astronomical observing techniques 2019 lecture 3

49
Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3: Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Optics Huub Rottgering [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 20-Feb-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Astronomical Observing Techniques2019

Lecture 3: Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Optics

Huub Rottgering

[email protected]

Page 2: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Content

2

1. Waves

2. Ideal Optics

3. Zernike-van Cittert Theorem

4. PSFs

5. Aberrations

Page 3: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Waves from Maxwell Equations• Maxwell equations & linear material equations:

differential equation for damped waves

∇2𝐸 −𝜇𝜀

𝑐2𝜕2𝐸

𝜕𝑡2−4𝜋𝜇𝜎

𝑐2𝜕𝐸

𝜕𝑡= 0

• 𝐸 electric field vector• Material properties:

– 𝜀 dielectric constant– 𝜇 magnetic permeability (𝜇 = 1 for most materials)– 𝜎 electrical conductivity (controls damping)

• 𝑐 speed of light• Same equation for magnetic field H

3

Page 4: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

• Linear equation: sum of solutions is also solution

• Plane wave 𝐸 = 𝐸0𝑒𝑖(𝑘∙ Ԧ𝑥−𝜔𝑡)

– 𝐸0 complex constantvector (polarization)

– 𝑘 wave vector– Ԧ𝑥 spatial location– 𝜔 angular frequency

• real electric field given by real part of E

• dispersion relation: 𝑘 ∙ 𝑘 =𝜔2

𝑐2𝑛2, 𝑛2 = 𝜇 𝜖 + 𝑖

4𝜋𝜎

𝜔• complex index of refraction 𝑛 = 𝑛 + 𝑖𝑘

• 𝐸,𝐻, 𝑘 form right-handed triplet of orthogonal vectors

Plane Waves

4

Page 5: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Snell’s law

5

Page 6: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Fresnel’s equation

• ‘snellius’ for polarized plane waves

• See: https://www.brown.edu/research/labs/mittleman/sites/brown.edu.research.labs.mittleman/files/uploads/lecture13_0.pdf

• http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/freseq.html

• Given here for completeness, will (likely) not be used further

6

Page 7: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Fractions of reflected and transmitted light

7

Page 8: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Spherical and Plane Waves• light source: collection of

sources of spherical waves

• astronomical sources: almost exclusively incoherent

• lasers, masers: coherentsources

• spherical wave originating at very large distance can be approximated by plane wave

8

Page 9: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Ideal Optics

• ideal optics: spherical waves from any point in object space are

• imaged into points in image space

• corresponding points are called conjugate points

• focal point: center of converging or diverging spherical wavefront

• object space and image space are reversible9

Page 10: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Ideal Optical System

ideal optical system transforms plane wavefront into spherical, converging wavefront

10

Page 11: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Azimuthal Symmetry

• most optical systems are azimuthally symmetric

• axis of symmetry is optical axis

Optical Axis

11

Page 12: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Locally Flat Wavefronts

• rays normal to local wave (locations of constant phase)

• local wave around rays is assumed to be infinite, plane wave

12

Page 13: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Rays

• geometrical optics works with rays only

• rays reflect and refract according to Fresnel equations

• phase is neglected (incoherent sum)13

Page 14: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Finite Object Distance

• object may also be at finite distance

• also in astronomy: reimaging within instruments and telescopes

14

Page 15: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

• Aperture stop: determines diameter of light cone from axial point on object.

• Field stop: determines the field of view of the system.

Aperture and Field Stops

15

Page 16: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Images

• every object point comes to focus in image plane

• light in image point comes from all pupil positions

• object information encoded in position, not angle

16

Page 17: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Pupils

• all object rays are smeared out over complete aperture

• light in one pupil point comes from different object positions

• object information is encoded in angle, not in position

17

image

plane

pupil

planefocal

planecollimator

camera

telescope

aperture

Page 18: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Θ

Speed of optical system described by numerical aperture (NA) or F-number:

NA=𝑛 ∙ sin 𝜃 ≈ 𝑛1

2𝐹, 𝐹 =

𝑓

𝐷

f

D

• fast optics (large NA, small F-number)• slow optics (small NA, large F-number)• f-ratio = 1/F, sometimes written as f/2.8

n

Speed/F-Number/Numerical Aperture

18

Page 19: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Fermat’s view: “A wavefront is a surface on which every point has the same OPD.”

Huygens’ view: “At a given time, each point on primary wavefront acts as a source of secondary spherical wavelets. These propagate with the same speed and frequency as the primary wave.”

The Huygens-Fresnel Principle

19

Page 20: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

A light source may exhibit temporal and spatial coherence. The coherence function Γ12 between two points (1,2) is the cross-correlation between their complex amplitudes:

The normalized representation is called the degree of coherence:

which leads to an interference pattern* with an intensity distribution of:

where

and the visibility for I1 = I2.

( ) ( ) ( )tEtE += 2112

Reminder: Coherent Radiation

( )( )

21

1212

II

=

( ) 122121 Re2 IIIII ++=

coherence partial 10

incoherent 0

coherent 1

12

12

12

=

=

*e.g., from Young’s double slit experiment

( )12=V

20

Page 21: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

( ) ( ) ( )( )

drRR

RRikrItVtV

sA 21

2121

exp −=

The Zernike-van Cittert Theorem (1)

Consider a monochromatic, extended, incoherent source As with intensity I(x,y).

Consider further a surface element dσ (dσ<<λ), which illuminates two points P1 and P2

at distances R1 and R2 on a screen.

The quantity measuring the correlation of the electric fields between P1 and P2

(for any surface element dσ at distance r) is:

Θ

21

Page 22: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

The Zernike-van Cittert Theorem (2)

Generally, the degree of coherence is then given by the Zernike-van

Cittert theorem: ( )( )

drRR

RRikrI

VV source 21

21

2

2

2

1

12

exp1)0(

−=

In words, the general Zernike-van Cittert theorem describes the relation between the degree of coherence between two points on the screen and the intensity distribution across the illuminating source As.

Frits Zernike (1888-1966) : Dutch physicist and winner of the Nobel prize for physics in 1953 for his invention of the phase contrast microscope,

22

Page 23: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

For large distances from source to screen (relative to the distance between P1 and P2 and the size of the source) we can use angular variables [x/R=α, y/R=β, Θ=(α,β), and ΔX=X2-X1] to describe the source as seen from the screen.

( ) ( )

( )

dI

dYXi

I

source

source

+−

=

2exp

)0(12

*absolute value of a complex number

The Z-vC Theorem for Large Distances (3)

Then the general Z-vC theorem simplifies (Lena p. 211) to:

For large distances, the modulus* of the degree of coherence |γ12| between two points is the modulus of the normalized Fourier transform of the source intensity distribution.

23

Page 24: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Now: calculate the complex degree of coherence for a circular source of radius r0. Let P1 be at the center of the screen and P2 at distance ρ where Θ=r0/R.

The Z-vC Theorem for a Circular Source (4)

Then the modulus of the degree of coherence for a circular source is:

( )

=

=

00 22

r

rI

( ) ( )( )

u

uJJ

1

0

01

12

22

0,0 =

==

Θ0 = angular size of circular sourceρ = distance of P2 from centerλ = wavelengthJ1 = 1st order Bessel function 24

Page 25: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Fourier Pair in 2-D: Box Function

2-D box function with r2 = x2 + y2:

=

1for 0

1for 1

2 r

rr

( )

2

2

1Jr

Fourier Transform: (1st order Bessel function J1)

Larger telescopes produce smaller Point Spread Functions (PSFs)!

Electric Field in Electric Field inTelescope Aperture: Focal plane:

25

Page 26: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

First dark ring (minimum) at:

Point Spread Function

Df

rFr

22.1or 22.1 1

11 ===

PSF often characterized by Full Width at Half Maximum(FWHM) in angular units. Airy function: FWHM=1.028 λ/D

Nyquist sampling theorem requires sampling at least every 0.5 FWHM. Airy function: at least every 0.5λ/D

26

Page 27: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Telescope Aperture Focal Plane 1

27

Page 28: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Telescope Aperture Focal Plane 2

28

Page 29: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

PSF Examplecentral obscuration,

monolithic mirror (pupil)no support-spiders

39m telescope pupil → FT = image of a point source (log scale)

29

Page 30: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

central obscuration,

monolithic mirror (pupil)

with 6 support-spiders

39m telescope pupil → FT = image of a point source (log scale)

30

Page 31: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

central obscuration,

segmented mirror (pupil)

no support-spiders

39m telescope pupil → FT = image of a point source (log scale)

31

Page 32: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Point Spread Functions

32

Page 33: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Angular Resolution: Rayleigh Criterion

Two sources can be resolved if the peak of the second source is no closer than the 1st dark Airy ring of the first source.

D

22.1sin =

33

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/Raylei.html

Page 34: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Aberrations

Aberrations are departures of the performance of an

optical system from the ideal optical system.

1. On-axis aberrations: aberrations that can be seen

everywhere in the image, also on the optical axis

(center of the image)

2. Off-axis aberrations: aberrations that are absent on the

optical axis (center of the image)

a) Aberrations that degrade the image

b) Aberrations that alter the image position

34

Page 35: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Spot Diagram

intersection of rays with image surface

35

image

surface

Page 36: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

RMS Spot Radius

• calculate rms radius of all spots from the perfect center

• provides a rough measure of image quality

• optics are virtually perfect if rms spot radius ≦ 𝜆/2D

36

Page 37: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Wavefront Error

• deviation of surface that is normal to rays and spherical reference surface (distance between red & blue line)

• often shown as grayscale image or 3D surface37

Page 38: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Aberrated Point-Spread Function

38

perfect aberrated

Page 39: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

• Reference sphere S with radius R for off-axis point P’ and aberrated wavefront W

• “Aberrated” ray from object intersects image plane at P”

• Ray aberration is P’P”

• Wave aberration is

( )r

rW

n

Rr

i

i

=Small FOV, radially symmetric wavefront W(r)

Wave and Ray Aberrations

39

ni ×QQ

Page 40: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

2

2

NA

1

22

==

F

defocused image

Usually refers to optical path difference of λ/4.

Depth of focus:

focused image

Defocus (Out of Focus)

40

Page 41: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Rays further from the optical axis have a different focal point than rays closer to the optical axis.

Spherical Aberration

41

Made with Touch Optical Design

Page 42: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Spherical Aberration: Hubble Trouble

42

Page 43: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

HST Primary Mirror Aberration

• Null corrector cancels non-spherical portion of aspheric mirror shape. Viewed from point A, combination looks precisely spherical

• Null corrector had one lens misplaced by 1.3 mm

• Manufacturer analyzed surface with other null correctors, which indicated the problem, but ignored results because they were believed to be less accurate

43

Page 44: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Variation of magnification across entrance pupil. Point sources will show a come-like tail. Coma is an inherent property of telescopes using parabolic mirrors

Coma

44

Page 45: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

From off-axis point A lens does not appear symmetrical but shortened in plane of incidence (tangential plane). Emergent wave will have a smaller radius of curvature for tangential plane than for plane normal to it (sagittal plane) and form an image closer to the lens.

Astigmatism

45

Page 46: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Only objects close to optical axis will be in focus on flat image plane. Off-axis objects will have different focal points.

Field Curvature

46

Page 47: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Distortion

47

Straight line on sky becomes curved line in focal plane

because magnification depends on distance to optical axis.

1. Outer parts have larger magnification→ pincushion

2. Outer parts have smaller magnification → barrel

Page 48: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Aberrations Summary

48

Page 49: Astronomical Observing Techniques 2019 Lecture 3

Refractive index variation with wavelength n(λ) results in focal length of lens f(λ) to depend on wavelength; different wavelengths have different foci

Chromatic Aberration

49