asymco

Upload: prasanna-kumar-malepati

Post on 09-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/8/2019 asymco

    1/14

    asymcoCurated Market Intelligence

    Home

    Speaking of

    ADDs: Asymco Data Downloads

    What we do

    Sponsorship

    Archive

    SEARCH 620 ARTICLESTop of Form

    Go

    Bottom of Form

    CATEGORIES

    ADD4

    Financial115

    Industry199

    iPad content9

    Legal6

    Market184

    Nostalgia16

    Sponsor5

    Technology13

    Theory49

    Uncategorized65 All Categories11

    The symmetry of share shifts in mobile phones

    OCT 5, 105:52 PM

    AUTHORHorace DediuCATEGORIESIndustry

    Thanks to a readers suggestion, I took another look at theprofit and market share datafrom themobile phone

    market overview posted last quarter. This time to compare the vendors on two dimensions at the same time.

    I plotted the vendors on share of market and share of profit axes in two different points in time: Q2 2007 and Q2

    2010. I further broke the chart into four quadrants as shown:

    http://www.asymco.com/http://www.asymco.com/http://www.asymco.com/speaking/http://www.asymco.com/adds-asymco-data-downloads/http://www.asymco.com/what-we-do/http://www.asymco.com/sponsors/http://www.asymco.com/archive/http://www.asymco.com/category/add/http://www.asymco.com/category/add/http://www.asymco.com/category/add/http://www.asymco.com/category/financial/http://www.asymco.com/category/financial/http://www.asymco.com/category/financial/http://www.asymco.com/category/financial/http://www.asymco.com/category/industry/http://www.asymco.com/category/industry/http://www.asymco.com/category/industry/http://www.asymco.com/category/ipad-content/http://www.asymco.com/category/ipad-content/http://www.asymco.com/category/ipad-content/http://www.asymco.com/category/legal/http://www.asymco.com/category/legal/http://www.asymco.com/category/legal/http://www.asymco.com/category/legal/http://www.asymco.com/category/market/http://www.asymco.com/category/market/http://www.asymco.com/category/market/http://www.asymco.com/category/nostalgia/http://www.asymco.com/category/nostalgia/http://www.asymco.com/category/nostalgia/http://www.asymco.com/category/sponsor/http://www.asymco.com/category/sponsor/http://www.asymco.com/category/sponsor/http://www.asymco.com/category/technology/http://www.asymco.com/category/technology/http://www.asymco.com/category/technology/http://www.asymco.com/category/theory/http://www.asymco.com/category/theory/http://www.asymco.com/category/theory/http://www.asymco.com/category/uncategorized/http://www.asymco.com/category/uncategorized/http://www.asymco.com/category/uncategorized/http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/05/the-symmetry-of-share-shifts-in-mobile-phones/http://www.asymco.com/author/asymco/http://www.asymco.com/category/industry/http://www.asymco.com/2010/08/17/androids-pursuit-of-the-biggest-losers/http://www.asymco.com/2010/08/17/androids-pursuit-of-the-biggest-losers/http://www.asymco.com/2010/08/17/androids-pursuit-of-the-biggest-losers/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/21/can-android-change-the-profit-share-of-phone-vendors/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/21/can-android-change-the-profit-share-of-phone-vendors/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/21/can-android-change-the-profit-share-of-phone-vendors/http://www.asymco.com/http://www.asymco.com/speaking/http://www.asymco.com/adds-asymco-data-downloads/http://www.asymco.com/what-we-do/http://www.asymco.com/sponsors/http://www.asymco.com/archive/http://www.asymco.com/category/add/http://www.asymco.com/category/financial/http://www.asymco.com/category/industry/http://www.asymco.com/category/ipad-content/http://www.asymco.com/category/legal/http://www.asymco.com/category/market/http://www.asymco.com/category/nostalgia/http://www.asymco.com/category/sponsor/http://www.asymco.com/category/technology/http://www.asymco.com/category/theory/http://www.asymco.com/category/uncategorized/http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/05/the-symmetry-of-share-shifts-in-mobile-phones/http://www.asymco.com/author/asymco/http://www.asymco.com/category/industry/http://www.asymco.com/2010/08/17/androids-pursuit-of-the-biggest-losers/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/21/can-android-change-the-profit-share-of-phone-vendors/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/21/can-android-change-the-profit-share-of-phone-vendors/http://www.asymco.com/
  • 8/8/2019 asymco

    2/14

    I chose to label the quadrants to indicate the possible categorization of the companies.

    Dominant: large market share and large profit share

    Star: low market share with large profit share

    Fading: high market share with low profit

    http://www.asymco.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Screen-shot-2010-10-05-at-10-5-7.58.32-PM1.png
  • 8/8/2019 asymco

    3/14

    Marginal: low market share and low profit

    Its interesting to note the shift over the time period of the eight vendors. Whereas Nokia moved from Dominant to

    Fading, only Apple rose from Marginal to Star. The Marginal players dispersed their placement with Samsung

    moving laterally toward Nokia while RIM followed in the Apple trajectory and increased profit share while

    maintaining relatively low share.

    Thinking about motion around these two dimensions could be reduced to a vector model. If each vendor is

    represented by an arrow showing direction and distance moved, we can compare each vendor vs. a symmetric

    competitor which might account for the loss or gain of share.

    The vectors can be paired as follows:

    Although the data does not contain all market participants, the shifts in share are quite closely conserved with the

    vector magnitude (arrow length) and angle (direction) paired. Note how Nokia and Apple swapped Profit without too

    much impact in Units volume. Similarly, RIM and Sony Ericsson traded profits and volumes quite symmetrically.

    Samsung also took volume while Motorola lost it. HTC and LG did not change positions dramatically.

    Finally, moving all vectors to the same origin leads to this view of share gain/loss over three years in twodimensions:

    http://www.asymco.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Screen-shot-2010-10-05-at-10-5-8.41.56-PM.png
  • 8/8/2019 asymco

    4/14

    It becomes quite easy to see who the winners and losers are and by how much.

    This model is only an observation of the shifts in market power and is not conclusive about where share was gained

    or lost, however there is compelling symmetry which also matches the intuition of observers.

    PREVIOUS POSTNEW COMMENT SYSTEM IN USE

    NEXT POST[SPONSOR] AUTHENTIC JOBS

    Login

    Follow the discussion

    Comments (72)Sort by: DateRatingLast Activity

    +13

    Beautiful, just beautiful. Data visualization truly is a form of art, and you are a master at it.

    Reply

    0

    http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/05/new-comment-system-in-use/http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/05/new-comment-system-in-use/http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/06/sponsor-authentic-jobs/http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/06/sponsor-authentic-jobs/http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showLogin();http://intensedebate.com/postRSS/55845509http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20sortComments(1);http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20sortComments(0);http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20sortComments(2);http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20sortComments(2);http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102509815)http://www.asymco.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Screen-shot-2010-10-05-at-10-5-10.04.22-PM.pnghttp://www.asymco.com/2010/10/05/new-comment-system-in-use/http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/06/sponsor-authentic-jobs/http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showLogin();http://intensedebate.com/postRSS/55845509http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20sortComments(1);http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20sortComments(0);http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20sortComments(2);http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102509815)
  • 8/8/2019 asymco

    5/14

    weeks ago

    I am discounter, so I feel Nokia's pain. I however, do not understand why they would make so little profit.

    In discounting the most important measure after margin is stock turn. So, if a product is a low margin

    product, what we then try to influence is its turn. I am wondering how you treat this Horace.

    If their margin is low (given) and their turn is also low (don't know), why are they bothering?

    Apple should be a case study in all business school. They are doing something very different, totally

    unconventional.

    Reply

    1 reply active less than 1 minute ago

    +1

    eks ago

    So Sami is on the board-line of FADE. The more Android they pump out, the quicker they slip into fade.

    Correct?

    Reply

    2 replies active less than 1 minute ago

    +5

    Surely those manufacturers with near zero volume and near zero profit (mostly Android supporters) are

    not simply marginal, they're totally fucked.

    Reply

    1 reply active less than 1 minute ago

    +5

    eks ago

    Great graph, Horace.

    In the context of Android, what's interesting to me is that Android is turning some winners into losers and

    http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102510287)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20collapseThread(102510287);http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102510577)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20collapseThread(102510577);http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20collapseThread(102510577);http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102511762)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20collapseThread(102511762);http://twitter.com/ThembeKhttp://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102510287)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20collapseThread(102510287);http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102510577)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20collapseThread(102510577);http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102511762)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20collapseThread(102511762);
  • 8/8/2019 asymco

    6/14

    vice versa. Motorola has had a great run with the Droid, so even while their unit sales are way down, their

    profit is way up (positive now, finally!)

    In essence, when I look at this graph I see proof of what I'm noticing: that Android has created a product

    that can compete with Nokia on volume, price, and carrier selection by letting talentless software

    designers at manufacturing companies stand on google's shoulders, and thus give them a shot at selling

    lots of phones to the 80-90% of people using bad phones.

    In my opinion, Android isn't really going to be much competition with Apple on ANY carrier that sells both

    phones. Look at AT&T, look at the European carriers. Find any carrier whose iPhone sales lag their

    Android sales.

    When Apple busts out of AT&T exclusivity, they better have their supply chain ready to explode. There

    was a lot of talk about how Apple went after a license to use LiquidMetal technology, and after reading the

    interview with the FoxConn CEO on how difficult it was to make the iPhone 4 case, my guess is thatthey'd need LiquidMetal just to produce them fast enough to meet widespread demand.

    Reply

    +1

    4 weeks ago

    Billy, Yes you are right.

    It reflects Google's strategy; make the handset (profitless) "free" and run suite of Google applications.

    The handset makers have little choice;

    (a) Adopt Android and have chance against Apple, or

    (b) role their own (ex. Palm, Nokia), or

    (c) get out of smartphone market (get our handset market altogether).

    Handset market will end up like the PC industry ( Intel and MS taking +80% of industry profits), a very few

    players will take majority of profits.

    -Tek

    Reply

    +3

    ago

    http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102514253)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102514466)http://twitter.com/Kinnyhttp://twitter.com/TektonikShifthttp://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102514253)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102514466)
  • 8/8/2019 asymco

    7/14

    At one point in time, Samsung had absolutely no idea when it comes to product focus, specifically for

    mobile phones. They are better today, but still confused.

    Ironically, Samsung has the financial resources to enable them to play the trial-and-error game endlessly,

    hence why they were the only phone maker whos had products based on almost every smartphone

    mobile platform known to man with the exception of iOS, of course.

    I have absolutely no respect for Samsung as a phone maker. They lack any real creativity and succeed

    thanks to the merits of others (the Galaxy S is a perfect example of how they do things in the mobile

    division, and I have no hopes on the Galaxy Tab either).

    As for their semiconductor division, I believe it is doing a far better job. If they're able to produce good

    quality products, which Samsung are actually capable, then by all means Apple should keep them as their

    component supplier. There are only so many manufacturers out there who are able to churn out the

    quantities required in the fast-paced CE world we live in today,

    Reply

    1 reply active 4 weeks ago

    +2

    eks ago

    The summary of all summaries! The vector plots show the trends clearly.

    Reply

    Mobile phones: Who's up, who's down and who's moving sideways | All in one Articles |

    Submit free articles

    [...] Its a lovely piece of work and quite easy to follow. You see it here. [...]

    0

    ago

    Great graphs that succintly summarize the market players. Only suggestion I would have in the vector

    graphs is to show different colored arrows (may be red) for total market growth/units shipped and total

    profit growth over the same time period, just to see how the overall smartphone market did compared to

    each of the individual players.

    Reply

    +1

    http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102516129)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20collapseThread(102516129);http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102515412)http://www.furiz.in/mobile-phones-whos-up-whos-down-and-whos-moving-sideways/http://www.furiz.in/mobile-phones-whos-up-whos-down-and-whos-moving-sideways/http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102533625)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102516129)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20collapseThread(102516129);http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102515412)http://www.furiz.in/mobile-phones-whos-up-whos-down-and-whos-moving-sideways/http://www.furiz.in/mobile-phones-whos-up-whos-down-and-whos-moving-sideways/http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102533625)
  • 8/8/2019 asymco

    8/14

    go

    It will get worse for the Android makers.

    While Apple has a distinct brand and unique set of benefits, Android manufacturers have little to set one

    apart from the other. When the pie stops growing, they'll have to compete against each other on price.

    That's a path going nowhere.

    Reply

    +2

    44p 4 weeks ago

    I know they are a distant 3rd or 4th in mindshare, but it is interesting to see RIM succeeding along withApple. Obviously their star doesn't burn as bright, but they are the only other manufacturer with a truly

    differentiated product and ecosystem (BBM, hosted email, etc.). I wonder what this portends for WebOS

    when HP finally decides to start making product.

    Also, MOT has probably made their entire upward move on the profit share axis in the last 9 months. I bet

    this graph would look different on a shorter timeline. I for one would love to see this as a regular (quarterly

    or annual) feature on Asymco. My guess is that Apple will continue on its trajectory but the others will

    continue to shift around quite a bit.

    Reply

    1 reply active 4 weeks ago

    0

    eks ago

    Is is just me or Android caring companies are not very profitable. Seams the only thing that makes money

    for them is the paid licensing of the "Droid" word from Lucasilm by Verizon wireless.

    Reply

    0

    o

    Outstanding!

    Reply

    http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102534593)http://intensedebate.com/people/Joe_Winfield_ILhttp://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102537553)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20collapseThread(102537553);http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102540935)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102562975)http://twitter.com/lantinianhttp://intensedebate.com/people/Joe_Winfield_ILhttp://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102534593)http://intensedebate.com/people/Joe_Winfield_ILhttp://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102537553)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20collapseThread(102537553);http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102540935)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102562975)
  • 8/8/2019 asymco

    9/14

    0

    wn 4 weeks ago

    Love this article and its graphs. I just wish it was required reading alongside the dung-pile of "Androidrules the mobile space" articles that are churned out ad nauseum.

    Reply

    0

    ago

    very interesting ...apple=low market share but apple = high profilts...

    Reply

    0

    ago

    A picture speaks a thousand words.

    Absolutely fantastic visual synthesis of the data previously presented by Asymco!

    Reply

    Winners and Losers of the Smartphone Industry: Flow Chart - Phone-stuff

    [...] [asymco via DF] [...]

    Winners and Losers of the Smartphone Industry - Phone-stuff

    [...] [asymco via DF] [...]

    0

    ago

    no mention of motorola at all. Did all those flat flip phones die?

    Reply

    1 reply active 4 weeks ago

    0

    http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102563209)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102585637)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102598123)http://www.todaysphonenews.com/2010/10/06/winners-and-losers-of-the-smartphone-industry-flow-chart/http://www.todaysphonenews.com/2010/10/06/winners-and-losers-of-the-smartphone-industry/http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102605201)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20collapseThread(102605201);http://qtp.blogspot.com/http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102563209)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102585637)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102598123)http://www.todaysphonenews.com/2010/10/06/winners-and-losers-of-the-smartphone-industry-flow-chart/http://www.todaysphonenews.com/2010/10/06/winners-and-losers-of-the-smartphone-industry/http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102605201)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20collapseThread(102605201);
  • 8/8/2019 asymco

    10/14

    weeks ago

    Excellent analysis. I'd like to see a comparison of profit share for developers in the app

    stores/marketplaces though I guess a lot of that data isn't published.

    Reply

    -4

    go

    "there is compelling symmetry"

    See also: ley lines.

    Reply

    Winners and Losers of the Smartphone Industry | iPhone World Blog

    [...] [asymco via DF] [...]

    0

    o

    It seems that financially the only companies to survive in this market are those who produce their own

    software and hardware - Apple, RIM, Nokia, HP/Palm. I'm not sure what that means for Android and

    Win7. It will be interesting to see how this graph changes in the next year with the maturity of Android and

    the introduction of Win7. We'll also see Nokia's new OS and HP/Palm will finally release a new phone.

    My personal take is that manufacturers will have to either choose Android or Win7 if they want to survive.

    Apple, RIM, and Nokia will become the dominant players although I really hope that HP makes some

    headway. Conclusion - Android and Win7 are going to be the bain of most companies here in a couple

    years.

    Oh, and the manufacturers are really screwed because the winners of this industry are not going to becompeting on hardware specs to win customers (that is now taken for granted by consumers), the real

    money is in the services offered to differentiate the products. That is the real reason the Apple and RIM

    are doing well - the services behind the phones.

    Reply

    0

    http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102605289)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102612028)http://iphone.alargespace.com/winners-and-losers-of-the-smartphone-industry/http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102624610)http://twitter.com/rxtghttp://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102605289)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102612028)http://iphone.alargespace.com/winners-and-losers-of-the-smartphone-industry/http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102624610)
  • 8/8/2019 asymco

    11/14

    o

    Very, very nice indeed. Keep up the good work!

    One small niggle, for the final chart you say (emphasis mine) "Finally, moving all vectors to the same

    origin leads to this view of share gain/loss over TWO years in two dimensions:" but the chart axes are

    labelled for "3yr."

    Reply

    123Next

    Post a new commentTop of Form

    Bottom of Form

    Comment as a Guest, or login:

    Login to IntenseDebate

    Login to WordPress.com

    Login to Twitter

    Login to OpenIDTop of Form

    Name

    Email

    Website (optional)

    Displayed next to your comments.

    Not displayed publicly.

    If you have a website, link to it here.

    Bottom of Form

    Submit Comment

    http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102627616)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20IDPageLoad(1,%20'previous')http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20IDPageLoad(2,%20'previous')http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20IDPageLoad(1,%20'previous')http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showLogin();http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showWPLogin();http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20IDC.twitter.load_popup();http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20IDCNav('IDCNavOpenID');%20showSignupOpenIDNewThread();http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20postComment(0);http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showReply(102627616)http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20IDPageLoad(1,%20'previous')http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20IDPageLoad(2,%20'previous')http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20IDPageLoad(1,%20'previous')http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showLogin();http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20showWPLogin();http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20IDC.twitter.load_popup();http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20IDCNav('IDCNavOpenID');%20showSignupOpenIDNewThread();http://tmp/sv1l.tmp/javascript:%20postComment(0);
  • 8/8/2019 asymco

    12/14

    Subscribe to

    Comments byIntenseDebate

    Share167

    4,501 comments

    by 1,399 readers

    IntenseDebate

    EMAIL SUBSCRIPTIONTop of Form

    Your email:

    Enter email address...

    Subscribe

    Unsubscribe

    Bottom of Form

    MORE INFO

    RSS Feed for Entries

    RSS Feed for Comments

    Powered by WordPress

    RECENT COMMENTS

    Brad Larson on 14 Percent of App Store apps target the iPad

    jon jordan on Samsungs smartphones make up 10% of total sold. Nokia is at 30% and Motorola is over 40%.

    Study suggests Android handset makers will suffer the fate of PC makers | UmeedainTimes.comonHow much

    profit did vendors capture from Android-powered phones?

    Ziad Fazel on14 Percent of App Store apps target the iPad

    Ted Cranmore onCompeting with non-consumption: Can Apple sell 100M iPhones next year?

    Dave onHow much profit did vendors capture from Android-powered phones?

    Alexkhan2000 onHow much profit did vendors capture from Android-powered phones?

    Kalle onAbsolute value: the handset market stacked

    http://intensedebate.com/http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/05/the-symmetry-of-share-shifts-in-mobile-phones/&t=asymco%20%7C%20The%20symmetry%20of%20share%20shifts%20in%20mobile%20phones&src=sphttp://www.intensedebate.com/http://www.asymco.com/feed/http://www.asymco.com/comments/feed/http://wordpress.org/http://umeedaintimes.com/2010/11/05/study-suggests-android-handset-makers-will-suffer-the-fate-of-pc-makers/http://www.twitter.com/asymcohttp://intensedebate.com/http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/05/the-symmetry-of-share-shifts-in-mobile-phones/&t=asymco%20%7C%20The%20symmetry%20of%20share%20shifts%20in%20mobile%20phones&src=sphttp://www.intensedebate.com/http://www.asymco.com/feed/http://www.asymco.com/comments/feed/http://wordpress.org/http://umeedaintimes.com/2010/11/05/study-suggests-android-handset-makers-will-suffer-the-fate-of-pc-makers/
  • 8/8/2019 asymco

    13/14

    Fijai Cairo on How much profit did vendors capture from Android-powered phones?

    Alexkhan2000 onHow much profit did vendors capture from Android-powered phones?

    MOST COMMENTED POSTS

    Android's Pursuit of the Biggest Losers(206)

    iTunes app total downloads to overtake songs this year(104)

    Where are the iPod touch knockoffs?(98)

    Unix's Revenge(95)

    It takes nearly $1 billion/yr to run iTunes(92)

    Why Apple is on top today: the top 10 technology decisions(89)

    iPod touch made up 37.7 percent of all iOS devices sold so far(86)

    How much profit did vendors capture from Android-powered phones?(75)

    The symmetry of share shifts in mobile phones(73)

    Back to the PC(68)

    SUPPORT ASYMCO WHILE SHOPPING FOR APPS

    SPRINGAHEAD

    http://www.trnsfrmr.com/http://www.asymco.com/2010/08/17/androids-pursuit-of-the-biggest-losers/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/08/itunes-app-total-downloads-to-overtake-songs-this-year/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/03/where-are-the-ipod-touch-clones/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/29/unixs-revenge/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/09/it-takes-nearly-1-billionyr-to-run-itunes/http://www.asymco.com/2010/06/02/why-apple-is-on-top-today/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/03/ipod-touch-made-up-37-7-percent-of-all-ios-devices-sold-so-far/http://www.asymco.com/2010/11/03/how-much-profit-did-vendors-capture-from-android-powered-phones/http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/05/the-symmetry-of-share-shifts-in-mobile-phones/http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/20/back-to-the-pc/http://www.authenticjobs.com/?aff=39628http://click.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/click?id=b2hV3vrE0Gs&subid=&offerid=146261.1&type=10&tmpid=5573&RD_PARM1=http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/springahead/id398783208http://www.trnsfrmr.com/http://www.asymco.com/2010/08/17/androids-pursuit-of-the-biggest-losers/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/08/itunes-app-total-downloads-to-overtake-songs-this-year/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/03/where-are-the-ipod-touch-clones/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/29/unixs-revenge/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/09/it-takes-nearly-1-billionyr-to-run-itunes/http://www.asymco.com/2010/06/02/why-apple-is-on-top-today/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/03/ipod-touch-made-up-37-7-percent-of-all-ios-devices-sold-so-far/http://www.asymco.com/2010/11/03/how-much-profit-did-vendors-capture-from-android-powered-phones/http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/05/the-symmetry-of-share-shifts-in-mobile-phones/http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/20/back-to-the-pc/
  • 8/8/2019 asymco

    14/14

    MOST VISITED

    60 percent of Apple's sales are from products that did not exist three years ago(42356)

    The symmetry of share shifts in mobile phones(31834)

    Android's Pursuit of the Biggest Losers(27861)

    Unix's Revenge(26857)

    Back to the PC(26449)

    Can Android change the distribution of profit among phone vendors?(22239)

    Canalys: Android global share rises to 16% of smartphones in Q1 [Updated](21887)

    Android vs. Windows Phone: Extending the urination metaphor(20042)

    Gartner: as a Media Tablet, iPad deserves to be ignored in PC rankings(18056)

    Open always wins, unless it's Symbian or LiMo or Openmoko or Qt(15506)

    VIEWS SINCE JUNE 1 2010

    31834

    wp.com stats helper

    2010Horace Dediu. All rights reserved. RSS feed. This site uses theBasic Maths theme forWordPress, designed

    byKhoi Vinh &Allan Cole.

    620

    http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/19/60-percent-of-apples-sales-are-from-products-that-did-not-exist-three-years-ago/http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/19/60-percent-of-apples-sales-are-from-products-that-did-not-exist-three-years-ago/http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/05/the-symmetry-of-share-shifts-in-mobile-phones/http://www.asymco.com/2010/08/17/androids-pursuit-of-the-biggest-losers/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/29/unixs-revenge/http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/20/back-to-the-pc/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/21/can-android-change-the-profit-share-of-phone-vendors/http://www.asymco.com/2010/08/02/android-global-share-rises-to-16-of-smartphones-in-q1/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/22/android-vs-windows-phone-extending-the-urination-metaphor/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/22/android-vs-windows-phone-extending-the-urination-metaphor/http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/13/gartner-as-a-media-tablet-ipad-deserves-to-be-ignored-in-pc-rankings/http://www.asymco.com/2010/07/04/open-always-wins-unless-its-symbian-or-limo-or-openmoko-or-qt/http://www.asymco.com/what-we-do/people-of-asymco/http://www.asymco.com/what-we-do/people-of-asymco/http://www.asymco.com/what-we-do/people-of-asymco/http://www.asymco.com/feed/http://basicmaths.subtraction.com/http://basicmaths.subtraction.com/http://wordpress.org/http://wordpress.org/http://wordpress.org/http://subtraction.com/http://subtraction.com/http://fthrwght.com/http://fthrwght.com/http://store.ovi.com/content/61214?cid=ovistore-fw-bac-na-acq-na-na-g0--pac102_168x28http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/19/60-percent-of-apples-sales-are-from-products-that-did-not-exist-three-years-ago/http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/05/the-symmetry-of-share-shifts-in-mobile-phones/http://www.asymco.com/2010/08/17/androids-pursuit-of-the-biggest-losers/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/29/unixs-revenge/http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/20/back-to-the-pc/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/21/can-android-change-the-profit-share-of-phone-vendors/http://www.asymco.com/2010/08/02/android-global-share-rises-to-16-of-smartphones-in-q1/http://www.asymco.com/2010/09/22/android-vs-windows-phone-extending-the-urination-metaphor/http://www.asymco.com/2010/10/13/gartner-as-a-media-tablet-ipad-deserves-to-be-ignored-in-pc-rankings/http://www.asymco.com/2010/07/04/open-always-wins-unless-its-symbian-or-limo-or-openmoko-or-qt/http://www.asymco.com/what-we-do/people-of-asymco/http://www.asymco.com/feed/http://basicmaths.subtraction.com/http://wordpress.org/http://subtraction.com/http://fthrwght.com/