop

mentC

ertificate.

Siteliesw

ithinaerodrom

esafeguarding

area.

Networkof

footpathsa

ndbridlewayslieinclosep

roximity.

SiteadjoinsE

versleyQuarry,

andTh

ames

Basin

HeathsS

PAandSSSI.

Size

ofsiteisrestrictivea

ndmay

require

reconfigurationassiteis

lessthan

1hectare.

Siteincludes

aMaterialsRe

covery

Facility(M

RF)and

associated

developm

entsatunits

3,4and8of

thestoragedepo

t.

App

licationsubm

itted

inOctob

er2010

includingforthe

erectio

nof

aWasteRe

ceptionBu

ildingand

perm

anentuseofcerta

inexistingunits

forw

asterecyclingandtra

nsfer

activities,including

therecyclingand

transfero

fnon

putre

scible

construction,demolition,com

mercial,

industrialand

municipalwaste.

Granted

March

2011.


Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations

Identifiedpo

tentialextension

(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite

(plann

ingsitecode)

●●●

Thesitewas

nominated

inJanuary2006

toho

stfurthercon

struction,demolition

andextra

ction

Form

ersand

andgravelquarry

and

processin

gsite(partly

restored).

Processesm

aterialfrom

Nea

Farm

,Somerley(N

F106)

Sitealsohastem

poraryperm

issionfor

aggregaterecyclingop

erations

(permitted

1998).App

licationtovary

timelimittoallow

continuedrecycling

ofinertcon

structionanddemolition

waste(granted

in2002).

BlashfordQuarry,

Ellingham

Harbridge

&Ibsley(N

F097)

Goo

daccess.


toEurop


ndesig

natio

n.wasteprocessin

gfacilities.Th

esitemay

also

besuitableto

hostminor

andenclosed

waste

operations.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:NFT

022

Resid

entialpropertieslie

inclose

proximity

tothesite.

Sitemay

beatriskfrom

flooding.

Footpathslienearby.

●●●

Thesitewas

nominated

inOctob

er2008

fora

perm

anento

rlon

g-term

recyclingfacilityforinert

waste.Identifiedpo

tentialtohandle

100,000-150,000tpaof

inertm

aterials.

Activesandandgravelextra

ctionwith

inertlandfill(permitted

1992)and

aggregatesrecycling(permitted

2001).

Thew

inning

andworking

ofsand

and

graveliswith

progressivereclam

ation

byimpo

rtingandspreadingof

inert

wasteto

restorefarm

land

onadjacent

land.

BuryFarm

(Marchwoo

dQuarry),M

archwoo

d(N

F172)

Siteliesa

djacenttoFloo

dZon

es.

Siteliesa

djacenttoSINCsa

ndEurop

eandesig

natio

ns.

Nom

inationSiteCod

es:N

FT003,NFT

021&

NFT

060

Siteliesw

ithin250m

oftheN

ewFo

restNationalPark.

Issueswith

HGVtraffico

nBu

ryRo

adandaccidents.

Anoverallreviewof

operations

atMarchwoo

dQuarrywas

undertaken

in2010.

Applicationforextensio

nof

timeu

ntil

June

2012

wasgrantedFebruary2011.

●●Th

esite,plusadjoining

land,w

asno

minated

inMay

2007,onbehalfoftheformerwasterecyclingfacility

atthesite.SeeNom

inationSiteCode:SC

C002.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:SC

C011

Siteisprimarily

vacant,and

has

previouslybeen

operated

asawaste

facility

undertaking

aggregaterecycling.

App

licationforcrushingandstorage

refusedin1996.

NetworkRa

ilSite,

EmpressR

oad,

Southampton

(SN059)

Accessissues-vehicles

parked

alon

gtheroad.

Siteiswith

inFloo

dRisk

Zon

es2and3.

Resid

entialpropertiesa

nda

scho

olwith

in100m

.


Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations

Identifiedpo

tentialextension

(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite

(plann

ingsitecode)

Thesite

isow

nedby

NetworkRa

iland

issafeguardedinthelocalplanfor

railfreight

uses.

●Th

esite's

operatorsn

ominated

thesiteinMarch

2007

tosuggestthe

useof

thesitefora

waste

transferstation.Th

esite

operatorsp

ursued

approval

forthe

existingtem

poraryaggregaterecyclingfacility

tobe

madeaperm

anento

peratio

n.Nom

inationSiteCod

e:TTV002

Thesitecurrently

existsasa

sand

and

gravelprocessin

gfacility,forthe

impo

rtation,storage,anddistrib

ution

ofland

won

aggregates,m

arine

dredgedaggregates,secon

dary

aggregates

andbagged

cement.Th

esitealso

hostsanaggregates

recycling

facility(permitted

2000).Site

comprisesthe

existingLeeLane

yard,

anarea

of1.6hectares.

LeeLane,N

ursling

(TV055)

Accessissues(vehicles

would

passho

using).

Sitefully

developed(limited

scop

eforaddition

alcapacity).

ASSSI

liesn

earby,to

thewest

ofthesite.

Siteliesc

lose

toachurch

and

resid

entialproperties.

Akeyconsiderationistheneed

toavoidimpactso

nam

enity

from

thesiteitselfand

the

off-siteimpactso

florrytra

ffic.

Anapplication,allow

ingfora

totalsite

throughp

utof

C&D

wastesa

ndsoils

of75,000

tonn

esperannum

was

granted(Ju

ly2010).Th

iswas

withdraw

nandarevisedconsolidation

applicationford

epot,recycling,

concreteplantand

officeswasgranted

subjecttolegalagreement(Octob

er2010).

Currently

subject

topla

nning

application

Thesouthern

portionof

thesouthsectionof

the

Bunn

yLane

sitewasno

minated

inDecem

ber2

008

byR.

F.Salvidge

(Farms)Ltdforb

oththe

developm

ento

faperm

anentS

trategicRe

cycling

Facility,(asa

perm

anentexpansio

nto

theexisting

facility)andanewHouseho

ldWasteRe

cycling

Centre

(relocatedfrom

Casbroo

k).

Siteiscomprisedof

aform

erinert

landfill,partially

restored

back

togreenfieldland.Th

ewestern

corner

ofthesite(Bunny

Lane

Recycling

Centre

)has

tempo

rary

perm

ission

(until2015)for

inert,woo

dand

non-inertrecyclingandwaste

plasterboard

storage.

Bunn

yLane,T

imsbury

(Southernsection)

(TV066)

Siteislocatedwith

inthe

countryside.

Any

plansfor

thissitewould

need

tobe

considered

inconjunctionwith

futureplans

forinertlan

dfillingby

SITA

(the

operator

leasingtheno

rthern

portion

ofthesouthernsection).

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:TTV022


Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations

Identifiedpo

tentialextension

(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite

(plann

ingsitecode)

Anapplicationwas

subm

itted

inNovem

ber2

010to

retainandextend

therecyclingfacilitywith

ancillary

developm

entand

activities

(thiswas

refusedinAugust2011).

Accessissuesa

ndsite

configurationto

beresolved.

Somec

o-locatio

npo

tentialw

ithYo

kesfordHilltra

nsferstatio

n.

●Th

eland

immediatelysouthof

Rudd

Lane,along

with

someof

theland

with

inthesouthern

section

(see

above)was

nominated

bySITA

inDecem

ber

2008.T

hisn

ominationsought

toprom

ote

pre-tre

atmentprio

rtono

n-hazardouslandfillingby

anaerobicdigestionwith

electricitygeneratio

n,in-vesselcom

posting&provision

ofanewHWRC

(replacingtheCasbroo

ksite).

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:TTV039

Siteisform

ersand

andgravel

workings,comprisedof

twoareas

northandsouthof

Rudd

Lane.T

hesectionno

rthof

Rudd

Lane

was

sub-lea

sedtoRaym

ondBrow

nin2006

who

areactivelyu

ndertaking

low-level

restoration.

Theland

immediately

southof

Rudd

Lane

isno

tinactive

useandiscomprisedof

unrestored

mineralworkings.

Bunn

yLane,T

imsbury

(Northernsection)

(HuntsFarm

Sandpit,

Rudd

Lane)(TV

066)

Siteislocatedwith

inthe

countryside.

Siteisrestored.

Accessissuesa

ndsite

configurationto

beresolved.


68 Map showing the distribution of existing aggregate recycling operations with potential to diversify wastemanagement operations looked at within table 5.

Map 3Existing aggregate recycling operations with potential to diversify wastemanagement operations



Eastleigh Rail Aggregates Terminal, EastleighELH 004Eastleigh

Beacon HillHRT 025Hart

Blashford Processing Plant, BlashfordNFT 022New Forest

Marchwood Quarry extension, MarchwoodNFT 003New Forest

Bury Farm, MarchwoodNFT 021New Forest

Marchwood QuarryNFT 060New Forest



Network Rail site, Empress RoadSCC 011Southampton

Lee Lane Recycling Plant, NurslingTTV 002Test Valley

Recycling site at Bunny Lane, TimsburyTTV 022Test Valley

Thruxton Airfield, ThruxtonTTV 024Test Valley

Hunts Farm SandpitTTV 039Test Valley


Table6Othermineralsandwastesiteswith

potentialtodiversify

operations

(includ

ingexistin

gland

filloperatio

ns,formermineralextractio

nop

erations

etc)

Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations

Identifiedpo

tentialextension

(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite(plann

ing

sitecode)

●●●

Sitewas

originallyno

minated

inNovem

ber

2006.Itw

asproposed

thatinadditiontofurth

erSitehash

istoryof

chalkextra

ction,

which

hasn

owceased.

KingsclereLimeQuarry,

Wolverton

(BA055)

Wellscreened.

Siteliesw

ithinNorth

Wessex

Dow

nsAONB.

extra

ctionandinertinfill,thatthe

sitebe

suitableforaggregatesrecycling.

Furtherto

Anapplicationwas

received

forthe

Con

structionandop

erationof

amaterialsrecyclingfacilityandtra

nsfer

stationforconstruction,demolition

and

excavatio

nwaste,including

the

impo

rtationof

inertfillto

foran

engineered

basedandlocalised

road

improvem

entsto

theA339andsite

accessinFebruary

2012.

Overlies

aprincipalaquifer.

this,

anEIA

screeningop

inionwas

sought

inJuly2009

basedon

thepartialinfillingof

the

form

erlim

equarry

with

inertw

aste&theuse

ofthesiteforrecyclingandtra

nsfero

finert,

constructio

nanddemolition

waste.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:BSD

013

Historicbuildingslie

nearthesite.

Con

eygroveCop

se,a

semi-n

aturalancientw

oodland

existso

npartof

thesite.

Greenfieldsite

Highw

ayimprovem

entsneeded.

Wouldneed

toinvestigateall

environm

entalimpacts.

●Sitewas

nominated

foritspo

tentialtofurther

hostwasteprocessin

gop

erations

such

asconstructio

n&demolition

wasterecycling,

greenwastecompo

stingandsoiltre

atment

operations.

Previous

interestinusingsiteform

anagem

ent

ofgreenwaste.

Sitehash

istoryof

chalkextra

ction,

which

hasn

owceased.Sitehaslandfill

planning

perm

ission(subjectto

pollutio

ncontrol).

Sitecurrently

hosts

anactivetem

poraryaggregatesrecycling

facility(permitted

2000).

ButserHillLimeQuarry,

Portsm

outh

Road,

Petersfield(EH003)

Footpath

liesadjacenttothesite.

Southern

tipof

siteoverlies

source

protectio

nzone

3.Siteliesw

ithintheSouthDow

nsNationalPark.

Asemi-n

aturalancientw

oodland

andSINCexist

onthemajority

ofthesite.

Thereispo

tentialfor

recyclingintheno

rthern

corner.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:EHS023

Highw

ayvisib

ilityto

thesouthis

belowstandard.

Highw

aysA

gencylikely

torequire

atrafficimpactassessment.Good

accessto

theA3motorway.

●In

2008,the

operatorso

fthe

siteatSelborne

Brickw

orks

(Tow

erBrickandTileLimited)

suggestedtheidea

ofinstallingabiodigesterat

thesite.

Sitewas

previouslyused

forclay

extra

ctionandinertlandfill.Upuntil

early

2005

thesitewas

also

used

for

wasterecycling.

SelbourneBrickw

orks,

Selbourne(EH015)

Potentialimpacton

thelocal

highway

network.

Networkof

footpathsliecloseto

theno

rthof

thesite.

Europ

eanenvironm

ental

desig

natio

nslie

closeto

thesite.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:EHS031


Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations

Identifiedpo

tentialextension

(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite(plann

ing

sitecode)

Anapplicationforananaerobicd

igester

andassociated

developm

entw

assubm

itted

inAugust2010.

Prop

osalfor

anaerobicdigesterincludinglagoon

srefusedinNovem

ber2

010as

itwas

adeparturefrom

developm

entP

lanand

wouldhave

aperceived

adversea

menity

impactof

neighb

ourin

gdw

ellings.

Visu

alimpacton

countryside

locatio

nandproximity

ofSouth

Dow

nsNationalParkarekey

considerations.

Close

proximity

toho

uses

(potentialforam

enity

disturbance

toresid

ents.)

●●Sitewas

nominated

dueto

thesite's

apparent

potentialtoho

stbiom

asstechn

ologyandits

furtherp

otentialfor

inertvoidfilling.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:EHS034

Thesiteiscurrently

used

forthe

the

extra

ctionof

softsand

(until2016)and

theinfillingof

inertm

aterial.

Land

atFrith

endQuarry,

Sleaford,B

ordon

(EH121)

Well-screenedsitewith

good

access.

Siteinop

encountryside.

Footpath

crossessite.

Siteoverliesa

principalaquifer.

ASINCliesw

ithinthesite's

boundaries.

●Siteoperator

hassuggested

thatasectio

nof

the

sitecouldbe

used

foro

therwasteuses

such

aspre-tre

atmento

ftransferw

aste.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:ELH

019

Form

ernon-inertlandfill,followingsoft

sand

extra

ction,completed

in2008.In

2005

planning

perm

issionwas

granted

todevelopapowergeneratio

nplant

usinglandfillgas

generatedby

the

landfillsite.

FairOak

Landfill/

East

HortonFarm

,FairO

ak(EA083)

Sitenearingrestoration.

Footpathse

xistnearsite.

Siteliesw

ithinaerodrom

esafeguarding

area.

Land

ownershipissues.

Impacton

adjacent

resid

ential

propertiesisa

keyc

onsid

eration.


Potentialto

providenew

capacity

Siteconsiderations

Identifiedpo

tentialextension

(nom

inated

bysiteop

erators)

History

ofsiteuses

ExistingSite(plann

ing

sitecode)

●●●

Siteno

minated

in2006

byNetworkRa

il.Th

esitearean

ominated

(2.3hectares)isgreaterthan

theexistingsite(0.8hectares).Existingrail

depo

tiscon

sidered

capableo

faccom

modating

additio

naldem

and,forimpo

rtingaggregates,

plus

may

have

potentialfor

thetra

nshipm

ent

ofwastematerials.

Develop

mentfor

suitable

wasteuses

islikelyto

besupp

orted,as

long

astheop

erationas

anaggregatedepo

tisn

otprejudiced.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:FH

M001

Existingandactiveaggregatedepo

timpo

rtingcrushedrock

forlocal

distrib

ution.

Operatedby

Hanson

(underPerm

itted

Develop

mentrights

asrailyard

land

use).

FarehamAggregatesR

ail

Depot,StationApproach,

FarehamStation(FA048)

Noscop

eforp

hysicalexpansion

ofsite.

Sitehase

stablishedrailaccess.

Resid

entialpropertiesadjacentto

thesiteto

theno

rth.

Siteiswellscreened,butpotential

impactso

nam

enity

shouldbe

considered.

Localaspirations

toredevelopthe

sitelongerterm

fortow

ncentre

uses

(ifalternativeforraildepot

isidentified).

Allocatedforemploymentuse(if

nolongersafeguarded).

Narrowsiterestricts

configurationof

activitieson

site.

●●●

Thesite

wasno

minated

inJanuary2

006forthe

potentialuse

ofin-vesselorw

indrow

Activesand

andgravelextra

ctionwith

inertlandfill(permitted

1992)and

aggregates

recycling(permitted

2000).

Perm

itted

forthe

winning

andworking

ofsand

andgravelwith

progressive

reclam

ationby

impo

rtingandspreading

ofinertw

asteto

restorefarm

land

onadjacent

land.

Bury

Farm

(Marchwoo

dQuarry),M

archwoo

d(N

F172)

SiteliesadjacenttoFloo

dZon

es.

Siteliesa

djacenttoSINCsa

ndEurop

eandesig

natio

ns.

compo

sting,thesitewas

also

nominated

for

theuseof

acceptingandstoringIBA.

Nom

inationSiteCodes:N

FT003,NFT

021

&NFT

060(also

seeabovere.aggrega

terecycling

element).

Siteliesw

ithin250m

oftheNew

ForestNationalPark.

●●●

Thesitewas

nominated

inFebruary

2006,

identifiedforexpanding

anddiversifyingwaste

operations

ontheexistingraildepo

tsite.

Nom

inationSiteCod

e:WCC008

Sitecurrently

existsa

sanactive

aggregates

raildepo

twhich

allowsfor

theimpo

rtationof

sand,hardstone,

recycled

asph

altp

lanings(RA

P)and

recycled

concreteforu

seinan

existing

asph

altp

lant.Lo

catedwith

inthe

Hillsons

Road

IndustrialE

state.

BotleyRa

ilAggregates

Term

inal,C

urdridge

(WR0

81)

Siteliesa

djacenttoacaravan

park.

Aconservatio

narea

liesadjacent

tothesite.

Footpath

crossessite.

Siteliesw

ithinan

aerodrom

esafeguarding

area.

With

inan

existingindustrialarea.

Traffic

impacts.


70 Map showing the distribution of other minerals and waste sites with potential to diversify operations(including existing landfill operations, former mineral extraction operations etc) looked at within table 6.

Map 4 Other minerals and waste sites with potential to diversify operations (including existing landfilloperations, former mineral extraction operations etc)



Kingsclere Lime QuarryBSD 013Basingstoke

Butser Lime Quarry, former chalk quarryEHS 023East Hampshire

Selbourne BrickworksEHS 031East Hampshire

FrithendEHS 034East Hampshire

East Horton FarmELH 019Eastleigh

Fareham Depot, FarehamFHM 001Fareham



Marchwood Quarry extension, MarchwoodNFT 003New Forest

Bury Farm, MarchwoodNFT 021New Forest

Marchwood QuarryNFT 060New Forest

Botley Depot, BotleyWCC 008Winchester


Section 6 Nominated sites currently allocated for employment uses

72 As part of the site search and nomination process, a number of sites were identified which are located withinexisting employment and industrial areas. The adopted Hampshire Minerals & Waste Core Strategy providespolicy support for waste management developments (excluding landfill) on employment land, preferablyco-located with complementary activities (see policy DC13). 'Employment land' consists of both developedand undeveloped land (the latter includes land which is undeveloped currently, but is allocated for employmentuses in Local Plans). Further, guidance on preparing waste plans(31)explains that waste management needsare changing, and most activities are now suitable for industrial locations.

73 Certain waste management activities, often housed in enclosed industrial premises, can fall within the generalindustrial class in the Use Classes Order(32). It is therefore feasible that the built development which hostsindustrial operations could be adapted and modified to host waste management activities (subject to thenecessary permission and licences). Indeed, it is recognised that some of the best opportunities for drivingwaste management up the waste hierarchy are likely to exist through on-site management of Commercial& Industrial (C&I), Construction & Demolition (C&D) and agricultural wastes.

74 Based on the characteristics of the industrial locations illustrated by the site nominations below, it is likelythat such sites would be more suitable for development categories 3-6 (activities requiring enclosed industrialpremises (small or large scale depending on the site) and activities requiring an enclosed building with stack(small and large scale depending on the site).

75 The following sites are those specifically nominated which are formerly allocated as employment land, orare located on industrial sites in Hampshire(33). There are also a number of sites which lie adjacent toemployment and industrial land, and as a result have strong associations with industrial uses which havebeen included within this section, despite the fact they do not strictly lie on allocated employment or industrialland.

In addition to the nominated sites included in this section, a study has been prepared to demonstratethe industrial and employment areas inHampshire which are deemedmost suitable for waste uses(34).Please consult this accompanying study for further information about the industrial estatesmentionedbelow and the assessment of their suitability as a general location for waste management facilities.

31 DCLG (2006) Planning for Sustainable Waste Management: Companion Guide to Planning Policy Statement 10.32 The Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987. SI 1987 No. 76433 Two nominated sites which, although either being allocated for employment or existing on industrial estates, have not been included within this section due to the

nature of the site being suited to a specific industry, for example rail sidings. See NFT 037 Totton Yard and PCC 005 Fratton Freight Site.34 The Suitability of Industrial Areas for Waste Management in Hampshire.


BSD 004 Kingsclere Chipping Depot, Kingsclere

Local authority: Basingstoke & Deane Borough CouncilSite Area: Total area of business park approximately 2.4 hectares. Nominated site area approximately 0.54hectares. Previously developed land.

71

KEEPS

Keeps

25

PEEL

House

New

LB

Fairvi

ew 81

107

69

12

PlantagenetQueen Isabelle Ho

7

Kingsclere Park

12

73

71

28

48

6

17

MEAD

7

ESS

MEADOW

House

House

14

18

98.5m

Broad

3

46

4

King John

3

93

Cottage

Millmead

4

9

Coldridge's Farm

Blackberry Barn

House

GARD

ENS

Council Yard

15

Prince Henry House

6

55 to

61

Oak

9

63

House

79

Path

The

WELLMANS

Watership Barn

NEWBURY

El Sub Sta

26-29

1

2

21

53

5

11

Sunrise

Play Area34

8

14

1

Rose Hodson Court

Houses

1

16

1

El Su

b Sta

30

9

2

HARDYS FIELD

Meadow6

Kingsbrook

ROAD

Kingsclere

98.5m

22-25

Park

55

19

17

8

Queen Eleonor House

50

Orchard

1

14

97.4m

18

Coldridge House

2

Freemantle

Prince Richard

Police

20

10

Kenway

2

42

1

91

94.0m

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

Basingstoke and Deane

Deliverability & key issues to be addressed

i. Potential impacts on adjacent historic character would need to be avoided.ii. The proximity to residential properties and impacts on amenity are key considerations.iii. Land ownership is to be determined.iv. Site has good access and is well screened.v. Site has good connections to strategic road network.

Nomination

76 The site was nominated in November 2005.


Site history & background

77 The nominated site lies within Kingsclere Park a generally well occupied and well presented commercialsite covering an area of approximately 2.4ha. Kingsclere Park is allocated for employment uses withinBasingstoke and Deane's Local Plan, and is northwest of Kingsclere historic village. The nominated sitecovers an area of approximately 0.54ha and lies within an area which is well screened from surroundinghighways by vegetation.

Assessment findings:

Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 2and 3. This is due to the general character of the existing infrastructure and screening of the site. Proposalsfor such uses would need to address the deliverability issues identified above. The suitability of this site forother larger scale development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to the proximityto residential properties, site size and historic character etc).

CommentsAssessment criteria

Protection of waterresources

EA Flood Zones lie approximately 250m to the east of the siteSite does not overlie any groundwater vulnerability zones or source protection zones

Visual intrusion Elevated land lies to the south and east of the siteSite does not lie within national park, AONB or green belt landLandscape Type: Settlement (Kingsclere)Landscape Character Area: North Hampshire Lowland Mosaic (2a)

Nature conservation Local environmental designations lie within 1km of the site.No European environmental designations lie within 5km of the site

Historic environment andbuilt heritage

Conservation area lies within 300m to the south of the siteHistoric buildings lie adjacent to the sites boundaries and a small group of historic buildings lie to thenorth west of the site.Site does not impact on any scheduled ancient monuments

Traffic & access Site lies adjacent to, and has good access to, the Primary Route Network (A339)Site does not lie in close proximity to any alternative modes of transport

Proximity to sensitivehuman & environmentalreceptors

Site lies on edge of urban settlement, although adjacent to residential properties approximately 50mawayOne school lies within 1km of the siteAllotments lie in close proximity to the site

Proximity to aerodromesafeguarding areas

Site does not lie within aerodrome safeguarding area

Potential land use conflict Site lies adjacent to allocated employment land.

Opportunity forco-location

No opportunity for co-location of waste management facilities

Other issues (e.g. publicrights of way)

A network of footpaths lie in close proximity to the site


ELH 006 Site Adjacent to Waste Water Treatment Works, Eastleigh

Local authority: Eastleigh Borough Council (currently allocated for employment development within industrialuse classes (subject to a number of criteria in order to protect surrounding environmental designations(35).)Site Area: 7.6 hectaresNOTE:Only a proportion of this site would be available for waste management uses (subject to a developmentplot becoming available).

Traver

se Table

13.7m

MP.25

2

13.7m

Viaduct

(disused)

SB

Works

175

Tk

Drain

CHICKEN HALL LANE

Signal

10.4m

Track

Path (um)

The Itchen Navigation

Conveyor

El Sub Sta

Tank

1

Pond

122

136

Track

Path

Playground

Light

Track

Sewage Works

Tk

Track

149

161

El Sub Sta Gas Gov

Path (um)

Tanks

Tk

Works

11.9m

FB

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

Fareham

Eastleigh

City of Southampton


i. The strategic location of this site in relation to rail / road access should be maximised when consideringappropriate waste uses on this site.

ii. Any potential air pollution or hydrological issues likely to affect the River Itchen (SAC) need to be consideredas part of the Habitats Regulations Assessment process.

iii. Measures to avoid water pollution potentially arising through percolation into the ground or surface run-offmay be necessary (depending on type of facility).

iv. Chickenhall Lane/ Bishopstoke Road and the A335 are already heavily congested and a Transport Assessmentis likely to be required containing traffic-flow data for these routes. Modelling of the Chickenhall Lane/Bishopstoke Road roundabout is also likely to be required.

v. It is yet to be determined as to whether proposals would be acceptable in the absence of the link-road.

35 (saved policy 112.E in the Eastleigh Borough Council Local Plan Review. Adopted May 2006 (Special Policy Area)


vi. The capacity of the Itchen floodplain should be maintained.vii. The Aerodrome Safeguarding Zone will have implications for the type of waste uses which could be

developed (including the design and operation).

Nomination

78 This site was nominated in 2006 by Southern Water. It is located south of the Chickenhall Waste WaterTreatment Works.


79 The site is owned by Prysmian and is vacant and undeveloped. The site is located to the south of ChickenhallLane and is adjacent to a large industrial estate (Tower Industrial Estate). The potential for locating wasteuses on this site have been considered previously. This site is located in Eastleigh and therefore strategicallylocated to serve the urban populations of South Hampshire. The potential for rail access also means thissite provides an opportunity to transport material by sustainable means. The size of the site, and its proximityto heat and power demand (e.g. the neighbouring industrial uses) may also justify a strategic facility at thissite. There may be an opportunity to coordinate the development of an energy-from-waste facility with thewider redevelopment of the Riverside employment area.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 3-5.The ability to address the issues identified above would determine the acceptable uses. An enclosed wastefacility is likely to be more acceptable due to the proximity to sensitive habitats. The suitability of this site forother development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (particularly any proposals for alarge building with a stack, due to the proximity to the airport).



Site lies on a secondary aquifer.Flood zones 2 and 3 lie adjacent to the site on the eastern boundary.

Visual intrusion Potential to enhance the landscape from nearby critical viewpoints, such as the Itchen Way footpathand from more distant vantage points.Landscape Type: River Valley Floor / Settlement and Landscape Character Area: Itchen Valley (3c)

Nature conservation Very close (100m) from River Itchen SAC/ SSSI.Local records of otter and slow worm. Other potential species would be reptiles, water vole.


Roman Building recorded in the adjacent waste water treatment works.

Traffic & access Located to the southern most end of Chickenhall Lane.Suitable road access is presently problematic; the Strategic Road Network (M3) is approximately 3.5kmfrom the site.The accident record at this site should be taken into consideration, also capacity improvements arelikely to be needed along Bishopstoke Road to mitigate against the impact of traffic increases.Capacity assessments carried out indicate that the Chickenhall Lane/B3037 – Bishopstoke Road miniroundabout is nearing capacity.Not currently rail-connected. Potential for rail access to be assessed.




Small area of wet woodland on site.The amenity of residents of Campbell Road should not be adversely affected by proposals.Site adjacent but not up-wind of an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA).


Southampton International Airport is adjacent to the site.

Potential land use conflict Future masterplanning for Riverside development area to be confirmed.


Site is adjacent to an aggregate rail depot (Eastleigh Depot) and aggregate recycling facility (EastleighLocal Distribution Centre).


Public Rights of way (RoW) along the eastern boundary.


ELH 014 Land at Dutton Lane, Eastleigh

Local authority: Eastleigh Borough CouncilSite Area: 1.45 hectare. Previously developed land.

Bernie Tunstall Place

OlsonHouse

Sub Sta

(PH)

16

17.1m

S Gan

tries

CR

TCB

5062

Works

13.4m

Godfrey

Club

15.5m

Station

Drag

El Sub Sta

13.7m

DUTTON LANE

Works

2

15.2m LEIGH ROAD

16aThe Wagon Works

8

TWYFORD ROAD

1

3

Barton Park

5113

414

5

1

14

Bank

Club

WB

4 to 6

15.2m

SOUTHAMPTON ROAD

COLES

CLOSE

35a

2672

6 to 10

Club

Wessex House

31d

El

Earth

1

1b

(PH)

22 to

24

Industrial Estate

86

3

38

Allotment Gardens

El Sub Sta

House

to

16.8m

Ward Bdy

BISHOPSTOKE ROAD

Depot

37

4

14

7

1

Eastleigh House

1 to 26

20

STATION HILL

Car Park

MP .5

Sand

2

5

Black Horse

1 1e

4 2

El Sub Sta

18

Signa

l Box

3525

1

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

Fareham

Eastleigh

City of Southampton


i. Access into the site is the main issue with regards to further development of this site. A feasible solutionto improve access/ provide an alternative access will require investigation.

ii. The proximity to residential properties on Dutton Lane and potential impacts on amenity are keyconsiderations.

iii. The potential use of rail sidings warrants further investigation.iv. Any potential impacts on the River Itchen need to be considered as part of the Habitats Regulations

Assessment process.v. The Aerodrome Safeguarding Zone may restrict the type of waste uses which could be developed (including

the design and operation).vi. Potential co-location opportunities (see EHS020 Withys Meadow).vii. Potential to deliver waste uses without significantly altering the current form and scale of the existing site

use.


Nomination

80 The site was identified by Hampshire County Council in 2009, and has also been promoted by the privatesector. This site has previously been considered for an Household Waste Recycling Centre (HWRC). It islikely that enclosed waste uses would be more appropriate considering the exposed nature of the site.


81 The site is located within an industrial area adjacent to the railway off Dutton Lane. The site is to be clearedexcept for a 6 bay vehicle workshop and diesel storage tanks. The site is currently being leased to a deliveryand collection company, whilst Network Rail are the freeholder of the site. The site is currently occupiedby modern warehouses and storage areas.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 2and 3. This is due to the surrounding industrial area and existing built infrastructure on the site. Proposalsfor such uses would need to address the deliverability issues identified above. The suitability of this site forother enclosed development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to the proximityto residential properties and access issues etc).



Site lies on a secondary aquifer.Flood Zones 2 and 3 lie approximately 0.15km to the east of the site.

Visual intrusion Site is at a low elevation.Along the south part of the site adjacent to the B3037 Bishopstoke Road it is landscaped with hedgesand trees.Visual impact is considered to be neutral to slight adverse due to existing industrial buildings in vicinity.There are no landscape designations surrounding the site.The impact on townscape character is judged to be neutral to slight adverse.Landscape Type: Townscape (Eastleigh)Landscape Character Area: Itchen Valley (3c)

Nature conservation The River Itchen, SAC and SSSI lies approximately 0.11km to the north east of the site.Four SINCs lie within 1km of the site.

Historic environmentand built heritage

Approximately 18 Historic buildings lie within 1km of the site.Building associated with the history of Eastleigh railway works, which are of industrial archaeologicalimportance, and are significant in the local history of the area, which may take on increasing significancein townscape character.Approximately 0.47km to the east of the site lies a Conservation area.Five Historic parks and gardens lie within 1km of the site.

Traffic & access The Strategic Road Network (M3) is approximately 2km west of the site.The access road to the site is Dutton Lane. Depending on the size of the site, size of loads and numberof additional HGV movements etc, the junction may need to be upgraded (at significant cost).Bishopstoke Road on which Dutton Lane is located, is congested in the peak with high numbers of HGVmovements.Site is within Eastleigh urban area.Eastleigh Rail station is approximately 0.15km away from the site.



Proximity to sensitivehuman& environmentalreceptors

The closest residential properties lie adjacent on the east side of the site, at either side of Dutton Laneand along Barton Road. Other residential properties lie the other side of the railway line on the west sideof the site.Two nursing and residential Care homes lie approximately 0.21km away from the site.One Allotment lies 0.07km to the east of the site.Within 1km to the west and north west of the of the site lie five Schools.0.46km to the east of the site lies a footpath.


Site lies within Southampton aerodrome safeguarding area.

Potential land useconflict

Local Plan(36) states any development in the Dutton Lane industrial area or vicinity, which leads to anincrease in traffic onDutton Lane, increase in noise or loss of amenity will not be permitted until alternativeaccess is provided.


Approximately 1.3km to the north west of the site lies Woodside Avenue HWRC.


None identified.

36 Policy 121.E Eastleigh Local Plan 2006-2011.


ELH 017 Avalon, Parham Drive, Boyatt Wood

Local authority: Eastleigh Borough Council (currently allocated for employment uses)(37).Site Size: 1.84 hectares

PARHAM DRIVE

JUDD CLOSE

WOODSIDE

AVEN

UE

WOODSIDE ROAD

British

Hall

1 to 15

Buildings

Southampton District

El Sub Sta

Motorcycle Club

Channon Retail Park

Quarry Yard

Woodside Trade Centre

Gas Governor

Red C

ross

Tank

Depot

Woodside House

4

36

7

39

261

33

46

1

38

Hall ¯ 0 100 200 m"

"

"

"

"

"

"

FarehamGosport

Eastleigh

Winchester

New Forest

Test Valley

City of Southampton


i. Residential properties lie in close proximity to the siteii. Local environmental designations lie in close proximity to the nominated siteiii. European nature conservation designated sites lie within 1km of the nominated siteiv. Allotments lie close to the sites boundariesv. Footpath lies within the nominated sites industrial area.

Nomination

82 The site was nominated in July 2009 (identified by Hampshire County Council).

37 Eastleigh Borough Council Local Plan- Existing Employment Areas (117.E and 118.E).



83 The nominated site covers an area of approximately 1.84 hectare and lies within Boyatt Wood IndustrialEstate. The site has good transport linkages and hosts large industrial units on site, although the site alsosuffers from access and internal traffic circulation issues. Depending on use, it’s likely that vehicles willneed to be routed from the north, and additionally the number of additional HGV movements etc willdetermine whether junction enhancements are required. The site was identified as a potential sites for thereplacement of Eastleigh's Household Waste Recycling Centre. The site may have access to the railwayline, and has good access to the M3 motorway.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 3and 4. Proposals for such an enclosed facility would need to demonstrate appropriate reuse of the existingbuildings on the site. The suitability of this site for other development categories would need to be demonstratedby applicants (due to the proximity to existing and proposed new residential development).



Site overlies a secondary aquiferSite lies within 200m of EA Flood Zones 2 and 3

Visual intrusion Site lies within South Hampshire Lowland and Heath Landscape Character Area

Nature conservation Site lies adjacent to SINCs and ancient woodlandsSite lies within 1km of European nature conservation designations


No historic buildings lie in close proximity to the site

Traffic and access The Strategic Road Network (M3) is within 1km of the site.Site can be accessed via Woodside AvenueRailway line lies adjacent to the site

Proximity to sensitivehuman andenvironmental receptors

Residential properties lie adjacent to the site boundaryAllotments lie adjacent to the siteCare homes lie in close proximity; Six schools lie within 1km of the site


Site lies within aerodrome safeguarding area (Southampton)


Planned new residential development along Woodside avenue to be considered.


HWRC lies adjacent to the sites southern boundary (although earmarked for relocation)


Footpath crosses site


FHM 006/ 009 Little Park Farm Road, Segensworth

Local authority: Fareham Borough CouncilSite Area: 6.6 hectares*Also see FHM 012 below.NOTE:Only a proportion of this site would be available for waste management uses (subject to a developmentplot becoming available).

1

Yale Cottage

El Sub Sta

CR

20

23

Post

4

24

Tanks

9

30

23

CH

24

209

101

31

95

COLL

INGW

ORTH

RISE

BADGERS COPSE

69

2

7

3

FARM ROAD

6

9

Co Co

nst, C

P & ED

Bdy

6

5

5

7

Fulcrum 1

Drain

21.6m

27

28

KINGD

OM CL

OSE

5

16

13

4

4

St Elmo

Windruf f

22

1a

FF

15

65

31

38

39 to

61

61

65

Shirlaine

1

9

4

15

12

25

Tank

1

3

WAY

El Sub Sta

1

Track

Pond

16

0.91m

RH

Drain

El Sub Sta

9

MP .25

M 27

Sub Sta

April Rise

17

PARK MEWS

27

24to

29

Swanwick

Def

6

LITTLE FOX DRIVE

85

2

76

26

Track

2

33

5

83

7

COCK

EREL

L CLO

SE

Mast

4

Gull Coppice

49

ADAMS WAY

5

Track

El Sub Sta

4

DEWAR CLOSE

3

14

2

Track

Depot

ETL

3

Tank

1

15

12

Mast

12

SL

LOWE

R DUN

CAN R

OAD

15

RH9

11

Nursery

DUNCAN ROAD

CO LLIN GWORTH

CH

20

RIS E

2

SQUIRREL

41

21

1

TELF

ORD

WAY

Industrial

11

Tank

12

Issues

A 27

SOLEN

T WAY

El Sub Sta

8

12

7

El

Edenholme

Barle y B usi nes s Pa rk

14

11

2

108

ED &

Ward

Bdy

LOWER

12

8034

15

23

41

MP 10.75

37 to

47

1

5

Playground

CL

BADGERS COPSE

El Sub Sta

5

Bungalow

Mast

Path (um)

1

5

(Industrial Estate)

Issues

Barrat

Park

4

20

Path (um)

Def

Co Co

nst, C

P & ED

Bdy

3

10

2

8

ED &

Ward

Bdy

El Sub Sta

26

34

El Sub Sta

Drain

Drain

Drain

WHITE

LEY WA

Y

10

45

Windun Lodge

Coquetdale

Works

3

1

85

5

92

8 to 30

Hill

84

33

37

71

71

47

10

9

Kennels

Rumahsaya

2

6

WHITTLE AVENUE

6

25.4m

6

Pond

t

0.91m RH

1

FFCR

Subway

Def

36

1

4 6

Tank

24

14

Lannoch Tor

FF

1

1a

10

10

40

42

51

14

15

49

3

10

11

RED OAKS DRIVE

Lone Va lle y

and Cattery

3

CROMPTON

CR

Ward Bdy

Signal Post

El Sub Sta

1

El Sub Sta

Fulcrum 1

Def

Path (um)

4

3

El Sub Sta

2

Co Const, CP & ED Bdy

1

32

33

11

RH

14

SOUTHAMPTON ROAD

19

6

55

RED

OAKS

DRIV

E

59

35

29

16

14

75

Gas Gov

Travelling Crane

8

M 27

Segensworth West

Apple Industrial Estate

11

Mile Post 11

LITTLE PARK

Lesa nto

18

22.7m

0.91m RH

Path

(um)

Sinks

1

14

¯ 0 100 200 m"

"

Fareham

Gosport


i. Access into the site is the main issue with regards to further development of this site. A feasible solutionto improve access to the site is needed to support any future proposals for waste uses. One option couldbe improvement of the existing bridge beneath the railway line (subject to agreement from Network Railand Hampshire County Council). Road access would be through Segensworth West Industrial Estate, andwill also need to consider transport impacts in the wider road network.

ii. A habitat survey likely to be required prior to any development (great crested newts can utilise habitat upto 500m from waterbody).

iii. Any suitable facility would require appropriate siting, with suitable mitigation to avoid damage/encroachment/ pollution of surrounding woodland or any protected species.

iv. The feasibility of rail access is questionable- the costs and land required to make a siding have been judgednot viable.


v. A small proportion of the site is in Winchester City Council's administrative area, and it is important thata comprehensive and coordinated approach is taken.

vi. Due to the multiple ownership, some land assembly may be necessary depending on the extent of anyproposals.

vii. Any opportunities to increase tree cover to improve biodiversity linkages (between woodland areas) shouldbe maximised. Enhancements to the existing woodland edge as part of any proposal would be supported.

Nomination

84 There is substantial interest in developing this site for waste uses, owing to its size and strategic location.Waste operators have expressed their interest in possible uses. The site is under multiple landownership.


85 Little Park Farm is a low lying, partially wooded site which is overlooked by the M27 motorway. The siteis located to the north of Segensworth West industrial area in Park Gate, between the motorway and therailway line. Site straddles the boundary between Winchester and Fareham districts. The site is largelyvacant, although there is currently some housing and dog boarding kennels located on part of the site.

86 The site is a 'greenfield' site in an urban area. It is allocated as employment land (office, light and generalindustry, warehousing / storage(38) but not subject to existing permission. There are serious doubts regardingthe developability for B1, B2 or B8 uses due to access issues. According to Fareham Borough Council'sstudy of employment land, access constraints at Little Park Farm appear to effectively rule out B1 and B2use classes and mean anything but low density, sui generis type uses are unlikely(39).

87 This site, 'Land at Little Park Farm', is included in a recent Hampshire-wide employment land assessment.In terms of development potential for B1-B8 uses, the site is categorised as a 'strategic site' which "mayrequire remedial action to avoid market failure"(40). This site had been considered previously for its potentialas a rail depot (as a site to relocate the aggregate rail depot from Fareham Station Yard). This use hassubsequently been ruled out on viability grounds.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1-3,and 5. Proposals for such smaller scale facilities would need to address the deliverability issues identifiedabove. The suitability of this site for other development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants(due to the narrow nature of the site, its topography, access restrictions etc).



Watercourses (streams) at either end of the site.No flood or groundwater risks identified. A section of the eastern part overlies a secondary aquifer.

Visual intrusion Site is secluded, as it is contained by the surrounding major roads and the railway.Landscape Type: Townscape (Locks Heath, Sarisbury, Warsash)Landscape Character Area: Forest of Bere West (2e)

38 Fareham Borough Council local plan policy E2 and Winchester Local Plan Review policy S.15.39 Fareham Borough Employment Land Review February 2007.40 Hampshire Economic Partnership (2009) Employment Land in Hampshire Large Site Assessment Study 2009.



Nature conservation Pond on the site might contain amphibians (e.g. great crested newt which is a protected species).Possible presence of common reptiles, bats, badgers and dormice (known in woodlands on other side ofM27).SSSI and SINCs lie to the north on other side of the M27.The eastern part of the site includes mature hedgerows linking broad leaved woodland and ancientwoodland.


No archaeological sites currently recorded.Grade II building (Little Park Farmhouse) south of the site.

Traffic & access Issues over providing adequate access underneath Network Rail bridge and access from the motorwayvia a roundabout will need to be resolved via a routing agreement.Access improvements through the industrial estate and improvements to railway bridge are proposed (theonly existing access is a single track private road).Site includes internal access roads.No rail access to the site currently.Access to the site is through the industrial estate from the Primary Route Network (A27), whilst theStrategic Road Network (M27) is within 1km.

Proximity to sensitivehuman &environmental receptors

Small pocket of ancient woodland at east end of site, containing pond and stream.Residential properties approx. 50 m south of the western section.Two schools within 1km (Whitely primary to the north; Park Gate primary to the south).


Site lies within Southampton Airfield Safety Zone and Daedelus and Southampton Bird Strike Zone.


Available land (approx.1.5 ha) for possible housing development identified by Borough Council, approx.200 metres north of the site ('Whitely Area 11/ Shetland Rise').


Sites within approx. 1km: Rookery Farm; Unit 6 Crompton Way; Segensworth HWRC.


The uneven topography may need to be considered a limitation for some potential uses.Public footpath lies approx. 200 m to the south, running east to west.


FHM 012 Land South of Railway, Segensworth

Local authority: Fareham Borough CouncilSite Area: 2.79 hectares*Also see FHM 006/09 above.

23

1 to 21

Addison Court

14

15a

19

21

12

Warehouse

62

40

11

16

Cabana

10

Mast

ESS

The Talisman

1 to 35

7

24

DUNC

AN RO

AD

The L

aurel

s

Barley House

1

8

Yale Cottage

CR

20

23

Post

4

24

9

30

23

46.0m

CH

24

209

101

37

31

95

COLL

INGW

ORTH

RISE

BADGERS COPSE

69

2

46

El Sub Sta

57

ED & Ward Bdy

Broadcasting

7

3

FARM ROAD

75a 75b

6

9

6

Drain

DRAKE CLOSE

36

32

SL

6

13

15

8

Sarisbury Gate

26

3

Cottage

ED & Ward Bdy

4

4

St Elmo

22

Sub Sta

HUNTS POND ROAD1a

FF

15

65

31

38

3239

to 61

33

61

65

Shirlaine

1

9

4

6

26

15

12

25

36

Tank

53

1

1

3

WAY

El Sub Sta

3

9

1

75

Pond

16

7

New Court

8

1

21

1 to 17

42

1 to 2

4NO

RTHM

ORE C

LOSE

51.5m

Bank

Theobold House

14

DOVE

GAR

DENS

Club

BASTINS CLOSE

11

16

DUNCAN

2

Maple Court

7 to 9

1

Primary Schoo lPark Gate

3

Sub Sta

April Rise

CF

PARK MEWS

27

24

15

24to

29

Swanwick

Def

6

LITTLE FOX DRIVE

85

2

76

26

Track

2

33

5

83

7

COCK

EREL

L CLO

SE

Mast

Court

4

4

9ADAMS WAY

67

5

Track

El Sub Sta

4

DEWAR CLOSE

3

14

2

2

A 27

4 to 8

Depot

LB

12

BRIDGE ROAD

17

El Sub Sta

HARDY CLOSE

42

Hall

16

15

44

FirsThe

9

1

St George

StationSwanwick

Und

2

12

SL

12

LOWE

R DUN

CAN R

OAD

15

20

RH9

11

DUNCAN ROAD

CO LLIN GWORTH

28

CH

20

RIS E

2

SQUIRREL

41

21

11

1

TELF

ORD

WAY

Gloster

4

45.9m

CR

Station

Radio Mast

8

Industrial

11

4

7

Tank

1

12

Issues

A 27

20

D

17a

Bank

Station Industrial

54

El Sub Sta

1

25 to 36

La

FB

(PH)

20

4

Factory

El

Edenholme

Barle y B usi nes s Pa rk

11

2

108

ED &

Ward

Bdy

LOWER

1211

15a

80

34

15

47.2m

23

41

MP 10.75

37 to

47

1

5

Playground

CL

BADGERS COPSE

El Sub Sta

5

Bungalow

Mast

Path (um)

1

SOUTHAMPTON ROAD

5

(Industrial Estate)6

Issues

Barrat

Park

75d

45.6m

1

4

20

A 27

ESS

Path (um)

Def

Co Co

nst, C

P & ED

Bdy

10

ED &

Ward

Bdy

11

TCB

17

G

Park

FF

11

36

50.0m

TCBs

Church

ROAD

10

45

Windun Lodge

Coquetdale

Works

12a

16

3

1

85

5

92

8 to 30

Hill

84

33

37

71

36

71

47

10

9

SOUTHAMPTON ROAD

Kennels

Rumahsaya

2

6

WHITTLE AVENUE

6

25.4m

6

Pond

t

75c

FF

CR

6

Subway

10

Def

NORTHMORE ROAD

15

Marion Court

19a

11a

1444

12 10

6

6

Talisman Business Centre

50.3m

Montrose

1 to 4

4

CW

Rose

Lost Earls

24

14

Lannoch Tor

FF

CF

El

1

1a

10

9a

10

40

42

51

14

15

49

4

18

113

10

11

RED OAKS DRIVE

Lone Va lle y

and Cattery

Park Gate

3

6

CROMPTON

61

CR

Ward Bdy

Signal Post

El Sub Sta

1

El Sub Sta

Fulcrum 1

Def

Path (um)

54

Park Gate

56

BOTLEY ROAD

42

4

Duncan Road

2

Freelands

2

1

32

16a

33

9

11

RH

14

27

SOUTHAMPTON ROAD

19

1

2

6

55

RED

OAKS

DRIV

E

59

35

14

29

16

14

75

Gas Gov

Travelling Crane

8

2

M 27

Segensworth West

Apple Industrial Estate

11

Mile Post 11

5

LITTLE PARK

Lesa nto

Eagle Po int

18

Path

(um)

Sinks

BARNES WALLIS ROAD

9

12¯ 0 100 200 m"

"

Fareham

Gosport


i. Where possible development should avoid significant loss of habitat and provide necessary biodiversityenhancement to compensate.

ii. This site is currently undeveloped and may be used for informal recreation (potential land use conflicts area consideration to be investigated further).

iii. The proximity to residential properties on Red Oaks Drive and potential impacts on amenity are keyconsiderations.

iv. Potential co-location opportunities with Segensworth West and East Industrial Estate.v. Proposals would need to accommodate similar scale waste development to be in keeping with the surrounding

industrial buildings.vi. The topography of the land may restrict the type and configuration of any facility.

Nomination

88 The site was identified in December 2009 by Hampshire County Council.



89 The site lies partly within and on the boundary of Segensworth West Industrial Estate. The site is wellscreened from neighbouring highways by vegetation and benefits from good access to and from the nearestminerals and waste lorry route and the M27. Segensworth West Industrial Estate also benefits from goodlandscape and although it is more suited for office use, the site does hold potential for general industrialuses.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 3and 4. Proposals for such enclosed uses would need to address the deliverability issues identified above, andbe compatible with the adjacent industrial estate. The suitability of this site for other development categorieswould need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to the proximity to residential properties and the site'sphysical constraints).

CommentsAssessment Criteria


Site partially lies on a secondary aquifer.

Visual intrusion Site lies at a low elevation and is visible from the A27.The visual impact is likely to be slight adverse (if development is confined to the east of the site andthere is advanced planting). May result in loss of green space within the urban area.Landscape Type: Urban Area (Locks Heath, Sarisbury, Warsash) and Landscape Character Area: Forestof Bere West (2e)

Nature conservation High potential for protected species- eight ancient woodlands and twelve SINCs within 1km of thesite.


The site has ten historic buildings within a 1km area.

Traffic & access Access to the site is through the industrial estate from the Primary Route Network (A27), whilst theStrategic Road Network (M27) is within 1km.


Residential properties in close proximity, south and west of the site.Two schools, a hospital and care homes are within 1km of the site.


Site lies within Southampton aerodrome safeguarding area

Potential land use conflict Part of the site lies on Employment land identified by Fareham Borough Council to the north east ofthe site.


Within 2.5km of the site lie two Waste Transfer Stations and one Energy Recovery Facility.


Site appears to be used as a recreational resource (to be confirmed).


FHM 013 Pinks Industrial Park, Wickham Road, Crockerhill, Fareham

Local authority: Fareham Borough Council (allocated for employment uses)Site Area: 2.40 hectares.

6 45.4m

Meadows Crockerhill

3

Mill

Drain

2 11

5

43.3m

Dalmeny

Leahurst

Saw Mill

Industrial

CR

LB

La Colina

Ridgeways

44.2m

Cottages

CR

House

Heytesbury Farm

Ward Bdy

WICKHAM ROAD

Cottage

Cottage

Park

Pinks 40.5m

39.6m43.6m

Gingerbread

Krakatoa

Highbank

Marlings

Woodside H

ouse

Crockerhill

FORE

ST LA

NE

¯ 0 100 200 m"

"

Fareham

Gosport


i. Immediate access to minerals and waste lorry routeii. Located in existing industrial area containing a waste facility and designated as employment landiii. Adjacent to existing residential dwelling

Nomination

90 This site was identified by Hampshire County Council in 2010.



91 The Pinks Industrial Park, consisting of the former Pinks Sawmill site, is composed of a number of unitsconverted from the sawmill facility and currently housing a variety of commercial and industrial businesses.Part of this site has been identified as having potential to house a waste facility, due to a vacant unit, as theland is both designated as employment land by Fareham Borough Council and already houses existingcommercial/industrial activities. A waste tyre baling facility is already present at the site, present in units 1and 2, following the granting of planning permission byHampshire County Council in 2009, whilst permissionfor the recycling of tyres was additionally granted in April 2010.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1-3,and 5. Proposals for such smaller scale facilities would need to address the deliverability issues identifiedabove, including ensuring impacts on nearby residential amenity are avoided. Proposals would also need totake into account the drainage of the site, as the majority of the industrial area overlies a minor aquifer. Thesuitability of this site for other development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due tothe existing buildings on the site etc).



The majority of the site lies on a secondary aquiferThe southern section of the site lies in a source protection zone 3

Visual intrusion The site lies at a low elevation and visual impact likely to be moderate adverseSite is fairly open to the south being on the edge of open downs landscape typeVisual impact likely to be moderate adverseLandscape Type: Lowland Mosaic Medium ScaleLandscape Character Area: Forest of Bere East (2f)

Nature conservation Six designated ancient woodlands within 1km of the siteSeven SINCs lie within 1km of the site


Five historic buildings lie within 1km of the site, with one Grade II property immediately adjacent to thesite; the setting should not therefore be compromised, but this does not preclude any use of the site forwaste purposes.The site is currently undeveloped in an area where there are only modest archaeological records.

Traffic & access There is immediate access onto the Local Road Network (A32) whilst the Strategic Road Network (M27)is located approximately 1.9km south.Visibility splays from site onto A32 should be adequate.There may potentially need to be a right turn lane in and also a ban on right turns out depending upontraffic flows.


Residential properties lie immediately to the south of the boundary of the industrial area.


Site does not lie within an aerodrome safeguarding area


The site is designated as employment land by Fareham borough Council, following their EmploymentLand Review.




An aggregate recycling facility is located at Charity Farm, which lies approximately 625m south of thesite.


No public rights of way (RoW) cross the site.


GPT 003 Site at Quay Lane Industrial Estate

Local authority: Gosport Borough CouncilSite size: 1.4 hectares

FF FW

Quay West

Stone

81

QUAY LANE

Boat Repair Yard

114

18

31

54

Marsh

88

Mud and Shingle

El Sub Sta

163

16

FW

1

FF

Und

Works

42

57

67

7777a

86

6.4m

FF

221

Def

WB

15 43

78a

79

1

81

CAST

LE VIE

W

Portsmouth Harbour

6.4m

176

QUAY LANE

CR

Slipway

Sub Sta

CRWard Bdy

CR

11 11a

Works

30

53 El

Sub Sta

79a

219

274Def

19

El Sub Sta

85

Sub Sta

126

19

6

Mud and Shingle

PRIORY ROAD

El

FW

Und

2

Works

Mud and Shingle

7

Stone

Works

El66

78

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

Fareham

Gosport

City of Portsmouth


i. Residential properties lie close proximity and is a major consideration for this site (the need to avoid impacton amenity).

ii. Site lies within area of flood riskiii. Site lies adjacent to conservation areaiv. European nature conservation designated sites lie adjacent to the sites boundariesv. Site lies within an industrial area

Nomination




93 The site covers an area of approximately 1.4ha and lies within Quay Lane Industrial Estate in the Hardwayarea. The condition of buildings and internal environment indicate the industrial estate hosts some more'bad neighbour' uses. The site has some issues with regards to access and also its proximity to sites designatedfor nature conservation.

94 Access to the site from Priory Road is not recommended due to on-street parking and as such, a site accesson Quay Lane may be needed if traffic generation is low enough. The site is considered by Gosport BoroughCouncil as being suitable to host a range of employment activities, and a waste transfer station was grantedpermission in 2004 to operate within the industrial estate.

95 The Industrial Estates Study concludes that despite the site being associated with issues regarding access,environmental designations and designated sites for historic conservation, the estate does have some potentialto host waste management activities based on the sites general characteristics and proximity to the strategicroad network(41).


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 2and 3. Proposals for such facilities would need to address the deliverability issues identified above, includingensuring impacts on nearby residential amenity are avoided. Proposals would also need to take into accountof the existing buildings on site, and configure, manage the site to avoid impacts on nearby sensitive habitats.The suitability of this site for other development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (dueto the proximity to nature conservation designations, residential dwellings, access etc).


Protection of water resources Eastern boundary of the site lies adjacent to EA Flood Zone 3 and is partially covered by EAFlood Zone 2Site overlies a secondary aquifer

Visual intrusion Site lies within the South Hampshire Coast Landscape Character Area

Nature conservation SINCs lie approximately 300m to the northSites north eastern boundary lies adjacent to European nature conservation designations

Historic environment and builtheritage

Hardway conservation area lies adjacent to the south eastern boundary which hosts several buildingsof historical interest

Traffic and access The Local Road Network (A32) is approximately 1.3km west of the site, whilst the Strategic RoadNetwork (M27) is approximately 7.5km from the site.The site is accessible via Elson Road

Proximity to sensitive humanand environmental receptors

Sites eastern and southern boundaries lie adjacent to residential propertiesElson Infant and Junior Schools lies approximately 400m south west of the sitesAllotments lie approximately 400m to the south west


Site lies within aerodrome safeguarding area (Daedalus)

Potential land use conflict Slipways on site encourage marine employment uses




Two sites which lie in close proximity to the site were identified in SHLAAAdjacent site was identified in ELRSite currently hosts unfriendly neighbour uses

Opportunity for co-location Waste transfer station exists on site

Other issues (e.g. public rightsof way)

Footpath runs adjacent to the sites boundary


HRT 024 Clarks Farm, Frogmore, Yateley

Local authority: Hart District Council. Allocated for employment development (restricted to appropriatelight industry)(42).Site size: Approximately over 4 hectares. Previously developed land.

83

Works

Trac

k

Pond

4

37

3

56

Frogmore Community Campus

Und

Tank

1Tr

ack

PondCS

Und

Drain

CF

WB

Tank

54

CS

LANE

Shelter

SYDNEY

Darby Green

96

CD

CH

Pond

Tanks

PLACE

5

POTLEY HILL92

Two Oa ks Farm

Drain

5

DARBY

DARBY

Yateley Common

LANE

81

58

60

ROAD

94

SP

Boro

Cons

t Bdy

Works

GREEN ROAD

LOADER

3

GREEN

Collects

35a

82

86

PRIO

R'S

Co Co

nst &

Ward

Bdy

Farmhouse

READING ROAD

CR

Clark's

FB

Pond Farm

LB

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

Hart

Rushmoor


i. Access routes for large vehicles would need to be tightly controlled at this location. The site access is alsolocated close to a roundabout with no right turn lane in – providing one at this location may be difficult.

ii. The nominated site lies in close proximity to historic buildings.iii. European nature conservation sites are within close proximity to the site.iv. Site is at risk from flooding and lies adjacent to surface waters.v. Development should be sensitively designed to preserve and enhance the character and appearance of the

Strategic Gap.vi. Residential properties adjacent to the site.vii. District's Local Plan seeks to reduce the scale of built development on this site and restrict commercial uses

to appropriate light industry.

42 Hart District Local Plan (Replacement) policies ALTGEN 17 and ALTDEV 17.


Nomination

96 The site was nominated in February 2010.


97 The nominated site covers an area of just over 4 hectares and lies within Clarks Farm, a site which has beenidentified for employment use in Hart District's employment land review (although this is restricted tocertain types of development). The site has an existing hardstandng area and a history of agricultural andopen storage type uses. The site is well screened by vegetation and lies within strategic gap between Yateleyand Frogmore.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 2and 3. This excludes uses with potential bioaerosal emissions due to the proximity to residential properties.Proposals for such waste uses would need to address the deliverability issues identified above, and be compatiblewith existing structures on site. The suitability of this site for other open or larger scale development categorieswould need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to the proximity to residential properties, access restrictionsand other constraints).

Table 7



Site covers a secondary aquiferEA Flood Zone 3 and 2 covers a section of the siteSurface waters lie approximately 50m to the north of the site

Visual intrusion Site lies within North Hampshire Lowland and Heath Landscape Character Area

Nature conservation European nature conservation designation lies approximately 500m south of the site as well as SSSI'sDarby Green Lakes SINC is adjacent to northern boundary of site and Darby Green SINC lies approximately50m to the south east


Southern and eastern boundaries of the site are adjacent to the Darby Green conservation areaSite hosts listed buildings

Traffic and access The Local Road Network (A30) is approximately 1.5km from the site, whilst the Strategic Road Network(M3) is approximately 7.5km away.

Proximity to sensitivehuman andenvironmentalreceptors

At least three schools lie within 1km of the siteResidential properties lie adjacent to the eastern boundary

Proximity toaerodromesafeguarding areas

Site lies within an aerodrome safeguarding area (Farnborough)


Identified in ELR as being suitable for redevelopment for employment uses but not exceeding the volumeand bulk of the existing buildings on site




No opportunity for co-location on site

Other issues (e.g.public rights of way)

Located next to a cattery


HRT 019/ 026 Hartland Park & adjacent land, Pyestock Hill

Local authority: Hart District CouncilSite Area: Hartland Park (approx. 47 ha); adjacent land (5.8 ha). Previously developed land.NOTE:Only a proportion of this site would be available for waste management uses (subject to a developmentplot becoming available).

41

Drain

FB

Path (um)

Track

ROXBEE

SM

Path (um)

WEIR ROAD

SM

FB

Track

FB

IVELY R

OAD

FS

79.6m

BRAMSHOT ROAD

75.6m

Stone

FB

Drain

Path (

um)

Playing Field

Games Court

Comet Gate

BUCCANEER WAY

CB

1

49

Drain

(um)

ED & Ward Bdy

Path (um)

Drain

Track

Track

Path (um)

Gantry

Track

Cody Technology Park

CONSTANT ROAD

FB

FB

Day Nursery

Drain

FB


Playing Field

THE FAIRWAY

THE HOWF

CF

Drain

Drain

Co Co

nst, C

P & ED

BdyWater

CF

22

MARLBO

ROUG

H CLOS

E

28

El

20

Drain

Track

COX ROAD

Travelling

Trav C

FB

SM

Track

Trav C

SR

CF

Pavilion

IVELY ROAD

REYNOLDS ROAD

Drain

Track

Def

Co Co

nst, C

P & ED

Bdy

Drain

2

15

Drain

Gantry

Trav C

FB

FB

THE FAIRWAY

Track

THE HOWF

FB

Fairway

ARMSTRONG WAY

Posts

Drain

Und

75.8m

DW

Gate

DW

FB

SR

KENNE

LS LA

NEBor

o Cons

t Bdy

Boro C

onst B

dy

TYTE TRACK

El Sub Sta

20

Sub Sta

CSGelvert St ream

ED & Ward Bdy

Track

Path (um)

Drain

Gelvert St ream

Track

Track

Pond

SM

SM

Travelling Crane

Track

Subwa

y

82.9m

80.8m

FB

FB

Boro Const Bd

y

75.3m

Def

Pystock

Pond

CB

Drain

Drain

Path (um)

CS

Crane

Travelling Crane

Tanks

Drain

Path (um)

Path (um)

FB

TrackTHE ROMANY

WB

79.6m

Bramshot Gate

Drain

Drain

COMET ROAD

FB

Track

Drain

Pond

20

8

10

Cooling Tower

Trav C

Trav C

SM

Trav C

FB

FB

Drain

Drain

OLD IVELY ROAD

75.0m

Bowling Green

Und

Water

Chy

Und

Def

KENNE

LS LA

NE

Def

Path

Path (

um)

Drain

Track

Tanks

ROXBEE COX ROAD

SM SM

Track

IVELY

ROAD

PONDPENNY LANE

FB

75.0m

House

FB

FB

Drain

FB

Cycle Tra

ck

Water

CF

Drain

Def

TCB

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

Hart

Rushmoor

HRT026

HRT019


i. Proposals in this broad location depend on development plots becoming available for waste managementuses.

ii. The need to avoid adverse impact on the openness and rural character of the area is a key consideration.iii. Implications of proximity to European nature conservation designated sites to be investigated through

Habitats Regulations Assessment process.iv. Any alternative use of HRT 026 (The HOWF) would require a change of use.v. The limitations on development potentially imposed by the aerodrome safeguarding zone (e.g. building

height) require consideration.vi. Need to consider mechanisms to manage any prospective Large Goods Vehicle movements associated with

redevelopment of the HOWF site.


Nomination

98 HRT 019 (former Pyestock complex) was identified by Hampshire County Council in 2005. The potentialopportunity at the adjacent site (HRT 026) - known as The HOWF, east of Bramshott Road, was identifiedin January 2010. Only a proportion of the site would be identified for waste uses but the boundaries are yetto be defined.


99 These sites are located on Ively Road, Farnborough and fall within the Hart District Council administrativeboundary.

100 The larger site (HRT 019) is the former MoD NGTE (National Gas Turbine Establishment)- a leadingDERA (Defense Evaluation and Research Agency) facility which has been decommissioned. AstralDevelopments purchased the Pyestock site from QinetiQ in 2004. Their plans for the redevelopment ofPyestock North ('Hartland Park') include the total demolition of the existing structures, and their replacementby a number of distribution warehouses. In September 2009, the Hartland Park proposal was grantedpermission by the Secretary of State(43). The proposals involve retaining the occupied buildings whilstconverting the vacant part of the site into a new logistics and business park, and cleaning up the contaminatedsite.

101 The Hartland Park site has permission for 120,000m2 of B8 (storage and distribution) and ancillary officefloorspace. The permission has a number of restrictions relating to uses and activities on the site (includesrestrictions on noise, lighting levels etc). One of the conditions seeks to ensure the incorporation ofrenewable energy technologies.

102 TheHOWF site (HRT 026) also forms part of the former DERA site but did not form part of the proposalsfor Hartland Park. This site has a Certificate of Lawful Use for a sewage processing plant (most of thestructures fall under sui generis use class). The footprint of the current built development on the site is 1.15hectares. Unlike the Pyestock site, the HOWF site has no specific policy support for redevelopment in theexisting local plan(44).

103 This extensive previously-developed site and strategic location provides a potential opportunity for a largerscale 'strategic' waste site on a proportion of the land. Any waste uses on Hartland Park would need to becompatible with the Hartland Park warehouse development (in light of discussions with the developer).


Based on the information currently available, this broad area is considered suitable for development categories3-6. Proposals for such enclosed waste uses would need to address the deliverability issues identified above,and be compatible with planned new development on this site. There may be opportunities to utilise energyrecovered from waste treatment to support Hartland Park's business uses. The suitability of this site for otheropen categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants.

43 The Planning Inspector originally recommended that appeals against refusal by the District Council be dismissed and planning permission refused. The Secretaryof State disagreed with the Inspector's recommendation and has allowed both of the appeals and granted planning permission.

44 Policy Dev 12, Hart District Local Plan (Replacement) 1996-2006.




HOWF site overlies a secondary aquifer.

Visual intrusion Pyestock complex currently comprises office, administrative and research buildings; and industrial andengineering buildings.Sites surrounded by large areas of largely coniferous forest, and well screened from public vantage points -unlikely to be any residential visual receptors because of the woodland cover.The existing development of Cody park and Farnborough airport have negative effects on the erosion of ruralcharacter, which would be exacerbated further by this development.The Local Plan(45) seeks to retain the rural and open nature of the strategic gap between Fleet and Farnborough.Note: the Hartland Park appeals were originally dismissed by the Appeal Inspector due to adverse impact onthe Gap and the rural character.Overall the visual effect is considered to be slight adverse, and the impact on character is considered to bemoderate adverse.Landscape Type: Woodland and Plantation on Heath and Landscape Character Area: North East HampshirePlantations and Heath (1c)

Natureconservation

Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (SPA).SINC overlies a section of the HOWF site, designated for heathland habitats and plants species.Fleet Pond Local Nature Reserve lies to the northwest of the sites.Basingstoke Canal SSSI and conservation area approx. 800 m south of the sites.Contains records of common reptiles- high potential to support protected species.

Historicenvironment andbuilt heritage

Historic building approx. 250m to the west of the HOWF site.Site contains important industrial archaeology relating to development of the jet engine. Likely that recordingconditions associated with existing permission would also be attached to its use for waste purposes.HRT022 may have links with this site and the previous Pyestock site which is adjacent. Could be buildingrecording issues.

Traffic & access The Local Road Network (A327) is approximately 0.75km from the site, whilst the Strategic Road Network(M3) is approximately 2km from the site.Access via Bramshott Road (private road).Roads to the north of the sites linking to the M3motorway and A327 suffer significant peak period congestion.A package of transport improvements being put in place as part of Hartland park development e.g. cappingmechanism restricting HGV movements; vehicle monitoring system; and routing agreement.HOWF Site: Large congestion problems in area and strict routing and capacity agreements associated withpermission for adjacent Hartland Park site. Furthermore, the HOWF site does not have a baseline of trafficto build on meaning any vehicle movements would be additional.HOWF Site: Any development would need to consult with the Highways Agency re: restrictions associatedwith M3 J4A and consider mechanisms to manage any prospective vehicle movements associated withredevelopment of the HOWF site.

Proximity tosensitive human &

Residential properties 600+ metres northeast of the HOWF (the Southwood area).Residential properties approx. 300 metres west of Hartland park (Pond Tail area).

environmentalreceptors


Sites lie within Farnborough aerodrome safeguarding area.


QinetiQ Cody Technology Park (in Rushmoor) to the south.


Eelmoor Road Waste Transfer Station is within 2km east of the sites.

45 Hart District Local Plan (Replacement) 1996-2006.



Other issues (e.g.public rights ofway)

HRT019 has a bridleway that runs along part of the site to the north west.HRT019 has planning permission for B8 business use – for business and logistics park (known as HartlandPark).Provisional Tree Preservation Order on the woodland within and around the site.


HVT 005 Site at Solent Road, Havant

Local authority: Havant Borough Council (currently allocated for employment uses)(46)

Site Size: Less than 1 hectare

BosmereMedical Centre

Sub Sta

Industrial Estate

El Sub StaSolent Retail Park

El

The 20

16

Tank

El

23

5 to 9

El Sub Sta

26

A 27

18

Centre

14

24 to 2811

12

SELBOURNE ROAD

Industrial Estate

27

25d

Tank

BROCKHAMPTON LANE

Sub Sta

Depot

El

6

SOLENT ROAD

Tank

Recycling

25c

The Tanneries

3

1

10

15

Sub Sta19 to 21

39

25e

13

Tank

El Sub Sta

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

"

Havant

GosportCity of Portsmouth


i. Flood risk issues would need to be addressed as part of any proposals.ii. Conservation area lies adjacent to the siteiii. Proposals would need to be compatible with the local planning authority's aspirations for the site (to be

determined).

Nomination


46 Policy EMP4 Industrial Improvement Areas (Havant Borough Council Local Plan).



105 The site is located on an industrial estate within an area known as Brockhampton Lane Industrial Area. Thesite is known locally as Brockhampton Lane/Solent Road and is perceived as being one of the borough'solder industrial estates and no longer compatible with the needs of modern industry. Local planning policystates development on the site would be supported providing that there would be no prejudice onregeneration, environmental improvement and property development.

106 Investigations have taken place into exploring alternative access arrangements to the the site, as to assist inthe avoidance of HGV's impacts on the environment and resident. An active waste transfer station wasgranted consent in 2004 which lies adjacent to the site (HV045). The Industrial Estates Study indicates thesite has good access to the strategic road network, and good proximity to market areas for waste materials(47).


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 3and 5. Proposals for such small scale waste uses would need to address the deliverability issues identifiedabove, and be compatible with existing development in the vicinity. The suitability of this site for other openor larger scale development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to the limited sitesize and existing built development).



Site lies on a secondary Aquifer.The western boundary of the site lies on flood zone 2 and 3

Visual intrusion Site lies in South Hampshire Lowland and Heath Landscape area.

Nature conservation Within approximately 1km from the site lies Chichester and Langstone Harbours. This area is a SSSI,SPA, SAC and Ramsar.Five SINC’s lie within a 1km area from the site


The site boarders on Brockhampton Conservation areaHistoric buildings lie to the east of the site

Traffic & access The Strategic Road Network (A27(T)) is approximately 0.4km from the site.Access to the site is from Brockhampton Lane

Proximity to sensitivehuman &environmental receptors

The closest residential properties lie near the site to the north and eastFour Schools lie with 1km of the site




None identified


Within 1km of the site lies three Waste Transfer Stations and one HWRC site


A footpath lies to the east of the site



HVT 006 & 010 Sites at Harts Farm Way, Broadmarsh

Local authority: Havant Borough Council (allocated for employment uses)Site Area: HVT 006 (1.48 hectares). HVT 010 ( approx. 2 hectares).

MLWmasonry

Mud

Hermitage

WAY

LB

50

Conveyor

TanksConveyors

El Sub Sta

Path (um)

DW

Mast

Sluice

ETL

38

(disused)

Mud

15 to

36 1 to 5

El Sub Sta

DW

DW

Mud

Stream

Tank

Hopper

Sluice

Sloping

Sloping

HARTS FARM

Conveyor

ETL

Path

FB

Path (um)

Mud

Business & Innovation

masonry

Centre

Broadmarsh

MHW

45

Works

Hopper

El Sub Sta

Hopper

Tanks

Drain

Tanks

Path (um)

Sloping masonry

DW

37

SM

44

54

Hoppers

Hopper

El Sub Sta

¯ 0 100 200 m"

Havant

HVT006

HVT010


i. Land availability for other waste uses following redevelopment on these sites is to be determined.ii. It is likely that proposals in this area would need to be supported by an appropriate hydrological study.

Portsmouth Water would need to be notified of any intrusive works (aspects such as site drainage requirecareful consideration).

iii. The chalk streams running through/ adjacent to HVT 010 should be protected and enhanced where possible.iv. Any potential hydrological issues likely to affect nature conservation designations would need to be considered

as part of the Habitats Regulations Assessment process.v. It is likely that a new access road is required to support the construction of any new facility on site HVT

010.vi. Highways Agency advised a traffic impact assessment to be undertaken before allocating these sites for

uses which are likely to generate large numbers of trips which use the Strategic Road Network.vii. The requirement to implement Rusty Cutter roundabout improvements prior to further development in

this locality is to be recognised.viii. HVT 006 is unlikely to be deliverable for waste related uses unless an access road is constructed to enable

access to this SEEDA-owned site.


ix. HVT 006 is not currently supported by Havant Borough Council for waste related uses.x. Proposals should be designed to the highest visual standards having regard to the exposed location of the

sites.

Nomination

107 The former incinerator site at Broadmarsh was originally considered in its entirety(48). The site area wassubsequently reduced however, to exclude the northern part which is owned by SEEDA. This lesser sitebecame site HVT 010 (Former Incinerator Site). Site HVT 006 is the western part of the site and isowned by SEEDA. This site lies behind SEEDA's Broadmarsh Business Centre, and was originally promotedalongside the former incinerator site for possible waste uses(49).


108 The incinerator formerly located at HVT 010 ceased operation in 1996 and was demolished in 1997. HVT010 currently includes a Household waste Recycling Centre (HWRC) and a waste transfer station operatedby Veolia Environmental Services. A redevelopment scheme for this sites was approved by Hampshirecounty Council in 2010. It is planned that the site will continue to host a relocated HWRC (at the rear ofthe site), and the remaining land on the former incinerator site (to the south of the new HWRC) will besurplus to requirements. There are no firm plans for the land at the front of the site although not excludinga possible waste recycling use but also not excluding other commercial uses.

109 HVT 006 and 010 are both allocated for employment land uses(50). The allocation states significantlandscaping provision will be a requirement of this site which is intended for high tech employment uses(although it is recognised that redevelopment of this area would be dependent upon the relocation of theexisting waste handling facility and the use rights being extinguished).

110 HVT 010 was previously included in the Minerals & Waste Local Plan (1998) as a Preferred Site for anintegrated waste processing plant(51). The plan made clear that this site occupies a very prominent locationand is visible over a wide area. It also indicated that an environmental statement would be required withany application to demonstrate that unacceptable impact would not be caused.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1-3and 5. Proposals for such uses would need to address the deliverability issues identified above, and becompatible with existing development in the vicinity. The suitability of this site for other larger scaledevelopment categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to the limited site size, landscapeconstraints and existing built development).

CommentsAssessmentcriteria

Protection ofwater resources

The sites overlie a principal aquifer.HVT 006 is in close proximity to the Hermitage Stream and the sensitive Shellfish waters of Langstone Harbour.

48 Site nomination HVT 00749 The adjacent site Former Harts Farm Depot (HVT 008) was also considered but subsequently ruled out (see Appendix 4 Sites ruled out).50 Havant Borough Council local Plan. EMP1.1 Former Incinerator site and Havant Borough Council Depot, Harts Farm Way, Havant (6.8 ha). Also see: EMP1.7 Land

to west of former incinerator, Harts Farm Way, Havant (0.84 ha) 241. This site is intended for high-tech employment uses.51 Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton Minerals and Waste Local Plan: Adopted December 1998 (Policy 43).



Groundwater in the locality is shallow and vulnerable to pollution.Patches of Flood Risk Zone 2 across HVT 0006. HVT 010 within flood Risk Zone 2 and patches in Zone 3.

Visual intrusion Sites run alongside the A27 which is screened by a belt of trees.Located within an industrial area with limited views.Landscape Type: Urban Area (Havant)Landscape Character Area: Havant and Emsworth Coastal Plain (9g)

Natureconservation

400m to Solent Maritime SAC and Chichester & Langstone Harbours SPA.North west (Broadmarsh) part possibly used by Brent Geese.Natural England have raised concerns about potential noise disturbance/ pollution of Brent Geese habitats.Small chalk streams run through the HVT 010 site/ immediately adjacent to it.


No historic building/ archaeological constraints identified.

Traffic & access The Strategic Road Network (A27(T)) is approximately 0.75km from the site.Access currently via Harts Farm Way off the junction of the A27.Hatrs FarmWay experiences congestion at times (linked to vehicles queueing for the Harts FarmDepot; employeesof Langstone Technology Park; Tesco etc).

Proximity tosensitive human

HVT 006 has a watercourse and SINC on its western boundary (Broadmarsh playing field SINC, used by BrentGeese).

&environmentalreceptors

Proximity toaerodrome

Sites do not lie within an aerodrome safeguarding area

safeguardingareas

Potential landuse conflict

Adjacent to Broadmarsh Business & Innovation Centre.


Adjacent to open storage waste transfer facility at Harts Farm Way (TJ Waste & Recycling).Sewage works to the south.

Other issues(e.g. publicrights of way)

Site is close proximity to Havant's urban areas (waste sources) and could provide employment opportunities forthe area.


HVT 011 Land at Solent Road Trade Park, Brockhampton

Local authority: Havant Borough Council (within allocated employment area (to be confirmed))Site Size: approximately 1.3 hectares

ElEl Sub Sta

Works

El Sub Sta

4

1 to 6

BROOKSIDE ROAD

BosmereMedical Centre

Sub Sta

Sub

KINGSCROFT COURT

12aBROOKSIDE ROAD

A 27

Court

LB

7 to 10

Works

Drain

4

BROCKHAMPTON ROAD

HAMPTON

Brockhampton

Manor

El

The 20

16

A 27

Works

2

26

A 27

5

Path (

um)

Stream

BROCK

El

Ponds

11 to 14Industrial Estate

27

Pond

MARPLES WAY

WorksStaSub

Pond

El Sub Sta

15 to 22

Sub Sta

Depot

El

6

1

Brock

hamp

ton

2

ROAD

Manor Court

10

Sta 14

2

SOLENT ROAD

Stream

53

BROCKHAMPTON

Gas Gov

39

25e

¯ 0 100 200 m"

Havant


i. Flood risk issues would need to be addressed as part of any proposals.ii. Conservation area lies adjacent to the siteiii. Residential properties exist adjacent to the site

Nomination

111 This site was nominated in 2009. The site has a total area of approximately 1.46 hectares, however an areain the west of the site, totalling approximately 0.14 hectares, has been pre-let to a builders' merchants, leavingapproximately 1.3 hectares remaining for a potential waste facility.



112 The Solent Road Trade Park is located approximately 1.5km west of the centre of Havant, within anestablished retail and commercial estate (Solent Road Industrial Estate). The site comprises a collection ofgeneral industrial sheds with ancillary office space. The site appears to be located within the wider SolentRoad employment area(52).

113 The site is accessible from both the A27 and Harts Farm Way. Highway visibility is constrained at theeastern end of the site. Solent Road is capable of taking HGVs and the direct route to the strategic roadnetwork is via Solent Road, Park Road South and the Langstone Roundabout with the A27.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 2and 3. Proposals for such uses would need to address the deliverability issues identified above. Proposalswould also need to take into account the existing buildings on site and be compatible with existing developmentin the vicinity. The suitability of this site for other larger scale development categories would need to bedemonstrated by applicants (due to the limited site size, landscape constraints and existing built development).



Site lies on a secondary aquifer.Source Protection Zone 1 over lies a small part of the site to the north.Half of the site, to the west over lies flood zone 2, and flood zone 3 and 2 lie adjacent and around thesite.

Visual intrusion Site lies at a low elevation and is visible from the A27.AONB lies approximately 0.96km to the south east of the site.

Nature conservation Within 1km from the site lies Chichester and Langstone Harbours. This area is a SSSI, SPA, SAC andRamsar.Five SINC’s lie within a 1km area from the site


Historic buildings, mainly being Grade 2 lie to the south west and north east of the site within a 1kmarea to the site.Eight Historic parks and gardens lie within approximately 1km area of the site.Seven Conservation areas lie within a 1km area of the site.

Traffic & access The Strategic Road Network (A27(T)) is approximately 0.6km from the site.The access road to the site is Solent Road.Within 1km to the north west and north east of the site lie two railway stations.Site is within Urban Area.


Residential properties lie nearby the site to the north west and south eastFour Schools lie approximately within a 1km area of the site.Within a 1km area of the site lies a Hospital to the north of the site, four Care homes and three allotments.


Site does not lie within an aerodrome safeguarding area.

Potential land use conflict None identified

52 (Industrial Improvement Areas policy EMP4.3 Brockhampton Lane/Solent Road, Havant).




Within 1km of the site lies three Waste Transfer Stations and one HWRC site


West of the site lies a RoW public footpath


NFT 068 Husbands Shipyard, Cracknore Lane

Local authority: New Forest District CouncilSite size: Approximately 4 hectares

Marchwood Industrial Park

1

NTL

F8

Cracknore Industrial Park

Stone

Mean High Water

MP

G4

2 to 4

Pond

F4

Drain

HARBOUR CLOSE

Slipway

Mud

El Sub Sta

Tanks

F6CRACKNORE HARD

Sloping Wall

El Sub Sta

Dolphin

Mean High Water

G2

F5

OCEANIC WAY

7

MudMud

Shingle

MP

Tanks

Cracknore Industrial Park

Mud and Shingle

Drain

G3

Drain

3.0m

2.1m

F7

56

MHW

Slipw

ay

Oceanic House

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

"

"

Fareham

Eastleigh

New Forest

City of Southampton


i. Site may have issues regarding road safetyii. Site may be conflicting with local planning authorities aspirations for employment use and nearby housing

deliveryiii. European 2000 sites lie in close proximity to the nominated siteiv. New Forest National Park boundary lies within close proximityv. Local environmental designations exist nearby

Nomination

114 The site was identified in May 2010 by an interested party.



115 Husbands Shipyard is adjacent to Marchwood Industrial Park and comprises an area of existing industryfronting the coast at Cracknore Hard, together with two undeveloped areas. One of these is an area ofrough land east of the shipyard partly used for open storage. The other lies between the existing andproposed alignments of Cracknore Hard Lane and was formerly part of the military port landholding. Theexisting industry is very prominent in the views of the coast and is in some need of improvement. Theundeveloped sites are predominantly flat and featureless. There are several mature trees adjoining theexisting Cracknore Hard Lane.

116 This site offers the opportunity to create additional local employment and at the same time to improve theappearance of this visually prominent waterfront area. It also provides the opportunity to provide forenhanced public access in association with development of the adjoining former power station site. TheMarchwood industrial area currently hosts an number of minerals and waste facilities.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1-5.Proposals for such uses would need to address the deliverability issues identified above, be compatible withexisting development in the vicinity and to avoid impacts on nearby sensitive habitats. The suitability of thissite for other larger scale development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to thesite size, existing built development and conservation constraints).



Site lies on Flood zones 2 and 3Site lies on a secondary aquifer

Visual intrusion Site lies within existing industrial area.

Nature conservation Ancient woodland sites lie under 2km to the south west and north west of the siteHythe to Calshot Marshes SSSI, SPA and Ramsar and Eling & Bury Marshes SSSI, SAC and Ramsarlie within 2km of the site to the north west and north east.


Marchwood Conservation Area lies to the north west of the site under 2km awayA small group of historic buildings lie under 2km away to the north west of the site.

Traffic & access The Local Road Network (A326) is approximately 5km from the site (avoiding Marchwood), whilst theStrategic Road Network (M271) is approximately 8km from the site.


Residential dwelling lie to the west of the site within 1kmTwo Schools lie within 2km of the siteSite lies within Marchwood urban area



Potential land use conflict Relevant District planing Policy: MA-3 Husbands Shipyard


Within 1km of the site lies three Waste Transfer facilities and one Aggregate WharfPermission granted in 2005 at a site further along Cracknore Lane to construct a recycling facility toprocess incinerator bottom ash and manufacture secondary aggregates.




None identified


PCC 004 Site at Voyager Park, Copnor

Local authority: Portsmouth City CouncilSite size: Approximately 2.8 hectares

ALLCOT ROAD

42

43

56

53

40

D17

E1

PORT

FIELD

ROAD

3

40

4.0m

52

56

63

64

86

85

Portsea Island

1a

LB

929

D2

Tanks

E3

El Sub Sta

PORT

FIELD

ROAD

Aspen House

44

LOVETT ROAD

47

66

Tennis Courts

61

66

3.4m

83

Ward Bdy

197

1

DEVO

N RO

AD

El Sub Sta

Mast

E8

PORTFIELD ROAD

4.0m

1

29

GREEN LANE

54

CF

4.0m

71

2

19

El Su

b Sta

2436

D1

2

49

52

57

76

2614

76

1cTCB

11

58

FB

D3

Voyager Park

6

46

WESLEY GROVE

61

73

4.0m

12

82

31

34.0m

El Sub Sta

D4

E4

GATCOMBE AVENUE

42

43

64

38

8

4.0m

1 12

46

NEVILLE SHUTE

ESS

The Nelson Centre

43

55

El Su

b Sta

69

68

4

45

83

3931

2

MP .75

ROAD

E7

El Sub Sta

7¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

Havant

Gosport

City of Portsmouth


i. Site is at risk from floodingii. Residential properties exist on opposite side of rail trackiii. Internal traffic flow within existing industrial industrial area may be an issue.

Nomination

117 The site was nominated in February 2006, and has previously been subject to consultation.


118 The nominated site lies within Blueprint Industrial Estate and covers an area of approximately 2.8ha. Theestate currently has permission for B1, B2 and B8 uses and is a fairly new and modern estate. The site alsolies in close proximity to a cluster of waste management facilities which range in their use types from thermaltreatment and energy recovery to waste transfer and recycling facilities.


119 The site has a history of land contamination but has since then been subject to remediation. The site issituated within an existing industrial area which gains access to the local road network at two locationswhich are considered adequate. The site is adjacent to a railway line and is in close proximity to existingwaste management facilities(53).


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1-4.Proposals for such facilities would need to address the deliverability issues identified above, including ensuringimpacts on nearby residential amenity are avoided and impacts on hydrology. The suitability of this site forother development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to the proximity to residentialdwellings etc).


Protection of water resources Site lies on Flood zones 2 and 3Site lies on a secondary aquifer

Visual intrusion Landscape type: Settlement

Nature conservation Langstone Harbour SSSI, SPA, SAC and Ramsar and Portsmouth Harbour SSSI, SPA and RamsarFarlington Marshes Local Nature Reserve lies to the north east of the site

Historic environment and builtheritage

Hilsea Lines Scheduled Ancient Monument lies under 2km to the north of the siteA few historic sites lie west to the site within 1km

Traffic & access The Local Road Network (A3020) is approximately 1km from the site, whilst the Strategic RoadNetwork (A27(T)) is approximately 2km from the site.Railway line lies adjacent to the western boundary of the site.Site lies in Portsmouth urban area.

Proximity to sensitive human& environmental receptors

Residential properties lie in close proximity to the siteNine Schools lie within 1km of the siteAllotment sites lie within 1km to the south of the site



Potential land use conflict Relevant District Planning Policy: DC30 Primary Employment Land and Sites, DC31 EmploymentSites outside the Primary Areas, SP8 Employment and Economy

Opportunity for co-location Five Waste Transfer Recycling facility and one Aggregate Wharf lie within 1km of the site

Other issues (e.g. public rightsof way)

None identified



PCC 011 Site at Robinson Way, Quatremaine

Local authority: Portsmouth City CouncilSite size: Approximately 0.5 hectares

8

Business

Works

Fairway

Works

El Sub Sta

1

1

15

Car

El Sub Sta

Centre

18

414

AIRPORT

7

El Sub Sta

17

Park

Fairway

House

2.7m

12

Business Centre

20

2.4m

2.1m

AIRSPEED ROAD

Garage

Drain

El Su

b Sta

11

3

2.1m

El Sub Sta

10

Links

Works

El Sub Sta

Bilton Business Park

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

Havant

Gosport

City of Portsmouth


i. Site is at risk from floodingii. European 2000 sites lies in close proximity to the siteiii. Internal traffic flow within existing industrial industrial area may be of issue

Nomination

120 The site was nominated in January 2007.


121 The nominated site lies within Airport Industrial Estate East and covers an area of approximately 0.5hectaresand is currently in used for maintenance and repair of motor vehicles and garage services. The site lies inclose proximity to a cluster of waste management facilities which range in their use types from thermaltreatment and energy recovery to waste transfer and recycling facilities.


122 The Industrial Estates Study concludes that the site has good access to the strategic road network and isclose proximity to other waste management operations(54). Portsmouth City Council planning officers aresupportive of intensification of industrial uses within the Anchorage Park Area which are not very intensivelyused. There is also already a concentration of waste uses in this area and thus potential for co-location.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 2and 3. Proposals for such small scale waste uses would need to address the deliverability issues identifiedabove, and be compatible with existing development in the vicinity. The suitability of this site for other openor larger scale development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to the limited sitesize and existing built development).



Site lies on Flood zones 2 and 3Site lies on a secondary aquifer

Visual intrusion Landscape type: Settlement

Nature conservation Langstone Harbour SSSI, SPA, SAC and Ramsar and Portsmouth Harbour SSSI, SPA and RamsarFarlington Marshes Local Nature Reserve lies to the north east of the site


Hilsea Lines Scheduled Ancient Monument lies 1km to the north of the site

Traffic & access The Local Road Network (A3020) is approximately 0.5km from the site, whilst the Strategic Road Network(A27(T)) is approximately 1.5km from the site.


Residential properties lie in close proximity to the siteThe closest School lies under 0.5km to the south of the site





Relevant District Planning Policy: DC30 Primary Employment Land and Sites, DC31 Employment Sitesoutside the Primary Areas, SP8 Employment and Economy


Four Waste Transfer Recycling facility and one Aggregate Wharf lie within 1km of the site


None identified



PCC 014 Land Adjacent to Military Road, Royal Naval Dockyard, Portsmouth

Local authority: Portsmouth City Council (currently allocated for employment uses).Site Size: Approximately 0.90 hectares

MOUN

TBAT

TEN

WAY

4.9m

MOUN

TBAT

TEN

WAY

GUARDHOUSE ROAD

Tanks

Transit

Depot

Harbour Office

6.4m

WB

Depot

28 to 34

Prosp

ect

FITZHERBERT STREET

391

Shed

11

MILE

END

ROAD

Mile End

COMM

ERCIA

L ROA

D38

9

CIRCULAR ROAD

5.8m

DW

Works

HERBERT STREET

Works

Victory Retail Park

Subway

Dickens

MILL LANE

6.7m

WB

6.7m

Scrap Yard

CIRCULAR ROAD

CLAR

ENCE

STRE

ET

5

Works

Depot10

El Sub Sta

Museum

375

Tank

HM Naval Base

Depot

HOPE STREET

1

399

381

Chy

WB

6.7m

MILITARY ROAD

HOPE STREET

CR

MILE

END

ROAD

IslandPortsea

MILITARY ROAD

HM Naval Base

WB

IslandPortsea

7.6m

7.0m

FLATHOUSE ROAD

Deltex House

LANDPORT

Depot

Hous

e

Chapel

El Sub Sta

East Gate

RSPCA

REGENT STREET

401

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

"

HavantFareham

GosportCity of Portsmouth


i. Site is appropriate for port related development.ii. Limited site size.iii. MOD owned site and interested operator (current industry interest to be ascertained however).iv. Surrounded by industrial development (visual impacts of waste development likely to be minimal).v. Opportunities to provide energy recovery (from waste) should be maximised.

Nomination

123 This site is being promoted for waste and energy uses by the operator of the Naval Dockyard, and wasinitially nominated in December 2007. The proposal however would require the permission of the landowner,Defence Estates before proceeding.



124 The site is located on Defence Estates land within the Royal Naval Dockyard, located on the west of PortseaIsland. The site is located at the east end of the Naval dockyard, adjacent to Trafalgar Gate and Mile EndIndustrial Estate. The site is allocated for B1, B2 and B8 employment use in Portsmouth City'sLocal Plan(55).The site has been promoted by industry for an Energy fromWaste (EfW) plant which incorporates CombinedHeat and Power (CHP) to enable energy and heat consumption needs in the Naval Dockyard area to bemet. Waste could be accepted from the dockyard, as well as from other local commercial and industrialsources.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 2, 3and 5. Proposals for such small scale waste uses would need to address the deliverability issues identifiedabove, and be compatible with existing development in the vicinity. The suitability of this site for other openor larger scale development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to the limited sitesize and existing built development).



Site lies on a secondary aquifer.Flood Zones 2 and 3 lie to the north west of the site, approximately 0.27km away.

Visual intrusion Site lies at a low elevation.The site lies in the landscape character area of south Hampshire coast.

Nature conservation Portsmouth Harbour lies just over 1km away to the north west of the site.


Historic buildings east and south west of the site. Five conservation areas within 1km of the site.Historic Park and Garden to the south west of the site.

Traffic & access The Local Road Network (A3) is approximately 0.15km from the site, whilst the Strategic Road Network(M275) is approximately 0.6km from the site.Access to the site is through the HM Naval Base industrial estate.


Residential properties close to the site on the east side. Five schools and a care home lie within 1kmof the site.



Potential land use conflict The site is allocated for B1, B2 and B8 employment use in Portsmouth City's Local Plan


None Identified


None Identified

55 CD15 Land Adjacent To Military Road.


RMR 007 Hawley Lane West, Hawley

Local authority: Rushmoor Borough CouncilSite size: 3.3 hectares

10

Highcroft

62.5m

El Sub Sta

1

9

18

BAYF

ORD

CLOSE

4a

Hawley House

9

MALL

ARD

PLAC

E

21

79

Park51

54

64

49

27

20

ETL

23

13

El

Warehouse

HAWLEY LANE

6

19

Playing Field

3

GARDENS

62.5m

6

LB

1

CLOS

E

4

7 to 10

52a

5557

Bridg

e Cott

ages

37

58

Hawley

45

24

Cove Brook

Chy

12

Sub StaEl Sub Sta

SM

Tank

6b6a

2

2

3129

CF

Works

PH

11

9

61.0m

17

52b

Brookl

ea

47

69

Sewage

Drain

Cotta

ges

6d

61.9m

MOORSIDE

17

15

32

44

DRIVE

Brookside

52

Sub Sta

Mobile Home Park

66

Pumping

Tk

121

Blackwater River

Boro Const Bdy

Drain

5

2

Ward Bd

y

HAWLEY ROAD

5

3

31

42

2

El

56

63

Brookside Park

CS

Co Const Bdy

SM

ETL

M 3

Drain

Blackwater River

1 10

5

CHAP

EL LA

NE

20

1

22a

15

11 to 20

1 to 6

19

1

81

53

Wasahla

n

46

64

Station

Def

19

12a

16

15

Tk H

122

112

3

4

CR

76

Path

Ahlan

Bridge

1.22m

Tk H

26

12b 11

Tank

1.22m

Def

ETL

El Sub Sta

DrainCLAYDON

21

33

6c

Draycott

13

New Inn

6

11

ASHBURY

1

56

CP & ED Bdy

43

50

2

8

7

ElSub Sta

MP 54.5

Drain

Drain

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

Hart

Rushmoor


i. Site is at risk from floodingii. European 2000 sites lie within close proximityiii. Historic buildings and conservation area lie in close proximityiv. Residential properties lie adjacent to the sitev. Schools lie in close proximityvi. Network of footpaths exist nearby

Nomination

125 The site was identified in December 2009 by Rushmoor Borough Council.


126 The nominated site covers an area of approximately 3.3ha and lies within Hawley Lane West IndustrialEstate. The site currently contains B8 uses, is well screened and boasts of good access. The site has ahistory of high vacancy rates due to the low market attractiveness and low profile of the site.


127 The site is on the western edge of the North east Hampshire Strategic Gap – site separated from Gap byrailway. Overall visual and character impact of site is slight. Access from M3 Junction 4 (which wouldlikely be the strategic access to this site) is of concern in terms of congestion. Furthermore, the impacts onBradfields Roundabout (junction of A325/ B3272) and Hawley Lane (often raised as safety concerns) wouldalso need to be considered carefully.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 2, 3and 4. Proposals for such facilities would need to address the deliverability issues identified above, includingensuring impacts on nearby residential amenity are avoided. Proposals would also need to take into accountof the existing buildings on site, and configure, manage the site to avoid impacts on nearby sensitive habitatsand hydrology. The suitability of this site for other development categories would need to be demonstratedby applicants (due to the proximity to nature conservation designations, residential dwellings, access etc).



Site lies on a secondary aquifer.Site lies on flood zone 2 and adjacent to flood zone 3.

Visual intrusion Site lies within North Hampshire Lowland and Heath landscape character area

Nature conservation Thames Basin Heaths SPA lies approx 1.32km west to the siteApprox 1.27km west to the site lies a SSSI - Castle Bottom to Yateley and Hawley Commons.Site is adjacent to a Meadow


Nine Historic buildings lie within a 1km area of the site.The site lies near two conservation areas; Haley Park and Green approx 0.51km north west andFarnborough Hill approximately 1.45km away.

Traffic & access The site is adjacent to a railway line, with Frimley Station being approx 1.22km away.Access to the site is via Hawley Lane, which it has a single entrance and is suitable for HGVs. The sitealso benefits from a large service yard.The Local Road Network (A325) and Primary Route Network (A331) are approximately 1.25km fromthe site, whilst the Strategic Road Network (M3) is approximately 2.35km from the site.Site is within an Urban Area.


The site is surrounded by residential properties to the west, (mobile caravan site) but screened by maturevegetation. Site is open land with motorway flyover.There are four Schools within a 1km area of the site.Frimley Park Hospital lies 1.39km away from the site.Site is approximately 0.50km away from an allotment area.Two Care homes approx 0.76km and 1.08km away from the site


Site lies within Farnborough aerodrome safeguarding area.

Potential land use conflict Relevant District Planning Policy: Development in Employment Areas E3


None identified


ELR comments that the site has a reasonable surrounding environment and is in a low profile location.The site is located in a built up area and allocated for employment uses.Site is 0.07km north east to a footpath.


SCC 004 & 005 Sites at Bevois Valley/ Mount Pleasant Road, Southampton

Local authority: Southampton City CouncilSite size: SCC 004 approximately 2.7 hectares and SCC 005 approximately 0.7 hectares

7.0m

36

PH

29

24

Court

16

19

19

25

10CLAUSENTUM ROAD

13

47

VERULAM ROAD

42 40

60 to 62

9

21

Depot

54

DENZIL AVENUE

Works

98110

20

47

EMPR

ESS R

OAD

77 to 107

88

Junior School

2a

98

TCB

Works

MOUNT PLEASANT ROAD

279

Pipeline

Sta

Unit C

El

30

14

House

Pleasant

CCLW

Post

20

Gurdw

ara

12

22

14

38

30

10.7m

14

TERRACE

26

LB

42

PHWorks

64 to 68 Kingsbury House

72

35

110a

GroundRecreation

6062

Unit B

Works

Works

Josian Centre

Imperial House

Centre

A1 to A4

Playground

23

33Me

an H

igh W

ater

17

Boro Const & Ward Bdy

1

7

31

Denzil

10

Garage

13

23

PW

22

13

27

5

22

Works

Tank

Works

BEVO

IS VA

LLEY

ROAD

10

72a

65 to

75Ca

r Park

6

120

61 to 75

197

205

PDSA

Sta

BEVOIS VALLEY

26

3

Works

4

Works

Mud

Wharf

25

Garage

3438

16

21

49

3036

38

53 to

65

1 to 8

6

Iroquois

26

Works

Works

7480

57

KINGSBURY ROAD

122

21

Tank

58

2d

Dairy

Tank

129 to 155

FamilyDerby Road

79

Maytree Nursery

22

Tank

Sub

Depot

3.6m

19

Works

16

River I

tchen

58

9

11

36

13

5.2m

TCB

38

56 to 58

4.3m

CRANBURY AVENUE

Works

Depot

80 to 96

7.6m

70

Ambassador House

81

59

48

ImperialPark

3 to 5

5.2m

LB

Centre

El

Tank5

FB

Mud

Fairways

Sloping masonry

Mud

20

10.1m

24

28

PH

33

12

El Sub Sta

45

17

94 to 97

5.2m

90 to 93

1 to 11

7

PH

118

6 to 1

8

184

33 to 43

El Sub Sta

1

169 t

o 193

40 to 46

B1 to B4Empress Park

Unit E

El Sub Sta

2

31

3.7m

SM

MHW

1a

4145

17

14

11

FRED

ERICK

STRE

ET

BLACKBERRY

22 to

11

12

35

25

34 32

PH

1

70

401 to 8

112

45

54 to

58

9 to 43

78

91

69

Works

70

WB

Waste Transfer Station

Tank

195

Sub Sta

IMPE

RIAL R

OAD

4.0m

(PH)

CementHoppe r

WB

Conveyor

Level Crossing

S Gantry

Mount Pleasant Industrial Park

15

Mount

Posts

MP

8.5m

11.3m

28

18

15

1

11.0m

21

2 4

ANCASTA ROAD

45

Works

48 4652 50

4

Court 1 to 6

25

MOUNT PLEASANT ROAD

13

20 to

36

69

66

47

38

18

52

Depot

Mount Pleasant

Empress House

and Infant School

4.6m

Ppg

Old Farm House

Gas Govn

Works

Hopper

El

Sub Sta

24 to 25

27 to 29

32

MP .5

1

13

River

Itche

n

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

"

"

"

FarehamGosport

Eastleigh

Winchester

New Forest

City of Southampton


i. Site is at risk from floodingii. Site lies adjacent to local environmental designationsiii. European 2000 sites lie in close proximityiv. Residential properties lie adjacentv. Schools lie in close proximityvi. Historic buildings lie adjacentvii. Southampton Local Plan safeguards the area for rail freight

Nomination

128 These two sites were nominated in February 2006, and comments have previously been sought on theirsuitability for waste management.



129 The two nominated sites lie within Empress Park and next to each other. The two sites lie adjacent to arailway line on the banks of the River Itchen. The site already hosts a waste transfer station and is in closeproximity to rail and suitable road infrastructure. The site is adjacent to land in both general industry andstorage and distribution uses.

130 The Industrial Estates Study indicates the site is well connected to the transport network, and in closeproximity to existing waste activities and to market areas.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1-4.Proposals for such facilities would need to address the deliverability issues identified above, including ensuringimpacts on nearby residential amenity are avoided. Proposals would also need to take into account of theexisting buildings on site, hydrology issues and manage the site to avoid impacts on nearby sensitive habitatsincluding ensuring impacts on nearby residential amenity and the school are avoided. The suitability of thissite for other development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to the proximity tonature conservation designations, residential dwellings and Southampton Local Plan safeguarding part of thearea for rail freight).

Consideration would need to be given to the rail freight safeguarding, including the use of temporary consentsand maintaining the ability to access the rail network



Sites lie on flood zone 2 and 3Sites lie on a secondary aquifer

Visual intrusion Sites lie within South Hampshire Lowland and Heath Landscape Character Area

Nature conservation The sites lie opposite Lee-on-the Solent to Itchen Estuary SSSIThe sites lie opposite Solent and Southampton Water SPA and RamsarAcross the River Itchen within approximately 1km of the sites lies Chessel Bay Nature ReserveSites lie adjacent to River Itchen Mudland SINC


To the west of the sites within 1km lie three Conservation AreasHistoric buildings lie near the siteAcross the River Itchen within 1km of the sites lies a Scheduled Ancient Monument

Traffic & access The site is accessed from Empress Road.The Local Road Network (A335) is approximately 0.3km from the site, whilst the Primary RouteNetwork (A33) is approximately 0.9km from the site.A railway line runs along the eastern boundary of the site.


Five Schools lie within 1km of the sites, two Schools lie in close proximity on the southern end of thesitesResidential dwellings lie to the south, west and north of the sites


Sites lie within Southampton aerodrome safeguarding area

Potential land use conflict Relevant District planning Policy: T14 Rail freight safeguarding, REI11 Light Industry




Within 1km of the sites there lie three Aggregate Wharfs, two Waste Transfer Stations, with the closestWaste Transfer Stations being adjacent to the site


None identified


SCC 010 Site at Whites Wharf, Woolston

Local authority: Southampton City CouncilSite Size: Approximately 0.4 hectares

JPM Building

Works

Waste Transfer Station

GatehouseYard 4

Bollards

and Business Park

Jetty

WB

Slipway

Quay

Jetty

30

19

Mud

Yard 3

MLW

WB

Yard 1

17

32

27b

Works

Capstan

Slipway

Mud

Boat Yard

2.7m

27a

MP

MHW

31

2.7m

Alpha

Mill House Business Centre

Bollards

Mooring

Jetty

Mooring Posts

Slipway

Willment Marine

28

Mean

High

Wate

r

Yard 2

4

Mooring Posts

Posts

Slipway

Mooring Posts

B1

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

Fareham

EastleighCity of Southampton


i. Site is at risk from flooding.ii. European nature conservation designation lies adjacent to the site.iii. Control of traffic movementsiv. Possibility of competing land uses if comprehensive regeneration of the area were to be acceptable

Nomination

131 The site was nominated in September 2006.



132 The nominated site lies within Willments Shipyard, an allocated employment site, Hazel Road/ WillmentMarine & Business park area suitable for general industry and storage and distribution uses. The site lies onthe banks of the River Itchen and adjacent to a railway line to the east. The site has a history of being usedfor concrete batching. The site is located in an industrial estate which is well used by HGVs. The roadsurface however is poor with pot holes, poor drainage, and access past some residential properties. Thetraffic impact on Hazel Road could only be severe if the maximum traffic generation assumption wererealised (which indicates the need for assessment and control).


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 2and 3. Proposals for such small scale waste uses would need to address the deliverability issues identifiedabove, and be compatible with existing development in the vicinity and address access. The suitability of thissite for other open or larger scale development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (dueto the limited site size hydrology issues and close proximity to nature conservation).

In the long term there might be the potential to comprehensively regenerate the area (subject to addressing arange of issues).



Site lies on flood zone 2 and 3Site lies on a secondary aquifer

Visual intrusion Site overlies both the South Hampshire Coast and the South Hampshire Lowland and Heath LandscapeCharacter Area

Nature conservation Ancient woodlands lie over 1km away for the site to the south eastThe site lies opposite Lee-on-the Solent to Itchen Estuary SSSIThe site lies Solent and Southampton Water SPA and Ramsar


Site lies adjacent to Peartree GreenSix Historic buildings lie near the site

Traffic & access The Primary Route Network (A33) is approximately 1.75km from the site, via the A3025.Access to the site is from Hazel Road, via the A3025.A railway line lies immediately east of the site.Woolston rail station lies to the south east of the site, under 1km away


Residential developments lie the other side of Peartree Green, approximately 0.5km away from the siteThree Schools lie with 1km of the site


Site lies within Southampton urban area


Site lies within Southampton aerodrome safeguarding area


Relevant District planing Policy: REI10 Industry and WarehousingPossible long term regeneration




Within 1km of the site there lies two Aggregate Wharfs, two Waste Transfer Stations and one AggregateRecycling facility. Across the River Itchen from the site within 1km lies a further twoWaste Transfer facilitiesand five Aggregate Wharfs.


None identified


TTV 029 Land East of Abbey Park Industrial Estate, Romsey

Local authority: Test Valley Borough CouncilSite size: 4.8 hectares (not previously developed land)

3

A7

D5

48

31

ETL

El Sub Sta

ETL

ETL

11

ETL

1

The Quadrangle

LB

B4

C5

E3

7

15

Lake

FB

ETL

C3 to C4

The Premier Center

44

77

Depot

House

1

The Triton Centre

El Sub Sta

Works

1 to 6

21

2

8

B1 to

B2

9

D1

E1

Depot

Drain

PREMIER WAY

7

D6

El Sub Sta

Dynasty

ETL

Luzborough Plantation

19

A1

The Premier Center

5

C1

32 to

43

C8

D2

79

50

Abbey Enterprise Centre

51 to 76

¯ 0 100 200 m"

"

"

Eastleigh

New Forest

City of Southampton


i. Site lies adjacent to local gapii. Residential properties lie within 250m of the siteiii. Site lies on undeveloped landiv. Proposals would need to be compatible with the local planning authority's aspirations for the site (to be

determined).

Nomination




134 The site lies adjacent to Abbey Park Industrial Estate and may offer potential to provide an extension tothe industrial estate. The latter has been assessed in the study of Industrial areas and therefore site TTV029 should be considered in the context of the neighbouring industrial estate. The site is of such a sufficientsize, that it may be suitable to deliver more than one waste facility on this site. There is a possibility thatthe site could be used to provide land for the expansion of the adjacent industrial estate.

135 Site is accessed from Premier Way at the roundabout with the A27. There may be issues with the accessjunction and the potential for queueing traffic at peak hours if the site was developed for an HWRC.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1-5.Proposals for such facilities would need to address the deliverability issues identified above, including impactson nearby residential amenity are avoided. Proposals would also need to take into account the aspirations ofthe local planning authority and being adjacent to a local gap. The suitability of this site for other developmentcategories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to the proximity of residential dwellings, accessetc).


Protection ofwater resources

Site lies on a secondary aquiferPart of the site lies in flood zones 2 and 3.

Visual intrusion Site lies at a low elevation.Landscape character area that the site lies in is South Hampshire Lowland and Heath.

Natureconservation

Five ancient woodland sites lie to the south west and north west of the site within 1km.Thirteen SINCs lie to the north east, south and south west of the site within 1km.Mostly improved grassland, small strips of woodland. Large pond immediately adjacent.Site is undeveloped and has potential for protected species in surrounding habitats.


Historic buildings lie to the north and north west of the site.A Historic Park and Garden lies approximately 0.21km north west of the site.

Traffic & access There is immediate access onto the Local Road Network (A27), whilst the Strategic Road Network (M27) isapproximately 4.1km from the site.The site is approximately 1.7km to the minerals and waste lorry route, which is via Luzborough Road.Access Road to the site is Premier Way.Site is within 1km of Romsey and North Baddesley urban area.

Proximity tosensitive human

Residential properties lie to the east and north west of the site with the closest property being 0.16km to thenorth of the site.

& environmentalreceptors

Two Schools lie within 1km to the north west of the site.

Proximity toaerodrome

Site is within Southampton aerodrome safeguarding area.

safeguardingareas




Relevant District planing Policy: ESN 15: Retention of Employment Land


A waste transfer station lies to the south east of the siteSite is adjacent to Abbey Park Industrial Estate.Ashfield Sawmill lies over 1km away to the south west of the site.

Other issues (e.g.public rights ofway)

N/A


136 The map below shows the distribution of the sites currently allocated for employment uses which havebeen looked at within this section.

Map 5 Nominated sites currently allocated for employment uses.



Section 7 Other nominated sites

138 The sites included in this section are those nominated on land which is not allocated as employment land.These sites have been identified as those most likely to have support in principle for a waste use in future,and where no major 'showstoppers' in terms of deliverability have been identified.

139 As shown by the 'site assessment' tables displayed below for each site, there are numerous issues whichwould need to be addressed in order for these sites to be acceptable in planning terms. Prior to a planningapplications being proposed however, the detailed requirements cannot be be determined.

140 Maps showing the indicative site boundaries of each of the following sites are included for each site. Fora map showing the location of all the sites by district see the end of this section.

141 The following sites are listed in alphabetical order by the local authority area within which they fall. Mostof these sites have been consulted on previously as part of the 'Issues and Options' consultation stage in2006 and 2007 (see Section 2 'Methodology for site selection and assessment'). Since this period, in mostcases further information has become available about the sites.

Assessment findings

Based on the assessment for each of the sites, the broad development categories which may be suitable areshown below. Please refer to development categories Section 2 'Methodology for site selection and assessment'.There are no landfill voids at these sites which makes category 7 irrelevant. For sites that potentially havelandfill voids see Section 9 'Sites nominated for disposal to land' and Landfill and Surcharging Report.


BSD 008 - Rail Sidings, Basingstoke

Local authority: Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council.Site Area: 2.31 hectares. Previously Developed Land

Posts

Signal Gantry

Tanks

House

Depot

Waterworks

Sub

2333

Brookvale School1 to 16

ED & Ward Bdy

13

LOWER BROOK STREET

171 169

Depot

El Sub Sta

153

QUEEN'S ROAD

141

191

32

6972

381 Dairy Court

86

Cycle Track

Tank

Meridian

Superstore

102

43

25

201

2

GEORGE STREET

187 183

1a

42

167

30

Depot

18

11 to

45

47b

40 to 76

MAY STREET

Chy

124

ElSub

Mast

House

Path

Subway

Sta

84.1m

239

90

39

COLLEGE ROAD

175

51

Depot

52

18

16

SINCL

AIR D

RIVE

LB

2

TCB

47a

50

68

El Sub Sta

167 to 197

70

84

199

Cycle Track and Path

2

3

12 to 22

1 to 11

83.8m

CHURCHILL WAY WEST

Allotment Gardens

51

Tank

Loddon

83.4m

Subway

181

60

Drain

50

9

57 to 165

MP 48.25

House

El Sub Sta

Signal Gantry

Works

El Sub Sta

40

71

65

209

Tanks

CHURCHILL WAY WEST

Path

Club

Cottages

King George V Playing Fields

CHURCHILL WAY WEST

55

225

78

213

74

189

Mast

4139

40

47

Ramp

66

1364

Dairy Court

Pumping Station

El Sub Sta

Drain

65

41

River

CR

El Sub Sta

54

185

30

1

47

Wins

ton H

ouse

45

Car Park

PELTON ROAD

64

82.8m

78

ED & Ward Bdy

Pond

Cycle Track

Bowling Green

Cycle Track and Path

Meridian

1

El

Playground

Hall

76

66

1

82.8m55

Kingfisher

67

CHURCHILL WAY WEST

Sta

MP .5

Millennium Court

Cycle Path

72

1

185177 173

53

40

3349

193

4656

140

Drain

1-4

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

Hart

East Hampshire



i. Proposals would need to consider the potential incompatible land uses proposed on neighbouring land(and how any impacts on amenity would be managed).

ii. Potential uses would only be determined following further investigation and release of the site from currentleasing arrangements.

iii. Proposals for waste management should not prejudice the potential future use of the sites as an aggregatesdepot (uses should be complementary).

iv. Appropriate measures will need to be taken to prevent impact on local businesses (e.g congestion).v. Suitable access to the site would need to be securedvi. Proposals would need to ensure the underlying aquifer is protected.vii. Proximity to conservation area to be considered (visual intrusion impacts by large scale buildings to be

avoided).viii. Linear site unlikely to be suitable for large-scale waste facilities.


Nomination

142 Site nominated by the landowner Network Rail in 2006 who lease the rail sidings to rail operator EWS.The site was identified for potential minerals and waste activity due to its ability to transport materials byrail. The site boundary is approximate and may change to suit operational requirements.


143 The site is located within the centre of Basingstoke south of Houndmills industrial estate (west of Basingstoketrain station). The site is currently used as rail sidings, and has been identified as an opportunity to importcrushed rock to the north of the county (a market for imported aggregates which is currently not served byrail). The site has been identified by an independent study as a preferred site for an aggregates rail depot,which should be safeguarded for such uses(56).

144 Adjacent land to the north east of the site is under pressure for development, and if eventually implementedcould result in potential land use conflicts. In 2009 for instance, a planning application for a major mixeduse development (including approx. 500 residential units) was submitted to Basingstoke Borough Counciland subsequently refused. This decision was appealed (the appeal decision is currently pending)(57). Further,permission has been granted for approximately 300 residential units south of the site (between the railwayand Churchill Way West).


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1and 2. Proposals for such facilities would need to address the deliverability issues identified above, includingensuring impacts on the underlying aquifer and conservation area. Proposals would also need to take accountof the existing uses on the site. The suitability of this site for other development categories would need to bedemonstrated by applicants (due to the restrictions on the scale of built development (to avoid visual impacts)etc).



Overlies a principal aquifer and Source protection Zones 1 and 2.

Visual intrusion Site screened by mature hedgerows and trees (fairly well screened from residential properties to thesouth).Located within urban area and industrial setting. Brookvale West Conservation Area lies south of thesite however (approx. 190m).Site is very visible from railway.

Nature conservation Site runs along the railway bank (tree cover either side).


Conservation Area in vicinity.

Traffic & access No existing proper road access (potential access through industrial estate (A340). Any proposal wouldneed to avoid increased congestion to junction 6 of the M3.Well-established rail access

56 Land & Mineral Management Ltd on behalf of Hampshire County Council (2009)Wharves & Depots Needs Assessment57 Application number BDB/ 69757 (Former Victoria and Eli Lilly Sites, Kingsclere Road, Basingstoke, RG21 6XA)




Existing residential properties and college located south of the site (approx. 190m). Allotment landand bowling green nearby.



Potential land use conflict Potential planned new development in close proximity (see above).Proposed that the majority of site


Complementary activities to the north of the site in industrial estate.


RoW runs along western boundary of the site (but no direct public access onto the site).


BSD 016/ 022 Peak Copse, Dummer

Local authority: Basingstoke & Deane Borough CouncilSite Area: Total area of 14.68 hectares. Available area of ‘brownfield land’ comprises 1.08 hectares of hardstanding and former buildings. The County Council likely to retain approximately 0.5 ha. of the developablearea for potential operational uses. Partially previously developed land.NOTE: Only a proportion of this site would be available for waste management uses (subject to a development plot becomingavailable).

BSD016BSD022

0 100 200 m

Hart

Winchester

East Hampshire



i. Planning permission would be required for a change of use and development of a waste facility.ii. Any suitable facility would require appropriate siting on the caravan site, with suitable mitigation to avoid

damage/ encroachment/ pollution of surrounding copse. Part of the caravan site is likely to be retainedand thus unavailable.

iii. Proposals would need to include appropriate landscape strategy and consider the protection, conservationand enhancement of historic landscape features and their setting.

iv. Shared vehicular access would be required.v. Financial contribution towards long term countryside management and enhancement of the surrounding

woodland likely to be required.


Nomination

145 Peak Copse is owned by Hampshire County Council. The site was identified in 2005 following a site searchfor the south-west Basingstoke area. The original nomination (BSD 016) has since been reduced to reflectthe available brownfield element only (BSD 022). The latter area (the former caravan site) is assessedbelow. Due to its strategic location, the site has previously been considered for its potential to host aHousehold Waste Recycling Centre (HWRC).


146 Peak Copse has planning consent and was used previously as a gypsy and traveller residential site. Thebrownfield elements of the site consist of this caravan park and a Hampshire County Council depot. Thesite has an adjoining copse which is currently unmanaged. Peak Copse is located directly north of the A30dual carriageway adjacent to Junction 7 of the M3 motorway to the south-west of Basingstoke.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1-3.Proposals for such facilities would need to address the deliverability issues identified above, including impactson the surrounding copse and protection of the conservation area, historic landscape and setting. Proposalswould also need to take account of the existing development on site. The suitability of this site for other largerscale development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (esp. how visual impacts wouldbe avoided).



Overlies a principal aquifer.

Visual intrusion Well screened within the existing setting of ancient woodland and landscape buffer zone.Landscape Type: Downland Mosaic Large ScaleLandscape Character Area: Hannington and Dummer Downs (7b)

Nature conservation Potential presence of reptiles/ bats/ badgers from surrounding woodland.Area of adjoining ancient woodland is designated as a Site of Important Nature Conservation (SINC).Also contains population of dormice (European protected species).


Site has high archaeological potential (esp. woodland).Some mature trees may be original plantings associated with the historic parkland.Group of listed buildings in the vicinity.

Traffic & access Immediate access onto the A30, whilst the Strategic Road Network (M3) is approximately 0.3km fromthe site.Located opposite a restricted turn junction with a significant record of road traffic accidents.Furthermore, reduced visibility to the north, traffic impact slight to high and could be an issue.


Farm located within 150 metres.Adjacent to a golf course.



Potential land use conflict None identified.




No waste management facilities in close proximity.


Public right of way through the site in the northwest corner and along the north east side.Opportunities for improving countryside access from developing this site need to be exploited.Within 300m of an urban area (Basingstoke) - a source of waste material


BSD 021/ 025 Land adjacent to Apsley Farm, near Andover

Local authority: Basingstoke & Deane Borough CouncilSite Area: Total area of the two sites are approximately 7.47 Hectares. Not previously developed land.

Pipe Line

Tk

104.5m

B 3400

Station

0.91m RH

WB


0.91m RH

Daltons House

The Ridge

Track

House

Track

WB

Track

B 3400

Def

Ridges Plantation

Apsley Sawmill

Filling

Track

Reservoir

Def

Track

Tower

0.91m RH

Track

109.2m

Track

Well

Track

Track

108.4m

Dism

antle

d Rail

way

Budgett Farm

Bourne Wood

¯ 0 100 200 m

"


BSD025

BSD021


i. Any proposals should avoid setting a precedent for built development in this countryside location.ii. Opportunities to utilise existing hardstanding and waste management infrastructure should be maximised.iii. The proximity to a nitrate vulnerable area is a key consideration.iv. Potential to use the existing site access should be maximised.v. The need to avoid impact on the landscape character is a key consideration.vi. Traffic likely to exceed levels under the previous planning permissions is a key consideration, and should

seek to avoid significant adverse impacts in terms of traffic or road safety.

Nomination

147 BSD021 was nominated in 2009 by SITA. Neighbouring site BSD 025 was identified by a waste operatorin 2010. The sites will be considered together for the purposes of this assessment. BSD 021 was identifiedby a waste operator originally for an eco recovery park (linked to agricultural production within the adjoiningApsley estate) An operator has recently identified BSD 025 as having potential for open windrow composting.



148 The sites are located near to the village of Hurstbourne Priors, on arable land located east of Apsley Farm,a former chalk quarry and non-hazardous waste disposal (landfill). Chalk extraction and infill at ApsleyFarm commenced during the 1980s and extraction ceased in 2006. Apsley farm landfill was grantedpermission for three separate phases of development, although only the first two phases were developed.During the 1990s permission was granted to use part of the landfill site for a waste transfer station. ApsleyFarm landfill site was acquired by SITA in 2004 (leased fromApsley Farm Estates Ltd.). In 2009 permissionwas granted to import capping soils to use to complete and improve the restoration and gas managementat the landfill site.

149 BSD021/ 025 are east of a disused railway cutting and haul road. BSD 025 is located on Phase III of thelandfill permission (which is unimplemented because a PPC permit from the Environment Agency was notreceived). BSD 021 is south of BSD 025. Apart from the restored former landfill, the sites are surroundedby agricultural land.

Assessment Findings:

Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1and 2. Proposals for such facilities would need to address the deliverability issues identified above, includingavoiding significant adverse impacts in terms of traffic or road safety, and be compatible with the countrysidelocation. The suitability of this site for other development categories would need to be demonstrated byapplicants.



Site lies in Source protection zone 2.Site lies on a principal aquifer.Flood Zones 2 and 3 lie within 1km to the north east and west of the site.

Visual intrusion Sites lie at a high elevation and slope in south westerly direction.North Wessex Downs, AONB lies to the north east of the site within 1km.Landscape Type: Downland Mosaic Large ScaleLandscape Character Area: Andover Open Downs (8d)BSD021 is well screened.

Nature conservation 3 Ancient Woodlands lie to the south west and north west of the site within 1km.Harewood Forest and Faulkners Bushes lie within 1km of the site to the south west and north west of thesite.


A few Historic buildings lie to the north of the site.To the east of the site lies Hurstbourne Priors, Conservation Area.

Traffic & access Traffic would be routed to the east along the B3400.The Strategic Road Network (A34) is approximately 4.0km from the site.

Proximity to sensitivehuman &

A few residential properties lie around the site.



Site does not lie within aerodrome safeguarding area.




None identified.


The site sits within Apsley Farm (c) and Apsley Landfill.


None identified.


BSD 023 Carousel Dairy Farm, Manor Farm, Farleigh Wallop

Local authority: Basingstoke & Deane Borough CouncilSite Area: 1.07 Hectares. Previously developed land.

A planning application for this site (BDB/75034 ) has been granted subject to legal permission.

Track

Cottages

205.1m

Track

(disused)

FARLEIGH LANE

200.3m

2

190.8m

1

Pit

Mast (Telecommunication)

Manor Farm

193.4m

Manor Farm

¯ 0 100 200 m

"



i. Relatively unconstrained and well-screened site.ii. The risk of groundwater contamination is a key consideration and make restrict the type of facility.iii. Detailed proposals for this site have been considered by a potential operator.iv. There is minimal industrial related development in the area and development should avoid detrimental

impact to the rural character of the area.v. The access arrangements and any routing measures would need to be assessed as the main route goes via

Hatch Warren housing, a school and is traffic calmed. Any increased level of HGV movements would haveto be monitored and appropriately mitigated.

vi. The site is of single ownership.


Nomination

150 The site was nominated in 2010, and is located just south of Basingstoke and the M3. The site has beenidentified for its potential for an on-farm anaerobic digestion of agricultural wastes, energy crops and foodwaste.


151 This site was previously used as a dairy, which ceased due to changes in the market. The site is made upof existing agricultural style buildings and is well screened by existing vegetation and landform. The site hasnow got planning permission (BDB/75034) subject to legal agreement for the demolition of existingagricultural buildings, the construction and operation of an anaerobic digestion facility to handle food wasteand agricultural slurries, and the creation of an access track to connect the site to an existing highwayentrance,


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development category 2.This is due to the screening of the site and existing agricultural style buildings. Proposals for such uses wouldneed to address the deliverability issues identified above. The suitability of this site for other larger scaledevelopment categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to the risk of groundwatercontamination, surrounding buildings / rural character and impact on traffic route etc).



Site lies in Source Protection Zone 3.The site lies on a principal aquifer.

Visual intrusion Low visual impact as the site is well screened on all sides by a thick tree belt and landform.Overall, there are no visual receptors so the visual impact is low adverse.There are no landscape designations surrounding the site.Development may be detrimental to the rural character of the area as there is little other industrialdevelopment in the area.Landscape Type: Open DownsLandscape Character Area: Basingstoke Open Downs (8b)

Nature conservation Six ancient woodland sites lie within 1km of the siteTwo SINCs lie to the south west and north west of the site within 1km..


The site does not lie within an Historic environment.

Traffic & access The Strategic Road Network (M3) is approximately 2km from the site.Access to the SRN is via the Farleigh Lane, Nut Lane and Down Street.The site is not within an Urban Area.


A few residential properties lie to the south east and south west of the site with the majority situated tothe north of the site.







None identified.


None identified.


None identified.


EHS 004 Spaniard Inn, Liphook

Local authority: East Hampshire District CouncilSite Area: 1.4 hectare. Approximately 0.9 hectares would be available. Partially previously developed land.

175.0m

Path (um)

The Spaniard Inn

Path

(um)

173.4m

CottageKnockhundred

KNOCKHUNDRED LANE

Gorselands

Path (u

m)

¯ 0 100 200 m"

"

"

"

Winchester

East Hampshire


i. Need to ensure any uses do not have adverse impact on surrounding sensitive environment.ii. Likely to require junction improvements considering the size and speed of the road.iii. Highways Agency advised transport impact survey required (site likely to benefit from A3 Hindhead

Improvement project).iv. Would require sufficient landscaping to screen any waste uses due to prominent location (this could reduce

available space for development).v. Implications of proximity to European nature conservation designations to be investigated through Habitats

Regulations Assessment process.vi. Need to ensure biodiversity on the site is protected and enhanced where possible.vii. Preferred uses on the site would need to be agreed with local planing authority.


Nomination

152 This site was identified in 2006 from the National Land Use Database. The landowner was since contactedand has promoted the site for waste uses, recognising the opportunity for development to enhance the site.This site has a single landowner and the boundary of the available land is to be confirmed. Site includes aconcrete area (car park and ruined building not suitable for reuse). Previously suggested that a recyclingcompany have expressed an interest in operating a waste facility on site.


153 This is the site of a derelict public house (The Spaniard Inn hotel) located in Bramshott Chase (PortsmouthRoad (A3)). An outline application to develop the sites for housing in 2001 was dismissed at appeal.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1, 2and 3. Proposals for such facilities would need to address the deliverability issues identified above, includingthe need for adequate screening and the surrounding sensitive environment. Proposals would also need totake into account the existing development on site. The suitability of this site for other development categorieswould need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to the restricted site size and proximity to residentialproperties etc).



Site overlies a principal aquifer.Flood zones 2 and 3 lie within 1km to the south of the site.

Visual intrusion Prominent location on main road (A3).AONB within 250m.Landscape Type: Greensand HillsLandscape Character Area: Western Weald Forest and Farmland Heath (1d)

Nature conservation Site predominantly grassland/scrub/ broadleaved woodland. Potential species on site include reptilesand invertebrates.Across road from Wealden Heaths SPA and SSSI (sites could support notable bird species).Adjacent to heathland SINC.SPA within 50m and contains Biodiversity Action Plan Priority Habitats.Site is separated from the SSSI/SPA by the Portsmouth Road.


Limited archaeological potential.Mission Hall lies to the north east of the site.

Traffic & access Site has direct access onto the Strategic Road Network (A3(T)).A new junction serving the site has been provided off Knockhundred Lane as part of the A3 HindheadTunnel project.Traffic impacts range from slight to high.Highways Agency are likely to require a detailed traffic impact assessment due to the site's proximityto the A3 trunk road.


Residential properties adjacent to the site to the northeast.Greyshott is nearest urban area (1km from site).




Site does not lie within aerodrome safeguarding area.

Potential land use conflict Site is previously developed vacant land (in isolated open area).


No opportunities for co-location, and some distance from waste source- preferably use for a specialistfacility therefore which benefits from remote location.


Potential recreational use of site to be investigated (public rights of way along the eastern and northernboundary).


EHS 011 Army Cadet Site, Greatham

Local authority: East Hampshire District CouncilSite Area: 1.53 hectares. Partially previously developed land.

98.2m

A 325

Hampshire and Isles of Wight

Army Cadet Force

Drain

A 325

Track

Mast

LONGMOOR

ROAD

El Sub Sta

A 3

B 2131

Longmoor Inclosure

A 3

WOOLMER

ROAD

¯ 0 100 200 m"

"

"

"

Winchester

East Hampshire


i. Consideration should be given to any plans for the surrounding military land (e.g. Longmoor Camp, trainingareas and ranges).

ii. Proposals should seek to avoid harm to the nature conservation interests of the Sites of Importance forNature Conservation (SINC) located at this site.

iii. Implications of the site's proximity to the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA; East Hampshire Hangars SAC;and Woolmer Forest SAC, need to be considered as part of the Habitats Regulations Assessment process.

iv. Any suitable facility should be of a scale which ensures development would not compromise the objectivesof the South Downs National Park designation.

v. Opportunities to enhance the major road junction should be considered.vi. The disposal and release of this MoD-owned site is to be confirmed.

Nomination

154 This site was identified in 2006 by a waste operator. The site is owned by the MoD. It has been suggestedthat an enclosed facility on this site could represent an 'extension' to the existing adjacent built development(west of the site).



155 The site is well located at a major road junction (the intersection of the A325 and A3). The site is mostlyundeveloped land and lies between the A325 (Woolmer Road) and large industrial units used by the MoD.The high ecological value of the site should be recognised.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 2, 3and 4. Proposals for such facilities would need to address the deliverability issues identified above, includingthe need for adequate screening and surrounding sensitive environment. Proposals would also need to takeaccount of the existing development on site. The suitability of this site for other development categorieswould need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to surrounding military land and the location within theNational Park etc).



Site over lies a principal aquifer.Source Protection Zone 3 lies approximately 0.30km to the south west of the site.Flood Zones 2 and 3 lie to the south west of the site.

Visual intrusion Site lies at a low elevation to the surrounding area.Site lies within the South Downs National Park.AONB lies to the west of the site.Landscape Type: Woodland and Plantation on HeathLandscape Character Area: Western Weald Forest and Farmland Heath (1d)

Nature conservation Site is designated as a SINC for its grassland habitats and notable plant species. Also likely to supportprotected animal species – there are records of badgers and great crested newts in the area.High quality habitats associated with the existing road verges.Site is adjacent to SSSI/ SAC/ Wealden Heath Phase II SPA.


Historic buildings located to the west of the site.Four scheduled ancient monuments are within 1km to the site.

Traffic & access The site has direct access to the Strategic Road Network (A3(T)) and Local Road Network (A325).Access into this site requires further investigation due to shared access with military base.Traffic impact is low across ranges, although the Highways Agency are likely to require a detailed trafficimpact assessment due to the site's proximity to the A3 trunk road.


The nearest residential properties are in Greatham which is approx. 500m from the site.



Potential land use conflict The future availability of this land (and adjacent buildings) requires clarification.


Site is adjacent to an industrial estate.Blackmoor Estate, Waste Transfer (soil treatment) is located approx. 1km from the site.


Site is unlikely to be used by the public.


EHS 026/ 030 Land East & West of Alton MRF, Holyborne (A31)

Local authority: East Hampshire District CouncilSite Area: Approx. 3 hectares in total. EHS 026 is not previously developed land. EHS 030 is partially developed land.

CR

Depot

River W

ey

Tank

102.2m

1Malms Farm Cottages

97.4m

Haw Bridge

0.91m RH

Hawbridge

2

A 31100.0m

MP 47

91.4m

Tanks

91.1m101.0m

102.9m

0.91m RH

Depot

Ward Bd

y

95.3m

MP .5

CR

Transformer

Farm

ED Bdy

ESS

100.0m

Pond

105.6m

ETL

El Sub Sta

2

CR

92.6m

Tank

Def

98.9m

LOWER

NEAT

HAM M

ILL LA

NE

SL

Station

Hawbridge Cottages

0.91m FF1

Filter Bed

Issues

Bonham's Farm

Stone

ED & Ward Bd

y

MP .25

WB

105.4m¯ 0 100 200 m"

"

"

Eastleigh

Winchester

East Hampshire

EHS026

EHS030


i. Uses which maximise opportunities to transport materials by rail should be exploited in this area.ii. The scale of facility should seek to avoid inappropriate encroachment into the undeveloped land to the

east.iii. Careful consideration should be given to any possible impacts on the listed buildings to the east of the site.iv. The access arrangements and any routing measures would need to be assessed.v. Proposals would need to incorporate design and landscaping treatments to address any potential visual

impacts (as in the case of the Alton MRF).vi. This location is comparatively unconstrained.


Nomination

156 EHS026 (1.67 hectares) was identified in 2007 by Hampshire County Council due to its potential rail accessto the existing MRF (Materials Recovery Facility). EHS030 (1.4 hectares) was nominated in 2008 by thelandowner Exxon Mobil (land surplus to requirements). Alton MRF is a major facility and the adjacentsites represent an opportunity to expand the waste uses at this location in the form of a Resource Park typeof development. It has been suggested that an intermodal rail service could be developed at this locationto move recovered paper from Alton MRF to the UPM Shotton processing site in North Wales.


157 The two sites lie either side of Alton MRF- a facility which sorts dry mixed recyclables and is operated byVeolia Environmental Services. EHS026 is undeveloped land owned by the Treloar Trust. EHS030 is an'L' shaped piece of brownfield land to the rear and side of Exxon Mobil's existing oil pumping station.


Based on the information currently available, these sites are considered suitable for development categories1-4. The uses on each of the sites are likely to differ as EHS026 is undeveloped land and may be morecompatible with categories 1 and 2. Proposals for such facilities would need to address the deliverabilityissues identified above, including visual impacts on surrounding area / buildings and opportunities to exploitrail transport. The suitability of this site for other development categories (buildings with a stack) would needto be demonstrated by applicants.



The sites lies on a principal aquiferFlood Zones 2 and 3 lie to the south of the sites

Visual intrusion The sites are visible from the A31.Landscape Type: Greensand TerraceLandscape Character Area: Wey Valley (3f)

Nature conservation Site has limited ecological value, although there are local records of badgers and brown hare.Adjacent railway embankment has potential to function as a wildlife corridor.


Group of listed buildings lie round the site.Two conservation areas lie with 1km of the sites to the north east and south west.Cuckoo's Corner Roman Site and Settlement, scheduled ancient monuments lies south west of EHS030.

Traffic & access The site has direct access to the Primary Route Network (A31).Located immediately to the east of the existing Alton MRF, on the south side of the A31.Main concern is entry and exit slips are only accessible via south western A31, with vehicles exiting thesite required to travel 1 mile before being able to turn around and travel NW.May need to reassess site capacity of, and subsequently, improve junctions at the turning points to thenorth and south of the site.Potential to utilise the rail link.


Sites are comparatively remote.Nearest residential properties 400m from the sites.


Sites lie in Farnborough aerodrome safeguarding area.



Potential land use conflict Alton MRF (Waste Transfer) lies between the two sites.


Sites are adjacent to the existing Alton Materials Recovery Facility (a large scale facility).


Pipelines crossing the site affects a small area of EHS030.


EHS 036 Land at Hazelton Farm, near Horndean

Local authority: East Hampshire District CouncilSite Area: Specific area nominated occupies 8-10 hectares (site measures approximately 26 hectares in total).Not previously developed land.NOTE: Only a proportion of this 26 hectare site is likely to available for waste management uses.

EGLA

NTINE C

LOSE

EGLANTINE WALK

52

7

14

27

96

MAGNOLIA

WAY

2

GREE

NFIEL

D CR

ESCE

NT

82

5767

9

ELDERBER RY

737

CHES

TNUT

AVEN

UE

92

17

10

17 13

GREENFIELD CRESCENT

218

13

FFCW

1

55.2m

11

202

1

55.1m 18

SHEEPWASH

Golf Course

ETL

Pond

Def

17

8

5

104

51

EGLANTINE WALK

227

228

48.5m

71

110

81

2

41

El

120

LAUREL RO AD

54.1m

54.4m

168

54.7m

13

CP and ED Bdy

180

BANK CLOSE

0.91m TB

Hazleton WoodDe

f

Def

Ward

Bdy

Ward Bd y

FB

Drain

Drain

FW10

912

1

Playground

86

HAZL

ETON

WAY

49

5

106110

Pos ts

17

3

1

229

55

El Sub Sta

106

9321

120

9

11

55.1m

Hazleton Wood

167

9

FB

156

179

193

HOLLY BANK

Def

192

22

Golf Course

ETL

Drain

ETL

Motor R ac in g Circuit

Ward Bdy

58.7m

1

6

5

476

Und

Und

62

2

10

CELA

NDINE A

V ENUE

29

1

13

16

Sub Sta

1

MAPLETR EE AV ENUE

32

6

6

Def

MAPLETR EE AV ENUE

CP and ED Bdy

23

20

ALMOND CLOSE

210

Def

187

0.91m

TB

Blendworth Common

(Track)

ETL

El Ps

ETL

A 3(M

)

ETL

Def

Blendworth Common

B 2149

Und

74

115

Pos ts

CELA

NDIN

E AV E

NUE

2

LB

10

11

13

118

17

7

Pumping

WAY CR

42

6

203

2

15

56.1m

204

Drain

Drain

6

Blendworth Common

A 3(M)

Drain

Track

Def

Ward Bd y

Drain

Drain

1

1

56

MARJORAM CRESCENT

122124

16

ElUnd

1

Sub Sta

132

20

21

GREE

NFIEL

D CR

ESCE

NT

207

1

11

7

FB

0.91m

TB

Und

ROAD

Ward Bd

y

Und

A 3(M

)

A 3(M)

Drain

0.91m RH

Circuit

Drain

Track

Und

1

50

44

13

23

68

47

9

6

Padnell Cuts Wood

70

2

53

24

18

15

15

20

96

Stat io n

48.8m

79

49.9m

45

SH EEPWASH

ROAD

(Track

)

18

5

144

161

1

16

0.91m

TB

HOLLY

10

15

16

24

Track

Drain

Blendworth Common

B 2149

Pond

Track

ELDERBER RY WAY

119

TCB

68

43

6

FF

14

11a

4

2

227

14

0.91m

TB

Def

Und

207a

CL

208

5

4Hazleton Wood

Drain

Blendworth Common

Def

0.91m TB

Motor R ac in g

Drain

Drain

Def

B 2149

¯ 0 100 200 m"

"

"

"

Winchester

East Hampshire


i. The scale of the site and its access to the main road network offers an opportunity to locate a resource parktype model (large scale facility). This would also need to demonstrate that there would be no adverse impactson the junction / A3

ii. Relatively unconstrained site with in terms of designations and information on land availability anddeliverability is available.

iii. Any suitable facility would require appropriate siting, with suitable mitigation to avoid damage/encroachment/ pollution of surrounding woodland or any protected species. A habitat survey likely to berequired prior to any development (records of great crested newts).

iv. It is likely that permission for a permanent facility would be required to justify the investment in developingthis site.

v. Located in area designated as countryside.vi. Potential opportunity to provide waste management facility serving Portsmouth and planned growth of

Waterlooville


vii. Hydrogeology constraints likely to restrict potential proposals.viii. Drainage and proximity to the stream means pollution issues would need to be considered.ix. Advice from the Environment Agency would be necessary due to the water resource issues.

Nomination

158 This site was nominated in 2009 on behalf of the landowner. This site lies within a larger area known asHazleton Interchange which has previously been nominated for clay extraction and infill (see ruled out siteEHS022). The promoter of this site has devised a waste management proposal termed Blendworth ResourceFarm s based on a Resource Management Park concept.


159 The site is owned by one landowner and is located on Blendworth Common within Hazleton Farm. Thesite is adjacent to the A3 motorway (near junction 2). The site lies outside a settlement policy boundary inthe Local Plan(58), and as such it is regarded as countryside. Part of the site has a permission for use as arace track contained within two arcs of earth bunding.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1and 2. This is due to the existing infrastructure and size of the site. Proposals for such uses would need toaddress the deliverability issues identified above, for example the hydrological constraints. The suitability ofthis site for other enclosed development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to beingin an open countryside location etc).



Site overlies a secondary aquifer and is in an area of groundwater vulnerability.Site overlies Source Protection area 1 and 4.An Environment Agency Licenced Water Extraction Zone covers part of the site.

Visual intrusion Site lies adjacent to the South Downs National Park to the east - development is predicted to have amoderate to strong adverse effect on the rural setting to the ParkAONB lies approximately 1.4km to the north east.Site may be visible from elevated land to the east of the site.The development of this relatively open site could diminish the rural character of the landscape.Affect on landscape character likely to be moderate adverse.Landscape Type: Lowland Mosaic Medium Scale. Landscape Character Area: Forest of Bere East (2f)

Nature conservation Hazleton Common Local Nature Reserve lies approximately 50m to the west on the opposite side ofthe A3(M).Site is surrounded by SINCs in close proximity.The Holt Ancient Woodland area lies approximately 200m to the east of the site.


The area has high archaeological potential.Seven historical buildings lies to the north east and north west of the site.Horndean and Blendworth Conservation areas lie approximately 1km to the north of the site.Two scheduled ancient monuments lie approximately 1.1km to the east of the site.

58 East Hampshire District Local Plan: Second Review



Traffic & access The Strategic Road Network (A3M) is located approximately 0.85km from the site, via the B2149.No right turn provision into the site, though visibility is good.The site lies just outside the urban area of Waterlooville.


Stream approx. 100m south of the site.Predominantly rural setting to the south and east of the site.Residential properties exist approximately 500m to the west of the site, on the opposite side of theA3(M).Residents also reside approximately 500m to the north of the side on the opposite side of the B2149.




Hazleton Farm and nursery is approx. 500m north of the site.Motor racing track on site.Area to the north of the site has been promoted as a site for housing and employment (East Hants CoreStrategy)


Site lies within Hazelton Interchange and Hazelton Industrial Estate lies to the north of the site.


A bridleway lies adjacent the top north west side of the site.Broad Walk Path RoW approx. 750m from site.Waterlooville Golf Course lies in close proximity to the site.A Transco Gas high-pressure pipeline crosses the site near to where the access road joins the main siteand the south west corner of the site.


ELH 016 Land off Chestnut Avenue, Eastleigh

Local authority: Eastleigh Borough CouncilSite Area: 1.68 hectares. Not previously developed land.

Def

1.22m

Skateboard Park

M 3

TB

El Sub

Sta

Mast

El Sub Sta

El Sub

Sta

El Sub Sta

New Kings Court

Gantry

Car Park

1.22m

STONEY CROFT RISE

M 3

1.22m TB

Garage

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

Fareham

Eastleigh

City of Southampton


i. Site partly allocated for landscape improvements.ii. Measures should be taken to minimise impacts on the openness of area. Proposals which would be

detrimental to the quality of the landscape in the area are unlikely to be acceptable.iii. Site lies on the edge of a retail park and Hampshire Corporate Park, so any development should reflect this

and be in keeping.iv. Compatibility with neighbouring uses is a major consideration (offices, car showroom). Specifically, screening

and planting may be necessary to reduce visibility of waste management activities by neighbouring uses.

Nomination

160 The site was nominated in January 2010 by Eastleigh Borough Council as a possible site to host an HouseholdWaste Recycling Centre (which is being relocated from elsewhere in the borough).



161 The site is an undeveloped sloping site lying between existing mixed use employment areas. The site currentlycontains a temporary skate park. The site is on the edge on character area 'EAST 10 Retail Park andHampshire Corporate Park' which means that there is generally a higher architectural quality, so any futuredevelopment should reflect this and be in keeping. The site is away from residential properties and one ofthe boundaries is close to the north bound carriageway of the M3.

162 The site appears to partly covered by an area allocated for landscape improvements. Eastleigh BoroughCouncil are seeking to improve the landscape alongmajor transportation corridors and improve and reinforceboundaries between built-up and green areas and link these areas through appropriate landscape treatment.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 2and 3. This is due to the surrounding employment area, where an enclosed development is likely to be moreappropriate considering the exposed nature of the site. Proposals for such uses would need to address thedeliverability issues identified above. The suitability of this site for other development categories would needto be demonstrated by applicants (due to surrounding landscape, screening considerations etc).



Site over lies a secondary aquifer.Flood Zones 2 and 3 are approximately 0.58km away from the site.

Visual intrusion Site lies at a low elevation, which slopes gently down to the north from the motorway.The site is within the Strategic Gap between Eastleigh and Southampton.Development of the site would have a slight negative effect on the separating function of the Gap.The site is judged to have neutral to slight adverse effect on townscape character and slight adverse effecton the rural landscape.Landscape Type: Lowland Mosaic Heath AssociatedLandscape Character Area: Romsey to Eastleigh Wooded Lowland Mosaic (2d)Site would be visible from the M3 motorway.

Nature conservation Five ancient woodland sites lie approximately 1km from the site.


Nine Grade II listed buildings exist within 1km of the site.Approximately 1.09km away from the site lies Flemming Park.Although the site sits within an existing industrial estate it is still open space.

Traffic and access The Strategic Road Network (M3 north) is located approximately 2km from the site, via central Eastleigh.The Primary Route Network (A33) is located approximately 2.75km from the site.Access to the site is off Chestnut Avenue.Site is on the outskirts of an Urban Area.Approximately 1.5km from the site lies the railway line, with the station approximately 2km north of thesite.


Residential properties lie to the north and north east of the site and approx 0.91km to the south west.One School lies approximately 0.34km from the site.Approximately within 1km of the site lies two Care homes.






Hampshire Corporate Park lies approx 0.36km away from the site.Site allocated for landscape improvements (Eastleigh Borough Council Local Plan Review (2006) saved policy20.CO).


Over 1km from Woodside Avenue HWRC (which is being relocated subject to finding a suitablereplacement site).

Other issues (e.g. Publicrights of way)

The site is undeveloped land with a skate park and BMX track to the south west of the site.


ELH 020 Withys Meadow, Dutton Lane, Eastleigh

Local authority: Eastleigh Borough CouncilSite Area: 0.7 hectare. Previously developed land.

Drain

Ward

Bdy

MP 73

Und

TankFB

CR

DUTT

ON LA

NE

FB

Conv

eyor

FB

Signal Gantry

FB

Barton RiverWard Bdy

Conv

eyor

Withy Meadows

Conv

eyor

FB

Drain

Sluice

FBFootbridge

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

Fareham

Eastleigh

City of Southampton


i. Access via the Dutton Lane area and additional HGV traffic generation are key issues. A feasible solutionto improve access/ provide an alternative access will require investigation.

ii. Any potential impacts on the River Itchen SAC must be considered as part of the Habitats RegulationsAssessment process.

iii. A habitat survey may be required prior to any development.iv. Any suitable facility would require appropriate siting, with suitable mitigation to avoid damage/

encroachment/ pollution of surrounding woodland or any protected species.v. The Aerodrome Safeguarding Zone may restrict the type of waste uses which could be developed (including

the design and operation).vi. Potential co-location opportunities (EHS 014 Land at Dutton Lane).

Nomination

163 This site was nominated in 2010 by an interested operator and is located at the end of Dutton Lane, to theeast of Eastleigh Rail Yard.



164 A number of steel framed, timber framed and prefabricated concrete buildings occupy the site. This site issubject to a Lawful Development Certificate (U/05/53885), which was issued in 2005 and also has a WasteExemption Licence and a Waste Carriers Licence. Skips are currently used on site for storage ofgreen/composted waste and associated hard landscaping materials.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development category 2. Thisis due to the surrounding industrial area and existing built infrastructure on the site. Proposals for such useswould need to address the deliverability issues identified above (notably the access constraints). The suitabilityof this site for other enclosed development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due tothe proximity to woodland and potential visual impacts on residential properties etc).



Site lies on a secondary aquifer.Site lies within Flood Zones 2 and 3.

Visual intrusion Site lies at a low elevation.Landscape Type: River Valley FloorLandscape Character Area: Itchen Valley (3c)

Nature conservation Breach Copse lie within 1km of the site to the north east.The River Itchen, SAC and SSSI lies adjacent to the south of the site.Six SINCs lie within 1km of the site from north west to south east.


A handful of Historic sites lie to the south east and south west of the site.Bishopstoke Conservation area lies to the south east of the site within 1km.

Traffic and access The Strategic Road Network (M3) is approximately 2km west of the site.HGV movements are currently permitted under the existing use.


Residential properties lie to the east, south and west of the site.Four Schools lie to the south west of the site within 1km.Allotment site within 50km south of the site




Local Plan(59) states any development in the Dutton Lane industrial area or vicinity, which leads to anincrease in traffic onDutton Lane, increase in noise or loss of amenity will not be permitted until alternativeaccess is provided.


Approximately 1.50km to the south west of the site lies Woodside Avenue HWRC.

Other issues (e.g. Publicrights of way)

Within 0.20km to the east of the site lies a footpath.

59 Policy 121.E Eastleigh Local Plan 2006-2011.


HRT 006 Hook Depot, Junction 5 of the M3

Local authority: Hart District CouncilSite Area: 2.36 Hectares. Previously developed land.

Def

CR

Tanks

A 287

Cottage

Ward Bdy

Depot

A 287

Cottage

Butterwood

Woodlands

Path (

um)

87.8m

Vernwood

Issues

Cottage

Depot

A 287

Bartley Heath

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

Hart

Rushmoor


i. The ownership and future use of this site as a depot is to determined in order to assess its likely availability.ii. Views of the Hampshire & IOW Wildlife Trust should be sought in developing any proposals.iii. Any suitable facility would require appropriate siting, with suitable mitigation to avoid pollution of the

adjacent SSSIs.iv. Potential to deliver waste uses without significantly altering the current form and scale of the existing site

use.

Nomination

165 This site was nominated in January 2006 by a waste operator. This site is strategically located and veryaccessible. There may be potential to locate more than one facility on the site.


166 This site is south of Hook, off Junction 5 of the M3 motorway. It is currently used as a HighwaysMaintenance depot and occupied by Hampshire County Council and Highway Agency contractors.



Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 2, 3and 4. This is due to the existing buildings on site and good access. Proposals for such uses would need toaddress the deliverability issues identified above. The suitability of this site for other development categorieswould need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to impacts on surrounding sensitive environment).



The site lies just outside a secondary aquifer.Flood Zones 2 and 3 lie to the south east of the site.

Visual intrusion The site lies at a low elevation to the area, enclosed by woodland and well screened.Landscape Type: Settlement (Hook) / Woodland and Plantation on HeathLandscape Character Area: Loddon Valley and Forest of Eversley West (2b)

Nature conservation Ancient woodland lie to the south west of the site either side of the M3.Hook Common and Bartley Heath SSSI lie round the site.Site is mostly hardstanding but is surrounded by broadleaved woodland.Bartley Heath and Carleton’s Gorse lie within 1km of the site.


A Historic building lies within 1km of the site.North Warnborough conservation area is less than 1km from the site.

Traffic & access The Strategic Road Network (M3) and Local Road Network (B3349) are approximately 0.6km fromthe site.Access to the site is via the A287 and no significant accident issues are known.The site is approximately 0.60km from Hook urban area.


A small group of residential properties lie nearby to the south east and north west of the site.



Potential land use conflict Site currently in use.


Within 2km of the site lies OsborneWay Industrial Estate / Rose Industrial Estate and Fosters BusinessPark


Nearby Wildlife Trust nature reserves are visited by the public.


HRT 008 Mattingley Depot, Heckfield

Local authority: Hart District CouncilSite Area: 0.75 hectares. Previously developed land.

Path

(um)

Track

B 3011

81.4m

Path (um)

81.7m

Path (um)

Lodge

Path (um)

80.2m

Highfield

Track

B 334

9

Path (um)

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

Hart

Rushmoor


i. Effective lorry routing or other traffic management measures may be required through residential areas(Yateley and Eversley) in order to mitigate of the impact of traffic.

ii. The marketability of this site is to be investigated due to its remote location towards the far north of theCounty.

iii. The current uses for this site are to be determined.

Nomination

167 This site was identified by a commercial waste operator in 2006. The site is well screened and relativelyunconstrained. The distance from any sizeable population suggests a use for a small scale waste facilitysuch as a Household Waste Recycling Centre may be unsustainable however.


168 It is understood that this is a former depot site. There is also anecdotal evidence suggesting the site is usedinformally by travelling communities.



Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1-3.This is due to the remote location and screening of the site. Proposals for such uses would need to addressthe deliverability issues identified above. The suitability of this site for other enclosed development categorieswould need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to the limited size of the site).



Site lies on a secondary aquifer.

Visual intrusion Site enclosed by woodland and consequently well screened. Site lies at a slightly higher elevation to thesurrounding area.Landscape Type: Woodland and Plantation on HeathLandscape Character Area: North East Hampshire Plantations and Heath (1c)

Nature conservation Large area of hardstanding/ cleared land in mixed plantation woodland.Potential use of wood by protected species (particularly bats, reptiles, badgers and poss dormice).Ancient woodland lies to the south east and east of the site.250m from Thames Basin Heaths SPA, but site already well developed so low ecological value.SINCs lie round the site.


Historic buildings lie mainly to the south east, south and south west of the site.Heckfield Conservation Area lies approximately 0.15km away.

Traffic & access The site has immediate access to the Local Road Network (B3349), though direct access to the site isoff the B3011.The Primary Route Network (A33) is approximately 1km west of the site.Location next to roundabout is issue, whilst visibility is also substandard, though traffic impact is slight.Alternative access from B3349 offers greater visibility, though there would be significant costs associatedwith providing this.Heckfield urban area lies approximately 0.37km away.


A few residential properties lie nearby.


Site is within Farnborough aerodrome safeguarding area.



There are no active sites with 500m.


None identified.


HRT 017 Land at Minley, Blackbushe

Local authority: Hart District CouncilSite Area: 8.3 hectares. Not previously developed land.NOTE:Only a proportion of this site is likely to be available for waste management uses (subject to a development plot becomingavailable).

Track

Track

CRICK

ET H

ILL LA

NE

A 30

Co Const, ED & Ward Bdy

Def

ED &

Ward

Bdy

A 327

Path

(um)

Yateley Common

Penny Hill

MINLEY ROAD

Caravan Site

A 327

Minley Wood

Pond

Hornley

Ward Bdy

CR

The BungalowB 3013

Track

Co Const &

CR

101.2m

101.2m

93.6m

Boro Const Bdy

Common

Path (um)

Boro Const Bdy Mile Stone

Track

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

Hart

Rushmoor


i. Implications of proximity to European designation sites (e.g. disturbance to birds) to be investigated throughHabitats Regulations Assessment process.

ii. Opportunities to screen any future waste operation using the existing woodland should be maximised.iii. Any potential impact on the registered historic park would require investigation.iv. A buffer between the site and the gypsy site would be required.v. Traffic measures would be required if access was directly off the A30 (for example restrictions on turning

right).vi. Further assessment is required to determine whether access via the B3013 is suitable.vii. The proximity to Farnborough and Blackbushe Airports may restrict the nature of any future waste

operations.


Nomination

169 Site identified in 2005 by neighbouring Rushmoor Borough Council.


170 The site is at the intersection of the A30 and A325. The site is part of the Defence Training Estate and haspreviously been identified as a potential traveller site. The site is owned by the Ministry of Defence (MoD).The local district's aspirations for this land if it were to become available are not currently known.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1, 2,3 and 4. This is due to the site size. An enclosed development may be more appropriate considering theproximity of residential properties. Proposals for such uses would need to address the deliverability issuesidentified above. The suitability of this site for other development categories (buildings with a stack) wouldneed to be demonstrated by applicants (due to proximity to European designations, screening issues, existingcaravan site and impacts on surrounding area / habitats etc).



Site lies on a secondary aquiferFlood zones 2 and 3 lie within 1km to the north of the site.

Visual intrusion Site lies at a high elevation.Landscape Type: Woodland and Plantation on HeathLandscape Character Area: North East Hampshire Plantations and Heath (1c)

Nature conservation Thames Basin Heaths SPA lie to the north, east and west of the site.Site is mostly hardstanding but is surrounded by broadleaved woodland. Potential protected speciesinclude SPA birds (nightjar, woodlark).Castle Bottom to Yateley and Hawley Commons SSSI lie to the north, east and west of the siteWithin 1km of the site lie three SINCs.Vigo Lane Heath is north of the site.


Bowl Barrow on Hornley Common, Schedule Ancient Monument lies within 1km to the east of thesite.To the south east of the site lie eight Historic buildings.Cricket Hill Yateley, Conservation Area is less than 1km from the site.Site has archaeological potential and is adjacent to a registered historic park – Minley Manor.

Traffic & access No existing access into the site, access to the site would be off the B3013, that runs along the southside of the site.The site has immediate access to the Local Road Network (A327 and A30), though direct access to thesite is off the B3013.The Strategic Road Network (M3) is approximately 3km from the site.There is an accident cluster at the B3013/A327 junction currently, whilst traffic impact is slight for theminimum traffic generation assumption and severe for the average and maximum assumptions.


Penny Hill caravan site is within 100m to the west.Residential properties lie to the north of the site less than 1km away.Yateley urban area lies to the north west of the site.




Site is within Farnborough aerodrome safeguarding area.Site is south east of Blackbushe Airport.

Potential land use conflict The site is undeveloped and shown as a gypsy site on the Hart Proposals Map (although alternativeuses have been considered).


Blackbushe Metals (waste metal transfer facility) is approx. 400m to the north of the site in Yateley.


The use of the site is unclear, although there are no public rights of way through the site.


HVT 001 Simonds Hill, West Hulbert (Havant)

Local authority: Havant Borough CouncilSite Area: 3.7 Hectares. Not previously developed land.

1

10

16

29.0m

Issues

Johnston's Coppice

15

CR

LAURUS CLOSE

COVERT GROVE

Spreads

35

Collects

Simond's HillA 3

(M)

El Sub Sta

Pond

1412

Drain

Simon

d's H

illNeville's Park

20

14

FB

11

34

ED &

Ward

Bdy 26.2m

Neville's Park

Pond

HULB

ERT R

OAD

25.6m

FB

ETL

¯ 0 100 200 m"

Havant


i. The extent to which the strategic gap would be physically or visually diminished is a key consideration(60).ii. Appropriate screening would be required as the site is fairly visible from the A3 and Hulbert Road.iii. Development would require appropriate siting, with suitable mitigation to avoid damage/ encroachment/

pollution of surrounding woodland or any protected species.iv. Due to the existing traffic associated with the superstore south of the site, access via the north of the site

and routing arrangements would be preferable.v. Traffic access constraints would need to be addressed.vi. The suitability of using Hulbert Road for Large Goods Vehicles in its current state is a key consideration.vii. The site is of single ownership (to be confirmed).

Nomination

171 The site was nominated by Hampshire County Council in October 2005.

60 Saved Havant Borough District Wide Local Plan policy UF1 STRATEGIC GAPS



172 This site is relatively isolated and located within an undeveloped gap between urban settlements (i.e. theHavant, Leigh Park/ Cowplain, Waterlooville, Purbrook, Portsmouth strategic gap). A large superstore ishowever located to the south of the site. This site is undeveloped land, outside the 'urban area' boundary.Due to its size and proximity to urban areas (a waste source), this site offers an opportunity to accommodatemore than one facility, or a large scale facility.

173 Site is located to the west of the B2150 Hulbert Road and to the south of A3(M) junction 3. Visibility andthe accident record of the local road network are the main highways concerns. The proposed site has goodlinks to the strategic road network however.

174 Temporary planning permission was granted across part of this site in May 2009 (permission to to constructan hydrocarbon exploration site, including new highway access, access track and passing places).


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1, 2,3 and 4. This is due to the site size, good links to the strategic road network and the relative isolation of thesite. Proposals for such uses would need to address the deliverability issues identified above. The suitabilityof this site for other development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to screeningissues and potential damage / pollution of surrounding woodland etc).



Flood Zones 2 and 3 lie to the north east of the site

Visual intrusion Site lies at a low elevation, within south Hampshire Lowland and Heath Landscape character area.

Nature conservation The north east side of the site lies adjacent to ancient woodlands, with further woodlands to the southand south west of the site.Site is surrounded by SINCS and lies in between two.Landscape Type: Lowland Mosaic Medium ScaleLandscape Character Area: Forest of Bere East (2f)


A few Historic buildings lie to the west of the site.A Scheduled Ancient Monument lies to the south west of the site.

Traffic & access The Strategic Road Network (A3M) is approximately 0.75km from the site, via the B2150.The access road to the site is off Hulbert Road (B2150).The site is within 1km of Havant to the west and Leigh Park to the east, urban areas.


Residential properties lie to the north west and south east of the site.There are eight schools within 1 km for the site.





Site is of sufficient size to locate more than one facility.




None identified.


NFP 001 Giddings Sawmill Site, Bartley, Netley Marsh

Local authority: New Forest District CouncilSite Area: 4.63 hectares (approximate figure based on site footprint). Previously developed land.

Bartley Cross Lodge

House

LB

3

The C

roft

EADENS LANE

Corner

Stone

The Coach House

Cottage

21.6m

Rest-

a-Wh

ile

18.9m

The O

aks WB

ESS

Goddards Copse

Trac

k

Chab

ar

Pear T

ree Co

ttage

Pendragon

RINGWOOD ROAD

Bartley

Cotta

ges

1

Bartley Grange

Eyewo

rth

Home

land

Conveyors

Petlake Farm

Saw Mill

Track

22.6m

Katonah

Amherst

Paradise

Bartley Farm

Stone

CottageStable

Cottage

Herm

itage

El Sub Sta

RINGWOOD ROAD

Kelston

Drain

A 336

Stones

Stone

El Sub Sta

Track

Jacobs Copse

4

25.9m

Marley

Kingsw

ood

Wood Vale

PARADISE LANE

Langford Farm

Bartley Farm

Track

2

The

17.7m

Cedarwood

Copse

Hilly Copse

White House

Netherwell

Cissbury

21.6m

The Batch

Wood

cot

0.91m

RH

Cottage

Track

18.6m

Bartley Grange

Wood

side

Mumms Copse

Cottage

A 336

Reformatory Copse

0 100 200 m

Eastleigh

New Forest

City of Southampton


i. Potential landscape impact issues is a key consideration as the site is located in New Forest National Park.ii. History of industrial uses at the site.iii. The boundary shown is indicative (would require discussions with landowner).iv. Potential opportunity to provide small-scale waste management facilities for local businesses.v. Relatively unconstrained site (although amenity impacts on adjacent residential properties to be avoided).vi. Any facility would need to ensure biodiversity interests in the area are protected and where possible enhanced.

Nomination

175 This site was identified by Hampshire County Council in 2006.



176 The site is located between the A336 Ringwood Rd and Eadens Lane, between Netley Marsh and Bartley.The site is located in the New Forest National Park. Part of the site is currently used as a saw mill by R. F.Giddings & Co. Ltd. The saw mill was completely rebuilt in 2005-06, following a fire at the start whichdestroyed the original sawmill.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 2and 3. A small enclosed development would be more in keeping with the existing buildings on the site .Proposals for such uses would need to address the deliverability issues identified above. The suitability of thissite for other enclosed development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to potentialimpacts on the surrounding area and residential properties, and the location within the New Forest NationalPark etc).



The site overlies a secondary aquifer.

Visual intrusion Site located within New Forest National Park.Landscape Type: Lowland Mosaic Heath AssociatedLandscape Character Area: Copythorne and Ashurst Heath Associated Wooded Farmland (1k)

Nature conservation No European designated sites located within 1000m.Mumms Copse SINC partially located on the site, with a further 9 SINCs located within 1000m.


No historic buildings located within 700m of the site.Parts of the site lie within an ancient woodlandBartley Grange historic park and garden located 100m west of the site.Located within Forest North East conservation area.

Traffic & access The Local Road Network (A326) is approximately 1.5km east of the site, via the A336.The Strategic Road Network (M27) is approximately 3.5km west of the site, via the A336.


Residential properties are located immediately adjacent to the site.One school is located within 1000m of the site, approximately 950m east.


Not applicable

Potential land use conflict Landowner aspirations for the site are not currently known.


Not applicable


A public right of way passes adjacent to the north west boundary of the site.


NFT 016 Charleston Road, Fawley

Local authority: New Forest District CouncilSite Area: 15 hectares. Previously developed land.NOTE: Only a proportion of this site may be available for waste management uses.

Und

FAWLEY ROAD

Def

Ward

Bdy

FBs

Tanks

FB Tanks

Tanks

Tanks

Tanks

Tanks

Tank

(disused)

Drain

Tank

Cooling Tower

El Sub Sta

Depot

Tanks

Tks

Tank

Tanks

36.9m Shelter

NEW ROAD

New

Road

(trac

k)

NEW ROAD

Collects

Issues

El Sub Sta

FBs

FB

FB

Issues

CADLA

ND ROAD

Pit

CADL

AND R

OAD

Tank

Tank

Tank

PondSettling

Tank

SM

Path

FF

37.6m

New Road (t rack)

Path

Track

Spreads

Tanks

Tanks

Gringo 's Copse

Tower

El Sub Sta

Tanks

El Sub

Sta

Issues

ETL

Shelt

er FF

Gas Governor

Und

Track

Path

NEW

ROAD

FB

FB

FB

Tank

Chy

(disused)

Track

Works

Pit

Depot

Drain

Tank

Tank

Tanks

Tanks

Ta nk s

Tanks

TCB

Tks

36.7m

37.3m

37.3m

HARDLEY LANE

Co llects

Ward Bdy

The Nutshell

New Road (t rack)

Co llects

Co llects

Spring

Collects

FB

Oil Storage DepotFB

FB

(disused)

Cooling

WB

El Sub

Sta

Tanks

Tanks

ED & Ward Bdy

Drain

Hart Hill

Yewtree Cottage

Collects

Crampool Copse

Pond

FB

Collects

FB

Tanks

Tanks

Pit

Tanks

Pit

EAST RO

AD

Tank

Tank

Works

Tanks

Chy

El Sub Sta

Tanks

Tanks

Sloping masonry

Tks

37.6m

Ward Bdy

Tk

Ward Bdy

Track

Tanks

Tank

Works

Filter Bed

FB

CHARLESTON ROAD

(disused)

Chy Chy

Tank

Tank

Tank

Works

DWs

Track

WB

DWsSpring

Collects

FB

FB

Issues

Tanks

Tanks

Tank

Works

CHARLESTON ROAD

Tanks

Tanks

Tanks

CADLAND ROAD

Tanks

0 100 200 m

Eastleigh

New Forest

City of Southampton


i. Access to and from the site should be via Charleston Road and Cadland Road from the A326.ii. An assessment should be made of the potential impact of development on the area of nature conservation

interest adjoining the southern boundary of the site.iii. An assessment should be made of the potential impacts of development on watercourses and groundwater.iv. The public right of way adjoining the site should be safeguarded.v. Likely that Environmental Impact Assessment would be required.vi. Health & Safety Executive would need to be consulted on any applications (due to proximity to COMAH(61)

site).vii. Appropriate measures required to ensure that there would be no unacceptable impact on the locality,

particularly on nearby houses in Hythe.viii. Any buildings should be sited, designed and landscaped (screened) recognising the proximity to housing

and the New Forest National Park.

61 Control of Major Accident Hazards


Nomination

177 Site identified in 2005 due to its inclusion as a 'Preferred Site' in the Minerals & Waste Local Plan (1998)('saved' policy 43). The original inclusion of the site in the Local Plan was for the development of anintegrated waste processing plant. (subject to specified criteria for development).


178 Unrestored sand and gravel pit located on the edge of Fawley oil refinery and petrochemicals works complex.The site has been allocated since 1998 for an integrated waste processing plant but remains unimplemented(62)


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1-4.Due to the surrounding employment area and close residential properties, an enclosed development may bemore appropriate. Proposals for such uses would need to address the deliverability issues identified above(notably appropriate screening and landscaping). The suitability of this site for other enclosed developmentcategories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to nature conservation adjoining the boundaryand proximity to residential properties etc).



Site over lies a secondary aquifer.Flood Zones 2 and 3 lie to the north east of the site.

Visual intrusion Site lies at a low elevation.New Forest National Park lies to the south west of the site.Landscape Type: Coastal Plain EnclosedLandscape Character Area: New Forest Waterside (9c)

Nature conservation Crampool/Gringos Copses awi, lies north to the site.The New Forest National Park and Solent and Southampton Water, SPA, SAC, and Ramsar lie to thesouth west and north east of the site.New Forest SSSI, lies adjacent to the site on the south and a further sites lie to the south west and northeast.SINCs lie to south west, north and north east of the site.


Historic buildings lie to the south of the site.Historic parks and gardens lie to the north west of the site.In close proximity to The New Forest National Park.

Traffic & access The Local Road Network (A326) is approximately 1km from the site via Cadland Road, an industrial-useaccess only.Impact on A326 would need to be assessed, there is HGV protection for Hythe.Local network already in use by HGVs.Site is between two urban areas, Hythe to the west and Fawley to the south.


Residential properties lie approximately 0.3km to the west of the site.

62 Minerals & Waste Local Plan (1998) ('saved' policy 43 Preferred Site G).





Potential land use conflict None identified.


Site is adjacent to an existing waste processing plant (high temperature hazardous waste incinerator)and less than a km from a waste transfer site.Site is of sufficient size to locate more than one facility.


The site lies within the 'major hazard zone' around the Fawley oil refinery.A public right of way adjoining the site to the west is part of the Solent Way.


NFT 037 Totton Yard, Totton

Local authority: New Forest District CouncilSite Area: 1.34 Hectares. Previously developed land.

25

LACKFORD

32

Bartley

Water

SL

1

47

49

2c

1 16

35

33

5

2430

42

6a

4a

SALISBURY ROAD

9a

TCB

15

Club

3.0m

21

25

Brokenford Business

9 2

Bank

21

39

10 to 156

1 to 12

Bank

2

BY PASS

Court

3

25

49

53

Cycle Path

FB

JUNCTION ROAD

56

4

65

WINSOR ROAD

16

1

22

7

Telephone

1

3

House

4

Garage

Eling Mews

Units

2 to

10

102

7

17

26

HIGH

100

5

71

Industrial Estate

Brokenford Court

45

7

Hall

15

2

21Wa

rd Bd

y

17

9 to 15

Court

MLW

81a

88

14

Centre

8

2

1

Court

MP 82.75

4.3m

60

9

85c

12

39

3.7m

5

OSBORNE ROAD

12

48

3

41

42

10

30

19a

1

Shelter

Cycle Path

95d

1

23

11

20

4

12

1

Tank

PC

ELING LANE

The

1 to 10

19 21

ED & Ward Bdy

WATER LANE

WESTFIELD ROAD

3

66

32

12

14

Hall

SUNNY WAY

21

54

62

19

16

23

3a3

14a

El Sub Sta

26

Path (um)

5248

ESS

54

15

MLW

MLW

Water

9

South

7

77

BROKENFORD AVENUE

6

23a to 23c

10

5

The

23

62b

62

Rumbridge

Court

El Sub Sta

91

El Sub Sta

85b

20a

47 49

55 57

5523

1 to 5

58

19

5

TCB

28

Posts

4

4

Exchange

12a

12

14

18

30

5b5a

Manchester

Club

Works

AVENUE

HASELBURY ROAD

44

78

2

6

9

2

3.7m

Springdale

32RO

AD

9

CR

14 12a

10a

21

42

BROKENFORD LANE

RUMB

RIDGE

STRE

ET

24

89

4

81

Narnia

11

Club

9

61

62a

2028

58

1 to 11

LB

CR

16

Hall

84

(PH)and Castle

45

TOTTON

37

18

15

Coal Yard

3

15

56

52

26

2720

13 to 15

10

4.0m

Car Park

5

6

14

8

10

1

El Sub Sta

Evergreens

4.6m

Sw an Inn

(PH)

66

9

95

3.4m

21a 2321

Posts

MP 83

16

81

13

S Gantry

2b

2a

Issues

33

15

Car Park

TCB

74

21 to 27

18

56

1Sali

sbury R

oad Arca

de

17

CS

FB

BROKENFORD LANE

1 to 5

0

MLW

3 to 7 11

34

83

2

12

22

14

75

4

Superstore

Cross Keys

26

Bank

43

Ward Bdy

51 to 57

PH

5

2826

Timber Yard

FB

20

70

27 26

59

25

29

LC

BEAUMONT ROAD

17

26

2

MAYDAY COURT

11

7

Works

Works

26

6

Mill House Centre

93

72

62

1

Shelter

15a

7

68

1119

Court

11

20

RINGWOOD ROAD

Popes

ED & Ward Bdy

7a

20

93

15

Works

79b

1

Car Park

30

16

7

Bannister

MAYNARD ROAD

24

BARTRAM ROAD

15

STREET

RUMBRIDGE GARDENS

1

30

Bank

TCBs

47

Shelter

TCB

40

LB

14

33

54

84

94

14

24

RC Church

1

21

79

2

6

MILL ROAD

3

1 to 133

Sub Sta

9.8m

10 to 14

11a

SP

24

4.6m

18

26

39

34

7

Brokenford

67 to 69

31KIN

ROSS

1

POPE

S LAN

E

40FB

CCLW

Mean

Sub Sta

MAYNARD ROAD

8

6

4

44

LB

Gantry

102

Church

11

13

34

9

1

75a

78

JACKIE WIGG GARDENS

(PH)

RUMBRIDGE66

62c

22

6

Savoy House

ElSub Sta

50

28a26a

PO

133

60

18

to

3

62 to

69

St Teresa's

21

8

TREESIDE AVENUE

10

4.0m 2

Government

Club

CAUSEWAY CRESCENT

1 to 5

El

16

6

17

4.0m

61

13

19a23a

25 25a

112 to 114

96

KINROSS ROAD

TOTTON

14

Anchor House

6

10

8

2012 17

1

1 to 14

1 to 30

22

El Sub

Sta

NTL

1210

High Water

El

Mean HighPath (um)

PO

Parade

9

2

90

6

27

79

26

4.0m

1 to 38

11

22

87

1 to 16

49

85a

The Elephant

4745

Bridgeway

32

37

6

5.2m

RUMBRIDGE STREET

COMMERCIAL ROAD

ROSE ROAD

71

2

1

5c

20

12

1 to 3

Offices

5

911

1a

15

Unit 1

26a

0 100 200 m

Eastleigh

New Forest

City of Southampton


i. Local plans and aspirations for development of this site are yet to be determined.ii. Any proposals would need to be designed and operated to avoid impacts on residential amenity.iii. Habitat surveys may be required considering the proximity to nature conservation areas.iv. The site is long and narrow which will restrict the type of use and configuration of any facilities.v. The site is relatively unconstrained although flood risk is a key consideration.vi. Traffic access constraints would need to be addressed, and rail access should be the primary means of

transport.vii. The potential for impacts on nature conservation designations will need to be addressed by the Habitats

Regulations Assessment process.viii. Opportunities for reverse logistics should be considered, considering the proximity to facilities in Totton

and Marchwood.


Nomination

179 The site was nominated in 2006 by Network Rail. This site has been identified for its freight potential asit has a valuable rail connection and yard space for storage.


180 The site is an existing rail siding. This site is a former coal yard rail siding owned by Network Rail and hasan established rail access. The site is located next to Brokenford Business Park central Totton (off the TottonBypass). The site is currently used by freight operator EWS and an alternative use would require theirconsent. This site has previously been allocated for a train station.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1and 2. This is due to established rail access and the industrial location. Opportunities to utilise part of thesite for the storage and transhipment of waste materials (e.g. recycled aggregates) has been identified. Proposalsfor such uses would need to address the deliverability issues identified above. The suitability of this site forenclosed development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to the proximity toresidential properties and narrow nature of the site etc).



Site lies on a secondary aquifer.Most of the site lies within Flood zone 2 and flood zone 3 runs along the west boundary of the site.

Visual intrusion Site lies at a low elevation.Landscape Type: Townscape (Totton)Landscape Character Area: New Forest Waterside (9c)

Nature conservation Solent and Southampton water, SPA, SAC, Ramsar and SSSI lies to the north east of the site.Five SINCs lie to the north east, south east and south west of the site.Large area of railway sidings/old railway coal yard - area highly developed and probably contaminated.Only biodiversity likely in line of trees/shrubs to south. Provided vegetation not impacted, no otherapparent constraints.


Historic buildings lie to north, north east, south and north west of the site.Eling conservation area lies to the south of the site.Redbridge Old Bridges, scheduled ancient monuments lie to the north east of the site.

Traffic & access The Local Road Network (A35) is approximately 0.5km from the site via Junction Road and the B3076.The site is within the Totton urban area.HGV restrictions apply around the vicinity of Totton High Street.Potential rail linked waste site, though would still need to be accessed by road vehicles as well.Within Air Quality Management Area (AQMA).


Residential properties lie adjacent on the east and south side of the site, with further properties to thenorth.Two Schools lie to the north east and south east of the site.Allotments lie to the north and north west of the site.





Potential land use conflict New Forest Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment says that the site is currently unavailablefor development as the site does not have planning permission.


Totton Deport waste transfer station and Totton MRF (Houndsdown business park) are within 2kmof the site.Marchwood Energy Recovery Facility, HWRC and other facilities are within 4 km of the site.


A footpath lies along the western boundary and approaching the site to the east.


PCC 005 Fratton Freight Site, Portsmouth

Local authority: Portsmouth City CouncilSite Area: 0.93 hectares. Previously developed land.

38

Signal Light

50

227

Mast

Ward Bdy

57

67

55

192

186

FRANCIS

279

79

261

Tanks

134

Garage

Car Park

6.4m

229

Fratton Station

26

62

36

57

137

1

131

LB

5.8m

160

Carriage Shed

Ward Bdy

245

17 to 32

63

29

WB

26

Club

13

14

13

14

47

SB

25

56

127

207

93

144

4

CR

6.7m

61

231

25

46

35

84

El Sub Sta

ShelterGOLDSMITH AVENUE

74

a

176

174

94

86

170

10

75

Goods Sidings

El Sub Sta

Club

101

247

ESS

26

Portsea

75

1

239

FB

38

WALMER ROAD

THORNCROFT ROAD

ORCHARD ROAD

Builder's Yard

(telecommunication)

50

45

135

ROAD

112

Tanks

SP

150

Island

243

2

2

CR

26

SB

6.1m

35

182

73

Warehouse

98

2

28

275

TCB

118

117

Denmark House

GOLDSMITH AVENUE

14

8541

Hall

WB

1

43

66

45

38

Playground

55

172

CRWard Bdy

5.8m

147

168

69

15

281

5.5m

87

247b

TCB

58

7.3m

48

Fratton Goods Yard

69

RENNY

AVENUE

20

Warehouse

95

WALM

ER RO

AD

0 100 200 m

Havant

Gosport

City of Portsmouth


i. Site has established rail access.ii. Residential properties located within 50m of site.iii. The access road is very narrow – would be an issue for HGVs.iv. Relatively unconstrained site.

Nomination

181 This site is being promoted for waste uses by Portsmouth Commercial Port (Portsmouth City Council'sPort department). The site has been identified as a potential opportunity to transport waste paper by railfrom Fratton to a freight siding at Shotton paper mill on Deeside. This would include waste paper receivedfrom the Quartremaine waste transfer facility (Portsmouth Incinerator Site) and Alton Materials RecoveryFacility.



182 This site is part of the newly constructed Fratton Goods Yard in Portsmouth. It is currently inactive andvacant (latest at February 2010). The site is owned by Network rail and leased to the Port.

183 This site has been deemed unsuitable for aggregate landing and transshipment in a recent study(63), as bulkrail freight movements would be difficult to schedule between deep sea container freight services. However,the study suggests that whether waste transshipments from nearby scrap metal and other waste treatmentfacilities could take advantage of Fratton Goods Yard remains to be seen.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1and 2. This is due to established rail access. The suitability of this site for enclosed development categorieswould need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to proximity to residential properties, access constraints,size of the site etc).



Flood zones 2 and 3 approximately 0.91km to the north east of the site.The site lies on a secondary aquifer.

Visual intrusion The site lies at a low elevation.Landscape Type: Settlement. Landscape Character Area: Settlement (Portsmouth)

Nature conservation The site does not lie near any environmental designations.


Historic buildings lie around the site. Three conservation areas lie within 1km of the site.

Traffic & access Railway sidings with existing mainline connection already in place (new railhead developed in 2007 for theport).The Local Road Network (A280) is approximately 1.25km from the site, via the A2030.


Lies within Portsmouth urban area and residential properties lie around the site).Three Hospitals lie within 1km of the site. Fourteen schools located around the site.





None identified.


The site has sufficient rail traffic to justify an 'intermodal hub'.


None identified

63 Land & Mineral Management Ltd on behalf of Hampshire County Council (2009) Needs Assessment for Wharves & Rail Depots in Hampshire.


PCC 010 Burrfields Road, Portsmouth

Local authority: Portsmouth City CouncilSite Area: 0.69 hectares. Previously developed land.

El Sub Sta

1.2m

Path (um)

Club House

0.0m

0.0m

BURRFIELDS ROAD

Pond

Tank

Great Salterns

0.0m

Great Salterns

CR

Pond

Golf Driving Range

Portsea Island

CR

Recreation Ground

0.9m

Recreation Ground

Pond

Golf Course

(PH)

Ward Bdy

Path

Path

Drain

Drain

FB

Farmhouse

0.3m

Ocean Park

DUND

AS LA

NE

0.3m

Drain

El Sub Sta

Golf Driving Range

El Sub

Sta

Great Salterns

BURRFIELDS ROAD

Hotel

FB

FB

Cycle

Track

Drain

Great Salterns Golf Course

Path

(um)

Lake

Drain

FB

-0.3m

The

0 100 200 m

Havant

Gosport

City of Portsmouth


i. Site is currently being investigated for the relocation of the city owned dog kennels. It is likely that this sitewill be unavailable, and thus availability needs to be monitored.

ii. Designated as a community allocation in Local Plan.iii. Any buildings would need to be single storey and be compatible with the existing buildings on site.iv. The potential for impacts on nature conservation designations will need to be addressed by the Habitats

Regulations Assessment process.

Nomination

184 The site was nominated by Portsmouth City Council in January 2007. The site is adjacent to Southsea golfclub and is close to the Great Salterns recreation area.



185 The Portsmouth City Local Plan 2001-2011 designates the site, known in the plan as Land South of BurrfieldsRoad, as a new community allocation, which is owned by Portsmouth City Council. The communityallocation designation relates in part to a reservation of the site as a City Farm, although this proposal wasnever implemented. The plan does however indicate that "another similar educational or environmentalenterprise could be acceptable" or "the provision of sports / community facilities could also be acceptable"in the event of the City Farm proposal failing to progress. The Local Plan also states that the currentcondition of the site does little to improve the visual impact of the Burrfields Road frontage and containsa number of small buildings which, while not listed, are of some architectural merit and should preferablybe retained. Any additional development / redevelopment should be low key (single storey only).


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 2and 3. This is due to the size and surrounding build environment. Proposals for such uses would need toaddress the deliverability issues identified above. The suitability of this site for other enclosed developmentcategories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to the site size, screening issues etc).



Site lies on a secondary aquifer.Site lies on Flood Zones 2 and 3.

Visual intrusion Site lies at a low elevation.Landscape Type: Coastal Plain Open. Landscape Character Area: Settlement (Portsmouth)

Nature conservation Chichester and Langstone Harbours, SPA, SAC, Ramsar, and SSSI lies to the east of the site.


Historic buildings lie to the east, south west and north west of the site within 1km.

Traffic & access The Local Road Network (A2030) is located approximately 0.5km east of the site.Access to the site is from Burrfields Road.


The closest residential properties lie to west and south west of the south.Three schools within 1km of the site to the south west and north west.




West of Portsmouth urban area.


Hilsea and Quartermaine site to the west (waste transfer/ recycling facilities).


None identified.


RMR 001 Gold Lane site off Government Road, Aldershot

Local authority: Rushmoor Borough CouncilSite Area: 1.21 Hectares. Not previously developed land.

78.0m

Ash Lock Cottage

Pond

Ash Lock

Bungal

owMP 3

3.75

Stone

Club

Signal

Post

Stone

Co Const Bdy

Stone

StoneStone

SL

Stones

Drain

Springlake C ottages

Lake

Lakeside

Stone

CAMP FARM ROAD

Stones

Drain

Stone

Gasworks

Stone

Stone

Stone

75.9m

Drain

Stone

Drain

Drain

The Grebes

Blackwater

ROAD

Stone

FB

Stone

Bridge

Stone

72.5m

Drain

Spring Lakes

Stone

CC

The

Stone

Gold Farm

Lake

Pond

CR

ED & Ward Bdy

DrainGOVER

NMENT ROAD

Drain

Lake

Lake

Drain

Park

Towing Path

76.2m

Path (um)

Gold Valley Lakes

Drain

Gold Valley Lakes

Boro Const Bdy

GOVERNMENT

ED & Ward Bd

y

Homeleigh

StoneBasingstoke Canal

Stone

Stone

Stone

1

Towing Path

GOLD LANE

Drain

Country

River

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

Rushmoor


i. Access arrangements and highways improvements are likely to be required to make any proposals acceptable(ideally in conjunction with the urban extension plans).

ii. The MoD's future plans for this site need to be ascertained.iii. Proposals should not prejudice the successful redevelopment of the Aldershot Urban Extension (any

potential land use conflicts would require early identification).iv. Proposals should be considered alongside the existing Gold Farm (Newman's site).v. Opportunities to maximise the potential for rail access should be considered.vi. The proximity to the Basingstoke Canal (SSSI and Conservation Area) is a major consideration.


Nomination

186 This site is part of the MoD's estate in Aldershot, near to land being released on behalf of Aspire Defencefor private redevelopment (known as the Aldershot Urban Extension). This site was identified in 2005 bythe consultants working on behalf of Defence Estates to design a masterplan for the urban extension. Thissite was originally identified as a possible Household Waste Recycling site to support the future expansionof Aldershot (the urban extension). Subsequently, an alternative location has been agreed (see RMR 002Sites in areas of planned development).


187 It is understood that this site has been used as a mulching site by the MoD. There does not appear to beany built development on the site and it provides an area of woodland/ grassland. The road access is anunadopted road (MoD owned), and large vehicle movements in the vicinity are an existing concern locally.The adjacent Gold Farm site (RMR 003) has previously been refused planning permission for waste uses.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1-3.Proposals for such uses would need to address the deliverability issues identified above, includingaccommodating a suitable access. The suitability of this site for other enclosed development categories wouldneed to be demonstrated by applicants (due to the size of the site and proximity to a conservation area etc).



Overlays a secondary aquiferFlood zones 2 and 3 lie to the east of the site.No groundwater risk.

Visual intrusion The site is well screened (few sensitive visual receptors).The Basingstoke Canal Authority and the Surrey and Hampshire Canal Society would need to be consulted.Within land identified as Strategic GapLandscape Type: River Valley FloorLandscape Character Area: North East Hampshire Plantations and Heath (1c)

Nature conservation Close to the Basingstoke Canal SSSI.Adjacent to Hilland Lake SINC.


The closest Historic building lies approximately 0.1km to the north west of the site.

Traffic & access Located to the south of Government Road, opposite the junction with Camp Farm Road.Visibility from the existing site access is reduced due to a bridge, whilst the accident record is very poor.The Local Road Network (A323) is located approximately 1.85km from the site, via Government Roadand Ordnance Road.The Primary Route Network (A331) is located approximately 3.75km from the site.Adjacent to railway line (no rail connection currently).Road access is via residential areas.


Residential properties approx. 250m away.







The masterplan for the urban extension indicates this site may be earmarked for alternative open spaceuses.Alongside the Basingstoke Canal Conservation Area.Close to Gold Valley fishing club


Four active waste management sites within 550m.Potential HWRC planned nearby as part of urban extension.Near to Hollybush Lane Industrial Estate.


None identified.


RMR 004 Site on Hollybush Lane, North Camp

Local authority: Rushmoor Borough CouncilSite Area: 1.85 Hectares. Previously developed land.

Marlborough

Works

Works

2

20

67.7m

Drain

Hopper

Drain

FB

Blackwater River

25

Drain

Hollybush Park

Boro Const Bdy

67.7m

Tanks

Drain

Park

2

26

13

A 331

Pond

GORT CLOSE

8

HOLL

YBUS

H LA

NE

Hollybush Park

Drain

Hopper

HOLL

YBUS

H LA

NE

Sloping masonry

Pond

Drain

308

Tank

Track CR

1

14

Playg

roun

d

Def

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

Rushmoor


i. The extent to which the openness of the Blackwater Valley would be physically or visually diminished is akey consideration.

ii. The need to avoid prejudicing plans for use of Blackwater Valley footpath for recreation/ mitigation landis a key consideration.

iii. The sensitivity of the adjacent SINCs to changes in hydrology and pollution (e.g. from dust) will need tobe considered.

iv. The potential for impacts on nature conservation designations will need to be addressed by the HabitatsRegulations Assessment process.

v. Retention and possible enhancement of the mature wooded boundary to the west should be considered.vi. The proximity to Farnborough Airport may restrict the nature of any future waste operations.vii. The MoD will need to be consulted if the use of military roads to access the site is considered.


Nomination

188 This site is one of Lafarge Redland Aggregate's landholdings and was nominated by the operator in 2007.Considering the owners of the site, there may be interest in future to use this site for construction anddemolition waste (storage, processing etc). The site is located near to North Camp station on the borderof Rushmoor borough.


189 This site is towards the northern end of Hollybush Lane, an unadopted road which runs parallel to theBlackwater Valley Road and the Blackwater River. The site was formerly used as the Old Redland Plantsite (minerals working). An application to import construction and demolition for aggregate recycling wasrefused in 2001. Large vehicle movements in the vicinity are an existing concern locally. The East ofAldershot study (as noted for RMR 002) will also look at the potential to improve access to the junction ofthe A3011 (Lynchford Road) & the A331.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1-3.Proposals for such uses would need to address the deliverability issues identified above. The suitability of thissite for other enclosed development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to impactson Blackwater Valley and access constraints etc).



Site contains surface water and is adjacent to surface water.

Visual intrusion Site is well enclosed and screened by woodland and hedgerows.Landscape Type: River Valley FloorLandscape Character Area: North East Hampshire Plantations and Heath (1c)

Nature conservation Thursley, Ash, Pirbright and Chobham, SAC and Thames Basin Heaths, SPA, Basingstoke Canal and Ashto Brookwood Heaths, SSSI lie within 1km east of the site.Six SINCs lie with 1km to the site, with Ramillies Park/North Camp Lakes adjacent to the site.


Within 1km to the west of the site lies a grade II Historic building.Aldershot Military Town, Conservation Area lies within 1km to the west of the site.

Traffic & access Located west of the A331 Blackwater Valley Route and accessed via Hollybush Lane, from the roundabouton the east side of the A331.Accident record within the vicinity of the site is poor, whilst access to the proposed site is lined with parkedvehicles. Recommended that parking restrictions should be considered for Hollybush Lane.The Primary Route Network (A331) is located approximately 0.5km from the site, via Hollybush Lane.Access by road only.The site is within Farnborough urban area.North Camp railway station lies to the north of the site approximately 0.38km.


Residential properties located less than 200m from site (east and west)Within 1km to the north west of the site lies an allotment.


Three Schools lie west and north west from the site within 1km.






None identified.


Hollybush Lane Industrial Estate located to the south (includes waste uses).Lynchford Lane Waste Transfer and Recycling Facility


Recreational use of the Blackwater Valley footpath


SCC 012/ TTV 037 Sites at Redbridge Lane, Nursling, Southampton

Local authorities: Southampton City Council & Test Valley Borough CouncilSite Area: 7.27 hectares in total. Not previously developed land.NOTE:Only a proportion of this site may be available for waste management uses (subject to a developmentplot becoming available)

Def

Sluice

17

12

Posts

88

10.1m

86

80

56

7.6m

LOWER BROWNHILL ROAD

2280

347

22

Infant School

Test

Nursling Trailer Park

Business Centre

Test Valley Business Centre

Club House

1

Car

102

Def

Boro C

onst &

UA Bd

y

68

12

SEAC

OMBE

GRE

ENCA

NFOR

D CL

OSE

MLW

Path (um)

River

DrainMLW

MLW

22

Depot

0.91m

RH

Park

5

2

Holy Family

5

37

Level Crossing

Path

Test Valley

5

REDBRIDGE LANE

Track

Track

104

THORNESS CL

Catholic Primary School

193 1

15

62

10.1m

MLW

MP.5

Depot

2

Und

69

6.1m

7.6m

LOWE

R BRO

WNHIL

L ROA

D

7.0m

61 10

18 13

49

17

Halls

292

1

New Cottages

43

39

13

Mansel

Mean High Water

Tk D

CD

El Sub Sta

24 23

13

Def13

16

Gravel Pit

Boro

Cons

t & U

A Bd

y

6.7m

6.7m

Drain

53

4

Def

90

The Scitt

10.4m

24

9

2

FS

SEACOMBE GREEN

6

6

24

TEST

LANE

1

M 271

96 15

94

65

10

23

41

PORLOCK ROAD

19

339

56

4

Tk D

MP.75

Level Crossing

3

4.6m

Yeoman Park

Co C

onst

Bdy

REDB

RIDGE

LANE

8.5m

New Cottages

Drain

6

2

Test Playing Field

Path (um)

BROWNHILL WAY

27

16

1

70

Co Co

nst Bd

y

13

21

20

11.0m

TTV037

SCC012

¯ 0 100 200 m"

"

"

"

"

Fareham

Eastleigh

Winchester

New Forest

City of Southampton


i. Site overlaps local authority boundary (potentially different site aspirations).ii. Access to the motorway network (M271) - existing local access is inappropriate, existing industrial area lies

the other side of the M271.iii. Scale, layout etc of uses should be designed to minimise impacts on the openness of the site.iv. The proximity to residential properties and schools, with impacts on amenity is a key consideration.v. Potential uses should be complementary to any future economic uses in the vicinity.vi. Types of waste may be constrained due to proximity of schools, playing fields and allotments.

Nomination

190 This sites were nominated by Hampshire County Council in June 2006(64). The northern section lies withinTest Valley Borough Council. The southern section lies within Southampton City Council.

64 Note: The site was originally considered as one comprehensive site comprising the two sites (site nomination code SCC009).



191 The sites are currently undeveloped land and in agricultural use. The southern section of the site (1.73hectares), was previously subject to a planning application for a Combined Heat and Power (CHP) plant in200, which was permitted but not implemented. The site was previously identified in Southampton CityCouncil's Local Plan Review (2006) as having potential for the development of a Combined Heat and Powergenerating Station (CHP), subject to various environmental protection criteria(65).

192 The northern section of the site, is currently safeguarded for park and ride uses in Test Valley BoroughCouncil's current Local Plan. However, the Council may seek to reallocate the site for warehousedevelopment to provide economic development opportunities.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 2-4.This is due to the size of the site and access to motorway network M271. Proposals for such uses would needto address the deliverability issues identified above. The suitability of this site for other enclosed developmentcategories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to close proximity to schools and residentialproperties and amenities, and screening / visibility issues etc).



Site overlies a secondary aquifer.Flood Zones 2 and 3 located approximately 200m west of the site.

Visual intrusion Site lies at a low elevation (approximately 6m Above Ordnance Datum) and is relatively flat.Located adjacent to Southampton - Totton Strategic GapLandscape Type: Lowland Mosaic Heath Associated / SettlementLandscape Character Area: Settlement (Southampton Urban Area)

Nature conservation Solent and Southampton Water SPA and Ramsar, Solent and Maritime SAC and Lower test Valley SSSIare all located approximately 200m west of the site.Redbridge Mudflats SINC lies approximately 875m south from the site.


No listed buildings are located within 250m from the site.

Traffic & access There is no right turn into Redbridge Lane, routed around a roundabout.The site is located on a narrow lane, and so there could be visibility issues with the hedges.Access is very near the Redbridge Lane / Brownhill Way junction.The Strategic Road Network (M271) is located approximately 135m from the end of Redbridge Lane.Redbridge Lane - Brownhill Way junction will require improvements.


The closest residential properties lie immediately adjacent to the site, on Redbridge Lane.Six schools lie within 1km of the site. The closest being situated along Lower Brownhill Road.An allotment is located approximately 400m south of the site.




Site not currently allocated as employment land by either Southampton City or Test Valley.

65 Policy MSA 20 Combined Heat& Power generation at Redbridge Lane.



Allocated in Southampton for CHP and Test Valley for park and ride.Future plans for the sites are to be determined and may include employment.


No existing minerals or waste sites within 1km.


None identified


SCC 018 Associated British Port Land, Southampton Docks area near Millbrook

Local authority: Southampton City CouncilSite Area: wider area approximately 16 hectares (indicative boundary- to be confirmed).NOTE:Only a proportion of this site may be available for waste management uses (subject to a developmentplot becoming available). Previously developed land.

Subway

TC B

L Twr

425

Mil lbrook Cottages

MlLLBROOK ROAD WEST

AVENUE

Naviga tion

Und

Gas Governor

L Twr

Sloping masonry

Lighting Tower

Dra in

Berth 110

Re settlement

Ward Bdy

Tra velling Cranes

Sub Sta

67

269

35

13

1919

a21

26a

28a

3030

a

5

2

12

28

87

Depot

PAYNE 'S ROAD

Court

El Su

b Sta

Mary

Cath

erine

Hou

se

S Gantr y

L Twr

Pavilion Car Park

L Twr

L Twr

2

TC B

El Sub S ta

Mast (Tele comm unication)

Vehicle Te rminal

L Twr

Mast

Sloping masonry

El Sub S ta

5.2m

Sloping masonryC Dry Dock

Sloping masonry

369

Hoppe r

L Twr

Ra il F reightliner Te rminal

Chy

L Twr

Gas Gov

Sinks

BLIGHMONT CRESCENT

L Twr

Beech

43

3.7m

267

22a

29

El Sub S ta

13

26

7.0m

28

12

Southampton Docks

LAKELANDS D

RIVE

48

SP

49

WB

Gantry

20

TERRACE

3.7m

L Twr

Playground

451

MP 80.75

L Twr

423

El Sub S ta

L Twr

L Twr

Southampton Docks

Beacon

L Twr

WESTERN A VENU E

371

Sloping masonry

371a

River Test

Cradle

19

3.7m

3.0m

Ward Bdy

No 12 Gate

Warehouse

El Sub S ta

CR

Mean High Water

HERBERT WALKER AVENUE

4.3m Mem orial Hall

2

283

13

Warehouse

19

257

22

18a

20a

2221

a

Mil lbrook Station

7

L Twr

9

45

25

38

43

L Twr

8

47

89

151

14

1 to 5

PC

149

118

Southampton

75b

L Twr

to453

L Twr

Mast

411 to 419

Mean

High

Wate

r

L Twr

Depot

Depot

2.4m

MILL

BROO

K POI

NT RO

AD

L Twr

Ward

Bdy

Sloping masonry

367

Mean High Water

Government

Sloping masonry

Und

Blighmont TA C entr e

3.7m

3.7m

3.0m

343

321215

MP 80.25

WATE

RHOU

SE LA

NE

18

3.0m

1 to 5

36

ETL

17

24

BEEC H ROA D

Conveyor

TC B

13

8

HARDY CL OSE

WB

Vehicle Stora ge Depot

25

MP 80

1 to 9

Park Court

1 to 6

DocksEl Sub S ta

Recreation Ground

L Twr

ESS

435

Jubilee House

MILLBROOK ROAD WEST

8

11

King George V Graving Dock

Centre

Caisson

Weighbridge

L Twr

361

L Twr

L Twr

Berth 109

L Twr

L Twr

Conve

yor

205

1

1 to 4

6

Ward Bdy

L Twr

Mast

23

LB

17a

23a

24a

27

Conveyor

Cargo Shed

37

ETL

86

LodgeSycamore

2

SOMERSET

69

MOUNTBATTEN WAY

79

Flats

75a

L Twr

L Twr

441

Bol

429

El Sub S ta

1

42

L Twr

FB

CP

MILLBROOK ROAD WEST

1

FAWL EY ROAD

11a

Sloping masonry

3.7m

3.7m

El

L Twr

HERBERT WALKER AVENUE

SP

Solent Business C entre

Signa l Gantry

Jubi lee Training Centre

Tra velling Cranes

204

Bapt

ist C

hurch

3.0m

293

55

Ho use

TES TWOOD ROAD

16

16

Berth 107

3.7m

1

Bollards

1

13.4m

El Su

b Sta

1115

128

88

71

L Twr

L Twr

LB

L Twr

421

L Twr

Football Centre

THIRD

Mean

High

Wate

r

Lighting Tower

3

CR

Sloping masonry

3.4m

MP 80.5

Weighbridge

HERB

ERT W

ALKE

R AVE

NUE Docks

13

203

Berth 108

MILLBROOK ROAD WEST

Thompson

271

El Sub S ta

FB

1720

2328

2526

27a

29a

1

12

El Sub S ta

2

MHW

CRFO

UNDR

Y LANE 37

5874

12

61

L Twr

22

Path

Somerset

78

WB

L Twr

WESTERN

AVENUE

Gara ge

Playground

Works

L Twr

14

Dra in

Tra velling Cranes

Sloping masonry

L Twr

3.7m

MLW

Southampton

TC B

Tra velling Cranes

3.0m

2

216

Bollards

3.7m

WEST BAY ROAD

305

Mil lb

rook

195

48

11

El Sub S ta

31 MARC

HWOO

D RO

AD

18

CP

1

24

Path

8.8m

S

73

83

30

143 to 145

0 100 200 m

Eastleigh

New Forest

City of Southampton


i. Located in intensive port area with good road and sea access (waterside access and berthing facility).ii. Only a proportion of this area should be developed for waste management-related uses- land should be

preserved for port uses as much as possible and to minimise the potential for cumulative impacts on theurban area.

iii. The site has good internal dock road access and railway access could be explored as Millbrook rail accessto the port runs through the site.

iv. The character, potential flood risk and setting of the listed King George V dry dock should be taken intoaccount.

v. Aerodrome Safeguarding Zonemay restrict the type of waste uses which could be developed. If the proposedstructure is greater than 90 metres then consultation with BAA will be required

vi. Any proposal would need to ensure the design, transport arrangements and avoidance of environmentalimpacts are appropriately addressed, taking into account the nearby air quality management zone.


vii. Restrictions on the level of materials imported onto the site by road will be required to ensure importationis predominately by sea. (Southampton’s core strategy safeguards the area for port related uses)

viii. Any facility should create a positive landmark architectural statement and its scale / bulk will require carefulassessment, to ensure an appropriate relationship with the surrounding area, taking into account the portenvirons and nearby residential properties.

ix. Implications of proximity to European nature conservation designations to be investigated through HabitatsRegulations Assessment process.

Nomination

193 The broad area (comprising three individual nominated sites) was identified by Southampton City Councilin 2010. The site is located south of the railway line and Rail Freightliner Terminal. The site is visible fromMillbrook Road West (which is parallel to the railway line), and also from some residential streets to thenorth. There are different options for how this area could be configured to accommodate waste managementuses, but it is unlikely that the entire site would be developed. Other than for supporting infrastructure.


194 Part of this wider site was previously subject to a proposal for a palm oil energy plant. However, anapplication was submitted, but then withdrawn. The area includes the King George V Dry Dock, a listeddry dock structure (King George V Graving Dock) and associated berth (Berth 110), plus adjacent hardstanding dock land. The dry dock was constructed in 1932 to enable big ship construction to take place inSouthampton.

195 The identified area is near to Dock Gate 12 and lies either side of a large container storage area (along WestBay Road). The Recresco Glass Recycling Facility is located to the south east of the area.

196 An energy firm has discussed proposals with the port owners Associated British Ports (ABP) to build a100 megawatt (MW) biomass plant and for the heat generated to be piped into homes around Southampton.The firm has submitted an Environmental Impact Assessment scoping report and an application for aproposal is anticipated in 2011.

197 The majority of this area comprises of warehouse type buildings across the south of the site and asphalt /concrete hardstanding across the northern section, but no warehouse buildings are within the identifiedsite. In principle an appropriate renewable energy plant of a suitable scale can be supported, which usessuitable fuel and technology for the urban and environmental context within the Port of SouthamptonWestern Docks, subject to consideration of the following issues. Such uses (which could incorporaterecovery from appropriate waste streams such as biomass) would be supported only where the plant wouldnot prejudice the wider operation of the Port (and would be supplied predominately by ship); would becapable of supplying heat to the local area; and the design, transport, air quality, environmental and othereffects are acceptable, including in respect of nearby residential areas. Any energy facility with a generatingcapacity of 50MW or more will be determined through the Infrastructure Planning Commission (IPC) orsuccessor arrangements. In these circumstances the Council will submit a local impact statement.



Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1-3and 5. This is due to the industrial location which has good road and sea access and existing built developmenton the site, but is a prominent site in proximity to residential properties and an Air Quality Management Area.The suitability of this site for other development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (dueto the need to control the scale of a facility, and the proximity of the site to residential areas and the AQMA).In practice the requirement for fuel to be transported to the site predominately by ship is likely to strictly limitthe types of development within the potentially suitable categories, which will be appropriate. Proposals wouldneed to address the deliverability issues identified above (notably traffic, design and air quality considerations,screening required and proximity to European Nature conservation designated areas etc). Parts of the siteare within 250 metres of sensitive receptors, which is likely to limit or require additional careful assessmentof some types of development within these categories.



Sites lie on a secondary aquifer.Part of flood zone 2 and 3 lie on the sites and in close proximity around the site.

Visual intrusion Sites lies at a low elevation.Landscape Type: SettlementLandscape Character Area: Settlement (Southampton)

Nature conservation Solent and SouthamptonWater SPA and Ramsar Site, Solent Maritime SAC and Eling and Bury MarshesSSSI are all located within 1km of the sitesCracknore Hard and Marchwood Mudflats, SINC are located within 1km south of the site.


Historic buildings lie within 1km of the site.The dry dock site is a listed structureTwo historic parks and gardens lie within 1km to the north east of the sites.Marchwood conservation area is located approximately 1km away of the sites, across the River Test.

Traffic & access The Primary Route Network (A33) is located approximately 2km from the site, via West Bay Road, aninternal port road.Site is within the Southampton urban area.Millbrook train station is located approximately within 450m of the site.The railway line runs directly behind the site.


Residential properties lie to the north of the sites along Millbrook Road and immediately beyond therailway and A3024 highway.Four Schools lie with 1km of the sites.Three Nursing and residential Care homes lie within 1km of the sites.Allotments lie within 1km of the sites.Millbrook Road is designated an Air Quality Management Area.


Sites lie within Southampton aerodrome safeguarding area


One of these sites will only be available, as only one of the three port sites will be developed.Safeguarded in Southampton Core Strategy for port related uses.


Millbrook Sewage Treatment works is located approximately within 450m to the sites.Marchwood ERF is located approximately 1km to the sites, across the River Test.




None identified.


TTV 013 Land off Foxcotte Lane, Andover

Local authority: Test Valley Borough CouncilSite Area: 3.21 Hectares. Not previously developed land.

Und CR

Track

Path (

um)

Ward Bdy

Charlton Sports

Def

Water

Def

and Leisure Centre

(disused)

Path (um)

Pond

Pond

Pump

Ward

Bdy

FOXCOTTE LANE

0.91m

RH

FOXCOTTE LANE

Football Ground

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

"

"

Eastleigh

Winchester

Test Valley



i. Relatively unconstrained site, although local plans and aspirations for development of this site are to bedetermined.

ii. This site is currently undeveloped and used for informal recreation. Potential concerns raised by localresidents would need to be addressed and overcome.

iii. The extent to which the openness of the area would be physically or visually diminished is a key consideration.iv. Full assessment of drainage and surface water would be required as the area is sensitive with respect to

controlled waters.v. Appropriate screening would be required as the site is visible from Foxcotte Lane.vi. Proximity to Bird Strike area may restrict the nature of any future waste operations.vii. Significant damage to adjacent habitats should be avoided and necessary biodiversity enhancements provided

where necessary.


Nomination

198 This site was identified by Hampshire County Council in 2004. This site was originally identified from asearch for a possible replacement site for the Andover Household Waste Recycling Centre (since developedat Walworth Industrial Estate).


199 The site is an undeveloped strip of grass and shrubs bounded by a watercourse on two sides. It is currentlybeing used as an unofficial dog walking area and informal recreation area. The site is owned by Test ValleyBorough Council. The site was historically used for chalk and flint gravel extraction.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1-3. This is due to the size of the site. Proposals for such uses would need to address the deliverability issuesidentified above, particularly the need to avoid visual impacts and impacts on amenity. The suitability of thissite for other enclosed development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to site beingin a bird strike area, hydrology issues, screening issues and residential properties nearby etc).



The site lies on source protection zones 2 and 3.The site lies on flood zone 2 and 3.Site lies on a principal aquifer.

Visual intrusion Site lies at a low elevation in relation to the area.Landscape Type: Open DownsLandscape Character Area: Andover Open Downs (8d)

Nature conservation Andover Ring Road, SINC lies to the south of the site within 1km.Improved grassland and scrub. Rural area so higher potential for protected species.


Foxcott Deserted Medieval Village, Scheduled Ancient Monument lies to the north east of the sitewithin 1km.Historic buildings lie to the north west, north and south east of the site.The Pentons, conservation area lies with 1km to the north west of the site.

Traffic & access The Local Road Network (A343) is located approximately 2km from the site, via Foxcotte Lane east.The Strategic Road Network (A303) is located approximately 5.25km from the site, via Foxcotte Lanewest and the A342.Does not link in with Portway Industrial Estate, routing is unsatisfactory and possibly unsuitable.

Would need a full transport assessment.


The site is within 100m of Andover urban area.Residential properties lie round the site.


Site does not lie within an aerodrome safeguarding area.In Middle Wallop Bird Strike Area.

Potential land use conflict Currently being used as an unofficial dog walking area and informal recreation area.




Plot 5 West Portway Industrial Estate, Waste Transfer lies to the south east of the site approximately0.46km away.


A footpath lies adjacent to the site on the east side.


TTV 038 Land at Dunwood Nurseries, Romsey

Local authority: Test Valley Borough CouncilSite Area: 7.44 Hectares overall (at least 0.7 hectares potentially available for waste management). Previouslydeveloped land.

Farm

Buckhill Cottage

Fircones

Sandhill

LB

ROAD

Pond

GPSALISBURY ROAD

NEWTO

WN FB

Drain

CR

Farm

43.6m

CS

Fernlea

Track

Fruit Farm

50.3m

Track

Drain

Merlins

39.0m

Dunwood

Track

Cottage

Brannian

Drain

Council Depot

1.22m

RH

42.1m

Birchwood House

Cherrytree

1.22m RH

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

"

"

Eastleigh

Winchester

Test Valley

City of Southampton



i. Opportunity to use the existing yard (highways depot hardstanding), although the exact location for wastemanagement is to be determined

ii. Potential waste uses need to be considered alongside future plans for the wider Dunwood nurseries site forsoft sand extraction and inert infill (yet to be determined). Waste management uses should avoid permanentsterilisation of mineral reserve and seek to complement future uses.

iii. Any built development would need to avoid impacts on visual amenity and be sympathetic to thesurroundings.

iv. The proximity to residential properties and impacts on amenity are key considerations.v. Further assessment is required to determine whether the existing access would be suitable.


Nomination

200 This site was initially promoted in 2003 by an operator for the development of a Construction &Demolitionreclamation unit. Later in 2006 a waste operator nominated this site for a specialist waste processing facility.Most recently, TTV038 has been nominated by the landowner for a range of waste management facilities.The wider 'Dunwood Nurseries' site has been nominated for extraction and infill (see TTV010 Sitesnominated for disposal to land). The site has been identified in the past by Hampshire County Council fora possible Household Waste Recycling Centre. This use was subsequently ruled out because potentialqueueing traffic on the A27 would not be suitable. Non-hazardous landfill following extraction has alsobeen ruled out in principle due to the proximity to residential properties.

201 Proposals to develop the entire 7.4 hectare site for a range of waste management facilities have beensuggested, although concentrating development on the former highways depot part of the site (which hasa Certificate of Lawful Use for storage) is the developer's preference.


202 The site is located within a rural setting just west of Romsey and east of Sherfield English, adjacent to theA27 road, which forms the southern edge of the site. The northern edge of the site backs on to Hazelcoppice woodland. The site was previously a fruit farm and piggery, with part of the site also being quarriedfor sand, which ceased over 40 years ago. The site is in single ownership. The wider 'Dunwood Nurseries'site contains a Hampshire County Council depot, cattery, former fruit farm and surplus agricultural land.The depot is currently leased to Hampshire County Council for use as a stone chipping storage yard.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1, 2and 3. This is due to existing built development on site and site size. Proposals for such uses would need toaddress the deliverability issues identified above. The suitability of this site for other enclosed developmentcategories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to impact on traffic management, impacts onresidential properties and amenity etc).



Site lies on a secondary aquifer.Flood zones 2 and 3 lie south of the site approximately 0.5km away.

Visual intrusion Site lies at a low elevation.Site screened from the main road by mature landscaping.Landscape Type: Lowland Mosaic Small ScaleLandscape Character Area: Wellow and Awbridge Heath Associated Wooded Farmland (1j)

Nature conservation Ancient woodland lie to the north east, south east and south west of the site.SINCs located round the site.Council depot forms large part of site with extensive area of hardstanding.Rest of site is predominantly grassland with some woodland along the western edge.Connected to other pocket woodlands in area.


Historic buildings lie round the site with one adjacent to the south west boundary.Dunwood Camp, scheduled ancient monument lies to north east of the site.



Traffic & access Site has direct access to the Local Road Network (A27).The former highways depot has it's own access, which would make a one way system possible on thesite.


There is a residential property as part of the site and further properties lying nearby.



Potential land use conflict Site has been nominated for sand extraction (to be confirmed).


Potential for waste management uses to complement sand extraction and associated activities (to beconfirmed).


Two Footpaths go through the site.


WCC 014 Micheldever Station

Local authority:Winchester City CouncilSite Area: 7.22 Hectares. Previously developed land.NOTE:Only a proportion of this site is likely to be available for waste management uses (subject to a development plot becomingavailable).

Warre

n Row

Strod

es C

ottag

e

Cottages

Pavilion

Hall

1

New

Cott

9

48

Granary

Mast

14

1 to 7 28

Travellers

A 303

Lade

ne

Cotta

ges

Thim

ble C

ott

Trac

k

Cott

Station

MP 57.75SL

SM

11

22

2726

Court

8

OVER

TON

ROAD

Water

OVER

TON

RD

A 303

Western

138.4m

(site of)

The Barn

23

The O

ld Sto

res

Victor

ia135.3m

110.9m

Recreation Ground

24 27

A 303

36

Sycam ore

MILL

PLAC

E

25

29

NEW ROAD

1

LB

Gable

End C

ottag

e

Warren

Old

Works

(PH)

Micheldever

42

28

SL

House

1 to 6

Harvest

30

A 303

Farm

Trac

k

Tumulus

15 32

Path (um)

58

Subway

12

19

31

ANDOVER ROADLB 21

21

23

5

38

Depot

MP

SL

1

OVER

TON

ROAD

Deve

r Hou

se4

1

Garag

e

MS

Micheldever

Post

13

InnStation

BRUNEL CLOSE

Path

(um)

House

4

11

RestBeechwood

2 TheDove

31

WB

SL

10

Mast

76

Slopin

g mas

onry

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

HavantFareham

Eastleigh

Winchester

Test Valley

East Hampshire

City of Southampton


i. Opportunities to maximise the potential for the transshipment of waste by rail should be considered.ii. Potential for access to the strategic road network (if an alternative access could be established further north,

as close to the A303 junction as is possible).iii. The site is long and narrow which will restrict the type of use and configuration of any facilities.iv. The public footpath running alongside the site is a key consideration.v. Future railway operational requirements at this site would need to be determined before the site boundary

is confirmed.vi. The proximity to residential properties and impacts on amenity are key considerations.vii. A habitat survey likely to be required prior to any developmentviii. Any facility should be designed and appropriately screened to minimise visual impact.ix. Relatively unconstrained site, although some distance to the main urban areas in Hampshire.


Nomination

203 Network Rail identified the strategic freight site at Micheldever in 2005 for potential future minerals andwaste related uses. It has been safeguarded as a site for a rail-head aggregates depot since 1987. The siteboundaries are approximate.


204 The site is located north of Micheldever Station, south of the A303 and west of Overton Road. The sitehas been partly used as a rail terminal for oil with part of the eastern chalk slope containing undergroundstorage tanks. Despite the size, land at this site appears to be based on two significantly split levels in height– the lowest level at the approximately same height as the siding.

205 The site was safeguarded as a site for a rail-head aggregates depot in the Hampshire Minerals &Waste LocalPlan (1998). A recent study indicates that the combined land at WCC014 could be used for a wastedistribution or recycling facility in addition to aggregate imports(66).


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 1-2. Opportunities to utilise part of the site for the storage and transhipment of waste materials has beenidentified. Proposals for such uses would need to address the deliverability issues identified above. Thesuitability of this site for other enclosed development categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants(due to proximity to residential properties and amenities and site layout etc).



Site lies on a principal aquiferThe north part of the site lies in Source Protection Zone 3

Visual intrusion Site lies at a high elevationLandscape Type: Open DownsLandscape Character Area: Mid Hampshire Open Downs (8e)

Nature conservation Ancient woodland lies to the north of the site.Micheldever Spoil Heaps, SSSIFour SINCs lie within 1km of the site with the closest being Micheldever Oil Terminal, which liesadjacent to the top part of the site.


Popham Beacons Round Barrow Cemetery lies north east of the site.South west of the site lies a small group of Historic Buildings.

Traffic & access There is existing site access via Overton Road and New Road, a short residential road, however thiswould be unsuitable for any future uses.The Strategic Road Network (A303) is located approximately 0.75km north of the site.Micheldever rail station lies adjacent to the site on the south west side.


Residential properties lie mainly to the south of the site.

66 Land & Mineral Management Ltd on behalf of Hampshire County Council (2009) Needs Assessment for Wharves & Rail Depots in Hampshire.





Potential land use conflict Site also identified for a potential aggregates depot.


Micheldever Depot, waste transfer/recycling lies north west of the site.


A footpath lies adjacent to the site on the west side.


WCC 015 Hydro Chafer site, Larkwhistle Road, Micheldever

Local authority:Winchester City CouncilSite Area: 1.87 Hectares. Previously developed land.

Tanks

Tanks

Trac

k

Slurry

WB

Track

SlurryPit

Track

Slurry Pit

Slurry Pit

Black Wood

Tanks

106.4m

Works

LARKWHISTLE FARM ROAD

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

HavantFareham

Eastleigh

Winchester

Test Valley

East Hampshire

City of Southampton


i. The site is well screened by vegetation and located away from sensitive receptorsii. Site overlies a principal aquiferiii. Site is of sufficient size to accommodate more than one waste facilityiv. Direct highways access is from Larkwhistle Road, a B classification road, however the A33 is only 0.5km

from the site entrance

Nomination

206 This site was identified by Hampshire County Council in 2005. The site is of significant size, is well screenedby vegetation and further than 500m from the nearest receptor.



207 The site is a former liquid fertilizer manufacturing plant which was acquired by a property developmentfirm in September 2006. Although no longer operational, the site still houses a number of large liquidstorage tanks, an open liquid storage lagoon and enclosed plant buildings. Due to the hazardous nature ofthis former manufacturing activity, the site is enclosed around its boundary by security fencing.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 2, 3and 4. This is due to the site being well screened and its direct highway access. Proposals for such uses wouldneed to address the deliverability issues identified above. The suitability of this site for other encloseddevelopment categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to open liquid storage lagoon andexisting structures on the site etc).



Source protection zone 3 south east of the site. Flood zone 2 and 3 south of the site.Site overlies a principal aquifer.

Visual intrusion The site lies at a high elevation.Landscape Type: Open Downs. Landscape Character Area: Mid Hampshire Open Downs (8e)

Nature conservation Ancient woodland north of the site and approximately 0.58km to the south east of the site.Black Wood SINC adjacent to the site.


A few Historic building are within 1km.The site is an existing industrial estate, with multiple buildings and hardstanding on the site.

Traffic & access Site is located approximately 0.5km from the A33, with good visibility splays from the access.The Strategic Road Network (A303) is located approximately 3.2km from the site via MicheldeverStation.HGV issues with weak bridge when using the Micheldever station junction on the A303.A33 junction with Larkwhistle Farm Road is on a duelled section, but central island should allowsufficient space for right turning HGVs.


A few residential properties lie round the site.



Potential land use conflict Winchester City Council have assessed land to the immediate west and south within their StrategicHousing Land Allocation Assessment.


None identified


A restricted byway lies just north west of the site.


WCC 018 Bishops Waltham Depot, Bishops Waltham

Local authority:Winchester City CouncilSite Area: 1.58 Hectares. Previously developed land.

Trac

k

River Hamble

Ford

Sewage

Woodlands

ETL

ETL

El Ps

Nursery

El Ps

20.1m

Yelfs Yard

26.8m

Ingledean

Halland

Orchardleigh

El Ps

ETL

ETL

Disma

ntled

Railw

ay

B 303

5

TankView

Weir

El Ps

El Ps Works

Sunny

Moordown

Croft

ETL

BOTLE

Y ROAD

Three Oaks

Edgebank

39.6m

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

HavantFareham

Eastleigh

Winchester

Test Valley

East Hampshire

City of Southampton


i. Proposals would need to be designed and operated to avoid impacts on residential amenityii. Suitable access onto the site from Botley Road needs to be further explorediii. Sewage treatment plant is located immediately adjacent

Nomination

208 This site was nominated by Hampshire County Council in 2006. As the site is located adjacent to a sewagetreatment works, there may be potential to locate some form of facility to recover energy from sewagesludge.


209 The site has been in use by Hampshire County Council as a highways maintenance and storage depot since1980. A number of covered structures and hard standing storage areas associated with vehicle maintenanceand storage are present on the site. The site is well screened along its boundary by vegetation.



Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 2and 3. This is due to the site being well screened and existing built development on the site. Proposals forsuch uses would need to address the deliverability issues identified above. The suitability of this site for othercategories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to size of the site, proximity to residentialproperties, River Hamble and adjacent sewage treatment plant etc).



Flood zone 2 and 3 lie round the site.

Visual intrusion The site lies at a low elevation.Landscape Type: Lowland Mosaic Small ScaleLandscape Character Area: Forest of Bere West (2e)

Nature conservation Five SINCs lie to the west and south west of the site within 1km.Two ancient woodland sites, Durley Wood and Gunners/Brokers Copses to the west and south westof the siteSite immediately adjacent to sewage works and by River Hamble.Site is largely developed with hardstanding and buildings. However, careful selection of type of facilitywould be essential to avoid any impacts upon river and protected species it supports.


Three historic buildings lie to the north of the site within 1km.Within 1km to the north of the site lies Bishop Waltham urban area.

Traffic & access Located west of B3035 Botley Road (which has a poor accident record).Additional HGV traffic to Botley / Bishops Waltham would need to be carefully considered due to theexisting HGV uses within the area.The Local Road Network (B2177) is located approximately 1.5km from the site, via Botley Road.


The site lies adjacent to residential properties.



Potential land use conflict Within 1km of the site to the north lies country side.


None identified


None identified.


WCC 019 Winnall Down Farm, Winchester

Local authority:Winchester City CouncilSite Area: 1.14 hectares. Previously developed land.

The

Winnall Down Copse

Winnall Down Farm

Def

2

1

Drain

Hostel

Def

FAIR L

ANE

Fair

1.22m RH

Farmhouse

Und

Haven

New Cottages

Winnall Down Copse

Def

1.22m

RH

Def

Kemari

Winnall Down

¯ 0 100 200 m

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

HavantFareham

Eastleigh

Winchester

Test Valley

East Hampshire

City of Southampton


i. Access to the site is currently not suitable to handle increased vehicle movements and a feasible solutionto provide an alternative access will need to be resolved prior to development.

ii. Any suitable facility would need to be at a scale which ensures development would not compromise theobjectives of the South Downs National Park designation.

iii. Opportunity to re-use redundant agricultural buildings.iv. Prominent structures unlikely to be suitable due to possible visual impacts.

Nomination

210 This site was nominated in 2006 by the current occupier.



211 The site consists of a group of farm buildings set in extensive farmland, which are well hidden and remotefrom dwellings. One of the buildings is still in agricultural use. Permission was granted in 1998 andimplemented for change of use from agricultural to mixed use of B2 industrial and B8 storage and distribution.The site is within 1km of the Winchester urban area.


Based on the information currently available, this site is considered suitable for development categories 2and 3. This is due to the site being well screened and the existing built development. Proposals for such useswould need to address the deliverability issues identified above. The suitability of this site for other encloseddevelopment categories would need to be demonstrated by applicants (due to access restrictions, potential forvisual impacts etc).



Site lies on a principal aquifer.

Visual intrusion Site lies at a low elevation to the surrounding areaSite lies in the South Downs National Park.East Hampshire AONB 1km to the south of the site.Landscape Type: Open Downs. Landscape Character Area: East Winchester Open Downs (8g)

Nature conservation Magdalen Hill Down and Magdalen Hill Down Verge, SINCs to the south west of the site


Two historic buildings south east of the site.Round Barrow Cemetery Scheduled Ancient Monument south west of the site.Existing industrial or agricultural site, with multiple buildings and hardstanding on the site which mighthave been significantly terraced into the landscape.

Traffic & access Access via Fair Lane has very poor visibility and third party land would be required to remove the hedge,plus there is limited carriageway width and numerous residential properties within the vicinity of thesite.The Primary Route Network (A31) is located approximately 1.6km from the site via the B3404 and FairLane.North of the B3404 Alresford Road.


Majority of nearby residential properties are to the west of the site (just over 1km away).





A waste transfer facility lies over 1km to the west of the site.


Indications that Southern Water wastewater infrastructure close to the site.


212 The map below shows the distribution of other nominated sites, which have been looked at within thissection.

Map 6 Other nominated sites in Hampshire.



Section 8 Sites in areas of planned development

214 In Hampshire, development areas have been identified to provide new housing and employment developmentto meet housing needs and economic growth aspirations across planning authority areas over the nexttwenty years. It is recognised that waste management infrastructure may be necessary to support plannednew development. This section assesses the capacity for planned new development areas to accommodatenew waste management facilities. For instance some planned new development has already identified sites(or land requirements) for waste management as part of the master planning for these development areas.For other areas, the precise location, siting and scale of any facility is yet to be determined.

215 These areas of planned development identified are:(67)

Bordon/ Whitehill Eco-townFareham Strategic Development Area (SDA)Aldershot Urban Extension (AUE)West of Waterlooville Major Development Area (MDA)North of Whiteley Major Development Area (MDA)

216 It is also worth noting that the siteELH 006 site adjacent to Waste Water Treatment Works, Eastleigh(see Section 6 'Nominated sites currently allocated for employment uses') provides a potential opportunityto provide a waste management/ energy generation facility to support the Eastleigh Riverside redevelopmentarea(68). For the purposes of this study, ELH 006 is considered as a distinct site however as the site boundaryand planning policy status are defined which enables more detailed site assessment.

67 The majority of growth areas were identified in the South East Plan (SEP) which the Government is currently proposing to revoke. These development areas arestill being planned for at a local level, with the exception of Hedge End Strategic Development Area (SDA) as this site is no longer being considered due to teststhat were undertaken on various feasibility studies

68 This is also known as the South Hampshire Strategic Employment Area, which was also included in the South East Plan (see policy SH3-Scale, Location and Type ofEmployment Development). According to the South East Plan, this area is the largest employment area in South Hampshire and is capable of being developed for awide range of uses.


EHS 029 Whitehill Bordon Eco-town Area of Search

Local authority: East Hampshire District CouncilPlanned new development: 5,500 dwellings (net) and associated infrastructure and employment opportunities.


i. HWRC would require ample landscaping as a buffer to the planned adjoining areas.ii. The siting of a waste use on this site will depend on the final configuration of theWhitehill Bordon Eco-town

masterplan.iii. Access arrangements and highways improvements will be a key consideration in determining an acceptable

location.iv. Delivery subject to a proposal being granted the necessary permits by the Environment Agency.

Nomination

217 The Eco-town masterplan for Whitehill Bordon has identified an area to the north of the 340 hectaredevelopment master plan, that may be suitable for a selection of waste facilities.


218 Whitehill Bordon was awarded Eco-town status in July 2009, which will lead to the building of up to 5,500new 'green' homes on land comprising existing urban areas and a large MoD training facility, when thisbecomes vacant in approximately 2014. Due to the proposed expansion in the urban area, a number ofnew waste facilities will be required in order to manage the increased production of waste from an increasedurban population.

Potential uses/ proposal

219 The Eco-town status of the development presents an opportunity for the construction of a number ofpotential waste facilities, including a combined heat and power (CHP) plant with district infrastructurenetwork in order to supply the new dwellings with heat and power created from the combustion of householdwaste or biomass, for example. The increased size of the urban area is also likely to require other wastefacilities such as a new Household Waste Recycling Centre (HWRC), an anaerobic digestion plant forhousehold food waste and a green waste composting plant.

220 The potential may be to locate all new waste facilities in an integrated waste 'resource park', or alternativelyco-locate small scale waste facilities alongside industrial facilities where 'symbiotic' relationships can becreated, in order share infrastructure or provide complimentary services.


FHM 007 Fareham SDA Area of Search

Local authority: Fareham Borough CouncilPlanned new development: To the north of the M27 motorway and comprising 7-8,000 new dwellings andassociated infrastructure.


i. The siting of one or more waste facilities in this SDA will depend on the final configuration of the Northof Fareham SDA masterplan.

ii. Access arrangements and highways improvements will be a key consideration in determining an acceptablelocation.

iii. Appropriate landscaping will be required if facilities are to be located on edge of development.iv. Delivery subject to a proposal being granted the necessary permits by the Environment Agency.

Nomination

221 A specific site for a waste facility within the North of Fareham SDA has yet to be identified, as the masterplanfor the proposed development has yet to be finalised. The total SDA area is approximately 491 hectares.


222 The North of Fareham SDA is a potential new development containing up to 8,000 new homes, as well asemployment, retail, leisure and open space uses. Due to the proposed expansion in the urban area, at leastone or more new waste facilities will be required in order to manage the increased production of waste froman increased urban population.


223 The new development presents an opportunity for the construction of a combined heat and power (CHP)plant with district infrastructure network in order to supply the new dwellings with heat and power createdfrom the combustion of household waste or biomass, for example. The increased size of the urban area isalso likely to require other waste facilities such as a new HouseholdWaste Recycling Centre (HWRC), whilstthere may also be opportunities within the masterplan for an anaerobic digestion plant for household foodwaste, a green waste composting plant and / or a waste water treatment plant with energy recovery formsewage sludge.

224 The potential may be to locate all new waste facilities in an integrated waste 'resource park', or alternativelyco-locate smaller scale waste facilities alongside industrial facilities where 'symbiotic' relationships can becreated, in order to share infrastructure or provide complimentary services.


RMR 002 Aldershot Urban Extension (AUE) HWRC site

Local authority: Rushmoor Borough CouncilPlanned new development: 4500 dwellings and associated infrastructure and employment opportunities.


i. HWRC would require ample landscaping as a buffer to the planned adjoining areas.ii. The siting of a waste use on this site will depend on the final configuration of the AUE.iii. Access arrangements and highways improvements are likely to be required to make this an acceptable

location for use by the public (in conjunction with the overall transport plan for the AUE).iv. Within this development a size of 0.8ha is reserved for a Household Waste Recycling Centre (HWRC)v. Delivery subject to a proposal being granted the necessary permits by the Environment Agency.

Nomination

225 This site is part of the MoD's estate in Aldershot, near to land being released on behalf of Aspire Defencefor private redevelopment (known as the Aldershot Urban Extension). This site was identified in 2005 bythe consultants working on behalf of Defence Estates to design a masterplan for the urban extension.


226 The Aldershot Urban Extension (AUE) involves the reuse and redevelopment of former MoD land andbuildings for residential and mixed use development. The masterplan for the development proposes tolocate an on-site waste facility alongside light industrial uses. The proposed site area is 0.8 hectares.

227 A study is to commence looking at access issues to the east of Aldershot, which will include looking at HGVmovements on roads in this area, coming from industrial sites adjacent to the A331 at the end of GovernmentRoad. This study will also look at potential junction / access / capacity improvements to the A331, includingtaking into account the impact of the proposed Aldershot Urban Extension development area (approx.4500 dwellings).


228 The site was identified as a possible Household Waste Recycling Centre (HWRC) site to support the futureexpansion of Aldershot (the AUE). Several options were considered as to where a new HWRC to supportthe new community and service north Aldershot should be located. This site (currently redundant militarydepot buildings off Ordnance Road) is the preferred location. This has been formalised by its inclusion ina Supplementary Planning Document adopted by Rushmoor Borough Council(69).

69 For further details of the Supplementary Planning Document see http://www.rushmoor.gov.uk/aue


http://www.rushmoor.gov.uk/aue

WCC 006 Land at West of Waterlooville MDA

Local authority: Winchester City Council & Havant Borough CouncilPlanned new development: 2000 dwellings (net) and associated infrastructure and employment opportunities.


i. HWRC would require ample landscaping as a buffer to the planned adjoining areas.ii. Access arrangements and highways infrastructure will need to ensure that this an acceptable location for

use by the public.iii. Delivery subject to a proposal being granted the necessary permits by the Environment Agency.

Nomination

229 This site is located on land known as Old Park Farm, which forms the northern section of the West ofWaterlooville MDA and is to be developed by Taylor Wimpey. A 0.75 hectare site has been identified andallocated within the south west of the Old Park Farm area for the development of a Household WasteRecycling Centre (HWRC).

230 The need for a newHWRCwas identified by Hampshire County Council in 2005, as the existing HambledonRoad HWRC in Waterlooville is both out of date and running at full capacity.


231 The West of Waterlooville MDA was identified within the Hampshire Country Structure Plan 1996 - 2011(Review). Planning permission for a mixed employment and residential use development was granted, forboth Old Park Farm and Plant Farm, in 2006. Within the original planning application for the 38 hectareOld Park Farm development, a specific site was not identified for a HWRC, however following discussionbetween Hampshire County Council and the applicant, Taylor Wimpey, a site was allocated alongside lightindustrial units.


232 The proposal is to develop the 0.75 hectare site into a new, split-level, HWRC which will replace the existingoutdated HWRC facility on Hambledon Road. This facility will support the existing population ofWaterlooville and surrounding settlements, alongside the West of Waterlooville MDA.


WCC 020 North of Whiteley MDA Area of Search

Local authority: Winchester City CouncilPlanned new development: 3000 new dwellings and supporting uses


i. The siting of one or more waste facilities in this MDA will depend on the final configuration of the Northof Whiteley MDA masterplan.

ii. Access arrangements and highways improvements will be a key consideration in determining an acceptablelocation.

iii. Appropriate landscaping will be required if facilities are to be located on edge of development.iv. Delivery subject to a proposal being granted the necessary permits by the Environment Agency.

Nomination

233 Winchester's Local Development Framework (LDF) Preferred Option Core Strategy (May 2009) identifiesan area to the north of Whiteley as a possible location for the construction of approximately 3,000 newhomes and supporting uses. This comprises the Major Development Area (MDA) known as North ofWhiteley. Policy SH3 in the Preferred Option Core Strategy indicates the development must be developedas an extension to Whiteley and include the provision of green infrastructure. There is no explicit mentionof waste management facilities within Policy SH3, however the masterplan for the proposed developmenthas yet to be finalised. The total MDA area is approximately 214 hectares.


234 TheNorth ofWhiteley MDA is a potential new development containing up to 3,000 new homes and supportuses, such as schools and transport infrastructure.Due to the proposed expansion in the urban area, newwaste facilities will be required to manage the increased production of waste from an increased urbanpopulation.

235 In December 2009, Winchester City Council granted planning consent for the redevelopment of the existingWhiteley outlet village. This scheme will see the site owners replace the existing retail outlets with a new'town centre' providing shops and services which are suited to a residential area.

236 A consortium of three developers has begun master planning work and public consultation ahead of theformal adoption of Winchester's Local Development Framework (LDF), which is not likely to be until early2012.


237 The increased size of the urban area at Whiteley is likely to require new waste facilities such as a newHousehold Waste Recycling Centre (HWRC), since the nearest current site is Segensworth HWRC, locatedjust over one mile to the south of the MDA. In 2009/10 it was the 2nd busiest site in the county’s HWRCnetwork, and which at peak periods of use is already close to its operational limit. The impact of the additionalwaste from the new houses in North Whiteley would very probably exceed the operational capacity of thisexisting facility.


238 The next nearest site is Hedge End HWRC just over 3 miles to the north-west, which is the 16th (out of26) busiest site in the county’s HWRC network. Since it was built there has been intensive housingdevelopment in the surrounding area to the point where it is now effectively in the middle of a housingestate and land locked and as such, offers no potential for expansion and to accommodate the overflowfrom the users of Segensworth HWRC.

239 Therefore, a new HWRC site within North Whiteley MDA, to act as both a replacement for the HedgeEnd site and also to take some of the capacity pressure off the Segensworth HWRC, would be the preferredoption. As such, a suitable plot of land within the MDA, for a new split-level HWRC site to be built on,would be required to be accommodated within the master planning process.

240 TheMDAmay also provide further waste management opportunities to be explored, such as the developmentof an anaerobic digestion plant for household food waste, which could be designed to be sympatheticallylocated within the MDA and provide energy to the new dwellings.


241 The map below shows the distribution of sites located within areas of planned development, which havebeen looked at within this section.

Map 7 Sites located within areas of planned development.


Section 9 Sites nominated for disposal to land

242 The areas nominated for their potential to provide additional disposal capacity (including landfill, land raisingand surcharging) are listed in the Landfill and Surcharging Report(70). A large number of site options have beenconsidered although it is apparent that feasible opportunities are very limited, particularly for non-hazardouslandfill. The majority of the nominations have been considered less suitable at the initial stages due toenvironmental constraints or historic management or enforcement issues at the sites. There are no sitesconsidered suitable as new landfill locations. This is partly due to a lack of likely void capacity (i.e. mineralextraction is not considered suitable).

In terms of inert landfill, there are ten sites (only one is an 'existing site') that may provide potential for increasedinert landfill capacity.

In terms of non-hazardous landfill, there are three sites that have been identified (two are currently permittedfor landfill) that may provide potential for increased non-hazardous landfill capacity.

Non-hazardous is landfilling of wastes such as wood, paper, card, textiles, food and green wastes.

Surcharging involves filling a landfill above the final contours to allow for the subsequent settlement ofwaste. Surcharging of existing landfills requires planning consent from the Minerals Planning Authority, aswell as permit from the Environment Agency.

243 Further discussion of the findings is provided in Section 4 'Key Findings'. The three areas considered fornon-hazardous landfill are shown in the maps below.

70 Assessment of need for Waste Management Facilities in Hampshire: Landfill and Surcharging Report


NFT 011 Purple Haze

Local authority: New Forest District CouncilSite size: 70 hectaresNomination: Nominated for mineral extraction with restoration to non-hazardous landfill

0 100 200 m

New Forest


244 This site was nominated in May 2006, and is located close to the existing Blue Haze landfill site. The sitehas been nominated for mineral extraction and is considered to be suitable for the landfilling of waste aspart of the process to restore the site. It is unclear however, when this site may be available for landfillingas this will depend on the relevant planning permission being granted for such activities and when mineralextraction is completed at the site. The site would be operated in sections.




Site lies on a secondary aquiferFlood zones 2 and 3 lie to the north west and east of the site

Visual intrusion Site is well screened by the coniferous plantations

Nature conservation Site lies within landscape character area woodland and plantation on heathSite lies within Ringwood Forest and Home wood SINCAncient woodland lies within 2km to the north east and north west of the siteDorset Heaths, SPA, SAC and Ramsar lie to the north west and Avon Valley SPA, Ramsar lies to theeast of the siteRiver Avon SPA lies to the east of the site within 2 kmSSSI Ebblake Bog lies to the north west of the site and Avon Valley (Bickton - Christchurch) SSSI liesto the east of the site.


Scheduled ancient monuments lie to the south west of the site and to the north of the site.Historical sites lie to the north, north east and east of the site.Ringwood Town lies to the west of the site.Somerley Park lies within 2km to the north east of the site

Traffic & access Access would be from the B3081.Strategic Road Network (A31) is located approximately 2.75km from the site, via the B3081.


The closest residential properties lie to the north west of the site.


Site lies within Bournemouth aerodrome safeguarding area

Potential land use conflict The site is adjacent to and incorporating part of Moors Valley Country Park


Blue Haze and Somerley Landfill lie the the north east of the site


A bridleway touches the north west edge of the site boundary


NFT 047 Blue Haze

Local Authority: New Forest District CouncilSite Size: Approximately 77.67 hectaresNomination: Nominated non-hazardous landfill site (Active site)

The current operator considers that any extension would represent a significant engineering challenge withoutcreating steep slopes.

0 100 200 m

New Forest


245 Blue Haze is an existing site and was nominated in December 2005. It is an active non hazardous landfillsite which was also previously identified as a possible areas for surcharging through the draft Minerals Plan.The site was a former soft sand extraction site which has now ceased, and the restoration of the site isthrough the importation of controlled wastes subject to legal agreements concerning lorry routing, accessand highway improvements, management agreements for nature conservation and footpaths/access forpublic recreation, and relating to off-site heathland.




Site lies on a secondary aquiferFlood zones 2 and 3 lie to the north west and east of the site

Visual intrusion Visual impacts should be mitigated

Nature conservation Site lies within landscape character area woodland and plantation on heathSite lies within Ringwood forest and Home Wood SINCAncient woodland lies within 2km to the north east and north west of the siteDorset Heaths, SPA, SAC and Ramsar lie to the north west and Avon Valley SPA, Ramsar lies to theeast of the siteRiver Avon SPA lies to the east of the site within 2 kmSSSI Ebblake Bog lies to the north west of the site and Avon Valley (Bickton - Christchurch) SSSI liesto the east of the site.


Scheduled ancient monuments lie to the south west of the site and to the north of the site.Historical sites lie to the north, north east and east of the site.Somerley Park lies within 2km to the north east of the site

Traffic & access Access would be from the B3081.Strategic Road Network (A31) is located approximately 3.5km from the site, via the B3081.


The closest residential properties lie under 0.60km to the north west of the siteRingwood Town lies to the west of the site.


Site lies within Bournemouth aerodrome safeguarding area

Potential land use conflict The extension would create an unacceptable landform and would be difficult to deliver.


Purple Haze lies directly to the south of the site


A bridleway runs along the north part of the site (should continue to be safeguarded)Restoration to heathland would be required.


TTV 027 Squabb Wood, Shootash

Local authority: Test Valley Borough CouncilSite Area: Approximately 48.49 hectaresNomination: Nominated for non-hazardous landfill site (Active site)

0 100 200 m

Eastleigh

New Forest

Test Valley

City of Southampton


246 The site was nominated in May 2006 and is situated to the south east of Shootash and north of the A27.The operator has expressed that the site is suitable for the expansion of the existing landfill void, potentiallyvia an extension or surcharging on top of the existing void. The site is also nominated as suitable toaccommodate other appropriate waste technologies. Restoration to agriculture is likely to be required.




Flood zones 2 and 3 lie under 1km to the east and west of the site.Site lies within a secondary aquifer

Visual intrusion Site is fairly enclosed by a thick belt of forestry

Nature conservation Squabb Wood SINC, ancient woodland lies adjacent to the site of the north east boundaryRiver Test SSSI lies under 1.30km to the east of the site


Landscape type: lowland mosaic medium scaleLandscape character area: Wellow and Awbridge Heath associated wooded farmlandFour historical buildings lie within close proximity to the site.

Traffic & access The Local Road Network (A27) runs along the south west boundary of the siteAccess to the site should be via the existing access on the A27


Romsey urban area and conservation area lie under 1.5km to the east of the site.A few residential properties lie near the site


The eastern section of the site is located with Southampton aerodrome safeguarding area.



Roke Manor, Shootash lies to the north of the site.


A footpath runs along a section of the northern boundary of the site. This will need to be safeguarded


247 The map below shows the distribution of sites nominated for disposal, which have been looked at withinthis section.

Map 8 Sites nominated for disposal to land (landfilling)



The list below shows the specialist terms that are used in this study:

Aerodrome Safety Exclusion Zone: An area identified where mineral and waste development may be impactedby its location. Landfill and mineral operations, including site working and restoration options, in these areas canbe affected due to the need to keep birds away from aircraft flight paths.

Anaerobic Digestion (AD): A biochemical process by which organic matter is decomposed by bacteria undercontrolled conditions in the absence of oxygen, producing methane gas and other by-products

Ancient woodland:Woodland that is believed to have existed from at least medieval times.

Air Quality Management Area (AQMA): A designation made by a local authority where an assessment of airquality results in the need to devise an action plan to improve quality of air.

Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB): Areas of countryside considered to have significant landscapevalue, and protected to preserve that value. Originally identified and designated by the Countryside Commissionunder Sections 87 and 88 of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949. Natural England is nowresponsible for designating AONBs and advising Government and other organisations on their management andupkeep.

Biological Treatment: Technologies that use bacteria under controlled conditions to break down organic materialsand wastes

Biomass: Biological material derived from living, or recently living organisms.

Bird strike: Risk of aircraft collision with birds, which are often attracted to landfill sites containing organic waste.

Brownfield: Land which has been previously developed.

Co-location: The placement of several activities in a single location.

Composting:Aerobic decomposition of organic matter to produce compost for use as a fertiliser or soil conditioner.

Combined heat and power (CHP):Heating technology which generates heat and electricity simultaneously, fromthe same energy source.

Commercial and industrial waste (C&I):Waste generated by business and industry.

Conservation areas: Designated areas of special architectural or historic interest, the character or appearance ofwhich it is desirable to preserve or enhance.

Construction, Demolition&ExcavationWaste (CDE):Waste generated by the construction, repair, maintenanceand demolition of buildings and structures. It mostly comprises brick, concrete, hardcore, subsoil and topsoil butcan also include timber, metals and plastics.

Certificate of Lawful Use (CLU):A legal document stating the lawfulness of past, present or future development.The issue of a certificate depends entirely on factual evidence about the history and planning status of the buildingor other land and the interpretation of any relevant planning law or judicial authority.

Eco-town: A government-sponsored programme of new towns to be built in England, which are intended toachieve exemplary standards of sustainability.


ELV: End of Life Vehicle such as an old car disposed of as scrap

Employment land review (ELR):

Energy from waste (EFW): Conversion of waste into a useable form of energy, either by incineration or by theproduction of gas.

Energy Recovery Facility (ERF): A facility at which a part of all of the waste material produced in a process isburned to generate heat or electricity.

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Systematic investigation and assessment of the likely effects of aproposed development, to be taken into account in the decision-making process under the Town and CountryPlanning (Environment Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999. The process is undertakenfor a proposed development that would significantly affect the environment because of its siting, design, size orscale.

Gasification: A waste-treatment process in which waste is heated to produce a gas that is burned to generate heatenergy.

Green belt: An area designated in planning documents such as Structure Plans, providing an area of permanentseparation between urban areas. The main aim of green belt policy is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping landpermanently open; the most important quality of green belts is their openness.

Green waste: Compostable garden waste.

Hampshire Minerals and Waste Development Framework (HMWDF): A collection of minerals and wastedevelopment documents, including development plan documents and supplementary planning documents. It willalso include a Statement of Community Involvement, the Minerals andWaste Development Scheme and the AnnualMonitoring Review. The Hampshire Minerals and Waste Development Framework provides a framework fordelivering the minerals and waste spatial planning strategy for the areas of Hampshire, Portsmouth, Southamptonand the New Forest National Park.

Habitats Regulation Assessment (HRA): Statutory requirement for Planning Authorities to assess the potentialeffects of land-use plans on designated European Sites in Great Britain. The Habitats Regulations Assessment isintended to assess the potential effects of a development plan on one or more European Sites (collectively termed'Natura 2000' sites). The Natura 2000 sites comprise Special Protection Areas (SPAs) and Special Areas ofConservation (SACs). SPAs are classified under the European Council Directive on the conservation of wild birds(79/409/EEC; Birds Directive) for the protection of wild birds and their habitats (including particularly rare andvulnerable species listed in Annex 1 of the Birds Directive, and migratory species).

Heavy goods vehicles (HGV): A vehicle that is over 3,500kg unladen weight and used for carrying goods.

Household waste recycling centre (HWRC): A facility provided by the Local Authority which is accessible tothe general public to deposit waste which cannot be collected with the normal household waste, such as bulkyitems, garden waste and engine oil (formerly known as civic amenity sites).

Incinerator Bottom Ash (IBA): The coarse residue left on the grate of waste incinerators.

Inert waste: Waste that does not normally require any significant physical, chemical or biological changes whendeposited at a landfill site.


Integrated Sustainability Appraisal (ISA): An appraisal process, undertaken as part of the development of thisStrategy, which fulfils the statutory requirements of Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment.See Sustainability Appraisal for further information.

In-vessel composting: Composting within a sealed chamber where environmental parameters are optimised(temperature, moisture, mixing and air flow), resulting in the production of higher quality finished compost withina shorter time.

Landscape character: A combination of factors such as topography, vegetation pattern, land use and culturalassociations that combine to create a distinct, recognisable character.

Landfill: The deposit of waste into voids in the ground.

Leachate: Water which seeps through a landfill site, extracting substances from the deposited waste to form apollutant.

Local Development Framework (LDF): Is a folder of local development documents that outlines how planningwill be managed in your area.

Local Nature Reserves (LNR): A statutory designation made (by principal local authorities) under Section 21of the National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949. They are places of local, but not necessarily national,wildlife or geological importance and also often have good public access and facilities. Local Nature Reserves arealmost always owned by local authorities, who often pass the management of the Local Nature Reserves ontoCounty Wildlife trusts.

Major Development Area (MDA): An area identified for large scale, mixed-use development.

Materials Recovery Facility (MRF): A facility where elements of the waste stream are mechanically or manuallyseparated before recycling and/or are, bulked, crushed, baled and stored for reprocessing, either on the same siteor at a material reprocessing plant.

Mechanical Biological Treatment (MBT): Various processes used to treat waste further before final disposal.The aim of MBT is to minimise the environmental impact of end disposal by removing as much recyclable, organicand toxic material as possible. Then this produces a reduced volume of relatively inert, stabilised end productwhich may be landfilled. It also means further value from the waste can be gained by recovering recyclables and,in some cases, energy

Ministry of Defence (MoD): The Government department responsible for implementation of the governmentdefence policy and the headquarters of UK armed forces.

Natura 2000 sites:Designated land including Special Protection Areas (SPAs) and Special Areas of Conservation(SACs) and Ramsar sites.

Non-hazardous landfill: One of the three classifications of landfills made by the Landfill Directive, takingnon-hazardous waste.

Non-hazardous waste:Waste permitted for disposal at a non-hazardous landfill. It is not inert or hazardous andincludes the majority of household and commercial wastes.

Non-inert: A material that can react chemically when mixed with others


Open windrow composting: Involves the raw material (usually green and/or garden waste and cardboard) beingarranged outdoors in long narrow piles on a hard and preferable impermeable surface. The windrows are mixedand turned regularly for aeration, by hand or mechanically.

Planning Policy Statements (PPS):National planning policy guidance, and includes PPS10 on sustainable wastemanagement, PPS12 on developing local development frameworks and PPS25 on development and flood risk.

Primary Route Network (PRN): A network of regionally significant highways, or routes for longer distancetravel.

Pyrolysis: Thermal decomposition taking place in the absence of oxygen.

Rail depot:A railway facility where trains regularly stop to load or unload passengers or freight (goods). It generallyconsists of a platform and building next to the tracks providing related services.

Ramsar Sites (Wetlands of International Importance): Sites of international importance for waterfowl protectedunder the Ramsar Convention of the Conservation of Wetlands of International Importance, ratified by the UKGovernment in 1976.

Recycling: The series of activities by which discarded materials are collected, sorted, processed and convertedinto raw materials and used in the production of new products.

Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS): Prepared by the regional body, the RSS sets out policies in relation to thedevelopment and use of land in the region (The South East Plan was adopted in 2007 but Government policy isto remove this part of the development plan).

Rights of Way (RoW): Paths which the public have a legally protected right to use.

Safeguarding: The method of protecting needed facilities or mineral resources and of preventing inappropriatedevelopment from affecting it. Usually, where sites are threatened, the course of action would be to object to theproposal or negotiate an acceptable resolution.

Scheduled Ancient Monument (SAM): Nationally important archaeological sites included in the Schedule ofAncient Monuments maintained by the Secretary of State under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological AreasAct 1979.

Sites:Other than the usual meaning, specific sites are identified for minerals and waste activities in the Plan wherethere are viable opportunities, have the support of landowners and are likely to be acceptable in planning terms.

Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC): A local designation conferred on an area of particularinterest in Hampshire for its biodiversity by the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre according to criteriaagreed with Natural England and the Hampshire Wildlife Trust. These sites may be designated for a range ofecological interests and may be of national importance.

Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI): A national designation for an area of special interest because of itsflora, fauna, or geological or physiographical features, selected by Natural England and notified under Section 28of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.

Source Protection Zone (SPZ): Geographical areas defined by the Environment Agency and used to protectsources of groundwater abstraction.

South East Plan (SEP): See Regional Spatial Strategy


Special Area of Conservation (SAC):Areas which have been given special protection under the European Union’sHabitats Directive. They provide increased protection to a variety of wild animals, plants and habitats and are avital part of global efforts to conserve the world’s biodiversity.

Special Protection Area (SPA): An area of importance for the habitats of certain rare or vulnerable categoriesof birds or for regularly occurring migratory bird species, required to be designated for protection by member statesunder the European Community Directive on the Conservation of Wild Birds (79/409/EC).

SpecialWaste:Any waste with hazardous properties that may render it harmful to human health or the environment,also referred to as hazardous waste.

Strategic and Local Gap: Strategic gaps and local gaps is to define and maintain the separate identity of settlements.

Strategic Development Area (SDA): Area of concentrated new greenfield development including a variety ofnew homes, as well as jobs, shops, schools, health and community facilities and recreation.

Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA):

Sewage Treatment Works (STW):

Void Capacity: Available capacity for waste at a landfill/ landraising site.

Waste: The Waste Framework Directive 75/442 (as amended) defines waste as “any substance that the holderdiscards or intends or is required to discard”.

Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE): European Directive which sets targets for the per capitaamount of electrical and electronic equipment to be recycled.

Waste Transfer Station (WTS): A location where waste can be temporarily stored, separated and bulked afterbeing dropped off by domestic waste-collection lorries and before being carried off by larger vehicles for subsequenttreatment or ultimate disposal.

Wastewater Treatment Works (WWTW): A facility where sewage volumes are reduced by de-watering andaerobic and anaerobic biological treatment.


Appendix 1 Extract from PPS10 - Site suitability criteria

ANNEX E

Taken from PPS10 (Department of Communities and Local Government, 2011)(71).

Locational Criteria

In testing the suitability of sites and areas against the criteria set out in paragraph 20, waste planning authoritiesshould consider the factors listed below. They should also bear in mind the envisaged waste management facilityin terms of type and scale, taking account of best available technologies (not involving excessive costs). Advice onlikely impacts and the particular issues that arise with specific types and scale of waste management facilities isgiven in accompanying practice guidance.

a. protection of water resources

Considerations will include the proximity of vulnerable surface and groundwater. For landfill or land-raising,geological conditions and the behaviour of surface water and groundwater should be assessed both for the siteunder consideration and the surrounding area. The suitability of locations subject to flooding will also need particularcare.

b. land instability

Locations, and/or the environs of locations, that are liable to be affected by land instability will not normally besuitable for waste management facilities.

c. visual intrusion

Considerations will include (i) the setting of the proposed location and the potential for design-led solutions toproduce acceptable development; (ii) the need to protect landscapes of national importance (National Parks, Areasof Outstanding Natural Beauty and Heritage Coasts).

d. nature conservation

Considerations will include any adverse effect on a site of international importance for nature conservation (SpecialProtection Areas, Special Areas of Conservation and RAMSAR Sites) or a site with a nationally recognised designation(Sites of Special Scientific Interest, National Nature Reserves).

e. historic environment and built heritage

Considerations will include any adverse effect on a site of international importance (World Heritage Sites) or asite or building with a nationally recognised designation (Scheduled Monuments, Conservation Areas, ListedBuildings, Registered Historic Battlefields and Registered Parks and Gardens).

f. traffic and access

Considerations will include the suitability of the road network and the extent to which access would require relianceon local roads.

g. air emissions, including dust

71 Available online at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/planningpolicystatement10


http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/planningandbuilding/planningpolicystatement10

Considerations will include the proximity of sensitive receptors and the extent to which adverse emissions can becontrolled through the use of appropriate and well-maintained and managed equipment and vehicles.

h. odours

Considerations will include the proximity of sensitive receptors and the extent to which adverse odours can becontrolled through the use of appropriate and well-maintained and managed equipment.

i. vermin and birds

Considerations will include the proximity of sensitive receptors. Some waste management facilities, especiallylandfills which accept putrescible waste, can attract vermin and birds. The numbers, and movements of somespecies of birds, may be influenced by the distribution of landfill sites.

Where birds congregate in large numbers, they may be a major nuisance to people living nearby. They can alsoprovide a hazard to aircraft at locations close to aerodromes or low flying areas. As part of the aerodromesafeguarding procedure (ODPM Circular 1/2003) (72) local planning authorities are required to consult aerodromeoperators on proposed developments likely to attract birds. Consultation arrangements apply within safeguardedareas (which should be shown on the proposals map in the local development framework).

The primary aim is to guard against new or increased hazards caused by development. The most important typesof development in this respect include facilities intended for the handling, compaction, treatment or disposal ofhousehold or commercial wastes.

j. noise and vibration

Considerations will include the proximity of sensitive receptors. The operation of large waste management facilitiesin particular can produce noise both inside and outside buildings. Intermittent and sustained operating noise maybe a problem if not kept to acceptable levels and particularly if night-time working is involved.

k. litter

Litter can be a concern at some waste management facilities.

l. potential land use conflict

Likely proposed development in the vicinity of the location under consideration should be taken into account inconsidering site suitability and the envisaged waste management facility.

72 Safeguarding aerodromes, technical sites and military explosives storage areas and on the application of The Town and Country Planning (Safeguarded Aerodromes,Technical Sites and Military Explosives Storage Areas) Direction 2002.


Appendix 2 Broad categories of waste management facilities

The following information has been used as a guide to inform suggestions throughout the document about thesuitability of the various nominated sites for waste management development.

National guidance suggests plans should not generally prescribe the waste management techniques or technologiesthat will be used to deal with specific waste streams in the area. Rather, the type or types of waste managementfacility that would be appropriately located on the allocated site or in the allocated area should be identified. Localplanning authorities should consider the size, type and mix of facilities when planning for waste infrastructure.

The following summary tables provide information about seven broad types of wastemanagement developmentwhich are considered relevant to Hampshire. The information has been collated using local knowledge and thefollowing publications:

Defra (2010) Guidance on Applying the Waste Hierarchy (consultation draft).Enviros Consulting for ODPM (2004) Planning for Waste Management Facilities: A Research Study.DCLG (2006) Planning for Sustainable Waste Management: Companion Guide to Planning Policy Statement 10.

Each of the broad types of development are necessary to ensure waste is managed at all levels of the waste hierarchy.For instance, facilities are necessary to support activities such as preparing for re-use(73)and recycling(74), recoveryand disposal.

Each of the broad types of development are associated with different potential impacts on the environment andcommunities which need to be appropriately managed. These planning issues are set out in the tables below underthe main themes e.g protection of water resources. For some of the themes, the issue may not be applicable orwill normally be insignificant. For others, development may, under certain circumstances and without appropriatemitigation measures in place, result in significant negative impact. It is important to understand the aspect of thedevelopment which may result in a negative impact (e.g bioaerosals) to inform decisions about whether certaintypes of sites should not be considered suitable for such uses (e.g sites with adjacent residential properties).

73 May involve checking, cleaning or repairing recovery operations, by which products or components of such products that have become waste are prepared so that they can be re-used without anyother pre-processing.

74 Recycling includes the reprocessing of organic material i.e composting (so long as it meets PAS/Quality Protocol standards).


Category 1: Activities requiring open sites or ancillary open areas (involving biologicaltreatment)

Description/overview

Activities requiring space for storage of waste and machinery (e.g recycling crusher and screener;vehicle dismantlers). Open sites can accommodate processing equipment (e.g storage containers/skips, loaders for shipment).Activities similar to some agricultural practices require large openspaces (e.g composting plants using open air windrows (elongatedpiles)). Large areas of land are converted to hard-standing areas forthe running of machinery, and soil and ground water protectionmeasures.Small proportion of the site may include building (e.g. for stafffacilities).

Waste facilities Open windrow composting (composting sites typically require sites 2–3 hectares)Aggregate recycling/ construction and demolition waste processing (typically require 2 hectares orgreater)Processing incinerator bottom ash (IBA)End of Life Vehicle (ELV) processing/ scrap metal yardSoil hospital (remediation of contaminated soils)Household Waste Recycling Centre (Civic Amenity Site) (typically approx. 0.8 hectare site required)

Examples ofwaste streamshandled

Unsorted or segregated household wasteConstruction waste (soils, rubble etc)Incinerator bottom ashScrap vehiclesBiodegradable municipal solid wastes and industrial wastes converted to composted products (gardentype waste collected separately or co-collected with kitchen waste)

Preferredlocations for

Typically located in rural or urban fringe sites (where access is good).Close proximity to development areas (markets) is preferable (it is often not viable to transportmaterials such as recycled aggregate long distances).these activities

(including siterequirements)

Larger scale centralised composting facilities can be located at selected composting sites but smallerfacilities can be located at landfill sites, sewage treatment works, industrial sites and transfer stations.Small scale composting operations are also located on farms, due to their ability to exploit existinginfrastructure, equipment, and labour associated with normal farm activities(75).Aggregate recycling sites and ELV sites can be located on industrial estates alongside heavier industrialuses (affordable sites of an adequate size can be very difficult to obtain for these uses however).Aggregate recycling activities (usually temporary operations) can also be located at mineral workingsand landfill sites and at demolition and construction sites where the spoil is to be used in the projectitself.Rail sidings can be used for activities whereby materials are loaded for shipment to market(transhipment of waste).HouseholdWaste Recycling Centres require good access from the primary road network and sufficientvehicle queueing space.

Locationswhere

Would not normally be compatible with a business park environment or an urban setting, or closeto villages.

activities An appropriate distance of 'buffer' would be required between operations and sensitive receptors.would beunsuitable

Should be located at appropriate distances from sensitive habitats (where there is potential dust andbioaerosol impacts).

75 Most on-farm facilities possess waste management exemptions, and all community-run sites are exempt and so are restricted in size


Examples offacilities inHampshire

Little Bushywarren Copse is a green waste composting site with a capacity of 75,000tpa. It is housedon top of a hardstanding. The site is operated by Veolia.

Summary of planning issues:

Protection of waterresources:

The protection of controlled waters by adequate site surfacing, segregated drainage and containmentare essential in the control of leachate.

Visual intrusion: Traditional windrow composting plants can blend in with rural development due primarily to theirlow profile structures and their similarity to other rural developments (e.g. farms). Compostingoperations have a low height profile as they do not require tall buildings or other structures.Appropriate screening (e.g. tree planting) can help to minimise any potential adverse impact.Aggregate recycling operations are predominantly industrial by nature, noisy and without mitigationhave the potential to be visually intrusive. Suitable screening is often required.

Natureconservation:

Aggregate recycling operations are predominantly industrial by nature, noisy and without mitigationhave the potential to be dusty and disturb wildlife.

Historicenvironment &built heritage:

An archaeological watching brief might have to be accommodated during any topsoil stripping(especially for undeveloped land).

Traffic & access: Requires good access from primary road network and access roads which are free from restrictionsfor HGVs.Vehicles should be routed away from inappropriate roads, such as sensitive residential areas andschools.Vehicle numbers depends on the size and scale of the operation.

Proximity toreceptors:

Facilities which accept organic waste, can attract vermin and birds.Where possible facilities should be located at least 250 metres from sensitive properties, which mayinclude business premises(76).Composting- bioaerosols may be carried in the air as spores or microbes, on fine dust particles ortiny water droplets. Environment Agency (EA) research suggests that bioaerosol levels are likely tobe equal to or below natural levels within 250metres of a composting operation. If mitigating measuresare taken this distance may be reduced.Dust production potential is highest when materials are allowed to become too dry, and duringshredding, turning, and screening. Dust can also be created by vehicle movements on site.Odour production occurs when fresh and partially composted materials are allowed to sit for excessiveperiods of time without aeration, or if materials become too wet. This can lead to anaerobicdecomposition (at a well-run facility this will not be an issue as anaerobic conditions are kept to aminimum through minimum storage periods of fresh waste).Typically noise limits are either set at site boundaries or at sensitive receptors and these limits areusually based on target levels at agreed properties.Dust and bioaerosol emissions associated with composting may produce health concerns, reflectedin the Environment Agency 250 m rule with regard to sensitive receptors and the need for riskassessments and mitigation measures required for bioaerosol production.Aggregate recycling activities should not cause unacceptable harm to the environment or residentialamenity from noise, dust or heavy traffic. Careful plant siting and management will help to mitigateeffects of dust produced from aggregate recycling.

76 Site specific risk assessment needs to be a condition if composting operations are to be located within 250 metres of any working or dwelling place.


1 The map below shows the distribution of sites considered suitable for category 1: Activities requiring opensites or ancillary open areas (involving biological treatment) based on Section 6 'Nominated sites currentlyallocated for employment uses' and Section 7 'Other nominated sites'.

Map 9 Distribution of Category 1: Activities requiring open sites or ancillary open areas (involvingbiological treatment)



Category 2: Activities requiring open sites or ancillary open areas (not involving biologicaltreatment)


Activities which involve temporary storage of waste usually consistof buildings where vehicles deliver waste either onto the floor, intobays, or into compaction units. Inert wastes in particular may betransferred to such sites and stored in the open.Facilities may require extensive plant and specialist machinery.For instance, hard standing areas to site recycling bins, skips andpossibly compactors which can be fully/partially enclosed or open.Unsorted waste may be stored in open bunkers or skips, housedwithin a building. Facilities may be co-located on sites (e.g storage alongside a Waste TransferStation).Sites usually require a minimum of 0.5 hectares (but size depends on throughput).

Waste facilities Outdoor Waste Transfer Station (where space required for open storage).Anaerobic digestion (AD) plant (small scale) (agricultural/ rural locations) (unsorted waste, segregatedwaste and residual waste may be stored in open bunkers, possibly outside).Enclosed composting systems(77).MBT (Mechanical Biological Treatment) plant (including biological treatment e.g. AD)(78).Sites for aggregating waste wood (sorting and processing).Biological treatment of liquid waste and leachate (can involve enclosed buildings and tanks in openareas).Wastewater Treatment Works.


Unsorted or segregated household or commercial wasteGreen wasteSpecialist wastes (e.g. liquid waste and leachate)


Enclosed composting facilities are suited to areas allocated for employment/ industrial uses in urbanareas, and are compatible with the more intensive B2 activities under the Use Classes Order.

these activities Small scale AD plants (throughput of circa 5000 tones per annum) can be located on sites less than0.5 hectares (Wastewater Treatment Works in particular can provide suitable locations).(including site

requirements) Facilities to recycle agricultural waste can be located on farms (digestate from AD plants maybeused by neighbouring farms).Options for locating wastewater treatment plant are very limited and are typically linked to existinginfrastructure.

Locationswhere activities

An appropriate distance of 'buffer' would be required between operations producing bioaerosols/odours, and sensitive receptors.

would beunsuitable

Should be located at appropriate distances from sensitive habitats (where there is potential dust andbioaerosol impacts).Facilities involving open-air activities with potential to generate noise would not normally becompatible with a business park environment, an urban setting, or close to villages.


Wallington Depot is a multi use site with integrated waste recycling and transfer, includingconstruction and demolition, commercial and industrial wastes and aggregate recycling. The natureof the site means it requires both internal and external work areas.


77 e.g. In-vessel composting (IVC) allows collected food waste to be composted on a large scale. IVC is not considered as environmentally beneficial as anaerobicdigestion. For effective waste handling, a covered waste reception area, as well as hard standing for post composting and a covered storage area are needed.

78 The term ‘mechanical and biological treatment’ (MBT) is commonly used to describe a hybrid process which combines mechanical and biological techniques usedto sort and separate mixed household waste.



Outdoor transfer stations typically require drainage systems to ensure that dirty waters are dealtwith appropriately.

Visual intrusion: The presence of waste materials stored/ handled outside may lead to impacts on landscape characterand visual amenity, but this should not be significant in industrial locations.AD plants do not include a stack, but tanks can measure around 6 metres.New lines or cables used to connect the AD plants to the National Grid for electricity transfer willalso have an impact on visual amenity both on and off site.

Nature conservation: Whilst the anaerobic digestion process itself is enclosed, some fugitive emissions may arise (impactsof sensitive habitats would need to be considered).Waste water from some activities may contain contaminants and cause pollution to nearby riverhabitats (often therefore treated on site).Routing arrangements for transfer stations may be necessary to avoid air quality effects on sensitivehabitats.Operational plant failure could increase the risks to local ecosystems (e.g. odour from AD plants).


The significance of any impacts is dependent on the site setting, i.e. the proximity of listed buildingsand/or conservation areas.

Traffic & access: Transfer routes away from residential areas are preferable. Limits on vehicle movements can alsoassist in mitigation of traffic impacts.


The handling of waste and the movement of vehicles may give rise to dust.Facilities which accept organic waste, can attract vermin and birds.Noisy activities are those such as vehicle manoeuvring areas and glass bottle banks. Design of sitesmay include the use of acoustic enclosures and physical barriers, as well as the location of operationsthat will give rise to noise as far away as practically possible from sensitive receptors.Bioaerosol emissions associated with facilities accepting organic waste (e.g. AD) may produce healthconcerns, reflected in the Environment Agency 250 m permitting rule with regard to sensitivereceptors. To reduce risks, segregated waste can be tipped directly into a sealed conditioning tank,and there is no storage of untreated waste outside the building.Enclosure of In-vessel composting (IVC) components allows for the further control of nuisance,including noise and dust.Litter picking, as well as ensuring that servicing vehicles are adequately sheeted/contained will helpto contain litter.


3 The map below shows the distribution of sites considered suitable for category 2: Activities requiring opensites or ancillary open areas (not involving biological treatment) based on Section 6 'Nominated sites currentlyallocated for employment uses' and Section 7 'Other nominated sites'.

Map 10 Distribution of Category 2: Activities requiring open sites or ancillary open areas (not involvingbiological treatment)



Category 3: Activities requiring enclosed industrial premises (small scale)


Waste developments are increasingly enclosed within new orexisting structures, often sited on brownfield or industrial land;allowing for a large proportion of the perceived issues/problemsto be mitigated for, i.e. dust and noise.'Small scale' enclosed premises are typically <1-2 hectares(throughput of approx. 50,000 tonnes per annum).Usually located on industrial estates.Enclosing activities helps to mitigate against many noise/odourissues.

Waste facilities Plant for Refused Derived Fuel production (small scale e.g. Mechanical Heat Treatment/Autoclaving)(79). Autoclaving is a pressurised steam treatment process that can produce fuel pelletsor pulp (by 'cooking' waste).Dis-assembly and re-manufacturing plant (Waste Electronic & Electrical Equipment recycling).Enclosed waste transfer station (designed to process dry, separated recyclables).Small-scale recyclables processing facility.


All types of non-hazardous waste typically handled (e.g. dry mixed recyclables)Inert waste may also be handled (e.g. sorting of construction waste, glass etc)Clean waste wood can be handled for recyclingWaste Electronic & Electrical Equipment


As activities can be similar to other industrial activity, these facilities can be located on land previouslyused for general (B2) industrial activities or B1 uses (light industry appropriate in a residential area).

these activities The requirement for good transport infrastructure is essential and therefore, where possible, shouldbe located close to the primary road network or have potential access to rail.(including site

requirements) Placement of sites near to the source of waste is increasingly important, by limiting movement ofwaste from source the impact of sites decreases.

Locationswhere

Sites with existing access issues should be avoided where possible.Areas should be avoided where facilities seeking expansion of existing hardstanding would encroachinto floodzones.activities

would beunsuitable


The Crompton Way site is situated within one of the units on the Segensworth Industrial Estate andacts as a transfer station for clinical waste. It is operated by Rentokil Initial.



Most recycling facilities are under cover and on concrete hard standing with separate foul waterdrainage, rainfall is unlikely to come into contact with the waste materials (water pollution is unlikely).The incorporation of both a building and often hardstanding area can increase potential risk offlooding elsewhere and this would need to be considered as part of the Strategic Flood RiskAssessment.

Visual intrusion: If sited in an industrial setting remote from residential areas impacts are likely to be minimal.

Natureconservation:

Air quality and other impacts will not be a significant issue for recycling facilities (due to the typicalabsence of bio-degradable wastes).

79 Refuse-derived fuel, (RDF), is made by refining municipal solid waste in a series of mechanical sorting and shredding stages to separate the combustible portion ofthe waste. Either a loose fuel, known as fluff, floc or coarse RDF (c-RDF), or a densified pellet or briquette (d-RDF) is produced.



The significance of any impacts is dependent on the site setting, i.e. the proximity of listed buildingsand/or conservation areas.Visual impacts may be reduced by appropriate siting, sensitive building design and appropriate useof cladding and colour treatments.

Traffic & access: Sites need to be suitable for use by HGVs. Sites should normally be located close to the primaryroad network.


Enclosure of operations within a building is the primary means of preventing odour and dust impacts.The movement and unloading of trucks/transport may have potential to create noise.

5 To see the distribution of sites considered suitable for category 3: Activities requiring enclosed industrialpremises (large scale) see the end of category 4 as these two categories are show together.


Category 4: Activities requiring enclosed industrial premises (large scale)


Large buildings required to process mixed waste primarily viamechanical and/or biological means.Various physical separation and waste reduction techniques can beused either as stand alone operations or in combination. Suchactivities are typically housed in an enclosed 'warehouse' typebuilding.'Large scale' enclosed premises typically require site of 2-4 hectares(throughput can be up in excess of 100,000 tonnes per annum).

Waste facilities Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) (for dry recyclables).Enclosed Anaerobic Digestion plant (large scale).Enclosed MBT (Mechanical Biological Treatment) (large scale integrated plant)(80).


Unsorted ‘black bag’ wastes (AD and MBT)Residual household waste following doorstep separation of dry recyclables/green wasteResidual waste following separation of recyclables/organics at another facility.


Large scale processing operations can take place in a range of buildings and at different locations.Preference should be given to industrial or degraded sites or sites on or close to existing wastemanagement facilities.these activities


B1/B2 and B8 use class designations may potentially be acceptable.Sites need to be suitable for use by HGVs.Consideration should be given to the potential for co-location with rail or barge transfer operations.

Locationswhere

Mixed household waste has the potential to cause additional nuisance from litter, odour and leachate.The planning and siting considerations will therefore be different to dry recyclables processing.

activities Locating sites close to residential development should be avoided. Some operations which involvemechanical processing and external loading and unloading of material may be inherently noisy whichwill also affect the choice of site.

would beunsuitable

Sites with existing access issues should be avoided where possible.Areas should be avoided where facilities seeking expansion of existing hardstanding would encroachinto floodzones.


Alton Materials Recovery Facility has a capacity for 85,000tpa and is located within previouslydeveloped land to the north east of Alton. It forms part of the Project Integra infrastructure forwaste management in Hampshire and has been processing Hampshire’s waste since it’s opening in2004. It is housed in a large building and has limited impact on its surrounds due to its well chosenlocation and the conditions applied to it during planning permission approval.



Most recycling facilities are under cover and on concrete hard standing with separate foul waterdrainage, rainfall is unlikely to come into contact with the waste materials (water pollution is unlikely).The incorporation of both a building and often hardstanding area can increase potential risk offlooding elsewhere and this would need to be considered as part of the Strategic Flood RiskAssessment.

Visual intrusion: AD plants do not include a stack, but tanks can measure around 6 metres.Recyclables processing facilities are generally housed in large warehouse type buildings.If sited in an industrial setting remote from residential areas impacts are likely to be minimal.Public concern can be generated by the visual appearance of a facility.

80 The term ‘mechanical and biological treatment’ (MBT) is commonly used to describe a hybrid process which combines mechanical and biological techniques usedto sort and separate mixed household waste, and produce a Refused Derived Fuel (RDF).


Natureconservation:

Air quality impacts will not be a significant issue for recycling facilities (due to the typical absence ofbio-degradable wastes).Operational plant failure could increase the risks to local ecosystems (e.g. odour from AD plants).


Visual impacts may be reduced by appropriate siting, sensitive building design and appropriate useof cladding and colour treatments.The significance of any impacts is dependent on the site setting, i.e. the proximity of listed buildingsand/or conservation areas.

Traffic & access: Sites need to be suitable for use by large numbers of HGVs.Sites should normally be located close to the primary road network.


Concerns over health risks from bio-aerosols generated by biological treatment processes may requireplants to be located at least 250m from sensitive receptors.If amenity issues can be minimised, recycling facilities could be located within 100 metres of residentialproperties.Recycling facilities will not normally experience problems associated with pests/ vermin as operationstend to take place within a building and waste materials are only present for short periods.Enclosure of operations within a building is the primary means of preventing odour and dust impacts.The movement and unloading of trucks/transport may have potential to create noise.


6 The map below shows the distribution of sites considered suitable for category 3: Activities requiringenclosed industrial premises (small scale) and category 4: Activities requiring enclosed industrial premises(large scale) based on Section 6 'Nominated sites currently allocated for employment uses' and Section 7'Other nominated sites'.

Map 11 Distribution of Category 3 and 4: Activities requiring enclosed industrial premises



Category 5: Activities requiring enclosed building with stack (small scale)


Plants with a throughput of approx. 50,000 tonnes per annum.Smaller scale thermal treatment facilities are often designed to receivea specific component of the waste stream.Can offers a waste management option which is more likely to beaccepted by local residents. Energy is generated.Often combustion chambers are fired up according to the need torespond to fluctuations in the supply of waste.Gasification is a thermal process in which carbon is converted to asyngas leaving a solid residue.Pyrolysis takes place either in the complete absence of oxygen or with limited oxygen.Require site of <1-2 hectares.

Waste facilities Pyrolysis and gasification technologies (advanced thermal treatment).Small scale incinerator.Small thermal plants (Combined Heat & Power plant)(81).Small thermal treatment plants (furnaces or kilns) are also used to treat clinical wastes at hospitalsites.


Capable of handling a wide range of waste materials.Can be specifically designed to take a pre-processed feedstock or refuse derived fuel (RDF) (seecategories 3 and 4 above).Can be used to treat clinical wastes at hospital sites.Unburned residue (bottom ash) is produced after combustible material is burnt.There are three products of pyrolysis: gas, liquid and a solid known as char.


Localities which are as close as possible to the source of waste arisings in order to minimise transport.Sites which offer the potential for CHP and export of energy to businesses which would otherwiseuse fossil fuel sources. May also be considered as part of large scale residential developments.these activities


Can be more suited to rural areas and areas of dispersed population centres than large-scale facilities.Most small thermal plants have been designed to treat specific industrial waste streams as part ofcombined heat and power (CHP) arrangements. CHP may be connected to existing decentralisedenergy networks in town and city centres for instance.Preference should be given to areas allocated for business use or in traditional commercial/industrialurban areas.Existing waste sites should also be considered. Plants can be located alongside modern industrialbuildings or as a part of business parks where CHP potential can be developed.Pyrolysis and gasification- the scale of individual buildings and process components is likely to becompatible with most small/medium sized industrial activities.

Locationswhere

Should be located appropriate distances from sensitive habitats and other sensitive receptors (e.gresidential).

activities Safeguarding zones around aerodromes where building height is restricted should be avoided.would beunsuitable

Pyrolysis and gasification facilities should avoid sites closer than 250 m of housing etc where possibleor demonstrate emission standards can be met where closer.


Broxhead Farm uses existing farm incinerators (thermal treatment) to dispose of imported pet carcasesand associated material.


81 The revised Waste Framework Directive sets a threshold above which energy efficient municipal waste incinerators can be classified as recovery facilities, and belowwhich they continue to be classified as disposal facilities.



Thermal treatment facilities tend to have closed drainage to prevent contaminants entering normalsurface water drainage.

Visual intrusion: Small scale thermal treatment facilities are often modular (several combustion chambers can be placedin parallel).The height of the main boiler unit is smaller than large scale thermal plants (although the stack heightmay be similar).Stack height is determined by the local wind characteristics, topography and relationship to otherbuildings (minimum of 40 metres). The plume from the stack can be visible.Careful site selection and appropriate orientation of the building footprint together with appropriatescreening measures can help to minimise any potential adverse impact.The stack can be disguised by use of architectural embellishment.Building height can be 15-25 metres.

Natureconservation:

Proposals must include a detailed assessment of emissions to air which addresses effects on thenatural environment.


Small scale plants have greater potential for integration into the existing built environment and indeedrural or semi-rural settings than large scale plants.Pyrolysis and gasification can be housed in buildings which may be similar to large agriculturalbuildings or industrial warehouses with the addition of a stack.The significance of any impacts is dependent on the site setting, i.e. the proximity of listed buildingsand/or conservation areas.

Traffic & access: If waste feed is from on-site industrial operations then access is not critical.Plants can be served by a significant number of HGVs.Traffic volumes may be significantly reduced if the plant is directly linked to an industrial operation.Mitigation measures should ensure that vehicles are routed away from inappropriate routes andsensitive residential areas and schools.


Scale and environmental performance standards should enable well-designed plants to be locatedclose to houses etc, particularly when part of a CHP/district heating scheme.Air emissions represent a significant public concern issue- air quality impact assessment likely to berequired.All waste incinerator plant emissions will be regulated through the Pollution Prevention Controlregime enforced by the Environment Agency. Waste incineration plants are required to operate toair emission standards set by the EC Waste Incineration Directive.Compliance with emission limits can be closely monitored by the plant.At a well run facility where stored waste is kept to a minimum, odour and dust problems will not bean issue.Noise from normal plant operations should be controlled to acceptable levels by careful buildingdesign.Wastes can soon start to generate odour and dust problems at pyrolysis and gasification facilitiesduring times of plant failure. At a well run facility this will not be an issue as stored waste is kept toa minimum.

8 To see the distribution of sites considered suitable for category 5: Activities requiring enclosed buildingwith stack (small scale) see the end of category 6 as these two categories are show together.


Category 6: Activities requiring enclosed building with stack (large scale)


Plants with a throughput of approx. 200,000 tonnes perannum.Plants typically designed to handle large volumes of mixed wastefollowing the ‘mass combustion’ approach.Designed to burn waste as efficiently as possible, usually recoveringenergy.The volume of waste needing disposal following treatment is reducedby approximately 90%, reducing the need for landfill.The whole process is typically contained within a single building.Legislation requires that all new and existing plants operate to extremely high environmental standards.Require site of 2-5 hectares.

Waste facilities Energy Recovery Facility ('mass burn' with energy generation)(82);Fluidised bed incinerators generally require some form of refuse derived fuel (RDF).Biomass plant (including proportion of waste biomass feedstock)


Can receive between 90,000 and 600,000 tonnes of waste per year.Capable of handling a wide range of waste materials.Contaminated paper (e.g. with grease from food) can be more suited to energy recovery.


Often located in or near urban areas.Compatible with the more intensive Class B2 activities under the Use Classes Order.

these activities Existing waste sites should also be considered.(including siterequirements)

Should be located as close as possible to the source of waste arisings in order to minimise transport.Should be located on sites which offer the potential for combined heat and power (CHP) and exportof energy to nearby businesses.

Locationswhere

Not normally be compatible with a hi-tech business park environment or a rural/semi rural setting.Should be located appropriate distances from sensitive habitats and other sensitive receptors (e.gresidential).activities

would beunsuitable

Safeguarding zones around aerodromes where building height is restricted should be avoided.


Marchwood Energy from Waste Facility operates as part of the Project Integra infrastructure and issituated in the Marchwood Industrial Park. It has capacity to process 165,000 tonnes per year resultingin the generation of approximately 14Mw of electricity. On site there is also a transfer station thatcan handle 25,000 tonnes per year of waste that is not suitable for incineration.



Information on drainage arrangements should be included in planning application.

Visual intrusion: Buildings can measure up to 30 metres.Plants are typically characterised by large building designs and may not blend in with surroundingdevelopment due primarily to the size of the stack and boiler house elements of the plant.Potential for significant impacts on both landscape character and visual amenity. Plume visibilitymay be a particular problem in some locations.Design-led solutions would be necessary in certain locations where the building would be seen as aprominent landmark feature.

82 The revised Waste Framework Directive sets a threshold above which energy efficient municipal waste incinerators can be classified as recovery facilities, and belowwhich they continue to be classified as disposal facilities.


The height of the stack is determined by certain factors e.g based on air dispersion modelling.Careful site selection and appropriate orientation of the building footprint together with appropriatescreening measures can help to minimise any potential adverse impact.

Natureconservation:

New large scale incinerators will require EIA (Environmental impact Assessment)- ecological studiesmay be required.Proposals must include a detailed assessment of emissions to air which addresses effects on thenatural environment.


A large built development of this nature means that there is the potential for significant impacts onvisual amenity. The significance of any impacts is dependent on the site setting, i.e. the proximity oflisted buildings and/or conservation areas.

Traffic & access: Requires good access from primary road network and access roads which are free from restrictionsfor HGVs. Consideration should be given to sites which offer the potential for rail transfer.Nature and volume of vehicle movements will be determined by the volume throughput of the plant,and nature and source of the waste.Vehicles should be re-routed away from inappropriate roads and sensitive residential areas and schools.


Air emissions represent a significant public concern issue- air quality impact assessment likely to berequired.All waste incinerator plant emissions will be regulated through the Pollution Prevention Controlregime enforced by the Environment Agency. Waste incineration plants are required to operate toair emission standards set by the EC Waste Incineration Directive.Compliance with emission limits can be closely monitored by the plant.Where possible facilities should be located at least 250 metres from sensitive properties or demonstrateemission standards can be met where closer.At a well run facility where stored waste is kept to a minimum, odour and dust problems will not bean issue.Noise from normal plant operations should be controlled to acceptable levels by careful buildingdesign.


9 The map below shows the distribution of sites considered suitable for category 5: Activities requiringenclosed building with stack (small scale) and category 6: Activities requiring enclosed building with stack(large scale) based on Section 6 'Nominated sites currently allocated for employment uses' and Section 7'Other nominated sites'.

Map 12 Distribution of Category 5 and 6: Activities requiring enclosed building with stack



Category 7: Landfilling


Modern landfill practice requires a significant degree of engineeringin order to contain tipped waste, control emissions and minimisepotential environmental effects.The majority of landfills are operated on a phased cell systemwhereby,as one cell is being filled, another is being prepared, and another isbeing completed/ restored(83).

Wastefacilities

Waste disposal mainly below ground level (infilling a void). Landraise, also generically referred to aslandfill, refers to waste disposal mainly above pre-existing ground levels.The primary by-products where biodegradable materials are disposed of are landfill gas and leachate(requiring ancillary operations including abstraction systems).Inert waste can be used to restore minerals workings.Sites may include a separate protective cell for hazardous materials.

Examples ofwaste

Most types of non-hazardous waste may be disposed of via landfill although as disposal is increasinglydiscouraged, the future role of landfill is likely to be limited to the residues of other waste managementoperations such as incinerator ashes and materials recovery facility (MRF) rejects etc.streams

handled Hazardous wastes (although certain hazardous wastes are banned from landfill disposal).Inert waste (non-biodegradable) is a restoration material and is not classed as landfilling.


Landfill sites sited where an existing void is available, such as in existing mineral workings.The location of land-raise sites is less limited and may include derelict land, or extensions to existinglandfills.these

activities Landfill sites tend to be located in rural areas.(including Range in size from just a few hectares (Ha) to over 100 Ha. The larger sites are more economically

viable.siterequirements)

Locationswhere

Sites close to housing, commercial or recreational areas etc. should generally be avoided.Areas overlying principal aquifers or close to potable waters should also be avoided,.

activities Sensitive habitats should be avoided.would beunsuitable

Bird strike’ zones around aerodromes should be avoided.


Squabb Wood is a non hazardous landfill in Test Valley that is filling the void left behind after thegravel extraction on site ended.


Protection ofwater resources:

Potential effects on water resources are controlled under legislation.Significant buffer zones/intervening impermeable geology or improved containment may re requiredto protect groundwater.Contaminants can cause significant pollution if allowed to escape in uncontrolled amounts to eithersurface waters (lakes, ponds or rivers) or groundwater.Surface run-off from landfill sites may also be a potential source of contamination to local watercourses.Landfill activities may also disrupt surface and groundwater flows by altering local topography,excavating below groundwater levels and via dewatering operations.

83 Cells are holes which are lined with a waterproof liner and contain systems to manage landfill gas and leachate/ liquids. When complete the cells are covered withclay to seal the waste.


Visual intrusion: Landfilling activities are often utilised to reprofile and landscape derelict land or mineral voids leadingto landscape improvement in the long term.The size of sites means that there is the potential for significant impacts on both landscape characterand visual amenity.Restoration is usually phased and designed to reflect previous land-uses and complement thesurrounding landscape.

Natureconservation:

Potential for direct land-take of habitats and destruction of hedgerows and trees etc.Indirect effects on local ecology and species may also occur through pollution of water courses, dustdeposition and human disturbance etc.Completed and restored cells can often provide habitats for a wide range of wildlife including protectedspecies such as adders, badgers, various birds and insects along with flowering plants.Ecological studies may be required.


Related excavation may represent an opportunity for archaeological investigation.On land-raise sites any existing archaeological resource may become sterilised.

Traffic & access: Ideally accessed via good quality A/B class roads, or a primary road network free from restrictions onHGVs.Vehicles may be re-routed away from inappropriate routes and sensitive residential areas such asschools.


Atmospheric emissions from new (and, progressively, existing) landfills are controlled under regulationsby the Environment Agency (including via landfill gas risk assessment).Disposal of fresh wastes or specially odorous wastes may also potentially cause odour problems (mostodour problems may be overcome with good site and landfill gas management procedures).Dust is controlled and not usually considered a significant problem.Birds such as gulls may be attracted to landfills where they may constitute a hazard to aircraft (whennear airports) and a nuisance to local residents via soiling from bird droppings. Where nuisance doesoccur enforcement may also be carried out.Typically noise limits are either set at site boundaries or at sensitive receptors and these limits areusually based on target levels at agreed properties.Noise mitigation measures may include the construction of noise bunds, regular plant maintenance,vehicle/plant silencing and limitation of operating hoursLitter issues are controlled in a similar way to noise, dust and odour.Sites should be located over 250m from housing to help control a range of impacts (e.g landfill gashazards).

11 Please see Section 9 'Sites nominated for disposal to land' to see the proposed landfill site.


Appendix 3 Nominated sites considered less suitable

1 The sites detailed below have been classified as 'nominations considered less suitable' based upon their siteassessment criteria, this can include sites where the proposed site is too small for any significant wastedevelopment or sites that were proposed have subsequently been developed with other uses, or it could bethat the original site nominee is no longer promoting the site.

2 Details of site assessments vary depending on the final reason as to why the nominated sites were consideredless suitable. Those that have ecological, water based problems or considered less suitable (ruled out) onplanning grounds will have a description detailing the desktop assessment, however those that are consideredtoo small or are no longer available will not have this level of detail, but may refer to other studies detailingwaste category assessments.

3 The following sites are listed in alphabetical order by the local authority area within which they fall. Mostof these sites have been consulted on previously as part of the 'Issues and Options' consultation stage in2006 and 2007. Since this period, in most cases further information has become available about the sites.Indeed, this study takes account of the comments received previously about those nominated sites consideredsuitable, and takes the site assessment process to the next stage.

4 Amap showing the location of all those nominations considered less suitable can be seen at the end of table8.


Table8Nom

inated

sitesconsidered

less

suitableremoved

atan

early

stage(listed

bylocalautho

rityarea)

Reasons

forE

limination

Reasons

forn

omination

Locatio

nandsitebackgrou

ndDistrict

Siteno

minationandsite

size

Basin

gstoke

&Deane

BSD

002-W

adeRo

ad,

Basin

gstoke

(1.61hectares)

i.Siteisno

longeravailableforw

astedevelopm

entash

asbeen

developedundera

districtp

lann

ingapplication(district

planning

applicationBD

B61367)

Identifiedby

Ham

pshire

CountyCouncilin2005

dueto

strategiclocatio

nandgood

access.

Thesitelieso

nWadeRo

ad,to

theEasto

fthe

citycentre,

accessto

theA33

totheNorth

Westand

A339to

theSouth

West.

Basin

gstoke

&Deane

BSD

003-B

eech

Arm

sServiceStation,Oakley

(0.3hectares)

i.Districtautho

rityconsideraccessto

bepo

ordueto

itsroad

accident

history.

Identifiedby

Ham

pshire

CountyCouncilEstates

Practicein2005

followinga

LocatedwestofB

asingstoke

ontheA3400

betweenEast

OakleyandOverton

.ii.

Thesiteisrestrictedow

ingto

itssiz

e(it

islessthan

0.5

hectares).Th

isdoesno

tprecludethe

siteb

eing

considered

onrequestfor

land

searches

for

suitableHouseho

ldWaste

Recyclingsites

Itissurrounded

byresid

ential

prop

ertiesa

ndthepublic

house.

itsmerits

ifap

ropo

salcam

eforwardinfuture(e.g.

aspecialist

wasteuse).

Thesite

waspreviouslyused

asdepo

tfor

acoachop

erator

iii.

Thesitewas

considered

tobe

toosm

allfor

theprop

osed

developm

ento

fanHWRC

,(CLU

applicationrefused

1996).

iv.Re

sidentialpropertiesa

relocatedaround

theprop

erty.

Basin

gstoke

&Deane

BSD

005-L

andadjoining

Beggarwoo

dLane,

Kem

psho

tt(2.41hectares).

i.Siteisundeliverabledueto

thesubsequent

developm

ento

fthesitewith

acommercialdevelopm

ent.

Nom

inated

byHam

pshire

CountyCouncilEstates

Practicein2005

followinga

requestfor

land

searches

for

Locatedoffthe

A30

tothe

southwesto

fBasingstoke

and

accessisconsidered

tobe

good.

ii.Despitethesitebeingof

good

sizeandaccessbeinggood

the

sitehasm

anyconstra

ints.

suitableHouseho

ldWaste

Recyclingsites.

IdentifiedintheLo

calP

lanas

employmentlandandmarketed

foro

fficeuse.

Basin

gstoke

&Deane

BSD

007-G

erman

Road,

Bram

ley

(9.0hectares.)

i.Cum

ulativeimpacton

anumbero

fEnviro

nmental

Designatio

nsIdentified

followingasearchon

theNationalL

andUse

Databaseb

yHam

pshireCo

unty

Council.

Thesite

islocatedinsoutheast

cornerof

thevillage

ofBram

ley,no

rthof

Basin

gstoke

andbetweentherailw

ayline

ii.Sitesubsequentlypartially

developedunderanapplication

subm

itted

totheDistrictfor

housingin2004

butw

assubsequentlywith

draw

n,asecond

applicationwassubm

itted

(Basingstoke

toReading)tothe

Westand

theA33

totheeast.

Theland

hadbeen

previously

developed,ho

usingsome

(BDB/

64044)andan

appealwon

in2007

allowingfora

Eventhough

theA

33isnearby

developm

ento

fover2

50prop

erties,anursingho

meandsix

commercialunits.

industrialuse

andhaving

been

form

erMilitary

ofDefence

(MoD

)landwas

also

thesiteaccesswas

considered

tobe

poor

bytheDistrict.

iii.

Despitethesitebeingof

good

sizethesitehasm

any

constraintsresulting

inmajo

rconcernso

vercum

ulativeimpact.

considered

likelyto

becontam

inated.


Reasons

forE

limination

Reasons

forn

omination

Locatio

nandsitebackgrou

ndDistrict

Siteno

minationandsite

size

Basin

gstoke

&Deane

BSD

015-L

andatGresley

Road,B

asingstoke

(3.33hectares).

i.Siteisno

longeravailable(being

prom

oted

bytheDistrictas

partof

planstoredeveloptheBa

singViewarea

ofthetown

toincluderesid

entialand

largescalebusin

ess).

Siteidentifiedby

Ham

pshire

CountyCouncilas

considered

tobe

brow

nfieldwith

some

existinghardstanding

and

allocatio

nof

B1-B8use

Thesiteislocatedto

theEast

ofcentralB

asingstoke

andis

considered

tohave

good

access

duetothelocationof

theA

339

ringroad

andtherailline

runn

ingclosetothesouthwest

partof

thesite.

Basin

gstoke

&Deane

BSD017-L

andadjacentto

EnergyRe

covery

Facility

(ERF

),Chineham

i.Th

island

wasoriginallyon

lyallocatedinthe1998

Minera

ls&

WasteLo

calP

lanforthe

purposes

ofprovidingpo

tential

flexibilityforthe

sitingof

theERF

(now

builtand

operational).

Sitehasa

singlelandow

ner

Thesiteislocatedadjacent

totheexistingEnergyRe

covery

FacilityinChineham

(Integra

North),andtheBa

singstoke

Sitewas

allocatedas

a'preferred

site'forthe

developm

ento

fanintegrated

wasteprocessin

gplantin1998.

(4.58hectares).

(Chineham)Sew

ageT

reatment

Works

(STW

).ii.

Noexistingsiteaccess-accesssharin

garrangem

entswith

adjacent

ERF

wouldneed

tobe

agreed.

iii.

Siteliesincountrysideandisan

expo

sedsite.

iv.Po

tentialfor

encroachmentb

yresid

entialdevelop

ment

(potentialplann

ednewdevelopm

entinsurroundingarea).

v.Otherconstra

intse.g

overground

seweragepipe.

Basin

gstoke

&Deane

BSD018-K

empsho

ttPark

IndustrialPark,Basin

gstoke

(0.91hectares).

i.Sitewas

identifiedby

Ham

pshireCountyCouncil

durin

gasite

visit

inJune

2006.

Siteno

longeravailableas

subjecttoplanning

perm

issionas

partof

awiderarea,for

thedevelopm

entfor

housingand

flats,

anofficeandan

industrialunit.

Thesite

islocatedatthee

ndof

Longwoo

dCop

seLane,

adjacent

totheM3motorway.

Itform

erlyho

used

two

Thesitehasb

eenlargely

derelictsince

thed

emolition

ofwarehousestructures,w

ithonly

oneremaining

untilrecently.

allbut

oneof

thewarehouse

Afurthertwostructures,part

structures,w

hich

housed

commercialactivity.

oftheindustriallandwere

housed

onland

immediately

northof

thissite.

Basin

gstoke

&Deane

BSD020-F

ormerSSIS

ite,

Basin

gstoke

(3.33hectares).

i.Siteno

longerconsidered

deliverableasissubjecttoan

appeal

decisio

nfora

major

mixed

used

developm

entschem

ewhich

incorporates

thissite(84)

Sitewas

identifiedby

Ham

pshireCo

untyCo

uncil

due

toits

proximity

totherail

sidings.Identifiedlfollowing

Locatedto

theEasto

fcentra

lBa

singstoke

andhasa

ccessto

theA339rin

groad

andthe

A33.Accessfromthesouthis

asitesearch

ontheNational

Land

Use

Database.

howeverthroughthetown

centreandno

tapp

ropriatefor

alargenumbero

fHGVs;

although

accessfrom

then

orth

isviatherecentlyupgraded

84SeeBa

singstoke

BoroughCouncilplanning

applicationBD

B69757

(FormerVictoria

andEliLilly

Sites,KingsclereRo

ad,B

asingstoke,R

G21

6XA).


Reasons

forE

limination

Reasons

forn

omination

Locatio

nandsitebackgrou

ndDistrict

Siteno

minationandsite

size

A340AldermastonRo

adroundabo

ut.

EastH

ampshire

EHS005-L

asham

Coal

Yard,L

asham,A

lton

(0.36hectares).


itssm

allsizeandthereforeits

inabilityto

houseawastesiteof

anysig

nificantu

seIdentifiedby

Ham

pshire

CountyCouncilfollowinga

review

oftheNationalL

and

Use

Database.

Locatedinthevillage

ofLasham

,lying

betweenAlto

nto

theSouthandBa

singstoke

totheno

rth.

Accesstothe

A339.

ii.Th

epo

tentialuse

ofthesiteisrestrictedow

ingto

itssiz

e(it

islessthan

0.5hectares),andithasthereforebeen

discounted

atthisstage.Th

isdoesno

tprecludethesitebeingconsidered

onits

merits

ifaprop

osalcameforwardinfuture(e.g.

aspecialistw

asteuse.

EastH

ampshire

EHS006-E

xGas

Works

Site,B

uttsRo

ad,A

lton

(0.38hectares).

i.Th

epo

tentialuse


ingto

itssiz

e(it

islessthan


discounted

atthisstage.Th

isdoesno


Identifiedby

Ham

pshire


review

oftheNationalL

and

Use

Database.

Thesiteislocatedinthetown

ofAlto

nwith

accessto

the

A339viaBu

ttsRo

ad.Th

iswouldallowaccessto

theA31

andBasin

gstoke,how

everthere

onits

merits

ifaprop


aspecialistw

asteuse.

aresomeaccessissuesa

tthe

ii.Th

esitewas

considered

tobe

toosm

allfor

anywasteuses

fron

tofthe

sited

uetoTransco

land

ownership.

EastH

ampshire

EHS007-E

xWater

Pumping

Station,New

man

Lane,A

lton(0.51hectares).

i.Th

epotentialuseof

thesite

isrestrictedow

ingtoits

size,and

ithasthereforebeen

discounted

atthisstage.Th

isdoes

not

preclude

thesitebeingconsidered

onits

merits

ifaprop

osal

cameforwardinfuture(e.g.

aspecialistw

asteuse

Identifiedby

Ham

pshire


review

oftheNationalL

and

Use

Database.

Thesite

islocatedon

theN

orth

Eastern

edge

ofAlto

nbetween

theraillineandMillLane

(B3004).Th

esiteisconsidered

tohave

accessconstra

ints.

EastH

ampshire

EHS008-B

urito

nSawmill,

DeanLane,B

urito

n(2.17hectares).

i.Accessc

onsid

ered

poor

Identifiedby

Ham

pshire


review

oftheNationalL

and

Use

Database.

Locatedinthevillage

ofBu

riton

,app

roximately3km

southwesto

fPetersfield.Th

esiteisconsidered

tohave

road

accessconstra

ints,

anddespite

ii.Despitethesitebeingof

good

size,thesitehasm

any

constraintsresulting

inmajo

rconcernso

vercum

ulativeimpact,

includingdirectissuesd

ueto

theinclusionof

aSINCwith

inthesitebo

undary.Th

esitealso

falls

with

inthenewSouth

beinglocatednearto

the

Dow

nsNationalPark.

Resid

entialpropertiesc

anbe

found

adjacent

tothesite.

Havant-

Petersfieldrailw

ay,no

sidings

oraccessto

therailw

ayispo

ssible.

EastH

ampshire

EHS012-FormerBatching

Site,W

oolmerFo

rest,

Grig

gsGreen

(0.54hectares).

i.Nom

inated

byOnyx(now

VeoliaEnviro

nmental

Services).

Thep

otentialuseof

thesite

isrestrictedow

ingtoits

size,and

ithasthereforebeen

discounted

atthisstage.

Thisdoes

not

preclude

thesitebeingconsidered

onits

merits

ifaprop

osal

cameforwardinfuture(e.g.

aspecialistw

asteuse).

Thesiteislocatedimmediately

southof

theA3dual

carriageway,atthe

western

end

ofLo

ngmoo

rRoad,

approximately2.75km

westo

fTh

esite

waspreviouslywo

rking

asaconcreteb

atchingplantbut


Reasons

forE

limination

Reasons

forn

omination

Locatio

nandsitebackgrou

ndDistrict

Siteno

minationandsite

size

isno

longerinuseandisnow

largelycoveredagainby

vegetatio

n.

Liph

ookand1km

eastof

Longmoo

rCam

p.Tw

oresid

entialdwellingsarelocated

immediatelyeastof

thesite,on

QueensR

oad.

EastH

ampshire

EHS027-L

andto

the

Southof

Woo

lmerTrading

Estate,Bo

rdon

(1.97hectares).


developm

ento

nsite.

Identifiedby

Ham

pshire


review

oftheNationalL

and

Use

Database.

Thesiteislocatedto

thesouth

ofWoo

lmertra

ding

estate

which

isfoundon

thesouthern

outskirtso

fBordon.

Access

wouldhave

been

viatheA325

ii.Sinceits

originalno

minationthesitehassubsequently

been

developedandisno

longeravailableforw

asteuses.

PetersfieldRo

ad,w

hich

liesto

theeastof

thesite.

EastH

ampshire

EHS033-B

ordonSandpit,

Sleaford,B

ordon

(6.68hectares).

i.Th

esiteisno

longerbeingconsidered

asthesitehistory

presentsmanypo

tentialcon

flictsd

ueto

ahistoryof

incompatib

leuses.

Previouslysubjecttoan

application(site

refE

H046)

LocatedatSleaford,

approximately1

.85kmnorthof

thetow

nof

Bordon

.Accessto

Thesitewas

nominated

byTaurus

WasteRecyclinglim

ited

thesiteisviaan

unadop

ted

track

toTrottsford

Farm

,locatedoffP

icketts

Hill.

ii.Th

ereremains

apo

tentialfor

infillingof

thevoidwith

inert

waste,how

everthesite

overliesa

principalaquiferand

assuch,

itmayproved

ifficulttoobtainan

Enviro

nmentalPermitfrom

theEnviro

nmentA

gency,forthisa

ctivity.

asapo

tentialsite

forinert

wasterecycling.

Thesiteisknow

nas

Bordon

Sandpitand

hasp

reviously

operated

asasand

andgravel

extra

ctionsite.

Eastleigh

ELH

002/003/005-

Alstom

/EWSSidings/

NetworkRa

ilLand,

Eastleigh

(18.71/8.45/8.94

hectares).

i.Sitenowbeingconsidered

aspartof

muchlargerd

evelopment

bytheDistrictA

utho

rity

Thesites

wereallpropo

sedby

EastleighBo

roughCouncilfor

MaterialsRe

covery

anddueto

theirclose

proximity

arebeing

considered

together.

Thesites

arelocatedto

the

southeastof

thetowncentre

andhave

accessviaC

hickenhall

Lane

andgood

accessto

the

tworaillines,Southam

pton

and

Portsm

outh.

ii.Re

stricteddevelopm

entd

ueto

thesite's

locatio

nwith

the

airfieldsafeguarding

zone

ofSouthampton

Airp

ort.

Previouslyactedas

aggregates

depotand

railballastoperation,

largescaleindustrial

warehousin

gon

site.

Eastleigh

ELH

009-B

otleyRo

adSite,W

estE

nd(1.23

hectares).

i.Cum

ulativeimpactso

faccessand

locatio

nof

woo

dlandmake

thesiteunviable.

Thesitewas

prop

osed

byEastleighBo

roughCouncilas

apo

tentialreplacementfor

an

Thesiteislocatedina

triangularp

iece

ofland

tothe

SouthoftheM

27,N

orthofthe

ii.Lo

catedwith

aStrategicGap

andliesa

pproximately100m

from

aSiteof

SpecialScientificInterest.Noexistingaccess

existingciv

icam

enity

siteinthe

borough.

B3035andEasto

fMoo

rgreen

Hospital(Sham

blehurstLane).

totheprop

osed

site,andas

such,significantw

orks

wouldbe

needed

toprovideon

e,with

aright

turn

lane

necessary.


Reasons

forE

limination

Reasons

forn

omination

Locatio

nandsitebackgrou

ndDistrict

Siteno

minationandsite

size

Accidentrecordisvery

poor,w

hilst

trafficimpactwouldbe

slight,though

proximity

tothecricketgroundcouldcause

trafficandroad

safetyprob

lemso

nmatch

days.

Eastleigh

ELH

011-R

ailLinkedSite,

Eastleigh

(3.06hectares)

i.Th

esitesareno

longerbeingconsidered

asthearea

issubject

tointerestfrom

theBo

roughCouncilforlarge

scale

redevelopm

ent,includingthepurchase

ofsomeof

theland

byaprop

ertydeveloper.

Thesid

ings

wereputforward

bytheow

nero

fthe

land,

NetworkRa

il,asap

otentialsite

forw

astedevelopm

ents.

Thesiteislocatedwith

inexistingrailsid

ings

andan

industrialareatothesoutheast

ofthetowncentre.Ra

ilaccess

isgood,assite

isadjacent

tomainlinerailw

ayandexisting

railsid

ings.Ro

adaccessto

the

siteishoweverdifficult.

Eastleigh

ELH

015BrickfieldLane,

ChandlersFo

rd(lessthan

1hectare).

i.SiteidentifiedinJuly2010

byHam

pshireCountyCouncil.

Thesitelieso

ncleared

Siteno

longeravailable(currentlybeingredeveloped)

Locatedwith

inChandlersFo

rdIndustrialE

stateandisafairly

prom

inentsite

which

benefits

from

beingeasilyaccessible

brow

nfieldland

andcurrently

from

nearby

road

network,and

hasp

ermissionforeight

thatthesitecanbe

accessed

from

morethan

onelocatio

nswarehousesand

industrialunits

totalling

27.521ft2.

Landow

nerw

aslookingfor

alternativetypeso

fdevelopm

entsforthissite.

Fareham

FHM

005-R

earo

fArgyle

Crescent,Fareham

(0.88hectares)


itssm

allsizeandthereforeits

inabilityto

houseawastesiteof

anysig

nificantu

se.

Identifiedby

Ham

pshire


review

oftheNationalL

and

Use

Database.

Locatedwith

inthecentreof

Fareham,itsits

betweentwo

trainlines,one

headingwest

towards

Swanwick

andHam

ble,

ii.Lo

calamenity

issuesa

ndpo

tentialasfuturedistrict

developm

entsite.

theotherthe

mainlineNorth

Due

toits

locatio

ntherewas

potentialfor

railaccess,

iii.

Previous

interestby

thedistrictfor

developm

entm

ayresult

inaconflicto

flanduses.

towards

Botleyand

Southampton

.howeverthesiterequiressom

elandscapingto

levelito

utand

iv.Despitethesitehaving

potentialfor

railaccessandalocatio

nto

thewastesource

theam

enity

andresid

entialproperty

locatio

nsthesiteisno

tcon

sidered

tobe

suitable.

also

isconsidered

topreviously

have

been

contam

inated.

Thissitehasa

lsopreviously

been

considered

ford

istrict

resid

entialdevelop

ments,

with

thed

evelopmentofanadjac

ent

sitealreadyh

avingoccurred

for

thedevelopm

ento

f65

prop

erties.


Reasons

forE

limination

Reasons

forn

omination

Locatio

nandsitebackgrou

ndDistrict

Siteno

minationandsite

size

Gospo

rtGPT

002-B

rockhurst

IndustrialE

stateE

xtensio

n,GunnersWay,G

ospo

rt(2.24hectares).

i.Despitethesitebeingof

good

sizeits

locatio

nwith

inMoD

landandtheu

navailabilityo

fitm

eans

itwillnotbec

onsid

ered

furtherfor

wasteprocesses.

Initiallytakenforwardas

apo

tentialsite

forthe

locatio

nof

anIncineratorB

ottom

Ash

plantd

uringaHam

pshire


inthe

BrockhurstIndustrialE

state,at

theEastern

sideof

Gospo

rtwith

accessto

theA32

tothe

CountyCouncilassessmento

fsites.

WestviaGunnersWay.Site

liesw

ithinMinistryof

Defence

land

andisconsidered

tobe

'OpenSpace'.

Gospo

rtGPT

004-P

ropo

sed

Gospo

rtSH

LRTDepot,

Gospo

rt(3.03hectares).

i.Despitethesitebeingof

good

sizeits

locatio

nwith

inthe

prop

osed

developm

entfor

theB

RTprogrammeans

itshould

nolongerbe

considered

aspartof

thewastesiteassessment.

Thesitewas

initiallytaken

forwardas

apo

tentialsite

for

thelocationof

wasteprocesses

byHam

pshireCountyC

ouncil.

Thesiteislocatedquite

centrally

withinGosport,north

ofHMSSultanandtotheW

est

oftheA32.Siteform

sparto

ftra

nspo

rtimprovem

ent

program

forS

outh

Ham

pshire

calledtheBu

sRapidTransit

(BRT

).

Hart

HRT

010-B

ramshill

Depot,Y

ateley

Heath

Woo

d,Blackbushe,Y

ateley

(0.55hectares)

i.Lack

oflandow

nerinterest.

Identifiedby

Ham

pshire

CountyCouncilinFebruary

2006.

Thesitecurrently

hasv

ehicle

accessfrom

aforesttrack

inthe

eastfrom

MinleyRo

ad(B3013).Accesstothenearest

ii.Land

surroundingthesitecompriseso

fdense

coniferous

forest(Yateley

Heath

Woo

d/Bram

shillFo

rest)inall

directions.

Form

erFo

restry

Com

mission

depo

tcom

prising

ofa

mineralsand

wastelorryroute,

theA327,isapproximately

iii.

Poor

access(th

isincludes

asharpbend

ontheB3

013,just

priortotheA327).

warehouse

with

offices

anda

furtherp

refabricated

style

1.1km

eastof

thesite,viathe

B3013.

Blackbushe

airportis

iv.Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified.

officetogetherwith

alarge

surfaced

yard.

v.Perm

issionwillbe

needed

from

thelandlord

forchangeof

useinadditio

nto

theapprop

riateplanning

perm

ission,

howeveritislikely

thatonlyashort-term

leasewillbe

available.

locatedbeyond

theforest,

approximately215m

northof

thesite.

Sitehasa

Certificateof

Lawful

Use

foru

seas

worksho

pbuildings

with

open

yard.

Hart

HRT

018-S

pencer'sPit,

Coo

per's

Hill,E

versley

Com

mon

,Yateley

(1.45hectares)

i.Issues

oversurroundingenvironm

entaldesignatio

nsIdentifiedby

theHart/

Rushmoo

rHam

pshireArea

Team

(HAT)

inJanuary2007.

Thesite

hasvehicleaccessfrom

theB3

016(Coo

per's

Hill)into

theeastof

thesite.

Accessto

thenearestm

ineralsa

ndwaste

ii.Po

orvehicleaccess(anewsiteaccesswouldbe

required).

iii.

Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified

Thesiteispredom

inantly

greenfieldland

with

woo

ded

lorryroute,the

A327,islocated

approximately

550m

southwest

ofthesite,viatheB3

016.

cover,howeverasm

allportio

nof

thesite,nearesttoCoo

per's

Hillisused

asaH

CChighways

depo

t.Land

surroundingthesite

compriseso

fwoo

dlandto

the

north,theexistingEversley


Reasons

forE

limination

Reasons

forn

omination

Locatio

nandsitebackgrou

ndDistrict

Siteno

minationandsite

size

Com

mon

Quarryaggregate

extra

ctiontothee

astand

south

Existingaggregateworkings

surround

thesiteto

thesouth

andconiferous

plantatio

nto

andeast.(Sitereference

HRT

040).

thewest(beyond

Coo

per's

Hill).

Thesitehasp

reviously

been

subjecttoan

applicationfor

greenwastecompo

sting,but

was

subsequentlywith

draw

n.

Havant

HVT002-W

asteTransfer

andRe

cycling,New

Lane,

Havant

(0.35hectares).

i.Anapplicationimprovem

entsof

wastetra

nsferfacility

includingconstructio

nof

newbuildingwas

refusedin2002.

Thissitewas

nominated

inSeptem

ber2

002.

Thesiteisaform

erwaste

transfersite

operated

byWessexConstructionandPlant

Hire

Ltd.

ii.Th

esiteislocatedon

suspectedheavily

contam

inated

land.

Thesiteisalso

aform

ergas

works,w

hich

suggeststhatthe

underlyingground

islikelyto

iii.

Has

previouslybeen

subjecttoaplanning

applicationfor

resid

entialproperties.

besig

nificantly

contam

inated

iv.Lo

catedwith

inadenselypo

pulatedresid

entialarea.

andthereforewouldrequire

v.Th

esitehasb

eenconsidered

lesssuitableandthereforn

otconsidered

inthestudy,dueto

itssm

allsizeandits

locatio

nwith

inadenseresid

entialarea

investigationandremediatio

n,priortofurtherd

evelop

ment

taking

place.

Thesitewas

subjecttoa

planning

applicationinApril

2008

forthe

developm

ento

f44

flatsinthreeseparateb

locks,

howeverthiswas

not

proceededwith

.

Havant

HVT004-P

roctor

&Gam

bleSite,D

unsbury

Way,L

eigh

Park,H

avant

(8.28hectares)

i.Opp

osite

sideof

Dunsbury

Road

toRidersInfant

and

Junior

Scho

ols.

Siteisundeliverabledueto

itsrecent

redevelopm

entw

ithho

using(site

nolongeravailable).Th

esitereceived

planning

perm

issionfrom

HavantB

orough

Councilin2006

fora

mixed

4.26ha

resid

ential,3haem

ploymentand

1hacommunity

use

redevelopm

ent,which

hassubsequently

been

built.

Identifiedby

Ham

pshire

CountyCouncilfrom

the

NationalLandUseDatabasein

January2006.

Sitelocatedbetweenresid

ential

prop

ertiesinLeighPark,w

ithGreatCop

seto

theeastof

the

site.

Havant

HVT008-F

ormerHarts

Farm

Depot,H

artsFarm

i.Sinceno

minated,thereisnowinterestto

redevelopthesite

forcom

mercialdevelopm

ent(light

industrialand

storageand

distrib

utionunits).

Thesitewas

nominated

byHam

pshireCountyCouncilin

June

2006

asapo

tential

locatio

nforanHWRC

.

Thesiteisadjacent

tothe

form

erincineratorsite

(site

nominationHVT0

10).

Way,B

rockhampton

,Havant

(2.71hectares)

ii.Th

eform

erdepo

tiso

wnedby

SEEDA.

Itpreviouslyop

erated

asa

wastevehicledepo

twhich

has

nowbeen

relocated.

iii.

Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified(see

table

below).Sitehasb

eenconsidered

lesssuitableforw

asteuses


Reasons

forE

limination

Reasons

forn

omination

Locatio

nandsitebackgrou

ndDistrict

Siteno

minationandsite

size

previouslydueto

thewatercourse

thatruns

throughitand

associated

drainage

issues.

Thesitehassince

been

operatingfortem

porary

industrialuses.Th

eland

isallocated

foremploymentuses.

Thesiteisow

nedby

SEEDA

who

have

allocateditforh

igh

endcommercial-in

dustrialuses

andhave

resistedwasteusesto

bedevelopedon

thesite.

Havant

HVT009-L

andat

Southm

oorL

ane/Penn

eri.

Thesitewas

nominated

byHam


June

2006.

Siteisundeliverabledueto

itsrecent

redevelopm

entw

itha

HavantB

orough

Councilhighwaysd

epot

(site

nolonger

available).

Locatedwith

inPenn

erRo

adIndustrialE

state.

Road

IndustrialE

state,

Brockham

pton

,Havant

(1.02hectares)

Sitewasoriginallysuggestedas

arelocatio

nsiteforthe

Broadm

arsh

HWRC

siteon

HartsFarm

Way,how

eversite

hassubsequently

been

developedas

anextensionto

theHavantB

orough

Council

Depot

onPenn

erRo

ad.

New

Forest

District

NFT

004-D

ownton

Manor

Farm

Buildings,

Milfordon

Sea

(1.55hectares)

i.Green

beltland.

Nom

inated

bythesite's

owner

inMay

2005.

Thesiteislocatedto

thesouth

ofChristchurch

Road,

approximately3

50meastof

the

village

ofDow

nton

and

ii.Traffic

prob

lems;accesswouldbe

throughnewmineralsite

accessandthatmay

notb

eperm

itted.

Form

eragriculturalholding

comprising

ofanumbero

fiii.

Not

feasibleto

re-use

existingbuildings;to-rebuild

buildings

wouldbe

contrary

toGreen

Beltpo

licy.

approximately1.15km

north

westo

fthe

urbanarea

ofadjoiningagriculturalbuildings

which

areno

longerinuse.

iv.Highvisib

ilitysite.

Milfordon

Sea.

Thesiteis

Theland

isdefin

edas

green

beltandthesurroundingland

v.Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified

locatedinthep

arish

ofMilford

onSea.

Thesiteisaccessed

vi.

Anapplicationwas

subm

itted

inAugust2003forthe

relocatio

nof

Manor

Farm

,PenningtonRe

cyclingCentre

toiscomprisedexclusivelyof

agriculturalland,with

theland

directlyfrom

Christchurch

Road

(A337)which

ispartof

Dow

nton

Manor

Farm

.Public

opinionstronglypreferredthe

wastemanagem

entfacilityto

remainatPenn

ington

.Th

isoriginalapplicationwas

then

with

draw

ninJune

2005.

totheimmediatesouthhaving

been

perm

itted

form

ineral

extra

ction.

them

ainrouten

etwork.

Anew

accesson

tothishighway

isto

bebuiltas

partof

theadjacent

vii.

Anewplanning

applicationiscurrently

beingdevelopedto

retainandupgradethewasterecyclingcentreatPenn

ington

mineraldevelopm

ent,however

onlyno

minaltra

fficvolumes

wouldbe

generatedfrom

such

awastefacility.


Reasons

forE

limination

Reasons

forn

omination

Locatio

nandsitebackgrou

ndDistrict

Siteno

minationandsite

size

New

Forest

District

NFT

012-R

ingw

ood

SewageTreatm

entW

orks

i.Addition

alseweragecapacityno

tcurrentlyrequired.

Nom

inated

bythelandow

ner

inMay

2005.

Thesiteisan

existingand

activeSewageTreatm

ent

ii.Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified

Works

(STW

)located

inthe

(STW

),Moo

rtow

n,Ringwoo

d(3.62hectares)

Identifiedas

requiring

the

provision

ofadditio

nal

treatmentu

nits,

aspartof

iii.

Locatedinan

area

ofgreenbeltandispredom

inantly

surrounded

byagriculturallandor

open

space.

area

ofMoo

rtow

n,which

islocatedtotheimmediatesouth

oftheRingwoo

durbanarea.

iv.Th

eclosestresidentialdwellings

arelocatedimmediatelyto

thesouthof

thesite.

WessexWater'sstatutoryAsset

Managem

entP

lanforthe


inthe

districtw

ardof

Ringwoo

dSouth.

perio

d2005

-2010,inorderto

ensurecompliancewith

the

urbanwastewaterandhabitats

directives.

Thesiteisaccessed

directly

from

Ham

pshireHatchesLane,

aminor

road,located

Itisno

tpossib

leto

accurately

defin

ethearea

forexpansio

n,approximately

250m

southwest

ofChristchurch

Road

(B3347).

although

plansw

eredraw

nup

show

ingan

estim

ated

area

for

Themainroutenetwork,the

A35,isaccessedapproximately

'safeguarding'for

longerterm

futureexpansion.

2km

totheno

rthvia

Christchurch

Road.

New

Forest

District

NFT

013-F

ordingbridge

SewageTreatm

entW

orks

(STW

),Fo

rdingbrid

ge(2.19hectares)

i.Addition

alseweragecapacityno

tcurrentlyrequired.

Nom

inated

bythesite's

owner

inMay

2005.Th

esitewas

identifiedas

requiring

the

provision

ofadditio

nal

ExistingandactiveSewage

Treatm

entW

orks

(STW

)locatedto

thesouthof

the

Fordingbrid

geurbanarea.

ii.Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified.

iii.

Thesite

isentirelysurroundedby

open

agriculturalland,apart

from

anumbero

fagriculturalbuildings

immediatelyno

rth

westo

fthe

site.

Theclosestresidentialdwellingislocated

approximately200m

northof

thesite.

treatmentu

nits,

aspartof

WessexWater'sstatutoryAsset

Managem

entP

lanforthe


inthe

districtw

ardof

Fordingbrid

ge.

Thesiteisaccessed

directly

from

Frog

Lane,a

minor

road,

perio

d2005

-2010,inorderto

ensurecompliancewith

the

locatedapproximately450m

urbanwastewaterandhabitats

directives.

southof

ChurchStreet

(B3078).Th

emainroute

network,theA338,isaccessed

Itisno

tpossib

leto

accurately

defin

ethearea

forexpansio

n,approximately1.8km

tothe

although

plansw

eredraw

nup

northeastviaChurchRo

adthroughFo

rdingbrid

ge.

show

ingan

estim

ated

area

for

'safeguarding'for

longerterm

futureexpansion.

New

Forest

District

NFT

020-E

lingWharf,

Totto

n,Southampton

(9.41hectares)

i.Siteno

tpromoted

bylandow

ner.

Thesitewas

nominated

byNew

ForestDistrictC

ouncilin

January2006.

Thesite

isan

existingindustrial

estatelocatedintheurbanarea

ofTo

tton.

Thesitehasw

harf

ii.Major

ground

contam

inationissueso

nsouthern

portionof

site.


Reasons

forE

limination

Reasons

forn

omination

Locatio

nandsitebackgrou

ndDistrict

Siteno

minationandsite

size

fron

tage

onto

ElingChann

el,

which

feedsintotheRiver

Test.

Identified

potential

opportu

nity

tomovewastematerialsand

recycled

productsby

bargeto

andfrom

thesite.

iii.

Localautho

rityprom

otingsiteforh

ousin

gandmixed

use

developm

ent,no

tawasteuse.

iv.Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified.

Land

surroundingthesite

compriseso

fresidential

v.Sitecurrently

supp

ortsindustrialuses.

Sitehase

stablishedroad,rail

andwateraccess,including

dwellingsimmediatelyno

rthof

publictra

nspo

rt,and

iswith

inthesite(beyon

dtheA35),an

1.5km

ofan

area

ofhigh

adjacent

industrialw

harfsite

unem

ployment.Ro

adaccess

adjoiningtothen

orth-east,the

tothesiteisdirectfrom

the

ElingChann

elandElingGreat

A35

Totto

nBy

-Pass,partof

Marsh

totheeast,B

artley

themineralsa

ndwastelorry

Waterandmud

flattothe

route.To

ttonrailstationisalso

immediatesouthwith

Eling

with

in250m

ofthesite

entra

nce.

peninsulabeyond

and

resid

entialdwellingstothew

est

ofthesite.

New

Forest

District

NFT

024-E

lingWharf2,

Totto

n,Southampton

(5.11hectares)

i.Difficultaccessintosite.

Nom

inated

bySouthampton

City

CouncilinJanuary

2006.

Thesite

isan

existingindustrial

estatelocatedintheurbanarea

ofTo

tton.

Thesitehassom

eii.

Major

land

contam

inationissueso

n-site.

iii.

Localauthorityp

romotingadjac

entsite

(NFT

020)forp

restige

housing.

small

wharffrontage

ontoEling

Chann

el,w

hich

feedsintothe

Identifiedopportunity

tomove

wastematerialsandrecycled

iv.Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified.

RiverT

est.Land

surrounding

productsby

bargeto

andfrom

thesite.

v.Sitecurrently

supp

ortsindustrialuses,howeversouthern

part

ofadjacent

site(N

FT020)hasb

eenallocatedforp

restige

housingby

New

ForestDistrictC

ouncil,with

potentially

the

thesitecompriseso

fEling

GreatMarsh

totheno

rth,the

RiverT

estm

udflatsandEling

remainderof

thesitebeingredevelopedinto

amixed

use

developm

ent.

Channeltotheeast,an

adjac

ent

industrialw

harfsite(N

FT020)

adjoiningto

thesouthand

resid

entialdwellingsandasmall

industrialarea(beyon

dthe

A35),to

thewesto

fthe

site.

New

Forest

District

NFT

036-L

andAdjacent

toSlow

hillCop

sei.

Not

prom

oted

bylandow

nero

rlocalauthority.

Identifiedby

Ham

pshire


2006.

Thesiteisgreenfieldland,

currently

comprising

ofagriculturalpastureland

and

ii.Difficulttoextend

sitedueto

StrategicGap.

WastewaterTreatm

ent

Works,N

ormandy

Way,

Marchwoo

d(2.65hectares)

iii.

Greenfieldland.

woo

dlandandlocatedon

Normandy

Way,adjacenttothe

activeMarchwoo

dSewage

Themainpo

tentialidentified

forthissite

wasfora

facilityto

belinkedtotheadjacentformer

iv.Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified.

v.Th

esite

hasn

ocurrentvehicleaccess,though

anyfutureaccess

wouldlikelybe

viaNormandy

Way.

Treatm

entW

orks

(STW

)and

Marchwoo

dIncineratorS

ite


Reasons

forE

limination

Reasons

forn

omination

Locatio

nandsitebackgrou

ndDistrict

Siteno

minationandsite

size

(NFT

035)and/or

toco-lo

cate

abiow

astefacilitywith

Marchwoo

dST

W.

theform

erMarchwoo

dIncineratorS

ite.

Land

surroundingthesite

compriseso

fopenwoo

dland

Potentialresidential

developm

entsatCork’s

Farm

tothen

orth,beyon

dwhich

lies

andTavell’s

Farm

,may

have

thedisusedslu

dgejetty,B

ury

Marsh

andtheRiverT

est.

potentialtosupp

orta

Com

binedHeatand

Power

(CHP)

planto

nthesite.

With

thepresence

ofthedisused

sludgejetty,theremay

bethe

potentialtomovewaste

materialsto

thesiteby

barge.

New

Forest

District

NFT

054-L

andEasto

fMoD

Depot,C

alshotR

oad,

Fawley,Southampton

(10.47

hectares)

i.Prob

ablelandscapeissues.

Thesitewas

identifiedby

Ham


Thereiscurrently

vehicular

accessintothesouthof

thesite

viaahardstanding

track

from

theNorthernAccessR

oadto

FawleyPo

werStation.

ii.Re

motefrom

significantp

opulationcentres.

Brow

nfieldsitethatwas

used

durin

gtheconstructio

nof

FawleyPo

werStation.

iii.

MoD

have

aspiratio

nsto

expand

adjacent

site.

iv.Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified.

Land

tothesouthcompriseso

fFawleyPo

werStation,whilst

Currentlycomprisedof

concretehardstanding

interspersed

with

vegetatio

n.land

tothewest,isaform

erMilitaryof

Defence(M

oD)site

used

forthe

storageof

oil

tanks,andcurrently

houses

asoilscreeningp

rocessinan

area

ofit.

New

Forest

District

NFT

055-C

ork'sF

arm,

Normandy

Way,

Marchwoo

d,Southampton

(13.10

hectares)

i.Accessissues(currently

hasb

asicvehicleaccessfrom

Normandy

Road).

Locatedon

Normandy

Way,

Marchwoo

d.Th

issiteis

adjacent

totheruledoutsite

"LandAdjacenttoMarchwoo

d

Thesitewas

identifiedby

Ham


ii.Partof

StrategicGap.

iii.

Adjacenttonewho

using(Adm

iralty

Way)

STW,N

ormandy

Way,

iv.Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified

Marchwoo

d,Southampton

"(N

FT036).See

above.

v.Th

esite

isgreenfieldlan

d,currently

comprising

ofagricultural

pastureland

andwoo

dland.

andsurroundingthesite

comprisesthe

RiverT

esttothe

north,newho

usinglocatedon

Adm

iralty

Way

totheeastand

existingho

usingto

thesouth,

locatedon

ShorefieldRo

ad,


Reasons

forE

limination

Reasons

forn

omination

Locatio

nandsitebackgrou

ndDistrict

Siteno

minationandsite

size

Pebb

leCourtandTidesW

ayin

Marchwoo

d.Lo

catedto

the

west,isruledoutsite

NFT

036,

which

currently

iscomprised

ofop

enagriculturallandand

woo

dland.

New

Forest

District

NFT

063-L

andatDibden

Bay(ABP

Land)

(12hectares)

Wharves&

Depots

Need

sAssessm

entindicated

anewwharfis

unlikelyto

berequireddurin

gtheplan

perio

d.How

everif

portrelateddevelopm

entw

asprop

osed

infutureinthis

Nom

inated

byABP

inJanuary

2010,asanareatobe

zonedfor

potentialsafeguardingforb

oth

Thesitewas

broughtin1967

byBT

DB,

ABP

'spredecessor

asstrategicland

reserved

for

portexpansion.ABP

own

locatio

n,aprop

ortio

nshouldbe

safeguardedforu

seas

amineralsa

ndwaste

developm

ents.

sufficient

land

tothewesto

fthissite.

aggregates

wharf.Ifimplem

ented,therecouldbe

oppo

rtunities

toco-lo

catewasteuses.Th

ereareno

oppo

rtunities

fora

standalone

wastefacilityon

thissite

currently.

Partof

a12

hectaresitewas

nominated

fora

wasteexpo

rtfacility.

Thisland

ispredom

inately

reclaimed

from

dredgingsfor

portuseand

islocatedopposite

Siteliesa

djacenttotheNew

ForestNationalPark

Thesite

isingood

proximity

tothed

eepwaterchannel,e

xisting

theEastern

Docks,adjacentto

thesouthern

shoreof

Southampton

Water.

Hythe

andHythe

MarinaVillageliestothesouthof

thesite

railw

ayandprimaryroad

network.

Thissitewouldcausesig

nificantvisu

alimpacton

the

surroundingareas

Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified.

Portsm

outh

City

PCC002-P

ortsdown

Main,James

Callaghan

i.Siteno

longeravailable,afterformerlybeingdeem

edsurplus

torequirementsby

owner,MinistryofDefence(M

oD)E

states.

Thissitewas

nominated

byHam


Thesiteis

locatedon

Ports

Dow

nhillabovethe

settlem

ent

ofPaulsgrove.

Drive/Southw

ickRo

ad,

PortsD

own

(29.75

hectares)

May

2005.Siteisaform

erMoD

landho

lding,butisn

owpredom

inantly

vacant,apart

ii.Lo

catedinAreaof

Speciallandscape.

iii.

Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified.

Thevacant

part

ofthesiteis

accessed

inthesouthof

the

site,

from

James

Callaghan

Drive,aB

-classhighway,w

hilst

the

active

defence

facility

portionof

thesiteisaccessed

intheeast

ofthesite,

from

Southw

ickRo

ad(B2177).Th

emainroutenetwork,theA3,is

locatedapproximatelyb

etween

2.15

and3km

from

thesite.

iv.Th


tothesiteareapproximately

200m

south,atthebase

ofthesteepcliff

face

tothesouth.

from

anactiveprivatedefence

facilityintheeastof

thesite.

Thevacant

partof

thesitehas

been

declared

surplusto

requirementsby

theMoD

.Sitewas

allocatedfora

mixed

resid

entialand

commercialuse

developm

entb

ythelocal

authorities,how

everthis

allocatio

nhassince

been

deleted,asthelandisno

longer

tobe

released

bytheMoD

.


Reasons

forE

limination

Reasons

forn

omination

Locatio

nandsitebackgrou

ndDistrict

Siteno

minationandsite

size

Portsm

outh

City

PCC003-G

oldsmith

Avenue,C

entra

lSouthsea,

Portsm

outh

(0.67hectares)

i.Siteissm

alland

with

poor

access.

Nom

inated

byHam

pshire

CountyCouncilfrom

the

NationalL

andUse

Database

(NLU

D)inJanuary2006.

Locatedatthewestern

endof

Goldsmith

Avenue

(A2030),to

theimmediatesouthof

Fratton

railstation,intheCentra

lSouthsea

wardof

Portsm

outh.

ii.Currentlysurrounded

bytherailw

ayto

theno

rth(beyon

dGoldsmith

Avenue),by

resid

entialdwellings

totheeastand

southandby

aroundabo

utandindustrialbuildings

(beyon

dFawcettRo

ad)tothewest.

Currentlycontains

vario

uscommercialuses

(including

buildingmaterialsyard).

Accesstothesite,isfrom

the

north,directlyoffG

oldsmith

Avenue.

iii.

Activeindustrialsite,close

toresid

entialdwellings.

iv.Th


tothesitearelocated

immediatelyadjacent

totheeastandsouthandthereisa

scho

olacrosstheroad

v.Allocatedby

Portsm

outh

City

Councilforcom

prehensiv

eredevelopm

entw

ithan

oppo

rtunity

toenhancethevisual

appearance

andtownscape

character.

vi.

Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified

Southampton

City

SCC001-M

arineP

arade&

BelvidereRo

ad,B

elvidere,

Southampton

(6.63hectares)

i.Siteiscurrently

establish

edby

activeaggregatewharves.

Nom

inated

byHam

pshire

CountyCouncilfrom

areview

oftheNationalL

andUse

Database(N

LUD)inJanuary

2006.

Locatedincentral

Southampton

,with

inBa

rgate

andBe

voiswards

onthewest

bank

oftheRiverItchen.

Itis

locatedwith

inaheavily

ii.Sitesafeguardedform

arineindustries.

iii.

Sitehasp

otentialfor

regeneratio

ninthelong

term

.iv.

Surroundingland

includes

industrialpremisestotheno

rth

andwest,theRiverItchento

theeast,residentialdwellings

tothesouthandafootballstadium

tothewest.Th

enearest

industrialised

area

with

inthe

citycentre.

Thesiteiscurrently

form

edof

fourparcels

oflan

d;from

north

tosouththesearecomprised

resid

entialdwellings

lieapproximately100m

southwesto

fthesite.

Thesite

isarectangularstrip

oflan

dalo

ngsid

ethe

RiverItchen.

ofDiblesa

ggregatewharf,

Leam

outh

aggregatewharf,a

v.Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified

redundantcon

creteblock

makingsiteandBu

rnley

aggregatewharf.

Eachof

thethreeactive

aggregatew

harvesareo

perated

bydifferentcom

panies.

Thesite

ispreviouslydeveloped

land

andhase

stablishedriver

accessviawharves.

Southampton

City

SCC003-L

andsouthof

Millbroo

kSewage

i.Siteno

longersafeguardedforw

aste-n

owinuseas

operationalportland.

Nom

inated

bySouthern

Water

Services,the

land

ownero

fthe

Originallyformed

thesouthern

extensionof

theexisting

sewagetre

atmentw

orks

site

locatedto

theno

rth.

Treatm

entW

orks,

Southampton

Docks

(Totalareaofapproximately

4.6hectares)

adjacent

sewagetre

atment

works,prio

rtotheadop

tionof

theHam

pshire,

Portsmo

uth&

Southamp

tonMinera

lsandWaste

LocalP

lan,D

ecem

ber1

998.

ii.Sewagetreatmentw

orkimprovem

entsconstrained

toadjoining

siteto

north-n

oneed

foraddition

alland.

iii.

Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified


Reasons

forE

limination

Reasons

forn

omination

Locatio

nandsitebackgrou

ndDistrict

Siteno

minationandsite

size

Thislargersitewas

also

safeguardedwith

inthe

Ham

pshire,

Portsmo

uth&

Southamp

tonMinera

lsandWaste

LocalP

lan,w

hich

was

adop

ted

inDecem

ber1

998.

InMarch

1997,plann

ing

perm

issionwas

grantedfora

sub-region

alslu

dgetre

atment

andrecyclingcentreon

the

adjacent

sewagetre

atment

works

site

Develop

mento

nthissitewas

howeverneverp

ursued

bySouthern

WaterServices

and

followingadop

tionof

the

Ham

pshireMinerals

andWaste

CoreStrategy

inJuly2007,the

policywhich

ensuredthe

safeguarding

ofthissitewas

superseded

andassuch,the

site

lostits

safeguardedstatus.

Thisarea

was

then

subsequentlyallocatedforp

ort

usewith

inSouthampton

City

Council'sC

oreStrategy,

adop

tedinJanuary2010

and

also

inSouthampton

'sLo

cal

Plan

2006,since

ithadbecome

operationalportland.

Southampton

City

SCC006-F

ormerBritish

RailWorks,R

edbridge,

Southampton

(14.67

hectares)

i.Siteunavailableduetobeingoccupied

bycurrentdockactivity.

Originallyidentifiedas

aPreferredSitewith

inHam

pshireCountyCouncil's

DepositPlan

inNovem

ber

1993.

Locatedwith

intheRe

dbrid

gewardof

western

Southampton

andform

sthe

western

most

portionof

theSouthampton

Docksite.

ii.Southampton

'sCoreStrategy

(January2010)safeguardsthe

portforp

ortrelated

developm

ent,

iii.

Likelyto

besig

nificantgroundcontam

inationas

aresultof

form

errailworks.

Currentlyinusefor

thestorage

ofnewmotor

vehicles

and

Thesiteform

sparto

faop

erationalportlandthatis


Reasons

forE

limination

Reasons

forn

omination

Locatio

nandsitebackgrou

ndDistrict

Siteno

minationandsite

size

form

spartofthe

Southampton

Docks

land

parcel.

locatedapproximately4km

tothewesto

fthe

citycentre.

iv.Th

esiteiscloseto

ElingandBu

ryMarshes

SSSI

andto

the

RiverT

estand

Tann

ersC

reek.

v.Likelyto

besubjecttoground

contam

inated

from

itsform

erTh

esiteisaccessed

viaan

internaldock

road

from

dock

Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified.

useas

arailworks

siteby

British

Rail.

gate20,w

hich

issubsequently

accessed

from

theA33/A

35mainroutenetwork

interchange.

Southampton

City

SCC007-T

estL

aneS

outh,

TestLane,R

edbridge,

Southampton

(6.53hectares)

i.Identifiedandallocated

bySouthampton

City

Councilforn

ewmajor

econ

omicdevelopm

ent,no

tincluding

wasteuses.

Identifiedby

Ham

pshire

CountyCouncilfrom

the

NationalLandUseDatabasein

January2006.

Siteislocatedtothew

estofthe

centreof

Southampton

,inthe

Redbrid

gearea.Th

esiteis

sandwichedbetweentheM271

ii.Th

esiteismoresuitedto

realising

econ

omicdevelopm

ent

objectives

totheeast,T

estL

aneandthe

Form

erlycontainedindustrial

developm

ent,though

thishas

iii.

Significant

road

improvem

entsrequiredto

improveaccessto

thesite.

RiverT

estecology

desig

nations

tothewestand

GoverRo

adsin

cebeen

removed

andthesite

iv.Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified

resid

entialareato

thesouth

west.

restored.Itisnowclassifiedas

greenfieldland.

New

spaperofficeHQ

/print

works

andthen

Yeom

anPark

Thesitestillhasland

contam

inationissuesasa

result

industrialareaislocatedto

the

immediateno

rthof

thesite.

oftheform

eruses,and

italso

hasroadaccessdifficulties.

Thisarea

was

previously

safeguardedforindustrialuses

inSouthampton

'slocalplan

review

andisallocatedin

Southampton

'slocalplanfor

employmentuse,and

hassince

been

identifiedby

SCCasasite

toho

usemajor

newecon

omic

developm

entintheirrecently

adop

ted(January2010)core

strategy.

Southampton

City

SCC008-W

oolston

SewageTreatm

entW

orks

(STW

),Southampton

(1.25hectares)

i.Siteiscurrently

inuseas

aSewageTreatm

entW

orks

(STW

),andconstra

insthe

adjacent

plannedCentenary

Quay

regeneratio

nsite.

Locatedwith

inthe

Southampton

suburban

areaof

Woo

lston

,app

roximately

1.25km

southeastof

central

Southampton

.

Currentlyinuseas

sewage

treatmentw

orks.

ii.Th

eST

Wneedsu

pgrading

tomeetenviro

nmentalstandards,

eitheron

siteo

rbyrelocatingtoPeelCom

mon

.Itsimpo

rtant

theu

pgrading

solutio

nsdesig

nedtoimprovestandards

sothat


Reasons

forE

limination

Reasons

forn

omination

Locatio

nandsitebackgrou

ndDistrict

Siteno

minationandsite

size

isdoes

notcon

straintheabilityto

fully

developtheadjacent

Centenary

Quaysite,anddoes

notimpacton

existing

resid

ential/

ecologyareas.

AccessedviaVictoria

Road,a

resid

entialstre

et.

Surrounded

byaform

erindustrialsite

totheno

rth

iii.

Any

onsiteupgradeshouldalso

extend

theriversid

ewalk

south,creatinglinkstosurroundingo

penspaceand

waterfront,

(Centenary

Quay,amajor

createapo

sitivedesig

nstatem

entand

beof

anapprop

riate

redevelopm

entschem

e),

scale

inrelationtosurroundingresid

entialdevelo

pment.Other

wastemanagem

entu

sesw

ouldno

tbeapprop

riate.

resid

entialdwellings

andop

engreenspace,beyond

Victoria

Road,totheeast,byasm

all

iv.Adjacenttokeyregeneratio

nsite

sailing

dingybo

atyard

tothe

v.Accessw

ouldbe

inapprop

riate

southandby

theRiverItchen

vi.

Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified

andecologyd

esignations

tothe

west.

Southampton

City

SCC013Trucks

Holding

Site,A

shleyCrescent

(0.2hectares)

i.Th

esitehasb

eenconsidered

lesssuitableandthereforn

otconsidered

inthestudy,outduetoits

smallsizeand

proximity

toresid

entialhousin

gandadjacent

scho

ol.

Thesitewas

nominated

inDecem

ber2

009by

aninterested

party.


inthe

industrialareaof

Ashley

Crescentand

isinclose

proximity

totheM

27,alth

ough

ii.Siteliesa

djacenttolocalenviro

nmentaldesignatio

ns.

Theindustrialsite

inwhich

the

nominated

siteliesw

ithinis

internalaccessispartially

constra

ined

iii.

Prop

osalforanasph

altrecyclingcentrewas

recentlyrefused

onthissite

suitablefora

rangeof

employmentu

ses,namely;B1

(c),B2

andB8

.Th

esiteissafeguardedby

Southampton

City

Council.

Theindustrialsitealreadyh

osts

awastemanagem

entoperations

andsafeguardedforindustrial

use.

TestVa

lley

TTV006-L

uzbo

rough

Road

Depot,H

ighw

ood

Lane,W

hitenap,Ro

msey

(1hectare)

i.Siteisundeliverableas

islocatedinstrategicgap.

Identifiedby

Ham

pshire

CountyCouncilWaste

Managem

entinDecem

ber

2005

foru

seas

anew

Locatedapproximately2

.25km

totheeastof

themarkettow

nof

Romsey,nearto

theareaso

fHalterwo

rthandWhitenap,and

ii.Th

esitehasb

eenused

assuch

since

the1970su

ndera

certificateof

lawfuluse,how

everisno

townedby

Ham

pshire

CountyCouncil.

Househo

ldWasteRe

cycling

situatedjustbeyond

the

Romseyurbanarea

boundary.

iii.

Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified

Centre

(HWRC

)toreplacethe

existingHWRC

facilityat

iv.Agriculturallandliestotheno

rthandwesto

fthe

site,and

also

beyond

Highw

oodLane

totheeastandBo

tleyRo

adto

thesouth.

With

inastra

tegicd

evelop

ment

gapbetweenRo

mseyand

North

Baddesleyandwith

ina

predom

inantly

ruralsettin

g.

Casbroo

k,Bu

nnyLane

tothe

northof

Romsey.

v.Th

enearestresidentialdwellingliesa

pproximately100m

southwesto

fthe

site.

Siteidentifiedoriginallyas

having

potentialfor

useas

aTh

esiteisaccessed

directly

from

Highw

oodLane,a

new"split-level"HWRC

,to


Reasons

forE

limination

Reasons

forn

omination

Locatio

nandsitebackgrou

ndDistrict

Siteno

minationandsite

size

provideadditio

nalcapacity

with

intheRo

mseyarea.

B-classificationhighway,w

hich

subsequentlylinks

with

Botley

Road,a

furtherB

-classified

Thesiteiscurrently

leased

byHam

pshireCo

untyCo

uncil

and

highway,app

roximately115m

from

thesiteentra

nce.

This

inuseforthe

storageof

road

highway

subsequentlylinks

chippingsa

ndotherh

ighw

ays

materials.

with

theA27

mainhighway,

approximately150m

from

the

siteentra

nce.

TestVa

lley

TTV012-L

ongStay

Car

Park,Sheph

erds

Sprin

gLane,A

ndover

(0.51hectares)

i.Siteisoverlooked

byresid

entialproperties.

Nom

inated

byHam

pshire

CountyCouncilWaste

Managem

entinFebruary2006

ford

evelop

mentasa

new

Currentlyalong

stay

carp

ark

which

isow

nedandop

erated

byTestVa

lleyBo

rough

Council.

Itislocatedinthe

ii.Lies

with

inindicativeflo

odplainof

theRiverA

nton

iii.

Potentialcon

flictasresid

entialdevelop

mento

fsite

prop

osed

byTestVa

lleyBo

roughCouncil.

Househo

ldWasteRe

cycling

centreof

theurbanarea

ofiv.

Thepo

tentialuseof

thesiteisrestrictedow

ingto

itssiz

e(0.5

hectares),andithasthereforebeen

discounted

atthisstage.

Centre

(HWRC

)toreplacethe

existingHWRC

facilityon

ShepherdsS

pringLane.

Andover,w

ithinthewardof

StMary's.

Thisdoesno

tprecludethe

siteb

eing

considered

onits

merits

ifaprop


aspecialistw

aste

use),asitisrelativelyfree

ofconstra

ints.

Accesstothesiteisdirectly

from

ShepherdsS

pringLane,

which

links

with

theA3057

Sitecoveredby

tarm

achardstanding.

v.Anumbero

fcon

straintshave

been

identified.

(ring

road),approximately

vi.

Surroundingland

compriseso

fbuildings

totheno

rth,a

cemetaryto

theeast(beyon

dShepherdsS

pringLane),

300m

totheno

rtheastof

the

siteandMarlborough

Street,

resid

entialdwellings

tothesouthandrecreatio

nallandto

the

approximately150m

tothe

southwesto

fthe

site.

west,beyond

theRiverA

nton

.Th

enearestresidential

dwellingsarethosetothesouthwhich

areapproximately

100m

away.

TestVa

lley

TTV030-

Siteadjacent

toYo

kesfordHillIndustrial

i.Th

esiteisconsidered

greenfieldandan

impo

rtanto

penarea

(not

previouslydevelopedland).

Thesitewas

identifiedin2006

byHam

pshireCountyCouncil

Siteisaform

erlandfillsite

which

hasb

eenrestored

inthe

1990s.

Estate,Be

lbins,Ro

msey

(RestoredWynford

Hill

Landfill)

(1.74hectares)

durin

gasearch

forp

otential

sites

onwhich

torelocatethe

RomseyHouseho

ldWaste

RecyclingCentre

.

ii.Develo

pmentonthissitew

ouldextend

existingw

asteactivities

closerto

themainroad.

Thesiteisadjacent

tothe

YokesfordHillWasteCentre

iii.

Potentialcum

ulativeintheimmediatearea

ofYo

kesfordHill.

iv.Accessedalreadyused

forw

astevehicles

(HGVs).

Potentialsynergies

with

adjacent

wastemanagem

ent

v.Re

sidentialpropertiesa

readjacent

tothesite.

activitieswereidentified

aswell

astheindustrialnatureof

the

widerarea.


Reasons

forE

limination

Reasons

forn

omination

Locatio

nandsitebackgrou

ndDistrict

Siteno

minationandsite

size

Winchester

WCC003-M

icheldever

Mill,O

verton

Road,M

icheldever

(1.15hectares)


therecent

redevelopm

ento

fthe

sitewith

housing.

Locatedno

rthof

Canada

Cottages(resid

entialarea),east

oftherailw

ayline.

Mich

eldeverM

illwasidentified

byHam

pshireCountyCouncil

inJanuary2006.

ii.Th

esitereceived

planning

perm

issionfrom

WinchesterC

ityCo

uncilinApril2006

foritsredevelopm

entw

ith43

resid

ential

dwellings.Th

esiteisthereforeno

longeravailable.

NearM

icheldeverTrain

Station.

Winchester

WCC005-L

andon

Sheep

Pond

Lane,D

roxford

(0.33hectares)


itssm

allsize.

Currentlygreenfieldland

and

islocatedintheruralM

eon

Valley.

Thesiteis"w

edge"

Identifiedby

Ham

pshire

CountyCouncilfrom

areview

oftheNationalL

andUse

ii.Th

epo

tentialuse


ingto

itssiz

e(it

islessthan


discounted

Database(NLU

D)inFebruary

2006.

shaped

andislocatedatthe

junctio

nof

Cut

ThroatLane

with

SheepPo

ndLane,

atthisstage.Th

isdoesno


onits

merits

ifaprop


aspecialistw

asteuse).

approximately300m

northof

thevillage

ofDroxford.

iii.

Despitethesitebeingsm

all,itisrelativelyfree

ofmany

constra

ints,

butd

oessufferinrespecto

fthe

landscapeas

itislocatedwith

intheSouthDow

nsNationalPark.

Thesiteislocated

approximately160m

westo

ftheA32

andas

such

accessis

reason

ablygood.H

owever,

thereappearstobe

nocurrent

accessinto

thesite.

Winchester

WCC007-B

ishop

'sSutto

nCh

ipping

Depot,N

orthsid

eLane,B

ishop

sSutton

(0.44hectares)

i.Th

epo

tentialuse


ingto

itssiz

e(it

islessthan


discounted

atthisstage.Th

isdoesno


onits

merits

ifaprop


aspecialistw

asteuse).

Locatedon

Northsid

eLane,

approximately

0.7kmtotheeast

oftheruralvillageof

Bishop

'sSutto

n.

Identifiedby

Ham

pshire


2006.

Currentlyinuseas

astorage

depo

tfor

highway

resurfacing

material.

ii.Despitethesitebeingsm

all,itisrelativelyfree

ofconstra

ints.

Theaccessto

thesiteisoff

Northsid

eLane,immediately

adjac

enttoits

junctio

nwith

the

B3047andapproximately

100m

from

thejunctionwith

theA

31publichighway.


5 Map showing the distribution of nominated sites ruled out from further assessment (see also Landfill andSurcharging Report)

Map 13 Sites ruled out from further assessment



Appendix 4 List of nominated sites by local authority area

4.1 Basingstoke

Table 9 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Basingstoke & Deane

Study sectionType of site nominationSite name and nomination code

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitable (landno longer available)

BSD 002 Wade Road, Basingstoke


BSD 003 Beech Arms Service Station, Andover Road, Oakley

Section 6Nominated sites currently allocated foremployment uses

BSD 004 Kingsclere Chippings Depot, Kingsclere


BSD 005 Land adjoining Beggarwood Lane, Kempshott

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableBSD 007 German Road, Bramley

Section 7Other nominated sitesBSD 008 Basingstoke Sidings, Basingstoke

Section 5Existing SiteBSD 013 Kingsclere Lime Quarry


BSD 015 Land at Gresley Road, Basingstoke

Section 7Other nominated sitesBSD 016/ BSD 022 Peak Copse, Dummer/ Peak Copse 2Caravan site

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableBSD 017 Land adjacent to Chineham energy recovery facility

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableBSD 018 Kempshott Industrial Park


BSD 020 Former SSSI Site

Section 7Other nominated sitesBSD 021/ BSD 025 Land at Apsley Estate, adj. To former landfill,Andover

Section 7Other nominated sitesBSD 023 Carousel Dairy Farm, Manor Farm, Farleigh Wallop

Section 5Existing SiteBSD 024 Bessemer Park

4.2 East Hampshire

Table 10 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in East Hampshire

Study sectionType of nominated siteSite name and nomination code

Section 5Existing siteEHS 003 Alton Sewage Treatment Works, Alton

Section 7Other nominated sitesEHS 004 Spaniard Inn

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableEHS 005 Lasham Coal Yard, Lasham, Alton

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableEHS 006 Ex Gas Works Site

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableEHS 007 Ex Water Pumping Station

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableEHS 008 Buriton Sawmill



Section 7Other nominated sitesEHS 011 Army cadet Site

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableEHS 012 Batching Site

Section 5Existing siteEHS 023 Butser Lime Quarry, former chalk quarry

Section 7Other nominated sitesEHS 026 Land east of Alton MRF

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableEHS 027 Land to the south of Woolmer TradingEstate

Section 8Sites in area of planned developmentEHS 029 Bordon/ Whitehill eco-town

Section 7Other nominated sitesEHS 030 Land to west of Alton MRF, Alton

Section 5Existing siteEHS 031 Selbourne Brickworks

Section 5Existing siteEHS 032 Home Farm, Ropley

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableEHS 033 Bordon Sandpit, Sleaford, Bordon

Section 5Existing siteEHS 034 Land at Frithend Quarry, Sleaford, Bordon

Section 7Other nominated sitesEHS 036 Land at Hazleton Farm, nr Horndean

4.3 Eastleigh

Table 11 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Eastleigh


Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableELH 002/ 003/ 005 Alstom/ EWS Sidings/ Network RailLand, Eastleigh

Section 5Existing SiteELH 004 Eastleigh Rail Aggregates Terminal, Eastleigh

Section 6Nominated sites currently allocated for employmentuses

ELH 006 Site Adjacent to Waste Water Treatment Works,Eastleigh

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableELH 009 Botley Road Site, West End

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableELH 011 Eastleigh Rail-linked Site


ELH 014 Land at Dutton Lane, Eastleigh

Section 7Other nominated siteELH 016 Land off Chestnut Avenue, Eastleigh


ELH 017 Avalon, Parham Drive, Boyatt Wood

Section 5Existing SiteELH 018 Netley Transfer Station

Section 5Existing SiteELH 019 East Horton Farm

Section 7Other nominated sitesELH 020 Withys Farm, Dutton Lane


4.4 Fareham

Table 12 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Fareham


Section 5Existing siteFHM 001 Fareham Depot, Fareham

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableFHM 005 Rear of Argyle Crescent, Fareham


FHM 006/ FHM 009 Little Park Farm Road, Park Gate

Section 8Sites in area of planned developmentFHM 007 Fareham SDA Area of Search

Section 5Existing siteFHM 008 Charity Farm

Section 5Existing siteFHM 010 Downend Quarry

Section 5Existing siteFHM 011 Wallington Transfer Station, Fareham


FHM 012 Land to the South of Railway, Segensworth


FHM 013 Pinks Industrial Estate, Crockerhill

4.5 Gosport

Table 13 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Gosport


Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableGPT 002 Brockhurst Industrial Estate Extension, GunnersWay


GPT 003 Site at Quay Lane Industrial Estate

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableGPT 004 Proposed Gosport SHLRT Depot

4.6 Hart

Table 14 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Hart


Section 5Existing SiteHRT 002 Calf Lane Quarry and adjacent land

Section 5Existing SiteHRT 003 Eversley Star Hill

Section 7Other nominated sitesHRT 006 Hook Depot, Hook

Section 5Existing SiteHRT 007 Hart Depot

Section 7Other nominationHRT 008 Mattingley Depot

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableHRT 010 Bramshill Depot

Section 7Other nominated sitesHRT 017 Land at Minley, Blackbushe

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableHRT 018 Spencers Pit




HRT 019 /HRT 026Hartland Park & adjacent land, PyestockHill

Section 5Existing SiteHRT 021 Eversley Storage Depot


HRT 024 Clarks Farm, Yateley

Section 5Existing SiteHRT 025 Beacon Hill

Section 5Existing siteHRT 027 Land at Warren Heath, Bramshill

4.7 Havant

Table 15 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Havant


Section 7Other nominated sitesHVT 001 Simonds Hill/Nevilles Park, West Hulbert

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableHVT 002 New Lane Waste Transfer and Recycling

Section 5Existing SiteHVT 003 Farlington Redoubt, Portsdown Hill

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableHVT 004 Proctor & Gamble


HVT 005 Solent Road, Havant


HVT 006 / HVT 010 Sites at Harts Farm Way, Havant

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableHVT 008 Former Harts Farm Depot, Havant

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableHVT 009 Penner Road


HVT 011 Land at Solent Road Trade Park, Brockhampton

4.8 New Forest and New Forest National Park Authority

Table 16 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in New Forest


Section 7Other nominated sitesNFP 001Giddings Sawmill Site (New Forest National Park)

Section 5Existing SiteNFP 002 Former MoD Depot, Fawley (New ForestNational Park)

Section 5Existing SiteNFP 003 Pound Bottom, Redlynch, Wiltshire (New ForestNational Park)

Section 5Existing SiteNFT 001 Manor Farm, Pennington

Section 5Existing SiteNFT 003 Marchwood Quarry extension, Marchwood

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableNFT 004 Downton Manor Farm Buildings



Section 9Site nominated for disposal to land (opportunitiesdependent on mineral extraction). Longer termopportunities for non-hazardous landfill.

NFT 011 Land at Verwood Road (Purple Haze)

Appendix 4Site rued outNFT 012 Ringwood STW

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableNFT 013 Fordingbridge STW, Frog Lane, Fordingbridge

Section 7Other nominated sitesNFT 016 Charleston Road, Fawley

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableNFT 020 Eling Wharf, Totton

Section 5Existing SiteNFT 021 Bury Farm, Marchwood

Section 5Existing SiteNFT 022 Blashford Processing Plant, Blashford

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableNFT 024 Eling Wharf 2, Totton (north of NFT 020)

Section 5Existing siteNFT 035 Marchwood Incinerator Site

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableNFT 036 Land adjacent to Slowhill Copse WastewaterTreatment Works, Normandy Way, Marchwood,Southampton

Section 7Other nominated sitesNFT 037 Totton Yard, Totton

Section 9Site nominated for disposal to land (opportunities fornon-hazardous landfill).

NFT 047 Blue Haze (North), Ringwood Forest

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableNFT 054 Land east of MoD Depot, Fawley

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableNFT 055 Cork's Farm, Normandy Way, Marchwood

Section 5Existing SiteNFT 060 Marchwood Quarry

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableNFT 063 Land at Dibden Bay (ABP Land)

Section 5Existing SiteNFT 064 Ambervale Farm

Section 5Existing SiteNFT 065 Tower View

Section 5Existing SiteNFT 066 Holbury/Lime Kiln Lane

Section 5Existing SiteNFT 067 Caird Avenue


NFT 068 Husbands Shipyard Site, Cracknore Lane

4.9 Portsmouth

Table 17 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Portsmouth


Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitablePCC 002 Portsmouth Main, James Callaghan Drive / Southwick Road,Ports Down

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitablePCC 003 Goldsmith Avenue, Central Southsea, Portsmouth


PCC 004 Site at Voyager Park, Portfield Road, Copnor



Section 7Other nominated sitesPCC 005 Fratton Freight Site, Portsmouth

Section 7Other nominated sitesPCC 010 Burrfields Road


PCC 011 Robinson Way, Quatremaine

Section 5Existing SitePCC 012 Port Way HWRC Site

Section 5Existing SitePCC 013 Site at Quartremaine Road


PCC 014 Site Adjacent to Military Road

4.10 Rushmoor

Table 18 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Rushmoor


Section 7Other nominated sitesRMR 001 Gold Lane, Aldershot

Section 8Sites in area of planned developmentRMR 002 Aldershot Urban Extension Site, Aldershot

Section 5Existing SiteRMR 003 Newman's Site

Section 7Other nominated sitesRMR 004 Site onHollybush Lane, North Camp (Lafarge,former Redland plant)

Section 5Existing SiteRMR 006 Hollybush Lane


RMR 007 Hawley Lane West, Hawley

4.11 Southampton

Table 19 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Southampton


Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableSCC 001Marine Parade & Belvidere Road, Belvidere, Southampton

Section 5Existing SiteSCC 002 Empress Road, Southampton

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableSCC 003 Part of Southampton Docks (ABP land)


SCC 004 Network Rail site, Beavois Park, Southampton


SCC 005 Network rail site, Mount Pleasant Road, St Lukes

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableSCC 006 Former British Rail Works, Redbridge, Southampton

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableSCC 007 Test Lane South

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableSCC 008Woolston Sewage TreatmentWorks (STW), Southampton


SCC 010 Whites Wharf, Hazel Road, Woolston, Southampton



Section 5Existing SiteSCC 011 Network Rail site, Empress Road

Section 7Other nominated sites (also see TTV037)SCC 012 Land between M271 and Redbridge Lane, Nursling

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableSCC 013 Trucks Holding Site, Ashley Crescent

Section 7Other nominated sitesSCC 018 Associated British Port Land, Southampton Docks areanear Millbrook

4.12 Test Valley

Table 20 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Test Valley

Studysection

Type of nominated siteSite name and nomination code

Section 5Existing SiteTTV 002 Lee Lane Recycling Plant, Nursling

Section 5Existing SiteTTV 004 Casbrook Park

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableTTV 006 Luzborough Road Depot

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableTTV 012 Long term car park, Shephers Spring Lane,Andover

Section 7Other nominated sitesTTV 013 Foxcotte Lane, Andover

Section 5Existing siteTTV 022 Recycling site at Bunny Lane, Timsbury

Section 5Existing siteTTV 024 Thruxton Airfield, Thruxton

Section 5Existing siteTTV 026 Ashfield Sawmill

Section 9Site nominated for disposal to land (opportunities fornon-hazardous landfill).

TTV 027 Squabb Wood

Section 5Existing siteTTV 028 Site near Longparish, of off the A303,Andover

Section 6Nominated sites currently allocated for employment usesTTV 029 Land adjacent to Abbey Park Site, Romsey

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableTTV 030 Site adjacent to Yokesford Hill Industrial Park,Belbins

Section 7Other nominated sitesTTV 037 Land South of Brownhill Way, Nursling

Section 7Other nominated sitesTTV 038 Site at Dunwood Nurseries

Section 5Existing SiteTTV 039 Hunts Farm Sandpit

4.13 Winchester

Table 21 Sites identified/ nominated for waste management facilities in Winchester


Section 5Existing SiteWCC 002 Pegham Industrial Park, Unit D LaveysLane, Titchfield



Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableWCC 003 Micheldever Mill, Overton Road,Micheldever

Section 5Existing SiteWCC 004Otterbourne Incinerator Site, Otterbourne

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableWCC 005 Land on Sheep Pond Lane, Droxford

Section 8Sites in area of planned developmentWCC 006 Land West of Waterlooville

Appendix 4Nominated sites considered less suitableWCC 007 Bishop's Sutton Chipping Depot,Northside Lane

Section 5Existing SiteWCC 008 Botley Depot, Botley

Section 7Other nominated sitesWCC 014 Micheldever Station

Section 7Other nominated sitesWCC 015 Hydro Chafer, Larkwhistle Road,Micheldever

Section 7Other nominated sitesWCC 018 Bishops Waltham Depot

Section 7Other nominated sitesWCC 019 Winnall Down Farm

Section 8Sites in area of planned developmentWCC 020 North of Whitley MDA, Winchester


This document can be made available in large print, on audio media, in Braille or in some other languages. For further information, please contact Planning Policy in the County Planning group: Telephone: 0845 603 5634 or 01962 845517 Email: [email protected] Write to: Planning Policy County Planning Economy, Transport & Environment Department Hampshire County Council Floor 1, Elizabeth II Court West Winchester SO23 8UD Internet: www.hants.gov.uk/county-planning _______________________________________________________________________

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.hants.gov.uk/county-planning

assessment of sites and areas for waste management facilities in

Documents