assignment #16 final project adult instructional program ... · heather bayne ate 656 instructional...
TRANSCRIPT
Heather Bayne ATE 656 Instructional Planning for Adult Populations
Instructor: Dr. Feon Smith August 2, 2015
Assignment #16 Final Project Adult Instructional Program Plan
Portfolio
TECHINTEGRATION TRAINING SESSION
1
Table of Contents Proposal Paper ............................................................................................................................................. 2
Bio Sketch ................................................................................................................................................. 2
Organization ............................................................................................................................................. 3
Targeted Audience, Purpose, Description of the Course and Conference ............................................. 3
Needs Analysis Instrument .......................................................................................................................... 4
Program Ideas ........................................................................................................................................... 4
Needs Analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 6
Prioritizing Program Ideas (Alternative Intervention Document) .............................................................. 7
Prioritizing Program Ideas ........................................................................................................................ 7
Program Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................................. 7
Program Format ....................................................................................................................................... 8
Program Schedule ........................................................................................................................................ 9
Program Schedule .................................................................................................................................... 9
Program Staff Needs ................................................................................................................................ 9
Instructional Plan Outline for the Training ................................................................................................ 11
Instructional Plan: Learning Objectives ................................................................................................. 11
Instructional Plan: Instructional Techniques ......................................................................................... 12
Instructional Plan: Resources................................................................................................................. 13
Instructional Plan: Assessment .............................................................................................................. 13
Transfer of Learning ............................................................................................................................... 14
Program Evaluation Instrument ................................................................................................................ 17
Program Evaluation ................................................................................................................................ 17
Recommendations & Communicating Results ...................................................................................... 19
Program Budget .......................................................................................................................................... 19
Program Budget and Cost Reduction Plan ............................................................................................ 19
Promotional Material Document ............................................................................................................... 20
Marketing Plan ....................................................................................................................................... 20
Coordinating Facilities and Onsite Events ............................................................................................. 22
References .................................................................................................................................................. 23
2
Proposal Paper
Bio Sketch Heather Bayne is a teacher for the Marion County Adult and Community Education
Center located in Fairmont, WV. She received her bachelor’s degree from Fairmont State
University Arts and Education in Social Studies 5-Adult, and later received her Technology
Integration Specialist Credential from Marshall University. Heather is currently attending
Marshall University and is seeking to obtain her master’s degree in Adult Education.
Throughout her career in adult education Heather continually strives to increase her
knowledge of adult education. She has done this by becoming an active member in the West
Virginia Adult Education Association (WVAEA). She has been a member of this organization
since 2009 where she has, on a yearly basis, attended adult education conferences to educate
herself on new teaching trends in adult education. She was then asked by the WVAEA leaders to
become a member of the West Virginia State Curriculum team in 2013. Her role on this
committee is to help develop adult education curriculum for the state as well as play an active
role in training adult educators. Through here role as a trainer she was then asked to be a
member of the West Virginia Technology Quest Team. She and the team provide leadership,
staff development, and instructional support to all instructional and administrative staff.
Develops and offers state wide instructional technology education for teachers and
administrative staff. Assists in the development and implementation of curriculum and
technology integration projects. Provides instructional staff with the essential support needed to
complete technology-based instructional management and productivity functions.
Heather is currently developing and designing the new West Virginia Adult Education
Technology website that will be utilized by adult education teachers and staff throughout the
3
state. When Heather isn’t working on her projects she takes an active role in her church and is
the vice president of her church women’s volunteer group.
Organization The West Virginia Adult Education Association (WVAEA), Inc. supports the
development of life-long learning in West Virginia by unifying interested individuals and
groups; encouraging participation in local, state, and national conferences; and taking an
advocacy role in adult education legislation. Membership is open to all institutions, businesses,
organizations, students, and individuals interested in the field of adult education and literacy
(Killion, 2015). The West Virginia Technology QUEST Team are members of the WVAEA
consisting of five Technology Integration Specialists who create technology curriculum together
to train adult educators who are members of the WVAEA. Each member of the team has an area
of technology that they specialize in to form an overall cohesive group. I am a member of both
the WVAEA as well as a member of the Technology QUEST Team. My role in the group is an
advisor where I advise the group on what new technologies are up and coming, and whether
these technologies should or should not be integrated into the training curriculum. I specialize in
web 2.0 tools as well as designing and maintaining the West Virginia Adult Education website.
Targeted Audience, Purpose, Description of the Course and Conference The adult education instructional program that I would like to create is called
TechIntegration. The Technology Quest Team has decided that we would like to develop a
training (TechIntegration) for the WVAEA Fall Conference where we teach adult education
instructors specific web 2.0 tools that they can integrate into their lessons and classrooms. We
will be using the SAMR (Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition) model to
4
help train teachers as well as using ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education)
standards. Participants will be engaged in hands on learning where they will utilize the new web
2.0 tools that is being introduced to them. As part of this training participants will be asked to
complete a follow up activity where they will learn about twenty-three more web 2.0 tools as
they complete the 23 Things Module. We have decided as a team to launch this training session
at the WVAEA Fall Conference because this is the one time of the year that all West Virginia
adult basic education instructors are in attendance and we can present to our targeted audience on
a mass scale.
Needs Analysis Instrument
Program Ideas In researching for this training we have come across adult education programs who are
using the SAMR Model as well the ISTE standards for technology integration. We are following
models from an adult education group in Arizona, South Carolina, and West Virginia. Those in
West Virginia who specifically influenced us was Bodie Fulford and Lori Whitt from the state
education department. They used the 23 Things model from ISTE standards to train West
Virginia Technology Integration Specialists (TIS). We felt that using this model is a great hands
on experience for our teachers to learn and experience. These sources other than WV were
found online from websites that explained their trainings.
The source of ideas for this would be from personal development. A few of us in our
group actually went through the 23 Things Module when we were becoming TIS’s. This module
was fun and creative and taught us the most about how to integrate technology into the
classroom. So we discussed integrating the 23 Things Module into our training so others can
learn how we were taught.
5
We as a group identified that at the local level as well as at the state level that our adult
educators were struggling with technology integration which is mandated by the state that they
integrate into their classrooms. So we as a technology group decided to address these issues by
teaching them how to use technology and web 2.0 tools as well as why they should integrate
them into their lessons.
Our group did use a focus group consisting of the other members of the state curriculum
team. After we generated our ideas we then presented these ideas to the larger group to
determine if our ideas was something they felt a training program should be developed for
technology integration. This was very helpful to use because as a small group whose main focus
is technology, the other groups focus was not and this gave us vital information on their feelings.
They said that because they were not “techy” they felt like the TIS’s were an elite group and
creating a training using the same methods that were used to teach us made them feel like they
could rise up to the same knowledge base as us who were “techy”.
Sample Needs Analysis Instrument:
1. Do you currently utilize technology to aid in your teaching? If yes explain what type of
technology you use and how you use it to aid in your teaching.
2. Do you use technology currently to aid you in teaching subjects you are not comfortable
teaching? If yes please explain the technology that you are using and how it helps you.
6
Needs Analysis Needs Analysis Instrument for Focus Group:
3. How long have you been with West Virginia Adult Basic Education?
4. What do you specialize in teaching?
5. Do you currently utilize technology to aid in your teaching? If yes explain what type of
technology you use and how you use it to aid in your teaching.
6. Do you use technology currently to aid you in teaching subjects you are not comfortable
teaching? If yes please explain the technology that you are using and how it helps you.
7. What skills do you feel like you are lacking in technology when trying to use a new
technology tool?
8. Does you utilize your assigned TIS to help you when you are having issues integrating
technology into your classroom? If no why?
7
Prioritizing Program Ideas (Alternative Intervention Document)
Prioritizing Program Ideas If participants needs are not being met during the training session then the groups is
prepared to adjust their teaching styles to accommodate the participant needs. A PowerPoint
presentation will be created and posted on the learning management system Schoology course
for participants to access when they are working on their follow-up assignments. The
PowerPoint is also used to in case of Internet issues that are unforeseen. The PowerPoint will
have all examples included so participants can see how tools are utilized. If the needs of the
participants are not being met when participants are working on their follow-up assignments than
the alternative intervention that our group has created is the West Virginia TIS Website where
participants can go to learn from West Virginia Adult Education TIS’s and how we use the web
2.0 tools in our adult education classrooms that we are teaching them in the TechIntegration
training. This website is still being developed but the video tutorials of the web 2.0 resources
pages is complete.
(Alternative Strategy)To access this website go to: http://www.wvadulted.org/video-
tutorials.html
Program Goals and Objectives As a part of WIOA (Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act) our goals for
TechIntegration include:
Goal Statement One:
To teach adult educators how to utilize web
2.0 tools to help determine student’s
employability skills as well as how to
integrate these tools to prepare students for
employment.
Program Objectives:
To provide participants with web 2.0 tools that are
specifically designed to aid in determining student’s
employability skills as well as how to use these
tools to help students gain the necessary skills they
need to obtain employment.
SMART Objective One:
By the end of the training adult educators will be
able to access and utilize web 2.0 tools with 90%
8
accuracy that will help determine student’s
employability skills as well as how to integrate
these tools in their lessons with 100% accuracy to
help prepare students for employment.
Goal Statement Two:
To assist adult educators in learning how to
integrate web 2.0 tools to aide in guiding
students in career exploration as well as
using web 2.0 tools to develop career
portfolios.
Program Objectives:
To provide participants with web 2.0 tools that will
assist students in exploring and determining goals
that they set in career exploration. Teachers will
also learn how to use web 2.0 tools to help students
understand how and why they should build career
exploration portfolios.
SMART Objective Two: By the end of the training adult educators will have
been assisted in learning how to integrate web 2.0
tools that aide in guiding students in career
exploration as well as using these tools to develop
career portfolios with 100% accuracy.
Goal Statement Three:
To aide adult educators who are seeking new
technology tools to assist their adult students
seeking to acquire their high school
equivalency diploma to improve their FFL
(Federal Functioning Level).
Program Objectives:
To provide participants with web 2.0 tools to help
students increase their FFLs. Participants will use
these tools and provide evidence of how they used
these tools by creating a blog with their artifacts
and how each artifact can be used to help students
increase their FFLs.
SMART Objective Three:
By the end of the training participants will have
been provided the web 2.0 tools necessary to help
increase student FFLs by at least two grade levels.
Participants will also demonstrate 100%
understanding of these web 2.0 tools by creating a
blog to post their web 2.0 artifacts to be completed
in six weeks after the training.
Program Format The format of TechIntegration will be a hands on collaborative learning and the reason
our group has decided to format this training like this is because we feel the more participants
can see, do, and work together to complete a task the better they will remember when they
9
complete their follow up assignments. We have designed the training where participants in the
morning will be learning the material and practicing with the presenters and then in the afternoon
participants will have an opportunity to work together in starting their follow up assignments.
This gives the presenters an opportunity to observe participants to check for participant
understanding as well as obtain feedback from participants, and allow presenters to assist
participants who might be struggling.
Program Schedule
Program Schedule
8:00-8:15 a.m.
Doors open participants find seating and
get their prepared to begin
8:15-8:30 a.m.
Welcome participants and purpose and
objectives for the TechIntegration Training
8:30-9:45 a.m.
SAMR Model of Technology Integration
Small Group sessions practice SAMR
9:45-10:05 a.m.
Refreshment break and time for
networking
10:05-11:45 a.m.
What are web 2.0 tools and how can they
be utilized and integrated into the adult
education classroom?
23 Things Module
11:45 a.m.-12:30 p.m. Lunch break
12:30-1:30 p.m.
Collaborative work session on 23 Things
Module (Transfer of learning)
Participant/Instructor Q&A (Observation)
1:30-2:00 p.m. Follow-up Activities and dismissal
Program Staff Needs
Criteria
Name and role of
instructional staff members
Why I believe the staff
members chosen will meet
the criteria appropriate
for their roles
Content Knowledge Heather Bayne-Technology
Integration Specialist
Nick Northup-Technology
Integration Specialist
Both staff members created
the content for the training
and have done extensive
research on SAMR Model
and 23 Things Module
10
Competence in the Process of
Instruction
Heather Bayne-Technology
Integration Specialist
Nick Northup-Technology
Integration Specialist
Both staff members are
adult education teachers and
have done many trainings
individually as well as team
teaching.
Ability to respond effectively to
the background and experience
of the participants
Heather Bayne-Technology
Integration Specialist
Nick Northup-Technology
Integration Specialist
Both staff members are
adult education teachers and
all participants of the
training will be adult
education teachers so the
staff members will be able
to respond to and understand
the background and
experiences of the
participants
Belief that caring for learners
matters
Heather Bayne-Technology
Integration Specialist
Nick Northup-Technology
Integration Specialist
Both staff members are
passionate about adult
education and understand
the needs of participants.
Both want the learners to
walk away having a positive
and fun learning experience.
Credibility Heather Bayne-Technology
Integration Specialist
Nick Northup-Technology
Integration Specialist
Both staff members have
been Technology Integration
Specialists for three years,
and both have trained and
mentored adult educators
throughout the state in
technology and are very
well known to other adult
educators.
Enthusiasm and Commitment Heather Bayne-Technology
Integration Specialist
Nick Northup-Technology
Integration Specialist
Both staff members are very
passionate about technology
and each continually seek to
educate themselves on
cutting edge trends in
technology and adult
education.
Personal Effectiveness Heather Bayne-Technology
Integration Specialist
Nick Northup-Technology
Integration Specialist
Both staff members are very
down to earth people yet
very knowledgeable about
technology. They
continually seek to help
others in any way that they
can. They are quick to think
out of the box when
11
teaching participants who
are not grasping concepts.
Enterprise Knowledge Heather Bayne-Technology
Integration Specialist
Nick Northup-Technology
Integration Specialist
Both staff members are
themselves employed as
adult education instructors
and are volunteer trainers.
They have a full
understanding of the
participant’s jobs and
programs because they also
work for the same
organizations.
Ability to Teach from the Heart
and Spirit, as Well as the Mind
Heather Bayne-Technology
Integration Specialist
Nick Northup-Technology
Integration Specialist
Both staff members have
done the same trainings they
are asking participants to do,
so they understand how to
go about learning this new
information because they
have experienced it
themselves.
Skills in using technology
effectively
Heather Bayne-Technology
Integration Specialist
Nick Northup-Technology
Integration Specialist
Because both staff members
are technology integration
specialists they are
extremely proficient in using
technology as well as
teaching others how to use
the technology.
Instructional Plan Outline for the Training
Instructional Plan: Learning Objectives Objective One: The adult educator participants will demonstrate employability web 2.0 tools
and resources when provided with criteria to make a blog to document their understanding of the
employability tools with 98% accuracy.
Objective Two: The adult educator participants will evaluate career readiness web 2.0 tools
when provided with a list of career readiness websites by brief responses to evaluate how these
resources can be utilized in their classroom.
12
Objective Three: The adult educator participants will apply knowledge of web 2.0 tools by
creating a blog with artifacts of the new tools with 98% accuracy.
Instructional Plan: Instructional Techniques In evaluating learner characteristics we as a group are creating a PowerPoint presentation
that will be culturally diverse. We are doing this because it is important to represent diverse
experiences because each one of our participants bring their own experiences to this training. By
using a collaborative approach to instruction participants can then share their own experiences
with each other to create a richer learning atmosphere. Three learning techniques that we will be
utilizing in our training are Circle of Voices which is where participants have their own moment
of reflection then in groups each person speaks about their thoughts on a topic then the group as
a whole moves into an open conversation. The next learning technique is the Post It Wall when
participants are working on their assignments in a group or as individuals participants that have
questions or comments can post it on the designated wall, which for this session will be a web
2.0 tool that they can utilize in their own classroom called Padlet. This way the trainers can
answer participant questions quickly and effectively and all participants will have access to the
information given from the trainers on this website which will also be posted on the Schoology
site. And the third learning technique will be Flipping the Classroom, which is a method of
teaching that puts the learning into the students hands. We will have resource videos and
activities that we want our teachers to learn and do and we send them to these assignments then
when the group is done we have a discussion about what they learned, where it is student driving
the questions and leading the conversation while the presenters are there to mediate. This is a
method that we want our teachers to utilize in their classrooms and this is a great way to have
them experience what we want them to do.
13
Instructional Plan: Resources The first resource we have decided to use is a book called Training From the Back of the
Room! This book has given us many different ideas on how to train our participants, primarily
hands on activities that will engage them in learning new skills.
Bowman, S. L. (2009). Training From the Back of the Room! 65 Ways to Step Aside and Let Them Learn.
San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
The second source we have decided to use is a website called Kathy Schrock’s Guide to
Everything Resources to support the SAMR Model. Kathy Schrock has compiled multiple
resources to help the program planners in creating the TechIntegration training session. This
website is also a tool that we will be sharing with our participants so they have access to all the
resources that Kathy has shared.
Website: http://www.schrockguide.net/samr.html
The third resource that we will be utilizing is a website created by Adam Bellow called
EduTecher. This website is constantly updated with new web 2.0 tools that teachers can utilize
in their classrooms. We decided to use this website as a resource for us to explore tools to
incorporate into the 23 Thing Module, as well as sharing this website to participants as a
resource that they can utilize to find new web 2.0 tools.
Website: http://www.edutecher.net/index.php
Instructional Plan: Assessment The first assessment technique that we will be using is a reflective journal. When
participants are doing their follow up assignment we will be asking them to reflect when they
have completed a grouping of assignments. The desired learning outcome for this assessment is
changing attitudes and feelings towards technology. The second assessment technique
participants will be asked to create a portfolio of their work. Portfolios provide direct evidence
14
of participants work when completing the 23 Things Module. The learning outcome of the
portfolio is acquiring knowledge, changing attitudes about technology, changing their belief that
they can utilize technology, and changing their feelings overall about the use of technology and
their ability to use it in their classroom.
The nine indicators of assessment include:
1. Are they of high quality?
2. Are they appropriate for the targeted learning outcomes?
3. Are they practical and efficient to use? Are they fair and can they account for individual
and cultural differences?
4. Do they appeal to their professional judgement and intuition about its usefulness?
5. Will they be seen as credible and user-friendly by the learners?
6. Are they going to turn into a self-inflicted chore for instructors and the participants?
7. Have instructors planned enough time to use them in an effective manner
8. Have instructors tried out the techniques themselves?
Transfer of Learning For the TechIntegration program there is a definite need for transfer of learning because
we are teaching them a skill. This session is designed to teach adult education teachers how to
integrate technology into their lessons by teaching them the methods of integration as well as
specific web 2.0 tools that they can easily integrate. To insure that transfer of learning is taking
place we are planning to have participants engage in follow-up activities where they have to
show evidence of their knowledge. The follow-up activity is we give them 23 web 2.0 tools that
they have to use and show evidence of their use by posting their web 2.0 artifacts onto a blog that
they create. We decided to do this activity because we have each done the activity and found
that most of our learning of web 2.0 tools came from participating in the 23 Things activity.
15
Factor Things That
Enhanced or
Inhibited
Span of Decision-
Making Control
People Who Did or
Can Assist in
Transfer
Program Participants Inhibited: Do not
have the confidence
to make any changes.
Participants do not
feel confident in
using technology in
their lessons and are
afraid they will not be
able to execute on
their own.
My level of control is
to design the program
in a way that
encourages
participants and gives
them a level of
confidence that they
can succeed on their
own. (A lot of
control)
Program Design and
Execution
Enhanced: Active
learning, including
application exercises,
is used extensively
We are planning a lot
of hands on activities
in the session as well
as in the follow up
activities to aid in
active learning.
I help to design
activities that engage
the learners so that
they have fun while
learning. (A lot of
control)
Program Content
Enhanced: Relevant,
useful, and practical
The material being
taught is relevant to
state requirements, as
well as is useful in
making processes
easier for the
teachers, and
practical to aid in the
learning process
I help to determine
what resources are
out there that are
relevant to adult
education as well as
to determine if the
tool is too
complicated to be
incorporated into the
program ( A lot of
control)
Changes Required to
Apply Learning
Inhibited: Perception
is that no real
opportunity exists to
apply what is learned.
Participants feel that
once they leave the
session that because
they have so much to
do already that they
don’t have the time to
apply what they have
learned.
I have to show
participants how
these tools are
currently being used
in adult education so
that they can see
people that they
know use these tools
so their perception of
using these tools
change (Some
control)
Regional Adult
Education
Coordinator
16
Organizational
Context
Enhanced: Innovation
and change are
viewed as positive.
Our state leaders
look at technology as
the future and
anyway that we can
impart the use of
technology in the
classroom is
extremely positive
On my technology
team we strive to
come up with cutting
edge trends to
incorporate into our
training sessions so
that the incorporation
of technology is
viewed in a positive
light (Little control)
WV Adult Education
Curriculum Team
State Adult Education
Directors
Community and
Societal Forces
Enhanced: Key
leaders are highly
supportive
Our state adult
education director is
a member of the
technology team and
encourages new ways
of imparting
technology into adult
education
By showing our
leaders what
technology can do it
helps to gain their
support so we as
technology leaders
can continually learn
and seek out
opportunities to learn.
(Little control)
WV Adult Education
Director
We chose to reflect upon the components and give explanations so that we can decide
what components should or should not be added. Some components that are added are
mandatory while others are wants and we think about how each component that we want added
to the program is valid to adult education. For during the program we want as many visual aids
as possible so that participants can see examples as well as recreate what they have seen to
increase their retention. And after the program we need to be able to observe participants to
insure that the transfer of learning has taken place, and if there is a certain area that the transfer
has not taken place then we can make adjustments to the program as necessary.
People Involved Strategy for Before
Program
Strategy for During
Program
Strategy for After
Program
Program Planners Reflect upon the
components and
explain why
Use of Visuals
incorporate visual
aids into the
Observation of
participants after to
ensure the transfer
17
components
should/should not
be added
program to increase
retention
of learning, and
make modifications
to program where
needed
Instructors or
Facilitators
Develop
application-
oriented objectives
Answer “What’s in
it for me?”
Give individualized
feedback
Learners Connect with peers
prior to training
Set goals for future
applications of the
materials being
taught
Review training
content and
maintain contact
with peers
Work Supervisors Ensure a positive
learning
environment for
participants
Prevent
interruptions during
the training
Provide
opportunities to
practice new skills
and to encourage
the use of the new
skills
Program Evaluation Instrument
Program Evaluation WV Adult Education Director will be sent a memo of our timeline for the evaluation as
well as the purpose of the evaluation. Our group leader will be responsible for designing and
implementing the evaluation. The purpose of the evaluation is to determine if the skills that have
been taught are being utilized in the participant’s classrooms as well as to determine if these
tools and skills aid teachers in their everyday tasks. The area to be judged is participant’s ability
to utilize the new tools and be able to integrate the tools into their lessons.
The evaluation questions are:
1. Were participants able to apply what they have learned into their lesson plans?
2. Have participants maintained utilizing these tools after their follow up activities?
3. What changes can the technology team make to better help adult education teachers
integrate technology into their classrooms?
18
Evidence is supplied by the participants, there is no evidence currently available. This
evaluation is objective based. Participants learning goals, changes in their teaching strategies,
and how they choose to incorporate technology is the main focus of the evaluation. Four types of
data collection techniques will be used; observation, interviews, portfolios, and surveys.
Observations will be done during the formal instruction as well as after the instruction;
interviews will be during and after the learning as individual and group interviews; portfolios
will be used after the formal learning as a summative assessment; and surveys will be given
when participants have completed at the very end of completing all other evaluations The data
collected will be qualitative data which will be analyzed from participant interviews to check for
consistency and patterns. Qualitative data from the surveys will be analyzed to compare
participant experiences. Participants will be able to demonstrate at the end of the program that
they have acquired at least 80% of knowledge of the tools and skills they have acquired. At least
75% of the participants will complete their portfolios and are able to demonstrate the tools and
skills that they have acquired. Timeline for qualitative evaluation:
1. Interviews of participants in a group setting will be conducted during the learning session
to determine if the majority of participants understand material.
2. Observations of participants will be done in the formal learning environment to determine
if individuals/group is acquiring the knowledge of the new tools and skills.
3. Portfolios will be made as a follow-up to determine if the transfer of learning has
occurred.
4. Surveys will be given after all evaluation methods have been completed to determine if
participants feel that the transfer of learning has occurred.
19
There is no budget for the evaluation (excluding instructor costs). Monitoring and judgement
making is completed by the state adult education director, technology team, and curriculum
team. Findings from the evaluations are made by curriculum team as well as technology team.
Recommendations are made by both teams and an action plan is then created to make any
necessary changes to the program.
Recommendations & Communicating Results The recommendations from this training will occur after the training has been
administered. Participants will be given a program evaluation which will be on the Likert Scale
as well as short answers. The results from the program evaluation will be reviewed by the state
curriculum team and recommendations for changes will be made based on participant
experiences and suggestions. Changes will also be made by trainers after the training has been
administered depending on what they felt needed to be changed do to any unforeseen outcomes.
Program Budget
Program Budget and Cost Reduction Plan
Program Budgets for Estimating Expenses and Income
Budget Items Expenses
Copying $500.00
Supplies $100.00
Income Source Amount of Income/Subsidy
RESA 3 $600.00
Total Income: $600.00
My budget and income sources are inline. Each training session is given $600.00 for
their training by RESA 3. That is the only income for the training that I know of because all of
the budgeted items are provided by the WVAEA so there is very little expenses that are incurred.
20
Cost Reduction Strategies:
Strategies Reasons for Choosing This
Strategy Cut down the material to be copied The material that was cut down can be
posted on the learning management
system along with other additional
handouts.
Have participants create digital examples
instead of examples that might use
markers and presenter tablets
This way participants can practice what
they are learning (technology) and the
cost of supplies will go down.
Promotional Material Document
Marketing Plan TechIntegration will be marketed through the WVAEA on their website as well as in
their catalog of training offerings. The technology team will have a flier of the training to market
in the different regions of West Virginia. Below is the flier:
21
22
Coordinating Facilities and Onsite Events
Meeting rooms: General sessions, breakout rooms, social and entertainment areas
X Size Multiple room sizes to accommodate large and small
groups
X Appearance Rectangle and Round tables with wheeled chairs
X Lighting Adjustable
X Décor Solid walls with beige color
X Furnishings Tables are movable and they will accommodate to
session (round or rectangle tables)
Checklist for Selecting Facilities- Camp Dawson, Preston County WV
Availability of program dates
1st choice Oct. 5 2015
2nd choice Oct. 6 2015
3rd choice Oct. 7 2015
Other
Location Camp Dawson, Preston County WV
X
Good transportation access(plane,
car,
ground transportation)
Participants will travel by car
X Participant appeal
Accommodations and
conference rooms are very
nice
X
Safe and secure (lighting, security
staff)
Located on an Army base
ample security
X Ease of parking
X
Affordable for the program budget
and/ or for participants.
Individual participants will
pay their lodging and
conference fee; WVAEA will
pay for facility
23
References Caffarella, R. S., & Daffron, S. R. (2013). Planning Programs for Adult Learners: A Practical Guide: Third
Edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Killion, E. (2015). Home. Retrieved from West Virginia Adult Education Association, Inc.:
http://www.wvaea.org/