asx announcement mt venn emerges as a major copper …marionette shear, interpreted as a splay off...
TRANSCRIPT
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
Quarterly Report to 31 December 2017
Mt Venn emerges as a major copper-nickel-cobalt discovery
Yamarna: Mt Venn Copper-Nickel-Cobalt Discovery
▪ Phase 1 RC drilling in October discovered significant copper-nickel-
cobalt sulphide mineralisation at the Mt Venn prospect within the
Yamarna Project, WA
▪ Initial assays of up to 4.3% copper and 0.1% cobalt confirm the
potential of the Mt Venn mineralised system
▪ Wide zones of mineralisation intersected, including:
48m at 0.8% Cu, 0.2% Ni, 0.07% Co from 103m downhole
18m at 0.8% Cu, 0.1% Ni, 0.02% Co from 187m downhole
10m at 0.8% Cu, 0.2% Ni, 0.06% Co from 90m downhole
61m at 0.5% Cu, 0.2% Ni, 0.05% Co from 86m downhole
▪ Phase 2 RC and initial diamond drilling completed in late December
First diamond holes returned massive, semi-massive and
stringer sulphide mineralisation over wide intersections of +70m
Coarse grained sulphide mineralisation with distinct copper
(chalcopyrite) and nickel-cobalt (pyrrhotite) zones
Assay results due imminently (refer to page 5)
Tarmoola
▪ Soil sampling completed which identified two strong gold anomalies
associated with the Marionette and Ursus shear zones
Corporate
▪ $3.4m in cash at the end of the quarter
▪ 2,081,857 options were exercised in the quarter, raising $416,000
▪ Preliminary EIS co-funded drilling grant of $108,000 and Research
and Development refund of $155,000 received during the quarter
ASX Code: GBR
Capital Structure
Ordinary Shares: 70.5m
Unlisted Options: 36.0m
Unvested Performance Rights: 2m
Current Share Price: 28₵
Market Capitalisation: A$19.7m
Cash: A$3.4m
Debt: Nil
Board of Directors
Greg Hall
Non-Executive Chairman
Stefan Murphy
Managing Director
Murray Black
Non-Executive Director
Melanie Leighton
Non-Executive Director
Projects
Yamarna – Mt Venn
Tarmoola
Jundee South
Balagundi
Broadwood
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
2
Yamarna – Mt Venn
PHASE 1 RC
During October, Great Boulder completed its maiden RC drilling program at Mt Venn with a total of
20 reconnaissance RC holes drilled (2,868m). The drilling targeted conductors identified from a
ground-based EM survey, successfully discovering a significant new copper-nickel-cobalt sulphide
system at Mt Venn. Drilling intersected wide zones of shallow sulphide mineralisation over an
extensive strike length and open in all directions. Significant assay results from the maiden RC drill
program include:
17MVRC001
− 18m at 0.8% Cu, 0.1% Ni, 0.02% Co from 187m (downhole)
• including 2m at 1.0% Cu and 1m at 4.3% Cu
17MVRC007
− 61m at 0.5% Cu, 0.15% Ni, 0.05% Co from 86m (downhole)
• including 2m at 1.1% Cu and 12m at 0.8% Cu
17MVRC015
− 48m at 0.8% Cu, 0.2% Ni, 0.07% Co from 103m (downhole)
• including 3m at 1.3% Cu and 5m at 1.0% Cu
• including 6m at 0.7% Cu, 0.3% Ni and 0.10% Co
17MVRC017
− 15m at 0.5% Cu, 0.2% Ni, 0.05% Co from 24m (downhole)
− 16m at 0.6% Cu, 0.1% Ni and 0.04% Co from 62m (downhole)
− 10m at 0.8% Cu, 0.2% Ni, 0.06% Co from 90m (downhole)
Mineralisation is typically wide and steeply dipping to the east. There is also very little cover or
weathering profile, with fresh sulphide ore extending to surface along the central zone where the
bulk of the mineralisation has been intersected to date.
Mineralisation is copper-dominant, with distinct nickel-cobalt rich zones. Copper grades up to 4.3%
have been returned within the more chalcopyrite-rich copper zones. Copper mineralisation is
intermingled with a more nickel-cobalt rich pyrrhotite phase. The nickel and cobalt grades up to
0.3% Ni and 0.1% Co respectively within the massive sulphide zones and are much higher than
anticipated based on previous drilling.
Two holes were also drilled north of the EM survey area to test a zinc, lead and silver aircore
anomaly. 17MVRC004 was drilled under the main zinc-lead aircore anomaly and returned a highly
encouraging 2m at 2.1% Zn from 58m.
A downhole EM (DHEM) survey was completed on the available Phase 1 RC drill holes, with the
objective of identifying off-hole conductors along the main mineralised trend and to better constrain
the EM plate modelling. The results from the RC drilling and DHEM survey confirm the steep dipping,
wide nature of sulphide mineralisation at Mt Venn. These results were used to design the Phase 2
RC and initial diamond drilling program.
Exploration Activities
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
3
DIAMOND DRILLING & PHASE 2 RC
The Phase 2 RC and initial diamond drilling programs commenced in December. The drilling
focused on strike and dip extensions to the central mineralised zone as well as testing downhole EM
(DHEM) and magnetic targets along the broader Mt Venn trend.
Visual logs of the RC and diamond drilling confirm the mineralised system at Mt Venn is extremely
large. Drilling, EM and magnetic modelling have also confirmed the western magnetic trend
represents a strike extensive pyrrhotite-rich sulphide horizon which hosts copper-nickel-cobalt
mineralisation. Continuous sulphide mineralisation in the central zone has now been delineated
over 500m with multiple parallel zones of mineralisation.
Diamond drilling has provided valuable information on the size, orientation and formation of
mineralisation at Mt Venn. The separate copper and nickel-cobalt zonation seen in the RC assay
results is clearly visible in the drill core as chalcopyrite (copper) and pyrrhotite (nickel-cobalt)
mineralisation.
Diamond holes 17MVRCD008 and 018 were drilled as diamond tails off existing RC holes, targeting
DHEM conductor plates. Both diamond tails intersected sulphide mineralisation associated with the
western magnetic trend, confirming Mt Venn hosts a mineralised system over several kilometres.
Mt Venn mineralised trend based on recent diamond and RC drilling. Central zone is becoming more defined but drilling along the north and south extensions remains sparse and open
Central Zone – Previously reported drill results (red) and significant new sulphide intercepts (orange) over RTP 1VD magnetics
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
4
Diamond holes 17MVDD001 and 003 were drilled into the central zone, confirming strike continuity
and DHEM plate modelling. 17MVDD002 was designed as a wide diameter HQ metallurgical hole,
drilled from surface and planned to intersect the same wide copper and nickel-cobalt zones
previously intersected in RC drilling. Diamond holes 17MVDD001, 002 and 003 all intersected wide
zones of massive pyrrhotite, associated with nickel-cobalt mineralisation. Chalcopyrite typically
occurs as stringer, blebby and disseminated sulphide within the pyrrhotite but more concentrated
around the margins of the pyrrhotite or within structures.
17MVDD002 – Stringer chalcopyrite and
pyrrhotite mineralisation (109m)
17MVDD003 – Western copper zone with interstitial chalcopyrite
and pyrrhotite within very coarse-grained gabbro (108m)
•
17MVDD001 – Massive pyrrhotite with chalcopyrite at
105m downhole
•
17MVRCD008 – Semi-massive and stringer pyrrhotite with
chalcopyrite at 113m downhole
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
5
RC drilling intersected several offset and parallel mineralised zones striking northeast, with more
copper-bearing chalcopyrite-rich zones occurring along these structures and at the margins of the
massive pyrrhotite mineralisation. Having parallel zones of mineralisation is considered important
because it improves the overall metal endowment per vertical metre. Drilling has also shown good
continuity of mineralisation, which remains open in all directions.
ASSAYS AND METALLURGY
The slow assay turnaround has been caused by delays in the preparation and digest stage at the
laboratory, due primarily to the presence of large amounts of massive pyrrhotite in the samples.
Pyrrhotite from Mt Venn is very reactive, oxidising readily during preparation and exposure to air.
The conventional four-acid digest used for this assay method was altered to slow down the reaction.
The amended four-acid digest (replacing hydrochloric acid with hydrobromic acid) had to undergo
QAQC tests for certification, which in turn delayed the results. While a delay in assay turnaround
time is unfortunate, it is important that proper QAQC protocol is maintained during the process. All
samples are currently being processed in Perth with final assay results now expected in the first
week of February.
Once assay results are received for the metallurgical drill hole, several composite samples will be
made to test the extraction of separate copper and nickel-cobalt concentrates. Copper appears to
be predominantly hosted within chalcopyrite, while the nickel and cobalt is predominantly hosted in
pyrrhotite with minor pentlandite and pyrite. The pyrrhotite mineralisation at Mt Venn has proven to
be quite unique, containing relatively high amounts of nickel and cobalt and readily oxidises under
atmospheric conditions. This is highly favourable for the project because it shows the pyrrhotite may
be amenable to low-cost atmospheric leach. Tests will also be conducted to determine the ability to
process the nickel-cobalt concentrate into nickel and cobalt sulphate products, which are in strong
demand from the battery sector. Further information on the metallurgy test program will be provided
once the flow sheet is finalised.
NEXT STEPS
Drilling activities in the March quarter of 2018
will focus on the western Mt Venn trend north
of the east-west bounding fault that appears to
mark the southern extent of mineralisation.
Drilling on the central zone will focus on dip and
strike extensions of known mineralisation.
Drilling will also be undertaken along the 4.5km
western magnetic trend as we understand
more about the mineralised system, particularly
the remobilization of copper-bearing
chalcopyrite along structures and the margins
of the massive pyrrhotite zone.
A gravity survey over the Mt Venn intrusion,
including the Eastern mafic complex, will be
completed early in the New Year. A surface
geochemistry program and geological mapping
will be undertaken in conjunction with the
gravity survey to identify intrusions considered
more prospective for nickel sulphide
mineralisation to complement the western
copper-rich zone.
Mt Venn Igneous Complex
Eastern Mafic Complex
Great Boulder’s Yamarna project showing Mt Venn and Eastern Mafic Complexes
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
6
Tarmoola
During the quarter, Great Boulder completed a soil sampling program at the Tarmoola project,
located 40km north-west of Leonora in WA.
The program targeted an area of outcropping greenstone where previous mapping and surface
sampling identified a 2km trend of high grade gold rock chips associated with the Ursus Fault and
Marionette shear, interpreted as a splay off the Ursus Fault. The Ursus fault is a regionally
significant structure which is considered a key gold bearing structure at the +2Moz King of the Hills
gold mine.
A total of 1,022 soil samples were collected over a 200m x 25m grid, covering the prospective
Ursus-Marionette structures. The 25m spaced samples were composited into 100m lengths and
then assayed for gold and a suite of pathfinder elements consistent with hydrothermal gold
mineralisation. Zones of anomalous gold were then split back to their original 25m samples to
better define the soil anomaly for RC drill hole design. These infill soil results have highlighted two
zones of anomalous gold that will be RC drill tested.
The first target is at the intersection of the Ursus and Marionette shear and extending into the
hangingwall where elevated gold in soil (peak 76ppb Au) and rock chips (peak 23.9g/t Au) have
been returned. Elevated arsenic occurs along the Ursus Fault, indicating the presence of a
hydrothermal fluid pathway.
Target 2 has a very coherent gold in soil anomaly for approximately 1km along the Marionette
shear zone, with a peak grade of 158ppb Au return on the southernmost line making the target
open to the south. Target 2 also has a strong geochemical pathfinder association, making it a
priority target. A maiden RC drill program is anticipated to commence in late Q1.
Tarmoola soil sampling showing gold results over geology map
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
7
Jundee South
During the September quarter, Great Boulder completed a field mapping and surface sampling
program at Jundee South. Following a review of the data, Great Boulder is in the process of
designing a close-spaced auger geochemistry program for more detailed target generation ahead
of a drilling program. It is anticipated the auger program will be completed in Q1 with the drill
program in Q2 following receipt of auger results and Heritage clearance.
Other Projects
No field activities were undertaken at Balagundi or Broadwood during the quarter.
At the end of the December quarter Great Boulder had $3.4m in cash.
The following changes occurred to the issued capital of Great Boulder during the December 2017
quarter:
• Exercise of 2,081,857 options and allotment of shares
The issued share capital of the Company at 31 December 2017 is:
Class of Securities Issued Capital
Ordinary fully paid shares 70,475,857
• Quoted on the ASX 50,191,214
• Escrowed (18 Nov. 2018) 20,284,643
Unlisted Options (exercisable at $0.20 and expire 18 Nov. 2020) 36,004,893
Unlisted Performance Rights 2,000,000
Corporate
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
8
Competent Person’s Statement
Exploration information in this Announcement is based upon work undertaken by Stefan Murphy whom is a Member of the Australasian Institute of Geoscientists (AIG). Mr Stefan Murphy has sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a ‘Competent Person’ as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’ (JORC Code). Mr Stefan Murphy is Managing Director of Great Boulder and consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on their information in the form and context in which it appears.
Forward Looking Statements
This Announcement is provided on the basis that neither the Company nor its representatives make any warranty (express or implied) as to the accuracy, reliability, relevance or completeness of the material contained in the Announcement and nothing contained in the Announcement is, or may be relied upon as a promise, representation or warranty, whether as to the past or the future. The Company hereby excludes all warranties that can be excluded by law. The Announcement contains material which is predictive in nature and may be affected by inaccurate assumptions or by known and unknown risks and uncertainties, and may differ materially from results ultimately achieved.
The Announcement contains “forward-looking statements”. All statements other than those of historical facts included in the Announcement are forward-looking statements including estimates of Mineral Resources. However, forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks include, but are not limited to, copper, gold and other metals price volatility, currency fluctuations, increased production costs and variances in ore grade recovery rates from those assumed in mining plans, as well as political and operational risks and governmental regulation and judicial outcomes. The Company does not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to any “forward-looking statement” to reflect events or circumstances after the date of the Announcement, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as may be required under applicable securities laws. All persons should consider seeking appropriate professional advice in reviewing the Announcement and all other information with respect to the Company and evaluating the business, financial performance and operations of the Company. Neither the provision of the Announcement nor any information contained in the Announcement or subsequently communicated to any person in connection with the Announcement is, or should be taken as, constituting the giving of investment advice to any person.
The exploration results contained in this report were previously reported by the Company in its announcements released to ASX and listed below. The Company confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the Company’s previous announcement.
▪ Copper-Nickel-Cobalt Discovery at Mt Venn (13 November 2017) https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20171113/pdf/43p557mpvc9jwy.pdf
▪ Further Copper-Nickel-Cobalt Intersected at Mt Venn (27 November 2017) https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20171127/pdf/43pln1nlwp92z8.pdf
▪ Diamond Drilling Extends Mineralisation at Mt Venn (5 December 2017) https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20171205/pdf/43pwrp02kbmg6s.pdf
▪ More Wide Zones of Mineralisation Intersected at Mt Venn (14 December 2017) https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20171214/pdf/43q50q8r5gm03t.pdf
▪ RC Drilling Extends Central Mineralised Zone at Mt Venn (21 December 2017) https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20171221/pdf/43qc1w5fm7k07n.pdf
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
9
Appendix- JORC Code, 2012 Edition Table 1
The following table relates to activities undertaken at Great Boulder’s Tarmoola projects.
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques
• Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut
channels, random chips, or specific
specialised industry standard measurement
tools appropriate to the minerals under
investigation, such as down hole gamma
sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc).
These examples should not be taken as
limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
• Include reference to measures taken to
ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any
measurement tools or systems used.
• Aspects of the determination of
mineralisation that are Material to the
Public Report.
• In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has
been done this would be relatively simple
(eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to
obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was
pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire
assay’). In other cases more explanation
may be required, such as where there is
coarse gold that has inherent sampling
problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (eg submarine
nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed
information.
The reported results are of a focused soil programme.
The soil samples were collected at a spacing of 25m on
lines spaced 200m apart. Composite samples were
created along-line in lots of 4; with a quarter of each
original sample put into a composite bag. This provided
an initial 100m x 200m soil spacing. Upon receipt of
preliminary results an area of prospectivity was defined.
Within this area the initial 25m spaced samples were
submitted for analysis. This provided a 25m x 200m grid
within the area of prospectivity. These samples typically
weighed 0.1-0.3kg, averaging 0.2kg.
The samples were pulverised at the laboratory, with a 25g
sample digested via Aqua Regia followed by mass
spectroscopy.
The sampling techniques used are deemed appropriate
for the style of exploration.
Drilling
techniques
• Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-
hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger,
Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core
diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of
diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other
type, whether core is oriented and if so, by
what method, etc).
Not applicable as no drilling was undertaken.
Drill sample
recovery
• Method of recording and assessing core and
chip sample recoveries and results assessed.
• Measures taken to maximise sample
recovery and ensure representative nature
of the samples.
• Whether a relationship exists between
sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to
No drilling was undertaken during the field mapping
campaign.
No quantitative analysis of samples weights or condition
has been undertaken.
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
10
preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
material.
Logging • Whether core and chip samples have been
geologically and geotechnically logged to a
level of detail to support appropriate
Mineral Resource estimation, mining
studies and metallurgical studies.
• Whether logging is qualitative or
quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
channel, etc) photography.
• The total length and percentage of the
relevant intersections logged.
Qualitative moister, grainsize, hardness, colour and
sample comment was recorded for each soil sample.
Sub-sampling
techniques
and sample
preparation
• If core, whether cut or sawn and whether
quarter, half or all core taken.
• If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled,
rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or
dry.
• For all sample types, the nature, quality and
appropriateness of the sample preparation
technique.
• Quality control procedures adopted for all
sub-sampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling
is representative of the in situ material
collected, including for instance results for
field duplicate/second-half sampling.
• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to
the grain size of the material being sampled.
No drilling was undertaken during the field mapping
campaign.
All soil samples were dry. No field duplicates were taken.
Samples taken were typically between 0.1-0.3kg (soil)
with the entire sample pulverised.
All samples were submitted to ALS Minerals (Kalgoorlie)
for analyses. The sample preparation included:
Samples were weighed and pulverised such that
a minimum of 85% passed 75um (as per ALS
standards).
Analysis was undertaken for gold using a 25g
sample for digest via Aqua Regia and ICP-MS
(ALS method: Au-TL43), with multi element
analysis from the Aqua Regia digest and ICP-MS
(ALS method; ME-MS43).
Sample collection, size and analytical methods are
deemed appropriate for the style of exploration.
Quality of
assay data
and
laboratory
tests
• The nature, quality and appropriateness of
the assaying and laboratory procedures
used and whether the technique is
considered partial or total.
• For geophysical tools, spectrometers,
handheld XRF instruments, etc, the
parameters used in determining the
analysis including instrument make and
model, reading times, calibrations factors
applied and their derivation, etc.
• Nature of quality control procedures
adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates,
external laboratory checks) and whether
acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias)
and precision have been established.
• All samples were assayed by industry standard methods
through commercial laboratories in Australia (ALS
Minerals, Kalgoorlie).
• Typical analysis methods used;
Analysis was undertaken for gold using a 25g
sample for digest via Aqua Regia and ICP-MS
(ALS method: Au-TL43), with multi element
anlysis from the aqua regia digest and ICP-MS
(ALS method; ME-MS43).
• The analytical laboratories provided their own routine
quality controls within their own practices. No
significant issues were noted.
• Great Boulder did not submit any additional standards,
blanks or duplicates due to the preliminary nature of the
exploration method.
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
11
Verification of
sampling and
assaying
• The verification of significant intersections
by either independent or alternative
company personnel.
• The use of twinned holes.
• Documentation of primary data, data entry
procedures, data verification, data storage
(physical and electronic) protocols.
• Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
• No verification of sampling and assaying has been
undertaken in this field sampling programme.
• Great Boulder has strict procedures for data capture,
flow and data storage, and validation.
• Limited adjustments were made to returned assay data;
values returned lower than detection level were set to
the methodology’s detection level, and this was flagged
by code in the database.
Location of
data points
• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to
locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and other
locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.
• Specification of the grid system used.
• Quality and adequacy of topographic
control.
• Sample locations were collected using a hand held GPS
as was deemed acceptable for the nature of this
programme.
• The MGA94 UTM zone 51 coordinate system was used
for all undertakings.
Data spacing
and
distribution
• Data spacing for reporting of Exploration
Results.
• Whether the data spacing and distribution
is sufficient to establish the degree of
geological and grade continuity appropriate
for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve
estimation procedure(s) and classifications
applied.
• Whether sample compositing has been
applied.
• As detailed in Table 1 of this report, reported results are
from a focused soil programme and is considered
reconnaissance in nature.
• The spacing and location of data is currently only being
considered for exploration purposes.
• Sample compositing was applied to the soil programme
in areas outside a defined area of prospectivity. These
samples were composited along-line in lots of 4, and
provided a nominal 100m x 200m spacing.
Orientation of
data in
relation to
geological
structure
• Whether the orientation of sampling
achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this is
known, considering the deposit type.
• If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to have
introduced a sampling bias, this should be
assessed and reported if material.
The orientation and relationship of sampling to
underlying structures or mineralisation is unknown and
is considered reconnaissance in nature.
No drilling was undertaken during the field mapping
campaign.
Sample
security
• The measures taken to ensure sample
security.
Field samples were collected by Great Boulder in labelled
and secure ploy weave bags with the ID number clearly
visible. The sample bag is secured such that no sample
material can spill out.
Audits or
reviews
• The results of any audits or reviews of
sampling techniques and data.
None completed.
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
12
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral
tenement and
land tenure
status
• Type, reference name/number, location
and ownership including agreements or
material issues with third parties such as
joint ventures, partnerships, overriding
royalties, native title interests, historical
sites, wilderness or national park and
environmental settings.
• The security of the tenure held at the
time of reporting along with any known
impediments to obtaining a license to
operate in the area.
Great Boulder Resource Ltd (GBR) is comprised of
several projects with associated tenements;
Tarmoola Project tenements and details;
Exploration licences E37/1241, E37/1242, and
prospecting licences P37/8667, P37/8668, P37/8669,
P37/8670, P37/8671, P37/8672, P37/7673,
P37/8674, P37/8675, P37/8676, P37/8677,
P37/8678, P37/8679, P37/8680, P37/8681,
P37/8682, P37/8683, P37/8684, P37/8685 where,
GBR has executed a JV agreement to earn 75%
interest through exploration expenditure of
$1,400,000 AUD over five years. Following
satisfaction of the minimum expenditure
commitment by GBR, EGMC (current tenement
owner) will have the right to contribute to
expenditure in the project at its 25% interest level or
choose to convert to a 2% Net Smelter Royalty (NSR).
Should EGMC choose to convert its remaining interest
into a 2% NSR, then GBR will have a 100% interest in
the project.
Exploration
done by other
parties
• Acknowledgment and appraisal of
exploration by other parties.
Previous explorers included:
1990’s - 2000’s. Saracen Metals Pty Ltd
compiled results from previous explorers
drilling on the northern ELs near Randle’s
Find.
2000’s. Jubilee Mines NL conducted soil
sampling on the western side of the
Robbie’s Well Pluton. Agnew Gold Mining
Company Pty Ltd (Goldfield) undertook
limited drilling on the northern portions of
project, as well as soil sampling.
2010-2011 T.E Johnston & Associated Pty
Ltd conducted limited soil along the
eastern margin of Robbie’s Well Pluton.
2011. St Barbara Ltd conducted a small,
focused aircore drilling along the eastern
margin of the Robbie’s Well Pluton.
Regional soil sampling has been
undertaken by the Geological Survey of
WA.
Geology • Deposit type, geological setting and style
of mineralisation.
Greenstone sequences with a km-scale internal
granitoid and a number of discrete dioritic to tonalitic
stocks known to be associates with regional gold
mineralisation (e.g. Tarmoola/King of the Hills)
The project contains the northern extension to the
regional granite-greenstone terrain contact with a
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
13
similar geological setting as Tarmoola/King of the Hills
and Gwalia.
Drill hole
Information
• A summary of all information material to
the understanding of the exploration
results including a tabulation of the
following information for all Material drill
holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole
collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation
above sea level in metres) of the drill hole
collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.
• If the exclusion of this information is
justified on the basis that the information
is not Material and this exclusion does not
detract from the understanding of the
report, the Competent Person should
clearly explain why this is the case.
The location and context of the soil sampling is
provided in grid images in the main report body.
No drilling results are reported.
Data
aggregation
methods
• In reporting Exploration Results,
weighting averaging techniques,
maximum and/or minimum grade
truncations (eg cutting of high grades)
and cut-off grades are usually Material
and should be stated.
• Where aggregate intercepts incorporate
short lengths of high grade results and
longer lengths of low grade results, the
procedure used for such aggregation
should be stated and some typical
examples of such aggregations should be
shown in detail.
• The assumptions used for any reporting
of metal equivalent values should be
clearly stated.
No weight averaging techniques, aggregation
methods or grade truncations were applied to these
exploration results.
No metal equivalents are used.
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and
intercept
lengths
• These relationships are particularly
important in the reporting of Exploration
Results.
• If the geometry of the mineralisation with
respect to the drill hole angle is known, its
nature should be reported.
• If it is not known and only the down hole
lengths are reported, there should be a
No mineralisation widths are reported.
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
14
clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down
hole length, true width not known’).
Diagrams • Appropriate maps and sections (with
scales) and tabulations of intercepts
should be included for any significant
discovery being reported These should
include, but not be limited to a plan view
of drill hole collar locations and
appropriate sectional views.
Refer to figures in announcement.
Balanced
reporting
• Where comprehensive reporting of all
Exploration Results is not practicable,
representative reporting of both low and
high grades and/or widths should be
practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
Exploration Results.
Any contours in diagrams are provided to define areas
of relative “moderate” and “high” anomalous
element areas.
Other
substantive
exploration
data
• Other exploration data, if meaningful and
material, should be reported including
(but not limited to): geological
observations; geophysical survey results;
geochemical survey results; bulk samples
– size and method of treatment;
metallurgical test results; bulk density,
groundwater, geotechnical and rock
characteristics; potential deleterious or
contaminating substances.
Great Boulder recently undertook surface mapping of
select portions of the project. This was also
supported by recent re-processing of open source
magnetic data, and also recently acquired (surface)
gravity data. These were used to assist the
reinterpretation of the underlying project geology.
Refer to document for images and context.
Further work • The nature and scale of planned further
work (eg tests for lateral extensions or
depth extensions or large-scale step-out
drilling).
• Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of
possible extensions, including the main
geological interpretations and future
drilling areas, provided this information is
not commercially sensitive.
Potential work across the project may include
detailed additional geological mapping and surface
sampling ahead of potential confirmatory or
exploratory drilling.
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
15
Appendix 2 – Tenement Schedule
In line with obligations under ASX Listing Rule 5.3.3, Great Boulder provides the following information relating to its mining tenement
holdings as at 30 September 2017.
Project Tenement Number Status % Held % Earning
Changes during the Quarter
Balagundi M25/194 Granted - 75%
Broadwood P26/4009 Granted - 75%
Broadwood P26/4010 Application - 75%
Broadwood P26/4030 Granted - 75%
Broadwood P26/4037 Granted - 75%
Broadwood P26/4038 Granted - 75%
Broadwood P26/4039 Granted - 75%
Broadwood P26/4049 Granted - 75%
Jundee South E53/1101 Granted 100% -
Tarmoola E37/1241 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola E37/1242 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8667 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8668 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8669 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8670 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8671 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8672 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8673 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8674 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8675 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8676 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8677 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8678 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8679 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8680 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8681 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8682 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8683 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8684 Granted - 75%
Tarmoola P37/8685 Granted - 75% Tarmoola P37/8935 Granted 100% -
Yamarna E38/2320 Granted - 75%
Yamarna E38/2685 Granted - 75%
Yamarna E38/2952 Granted - 75%
Yamarna E38/2953 Granted - 75%
Yamarna E38/2957 Granted - 75%
Yamarna E38/2958 Granted - 75%
Yamarna P38/4178 Granted - 75%
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
16
+Rule 5.5
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report
Introduced 01/07/96 Origin Appendix 8 Amended 01/07/97, 01/07/98, 30/09/01, 01/06/10, 17/12/10, 01/05/13, 01/09/16
Name of entity
Great Boulder Resources Ltd
ABN Quarter ended (“current quarter”)
70611695955 31 December 2017
Consolidated statement of cash flows Current quarter
$A’000
Year to date
(...6..months)
$A’000
1. Cash flows from operating activities
1.1 Receipts from customers
1.2 Payments for
(827) (1,060) (a) exploration & evaluation
(b) development
(c) production
(d) staff costs (73) (146)
(e) administration and corporate costs (96) (187)
1.3 Dividends received (see note 3)
1.4 Interest received 6 54
1.5 Interest and other costs of finance paid
1.6 EIS Co Funding 108 108
1.7 Research and development refunds 155 155
1.8 Other (provide details if material) GST (88) (93)
1.9 Net cash from / (used in) operating
activities
(815) (1169)
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
17
Consolidated statement of cash flows Current quarter
$A’000
Year to date
(...6..months)
$A’000
2. Cash flows from investing activities
(58) (58)
2.1 Payments to acquire:
(a) property, plant and equipment
(b) tenements (see item 10) (Lease
payment)
(c) investments
(d) other non-current assets
2.2 Proceeds from the disposal of:
(a) property, plant and equipment
(b) tenements (see item 10)
(c) investments
(d) other non-current assets
2.3 Cash flows from loans to other entities
2.4 Dividends received (see note 3)
2.5 Other (provide details if material)
2.6 Net cash from / (used in) investing
activities
(58) (58)
3. Cash flows from financing activities
3.1 Proceeds from issues of shares
3.2 Proceeds from issue of convertible
notes
3.3 Proceeds from exercise of share
options
416 416
3.4 Transaction costs related to issues of
shares, convertible notes or options
3.5 Proceeds from borrowings
3.6 Repayment of borrowings
3.7 Transaction costs related to loans and
borrowings
3.8 Dividends paid
3.9 Other (provide details if material)
Seed capital refunds
3.10 Net cash from / (used in) financing
activities
416 416
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
18
Consolidated statement of cash flows Current quarter
$A’000
Year to date
(...6..months)
$A’000
4. Net increase / (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents for the period
3,902 4,256
4.1 Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
4.2 Net cash from / (used in) operating
activities (item 1.9 above)
(815) (1,169)
4.3 Net cash from / (used in) investing
activities (item 2.6 above)
(58) (58)
4.4 Net cash from / (used in) financing
activities (item 3.10 above)
416 416
4.5 Effect of movement in exchange rates
on cash held
4.6 Cash and cash equivalents at end of
period
3,445 3,445
5. Reconciliation of cash and cash
equivalents
at the end of the quarter (as shown in
the consolidated statement of cash
flows) to the related items in the
accounts
Current quarter
$A’000
Previous quarter
$A’000
5.1 Bank balances 372 727
5.2 Call deposits 3,073 3,529
5.3 Bank overdrafts
5.4 Other (provide details)
5.5 Cash and cash equivalents at end of
quarter (should equal item 4.6
above)
3,445 4,256
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
19
6. Payments to directors of the entity and their associates Current quarter
$A'000
6.1 Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in
item 1.2
371
6.2 Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties
included in item 2.3
6.3 Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in
items 6.1 and 6.2
Directors salaries, superannuation and payment for drilling services at commercial rates
7. Payments to related entities of the entity and their
associates
Current quarter
$A'000
7.1 Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in
item 1.2
7.2 Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties
included in item 2.3
7.3 Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in
items 7.1 and 7.2
8. Financing facilities available
Add notes as necessary for an
understanding of the position
Total facility
amount at quarter
end
$A’000
Amount drawn at
quarter end
$A’000
8.1 Loan facilities
8.2 Credit standby arrangements
8.3 Other (please specify)
8.4 Include below a description of each facility above, including the lender, interest rate
and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any additional facilities have been
entered into or are proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include details of
those facilities as well.
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
20
9. Estimated cash outflows for next quarter $A’000
9.1 Exploration and evaluation 1,195
9.2 Development -
9.3 Production -
9.4 Staff costs 84
9.5 Administration and corporate costs 76
9.6 Other (provide details if material) -
9.7 Total estimated cash outflows 1,355
10. Changes in
tenements
(items 2.1(b) and
2.2(b) above)
Tenement
reference
and
location
Nature of interest Interest at
beginning
of quarter
Interest
at end of
quarter
10.1 Interests in mining
tenements and
petroleum
tenements lapsed,
relinquished or
reduced
10.2 Interests in mining
tenements and
petroleum
tenements acquired
or increased
Compliance statement
1 This statement has been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.
2 This statement gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
Sign here: Date: 23 January 2018
(Company Secretary)
Print name: John Sendziuk
ASX Announcement
24 January 2018
21
Notes
1. The quarterly report provides a basis for informing the market how the entity’s activities have
been financed for the past quarter and the effect on its cash position. An entity that wishes to
disclose additional information is encouraged to do so, in a note or notes included in or
attached to this report.
2. If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards,
the definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral
Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly report
has been prepared in accordance with other accounting standards agreed by ASX pursuant to
Listing Rule 19.11A, the corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.
3. Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from operating activities or cash
flows from investing activities, depending on the accounting policy of the entity.