astrid j.a. lubeck, msc 1 jelte e. bos, phd 1,2 john f. stins, phd 1 1 research institute move,...

15
Astrid J.A. Lubeck, MSc 1 Jelte E. Bos, PhD 1,2 John F. Stins, PhD 1 1 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2 TNO Perceptual and Cognitive Systems, Soesterberg, the Netherlands Moving and still images can induce comparable amounts of postural sway, but different levels of sickness 1

Upload: beatrice-mcdonald

Post on 03-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Astrid J.A. Lubeck, MSc 1 Jelte E. Bos, PhD 1,2 John F. Stins, PhD 1 1 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam,

Astrid J.A. Lubeck, MSc1 Jelte E. Bos, PhD1,2 John F. Stins, PhD1

1 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands

2 TNO Perceptual and Cognitive Systems, Soesterberg, the Netherlands

Moving and still images can induce comparable amounts of postural sway,

but different levels of sickness

1

Page 2: Astrid J.A. Lubeck, MSc 1 Jelte E. Bos, PhD 1,2 John F. Stins, PhD 1 1 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam,

Introduction

Studies about the effect of moving images• General design experiments

1. Pre- and post measurement2. Variables:• Postural Sway• Visually induced motion sickness (VIMS)

3. Exposure to moving images

• Result– Postural sway ↑, VIMS ↑

• Are these results caused by motion?

2

Page 3: Astrid J.A. Lubeck, MSc 1 Jelte E. Bos, PhD 1,2 John F. Stins, PhD 1 1 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam,

Introduction

Research question and hypothesis

• Research question– Is motion essential for causing an increase in postural sway and

VIMS?

• Hypothesis– Motion does cause an increase in postural sway and VIMS.

• No changes in still images condition.• Changes in moving images condition.

3

Page 4: Astrid J.A. Lubeck, MSc 1 Jelte E. Bos, PhD 1,2 John F. Stins, PhD 1 1 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam,

Method

Subjects and design

• Subjects– 15 subjects– 6 males, 9 females– Mean (SD) age: 29.5 (5.9) years

• Design– Within subject design– Experimental condition: Moving images– Control condition: Still images– 2 measurements: Pre and post

4

Page 5: Astrid J.A. Lubeck, MSc 1 Jelte E. Bos, PhD 1,2 John F. Stins, PhD 1 1 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam,

Method

Images

5

Page 6: Astrid J.A. Lubeck, MSc 1 Jelte E. Bos, PhD 1,2 John F. Stins, PhD 1 1 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam,

Method

Measurements

• Postural sway– Force plate– Normal double stance

• Eyes closed– Duration: 60 seconds– Center of pressure (CoP) data

• Sway path length

• Visually induced motion sickness (VIMS)– Simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ; Kennedy et al., 1993)– Only total score

6

Page 7: Astrid J.A. Lubeck, MSc 1 Jelte E. Bos, PhD 1,2 John F. Stins, PhD 1 1 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam,

Results

Total simulator sickness scores

7

Page 8: Astrid J.A. Lubeck, MSc 1 Jelte E. Bos, PhD 1,2 John F. Stins, PhD 1 1 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam,

Results

Sway path length

8

Page 9: Astrid J.A. Lubeck, MSc 1 Jelte E. Bos, PhD 1,2 John F. Stins, PhD 1 1 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam,

Discussion

• Postural sway– Increase in SPL after exposure to both moving and still images

• VIMS– Only an increase in VIMS after exposure to moving images

• No difference in postural sway after exposure– Puzzling?

9

Puzzling results?

Page 10: Astrid J.A. Lubeck, MSc 1 Jelte E. Bos, PhD 1,2 John F. Stins, PhD 1 1 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam,

Discussion

10

2 possible explanations

Page 11: Astrid J.A. Lubeck, MSc 1 Jelte E. Bos, PhD 1,2 John F. Stins, PhD 1 1 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam,

• Wallpaper illusions – Can cause changes in postural sway (Kelly et al., 2005) – Can cause disorientation (Cohn & Lasley, 1990)

Discussion

Moved by still images

Page 12: Astrid J.A. Lubeck, MSc 1 Jelte E. Bos, PhD 1,2 John F. Stins, PhD 1 1 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam,

Discussion

Moved by a first person shooter (FPS) game

12

Page 13: Astrid J.A. Lubeck, MSc 1 Jelte E. Bos, PhD 1,2 John F. Stins, PhD 1 1 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam,

• Vection– Illusion of self-motion

• Do players experience vection or some other sensation?– Images may not contain adequate flow

• Sustained and unidirectional– Other possible mechanisms at work?

Discussion

Vection in FPS games?

Page 14: Astrid J.A. Lubeck, MSc 1 Jelte E. Bos, PhD 1,2 John F. Stins, PhD 1 1 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam,

Still images can cause an increase in postural sway but only moving images cause motion sickness.

Conclusion

Take home message

Page 15: Astrid J.A. Lubeck, MSc 1 Jelte E. Bos, PhD 1,2 John F. Stins, PhD 1 1 Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam,

(potentiële) belangenverstrengeling Geen

Voor bijeenkomst mogelijk relevante relaties met bedrijven Geen

Sponsoring of onderzoeksgeld Honorarium of andere

(financiële) vergoeding Aandeelhouder Andere relatie, namelijk …

• NWO MaGW onderzoekstalent

Disclosure of interests

Disclosure