asset mgmt ppt_07-14_final_v3

21

Upload: sharif-abou-sabh-pe

Post on 22-Jan-2018

89 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3
Page 2: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

Today’s Presenters

• Sharif Abou-Sabh

2

Page 3: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Success

3

Page 4: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

Chicago Transit Authority

4

Page 5: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

Why Culture Management? HNTB's experience with transportation agencies: • Strategic asset management is a long range capital

project planning function that requires shared goals and interaction between departments that handle finance, operations, engineering and maintenance.

• Agency mission (safe and reliable movement of

people and goods) does not include “optimization of costs (capital and user based) to sustain the operating infrastructure”.

• This cultural change must be addressed first,

otherwise any attempt to implement asset management, and worse yet, purchase EAM software, is doomed.

5

Page 6: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

Port Authority Asset Management Needs

PATH Example – State of Good Repair (SGR) Projects

Data Needed Alternatives Assessment

Engineering Evaluation

Short Term Repairs (“Patching”)

Inspection

Testing

Long Term Repairs (Rehab)

History of Repairs

Rate of Deterioration

Replacement

Remaining Life

Future Repair Cycles

Future Repair Costs

Who Is

Responsible for Data?

• PATH Dept. • QAD • Design • Construction

Who is best

positioned to collect/provide

data on a regular basis?

6

Page 7: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

Port Authority Asset Management Needs PATH Example – State of Good Repair (SGR) Projects

Data Needed Alternatives Assessment

Engineering Evaluation

Short Term Repairs (“Patching”)

Inspection

Testing

Long Term Repairs (Rehab)

History of Repairs

Rate of Deterioration

Replacement

Remaining Life

Future Repair Cycles

Future Repair Costs

Who Is

Responsible for Data?

• PATH • QAD • Design • Construction

Who is best

positioned to collect/provide

data on a regular basis?

Focus on Safety with low operation impact

7

Page 8: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

Port Authority Asset Management Needs TB&T Example – GWB 244.022 Upper Level Steel Rehabilitation

Figure 10.1: Life Cycle Cost Components

*Steel Repair years 3, 6 & 9 based on current repair ratesDeck Replacement includes miscellaneous steel repairs, joint replacement and wearing surface replacement.Joint replacement and wearing surface replacement every ten years.

Strap Pl. Clamps

Replace Deck

Steel Repair Strap Pl. clamps

Rehab.

Deck/Steel

$9.04 M $16.27 M $16.33M $29.38 MUser Costs $21.25 M $27.470 M $74.52 M

$-221.95 MPriority & Routine Repairs

Steel Repairs*

Replace Deck

Joint & WS Repl.

Steel Repair, Joint & WC

Repl.

Joint & WS Repl.

Steel Repair, Joint & WC

Repl.

$403.18 M $13.87 M $22.75 M $25.04 M

Repair (P Only)

Construction Cost $46.18 M $59.70 M*

Construction Cost $53.67 M $63.39 M* $403.18 M $22.75 M $25.04 M $-221.95 M

$8.20 M

Repair (P&R)

$55.45 M $9.17 M

$12.42 M $0.46M

User Costs

Replacement

Construction Cost

$4.54 M

$0.62 M

Replace Deck

$300.00 M $10.32 MJoint & WS

Repl.

$6.16 M

Steel Repair, Joint & WC

Repl.

$16.93 M

$100.14 MUser Costs

Rehabilitation

$1.97 MSteel

RepairSteel Repair, Clamps, Jnt &

WS Repl.

$97.29 MConstruction Cost

$13.87 M

$-492.43 MJoint & WS

Repl.Steel Repair, Joint & WS

Repl.

Joint & WS Repl.

$33.65 MJoint & WS

Repl.Steel Repair, Joint & WC

Repl.

$18.63MJoint & WS

Repl.

$30.58 M$18.63 M$19.32 M $7.56 M $547.53 M

Steel Repairs*

Replace Deck

Priority & Routine Repairs

$16.27 M

Steel Repair, Joint & WC

Repl.

$9.04 M

Joint & WS Repl.

User Costs $23.61 M $30.520 M $74.52 M

$10.17 M

$16.33M

$18.36 M

$14.80 M

Steel Repair, Joint & WC

Repl.

$29.38 M

Joint & WS Repl.

$14.95 M

$30.58 M

$16.55 M

8

Page 9: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

Port Authority Asset Management Needs TB&T Example – GWB 244.022 Upper Level Steel Rehabilitation

Scheme Duration Months

Construction Cost (2008 $)

Project Cost

(2008 $)

PW – 50 Yr LCCA

(2008 $)

50 Yr Sum of

User Costs

Rehabilitation (20 Year Life) 20 $ 100 M $170 M $230M $160 M

Replacement (50-70 Year life) 48 $ 300 M $510 M $315 M $110 M

Priority and Routine Repairs (Not Recommended)

24 $ 55 M $85 M $300 M $200 M

Priority Repairs Only

(Not Recommended) 24 $ 45 M $75 M $285 M $190 M

Table 1a: Comparison of Construction Duration, Construction Cost and User Costs

9

Page 10: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

EAM Benefits

• 28.3% increase in maintenance productivity

• 20.1% reduction in equipment downtime

• 19.4% savings in lower material costs

• 17.8% reduction in maintenance and repairs

• A reasonable expectation is to see a 5% to 15% reduction in maintenance budget with potential of a 20% to 40% reduction within 6 to 36 months of EAM implementation

Source: A.T. Kearney’s and Industry

10

Page 11: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

EAM Applications

11

Supporting the Entire Asset Lifecycle

Page 12: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

Driving Performance-based Infrastructure Management

12

Page 13: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

EAM Case Study - NJTA

13

Page 14: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

EAM Case Study - MNR

14

Infrastructure Management Metro North Railroad – Bridge Management System • 2010 FRA Regulations for RR bridge

management and inspections • Modern, “clean slate” to BMS; web-based and

real-time • Extremely user friendly; desktop web (core

app), and agnostic mobile solution (inspection app); client configurable; integration with leading vendors; scalable to other assets; cloud-based (cost savings)

Page 15: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

EAM Case Study – Iowa DOT

15

Infrastructure Management Iowa DOT – Bridge Management System

Instead of using the traditional “worst first” approach, Iowa DOT is leveraging their bridge management system to make logical, risk-based decisions regarding necessary bridge replacements.

Page 16: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

Incorporating EAM Current Process

Build on an established two-year-cycle process?

QAD

Consultant Performs Inspection and

Prepares Report

PATH

E/A Design

QAD

Consultant Performs Inspection and

Prepares Report

E/A Design

AM Appendix: Consultant Adds

Deterioration Trends, Completed Construction

(since last report), Remaining Life Forecast,

etc.

PATH

20

Page 17: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

MAP-21

• MAP-21: Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century – 2-year Surface Transportation Bill – Signed July 6, 2012 / Effective October 1, 2012

• Sets a national goal for all transportation infrastructure to be in a state of good repair: – Transit – Highways – Bridges

• Asset Management Plan Requirements

– Must cover bridge and pavement assets – Specific objectives for condition and risk

• Penalties imposed for missing objectives and targets

21

Page 18: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

Guidance/Best Practices

22

Page 19: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

EAM Benefits

23

Page 20: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

Next Steps

• What are the cultural challenges? • Determine what works and how? • Workshop?

Don’t Let the Tail Wag The Dog - The Tail is the Software

24

Page 21: Asset Mgmt PPT_07-14_FINAL_v3

Q&A

25