astatisticalanalysisofmpecdt.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/thomas_poster... ·...

1
A statistical analysis of Tropical Cyclone genesis Thomas Patrick Leahy [email protected] Introduction The genesis of tropical cyclones refers to the initialisation of a tropical cyclone in the atmosphere. Understanding the atmospheric and oceanic factors that contribute or inhibit the development of a tropical cyclone will help improve models to predict genesis both in the current climate and in future climates. In this study we look at the cyclone-prone area of the western-North Pacific (WNP) as show in Figure 1. The aim is to predict the seasonal variation of tropical cyclone count, that is to predict the correct number of tropical cyclones not only each year but for each month of that year and to quantify our uncertainty. Data JTWC The Joint Typhoon Warning Centre is a joint US Navy - Air Force agency. It pro- vides data on tropical cyclones from 1945 to the present. For the purpose of this study we examine the period from 1991 - 2010 in the western-North Pacific. ERA Interim ERA Interim is a global at- mospheric reanalysis product developed by European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF). It pro- vides reanalysis from 1979 on many physi- cal variables at various spatial resolutions and pressure levels. Source: NASA Conclusion Using generalised linear modelling we can pre- dict with some skill the seasonal variation of tropical cyclones. We note that there is a peak in tropical cyclone activity in August that the model does not yet capture. We may need to in- clude other physical factors not yet included in the model or look at interactions between cur- rent covariates. Future Work We would next like to investigate the spatial dis- tribution of tropical cyclone genesis. Predicting the correct spatial distribution of tropical cy- clone genesis is vital for land falling cyclones and hence risk assessment. Acknowledgements Prof. Axel Gandy, Prof. Ralf Toumi. Supported by, Statistical Methodology & Analysis Generalised Linear Models (GLM) provides a flexible statistical framework in which to analyse the environmental factors that affect tropical cyclone genesis. Since we are looking counts or the number of occurrences we use a logit link function resulting in a logistic regression model. Figure 1: Genesis locations in WNP, 1991 - 2010. We looked at several models combining a some or all the environ- mental factors listed above. To check the models predictive power we used Leave-one-out cross-validation on each of the 20 years and then averaged the values for each month. We also report the Mean Squared error (MSE) for each of the models, MSE = 1 n n X i=1 ( ˆ Y i - Y i ) 2 , where Y i is the vector of observations. The atmospheric and oceanic factors that we consider are the fol- lowing: SST Sea Surface Temperature ( C ) Lat Latitude Land the percentage of land in a 1 × 1 box around the genesis point WindShear vertical Wind Shear CAPE Convective Available Potential Energy Relvor Relative Vorticity Results Model MSE SST + Lat 2.459 SSTmin3 + Lat 1.879 SSTmin3 +Lat+Land 1.751 SSTmin3 +Lat + WindShear 1.604 SSTmin3 +Lat + WindShear +CAPE 1.335 SSTmin3 +Lat + WindShear +CAPE+Relvor+Land †† 1.120 Table 1: Models and their corresponding MSE. Figure 2: Model (top); Model †† (bottom) Note. SSTmin3 refers to the SST at the same location 3 days earlier. It was found that the SST at the time and location of the tropical cyclone is affected by the presence of the cyclone itself. Using the SST at the same location 3 days previous circumvents this problem. Deviance Resid. Df Resid. Dev Pr(>Chi) Null 2618 2864.33 SSTmin3 1322.01 2611 1542.32 <2.2e-16 Lat 162.21 2602 1380.11 <2.2e-16 WindShear 322.66 2595 1057.44 <2.2e-16 CAPE 231.87 2588 825.58 <2.2e-16 Relvor 138.44 2587 687.14 <2.2e-16 Land 11.49 2584 675.65 0.009371 Table 2: ANOVA of Model ††. Figure 2 shows the improvement in the models to capture the sea- sonal variation of tropical cyclone count. The prediction somewhat follows the observations, however we note that the peak tropical cyclone activity in August is not captured. Table 2 shows the analysis of variance for model ††. The deviance and residual deviance demonstrates the quality-of-fit of the model. The residual deviance of 675.65 is the amount of the uncertainty that is unexplained by the model. By improving our model , we aim to reduce the residual deviance which may aid in obtaining a better prediction of the peak tropical cyclone season.

Upload: others

Post on 11-Sep-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Astatisticalanalysisofmpecdt.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Thomas_poster... · Astatisticalanalysisof TropicalCyclonegenesis Thomas Patrick Leahy t.leahy14@imperial.ac.uk Introduction

AstatisticalanalysisofTropicalCyclonegenesis

Thomas Patrick [email protected]

IntroductionThe genesis of tropical cyclones refers tothe initialisation of a tropical cyclone in theatmosphere. Understanding the atmosphericand oceanic factors that contribute or inhibitthe development of a tropical cyclone will helpimprove models to predict genesis both in thecurrent climate and in future climates.

In this study we look at the cyclone-prone areaof the western-North Pacific (WNP) as show inFigure 1. The aim is to predict the seasonalvariation of tropical cyclone count, that is topredict the correct number of tropical cyclonesnot only each year but for each month of thatyear and to quantify our uncertainty.

DataJTWC The Joint Typhoon Warning Centre is

a joint US Navy - Air Force agency. It pro-vides data on tropical cyclones from 1945to the present. For the purpose of thisstudy we examine the period from 1991 -2010 in the western-North Pacific.

ERA Interim ERA Interim is a global at-mospheric reanalysis product developedby European Centre for Medium RangeWeather Forecasting (ECMWF). It pro-vides reanalysis from 1979 on many physi-cal variables at various spatial resolutionsand pressure levels.

Source: NASA

ConclusionUsing generalised linear modelling we can pre-dict with some skill the seasonal variation oftropical cyclones. We note that there is a peakin tropical cyclone activity in August that themodel does not yet capture. We may need to in-clude other physical factors not yet included inthe model or look at interactions between cur-rent covariates.

Future WorkWe would next like to investigate the spatial dis-tribution of tropical cyclone genesis. Predictingthe correct spatial distribution of tropical cy-clone genesis is vital for land falling cyclones andhence risk assessment.

AcknowledgementsProf. Axel Gandy, Prof. Ralf Toumi. Supported by,

Statistical Methodology & AnalysisGeneralised Linear Models (GLM) provides a flexible statistical framework in which to analyse theenvironmental factors that affect tropical cyclone genesis. Since we are looking counts or the numberof occurrences we use a logit link function resulting in a logistic regression model.

Figure 1: Genesis locationsin WNP, 1991 - 2010.

We looked at several models combining a some or all the environ-mental factors listed above. To check the models predictive powerwe used Leave-one-out cross-validation on each of the 20 years andthen averaged the values for each month. We also report the MeanSquared error (MSE) for each of the models,

MSE =1

n

n∑i=1

(Yi − Yi)2,

where Yi is the vector of observations.The atmospheric and oceanic factors that we consider are the fol-lowing:

SST Sea Surface Temperature (◦C)Lat LatitudeLand the percentage of land in a 1◦ × 1◦ box around the genesis pointWindShear vertical Wind ShearCAPE Convective Available Potential EnergyRelvor Relative Vorticity

ResultsModel MSE

SST + Lat † 2.459SSTmin3 + Lat 1.879SSTmin3 +Lat+Land 1.751SSTmin3 +Lat + WindShear 1.604SSTmin3 +Lat + WindShear +CAPE 1.335SSTmin3 +Lat + WindShear +CAPE+Relvor+Land †† 1.120

Table 1: Models and their corresponding MSE.

Figure 2: Model † (top); Model†† (bottom)

Note. SSTmin3 refers to the SST at the same location 3 daysearlier. It was found that the SST at the time and location of thetropical cyclone is affected by the presence of the cyclone itself.Using the SST at the same location 3 days previous circumventsthis problem.

Deviance Resid. Df Resid. Dev Pr(>Chi)

Null 2618 2864.33SSTmin3 1322.01 2611 1542.32 <2.2e-16Lat 162.21 2602 1380.11 <2.2e-16WindShear 322.66 2595 1057.44 <2.2e-16CAPE 231.87 2588 825.58 <2.2e-16Relvor 138.44 2587 687.14 <2.2e-16Land 11.49 2584 675.65 0.009371

Table 2: ANOVA of Model ††.

Figure 2 shows the improvement in the models to capture the sea-sonal variation of tropical cyclone count. The prediction somewhatfollows the observations, however we note that the peak tropicalcyclone activity in August is not captured.

Table 2 shows the analysis of variance for model ††. The devianceand residual deviance demonstrates the quality-of-fit of the model.The residual deviance of 675.65 is the amount of the uncertaintythat is unexplained by the model. By improving our model , weaim to reduce the residual deviance which may aid in obtaining abetter prediction of the peak tropical cyclone season.