athena swan silver department award application · 2014. 8. 11. · sap = senior academic...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Athena SWAN Silver Department award application
Name of university: University of Cambridge
Department: Department of Psychology
Date of application: November 2013
Date of university Bronze and/or Silver SWAN award:
April 2006, renewed in 2009 and November 2012
Contact for application: Professor Claire Hughes
Email: [email protected]
Telephone: 01223 334517
Departmental website address: www.psychol.cam.ac.uk/
2
Abbreviations:
ASWG = Athena SWAN Working Group BPS = British Psychological Society CFR = Centre for Family Research DUGE = Director of Undergraduate Education E&D = Equality and Diversity ECMS = Employment and Career Management Scheme EP = The Department of Experimental Psychology EPS = Experimental Psychology Society GEC = Graduate Education Committee HESA = Higher Education Statistics Agency HoD = Head of Department NST = Natural Sciences Tripos PBS = Psychological and Behavioural Sciences Tripos PPD = Personal and Professional Development SAP = Senior Academic Promotions SDP = The Department of Social and Developmental Psychology
SRA = Senior Research Associate WiSETI = Women in Science, Engineering and Technology Initiative
3
Contents
Page Number
1 Letter of endorsement from the Head of Department…………………………...5
2 The self-assessment team (Athena SWAN Working Group……………………7
The self-assessment process…………………………………………………….10
3 A picture of the department……………………………………………………….12
Student data…………………….………………………………………………….14
i) Numbers of males and females on access or foundation courses (N/A)
ii) Undergraduate male and female numbers……………………………...14
iii) Postgraduate male and female numbers completing taught courses (N/A)
iv) Postgraduate male and female numbers on research degrees………. 15
v) Ratio of course applications to offers and acceptances by gender for undergraduate, postgraduate taught and postgraduate research……..16
vi) Degree classification by gender…………………………………………...18
Staff data…………….……………………………………………………………….21
i) Female : male ratio of academic staff and research staff ………………22
ii) Turnover by grade and gender ……………………………………………23
4 Supporting and advancing women’s careers……………………………….……24
i) Job application and success rates by gender and grade……………….24
ii) Applications for promotion and success rates by gender and grade….25
iii) Recruitment of staff…………………………………………………………27
iv) Support for staff at key career transition points…………………………28
Career development…………….………………………………………………….28
i) Promotion and career development ………………………………………28
ii) Induction and training ………………………………………………………31
iii) Support for female students ……………………………………………..32
4
Organisation and culture……………………………………..……………………33
i) Male and female representation on committees………………………..33
ii) Female : male ratio of academic and research staff on fixed-term contracts and open-ended (permanent) contracts……………………...33
iii) Representation on decision-making committees………………………..34
iv) Workload model ……………………………………..……………………..34
v) Timing of departmental meetings and social gatherings……………….35
vi) Culture ……………………………………..…………………….………….36
vii) Outreach activities ……………………………………..……….………….38
Flexibility and managing career breaks……………………………………..……...…….39
i) Maternity return rate……………………………………..………………….40
ii) Paternity, adoption and parental leave uptake……………………..…….40
iii) Numbers of applications and success rates for flexible working by gender and grade ……………………..…………………………..…….40
iv) Flexible working…………………………………………..………………….41
vi) Cover for maternity and adoption leave and support on return…………41
5 Any other comments……………………………………..………………………….43
6. Action plan Please see attached document
Case Study 1……………………………………..…………………………………………..44
Case Study 2……………………………………..…………………………………………..45
5
Professor Trevor W Robbins, CBE, FRS
Head of Department
29 November 2013
Athena SWAN Silver Department Application; Letter of endorsement
Integrating women into the intellectual and scientific, as well as social, fabric of the
Department has, for me, always been a rather natural inclination. My first major scientific
mentor was Professor Susan Iversen, spanning the period from my undergraduate to
postgraduate and eventually junior faculty status. Our professional relationship enabled
me to observe at first hand some of the difficulties with which academic women often have
to contend. That knowledge helped me when I married Barbara Sahakian who became a
leading clinical neuropsychologist and has also informed my attitude, training and
commitment as Head of Department to the career development of women. I have also
been monitoring the education of my two daughters who are both now at the post-graduate
stage.
I have taken special interest in this important Athena SWAN process which has enabled us
to review and evaluate our practices with respect to career support for women faculty, and
I have sat on the self-assessment panel throughout, writing several portions of the
Department’s submission. One example of our achievements on this front is the recent
appointment of two female Deputy Heads of Department following the merger of the two
Departments into a unified Department of Psychology: (i) Professor Melissa Hines (special
responsibility for teaching) and (ii) Professor Nicola Clayton (special responsibility for
research, including career development of post-doctoral researchers). These female
appointments are important as women professors now outnumber men in this Department.
Other evidence of my commitment to supporting the career development of women in the
Department is my nomination of two female professors for the Presidential Award of the
6
British Psychological Society (BPS), of whom one (Professor Usha Goswami) was
successful.
Importantly, however, our review has also revealed some areas in which further
improvements are warranted, including new measures to support career development for
post-doctoral workers (where working women often have problems because of imposed
lack of mobility), and greater inter-departmental communication, which we hope will arise
from our new Athena SWAN web-pages. We are also reviewing the scheduling of
seminars to help those families with children at school, nursery or day-care. I am
convinced that our carefully formulated action plan will make an important contribution
both to the future work of the Department and to its academic success and status. In
particular, by preserving and extending our reputation as a forward-looking and friendly
Department we aim to continue to attract (in an increasingly competitive field) the highest
calibre male and female students and academic staff, who will in turn contribute to its
future success. For these reasons, I am committed to making available the necessary
resources in time and finance, as well in my leadership role, to sustaining our action plan
and moving the Department to best practice status in all domains of the Athena SWAN
process.
Yours sincerely,
Head of Department
Downing Street
Cambridge
CB2 3EB
Tel: +44 (0) 1223 333551 Fax: +44 (0) 1223 333564 Email: [email protected] www.psychol.cam.ac.uk
7
2 The self-assessment process (954 words)
a) Description of the self-assessment team.
Members of the Athena SWAN Working Group (ASWG) are listed below with their focus of
contribution in brackets:
Mrs Sonia Brignell joined the Department in 2011 as the Department’s HR Administrator
(Recruitment).
Professor Tim Bussey joined the Department in 2000 as a Lecturer, was promoted to
Senior Lecturer in 2003, Reader in 2010 and Professor of Behavioural Neuroscience in
2013. Tim is married to Dr Lisa Saksida and they share childcare arrangements for their
young son (‘Supporting and advancing women's careers’).
Mrs Anne-Marie Catchpole is the SBS Athena SWAN Coordinator (University and School
data).
Dr Luke Clark joined the Department in 2007 as a Lecturer and was promoted to Senior
University Lecturer in 2012. Luke has had two periods of paternity leave (August 2007,
2009). Luke is Course Organiser and Admissions Officer for our 3rd year course
(Undergraduate admissions).
Mr Malcolm Davis joined the Department of SDP in 2010 as Teaching Administrator.
(Staff induction and training).
Mr Nik Darshane completed our MPhil course in 2011-2012 and was graduate student
representative in 2012-2013.
Dr Vivien Hodges is the WiSETI Project Officer and University Athena SWAN Coordinator
(advice and relevant University information).
Professor Claire Hughes is a former undergraduate and graduate student of the
Department (see Case Study 2). Claire became the Acting Chair in October and, assisted
by the Department Librarian, has set up the Department Athena SWAN webpages.
8
Dr Amy Milton was a former undergraduate (2001-2004) and postgraduate (2004-2007)
in the Department. She became a fixed term Departmental Lecturer in 2008 and is now in
a permanent Lectureship. (‘Flexibility and managing career breaks’).
Dr Jennifer Murray joined the Department in 2009 as a Research Associate and
represents the Department's Postdoctoral staff at academic staff meetings.
Miss Kayleigh Paske joined the Department as the HoD’s Secretary at the beginning of
2013 (assistance in data presentation).
Professor Susan Golombok joined the University in 2006 as Professor of Family
Research and is the CFR Director. Susan was our Acting Chair from January-October
2013 (whilst Professor Lamb was on sabbatical leave). Susan is married and has 1 adult
child.
Professor Michael Lamb joined the University in 2004 as Professor of Psychology in the
SDP Department. At that time Michael was a widower with 4 children, the youngest of
whom was 7 years old. Michael volunteered to Chair the ASWG and led the first meeting
prior to taking (January to December 2013).
Professor Trevor Robbins was a former undergraduate (1968-1971) and graduate
(1971-1973) of the Department and was then appointed University Demonstrator (1973),
Lecturer (1978), Reader (1992) and Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience (1997),
becoming HoD in 2002. Trevor and his wife (also a University Chair) have two grown-up
daughters. (‘Career development’, ‘workload model’, culture’).
Dr Lisa Saksida joined the Department in 2000 and was appointed to a Lectureship in
2001 with promotion to Reader in Cognitive Neuroscience in 2012. Lisa is the
Department’s Graduate Tutor and has had one period of maternity leave (Graduate
numbers).
Ms Kate Stacey joined the Department in 2007 as Senior Administrator. Kate is Secretary
to the ASWG and relayed the School's Staff Survey results to staff. Kate liaises with the
University and School to identify and implement good practice and has assisted
substantially in constructing this application.
9
Ms Helen Statham is a Senior Research Associate and Deputy Director of the CFR,
which she joined in 1989, managing her research career alongside raising two children.
Helen led focus group meetings to explore feedback from the School's Staff Survey.
Mrs Gina Warren is a University E&D Consultant (staff and student data).
10
b. The self-assessment process
The Department convened an Athena SWAN Working Group (ASWG) in April 2012 and
first met in October 2012, shortly after the formation of the new Department of Psychology
from the merger of the former SDP and EP Departments. The many meetings held in
2011-2012 to achieve this merger provided a perfect opportunity for staff to develop a
vision for the future and reflect on differences in work practice to ensure that the new
Department adopted practices that were most likely to foster staff development.
Subsequently, the ASWG met in February, April, June, July, October and November 2013,
reporting minutes to Academic Staff meetings. From 2014 we will hold termly meetings.
A School-wide staff survey launched in January 2013 consulted staff on issues ranging
from leadership, communication and career development to work/life balance and
pay/benefits. The Department 72% response rate was similar to the overall School rate
(78%). Survey results were posted on the Department’s intranet and discussed with staff
by the Head of Department (HoD), who encouraged further discussion in two focus groups
led by Helen Statham.
Survey feedback has promoted dialogue regarding common issues across and within the
eight Departments of the School of Biological Sciences (SBS) and with the Human
Resources Section of the University. After discussing this feedback the ASWG constructed
an action plan that focused on concerns raised by post-doctoral staff, a large group that
represents the next generation of academic staff and faces multiple challenges following
the economic downturn. Specifically, to address this group’s key concerns (communication
and career development), the ASWG proposed the following action points:
Away day (Spring 2014) to gather views and ideas and launch a Development
programme that is responsive to Post-doctoral researchers’ concerns and goals.
Postdoctoral Development Programme: The specific content of this programme will
be decided during the first Annual Away day, but will broadly consist of 6-monthly
meetings to enable post-doctoral researchers to become a cohesive cohort, to keep
abreast of Department issues and to gain opportunities to discuss their career plans
with senior members.
11
HoD to hold regular meetings with post-doctoral researchers, to parallel his existing
regular meetings with support staff and improve communication regarding strategic
developments in the Department.
Research Staff Development Officer (Professor Nicky Clayton) to invite
Postdoctoral Researchers to become more involved in the organisation of
Department seminars and outreach activities.
Review and re-invigorate existing appraisal procedures to ensure that all staff
receive constructive advice about training, personal development and promotions.
Action Points; 2.3a, 2.3b, 2.4a, 4j, 5a and 6.1
12
3 A picture of the Department (1979 words):
Psychology was acknowledged as a discipline at Cambridge at the turn of the 19th Century
and a Psychological Laboratory was established in 1913, with the first Professor of
Experimental Psychology appointed in 1931 (www.psychol.cam.ac.uk/about-us/history).
In August 2012, the Departments of Experimental Psychology (EP), Social and
Developmental Psychology (SDP) and the Centre for Family Research (CFR) were
merged to form the new Department of Psychology (one of eight Departments in the
School of Biological Sciences). This application relies on data from former EP and the
new Department of Psychology; data from the CFR and the former SDP and (which were
not STEM Departments) have not been included. Section 5 provides a summary of the
challenges and solutions involved in this merger.
Liaison and cooperation over the development of a new undergraduate course launched in
October 2013, the Psychological and Behavioural Sciences (PBS) Tripos, which draws
teaching from both former Psychology Departments, has assisted with the positive attitude
towards the merger process. The Department's undergraduate degrees are accredited by
the BPS which means that on graduation former students are eligible for BPS
membership; important for professional development in several Psychology career
pathways. The Department also offers an MPhil in Social and Developmental Psychology
(with an intake of around 20 students per year) and postgraduate training for the PhD
award (with around 30 new students registering per year). Teaching standards are high.
EP obtained the maximum score for Teaching Quality in the last assessment exercise. The
Department also achieved the highest student satisfaction scores for teaching in a recent
survey by the Guardian.
The Department also has a reputation for world-class, innovative research, the former
Department of EP being placed first, above 76 other University psychology departments in
the last Research Assessment Exercise (UoA44). The merged Department now covers
the full breadth of psychological research; sensory psychology, including psychoacoustics
and vision, experimental psychology, including learning, memory and decision-making,
social and developmental psychology, and behavioural and cognitive neuroscience, The
affiliated CFR (Professor Susan Golombok, Director) focuses on research that increases
13
understanding of child development and family relationships and comprises around 30
members ranging from PhD students to senior academics. Other major Centres based in
the Department include the cross-School MRC and Wellcome Trust funded Behavioural
and Clinical Neuroscience (Professor Trevor Robbins, Director), the Centre for
Neuroscience in Education (Professor Usha Goswami, Director), the Centre for Speech
Language and the Ageing Brain (Professor Lorraine Tyler, Director) and the
Psychometrics Centre (Professor John Rust, Director)
The new merged Department is a vibrant new organisation that has, in its first year,
welcomed a large number of external visitors and made two major academic appointments
in the area of visual neuroscience, (Professor Zoe Kourtzi and Dr Andrew Welchman), with
more appointments to follow in other areas. Future challenges include finding suitable new
accommodation and replacing distinguished retiring staff (including 4 Fellows of the Royal
Society). In this latter goal we are mindful of the fact that although the appointment of
Professor Zoe Kourtzi means that the female to male professorial ratio is now an
impressive 6 to 4, in the other academic staff categories there are now, with the
appointment of Dr Andrew Welchman, twice as many men as women (12 to 6) such that
care will be needed to sustain the Department’s current progress towards gender parity.
14
Student data
(i) The Department does not offer access or foundation courses.
(ii) Undergraduate courses
Figure 1: Psychology undergraduates by gender (2009-2012)
357 355 343
254 237 261
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Female
Male
Year 2 Year 3
Psychology undergraduate courses in the UK typically comprise around 80% female
students. Psychology in Cambridge is unusual because of its position in the Natural
Sciences Tripos (NST), which has no first year psychology paper and attracts a majority of
male applications. Over the assessment period (2009-2012), the second year introductory
course has attracted 42%, 40% and 43% female students, while our final year courses
have attracted 65%, 59% and 54% female students. Thus, the relatively low percentage of
female students studying Psychology in Cambridge reflects the fact that this cohort was
admitted to read Natural Sciences. Based on numbers for the new Psychological and
Behavioural Sciences Tripos (see Figure 4) this percentage appears likely to rise.
1727
30
3139
35
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Female
Male
15
(iii) The Department does not offer any taught post-graduate courses.
(iv) MPhil and Research Degree courses (see Figures 2 and 3)
Figure 2: Psychology graduate students by gender (2009-2012)
SDP MPhil students PhD students
3 8 7
13 27 17
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Female
Male
The Department offers a full time MPhil in Social and Developmental Psychology (SDP)
and a variety of research degrees (>95% full-time). In line with the national average for
Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Psychology, approximately 80% of MPhil students are
female. Over the past 3 years, approximately 60% of our candidates for research degrees
have been female. The difference between this and national average percentage
(approximately 75% female) reflects the large proportion of Department research that is
neuroscience-based (nationally approximately 53% of candidates for research degrees in
the biological sciences are female). The proportion of female research students in our
Department is also in line with the proportion of women at the final year level, suggesting
that there is no ‘leakage’ between the undergraduate and the graduate levels. Thus our
only action points here are for the Department's Graduate Education Committee
(comprised of four females and four males with a female Professorial Chair) to continue to
monitor the numbers of male and female students at each level.
Action Point: 1.1.a, 1.1b and 1.1c
5
7
6
9
6
10
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2009-10 2010-11 2011-12
Female
Male
16
(v) Applications to offers and acceptances ratios, by gender for NST PBS Tripos
undergraduates, SDP MPhil and PhD degrees (see Figures 3-6)
Cambridge departments have no direct influence over application and admission ratios as
undergraduates are admitted to one of 31 self-governing Colleges. The number of NST
applications has risen steadily over the past three years, but the number of acceptances
has remained fairly stable, with approximately 60% male students, for both applications
and acceptances.
Figure 3: Applications and acceptances for the NST, by gender (2010-2012)
1,370 367 1,512 378 1,625 426
1,008 270 978 229 1,045 249
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Applications Acceptances Applications Acceptances Applications Acceptances
2010 2011 2012
Female
Male
Figure 4: Applications and acceptances for the PBS Tripos, by gender (2013)
80 2014100
285 5754255
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Applications Acceptances
PBS Tripos (13/14) HESA (11/12)
Female
Male
This year we received 365 applications (285 female) and made 77 offers (57 female) for
the new PBS Tripos. The 78% female applications accords with national figures for
Psychology; the 74% female admissions indicates no gender-related acceptance bias.
17
Figure 5: Applications and acceptances for the SDP MPhil by gender (2010-2012)
2010 21 8
61
2800
8228 69 21
3815
10455
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Applications Acceptances Applications Acceptances Applications Acceptances
2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 HESA(11/12)
Female
Male
Figure 6: Applications and acceptances for PhD degrees by gender (2010-2012)
177
18 627
5 1185
186
27 1066
17 3520
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Applications Acceptances Applications Acceptances Applications Acceptances
2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 HESA(11/12)
Female
Male
Developmental psychology is an area in which women are particularly well represented
and so the merger of SDP and EP to create the new Department has substantially
increased the proportion of females (as well as the numbers of applications and places). In
all years, the proportion of applications from women is mirrored in the proportion accepted.
We will continue to monitor the proportions of men and women applying for and gaining
places on these post-graduate courses.
(vi) Degree classification by gender (see Figures 7 and 8)
Undergraduate degree classifications, combined for students taking single subject
Psychology and the Physiology and Psychology Joint Course, have been stable over
18
recent years. In the assessment period no student received a grade below a 2.2. Across
the three assessment years, there is no significant gender difference in the numbers of
students awarded Firsts (although the overall number is quite low). This lack of gender
difference is noteworthy, as there is a persistent and pervasive discrepancy between the
number of males and females achieving Firsts in Cambridge overall (just as there is at
Oxford). A recent Oxford-based longitudinal study of the factors that might contribute to
this discrepancy showed a female-specific drop in wellbeing across the three years of
university study, with factors that one might expect to be universally associated with exam
success (e.g., hours spent revising) predicting the likelihood of obtaining a First for men,
but not for women (Mellanby, Zimdars & Cortina-Borja, 201311). In response to these
findings our Staff Student Committee will work alongside the University E&D Team and the
Colleges in monitoring student wellbeing, academic strategies and exam success. The
new PBS Tripos includes a final year Gender paper, led by Professor Melissa Hines; this is
likely to prove particularly popular with female students and may lead to a stronger female
exam performance. Our undergraduates are alive to the importance of gender equality; an
illustration of this comes from a recent staff-student committee, in which discussion of a
student complaint about Professor Simon Baron-Cohen’s extreme male brain theory of
autism provided staff with an opportunity to emphasise to our student representatives that
we welcome exam scripts that challenge ideas presented during lectures.
Figure 7: Distribution of degree classes, by gender (2009-2012)
5
6
11
24
1 14
4
2331
0 4
7
6
21
28
2 10%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Men Women Men Women Men Women
1st 2.1 2.2
2009-2010
2010-2011
2011-2012
1 Mellanby, J., Zimdars, A., Cortina-Borja, M. (2013). Sex differences in degree performance at the
University of Oxford. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 103-111.
19
Until this year, the main route for undergraduates to study Psychology at Cambridge was
via the Natural Sciences Tripos (which has a preponderance of male students). With the
new PBS Tripos, the balance is likely to change and become closer to national figures for
psychology (80% female).
Figure 8 shows the same data, but placed in comparison with national data. As expected,
very few Cambridge students (either male or female) are awarded degrees classified lower
than a 2.1, and no student in this assessment period was awarded a third class degree (as
compared with 17% of women and 21% of men, nationally). There is no difference in the
proportion of women receiving Firsts at Cambridge (17%) and elsewhere in the UK (13%),
but a higher proportion of men receive Firsts at Cambridge (23%) than elsewhere in the
UK (12%). This comparison is based on a quite a small sample of men (n = 74) and so
further monitoring is needed to investigate whether the Cambridge system is particularly
favourable to men, or whether (as we expect) this difference reflects the somewhat
unusual NST intake.
To address this issue we will record the proportion of female PBS students receiving
Firsts. Examiners are encouraged to complete checklists to ensure consistency and
fairness in marking; if allowed by the Data Protection Act, we also plan to retain these data
alongside a record of gender for review at 3-yearly intervals. Our goal here is to increase
the transparency of the exam process by providing students with directly relevant feedback
about features of exam scripts associated with high marks.
Finally, a review of the students receiving distinctions on our MPhil over the assessment
period (i.e., since 2009) showed that this was consistently between 75% and 80% female;
that is, exactly in line with the overall percentage of women on this course. As for
undergraduate work, essays for the MPhil are submitted anonymously and this parity
between the proportions of women on the course and women receiving distinctions is
reassuring. MPhil Examiners provide students with detailed feedback, which is signed to
enable them to request a face-to-face meeting to discuss the feedback in more depth.
20
Figure 8: Distribution of degree classes by gender - compared with national data
(2009-2010)
Staff data
(vii) Gender ratio for academic and research staff (see Figures 9, 10 and 11).
In relation to other UK departments of Psychology, our Department is fairly small, with
around 27 academic staff and ~70 research staff in any one year. In 2009 there were 9
male but only 2 female University Lecturers and in 2010 there were 7 male but only one
female Research Assistant. This imbalance continued in 2011 (10 male and just 2 female
Research Assistants). One positive consequence of the merger in 2012 was to redress
this imbalance (to 11 male and 8 female Research Assistants); currently the breakdown is
an even five of each gender among Research Assistants. Across all categories, women
account for 55% of staff in the Department. This lack of gender difference in the
Department is similar to the national picture (59% female) but noteworthy in the
Cambridge context as it contrasts with the greater preponderance of men in senior posts
within the School and the University as a whole (see Figure 11). We will continue to
monitor carefully the gender distribution for each category of staff on a regular, annual
basis and support the career development of our female staff both within and outside the
Department, especially with regards to appointments to Lectureships (see below).
Action Point 2.1d
1830 390
6710 1360
2810 780
2300 665
6 7
28
21
1 2 0 0 0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male
First 2.1 2.2 other
HESA Cambridge
21
Figure 9: Academic and Research Staff by gender (2010-2012)
24 25 29
7 7
4
1
5
2 2
2 5
3 4
31 39 40
1 1
3
2
2
2 1 2
3 5
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012
Researcher University Lecturer Senior Lecturer Reader Professor
Male Female
Figure 10: Pipeline for Students, Research and Academic Staff by gender (2012)
Figure 11: Percentage Female Staff in University, School and Psychology, (2012)
45%
34% 32%
20% 16%
46%
36%
28%
16%
24%
58%
43%
29% 33%
56%
0%
20%
40%
60%
Researcher University Lecturer Senior Lecturer Reader Professor
University School Biological Sciences Department of Psychology
22
(viii) Turnover by grade and gender
Academic staff. Our four academic staff-leavers over the past three years were all
male and included two retirements, one move to a College post and one return to a
position (and his family) in the USA following health problems.
Researchers. Over the past three years, 44 researchers have left the Department.
The percentage turnovers for male researchers were 32%, 55% and 25% in 2010, 2011
and 2012 respectively. The corresponding percentages for female researchers were 19%,
19% and 25%. Chi-squared tests showed no gender difference in turnover rate for 2010
and 2012, but significantly more male than female turnover in 2011 (Chi-squared = 9.41, p
< .01). Reasons for staff leaving include: maternity leave (one female), resignation (one
female) and end of a fixed-term contract (18 female, 24 male). Of these 42, we only have
clear data on new posts for 9 staff; of these, 6 (5 male, one female) went on to other
research /academic posts and 3 (one male, two female) went on to other scientific posts
(editorial work at Nature and GSK scientist). This review process has been salutary in
highlighting both the contrast across staff categories (reflecting the short-term nature of
grant funding) and in identifying a need to sustain contact with former members of staff, in
order to refine our understanding of turnover data, to increase networking opportunities for
existing staff and to support and celebrate the work of former members.
Action Point 4i
23
4. Supporting and advancing women’s careers: (4310 words).
a) (i) Job application and success rates by gender and grade.
Rather than presenting data for all individual grades, we focus on two key career transition
points: Research Associates and our Lectureship appointments.
Figure 12: Applicants, shortlisted and appointed Research Associates by gender
(Feb 2010 to Nov 2012)
109 29 12
82 20 9
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Number ofapplicants
Number shortlisted Appointments
Female
Male
Figure 13: Applicants, shortlisted and appointed Lecturers by gender (Feb 2010 to
Nov 2012)
25
5
19
7
1
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Number ofapplicants
Number shortlisted Appointments
Female
Male
24
Nine (40%) of the 21 Research Associate posts made in the assessment period were
awarded to women. Although lower than one might expect given the preponderance of
female psychology graduates, this proportion is broadly in keeping with the UK picture for
Biological Sciences.
More men than women applied for the Lectureship position, but more women than men
were shortlisted and the successful candidate was a woman. Corresponding figures for
university academic appointments in Science, Engineering and Technology in the same
period are similarly reassuring from a gender perspective (with 22%, 25% and 25% of
applications, shortlisting and appointments being female). Thus our recruitment process
shows no evidence of gender bias.
ii) Applications for Senior Academic Promotion
Figure 14: Senior Academic Promotions by gender (2004-2012)
The data shown in Figure 14 suggest two clear trends. First, men are more likely than
women to apply for promotion. The University’s E&D Office is taking measures to
reduce this gender disparity (and investigate potential reasons for any cases of gender-
based unequal pay, although we are unaware of any current examples of this in this
Department). Interestingly Professorial applications showed no gender difference (3 of 6
applications since 2004 were from women). Second, women are generally more
50
66.7
50
33.3 28.6
100
71.4
20
30
66.7 70
57.1
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
%femaleapplicants
%femalessuccessful
%maleapplicants
%malesuccessful
Professor
Reader
Senior Lecturer
25
successful in their promotion applications than men. All female (but just 3 of 5 male).
These findings indicate that men are more likely than women to apply for promotion
prematurely, resulting in both more applications and a greater proportion of
unsuccessful applications.
Figure 15: Senior Academic Promotions in the University of Cambridge (2004-2012)
Interestingly, while success rates for women in Psychology appear at least as
favourable than those for the School of Biology and the University as a whole, success
rates for men in Psychology appear somewhat lower than those for men in the School
and the University as a whole – but small numbers preclude formal analysis.
Promotion to personal Professorships, Readerships and Senior Lectureships is run
through an annual competitive exercise with initial recommendations made by the
Faculty of Biological Sciences and final decisions made by a Committee chaired by the
Vice-Chancellor. The Faculty and University Committees are composed with
consideration to balanced gender membership.
Eligible candidates are encouraged to discuss potential applications with the HoD. To
promote positive communication and career development, our ASWG Chair (for 1
January 2014 onwards), Professor Michael Lamb will also act as a contact point for
potential applicants. To encourage more female academics to apply for promotion, the
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Psych School Bio Uni Psych School Bio Uni
%females successful %males successful
Professor
Reader
Senior Lecturer
26
University has recently introduced a Senior Academic Promotion CV Scheme2, in which
female Lecturers, Senior Lecturers and Readers can have their CV reviewed by a senior
academic with relevant experience. To increase the transparency of the SAP process
the University hosted three Senior Academic Promotion (SAP) Open Fora in 2013. We
will use the CV scheme and Open Fora to foster female mentoring in the Department
via one to one support from our ASWG Chair, Professor Michael Lamb.
Action Point 2.5
b) (i) Recruitment of staff
The University provides substantial guidance on how to recruit effectively in compliance
with University policy and procedures, employment law and equal opportunities
legislation3. The Departmental HR administrator oversees the recruitment process and
ensures adherence to the University’s equal opportunity policies and best practice for
every post and the HoD, Senior Administrator, HR administrator and many other
Department senior staff have completed training in recruitment and equality and diversity.
Job descriptions are written carefully to avoid unconscious discrimination; the further
particulars provide prospective applicants with information about work benefits that are
likely to be important to women: flexible working options, generous annual leave,
maternity/paternity leave, and family-friendly policies, including the salary sacrifice scheme
for childcare and the new ‘returning carers’ scheme (see below). Shortlisted candidates for
academic posts present their work to the Department, whose views are taken into account
by Boards of Electors containing strong national and international expertise, but also with a
view to gender balance. New guidelines for Boards of Electors were introduced in 2013 to
ensure a wide search for a diverse range of candidates.
Action Point 2.1
2 www.admin.cam.ac.uk/offices/hr/equality/wiseti/cv/
3 www.admin.cam.ac.uk/cam-only/offices/hr/recruitment/;
www.admin.cam.ac.uk/cam-only/offices/hr/recruitment/equality/
27
(i) Support for staff at key career transition points
The University has received the European Commission’s ‘HR Excellence in Research’
badge for its work fostering researchers’ career development. This included the launch of
an Employment and Career Management Scheme (ECMS) in April 2011, which provides a
clear framework for the induction, probation and appraisal of contract research staff4. All
research staff have an induction meeting (a Career Management Review - CMR) with their
Principal Investigator (PI) to identify their development needs and arrange mentoring and
appraisal. Detailed online guidance provides researchers with clear role descriptions,
guidance on pay progression and the types of experience and responsibilities needed for
promotion. The scheme requires further CMRs every two years and regular informal
meetings.
Our staff survey highlighted inconsistencies in the format and frequency of appraisals for
different parts of the Department, making this one area in which we recognize the need for
positive action to reinvigorate the appraisal process within the Department. We will take
this opportunity to implement ECMS recommendations, communicate the details of this
scheme to all staff members (e.g., via Academic Staff Meetings) and monitor the process
of appraisal from a gender perspective.
Action Point 2.4
Career development
(i) Promotion and career development
Appraisal and review
The merger made clear that while SDP and CFR staff had consistently received annual or
biennial appraisals, these formal appraisals were less regular in EP as line-managers had
adopted a more informal approach. Our School Survey indicated that staff would
appreciate the opportunities for feedback provided by the appraisal system. The HoD has
therefore agreed to champion a more formal and regular system in which he (or his Senior
4 www.cam.ac.uk/research-staff/employment-and-career-management
28
Administrator) will consult with appraisees before selecting appraisers (normally the
research group leader or another individual acquainted with their work). Three weeks
before the appraisal, appraisees complete a questionnaire covering their previous
achievements, future goals and actions; appraisers complete a complementary document
to ensure that the appraisal discussion covers all areas identified on each side. The
appraisee then develops an action plan, which may include a training programme that is
subsequently approved by the appraiser and the HoD.
Action Points 2.4
Career progression for Graduate students:
Most of our 83 PhD students (98% completion) and 115 MPhils in the assessment
period proceeded on to further post-graduate scientific positions, clinical medicine
training, or professional positions. In the last 3 years our graduates have been first
authors on 234 peer-reviewed journals papers. In this period, women (Claire Gillan and
Molly Crockett) accounted for both of our Sir Henry Wellcome Fellowships, three of the
four College Junior Fellowships (Jenny Bosten, Lucy Cheke and Kathryn Hopkins);
Hopkins also won the first EPS Frith Prize from the for “an exceptional body of PhD
work”. One female graduate (Angela Kehagia) became a Lecturer at King’s College
London in 2012 and another (Molly Crockett) became a University Lecturer at the
University of Oxford in 2013.
Action Points 1.3b, 1.3c,
Career development for Researchers
The University of Cambridge accepts responsibility for developing young academics
through fellowships to full independence. Within a competitive personal promotions
culture, researchers in the Department receive mentorship through a number of
research fellowship schemes or grant-supported post-doctoral posts. In the assessment
period we have gained 26 Research Fellowships (62% female) from the Royal Society,
MRC, BBSRC, ESRC, Newton International, Wellcome Trust, British Academy, Marie
Curie, and College Junior Research Fellowships. Competitions for the latter generally
29
attract over 100 applications across all disciplines for each fellowship. Some of the more
striking career successes among our research fellows have included MRC Career
Development Awardee, Bishop, (Asst. Professor, Berkeley). Post-doctoral researchers
are admitted into Colleges as bye-fellows on the basis of their contributions to
undergraduate teaching; a Post-docs of Cambridge Society (PdOC) holds regular
meetings and workshops about career development. In 2013 the University introduced a
new Office of Post-Doctoral Affairs with an Academic Director to champion the cause of
post-docs at Cambridge and develop a coordinated network of support services.
Another important route for post-doctoral career development is promotion to the Senior
Research Associate (SRA) grade (in the last 5 years 6 of 10 SRA promotions have been
awarded to women), which can lead to permanent University Lectureships (e.g., Dr
Mirjana Bozic). After her PhD Dr Amy Milton was appointed as a fixed term,
Departmental Lecturer and recently succeeded in gaining a permanent University
Lectureship.
Action Points 2.3
Career development for Academic Staff
Two Deputy HoDs (Professors Nicola Clayton and Melissa Hines) share responsibilities
for research and teaching and provide support for staff at key career transition points
including promotion and sabbatical leave (which, in Cambridge is a relatively generous
term per 6 terms worked, including terms on maternity leave). Periods of sabbatical
leave provide academic staff with valuable opportunities to focus on their research, but
their timing requires careful consideration to avoid creating unreasonable administrative
workloads for other colleagues. Our review also highlighted potential implications of the
age profile of Department members with regards to the importance of nurturing young
and/or new staff for the future success of the Department. In particular, 8 members of
staff are under 40 and many of these have (or will have) young children. In addition, we
will soon be making several new appointments as 7 staff members are approaching
retirement.
30
(ii) Induction and training
New members receive a tour of the Department on their first day and are introduced to key
colleagues and the HR Administrator, who ensures that they have all the resources they
need to conduct their roles. New members of staff are also assigned mentors, who act as
impartial confidantes for any concerns or difficulties. Tea and cake events before each
weekly Zangwill Club Seminar provide opportunities for staff to socialise with colleagues.
The University holds a bi-annual Welcome to Cambridge networking event for new staff.
We have also developed an Athena SWAN webpage, which includes photos of people
who have agreed to act as contacts for a variety of work/life balance and career
progression issues; information about this webpage will soon be added to the Induction
pack.
www.psychol.cam.ac.uk/about-us/athena-swan (link to become active in mid December)
Action Points 2.2
Training
Upon appointment, staff join a role-appropriate email groups to which the Senior
Administrator regularly communicates relevant University training opportunities5. These
include training in interview techniques, communication and presentation skills, lecturing
performance, and supervision of students.
The New Perspectives for Women programme6 addresses many of the career issues
faced by women and offers courses targeted at specific staff groups (e.g. Confident Ways
of Working, Furthering Your Career, and Gaining Recognition at Work).
Springboard7, a personal development programme for women, offers female staff and
graduate students practical career support through self-assessment and the setting of
challenging goals. The programme addresses communication, assertiveness, self-
confidence, and work/life balance issues.
5 www.admin.cam.ac.uk/offices/hr/ppd/
6 www.training.cam.ac.uk/cppd/theme/women?providerId=36612
7 www.training.cam.ac.uk/cppd/course/cppd-perdev3
31
The University’s Women in Science, Engineering and Technology Initiative (WiSETI)8
supports women from undergraduate to Professorial level in Science, Technology,
Engineering and Mathematics. WiSETI activities include an annual WiSETI lecture and
career development seminars (including a ‘Cake and Careers’ session specifically for the
School of Biological Sciences in December 2013 which female members of the
Department will be encouraged to attend).
Action Points 2.3c, 2.3d
(iii) Support for female students
Springboard and WiSETI (described above) include students in many of their career-
related events. In addition, the University’s Careers Service (available to all staff and
students) offers specialist careers advice for contract research staff and post-docs and has
a dedicated advisor for the Life Sciences, while the Graduate Student and Postdoc Forum,
provides careers resource for postgraduate students and early career researchers.
Initiatives include Fora for the communication of ideas and the coordination of academic
activities, including student-run conferences. We will continue to encourage students to
attend and participate in these events.
Students are typically enthusiastic about attending the Departmental weekly ‘Zangwill
Seminar Series’ (financial support from the Department enables graduate students to join
senior colleagues at dinners held after each seminar). These initiatives provide valuable
opportunities for students to ‘network’ with senior colleagues in their field. All postgraduate
students have both a supervisor (who provides direct academic support) and an advisor
(to provide more general academic support). We will explore ways of increasing
interactions between senior members of faculty and graduate students (e.g., through
seminar series to celebrate women in science).
Action Point 1.3
8 www.admin.cam.ac.uk/offices/hr/equality/wiseti/
32
Organisation and culture
(i) Male and female representation on committees
The Department of Psychology has 9 internal Committees, which generally meet termly
and report to Academic Staff Meetings held 5 times a year. Committee membership is
determined by expertise, workload and other Departmental administrative duties. There
are 33 membership opportunities on these Committees; 19 occupied by males (15 male
staff available) and 14 by females (12 female staff members available).
Action point 3.1|
(ii) Gender ratio of staff on fixed-term and permanent contracts
Figure 16 shows that there are no consistent gender differences in the proportion of staff
on fixed and permanent contracts, by staff type (academic / researcher) and gender. One
of the two female fixed-term academic staff (Dr Amy Milton) has recently been awarded a
permanent Lectureship within the Department. As the assessment period encompasses
the formation of the new Department it is difficult to examine trends over time. We will
review annually the proportion of male and female staff in fixed term vs permanent posts.
Action Point 4k
Figure 16: Numbers of fixed-term and permanent staff by gender (2010-2012)
1 1 2 2
14 18 20 13 15 20
4 4 11 14 13
14
17 21 20 11 10 9
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012
Female Male Female Male
Academic Researcher
Fixed Term Permanent
33
(i) Representation on decision-making committees
Suitable individuals are selected for their expertise and experience. The fairly equal
gender balance of the academic staff makes it feasible to achieve a gender balance on
Committees without increasing workload for female staff. As senior female staff are,
however, under-represented in the School of Biological Sciences, the HoD regularly
proposes senior women from the Department to sit on influential School and University
Committees (e.g. Professor Nicky Clayton is a Member of the School of Biological
Sciences Appointments Committee and Professor Lorraine Tyler was, for 10 years, the
Chair of the School’s Senior Academic Promotions Committee). In addition, Professor
Claire Hughes (acting Chair of ASWG) has been involved in high-level University events to
promote gender equality.
Action Point 3.1
(ii) Workload model.
We believe that formal algorithms for assigning administrative and teaching duties would
not benefit the spirit of teamwork we have strived to foster within our Department. Instead,
the HoD and Administrator take into consideration individual variation in preferences and
capacities for different types of work to ensure an even spread of responsibilities, expertise
and opportunity. Regard is also given to duties undertaken in the previous years and staff
seniority. After extensive consultation with Department staff, a roster of Departmental,
Faculty and University-related duties for the academic year ahead is discussed at the
penultimate staff meeting (i.e. end April). This is based on the HoD and Administrator’s
intimate knowledge of individual workloads, and takes into account periods of sabbatical
leave, absence through chronic illness, maternity and paternity leave. The roster is
finalised through democratic discussion at the end-of-year staff meeting (mid-June). This
tried and tested approach works well in a small consultative Department and gives ample
opportunity for staff to comment on their workload, and change their assigned
responsibilities if necessary.
Action Point 3.2
34
(iii) Timing of Departmental meetings and social gatherings
Around half of the Department’s 27 academic staff have young children and the
Department recognises the difficulties raised by school runs and other caring commitments
that impact at the start and end of the traditional working day. Times and dates of key
regular meetings are announced at the beginning of the academic year to allow staff to
make necessary arrangements. Where 'ad hoc' meetings are required all members of the
relevant committee are contacted for their availability prior to setting dates/times. If
members cannot stay for the whole meeting, agenda items are rescheduled to suit. Efforts
are made to ensure Departmental meetings and research seminars start after 9.30am and
finish before 3.30pm.The exception to this rule is the Department’s well-attended weekly
Zangwill seminar series, which finishes at around 5.30pm with an invitation to all staff,
visitors, graduate and final year undergraduate students.to adjourn to the local pub and/or
have dinner with the speaker.
Action Point 3.3
(iv) Culture
The EP Department had a long record of supporting famous women psychologists at all
levels. Professors Brenda Milner FRS (McGill University, Montreal) and Anne Treisman
FRS (Princeton University) were undergraduates reading Psychology here. From 1960-
1980 the Department included such famous figures as Alice Heim, Margaret Vince,
Eleanor Lieven, Joan Stevenson-Hinde, and Susan Iversen (who subsequently became
Professor of Experimental Psychology at Oxford). In the last 20 years, University Lecturers
have included the clinical and cognitive neuropsychologists, Barbara Sahakian FMedSci,
(now Professor, in the Department of Psychiatry) and Dr Rosaleen McCarthy. Dr Usha
Goswami FBA, was a University Lecturer in the early 1990s, moved to a Chair at the
University of London and then returned to take a Chair at Cambridge now within the
Department of Psychology. Dr Lorraine Tyler FBA took a similar route, being a University
Lecturer in the 1980s and is now a Professor in the Department. We are vividly reminded
35
of these historical links by the photographic portraits of distinguished prior faculty we
display on the walls of the Department.
Prominent recent appointments (since 2000) have included Dr Lisa Saksida (now Reader),
Professor Nicola Clayton FRS (appointed as a University Lecturer in 2000, Reader in 2002
and Professor in 2005). In the past two years we have appointed Dr Mirjana Bozic and Dr
Amy Milton to University Lecturer from previous posts as Senior Research Associate and
Departmental Lecturer, respectively. The formation of the new Department in 2012 has
further swelled the ranks of our female Departmental staff with no fewer than three
additional female professors, Susan Golombok, Melissa Hines, and Claire Hughes, as well
as one Senior Lecturer, Simone Schnall. The recent appointment of Professor Zoe Kourtzi
means that female Professors now outnumber male Professors in this Department.
We support our female staff in various ways, nominating them for prestigious awards and
ensuring their awards are recognised within the Department via announcements at
meetings and on our website. Nicola Clayton is now FRS (2010) and Usha Goswami
received the BPS President’s Award in 2011. Brenda Milner, a former undergraduate,
received a particular mark of distinction by receiving an Honorary Degree at this University
in 2000.
More generally, we try to ensure that students, especially undergraduates, use the
Departmental facilities, which include newly refurbished ‘café’ style accommodation
equipped with access to web facilities, as well as the Departmental Library, with its full
time Librarian. The merger has not adversely affected our busy but friendly ambience, as
illustrated by a photo of one of our Department noticeboards and the recent quotes from
undergraduates in feedback questionnaires:
36
"Excellent community spirit in the Department. Top draw receptionists /library functions etc. Felt very welcomed." "The friendly community feel of the Department made it easy to approach people with questions. It was very helpful and inspiring to be able to have supervisions with the lecturers themselves or other knowledgeable people currently doing research in the field." "Everyone in the Department is incredibly knowledgeable and friendly." "Some amazing lecturers/supervisors. High flexibility in choosing modules. Reading week. Drinks reception after last exam. Lovely supporting staff: it/reception/ librarian."
37
Each year we have three Departmental parties and following the merger we held a
Department Awa1y-Day to discuss important issues and future strategy. We expect to
continue these on a regular basis. We take care to ensure that there is a good gender
balance on various sub-committees of students or academic staff. We have had no
examples of bullying or complaints by female staff of discrimination. Sexist language is
frowned upon and is virtually non-existent. The HoD has termly meetings with support staff
to keep them informed of developments in the Department and to discuss any issues
arising; this practice will be extended to the post-doctoral community to augment their
meetings in specialised laboratory groups. Our Librarian keeps the Departmental website
up to date with news and events, including celebrations of successes and achievements
(e.g. promotions, new grants, awards and new publications). This website now includes an
Athena SWAN page, designed both to make information about careers and work/life
balance more accessible and to celebrate the many inspiring women in the Department.
(v) Outreach activities
Many Department members are involved in outreach activities, especially initiatives
designed to: (a) widen access to our highly competitive undergraduate degree; and (b)
foster public engagement with science.
a) Widening access.
At least four staff members (Dr Lucy Blake, Dr Vasanti Jadva, Dr Mike Aitken and Dr Juliet
Foster) have contributed to Psychology days within summer schools organized by the
Sutton Trust to raise the aspirations of academically talented teenagers from
disadvantaged communities. In response to the popularity of these Psychology days, Dr
Lucy Blake will coordinate a Departmental one-week course (14th-18th July 2014) including
talks given by our HoD, Professor Trevor Robbins, and one of the two deputy Heads,
Professor Nicky Clayton and her tango dancing partner, Clive Wilkins, who is the
Department’s artist in residence.
Other access initiatives in which staff (both male and female) are involved include: (i)
assisting in a new University initiative to raise academic aspirations among talented GSCE
students; (ii) representing the Department at all of the Oxford and Cambridge 2014
Conferences (taking place in 7 different venues across the UK); (iii) visiting local primary
38
schools as part of the Cambridge Science Festival School Roadshow; (iv) a national 6th
form essay competition, with submissions being received from 500+ schools; and (v)
College outreach activities (e.g., open days, subject interest groups, school visits).
b) Public engagement with science
Several Department members regular contribute to events designed to promote public
engagement with science. Two female staff who are particularly active in this area include
Professor Nicky Clayton and Dr Amy Milton. Specifically, alongside her internationally
acclaimed work with corvids, Professor Nicky Clayton is also a very successful dancer
(working with the Rambert Dance Company). The Department submitted a summary of her
work in dance as part of its documentation of impact activities for the forthcoming REF.
Professor Nicky Clayton also frequently contributes to our public dissemination work (e.g.,
Cheltenham Science Festival; plenary talks at the Cambridge Science Festival and
Festival of Ideas and this year’s Cambridge University Alumni; a Royal Institution talk and
a TEDx Oxbridge talk (www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iavquY2OFo, June 2013). Likewise, in
addition to her work on widening access to the University, Dr Amy Milton regularly takes
part in events organized by the Institute of Continuing Education, by ‘Skeptics in the Pub’
and by ‘A Pint of Science’.
Action Point 5
Flexibility and managing career breaks
Department members appreciate the importance of a good work-life balance, and fully
support flexible working and career breaks. The Department follows University practice in
having considerably more generous maternity/paternity/adoption leave provision than
required by law and offering a graduated return to work plan and flexible working
arrangements. Female staff receive 18 weeks fully paid maternity leave, 21 weeks on
Statutory Maternity Pay, and up to 13 weeks unpaid maternity or adoption leave. Staff may
also request a career break of up to two years.
39
(i) Maternity return rate.
Nine members of the Department have made use of this leave entitlement in the past 3
years, with duration of maternity leave ranging from 6 to 12 months and 3 staff (2
researchers and one assistant) choosing not to return from maternity leave.
The Department has several measures in place to facilitate the return to work after
maternity or adoption leave. Prior to the leave, the Department Secretary conducts a risk
assessment to ensure that the work environment can be adapted appropriately during
pregnancy. Once maternity leave has begun, contact is maintained through a nominated
person in the Department (often the line manager) or through up to 10 paid ‘Keeping in
Touch’ days in which a member of staff may work without affecting statutory maternity pay.
(ii) Paternity, adoption and parental leave uptake
The University provides 2 weeks’ paid paternity leave (used by 3 members of staff during
the 2009-12 period). As from April 2011, the University also offers provision for fathers
who would like to undertake paid additional paternity leave of up to 26 weeks during the
period from 20 weeks after the birth to the end of the mother’s paid maternity leave, if the
mother has returned to work. To date no members of staff have taken additional paternity
leave (or adoption or parental leave), but should any member of staff wish to do so in the
future, then he will be entitled to the same arrangements and ‘Keeping in Touch’ days as
are currently available for female staff returning from maternity leave.
(iii) Numbers of applications and success rates for flexible working by gender
and grade.
Flexible working arrangements are readily available in the Department. The University’s
flexible working policy (for all staff) allows for alteration to working hours in consultation
with the individual's line manager. Currently 18 of 70 researchers (26%) are working part-
time, 13 of these (72%) are female. Of the 27 academic staff, 3 (11%) are part-time, of
whom one is female. All four members of support staff who applied for have changes of
hours in relation to their childcare needs over the past three years have been successful.
40
(iv) Flexible working
The flexible working policy is implemented informally for academic staff who do not have
‘core’ hours but instead are assessed in terms of their responsibilities to the Department.
Similarly, research staff do not have set hours of work but are expected to average 37
hours per week with hours arranged in consultation with their line manager and the needs
of the research group. Numbers are small but one example is a researcher who has
shifted her working hours to 7am – 3pm for childcare reasons. Where practicable,
members of staff are also permitted to work from home. This flexibility in working is widely
utilised in the Department; in the recent Staff Survey, 91% of Psychology staff endorsed
the statement, “I have a choice in deciding how I do my work”.
(v) Cover for maternity and adoption leave and support on return
The University launched a ‘Returning Carers’ support scheme in August 2013. This
scheme (piloted in the Schools of Physical Sciences, Technology and Clinical Medicine in
2012/13) enables researchers who have taken 3+ months leave in the past 4 years to
apply for up to £10,000 to be used on teaching buy-out, setting up new research, attending
conferences in order to build up their research profiles and other academic activity after a
period away from work. Dr Vasanti Jadva has already applied to this scheme (decision
pending - see Case Study 1). The scheme addresses an issue of real concern to staff;
survey responses indicated that just 33% of Psychology staff were satisfied with the
support that the University has, to date, provided to help with achieving a good work-life
balance. Underlining the view that there is room for improvement in existing provisions, 3
of the 9 members of staff (1 support, 2 researchers) taking maternity leave in the 2009-12
period did not return to the Department. (One member of support staff has not yet returned
from maternity leave but is anticipated to return to the Department later this year.) In
future, staff appointed to the ‘Keeping in Touch’ role will be encouraged to communicate
information so that a central record can be kept in order to identify any issues that might
be addressed in order to retain a higher proportion of staff with very young children.
Action Point 2.6
41
Figure 17: The numbers of full and part-time Academic and Research Staff by
gender (2010-2012)
Summary of key points.
We hope this application demonstrates that, while our Department offers much to
celebrate with regard to the role of women in science, we are very aware that female staff
face multiple challenges and are taking active steps to support their career progression.
Positive points that we would like to highlight include: the friendly and democratic
atmosphere in our Department; careful adherence to guidelines on equality and diversity in
recruitment and promotion processes; the adoption of family-friendly work practices and
support for staff on or returning from periods of parental leave; and the inclusion of gender
research in our teaching at both undergraduate and graduate levels. Each of these factors
has had a real impact in enabling us to achieve a gender balance in our staff (with women
accounting for 55% of our overall staff and 56% of our Professorial staff). Action points for
the future that deserve highlighting include: a comprehensive programme to support all
postdoctoral researchers (likely to be particularly valued by female staff); the development
of an Athena SWAN webpage to facilitate communication about career development and
work/life balance; the reinvigoration of appraisal processes to ensure that all eligible staff
are encouraged to apply for promotion; and efforts to ensure that senior female staff are
included in decision-making committees within the School of Biological Sciences.
5 14 6 13 10 15
23
23 32
23
28 26
1 1 8
1 7
2
12 3
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male
2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012
Academic Researcher
Full-time Part-time
42
5 Any other comments: (498 words)
The main advantages of the merger of the two Departments were to consolidate teaching
responsibilities, enable new research areas to be developed jointly and provide both a
strong single entity representing Psychology for the forthcoming REF submission and a
single Department for the admission of high quality Psychology undergraduates. The
mission of the Department is to serve society by providing outstanding teaching,
scholarship and research in the area of psychology and cognate disciplines.
We draw attention to the merger as this exercise is a good example of the success of the
consultative approach we adopted during a challenging period. The merger also provided
an opportunity to review both Departments’ policies and procedures to ensure that the new
Department of Psychology would draw on best practice. Both HoDs and Senior
Administrators (together with relevant key staff) met on a monthly basis throughout the
year to review all relevant areas of activity and staff in both Departments were kept up to
date with progress on the merger throughout the year via: (i) staff meetings; (ii) a joint
presentation by the HoDs in March 2012; (iii) a full discussion of the feedback received
and (iv) individual consultations with the Senior Administrator prior to the merger for all
directly affected support staff (with feedback relating to the practical support required for
the new Departmental structure being relayed back to Department management).
The merger was challenging for both Institutions, with staff in SDP in particular, given the
relatively small size of their Department, initially feeling concerned about potentially
negative consequences arising for their area of psychology and their position within the
merged Department. However, through consultation and communication over a long
period, these fears have been allayed. During the year prior to the merger both Heads of
Departments met with all academic staff to ensure that all staff had input to the merger
process. Another hurdle was the location of the two Departments, which, although close
(an eight minute walk), were on different University sites. Upon the merger two groups of
staff were re-accommodated on the 'other' Site. There were good academic reasons for
relocating these staff, but this also assisted with the feeling of a merged Department
breaking down the sense of 'us’ and ‘them'. Departmental meetings and seminars are
scheduled on both sites alternately and administrative and secretarial staff are
43
accommodated on both sites to ensure that all academic staff feel supported. The
Department organised an Away Day in December 2012, four months after the merger,
which focussed on celebrating the past successes of the two former Departments and
looked forward to the development of the new Department, with particular attention to new
strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities, identifying areas that needed further work or
dialogue. Combining the two Department’s cultures, policies and procedures during the
merger has been a challenge for everyone involved but has had a successful outcome and
promises new research collaborations in the areas of social and affective neuroscience
and in bringing together different approaches to developmental psychology.
6 Action plan
See attached document.
44
Case Study 1 – Dr Vasanti Jadva
I joined the CFR in March 2006 as a Research Associate. I took my most recent maternity
leave on 1st Feb 2012. At this time I was working on a large grant headed by Professor
Susan Golombok, and I was also Principle Investigator I on my own research grant which I
was awarded under the ESRC’s first grants competition. I had health complications and a
long commute from London and so I was allowed to work from home for the last 5 weeks
before I left for maternity leave. This allowed me to continue working to complete
academic papers that I wished to submit before going on leave. In addition, prior to leaving
for maternity leave, I was encouraged to apply for promotion which was successful, and I
was promoted to Senior Research Associate on my return. When I went on maternity
leave, Professor Golombok became the day-to-day contact for my research assistant.
My third daughter was born on 3rd March 2012 and I returned to work on 1st Jan 2013 after
having taken 11 months leave. During my maternity leave, I utilised the University’s
Keeping in Touch Days to monitor the progress of my grant via email and carried out any
necessary work from home. The Centre was very flexible about the date of my return to
work. Professor Golombok discussed the details of my return with me including my
workload and whether I wished to return full-time or part-time. I decided to return to work 4
days per week. The Centre also allowed me to gradually return to work, such that for the
first 5 weeks I was working only 2 days per week. This was vital in providing me with the
necessary time to adjust and settle into the new routine. I have continued to be supported
and encouraged by the Centre. Since I returned to work, I have taken on two PhD students
as a co-supervisor and I plan to apply for further research grants to advance my research
career. I do not feel that returning to work part-time has affected the progress that I am
making, and this is largely attributed to the support received from the Director and Deputy
Director of the Centre. I am able to work from home and have been given the flexibility to
manage my working hours which has been an enormous help. This has been particularly
beneficial as I am currently at the writing-up phase of my own grant.
45
Case Study 2 – Professor Claire Hughes
My first experiences at the Department were as an undergraduate in Natural Sciences.
Having been inspired by my (male) A-level physics teacher to think about a career in
medical physics, I was then discouraged by frequent encounters with sexist attitudes
during a gap year at Thorn EMI electronics. This changed in my 2nd year at Cambridge
when I discovered experimental psychology, which opened up a world of science in which
women were welcome. My years as PhD student in the Department, working on executive
functions in autism were very happy and productive and I recall being encouraged and
inspired by many different researchers, male and female, within and outside Cambridge.
Knowing that I am half-French, my supervisor encouraged me to apply for post-doctoral
funding from the Fyssen Foundation in Paris. This challenging two-year post-doc was
followed by six very productive years at the Institute of Psychiatry in London. However,
the birth of my son (in 1999) made me realise that I needed an alternative to the hamster-
wheel of short-term research contracts. A key attraction of a job advertised in Cambridge
was the possibility of becoming a member of the CFR, which I reasoned (correctly), would
have a family-friendly work culture. However, the CFR was, at that time, housed within the
Faculty of Social and Political Sciences (SPS), in which I was, for some years, the only
female member of staff of childbearing age. Since my arrival in Cambridge in November
2000 I have had two further children (daughters born at the start of 2002 and in July 2006).
The contrast between my experiences in and around these two periods of maternity leave
is a clear testimony to the changing culture within the university across this period and
when my third child was born in 2006 my new colleagues could not have been more
supportive. By then the new CFR director, Professor Susan Golombok, had raised funds
for major refurbishments (including a baby-changing room and a large sofa in my office -
perfect for brief power-naps in the late stage of pregnancy). More importantly, the
changes in staff led to the introduction of more positive practices at an institutional level,
including a risk assessment for pregnant women.
Another way in which my senior colleagues have been very supportive has been in
encouraging me to apply for promotion. Thus I arrived as a lecturer in November 2000,
was promoted to Senior Lecturer in 2003 and to Reader in 2005. Although my initial
application for a professorship in 2010 was unsuccessful, it was helpful to be granted a
46
face-to-face meeting with the chair of the school’s promotion committee and to receive
written feedback that my application was judged ‘slightly premature’. This encouraged me
to apply again in 2011 and I found out that my second application had been successful
shortly before the merger that led to the formation of the new Department of Psychology. I
now find myself in a position in which it is my turn to mentor and support junior members of
staff, in a Department that is full of inspiring and friendly colleagues. As a result, despite
the challenges of juggling the demands of work and the needs of three children, I feel
fulfilled and privileged.
(952 words)
Department of Psychology Action Plan
47
Objective Actions to date Action(s) Required Responsibility Specific Measurable Timeline
1. Supporting students
1.1 To support undergraduate students
The ASWG has reviewed the gender balance of students taking Part IB and Part II (years 2 and 3) Psychology as part of the Natural Science Tripos. The ASWG has reviewed degree attainment by gender. The ASWG notes that termly undergraduate feedback surveys are reviewed to identify any issues. The AS Working Group noted attendance at the annual Careers Day for undergraduates.
a) Monitor and review gender balance of students taking new Psychology degree including application and acceptance rates. Continue to monitor NST students. b) Support female students and encourage confidence and risk taking in exams/essays to improve first class honours amongst female students. c) Improve the response rate of surveys to ensure feedback represents student body. d) Increase transparency of the exam process by giving students feedback about features of exam scripts associated with high marks, gathered over 3 years to increase power
Director of Undergraduate Education and Teaching Administrator Director of Undergraduate Education and Supervisors Director of Undergraduate Education and Teaching Administrator Director of Undergraduate Education and Teaching Administrator
Examine gender balance statistics at relevant teaching committees for anomalous data. Send any concerns to Colleges for review of admissions procedures. Include advice in Departmental supervisor training sessions on encouraging confidence in female students. Response rate improved. Appropriate actions in response to feedback developed.
To be reviewed on annual basis in October. Next training session will be held in August 2013; to be held annually October 2014 Termly Teaching Committee meetings and Annual Teaching Meeting
Department of Psychology Action Plan
48
The AS Working Group noted avenues of personal support to undergraduates and graduates.
e) Improve attendance at the annual undergraduate Careers Day and monitor gender of attendance f) ensure a gender balance of presenters at Careers Day g) promote a wider breadth of career options including academia at Careers Day h) Encourage student representative involvement in the Department and establish a Psychology Student Society.
Director of Undergraduate Education and Teaching Administrator Director of Undergraduate Education and Teaching Administrator and University Careers Officer Director of Undergraduate Education and Teaching Administrator
Attendance improved Gender balance achieved Breadth of career options presented widened Assist formation of a Psychology Student Society, support student representatives in any events planned.
Next annual Careers Day will be held in October 2014 October 2014 December 2014
1.2 To support MPhil students
Gender balance of MPhil students reviewed by ASWG. ASWG noted that student feedback is regularly reviewed.
a) Continue to monitor gender balance on MPhil courses b) Continue to review student feedback c) Review completion rate by gender
MPhil course director with Graduate Education Committee (GEC)
Any underlying cause of gender disparities to be considered further Actions continually considered to resolve any potential issues identified by feedback Any underlying cause of gender disparities to be considered further
a) - d) For discussion at GEC on an annual basis
Department of Psychology Action Plan
49
d) Promote career options, including academic careers
Sustained growth in contacts listed on Athena SWAN page, and regular use of this resource
1.3 To support PhD students
Gender balance of PhD students monitored and reviewed.
a) Continue to monitor gender balance taking PhDs.
b) At induction, encourage students to visit the University Careers Service. c) Invite graduate students to the departmental careers event; promote career options, including academic careers d) Highlight female role models from within Department e) Encourage students to choose at least one female mentor (either supervisor, advisor or College graduate tutor), review and report to GEC
Graduate Tutor and Graduate Admissions Officer Graduate Tutor Graduate Tutor Graduate Tutor Graduate Secretary Graduate Tutor, Graduate Secretary
Examine gender balance statistics at relevant GEC meetings, particularly when making admissions decisions. Increased use reported by Careers Service Attendance by postgraduates at careers event Information on website Increase in gender balance of support (where possible)
Review annually at GEC admissions and funding meeting Annually at induction Annually By end 2014 By end of 2015, and annual review
Department of Psychology Action Plan
50
f) Encourage attendance at WiSETI Cake and Careers events g) Encourage attendance at Departmental Seminars and monitor attendance
Graduate Tutor Graduate Tutor
Increased attendance at WiSETI/careers events Increased graduate attendance at seminars
By end of 2016 By end of 2015
2. Supporting Staff
2.1 Recruitment
To attract high calibre women to apply for positions
Recruitment data for all staff in relation to gender of applicants, interviewees and appointees is routinely collected and has been analysed by gender by the ASWG for the past 3 years (approx. 40% women; double the University average for STEM Departments). The University has introduced a web based recruitment system to facilitate monitoring.
a) Highlight family friendly policies and practices in further particulars for vacancies and ensure a wide search for candidates b) Continue to record and monitor applications by gender on an annual basis and report to an academic staff meeting c) take forward the web based recruitment system within the Department
HR Administrator and E&D section Chair of ASWG HR Administrator
Increase in female applicants for academic and research positions. Annual report to Academic Staff meeting Increased ability to analyse data
End of 2016 Annually, October End of 2014
To ensure no bias in recruitment procedures
The gender balance on all appointment panels within the Department for academic staff is routinely considered by the HoD
d) Promote a Departmental policy requirement of gender balanced appointment panels for all appointments where possible.
HoD and HR Administrator
Gender balanced appointment panels
Mid 2014
Department of Psychology Action Plan
51
e) Receive updated guidelines for Boards of Electors to Professorships and Appointment Committee procedures (being developed by the University f) Ensure all staff involved in recruitment have passed University online E&D training.
HR Section Administrator and HR Administrator
Guidelines re: gender representation on appointments committees to be received Increase current 0.14% uptake to 70% Increase uptake to 90%.
Mid-2014 End of 2014 End of 2016
2.2 Induction
To ensure all staff are provided with a mentor/buddy on appointment
All academic staff have a nominated mentor on appointment. Mentoring training available via PPD
a) Roll out mentoring/buddy scheme to all staff b) Encourage attendance on mentoring course as appropriate; publicise eg via website
Line Managers, HR Administrator, Administrator HR Administrator, Administrator
New staff aware of Departmental policies and support available. Increased attendance on the mentoring course Increased number of mentors
By end of 2014 By end of 2014 By end of 2015
To review induction process for family friendly information
An induction pack and induction session in the Department and in the University is available for all new staff.
c) Induction pack to be reviewed for information on family friendly information.
Administrator, HR Administrator and E&D section
Revised induction pack.
By end 2014
Department of Psychology Action Plan
52
d) Induction pack to be maintained on website as resource for current staff of basic information on staff benefits, childcare, E&D training and family friendly policies. e) ASWG to monitor uptake of University induction session and report to academic staff meeting.
Administrator, HR Administrator Chair of ASWG
Induction pack available on website All staff to have undertaken appropriate University induction session
By end 2014 End of 2014 and monitored annual in October.
2.3 Career Development and Training
Improve employment prospects for staff
The Department has appointed a member of staff to support researchers career development
a) Organise Away Day for post doctoral researchers to brainstorm ideas for a development programme b) Postdoctoral Development Programme to be drawn up
Research Staff Development Officer Research Staff Development Officer
Away Day arranged Postdoctoral Development Programme introduced
By end of 2014 By end of 2015
c) Encourage attendance at WiSETI Cake and Careers events
Research Staff Development Officer
Increased attendance at WiSETI Cake and Careers events
By end of 2016
Assist with training of all staff
The University provides a huge range of training opportunities Training bulletins are regularly circulated around the Department
d) Training opportunities to be highlighted at appraisals
Line Managers Increased attendance on courses
Be end of 2016
Department of Psychology Action Plan
53
2.4 Appraisal
To ensure staff are appraised on a regular basis
The University has a biennial appraisal policy
a) Appraisal scheme to be reinvigorated within the Department. b) Run appraiser/appraisee courses within the Department/School. c) Monitor and report on course uptake annually to the academic staff meeting. d) Monitor and report on appraisal statistics annually to the academic staff meeting.
HoD, Administrator Administrator Chair of ASWG Chair of ASWG
Increase in manager's attendance on appraiser's course. Increase in number of appraisals taken place within the Department Report to Academic Staff meeting Report to Academic Staff meeting
By end of 2014 By end of 2015 Annually in October
2.5 Promotion
To ensure all staff (particularly women) are supported in promotion applications
The SAP process and guidelines have been revised by the University to encourage gender equality. The University SAP open fora has been introduced to promote transparency of process The University is currently revising promotions process for researchers.
a) Promote SAP Open Fora/ SAP CV Scheme in the Department b) Circulate revised procedures to relevant staff. c) HoD to continue to encourage appropriate female applicants to apply for promotion
Chair of ASWG HoD, Administrator HoD, Administrator
Increase in applications for promotion from female academic staff Record of documents sent to each staff group Record of appropriate positive discussion in appraisals
End of 2015 (if possible, small numbers of staff may preclude this) October 2014 September (each year)
Department of Psychology Action Plan
54
The HoD meets and advises all staff who express an interest in promotion.
d) Review promotion success rates on an annual basis and report to an academic staff meeting.
Chair of ASWG Success rates reviewed Report to Academic Staff Meeting
May 2015 Annually in October
2.6 Maternity/paternity/carers breaks
To support staff going on and returning from care leave
A Returning Carers Scheme has been introduced in the University and information on this has been promoted within the Department.
a) Continue to promote Returning Carers Scheme to all those eligible, by including information in a maternity / paternity leave information pack, and publicising on Departmental webpages b) Encourage staff to participate in University maternity survey by including details of this survey in a maternity / paternity leave information pack c) Follow up on staff who do not return from maternity leave d) Appoint a maternity leave advisor and include their details, frequently asked questions, links to University maternity policy, family-
Administrator, HR Administrator, Chair of ASWG Administrator, HR Administrator Administrator, HR Administrator Administrator, HR Administrator, Chair of AS Working Party
Increased uptake of and awareness of the Returning Carers Scheme among those eligible Increased participation in the survey Increased understanding of the reasons staff do not return from maternity leave All eligible staff are aware of the support in place for career breaks and know how to contact the maternity leave advisor
End of 2014 End of 2014 End of 2015 End of 2014
Department of Psychology Action Plan
55
friendly funding opportunities etc on the Departmental website e) Publicise the recent changes in shared maternity / paternity leave provision
HR Administrator, Chair of ASWG
All eligible staff are aware of the University’s policy on maternity and paternity leave
End of 2014
To promote information on family leave and careers breaks
. f) Administrator to draw to the attention of all staff to the policy following career breaks. g) Include information regarding family leave and career breaks in Departmental induction pack.
HR Administrator, Administrator HR Administrator, Administrator
All appropriate staff aware of the scheme Include on website and induction packs
By end of 2014 By end of 2014
2.7 To highlight family friendly nature of Department
Children of staff often attend the Department’s annual garden party Many children of staff attend the Department Science on Saturday session in the Cambridge Science Festival
h) Include illustrative photos and publicise these events on the Departmental webpages
Librarian Increased awareness of family-friendly events in the Department
End of 2014
Department of Psychology Action Plan
56
2.8 Flexible working
To support flexible working opportunities
There is a culture of informal flexible working (including occasional days working from home), agreed with line managers within the Department. Part time working is available, and in 2012 22% of academic and research staff (30% of female staff; 10% of male staff) were working part time
a) Promote flexible working options in the Departmental induction pack, and when individuals inform the Department of the intention to take maternity or paternity leave
Administrator, HR Administrator
Increased awareness among staff of flexible working options
End of 2014
3 Organisation
3.1 Committees (internal and external)
To ensure women have the opportunity to serve on key Committees
The HoD maintains an oversight for gender balance on Departmental Committees. The HoD nominates senior women to serve on influential School and University Committees.
a) HoD to continue to rotate positions according to roles and workloads and consider gender where possible b) ASWG to monitor Departmental committee membership and nominations for Departmental membership of School/University Committees by gender and report annually to the academic staff meeting.
HoD Chair of ASWG
Maintain gender balance on Departmental Committees where possible. Gender balance on School/University Committees facilitated Report to Academic Staff Meeting
Renewed annually By end of 2016 Annually in October
Department of Psychology Action Plan
57
3.2 Workload model
Maintain balanced workload across academic staff
The HoD maintains oversight of the workload associated with teaching, research and administrative roles and
a) HoD to continue to rotate positions according to roles and workloads and consider gender issues where relevant
HoD Administrative roles agreed at Academic Staff Meeting
Annually in October
To review workload responsibilities for Academic staff
The HoD shares workload across staff according to their various commitments, experience and talents.
a) HoD to consider gender balance against workloads
HoD
Equitable workloads across the genders of academic staff
End of 2014
3.3 Timings of meetings
Regular meetings are held between the hours of 9.30 and 3.30 to allow staff to drop off and collect children from school
a) Review the idea of changing the time of the Zangwill Seminar (currently 4.30pm on a Friday, but well-attended).
HoD Decision to reflect a consensus view of the Department (obtained via online survey)
Mid 2014
4 Promoting an inclusive and supportive culture
To maintain gender balance of speakers at seminar series
The seminar series over the past 3 years has been analysed by gender
a) Guidelines for seminar coordinators to consider gender balance of seminar speakers
Seminar coordinators
Increase in number of senior female speakers
End of 2014
To raise awareness of equality and diversity
A new online E&D training module had been launched by the University in October 2013; all staff have been encouraged to complete E&D training.
b) Given low take up so far, further encouragement to be given.
HoD, Administrator
Staff attendance to have increased to 60%
End of 2016
Department of Psychology Action Plan
58
c) Increase awareness of Athena SWAN and University and Departmental family friendly policies and procedures across the Department via new web page d) Promote Cambridge book celebrating female academic success (launch March 2014)
Chair of ASWG, Librarian E&D Section
Populated website with regular updates. Increased awareness of female success.
End of 2014 End of 2014
To improve communication across the Department and across its four sites
Feedback from a School wide Staff Survey and focus groups has been reported back to staff, made available online and used extensively to identify actions required by ASWG. Regular social events are promoted to all staff and well attended.
e) Undertake future Staff survey f) Continue to host social events and monitor attendance, consider ideas for different formats. g) Webpages to promote role models in the department. h) Monitor usage of website and report annually to academic staff meeting
Chair of ASWG HoD, Administrator Chair of ASWG and Librarian Chair of ASWG and Librarian
Future survey data to be received and analysed. Improved positive responses in relation to communication Social events are well attended Maintenance of attendance levels. Website is accessed regularly and gets positive feedback
End of 2016 End of 2016 Reviewed annually End of 2014 End of 2014
Department of Psychology Action Plan
59
i) Provide networking opportunities to facilitate the sharing of experiences and strategies for work/life balance and career development (e.g., Returning Carers, SAP CV advice) j) HoD to meet termly with researchers k) Continue to monitor gender breakdown within the Department across all grades of staff and types of contract and report to Academic Staff Meeting
Chair of ASWG HoD Chair of ASWG
Report to Academic Staff Meeting Growing number of alumnae and former staff/affiliates willing to respond to career related questions Researchers aware of strategic issues, administrative matters and opportunities in the Department Report to Academic Staff Meeting
End of 2014 End of 2016 End of 2014 Annually in October
5 Outreach
To maintain outreach activities
Large number and range of staff undertake outreach activities
a) Researchers to be invited to become more involved in outreach activities
Research Staff Development Officer
Increase in outreach activities by researchers
End of 2016
6 Athena SWAN Working Group
Ensure Action Plan actions achieved within three years
Action plan drawn up Silver Award application and action plan submitted
a) Termly meetings to review progress with action plan and to ensure momentum maintained
Chair of ASWG, HoD
Action Points achieved
End of 2016
Department of Psychology Action Plan
60
b) Reports on progress and data presented to Academic Staff meeting
Chair of ASWG Reports received by Academic Staff Meeting
Annually in October